insiderdeltaSEC filings, surfaced and scored

CoverageForm 410-K10-Q8-K13D13G13F

Fti Consulting, Inc

FCNCIK 0000887936 · Every Form 4 filed by insiders at this issuer. See financials →

Annual report (10-K)

Latest 10-K filed Feb 26, 2026. Sentiment + YoY language diff vs prior year. Read sections →

Signal:Neutral

Risk Factors:tone -0.0300Δ+0.000296% similar+45/-44 ¶

MD&A:tone -0.0046Δ+0.000587% similar+61/-60 ¶

Sentiment via Loughran-McDonald lexicon · YoY diff via Jaccard similarity + paragraph set difference.

Recent 8-K announcements

Per-item disclosure feed. Item 2.02 is the earnings release.

May 1, 2026no items parsed Mar 18, 2026no items parsed Mar 9, 2026no items parsed Feb 27, 2026no items parsed Dec 9, 2025no items parsed

YoY shift: Neutral

Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is 0.03pp more bullish than last year's.

Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.

Tone shift by section

The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.

Risk Factors

+0.02pp

Flat

Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.

MD&A

+0.05pp

Flat

Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.

Per-snippet highlights

Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.

Top insiders

Most active reporters at Fti Consulting, Inc

Name	Roles	Filings
Gunby Steven Henry	OfficerDirector	40
Linton Paul Alderman	Officer	30
Lu Curtis P	Officer	22
Paul Holly	Officer	17
Sabherwal Ajay	Officer	17

Showing 1-5 of 21

Per pagePage 1 of 5Next

Top performers

Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Fti Consulting, Inc. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.

#	Insider	Trades	Win rate	Avg	Median	Best	Worst
1	Paul Holly	8	88%	+9.5%	+10.3%	+12.4%	-0.2%
2	Sabherwal Ajay	5	80%	+3.4%	+0.6%	+9.6%	-3.5%
3	Ellis Vernon James	3	0%	-4.7%	-1.4%	-1.1%	-11.7%
4	Lu Curtis P	5	20%	-4.7%	-2.5%	+1.7%	-16.7%
5	Gunby Steven Henry	46	13%	-4.3%	-2.5%	+15.3%	-19.4%
6	Bartlett Mark S.	4	50%	-2.5%	-2.4%	+10.7%	-15.7%
7	Seeger Laureen	7	0%	-1.3%	-1.3%	-1.3%	-1.3%
8	Linton Paul Alderman	10	50%	-0.2%	-1.8%	+9.6%	-6.0%

All filings

217 Form 4 / 4-A filings, newest first

Filed	Insider	Top transaction	Shares	Price	Value
Jun 4, 2026	Costamagna Claudio Director	AGrant	1,616	$0.00	$0
Jun 4, 2026	Fanandakis Nicholas C Director	AGrant	1,616	$0.00	$0
Jun 4, 2026	Seeger Laureen Director	AGrant	1,616	$0.00	$0
Jun 4, 2026	Boglioli Elsy Lisa Director	AGrant	1,616	$0.00	$0
Jun 4, 2026	Robinson Stephen C Director	AGrant	1,616	$0.00	$0

Showing 1-5 of 217

Per pagePage 1 of 44Next

Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.

Filed		Top transaction	Shares	Price	Value

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

All of the following risks, uncertainties and factors could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity. In addition to the risks, uncertainties and factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report, other risks, uncertainties and factors not currently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial could, in the future, materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, financial results, cash flows and liquidity. Some of the risks, uncertainties and factors discussed below may have occurred in the past, but the disclosures below are not representations as to whether or not the risks, uncertainties or factors have occurred in the past, and instead reflect our beliefs and opinions as to the risks, uncertainties and factors that could materially and adversely affect us in the future.

Risks Related to Our Reportable Segments

Changes in capital markets, M&A activity, legal or regulatory requirements, general economic conditions and monetary or geopolitical disruptions, as well as other factors beyond our control, could reduce demand for one or more of our segment or practice offerings or services, in which case our revenues and profitability could decline.

Different U.S. and/or international factors outside of our control could affect demand for a segment’s practices and our services. These include: (i) fluctuations in U.S. and/or global economies, including economic downturns or recessions and the strength and rate of any general economic recoveries; (ii) the U.S. or global financial markets and the availability, costs, and terms of credit and credit modifications, including interest rate levels and inflationary pressures; (iii) level of leverage incurred by countries or businesses; (iv) M&A activity; (v) frequency and complexity of significant commercial litigation; (vi) overexpansion by businesses causing financial difficulties; (vii) business and management crises, including the occurrence of alleged fraudulent or illegal activities and practices; (viii) new and complex laws and regulations, repeals of existing laws and regulations or changes of enforcement of laws, rules and regulations, including antitrust/competition reviews of proposed M&A transactions; (ix) other economic, geographic or political factors, including wars and other geopolitical ; (x) widespread public health , including epidemics and pandemics and government restrictions or regulations enacted in response thereto, or employees’ to adhere to such restrictions; and (xi) general business or other conditions in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in which we conduct business or our employee population resides.

We are not able to predict the positive or negative effects that future events or changes to the U.S. or global economies will have on our business or the business of any particular segment or practice. Fluctuations, changes and disruptions in financial, credit, M&A and other markets, political instability, significant geopolitical conflicts and general business factors could impact various segments’ operations and could affect such operations differently. Changes to factors described above, as well as other events, including by way of example, contractions of regional economies, or the economy of a particular country, trade restrictions, sanctions, prohibitions or restrictions, or laws, regulations, or other conditions or limitations, on conducting business in certain geographies or with certain persons or governments or authorities, monetary systems, banking, real estate and retail or other industries; government shutdowns; inflation and interest rate fluctuations; debt or credit difficulties or defaults by businesses or countries; new, repeals of or changes to laws and regulations, including changes to the and competition laws of the U.S. or other countries; tort reform; banking reform; a in the implementation or adoption of new laws or regulations, or in government enforcement, or monetary or remedies that are sought; climate change; or political and wars may have effects on one or more of our segments or service, practice or industry offerings.

Our revenues, operating income and cash flows are likely to fluctuate.

We experience fluctuations in our revenues and cost structure and the resulting operating income and cash flows and expect that this will continue to occur in the future. We experience fluctuations in our annual and quarterly financial results, including revenues, operating income and earnings per share, for reasons that include: (i) the types and complexity, number, size, timing and duration of client engagements; (ii) the timing of revenues; (iii) the utilization of billable professionals, including the ability to adjust staffing levels up or down to accommodate the business and prospects of the applicable segment and practice; (iv) the number of new hires, their compensation and the time it takes before a new hire becomes profitable; (v) the departure of professionals in the ordinary course of business; (vi) the geographic locations of our clients or the locations where services are rendered; (vii) billing rates and fee arrangements, including the opportunity and ability to successfully reach milestones, and complete engagements and collect success fees and other outcome-contingent or performance-based fees; (viii) the length of billing and collection cycles and changes in amounts that may become uncollectible; (ix) changes in the frequency and complexity of government regulatory and enforcement activities; (x) business and asset acquisitions; (xi) fluctuations in the exchange rates of various currencies the U.S. dollar; (xii) wage and cost increases; and (xiii) other economic factors beyond our control.

The results of different segments and practices may be affected differently by the above factors. Certain of our practices, particularly our restructuring practice, tend to experience their highest demand during periods when market and/or industry conditions are less favorable for many businesses. For example, in periods of limited credit availability, reduced M&A activity and/or declining business and/or consumer spending, while not always the case, there may be increased restructuring opportunities that will cause our restructuring practice to experience high demand. On the other hand, those same factors may cause one or more of our other segments and practices, such as our M&A-related “second request” services in Technology, to experience reduced demand. The positive effects of certain events or factors on certain segments and practices may not be sufficient to overcome the negative effects of those same or other events or factors on other parts of our business. In addition, our mix of practice offerings adds complexity to the task of predicting revenues and results of operations and managing our staffing levels and expenditures across changing business cycles and economic environments.

We derive a portion of our revenues from large engagements. The loss of a large client or the completion of a major engagement can impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations if we do not obtain a sufficient number of new large engagements to replace lost clients or completed engagements. Our results are also subject to seasonal and similar factors, such as during the fourth quarter when our professionals and our clients typically take vacations. We may also experience fluctuations in our operating income and related cash flows because of increases in employee compensation, including changes to our incentive compensation structure and the timing of incentive payments, which we generally pay during the first quarter of each year, or hiring or retention payments, which are paid throughout the year. Also, the timing of investments or acquisitions and the cost of integrating them may cause fluctuations in our financial results, including operating income and cash flows. This volatility makes it difficult to forecast our future results with precision and to assess accurately whether increases or decreases in any one or more quarters are likely to cause annual results to exceed or fall short of previously issued guidance. While we assess our annual guidance at the end of each quarter and update such guidance when we think it is appropriate, unanticipated future can cause actual results to vary significantly from our guidance, even where that guidance reflects a range of possible results and has been updated to take account of partial-year results.

If we do not effectively manage the utilization of our professionals or billable rates, our financial results could decline.

Our failure to manage the utilization of our professionals who bill on an hourly basis, or maintain or increase the hourly rates we charge our clients for our services, could result in adverse consequences, such as non- or lower-revenue-generating professionals, increased employee turnover, fixed compensation expenses in periods of declining revenues, the inability to appropriately staff engagements with employees and/or independent consultants (including adding or reducing staff during periods of increased or decreased demand for our services, or redeploying staff to other practices or engagements), or special charges associated with reductions in staff or operations. Reductions in workforce or increases of billable rates will not necessarily lead to savings. In such events, our financial results may decline or be adversely impacted. A number of factors affect the utilization of our workforce, some of which we cannot predict with certainty, including general economic and financial market conditions; the complexity, number, type, size and timing of client engagements; the level of demand for our services; appropriate staffing levels, in light of changing client demands, expectations or market conditions; redeployment or utilization of staff across segments and geographic regions; competition; acquisitions; or the utilization of temporary independent consultants who may be compensated on a different or higher basis than certain employees, provide services under fixed-term and/or fixed-fee contracts that are not amenable to extension or early , or are not as disposed to redeployment to other client engagements, segments or practices. In addition, our global expansion into or within locations where we are not well-known or where demand for our services is not well-developed could also contribute to low or lower utilization rates in certain locations.

Certain practices within our segments may enter into engagements such as fixed-fee and time and materials with caps. Failure to effectively manage staff utilization and other aspects of alternative fee engagements may result in the costs of providing such services exceeding the fees collected by the Company. Failure to successfully complete or reach milestones with respect to contingent fee or success fee assignments may also lead to lower revenues or the costs of providing services under those types of arrangements may exceed the fees collected by the Company.

Factors that could negatively affect utilization in our segments include:

Corporate Finance — The completion of bankruptcy proceedings; the timing of the completion of other engagements; fewer and smaller restructuring (including bankruptcy) cases; a recovering or strong economy; easy credit availability; lower interest rates; fewer, smaller and less complex M&A and restructuring activity; and less capital markets activity or fewer complex transactions.

FLC — The settlement of litigation; less frequent instances of significant mismanagement, fraud, wrongdoing or other business problems that could result in fewer or less complex business engagements; fewer and less complex legal disputes;

fewer class action suits; the timing of the completion of engagements; less government regulation, less government enforcement activity, and fewer regulatory investigations; and the timing of government investigations and litigation.

