ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties set forth below, together with the financial and other information included elsewhere in this Annual Report. If any of the risks discussed in this Annual Report occur, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially impaired, in which case the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Some statements in this Annual Report, including statements in the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We are affected by factors that adversely impact the commercial and business aviation industries.
As a provider of aftermarket services to the commercial and business aviation industries, we are greatly affected by the overall impact of U.S. and global macroeconomic conditions on those industries. The commercial and business aviation industries are historically cyclical and have been negatively affected in the past by geopolitical events, such as ongoing wars and conflicts (including in Ukraine and the Gaza strip and surrounding areas), terrorism, weather related events, acts of God, natural disasters, pandemics, disruption to fuel and oil production and supply shortages, high fuel and oil prices, environmental concerns (including climate change), lack of capital, inflationary pressures and conditions, economic sanctions, labor market shortages and weak economic conditions. The impact of instability and disruptions in the global financial markets has led, and may in the future lead, our customers to reduce domestic or international flight capacity. In addition, certain of our customers have in the past been impacted by tight credit markets and high interest rates, which has limited their ability to buy and finance parts, services, engines and aircraft.
A reduction in flight activity of aircraft and changes in customer travel patterns both in the United States and abroad could result in reduced demand for aftermarket services. A deteriorating airline environment may also result in commercial airlines deciding to retire some of the aircraft that use engine platforms that we service, excess capacity in the aftermarket and increased competition for aftermarket service work and additional airline bankruptcies, and in such circumstances, we may not be able to fully collect outstanding accounts receivable. Reduced demand from customers caused by economic conditions, including tight credit conditions and customer bankruptcies, may adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, weak national and local economic conditions, or changes in owner or operator fees or taxes by the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”) or tax incentives by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), may contribute to a decline in the demand for business jet transportation, and thus would reduce the requirements for aftermarket services in the business aviation industry.
In addition, an increase in energy costs and the price of aviation fuels could result in additional pressure on the operating costs of airlines and business jet operators, which comprise a substantial portion of our customers. The market for fuels is inherently volatile and is subject to, among other things, changes in government policy on fuel production, changes in tax policy related to fuel, fluctuations in the global supply of crude oil and disruptions in oil production or delivery caused by hostility in oil-producing areas. In addition, airlines and business jet operators are sometimes unable to pass on increases in fuel prices to customers by increasing fares or fees due to the competitive nature of the aviation industry, and this compounds the pressure on operating costs, and in turn, airlines’ and business jet operators’ ability to do business with us.
We are also subject to the risk that action by the FAA or any other regulatory authority could restrict or limit the utilization of aircraft with the engine platforms that we service or on the use of the engine platforms that we service, which could reduce demand for our services.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects have been and may continue to be adversely affected by these and other similar events that impact the commercial and business aviation industries.
Decreases in budget, spending or outsourcing by our military end-users could result in a reduction in the amount of services we provide to the various agencies and buying organizations of the U.S. government, which would materially reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A portion of our revenue is derived from contracts, directly or indirectly, with the U.S. military that are subject to U.S. government contracting rules and regulations. A decline in the level of operational activity of the U.S. military or decreases in budget, spending or outsourcing by the U.S. military end-users could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The demand for our aftermarket services in the military market is significantly dependent upon government budget trends, particularly the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) budget. Services to our military end-users accounted for $1,081.0 million, or 17.8%, of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025, and $993.4 million, or 19.0% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024. U.S. federal law currently prevents U.S. military departments and agencies from using more than 50% of their funding for depot-level maintenance of core assets on outsourced work without a waiver from the Secretary of Defense, which impacts the size of the overall market for our services. Additionally, the retirement of mature aircraft from the U.S. military may decrease the need for our aftermarket services. Defense spending by United States, Canadian, European and other governments worldwide has fluctuated in recent years, at times resulting in reduced demand for our services. Growth in revenue to our military customers depends upon continued outsourcing by military end-users of certain aftermarket service functions to the civil industrial base.
Companies engaged in supplying defense-related equipment and services to U.S. government agencies, whether through direct contracts with the U.S. government or as a subcontractor to customers contracting with the U.S. government, are subject to business risks specific to the defense industry. Our supply of products to the U.S. government is subject to such unique risks largely beyond our control. Our operations may be adversely affected due to an unexpected termination or modification of a significant contract by the government or a higher-tier contractor, including for non-performance or for convenience; a change in the government’s procurement priorities for any reason, including as a result of elections or failure to pass budget or appropriations statutes; a reduction in the volume of contracts or subcontracts awarded to us; or substantial cost overruns. For instance, the terms of defense contracts with the U.S. government generally permit the government or a higher-tier contractor to terminate or modify contracts partially or completely, with or without cause, at any time. We also face the risk that the U.S. government may unilaterally suspend or debar our customers, the prime contractor with whom we subcontract, or us from new contracts in the event of any of procurement laws or regulations or for a of responsibility. Furthermore, the U.S. government retains discretion to required security clearances. In addition, our subcontracts may be or we may be required to terms of our military contracts if the U.S. government to the contract of a primary contractor through whom we provide services. If we to with the primary contractor, we and the primary contractor may all of our business related to such contract. Also, some of the tooling, equipment and materials we use in providing aftermarket services to the U.S. military are provided to us under the terms of contracts with the U.S. government or a prime contractor. If we were to use these government-furnished tooling, equipment and materials, we could be required to incur significant capital investment to fulfill our obligations under such contracts and could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, DoD budgets could be negatively impacted by several factors, including, but not limited to, a change in defense spending policy as a result of the change in political administration, the U.S. government’s budget deficits, spending priorities (e.g., shifting funds to assist Israel or appropriating budget to new development programs away from sustainment and maintenance of existing programs), the cost of sustaining the U.S. military presence internationally and possible political pressure to reduce U.S. government military spending, each of which could cause the DoD budget to remain unchanged or to decline. While current world tensions—including the conflicts in Ukraine and the Gaza strip and surrounding areas—are driving short-term spending increases, if future military spending declines, is redirected away from markets in which we operate or aircraft in which our services are used, or if military outsourcing decreases or ceases, our business results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected. Additionally, unlike civil aviation, military organizations have discretion over their own maintenance regimens. Military aviation end-users may elect to reduce aftermarket service spending by lengthening the time between required overhaul for certain engines, which could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The U.S. government may review our costs and performance on their contracts, as well as conduct periodic audits of our accounting and general business practices. Based on the results of such audits, the U.S. government may adjust our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs. In addition, under U.S. government purchasing regulations, some of our costs, including most financing costs, portions of research and development costs and certain marketing expenses may not be reimbursable under U.S. government contracts.
We depend on certain component parts and material suppliers for our engine repair and overhaul operations, and any supply chain disruptions or loss of key suppliers could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business depends on maintaining a sufficient supply of parts, components and raw materials to meet our customers’ demands and maintain the operation of our business and services. Global supply chain and labor markets are continuing to experience high levels of disruption, such as that caused by attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea, causing significant materials and parts shortages, as well as demurrage, delivery delays, labor shortages, energy cost increases and freight price increases. Current geopolitical conditions, including sanctions, other trade restrictive actions and strained intercountry relations, are contributing to these issues. These issues could lead to significant supplier performance failures and delays. Disruptions to our supply chain and business operations, or to our suppliers’ supply chains and business operations, could have adverse effects on our ability to provide aftermarket support and services to our customers and, thus, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In particular, we source the materials, parts and components for our business from OEMs and material suppliers. Our authorizations from OEMs often require that we purchase component parts from the OEMs or their designated distributors. Our business, therefore, could be adversely impacted by factors affecting our OEMs and other suppliers (such as the destruction of our suppliers’ facilities or their distribution infrastructure, including damage or disruption by external factors, including wars or other conflicts, terrorism, weather-related events (including due to climate change), acts of God, natural disasters or other similar events, a work stoppage or strike by our suppliers’ employees or the failure of our suppliers to provide materials of the requisite quality), or by increased costs of such raw materials or components if we were unable to pass along such price increases to our customers.
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, our four largest parts suppliers, which consisted of OEMs, accounted for a substantial majority of our total parts purchases. If we were to lose a key supplier or were unable to obtain the same levels or quality of deliveries from these suppliers and were unable to supplement those purchases with products obtained from other suppliers, it could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if our key suppliers increase the prices of their products, it would negatively affect our operating results if we were not able to pass these price increases through to our customers, which could lead to decreased sales, profit margins and earnings.
In recent years, we have experienced supply chain delays from our key suppliers that impacted the availability of parts and materials and ultimately engine repair and overhaul throughput across all of our end markets. Any significant prolonged disruption or future delays could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Because we strive to limit the volume of raw materials and component parts on hand, our business could be adversely affected if we were unable to obtain raw materials and components from our suppliers when we need them, in the quantities we require to operate our business or on favorable terms. Although we may identify alternative suppliers, or alternative raw materials or component parts, this could require substantial time to implement, particularly if it involves the lengthy and expensive aviation authority and OEM certification processes associated with aerospace products, which could prevent efficient replacement of a supplier, raw material or component part, and our ability to supply parts to our customers when needed could be , which in turn could impact our production timelines, fulfillment of customer contracts, revenue, and reputation.
In addition, supply chain disruptions could cause significant production and delivery delays to any new or expanded product or engine platforms, such as providing aftermarket services to the LEAP platform and expanding aftermarket services on the CFM56 platform. Execution and implementation of new or expanded platforms, like the new LEAP platform and expanded CFM56 platform, depends in part on our suppliers having access to the materials and skilled labor they require and making timely deliveries to us. Any such disruptions to our supply chain and business operations, or to our suppliers’ supply chains and business operations, could have adverse effects on our ability to provide aftermarket support and services to our customers and, thus, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Inflation has adversely affected us and may continue to adversely affect us by increasing our costs beyond what we can recover through price increases.
Inflation has adversely affected us in recent years by increasing our costs of labor, equipment, raw materials, freight and utilities. We strive to offset these items by price increases, operating improvements and other cost-saving initiatives and through contractual provisions that allow us to pass along material and other cost increases to customers. In certain end markets, implementing price increases may be difficult and there is no assurance that we will be successful. From time to time, we may encounter difficulties in obtaining certain raw materials or components necessary for production due to supply chain constraints and logistical challenges, which may also negatively impact the pricing of materials and components sourced or used in our services.
Future outbreaks and infectious diseases could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
While the overall demand for commercial air travel has significantly recovered from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of future outbreaks, health concerns and infectious diseases could pose a threat to the commercial aviation industry, including our business and operations. Public health crises, including a resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic (including through any new variant strains of the underlying virus), H5N1 bird flu, a new health epidemic or similar outbreak or other negative developments associated with the pandemic or outbreak (e.g., restrictive government policies or mandates), could disrupt supply chains, adversely affect the number of new commercial jet deliveries and the utilization of commercial and business aviation engines that we service and hinder or reverse the commercial flight activity recovery, leading to decreased worldwide commercial activity and a reduced demand for airline passenger and cargo services. Reduced flight activity negatively impacts the demand for our aftermarket services, and any reduction could materially and affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Moreover, prolonged pandemics, epidemics and similar outbreaks, or the threat thereof, could result in worker absences, lower productivity, voluntary or involuntary closure of our offices and facilities, travel restrictions for our employees and other disruptions to our business, including disruptions which are unanticipated or unknown at this time. Any of these could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our ability to predict and respond to future changes resulting from potential health crises is uncertain. Even after a public health crisis subsides, there may be long-term effects on our business and the business of our customers, suppliers, vendors and other business partners, in economies in which we operate that could severely disrupt our operations and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. As we cannot predict the duration, scope or severity of future public health crises, the negative financial impact to our results cannot be reasonably estimated and could be material.
Competition in our business is intense given the market in which we participate and the range of services that we provide within that market.
