Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.
Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.
YoY shift: Neutral
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is -0.11pp more bearish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
-0.04pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
-0.19pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
shutdown+7
negatively+5
unable+3
incident+3
unpredictable+3
Positive rising
effective+2
efficiency+2
gains+2
integrity+2
successfully+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
24,370 words
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before making an investment decision related to our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. We operate in a continually changing business environment, and new risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time. If any of these risks should occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition or growth prospects could be adversely affected. In those cases, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Industry
The demand for airline services is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions, and a recession or similar economic downturn in the United States or globally would weaken demand for our services and have a material effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, particularly since a substantial portion of our customers travel for leisure or other non-essential purposes.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
loss+4
breakage+4
against+1
adversely+1
volatility+1
Positive rising
enhanced+2
greater+1
MD&A (Item 7)
10,756 words
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our discussion and analysis of fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024 is included herein. For a discussion of the results of operations for fiscal year 2023 and comparisons between fiscal year 2024 and fiscal year 2023, please refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, which was filed with the SEC on February 18, 2025.
Overview
The following table provides select financial and operational information for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in millions, except percentages):
Year Ended December 31,
Change
Total operating revenues
Total operating expenses
Income (loss) before income taxes
Available seat miles (“ASMs”)
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted
Revenues
Total operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 totaled $3,724 million, a decrease of 1% compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Revenue per available seat mile (“RASM”) decreased by 1% driven by a 1% decrease in total revenue per passenger, as compared to the corresponding prior year period.
The demand for travel services is affected by U.S. and global economic conditions. Unfavorable economic conditions, such as those resulting from an inflationary economic environment and the responses by monetary authorities to control such inflation, rising interest rates, debt and equity market fluctuations, diminished liquidity and credit availability, increased unemployment rates, decreased investor and consumer confidence, political turmoil, supply chain challenges, natural catastrophes and the effects of climate change, regional and global conflicts and terrorist attacks and/or reactions to pandemics or other health threats, including measures to reduce the spread of any such disease, have historically impaired airline economics. For most cost-conscious leisure travelers, travel is a discretionary expense, and though we believe ULCCs are best suited to attract travelers during periods of unfavorable economic conditions as a result of such carriers’ low-cost fares, travelers have often elected to replace air travel at such times with various other forms of ground transportation or have opted not to travel at all. Likewise, during periods of unfavorable economic conditions, businesses have deferred air travel or forgone it altogether. Travelers have also reduced spending by purchasing fewer non-fare services, which can result in a decrease in average revenue per passenger. Because airlines typically have relatively high fixed costs as a percentage of total costs, much of which cannot be mitigated during periods of lower demand for air travel, the airline business is particularly sensitive to changes in U.S. and global economic conditions. A reduction in the demand for air travel due to unfavorable economic conditions also limits our ability to raise fares to counteract increased fuel, labor and other costs. If U.S. or global economic conditions are unfavorable or uncertain for an extended period of time, including due to inflationary pressures and/or the disruption, instability and volatility in global markets resulting
from the war between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, including our senior management team or other key employees, at reasonable costs or fail to maintain our company culture, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.
Our business is labor intensive. We require large numbers of pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians and other personnel. We compete against other airlines for pilots, mechanics and other skilled labor and certain U.S. airlines offer wage and benefit packages exceeding ours. The airline industry is currently experiencing certain shortages of qualified personnel. As is common with most of our competitors, we have faced considerable turnover of our employees. As a result of the foregoing, there can be no assurance that we will be able to attract or retain qualified personnel and we may be required to increase wages and/or benefits in order to do so. Furthermore, we cannot predict what policies we may elect to or be required to implement in the future, or the effect thereof on our business, which could cause us to lose or experience difficulties hiring qualified personnel. If we are unable to hire, train and retain qualified employees, our business could be harmed.
Additionally, much of our future success and our ability to efficiently execute our business strategy depends on the retention of our senior management team and other key employees with industry experience and knowledge. Competition for highly qualified personnel is intense and the loss of key employees, including members of our senior management team, could disrupt our operations, adversely impact employee retention and morale, and seriouslyharm our business. If we are unable to provide for the succession of our senior management team and/or other key employees or if we are unable to find suitable replacements in the event that we lose one or more of those employees, our business and our growth plan may be adversely affected.