Economic Consulting — Fewer, smaller and less complex M&A activity; less capital markets activity or fewer complex transactions; a reduced number of regulatory filings and less litigation, reduced or less aggressive antitrust and competition regulation or enforcement; fewer government investigations and proceedings; and the timing of client utilization of our services.

Technology — The settlement of litigation; a decline in volume and complexity of litigation proceedings and governmental investigations; a decline in volume and the timing of M&A activities and reduced or less aggressive enforcement of antitrust and competition regulations; the more rapid and successful integration of new and emerging technologies in client offerings, such as artificial intelligence (“AI”) or machine learning, by competitors, or the availability and engagement of independent consultants, which this segment, more than our other segments, relies on for staffing e-discovery and certain other types of client engagements.

Strategic Communications — Fewer event-driven crises affecting businesses; general economic decline that may reduce certain discretionary spending by clients; a decline in capital markets activity, including M&A; and fewer public securities offerings.

Our segments may face risks of fee non-payment, and clients may seek to renegotiate existing fees and contract arrangements and may not accept billable rate or price increases, which could result in loss of engagements, fee write-offs, reduced revenues and less profitable business.

In some cases, our segments are engaged by certain clients who are or anticipate experiencing financial distress or are facing complex challenges, are engaging in litigation or regulatory or judicial proceedings, or are facing foreclosure of collateral or liquidation of assets. This may be due to general economic conditions; lingering effects of past economic slowdowns or recession; or business- or operations-specific reasons. Such clients may not have sufficient funds to continue operations or to pay for our services. We typically do not receive retainers before we begin performing services on a client’s behalf in connection with a significant number of engagements in our segments. In the cases where we have received retainers, we cannot assure the retainers will adequately cover our fees for the services we perform on behalf of these clients. With respect to bankruptcy cases, bankruptcy courts have the discretion to require us to return all, or a portion of, our fees.

We may receive requests to discount our fees or to negotiate lower rates for our services and to agree to contract terms relative to the scope of services and other terms that may limit the size of an engagement or our ability to pass-through costs. We consider these requests on a case-by-case basis. We routinely receive these types of requests and expect this to continue in the future. In addition, our clients and prospective clients may not accept rate increases that we put into effect or plan to implement in the future. Fee discounts, pressure not to increase or pressure to decrease our rates, and less advantageous contract terms could result in the loss of clients, lower revenues and operating income, higher costs and less profitable engagements. More discounts or write-offs than we expect in any period would have a negative impact on our results of operations. There is no assurance that significant client engagements will be renewed or replaced in a timely manner or at all, or that they will generate the same volume of work or revenues or be as profitable as past engagements.

Certain clients prefer fixed and other alternative fee arrangements that place revenue ceilings or other limitations on our fee structure or may shift more of our revenue-generating potential to back-end contingent and success fee arrangements. With respect to such alternative fee arrangements, we may discount our rates initially, which could mean that the cost of providing services exceeds the fees collected by the Company during all or a portion of the term of the engagement. In such cases, the Company’s failure to manage the engagement efficiently or collect the success or performance fees could expose the Company to a greater risk of loss on such engagement than other fee arrangements or may cause variations in the Company’s revenues and operating results due to the timing of achievement of the performance-based criteria, if achieved at all. A segment’s ability to service clients with these fee arrangements at a cost that does not directly correlate to time and materials may impact or result in a of the of such engagements, affecting the financial results of the segment.

Our segments and practices could suffer competitive, reputational and business harm or increased liability or legal or regulatory action arising from the rapid introduction, integration, deployment, evolution and use of new technologies, including AI.

The benefits and risks of adopting and implementing new and emerging technologies, such as AI, necessitates, in most cases, our review and analysis of such technology and its risks and benefits on a service-by-service basis. The need for complex analysis could result in significant delays adopting AI and other technologies, which could adversely impact our competitive position; ability to market services; win new engagements; provide state-of-the-art services to clients; and attract, hire and retain members of our workforce, as compared to early adopters of such technologies. Furthermore, we may not be successful in our AI or other technology-related initiatives. Moreover, AI algorithms and training methodologies may be flawed and

datasets may be over-broad, insufficient or contain biased or inaccurate information. The adoption of new technologies, such as AI, may require the investment of significant capital, time and resources. Such investment could require the engagement of third parties or independent contractors and may interfere with the other duties of our management and employees. Leveraging AI capabilities for our internal functions and operations presents additional risks, costs and challenges, including those discussed in these risk factors. The development, adoption and use of AI technologies are still in the early stages and involve significant risks and uncertainties, which may expose us to legal, reputational and financial harm. In addition, AI and other technologies that are open source and available for no or low cost could result in low barriers to development and utilization, and additional competition from third parties, and the adoption and deployment of AI and other new and emerging technologies by competitors more rapidly or successfully than we do could materially adversely affect our competitive position and financial results.

New technologies, such as AI, continue to evolve and as a result, risks continue to be unknown or uncertain. We are increasingly applying AI-based technologies to our solutions and services, to how we deliver work for our clients, and in our own internal operations. As these technologies evolve, some non-expert services and tasks currently performed by our professionals have been and will continue to be replaced by automation, including AI-enabled solutions, which could lead to reduced demand for our services and/or adversely affect the utilization rate of our professionals, if demand for those services is not replaced by demand for new solutions and services or if the pace and level of spending on new solutions or services are not sufficient to make up any shortfall. If we are unable to introduce or if our clients do not accept new pricing or commercial models that reflect the value of these AI-enabled solutions, our results of operations may be adversely affected. There is no assurance that (i) we can successfully develop, integrate and deploy AI or other technologies in our business, (ii) such technologies will improve and our services, operations or , (iii) clients will accept the incorporation of such technology in our services, (iv) we can market the use of these technologies to prospective clients, (v) we can hire and retain staff with the required specialized knowledge and skills to utilize these technologies, (vi) new or heightened cybersecurity, data protection or other operational risks will not arise, (vii) we can identify, mitigate or recover from cybersecurity or other events that occur, (viii) we can protect and maintain the privacy of our employees and safeguard confidential and proprietary information, (ix) new laws, regulations or regulatory interpretations will not be adopted, or that compliance with any such requirements will not be , (x) material additional monetary and time expenditures will not be required, (xi) we can pass on costs of such technologies to clients, (xii) AI and other emerging technologies will be compatible with our existing systems and technologies, or (xiii) AI and other new technologies will not result in significant legal and other liabilities, , regulatory, reputational or operational issues, and ethical or other dilemmas. The above risks and potential effects could result in material consequences to our operations, reputation, client relationships, ability to market our services, and financial results.

Our Technology segment faces certain risks, including (i) industry consolidation and a highly competitive environment, (ii) downward pricing pressure, (iii) data breaches, (iv) technology changes and obsolescence, including AI and machine learning, and (v) failure to protect intellectual property (“IP”) used by the segment, which individually or together could cause the financial results and prospects of this segment and the Company to decline.

Our Technology segment faces significant competition from other consulting and/or software providers specializing in e-discovery and the management of electronic content. There has been considerable new development and evolution of technologies such as AI and machine learning, used to perform certain services. Rapid adoption and deployment by other companies in our industry could adversely affect our ability to offer and provide competitive services. Competitors may introduce new offerings and technologies that operate more quickly, provide better outcomes or are alternatives to our service offerings. If our competitors are more successful employing new technologies, such as AI and machine learning, our financial performance and operations, competitive position and reputation may be negatively impacted.

There continues to be consolidation of companies providing products and services similar to those offered by our Technology segment, which may provide competitors access to greater financial and other resources than those of the Company. Larger competitors may be able to react more quickly to new regulatory or legal requirements and provide similar services at lower prices, particularly with respect to hosting and e-discovery services.

The success of our Technology segment and its ability to compete depends significantly on our ability to safeguard client data. There is no assurance that we will not incur losses related to cyber incidents or malicious data breaches from external or internal sources in the future.

Our Technology segment also relies on the IP rights we license from third parties. There is no assurance that (i) the software we license to provide our services will remain competitive or technologically innovative, (ii) new, innovative or improved software or products will not be developed by others that will compete more effectively with the software or products we currently license or use to service our customers, or (iii) we can enter into licenses or other agreements on economically advantageous terms to utilize new or more innovative third-party software and products to provide our services. If our

Technology segment is unable to license or otherwise use competitively innovative or technologically advanced software and products to provide our services, we could be unable to retain clients, grow our business and capitalize on market opportunities, which would adversely affect our operating margins and financial results, competitive position and reputation.

We face certain risks relating to cybersecurity and the failure to protect the confidentiality of our or our client’s information against misuse or disclosure.

Maintaining the confidentiality of proprietary, confidential and trade secret information is critical to maintaining the trust of our clients, the success of our segments and the reputation of our company. In addition, our Technology segment is dependent on providing secure storage of, and access to, client information as a service. Our systems, which include those of third parties on whom we rely, may fail or not operate properly or become disabled as a result of network security failures. We are subject to and routinely face cyber-based attacks and attempts by hackers and similar unauthorized users to gain access to or corrupt our information technology systems. Such attacks, if successful, could harm our overall professional reputation, disrupt our business operations, cause us to incur unanticipated losses or expenses, and result in disclosures of confidential or proprietary information. We expect to continue to face such attempts. Although we seek to prevent, detect and these network security and have taken steps to mitigate the likelihood of network security , cyber-based attacks and other cyber events are evolving, and increasing in sophistication, including through the use of increasingly sophisticated and evolving AI technologies, and there can be no assurance that attacks by users will not be attempted in the future or that our security measures will be . If we to effectively protect the confidentiality of our clients’ or our own IP and proprietary information from disclosure or by our employees, contractors or third parties, the financial results of the affected segment or the Company and our reputation would be affected. There is no certainty that we or third parties on whom we rely can maintain the confidentiality, prevent the of our own or our clients’ information or mitigate related . As of December 31, 2025, we are not aware of any risks from cybersecurity , including as a result of any previous cybersecurity , that have materially affected us, including our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition, or that we believe are reasonably likely to have such an effect over the long term.

We may not manage our growth effectively, and our profitability may suffer.

We experience fluctuations in growth of our different segments, practices and services, including periods of rapid or declining growth. Periods of rapid expansion may strain our management team or human resources and information systems. To manage growth successfully, we may need to add qualified managers and employees and periodically update our operating, financial and other systems, as well as our internal procedures and controls. We also must effectively motivate, train and manage a larger professional staff. If we fail to add or retain qualified managers, employees and contractors when needed, estimate costs, or otherwise manage our growth effectively, our business, financial results and financial condition may suffer.

We cannot assure that we can successfully manage growth through acquisitions and the integration of the companies and assets we acquire or that they will result in the financial, operational and other benefits that we anticipate. Some acquisitions may not be immediately accretive to earnings, and some expansion may result in significant expenditures.

In periods of declining growth, underutilized employees and contractors may result in expenses and costs being a greater percentage of revenues. In such situations, we will have to weigh the benefits of decreasing our workforce or limiting our service offerings and saving costs against the detriment that the Company could experience from losing valued professionals and their industry expertise and clients.

Risks Related to Our Operations

Our operations involve financial and business risks that differ among the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions.

