PTEN Patterson Uti Energy Inc - 10-K
0000889900-26-000013Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is -0.03pp more bearish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase- declined+3
- adversely+1
- disputes+1
- negatively+1
- expose+1
- enabled+2
- profitability+1
- effective+1
- enable+1
- leading+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
14,465 words
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
You should consider each of the following factors as well as the other information in this Report in evaluating our business and our prospects. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations
could be harmed. You should also refer to the other information set forth in this Report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes.
Risk Factors Summary
The following is a summary of the principal risks included in this Report that we believe could adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations:
Business and Operating Risks
• We are dependent on the oil and natural gas industry and market prices for oil and natural gas. Declines in customers’ operating and capital expenditures and in oil and natural gas prices may adversely affect our operating results.
• Global economic conditions may adversely affect our operating results.
• A surplus of equipment and a highly competitive oil service industry may adversely affect our utilization and profit margins and the carrying value of our assets.
• Our operations are subject to a number of operational risks, including environmental and weather risks, which could expose us to significant losses and damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us.
• Our backlog of contract drilling revenue has declined in recent years and may not ultimately be realized, as fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment.
• New technologies may cause our operating methods, equipment, products and services to become less competitive, and higher levels of capital expenditures may be necessary to remain competitive.
• Loss of key personnel and competition for experienced personnel may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.
• The loss or consolidation of key customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
• Shortages, delays in delivery, and interruptions in supply, of equipment and materials could adversely affect our operating results.
• Our business is subject to cybersecurity risks and threats.
• Our commitments under supply agreements could exceed our requirements, exposing us to risks including price, timing of delivery and quality of equipment and materials upon which our business relies.
• Growth through acquisitions, the building or upgrading of equipment and the development of technology is not assured.
• Complications with the design or implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system could adversely impact our business and operations.
• Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas could reduce demand for oil and natural gas, which would, in turn, reduce the demand for our services.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
• The adoption of any future federal, state, or local laws or implementing regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting or banning, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete natural gas and oil wells and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
• Our and our customers’ operations are subject to a number of risks arising out of the threat of climate change that could result in increased operating and capital costs, limit the areas in which oil and natural gas production may occur and reduce demand for our services.
• Environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including violations thereof, could materially adversely affect our operating results.
• Intellectual property disputes could negatively impact our operations, costs, revenues and competitiveness.
• The design, manufacture, sale or rental, and servicing of products, including drill bits and electrical controls, may subject us to liability for personal injury, property damage and environmental contamination.
• Legal proceedings and governmental investigations could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
• Political, economic and social instability risk and laws associated with conducting international operations could adversely affect our opportunities and future business.
• We are subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations regarding data privacy and security.
Financial Risks
• Investor sentiment and public perception related to the oil and natural gas industry and to ESG initiatives could increase our costs of capital and our reporting requirements and impact our operations.
• Variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.
• Our ability to access capital markets could be limited, and a downgrade in our credit rating could negatively impact our cost of and ability to access capital.
• We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our debt, and we may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our debt, which may not be successful.
• Our return of capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, and there is no guarantee that we will return capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, in the future or at levels anticipated by our stockholders.
• Our ability to utilize our historic U.S. net operating loss carryforwards is expected to be limited as a result of the completion of the NexTier merger.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock and Corporate Structure
• The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile, and investors may not be able to resell shares at or above the price paid.
• Anti-takeover measures in our charter documents and under state law could discourage an acquisition and thereby affect the related purchase price.
• Our bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States are the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Business and Operating Risks
We are dependent on the oil and natural gas industry and market prices for oil and natural gas. Declines in customers’ operating and capital expenditures and in oil and natural gas prices may adversely affect our operating results.
We depend on our customers’ willingness to make operating and capital expenditures to explore for, develop and produce oil and natural gas. When these expenditures decline, our business may suffer. Our customers’ willingness to explore, develop and produce depends largely upon prevailing industry conditions that are influenced by numerous factors over which we have no control, such as:
• the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, including current natural gas storage capacity and usage,
• the prices, and expectations about future prices, of oil and natural gas,
• the supply of and demand for drilling services, completion services and drilling products,
• the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and natural gas,
• the availability of capital for oil and natural gas industry participants, including our customers, and the extent to which they are willing or able to deploy capital,
• the availability of and constraints in pipeline, storage and other transportation capacity in the basins in which we operate,
• the environmental, tax and other laws and governmental regulations regarding the exploration, development, production, use and delivery of oil and natural gas, and in particular, public pressure on, and legislative and regulatory interest within, federal, state, foreign, regional and local governments to stop, significantly limit or regulate drilling services and completion services activities, including hydraulic fracturing,
• increased focus by the investment and financing community and the general public on sustainability practices in the oil and natural gas industry, and
• merger and divestiture activity among oil and natural gas producers.
In particular, our revenues, profitability and cash flows are highly dependent upon prevailing prices for oil and natural gas and expectations about future prices. Oil and natural gas prices and markets can be extremely volatile. Prices, and expectations about future prices, are affected by factors such as:
• market supply and demand,
• the desire and ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”), its members and other oil-producing nations, such as Russia, to set and maintain production and price targets,
• the level of production by OPEC and non-OPEC countries,
• domestic and international military, political, economic, health and weather conditions, including the impacts of war, including the impact of the ongoing armed conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East and actions by the United States in Venezuela and other countries, and the continuation of, or any escalation in the severity of, these conflicts or actions, or terrorist activity, pandemics and other unexpected disasters or events,
• changes to tax, tariff and import/export regulations and sanctions by the United States or other countries,
• legal and other limitations or restrictions on exportation and/or importation of oil and natural gas,
• technical advances affecting energy consumption and production, and
• the development, price, availability and market acceptance of alternative fuels and energy sources.
All of these factors are beyond our control. Commodity prices have historically been volatile but were relatively range-bound from the end of 2022 through the first quarter of 2025. The current demand for equipment and services remains impacted by macro conditions, including commodity prices, geopolitical environment, changes to international tariffs and trade policies, inflationary pressures, economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere, as well as customer consolidation and focus by exploration and production companies and service companies on capital returns. During the second quarter of 2025, global economic conditions deteriorated, in part, because of enacted and proposed trade policies and tariffs by the United States and other governments, as well as uncertainty regarding potential future changes to global trade policies and tariffs. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2025, OPEC+ countries began phasing out voluntary crude oil production cuts, leading to an increase in global supply. These developments, combined with rising geopolitical tensions—particularly in the Middle East—heightened uncertainty in global energy markets, which contributed to a decline in our share price, lowered average crude oil futures prices and increased uncertainty regarding the future economic environment in which we operate. During the second half of 2025, global economic conditions and the global energy market remained uncertain, with ongoing effects from trade policy uncertainty, the phase-out of voluntary crude oil production cuts by OPEC+ countries and downward pressure on crude oil futures prices. While the full effects are yet to be determined, prolonged trade tensions and sustained lower crude oil futures prices could adversely affect our future outlook on activity and profitability. Oil prices averaged $59.62 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2025 and closed at $61.60 per barrel on February 2, 2026. Natural gas prices (based on the Henry Hub Spot Market Price) averaged $3.73 per MMBtu in the fourth quarter of 2025 and closed at $4.40 per MMBtu on February 2, 2026.
In light of these and other factors, we expect oil and natural gas prices to continue to be unpredictable and to affect our financial condition, operations and ability to access sources of capital. Higher oil and natural gas prices do not necessarily result in increased activity because demand for our services is generally driven by our customers’ expectations of future oil and natural gas prices, as well as our customers’ ability to access, and willingness to deploy, capital to fund their operating and capital expenditures. A decline in demand for oil and natural gas, prolonged low oil or natural gas prices, expectations of decreases in oil and natural gas prices or a reduction in the ability of our customers to access capital would likely result in reduced capital expenditures by our customers and decreased demand for our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and cash flows. Even during periods of historically moderate or high prices for oil and natural gas, companies exploring for oil and natural gas may cancel or curtail programs or reduce their levels of capital expenditures for exploration and production for a variety of reasons, including the depletion of capital expenditure budgets and/or meeting annual drilling and completion targets, which could reduce demand for our services.
Global economic conditions may adversely affect our operating results.
Concerns regarding global economic conditions, energy costs, geopolitical issues, supply chain disruptions, public health crises or global pandemics, inflation and the availability and cost of credit have contributed, and may in the future contribute, to increased economic uncertainty. Demand for energy and for oil and natural gas end products is highly sensitive to economic conditions; as a result, global economic conditions, indications that economic growth is slowing and volatility in commodity prices may cause our customers to reduce or curtail their drilling and well completion programs, which could result in a decrease in demand for our services. In addition, uncertainty in the capital markets, whether due to global economic conditions, low commodity prices or
otherwise, may result in reduced access to, or an inability to obtain, financing by us, our customers and our suppliers and result in reduced demand for our services. An economic slowdown or recession in the United States or in any other country that significantly affects the supply of or demand for oil or natural gas could negatively impact our operations and therefore adversely affect our results. Furthermore, these factors may result in certain of our customers experiencing an inability or unwillingness to pay suppliers, including us. The global economic environment in the past has experienced significant deterioration in a relatively short period, such as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic or the ongoing armed conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, and there is no assurance that the global economic environment, or expectations for the global economic environment, will not quickly deteriorate again due to one or more factors, including as a result of actual or perceived threats to geopolitical stability, changes in production from OPEC, its members and other oil-producing nations, or governmental actions or restrictions in response to events such as a global pandemic. A deterioration in the global economic environment could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
A surplus of equipment and a highly competitive oil service industry may adversely affect our utilization and profit margins and the carrying value of our assets.
Our industry is highly competitive, and available drilling services equipment, completion services equipment and drilling products often exceed the demand for such equipment and products. A low commodity price environment or capital spending reductions by our customers due to additional customer consolidation, investor requirements or other reasons can result in substantially more equipment and products being available than are needed to meet demand. Low commodity prices and a rise in new and upgraded equipment or products can result in excess capacity and substantial competition for a declining number of drilling services and completion services contracts and drilling products rentals and sales.
Operating costs for our drilling services and completion services businesses include all direct and indirect costs associated with the operation, maintenance and support of our equipment, which is often not affected by changes in our rates and utilization. During periods of reduced revenue and/or activity, certain of our fixed costs, such as depreciation, may not decline and often we may incur additional costs. During times of reduced utilization, reductions in costs may not be immediate as we may incur additional costs associated with maintaining and stacking equipment, or we may not be able to fully reduce the cost of our support operations in a particular geographic region due to the need to support the remaining operations in that region. Accordingly, a decline in revenue due to lower rates and/or utilization may not be offset by a corresponding decrease in operating costs, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Even in an environment of high oil and natural gas prices and/or increased drilling and completion activity, reactivation and improvement of existing drilling services and completion services equipment, construction of new technology drilling services and completion services equipment, movement of drilling services and completion services equipment from region to region in response to market conditions or otherwise can lead to a surplus of equipment.
In times of reduced demand for our industry’s services, certain of our industry competitors may initiate bankruptcy proceedings or engage in debt refinancing transactions, management changes or other strategic initiatives in an attempt to reduce operating costs to maintain a position in the market. This could result in such competitors emerging with stronger or healthier balance sheets and, in turn, an improved ability to compete with us in the future. We may also see corporate consolidations among our customers, competitors and/or vendors, which could significantly alter industry conditions and competition within the industry and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We periodically seek to increase the prices on our services to offset rising costs, earn returns on our capital investment and otherwise generate higher returns for our stockholders. However, we operate in a very competitive industry, and we are not always successful in raising or maintaining our existing prices. Even if we are able to increase our prices, we may not be able to do so at a rate that is sufficient to offset rising costs, including capital expenditures, without adversely affecting our activity. The inability to maintain our pricing and to increase our pricing as costs, including capital expenditures, increase could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. In addition, we may be unable to replace fixed-term contracts that expire or are terminated early, extend expiring contracts or obtain new contracts in the spot market, and the rates and other material terms under any new or extended contracts may be on substantially less favorable rates and terms.
Accordingly, high competition and a surplus of equipment and products can cause oil and natural gas service contractors to have difficulty maintaining pricing, utilization and profit margins and, at times, result in operating losses. We cannot predict the future level of competition or surplus equipment and products in the oil and natural gas service businesses or the level of demand for our drilling services, completion services or drilling products.