We operate in a highly competitive global industry and compete against a number of companies. Competitors in our product lines are both U.S. and foreign companies and range in size from divisions of large public corporations to small privately-held entities. Our primary competitors include the service divisions of OEMs, other independent aftermarket service providers, in certain cases the in-house maintenance services divisions of the commercial airlines and U.S. and foreign militaries, and engine component repair specialists. Certain characteristics of these competitors are as follows:
Service divisions of OEMs. The service divisions of OEMs, including GE Aerospace, CFM International, Pratt & Whitney, Rolls Royce and Safran, traditionally hold a sizeable aftermarket service market share on newer platforms, in order to support the installed base and generate technical insight into the performance of their engine models, which is particularly important early in the platform lifecycle. Service divisions of OEMs compete on the basis of their affiliations with OEMs, which may give them design authority, brand recognition, strong and long-term customer relationships beginning with the original sale of the engines, the ability to adapt more quickly to customer requirements involving technical specification changes, a diverse product and service base, significant financial resources, control over certification and control over sources and pricing of approved parts. OEMs may in the future attempt to perform a greater portion of the repair and overhaul services related to the engines they manufacture themselves or change the pricing or level of work scopes that we receive or have access to.
Other independent aftermarket service providers. Independent service providers like us are not affiliated with any one OEM or airline and are able to work on a wide range of engine platforms for many different customers. Most of the independent service providers of engine repair and overhaul services that compete with us, including MTU Aero Engines, ST Engineering Aerospace (“ST Aerospace”), SR Technics Switzerland AG (“SR Technics”), OGMA Indústria Aeronáutica de Portugal (“OGMA”) and Duncan Aviation, also operate under authorizations from OEMs. We also compete with independent service providers that do not have authorization from the OEMs or hold limited approvals or licensing agreements from the OEMs that only allow for the repair of certain engines or components. Independent service providers who currently do not compete with us may decide or attempt to provide services on engines that we currently service and for which they may or may not have OEM authorization. These competitors and potential competitors may have strong and long-term customer relationships and greater financial resources than us.
In-house maintenance service divisions of the commercial airlines. While recently there has been an increasing trend among commercial carriers to outsource engine aftermarket services, some of the large commercial airlines globally maintain in-house divisions, some of which provide services externally to third-party customers. In-house divisions have several competitive advantages over us, including captive engine fleets, leverage over OEMs and access to parts discounts via their captive airline, and may have greater financial resources than us.
U.S. and foreign militaries. The U.S. military has active aftermarket services facilities and activates new facilities from time to time, which displaces business that we might otherwise compete for. To protect national interests and foster job creation and national capability development, many foreign militaries also actively operate existing aftermarket services facilities and activate new facilities from time to time, which displaces business that we might otherwise compete for.
Engine component repair specialists. The engine component repair market is highly fragmented with many providers and varying levels of scale and breadth of capabilities. Within this market, we face competitors including scaled providers of component repairs such as HEICO, as well as a number of smaller, specialized repair providers that may focus on a limited number of components or platforms. Some of these competitors may have greater financial and other resources than we do.
We believe that providers of aftermarket services have traditionally competed on the basis of price, quality and the ability to perform repairs and overhauls efficiently. Developing and maintaining a competitive advantage will require continued investments in technology and innovation, engineering, operations, customer service and sales and marketing. We may not have sufficient resources to make the necessary investments and we may not be able to compete effectively. Furthermore, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected by changes in the competitive environment, including any intensification of competition, which could lead to a loss of business and a decline in our margins.
Loss of an OEM authorization or license could negatively impact our ability to service an engine platform and damage our competitive advantage in such platform’s market.
OEMs grant participants in the aftermarket services sector authorizations or licenses to perform repair and overhaul services on the engines they manufacture. We currently have OEM authorizations or licenses for all of the engine platforms that we service. Any loss, revocation, suspension or non-renewal of an OEM authorization or license could negatively impact our ability to service certain engine platforms and significantly impact our competitive advantage
in the market for that platform. For example, any loss or non-renewal of an OEM authorization or license could impact our competitiveness within a market by changing the pace at which we go to market and restricting us from benefits like discounts on parts, technical information, OEM warranty support and use of the OEM name in marketing. In addition, many of our OEM contracts that provide us the authorization or licenses contain provisions requiring consent to certain change of control transactions that have historically required and may in the future require us to pay significant fees in order to obtain such consent. If such consent is not obtained, these provisions may result in such contracts being terminated if there is such a change in control, resulting in a potential loss of revenue. In addition, these provisions may act as a deterrent to any attempt by a third party to acquire us.
A portion of our revenue is generated from engine platforms that are mature and for which the installed base is flat or declining. If we are unable to offset the resulting declines in revenue as engines are retired, then our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
The long-term prospects of our business depend in part on the size of the installed base across the engine platforms we service. A portion of our revenue is generated from engine platforms that are mature and for which the installed base is flat or declining. In addition, certain airlines operate new fleet types and/or newer generation aircraft and we may not have contractual arrangements to service these aircraft, nor technicians trained and certified to perform the required aftermarket services on such aircraft.
If we are unable to offset any declining installed base with price increases, market share gains or services for new or additional platforms, or if such new or additional platforms are not used as widely or at as high a rate as the engines that we currently service, then our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
A significant portion of our revenue is derived from a small number of customers.
We have derived, and may continue to derive, a significant portion of our revenue from a small number of customers. When all subsidiaries and divisions of a single parent are regarded as a single customer, for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, our top four OEM customers accounted for approximately 36% and 41% of our revenue, respectively. We cannot assure you that these customers will continue to contract with us on terms currently in effect or other terms which are favorable but not currently in effect, or whether they will elect to contract with our competitors or attempt to perform the services themselves. We are party to a number of long-term contracts with each of our top customers, with such contracts typically covering specific engine platforms or certain aspects of our relationship with the customer. Some of these customers have the right to terminate certain contracts without penalty with advance written notice. These contracts generally do not include any minimum purchase requirements for the customers and were made in the ordinary course of business. As a result, these customers could stop purchasing our services, reduce or defer the need for our services or request reduced pricing structures at any time. We may therefore need to adapt our pricing strategies in response to a customer who may seek concessions in return for its continued or increased business. In addition, a macroeconomic or any other cause of consolidation in the commercial, military and business aviation industries or among our other customers could significantly increase the market share and bargaining power of a limited number of customers and give them significant additional leverage to negotiate more terms and place demands on us. The of any of these customers, if not offset by revenue from new or other existing customers, or any of any customer to pay amounts as and when due, could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. A significant portion of our revenue from commercial, military and business aviation customers is derived from services we provide on behalf of OEMs as a subcontractor and authorized provider for services the OEMs provide to their customers. As a result, we could be affected by changes in demand by OEMs or OEMs’ customers or by a or non-renewal of an OEM authorization for any of our platforms.
Aircraft engine OEMs, including GE Aerospace, CFM International, Rolls-Royce, Honeywell, Pratt & Whitney and Safran in addition to providing authorizations to service the engines they manufacture, are also significant customers as a result of subcontracting aftermarket services to us for contracts they have with their end customers. Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if these OEMs modify pricing, modify work scope requirements or reduce the volume of engines subcontracted to us, either because of decreased demand by their end users or because of an increase in the volume of aftermarket services provided directly by the OEMs. In addition, our business could be adversely affected if these OEMs or their end customers provide their own aftermarket services or engage other aftermarket service providers to subcontract for their services. Further, our business, results of
operations and financial condition would be adversely affected if our relationships with the customers for whom we provide services as a subcontractor are reduced or discontinued.
In addition, many of our customer contracts are complex and contain provisions that could cause us to incur penalties, be liable for liquidated or actual damages and incur unanticipated expenses with respect to the timely delivery, functionality, deployment, operation and durability of our products and services. Any such penalties, damages or expenses could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We do not have volume commitments with our customers and, therefore, do not have guaranteed future sales.
Although we have long-term contracts with many of our customers, the majority of our contracts with these customers do not have volume commitments and, therefore, do not have guaranteed levels of future sales. Many of those customers may terminate the contracts on short notice and, in most cases, our customers have not committed to buy any minimum quantity of our products. In addition, in certain cases, we must anticipate the future volume of orders based upon the historic purchasing patterns of customers and upon our discussions with customers as to their anticipated future requirements, and this anticipated future volume of orders may not materialize.
The prices that we charge under our fixed-price contracts are predetermined and we bear the risk that our costs or lead time may exceed our estimates.
From time to time, we enter into multi-year, fixed-price contracts (including fixed-price arrangements based on engine utilization) with some of our customers, in which we have agreed to service engines for a price determined based on then-existing engine maintenance and usage data. In a fixed-price contract, we realize all the benefit or detriment resulting from any decreases or increases in the costs of servicing these products, with a greater risk to the costs in a high inflationary environment, which we are experiencing now.
Several factors may cause the costs that we incur in fulfilling these contracts to vary substantially from original estimates, including the actual condition of the customers’ engine fleet and our ability to inspect the condition of the customers’ aircraft prior to bidding. Many of our contracts do not permit us to recover the entirety of increases in raw material prices, taxes or labor costs. In addition, for our fixed-price arrangements based on engine utilization, the timing of payments from our customers may not coincide with the timing of costs incurred to perform the maintenance services under these agreements. In such cases, our cash flow and liquidity may be negatively impacted to the extent we incur significant costs in advance of the scheduled payments for such maintenance services.
Damage to our reputation or the reputation of other parties in the aerospace industry could hurt our business.
Damage to our reputation can cause significant harm to our business and prospects. Harm to our reputation can rise from numerous sources, including, among others, litigation or regulatory outcomes, compliance failures, quality escapes, cybersecurity breaches and unethical behavior. Negative publicity about us, whether or not true, may also result in harm to our prospects.
In addition, damage to the reputation of other parties in the aerospace industry, including OEMs and commercial airlines, could harm our business. If the reputation of the commercial airline industry is damaged, the need for our services in the commercial airline industry could be reduced, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our operations depend on our facilities, which are subject to physical and other risks that could disrupt our business.
The facilities at which we provide services could be damaged or disrupted by external factors, including wars or other conflicts, terrorism, weather-related events (including due to climate change), acts of God, natural disasters or other similar events. These could result in potential damage to our physical assets as well as disruptions in production activities. Moreover, we are vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including power loss, grid failures, fire, explosions, floods, communications failures, technological disruptions and similar events. Disruptions could also occur due to health-related outbreaks and crises, cyber attacks, computer or equipment ( or
intentional), operator error or process failures. Any of these events could result in prolonged interruption of our business. Any disruption resulting from these events could cause significant delays in service and shipments of engines and the loss of sales and customers. Should insurance and other risk transfer mechanisms be inadequate to recover all costs and compensate us for any of these events, it could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Implementing new or expanded platforms, products and services and keeping pace with technological or process developments in our industries may require significant capital and operational risk.
The commercial, military and business aviation industries are constantly undergoing development and change, and it is likely that new products, platforms, equipment, digital tools and methods which are more advanced, will be introduced in the future. We may need to make significant expenditures to fund and implement new or expanded platforms, such as the new LEAP platform and expansion of the CFM56 platform, and purchase new equipment.
New or expanded platforms with new technologies typically carry risks associated with design responsibility, development of new production tools, hiring and training of qualified personnel, increased capital and funding commitments, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery schedules and unique contractual requirements, supplier performance, subcontractor performance, ability of the customer to meet its contractual obligations to us, and our ability to accurately estimate costs associated with such platforms. We may face financial risks in connection with new or expanded platforms or technologies if we are not able to reduce the costs of these products over time, through experience and other measures, including the introduction of new designs, technologies, manufacturing methods and suppliers. In addition, any new or expanded platform may not generate sufficient demand or may experience technological problems or significant delays in the regulatory certification or manufacturing and delivery schedule. If we were unable to perform our obligations under new or expanded platforms to the customer’s satisfaction or expectations or manufacture products at our estimated costs, if we were to experience unexpected fluctuations in raw material prices or other fluctuations in supplier costs leading to cost , if we were to perform under revised design and manufacturing plans or and equitably and , or if a new or expanded platform in which we had made a significant investment was or experienced demand, or technological , our business, financial condition and results of operations could be affected. This risk includes the potential for , quality or to meet contractual requirements and could result in low margin or forward contracts, and the risk of having to write-off inventory or contract assets if they were deemed to be over the life of the platform. In addition, beginning new work on existing platforms carries risks associated with the transfer of technology, knowledge and tooling. Any of the foregoing risks or expenditures could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
To perform on new or expanded platforms, we may be required to construct or acquire new facilities, requiring additional up-front investment costs. In the case of significant platform delays and/or platform cancellations, we could be required to bear certain unrecoverable construction and maintenance costs and incur potential impairment charges for the new facilities. We also may need to expend additional resources to determine an alternate revenue generating use for the facilities. Likewise, significant delays in the construction or acquisition of a plant site could impact production schedules.