Our operations involve financial and business risks that differ among the U.S. and the different foreign jurisdictions in which we operate including: (i) cultural and language differences; (ii) various levels of FTI Consulting “brand” recognition; (iii) different employment laws and rules, employment or service contracts, compensation methods, and social and cultural factors that could result in employee turnover, lower utilization rates, higher costs and cyclical fluctuations in utilization that could adversely affect financial and operating results; (iv) foreign currency disruptions and currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies that could adversely affect financial and operating results; (v) differing legal and regulatory requirements and other barriers to conducting business; (vi) difficulties resolving the collection of receivables when legal proceedings are necessary; (vii) difficulties in managing our non-U.S. operations, including client relationships, in certain locations; (viii) disparate systems, policies, procedures and processes; (ix) failure to comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and anti-bribery laws of other jurisdictions; (x) higher operating costs; (xi) longer sales and/or collections cycles; (xii) potential restrictions or tax consequences resulting from the repatriation of foreign earnings, such as trapped foreign and importation or withholding taxes; (xiii) different or less political and/or economic environments; (xiv) wars

and other geopolitical conflicts; (xv) conflicts between and among the U.S. and countries in which we conduct business, including those arising from trade disputes or disruptions, the termination or suspension of treaties, or boycotts; (xvi) civil disturbances or other catastrophic events that reduce business activity; (xvii) political interference with our ability to conduct business in the applicable jurisdiction; (xviii) impact of public health crises, including varying governmental responses and requirements, client impacts and travel restrictions; (xix) failure to meet evolving governmental or client-related standards and requirements pertaining to sustainability and corporate responsibility-related issues; and (xx) physical risks associated with climate change, including rising temperatures, severe storms, energy disruptions, fires or wildfires, flooding and rising sea levels, among others.

If we are not able to quickly adapt to or effectively manage our operations in the geographic markets in which we conduct business, our business prospects and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Failure to comply with governmental, regulatory and legal requirements or with our Company-wide Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, Anti-Corruption Policy, Policy on Inside Information and Insider Trading, and other policies could lead to governmental or legal proceedings that could expose us to significant liabilities and damage our reputation.

We have a robust Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, Anti-Corruption Policy, Policy on Inside Information and Insider Trading, and other policies and procedures that are designed to educate and establish the standards of conduct that we expect from our executive officers, outside directors, employees, and independent consultants and contractors. These policies require strict compliance with U.S. and local laws and regulations applicable to our business operations, including those laws and regulations prohibiting improper payments to government officials. In addition, as a corporation whose securities are registered under the Securities Act and publicly traded on the NYSE, our executive officers, outside directors, employees and independent contractors are required to comply with the prohibitions against insider trading of our securities. In addition, we impose certain restrictions on the trading of securities of our clients. Nonetheless, we cannot assure our stakeholders that our policies, procedures and related training programs will ensure full compliance with all applicable legal requirements. Illegal or improper conduct by our executive officers, directors, employees, independent consultants or contractors, or others who are subject to our policies and procedures could damage our reputation in the U.S. and internationally, which could affect our existing client relationships or affect our ability to attract and retain new clients, or lead to or governmental or regulatory proceedings in the U.S. or foreign jurisdictions, which could result in civil or , including substantial monetary awards, and , as well as of profits.

Governmental focus on data privacy and security has increased, and could continue to increase, our costs of operations.

In reaction to publicized incidents in which electronically stored personal and other information has been lost, accessed or stolen, or transmitted by or to third parties without permission, U.S. and non-U.S. governmental authorities have proposed or adopted or are considering proposing or adopting data security and/or data privacy statutes or regulations, including the California Consumer Privacy Act as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, and the General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union. Continued governmental focus and regulation of data security and privacy may lead to additional legislative and regulatory actions, which could increase the complexity of doing business in the U.S. or the applicable jurisdiction. The increased emphasis on information security and the requirements to comply with applicable U.S. and foreign data security and privacy laws and regulations has increased, and is expected to continue to increase, our related costs of doing business and could negatively impact our financial results.

Changes to corporate income tax rates, legislation, rules and regulations and tax treaties in countries in which we operate may negatively impact our effective tax rate and financial results and increase our cash tax payment obligations.

Changes to corporate income tax laws and rules and regulations and tax treaties in jurisdictions where we pay taxes that increase rates, eliminate or reduce deductions or affect the utility or value of deferred tax assets or liabilities could negatively affect our reported financial results and increase our cash tax payment obligations. For example, to the extent the expansion of Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, which will become effective for the Company’s year ending December 31, 2027, reduces the amount of tax deductions available to us, our income tax expense would increase, which would reduce our net income.

We may be required to recognize goodwill impairment charges, which could materially affect our financial results.

We assess our goodwill and related intangible assets as required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S. to determine whether they are impaired and, if they are, to record appropriate impairment charges. Factors we consider include significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results and significant negative industry or economic trends. We have previously recorded impairment charges to the carrying value of goodwill of certain segments and it is possible that we may be required to record significant impairment charges in the future. Such charges have had and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We are exposed to certain physical and regulatory risks related to climate change, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Due to the global nature of our business, we are exposed to a variety of physical risks that may be exacerbated by climate change, including extreme temperatures, severe storms, energy disruptions, fires or wildfires, floods and rising sea levels, among others, all of which are beyond our control. There has also been increased regulation as well as focus from governmental organizations, and our investors, clients and employees, as well as other stakeholders and the media (including social media), on environmental- and sustainability-related issues. Governments and regulators in the U.S. and around the world have been enacting or revising laws and regulations regarding these issues and their priorities or requirements may not be reconcilable. The threats from environmental events could adversely impact our ability to maintain business continuity, and could impair access to our leased office space in affected geographies and the integrity of our information technology systems. Further, compliance with the disparate climate-related frameworks, including requirements related to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change by federal, state, local and foreign legislatures and governmental agencies could cause us to incur operational and other costs to comply, and if we to do so.

Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from governmental organizations, investors, clients and our colleagues with respect to our social-related practices and those of our clients may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new or additional risks, including reputational harm.

Differing (and often conflicting) perceptions, attitudes or legal pronouncements regarding the consideration of social-related characteristics based on race, gender, sexual orientation and other attributes are complicating our ability to attract and maintain an inclusive workforce and comply with disparate U.S. federal and state and foreign legislative and court decisions. Some U.S. states, recent U.S. court decisions, the federal government and third-party activists are restricting or otherwise attempting to influence how we make and manage recruiting, hiring and other employment decisions. This contrasts with regulations being adopted by certain foreign jurisdictions in which we operate, the demands of many of our investors and other stakeholders, as well as third-party proxy and other advisory firms who provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters, who encourage or demand heightened consideration of diversity-related factors, including the reporting of characteristics of our employee populations, as well as reporting of our recruitment, hiring and other employment processes. Consequently, our employment processes, human capital management, risk management and reporting functions have become more complicated. Any failure to comply with U.S. federal and state and international laws and regulations or court decisions, or to meet the evolving and disparate expectations of our investors, other stakeholders and interested parties, and the media (including social media), could result in legal or regulatory proceedings us, increased public , client , reputational , employee disenfranchisement, increased employee turnover and other in retaining, recruiting and hiring employees, which may give rise to or , and materially affect our business, financial results and stock performance.

Our business depends on our ability to use and access information systems, and modernize or replace such systems from time to time, and failure to effectively maintain such systems or modernize or replace systems could materially adversely affect our business and operations and harm our reputation.

We depend on multiple information systems, including our enterprise resource planning system, for operating our business and internal controls. We utilize commercially available third-party technology solutions, which in many cases are customized to our business needs. Our information systems may be compromised by power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, hackers, catastrophic events, human error and other events, many of which are beyond our control, and are subject to obsolescence and technological changes. Delays in implementing our information systems, upgrading such systems or failure of such systems to work properly or if any of them should become unavailable, could require us to expend substantial time, effort and costs to adjust our processes, implement changes or corrections, or repair or replace such systems, to carry out our operations, including preparation of our financial statements and to maintain the effectiveness of our internal controls. , or compromise of any such information system or material functions, could our reputation or our clients, and us to that could affect our business and results.

The compromise of confidential or proprietary information could damage our reputation, harm our businesses and adversely impact our financial results.

The Company’s own confidential and proprietary information and that of our clients or vendors could be compromised, whether intentionally or unintentionally, by our employees, consultants, contractors or vendors. In addition, physical risks associated with climate change, including energy disruptions, flooding, fires or wildfires, and other events, may adversely impact the integrity of our information technology systems. Any significant compromise of the security of our information technology systems leading to theft or misuse of our own or our clients’ proprietary or confidential information, or the public disclosure or use of such information by others, could result in losses, damages or penalties, third-party claims, reputational

harm and the loss of clients and other adverse business consequences, which could negatively impact our financial results or financial condition.

Furthermore, the use or misuse of social media by employees or others could reflect negatively on us or our clients and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The available legal remedies for the use or misuse of social media may not adequately compensate us for the damages caused by such use or misuse and consequences arising from such actions.

Risks Related to Our People

Our failure to recruit and retain qualified professionals and manage headcount needs and utilization could negatively affect our financial results and our ability to staff client engagements, maintain relationships with clients and drive future growth.

We deliver sophisticated professional services to our clients. Our success and future growth are dependent, in large part, on our ability to keep our supply of skills and human resources in balance with client demand around the world. To attract and retain clients, we need to demonstrate professional acumen and build trust and strong relationships. Our professionals have highly specialized skills. They also develop strong bonds with the clients they serve, which is a critical element in obtaining and maintaining client engagements. Our continued success depends upon our ability to attract and retain professionals who have expertise, good reputations and client relationships critical to maintaining and developing our business. We face intense competition in recruiting and retaining highly qualified professionals to drive our organic growth and support expansion of our services and geographic footprint. We incur significant expenses, time and resources to train, integrate and develop our professionals. We experience attrition of highly qualified professionals in the normal course of our business. We cannot assure that we will be to attract or retain any particular qualified professionals or replace those that choose to leave us, or maintain or expand our business. If we are to integrate, motivate, retain or replace qualified professionals, our ability to continue to secure or perform work may . Competition and third-party recruiting efforts targeting professionals with expertise relevant to our business have accelerated and have caused our costs of retaining and hiring qualified professionals to increase. That is a trend that we see continuing and that has contributed to and in the future is likely to continue to contribute to increased costs of operations and, in some cases, lower operating margins. In addition, the departure of one professional may lead to the departure of other professionals who have worked together here and desire to continue to work together elsewhere.

Despite fixed terms or renewal provisions, we face retention issues during and at the end of the terms of those agreements and large compensation expenses to secure extensions. There is no assurance we will be able to enter into new or extend existing employment agreements with professionals subject to written employment agreements. We monitor contract expirations carefully to commence dialogues with professionals regarding their employment in advance of the actual contract expiration dates. Our goal is to renew employment agreements when advisable and to stagger the expirations of the agreements if possible. Because of the concentration of contract expirations in certain years, we may experience high turnover or other adverse consequences, such as higher costs, loss of clients and engagements or difficulty in staffing engagements, if we are unable to renegotiate employment agreements or the costs of retaining qualified professionals become too high. The implementation of new compensation arrangements may result in the concentration of potential turnover in future years.