A surplus of operable land drilling rigs, other drilling services equipment and drilling products, increasing rig specialization and surplus of completion services equipment, which can be exacerbated by capital spending reductions by our customers, could affect the fair market value of our drilling services equipment, completion services equipment, and drilling products, which in turn could result
in additional impairments of our assets. A prolonged period of lower oil and natural gas prices or changes in customer preferences and requirements could result in future impairment to our long-lived assets. For example, we recognized impairment charges of $32.4 million, $3.8 million and $7.0 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Our operations are subject to a number of operational risks, including environmental and weather risks, which could expose us to significant losses and damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us.
Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the businesses in which we operate, including inclement weather, blowouts, explosions, fires, loss of well control, motor vehicle accidents, equipment failure, unplanned power outages and surges, computer system disruptions or cybersecurity incidents, pollution, exposure and reservoir damage. These hazards could cause personal injury or death, work stoppage and serious damage to equipment and other property, as well as significant environmental and reservoir damages. These risks could expose us to substantial liability for personal injury, wrongful death, property damage, loss of oil and natural gas production, pollution and other environmental damages, and consequential damages. An accident or other event resulting in significant environmental or property damage, or injuries or fatalities involving our employees or other persons, could also trigger investigations by federal, state or local authorities. Such an accident or other event could cause us to incur substantial expenses in connection with the investigation, remediation and resolution, as well as cause lasting damage to our reputation, loss of customers and an inability to obtain insurance.
We have indemnification agreements with many of our customers, and we also maintain liability and other forms of insurance. In general, our contracts typically contain provisions requiring our customers to indemnify us for, among other things, reservoir and certain pollution damage. Our right to indemnification may, however, be unenforceable or limited due to negligent or willful acts or omissions by us, our subcontractors and/or suppliers. In addition, certain states, including Louisiana, New Mexico, Texas and Wyoming, have enacted statutes generally referred to as “oilfield anti-indemnity acts” expressly prohibiting certain indemnity agreements contained in or related to oilfield services agreements. Such oilfield anti-indemnity acts may restrict or void a party’s indemnification of us.
Our customers and other third parties may dispute, or be unable to meet, their indemnification obligations to us due to financial, legal or other reasons. Accordingly, we may be unable to transfer these risks to our customers and other third parties by contract or indemnification agreements. Incurring a liability for which we are not fully indemnified or insured could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
In addition, we maintain insurance coverage of the types and in the amounts we believe to be customary in the industry, but we do not insure against all risks, either because insurance is not available or because it is not commercially justifiable. See “Item 1. Business – Risks and Insurance” for a description of our insurance coverage. We also self-insure a number of risks, including loss of earnings and business interruption and most of our cybersecurity risks, and we do not carry a significant amount of insurance to cover risks of underground reservoir damage.
Our insurance may not in all situations provide sufficient funds to protect us from all liabilities that could result from our operations. Our coverage includes aggregate policy limits and exclusions. As a result, we retain the risk for any loss in excess of these limits or that is otherwise excluded from our coverage. There can be no assurance that insurance will be available to cover any or all of our operational or other risks, or, even if available, that insurance premiums or other costs will not rise significantly in the future, so as to make the cost of such insurance prohibitive, or that our coverage will cover a specific loss. Further, we may experience difficulties in collecting from insurers or such insurers may deny all or a portion of our claims for insurance coverage. Incurring a liability for which we are not fully insured or indemnified could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
If a significant accident or other event occurs that is not fully covered by insurance or an enforceable and recoverable indemnity from a third party, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Our backlog of contract drilling revenue has declined in recent years and may not ultimately be realized, as fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment.
Fixed-term drilling contracts customarily provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an early termination payment to us if a contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term. However, in certain circumstances, for example, destruction of a drilling rig that is not replaced within a specified period of time, our bankruptcy, or a breach of our contract obligations, the customer may not be obligated to make an early termination payment to us. Additionally, during depressed market conditions or otherwise, customers may be unable to satisfy their contractual obligations or may seek to terminate, suspend or renegotiate or otherwise fail to honor their contractual obligations, including as a result of their bankruptcy. In addition, we may not be able to perform under these contracts due to events beyond our control, and our customers may seek to terminate or renegotiate our contracts
for various reasons, including those described above. As a result, we may be unable to realize all of our contract drilling backlog. In addition, the termination, suspension or renegotiation of fixed-term contracts without the receipt of early termination payments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
In recent years, due to market conditions and other factors, our backlog of contract drilling revenue has declined. As of December 31, 2025, our contract drilling backlog in the United States for future revenues under term contracts, which we define as contracts with a duration of six months or more, was approximately $291 million, as compared to approximately $426 million, approximately $700 million and approximately $830 million, as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Please see Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Report for a description of our calculation of backlog. Our contract drilling backlog may continue to decline, as fixed-term drilling contract coverage over time may not be offset by new contracts or may be reduced by price adjustments to existing contracts, including as a result of a decline in the price of oil and natural gas, capital spending reductions by our customers, oversupply of drilling rigs or other factors. For these and other reasons, our contract drilling backlog may not generate sufficient liquidity for us during periods of reduced demand for our services or otherwise.
New technologies may cause our operating methods, equipment, products and services to become less competitive, and higher levels of capital expenditures may be necessary to remain competitive.
The market for our services and products is characterized by continual technological and process developments that have resulted in, and will likely continue to result in, substantial improvements in the functionality and performance, including environmental performance, of drilling services equipment, completion services equipment and drilling products. Our customers are increasingly demanding the services of newer, higher specification drilling rigs and completion services and other equipment, as well as new and improved technology, such as drilling and completions automation technology and lower-emissions operations and services, specialized drill bit solutions and data analytics. Accordingly, we may have to allocate a higher proportion of our capital expenditures to maintain and improve existing rigs and completion services and other equipment, purchase and construct newer, higher specification drilling rigs and completion services and other equipment to meet the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers, and develop new and improved technology, specialized drill bit solutions and data analytics. In addition, technological changes, process improvements and other factors that increase operational efficiencies could continue to result in oil and natural gas wells being drilled and completed more quickly, which could reduce the number of revenue earning days. Technological and process developments in the completion services and other drilling services businesses could have similar effects.
We continually attempt to develop or acquire new technologies for use in our business. For example, we have invested in natural gas-powered equipment, including electric, direct drive and dual fuel pumps, to replace legacy diesel completion services equipment. In the event that we are successful in developing or acquiring new technologies for use in our business, there is no guarantee of future demand for those technologies. Customers may be reluctant or unwilling to adopt our new technologies. We may also have difficulty negotiating satisfactory terms for our new technologies, including terms that would enable us to obtain acceptable returns on our investment in the development or acquisition of new technologies.
Development and acquisition of new technology is critical to maintaining our competitiveness. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully develop or acquire technology that our customers demand. Some of our competitors have greater financial, technical and personnel resources that may allow them to enjoy technological advantages and develop, acquire and implement new technology on a more timely basis or in a more cost-effective manner. If we are not successful keeping pace with technological advances in a timely and cost-effective manner, demand for our services may decline. If any technology that we need to successfully compete is not available to us or that we implement in the future does not work as we expect, we may be adversely affected. Additionally, new technologies, services or standards could render some of our equipment, services and products obsolete, which could reduce our competitiveness and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operation.
Loss of key personnel and competition for experienced personnel may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.
We greatly depend on the efforts of our key employees to manage our operations. The loss of members of management could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we utilize highly skilled field-based and non-field-based personnel in operating and supporting our businesses and in developing new technologies. In times of increasing demand for our services, it may be difficult to attract and retain qualified field-based and non-field-based personnel, particularly after a prolonged industry downturn. During periods of high demand for our services or inflation, wage rates for personnel are also likely to increase (and, during recent periods of high demand and inflation, have increased), resulting in higher operating costs. During periods of lower demand for our services, we may experience reductions in force and voluntary departures of personnel, which could adversely affect our business and make it more it difficult to meet customer demands when demand for our services improves. In addition, even in a period of generally lower demand for our services, if there is a high demand for our services in certain areas, it may be difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel
to perform services in such areas. The loss of key employees, the failure to attract and retain qualified personnel and the increase in labor costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
The loss or consolidation of key customers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Business consolidations within the oil and natural gas industry in recent years have resulted in some of our largest customers combining and using their size and purchasing power to seek economies of scale and pricing concessions. Continuing consolidation within the industry may result in reduced capital spending within the industry generally and by our customers specifically, all of which may lead to decreased demand for our products and services. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain our level of business and profitability with a customer after its consolidation or replace that business and profit with other customers. Additionally, consolidation among our competitors could significantly alter industry conditions and competition within the industry. As a result, the consolidation of one or more of our customers, particularly key customers, or consolidation among other oil and gas operators may have a significant adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We are unable to predict what effect further consolidation in the industry may have on capital spending by our customers, prices that we can charge, our selling strategies, our competitive position, our ability to retain customers or our ability to negotiate favorable agreements with our customers, and our revenue and profitability.
With respect to our consolidated operating revenue s in 2025, we received approximately 57% from our ten largest customers, approximately 39% from our five largest customers and approximately 12% from our largest customer. The loss of, or reduction in business from, one or more of our larger customers, due to consolidation or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Shortages, delays in delivery, and interruptions in supply of equipment and materials could adversely affect our operating results.
Periodically, the oilfield services industry has experienced shortages of equipment for upgrades, drill pipe, raw materials, replacement parts and other equipment and materials, including, in the case of our completion services operations, proppants, cement, acid, gel and water. These shortages can cause the price of these items to increase significantly and require that orders for the items be placed well in advance of expected use. In addition, any interruption in supply could result in significant delays in delivery of equipment and materials or prevent operations. Interruptions may be caused by, among other reasons:
• weather issues, whether short-term such as a hurricane, or long-term such as a drought,
• labor shortages or other labor issues,
• changes to tariff and import/export regulations by the United States or other countries,
• transportation, fuel shortages and other logistical challenges, and
• a shortage in the number of vendors able or willing to provide the necessary equipment and materials, including as a result of commitments of vendors to other customers or third parties or bankruptcies or consolidation.
These price increases, delays in delivery and interruptions in supply may require us to delay operations, increase capital and repair expenditures or otherwise incur higher operating costs. During recent years, there have been significant disruptions and delays across the global supply chain, which have created a tightening of supplies and shortages in a number of areas, including basic raw materials. Severe shortages, delays in delivery and interruptions in supply could increase our costs and limit our ability to construct, operate, maintain and upgrade drilling services equipment, completion services equipment, drilling products and other equipment and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Our business is subject to cybersecurity risks and threats.
Our operations are increasingly dependent on effective and secure information and operational technologies and services, including our own systems and the systems of third-party vendors and service providers upon which we rely, such as those providing cloud services to us. Threats to information and operational technology systems associated with cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks continue to grow, and include, among other things, storms and natural disasters, terrorist attacks, utility outages, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and systems, theft, viruses, malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, design defects, human error or complications encountered as existing systems are maintained, repaired, replaced or upgraded. Risks associated with these threats include, among other things:
• theft or misappropriation of funds, including via “phishing” or similar attacks directed at us or third parties, including our customers and vendors;
• loss, corruption or misappropriation of intellectual property, or other proprietary or confidential information (including customer, supplier, or employee data);
• disruption or impairment of our and our customers’ and vendors’ business operations and safety procedures;
• personal injuries and destruction or damage to property;
• downtime and loss of revenue;
• injury to our reputation, including the perception of our products or services as having security vulnerabilities;
• negative impacts on our ability to compete;
• loss or damage to our and our customers’ and vendors’ information technology systems, including operational technologies and worksite data delivery systems;
• diversion of management or workforce attention;
• exposure to litigation and legal and regulatory liability and costs; and
• increased costs to prevent, respond to or mitigate cybersecurity events.
During 2025, we significantly reduced the proportion of our office personnel who are on a “remote work” model; however, there remains continued usage of remote networking and online conferencing services that enable employees to work outside of our corporate infrastructure and, in some cases, use their own personal devices. This may expose us to additional cybersecurity risks or related incidents. Additionally, geopolitical tensions or conflicts may further heighten the risk of cybersecurity attacks and other cyber events. In particular, sophisticated nation state actors have targeted critical infrastructure and may continue to do so in the future.
