Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.
YoY shift: Neutral
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is 0.09pp more bullish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
+0.20pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
-0.02pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
litigation+4
losses+4
decline+3
harm+2
unable+2
Positive rising
profitability+4
effective+3
achieve+3
able+2
greater+2
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
19,765 words
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Operation of Business
In connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and clinical trial expenses. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, stockholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our Common Stock and listed Warrants.
If the interpretations, estimates or judgments we use to prepare our financial statements prove to be incorrect, we may be required to restate our financial results, which could have a number of material adverse effects on us.
We have a history of , anticipate increasing our operating expenses in the future and may not or maintain in the future.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
impairment+4
decline+4
absence+3
default+1
Positive rising
benefit+3
improvement+3
greater+1
leading+1
MD&A (Item 7)
8,308 words
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis provide information that VSee Health’s management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the results of operations and financial of VSee Health, Inc. (“VSee Health” and for purposes of this section only, referred to as the “Company”, “we,” “us” and “our”). The discussion and analysis should be read together with VSee Health’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related respective notes thereto. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon VSee Health’s current expectations, estimates and projections that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to, among other considerations, the matters discussed under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report and the section herein entitled “Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
Prior to June 24, 2024, we were a blank check company incorporated in the State of Delaware organized for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. On June 24, 2024, we completed the Business Combination pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement dated as of November 21, 2023, as amended by the first amendment dated February 13, 2024, and the second amendment dated April 17, 2024 (as amended, the “Business Combination Agreement”) that we entered into with VSee Lab and iDoc. Upon the completion of the Business Combination, we changed our name to “VSee Health, Inc.” and the business of VSee Lab and iDoc became our business.
We have a history of operating losses, including operating losses of $9,582,893 and $62,150,845 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $82,416,723 at December 31, 2025, and there can be no assurance if or when we will produce sufficient revenue from our operations to support our costs. We must generate and sustain higher revenue levels in future periods to become profitable, and, even if we do, we may not be able to maintain or increase our profitability. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future as we expend substantial financial and other resources and these expenditures may not result in additional revenue or the growth of our business. Accordingly, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to offset our expected cost increases and achieve and sustain profitability. If we fail to achieve and sustain profitability, the market price of our Common Stock could decline.
There is uncertainty regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, which stated that management has concluded that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern for one year after the date our consolidated financial statements are issued. As discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, we have an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2025 and continuing net losses and negative cash flows from operations and we expect to continue incurring operating losses and negative cash flows in the future. These matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. As a result of the uncertainty regarding our ability to continue as a going concern, there is increased risk that you could lose the entire amount of your investment in us. The financial statements included in this report do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
We operate in a competitive industry, and if we are not able to compete effectively, our business, financial condition, and results of operations will be harmed.
The telemedicine market is rapidly evolving and highly competitive. We expect competition to intensify in the future as existing competitors and new entrants introduce new telemedicine services and software platforms or other technology to U.S. healthcare providers, particularly hospitals and healthcare systems. We currently face competition from a range of companies, including other incumbent providers of telemedicine consultation services and specialized software providers, that are continuing to grow and enhance their service offerings and develop more sophisticated and effective transaction and service platforms. In addition, large, well-financed healthcare providers have in some cases developed their own telemedicine services and technologies utilizing their own and third-party platforms and may provide these solutions to their patients. Electronic medical record vendors could build telemedicine functionality directly into their existing systems for healthcare providers instead of utilizing our solution. Competition from specialized telemedicine services and software providers, healthcare providers and other parties will result in continued pricing pressures, which is likely to lead to price declines in certain of our services, which could negatively impact our sales, profitability and market share.
Some of our competitors may have greater name recognition, longer operating histories and significantly greater resources than we do. Further, our current or potential competitors may be acquired by third parties with greater available resources. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than either can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or client requirements and may have the ability to initiate or withstand substantial price competition. In addition, current and potential competitors have established, and may in the future establish, cooperative relationships with vendors of complementary products, technologies or services to increase the availability of their solutions in the marketplace. Accordingly, new competitors or alliances may emerge that have greater market share, a larger client base, more widely adopted proprietary technologies, greater marketing expertise, greater financial resources and larger sales forces than we have, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage. Our competitors could also be better positioned to serve certain segments of the telemedicine market, which could create additional price pressure. In light of these factors, even if the solutions we offer are more effective than those of our competitors, current or potential clients may accept competitive solutions in lieu of purchasing our solutions. If we are unable to compete successfully in the telemedicine industry, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be harmed.
Table of Contents
Moreover, we expect that competition will continue to increase as a result of consolidation in the healthcare industry. Many healthcare industry participants are consolidating to create integrated healthcare delivery systems with greater market power. As provider networks and managed care organizations consolidate, thus decreasing the number of market participants, competition to provide services like ours will become more intense, and the importance of establishing and maintaining relationships with key industry participants will become greater. These industry participants may try to use their market power to negotiate price reductions for our telemedicine consultation and platform services. If we are forced to reduce our prices and are unable to achieve a corresponding reduction in our expenses, our revenues would decrease, which could harm our business.
The level of demand for and market utilization of our software and solutions are subject to a high degree of uncertainty.
The market for telemedicine services and related technology is characterized by rapid change. As telemedicine specialty consultation workflows and related business drivers continue to evolve, the level of demand for and market utilization of our telemedicine services and platform remain subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Our success will depend to a substantial extent on the willingness of healthcare organizations to use, and to increase the frequency and extent of their utilization of, our solutions and our ability to demonstrate the value of telemedicine to healthcare providers. If healthcare organizations do not recognize or acknowledge the benefits of these telemedicine services platform or if either is unable to reduce healthcare costs or generate positive health outcomes, then the market for our solutions might not develop at all, or it might develop more slowly than we expect. Similarly, negative publicity regarding patient confidentiality and privacy in the context of technology-enabled healthcare or concerns about our solutions or the telemedicine market as whole could limit market acceptance of our solutions. If clients do not perceive the benefits of our solutions, then the market may not develop at all, or it may develop more slowly than we expect. Achieving and maintaining market acceptance of our solutions could be negatively affected by many factors, including:
the quality, popularity, pricing and timing of telemedicine consultation services utilized by us and our competitors;
general economic conditions, particularly economic conditions adversely affecting discretionary and reimbursable healthcare spending;
federal and state policy initiatives impacting the need for, fraud and abuseconcerns regarding, and pricing of telemedicine services;
changes in client needs and preferences;
the development of specialty care practice standards or industry norms applicable to telemedicine consultation services;
the availability of other forms of medical and telemedicine assistance;
lack of additional evidence or peer-reviewed publication of clinical evidence supporting the safety, ease-of-use, cost-savings or other perceived benefits of our solutions over competitive products or other currently available methodologies;
perceived risks associated with the use of our solutions or similar products or technologies generally; and
critical reviews and public tastes and preferences, all of which change rapidly and cannot be predicted.
In addition, our solutions may be perceived by clients or potential clients to be more complicated or less effective than traditional approaches, and may be unwilling to change their current healthcare practices. Healthcare providers are often slow to change their medical treatment practices for a variety of reasons, including perceived liability risks arising from the use of new products and services and the uncertainty of third-party reimbursement. Accordingly, healthcare providers may not recommend our solutions until there is sufficient evidence to convince them to alter their current approach. Any of these factors could adversely affect the demand for and market utilization of our solutions, which would harm its business.
We have in the past been, and may in the future be, dependent on a limited number of significant customers.
Due to the size and nature of our arrangements with customers, one or a few customers have in the past and may in the future represent a substantial portion of our consolidated revenues and gross profits in any one year or over a period of several consecutive years. In 2025, our three largest customers accounted for 45% of our total 2025 revenue. In 2024, our two largest customers accounted for 24% of our total 2024 revenue. We cannot predict whether any of these customers will have a significant downturn in funding, and whether any such downturn, or any loss of funding or delay in payment from any one of these customers resulting therefrom, would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
We may incur losses in the future, and thereafter may never achieve or sustain profitability.
We expect our costs will increase in the foreseeable future and we may incur losses. We also expect to invest significant additional funds towards enhancing our services and platform, growing our business and operating as a public company and as we continue to invest in increasing our hospital and healthcare system client base, expanding our operations, hiring additional employees, and developing future offerings. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues sufficiently to offset these higher expenses. Even if we achieveprofitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods. As we expand, we may not generate positive cash flow from operations in any given period. If we are not able to achieve or maintain positive cash flow in the long term, we will require additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all or which would be dilutive to our stockholders. If we are unable to address these risks and challengessuccessfully as we encounter them, our business may be harmed. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability or positive cash flow could negatively affect the value of our common stock.
Table of Contents
The developing and rapidly evolving nature of our business and the markets in which we operate may make it difficult to evaluate our business.
We have been creating offerings for the developing and rapidly evolving market for telemedicine services. Each of VSee Lab, iDoc and telemedicine overall has limited operating history with their current solutions and business model makes it difficult to evaluate their business and prospects. It is difficult to evaluate trends that may affect our business and whether our expansion will be profitable. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties either VSee Lab and/or iDoc encounter or may encounter. These risks and difficulties include those frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries, such as determining appropriate investments of our limited resources, market adoption of our existing and future solutions, competition from other companies, acquiring and retaining clients, hiring, integrating, training and retaining skilled personnel, developing new solutions, determining prices for our solutions, unforeseen expenses, and challenges in forecasting accuracy. If we have difficulty launching new solutions, our reputation and business may be harmed. Additional risks include our ability to effectively manage growth and to store, protect and use personal data in compliance with governmental regulation, contractual obligations and other legal obligations related to privacy and security. If our assumptions regarding these and other similar risks and uncertainties, which we use to plan our business, are incorrect or change as we gain more experience operating our businesses or due to changes in our industry, or if we do not address these challengessuccessfully, our business, financial condition and results of operations could differ materially from our expectations and our business could suffer.
Our business, results of operations, and financial condition may fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis, which may result in a decline in our stock price if such fluctuations result in a failure to meet any projections that we may provide or the expectations of securities analysts or investors.
Our operating results have in the past and could in the future vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year and may fail to match our past performance, our projections or the expectations of securities analysts because of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. As a result, we may not be able to accurately forecast our operating results and growth rate. Any of these events could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate. Factors that may contribute to the variability of our operating results include:
the addition or loss of large hospital and healthcare system clients, including through acquisitions or consolidations of such clients;
seasonal and other variations in the timing of our sales and implementation cycles, especially in the case of our large clients;
the timing of recognition of revenue, including possible delays in the recognition of revenue due to sometimes unpredictable implementation timelines;
the amount and timing of operating expenses related to the maintenance and expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure;
the timing and success of introductions of new products and services by us or our competitors or any other change in the competitive dynamics of our industry, including consolidation among competitors, hospital and healthcare system clients or strategic partners;
hospital and healthcare system client renewal rates and the timing and terms of such renewals;
the mix of services sold and utilization volume of our services during a period;
the timing of expenses related to the development or acquisition of technologies or businesses and potential future charges for impairment of goodwill from acquired companies;
technical difficulties or interruptions in our services;
breaches of information security or privacy;
our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel, including cross-licensing and privileging each of our physician networks;
changes in the structure of healthcare provider and payment systems;
changes in the legislative or regulatory environment, including with respect to healthcare, privacy, or data protection, or enforcement by government regulators, including fines, orders, or consent decrees;
the cost and potential outcomes of ongoing or future regulatory investigations or examinations, or of future litigation;
political, economic and social instability, including terrorist activities and health epidemics, and any disruption these events may cause to the global economy; and
changes in business or macroeconomic conditions.
The impact of one or more of the foregoing and other factors may cause our operating results to vary significantly. As such, we believe that quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.
Table of Contents
Our sales cycles can be long and unpredictable and requires considerable time and expense. As a result, our sales, revenues, and cash flows are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate significantly.
The sales cycle for our solutions from initial contact with a potential lead to contract execution and implementation varies widely by client. Some of our clients undertake a significant and prolonged evaluation process, including to determine whether our solutions meet their unique telemedicine service needs, which frequently involves evaluation of not only our solutions but also an evaluation of those of our competitors, which has in the past resulted in extended sales cycles. Our sales efforts involve educating our clients about the use, technical capabilities and potential benefits of our solutions. Moreover, our large hospital and healthcare system clients often begin to deploy our solutions on a limited basis, but nevertheless demand extensive configuration, integration services and pricing concessions, which increases our upfront investment in the sales effort with no guarantee that these clients will deploy our solution widely enough across their organization to justify our substantial upfront investment. It is possible that in the future that we may experience even longer sales cycles, more complex client needs, higher upfront sales costs and less predictability in completing some of our sales, we continue to expand our direct sales force, expand into new territories and market additional solutions and services. If our sales cycles lengthen or our substantial upfront sales and implementation investments do not result in sufficient sales to justify our investments, our business could be harmed.
Developments affecting spending by the healthcare industry could adversely affect our revenues.