Our people are our primary assets and account for the majority of our expenses. During periods of reduced demand for our services, or in response to unfavorable changes in market or industry conditions, we may seek to align our cost structure more closely with our revenues and increase our utilization rates by reducing headcount and eliminating or consolidating underused locations in affected reportable segments or practices. Following such actions, in response to subsequent increases in demand for our services, including as a result of favorable changes in market or industry conditions, we may need to hire, train and integrate additional qualified and skilled personnel and may be unable to do so to meet our needs or our clients’ demands on a timely basis. If we are unable to manage staffing levels on a timely basis in light of changing opportunities or conditions, our ability to accept or service business opportunities and client engagements, take advantage of positive market and industry developments, and realize future growth could be negatively affected, which could impact our revenues and . In addition, while increased utilization resulting from headcount reductions may our in the near term, it could affect our business over the longer term by limiting the time our professionals have to seek out and cultivate new client relationships and new projects.

We incur substantial costs to hire and retain our professionals, and we expect these costs to continue and to grow.

We may pay hiring or retention bonuses to secure the services of professionals and maintain incentive compensation programs for their benefit. Payments have taken the form of unsecured general recourse forgivable loans, stock options, restricted stock, cash-based stock appreciation rights and other equity- and cash-based awards, and cash payments to attract and retain our professional employees. We may provide forgivable or other types of loans under our incentive compensation programs, or to new hires and professionals who join us in connection with acquisitions, as well as to select current employees

and other professionals on a case-by-case basis. The aggregate amount of loans to professionals is significant. We expect to continue issuing unsecured general recourse forgivable loans.

In addition, our Economic Consulting segment has contracts with select economists or professionals that provide for compensation equal to a percentage of such individual’s annual collected client fees plus a percentage of the annual fees generated by junior professionals working on engagements managed by such professionals, which results in compensation expenses for that segment being a higher percentage of segment revenues and Adjusted Segment EBITDA than the compensation paid by other segments. We expect that these arrangements will continue, and the Company has and will continue to enter into similar arrangements with other economists and professionals hired by the Company.

In some cases, however, we have been, and in the future expect that we will continue to be, unsuccessful in reaching agreement on compensation or other key employment terms with certain highly qualified professionals who then choose to leave the Company. Such professionals will often pursue other business and professional opportunities and may compete with the Company for clients and/or employees. These situations have increased, and we expect that they will continue in the future to increase, our costs to retain other professionals at the Company and impact our ability to retain existing clients and win new engagements.

We rely heavily on our executive officers and the heads of our segments and industry and regional leaders for the success of our business, the loss of whom may negatively impact our business and operations.

We rely heavily on our executive officers and our segment, industry and regional leaders to manage our operations. Given the highly specialized nature of our services and the scale of our operations, our executive officers and the heads of our segments and industry and regional leaders must have a thorough understanding of our service offerings, as well as the skills and experience necessary to manage a large organization in diverse geographic locations. We are unable to predict with certainty the impact that leadership transitions and the loss of certain employees in leadership roles may have on our business operations, prospects, financial results, client relationships, or employee retention or morale. If one or more of our leaders leave and cannot be replaced with a suitable candidate quickly, we could experience difficulty in securing and successfully completing engagements and managing our operations, which could harm our business, prospects and financial results.

Professionals may leave our Company to form or join competitors or clients, and the loss of such professionals may negatively impact our business and operations.

Our professionals typically have close relationships with the clients they serve, based on their expertise and bonds of personal trust and confidence. Therefore, the barriers to our professionals pursuing independent business opportunities or joining our competitors or clients are low. Although our clients generally contract for services with us as a company, and not with an individual, in the event that a professional leaves, such clients may decide that they prefer to continue working with a specific professional rather than with our Company. This has occurred in the past, and we expect that it will continue to occur from time to time in the future.

We may not have, or may choose not to pursue, legal recourse against professionals that leave our Company to join competitors or clients.

While our written employment agreements with our Senior Managing Directors and equivalent employees may include non-competition and non-solicitation clauses, such clauses may offer us only limited or no protections and may be unenforceable in one or more jurisdictions. Further, in certain jurisdictions, non-competition clauses have been abolished or banned. These restrictions on our ability to adopt or enforce non-competition and non-solicitation clauses may increase turnover and compensation costs to hire and retain professionals, and may adversely impact our ability to hire, maintain and increase headcount, and our ability to service and keep our clients and secure engagements.

When inclusion of a non-competition clause is appropriate, we have generally drafted the restrictions to seek to comply with applicable state law, including “reasonableness” standards regarding scope and duration. However, changes in state laws and rules and new court decisions can raise questions about the enforceability of contractual restrictions that, when originally agreed, appeared to be enforceable. In the case of employees outside the U.S., we draft non-competition provisions in an effort to comply with applicable foreign law. In the event an employee departs and acts in a way that we believe violates an applicable non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, we will consider any available legal remedies we may have against such person on a case-by-case basis. We may decide that preserving cooperation and a professional relationship with a former employee or client, or other concerns, outweigh the potential benefits of litigation or other options to seek legal or equitable remedies. We may also decide that the likelihood of success does not justify the costs of pursuing a claim. Accordingly, there may be times we may decide not to pursue legal action, even if it is available. If we do decide to pursue legal action, we will incur additional costs as a result of such action.

Our failure to achieve and maintain an inclusive workforce may impair our ability to attract and retain qualified employees, win and maintain clients, or attract investment, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results, as well as reputational harm.

As a global company, our talent and retention initiatives are designed to create an inclusive workforce. We believe that a workforce that reflects the myriad identities of our clients and vendors with whom we do business, our stakeholders and the populations of the regions in which we have operations results in best in class advice to our clients, improves the quality of our services, promotes employee satisfaction and retention, and increases the overall value of our business. We promote inclusion through education, training and development opportunities. Failure to maintain an inclusive workforce may adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Client Relationships

Damage to our reputation could result in material adverse consequences to our business and adversely impact our client engagements and financial results.

Damage to our reputation or the reputations of key members of our workforce could materially and adversely affect our business and operations in many possible ways, including among, other things: (i) difficulty retaining clients or securing client referrals or new clients; (ii) adverse publicity and public comments; (iii) activist social media and other campaigns targeting our or our clients’ businesses and activities; (iv) increased employee turnover or difficulty recruiting and hiring staff; and (v) public scrutiny. Given the frequently high-profile nature of the matters we work on, any factor that diminishes our reputation or the reputation of any of our professionals could put us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our business, prospects and financial results.

If we are unable to accept or continue client engagements due to real or perceived relationship issues, our revenues, growth, client engagements and prospects may be negatively affected.

From time to time we may decide that we cannot or should not accept an engagement from an existing or prospective client or represent multiple clients in connection with the same or competitive engagements. In addition, on occasion, we may decide that we should or must resign from a client engagement. Such decisions may negatively impact our revenues, growth and financial results. While we follow internal practices to assess real and potential issues in the relationships between and among our clients, engagements, segments, practices and professionals, such concerns cannot always be avoided. For example, we generally will not represent parties adverse to each other in the same matter. Under U.S. federal bankruptcy rules, we generally may not represent both a debtor and its creditors in the same proceeding, and we are required to notify the U.S. Trustee of real or potential conflicts. Even if we begin a bankruptcy-related engagement, the U.S. Trustee could find that we no longer meet the disinterestedness standard because of real or potential changes in our status as a disinterested party and order us to , which could result in of fees. Future acquisitions may require us to from a client engagement because of relationship issues that are not currently identifiable. In addition, businesses that we acquire or employees who join us may not be free to accept engagements they could have accepted prior to our acquisition or hire because of relationship issues.

Claims involving our services or adverse publicity could harm our overall professional reputation and our ability to compete and attract business or hire or retain qualified professionals.

Our engagements involve matters that may result in a severe impact on a client’s business, cause the client a substantial monetary loss or prevent the client from pursuing business opportunities. Our ability to attract new clients and generate new and repeat engagements or hire professionals depends upon our ability to maintain a high degree of client satisfaction, as well as our reputation among industry professionals. As a result, any claims against us involving the quality of our services may be more damaging than similar claims against businesses in other industries.

From time to time, we may accept clients or perform engagements that may be viewed as controversial or that generate adverse publicity relating to our involvement or the services that we provide, including work we do for clients in high emissions industries. Such controversial engagements or negative reactions may adversely affect our reputation or the reputations of our employees and other professionals who provide services, or may otherwise harm our ability to attract or retain clients, employees and other professionals, all of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, business or prospects.

We may incur significant costs and may lose engagements as a result of claims by our clients regarding our services.

Many of our engagements involve complex analysis and the exercise of professional judgment, including litigation and governmental investigatory matters where we act as experts. Therefore, we are subject to the risk of professional and other liabilities. Although we believe we maintain an appropriate amount of insurance, it is limited. Damages and/or expenses

resulting from any successful claim against us, for indemnity or otherwise, in excess of the amount of insurance coverage will be borne directly by us and could harm our profitability and financial resources. Any claim by a client or third-party against us could expose us to reputational issues that adversely affect our ability to attract new or maintain existing engagements or clients or qualified professionals or other employees, consultants or contractors.

Our clients may terminate our engagements with little or no notice and without penalty, which may result in unexpected declines in our utilization and revenues.

Our engagements center on transactions, disputes, litigation and other event-driven occurrences that require independent analysis or expert services. Transactions may be postponed or canceled, litigation may be settled or dismissed, and disputes may be resolved, in each case with little or no prior notice to us. If we cannot manage our work in process, our professionals may be underutilized until we can reassign them or obtain new engagements, which can adversely affect financial results.

The engagement letters that we typically enter into with clients do not obligate them to continue to use our services. Typically, our engagement letters permit clients to terminate our services at any time without penalty. In addition, our business involves large client engagements that we staff with a substantial number of professionals. At any time, one or more client engagements may represent a significant portion of a segment’s revenues. If we are unable to replace clients or revenues as engagements end or if clients unexpectedly cancel engagements with us or curtail the scope of our engagements and we are unable to replace the revenues from those engagements, eliminate the costs associated with those engagements or find other engagements to utilize our professionals, the financial results of the Company could be adversely affected.

We may not have, or may choose not to pursue, legal remedies against clients that terminate their engagements.

The engagement letters that we typically have with clients do not obligate them to continue to use our services and permit them to terminate the engagement without penalty at any time. Even if the termination of an ongoing engagement by a client could constitute a breach of the client’s engagement agreement, we may decide that preserving the overall client relationship is more important than seeking damages for the breach and, for that or other reasons, decide not to pursue any legal remedies against a client, even though such remedies may be available to us. We make the determination whether to pursue any legal actions against a client on a case-by-case basis.

Risks Related to Competition

If we fail to compete effectively, we may miss business opportunities or lose existing clients, and our revenues and profitability may decline.

The market for some of our consulting services is highly competitive. We do not compete against the same companies across all of our segments, practices, services, industries or geographic regions. Instead, we compete with different companies or businesses of companies depending on the particular nature of a proposed engagement and the types of requested service(s) and the location of the client or delivery of the service(s). Our operations are highly competitive.

Our competitors include large organizations, such as the global accounting firms and the large management and financial consulting companies that offer a broad range of consulting services; investment banking firms; IT consulting and software companies, which offer niche services that are the same or similar to services or products offered by one or more of our segments; and small firms and independent contractors that focus on specialized services. Some of our competitors have significantly more financial resources, a larger national or international presence, larger professional staffs and greater brand recognition than we do. Some have lower overhead and other costs and can compete through lower cost service offerings.