Although we utilize various procedures and controls to mitigate our exposure to or limit the effects of the risks described above, cybersecurity attacks and other cyber events are evolving and unpredictable. In addition, there has been an increase in state-sponsored cyberattacks, which are often conducted by capable, well-funded groups. The rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies amplifies these concerns. As threat actors adopt and deploy AI tools, the speed and sophistication of cyber threats and privacy risks may increase across our environment and those of our customers, vendors and suppliers. As we and our service providers begin to integrate AI-enabled tools, those tools may be targeted or misused in ways that compromise data or enable harmful outputs. Additionally, AI outputs may be inaccurate, biased or unreliable, which could result in legal, regulatory or reputational harm. Misuse could create compliance or reputational risks and lead to legal exposure. Third parties may allege copyright infringement, intellectual property violations or misappropriation related to outputs. In addition, the legal and regulatory landscape governing the development and use of AI is rapidly evolving and remains uncertain, and new or changing laws, regulations or enforcement approaches could increase compliance costs, restrict the use or functionality of AI-enabled tools, or expose us to regulatory scrutiny, litigation or other liability.
There can be no assurance that the procedures and controls that we implement, or that our third-party service providers implement, will be sufficient to protect our people, systems, information or other property. Moreover, we have no control over the information and operational technology systems of our customers, suppliers, and others with which our systems may connect and communicate. As a result, the occurrence of a cyber incident could go unnoticed for a period of time. Even when an attack has been detected, it is not always immediately apparent what the full nature and scope of any potential harm may be, or how best to remediate it. We self-insure most of our cybersecurity risks, and any such incident could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. As cyber incidents continue to evolve, we may be required to incur additional costs to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate or remediate the effects of cyber incidents.
Our commitments under supply agreements could exceed our requirements, exposing us to risks including price, timing of delivery and quality of equipment and materials upon which our business relies.
We have purchase commitments with certain vendors to supply equipment and materials, including, in the case of our completion services business, proppants. Some of these agreements are take-or-pay or similar agreements with minimum purchase obligations. If demand for our services decreases from current levels, demand for the equipment that we use and the materials that we supply as part of these services will also decrease. In addition, our customers may self-source certain materials. If demand for our services and/or materials decreases enough, we could have contractual minimum commitments that exceed the required amount of materials we need to supply to our customers. In this instance, we could be required to purchase materials that we do not have a present need for, pay for materials that we do not take delivery of or pay prices in excess of market prices at the time of purchase.
Growth through acquisitions, the building or upgrading of equipment and the development of technology is not assured.
We have grown our drilling rig fleet and completion services fleet and expanded our business lines and use of technology in the past through mergers, acquisitions, upgrades, new construction and technology development. For example, in 2023, we significantly expanded our completions business through the NexTier merger, and we added a specialized drill bit solutions business through the Ulterra acquisition. There can be no assurance that acquisition opportunities will be available in the future or that we will be able to execute timely or efficiently any plans for building or upgrading equipment or developing or acquiring new technology. We are also likely to continue to face intense competition from other companies for available acquisition opportunities. In addition, because improved technology has enhanced the ability to recover oil and natural gas, our competitors may continue to upgrade and build new equipment and develop new technology, including drilling automation technology and lower-emissions operations and services.
There can be no assurance that we will:
• successfully complete any acquisitions we attempt on the terms announced, or at all,
• have sufficient capital resources to complete additional acquisitions, build or upgrade equipment or develop or acquire new technology,
• through due diligence conducted prior to an acquisition, successfully uncover situations that could result in financial or legal exposure, or appropriately quantify the exposure from known risks,
• successfully integrate additional equipment, acquired or developed technology or other assets or businesses into our operations and internal controls, including financial reporting disclosure and enterprise resource planning, cybersecurity and information technology systems,
• effectively manage the growth and increased size, complexity and geography of our organization, and increased scrutiny from governmental authorities,
• maintain existing business relationships and contract terms with our customers, distributors, suppliers, vendors, landlords, joint venture partners and other business partners, as well as with those of any acquired business,
• successfully deploy idle, stacked, upgraded or additional equipment and acquired or developed technology,
• maintain key employees, the crews necessary to operate additional equipment and the personnel necessary to evaluate, acquire, develop and deploy new technology, or be successful in hiring replacements for departing personnel,
• avoid unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with any merger or acquisition, or
• successfully improve our financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects, or provide an adequate return of capital, as a result of any completed acquisition, the building or upgrading equipment or the development of new technology.
Our failure to achieve consolidation savings, to integrate acquired businesses and technology and other assets into our existing operations successfully or to minimize any unforeseen operational difficulties could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we may incur liabilities arising from events occurring prior to any completed acquisitions, prior to our establishment of adequate compliance oversight or in connection with disputes over acquired or developed technology. While we generally seek to obtain indemnities or insurance for liabilities arising from events occurring before such acquisitions, we may be unable to do so, and any indemnities or insurance we do obtain will be limited in amount and duration. Additionally, indemnities may be held to be unenforceable or the seller may not be able to indemnify us.
We may incur substantial indebtedness to finance future acquisitions, build or upgrade equipment or acquire or develop new technology, and we also may issue equity, convertible or debt securities in connection with any such acquisitions, building or upgrade program or technology development. Use of cash for these purposes may adversely affect our cash available for capital expenditures and other uses, debt service requirements could represent a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition, and the issuance of additional equity or convertible securities could be dilutive to existing stockholders. Also, continued growth and resulting integration efforts could strain our management, operations, employees and other resources.
Complications with the design or implementation of our new enterprise resource planning system could adversely impact our business and operations.
We rely extensively on information systems and technology to manage our business and summarize operating results. We are in the process of implementing a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system that expands and enhances one of our existing ERP systems to address the operations of our combined company. This ERP system will replace our existing operating and financial systems. The ERP system is designed to accurately maintain our financial records, enhance operational functionality and provide timely information to our management team related to the operation of our integrated business. The ERP system implementation
process has required and will continue to require the investment of significant personnel and financial resources. We may be unable to successfully implement the ERP system without experiencing delays, increased costs and other difficulties. If we are unable to successfully design and implement the new ERP system as planned, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be negatively impacted. Additionally, if we do not effectively implement the ERP system as planned or the ERP system does not operate as intended, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures could be adversely affected or our ability to assess those controls adequately could be delayed.
Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas could reduce demand for oil and natural gas, which would, in turn, reduce the demand for our services.
Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas could reduce demand for oil and natural gas. The impact of the changing demand for oil and natural gas may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Additionally, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels) or increased focus on reducing the use of oil and natural gas (such as governmental mandates that ban the sale of new gasoline-powered automobiles, and relatively recent legislation such as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “Inflation Reduction Act”), which contains tax inducements and other provisions that incentivize investment, development, and deployment of alternative energy sources and technologies) could reduce demand for oil and natural gas and therefore for our services, which would lead to a reduction in our revenues. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was enacted with effective dates for provisions between 2025 and 2027. The OBBBA reduces or accelerates phase-outs of many of the tax inducements and incentives supporting alternative energy sources and technologies in the Inflation Reduction Act, which will likely lessen the potential impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on reducing demand for oil and natural gas.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
The adoption of any future federal, state or local laws or implementing regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting or banning, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete natural gas and oil wells and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Various federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives have been or could be undertaken that could result in additional requirements or restrictions being imposed on hydraulic fracturing operations or result in the failure to obtain or difficulty or delay in obtaining required permits, renewals or authorizations. For example, legislation and/or regulations have been adopted in many U.S. states that require additional disclosure regarding chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. Legislation, regulations and/or policies have also been adopted at the state level that impose other types of requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations (such as limits on operations in the event of certain levels of seismic activity). Additional legislation and/or regulations have been adopted or are being considered at the state and local level that could impose further chemical disclosure or other regulatory requirements (such as prohibitions on hydraulic fracturing operations in certain areas) and/or attempt to impose bans and other limitations on hydraulic fracturing operations via time, place and manner restrictions that could affect our operations. It is possible that these state and local efforts may increase in the absence of federal actions and/or in light of federal regulatory uncertainty. The adoption of any future federal, state or local laws or regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting or banning, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete natural gas and oil wells and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our and our customers’ operations are subject to a number of risks arising out of the threat of climate change that could result in increased operating and capital costs, limit the areas in which oil and natural gas production may occur and reduce demand for our services.
The physical and regulatory effects of climate change could have a negative impact on our operations, our customers’ operations and the overall demand for our customers’ products and, accordingly, our services. In recent years, GHG emissions and climate change issues have been a focus of local, state, regional, national and international regulatory bodies and the subject of wide-ranging policy debate, both in the United States and internationally. Initiatives that would impact our industry and regulate GHG emissions have included cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting, tracking programs, attestation requirements and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. If new or more stringent standards are enacted that would require substantial reductions in carbon and/or GHG emissions, such reductions could be costly and difficult to implement in the oil and natural gas sector. Additionally, in the absence of federal actions targeting GHG emissions and associated impacts, states and local governments may increasingly attempt to step in to pass more stringent regulations that may impact our and our customers’ operating costs and demand for services. Further, international focus on and efforts aimed at reducing GHG emissions and to address climate change may impact our operations. Several states and geographic regions in the United States have also adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs, including cap and trade regimes and commitments to contribute to meeting certain emissions reduction goals.
It is not possible at this time to predict the timing and effects of climate change or whether additional climate-related legislation, regulations or other measures will be adopted at the local, state, regional, national and international levels. However, continued efforts by governments and non-governmental organizations to reduce GHG emissions appear likely, and additional legislation, regulation or other measures that control or limit GHG emissions or otherwise seek to address climate change could adversely affect our business. The cost of complying with any new law, regulation or treaty will depend on the details of the particular program. We will continue to monitor and assess any new policies, legislation or regulations in the areas where we operate to determine the impact of GHG emissions and climate change on our operations and take appropriate actions, where necessary. Any direct and indirect costs of meeting these requirements may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Because our business depends on the level of activity in the oil and natural gas industry, existing or future laws or regulations related to GHGs and climate change, including incentives to conserve energy or use alternative energy sources, could have a negative impact on our business if such laws or regulations increase compliance costs, add operating restrictions or reduce demand for our customers’ products and, accordingly, our services.
Increasing attention to the risks of climate change has resulted in an increased possibility of lawsuits or investigations brought by public and private entities against oil and natural gas companies in connection with their GHG emissions. Should we be targeted by any such litigation or investigations, we may incur liability, which, to the extent that societal pressures or political or other factors are involved, could be imposed without regard to the causation of or contribution to the asserted damage, or to other mitigating factors.
These political, litigation and financial risks may result in our customers restricting or cancelling production activities, incurring liability for infrastructure damage as a result of climatic changes or impairing their ability to continue to operate in an economic manner, which also could reduce demand for our products and services. One or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Finally, increasing concentrations of GHGs in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods and other climatic events. If any such effects were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our and our customers’ facilities and operations.
Environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including violations thereof, could materially adversely affect our operating results.
Our business is subject to numerous federal, state, foreign, regional and local laws, rules and regulations governing the discharge of substances into the environment, protection of the environment and worker health and safety, including, without limitation, laws concerning the containment and disposal of hazardous substances, oil field waste and other waste materials, the use of underground storage tanks and the use of underground injection wells. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations could be substantial.
For example, in the United States, the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes impose strict liability on owners and operators of sites, including prior owners and operators who are no longer active at a site, as well as persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of “hazardous substances” found at sites.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), as amended, and comparable state statutes and implementing regulations govern the disposal of “hazardous wastes.” Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from the definition of “hazardous substances,” and RCRA also excludes certain classes of exploration and production wastes from regulation, such exemptions may be deleted, limited or modified in the future. The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and analogous state laws provide for administrative, civil and criminal penalties for unauthorized discharges and, together with the Oil Pollution Act of 1999, as amended, impose liability for the remedial costs and associated damages arising out of any unauthorized discharges, including oil and produced water spills, into jurisdictional waters.
Our operations are also subject to federal, state, foreign, regional and local laws, rules and regulations for the control of air emissions, including those associated with the Clean Air Act. We and our customers may be required to make capital expenditures in the future for air pollution control equipment in connection with obtaining and maintaining operating permits and approvals for air emissions. We are also subject to regulation by numerous other regulatory agencies, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Labor, which oversees employment practice standards.
Furthermore, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) promulgates and enforces laws and regulations governing the protection of the health and safety of employees. The OSHA hazard communication standard, EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of CERCLA and similar state statutes require that information be maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local governments and citizens. Also, OSHA has established a variety of standards related to workplace exposure to hazardous substances and employee health and safety.
Other jurisdictions where we may conduct operations have similar environmental, employee health and safety and other regulatory regimes with which we would be required to comply. These laws, rules and regulations also require that facility sites and other properties associated with our operations be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities. In addition, new projects or changes to existing projects may require the submission and approval of environmental assessments or permit applications. These laws, rules and regulations are subject to frequent change, and the clear trend is to place increasingly stringent limitations on activities that may affect the environment.