In addition, as we hire more people and grow, we believe it may be increasingly challenging to continue to hire people who will maintain our company culture. Our company culture, which we believe is one of our competitive strengths, is important to providing dependable customer service and having a productive, accountable workforce that helps keep our costs low. As we continue to grow, we may be unable to identify, hire or retain enough people who meet the above criteria, including those in management or other key positions. Our company culture could otherwise be adversely affected by our growing operations and geographic diversity. If we fail to maintain the strength of our company culture, our competitive ability and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.
The airline industry is exceedingly competitive, and we compete against legacy network airlines, LCCs and other ULCCs; if we are not able to compete successfully in our markets, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
We face significant competition with respect to routes, fares and services. Within the airline industry, we compete with legacy network carriers, LCCs and ULCCs. Competition on most of the routes we presently serve is significant, due to the large number of carriers in those markets. Furthermore, other airlines may begin service or increase existing service on routes where we currently face relatively little competition. In almost all instances, our competitors are larger than us and possess significantly greater financial and other resources than we do.
The airline industry is particularly susceptible to price discounting because, once a flight is scheduled, airlines incur only nominal additional costs to provide service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats. Increased fare or other price competition could adversely affect our operations. Airlines typically use discount fares and other promotions to stimulate traffic during normally slower travel periods to generate cash flow and to increase revenue per available seat mile. The prevalence of discount fares can be particularly acute when a competitor has excess capacity to sell. Moreover, many other airlines have unbundled their services, at least in part, by charging separately for services, such as baggage and advance seat selection, which previously were offered as a component of base fares. This unbundling and other cost-reducing measures could enable competitor airlines to reduce fares on routes that we serve.
In addition, airlines increase or decrease capacity in markets based on perceived profitability. If our competitors increase overall industry capacity, or capacity dedicated to a particular domestic or foreign region, market or route that we serve, it could have a material adverse impact on our business. If we continue to experience increased competition, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We also expect that new work patterns and the growth of remote work will lead to increasing numbers of employees choosing to live remotely from their office location, which has altered, and could continue to alter, the historical demand levels on the routes we serve. While we believe our low fares and low costs will enable us to grow our network profitably in new markets in order to take advantage of new demand patterns as they arise, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so or that we will be able to successfully compete with other U.S. airlines on such routes. If we fail to establish ourselves in such new markets, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our growth and the success of our ULCC business model could stimulate competition in our markets through our competitors’ development of their own ULCC strategies or through new market entrants. For example, certain legacy network airlines have further segmented the cabins of their aircraft in order to enable them to offer a tier of reduced base fares designed to be competitive with those offered by us and other ULCCs. We expect the legacy airlines to continue to match LCC and ULCC pricing on portions of their networks including through the deployment of so-called “basic economy” fares. A competitor adopting a ULCC strategy (including through the deployment of basic economy fares) may have greater financial resources and access to lower-cost sources of capital than we do, which could enable them to execute their network strategy with a lower cost structure than we can. If these competitors adopt and successfully execute a ULCC business model or similar model by deploying basic economy fares, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
There has been significant consolidation within the airline industry and, in the future, there may be additional consolidation. Business combinations could significantly alter industry conditions and competition within the airline industry and could enable our competitors to reduce their fares.