Since our business depends in large part on professional relationships, our business has low barriers to entry for professionals electing to start their own firms or work independently. In addition, it is relatively easy for professionals to change employers.

If we cannot compete effectively or if the costs of competing, including the costs of hiring and retaining professionals, become too expensive, our revenue growth and financial results could be negatively affected and may differ materially from our expectations.

Our competitors may adopt and deploy new technologies, such as AI and machine learning, more rapidly or successfully than we do, which may materially adversely affect our competitive position, operations and financial results.

We may face competition from parties who sell us their businesses and from professionals who cease working for us.

In connection with our acquisitions, we generally obtain non-solicitation agreements from the professionals we hire, as well as non-competition agreements from senior managers and professionals. The agreements prohibit such individuals from

competing with us during the term of their employment and for a fixed period afterward and from seeking to solicit our employees or clients. In some cases, but not all, we may obtain non-competition or non-solicitation agreements from parties who sell us their businesses or assets. The duration of post-employment non-competition and non-solicitation agreements typically ranges from six to 12 months. Non-competition agreements with the sellers of businesses or assets that we acquire typically continue longer than 12 months. Certain activities may be carved out of, or otherwise may not be prohibited by, these arrangements. We cannot assure that one or more of the parties from whom we acquire a business or assets, or who do not join us or leave our employment, will not compete with us or solicit our employees or clients in the future. States and foreign jurisdictions may interpret restrictions on competition narrowly and in favor of employees or sellers. Therefore, certain restrictions on competition or solicitation may be unenforceable. In addition, we may not pursue legal remedies if we determine that preserving cooperation and a professional relationship with a former employee or his or her clients, or other concerns, outweighs the benefits of any possible legal recourse or the likelihood of success does not justify the costs of pursuing a legal remedy. Such persons, because they have worked for our Company or a business that we acquire, may be to compete more effectively with us, or be more in soliciting our employees and clients, than unaffiliated third parties.

Risks Related to Acquisitions

We may have difficulty integrating acquisitions or convincing clients to allow assignment of their engagements to us, which can increase costs of, and reduce the benefits we receive from, acquisitions.

The process of managing and integrating acquisitions into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial, operational and managerial resources that would otherwise be available for the operation, development and organic expansion of our existing operations. To the extent that we misjudge our ability to effectively manage and integrate acquisitions, we may have difficulty achieving our operating, strategic and financial objectives.

Acquisitions also may involve a number of special financial, business and operational risks, such as: (i) difficulties in integrating differing corporate cultures and management styles; (ii) disparate policies and practices; (iii) client relationship issues; (iv) decreased utilization during the integration process; (v) loss of key existing or acquired personnel; (vi) increased costs to improve or coordinate managerial, operational, financial and administrative systems; (vii) dilutive issuances of equity securities, including convertible debt securities, to finance acquisitions; (viii) the assumption of legal liabilities; (ix) future earn-out payments or other price adjustments; (x) potential future write-offs relating to the impairment of goodwill or other acquired intangible assets or the revaluation of assets; (xi) difficulty or inability to collect receivables; and (xii) undisclosed liabilities.

In addition to the integration challenges mentioned above, our acquisitions of non-U.S. companies offer distinct integration challenges relating to foreign laws and governmental regulations, including tax and employee benefit laws, and other factors relating to operating in countries other than the U.S., which we have addressed above in the discussion regarding the difficulties we may face operating globally.

Asset transactions may require us to seek client consents to the assignment of their engagements to us or a subsidiary. All clients may not consent to assignments. In certain cases, such as government contracts and bankruptcy engagements, the consent of clients cannot be solicited until after the acquisition has closed. Further, such engagements may be subject to security clearance requirements or bidding provisions with which we might not be able to comply. There is no assurance that clients of the acquired entity or local, state, federal or foreign governments will agree to novate or assign their contracts to us.

The Company may also hire groups of selected professionals from another company. In such event, there may be restrictions on the ability of the professionals who join the Company to compete and work on client engagements. In addition, the Company may enter into arrangements with the former employers of those professionals regarding limitations on their work until any time restrictions pass. In such circumstances, there is no assurance that the Company will enter into mutually agreeable arrangements with any former employer, and the utilization of such professionals may be limited, and our financial results could be negatively affected until their restrictions end. The Company could also face litigation risks from group hires. Risks relating to claims or litigation relating to breach of applicable restrictive covenants by such new hires may result in the Company being subject to monetary damages, which could be significant, and could delay or restrict the ability of such new hires to provide services as employees of the Company.

We may have different systems of governance and management from a company we acquire or its parent, which could cause professionals who join us from an acquired company to leave us.

Our governance and management policies and practices will not mirror the policies and practices of an acquired company or its parent. In some cases, different management practices and policies may lead to workplace dissatisfaction on the part of professionals who join our Company following an acquisition. Some professionals of an acquired company may choose not to join our Company or leave after joining us. Existing professionals may leave us as well. The loss of key professionals may harm our business and financial results and cause us not to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

Our leverage could adversely affect our financial condition or operating flexibility if the Company fails to comply with operating covenants under applicable debt instruments.

Our senior unsecured bank revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”), or our other indebtedness outstanding from time to time, contains or may contain operating covenants that may, subject to exceptions, limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) create, incur or assume certain liens; (ii) make certain restricted payments, investments and loans; (iii) create, incur or assume additional indebtedness or guarantees; (iv) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to us from our restricted subsidiaries; (v) engage in M&A transactions, consolidations, sale-leasebacks, joint ventures, and asset and security sales and dispositions; (vi) pay dividends or redeem or repurchase our capital stock; (vii) alter the business that we and our subsidiaries conduct; (viii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates; (ix) modify the terms of certain indebtedness; (x) prepay, redeem or purchase certain indebtedness; and (xi) make material changes to accounting and reporting practices.

In addition, the Credit Facility includes a financial covenant that requires us not to exceed a maximum consolidated total net leverage ratio (the ratio of funded debt (less unrestricted cash up to $300.0 million) to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility).

Operating results below a certain level or other adverse factors, including a significant increase in interest rates, could result in us being unable to comply with certain covenants. Additionally, failure to attain or maintain certain credit ratings could result in our being required to secure the Credit Facility by the assets of substantially all of our wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries. rIf we violate any applicable covenants and are unable to obtain waivers, our agreements governing our indebtedness or other applicable agreement could be declared in default and could be accelerated, which could permit, in the case of secured debt, the lenders to foreclose on our assets securing the debt thereunder. If the indebtedness is accelerated, we may not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms or on terms that are acceptable to us. If our debt is in for any reason, our cash flows, financial results or financial condition could be materially and affected. In addition, complying with these covenants may cause us to take actions that are not to holders of our outstanding indebtedness and may make it more for us to execute our business strategy and compete companies that are not subject to such restrictions.

We and our subsidiaries may incur significant additional indebtedness.

We and our subsidiaries may incur substantial additional indebtedness, including additional secured indebtedness, in the future. The terms of the agreements governing our Credit Facility and other indebtedness limit, but do not prohibit, us from incurring additional indebtedness.

Our ability to incur additional indebtedness may have the effect of reducing the funds available to pay amounts due with respect to our indebtedness. If we incur new indebtedness or other liabilities, the related risks that we and our subsidiaries may face could intensify.

We may be unable to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness, and we may be forced to take actions to satisfy our payment obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, including the performance of our subsidiaries, which will be affected by financial, business and economic conditions, competition and other factors. We will not be able to control many of these factors, such as the general economy, economic conditions in the industries in which we operate and competitive pressures. Our cash flows may not be sufficient to allow us to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness and to meet our other obligations. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures or to sell assets, seek additional capital, or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be

successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements, including our Credit Facility, may restrict us from pursuing any of these alternatives.

In the event that we need to refinance all or a portion of our outstanding indebtedness before maturity or as it matures, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as the terms of our existing indebtedness or refinance our existing indebtedness at all. If interest rates or other factors existing at the time of refinancing result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, we will incur higher interest expense. Furthermore, if any rating agency changes our credit rating or outlook, our debt and equity securities could be negatively affected, which could adversely affect our financial condition and financial results.

Our Credit Facility is guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and will be required to be guaranteed by future wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries, including those that join us in connection with acquisitions.

Substantially all of our wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries guarantee our obligations under our Credit Facility. Future wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries, subject to certain exclusions, will be required to provide similar guarantees. If we default on any guaranteed indebtedness, our U.S. subsidiaries that are guarantors could be required to make payments under their guarantees, which could materially adversely affect our business and financial results.

Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our annual debt service obligations to increase significantly.

Borrowings under our Credit Facility bear variable rates of interest, including for U.S. Dollar borrowings at the Secured Overnight Financing Rate and, for borrowings in British Pounds, the Sterling Overnight Index Average, which expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and our cash flows could be adversely affected. An increase in debt service obligations under our variable rate indebtedness could affect our ability to make payments required under the terms of the agreements governing our indebtedness or our other indebtedness outstanding from time to time.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and liquidity and capital resources for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2025 and significant factors that could affect our prospective financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”). For a similar discussion and analysis of our results for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to our results for the year ended December 31, 2023, refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the United States (“U.S.”) Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 20, 2025. Historical results and any discussion of prospective results may not indicate our future performance.

Business Overview

FTI Consulting, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “FTI Consulting”) is a leading global expert firm for organizations facing crisis and transformation. Individually, each of our segments and practices is staffed with experts recognized for the depth of their knowledge and a track record of making an impact.

We report financial results for the following five reportable segments:

Our Corporate Finance segment focuses on the strategic, operational, financial, transactional and capital needs of our clients around the world. Our clients include companies, boards of directors, investors, private equity sponsors, lenders, and other financing sources and creditor groups, governments and other interested parties. We deliver a wide range of services centered around three core offerings: Transactions, Transformation and Turnaround & Restructuring.

Our Forensic and Litigation Consulting (“FLC”) segment provides law firms, companies, boards of directors, government entities, private equity firms and other interested parties with a multidisciplinary and independent range of services across risk & investigations and disputes, supported by our data & analytics technology-enabled solutions, with a focus on highly regulated industries. Our services are centered around five core offerings: Construction, Projects & Assets and Environmental Solutions, Data & Analytics, Dispute Advisory Services, Healthcare Risk Management & Advisory and Risk & Investigations, which includes our cybersecurity and financial services-related offerings.

Our Economic Consulting segment, including subsidiary Compass Lexecon LLC, provides law firms, companies, government entities and other interested parties with analyses of complex economic issues for use in international arbitration, legal and regulatory proceedings and strategic decision making and public policy debates around the world. We deliver a wide range of services centered around three core offerings: Antitrust & Competition Economics, Financial Economics and International Arbitration.

Our Technology segment provides companies, law firms, private equity firms and government entities with a comprehensive global portfolio of digital insights and risk management, artificial intelligence (“AI”) and data services. Our professionals help organizations better address risk as the growing volume and variety of enterprise and emerging data intersects with legal, regulatory and compliance needs. We deliver a wide range of expert and AI-powered solutions driven by five core client needs: Blockchain & Digital Assets, Information Governance, Privacy & Security, Investigations, Litigation, and M&A, Antitrust and Competition.