A failure to comply with these requirements could expose us to:
• substantial civil, criminal and/or administrative penalties or judgments,
• modification, denial or revocation of permits or other authorizations,
• imposition of limitations on our operations, and
• performance of site investigatory, remedial or other corrective actions.
In addition, environmental laws and regulations in the places that we operate impose a variety of requirements on “responsible parties” related to the prevention of spills and liability for damages from any such spills. As an owner and operator of land-based drilling rigs and completion services equipment, a manufacturer and servicer of equipment and automation to the energy, marine and mining industries and a provider of directional drilling and other services, we may be deemed to be a responsible party under these laws and regulations. In the event hydrocarbons and other regulated materials may have been disposed of, or released in or under properties currently or formerly owned or operated by us or our predecessors, which may have resulted, or may result, in soil and groundwater contamination in certain locations, any contamination found on, under or originating from the properties may be subject to remediation requirements under federal, state, foreign, regional and local laws, rules and regulations. In addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties over whom we have no control of their treatment of hydrocarbon and other regulated materials or the manner in which they may have disposed of or released such materials. We could be required to remove or remediate wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators. In addition, it is possible we could be held responsible for oil and natural gas properties in which we own an interest but are not the operator.
Intellectual property disputes could negatively impact our operations, costs, revenues and competitiveness.
Our services and products use proprietary technology and equipment, which can involve potential infringement of a third party’s rights, or a third party’s infringement of our rights, including patent rights. The majority of the intellectual property rights relating to our drilling services equipment, completion services equipment and drilling products are owned by us or certain of our supplying vendors. However, in the event that we or one of our customers or supplying vendors becomes involved in a dispute over infringement of intellectual property rights relating to equipment or technology owned or used by us, services performed by us or products provided by us, we may lose access to important equipment or technology or our ability to provide services or products, or we could be required to cease use of some equipment or technology or forced to modify our equipment, technology, services or products. We could also be required to pay license fees or royalties for the use of equipment or technology or provision of services or products. In addition, we may lose a competitive advantage in the event we are unsuccessful in enforcing our rights against third parties, third parties are successful in enforcing their rights against us, or our competitors are able to develop technology independently that is similar to ours without infringing on our patents or gaining access to our trade secrets.
Regardless of the merits, any such claims may result in significant legal and other costs, including reputational harm, and may distract management from running our business. Some of our competitors and current and potential vendors have a substantial amount of intellectual property related to new equipment and technologies. We cannot guarantee that our equipment, technology, services or products will not be determined to infringe currently issued or future issued patents or other intellectual property rights belonging to others, including, without limitation, situations in which our equipment, technology, services or products may be covered by patent applications filed by other parties. Technology disputes involving us or our customers or supplying vendors could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Certain subsidiaries we acquired in the Ulterra acquisition are defendants in a claim brought by a subsidiary of NOV Inc. alleging breach of a license agreement related to certain patents. Such subsidiaries have asserted defenses to the claim and are defending vigorously against this claim. Ulterra prevailed at the district court level, and NOV has filed a notice of appeal. An unfavorable judgment or resolution of this claim not covered by indemnity could have a material impact on our financial results. Please see Item 3 of this Report.
The design, manufacture, sale or rental and servicing of products, including drill bits and electrical controls, may subject us to liability for personal injury, property damage and environmental contamination.
We provide products, including specialized drill bit solutions and electrical controls, to customers involved in oil and natural gas exploration, development and production and in the marine and mining industries. Because of applications that use our products and services, a failure of such equipment, or a failure of our customer to maintain or operate the equipment properly, could cause harm to our reputation, contractual and warranty-related liability, damage to the equipment, damage to the property of customers and others, personal injury and environmental contamination, leading to claims against us. Any lawsuits or claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Legal proceedings and governmental investigations could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The nature of our business makes us susceptible to legal proceedings and governmental investigations from time to time. In addition, during periods of depressed market conditions, we may be subject to an increased risk of our customers, vendors, current and former employees and others initiating legal proceedings against us. Lawsuits or claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any legal proceedings or claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively affect our reputation among our customers and the public and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. Please see “Our operations are subject to a number of operational risks, including environmental and weather risks, which could expose us to significant losses and damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us.” and “Intellectual property disputes could negatively impact our operations, costs, revenues and competitiveness.”
Political, economic and social instability risk and laws associated with conducting international operations could adversely affect our opportunities and future business.
We provide specialized drill bit solutions throughout North America and internationally in over 30 countries, as well as contract drilling services in Colombia and Ecuador. We also sell products, including electrical controls, for use in numerous oil and natural gas producing regions outside of North America. In addition, through our Superior QC business, we occasionally provide remote data analytics and other services to customers to support their operations outside of the United States. One of our subsidiaries is party to a joint venture in Abu Dhabi. We also continue to evaluate opportunities from time to time to provide our services and products outside of the United States. International operations and sales or rentals of products are subject to certain political, economic and other uncertainties generally not encountered in U.S. operations, including increased risks of social and political unrest, changing political conditions and changing laws and policies affecting trade and investment, strikes, work stoppages, labor disputes and other slowdowns, terrorism, war, kidnapping of employees, blockades, regional economic downturns, nationalization, forced negotiation or modification of contracts, difficulty resolving disputes and enforcing contractual rights, difficulty in collecting international accounts receivable, potentially longer payment cycles, expropriation of equipment as well as expropriation of oil and natural gas exploration and drilling rights, foreign taxation and customs regulations, the overlap of different tax structures, changes in taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions and restrictions on repatriation of income and capital, currency rate fluctuations, increased governmental ownership and regulation of the economy and industry in the markets in which we may operate, economic and financial instability of national oil companies, and restrictive governmental regulation, bureaucratic delays and general hazards associated with foreign sovereignty over certain areas in which operations are conducted.
There can be no assurance that there will not be changes in local laws, regulations and administrative requirements, or the interpretation thereof, which could have a material adverse effect on the cost of entry into international markets, the profitability of international operations or the ability to continue those operations in certain areas. Because of the impact of local laws, any current and future international operations in certain areas may be conducted through entities in which local citizens own interests and through entities (including joint ventures, such as our Abu Dhabi joint venture) in which we hold only a minority interest or pursuant to arrangements under which we conduct operations under contract to local entities. While we do not control the actions of our joint venture partners, their actions could have an effect on our investment in the joint ventures and more generally our overall reputation. While we believe that neither operating through such entities nor pursuant to such arrangements would have a material adverse effect on our operations or revenues, there can be no assurance that we will in all cases be able to structure or restructure our operations to conform to local law (or the administration thereof) on terms we find acceptable. Additionally, we may be subject to foreign governmental regulations favoring or requiring the awarding of contracts to local contractors or requiring foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. These regulations could adversely affect our ability to compete.
There can be no assurance that we will:
• identify attractive opportunities in international markets,
• have sufficient capital resources to pursue and consummate international opportunities,
• successfully integrate international drilling and completion operations or other assets or businesses,
• effectively manage the start-up, development and growth of an international organization and assets,
• hire, attract and retain the personnel necessary to successfully conduct international operations, or
• receive awards for work and successfully improve our financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects as a result of the entry into one or more international markets.
In addition, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Some parts of the world where our services are or could be provided or where our consumers for products are located have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practice and could impact business. Any failure to comply with the FCPA or other anti-bribery legislation could subject to us to civil, criminal and/or administrative penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operation. In addition, investors could negatively view potential violations, inquiries or allegations of misconduct under the FCPA or similar laws, which could adversely affect our reputation and the market for our shares. We could also face fines, sanctions and other penalties from authorities in the relevant foreign jurisdictions, including prohibition of our participating in, or curtailment of business operations in, those jurisdictions and the seizure of drilling rigs, completion services equipment, manufacturing facilities, drilling products or other assets.
Many countries, including the United States, control the import and export of certain goods, services and technology and impose related import and export recordkeeping and reporting obligations. Governments also may impose economic sanctions against certain countries, persons and other entities that may restrict or prohibit transactions involving such countries, persons and entities. In particular, U.S. sanctions are targeted against certain countries that are heavily involved in the oil and natural gas industry. The laws and regulations concerning import and export activity, recordkeeping and reporting, including customs, export controls and economic sanctions, are complex and constantly changing. Any failure to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements governing international trade could also result in criminal and civil penalties and sanctions, such as fines, imprisonment, debarment from government contracts, seizure of shipments and loss of import and export privileges.
We may incur substantial indebtedness to finance an international transaction or operations, and we also may issue equity, convertible or debt securities in connection with any such transactions or operations. Debt service requirements could represent a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition, and the issuance of additional equity or convertible securities could be dilutive to existing stockholders. Also, international expansion could strain our management, operations, employees and other resources.
The occurrence of one or more events arising from the types of risks described above could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations regarding data privacy and security.
Governments around the world have implemented, and continue to implement, laws and regulations regarding data privacy and security, including with respect to the protection and processing of personal employee and customer data. These laws and regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and we are obligated to comply in all jurisdictions in which we conduct business. In the normal course of business, we and our third-party vendors or service providers may collect, process and store data that is subject to those specific laws and regulations governing personal data. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject us to significant liability, including fines, penalties, and potential criminal sanctions.
Financial Risks
Investor sentiment and public perception related to the oil and natural gas industry and to ESG initiatives could increase our costs of capital and our reporting requirements and impact our operations.
There are financial risks for oil and natural gas producers, as stockholders and bondholders currently invested in oil and natural gas companies and concerned about the potential effects of climate change, ESG and other sustainability-related issues may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors, or into competitors who are perceived to have stronger ESG practices and disclosures. At the same time, some stakeholders and regulators have increasingly expressed or pursued opposing views, legislation and investment expectations with respect to ESG, including the enactment or proposal of “anti-ESG” legislation or policies. In addition, other parties such institutional lenders may consider sustainability factors in lending to us or our customers. Limitations of investments in and financing for oil and natural gas could result in the restriction, delay or cancellation of drilling and completion programs or development of production activities. Our ESG practices and, through the publishing of our
Sustainability Report from time to time, disclosures may be subject to increased scrutiny and may not satisfy the requirements of all stakeholders or their requirements may not be made known to us. We may continue to face pressure regarding our ESG practices and disclosures.
We have developed, and will continue to develop, goals and other objectives related to ESG and sustainability matters. Statements related to these goals and objectives made in our published Sustainability Report and other public disclosure reflect our current plans and do not constitute a guarantee that they will be achieved. Our ability to achieve any stated goal or objective is subject to numerous factors and conditions, some of which are outside of our control. Our efforts to accurately report on ESG and sustainability matters, including our efforts to research, establish, accomplish and accurately report on our goals and objectives, expose us to numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal and other risks. Standards for tracking and reporting on ESG and sustainability matters, including climate-related matters, have not been harmonized and continue to evolve. Our processes and controls for reporting on ESG and sustainability matters, including our goals and objectives, may not always comply with evolving and disparate standards for identifying, measuring, disclosing and reporting such metrics, and such standards may change over time, which could result in significant revisions to our current ESG practices and disclosures.
Variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.
Our Credit Agreement includes a committed senior unsecured revolving credit facility. Under the Credit Agreement, interest is paid on the outstanding principal amount of borrowings under the credit facility at a floating rate based on, at our election, the SOFR rate (plus a 0.10% per annum adjustment) or base rate, in each case subject to a 0.00% floor. Under the Credit Agreement, the applicable margin on SOFR rate loans varies from 1.25% to 2.25% and the applicable margin on base rate loans varies from 0.25% to 1.25%, in each case determined based on our credit rating. As of December 31, 2025, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
We also have in place a reimbursement agreement pursuant to which we are required to reimburse the issuing bank on demand for any amounts that it has disbursed under any of our letters of credit issued thereunder. We are obligated to pay the issuing bank interest on all amounts not paid by us on the date of demand or when otherwise due at the Prime rate plus 2.00% per annum. As of December 31, 2025, no amounts had been disbursed under any letters of credit, and we had $32.0 million in letters of credit outstanding under the reimbursement agreement.
Interest rates could rise for various reasons in the future and increase our total interest expense, depending upon the amounts borrowed at floating rates under these agreements or under future agreements, as well as the terms of any future amendments to our existing agreements or future agreements.
Our ability to access capital markets could be limited, and a downgrade in our credit rating could negatively impact our cost of and ability to access capital.