In addition, we may need to make significant expenditures to keep pace with new technological or process developments in our industries. Technological development and expenditures pose a number of challenges and risks, including the following:
we may not be able to successfully protect the proprietary interests we have in our aftermarket services and component and accessory repair processes;
as OEMs continue to develop and improve jet engines and aircraft components, we may not be able to repair parts that perform as well as those offered by OEMs or we may not be able to profitably sell our aftermarket services at lower prices than the OEMs;
we may need to expend significant capital to (i) purchase new equipment and machines, (ii) train employees in new methods of servicing engines, components or parts and (iii) fund the research and development of new platforms; and
development by our competitors of patents or methodologies that preclude us from providing aftermarket services could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we may not be able to successfully develop new products, equipment or methods of repair and overhaul service, and the failure to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Acquisitions, joint ventures, business combinations and inorganic investments may prove risky for us.
In the past we have pursued, and in the future we expect to continue to pursue, acquisitions, joint ventures, business combinations or inorganic investments involving us or any of our subsidiaries that we believe may present opportunities to enhance our market position, extend our technological capabilities, realize significant synergies, operating expense reductions or overhead cost savings or otherwise benefit our stockholders. This strategy will depend in part on whether any suitable acquisition candidates or other business combination opportunities are available at acceptable valuations and upon advantageous or acceptable terms and conditions, and our ability to finance the purchase consideration of any acquisitions. However, we may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates to purchase or may be unable to acquire desired businesses or assets on economically acceptable terms or may be unable to receive necessary regulatory approvals or support. In addition, we may not be able to raise the capital necessary to fund future acquisitions. Because we may actively pursue a number of simultaneously, we may encounter expenses, and , including regulatory or in employing sufficient staff and maintaining operational and management oversight.
Any such acquisition, joint venture, business combination or inorganic investment that we pursue or complete could present a variety of risks, including:
the incurrence of any debt or contingent liabilities and an increase in interest and amortization expenses or periodic impairment charges related to goodwill and other intangible assets as well as significant charges relating to integration costs;
our failure to discover liabilities of the acquired company for which we may be responsible as a successor owner or operator despite any investigation we make before the acquisition, including potential exposure to regulatory sanctions resulting from an acquisition target’s previous activities;
unanticipated costs, expenses or other liabilities, including as a result of an acquisition target’s violation of applicable laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) or similar anti-bribery laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions, as well as post-closing asset impairment charges, expenses associated with eliminating duplicate facilities, litigation and other liabilities;
our inability to integrate the operations, technology and internal controls and retain and assimilate personnel of the acquired company;
our failure to realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipate when we first enter into a transaction;
the diversion of management’s attention from our core operations as they attend to any transactional or business integration issues that may arise;
our inability to exit or wind down any unfavorable joint ventures on acceptable terms or without additional concessions to our joint venture partners;
our loss of key personnel of the acquired company; and
our becoming subject to material liabilities as a result of failure to negotiate adequate indemnification rights.
Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, accounting requirements relating to business combinations, including the requirement to expense certain acquisition costs as incurred, may cause us to incur greater earnings volatility and generally lower earnings during periods in which we acquire new businesses.
Risks Related to Financial and Accounting Matters
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If our remediation of such material weaknesses is not effective, or if we experience additional material weaknesses or otherwise fail to design and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to accurately report our financial condition and results of operations in a timely manner or comply with applicable laws and regulations could be impaired, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us, subject us to litigation or significant financial or other penalties, and, as a result, affect the value of our common stock and our financial condition.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As we have previously been a privately held company, we were not subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC regarding compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”), to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
The following material weaknesses exist as of December 31, 2025:
Control environment and monitoring controls
We did not design and maintain an effective control environment commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. Specifically, we lacked a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of internal controls and accounting knowledge, training and experience to appropriately analyze, record and disclose accounting matters timely and accurately. Additionally, we did not design and maintain effective monitoring controls to verify the proper and consistent functioning of our internal controls.
These material weaknesses contributed to the following additional material weaknesses:
Period-end financial reporting and significant account balances
We did not design and maintain effective controls related to the period-end financial reporting process and significant account balances, including ensuring that there is adequate documented evidence of a sufficient level of management review over complex estimates and judgmental areas of accounting and financial reporting.
Information technology general controls
We did not design and maintain effective information technology ("IT") general controls over (i) program change management to ensure that program and data changes are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately; (ii) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and to adequately restrict user and privileged access to appropriate personnel; and (iii) computer operations controls to ensure that processing and transfer of data, and data backups and recovery are monitored.
Management is committed to implementing changes to our internal control over financial reporting to ensure that the control deficiencies that contributed to the material weaknesses are remediated. To address our material weaknesses, we are now in the process of planning to implement measures designed to improve our internal control over financial reporting and remediate the control deficiencies that led to the material weaknesses. These measures include (i) hiring additional accounting and IT personnel to support the effectiveness of our processes and controls; (ii) devoting proper time by those personnel to perform a comprehensive review of procedures to assess and identify risks; (iii) developing monitoring controls and protocols that will allow us to timely assess the design and operating effectiveness of controls; (iv) designing effective information and communication controls between various functions within the Company to verify complete and accurate financial reporting; (v) implementing additional procedures to support a sufficient level of management review over complex estimates and judgmental areas of accounting and financial reporting; and (vi) improving the design and testing of IT controls for IT systems that are relevant to the preparation of our financial statements, including with respect to program and data changes, user access controls, and computer operations controls.
While we believe these actions will contribute to the remediation of the material weaknesses we have identified, we have not completed the corrective processes, procedures and related evaluation or remediation that we believe are necessary. We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, and that we are continuing to implement, will be sufficient to remediate the material weaknesses we have identified or to avoid the identification of additional material weaknesses in the future. If the steps we take do not remediate the material weaknesses in a timely manner, or we identify new material weaknesses in the future, there could continue to be a reasonable possibility that these material weaknesses or others could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, any of which could diminish investor confidence in us and cause a decline in the price of our common stock.
If, when required in the future, we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an unqualified opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected, and we could become subject to litigation or investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.
Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in GAAP.
GAAP is subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. The accounting for our business is complex and is subject to change based on the evolution of our business model, interpretations of relevant accounting principles, enforcement of existing or new regulations and changes in SEC or other agency policies, rules, regulations and interpretations of accounting regulations. These complexities and other revisions to accounting standards could lead to a delay in the preparation and dissemination of our financial statements. Changes to our business model and accounting methods, principles or interpretations could result in significant changes to our financial statements, including changes in revenue and expenses in any period, or in certain categories of revenue and expenses moving to different periods and may result in materially different financial results and may also require that we change how we process, analyze and report financial information and our financial reporting controls.
If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as provided in the section titled “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Estimates.” The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity and the amount of revenue and expenses. Significant estimates and judgments involve: determining the appropriate revenue recognition over time for our contracts, assessments of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, goodwill and other long-lived asset impairment assessments, provisions required for estimated inventory obsolescence or unmarketable inventory and valuation allowances required against deferred tax assets. Our results of operations may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our results of operations to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a in the market price of our common stock.
We may be subject to risks relating to changes in our tax rates or exposure to additional income tax liabilities.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various non-U.S. jurisdictions. Our domestic and international tax liabilities are dependent upon the location of earnings among these different jurisdictions. Our future results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in our effective tax rate as a result of changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets, challenges by tax
authorities or changes in tax laws or regulations. From time to time, changes in tax laws or regulations may be proposed or enacted that could adversely affect our overall tax liability. There can be no assurance that changes in tax laws or regulations, both within the United States and the other jurisdictions in which we operate, such as the 15% global minimum tax under the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Pillar Two, Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules (the “Pillar Two Rules”), will not materially and adversely affect our effective tax rate, tax payments, financial condition and results of operations. As of December 31, 2025, among the jurisdictions in which we operate, only the United States has not enacted legislation adopting the Pillar Two Rules. Furthermore, On January 5, 2026, the OECD released a “side-by-side” package that generally establishes an exemption for U.S. multinationals from the global 15% minimum tax. However, implementation of the package depends on domestic legislation and regulation in OECD member countries and is subject to subsequent review.
In addition, the amount of income taxes paid by us is subject to potential future audits by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities and by non-U.S. tax authorities. If an audit results in an assessment, future financial results may include unfavorable adjustments to our tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are dependent upon continued availability of financing to manage our business and to execute our business strategy, and additional financing may not be available on terms acceptable to us.
Our ability to manage our business and to execute our business strategy is dependent, in part, on the continued availability of debt and equity capital. We intend to continue to make investments to execute our business strategy and may require additional funds for such development. In addition, our business and operations may consume resources faster than we anticipate. In the future, we may need to raise additional funds to execute our business strategy through the issuance of new equity securities, debt or a combination of both. Access to the debt and equity capital markets may be limited by various factors, including the condition of overall credit markets, general economic factors, interest rates, bank failures, the state of the aviation industry, our level of indebtedness, our financial performance and credit ratings. These events may have an adverse effect on us. In the event of a market downturn, our results of operations could be adversely affected by those factors in many ways, including making it more difficult for us to raise funds if necessary, and our stock price may decline. In addition, debt and equity capital may not continue to be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, particularly due to our substantial indebtedness. See “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors —Risks Related to Our Indebtedness—Our substantial indebtedness could affect our financial condition, limit our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness.” If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be to fund our capital requirements or invest in future growth . In particular, macroeconomic factors, including interest rate increases and bank have caused in the credit, financial and foreign exchange markets in the United States and worldwide, which may reduce our ability to access capital and affect our liquidity in the future. Our to obtain financing on terms, fund our capital requirements or invest in future growth could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Information Technology, Intellectual Property and Cybersecurity
If we or our third-party partners fail to protect Confidential Information and/or experience data security incidents, there may be damage to our brand and reputation, material financial penalties and legal liability, which would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on computer systems, hardware, software, technology infrastructure and online sites and networks for both internal and external operations that are critical to our business (collectively, “IT Systems”). We own and manage some of these IT Systems but also rely on third parties for a range of IT Systems and related products and services, including but not limited to cloud computing and SaaS services. We and certain of our vendors and other third-party partners collect, maintain and process data about our customers, employees, vendors, business partners and others, as well as proprietary information belonging to our business, our customers, business partners and others, such as trade secrets (collectively, “Confidential Information”).
Like other companies, we regularly experience cyber-based attacks. Cybersecurity threats are continuously evolving and include, but are not limited to, both attacks on our IT Systems and attacks on the IT systems of our customers, suppliers, subcontractors and other third parties with whom we do business routinely, both on premises and in the
cloud, attempting to gain unauthorized access to our confidential, proprietary, or otherwise protected information, regulated data, or information relating to our employees, customers and other third parties, or to disrupt our systems or the systems of third parties. Numerous and evolving cybersecurity risks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our IT Systems and Confidential Information, including from diverse threat actors, such as state-sponsored organizations, opportunistic hackers and hacktivists, particularly those adverse to the security interests of the United States and its allies, which target us and other defense contractors, as well as through diverse attack vectors, such as social engineering/phishing, malware (including ransomware), malfeasance by insiders, human or technological error, and as a result of malicious code embedded in open-source software, or misconfiguration, “bugs” or other vulnerabilities in commercial software that is integrated into our (or our suppliers’ or service providers’) IT systems, products or services. are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as actors are becoming increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools—including artificial intelligence—that security controls, detection and remove forensic evidence. Due to the evolving landscape, we and our third-party suppliers and vendors may be to detect, , remediate or recover from future attacks or , or to avoid a material impact to our IT Systems, Confidential Information or business.
While we have taken steps towards implementing a cybersecurity risk management program and processes, there can also be no assurance that such program and processes we implement, including policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our IT Systems and Confidential Information. In some cases, we must rely on the safeguards put in place by our customers, suppliers, subcontractors and other third parties to protect against and report cyber threats and attacks. Because we make extensive use of third-party suppliers and vendors, such as cloud services and SaaS platforms that support our internal and customer-facing operations, successful cyberattacks that disrupt or result in unauthorized access to third-party IT Systems can materially impact our operations and financial results. Any integration of artificial intelligence in our or any third party’s operations, products or services is expected to pose new or unknown cybersecurity risks and challenges. In addition, as a result of the rapid pace of technological change, we and our customers, suppliers, subcontractors and other third parties with whom we conduct business continue to rely on legacy systems and software, which can be more to cyber and attacks. Moreover, in light of our acquisition and business combinations strategy, we have acquired and continue to acquire companies with cybersecurity , unsophisticated security measures and/or legacy technology equipment and software, which us to significant cybersecurity, operational and financial risks. Further, remote and hybrid working arrangements at our company (and at many third-party providers) also increase cybersecurity risks due to the associated with managing remote computing assets and security that are present in many non-corporate and home networks. As a result, given the , nature and scope of , it is possible that we are to all , that potential could go and in the environment for an extended period, or that we may otherwise be to mitigate customer and other potential consequences of these attacks.