The extremely competitive nature of the airline industry could prevent us from attaining the level of passenger traffic or maintaining the level of fares or revenues related to non-fare services, required to achieve and sustain profitable operations in new and existing markets. This could impede our growth strategy, which could harm our operating results. Due to our relatively small size, we are susceptible to a fare war or other competitive activities in one or more of the markets we serve, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business has been, and may in the future be, materially adversely affected by the price and availability of aircraft fuel. Unexpected pricing of aircraft fuel or a shortage of, or disruption in, the supply of aircraft fuel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The cost of aircraft fuel is highly volatile and has generally been one of our largest individual operating expenses, accounting for 24% and 28% of our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. High fuel prices or increases in fuel costs (or in the price of crude oil) would result in increased levels of expense, and we may not be able to increase ticket prices sufficiently to cover such increased fuel costs, particularly when fuel prices rise quickly. We also sell a significant number of tickets to passengers well in advance of travel and, as a result, fares sold for future travel may not reflect such increased fuel costs. In addition, our ability to increase ticket prices to offset an increase in fuel costs is limited by the competitive nature of the airline industry and the price sensitivity associated with air travel, particularly leisure travel, and any increases in fares may reduce the general demand. Conversely, prolonged periods of low fuel prices could limit our ability to differentiate our product and low-cost fares from those of the legacy network airlines and LCCs, as prolonged periods of low fuel prices could enable such carriers to, among other things, substantially decrease their costs, fly longer stages or utilize older aircraft. In addition, prolonged periods of low fuel prices could also reduce the benefit we expect to receive from the new technology, more fuel-efficient A320neo family aircraft we operate and have on order. Any future fluctuations in aircraft fuel prices or sustained high or low fuel prices could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is also dependent on the availability of aircraft fuel (or crude oil), which is not predictable. Weather-related events and natural disasters (including hurricanes or similar events in the U.S. Southeast and on the Gulf Coast where a significant portion of domestic refining capacity is located), terrorism, wars (including the war between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East), supply chain disruptions, political disruption or instability involving oil-producing countries, changes in production levels of individual nations or associations of oil-producing states, economic sanctions imposed against oil-producing countries or specific industry participants, changes in fuel-related government policy, the imposition of tariffs, the strength of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, labor strikes, cyberattacks or other events affecting refinery production, transportation, taxes, marketing, environmental concerns, market manipulation, price speculation and other unpredictable events may drive actual or perceived fuel supply shortages. Shortages in the availability of, or increases in demand for, crude oil in general, other crude oil-based fuel derivatives and aircraft fuel in particular have resulted, and could continue to result, in increased fuel prices and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had no outstanding fuel cash flow hedges for future fuel consumption and, therefore, had no material impact within our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. We cannot assure you that any potential future fuel hedging program will be effective or that we will maintain a fuel hedging program at all. Even if we are able to hedge portions of our future fuel requirements, we cannot guarantee that our hedge contracts will provide an adequate level of protection against increased fuel costs or that the counterparties to our hedge contracts will be able to perform. Future fuel hedge contracts could contain margin funding requirements that could require us to post collateral to counterparties in the event of a significant drop in fuel prices in the future. Additionally, our ability to realize the benefit of declining fuel prices may be delayed by the impact of any fuel hedges in place, and we may record significant losses on fuel hedges during periods of declining fuel prices. A failure of our fuel hedging strategy, significant margin funding requirements, overpaying for fuel through the use of hedging arrangements or our failure to maintain a fuel hedging program could prevent us from adequately mitigating the risk of fuel price increases and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
On September 9, 2021, the U.S. Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge (“ SAF Grand Challenge”) was launched, built upon by the FAA’s Aviation Climate Action Plan published in 2021, which outlines plans to scale up the production of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF”). On January 13, 2025, the SAF Grand Challenge 2021-2024 Progress report was released, which highlighted goals of reducing gas emission by 50%, producing 3 billion gallons of SAF by 2030, and meeting domestic aviation fuel demand by 2050. Currently, industrial production of SAF is small in scale and inadequate to meeting growing demand and we anticipate that competition for SAF among industry participants will remain intense. As a result, we may need to pay a significant premium for SAF above the price we would pay for conventional jet fuel. Certain existing or potential future agreements pertain to SAF production from facilities that are planned but not yet operational, and which may utilize technology that has not been proven at commercial scale. There is no assurance that these facilities will be built or that they will meet contracted production timelines and volumes. In the event that the SAF is not delivered on schedule or in sufficient volumes, there can be no assurance that we will be able to source a supply of SAF sufficient to meet our stated goals, or that we will be able to do so on favorable economic terms.
We are subject to extensive regulation by the FAA, the DOT, the TSA, CBP and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies, compliance with which could cause us to incur increased costs and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Airlines are subject to extensive regulatory and legal compliance requirements, both domestically and internationally, that involve significant costs. In the last several years, the U.S. Congress has passed laws and the FAA, the DOT, the TSA and the Centers for Disease Control have issued regulations, orders, rulings and guidance relating to the operation, safety and security of airlines and consumer protections that have required significant expenditures. We expect to continue to incur expenses in connection with complying with such laws and government regulations, orders, rulings and guidance. Additional laws, regulations, taxes and increased airport rates and charges have been proposed from time to time that could significantly increase the cost of airline operations or reduce the demand for air travel, or have the effect of raising ticket prices, reducing revenue and increasing costs.