From time to time, we may need to access capital markets to obtain financing. Our ability to access capital markets for financing could be limited by oil and natural gas prices, our existing capital structure, the state of the economy, the health or market perceptions of the drilling and overall oil and natural gas industry, the liquidity of the capital markets and ESG-related regulatory and investor requirements and other factors. Many of the factors that affect our ability to access capital markets are outside of our control. No assurance can be given that we will be able to access capital markets on terms acceptable to us when required to do so, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, our ability to access capital markets or to otherwise obtain sufficient financing is enhanced by our senior unsecured debt ratings as provided by major U.S. credit rating agencies. Factors that may impact our credit ratings include debt levels, liquidity, asset quality, cost structure, commodity pricing levels, industry conditions and other considerations. A ratings downgrade could adversely impact our ability in the future to access debt markets, increase the cost of future debt, impact the terms of future amendments to our senior unsecured credit facility, require us to comply with covenants in our debt agreements as a condition to making restricted payments, including payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, and potentially require us to post letters of credit for certain obligations.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our debt, and we may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our debt, which may not be successful.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our debt obligations depends on our financial and operating performance, including the ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flows, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will
maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness.
In addition, if our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our debt. We cannot assure you that we would be able to take any of these actions, that these actions would be successful and would permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations or that these actions would be permitted under the terms of our existing or future debt agreements. In the absence of such cash flows and capital resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. However, our debt agreements contain restrictions on our ability to dispose of assets. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions, and any proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.
Our return of capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, and there is no guarantee that we will return capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, in the future or at levels anticipated by our stockholders.
Although we currently plan to return capital to stockholders, the amount and timing of returns of capital to stockholders may vary from time to time. The amount and timing of all returns of capital, including future dividend payments and purchases pursuant to our stock buyback program, if any, are subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon business conditions, results of operations, financial condition, terms of our debt agreements and other factors. Our Board of Directors may, without advance notice, reduce or suspend our dividend or limit, suspend or terminate our stock repurchase program. There can be no assurance that we will pay a dividend or make repurchases of our common stock in the future. The payment of dividends and stock repurchases could diminish our cash reserves, which may impact our ability to meet our working capital needs, satisfy our debt obligations, make capital expenditures, grow and pursue strategic opportunities and acquisitions. In addition, any elimination of, or downward revision in, our stock buyback program or dividend payments could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to utilize our historic U.S. net operating loss carryforwards is expected to be limited as a result of the completion of the NexTier merger.
As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $1.4 billion of gross U.S. federal net operating losses, approximately $60.0 million of gross Canadian net operating losses and approximately $889 million of post-apportionment U.S. state net operating losses, before valuation allowances. The majority of the U.S. federal net operating losses were generated after 2017 and can be carried forward indefinitely. Canadian net operating losses will expire in varying amounts, if unused, between 2036 and 2045. U.S. state net operating losses will expire in varying amounts, if unused, between 2028 and 2045.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”) generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of NOLs that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone an “ownership change” (as determined under Section 382). An ownership change generally occurs if one or more stockholders (or groups of stockholders) who are each deemed to own at least 5% of such corporation’s stock has increased their ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period. In the event that an ownership change occurs, utilization of the relevant corporation’s NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382, generally determined, subject to certain adjustments, by multiplying (i) the fair market value of such corporation’s stock at the time of the ownership change by (ii) a percentage approximately equivalent to the yield on long-term tax-exempt bonds during the month in which the ownership change occurs. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years.
We experienced an ownership change (under Section 382) as a result of the closing of the NexTier merger. Our ability to utilize our available NOLs and other tax attributes to reduce future taxable income following this “ownership change” depends on many factors, including our future income, which cannot be assured. Based on information currently available, we expect this ownership change could cause some of our NOLs incurred prior to January 1, 2018 to expire before we would be able to utilize them to reduce taxable income in future periods, and may also require NOLs to be utilized later than they otherwise would be able to be utilized, increasing cash taxes payable in earlier years.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock and Corporate Structure
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile, and investors may not be able to resell shares at or above the price paid.
The trading price of our common stock may be volatile. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume
fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as other general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our common stock in spite of our operating and/or financial performance. The following factors, in addition to other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Report, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:
• investor perception of us and the industry and markets in which we operate;
• general financial, domestic, international, economic and market conditions, including overall fluctuations in the U.S. equity markets;
• increased focus by the investment community on sustainability practices at our company and in the oil and natural gas industry generally;
• changes in customer needs, expectations or trends and our ability to maintain relationships with key customers;
• our ability to implement our business strategy;
• changes in our capital structure, including the issuance of additional debt;
• public announcements (including the timing of these announcements) regarding our business, financial performance and prospects or new services or products, service or product enhancements, technological advances or strategic actions, such as acquisitions or divestitures, restructurings or significant contracts, by our competitors or us;
• trading activity in our stock, including portfolio transactions in our stock by us, our executive officers and directors and significant stockholders or trading activity that results from the ordinary course rebalancing of stock indices in which we may be included;
• any elimination of, or downward revision in, our stock buyback program or dividend payments;
• short-interest in our common stock, which could be significant from time to time;
• our inclusion in, or removal from, any stock indices;
• changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by securities analysts;
• whether or not we meet earnings estimates of securities analysts who follow us; and
• regulatory or legal developments in the United States and the foreign countries where we operate.
Anti-takeover measures in our charter documents and under state law could discourage an acquisition and thereby affect the related purchase price.
We are a Delaware corporation subject to the Delaware General Corporation Law, including Section 203, an anti-takeover law. Our restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to one million shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights (including voting rights), conversion ratios, preferences and privileges of that stock without further vote or action by the holders of the common stock. It also prohibits stockholders from acting by written consent without the holding of a meeting. In addition, our bylaws impose certain advance notification requirements as to business that can be brought by a stockholder before annual stockholder meetings and as to persons nominated as directors by a stockholder. As a result of these measures and others, potential acquirers might find it more difficult or be discouraged from attempting to effect an acquisition transaction with us. This may deprive holders of our securities of certain opportunities to sell or otherwise dispose of the securities at above-market prices pursuant to any such transactions.
Our bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States are the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have, or declines to accept, jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court located within the State of Delaware) is the exclusive forum for any claims, including claims in the right of Patterson-UTI: (a) that are based upon a violation of a duty by a current or former director, officer, employee or stockholder in such capacity, or (b) as to which the Delaware General Corporation Law confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery. This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Our bylaws further provide that the sole and exclusive forum for any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be the federal district courts of the United States. The enforceability of similar exclusive federal forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and while the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled that this type of exclusive federal forum provision is facially valid under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts would enforce such provisions and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. These exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial
forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find either exclusive forum provision in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase- decline+7
- loss+6
- divestiture+5
- impairment+4
- prolonged+4
- profitability+3
- improved+3
- leading+2
- efficiencies+1
- greater+1
MD&A (Item 7)
10,539 words
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management Overview — We are a Houston, Texas-based leading provider of drilling and completion services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in the United States and other select countries, including contract drilling services, integrated well completion services and directional drilling services in the United States, and specialized drill bit solutions in the United States, Middle East and many other regions around the world. We operate under three reportable business segments: (i) drilling services, (ii) completion services, and (iii) drilling products.
Drilling Services
Our contract drilling business operates in the continental United States and internationally in Colombia and Ecuador and, from time to time, we pursue contract drilling opportunities in other select markets. We also provide a comprehensive suite of directional drilling services in most major producing onshore oil and natural gas basins in the United States, and we provide services that improve the statistical accuracy of wellbore placement for directional and horizontal wells. We also provide electrical controls and automation to the energy, marine and mining industries, in North America and other select markets.
We have addressed our customers’ needs for drilling horizontal wells in shale and other unconventional resource plays by improving the capabilities of our drilling fleet. The U.S. land rig industry has in recent years referred to certain high specification rigs as “super-spec” rigs, which we consider to be at least a 1,500 horsepower, AC-powered rig that has at least a 750,000-pound hookload, a 7,500-psi circulating system, and is pad-capable. Due to evolving customer preferences, we refer to certain premium rigs as “Tier-1, super spec” rigs, which we consider as being a super-spec rig that also has a third mud pump and raised drawworks that allows for more clearance underneath the rig floor. As of December 31, 2025, our rig fleet included 137 Tier-1, super-spec rigs marketed.
Completion Services
Our well completion services business consists of services for hydraulic fracturing, wireline and pumping, completion support, and cementing. It also includes our power solutions natural gas fueling business and our proppant last mile logistics and storage business. Our completion services business operates in several of the most active basins in the continental United States including the Permian, the Marcellus Shale/Utica, the Eagle Ford, Mid-Continental, Haynesville, and the Bakken/Rockies.
To address customer demand for lower-emission and more cost efficient operations, we continue to expand our portfolio of natural gas-powered solutions, including electric, direct drive, and dual fuel pumps, to replace legacy diesel completion services equipment.
We are also advancing our Vertex™ fully automated, closed-loop completions process, a component of our proprietary digital completions management platform, eos™, which offers our customers the opportunity for greater operational efficiency, lower costs, and improved performance, while laying the foundation for integrating AI-driven reservoir technologies.
Drilling Products
We serve the energy and mining markets by manufacturing and distributing drill bits and downhole tools throughout North America and internationally in over 30 countries. Our drilling equipment is used in oil and natural gas exploration and production and in geothermal and mining operations. We have manufacturing and repair facilities located in Fort Worth, Texas, Leduc, Alberta and Saudi Arabia and repair facilities located in Argentina, Colombia and Oman.
Recent Developments in Market Conditions and Outlook — Commodity prices have historically been volatile but were relatively range-bound from the end of 2022 through the first quarter of 2025. The current demand for equipment and services remains impacted by macro conditions, including commodity prices, geopolitical environment, changes to international tariffs and trade policies, inflationary pressures, economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere, as well as customer consolidation and focus by exploration and production companies and service companies on capital returns. During the second quarter of 2025, global economic conditions deteriorated, in part, because of enacted and proposed trade policies and tariffs by the United States and other governments, as well as uncertainty regarding potential future changes to global trade policies and tariffs. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2025, OPEC+ countries began phasing out voluntary crude oil production cuts, leading to an increase in global supply. These developments, combined with rising geopolitical tensions- particularly in the Middle East- heightened uncertainty in global energy markets, which contributed to a decline in our share price, lowered average crude oil futures prices and increased uncertainty regarding the future economic environment in which we operate. During the second half of 2025, global economic conditions and the global energy market remained uncertain, with ongoing effects from trade policy uncertainty, the phase-out of voluntary crude oil production cuts by OPEC+ countries, and downward pressure on crude oil futures prices. While the full effects are yet to be determined, prolonged trade tensions and sustained lower crude oil futures prices could adversely affect our future outlook on activity and profitability.
Oil prices averaged $59.62 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2025 and closed at $61.60 per barrel on February 2, 2026. Natural gas prices (based on the Henry Hub Spot Market Price) averaged $3.73 per MMBtu in the fourth quarter of 2025 and closed at $4.40 per MMBtu on February 2, 2026.
Quarterly average oil prices and our quarterly average number of rigs operating in the United States for 2023, 2024 and 2025 are as follows:
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Average oil price per Bbl (1)
Average rigs operating per day – U.S. (2)
Average oil price per Bbl (1)
Average rigs operating per day – U.S. (2)
Average oil price per Bbl (1)
Average rigs operating per day – U.S. (2)
(1) The average oil price represents the average monthly WTI spot price as reported by the United States Energy Information Administration.
(2) A rig is considered to be operating if it is earning revenue pursuant to a contract on a given day.
In our drilling services segment, our average active rig count in the United States for the fourth quarter of 2025 was 93 rigs. This was a decrease from our average active rig count for the third quarter of 2025 of 95 rigs. Our active rig count in the United States at December 31, 2025 of 93 rigs was less than the rig count of 105 rigs at December 31, 2024, reflecting the industry-wide activity declines due, in part, to expectations regarding future crude oil prices, increased drilling efficiencies and market consolidation. We expect our rig count in the United States will be in the low-to-mid 90s in the first quarter of 2026. Term contracts help support our operating rig count. Based on contracts in place in the United States as of February 4, 2026, we expect an average of 49 rigs operating under term contracts during the first quarter of 2026 and an average of 27 rigs operating under term contracts during 2026.