Further, the sophistication, availability and use of artificial intelligence by threat actors present an increased level of risk. As a result, we and certain of our third-party providers regularly experience cyberattacks and other incidents, and we expect to continue to experience more frequent and increasingly advanced cyberattacks in varying degrees. We cannot guarantee that these will not have a material impact on our operations or financial results. Additionally, in some cases, we must rely on the safeguards put in place by our customers, suppliers, vendors and other third parties to protect against and report cyberattacks. We could potentially be subject to production downtimes, operational delays, other detrimental impacts on our operations or ability to provide products and services to our customers, the compromise of our IT Systems or Confidential Information, misappropriation, destruction or corruption of data, security , other or use of our or third-party systems, networks or products, financial from remedial actions, of business, or potential liability, , and/or to our reputation. Any of these could have a material effect on our competitive position, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. Due to the evolving nature of such risks, the impact of any potential cannot be predicted. Any impact to the availability, or confidentiality of our IT Systems or Confidential Information can result in legal or proceedings (such as class actions), regulatory and enforcement actions, and , reputational impacts that cause us to existing or future customers, and/or significant response, system restoration or remediation and future compliance costs. For example, we are required to material cybersecurity pursuant to disclosure rules promulgated by the SEC. Any public disclosure relating to a material cybersecurity could our reputation, result in and affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Finally, we cannot guarantee that any costs and liabilities incurred in
relation to an attack or incident will be covered by our existing insurance policies or that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all.
In addition, we are subject to domestic and international cybersecurity-related laws and regulations, alongside government, customer and other cyber and security requirements. The scope and breadth of these requirements have expanded our compliance obligations, and cybersecurity regulatory enforcement activity has grown. We expect the regulatory environment and compliance requirements, including the application and interpretation of such requirements, to continue to evolve, and staying apace with these regulatory changes could require us, our suppliers and our business partners to modify existing practices, increase operational and compliance expenditures, and incur new or additional information technology and product development expenses. Given that compliance with such requirements and regulatory changes can take time, it is possible that our practices may not at all times comply fully or partially with all applicable requirements. For example, certain of the Company’s contracts are subject to the Cyber security and IT controls requirements of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”) for the protection of “covered defense information” (as that term is defined in DFARS 252.204-7012). Additionally, as a contractor to the DoD, we must comply with the controls outlined in the National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-171, the DoD's assessment reporting requirements and/or the DoD’s specific agency cybersecurity requirements.
Furthermore, we are subject to enhanced requirements, including Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (“CMMC”) assessments and/or certifications as as of November 10, 2025 when the 48 CFR CMMC acquisition rule became effective. Depending on the DoD agency and type of contract, we might be required to receive specific third-party cybersecurity certifications to be eligible for contract awards. Any failure to comply with these requirements could restrict our ability to bid for, be awarded and/or perform on DoD contracts. The DoD expects that all new contracts comply with CMMC. To the extent we, or our subcontractors or other third parties on whom we rely, are unable to achieve certification in advance of contract awards that specify the requirement, we may be unable to bid on contract awards or follow-on awards for existing work with the DoD, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects. We will also be required to go through a recertification process periodically, which may increase our costs of compliance relating to such certification and may cause operational delays. In addition, any obligations that may be imposed on us under the CMMC may be different from or in addition to those otherwise required by applicable laws and regulations, which may cause additional expense for compliance. Further, as a United Kingdom government contractor, we are required to demonstrate our Cyber Essentials Certification on an annual basis. Due to our current contracts with the Australian Government, we must also comply with the eight cybersecurity controls outlined by the Australian Cyber Security Center (ACSC) Essential Eight framework. Complying with such numerous and complex regulations in the event of an could be expensive and . Any actual or perceived non-compliance with such requirements could result in reputational, and financial risks, and liabilities under our current contracts and impact the prospects for certain new ones.
Compliance with ever evolving federal, state and foreign laws relating to the handling of data and information, including personal information, involves significant expenditure and resources, and any failure by us or our vendors to comply may result in significant liability, negative publicity and/or an erosion of trust, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We receive, store, handle, transmit, use and otherwise process business information and information related to individuals, including from and about actual and prospective customers, as well as our employees and vendors. We also depend on a number of third-party vendors in relation to the operation of our business, a number of which process data on our behalf and have access to our IT Systems.
We and our vendors are subject to a variety of federal, state and foreign data privacy laws, rules, regulations, industry standards and other requirements, including those that apply generally to the handling of information about individuals, and those that are specific to certain industries, sectors, contexts, or locations. These requirements, and their application, interpretation and amendment are constantly evolving and developing. For example, in the United States, the Federal Trade Commission and state regulators enforce a variety of data privacy issues, such as promises made in privacy policies or failures to appropriately protect information about individuals, as unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act or similar state laws. In addition, certain states have adopted new or modified privacy and security laws and regulations that may apply to our
business. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) requires covered businesses that process personal information of California residents (including residents acting in an employment and business-to-business capacity) to, among other things: provide certain disclosures to California residents regarding the business’s collection, use and disclosure of personal information; receive and respond to requests from California residents to access, delete and correct their personal information, or to opt-out of certain disclosures of their personal information; and enter into specific contractual provisions with service providers that process California resident personal information on the business’s behalf. The CCPA is enforceable by the California Attorney General and the California Privacy Protection Agency. The California Privacy Protection Agency is continuously amending the CCPA regulations, building upon the requirements in the CCPA, including with respect to cybersecurity audits, automated decision‑making and risk assessments. In the event of an actual or perceived violation of the CCPA, these regulators could seek severe statutory damages, injunctive relief or agreed settlements providing for ongoing audit and reporting requirements. There is also a private right of action relating to certain data security incidents. The CCPA has required and will likely continue to require us to modify our data collection or processing practices and policies or our business model and to incur substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply and increase our potential exposure to regulatory enforcement and/or , which could have an effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The enactment of the CCPA has also prompted a wave of comprehensive privacy laws in a number of U.S. states, with even more states considering their own laws, creating a patchwork of overlapping, but different state laws. These laws are similar to the CCPA, but also impose, or have the potential to impose, additional obligations on companies that collect, store, use, retain, disclose, transfer and otherwise process confidential, sensitive and personal information, and will continue to shape the data privacy environment nationally. There are also efforts in Congress working on new federal data protection and privacy frameworks to which we may become subject if it is enacted. Such legislation will likely add additional complexity, variation in requirements, restrictions and potential legal risk, and require additional investment in resources to compliance programs, could impact strategies and availability of previously useful data and could result in increased compliance costs and changes in business practices and policies. Further, in order to comply with the varying state laws around data breaches, we must maintain adequate security measures, which require significant investments in resources and ongoing attention.
As we have expanded, and may continue to expand, our international presence, we are and may become subject to additional laws relating to the processing of information in countries in which we operate and have customers, including Australia, Brazil, Canada, the European Union, Singapore, South Africa and the United Kingdom. Personal information is increasingly subject to regulation in these and other jurisdictions in which we operate, and the requirements can be more restrictive and rigorous than those in the United States.
In particular, we are subject to data protection laws in Europe including the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 and the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act of 2018 as amended from time to time (collectively, the “GDPR”), which impose stringent data protection obligations for processors and controllers of personal data with the risk of enforcement action, civil claims (including class actions), significant penalties or requirements for us to cease or change how we process personal data and conduct our business.
Amongst other things, the GDPR regulates cross-border transfers of personal information out of the European Economic Area and the United Kingdom. European case law and guidance have imposed additional onerous requirements in relation to data transfers, and we expect the existing legal complexity and uncertainty regarding international personal data transfers to continue. In particular, we expect international transfers from the European Union and the United Kingdom to continue to be subject to enhanced scrutiny by regulators. As regulatory guidance and the enforcement landscape develops, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Applicable requirements regarding data privacy and the processing of information in the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions, and the application and interpretation of such requirements, are continuously evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations, which increases the complexity of compliance and has required, and may require in the future, us to modify our practices, implement a variety of compliance measures, and incur compliance-related costs and expenses. It is also possible that we could become subject to a regulatory inquiry or investigation
and be required to take additional compliance steps or incur costs in remediating any identified issues. We continue to develop and update our policies, procedures and data transfer mechanisms in accordance with requirements under applicable data privacy and protection laws and regulations. Additionally, as these requirements may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another or conflict with other rules or our practices, our practices may not have complied or may not comply in the future with all such laws, regulations, requirements and obligations.
Furthermore, the regulatory framework around the development and use of emerging artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies is rapidly evolving, and many federal, state and foreign government bodies and agencies have introduced or are currently considering additional laws and regulations related to AI, machine learning, large language models, and additional emerging data technologies. Already, certain existing legal regimes (e.g., relating to data privacy) regulate certain aspects of AI technologies, and new laws regulating AI technologies have entered into force in the EU and United States. For example, in Europe, on August 1, 2024, the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (the “EU AI Act”) entered into force and establishes a comprehensive, risk-based governance framework for AI in the EU market. The majority of the EU AI Act’s substantive requirements, such as transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight, security and accuracy, will apply from August 2, 2026, and will impose penalties of between 3% and 7% of an undertaking’s worldwide annual turnover. Additionally, in the United States, legislation related to AI technologies has been introduced at the federal level and enacted or proposed at the state level as well, including in California, Colorado and Texas. Some enacted or proposed frameworks include requirements focused on transparency, risk-management and accountability for AI technologies, while others focus on high-risk uses of AI, the use of automated decision-making technology or companies that are developers or deployers of AI technologies We expect more laws focused on the development and deployment of AI technologies to be passed in the future, which will create more compliance requirements and potentially differing requirements across different jurisdictions in which we operate. Furthermore, the Trump administration’s approach to investment in and regulation of AI technologies has and is expected to continue to from that of the previous administration and we will need to adapt to any changes that may result from such approach, including as the result of new or changing executive orders. For instance, the federal government may seek to pre-empt state laws when they seek to govern certain topics, as evidenced by the Trump administration’s “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence” Executive Order signed on December 11, 2025. This order calls for federal standards and legislation that would preempt state AI regulations and create a federal task focused on state AI laws in court. The cost to comply with such laws, regulations, or decisions and/or guidance could be significant and would increase our operating expenses (such as by imposing additional reporting obligations regarding our use of AI technologies), which could impact our ability to develop, use and commercialize AI technologies in the future.
Moreover, it is possible that new laws, regulations and other requirements, or amendments to or changes in interpretations of existing laws, regulations and other requirements, may require us to incur significant costs, implement new processes, or change our handling of information and business operations. For example, the EU Data Act came into effect on September 12, 2025, and introduces rules regarding access to product data generated from the use of connected products and their related services, which includes making product data accessible to the user free of charge. Where the EU Data Act applies, non-compliance can result in regulatory enforcement and fines, civil claims, and reputational damage. In addition, any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with any U.S. federal, state or foreign privacy, processing of personal information, consumer protection or e-marketing related laws, regulations, standards or other requirements to which we may be subject or other legal obligations relating to these matters, any regulatory inquiry, or any significant data breach, could adversely affect our reputation, brand and business, result in , , proceedings or actions us by individuals, consumer rights groups, private and public customers, governmental regulatory entities or others or other or liabilities, or require us to change our operations and/or using certain data sets. We could incur significant costs in responding to any inquiries or and such , , proceedings or actions and, if found liable, pay significant or or be required to make changes to our business. Further, these proceedings and any subsequent
adverse outcomes may subject us to significant negative publicity and an erosion of trust. If any of these events were to occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
A disruption of our IT Systems and capabilities could lead to business disruption and could harm our reputation and result in financial penalty and legal liabilities, which would reduce our revenue and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business operations are reliant on our IT Systems and any interruption may impair our ability to provide our services to our customers. In addition to potential disruptions to our IT Systems from cyber-attacks and cybersecurity incidents, we also face potential disruptions resulting from equipment failures, shutdowns, power outages, human errors and other events, including disruptions experienced by service providers and other third parties. We may also experience disruptions during the implementation, upgrade or subsequent operation of our IT Systems, including supporting the legacy systems of acquired companies. Moreover, as we transition to new systems, our ability to timely mitigate, manage and patch vulnerabilities related to legacy systems and related legacy third-party technologies could impact security as well as our day-to-day operations. As a result, upgrades to our IT Systems may be expensive undertakings, may not be and/or could be . Additionally, if such upgraded IT Systems to operate or are to support our growth, our business operations could be , and we could be required to make significant additional expenditures to remedy any such .