Our Strategic Communications segment develops and executes communications strategies to help management teams, boards of directors, law firms, governments and regulators manage change and mitigate risk surrounding transformational and disruptive events, including crises, transactions, investigations, disputes, regulation and legislation. We deliver a wide range of services centered around three core offerings: Corporate Reputation, Financial Communications and Public Affairs.

The Company renamed its Corporate Finance & Restructuring segment to Corporate Finance to better align with the segment’s business activities, structure and strategy, as of December 31, 2025. The segment name change did not result in any change to the composition of the segment and has no impact on previously reported financial information.

We derive substantially all of our revenues from providing professional services to both U.S. and international clients. Most of our services are rendered under time and expense contract arrangements, which require the client to pay us based on the number of hours worked at contractually agreed-upon rates. Under this arrangement, we typically bill our clients for reimbursable expenses, including those relating to travel, out-of-pocket expenses, outside consultants and other outside service costs. Certain contracts are rendered under fixed-fee arrangements, which require the client to pay a fixed-fee in exchange for a

predetermined set of professional services. Fixed-fee arrangements may require certain clients to pay us a recurring retainer. Our contract arrangements may also contain success fees or performance-based arrangements in which our fees are based on the attainment of contractually defined objectives with our client. This type of success fee may supplement a time and expense or fixed-fee arrangement. Success fees and other contractual terms may cause variations in our revenues and operating results due to the timing of when achieving the performance-based criteria becomes probable. Seasonal factors, such as the timing of our employees’ and clients’ vacations and holidays, may impact the timing of our revenue recognition across our segments.

In our Technology segment, certain clients are billed based on the amount of data storage used or the volume of information processed. Unit-based revenues are defined as revenues billed on a per item, per page or another unit-based method and include revenues from data processing and hosting. Unit-based revenues include revenues associated with licensed software products made available to customers via a web browser (“on-demand”). On-demand revenues are charged on a unit or monthly basis and include, but are not limited to, processing and review related functions.

Our financial results are primarily driven by:

• the number, size and type of engagements we secure;

• the number of billable professionals;

• the utilization rates of the billable professionals we employ;

• the rate per hour or fixed charges we charge our clients for services;

• the timing of revenue recognition;

• the length of the billing and collection cycles; and

• the geographic locations of our clients or locations in which services are rendered.

We define acquisition growth as revenues of acquired companies in the first 12 months following the effective date of an acquisition. When significant, we identify the impact of acquisition-related revenue growth.

When significant, we identify the estimated impact of foreign currency (“FX”) driven by our businesses with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar (“USD”). The estimated impact of FX on the period-to-period performance results is calculated as the difference between the prior period results multiplied by the average FX exchange rates to USD in the current period and the prior period results, multiplied by the average FX exchange rates to USD in the prior period.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In the accompanying analysis of financial information, we sometimes use information derived from consolidated and segment financial information that may not be presented in our financial statements or prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”). Certain of these financial measures are considered not in conformity with GAAP (“non-GAAP financial measures”) under the SEC rules. Specifically, we have referred to the following non-GAAP financial measures:

• Total Segment Operating Income

• Adjusted Segment EBITDA

• Total Adjusted Segment EBITDA

• Adjusted EBITDA

• Adjusted EBITDA Margin

• Adjusted Net Income

• Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share

• Free Cash Flow

We have included the definition of Segment Operating Income, which is a GAAP financial measure, below in order to more fully define the components of certain non-GAAP financial measures in the accompanying analysis of financial information.

We define Segment Operating Income as a segment’s share of consolidated operating income. We define Total Segment Operating Income, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as the total of Segment Operating Income for all segments, which excludes unallocated corporate expenses. We use Segment Operating Income for the purpose of calculating Adjusted Segment EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define Adjusted Segment EBITDA as Segment Operating Income before depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, remeasurement of acquisition-related contingent consideration, special charges and goodwill impairment charges. We use Adjusted Segment EBITDA as a basis to internally evaluate the financial performance of our segments because we believe it reflects core operating performance and provides an indicator of the segment’s ability to generate cash. We define Total Adjusted Segment EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as the total of Adjusted Segment EBITDA for all segments, which excludes unallocated corporate expenses.

We define Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as consolidated net income before income tax provision, other non-operating income (expense), depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, remeasurement of acquisition-related contingent consideration, special charges, goodwill impairment charges, gain or loss on sale of a business and losses on early extinguishment of debt. We define Adjusted EBITDA Margin, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of total revenues. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with our GAAP financial results and GAAP financial measures, provide management and investors with a more complete understanding of our operating results, including underlying trends. In addition, EBITDA is a common alternative measure of operating performance used by many of our competitors. It is used by investors, financial analysts, rating agencies and others to value and compare the financial performance of companies in our industry. Therefore, we also believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, considered along with corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide management and investors with useful supplemental information.

We define Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share (“Adjusted EPS”), which are non-GAAP financial measures, as net income and earnings per diluted share (“EPS”), respectively, excluding the impact of remeasurement of acquisition-related contingent consideration, special charges, goodwill impairment charges, the gain or loss on sale of a business and losses on early extinguishment of debt. We use Adjusted Net Income for the purpose of calculating Adjusted EPS. Management uses Adjusted EPS to assess total Company operating performance on a consistent basis. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with our GAAP financial results and GAAP financial measures, provide management and investors with useful supplemental information on our business operating results, including underlying trends.

We define Free Cash Flow, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as net cash provided by operating activities less cash payments for purchases of property and equipment. We believe this non-GAAP financial measure, when considered together with our GAAP financial results, provides management and investors with useful supplemental information on the Company’s ability to generate cash for ongoing business operations and capital deployment.

Non-GAAP financial measures are not defined in the same manner by all companies and may not be comparable with other similarly titled measures of other companies. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, the information contained in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included elsewhere in this report.

Full Year 2025 Executive Highlights

Financial Highlights

Year Ended December 31,

Percentage change

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenues

Special charges (1)

Net income

Adjusted EBITDA

EPS

Adjusted EPS

Net cash provided by operating activities

Total number of employees

(1) Excluded from non-GAAP financial measures, including Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS.

Revenues

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased $90.2 million, or 2.4%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, due to higher revenues in our Corporate Finance, FLC and Strategic Communications segments, which was partially offset by lower revenues in our Economic Consulting and Technology segments.

Special Charges

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded special charges of $25.3 million. The charges related to targeted headcount reductions in areas of each segment and region where we realigned our workforce with current business demand for our consulting services. The majority of the special charges were paid during the year ended December 31, 2025 and the remaining amounts will be paid in cash in the next three months.

The following table details the special charges by segment:

Year Ended

December 31, 2025

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Technology

Strategic Communications

Segment special charges

Unallocated Corporate

Total special charges

During the year ended December 31, 2024 , we recorded special charges of $8.2 million. The charges related to targeted headcount reductions in areas of each segment and region where we realigned our workforce with current business demand for our consulting services.

Net income

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased $9.2 million, or 3.3%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 . The decrease in net income was primarily due to higher direct costs, which includes the impact of an increase in variable compensation and forgivable loan amortization, as well as higher income taxes, special charges and interest expense. The decrease was partially offset by higher revenues and lower selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses, which include legal settlement gains.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased $59.9 million, or 14.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 12.2% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 10.9% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues and lower SG&A expenses, which include legal settlement gains. The increase was partially offset by higher direct costs, which includes the impact of higher variable compensation and forgivable loan amortization. Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 excludes the $25.3 million and $8.2 million special charges, respectively.

EPS and Adjusted EPS

EPS for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased $0.43 to $8.24 com pared to $7.81 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in EPS was primarily due to lower weighted average shares outstanding, which was partially offset by a decrease in net income, as described above.

Adjusted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased $0.84 to $8.83 compared to $7.99 for the year ended December 31, 2024. Adjusted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 excludes the $25.3 million and $8.2 million special charges, which increased Adjusted EPS by $0.59 and $0.18, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Allocation

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased $243.0 million to $152.1 million compared to $395.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher forgivable loan issuances, compensation and income tax payments, which was partially offset by an increase in cash collections. Days sales outstanding (“DSO”) was 88 days at December 31, 2025 and 97 days at December 31, 2024.

Free Cash Flow was an inflow of $93.6 million and $360.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The decrease in Free Cash Flow was primarily due to lower net cash provided by operating activities, as described above, and higher net cash used for purchases of property and equipment.

A portion of net cash provided by operating activities was used to repurchase and retire 5,264,916 shares of our common stock under our Repurchase Program for an average price per share of $163.07, at a total cost of $858.6 million, excluding commissions, during the year ended December 31, 2025. We had $491.8 million remaining under the Repurchase Program to repurchase additional shares as of December 31, 2025.

Headcount

The following table includes the net headcount additions (reductions) by segment and in total for the year ended December 31, 2025:

Billable Headcount

Corporate

Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Technology

Strategic

Communications

Total

Non-Billable Headcount

Total Headcount

December 31, 2024

Additions (reductions), net

December 31, 2025

Percentage change in headcount from December 31, 2024

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Segment and Consolidated Operating Results:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands, except per share data)

Revenues

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Technology

Strategic Communications

Total revenues

Segment operating income

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Technology

Strategic Communications

Total segment operating income

Unallocated corporate expenses

Operating income

Other income (expense)

Interest income and other

Interest expense

Income before income tax provision

Income tax provision

Net income

Earnings per common share — basic

Earnings per common share — diluted

Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Net income

Add back:

Income tax provision

Interest income and other

Interest expense

Depreciation of property and equipment

Amortization of intangible assets

Special charges

Adjusted EBITDA

Reconciliation of Net Income and EPS to Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EPS:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands, except per share data)

Net income

Add back:

Special charges

Tax impact of special charges

Adjusted Net Income

EPS

Add back:

Special charges

Tax impact of special charges

Adjusted EPS

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted

Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Net cash provided by operating activities

Purchases of property and equipment

Free Cash Flow

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to December 31, 2024

Revenues and operating income

See “Segment Results” for an expanded discussion of revenues, gross profit and SG&A expenses.

Unallocated corporate expenses

Unallocated corporate expenses decreased $19.8 million, or 13.4%, to $127.8 million compared to $147.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to legal settlement gains.

Interest income and other

Interest income and other, which includes FX gains and losses, decreased $7.0 million, or 67.9%, to a gain of $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to a gain of $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to a $4.3 million net FX loss for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to a $0.5 million net FX gain for the year ended December 31, 2024, as well as a $1.4 million decrease in interest income.

FX gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, relate to the remeasurement or settlement of monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. These monetary assets and liabilities include cash, as well as third-party and intercompany receivables and payables.

Interest expense

Interest expense increased $14.4 million, or 207.8%, to $21.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to higher borrowings on our senior unsecured bank revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”).

Income tax provision

Our income tax provision increased $29.5 million, or 41.7%, to $100.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $70.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Our effective tax rate of 27.0% in 2025 compared to 20.2% in 2024. The increase in the income tax provision was primarily due to a less favorable tax benefit related to share-based compensation, resulting from fewer non-qualified stock option exercises and an increase in valuation allowances against certain foreign deferred tax assets as compared to the prior year.