The U.S. healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent years, and we expect that significant changes will continue to occur. General reductions in expenditures by healthcare industry participants could result from, among other things:
government regulations or private initiatives that affect the manner in which healthcare providers interact with patients, payors or other healthcare industry participants, including changes in pricing or means of delivery of healthcare products and services;
consolidation of healthcare industry participants;
reductions in government funding for healthcare, in particular telehealth; and
adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting healthcare payors or providers or other healthcare industry participants.
Any of these changes in healthcare spending could adversely affect our revenues. Even if general expenditures by industry participants remain the same or increase, developments in the healthcare industry may result in reduced spending in some or all of the specific market segments that we serve now or in the future. However, the timing and impact of developments in the healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot assure you that the demand for our solutions and services will continue to exist at current levels or that we will have adequate technical, financial, and marketing resources to react to changes in the healthcare industry.
Our practices rely on physician and physician extender’s abilities and therefore there are potential medical malpractice risks that may adversely affect our business.
Our business may expose them to potential medical malpractice, professional negligence, or other related actions or claims that are inherent in the provision of healthcare services. These claims, with or without merit, could cause them to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management from our core business, harm our reputation and adversely affect our ability to attract and retain clients, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Economic uncertainties or prolongeddownturns in the general economy, or political changes, could disproportionately affect the demand for our solutions and harm our business.
Current or future economic uncertainties or prolongeddownturns could harm our business. Negative conditions in the general economy in the United States, including conditions resulting from changes in gross domestic product growth, financial and credit market fluctuations, political deadlock, natural catastrophes, pandemics, social unrest, warfare and terrorist attacks, could cause a decrease in funds available to our clients and potential clients and negatively affect the growth rate of our business.
These economic conditions may make it difficult for us and our clients to forecast and plan future budgetary decisions or business activities accurately, and they could cause our clients to reevaluate their decisions to purchase our solutions, which could delay and lengthen our sales cycles or result in cancellations of planned purchases. Furthermore, during challenging economic times or as a result of political changes, our clients may tighten their budgets and face constraints in gaining timely access to sufficient funding or other credit, which could result in an impairment of their ability to make timely payments to us. In turn, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, which would adversely affect our financial results.
To the extent our solutions are perceived by clients and potential clients to be discretionary, our revenues may be disproportionately affected by delays or reductions in general information technology and telemedicine spending. Competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices and attempting to lure away our clients. In addition, the increased pace of consolidation in the healthcare industry may result in reduced overall spending on our solutions.
We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic slowdown, instability or recovery, generally or within the healthcare industry, or the effect of political changes. If the economic conditions of the general economy or the healthcare industry do not improve, or worsen from present levels, our business could be harmed.
Table of Contents
If our existing clients do not continue or renew their contracts with us, renew at lower fee levels or decline to purchase additional services from them, our business may be harmed.
We expect to derive a significant portion of our revenues from renewal of existing client contracts and sales of additional services to existing clients. Factors that may affect our ability to sell additional solutions and services include, but are not limited to, the following:
the price, performance and functionality of our software solutions;
the availability, price, performance and functionality of competing solutions;
our ability to develop and sell complementary solutions and services;
changes in healthcare laws, regulations or trends; and
the business environment and strategic priorities of our clients.
Most of our clients have no obligation to renew their subscriptions for our solutions after the initial term expires. In addition, our clients may negotiate terms less advantageous to them upon renewal, which may reduce our revenues from these clients. If our clients fail to renew their contracts, renew our contracts upon less favorable terms or at lower fee levels or fail to purchase new solutions and services from them, our revenues may decline, or our future revenue growth may be constrained.
Our telemedicine business and growth strategy depends on our ability to maintain and expand our network of established hospital system and telemedicine user bases, board-certified physicians and other provider specialists. If we are unable to maintain and expand our network, our future growth would be limited and our business would be harmed.
Our success is dependent upon our continued ability to maintain a network of established health care systems providers and established, board-certified physicians and other provider specialists. Our ability to develop and maintain satisfactory relationships with these providers also may be negatively impacted by other factors not associated with either of them, such as changes in Medicare and/or Medicaid reimbursement levels and other pressures on healthcare providers and consolidation activity among hospitals, physician groups and healthcare providers. The failure to maintain or to secure new cost-effective provider contracts may result in a loss of or inability to grow our client base, higher costs, healthcare provider network disruptions, less attractive service for our clients and/or difficulty in meeting regulatory requirements, any of which could harm our business.
Our telemedicine business is dependent on our relationships with affiliated professional entities, which we do not own, to provide medical services, and our business would be harmed if those relationships were disrupted.
There is a risk that U.S. state authorities in some jurisdictions may find that our contractual relationships with our physicians and physician extenders who provide telehealth services violate state’s prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine and related professions. The corporate practice of medicine prohibition exists in some form, by statute, regulation, board of medicine or attorney general guidance, or case law, in most states, though there is broad variation between state application and enforcement of the doctrine makes an exact count difficult. These laws generally prohibit the practice of medicine or related professions by lay persons or entities and are intended to prevent unlicensed persons or entities from interfering with or inappropriately influencing a physician or physician extenders’ professional judgment. The extent to which each state considers particular actions or contractual relationships between us and our providers to constitute improper influence of professional judgment varies across the states and is subject to change and to evolving interpretations by state boards of medicine and state attorneys general, among others. As such, we must monitor our compliance with laws in every jurisdiction in which we operate on an ongoing basis, but we cannot guarantee that subsequent interpretation of the corporate practice of medicine or related professions laws will not circumscribe our business operations. State corporate practice of medicine doctrines also often impose penalties on the licensed providers themselves for aiding the corporate practice of medicine, which could discourage physicians from participating in our network of providers.
A material change in corporate practice of medicine interpretation could impact our operations and could impair our ability to provide services to our clients and harm our business.
Table of Contents
If we are not able to develop and release new solutions, or successfulenhancements, new features and modifications to our existing solutions, our business could be harmed.
To date, we have derived a substantial majority of our revenues from sales of solutions from our telemedicine software platforms, and our longer-term results of operations and continued growth will depend on our ability successfully to develop and market new solutions and add in additional modules and feature in a timely manner. In addition, we have invested, and will continue to invest, significant resources in research and development to enhance our existing solutions. If existing clients are not willing to make additional payments for such new solutions, or if new clients do not value such new solutions or enhancements, it could harm our business. If we are unable to predict client and user preferences or other industry changes, or if we are unable to enhance or modify our solutions on a timely basis, we may lose clients. In addition, our results of operations would suffer if our innovations are not responsive to the needs of our clients or if such innovation are not appropriately timed with market opportunity or effectively brought to market. Delays in launching new solutions may open windows of opportunity for new and existing competitors to erode our market share and may negatively impact our revenues and profitability.
Any failure to offer high-quality technical support services may harm our relationships with our clients and our financial results.
Our clients depend on our support organization to resolve any technical issues relating to our services. In addition, our sales process is highly dependent on the quality of our solutions, our business reputation and on strong recommendations from our existing clients. Any failure to maintain high-quality and highly-responsive technical support, or a market perception that we do not maintain high-quality and highly-responsive support, could harm our reputation, adversely affect our ability to sell our solutions to existing and prospective clients, and harm our business.
We offer technical support services with our solutions and may be unable to respond quickly enough to accommodate short-term increases in demand for support services, particularly as we increase the size of our client base. We may also be unable to modify the format of our support services to compete with changes in support services provided by competitors. It is difficult to predict demand for technical support services and if demand increases significantly, we may be unable to provide satisfactory support services to our clients. Additionally, increased demand for these services, without corresponding revenue, could increase costs and adversely affect our results of operations.
Because competition for qualified personnel is intense, we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to support our continued growth.
To continue to execute on our growth plan, we must attract and retain highly qualified personnel. The pool of qualified personnel with experience working in the healthcare market is limited overall and the competition to hire them is intense. As such, we may not be successful in continuing to attract and retain qualified personnel. We have from time to time in the past experienced, and expect to continue to experience in the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. In addition, our search for replacements for departed employees may cause uncertainty regarding the future of our business, impact employee hiring and retention, and adversely impact our revenue, financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to attract new personnel or fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, our business and future growth prospects could be harmed.
We depend on our senior management team, and the loss of one or more of these employees or an inability to attract and retain qualified key personnel could harm our business.
Our success depends largely upon the continued services of our key executive officers. These executive officers are “at-will” employees and therefore may terminate employment with us at any time with no advance notice. We also rely on our leadership team in the areas of research and development, marketing, services and general and administrative functions. From time to time, there may be changes in our executive management team resulting from the hiring or departure of executives, which could disrupt our business. The replacement of one or more of our executive officers or other key employees would likely involve significant time and costs and may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives. In addition, volatility or lack of performance in our stock price may affect our ability to attract and retain replacements should key personnel depart. If we are not able to retain any of our key personnel, our business could be harmed.
Our management team has broad discretion in making strategic decisions to execute our growth plans, and there can be no assurance that management’s decisions will result in successfulachievement of our business objectives or will not have unintended consequences that negatively impact our growth prospects.
Our management has broad discretion in making strategic decisions to execute our growth plans and may devote time and company resources to new or expanded solution offerings, potential acquisitions, prospective customers or other initiatives that do not necessarily improve our operating results or contribute to our growth. Management’s failure to make strategic decisions that are ultimately accretive to our growth may result in unfavorable returns and uncertainty about its prospects, each of which could cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.
Table of Contents
We may acquire other companies or technologies, which could divert our management’s attention, result in dilution to our stockholders, and otherwise disrupt our operations, and we may have difficulty integrating any such acquisitions successfully or realizing the anticipated benefits therefrom, any of which could harm our business.
We may intend to acquire or invest in additional businesses, applications and services or technologies that we believe could complement or expand our solutions, enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities. The pursuit of potential acquisitions may divert the attention of management and cause us to incur various expenses in identifying, investigating and pursuing suitable acquisitions, whether or not they are consummated.
In addition, if we acquire additional businesses, we may not be able to integrate the acquired personnel, operations and technologies successfully, or effectively manage the combined business following the acquisition. We also may not achieve the anticipated benefits from the acquired business due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
inability to integrate or benefit from acquired technologies or services in a profitable manner;
unanticipated costs or liabilities, including legal liabilities, associated with the acquisition;
difficulty integrating the accounting systems, operations and personnel of the acquired business;
difficulties and additional expenses associated with supporting legacy products and hosting infrastructure of the acquired business;
difficulty converting the clients of the acquired business onto our platform and contract terms, including disparities in the revenue, licensing, support or professional services model of the acquired company;
diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
adverse effects to our existing business relationships with business partners and clients as a result of acquisitions;
the potential loss of key employees or contractors;
use of resources that are needed in other parts of our business; and
use of substantial portions of our available cash to consummate the acquisition.
In addition, a significant portion of the purchase price of businesses we acquire may be allocated to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets, which must be assessed for impairment at least annually or if there are triggering events identified. In the future, if our acquisitions do not yield expected returns, we may be required to take charges to our results of operations based on this impairment assessment process, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could adversely affect our results of operations or cause the market price of our common stock to decline. In addition, if an acquired business fails to meet our expectations, our business may be harmed.
Table of Contents
If we are unable to grow, or if we fail to manage future growth effectively, our revenues may not increase and we may be unable to implement our business strategy.
Our future success will depend upon our ability to grow, and if we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may incur unexpected expenses and be unable to meet our clients’ requirements, all of which could harm our business. A key aspect to managing our growth is our ability to scale each of VSee Lab’s and iDoc’s capabilities, including in response to unexpected shifts in demand for telemedicine. To manage our current and anticipated future growth effectively, we must continue to maintain and enhance our IT infrastructure, financial and accounting systems and controls. We must also attract, train and retain a significant number of board-certified physicians, sales and marketing personnel, client support personnel, professional services personnel, software engineers, technical personnel and management personnel, and the availability of such personnel, in particular physicians and software engineers, may be constrained.
Our growth will depend on the acceptance of our solutions as a suitable supplement to traditional healthcare delivery systems and on our ability to overcome operational challenges. Our business model and solutions could lose our viability as a supplement to traditional healthcare delivery systems due to client dissatisfaction or new alternative solutions. If we are unable to address the needs of our clients, or our clients are dissatisfied with the quality of our solutions, our clients may not renew our contracts, seek to cancel or terminate their relationship with us or renew on less favorable terms, any of which could cause our annual net dollar retention rate to decrease.
As we continue to grow, including from the integration of employees and businesses acquired in connection with previous or future acquisitions, we may find it difficult to maintain important aspects of our corporate culture, which could negatively affect our profitability and our ability to retain and recruit qualified personnel who are essential for our future success. If we do not effectively manage our growth, we may not be able to execute on our business plan, respond to competitive pressures, take advantage of market opportunities, satisfy client requirements or maintain high-quality solutions. Additionally, we may not be able to expand and upgrade our systems and infrastructure to accommodate future growth.