We could also encounter threats to our physical security, including our facilities and personnel, and threats from workplace violence, civil unrest, terrorism, or similar acts, any of which could disrupt our IT Systems and business. Our business, and the business of our suppliers, subcontractors, service providers and customers, could be disrupted by public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics, and governmental, business and individual actions taken in response, damaging weather or other acts of nature, or other events outside our control. The impact of any such disruptions is difficult to predict, but it could lead to operational delays and detrimental impacts on our operations, diversion of management’s attention and resources or loss of business.
Any of these developments could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to maintain, protect or enforce our rights in our proprietary technology, brands or other intellectual property, our competitive advantage, business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.
Our success is dependent, in part, upon protecting our intellectual property rights, including those in our brands and our proprietary know-how and technology. We rely on a combination of trademark, patent, trade secret, copyright and other intellectual property laws as well as contractual arrangements to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. While it is our policy to protect and defend our rights to our intellectual property, we cannot predict whether the measures that we have taken will be adequate to prevent infringement, misappropriation, dilution or other violations of our intellectual property rights, or that we will be able to successfully enforce our rights. Our failure to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason could result in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on our trademarks and trade names to distinguish our services from the services of our competitors and have registered or applied to register our key trademarks. We cannot assure you that our trademark applications will be approved. Third parties may also oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks. In the event that our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our services, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.
While software and other of our proprietary works may be protected under copyright law, we have not registered any copyrights in these works, and instead, we primarily rely on protecting our software as a trade secret. In order to bring a copyright infringement lawsuit in the United States, the copyright must first be registered. In addition, certain of our proprietary technologies were developed under contracts with the U.S. government under which the U.S. government retains certain license rights to such technologies. Accordingly, although we may be able to pursue federal and state
remedies for trade secret misappropriation, the remedies and damages available to us under U.S. copyright laws for unauthorized use of our software may be limited.
Although we attempt to protect certain of our proprietary technologies by entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and others who have access to such technologies and information, these agreements may be breached, and we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient remedies in the event any of these agreements are breached. Furthermore, trade secret laws do not prevent our competitors from independently developing technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours. Accordingly, despite our efforts to maintain these technologies as trade secrets, we cannot guarantee that others will not independently develop technologies with the same or similar functions to any proprietary technology we rely on to conduct our business and differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Policing unauthorized use of our know-how, technology and intellectual property is difficult, costly, time-consuming and may not be effective. Third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights. We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and enforce our intellectual property rights. Any could be expensive to , be time consuming and management’s attention, and may not ultimately be resolved in our favor. Furthermore, if we bring a claim to enforce our intellectual property rights an infringer, the infringer may bring the validity, enforceability or scope of our intellectual property rights, and if any such are , we could intellectual property rights. Any of these events could our business.
We rely on OEM authorizations and licenses in order to provide certain of our repair and overhaul services for engine platforms. Our breach of any of these licenses may result in their termination or expose us to financial liability or legal claims and could require us to cease using the OEM technology or technical information. Our loss of such licenses or inability to license such rights in future may result in a loss of competitive advantage, decrease in our revenue or increase in our operating expenses or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If third parties claim that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights, our operations could be adversely affected.
We may become subject to claims that we infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of others. Even if we believe these claims are without merit, any claim of infringement, misappropriation or other violation could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against the claim and could distract management and other personnel from other business. Any successful claim of infringement against us could require us to pay substantial monetary damages, require us to seek licenses of intellectual property from third parties or prevent us from using certain trademarks and require us to rebrand our services. Any licensing or royalty agreements, if required, may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Any of the foregoing could have a impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Government Regulation and Litigation
Changes to U.S. tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations
There continues to exist significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and other countries with respect to trade policies, treaties and tariffs under President Trump’s administration. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global trade and, in particular, trade between the impacted nations and the United States. Any of these factors could depress economic activity and restrict our access to suppliers or customers and have a material adverse effect on their business, financial condition and results of operations, which in turn would negatively impact us. We have operations, customers and suppliers in the U.S., Canada
and other countries and regularly import and export goods and services to and from those countries. An increase in tariffs could have a material impact on our costs and on the demand for our products and services.
We will not be able to operate our business if we fail to comply with or obtain and maintain the necessary regulatory approvals.
We operate in a highly regulated industry, subject to regulation under a wide variety of U.S. federal and state and non-U.S. laws, regulations and policies that require ongoing compliance efforts. We need a number of regulatory approvals to perform the services that we provide. In addition, most of our authorizations with OEMs terminate at the option of the OEM if we fail to obtain or maintain necessary regulatory approvals or fail to comply with applicable regulations.
Failure to obtain, maintain or comply with regulatory approvals, or the costs associated with obtaining, maintaining or complying with any such regulatory approvals, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Regulatory authorities monitoring our performance and products include the FAA in the United States, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, the U.K. Civil Aviation Authority, Transport Canada and others. Certain of these regulatory authorities require, among other things, that we:
periodically undergo extensive inspections and audits of our facilities and practices;
obtain and maintain certifications from regulatory authorities to provide service for commercially operated aircraft engines; and
obtain and maintain recognized quality approvals, such as AS9110 (the standard for repair stations).
The DoD, the Canadian military and most other military organizations to which we provide services similarly require us to comply with all applicable government regulations when servicing their equipment and may conduct reviews similar to those conducted by civil regulatory authorities. We are also subject to U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Treasury and U.S. Department of State regulations and other governmental trade regulations including regulations that govern citizenship and nationality that can increase costs and add to the complexity of doing business with aerospace and defense products.
We must comply with various laws and regulations relating to the export of products, services and technology and the economic and trade sanctions and other laws and regulations imposed, administered and enforced by the United States and other countries having jurisdiction over our operations. In the United States, these laws include, among others, the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”) administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce's, Bureau of Industry and Security, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) administered by the U.S. Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (“DDTC”) and the economic and financial sanctions and trade embargoes administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) or the U.S. Department of State. Certain of our products have military or strategic applications and are on the munitions list of the ITAR or are so-called “dual use” items governed by the EAR. As a result, these products require individual validated licenses in order to be exported to certain jurisdictions. In addition, we must maintain a registration with DDTC under the ITAR. Sanctions laws and regulations, including those administered by OFAC, may restrict or prohibit (unless authorized by relevant authorities) transactions or other business with certain countries or territories and individuals and entities that are targeted by sanctions, including those areas subject to U.S. trade embargoes (currently Cuba, Iran, North Korea, the Crimea region of Ukraine, the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic and the so-called Luhansk People’s Republic) and individuals and entities listed on Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, as well as similar lists maintained by relevant regulators. Any to comply with these export controls and sanctions laws and regulations could result in civil or , , , publicity and restrictions on our ability to export our products, and repeat could carry more significant , including the of export privileges. Any changes in export controls or sanctions or laws or regulations may further restrict the export of our products or the services that we may provide. Any restrictions on the export of our products or product lines, or on the services that we provide, could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, we may become subject to new governmental regulations if we expand our business into new countries or sell new products or services. The imposition of new, different or more stringent regulations could also materially adversely affect us because we might be unable to comply with them or compliance may require significant additional
expenditures. Our inability or other failure to comply with the applicable laws of the countries in which we do business could result in fines and penalties being imposed by foreign governments or the U.S. government. Additionally, non-compliance with laws could result in OEM contract terminations or non-renewals or the loss of contracts or suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. government, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our operations outside of North America are exposed to various risks, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is subject to certain risks associated with doing business internationally. Most of our operations are in North America, but we also have operations in other markets and may, in the future, expand organically or through acquisition into additional markets. We have a presence in many different countries, with facilities in 11 countries. Revenue from our customers outside of the United States and Canada represented approximately 32% and 30% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
International operations are subject to many additional risks, including:
the burden of complying with multiple and possibly conflicting laws and any unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
exchange controls, import and export restrictions and tariffs and other trade protection measures;
political risks, including risks of loss due to civil disturbances, acts of terrorism, acts of war, guerilla activities and insurrection;
unstable economic, financial and market conditions and increased expenses as a result of inflation, or higher interest rates; and
potentially adverse tax consequences from changes in tax laws, requirements relating to withholding taxes on remittances and other payments by subsidiaries and restrictions on our ability to repatriate dividends from our subsidiaries.
Furthermore, we have global operations and are subject to laws and regulations, such as the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and their employees, agents and contractors from directly or indirectly making improper corrupt payments to government officials (and, under some laws, to private counterparties) for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or an unfair business advantage. As an issuer, we are also subject to the FCPA’s books and records and internal controls provisions. Although we have implemented what we believe to be reasonable policies and procedures to promote compliance with applicable anti-bribery laws, we cannot guarantee that our employees and agents will comply with these policies or laws. Investigations of non-compliance can be disruptive and costly, and failure to comply with these laws could subject us to civil and that could affect our business, results of operations and financial conditions.
We are monitoring the ongoing conflicts between Israel and Hamas and between Russia and Ukraine and the related export controls and financial and economic sanctions imposed on certain industry sectors, including the aviation sector, and parties in Russia by the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and others. Although the conflicts had not, nor are expected to have, a direct material adverse impact on our business, the implications of the Israel and Hamas and Russia and Ukraine conflicts in the short-term and long-term are difficult to predict at this time. Factors such as increased energy costs, the availability of certain raw materials for engine components, parts and
accessories, embargoes on flights from certain airlines, sanctions on certain individuals and companies, and the stability of certain customers could impact the global economy and aviation sector.
Any one of these factors could materially adversely affect our sales of products or services to international customers, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, violations of which could result in substantial costs, liabilities and impacts on our business and operations.
Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the environment and health and safety in the United States and in the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, including those relating to the generation, storage, treatment, disposal handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials, emissions and discharges to air, soil and water, remediation of contaminated soil and ground water, occupational health and safety and other environmental matters. Environmental laws and regulations may require that we investigate and remediate the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and present operations or sites to which we have transported wastes. We have incurred and will likely continue to incur liabilities under various government statutes for the cleanup of pollutants previously released into the environment. While we do not anticipate that compliance with current environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, or any payments we may be required to make for cleanup liabilities, will adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly stringent, which may make compliance with such requirements more difficult or costly in the future or otherwise affect our operations.
Certain environmental laws and regulations also impose strict joint and several liability for contamination or releases of hazardous substances or petroleum on former and current owners and operators of real property and in connection with third-party sites where parties have disposed wastes. These environmental laws can impose cleanup responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the contamination or release. The liability under these laws has been interpreted to be strict, joint and several unless the harm is divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of the responsibility. Historical contamination is known or suspected to exist at certain of our facilities. Certain of our facilities contain or have contained asbestos and lead-based paint. Under some circumstances, we could be held responsible for cleaning up contamination at or emanating from our facilities, including facilities that we have sold or transferred to other companies, or at or emanating from waste disposal sites we use or have used in the past. We could also be held liable for any damages resulting from our workforce’s occupational exposure to such contamination, including harmful agents associated with the engines and other equipment we service, and we may be required to manage, remove, remediate or abate conditions at our facilities, such as asbestos and lead-based paint. It is possible that such environmental liabilities and other costs could materially affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Such laws and regulations require us to obtain, maintain and renew environmental permits, licenses and approvals from governmental authorities. The regulatory environment relating to such permits, authorizations and approvals is uncertain and there can be no assurance that all permits, authorizations and/or approvals can or will be obtained. These authorities can modify or revoke such permits and can enforce compliance with environmental laws, regulations and permits by issuing orders and assessing fines. We incur capital and operating costs to comply with such laws, regulations and permits. We cannot assure you that regulators will not successfully challenge our compliance or require us to expend significant amounts to comply with applicable environmental laws or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Many U.S. laws governing environmental matters include civil and criminal provisions. If we were convicted of a violation of the federal Clean Air Act or Clean Water Act, the facility or facilities involved in the violation would be ineligible to be used in performing any U.S. government contract we are awarded, until the Environmental Protection Agency thereafter certifies that the condition giving rise to the violation has been corrected.