SEGMENT RESULTS

Adjusted Segment EBITDA

We evaluate the performance of each of our operating segments based on multiple measures of segment profit, including Adjusted Segment EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. The following tables reconcile Segment Operating Income to Adjusted Segment EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Year Ended December 31, 2025

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Technology

Strategic Communications

Unallocated Corporate

Total

Net income

Interest income and other

Interest expense

Income tax provision

Operating income

Depreciation of property and equipment

Amortization of intangible assets

Special charges

Adjusted EBITDA

Year Ended December 31, 2024

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Technology

Strategic Communications

Unallocated Corporate

Total

Net income

Interest income and other

Interest expense

Income tax provision

Operating income

Depreciation of property and equipment

Amortization of intangible assets

Special charges

Adjusted EBITDA

Total Adjusted Segment EBITDA

We define Total Adjusted Segment EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as the total of Adjusted Segment EBITDA for all segments, which excludes unallocated corporate expenses. The following table reconciles net income to Total Segment Operating Income and Total Adjusted Segment EBITDA, for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands)

Net income

Add back:

Income tax provision

Interest income and other

Interest expense

Unallocated corporate expenses

Total segment operating income

Add back:

Segment depreciation expense

Amortization of intangible assets

Segment special charges

Total Adjusted Segment EBITDA

Other Segment Operating Data

Year Ended December 31,

Number of billable professionals (at period end):

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Technology (1)

Strategic Communications

Total billable professionals

Utilization rates of billable professionals: (2)

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

Average billable rate per hour: (3)

Corporate Finance

FLC

Economic Consulting

(1) The number of billable professionals for the Technology segment excludes as-needed professionals, who we employ based on demand for the segment’s services. We employed an average of 602 and 776 as-needed employees during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

(2) We calculate the utilization rate for our billable professionals by dividing the number of hours that all of our billable professionals worked on client assignments during a period by the total available working hours for all of our billable professionals during the same period. Available hours are determined by the standard hours worked by each employee, adjusted for part-time hours, U.S. standard work weeks and local country holidays. Available working hours include vacation and professional training days, but exclude holidays. Utilization rates are presented for our segments that primarily bill clients on an hourly basis. We have not presented utilization rates for our Technology and Strategic Communications segments as most of the revenues of these segments are not generated on an hourly basis.

(3) For engagements where revenues are based on number of hours worked by our billable professionals and fixed-fee arrangements, average billable rate per hour is calculated by dividing revenues (excluding revenues from success fees, pass-through revenues and outside consultants) for a period by the number of hours worked on client assignments during the same period. We have not presented average billable rates per hour for our Technology and Strategic Communications segments as most of the revenues of these segments are not based on billable hours.

CORPORATE FINANCE

Year Ended December 31,

(dollars in thousands, except rate per hour)

Revenues

Percentage change in revenues from prior year

Operating expenses

Direct cost of revenues

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Special charges

Amortization of intangible assets

Segment operating income

Percentage change in segment operating income from prior year

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets

Special charges

Adjusted Segment EBITDA

Gross profit (1)

Percentage change in gross profit from prior year

Gross profit margin (2)

Adjusted Segment EBITDA as a percentage of revenues

Number of billable professionals (at period end)

Percentage change in number of billable professionals from prior year

Utilization rate of billable professionals

Average billable rate per hour

(1) Revenues less direct cost of revenues

(2) Gross profit as a percentage of revenues

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to December 31, 2024

Revenues increased $159.8 million, or 11.5%, to $1,551.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to higher demand for our turnaround & restructuring and transactions services, higher realized bill rates for our transformation and transactions services and an increase in success fees, which was partially offset by lower demand for our transformation services and lower realized bill rates for our turnaround & restructuring services.

Gross profit increased $83.4 million, or 18.4%, to $537.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Gross profit margin increased 2.0 percentage points from 2024 to 2025. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily due to a 2 percentage point increase in utilization and the impact of higher realized bill rates.

SG&A expenses increased $14.7 million, or 6.7%, to $234.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. SG&A expenses of 15.1% of revenues in 2025 compared to 15.8% in 2024. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to higher bad debt, outside services, infrastructure support, and other general and administrative expenses.

FORENSIC AND LITIGATION CONSULTING

Year Ended December 31,

(dollars in thousands, except rate per hour)

Revenues

Percentage change in revenues from prior year

Operating expenses

Direct cost of revenues

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Special charges

Amortization of intangible assets

Segment operating income

Percentage change in segment operating income from prior year

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets

Special charges

Adjusted Segment EBITDA

Gross profit (1)

Percentage change in gross profit from prior year

Gross profit margin (2)

Adjusted Segment EBITDA as a percentage of revenues

Number of billable professionals (at period end)

Percentage change in number of billable professionals from prior year

Utilization rate of billable professionals

Average billable rate per hour

(1) Revenues less direct cost of revenues

(2) Gross profit as a percentage of revenues

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to December 31, 2024

Revenues increased $74.5 million, or 10.8%, to $764.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to higher realized bill rates for our risk & investigations, data & analytics and construction solutions services.

Gross profit increased $48.9 million, or 21.7%, to $274.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Gross profit margin increased 3.2 percentage points from 2024 to 2025. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily due to higher realized bill rates.

SG&A expenses increased $1.4 million, or 1.0%, to $146.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. SG&A expenses of 19.2% of revenues in 2025 compared to 21.0% in 2024. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to higher compensation and infrastructure support expenses, which was partially offset by favorable litigation settlements.

ECONOMIC CONSULTING

Year Ended December 31,

(dollars in thousands, except rate per hour)

Revenues

Percentage change in revenues from prior year

Operating expenses

Direct cost of revenues

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Special charges

Segment operating income

Percentage change in segment operating income from prior year

Add back:

Depreciation of property and equipment

Special charges

Adjusted Segment EBITDA

Gross profit (1)

Percentage change in gross profit from prior year

Gross profit margin (2)

Adjusted Segment EBITDA as a percentage of revenues

Number of billable professionals (at period end)

Percentage change in number of billable professionals from prior year

Utilization rate of billable professionals

Average billable rate per hour

(1) Revenues less direct cost of revenues

(2) Gross profit as a percentage of revenues

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to December 31, 2024

Revenues decreased $142.7 million, or 16.5%, to $720.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which included a 1.2% estimated positive impact from FX. Excluding the estimated impact from FX, revenues decreased $153.5 million, or 17.8%. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to lower demand for our M&A-related antitrust and non-M&A-related antitrust services, which was partially offset by higher demand for our financial economics services, as well as higher realized bill rates for our non-M&A-related antitrust and M&A-related antitrust services.

Gross profit decreased $92.8 million, or 39.5%, to $142.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Gross profit margin decreased 7.5 percentage points from 2024 to 2025. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to a 7 percentage point decrease in utilization and higher forgivable loan amortization expenses, which was partially offset by higher realized bill rates for our non-M&A-related antitrust and M&A-related antitrust services and lower compensation expenses, including the impact of an 8.6% decline in billable headcount.

SG&A expenses decreased $8.5 million, or 6.5%, to $122.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which included a 1.3% estimated negative impact from FX. SG&A expenses of 17.0% of revenues in 2025 compared to 15.2% of revenues in 2024. The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily driven by lower bad debt expense.

TECHNOLOGY

Year Ended December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

Revenues

Percentage change in revenues from prior year

Operating expenses

Direct cost of revenues

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Special charges

Segment operating income

Percentage change in segment operating income from prior year

Add back:

Depreciation of property and equipment

Special charges

Adjusted Segment EBITDA

Gross profit (1)

Percentage change in gross profit from prior year

Gross profit margin (2)

Adjusted Segment EBITDA as a percentage of revenues

Number of billable professionals (at period end) (3)

Percentage change in number of billable professionals from prior year

(1) Revenues less direct cost of revenues

(2) Gross profit as a percentage of revenues

(3) Includes personnel involved in direct client assistance and billable consultants and excludes professionals employed on an as-needed basis

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to December 31, 2024

Revenues decreased $43.8 million, or 10.5%, to $373.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to lower demand for our M&A-related “second request” services.

Gross profit decreased $21.2 million, or 14.6%, to $123.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Gross profit margin decreased 1.6 percentage points from 2024 to 2025. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to lower profitability of our processing, hosting and managed review services, primarily resulting from the decline in revenues from our M&A-related “second request” services, which was partially offset by an increase in profitability of our consulting services.

SG&A expenses decreased $8.7 million, or 8.5%, to $93.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. SG&A expenses of 25.1% of revenues in 2025 compared with 24.6% of revenues in 2024. The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to lower compensation, travel and entertainment and outside services expenses.

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS

Year Ended December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

Revenues

Percentage change in revenues from prior year

Operating expenses

Direct cost of revenues

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Special charges

Amortization of intangible assets

Segment operating income

Percentage change in segment operating income from prior year

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets

Special charges

Adjusted Segment EBITDA

Gross profit (1)

Percentage change in gross profit from prior year

Gross profit margin (2)

Adjusted Segment EBITDA as a percentage of revenues

Number of billable professionals (at period end)

Percentage change in number of billable professionals from prior year

(1) Revenues less direct cost of revenues

(2) Gross profit as a percentage of revenues

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to December 31, 2024

Revenues increased $42.4 million, or 12.6%, to $378.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which included a 1.5% estimated positive impact from FX. Excluding the estimated impact from FX, revenues increased $37.4 million, or 11.1%, primarily due to higher demand for our corporate reputation services and an $18.2 million increase in pass-through revenues.

Gross profit increased $17.3 million, or 14.1%, to $140.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Gross profit margin increased 0.5 percentage points from 2024 to 2025. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily due to lower compensation expenses as a percentage of revenues, which included a 7.5% decline in billable headcount. This increase was partially offset by higher pass-through revenues and expenses.

SG&A expenses were flat over the prior year period at $76.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which included a 1.7% estimated negative impact from FX. SG&A expenses were 20.2% of revenues in 2025 compared to 22.7% in 2024.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

Our annual cash flows from operations generally exceed our cash needs for capital expenditures and debt service requirements. We typically finance our day-to-day operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions and share repurchases through cash flows from operations. We believe that our cash flows from operations, supplemented by borrowings under our Credit Facility, as necessary, will provide adequate cash to fund our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.

Our operating assets and liabilities consist primarily of billed and unbilled accounts receivable, notes receivable from employees, accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued compensation expenses. The timing of billings and collections of receivables, as well as compensation and vendor payments, affects the changes in these balances.

Results of operations for our non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated from the designated functional currency to our reporting currency of USD. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for each month, while assets and liabilities are translated at balance sheet date exchange rates and certain equity transactions are translated at historical rates. Resulting net translation adjustments are recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.”

Uncertainties and Trends Affecting Liquidity

Our conclusion that we will be able to fund our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months by using existing capital resources and cash generated from operations does not take into account events beyond our control that could result in a material adverse impact on our business, the impact of any future acquisitions or unexpected significant changes in the number of employees or other unanticipated uses of cash. The anticipated cash needs of our business could change significantly if we pursue and complete additional business acquisitions, if our business plans change, if events such as economic, political and workforce disruptions arise, including any impact of future public health crises, or economic, political or business conditions change from those currently prevailing or from those now anticipated, or if unexpected circumstances or other events beyond our control arise that may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow or profitability of our business, including material negative changes in the health and welfare of our employees or those of our clients, and the operating performance or financial results of our business. Any of these events or circumstances, including any new business , could involve significant additional funding and could require us to borrow under our Credit Facility or raise additional debt or equity funding to meet those needs. Our ability to borrow or raise additional capital, if necessary, is subject to a variety of factors that we cannot predict with certainty, including:

• our future profitability;

• the quality of our accounts receivable;

• our relative levels of debt and equity;

• the volatility and overall condition of the capital markets; and

• the market prices of our securities.