Failure to effectively manage our growth could also lead us to over-invest or under-invest in development and operations, result in weaknesses in our infrastructure, systems or controls, give rise to operational mistakes, financial losses, loss of productivity or business opportunities and result in loss of employees and reduced productivity of remaining employees. Our growth is expected to require significant capital expenditures and may divert financial resources from other projects such as the development of new solutions and services. If we are unable to effectively manage our growth our expenses may increase more than expected, our revenues may not increase or may grow more slowly than expected and we may be unable to implement our business strategy. The quality of our services may also suffer, which could negatively affect our reputation and harm our ability to attract and retain clients.
If the estimates and assumptions we use to determine the size of our total addressable market are inaccurate, our future growth rate may be affected and our business would be harmed.
Market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates that may prove to be inaccurate. Even if the markets in which we compete meet our size estimates and forecasted growth, our business could fail to grow at similar rates, if at all. The principal assumptions relating to our market opportunity include all hospitals in the United States adopting outsourced clinical resources via telemedicine and that we can successfully add specialties to tour solutions beyond those currently offered today. Our market opportunity is also based on the assumption that our existing and future offerings will be more attractive to our clients and potential clients than competing solutions. If these assumptions prove inaccurate, our business could be harmed.
We may not grow at the rates we historically have achieved or at all, even if our key metrics may indicate growth, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
We have experienced significant growth in recent years. Future revenues may not grow at these same rates or may decline. Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to grow our revenues from existing clients, to complete sales to potential future clients, to expand our client base, and to develop new solutions and services. We can provide no assurances that we will be successful in executing on these growth strategies or that, even if our key metrics would indicate future growth, we will continue to grow our revenues or to generate net income. Our ability to execute on our existing sales pipeline, create additional sales pipelines and expand our client base depends on, among other things, the attractiveness of our services relative to those offered by our competitors, our ability to demonstrate the value of our existing and future services and our ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified sales and marketing leadership and support personnel. In addition, our existing clients may be slower to adopt our services than we currently anticipate, which could harm our business and growth prospects and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Table of Contents
We may in the future become subject to litigation, which could be costly and time-consuming to defend.
We may become subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, such as claims brought by our clients in connection with commercial disputes or employment claims made by our current or former associates. Litigation may result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, which may substantially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Insurance may not cover such claims, may not provide sufficient payments to cover all of the costs to resolve one or more such claims and may not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. Resolution of some of these types of matters against us may result in our having to pay significant fines, judgments, or settlements, which, if uninsured, or if the fines, judgments, and settlements exceed insured levels, could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows, thereby harming our business and stock price. For example, fines or assessments could be levied against us under domestic or foreign data privacy laws (such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), or the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”)) or under authority of privacy enforcing governmental entities (such as the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”)) or as a result of private actions, such as class actions based on data breaches or based on private rights of action (such as that contained in the CCPA). Certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance coverage, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured and adversely affect our ability to attract directors and officers. In addition, such litigation could result in increased scrutiny by government authorities having authority over our business, such as the FTC, the HHS, Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”), and state attorneys general.
We may become subject to medical liability claims, which could cause us to incur significant expenses, may require us to pay significant damages if not covered by insurance, and could harm our business.
Because our business delivers telehealth services to patients, each faces the risk of medical liability claimsagainst us and our affiliated professional entities. We and our affiliated professional entities have in the past and may in the future be subject to medical liability claims and, if these claims are successful, substantial damage awards. Although we maintain insurance covering medical malpracticeclaims in amounts that we believe is appropriate in light of the risks attendant to our business, we cannot predict the outcomes of medical malpractice cases, the effect that any claims of this nature, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could have on our business or reputation or on our ability to attract and retain clients. Professional liability insurance is expensive and insurance premiums may increase significantly in the future, particularly as we expand our services. As a result, adequate professional liability insurance may not be available to our providers in the future at acceptable costs or at all.
Any claims made against us that are not fully covered by insurance could be costly to defendagainst, result in substantial damage awards against us and divert the attention of our management and our providers from our operations, which could harm our business. In addition, any claims may harm our business or reputation.
Taxing authorities may successfully assert that we should have collected or in the future should collect sales and use, value-added, or similar taxes, and we could be subject to liability with respect to past or future sales, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We do not collect sales and use and similar taxes in any states for telemedicine services based on our belief that our services are not subject to such taxes in any state. Sales and use and similar tax laws and rates vary greatly from state to state. Certain states in which we do not collect such taxes may assert that such taxes are applicable, which could result in tax assessments, penalties and interest with respect to past services, and we may be required to collect such taxes for services in the future. Such tax assessments, penalties and interest or future requirements may adversely affect our results of operations.
We will likely require additional capital from equity or debt financings to support business growth, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all.
We intend to make investments to support our anticipated business growth and will likely require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new solutions or enhance our existing solutions, enhance our operating infrastructure and acquire complementary businesses and technologies. In order to achieve these objectives, we may make future commitments of capital resources, including incurring additional indebtedness under our credit facility. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing secured by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
Table of Contents
Risks Related to Governmental Regulation
In the U.S., we conduct business in a heavily regulated environment and if we fail to comply with health care laws and regulations, we could incur fines and other penalties, be prohibited from participating in certain reimbursement programs or be required to make significant changes to our operations or experience adverse publicity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The U.S. healthcare industry is heavily regulated and closely scrutinized by federal, state and local governments. Comprehensive statutes and regulations govern the manner in which we provide and bill for services and collect reimbursement from governmental programs and private payors, our contractual relationships with our providers, vendors and customers, our marketing activities and other aspects of our operations. Of particular importance are:
the federal physician self-referral law, commonly referred to as the Stark Law, that, subject to specific exceptions, prohibits physicians from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity for the provision of certain “designated health services” if the physician or a member of such physician’s immediate family has a direct or indirect financial relationship (including an ownership interest or a compensation arrangement) with the entity, and prohibit the entity from billing Medicare or Medicaid for such designated health services. Many states have adopted similar laws;
the federal Anti-Kickback Statute that prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any bribe, kickback, rebate or other remuneration for referring an individual, in return for ordering, leasing, purchasing or recommending or arranging for or to induce the referral of an individual or the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services covered, in whole or in part, by any federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation. In addition, the government may assert that a claim resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FalseClaims Act;
the federal FalseClaims Act that prohibits, among other things, presenting, or causing the presentment, of a false claim for payment or approval; making, using, or causing others to make or use, a false record or statement that is material to a false or fraudulent claim, Making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay money to the government; or conceals, avoids, or decreases an obligation to pay money to the government. Many states have adopted state falseclaims act laws.
We do not always have the benefit of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of these laws and regulations to guide our operations. In the future, different interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations could subject our current or past practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality or could require them to make changes in our operations or structure. A determination that they have violated these laws, or the public announcement that we are being investigated for possible violations of these laws, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and our business reputation could suffer significantly. In addition, other similar legislation or regulations at the federal or state level may be adopted that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
To enforce compliance with the federal laws, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, or OIG, have recently increased their scrutiny of healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Dealing with investigations can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert management’s attention from the business. Any such investigation or settlement could increase our costs or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, because of the potential for large monetary exposure under the federal FalseClaims Act, which provides for treble damages and penalties of $12,537 to $25,076 per false claim or statement, healthcare providers often resolveallegations without admissions of liability for significant and material amounts to avoid the uncertainty of treble damages that may be awarded in litigation proceedings. Such settlements often contain additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree, settlement agreement or corporate integrity agreement. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers’ compliance with the healthcare reimbursement rules and fraud and abuse laws.
The laws, regulations and standards governing the provision of healthcare services may change significantly in the future. We cannot assure you that any new or changed healthcare laws, regulations or standards will not materially adversely affect our business. We cannot assure you that a review of our business by judicial, law enforcement, regulatory or accreditation authorities will not result in a determination that could adversely affect our operations.
Table of Contents
State legislative and regulatory changes specific to the area of telehealth law may present the third party medical groups and independent physicians on our platform with additional requirements and state compliance costs, which may create additional operational complexity and increase costs.
Our affiliated professional entities and independent physicians’ and physician extenders’ ability to provide telehealth services to, and receive reimbursement for the services provided to patients in a particular state are dependent upon the laws and regulations of the state where the patient resides. Laws and regulations governing the provision of telehealth services are evolving at a rapid pace and are subject to changing political, regulatory, and other influences. Some states’ regulatory agencies or medical boards may have established rules or interpreted existing rules in a manner that limits or restricts providers’ ability to provide telehealth services or for physicians to supervise nurse practitioners and physician assistants remotely. Additionally, there may be limitations placed on the modality through which telehealth services may be provided or requirements related to the provision of telehealth services, such as having a prior in person visit or receipt of certain informed consents. For example, some states specifically require synchronous (or “live”) communications and restrict or exclude the use of asynchronous telehealth modalities, which is also known as “store-and-forward” telehealth. Because this is a developing area of law and regulation, we continually monitor our compliance in every jurisdiction in which we operate. However, we cannot be assured that our affiliated professional entities or independent providers’ activities and arrangements, if challenged, will be found to be in compliance with the state requirements or that a new or existing law or regulation will not be adopted, enforced, or changed in manner that is unfavorable to our business model. We cannot predict the regulatory landscape for those jurisdictions in which we operate and any significant changes in law, policies, or standards, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, could occur with little or no notice. The majority of the consultations provided through our platforms are synchronous consultations for patients located in jurisdictions that permit the use of asynchronous telehealth. If there is a change in laws or regulations related to our business, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, that adversely affects our structure or operations, including greater restrictions on the use of asynchronous telehealth or remote supervision of nurse practitioners or physician assistants, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Evolving government regulations and enforcement activities may require increased costs or adversely affect our results of operations.
In a regulatory climate that is uncertain, our operations may be subject to direct and indirect adoption, expansion or reinterpretation of various laws and regulations. This risk is especially acute in the healthcare industry given the level of government spending and oversight of the industry as a whole.
In the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to inquiries and audits by federal and state agencies that oversee applicable healthcare program participation, licensure and payment regulations. We may also be subject to routine and targeted government audits and investigations. We believe that the regulatory environment surrounding most segments of the healthcare industry remains intense. Responding to audits and inquiries may require us to incur significant expense. If the results of any audit or investigation reveal material non-compliance, we may have to incur additional expense in defending our business and making modifications to our operations.
In the states in which we operate, we believe we are in material compliance with all applicable material regulations, but, due to the uncertain regulatory environment, certain states may determine that we are in violation of their laws and regulations. If we must remedy such violations, we may be required to modify our business and services in such states in a manner that undermines our respective platform’s attractiveness to customers, we may become subject to fines or other penalties or, if we determine that the requirements to operate in compliance in such states are overly burdensome, we may elect to terminate our operations in such states. In each case, our revenue may decline and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
If we fail to comply with extensive healthcare laws and government regulations, we could sufferpenalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations.
The healthcare industry is required to comply with extensive and complex laws and regulations at the federal, and state government levels relating to, among other things:
licensure of health providers, and enrollment with government reimbursement programs;
necessity and adequacy of telehealth services;
Table of Contents
relationships with physicians and other referral sources and referral recipients;
billing and coding for services;
properly handling any overpayments;
quality of medical equipment, devices and services we make available;
qualifications of medical professionals and support personnel;
confidentiality, maintenance, data breach, identity theft and security issues associated with health-related and personal information and medical records; and
communications with patients and consumers.
Among these laws are the federal Stark Law, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the FalseClaims Act, and similar state laws. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer civil sanctions and criminalpenalties, including the loss of our ability to participate in the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs. While we endeavor to ensure that our financial relationships with referral sources such as hospitals and physicians comply with the applicable laws (including applicable safe harbors and exceptions), evolving interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations could subject our current practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality or could require them to make changes in our operations. A determination that we have violated these or other laws, or the public announcement that we are being investigated for possible violations of these or other laws, could harm our business, and our business reputation could suffer significantly. In addition, other legislation or regulations at the federal or state level may be adopted that could harm our business.
Our collection, use and disclosure of personally identifiable information, including health information, is subject to federal and state privacy and security regulations, and our failure to comply with those regulations or to adequately secure the information we hold could result in significant liability or reputational harm to us and, in turn, harm our client base and our business.
There are a number of federal and state laws, rules and regulations, as well as contractual obligations, relating to the protection, collection, storage, use, retention, security, disclosure, transfer and other processing of confidential, sensitive and personal information, including certain patient protected health information (PHI), such as patient records. Existing laws and regulations are constantly evolving, and new laws and regulations that apply to our business are being introduced at every level of government in the United States. In many cases, these laws and regulations regarding transfer or disclosure of personal information apply not only to transfer or disclosure to third-parties, but also to transfers of information between or among VSee Lab and iDoc, our affiliates and other parties with whom we conduct business. These laws and regulations may be interpreted and applied differently over time and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and it is possible that they will be interpreted and applied in ways that may have a material adverse effect on our business. We monitor legal developments in data privacy and security regulations at the local, state and federal level, however, the regulatory framework for data privacy and security worldwide is continuously evolving and developing and, as a result, interpretation and implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future.