The strategic priorities and financial performance of our business are subject to market and other dynamics related to efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which can pose risks in addition to opportunities.
Given the nature of our business and the industries we serve, we must anticipate and respond to market, technological, regulatory and other changes driven by broader trends related to greenhouse gas emission reduction efforts in response
to climate change and energy security concerns. These changes present risks for our business, which provides services to customers in the aviation sector that have historically been carbon-intensive, and we expect will remain important to efforts globally to lower greenhouse gas emissions. In the aerospace industry, greenhouse gas emission reduction over time may require a combination of continued technological innovation in the fuel efficiency of engines, expanded use of sustainable aviation fuels and the further development of hybrid-electric and electric flight and hydrogen-based aviation technologies. The risk of insufficient availability of low-carbon fuels (such as sustainable aviation fuels or hydrogen) may compromise the pace and degree of emission reduction within the aviation sector. Our success in advancing greenhouse gas emission reduction objectives across our business will depend in part on our actions, the actions of governments, regulators and other market participants to invest in infrastructure, create appropriate market incentives and to otherwise support the development of new technologies. The process of developing new high-technology products and enhancing existing products to mitigate climate change is often complex, and uncertain, and we may pursue strategies or make investments that do not prove to be commercially in the time frames expected or at all.
A failure by us or other industry participants to invest successfully in these technological developments, or to adequately position our businesses to benefit from the growth in adoption of new technologies, could adversely affect our competitive position, business, ability to attract and retain talent, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. In addition, we face increasing expectations from many customers, suppliers, governments, regulators, investors, banks and project financiers regarding the roles that the private sector and individual companies play in decarbonization, which can result in additional costs and pose reputational or other risks for companies like ours that serve carbon-intensive industries based on the progress that we make over time in reducing emissions from our operations, products or services and achieving our publicly announced ambitions. We anticipate that we will continue to need to make investments in new technologies and capabilities and devote additional management and other resources in response to the foregoing expectations, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of those investments and actions. Trends related to the global energy transition and decarbonization will affect the relative competitiveness of different types of service offerings within and across our business. Important factors that could impact our business include the pace of technological developments and related cost considerations, the levels of economic growth in different markets around the world and the adoption and pace of implementation of climate change-related policies (such as carbon taxes, cap and trade regimes, increased standards, greenhouse gas emission reduction targets or commitments, incentives or mandates for particular types of energy or policies that impact the availability of financing for certain types of projects) at the international, national and sub-national levels or by customers, investors or other private actors.
Sustainability and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters may adversely impact our business and reputation.
Investors, employees, customers, governmental and regulatory bodies and other stakeholders are focused on companies’ performances on a variety of sustainability and ESG matters, among other topics, which are considered to contribute to the long-term sustainability of companies’ performances. A variety of organizations measure the performances of companies on ESG topics, and the results of these assessments are widely publicized. In addition, investment in funds that specialize in companies that perform well in such assessments are increasingly popular, and major institutional investors have publicly emphasized the importance of ESG measures to their investment and voting decisions, with some relying on proprietary or third-party ESG ratings to measure performances of companies on ESG parameters. Topics taken into account in such assessments include, among others, climate change, environmental impacts, employee engagement, human and labor rights, responsible sourcing, low carbon transition, sustainability transparency, responsible use of artificial intelligence, the role of the board of directors in supervising various ESG issues and broader governance issues.
In addition, various regulatory authorities have imposed, and may continue to impose, mandatory substantive and/or disclosure requirements with respect to ESG matters that could otherwise materially impact our business and operations. For example, we may be subject to the climate-related laws from the State of California that require in-scope entities to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions, provide a climate-related financial risk report, as well as for entities that market, sell, purchase, or use voluntary carbon offsets and/or make certain claims regarding the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, or publish information about the offsets and/or reduction claims annually on their website. Other state legislatures have considered similar or conflicting rules. We may also be subject to, or indirectly impacted by, the requirements of the European Union’s sustainability reporting directives and related Taxonomy Regulation. In addition, we may be subject to International Sustainability Standards Board’s sustainability and
climate-related disclosure standards, as various countries have adopted or have indicated their intent to incorporate, account for or otherwise adopt such standards as law, including the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, Singapore, China, Australia and Kenya. Further, we may be impacted by carbon taxes and renewable energy and fuels utilization mandates implemented across our operating jurisdictions, as well as our suppliers and customers, which might increase operational costs and procurements costs, negatively impacting our business. Any of the foregoing may require us to make additional investments in facilities and equipment, require us to incur additional costs for the collection of data and/or preparation of disclosures and associated internal controls, may impact the availability and cost of key raw materials, and, in turn, may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, these requirements may not always be uniform across jurisdictions, which may result in increased complexity, and cost, for compliance. Additionally, many of our suppliers, customers and business partners may be subject to similar requirements, which may augment or create additional risks, including risks that may not be known to us.
In light of regulators’ and other stakeholders’ focus on sustainability and ESG matters, there can be no certainty that we will manage such issues successfully, or that we will successfully meet society’s various expectations as to our proper role or our own sustainability and ESG goals and values. This could lead to risks of litigation or reputational damage relating to our ESG policies, goals or performance. As we continue to focus on developing ESG practices, and as stakeholder expectations, voluntary and regulatory ESG disclosure standards and policies continue to evolve, we have made disclosures in these areas. Such disclosures may reflect aspirational goals, targets and other expectations and assumptions, which are necessarily uncertain and may not be realized. Certain anti-ESG advocates have brought legal challenges regarding corporate sustainability initiatives and goals, and to the extent we are subject to such challenges, it may require us to incur costs or otherwise adversely impact our business. Conversely, failure to realize (or timely achieve on) such aspirational goals and targets could affect our reputation, customer attraction and retention and access to capital, us to reputational, regulatory or risks or otherwise affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If we fail to comply with government procurement laws and regulations, we could lose business and be liable for various penalties or sanctions.
We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of government contracts. In the United States, these laws and regulations include the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, the Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Act (formerly known as the Truth in Negotiations Act (“TINA”)), Cost Accounting Standards, laws, regulations and orders restricting the use and dissemination of classified information and safeguarding of contractor information systems, and U.S. export control laws, regulations and orders relating to the export of certain products and technical information.
For example, under some of our U.S. government contracts, we are subject to TINA and under this act, the U.S. government may, in certain circumstances, obtain certified (or uncertified) cost or pricing data from contractors as a means of verifying that prices are reasonable. Moreover, some of our contracts are subject to the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual which specifies the requirements for the protection of classified information released or disclosed in connection with classified U.S. government contracts.
In addition, we are subject to U.S. government inquiries and investigations, including periodic audits of costs that we determine are reimbursable under government contracts. U.S. government agencies routinely audit government contractors, including us, to review performance under contracts, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards, as well as the adequacy of and compliance with internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Moreover, certain costs, including certain financing costs, portions of research and development costs, lobbying expenses, certain types of legal expenses and certain marketing expenses related to the preparation of bids and proposals and certain other costs, are not allowed for direct or indirect reimbursement under cost-reimbursement contracts (or for pricing purposes under TINA). Any costs found to be unallowable, unreasonable, misclassified or inaccurately allocated to a specific contract are not reimbursable, and to the extent already reimbursed, must be refunded. In addition, any inadequacies in our systems and policies could result in payments being withheld, penalties and reduced future business.
U.S. government rules allow contracting officers to impose contractual withholdings at no less than certain minimum levels if a contracting officer determines that one or more of a contractor’s business systems have one or more
significant deficiencies. If a contracting officer were to impose such a withholding on us or even on a prime contractor where we are the subcontractor, it would increase the risk that we would not be paid in full or paid timely. If future audit adjustments exceed our estimates, our profitability could be adversely affected.
If a government audit, inquiry or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we could be subject to criminal or civil penalties or administrative sanctions, including contract termination, breach of contract actions including related damages, fines, forfeiture of fees, suspension of payment, civil false claims allegations (which can include civil penalties and treble damages) and suspension or from doing business with government agencies, any of which could materially affect our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may be subject to periodic litigation and regulatory proceedings, which may adversely affect our business and financial performance.
From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits and regulatory actions brought or threatened against us in the ordinary course of business. These actions and proceedings may involve claims for, among other things, compensation for alleged personal injury, workers’ compensation, employment discrimination, breach of contract or property damage. In addition, we may be subject to class action lawsuits, including those involving allegations of violations of consumer product statutes or the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such actions or proceedings. The outcome of litigation, particularly class action lawsuits and regulatory actions, is difficult to assess or quantify, as plaintiffs may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts in these types of lawsuits, and the magnitude of the potential may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. In addition, in many types of actions may seek , civil , consequential or other , or injunctive or declaratory relief. These proceedings could result in substantial cost and may require us to devote substantial resources to ourselves. The ultimate resolution of these matters through settlement, mediation, or court judgment could have a material impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. See “Part II, Item 3. Legal Proceedings,” in this Annual Report.
We may face large liability claims, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our operations expose us to potential liabilities for personal injury, death or property damage as a result of a failure or malfunction of an engine or aircraft for which we have provided services or should have provided services. In addition, many factors beyond our control could lead to liability claims, including:
the failure of an aircraft on which an engine for which we provided services has been installed;
the failure of a component supplied by a vendor or the OEM that we installed in an engine or aircraft;
the reliability and skills of the operators of our customers’ aircraft; and
the type and amount of maintenance on aircraft and component systems performed by our customers.
In addition, a malfunction or crash of an aircraft for which we have provided services, or should have provided services, could damage our reputation for quality products. We believe our customers consider safety and reliability as key criteria in selecting an aftermarket service provider. If a malfunction or crash were to be caused by an engine, component or part that we serviced, or if we were to otherwise fail to maintain a satisfactory record of safety and reliability, our ability to retain and attract customers may be materially adversely affected.
We have obtained insurance coverage with respect to these types of liabilities. However, any liability not covered by insurance or for which third-party indemnification is not available could require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows to make payments on these liabilities. Some of our service contracts do not limit our liability or provide for indemnification by our clients against losses arising from parts or work provided to us by the clients. We may incur significant expenses in the course of defending against such claims. Adequate insurance may not be
available in the future or may be available only on unacceptable terms. We are also subject to warranty claims for which our reserves may prove to be inadequate.
Risks Related to Management and Employees
We are dependent on our senior management team and highly trained and qualified employees, and any work stoppage, difficulty hiring similar employees, retention issues or ineffective succession planning may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our services are complicated, highly engineered and involve sophisticated technologies with related complex manufacturing and integration processes. Our continued success depends on the services of our senior management team and on our ability to attract and retain highly trained and qualified managerial and technical personnel experienced in the various operations of our businesses. Historically, there has been substantial competition for skilled personnel in the aerospace aftermarket services industry, and we could be adversely affected by a shortage of skilled employees. Competition for qualified technical personnel is intense, and we have, at times, found it difficult to attract and retain skilled personnel for our operations. We may not be able to fill new positions or vacancies created by expansion or turnover or attract and retain qualified personnel. We cannot be assured that we can continue to hire, train and retain qualified employees at current wage rates since we operate in a competitive labor market, and there are currently significant inflationary and other pressures on wages. Loss of the services of these employees could materially affect our operations.
Although we believe that our relations with our employees are satisfactory, we cannot assure that we will be able to negotiate a satisfactory renewal of collective bargaining agreements or that our employee relations will remain stable. Any work stoppage or disruption could materially and adversely affect our ability to provide services to our customers.