We maintain a backlog of commitments for contract drilling services under term contracts, which we define as contracts with a duration of six months or more. Our contract drilling backlog in the United States as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was approximately $291 million and $426 million, respectively. Approximately 9% of our total contract drilling backlog in the United States at December 31, 2025 is reasonably expected to remain after 2026. See Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Report and “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Our current backlog of contract drilling revenue may decline and may not ultimately be realized, as fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment.”
In our completion services segment, activity and pricing for the fourth quarter of 2025 were steady compared to the previous quarter. We expect activity to decline slightly in the first quarter due to impacts from first quarter winter weather.
In our drilling products segment, U.S. and Canadian activity remains strong. International revenue was down slightly in the fourth quarter of 2025 compared to the third quarter of 2025 due to lower-than-expected sales in the Middle East, although we delivered revenue growth in several key markets, including Latin America and Asia-Pacific. We expect slightly lower U.S. revenue in the first quarter in this segment due to lower activity, which we expect will be offset by an increase in activity and revenue from our International business.
Cash capital expenditures for 2025 totaled $589 million. This was a decrease from the $678 million of cash capital expenditures in 2024 due to a decrease in business activity in 2025. Additionally, we received proceeds from sale of assets or idle equipment and insurance recoveries of $44.1 million and $25.8 million in 2025 and 2024, respectively. Based on our current outlook for activity, we expect our capital expenditures for 2026 to be approximately $500 million on a gross basis and less than $500 million, net of asset sales.
Recent Developments in Financial Matters — On January 31, 2025, we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and the other parties thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement amended and restated our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 27, 2018 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified at December 31, 2024, the “Prior Credit Agreement”). The commitments under the Credit Agreement are $500 million, and the loans and commitments under the Credit Agreement mature on January 31, 2030.
The Credit Agreement provides for a committed senior unsecured credit facility that permits aggregate revolving credit borrowings of up to $500 million, with a letter of credit sub-facility of $100 million and a swing line sub-facility that, at any time outstanding, is
limited to the lesser of $50 million and the amount of the swing line provider’s unused commitment. Subject to customary conditions, we may request that the lenders’ aggregate commitments be increased by up to $200 million, not to exceed total commitments of $700 million. For a description of the Credit Agreement, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” included in Part II, Item 7— “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Report.
As of December 31, 2025, we had no borrowings outstanding under our Credit Agreement. We had $5.0 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement at December 31, 2025 and, as a result, had available borrowing capacity of approximately $495 million under the Credit Agreement at that date.
Impact on our Business from Oil and Natural Gas Prices and Other Factors — Our revenues, profitability and cash flows are highly dependent upon prevailing prices for oil and natural gas, expectations about future prices, and our customers’ ability to access, and willingness to deploy, capital to fund their operating and capital expenditures. During periods of improved oil and natural gas prices, the capital spending budgets of oil and natural gas operators tend to expand, which generally results in increased demand for our services. Conversely, in periods when oil and natural gas prices are relatively low or when our customers have a reduced ability to access, or willingness to deploy, capital, the demand for our services generally weakens, and we experience downward pressure on pricing for our services. Even during periods of historically moderate or high prices for oil and natural gas, companies exploring for oil and natural gas may cancel or curtail programs or reduce their levels of capital expenditures for exploration and production for a variety of reasons, including the depletion of capital expenditure budgets and/or meeting annual drilling and completion targets, which could reduce demand for our services. We may also be impacted by delayed customer payments and payment defaults associated with customer liquidity issues and bankruptcies.
The oil and natural gas services industry is cyclical and, at times, experiences downturns in demand. During these periods, there has been substantially more oil and natural gas service equipment available than necessary to meet demand. As a result, oil and natural gas service contractors have had difficulty sustaining profit margins and, at times, have incurred losses during the downturn periods. We cannot predict either the future level of demand for our oil and natural gas services or future conditions in the oil and natural gas service businesses.
In addition to the dependence on oil and natural gas prices and demand for our services, we are highly impacted by operational risks, competition, labor issues, weather, the availability, from time to time, of products used in our businesses, supplier delays and various other factors that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Report.
For the three years ended December 31, 2025, our operating revenues consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
Drilling Services
Completion Services
Drilling Products
Other
Results of Operations
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
A discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 is included in Part II, Item 7— “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 11, 2025.
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
The following tables summarize results of operations by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Year Ended December 31,
Drilling Services
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues
Direct operating costs
Adjusted gross profit (1)
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
Other operating expense (income), net
Operating income (loss)
Capital expenditures
Operating days – U.S. (2)
(1) Adjusted gross profit is defined as revenues less direct operating costs (excluding depreciation, amortization and impairment expense). See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below for a reconciliation of GAAP gross profit to adjusted gross profit by segment.
(2) Operational data relates to our contract drilling business. A rig is considered to be operating if it is earning revenue pursuant to a contract on a given day.
Total revenues and direct operating costs decreased primarily due to a decrease in operating days in our contract drilling business within the United States.
The decrease in operating days for our U.S. contract drilling business reflects the industry-wide activity declines due, in part, to expectations regarding future crude oil prices, increased drilling efficiencies and market consolidation.
Total revenues declined in line with fewer operating days in our contract drilling business. The decrease was partially offset by a $30 million increase in directional drilling revenue driven by higher activity and job counts.
Direct operating costs decreased due to cost control initiatives and lower activity, although not at the same rate as operating days primarily due to fixed cost leverage. This decrease was partially offset by a $23 million increase in directional drilling operating costs from higher activity.
Depreciation, amortization and impairment expense decreased primarily due to a charge of $114 million related to the abandonment of 42 legacy, non-Tier-1 super-spec drilling rigs and related equipment in 2024. See Note 6 of Notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Capital expenditures decreased primarily due to a reduced capital expenditure budget as well as lower maintenance capital expenditures due to fewer operating days.
Year Ended December 31,
Completion Services
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues
Direct operating costs
Adjusted gross profit (1)
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
Impairment of goodwill
Other operating expense (income), net
Operating income (loss)
Capital expenditures
(1) Adjusted gross profit is defined as revenues less direct operating costs (excluding depreciation, amortization and impairment expense). See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below for a reconciliation of GAAP gross profit to adjusted gross profit by segment.
Completion services revenues and direct operating costs decreased primarily due to our fracturing operations. Revenues and direct operating costs from our fracturing operations decreased by approximately $306 million and $184 million, or 12% and 8%, respectively. Total pumping hours from our fracturing operations were relatively flat year over year, with most of the decline driven by lower service and materials pricing. Other completion services revenue decreased $34 million mainly due to lower service pricing for our wireline and power solutions operations and a decline in activity for our wireline and cementing operations.
Direct operating costs declined due to lower labor costs and improved maintenance efficiencies. This decline was partially offset by an $11 million increase in power solutions operating expenses driven by higher commodity costs.
Depreciation, amortization and impairment expense decreased primarily due to fewer capital additions placed in service relative to asset retirements between the periods.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded an $885 million impairment charge to goodwill associated with our completion services reporting unit. See Note 7 of Notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Other operating expense (income), net reflected a legal accrual that was partially offset by a favorable contract settlement, whereas other operating income in 2024 was due to gain on legal settlements.
We reduced capital expenditures in response to changing macroeconomic conditions between the periods.
Year Ended December 31,
Drilling Products
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues
Direct operating costs
Adjusted gross profit (1)
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation, amortization and impairment
Operating income (loss)
Capital expenditures
(1) Adjusted gross profit is defined as revenues less direct operating costs (excluding depreciation, amortization and impairment expense). See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below for a reconciliation of GAAP gross profit to adjusted gross profit by segment.
The $7.9 million decline in total revenue was primarily driven by reduced activity in Saudi Arabia and a lower U.S. rig count, which together contributed to a $14.1 million decrease. The decrease was partially offset by higher revenues from our Canadian operations where we gained market share, particularly during the second half of 2025, and improved pricing despite a reduction in Canadian rig count.
Direct operating costs increased primarily due to higher-than-normal bit repair expense during the second half of 2025. We enhanced our quality control procedures to offset the impact of these increases, and we observed measurable improvements in late 2025.
Direct operating costs and depreciation, amortization and impairment expense were approximately $2.6 million and $6.5 million higher than they would have otherwise been for the year ended December 31, 2025, respectively, as a result of the step up to fair value of our drill bits in accordance with purchase accounting. Direct operating costs and depreciation, amortization and impairment expense were approximately $7.9 million and $17.7 million higher than they would have otherwise been for the year ended December 31, 2024, respectively, as a result of the step up to fair value of our drill bits in accordance with purchase accounting.
Year Ended December 31,
Other (1)
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues
Direct operating costs
Adjusted gross profit (2)
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
Operating income (loss)
Capital expenditures
(1) Other includes our oilfield rentals business, prior to its divestiture in April 2025, and oil and natural gas working interests.
(2) Adjusted gross profit is defined as revenues less direct operating costs (excluding depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment expense). See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below for a reconciliation of GAAP gross profit to adjusted gross profit by segment.
The changes for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 can be primarily attributed to the divestiture of our oilfield rentals business during the second quarter of 2025. In order to provide a more meaningful basis for comparison, the discussion below is focused on changes between comparable periods excluding the effects of the divestiture.
Excluding the effects of our oilfield rentals business divestiture, the decrease in revenue and direct operating costs was driven by lower realized crude oil prices. Oil prices averaged $65.39 per barrel in 2025 as compared to $76.63 per barrel in 2024.
Excluding the effects of our oilfield rentals business divestiture, depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment expense, and capital expenditures, were relatively flat between the periods.
Year Ended December 31,
Corporate
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative
Merger and integration expense
Depreciation
Other operating expense (income), net
Interest income
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized
Other income (expense)
Capital expenditures
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased primarily due to certain severance costs incurred in the fourth quarter of 2024 that did not recur in 2025, as well as a continued focus on cost reduction efforts.
Merger and integration expense decreased due to the timing of the NexTier merger and the Ulterra acquisition, which both closed in the third quarter of 2023.
Depreciation expense increased due to the enhancement of our main corporate office, primarily arising from office consolidation following the NexTier merger and the completion of our digital performance center.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate increased to 9.6% for 2025 compared to (1.0%) for 2024. Our effective income tax rate fluctuates based on, among other factors, changes in pre-tax income in countries with varying statutory tax rates, changes in valuation allowances, and the impacts of various other permanent adjustments.
We continue to monitor income tax developments, including OECD Pillar 2 legislation, in the United States and other countries where we have legal entities or operations. We will incorporate into our future financial statements the impacts, if any, of future regulations and additional authoritative guidance when finalized.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, availability under our Credit Agreement and cash provided by operating activities. As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $554 million in working capital, including cash, cash equivalents of $419 million, and approximately $495 million available under our Credit Agreement.
Cash Flows
Our cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 are summarized below:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
Operating Activities — The decrease in cash provided by operating activities between fiscal years 2025 and 2024 was primarily attributable to lower activity in 2025. The increase in cash provided by operating activities between fiscal years 2024 and 2023 was primarily driven by the increased activities as a result of NexTier merger and Ulterra acquisition during the third quarter of 2023.
Investing Activities — The decrease in cash used in investing activities between fiscal years 2025 and 2024 was primarily attributable to our reduction of capital spending in response to changing industry conditions as well as lower maintenance capital expenditures due to fewer operating days. The decrease was partially offset by investment in an unconsolidated affiliate and investments in internally developed technology. The decrease in cash used in investing activities between fiscal years 2024 and 2023 was primarily driven by the cash paid as part of the NexTier merger and Ulterra acquisition during the third quarter of 2023.
Financing Activities — The decrease in cash used in financing activities between fiscal years 2025 and 2024 was primarily attributable to fewer share repurchases and a reduction in finance lease payments. The decrease in finance lease payments was due to the expiration of finance leases and equipment buyout options exercised during 2024. We derecognized $36.1 million of right‑of‑use assets as a result of these buyout options. The increase in cash used in financing activities between fiscal years 2024 and 2023 was primarily attributable to the issuance of the 2033 Senior Notes in 2023, as well as higher share repurchases and finance lease payments. As part of the Ulterra acquisition and NexTier merger in 2023, we acquired additional finance leases.
Credit Agreement
On January 31, 2025, we entered into the Credit Agreement, which amended and restated the Prior Credit Agreement. The commitments under the Credit Agreement are $500 million, and the loans and commitments under the Credit Agreement mature on January 31, 2030.