The DOT has broad authority over airlines and their consumer and competitive practices, and has used this authority to issue numerous regulations and pursue enforcement actions, including rules and fines relating to the handling of unfair or deceptive practices and unfair methods of competition including undisclosed display bias, lengthy tarmac delays, chronically delayed flights, airline advertising and marketing practices, codeshare disclosure, denied boarding compensation, ticket refunds, baggage liability, contracts of carriage, customer service commitments, consumer notices and disclosures, customer complaints and transportation of passengers with disabilities.
The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 (the “FAA Authorization Renewal”) was signed into law in May 2024. Among other things, the FAA Authorization Renewal increased the authorized funding level for the FAA and required the hiring of additional air traffic controllers, an effort to address staffing and resource shortages and improve the operation of the air traffic control system in the United States. The FAA Authorization Renewal also codified several consumer protection rulemakings that could be challenging to implement and have negative financial impacts, and required the FAA to conduct a study on improvements to the safety and efficiency of aircraft evacuation standards and engage in rulemaking to implement appropriate recommendations. Any new or enhanced requirements resulting from the FAA Authorization Renewal, including any new fees, costs we may be required to incur to comply with new rules, including with respect to any changes to the configuration of our aircraft, and compensation or other penalties we may be required to pay for violations of such rules, have the potential to significantly increase our operational costs and could decrease potential passenger revenue.
In October 2022, the DOT issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) which would require airlines and travel agents to increase disclosure of bag fees, change and cancellation fees and family seating fees during the ticket purchase process in an effort to improve the transparency of airline pricing. The final rule was published in April 2024, however the rule is being challenged by airline associations and certain individual airlines and, in October 2025, the Fifth Circuit granted the airlines’ request for rehearing. As such, the rule is under further review and any potential impacts are still being evaluated.
Also, in August 2024, the DOT issued a NPRM regarding family seating in air transportation which would require airlines to seat children aged 13 and under next to at least one accompanying adult at no additional cost beyond the fare, subject to limited exceptions. The DOT is still evaluating the impacts of this proposed rule.
The DOT has also issued several NPRMs related to aircraft accessibility measures. In January 2020, the DOT published a NPRM regarding short-term improvements, including with respect to the accessibility features of lavatories and onboard wheelchair requirements on certain single-aisle aircraft with an FAA certificated maximum capacity of 125 seats or more, training flight attendants to proficiency on an annual basis to provide assistance in transporting qualified individuals with disabilities to and from the lavatory from their aircraft seat and providing certain information on request to qualified individuals with a disability or persons inquiring on their behalf, on the carrier’s website and in printed or electronic form on the aircraft, concerning the accessibility of aircraft lavatories. Comments were reopened on this NPRM in November 2021. In March 2022, the DOT issued a NPRM regarding long-term accessibility improvements that would require airlines to ensure that at least one lavatory on new single-aisle aircraft with 125 seats or more is large enough to permit a passenger with a disability (with the help of an assistant, if necessary) to approach, enter and maneuver within the lavatory, as necessary, to use all lavatory facilities and to leave by means of the aircraft’s onboard wheelchair. In August 2023, the DOT published the final rule covering both the short- and long-term accessibility measures. The final rule mandated certain short-term accessibility measures that are substantially consistent with the measures outlined in the NPRM, which we are required to comply with by October 2026. The final rule also adopted the expanded lavatory size requirement for new single-aisle aircraft with 125 seats or more, which applies to aircraft that are ordered within 10 years of, or delivered 12 years after, the rule’s October 2023 effective date.