Any new debt funding, if available, may be on terms less favorable to us than our Credit Facility. See information under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31,

Cash Flows

(dollars in thousands)

Net cash provided by operating activities

Net cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

DSO (1)

(1) DSO is a performance measure used to assess how quickly revenues are collected by the Company. We calculate DSO at the end of each reporting period by dividing accounts receivable, net reduced by billings in excess of services provided, by revenues for the quarter, adjusted for changes in foreign exchange rates. We multiply the result by the number of days in the quarter.

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to December 31, 2024

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $243.0 million to $152.1 million compared to $395.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher forgivable loan issuances, compensation payments and income tax payments, which was partially offset by an increase in cash collections. DSO was 88 and 97 days as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $48.4 million to $58.5 million compared to $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was due to a $23.1 million increase in capital expenditures, primarily related to higher spend on leasehold improvements as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, as well as the prior year maturity of a short-term investment of $25.2 million, which created an inflow in the comparative prior year period.

Net cash used in financing activities increased $495.1 million to $510.5 million compared to $15.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in net cash used in financing activities was primarily due to an increase of $848.5 million in payments for common stock repurchases under the Repurchase Program, which was partially offset by an increase in net borrowings of $365.0 million under our Credit Facility compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.

The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents had a favorable impact of $21.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to an unfavorable impact of $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Cash paid for income taxes and tax credits, net of tax refunds, included $28.9 million and $40.6 million of payments for the purchase of tax credits during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Principal Sources of Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2025, our capital resources included $265.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and available borrowing capacity of $535.0 million under the revolving line of credit under our Credit Facility. The $900.0 million revolving line of credit under our Credit Facility includes a $125.0 million sublimit for borrowings in currencies other than USD, including the euro, British pound, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Swiss franc and Japanese yen.

The availability of borrowings, as well as issuances and extensions of letters of credit under our Credit Facility, are subject to specified conditions. Subject to certain conditions, at any time prior to maturity, we will be able to invite existing and new lenders to increase the size of the facility up to a maximum of $1.2 billion. See Note 13, “Debt” in Part II, Item 8, of this Annual Report for a further discussion of variable interest rates and guarantees under the Credit Facility.

The second amended and restated credit agreement entered into on November 21, 2022 (the “Credit Agreement”) governing the Credit Facility and our other indebtedness outstanding from time to time contains covenants that, among other things, may limit our ability to: incur additional indebtedness; create liens; pay dividends on our capital stock, make distributions or repurchases of our capital stock or make specified other restricted payments; consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets; guarantee obligations of other entities or our foreign subsidiaries; enter into hedging agreements; enter into transactions with affiliates or related persons; or engage in any business other than consulting-related businesses. In addition, the Credit Agreement includes a financial covenant that requires us not to exceed a maximum consolidated total net

leverage ratio (the ratio of funded debt (less unrestricted cash up to $300.0 million) to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement). As of December 31, 2025, we were in compliance with the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. See Note 13, “Debt” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for a further discussion of the Credit Agreement.

Principal Uses of Capital Resources

Future Capital Requirements

We anticipate that our future capital requirements will principally consist of funds required for:

• operating and general corporate expenses;

• capital expenditures, primarily for information technology equipment and systems, office furniture and leasehold improvements;

• debt service requirements, including interest payments;

• compensation to designated executive management and senior managing directors under our various long-term incentive compensation programs, including forgivable loans;

• discretionary funding of the Repurchase Program;

• contingent obligations related to our acquisitions;

• potential acquisitions of businesses; and

• other known future contractual obligations.

Capital Expenditures

During 2025, we spent $58.5 million in capital expenditures to support our organization. During 2026, we currently expect to make capital expenditures to support our organization in an aggregate amount of between $48 million and $58 million. Our estimate takes into consideration the needs of our existing businesses but does not include the impact of any expenditures that we may be required to make as a result of future acquisitions or specific client engagements that are not completed or not currently contemplated. Our capital expenditure requirements may change if our staffing levels or technology needs change significantly from what we currently anticipate, if we are required to purchase additional equipment specifically to support new client engagements or if we pursue and complete acquisitions.

Share Repurchase Program

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we made $858.7 million in payments, including commissions, for common stock repurchases under the Repurchase Program. We had $491.8 million remaining under the Repurchase Program to repurchase additional shares as of December 31, 2025.

Future Contractual Obligations

Our future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2025 include long-term obligations of $365.0 million related to outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. For more information on our Credit Facility, refer to Note 13, “Debt” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report. Under our operating leases as described in Note 14, “Leases” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, we have current obligations of $37.2 million and non-current obligations of $224.5 million as of December 31, 2025.

The above amounts reflect future unconditional payments and are based on the terms of the relevant agreements, appropriate classification of items under GAAP currently in effect and certain assumptions such as interest rates. Future events could cause actual payments to differ from these amounts.

On November 21, 2025, we entered into a material lease agreement to accept possession of three leases (the “Leases”) for our new office space in London, England. We expect to accept possession of the premises on or about September 25, 2027, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The Leases will have a fixed term of 15 years, subject to a break option allowing the tenant, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to terminate the Leases at the end of the 10th year. At the end of the initial 15-year term, the tenant has a one-time contractual right to renew each of the Leases for a term of either five years or ten years. Fixed rental payments under the Leases are scheduled to commence in February 2028, payable in quarterly installments, and will aggregate to approximately $115.0 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we were contingently liable under bank guarantees issued in favor of third parties that totaled $17.5 million and $10.9 million, respectively. These bank guarantees primarily support bid and performance obligations and operating leases for office space. The amounts are guaranteed under guarantee facilities totaling $32.5 million and $42.7 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We had $15.0 million and $31.8 million available under the guarantee facilities as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. These bank guarantees are issued separately from our Credit Facility and, as a result, do not affect available borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility.

Critical Accounting Estimates

General. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which we have prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Refer to Note 1, “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for further information on our significant accounting policies.

We evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenues, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes and contingencies, on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on current facts and circumstances, historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable, which form the basis for making judgments about the values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that the following critical accounting estimates reflect our more significant judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. We generate the majority of our revenues by providing consulting services to our clients. We recognize revenues primarily from three different types of arrangements: time and expense, fixed-fee and performance-based or contingent arrangements.

Certain fees in our time and expense arrangements may be subject to approval by a third-party, such as a bankruptcy court or other regulatory agency. In such cases, we record revenues based on the amount we estimate we will be entitled to receive in exchange for our services and only to the extent a significant reversal of revenues is not likely to occur when the uncertainty associated with the estimate is subsequently resolved.

In fixed-fee arrangements, we agree to a pre-established fee in exchange for a predetermined set of professional services. We estimate revenues using a proportional performance method, which is based on work completed to-date versus our estimates of the total services to be performed over the life of the contract.

In performance-based or contingent arrangements, fees are based on contractually defined objectives, such as completing a business transaction or assisting the client in achieving a specific business objective. Variable consideration to be included in the transaction price is typically estimated using the expected value method or the most likely amount method based on facts and circumstances. We recognize revenues earned in an amount that is probable not to reverse and by applying the proportional performance method when the criteria for over time revenue recognition are met.

Our estimates are monitored continually throughout the life of each contract and are based on the nature of the engagement, client economics, historical experiences, available information and other appropriate factors. While we believe that our estimates and assumptions used for revenue recognition are reasonable, subsequent changes could materially impact our results of operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We evaluate our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually as of the first day of the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We assess our goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level.

As part of the evaluation of goodwill and intangible assets for potential impairment, we exercise judgment to:

• Perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than it’s carrying value. Factors we consider when making the determination include assessing macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, and other relevant reporting unit specific events;

• Decide whether to bypass the qualitative assessment and perform a quantitative assessment. Factors we consider when making this determination include changes in the Company or general economic conditions since the previous quantitative assessment was performed, the amount by which the fair value exceeded the carrying value at that time and the period of time that has passed since such quantitative assessment; and

• Perform a quantitative assessment by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with the carrying amount of that reporting unit. We estimate fair value using a combination of an income approach (based on discounted cash flows) and market approach, using appropriate weighting factors.

The cash flows employed in the income approach are based on our most recent forecasts, budgets and business plans, as well as various growth rate assumptions for years beyond the current business plan period, discounted using an estimated weighted average cost of capital, which reflects an assessment of the risk inherent in the future revenue streams and cash flows. In the market approach, we utilize market multiples derived from comparable guideline companies. These valuations are based on estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows, determination of appropriate comparable guideline companies and the determination of whether a premium or discount should be applied to such comparable guideline companies.

The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill requires significant judgment and estimates. In 2025, we performed our annual impairment tests for each of our reporting units. The results of that test indicated that for each of our reporting units, no impairment existed. If market conditions significantly deteriorate from our current assumptions regarding forecasted cash flows, we may be required to record goodwill impairment charges in future periods. It is not possible at this time to determine if any future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such charge would be material.

Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. These events or changes in circumstances may include a significant deterioration of operating results, changes in business plans or changes in anticipated future cash flows. If an impairment indicator is present, we evaluate recoverability of assets to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying value of the assets with future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. We group assets at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. If the total of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset group, we estimate the fair value of the asset group to determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized. No impairment charges for intangible assets were recorded in 2025.

Income Taxes. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we estimate our income taxes for each of our legal entities in its respective jurisdiction. Differences which are temporary in nature result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets.

Subsequent to the initial recognition of deferred tax assets, we assess the likelihood that such deferred tax assets will be realized. We weigh all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and historical results of operations, and if we determine that we may not fully derive the benefit from a deferred tax asset, we consider whether it would be appropriate to apply a valuation allowance against the applicable deferred tax asset. The weight we give to any particular item is, in part, dependent upon the degree to which it can be objectively verified. Pre-tax operating losses on a three-year cumulative basis or lack of sustainable profitability are considered objectively verifiable evidence and will generally outweigh a projection of future taxable income.

Certain of our legal entities have individually experienced operating losses on a three-year cumulative basis or have tax attributes that we have determined may expire unused. In addition, some of our legal entities have recorded a valuation allowance on all or a portion of their deferred tax assets due to the combined effect of operating losses in certain subsidiaries of these entities. Based on all available evidence, we have determined that there is not available objective evidence of a greater than 50% likelihood that the deferred tax assets held by these entities will be realized. Consequently, we have recorded valuation allowances on the deferred tax assets held by these entities as of December 31, 2025. Refer to Note 16, “Income Taxes” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for further information on income taxes.

Fti Consulting, Inc

Annual report (10-K)

Recent 8-K announcements

Tone shift by section

Language change vs prior 10-K

Language change vs prior 10-K

External resources

Permalink

Top insiders

Top performers

All filings

Tone shift by section

Language change vs prior 10-K

Language change vs prior 10-K

External resources

Permalink

Risk Factors (Item 1A)

MD&A (Item 7)