The Credit Agreement provides for a committed senior unsecured credit facility that permits aggregate revolving credit borrowings of up to $500 million, with a letter of credit sub-facility of $100 million and a swing line sub-facility that, at any time outstanding, is limited to the lesser of $50 million and the amount of the swing line provider’s unused commitment. Subject to customary conditions, we may request that the lenders’ aggregate commitments be increased by up to $200 million, not to exceed total commitments of $700 million.
Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest by reference, at our election, to the SOFR rate (plus a 0.10% per annum adjustment) or base rate, in each case subject to a 0% floor. The applicable margin on SOFR rate loans varies from 1.25% to 2.25% and the applicable margin on base rate loans varies from 0.25% to 1.25%, in each case determined based on our credit rating. As of December 31, 2025, the applicable margin on SOFR rate loans was 1.75% and the applicable margin on base rate loans was 0.75%. A letter of credit fee is payable by us equal to the applicable margin for SOFR rate loans times the daily amount available to be drawn under outstanding letters of credit. The commitment fee rate payable to the lenders varies from 0.15% to 0.35% based on our credit rating.
None of our subsidiaries are currently required to be a guarantor under the Credit Agreement. However, if any subsidiary guarantees or incurs debt, which does not qualify for certain limited exceptions and is otherwise, in the aggregate with all other similar debt, in excess of Priority Debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement), such subsidiary is required to become a guarantor under the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement contains representations, warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default and associated remedies that we believe are customary for agreements of this nature, including certain restrictions on our ability and the ability of each of our subsidiaries to grant liens and on the ability of each of our non-guarantor subsidiaries to incur debt. If our credit rating is below investment grade at both Moody’s and S&P, we will become subject to a restricted payment covenant, which would generally require us to have a Pro Forma Debt Service Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) greater than or equal to 1.50 to 1.00 immediately before and immediately after making any restricted payment. Restricted payments include, among other things, dividend payments, repurchases of our common stock, distributions to holders of our common stock or any other payment or other distribution to third parties on account of our or our subsidiaries’ equity interests. Our credit rating is currently investment grade at both credit rating agencies. The Credit Agreement also requires that our total debt to capitalization ratio, expressed as a percentage, not exceed 50% as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreement generally defines the total debt to capitalization ratio as the ratio of (a) total borrowed money indebtedness to (b) the sum of such indebtedness plus consolidated net worth, with consolidated net worth determined as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter. We were in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Agreement at December 31, 2025.
Reimbursement Agreement
On March 16, 2015, we entered into a Reimbursement Agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Reimbursement Agreement”) with The Bank of Nova Scotia (“Scotiabank”), pursuant to which we may from time to time request that Scotiabank issue an unspecified amount of letters of credit. As of December 31, 2025, we had $32.0 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Reimbursement Agreement.
Under the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement, we will reimburse Scotiabank on demand for any amounts that Scotiabank has disbursed under any of our letters of credit issued thereunder. Fees, charges and other reasonable expenses for the issuance of letters of credit are payable by us at the time of issuance at such rates and amounts as are in accordance with Scotiabank’s prevailing practice. We are obligated to pay to Scotiabank interest on all amounts not paid by us on the date of demand or when otherwise due at the Prime rate plus 2.00% per annum, calculated daily and payable monthly, in arrears, on the basis of a calendar year for the actual number of days elapsed, with interest on overdue interest at the same rate as on the reimbursement amounts. A letter of credit fee is payable by us equal to 1.50% times the amount of outstanding letters of credit.
We have also agreed that if obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by liens on any of our or our subsidiaries’ property, then our reimbursement obligations and (to the extent similar obligations would be secured under the Credit Agreement) other obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement and any letters of credit will be equally and ratably secured by all property subject to such liens securing the Credit Agreement.
Pursuant to a Continuing Guaranty dated as of March 16, 2015, our payment obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement are jointly and severally guaranteed as to payment and not as to collection by our subsidiaries that from time to time guarantee payment under the Credit Agreement. None of our subsidiaries are currently required to guarantee payment under the Credit Agreement.
We had $39.1 million of outstanding letters of credit at December 31, 2025, which was comprised of $32.0 million outstanding under the Reimbursement Agreement, $5.0 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement, and $2.0 million outstanding with financial institutions providing for short-term borrowing capacity, overdraft protection and bonding requirements. We maintain these letters of credit primarily for the benefit of various insurance companies as collateral for retrospective premiums and retained losses which could become payable under terms of the underlying insurance contracts and compliance with contractual obligations. These letters of credit expire annually at various times during the year and are typically renewed. As of December 31, 2025, no amounts had been drawn under the letters of credit. As of December 31, 2025, we had $37.0 million in surety bond exposure issued as financial assurance on an insurance agreement.
Our outstanding long-term debt at December 31, 2025 was $1.2 billion and consisted of $483 million of our 3.95% Senior Notes due 2028, $345 million of our 5.15% Senior Notes due 2029 and $400 million of our 7.15% Senior Notes due 2033. We were in compliance with all covenants under the associated agreements and indentures at December 31, 2025.
For a full description of the Credit Agreement, the Reimbursement Agreement and our senior notes, see Note 9 of Notes to consolidated financial statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Report.
Cash Requirements
We believe our current liquidity, together with cash expected to be generated from operations, should provide us with sufficient ability to fund our current plans to maintain and make improvements to our existing equipment, service our debt, pay cash dividends and repurchase our common stock and senior notes for at least the next 12 months.
If we pursue other opportunities that require capital, we believe we would be able to satisfy these needs through a combination of working capital, cash flows from operating activities, borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility or additional debt or equity financing. However, there can be no assurance that such capital will be available on reasonable terms, if at all.
The majority of our capital expenditures are expected to be used for normal, recurring items necessary to support our business. A portion of our capital expenditures can be adjusted and managed by us to match market demand and activity. Based on our current outlook for activity, we expect our capital expenditures for 2026 to be approximately $500 million on a gross basis and less than $500 million, net of asset sales.
Sources and Uses of Cash
During 2025, our sources of cash flow included:
• $1.0 billion from operating activities, and
• $44.1 million in proceeds from the disposal of property and equipment, including insurance recoveries.
During 2025, our uses of cash flow included:
• $589 million to make capital expenditures for the betterment and refurbishment of drilling services and completion services equipment and, to a much lesser extent, equipment for our other businesses, to acquire and procure equipment to support our drilling services, completion services, drilling products and other operations,
• $122 million to pay dividends on our common stock,
• $69.6 million for repurchases of our common stock,
• $10.5 million for an investment in an unconsolidated affiliate,
• $6.4 million to repay the Equipment Loans,
• $7.8 million for payments related to finance leases, and
• $16.2 million for other investing and financing activities.
We paid cash dividends during the year ended December 31, 2025 as follows:
Per Share
Total
(in thousands)
Paid on March 17, 2025
Paid on June 16, 2025
Paid on September 15, 2025
Paid on December 15, 2025
Total cash dividends
On February 4, 2026, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend on our common stock in the amount of $0.10 per share to be paid on March 16, 2026 to holders of record as of March 2, 2026. The amount and timing of all future dividend payments, if any, are subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon business conditions, results of operations, financial condition, terms of our debt agreements and other factors. Our Board of Directors may, without advance notice, reduce or suspend our dividend for any reason, including to improve our financial flexibility and position our company for long-term success. There can be no assurance that we will pay a dividend in the future.
We may, at any time and from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt for cash through open-market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, redemptions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will be upon such terms and at such prices as we may determine, and will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
In September 2013, our Board of Directors approved a stock buyback program. In February 2024, our Board of Directors approved an increase of the authorization under the stock buyback program to allow for an aggregate of $1.0 billion of future share repurchases. All purchases executed to date have been through open market transactions. Purchases under the buyback program are made at management’s discretion, at prevailing prices, subject to market conditions and other factors. Purchases may be made at any time without prior notice. There is no expiration date associated with the buyback program. As of December 31, 2025, we had remaining authorization to purchase approximately $694 million of our outstanding common stock under the stock buyback program. Shares of stock purchased under the buyback program are held as treasury shares.
We acquired shares of stock from employees during 2025, 2024 and 2023 that are accounted for as treasury stock. Certain of these shares were acquired to satisfy the exercise price and employees’ tax withholding obligations upon the exercise of stock options. The remainder of these shares were acquired to satisfy payroll withholding obligations upon the settlement of performance unit awards and the vesting of restricted stock units. These shares were acquired at fair market value. These acquisitions were made pursuant to the terms of the Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2014 Plan”), the Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. 2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”), the NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc. Equity and Incentive Award Plan and the NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc. (Former C&J Energy) Management Incentive Plan, and not pursuant to the stock buyback program.
Treasury stock acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Shares
Cost
Shares
Cost
Shares
Cost
Treasury shares at beginning of period
Purchases pursuant to stock buyback program
Acquisitions pursuant to long-term incentive plan
Treasury shares at end of period
Commitments — As of December 31, 2025, we had commitments to purchase major equipment totaling approximately $47.5 million.
Our completion services segment has entered into agreements to purchase minimum quantities of proppants from certain vendors. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining minimum obligation under these agreements was approximately $21.7 million, of which approximately $16.9 million and $4.8 million relate to 2026 and 2027, respectively.
See Note 10 of Notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Report for additional information on our current commitments and contingencies as of December 31, 2025.
Operating lease liabilities totaled $46.3 million and finance lease liabilities totaled $13.2 million at December 31, 2025. See Note 13 of Notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Report for additional information on our operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2025.
We anticipate $45.1 million of expenditures in 2026 related to various contractual obligations such as certain commitments to purchase proppants and lease liabilities.
Trading and Investing — We have not engaged in trading activities that include high-risk securities, such as derivatives and non-exchange traded contracts. We invest cash primarily in highly liquid, short-term investments such as overnight deposits and money market accounts.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates. Accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this section are those considered to be the most critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they involve significant judgments and uncertainties. We believe the following critical accounting estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements address all important areas where the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change. For additional information on our accounting policies, see Note 1 of Notes to consolidated financial statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Report.
Depreciation and amortization — Our industry is very capital intensive, as property and equipment represented 48.7% of our total assets as of December 31, 2025 and depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment represented 19.3% of our total operating costs and expenses in 2025. Our property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. No provision for salvage value is considered in determining depreciation of our property and equipment. We calculate depreciation and amortization on our assets based on the estimated useful lives that we believe are reasonable. The estimated useful lives are subject to key assumptions such as maintenance, utilization and job variation. These estimates may change due to a number of factors such as changes in operating conditions or advances in technology. The method of depreciation does not change whenever equipment becomes idle. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred. Renewals and betterments which extend the life or improve existing property and equipment are capitalized.
The following table outlines a 10% change in the useful lives on our major categories of property and equipment and the impact on operating income for the year ended December 31, 2025:
Useful Lives
Change
Impact
(in thousands)
Drilling services equipment
1-15 years
Completion services equipment
1-25 years
Impairment of long-lived assets — We review our long-lived assets, including property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of certain assets may not be recovered over their estimated remaining useful lives (“triggering events”). In connection with this review, assets are grouped at the lowest level at which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of other asset groupings. We estimate undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the respective assets or asset groupings in our assessment of its recoverability. These estimates of cash flows are based on historical trends in the industry as well as our expectations regarding the continuation of these trends in the future.
During the second quarter of 2025, negative market indicators such as lower industry-wide drilling rig and pressure pumping fleet count forecasts, increased volatility and margin compression for certain of our asset groups led to our reduced outlook for activity. The
reduction in activity forecasts combined with the decline in the market price of our common stock were considered a triggering event indicating certain of our long-lived tangible and intangible assets may be impaired. We deemed it necessary to perform recoverability tests on our hydraulic fracturing asset group within our completion services reporting unit and our Latin American contract drilling asset group during the second quarter of 2025. We estimated future cash flows over the expected remaining life of the primary asset for each asset group.
On an undiscounted basis, the expected cash flows exceeded the carrying value of our hydraulic fracturing asset group within our completion services reporting unit, indicating that no impairment was required during the second quarter of 2025.
The recoverability test for our Latin American contract drilling asset group during the second quarter of 2025 indicated that estimated undiscounted cash flows did not exceed its carrying value. Accordingly, we performed an impairment test and estimated the fair value of the asset group using the income approach. Under this approach, we used a discounted cash flow model, which utilized present values of cash flows to estimate fair value. Forecasted cash flows reflected known market conditions in the second quarter of 2025 and management’s anticipated business outlook for the asset group. Future cash flows were projected based on estimates of revenue, gross profit, selling, general and administrative expense, changes in working capital, and capital expenditures. Future cash flows were then discounted using a market-participant, risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital. Based on the results of the analysis performed, we recorded a $27.8 million impairment charge to Latin American drilling equipment during the second quarter of 2025 in our drilling services segment.