We may also be impacted by regulations affecting certain of our major commercial partners, including our co-branded credit card partner or our loyalty program. For example, there has been bipartisan legislation proposed in the U.S. Congress, referred to as the Credit Card Competition Act, designed to increase credit card transaction routing options for merchants which, if enacted, could result in a reduction of the fees levied on credit card transactions. If this legislation or any similar legislation or regulation is enacted, it could fundamentally alter the
profitability of our agreement with our co-branded credit card partner and the benefits we provide to our consumers through our co-branded credit card. Additionally, in May 2024, the DOT and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) held a joint hearing on airline and credit card rewards. In September 2024, the DOT launched an inquiry into certain airline loyalty programs to investigate potential competition or consumer protection issues in airlines’ administration of these programs and the CFPB recently issued a circular to other law enforcement agencies warning that credit card issuers and their parties could violate federal law by devaluingrewards points and airline miles. Draft legislation introduced in the U.S. Congress, referred to as the Protect Your Points Act, similarly aims to regulate the management of frequent flyer program co-branded credit cards. If regulatory or legislative efforts to impose restrictions on airline loyalty programs are successful, they could materially reduce the revenues we derive from our FRONTIER Miles loyalty program and adversely impact our results of operations.
The FAA has issued final regulations governing pilot rest periods and work hours for all passenger airlines certified under Part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FAR”). The rule known as FAR Part 117, which became effective January 4, 2014, impacts the required amount and timing of rest periods for pilots between work assignments and modifies duty and rest requirements based on the time of day, number of scheduled segments, time zones and other factors. In addition, the U.S. Congress enacted a law and the FAA issued regulations requiring U.S. airline pilots to have a minimum number of hours as a pilot in order to qualify for an Air Transport Pilot certificate, which all pilots on U.S. airlines must obtain. In October 2022, the FAA issued a final rule mandating rest periods of at least 10 consecutive hours for flight attendants who are scheduled for a duty period of 14 hours or less and prohibiting the reduction of the rest period under any circumstances, which have impacted and will continue to impact our scheduling flexibility. Compliance with these rules may increase our costs, while failure to remain in full compliance with these rules may subject us to fines or other enforcement action. FAR Part 117 and the minimum pilot hour requirements may also reduce our ability to meet flight crew staffing requirements. We cannot assure you that compliance with these and other laws, regulations, orders, rulings and guidance will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, the TSA mandates the federalization of certain airport security procedures and imposes additional security requirements on airports and airlines, some of which is funded by a security fee imposed on passengers and collected by airlines. We cannot forecast what additional security and safety requirements may be imposed in the future or the costs or revenue impact that would be associated with complying with such requirements.
Our ability to operate as an airline is dependent on our obtaining and maintaining authorizations issued to us by the DOT and the FAA. The FAA from time to time issues directives and other mandatory orders relating to, among other things, operating aircraft, the grounding of aircraft, maintenance and inspection of aircraft, installation of new safety-related items, and removal and replacement of aircraft parts that have failed or may fail in the future. These requirements can be issued with little or no notice, can impact our ability to efficiently or fully utilize our aircraft, and could result in the temporary grounding of aircraft types altogether. A decision by the FAA to ground, or require time-consuming inspections of or maintenance on, our aircraft, for any reason, could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In November 2025, the DOT and FAA announced a temporary 10% reduction in flights at 40 major U.S. airports, due to the increased strain on both pilots and air traffic controllers due to the most recent U.S. Government shutdown. Although the U.S. government shutdown ended on November 12, 2025, the FAA did not lift the restrictions until November 17, 2025. When the restrictions were in place, airlines were required to issue full refunds to passengers. Future government shutdowns are unpredictable and could negatively impact our operations due to mandated flight reductions, decreased availability of air traffic controllers and security personnel, and other unforeseen impacts.
Federal law requires that air carriers operating scheduled service be continuously “fit, willing and able” to provide the services for which they are licensed. Our “fitness” is monitored by the DOT, which considers managerial competence, operations, finances and compliance record. In addition, under federal law, we must be a U.S. citizen (as determined under applicable law). Please see “Business—Foreign Ownership.” While the DOT has seldom revoked a carrier’s certification for lack of fitness, such an occurrence would render it impossible for us to
continue operating as an airline. The DOT may also institute investigations or administrative proceedings against airlines for violations of regulations.
International routes are regulated by air transport agreements and related agreements between the United States and foreign governments. Our ability to operate international routes is subject to change, as the applicable agreements between the United States and foreign governments may be amended from time to time. Our access to new international markets may be limited by the applicable air transport agreements between the United States and foreign governments and our ability to obtain the necessary authority from the United States and foreign governments to fly the international routes. In addition, our operations in foreign countries are subject to regulation by foreign governments and our business may be affected by changes in law and future actions taken by such governments, including granting or withdrawal of government approvals, airport slots and restrictions on competitive practices. We are subject to numerous foreign regulations in the countries outside the United States where we currently provide service. If we are not able to comply with this complex regulatory regime, our business could be significantly harmed. Please see “Business—Government Regulation.”