In addition, our success depends in part on our ability to attract and motivate our senior management and key employees. Achieving this objective may be difficult due to a variety of factors, including fluctuations in economic and industry conditions, competitors’ hiring practices, and the effectiveness of our compensation and benefits programs. Competition for qualified skilled management can be intense. If we are unable to effectively provide for the succession of senior management and other key personnel, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition may be adversely affected. Failure to attract or retain highly qualified personnel could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
To the extent that we lose experienced personnel, it is essential that we successfully manage the transfer of critical knowledge from those personnel, especially those who hold a significant amount of institutional knowledge about our IT Systems and operation of our business. In light of our acquisition and business combinations strategy, we have acquired and continue to acquire companies with cybersecurity vulnerabilities, unsophisticated security measures and/or legacy technology equipment and software, in which only certain key personnel possess the legacy knowledge required for maintaining such systems. As a result, the loss of personnel who maintain such knowledge could seriously harm our ability to successfully implement, manage and upgrade our IT Systems in the future, which would have an adverse effect on our business.
If we face labor shortages or increased labor costs, our results of operations and our growth could be adversely affected.
Labor is a significant component of the cost of operating our business. Our ability to meet labor needs while controlling labor costs is subject to external factors, such as employment levels, prevailing wage rates, inflation, minimum wage legislation, changing demographics, health and other insurance costs and governmental labor and employment requirements. In the event of increasing wage rates, if we fail to increase our wages competitively, the quality of our workforce could decline, while increasing our wages could cause our earnings to decrease. If we face labor shortages or increased labor costs because of increased competition for employees from our competitors and other industries, higher employee-turnover rates, increases in the federal- or state-mandated minimum wage, inflation, change in exempt and non-exempt status, or other employee benefit costs (including costs associated with health insurance
coverage or workers’ compensation insurance), our operating expenses could increase and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We have in the past, and may in the future, have underfunded pension plan liabilities. We have required, and may require, current and future operating cash flow to fund these shortfalls.
We maintain defined benefit pension plans covering employees who meet age and service requirements. Assets available to fund the pension obligations of one of our U.K. defined benefit plans was underfunded as of December 31, 2025. If we have underfunded pension plans in the future, we may need to make additional cash contributions to these plans, and this could divert resources from our operations and may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, increase our costs, divert management’s attention, and affect our ability to attract and retain executive management and qualified board members.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the listing standards of the NYSE, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform have imposed various requirements on public companies. The requirements of these rules and regulations have increased our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, some of which we did not previously incur, and have made some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and may place significant strain on our management, personnel, systems and resources. For example, these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to incur additional costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. Furthermore, several members of our management team have limited, if any, prior experience running a public company, interacting with public company investors and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. For example, the Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and results of operations, such as this Annual Report. As a result of the complexity involved in complying with the rules and regulations applicable to public companies, our management’s attention may be from other business , which could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Although we have hired additional employees to assist us in complying with these requirements, we may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants, which will increase our operating expenses.
In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time-consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest substantial resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expense and a diversion of management’s time and attention from business operations to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed. Being a new public company that is subject to these new rules and regulations has made it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly members who can serve on our audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.
As a result of the disclosure obligations required of a public company, our business and financial condition has become more visible, which may result in an increased risk of threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the
time and resources necessary to resolve them, would divert the resources of our management and harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition, limit our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2025, we had total indebtedness outstanding of $2,247.2 million, including $2,227.5 million under the New Credit Agreement. As a result of our substantial indebtedness, a significant amount of our cash flows will be required to pay interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness, and we may not generate sufficient cash flows from operations or have future borrowings available under the New 2024 Revolving Credit Facility to enable us to repay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Subject to the limits contained in the New Credit Agreement and our other debt instruments, we may incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our high level of debt would further increase. Specifically, our high level of debt could have important consequences to you, including:
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under the New Credit Agreement and our other debt agreements, and if we fail to comply with these obligations, an event of default could result;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions or other general corporate requirements;
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, thereby reducing the amount of cash flows available for working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and market conditions, including inflation, the risk of rising interest rates and tariffs;
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities, are at variable rates of interest;
limiting our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the markets in which we compete and to changing business and economic conditions;
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures in order to generate cash proceeds necessary to satisfy our debt obligations;
placing us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors and affecting our ability to compete; and
increasing our cost of borrowing or limiting our ability to refinance indebtedness.
The occurrence of any one of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and ability to satisfy our obligations in respect of our outstanding debt.
Despite our level of indebtedness, we and our subsidiaries may still incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks to our financial condition described above and impair our ability to operate our business.
As of December 31, 2025, we had total indebtedness outstanding of $2,247.2 million, including $2,227.5 million under the New Credit Agreement. We and our subsidiaries may incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. Although the New Credit Agreement contains restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, including with respect to our ability to incur additional indebtedness. The additional indebtedness we may incur in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. These restrictions also will not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness (including, among others, trade payables and other expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business). Additionally,
pursuant to the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities, we have the option to raise incremental term loans, to raise incremental revolving credit facility commitments, to increase the commitments under the New 2024 Term Loan Facilities and to increase the commitments under the New 2024 Revolving Credit Facility by certain amounts. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face would increase.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to service all of our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.
Our inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all, would materially and adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations and our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. Additionally, if we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default under the New Credit Agreement. Such a default, if not cured or waived, may allow the creditors to accelerate the related debt and may result in the acceleration of any other debt that is subject to an applicable cross-acceleration or cross-default provision. In addition, an event of default under the New Credit Agreement would permit the lenders under the New 2024 Revolving Credit Facility to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Furthermore, if we were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the lenders thereunder could proceed the collateral securing the indebtedness owing under our New Credit Agreement, including our available cash.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on or refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to financial, business, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond our control. We may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows from operations sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to meet our operating needs and fund our debt service obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures or to dispose of material assets or operations, seek additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. Additionally, we may not be able to obtain loans or other financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if successful, those alternative actions may not allow us to meet our operating needs or our scheduled debt service obligations. The New Credit Agreement restricts our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from such dispositions and may also restrict our ability to raise debt or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due. Because of these restrictions, we may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations then due.
Additionally, the New Credit Agreement permits us to pay certain dividends or make other restricted payments in the future, subject to certain limitations. Any dividends or other restricted payments would reduce our cash available to service our debt and the related risks that we now face would increase.
The terms of the New Credit Agreement impose restrictions that may limit our current and future operating flexibility, particularly our ability to respond to changes in the economy or our industry or to take certain actions, which could harm our long-term interests and may limit our ability to make payments on our indebtedness.
The New Credit Agreement contains a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us and limit our ability to engage in acts that may be in our long-term best interest, including among other things (and subject to certain exceptions), restrictions on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:
incur additional indebtedness;
grant or incur liens or security interests on assets;
merge or consolidate with other companies;
sell or otherwise transfer assets;
pay dividends;
optionally prepay or modify terms of payment subordinated indebtedness;
make acquisitions, loans, advances, or investments;
enter into certain restrictive agreements; or
change our fiscal year.
As a result of all of these restrictions, we may be:
limited in how we conduct our business;
unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns; or
unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities.
These restrictions might hinder our ability to grow in accordance with our strategies. These covenants could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs. Furthermore, they may restrict our ability to expand, pursue our business strategies and otherwise conduct our business. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by circumstances and events beyond our control, such as prevailing economic conditions, pandemics or epidemics and changes in regulations, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with such covenants. These restrictions also limit our ability to obtain future financings to withstand a future downturn in our business or the economy in general. In addition, complying with these covenants may also cause us to take actions that are not favorable to you and may make it more difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy and compete against companies that are not subject to such restrictions.
In addition, the New 2024 Revolving Credit Facility has a springing financial covenant, which under certain circumstances, requires us to maintain a maximum consolidated first lien net leverage ratio and may require us to reduce debt or take other actions in order to comply with this ratio.
A breach of a covenant under the New Credit Agreement could result in an event of default thereunder. Such a default, if not cured or waived, may allow the lenders under the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities to accelerate the debt in respect thereof and may result in the acceleration of any other debt that is subject to an applicable cross-acceleration or cross-default provision. In addition, an event of default under the New Credit Agreement would permit the lenders under the New 2024 Revolving Credit Facility to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under the New 2024 Revolving Credit Facility. Furthermore, if we were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the lenders thereunder could proceed against the collateral securing the indebtedness owing under our New Credit Agreement, including our available cash.
Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.
Borrowings under the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness will increase even though the amount borrowed may remain the same, and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, will correspondingly decrease. As of December 31, 2025, assuming that the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities were fully drawn, each 1 percentage point change in interest rates would have resulted in a change of approximately $30.0 million in annual interest expense on the indebtedness under the New Senior Secured Credit Facilities. We have entered into, and may in the future enter into, interest rate swaps that involve the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility. However, it is possible that we will not maintain interest rate swaps with respect to any of our variable rate indebtedness. Alternatively, any swaps we have entered into, or may enter into in the future, may not fully or effectively mitigate our interest rate risk.
We are a holding company with no operations and may not have access to sufficient cash to meet our financial obligations.
We are a holding company and have limited direct operations. Our most significant assets are the equity interests we directly and indirectly hold in our subsidiaries. As a result, we are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our outstanding debt service and other obligations and such dividends may be restricted by law or the instruments governing our indebtedness, including the New Credit Agreement or other agreements of our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries may not generate sufficient cash from operations
to enable us to make principal and interest payments on our indebtedness. In addition, our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and any payments on dividends, distributions, loans or advances to us by our subsidiaries could be subject to legal and contractual restrictions on dividends. In addition, payments to us by our subsidiaries will be contingent upon our subsidiaries’ earnings. Additionally, we may be limited in our ability to cause any future joint ventures under which our subsidiaries distribute their earnings to us. Subject to certain qualifications, our subsidiaries are permitted under the terms of our indebtedness to incur additional indebtedness that may restrict payments from those subsidiaries to us. We cannot assure you that agreements governing the current and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries will permit those subsidiaries to provide us with sufficient cash to fund our financial obligations.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our share price may change significantly, and you may not be able to resell our common stock at or above the price you paid or at all, and you could lose all or part of your investment as a result.
The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile. The stock market has experienced extreme volatility. This volatility often has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. You may not be able to resell your common stock at or above the price initially paid due to a number of factors such as those listed in other portions of this “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors” section and the following:
results of operations that vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;
results of operations that vary from those of our competitors;
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance and growth, including financial estimates and investment recommendations by securities analysts and investors;
changes in the perception of our brand or industry;
declines in the market prices of stocks generally;
strategic actions by us or our competitors;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new products, acquisitions, joint marketing relationships, joint ventures, other strategic relationships or capital commitments;
changes in general economic or market conditions or trends in our industry or markets;
changes in business or regulatory conditions;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
future sales of our common stock or other securities by us or our existing stockholders, or the perception of such future sales;
investor perceptions of the investment opportunity associated with our common stock relative to other investment alternatives;
the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or third parties, including our filings with the SEC;
announcements relating to litigation;
guidance, if any, that we provide to the public, any changes in this guidance or our failure to meet this guidance;
the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock;
changes in accounting principles; and
other events or factors, including those resulting from natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics, war, acts of terrorism or responses to these events.
These broad market and industry fluctuations may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, price volatility may be greater if the public float and trading volume of our common stock are low.
In the past, following periods of market volatility, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and divert resources and the attention of executive management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation.
Carlyle owns a significant amount of our voting power, and their interests in our business may be different than yours.
As of January 29, 2026 Carlyle owns approximately 31.4% of our common stock. Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, Carlyle has the right to designate a majority of our directors until it owns less than 25% of our outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, Carlyle or its nominees to the board of directors have the ability to strongly influence or effectively control the appointment of our management, the entering into of mergers, sales of substantially all of our assets and other extraordinary transactions and influence amendments to our certificate of incorporation. Although Carlyle no longer owns a majority of our common stock, they have the ability to strongly influence the vote in any election of directors and could have the ability to prevent any transaction that requires stockholder approval regardless of whether others believe the transaction is in our best interests. In any of these matters, the interests of Carlyle may differ from or conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. Moreover, this concentration of stock ownership may also adversely affect the trading price for our common stock to the extent investors perceive disadvantages in owning stock of a company with a large stockholder.
We have historically paid Carlyle an annual fee for certain advisory and consulting services pursuant to a consulting services agreement. In connection with our IPO, the consulting services agreement was amended and restated and is in full force and effect until the earlier of the second anniversary of the consummation of the IPO and the date on which Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. and its affiliates collectively and beneficially own, directly or indirectly, less than 10% of our outstanding common stock. In addition, Carlyle is in the business of making investments in companies and may, from time to time, acquire interests in businesses that directly or indirectly compete with our business, as well as businesses that are significant existing or potential customers. Carlyle may acquire or seek to acquire assets that we seek to acquire and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us or may be more expensive for us to pursue.