The management of PHI is subject to HIPAA. HIPAA is the primary federal law that protects patients’ health care data and records. HIPAA consists of the HIPAA privacy rule (“Privacy Rule”) and the HIPAA security rule (“Security Rule”). The HIPAA Privacy Rule protects medical records and other personal health information by limiting our use and disclosure, giving individuals the right to access, amend, and seek accounting of our own health information, and limiting most uses and disclosures of health information to the minimum amount reasonably necessary to accomplish the intended purpose. The HIPAA Security Rule protects individuals’ electronic personal health information that is created, received, used, or maintained, and requires appropriate administrative, physical and technical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and security of electronic protected health information. The HITECH Act strengthened HIPAA enforcement provisions, requires OCR to periodically audit covered entities and our business associates, and authorized State Attorneys General to bring civil actions for HIPAA violations. It permits the HHS to conduct audits of HIPAA compliance and impose significant civil monetary penalties even if we did not know or reasonably could not have known about the violation.
HIPAA requires healthcare providers and its business associates to develop and maintain policies and procedures with respect to PHI that is used or disclosed, including the adoption of administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect such information. HIPAA also implemented the use of standard transaction code sets and standard identifiers that covered entities must use when submitting or receiving certain electronic healthcare transactions, including activities associated with the billing and collection of healthcare claims.
HIPAA imposes mandatory penalties for certain violations. HIPAA also authorizes state attorneys general to file suit on behalf of their residents. Courts are able to award damages, costs and attorneys’ fees related to violations of HIPAA in such cases. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to sue us in civil court for violations of HIPAA, its standards have been used as the basis for duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness in the misuse or breach of PHI.
Table of Contents
In addition, HIPAA mandates that the Secretary of HHS conduct periodic compliance audits of HIPAA covered entities or business associates for compliance with the HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards. It also tasks HHS with establishing a methodology whereby harmed individuals who were the victims of breaches of unsecured PHI may receive a percentage of the Civil Monetary Penalty fine paid by the violator.
HIPAA further requires that patients be notified of any unauthorized acquisition, access, use or disclosure of our unsecured PHI that compromises the privacy or security of such information, with certain exceptions related to unintentional or inadvertent use or disclosure by employees or authorized individuals. HIPAA specifies that such notifications must be made “without unreasonabledelay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.” If a breach affects 500 patients or more, it must be reported to HHS without unreasonabledelay, and HHS will post the name of the breaching entity on its public web site. Breaches affecting 500 patients or more in the same state or jurisdiction must also be reported to the local media. If a breach involves fewer than 500 people, the covered entity must record it in a log and notify HHS at least annually. This reporting obligation is in addition to any state notification requirements.
There are proposed changes to the HIPAA regulations, which if enacted, may require us to make significant changes to our HIPAA compliance program and our patient access request procedures and may have other financial, and operational impacts.
There are other federal and state laws that protect the confidentiality, privacy, availability, integrity and security of personally identifiable information (PII), including PHI. At the state and local level, there is increased focus on regulating the collection, store, use, retention, security, disclosure, transfer and other processing of confidential, sensitive and personal information. These laws in many cases are more restrictive than, and may not be preempted by, the HIPAA rules and may be subject to varying interpretations by courts and government agencies, creating complex compliance issues for us and our clients and potentially exposing us to additional expense, adverse publicity and liability.
In addition, all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia have enacted breach notification laws that may require us to notify patients, employees or regulators in the event of unauthorized access to, disclosure of, or acquisition of personal or confidential information experienced by us or our service providers. These laws are not consistent, and compliance in the event of a widespread data breach is difficult and may be costly. Moreover, states have been frequently amending existing laws, requiring attention to changing regulatory requirements. We also may be contractually required to notify patients or other counterparties of a security breach. Although we may have contractual protections with our service providers, any actual or perceived security breach could harm our reputation and brand, expose us to potential liability or require us to expend significant resources on data security and in responding to any such actual or perceived breach. Any contractual protections we may have from our service providers may not be sufficient to adequately protect us from any such liabilities and losses, and we may be unable to enforce any such contractual protections. In addition to government regulation, privacy advocates and industry groups have and may in the future propose self-regulatory standards from time to time. These and other industry standards may legally or contractually apply to us, or we may elect to comply with such standards.
New health and personal information security standards, whether implemented pursuant to HIPAA, congressional action or otherwise, could have a significant effect on the manner in which VSee and iDoc must handle healthcare related data, and the cost of complying with standards could be significant. If we do not comply with existing or new laws and regulations related to PHI, we could be subject to criminal or civil sanctions.
Because of the sensitivity of the PII we store and transmit, the security features of our technology platforms are very important. If our security measures are breached or fail, unauthorized persons may be able to obtain access to sensitive client and patient data, including HIPAA-regulated PHI. As a result, our reputation could be severelydamaged, adversely affecting client or investor confidence. Clients may curtail their use of or stop using our services or our client base could decrease, which would cause our business to suffer. In addition, we could face litigation, damages for contract breach, penalties and regulatory actions for violation of HIPAA and other applicable laws or regulations and significant costs for remediation, notification to individuals and for measures to prevent future occurrences. Any potential security breach could also result in increased costs associated with liability for stolen assets or information, repairing system damage that may have been caused by such breaches, incentives offered to client or other business partners in an effort to maintain our business relationships after a breach and implementing measures to prevent future occurrences, including organizational changes, deploying additional personnel and protection technologies, training employees and engaging third-party experts and consultants. While we maintain insurance covering certain security and privacy damages and claim expenses, we may not carry insurance or maintain coverage sufficient to compensate for all liability and, in any event, insurance coverage would not address the reputational damage that could result from a security incident.
Table of Contents
We also publish statements to our clients that describe how we handle and protect personal information. If federal or state regulatory authorities or private litigants consider any portion of these statements to be untrue, we may be subject to claims of deceptive practices, which could lead to significant liabilities and consequences, including, without limitation, costs of responding to investigations, defendingagainstlitigation, settling claims and complying with regulatory or court orders.
In March 2020, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”) released a final rule implementing the information blocking prohibition of the 21st Century Cures Act, which went into effect on April 5, 2021. The rule, which applies to almost all health care providers, is designed to create a more interoperable health care system that supports seamless data exchange, improves care coordination, and removes barriers to the use and exchange of PHI between providers and plans and as directed by patients. “Information blocking” refers to activities that unreasonably limit the availability and use of electronic health information (“EHI”). The rule prohibits information blocking of EHI unless it is required by law or meets one of eight narrowly applied exceptions. Like most providers, we had to create new policies and procedures, trainings, and governance structures, and invest in new technology to comply with the rule. ONC has delegated oversight and compliance monitoring to the Office of Inspector General, and a provider may be subject to significant financial penalties if it fails to comply with these new rules. The exact penalties for providers will be determined through future rulemaking. Any individual can submit a complaintalleging that a provider has engaged in information blocking through an online portal made available by ONC.
If we fail to comply with federal and state laws and policies governing claim submissions to government healthcare programs or commercial insurance programs, we or our clients may be subject to civil and criminalpenalties or loss of eligibility to participate in government healthcare programs and contractual claims by commercial insurers.
We offer revenue cycle management services to our clients that include the preparation and submission of claims for professional service and billing agent collection processing with payers on behalf of our clients. Certain of these reimbursement claims are governed by federal and state laws with potential civil and criminalpenalties for non-compliance. The HIPAA security, privacy and transaction standards also have a potentially significant effect on our claims preparation, transmission and submission services, because such services must be structured and provided in a way that supports our clients’ HIPAA compliance obligations. Errors by us or our systems with respect to entry, formatting, preparation or transmission of claim information may be determined or alleged to be in violation of these laws and regulations. If our revenue cycle management services fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may be subjected to federal or state government investigations and possible penalties may be imposed upon us, falseclaims actions may have to be defended, private payers may file claimsagainst them, and we may be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or other government-funded healthcare programs. Further, our clients may seek contractual remedies and indemnification. Any investigation or proceeding related to these topics, even if unwarranted or without merit, could adversely affect demand for our services, could force us to expend significant capital, research and development and other resources to address the failure, and may harm our business.
Private pay sources such as third-party insurance and managed care entities also often reserve the right to, and do actually conduct audits of our billing processes, and have from time to time conducted such reviews. Our costs to respond to and defend any such reviews, audits and investigations are significant and are likely to increase in the current enforcement environment. These audits and investigations may require us to refund or retroactively adjust amounts that have been paid to us by the relevant government program or private pay source.
If our revenue cycle management services fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may be subjected to federal or state government investigations and possible penalties may be imposed upon us, falseclaims actions may have to be defended, private payers may file claimsagainst us, and we may be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or other government-funded healthcare programs. Further, our clients may seek contractual remedies and indemnification. Any investigation or proceeding related to these topics, even if unwarranted or without merit, could adversely affect demand for our services, could force us to expend significant capital, research and development and other resources to address the failure, and may harm our business.
Physician licensing and credentialing, a cost of providing professional services, can negatively impact our margins as it may incur increased expenses to utilize appropriately licensed and credentialed physicians for consult demands, especially when expanding to new jurisdictions and new hospital clients.
A physician’s (or a physician extender’s) ability to perform telemedicine consults is dictated by where the physician is licensed to practice and with whom the physician is privileged to provide services. State licensure and physician credentialing requirements take time to procure, often necessitating months of lead-time before a physician is able to begin providing consults for a particular hospital facility. Our ability to manage and anticipate physician need and prioritize licensing and credentialing could impact profit margins and expense management. As consult demands increase in areas where only a limited number of physicians hold necessary licenses and credentials, those physicians with appropriate licensing and credentialing to meet client demands may assume additional overtime shifts or otherwise demand increased fees, thereby increasing its costs. Further, obtaining a license to practice medicine in a particular jurisdiction is at the discretion of the local state medical board, and, as such, timing to achieve licensure in certain jurisdictions may be outside our ability to accomplish within expected time frames.
Table of Contents
Certain software products related to telemedicine platforms may be subject to FDA regulatory review and oversight. It is critical to identify applicable FDA requirements and ensure compliance with such requirements.
Certain software products often used in telemedicine platforms and offerings could fall under the broad category of digital health products that may, in certain circumstances, require FDA regulatory review prior to marketing. The FDA generally maintains regulatory oversight over products that meet the Agency’s statutory definition of a “medical device.” In certain circumstances, software applications and their corresponding platforms are considered medical devices when they are intended to be used for one or more medical purposes and are consequently regulated by the FDA. Determining whether a product meets the definition of a medical device requires assessment of both design and intended use. Intended use of a product is determined by the intent of the manufacturer as evidenced by the design of the product and the product labeling. Labeling is a broad term that includes marketing and advertising claims. The FDA’s regulatory approach toward digital health technologies is set forth in both regulations and guidance documents. This requires analyzing (1) whether a product meets the FDA’s definition of a medical device and, if it does, (2) whether it is carved out from active regulation by one of the FDA’s digital health “enforcement discretion” policies. In general, the FDA’s overarching approach is to apply its regulatory oversight in a risk-based manner to only software functions deemed to meet the definition of medical devices (i.e., those intended for the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease) and whose functionality could create patient safety risks in the event of a malfunction.
Risks Related to the Use of Our Technology
Failure to keep pace with advances in technology could cause our solutions to become obsolete, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The telemedicine industry is characterized by rapid technological change, changing consumer requirements, short product lifecycles and evolving industry standards. The successful implementation of our business model depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt to evolving technologies and industry standards and introduce new solutions accordingly. For example, we deployed our software platform to hospital organizations as a stand-alone software-as-a-service solution independent of its clinical services to enable these providers to optimize and scale its platform across all of our care sites. These new solutions carry risks, such as cost overruns, delays in delivery, performance problems, and lack of acceptance by our clients. If we cannot anticipate or adapt to rapidly evolving industry standards, technology, and increasingly sophisticated clients and our employees, our existing technology could become undesirable, obsolete, or harm our reputation. Moreover, we may not be successful in developing, using, marketing, selling or maintaining new technologies effectively or adapting our solutions to evolving client requirements or emerging industry standards, and, as a result, our business could be harmed. In addition, we have limited insight into trends that might develop and affect our business, which could lead to errors in our predicting and reacting to relevant business, legal, and regulatory trends and healthcare reform. Further, there can be no assurance that technological advances by one or more of our competitors or future competitors will not result in our present or future solutions and services becoming uncompetitive or obsolete. If any of these events occur, it could harm our business.
If the systems that we use to provide our services experience security breaches, we may incur significant liabilities, and our reputation and business may be harmed.