Restrictions on, or increased taxes applicable to, charges for non-fare products and services paid by airline passengers and burdensome consumer protection regulations or laws could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we generated non-fare passenger revenues of $2,117 million and $2,248 million, respectively. Our non-fare passenger revenue consists primarily of revenue generated from air travel-related services such as service fees, baggage fees, seat selection fees and other passenger-related revenue and is a component of passenger revenue within our consolidated statements of operations. The DOT has rules governing many facets of the airline-consumer relationship including, for instance, unfair or deceptive practices and unfair methods of competition. The DOT periodically audits airlines to determine whether such airlines have violated any of the DOT rules. The DOT has conducted audits of our business and routine post-audit investigations of our business are ongoing. For example, in 2023, the DOT sent us a request for information to assist in its investigation into whether we cared for our customers as required by law during Winter Storm Elliott, including providing adequate customer service assistance, prompt flight status notifications, and proper and timely refunds. The DOT concluded the investigation related to Winter Storm Elliott during 2025 with no material financial impact to our business. We will continue to fully cooperating with any requests from the DOT. If the DOT determines that we are not, or have not been, in compliance with these rules or if we are unable to remain compliant, the DOT may subject us to fines or other enforcement action.
The DOT may also impose additional consumer protection requirements, including adding requirements to modify our websites and computer reservations system, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The U.S. Congress and the DOT have also examined the increasingly common airline industry practice of unbundling the pricing of certain products and ancillary services. For example, in December 2024, a U.S. Senate subcommittee held a bipartisan hearing on ancillary fees and unbundled pricing practices, and numerous airline executives, including our Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer, were called to testify. However, if new laws or regulations are adopted that make unbundling of airline products and services impermissible, or more cumbersome or expensive, or if new taxes are imposed on non-fare passenger revenues, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed. Congressional, federal agency and other government scrutiny may also change industry practice or the public’s willingness to pay for non-fare ancillary services. For a discussion of DOT regulations and rulemaking efforts, please see “—We are subject to extensive regulations by the FAA, the DOT, the TSA, CBP and other U.S. and foreign governmental agencies, compliance with which would cause us to incur increased costs and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.”
We are also subject to the examination of our tax returns and other tax matters by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax authorities. Following a federal excise tax audit by the IRS covering the first quarter of 2021 to the second quarter of 2023, in June 2025, we received a revised assessment in the amount of $133 million related to the applicability of federal excise tax to certain optional ancillary products and services. We established reserves for certain fees subject to the assessment where we believe a loss for this matter is probable and estimable. We are actively contesting the assessment and our appeal is pending with the IRS. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these examinations, and we could face additional tax liability, including interest and penalties, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to risks associated with climate change, including increased regulation of our CO 2 emissions, changing consumer preferences and the potential increased impacts of severe weather events on our operations and infrastructure.
Efforts to transition to a low-carbon future have increased the focus by global, national and regional regulators on climate change and GHG emissions, including CO 2 emissions. In particular, ICAO has adopted rules, including those pertaining to CORSIA, which will require us to address the growth in CO 2 emissions of a significant majority of our international flights. For more information on CORSIA, see “Business—Government Regulation—Environmental Regulation.”
At this time, the costs of complying with our future obligations under CORSIA are uncertain because there is a significant uncertainty with respect to the future supply and price of carbon offset credits and lower-carbon aircraft fuels. In addition, we will not directly control our CORSIA compliance costs through 2032 because those obligations are based on the growth in emissions of the global aviation sector and begin to incorporate a factor for individual airline operator emissions growth beginning in 2033. Due to the competitive nature of the airline industry and unpredictability of the market for air travel, we can offer no assurance that we may be able to increase our fares, impose surcharges or otherwise increase revenues or decrease other operating costs sufficiently to offset our costs of meeting obligations under CORSIA.