We are not a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE rules. However, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements during a one-year transition period.
Since May 2025, Carlyle no longer owns a majority of our common stock. As a result, we are no longer a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the NYSE and the rules of the SEC. However, even though we are no longer a “controlled company,” we continue to qualify for, and may rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that would otherwise provide protection to stockholders of other companies during a one-year transition period concluding in May 2026. During this one-year transition period, we may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:
the requirement that a majority of our board of directors consist of “independent directors” as defined under the rules of the NYSE;
the requirement that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of directors who meet the NYSE independence standards for compensation committee members and that we adopt with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities;
the requirement that our director nominations be made, or recommended to our full board of directors, by our independent directors or by a nominations committee that consists entirely of independent directors and that we adopt a written charter or board resolution addressing the nominations process; and
the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees.
We do not currently and do not intend to rely on the exemptions listed above, however we may elect to rely on certain of these exemptions until the conclusion of the one-year transition period in May 2026. As a result, in the future, our board of directors and those committees may have more directors who do not meet the NYSE’s independence standards than they would if those standards were to apply. The independence standards are intended to ensure that directors who meet those standards are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.
Future sales, or the perception of future sales, by us or our existing stockholders in the public market could cause the market price for our common stock to decline.
The sale of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of our common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.
The shares of our common stock held by Carlyle, together with shares held by certain of our directors, executive officers and other affiliates, as that term is defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act (“Rule 144”), are “restricted securities” as defined under Rule 144 and subject to certain restrictions on resale. Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if they are registered under the Securities Act or are sold pursuant to an exemption from registration such as Rule 144.
Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, Carlyle has certain registration rights with respect to our common stock. Registration of any of these outstanding shares of common stock would result in such shares becoming freely tradable without compliance with Rule 144 upon effectiveness of the registration statement. If Carlyle exercises its registration rights, the market price of our common stock could drop significantly if the holders of these shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through future offerings of our common stock or other securities.
In addition, our shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2024 Plan, the ESPP and the Prior Plan will become eligible for sale in the public market once those shares are issued, subject to provisions relating to various vesting agreements, lock-up agreements and Rule 144, as applicable.
We may also issue our securities in connection with investments or acquisitions. The amount of our common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition could constitute a material portion of our then-outstanding common stock. Any issuance of additional securities in connection with investments or acquisitions may result in additional dilution to our stockholders and the securities issued may have rights that are senior to our common stock.
Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited.
We have historically funded our operations since our founding primarily through debt financings and cash generated from our operations. We intend to continue to make investments to support our growth and may require additional funds for such development, and additionally, our business and operations may consume resources faster than we anticipate. In the future, we may need to raise additional funds through the issuance of new equity securities, debt or a combination of both. Additional financing may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our capital requirements or invest in future growth opportunities. In particular, macroeconomic factors, including interest rate increases and bank failures have caused disruption in the credit and financial markets in the United States and worldwide, which may reduce our ability to access capital and negatively affect our liquidity in the future. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, our ability to develop our offerings, support our business growth, and respond to business could be significantly , and our business may be affected.
If we issue new debt securities, the debt holders would have rights senior to common stockholders to make claims on our assets, and any debt financing we secure may have higher interest rates and could restrict our operations, including our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. Furthermore, if we issue additional equity securities, existing stockholders will experience dilution, and the new equity securities could have rights senior to those of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus,
our stockholders bear the risk of our future securities offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their interest.
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade our common stock or our industry, or if there is any fluctuation in our credit rating, the price of our common stock and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock relies in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business or industry. We do not control these analysts. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover us downgrade our common stock or our industry, or the stock of any of our competitors, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or industry, the price of our common stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause the price of our common stock or trading volume to decline.
Additionally, any fluctuation in the credit rating of us or our subsidiaries may impact our ability to access debt markets in the future or increase our cost of future debt, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition, which in return, may adversely affect the trading price of shares of our common stock.
Some provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law may have anti-takeover effects that could discourage an acquisition of us by others, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or increase the cost of acquiring us, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These provisions include:
establishing a classified board of directors such that not all members of the board are elected at one time;
allowing the total number of directors to be determined exclusively (subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock to elect additional directors) by resolution of our board of directors, except that for so long as Carlyle has the right to designate at least one director to the board of directors pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, the prior written consent of Carlyle will be required in order to increase the number of directors to a number exceeding nine;
granting to our board of directors the sole power (subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock or rights granted pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement) to fill any vacancy on the board of directors, except that for so long as the Stockholders Agreement remains in effect, Carlyle will have the right to fill any vacancy resulting from the death, removal or resignation of a director designated by Carlyle as long as Carlyle continues to have the right to designate such director position;
limiting the ability of stockholders to remove directors without cause;
authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock by our board of directors, without further stockholder approval, to thwart a takeover attempt;
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent (and, thus, requiring that all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders);
eliminating the ability of stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders;
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at annual stockholder meetings; and
requiring the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of all outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class, to amend or repeal our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws.
Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder, generally a person, individually or together with any other interested stockholder, who owns or within the last three years has owned 15% of our voting stock, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. We have elected to opt out of Section 203 of the DGCL; however, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains a provision that is of similar effect, except that it will exempt from its scope Carlyle, and any of its direct or indirect transferees and any group as to which such persons or entities are a party.
In addition, Carlyle currently has the right to designate six of our nine directors and will continue to have the right to designate a majority of our directors until it owns less than 25% of our outstanding shares of common stock.
These provisions could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of the Company. They could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to take corporate actions other than those you desire.
Our board of directors is authorized to issue and designate shares of our preferred stock in additional series without stockholder approval.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors, without the approval of our stockholders, to issue shares of our preferred stock, subject to limitations prescribed by applicable law, rules and regulations and the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as shares of preferred stock in series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences, and rights of the shares of each such series, and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof. The powers, preferences, and rights of these additional series of preferred stock may be senior to or on parity with our common stock, which may reduce its value.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains a provision renouncing our interest and expectancy in certain corporate opportunities.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, none of Carlyle, the GIC Investor or any of their affiliates or any director who is not employed by us (including any non-employee director who serves as one of our officers in both his director and officer capacities) or his or her affiliates has any duty to refrain from (i) engaging in a corporate opportunity in the same or similar lines of business in which we or our affiliates now engage or propose to engage or (ii) otherwise competing with us or our affiliates. In addition, to the fullest extent permitted by law, in the event that Carlyle, the GIC Investor or any non-employee director acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or other business opportunity which may be a corporate opportunity for itself or himself or its or his affiliates or for us or our affiliates, such person has no duty to communicate or offer such transaction or business opportunity to us or any of our affiliates and they may take any such opportunity for themselves or offer it to another person or entity. For example, a director of our company who also serves as an officer, director, employee, agent, stockholder, member, partner or affiliate of Carlyle or its affiliates, or any of their respective portfolio companies or affiliated funds may pursue certain acquisitions or other that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, such acquisition or other may not be available to us. These potential of interest could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects if corporate are allocated by Carlyle or the GIC Investor to itself or its affiliates or its respective portfolio companies or affiliated funds instead of to us.
We currently do not intend to declare dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future and, as a result, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our common stock appreciates.
We currently do not expect to declare any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we anticipate that all of our earnings in the foreseeable future will be used to support our operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Any determination to declare or pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws and dependent upon a number of factors, including our earnings, capital requirements and overall financial conditions. In addition, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock may be limited by restrictions on our ability to obtain sufficient funds through dividends from subsidiaries, including restrictions under the covenants of the New Credit Agreement, and may be further restricted by the terms of any future debt or preferred securities. Accordingly, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment in the Company may be if the market price of our common stock appreciates and you sell your common stock at a profit. The market price for our common stock may never exceed, and may fall below, the price that you pay for such common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or federal district courts of the United States are sole and exclusive forum for certain types of lawsuit, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us, our directors, officers or employees.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws require, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed to us or our stockholders by any of our directors, officers, employees or agents, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine will have to be brought only in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or the federal district court for the District of Delaware or other state courts of the State of Delaware if the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction). Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws also require that the federal district courts of the United States of America are the forum for the resolution of any asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act; however, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision, and investors cannot waive compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. These provisions do not apply to any suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act, or any other claim for which the federal courts of the United States have jurisdiction, subject to applicable law.
The choice of forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our current or former directors, officers, other employees, agents, or stockholders, which may discourage such claims against us or any of our current or former directors, officers, other employees, agents, or stockholders and result in increased costs for investors to bring such a claim. We believe these provisions may benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of the DGCL and federal securities laws by chancellors and judges, as applicable, particularly experienced in resolving corporate disputes, efficient administration of cases on a more expedited schedule relative to other forums, and protection against the burdens of multi-forum litigation. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our amended and certificate of incorporation or our amended and bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may become subject to limitation.
As of December 31, 2025, we had U.S. federal and state disallowed interest expense carryforwards under Section 163(j) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), of approximately $786.0 million ($185.6 million tax effected). Our ability to utilize our disallowed interest expense carryforwards (the “Tax Attributes”) may become limited under Section 382 of the Code. The limitation applies if we experience an “ownership change,” which is generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in the ownership of our equity by certain stockholders over a rolling three-year period. The amount of the annual limitation
is generally equal to the product of the applicable long-term tax exempt-rate (as published by the IRS for the month in which the “ownership change” occurred) and the value of our outstanding stock immediately prior to the “ownership change.” If we have a net unrealized built-in gain in our assets immediately prior to the “ownership change,” the annual limitation may be increased as certain gains are, or are treated as, recognized during the five-year period beginning on the date of the “ownership change.”
We may undergo an “ownership change” due to future transactions in our stock, which may be outside of our control, and we cannot predict whether any future “ownership change” would result in a significant limitation on our ability to use our Tax Attributes to offset our taxable income and adversely affect our future cash flows.
Uncertainties in the interpretation and application of existing, new and proposed tax laws and regulations could materially affect our tax obligations and effective tax rate.
The tax laws to which we are subject or under which we operate are unsettled and may be subject to significant change. The issuance of additional guidance related to existing or future tax laws, or changes to tax laws or regulations proposed or implemented by the current or a future U.S. presidential administration, Congress or taxing authorities in other jurisdictions, including jurisdictions outside of the United States, could materially affect our tax obligations and effective tax rate. To the extent that such changes have a negative impact on us, including as a result of related uncertainty, these changes may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The amount of taxes we pay in different jurisdictions depends on the application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions, including the United States, to our international business activities, tax rates, new or revised tax laws, or interpretations of tax laws and policies, and our ability to operate our business in a manner consistent with our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements. The taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for pricing intercompany transactions pursuant to our intercompany arrangements or disagree with our determinations as to the income and expenses attributable to specific jurisdictions. If such a challenge or disagreement were to occur, and our position was not sustained, we could be required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties, which could result in one-time tax charges, higher effective tax rates, reduced cash flows and lower overall profitability of our operations. Our financial statements could fail to reflect adequate reserves to cover such a contingency. Similarly, a taxing authority could assert that we are subject to tax in a jurisdiction where we believe we have not established a taxable connection, often referred to as a “permanent establishment” under international tax treaties, and such an assertion, if , could increase our expected tax liability in one or more jurisdictions.
If we redeem or repurchase shares of our stock, we could be subject to an excise tax.
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposed a 1% excise tax on the fair market value of stock on certain repurchases (including redemptions) of stock by publicly traded corporations on or after January 1, 2023, subject to certain exceptions (including an exception that allows netting the amount of stock redemptions or repurchases against certain new issuances of stock). Subsequently, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued final regulations providing additional rules about this excise tax. On December 9, 2025, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program, effective immediately. The stock repurchase program authorizes us to repurchase up to $450.0 million of our common stock, subject to market conditions, contractual restrictions and other factors. As of the date of this report, $399.9 million remained available for repurchase under the stock repurchase program. If we redeem or repurchase shares of our common stock, we could be subject to this excise tax, unless we qualify for any of the exceptions that are provided in the Inflation Reduction Act, in the final regulations, or in other future laws, regulations or rules. Any such excise tax would be our liability and could increase the amount of tax that we are required to pay.