While the full effects of recent market developments are yet to be determined, prolonged trade tensions and sustained lower crude oil futures prices could adversely affect our future outlook on activity and profitability. If these conditions persist or deteriorate further, or if other unforeseen macroeconomic conditions emerge, they could negatively impact the expected cash flows used in our recoverability tests for our asset groups. Such changes could result in impairment charges in the future, which could be material to our results of operations and financial statements as a whole.
Fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in acquisitions — Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The difference between the purchase price amount and the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill on the balance sheet if the purchase price exceeds the estimated net fair value or as a bargain purchase gain on the income statement if the purchase price is less than the estimated net fair value. We apply significant judgment in estimating the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to rig counts, cash flow projections, estimated economic useful lives, operating and capital cost estimates, customer attrition rates, contributory asset charges, royalty rates and discount rates. Changes in these judgments or estimates can have a material impact on the valuation of the respective assets and liabilities acquired and our results of operations in periods after acquisition, such as through depreciation and amortization expense. The allocation of the purchase price may be modified up to one year after the acquisition date as more information is obtained about the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. See Note 2 of Notes to consolidated financial statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Report.
Goodwill — We assess goodwill at least annually on July 31, or more frequently when events or circumstances occur indicating recorded goodwill may be impaired. Goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level, which is at or one level below our operating segments. We determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value after considering qualitative, market and other factors. Any necessary goodwill impairment is determined using a quantitative impairment test. If the resulting fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized for the amount of the shortfall. The fair value of a reporting unit is determined using significant unobservable inputs, or level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. These inputs are based on forecasts and significant judgment.
We determined our drilling products operating segment consists of a single reporting unit to which the goodwill from our 2023 acquisition of Ulterra was allocated. We determined our completion services operating segment consisted of two reporting units: completion services, which was primarily comprised of our hydraulic fracturing operations and other integrated service offerings, and cementing services.
During the fourth and third quarters of 2025, we evaluated whether events or changes in circumstances indicated that the fair value of our goodwill may be less than its carrying amount. As part of this qualitative assessment, we considered the results of our most recent quantitative analysis performed in the second quarter of 2025, along with other factors such as macroeconomic conditions, market trends and indicators of potential changes in the fair value of our reporting units. Based on this assessment, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our goodwill exceeded its carrying amount. Therefore, no impairment was indicated, and a Step 1 quantitative goodwill impairment test was not required.
During the second quarter of 2025, we viewed the reduction in activity forecasts combined with the decline in the market price of our common stock as a triggering event that warranted a quantitative assessment for goodwill impairment.
We estimated the fair value of the drilling products and cementing services reporting units using the income approach. Under this approach, we used a discounted cash flow model, which utilized present values of cash flows to estimate fair value. Forecasted cash flows reflected known market conditions in the second quarter of 2025 and the expected market outlook. Future cash flows were projected based on estimates of revenue growth rates, gross profit, selling, general and administrative expense, changes in working capital, and capital expenditures. The terminal period used within the discounted cash flow model included a growth rate. Future cash flows were then discounted using a market-participant, risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital. Financial and credit market volatility directly impacts our fair value measurement through the weighted average cost of capital used to determine a discount rate. During times of volatility, significant judgment must be applied to determine whether credit market changes are a short-term or long-term trend.
The forecast for the cementing services reporting unit assumed lower activity in 2026 compared to estimated average activity for full year 2025 and moderate growth estimates thereafter. Those estimates were based on future drilling rig count forecasts during the second quarter of 2025 and estimated market share. Based on the results of the goodwill impairment test, the fair value of the cementing services reporting unit exceeded its carrying value with a substantial cushion. Accordingly, no impairment was recorded in the second quarter of 2025.
The forecast for the drilling products reporting unit assumed lower activity during 2025 relative to 2024, with growth estimates thereafter. The increases in estimated activity assumed growth in both domestic and international markets. Those growth estimates were based on drilling rig count forecasts and estimated market share. Geopolitical instability in regions in which we expect to maintain and grow market share, an unfavorable legal proceeding outcome, a global decrease in the demand of drilling products or other unforeseen macroeconomic considerations could negatively impact the key assumptions used in our goodwill assessment for our drilling products reporting unit. Based on the results of the goodwill impairment test, the fair value of the drilling products reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 8%. Accordingly, no impairment was recorded in the second quarter of 2025.
Assuming all changes are isolated, a decrease of 100 bps in our long-term revenue growth rate for our drilling products reporting unit would reduce our estimated fair value by approximately 7%, while a 100 bps increase to our discount rate would reduce our estimated fair value by approximately 10%.
A decrease in fair value resulting from unfavorable changes to these assumptions, or others, could result in goodwill impairment in future periods that could be material to our results of operations and financial statements as a whole.
Accruals for self-insured levels of insurance coverage — We maintain insurance coverage for fire, windstorm and other risks of physical loss to our equipment and certain other assets, employers’ liability, automobile liability, commercial general liability, workers’ compensation and insurance for other specific risks. We also self-insure a number of other risks, including loss of earnings and business interruption and most of our cybersecurity risks, and do not carry a significant amount of insurance to cover risks of underground reservoir damage. Our insurance accruals are based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported and are developed by our management with assistance from our third-party actuary and third-party claims administrator. The insurance accruals are influenced by our past claims experience factors and by published industry development factors. If we experience insurance claims or costs above or below our historically evaluated levels, our estimates could be materially affected. The frequency and number of claims or incidents could vary significantly over time, which could materially affect our self-insurance liabilities. Additionally, the actual costs to settle the self-insurance liabilities could materially differ from the original estimates and cause us to incur additional costs in future periods associated with prior year claims. A sensitivity analysis of the impact on earnings for these periods if other assumptions had been used in recording these liabilities is not practicable given the number of underlying assumptions and the wide range of reasonably possible outcomes. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Our operations are subject to a number of operational risks, including environmental and weather risks, which could expose us to significant losses and damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us.”
Income taxes — We are subject to income taxes in the United States and other foreign jurisdictions. We compute our provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets, if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in a future period, the deferred tax assets will be reduced by a valuation allowance. We believe the valuation allowance is a critical accounting estimate because it is susceptible to change from period to period, requires assumptions about our future income over the lives of the deferred tax assets, and because the impact of increasing or decreasing the valuation allowance is potentially material to our results of operations.
Our methodology for recording income taxes requires a significant amount of judgment in the use of assumptions and estimates.
Additionally, we forecast certain tax elements, such as future taxable income, as well as evaluate the feasibility of implementing tax planning strategies. Given the inherent uncertainty involved with the use of such variables, there can be significant variation between anticipated and actual results. Unforeseen events may significantly impact these variables, and changes to these variables could have a material impact on our income tax accounts. The final determination of our income tax liabilities involves the interpretation of local tax laws and related authorities in each jurisdiction. Changes in the operating environments, including changes in tax law, could impact the determination of our income tax liabilities for a tax year.
We continue to monitor income tax developments, including OECD Pillar 2 legislation, in the United States and other countries where we have legal entities. We recognize tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions when, in our judgment, it is more likely than not that such positions will be sustained on examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation, based on the technical merits. We adjust our liabilities for uncertain tax positions when our judgment changes as a result of new information previously unavailable. We routinely monitor the potential impact of these situations. As of December 31, 2025, we have no unrecognized tax benefits.
Volatility of Oil and Natural Gas Prices and its Impact on Operations and Financial Condition
Our revenues, profitability and cash flows are highly dependent upon prevailing prices for oil and natural gas, expectations about future prices, and our customers’ ability to access, and willingness to deploy, capital to fund their operating and capital expenditures. Commodity prices have historically been volatile, but were relatively range-bound from the end of 2022 through the first quarter of 2025. The current demand for equipment and services remains impacted by macro conditions, including commodity prices, geopolitical environment, changes to international tariffs and trade policies, inflationary pressures, economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere, as well as customer consolidation and focus by exploration and production companies and service companies on capital returns. During the second quarter of 2025, global economic conditions deteriorated, in part, because of enacted and proposed trade policies and tariffs by the United States and other governments, as well as uncertainty regarding potential future changes to global trade policies and tariffs. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2025, OPEC+ countries began phasing out voluntary crude oil production cuts, leading to an increase in global supply. These developments, combined with rising geopolitical tensions— particularly in the Middle East— heightened uncertainty in global energy markets, which contributed to a decline in our share price, lowered average crude oil futures prices and increased uncertainty regarding the future economic environment in which we operate. During the second half of 2025, global economic conditions and the global energy market remained uncertain, with ongoing effects from trade policy uncertainty, the phase-out of voluntary crude oil production cuts by OPEC+ countries, and downward pressure on crude oil futures prices. While the full effects are yet to be determined, prolonged trade tensions and sustained lower crude oil futures prices could adversely affect our future outlook on activity and profitability. Oil prices averaged $59.62 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2025. Natural gas prices (based on the Henry Hub Spot Market Price) averaged $3.73 per MMBtu in the fourth quarter of 2025.
In light of these and other factors, we expect oil and natural gas prices to continue to be unpredictable and to affect our financial condition, operations and ability to access sources of capital. Higher oil and natural gas prices do not necessarily result in increased activity because demand for our services is generally driven by our customers’ expectations of future oil and natural gas prices, as well as our customers’ ability to access, and willingness to deploy, capital to fund their operating and capital expenditures. A decline in demand for oil and natural gas, prolonged low oil or natural gas prices, expectations of decreases in oil and natural gas prices or a reduction in the ability of our customers to access capital would likely result in reduced capital expenditures by our customers and decreased demand for our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and cash flows. Even during periods of historically moderate or high prices for oil and natural gas, companies exploring for oil and natural gas may cancel or curtail programs or reduce their levels of capital expenditures for exploration and production for a variety of reasons, including the depletion of capital expenditure budgets and/or meeting annual drilling and completion targets, which could reduce demand for our services.
Impact of Inflation and Trade Policies
Moderate inflationary pressures and uncertainty regarding recently enacted and proposed changes to trade policies and tariffs by the United States and other governments, as well as uncertainty regarding potential future changes to global trade policies and tariffs, have contributed, or may contribute, to increases in the cost of certain goods, services, and labor. While the full effects are yet to be determined, prolonged trade tensions could, among other things, increase the costs of certain products used in our businesses, such as drill pipe, parts, and electronics. We continue to actively monitor market trends primarily related to sourcing labor, supplies and equipment.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recently issued accounting standards, see Note 1 of Notes to consolidated financial statements included as a part of Item 8 of this Report.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) is not defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus income tax expense (benefit), net interest expense, depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment expense, legal accruals and settlements, impairment of goodwill, and merger and integration expense. We present Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental disclosure because we believe it provides to both management and investors additional information with respect to the performance of our fundamental business activities and a comparison of the results of our operations from period to period and against our peers without regard to our financing methods or capital structure. We exclude the items listed above from net income (loss) in arriving at Adjusted EBITDA because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to the GAAP measure of net income (loss). Our computations of Adjusted EBITDA may not be the same as similarly titled measures of other companies. Set forth below is a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP financial measure of net income (loss).
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Net income (loss)
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net interest expense
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
Legal accruals and settlements
Impairment of goodwill
Merger and integration expense
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted Gross Profit
We define “Adjusted gross profit” as revenues less direct operating costs (excluding depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment expense, which does not include impairment of goodwill). Adjusted gross profit is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a useful indicator of our operating performance.
Drilling
Services
Completion
Services
Drilling
Products
Other
(in thousands)
For the year ended December 31, 2025
Revenues
Less direct operating costs
Less depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
GAAP gross profit (loss)
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
Adjusted gross profit (loss)
For the year ended December 31, 2024
Revenues
Less direct operating costs
Less depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
GAAP gross profit (loss)
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
Adjusted gross profit (loss)
For the year ended December 31, 2023
Revenues
Less direct operating costs
Less depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
GAAP gross profit (loss)
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment
Adjusted gross profit (loss)
- Ticker
- PTEN
- CIK
0000889900- Form Type
- 10-K
- Accession Number
0000889900-26-000013- Filed
- Feb 10, 2026
- Period
- Dec 31, 2025 (Q4 25)
- Industry
- Drilling Oil & Gas Wells
External resources
Permalink
https://insiderdelta.com/issuers/PTEN/10-k/0000889900-26-000013