In the event that CORSIA does not come into force as expected or is terminated for whatever reason, we and other airlines could become subject to an unpredictable and inconsistent array of national or regional emissions restrictions, creating a patchwork of complex regulatory requirements that could affect global competitors differently without offering meaningful aviation environmental improvements. Concerns over climate change are likely to result in continued attempts by municipal, state, regional and federal agencies, as well as international bodies, to adopt requirements or change business environments related to aviation that, if successful, may result in increased costs to the airline industry and us. In addition, several countries and U.S. states have adopted, or are considering adopting, programs, including new taxes, to regulate domestic GHG emissions. For example, in October 2023, California became the first state to sign two climate disclosure laws, if they survive ongoing legal challenge, require certain companies doing business in California, and above a certain threshold to disclose their GHG emissions and climate-related financial risks. Other states and jurisdictions in which we operate may adopt similar, divergent, or more stringent laws. Certain airports have adopted, and others could in the future adopt, GHG emission or climate-related goals that could impact our operations or require us to make changes or investments in our infrastructure.
In addition, in January 2021, the EPA adopted GHG emission standards for new aircraft engines, which are aligned with the 2017 ICAO aircraft engine GHG emission standards. Like the ICAO standards, the final EPA standards for new aircraft engines would not apply retroactively to engines on in-service aircraft. Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, the FAA issued a final rule in February 2024 to implement these standards, introducing new fuel efficiency certification regulations. These regulations, which took effect in April 2024, apply to airplanes manufactured after January 1, 2028, as well as to uncertified large business and commercial jet aircrafts.
U.S. commitments announced during the April 2021 Leaders’ Summit on Climate include working with other countries on a vision toward reducing the aviation sector’s emissions in a manner consistent with the 2050 net-zero emissions goal, continued participation in CORSIA and development of SAF. Whether these U.S. or international goals will be achieved and the potential effects on our business cannot be predicted at this time. If demand for SAF
increases beyond the current capacity of SAF production efforts, we may need to pay a significant premium for SAF above the cost of traditional fuel.
All such climate change-related regulatory activity and developments may adversely affect our business and financial results by requiring us to reduce our emissions, make capital investments to purchase specific types of equipment or technologies, purchase carbon offset credits or otherwise incur additional costs related to our emissions, either due to direct regulation on us, regulation on our suppliers or others in our value chain, or otherwise. Such activity may also impact us indirectly by increasing our operating costs, including fuel costs.
Growing recognition among consumers of the dangers of climate change may mean some customers choose to fly less frequently or fly on an airline they perceive as operating in a manner that is more sustainable to the climate. Business customers may choose to use alternatives to travel, such as virtual meetings and workspaces. Greater development of high-speed rail in markets now served by short-haul flights could provide passengers with lower-carbon alternatives to flying with us. Our collateral to secure loans, in the form of aircraft, spare parts, airport slots and loyalty and brand assets, could lose value as customer demand shifts and economies move to low-carbon alternatives, which may increase our financing costs. Additionally, climate change-related litigation and investigations have increased in recent years and any claims or investigationsagainst us could be costly to defend and our business could be adversely affected by the outcome.
Finally, the potential acute and chronic physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, fires, sea-level rise, excessive heat, longer-term changes in weather patterns and other climate-related events, could affect our operations, infrastructure and financial results. Such severe weather events may increase the incidence of delays and cancellations, increase turbulence-related injuries, impact fuel consumption to avoid weather, require repositioning of aircraft to avoid damage or accommodate changed flights, or reduce demand for travel. Operational impacts, such as the cancelling of flights, could result in loss of revenue. We could incur significant costs to improve the climate resiliency of our infrastructure and otherwise prepare for, respond to and mitigate such physical effects of climate change. We are not able to predict accurately the materiality of any potential losses or costs associated with the physical effects of climate change at this time.
We are subject to various environmental and noise laws and regulations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to increasingly stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of the environment and noise reduction, including those relating to air emissions, discharges (including storm water discharges) to surface and subsurface waters, safe drinking water and the use, management, disposal and release of, and exposure to, hazardous waste, materials and chemicals. We are or may be subject to new or proposed laws and regulations that may have a direct effect (or indirect effect through our third-party specialists or airport facilities at which we operate) on our operations. Any such existing, future, new or potential laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Similarly, we are subject to environmental laws and regulations that require us to investigate and remediate soil or groundwater to meet certain remediation standards. Under certain laws, generators of waste materials, and current and former owners or operators of facilities, can be subject to liability for investigation and remediation costs at locations that have been identified as requiring response actions. Liability under these laws may be strict, joint and several, meaning that we could be liable for the costs of cleaning up environmental contamination regardless of fault or the amount of wastes directly attributable to us.