Our services involve the storage and transmission of our clients’ proprietary information, sensitive or confidential data, including valuable personal information of patients, clients and others, as well as the PHI of our clients. Because of the sensitivity of the information we store and transmit, the security features of our computer, network and communications systems infrastructure are critical to the success of our business. A breach or failure of our security measures could result from a variety of circumstances and events, including third-party action, employee negligence or error, malfeasance, computer viruses, cyber-attacks by computer hackers, failures during the process of upgrading or replacing software and databases, power outages, hardware failures, telecommunication failures, user errors or catastrophic events. Information security risks have generally increased in recent years because of the proliferation of new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks. As cyber threats continue to evolve, We may be required to expend additional resources to further enhance our information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. If our security measures fail or are breached, it could result in unauthorized persons accessing sensitive client or patient data (including PHI), a loss of or damage to our data, an inability to access data sources, or process data or provide our services to our clients. Such failures or breaches of our security measures, or our inability to effectively resolve such failures or breaches in a timely manner, could severelydamage our reputation, adversely affect client or investor confidence in us and reduce the demand for our services from existing and potential clients. In addition, we could face litigation, damages for contract breach, monetary penalties, or regulatory actions for violation of applicable laws or regulations including HIPAA, and incur significant costs for remedial measures to prevent future occurrences and mitigate past violations. Although we maintain insurance covering certain security and privacy damages and claim expenses, we may not carry insurance or maintain coverage sufficient to compensate for all liability and, in any event, insurance coverage would not address the reputational damage that could result from a security incident.
Table of Contents
We may experience cyber-security and other breachincidents that remain undetected for an extended period. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventive measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, or if we are unable to effectively resolve such breaches in a timely manner, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose sales and clients, which could harm our business.
We rely on telecommunications and internet service providers for providing solutions to our clients, and any interruption or failure in the services provided by these third parties could harm our business.
Our business is highly dependent on telecommunications and internet service providers. Our services are designed to operate 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week, without interruption. However, we may experience interruptions and delays in services and availability from time to time. We may not maintain redundant systems or facilities for some of these services. While we control and have access to our servers, we do not control the operation of internet providers.
Additionally, if our vendors or internet providers are unable to keep up with our growing needs, this could harm our business. Interruptions in our services may reduce our revenue, cause us to issue refunds to clients for prepaid and unused subscriptions, subject us to potential liability or adversely affect client renewal rates.
In the event of a catastrophic event with respect to one or more of these systems or facilities, we may experience an extended period of system unavailability, which could negatively impact our relationships with clients. To operate without interruption, we and our service providers must guard against:
damage from fire, power loss, natural disasters and other force majeure events outside our control;
communications failures;
software and hardware errors, failures and crashes;
security breaches, computer viruses, hacking, denial-of-service attacks and similar disruptiveproblems; and
other potential interruptions.
Moreover, system failures may result in loss of data, including patient data, which is critical to the provision of our services. Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in connection with our or our third parties’ systems could negatively impact our relationships with clients, adversely affect our brand and expose us to liabilities to third parties, all of which could harm our business.
Failure to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights could impair our ability to protect our internally developed technology and our brand and the costs involved in such enforcement could harm our business.
Our intellectual property includes our internally developed processes, methodologies, algorithms, applications, technology platform, software code, website content, user interfaces, graphics, trade dress, databases and domain names. We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and copyright laws and confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property rights in our internally developed technology and content. We believe that our intellectual property is an essential asset of our business. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, our brand and reputation could be harmed and competitors may be able to use our technologies and erode or negate any competitive advantage we may have, which could harm our business, negatively affect our position in the marketplace, limit our ability to commercialize our technology, and delay or render impossible our achievement of profitability. A failure to protect our intellectual property in a cost-effective and meaningful manner could adversely affect our ability to compete. We regard the protection of our trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, trade dress, databases and domain names as critical to our success.
We strive to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state, and common law rights and other rights provided under foreign laws. However, the steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may be inadequate. For example, other parties, including our competitors, may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our services, or design around our intellectual property and, in such cases, we may not be able to assert our intellectual property rights against such parties. Further, our contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our confidential information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of our confidential information, and we may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights.
Table of Contents
We make business decisions about when to seek patent protection for a particular technology and when to rely upon trade secret protection, and the approach we select may ultimately prove to be inadequate. In particular, we do not currently hold a patent or other registered or applied for intellectual property protection for our software platform. Even in cases where we seek patent protection, there is no assurance that the resulting patents will effectively protect every significant feature of our solutions, technology or proprietary information, or provide us with any competitive advantages, since intellectual property law, including statutory and case law, particularly in the United States, is constantly developing, and any changes in the law could make it harder for us to enforce our rights.
In order to protect our intellectual property rights, we may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect these rights. Litigation brought to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of our intellectual property. Furthermore, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights. An adverse determination of any litigation proceedings could put our intellectual property at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put any related pending patent applications at risk of not issuing. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential or sensitive information could be compromised by disclosure in the event of litigation. In addition, during the course of litigation, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Negative publicity related to a decision by us to initiate such enforcement actions against a client or former client, regardless of its accuracy, may adversely impact our other client relationships or prospective client relationships, harm our brand and business, and could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Our failure to secure, protect, and enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our brand and our business.
We could incur substantial costs as a result of any claim of infringement of another party’s intellectual property rights.
There is considerable patent and other intellectual property development activity in our industry. Our future success depends in part on not infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others. From time to time, third parties may claim that we are infringing upon our intellectual property rights or that we have misappropriated our intellectual property. As competition in our market grows, the possibility of patent infringement, trademark infringement and other intellectual property claimsagainst us increases. In a patent infringement claim against us, we may assert, as a defense, that we do not infringe the relevant patent claims, that the patent is invalid or both. The strength of our defenses will depend on the patents asserted, the interpretation of these patents, and our ability to invalidate the asserted patents. However, we could be unsuccessful in advancing non-infringement and/or invalidityarguments in our defense. In the United States, issued patents enjoy a presumption of validity, and the party challenging the validity of a patent claim must present clear and convincing evidence of invalidity, which is a high burden of proof. Conversely, the patent owner need only prove infringement by a preponderance of the evidence, which is a lower burden of proof. We may be unaware of the intellectual property rights that others may claim cover some or all of our technology or services. Because patent applications can take years to issue and are often afforded confidentiality for some period of time, there may currently be pending applications, unknown to us, that later result in issued patents that could cover one or more aspects of our technology and services. Any claims or litigation could cause us to incur significant expenses and, whether or not successfully asserted against us, could require that we pay substantial damages, ongoing royalty or license payments or settlement fees, prevent us from offering our solutions or using certain technologies, require us to re-engineer all or a portion of our platforms, or require that we comply with other unfavorable terms. We may also be obligated to indemnify our clients or business partners or pay substantial settlement costs, including royalty payments, in connection with any such claim or litigation and to obtain licenses, modify applications or refund fees, which could be costly. Even if we were to prevail in such a dispute, any litigation regarding our intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations.
Our software platforms may not perform properly due to errors or similar problems, which could damage our reputation, give rise to claimsagainst us, or divert application of our resources from other purposes, any of which could harm our business.
Our software platforms provide our clients and providers with the ability to, among other things, complete, view and edit medical history; request a consult (either scheduled or on demand); conduct a consult (via video or phone); and initiate an expert medical service. Software development is time-consuming, expensive and complex, and may involve unforeseendifficulties. We may encounter technical obstacles, and it is possible that they may discover additional problems that prevent our software platforms from operating properly. If our solutions do not function reliably or fail to achieve client expectations in terms of performance, clients could assert liability claimsagainst us or attempt to cancel their contracts with us. This could damage tour reputation and impair our ability to attract or maintain clients.
Table of Contents
Moreover, complex software, such as ours, often contains defects and errors, some of which may remain undetected for a period of time. Material performance problems, defects or errors in our existing or new software and services may arise in the future and may result from interface of our solution with systems and data that we did not develop and the function of which is outside of our control or undetected in our testing. Such errors may be found after the introduction of new software or enhancements to existing software. If we detect any errors before we introduce a solution, we may have to delay deployment for an extended period of time while we address the problem. Any defects and errors, and any failure by us to identify and address them, could result in loss of revenue or market share, diversion of development resources, harm to our reputation and increased service and maintenance costs. Defects or errors may discourage existing or potential clients from purchasing our solutions from us. Correction of defects or errors could prove to be impossible or impracticable. The costs incurred in correcting any defects or errors may be substantial and could harm our business.
Risks Related to our Common Stock and Us as Public Company
We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our securities less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years. However, if our non-convertible debt issued within a three-year period exceeds $1.0 billion, or revenues exceeds $1.07 billion, or the market value of our shares of common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million on the last day of the second fiscal quarter of any given fiscal year, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following fiscal year. As an emerging growth company, we are not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and we are exempt from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Additionally, as an emerging growth company, we have elected to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As such, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates. We cannot predict if investors will find our shares less attractive because we may rely on these provisions. If some investors find our shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our shares and our share price may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, will not adopt the new or revised standard until the time private companies are required to adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accountant standards used.
We have no substantial combined operating history, and any failure to successfully integrate the business of VSee Lab and iDoc could adversely affect the results of our operations.
Until June 24, 2024, each of VSee Lab and iDoc operated independently since their inception. There can be no assurance that we will be able to integrate the operations of VSee Lab and iDoc successfully or to institute the necessary systems and procedures, including accounting and financial reporting systems, to manage the combined enterprise on a profitable basis and to report the results of operations of the combined entities on a timely basis. In addition, there can be no assurance that the management teams of each of VSee Lab and iDoc will be able to successfully manage the combined entity and effectively implement their operating or growth strategies. The financial results of VSee Lab and iDoc cover periods during which they were not under common control or management and, therefore, may not be indicative of their future financial or operating results. Our success will depend on management’s ability to integrate VSee Lab and iDoc into one organization. Our inability to successfully integrate these companies and to coordinate and integrate certain operational, administrative, financial and information technology systems would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we expect our costs will increase in the foreseeable future and we may incur losses. We also expect to invest significant additional funds towards enhancing our services and platform, growing our business and operating as a public company and as we continue to invest in increasing our hospital and healthcare system client base, expanding our operations, hiring additional employees, and developing future offerings. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues sufficiently to offset these higher expenses.
Table of Contents
Our current management team have no experience managing a public company.
Our current management have no experience managing a publicly-traded company, interacting with public company investors and research analysts, and complying with the increasingly complex laws and requirements pertaining to public companies, including those related to timely public disclosures, financial reporting, internal controls and enterprise risk management. As a result, we may not successfully or efficiently manage our new and additional roles and responsibilities. A public company is subject to significant regulatory oversight, reporting obligations under U.S. securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. These new obligations and constituents will require significant attention of our senior management and could divert our attention away from the day-to-day management of our business. Failure to adequately comply with the requirements of being a public company, including deficiencies in financial reporting or ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, could cause investors to lose confidence in the our reported financial and other information and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation, as well as severelynegatively affect our stock price.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.
As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes- Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing standards of Nasdaq. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we anticipate that we will continue to expend significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight. If any of these new or improved controls and systems do not perform as expected, we may experience material weaknesses in our controls. Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business.
In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, our management identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting related to the lack of sufficient number of personnel within the accounting function to adequately segregate duties, we did not have a designed and implemented effective Information Technology General Controls (“ITGC”) related to access controls to financial accounting system, we did not have a formalized control environment and oversite of controls over financial reporting, and we lack proper accounting for significant or non-recurring transactions.
We intend to continue to take steps to enhance our internal controls, including implementing additional internal procedures and utilizing well-established external consulting resources with experience and expertise in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and public company accounting and reporting requirements.
If we are unable to remediate the material weaknesses and achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and effective disclosure controls, our business could be adversely affected. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on Nasdaq. We are required to comply with the SEC rules that implement Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and are required to make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. We are required to provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting commencing with this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Table of Contents
If our business’ benefits do not meet the expectations of financial or industry analysts, the market price of our securities may decline.
The market price of our securities may decline if:
We do not achieve the perceived benefits of the acquisition as rapidly as, or to the extent anticipated by, financial or industry analysts; or
The effect of the Business Combination on the financial statements is not consistent with the expectations of financial or industry analysts.
Accordingly, investors may experience a loss as a result of decreasing stock prices.
We are required to meet the continuing listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market. However, we may be unable to maintain the listing of our securities in the future.
If we fail to meet the continued listing requirements and Nasdaq delists our securities, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for the Company; and
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
Investors could experience a reduction in share price for our Common Stock they own, or dilution resulting from the exercise of warrants into Common Stock or the conversion of preferred stock into Common Stock, or the vesting and settlement of equity grants to employees, directors and consultants.
As warrant holders exercise warrants to purchase Common Stock, or holders of preferred stock convert their preferred stock into Common Stock, and then attempt to sell those shares into the market, if there is not demand for shares of our Common Stock equal to, or greater than, the number of shares such security holders seek to sell, the price of our Common Stock could decline. If an employee, director or consultant who received restricted stock units or other equity awards as part of a compensation plan attempts to sell those shares into the market without equal or greater demand in the market for those shares, such attempted sales of our Common Stock could negatively impact the price of our Common Stock. The creation of Common Stock shares from warrants or preferred stock conversions, or the granting of stock or other equity under a compensation plan that results in the issuance of Common Stock, will create dilution for Common Stockholders, and potentially impact the per share value of our Common Stock, impacting their investments.
We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert our management’s attention.
The market price of our securities may be volatile, and in the past companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their securities have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigationagainst us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriouslyharm our business.
If our shares become subject to the penny stock rules, it would become more difficult to trade our shares.
The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or authorized for quotation on certain automated quotation systems, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. If we do not retain a listing on Nasdaq and if the price of our Common Stock is less than $5.00, our Common Stock will be deemed a penny stock. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document containing specified information. In addition, the penny stock rules require that before effecting any transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, a broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive (i) the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement; (ii) a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks; and (iii) a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements may reduce the trading activity in the secondary market for our Common Stock, so stockholders may have difficulty selling their shares.
Table of Contents
We will continue to incur significant costs from operating as a public company, and our management expects to devote substantial time to public company compliance programs.
As a public company, we have and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses due to our compliance with regulations and disclosure obligations applicable to us, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq. Stockholder activism, the current political environment and the current high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations, which may lead to additional compliance costs and impact, in ways we cannot currently anticipate, the way we operate our business. Our management and other personnel devote, and likely will continue to devote, a substantial amount of time to these compliance programs and monitoring of public company reporting obligations and as a result of the new corporate governance and executive compensation related rules, regulations and guidelines prompted by the Dodd-Frank Act and further regulations and disclosure obligations expected in the future, we will likely need to devote additional time and costs to comply with such compliance programs and rules. These rules and regulations will cause us to incur significant legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costlier.
To comply with the requirements of being a public company, we may need to undertake various actions, including implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring new accounting or internal audit staff. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate and weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls when we become subject to this requirement could negatively impact the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that we may be required to include in our periodic reports we will file with the SEC under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in a restatement of our prior period financial statements. If we are not able to demonstrate compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that our internal control over financial reporting is perceived as inadequate or that we are unable to produce timely or accurate financial statements, investors may lose confidence in our operating results and the price of our Common Stock could decline. In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on Nasdaq.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future and, as such, capital appreciation, if any, of our Common Stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our Common Stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, our current loan facility and any future loan arrangements we enter into may contain terms prohibiting or limiting the number or amount of dividends that may be declared or paid on our Common Stock. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our Common Stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
Without obtaining adequate capital funding or improving our financial performance, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.
Our recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital-raising activities. As a result, we have concluded that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Failure to secure additional funding may require us to modify, delay, or abandon some of our planned future expansion or development, or to otherwise enact operating cost reductions available to management, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition, and ability to achieve our intended business objectives.
Table of Contents
We may amend the terms of the public warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of public warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants. As a result, the exercise price of the public warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of a public warrant could be decreased, all without approval of each public warrant affected.
Our public warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Warrant Agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of public warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the public warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of shares of common stock, as applicable, purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
Although we consummated our initial business combination, there is no guarantee that the public warrants will ever be in the money, and they may expire worthless.
The exercise price for the public warrants is $11.50 per share of common stock. There is no guarantee that the public warrants will ever be in the money prior to their expiration, and as such, the public warrants may expire worthless.
Holders of our convertible promissory notes may sell a large number of shares, resulting in substantial diminution to the value of shares of Common Stock held by our current stockholders.
Pursuant to the terms of the Quantum Note and the Ascent Note (each as defined herein), they may not be converted into shares of Common Stock to the extent that the issuance of shares of Common Stock would cause the respective holders to beneficially own more than 4.99% of our then outstanding shares of Common Stock. However, we do not have the right to control the timing and amount of any sales by the holders of such shares. In addition, these restrictions do not prevent the holders from selling shares of Common Stock received in connection with such note conversions and then receiving additional shares of Common Stock in connection with a subsequent issuance. In this way, the respective holders could sell more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock in a relatively short time frame while never holding more than 4.99% at any one time.
The market price of shares of our Common Stock could decline as a result of substantial sales of our Common Stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders. Further, the registration of the sale of shares of our Common Stock underlying the Quantum Note and the Ascent Note may create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang” whereby a large number of shares of our Common Stock become available for sale or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.
The existence of an overhang and the anticipation of such sales, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, could cause the market price of our Common Stock to fall. It could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.
Our commitments to issue shares of Common Stock or securities that are convertible into shares of Common Stock may cause significant dilution to our stockholders.
The Quantum Notes bear guaranteed interest at a rate of 12.00% per annum and are convertible into shares of our Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $3.20 per share (after the conversion price reset pursuant to the terms thereof) or 85% of the lowest daily VWAP (as defined in the Quantum Note) during the seven (7) consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion or other date of determination. The Ascent Note bears an interest of 10% per annum and is convertible into shares of our Common Stock of at a conversion price of $2.00 per share. We have agreed not to issue any shares of Common Stock upon conversion of the Ascent Note in excess of stock issuance cap required by the rules of Nasdaq (the “Exchange Cap”) unless we obtain stockholder approval for issuance of shares of Common Stock exceeding such Exchange Cap. In addition, shares of Common Stock are issuable upon exercise of the Ascent Warrants (as defined herein).
Table of Contents
The issuance of shares Common Stock upon the conversion of the Quantum Note and the Ascent Note and the exercise of the Ascent Warrants, would dilute the percentage ownership interest of holders of our Common Stock, dilute the book value per share of our Common Stock and increase the number of our publicly traded shares, which could depress the market price of our Common Stock.
Our commitment to issue shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Quantum Note and the Ascent Note could encourage short sales by third parties, which could contribute to the future decline of our stock price.
Our commitment to issue shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Quantum Note and the Ascent Note has the potential to cause significant downward pressure on the price of our Common Stock. In such an environment, short sellers may contribute exacerbate any decline of our stock price. If there are significant short sales of our Common Stock, the share price of our Common Stock may decline more than it would in an environment without such activity. This may cause other holders of our Common Stock to sell their shares. If there are many more shares of our Common Stock on the market for sale than the market will absorb, the price of our Common Stock will likely decline.
The holders of the Quantum Note and the Ascent Note may participate in short sales of our Common Stock. It may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of the shares of Common Stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The holders may also sell shares of Common Stock short and deliver shares of Common Stock to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The holders may also loan or pledge shares of Common Stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares. Such activity could cause a decline in the market price of the shares of our Common Stock.
We may require additional financing to sustain our operations, without which we may not be able to continue operations, and the terms of subsequent financings may adversely impact our stockholders.
The extent we rely on current investors in the Company as sources of funding will depend on a number of factors, including the prevailing market price of our Common Stock and the extent to which we are able to secure working and other capital from other sources. If obtaining sufficient funding from our current investors were to prove unavailable or prohibitively dilutive, we will need to secure another source of funding in order to satisfy our working and other capital needs. In addition to the Quantum Note and the Ascent Note and the other securities purchase transactions discussed hereof, we may still need additional capital to fully implement our business, operating and development plans. Should the financing we require to sustain our working capital needs be unavailable or prohibitively expensive when we require it, the consequences may be a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects. Depending on the type and the terms of any financing we pursue, stockholders’ rights and the value of their investment in our Common Stock could be reduced. A financing could involve one or more types of securities including Common Stock, convertible debt or warrants to acquire common stock. These securities could be issued at or below the then prevailing market price for our Common Stock. Should the financing we require to sustain our working capital needs be unavailable or prohibitively expensive when we require it, the consequences could be a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
If we are unable to satisfy the applicable continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, our common stock could be delisted.
Our Common Stock and public warrants are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Although we have met the minimum initial listing standards set forth in the Nasdaq rules, we cannot assure you that our securities will be, or will continue to be, listed on the Nasdaq in the future. In order to continue listing our securities on Nasdaq, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and stock price levels. Generally, among other requirements, we must maintain a minimum bid price of our common stock (generally, $1.00) minimum amount in stockholders’ equity (generally, $2,500,000), maintain a minimum number of holders of our securities (generally, 300 public holders), and must timely file all required periodic financial reports with the SEC.
If Nasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
reduced liquidity for our securities;
Table of Contents
a determination that our Common Stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our Common Stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary VSee Lab is a telehealth software platform. VSee Lab’s proprietary technology platform and modular software solution empower users to plug and play telehealth services with end-to-end encrypted video streaming integrated with medical device data, electronic medical records, and other sensitive data, with multiple other interactive functionalities that enable teamwork that VSee Lab believes are not available from any other system worldwide. Our company’s core platform is a highly scalable, integrated, application program interface (“API”) driven technology platform, for virtual healthcare delivery, with multiple real-time integrations spanning the healthcare ecosystem. Our platform’s APIs power external connectivity and deep integration with a wide range of payors, electronic medical records, third party applications, and other interfaces with employers, hospital systems, and health systems, which we believe uniquely positions us as a long-term partner meeting the unique needs of the rapidly changing, healthcare industry. Our company will also be able to white label our solutions, so they fit into the plans and strategies of our clients, all on a platform that is high-performance and highly scalable.
We put telehealth software tools in the hands of clinicians to enable them to make changes without programming so that they can achieve the best patient outcomes. We provide our clients with capabilities specifically built to enable them to collaborate with their clinical and non-clinical colleagues, securely coordinate patient care, conduct virtual patient visits including remote physical exam and remote patient monitoring, and an analytical dashboard to manage their entire telehealth operations from patient satisfaction score to patient wait time to staffing allocations. We empower clinicians to create the workflow they want without waiting for IT; where today, most clinicians feel helpless given that IT departments often cannot give clinicians what they want.
Through VSee Lab, we offer a set of telehealth software building blocks, data connectors, and workflow templates that can be rapidly configured into the client’s workflows. Our offerings allow clinicians without programming experience to configure our building blocks into their existing workflow without requiring programmers - i.e. - no code. In addition, our building blocks allow programmers to increase their productivity with simple coding to piece together our building blocks - i.e. - low code. At the core of our platform is a comprehensive set of software building blocks for telehealth that include on-demand visits, scheduling appointments, in-take forms, signature for consent and compliance, team coordination, unified communication, remote exam and remote patient monitoring, payments including insurance processing, clinical notes, and administrative control panels and analytics. These set of building blocks can connect to electronic medical record systems such as EPIC and Cerner via HL7, FHIR, and SFTP. Lastly, we provide a set of templates to make creating telehealth workflow fast and easy. The entire telehealth platform sits on a scalable server architecture and is HIPAA compliant and SOC2 externally audited. VSee Lab is also GDPR compliant and supports single-sign-on (SSO) and multi-factor-authentication (MFA).
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary iDoc is a high acuity patient care solution providing elite physician services in intensive care units of our major hospital systems and other customers. iDoc delivers neuro-critical care through a proprietary technology platform. iDoc serves a diverse range of customers from large hospital systems to small/micro hospitals, long-term acute care (LTAC) facilities, correctional facilities and others. In addition to the specialization of neuro critical care, iDoc provides general tele-critical care services, and specialty e-consults to large organizations such as correctional facilities. iDoc has an experienced team of board-certified intensivists, neurointensivists, neurologists, and advanced practice providers that treat and coordinate care for acutely ill patients 24/7 in the Neurointensive Care Unit (“NICU”) and Intensive Care Unit (“ICU”) for stroke, brain trauma, spinal cord, and all other neurological conditions. Our Neurocritical care experts will also help develop multidisciplinary plans of care to optimally treat neurological conditions in relation to their overall medical needs. Our Neuro Critical care service delivery will focus on physicians and provider services in Teleneurocritical care, epileptology, and teleneurology. In addition to standard interventions, our Neurocritical care experts will offer specific care including monitoring intracranial pressure, cerebral hemodynamics, advanced multimodal neuro monitoring (brain oximetry, cerebral microdialysis and continuous electroencephalography).
Table of Contents
We strive to be the solutions provider of access to the shortage of intensivists across the care continuum utilizing sophisticated telehealth solutions to bridge the care gap. In a post Covid, physician burnout health care system, we aim to provide a solution to physician burnout and to a lack of patient access to quality intensive care. By using the sophisticated leading telehealth software and hardware devices, we provide access to highly skilled physicians in the highest acuity in patient setting, the ICU. We provide elite physician services in the Intensive care units of major hospital systems and other customers. Our core service delivers general critical care, neurology, EEG reading, and neuro critical care through a custom internal virtual health care technology platform. We also serve a diverse range of customers from large hospital systems to small/micro hospitals, to long-term acute care (LTAC) facilities to the federal prison system and others. We connect criticallyill patients to high quality Neurointensivists, general and cardiac intensivists and specialty specific e-consultations and helps to improve outcomes for patients as well as improved productivity and physician burnout while reduced costs for health systems. We have developed a unique quality control program in collaboration with each hospital by development of a hospital specific reporting dashboard to monitor and achieve high quality critical care quality. In addition, current workflows and protocols are evaluated to adjust to incorporate critical care. Continuous process improvement and readjustment of target metrics with the ICU team to maximize patient safety and improve outcomes.
Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company
The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012(the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The Jobs Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
The Company is also a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that either (i) the market value of our shares held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) the market value of our shares held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million and our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company may continue to be a smaller reporting company if either (i) the market value of our shares held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our shares held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million. The Company may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies.
Performance Factors
We believe that our future performance will depend on many factors, including the following:
The Rapid Transformation of the Telehealth Market
The Telehealth market today is one characterized by rapid transformation, with major customers and hospital systems looking to build or add capabilities and major legacy competitors looking to shore up historical limitations. We believe that the rapid transformation of the telehealth market indicates strong future growth of the market, and our current offerings provide an attractive value proposition to health systems, medical groups, and individual medical practitioners, driving higher market share. We plan to continue to harness our scale to further grow the value proposition of our platform for all stakeholders.
Ability to Expand Within the Market and Attract New Customers
Telehealth is still in its total infancy stages in terms of utilization, scope, and services. Most of the growth is expected within hospital systems, definition, and segmentation structure, and we believe our software platform and services have significant potential. We plan to leverage our industry relationships with government, hospital systems and insurance providers to increase our customer base.
Table of Contents
Innovation and New Product Offerings
Despite the rapid advancements in technology, growth in virtual healthcare delivery, and improvement in decision support algorithms and machine learning tools, Telehealth Technology Solutions have not fully penetrated medicine and hospital systems to become the standard methodology of care and represent less than 1% of total healthcare spending according to Grandview Research. Major reasons for Telehealth solutions not capturing its full potential include:
Many of the existing video and hardware and software used in telehealth are repurposed businesses that are not healthcare specific.
Remote monitoring/diagnostic devices do not readily integrate into telehealth systems limiting doctors real time metrics to enable diagnostics and assessment.
Backend software coordination is not optimized for telehealth use and connectivity, resulting in significant greater complexity and costs for implementation.
The software and code foundations of the early telemedicine companies have major functionality limitations and arduous implementation and incremental coding/connectivity requirements adding significant cost and reducing functionality.
We believe our technology solutions meet the performance and compliance standards in healthcare, increase the sharing of patient history, files and scheduling are integrated into the video view for doctors, create sophisticated video engagement between patients, staff and doctors and seamlessly integrate patients’ records to provide more comprehensive telehealth care. We believe our ability to invest in new technology and develop new features, modules, and solutions will be critical to our long-term success.
Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of consolidated financial statements also requires we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are differences between our estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, balance sheet, results of operations and cash flows will be affected. We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas involving our management’s judgments and estimates. Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that we consider the most important to the portrayal of our balance sheet and results of operations because they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in those consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Although we believe that the estimates we use are reasonable, due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making those estimates, actual results reported in future periods could differ from those estimates. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, included elsewhere in this report. Our critical accounting policies are described below.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). ASC 606 establishes a principle for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. The core principle of ASC 606 is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to clients in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
Table of Contents
The Company determines revenue recognition in accordance with ASC 606 through the following five steps:
1) Identify the contract with a customer
The Company considers the terms and conditions of its contracts and the Company’s customary business practices in identifying its contracts under ASC 606. The Company determines it has a contract with a customer when the contract has been approved by both parties, it can identify each party’s rights regarding the goods and services to be transferred and the payment terms for the goods and services, it has determined the customer to have the ability and intent to pay, and the contract has commercial substance. The Company applies judgment in determining the customer’s ability and intent to pay, which is based on a variety of factors, including the customer’s payment history or, in the case of a new customer, credit and financial information pertaining to the customer.
Contractual terms for subscription services are typically 12 months. Contracts are generally cancellable with a 30-day notice period, and customers are billed in annual, quarterly, or monthly instalments in advance of the service period of the subscription. The Company is not required to refund any prorated prepayment fees invoiced to cover services that were provided.
The Company also has service contracts with hospitals or hospital systems, physician practice groups, and other users. These customer contracts typically range from two to three years, with an automatic renewal process. The Company either invoices these customers for the monthly fixed fee in advance or at the end of the month, depending on the contract terms. The contracts typically contain cancellation clauses with advance notice, and revenue for goods and services transferred prior to cancellation is not refundable or creditable.
2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract
Performance obligations promised in a contract are identified based on the goods and services that will be transferred to the customer that are both capable of being distinct, whereby the customer can benefit from the service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available, and are distinct in the context of the contract, whereby the transfer of the services is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.
3) Determine the transaction price
Total transaction price is based on the amount to which the Company is entitled to base on the contracts with its customers. The Company believes the quoted transaction prices in the customer contracts represent the standalone selling prices for each of the separate performance obligations which are distinct and priced separately within the contract. Consideration promised in the Company’s contracts includes both fixed and variable amounts. The Company’s variable consideration is based on fixed unit price for promised services, though the total consideration is dependent upon the actual amounts of promised services used by the customers. If necessary, the Company estimates the total variable consideration based on the information available to management, and updates such estimates each financial period when needed.
4) Allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract
If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price to each performance obligation based on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”). The determination of a SSP for each distinct performance obligation requires judgment. Where applicable, the Company establishes standalone selling prices based on the observable prices of the good or service when the Company sells that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers. If a standalone selling price is not directly observable, the Company estimates the standalone selling price using the expected cost plus a margin approach.
5) Recognize revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation
Revenue is recognized when or as control of the promised goods or service are transferred to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
The Company derives revenue from business services associated with direct tele-physician provider patient fee services, telehealth services, subscription services and institutional services provided to our clients.
Table of Contents
Subscription Service Contracts and Performance Obligation
Subscriptions Services
Subscriptions represent a series of distinct goods or services because the performance obligations are satisfied over time as customers simultaneously receive and consume the benefits related to the services the Company performs. In the case of module specific subscriptions, a consistent level of service is provided during each monthly period of subscription to the Company’s platform. The Company commences revenue recognition when the customer is provided with platform subscription for the initial monthly period and revenue is recognized over time as a consistent level of subscription service during the subsequent period is delivered. The Company’s obligation for its integrated subscriptions is to stand-ready throughout the subscription period; therefore, the Company considers an output method of time to measure progress toward satisfaction of its obligations with revenue commencing upon the beginning of the subscription period. Deferred revenue consists of the unamortized balance of nonrefundable upfront fees which are classified as current and non-current based on the timing of when the Company expects to recognize revenue.
The Company treats each subscription to a specific module as a distinct performance obligation because each module is capable of being distinct as the customer can benefit from the subscription to each module on its own and each subscription can be sold standalone.
Furthermore, the subscriptions to individual modules are distinct in the context of the contract as (1) the Company is not integrating the services with other services promised in the contract into a bundle of services that represent a combined output, (2) the subscriptions to specific modules do not significantly modify or customize the subscription to another module, and (3) the specific modules are not highly interdependent or highly interrelated. The subscription to each module is treated as a series of distinct performance obligations because it is distinct and substantially the same, satisfied over time, and has the same measure of progress.
The transaction price is determined based on the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for transferring services to the customer. Under the contracts, the clients pay a fixed rate per user per subscription service. Prior to the start of a contract, clients generally make upfront nonrefundable payments to the Company when contracting for implementation services.
Professional Services and Technical Engineering Fees and Performance Obligation
Performance obligations under contracts for professional services may include maintenance, hardware, clinician fees, and technical engineering services. These services are generally distinct in the context of the contract and are accounted for as separate performance obligations.
For technical engineering services, performance obligations are typically satisfied over time based on the specified quantity of professional service hours provided to the customer. For maintenance, hardware, and clinician fees, revenue is recognized either over time or at a point in time or when control transfers to the customer. Maintenance and clinician fees are generally recognized over time as services are rendered, while hardware revenue is recognized at a point in time when control transfers to the customer.
The Company evaluates the nature of each professional services arrangement to determine the appropriate timing of revenue recognition, ensuring that revenue is recognized in a manner that faithfully depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer.
Patient Fees Services and Performance Obligation
Patient Fee Services
Patient fees represent a series of distinct services because the performance obligations are met when the Company’s physicians provide professional medical services to patients at the client site as this is deemed as transfer of goods and services to respective patients. The patient benefits from the professional services when care is rendered by the Company’s medical professionals. The Company commences revenue recognition on patient services when the Company satisfies its performance obligation to provide professional medical services to patients.
The Company acts as the principal in these arrangements because it controls the medical services before they are transferred to the patient. This control is evidenced by the Company’s primary responsibility for fulfilling the service and its direct authority over the affiliated physicians, including the right to direct their clinical activities and administrative protocols.
The Company receives payments from patients, third-party payors and others for patient fee services. Third-party payors pay the Company based on contracted rates or the entities’ billed charges. Payments received from third-party payors are generally less than billed charges. The Company determines the transaction price on patient fees based on standard charges for services provided, reduced by adjustments provided to third-party payors, and implicit price concessions provided to uninsured patients. The Company monitors its revenue and receivables from third-party payors and records an estimated contractual allowance to properly account for the differences between billed and collected amounts.
Table of Contents
Revenue from third-party payors is presented net of an estimated provision for contractual adjustments. Patient revenues are net of service credits and service adjustments, and expected credit losses . These adjustments and implicit price concessions represent the difference between the amount billed and the estimated consideration the Company expects to receive, based on historical collection experience, market conditions and other factors. Although the Company believes that its approach to estimates and judgments as described herein is reasonable, actual results could differ, from estimated amounts and such difference could be material.
All of the Company’s telemedicine contracts for patient reimbursement fees are directly billed to the payors by the Company. The Company earns patient fees by providing high acuity patient care solutions. For patient fees, performance obligations are met when the Company’s physicians provide professional medical services to patients at the client site as this is deemed as transfer of goods and services to respective patients. The patient benefits from the professional services when care is rendered by the Company’s medical professionals. The revenue is determined based on the telemedicine billing code(s) associated with the respective professional service rendered to patients. The Company earns primarily from reimbursement from the following third-party payors:
Medicare
The Company’s affiliated provider network is reimbursed by the Medicare Part B and Part C programs for certain of the telemedicine services it provides to Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare coverage for telemedicine services is treated distinctly from other types of professional medical services and is limited by federal statute and subject to specific conditions of participation and payment pursuant to Medicare regulations, policies and guidelines, including the location of the patient, the type of service, and the modality for delivering the telemedicine service, among others.
Medicaid
Medicaid programs are funded jointly by the federal government and the states and are administered by states (or the state’s designated managed care or other similar organizations) under approved plans. The Company’s affiliated provider network is reimbursed by certain State Medicaid programs for certain of the telemedicine services it provides to Medicaid beneficiaries. Medicaid coverage for telemedicine services varies by state and is subject to specific conditions of participation and payment.
Commercial Insurance Providers
The Company is reimbursed by commercial insurance carriers. The basis for payment to the commercial insurance providers is consistent with Medicare reimbursement fee structure guidelines, and the Company is in-network or out-of-network with the commercial insurance carriers based on state and insurer requirements.
Telehealth Fees Service Contracts and Performance Obligation
Contract For Telemedicine Care Services
Performance obligations in the contract for telemedicine care are based on services provided via the use of hardware and software integration that includes multi-participant video conferencing, and electronic communication for 24 hours per day, seven days per week for the duration of the contract. The Company provides administrative support for the tele-physician services and coordinates the services of its clinicians’ network through administrative support, hardware support, and software support and provider coverage availability. The Company provides coverage availability of its physician services ranging from 12-24 hours per day. Performance obligations in the contract for these services transferred to the customer are distinct in the context of the contract, whereby the transfer of the services is separately identifiable from patient services and institutional services obligations. Performance obligations are met when the Company provides administrative, business, and medical records and reports related to their professional services rendered pursuant to the agreement in such format and upon such interval as hospitals may require. Revenue from telemedicine care services is included in telehealth fees in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company recognizes revenue for variable consideration when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company estimates the amount of revenue to be recognized on variable consideration, using the expected value or the most likely amount method, whichever is expected to better predict the amount. The Company’s estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on assessments of legal enforceability, performance, and all information that is reasonably available to the Company. The determination of the amount of revenue the Company can recognize each accounting period requires management to make estimates and judgments on the estimated expected customer life or expected performance period.
The Company commences revenue recognition when the Company satisfies its performance obligation to provide the contractual tele-physician hours services monthly. Prior to the commencement of services, customers generally make initial start-up nonrefundable payments to the Company when contracting for Company training, hardware and software installation and integration, which includes a onetime setup of software security, API interfaces, and compatibility between hospital existing equipment and hardware and software. The Company recognizes revenue upon completion of the implementation when the performance obligation of equipment setup and initial training is completed. The start-up fees do not significantly modify or customize the other goods in the contract. As the start-up service primarily covers initial administrative services for which the Company’s clients can cancel future services upon completion, management considers it to be separable from the ongoing business services, and the Company records start-up fees as revenue when the start-up service is completed over time, using the input method to measure progress each financial period.
Table of Contents
Institutional Fees Service Contracts and Performance Obligation
Contract For Electroencephalogram (“EEG”) Professional Interpretation Services
Performance obligations in the contract for EEG professional interpretation services are based on the number of professional services EEG interpretation provides monthly. The performance obligation in the contract for these services transferred to the customer is distinct in the context of the contract, whereby the transfer of the services is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract. To facilitate the delivery of the EEG professional interpretation services, the Company’s physicians use EEG telemedicine equipment provided by the Company. The performance obligation is satisfied based on the number of EEG professional interpretations performed by the Company’s physicians. The number of professional interpretations is traced monthly by both parties and used to determine the revenue earned based on established contractual rates and is included in institutional fees in the consolidated financial statements.
Under most of the Company’s contracts, including contracts with its two top customers, the customer pays fixed monthly fees for telemedicine consultation services, EEG professional interpretation services, platform software services, and hardware fees. The fixed monthly fee provides for a predetermined number of daily, monthly, or annual physician hours of coverage and agreed upon rates for interpretation and software services. To facilitate the delivery of the consultation services, the facilities use telemedicine equipment and the Company’s virtual healthcare platform, which is provided and installed by the Company. The Company also provides the hospitals with user training, maintenance and support services for the telemedicine equipment used to perform the consultation services.
The Company commences revenue recognition on EEG professional interpretation services when the Company satisfies its performance obligation to provide professional interpretation monthly.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
“Fair value” is defined as the price that would be received for sale of an asset or paid for transfer of a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used to measure investments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment, characteristics specific to the investment, market conditions and other factors. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Investments with readily available quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from quoted prices in active markets will typically have a higher degree of input observability and a lesser degree of judgment applied in determining fair value.
See Note 15 Fair Value Measurements of the financial statements for additional information on assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. We evaluate goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level by assessing whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. If this assessment concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then goodwill is not considered impaired, and no further impairment testing is required. Conversely, if the assessment concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, a goodwill impairment test is performed to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. The Company determines fair value of the two reporting units using both income and market-based models. Our models contain significant assumptions and accounting estimates about discount rates, future cash flows, and terminal values that could materially affect our operating results or financial position if they were to change significantly in the future and could result in an impairment.
The Company performs goodwill impairment test annually as of year-end at the reporting unit level in accordance with ASC 350 to assess whether the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value. Additionally, the Company monitors for triggering events on an ongoing basis and performs interim impairment testing when events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not (i.e., greater than 50 percent likelihood) that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount. This process is designed to ensure that goodwill is stated at no more than its implied fair value at all reporting dates. .The cash flow estimates, and discount rates incorporate management’s best estimates, using appropriate and customary assumptions and projections at the date of evaluation.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company determined there were triggering events that required the Company to perform a quantitative analysis. Based on the analysis, the Company concluded the fair value of the Telehealth Services reporting unit was less than it’s carrying value. As a result, the Company recorded non-cash goodwill impairment charges of $56,675,210 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company conducted a qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment, considering macroeconomic conditions, industry trends, Company performance, and the prior-year impairment. These factors indicated potential impairment triggers, leading the Company to perform a quantitative Step 1 impairment test. Based on the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, which exceeded its carrying amount, the Company concluded that no goodwill impairment was required for the year.
Table of Contents
Impairment of Long-lived and Intangible Assets Other than Goodwill
In accordance with ASC 360-10, the Company, on a regular basis, reviews the carrying amount of long-lived assets, including fixed assets, right-of-use assets and intangible assets, for the existence of facts or circumstances, both internally and externally, that suggest impairment. The Company determines if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is impaired based on anticipated undiscounted cash flows, before interest, from the use of the asset. In the event of impairment, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value is determined based on the appraised value of the assets or the anticipated cash flows from the use of the asset, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and the respective tax basis and operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of general and administrative expenses. The Company’s federal tax return and any state tax returns are not currently under examination.
The Company applies ASC 740-10, Accounting for Income Taxes , which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually from differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Financial Statement Components
Years Ended December 31, 2025, and 2024 Results of Operations
The following table presents VSee Health’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
For the year ended December 31,
Change
Revenue
Cost of revenues
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Other income (expense)
Net loss before taxes
Income tax benefit (provision)
Net loss
Table of Contents
Revenue
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary VSee Lab, the Company generates revenue from subscription services to its software platform. Subscriptions represent a series of distinct goods or services because the performance obligations are satisfied over time as customers simultaneously receive and consume the benefits related to the services as VSee Lab performs. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary iDoc, the Company establishes management and administrative services contracts with hospitals or hospital systems to provide telehealth physician services to acute patients of the hospitals or hospital systems. iDoc also generate revenue by directly billing the insurance companies for care provided at hospitals or hospital systems. iDoc’s contracts typically range in length from two to three years, with an automatic renewal process.
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $14,618,184, an increase of $4,196,832, or 40%, compared to $10,421,352 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily driven by continued growth from the Company’s iDoc acquisition, completed in June 2024, which contributed $5,084,931, representing an increase of 229% over the prior-year. This growth was fuelled by higher telehealth service volume and patient fees of $2,919,118 and $2,170,193, respectively. Professional services and other fees increased $934,381, or 44%, reflecting higher medical device sales and services rendered in connection with the Company’s HHS contract.
These increases were partially offset by a $884,887, or 22%, decline in subscription revenue attributable to a reduction in recurring enterprise-level subscriptions, and a $937,593, or 47%, decrease in technical engineering services revenue, reflecting lower client utilization during the current year.
Cost of Revenues
VSee Lab’s cost of revenues consists primarily of expenses related to cloud hosting, personnel-related expenses for VSee’s customer success team, costs for third-party software services and contractors, and other services. iDoc’s cost of revenues is primarily comprised of personnel-related expenses for our employee and consulting physicians and other medical providers, and the costs for third-party software services and hardware used in connection with delivery of high acuity patient care solution when providing elite physician services in the intensive care units of our major hospital systems and other customers.
Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $7,262,219, representing an increase of $4,018,447, or 124%, as compared to $3,243,772 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to growth within the Company’s iDoc business unit, driven by a $1,883,533 increase in medical independent contractor costs reflecting higher telehealth service delivery volume, and a $476,189, or 48%, increase in salaries and wages supporting iDoc’s expanded operations. Within the VSee Lab business unit, the increase was further driven by higher overseas payroll of $637,603, increased medical equipment and device costs of $387,449 associated with the Company’s HHS contract and $216,400 in physician labor costs incurred for the first time during the current year.
Table of Contents
Operating Expenses
VSee Lab’s operating expenses include all operating costs not included in the cost of revenues. These costs consist of general and administrative expenses composed primarily of all payroll and payroll-related expenses, professional fees, and other costs related to the administration of its business. iDoc’s operating expenses include all operating costs not included in cost of revenues. These costs consist of compensation, general and administrative expenses composed primarily of all payroll and payroll- related expenses, professional fees, insurance, software costs, occupancy expenses related to iDoc’s operations, including utilities, depreciation and amortization, and other costs related to the administration of its business.
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025, were $16,938,858, a decrease of $52,389,567 or 76% as compared to $69,328,425 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decline was due to the absence of goodwill impairment charges during 2025, resulting in a reduction of $56,675,210 or 100%, compared to the prior year. The decrease was also due to the absence of transaction expenses during 2025, resulting in a reduction of $792,796 or 100%, compared to the prior year. These decreases were offset by higher general and administrative expenses of $3,483,314, an increase of 53%, primarily from an increase in amortization expense of $1,105,000 reflecting a full year of iDoc intangible asset amortization, a $952,680 increase in audit fees, and a $556,673 increase in bad debt expense, partially offset by decreases in accounting, legal, and printing costs.
The decline in operating expenses was also offset by $1,595,125 or 30% higher compensation-related expenses, driven by $1,825,684 in newly incurred research and development labor costs, a $1,291,454 increase in salaries and bonus expenses, and $364,493 of higher payroll and benefit related expenses, partially offset by a $1,886,505 decrease in G&A payroll reflecting the reallocation of certain labor costs to research and development functions.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income during the year ended December 31, 2025, decreased $7,867,460 or 280% as compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by the loss on change in fair value of the debt and derivative financial instruments of $7,626,368, and an increase in the interest expense of $2,600,402, primarily due to the conversion of the total interest due on the Quantum note, new loan agreements entered into in the current year, and default interest incurred during the current year. The decline in other income was partially offset by the improvement in loss on the extinguishment of the loan of $424,777 during the current year, compared to the prior year.
These decreases in other income were also reduced by the net change of $1,845,214 in loss on issuance of debt and derivative financial instruments, and $46,925 of other income recognized during the current year, primarily driven by the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) received by the iDoc business.
Net Loss
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $14,735,984, representing an improvement of $42,966,031, or 74%, as compared to a net loss of $57,702,015 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This improvement was driven by the absence of the $56,675,210 in goodwill impairment charges recognized during the prior year, partially offset by $3,901,221 in incremental operating expenses associated with the acquisition of iDoc and the recapitalization transaction with DHAC. The reduction in net loss was further supported by a $178,385 increase in gross margin contribution.
These reductions to the Company’s net loss were slightly offset by a $7,867,460 decrease in other income during the current year as compared to the prior year, and a $1,734,461 decrease in the Company’s income tax benefit, which reflects the non-recurring deferred tax benefit recognized in connection with the iDoc business acquisition during the prior year.
Going Concern, Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has incurred multiple years of losses resulting in an accumulated deficit of $82,416,723 as of December 31, 2025 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. Further, the Company had operating cash outflows of $3,445,733 for the year ended December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company had a loss from operations of $9,582,893. The Company’s operations have been funded principally through the issuance of debt and equity. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the issuance of these financial statements.
In assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, the Company monitors and analyses its cash and its ability to generate sufficient cash flow in the future to support its operating and capital expenditure commitments. At December 31, 2025, the Company had cash of $5,266,286 and working capital deficit of $7,879,201. The Company’s current cash on hand is insufficient to satisfy its operating cash needs for the 12 months following the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These conditions raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year after the date the consolidated financial statements are issued. Management’s plan to alleviate the conditions that raise substantial doubt include raising additional working capital through public or private equity or debt financings or other sources and may include collaborations with third parties as well as disciplined cash spending. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Should the Company be unable to raise sufficient additional capital, the Company may be required to undertake cost-cutting measures including delaying or discontinuing certain operating activities.
As a result of these factors, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year after the date of the financial statements. The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Table of Contents
Cash Flows
The following table presents selected captions from the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
For the year ended
December 31,
Net cash used in operating activities
Net cash used in from investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Change in cash
The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, totalling $5,266,286 and $326,115 as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The Company’s future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our growth rate, contract renewal activity, number of subscription renewals, the continuing market acceptance of telehealth, and debt funding.
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $3,445,733 for the year ended December 31, 2025. Cash used in operating activities consists of a net loss of $14,361,478, adjusted for non-cash items of $7,390,284 and $3,525,461 increase in net changes in operating assets and liabilities. The increases in accounts payable and deferred revenue primarily drove the increase in operating assets and liabilities.
Cash used in operating activities was $5,789,542 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change in operating activities presents changes for VSee Lab for the year ending December 31, 2024, and changes for iDoc and DHAC from the Business Combination date of June 24, 2024, to the end of the quarter, December 31, 2024. Cash used in operating activities consists of a net loss of $57,702,015 adjusted for non-cash items of $55,119,167 driven primarily by fair value changes, and a $3,206,694 decrease in net changes in operating assets and liabilities. The decrease in net changes in operating assets was primarily driven by the decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and due to related parties and slightly offset by the reduction in accounts receivable and the increase in deferred revenue.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $29,928, and was driven by the purchase of fixed assets.
Cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $26,144, driven primarily by $55,267 for the purchase fixed assets and was slightly offset by $29,123 of cash acquired from the acquisition of iDoc.
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $8,415,832, primarily consisting of $1,759,371, $5,519,085 and $1,500,003 of proceeds from notes issued during the period, proceeds from pre funded warrants and issuance of common stock and offset by $10,000, $179,007, $44, $25,000 and $148,576 for payment to shareholder, payments on factoring payables, payments due on acquisition purchase, payments on financing lease liabilities and repayment on note payable, respectively.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $6,023,067, primarily consisting of $2,700,000 proceeds from the Quantum Note, $2,000,000 proceeds from the September 2024 Convertible Note, $1,323,362 cash from the recapitalization with DHAC, $760,000 proceeds from ELOC and offset by $47,800, $335,750, $61,429, $52,680, $38,889, $38,200, $180,397 and $5,150 for repayment on advances from a related party, Extension Note, exchange note, additional bridge financing, September 2024 Convertible Note, note payable, factoring payable and acquisition purchase, respectively.