In addition, ICAO and jurisdictions around the world have adopted noise regulations that require all aircraft to comply with noise-level standards, and governmental authorities in several U.S. and foreign cities are considering or have already implemented aircraft noise reduction programs, including the imposition of overnight curfews and limitations on daytime take-offs and landings. Compliance with existing and future environmental laws and regulations, including emissions limitations and more restrictive or widespread noise regulations, that may be applicable to us could require significant expenditures, increase our cost base and have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition, and violations thereof can lead to significant fines and penalties, among other sanctions.
We routinely participate with other airlines in fuel consortia and fuel committees at our airports. The related agreements generally include cost-sharing provisions and environmental indemnities that are generally joint and several among the participating airlines. Any costs (including remediation and spill response costs) incurred by such fuel consortia could also have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Airlines are often affected by factors beyond their control, including: air traffic congestion at airports; air traffic control inefficiencies; government shutdowns; major construction or improvement projects at airports; aircraft and engine defects; FAA grounding of aircraft; adverse weather conditions; increased security measures; new travel-related identification requirements, taxes and fees; natural disasters; or outbreaks of disease, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Like other airlines, our business is affected by factors beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports, air traffic control inefficiencies, government shutdowns, major construction or improvement projects at airports at which we operate, aircraft and engine defects, FAA grounding of aircraft, adverse weather conditions, increased security measures, new travel-related identification requirements, taxes and fees, natural disasters and outbreaks of disease. Flight delays caused by these factors may frustrate passengers and may increase costs and decrease revenues which, in turn, could adversely affect our profitability. The federal government controls all U.S. airspace, and airlines are completely dependent on the FAA to operate that airspace in a safe, efficient and affordable manner. The federal government also controls airport security. The air traffic control system, which is operated by the FAA, has in the past and we expect will continue to face challenges in managing the demand for U.S. air travel. Federal government slowdowns or shutdowns may further impact the availability of federal resources, such as air traffic controllers and security personnel, necessary to provide air traffic control and airport security. Staffing shortages, such as the recent shortage of air traffic controllers, can cause delays or cancellations of flights or may impact our ability to take delivery of aircraft or expand our route network or airport footprint. In addition, U.S. and foreign air traffic controllers often rely on outdated technologies that routinely overwhelm the system and compel airlines to fly inefficient, indirect routes resulting in delays. Further, implementation of the Next Generation Air Transport System, or NextGen, by the FAA could result in changes to aircraft routings and flight paths that could lead to increased noise complaints and other lawsuits, resulting in increased costs. The U.S. Congress could enact legislation that could impose a wide range of consumer protection requirements, which could increase our costs of doing business.
In November 2025, the DOT and FAA announced a temporary 10% reduction in flights at 40 major U.S. airports, due to the increased strain on both pilots and air traffic controllers due to the most recent U.S. government shutdown. Although the U.S. government shutdown ended on November 12, 2025, the FAA did not lift the restrictions until November 17, 2025. When the restrictions were in place, airlines were required to issue full refunds to passengers. Future government shutdowns are unpredictable and could negatively impact our operations due to mandated flight reductions, decreased availability of air traffic controllers and security personnel, and other such unforeseen impacts.
In addition, airlines may also experience disruptions to their operations as a result of the aircraft and engines they operate, such as manufacturing defects, spare part shortages and other factors beyond their control. Please see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We depend on a sole-source supplier for our aircraft and two suppliers for our engines.”
We provide service to many areas of the United States that are at risk of, and from time to time experience, severe weather events. Adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, thunderstorms, blizzards, snowstorms or earthquakes, can cause flight cancellations or significant delays. Cancellations or delays due to adverse weather conditions or natural disasters, air traffic control problems or inefficiencies, breaches in security or other factors may affect us to a greater degree than other larger airlines that may be able to recover more quickly from these events, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition to a greater degree than other air carriers. Because of our high utilization, operational
disruptions can have a disproportionate impact on our ability to recover from such disruptions. In addition, many airlines re-accommodate their disrupted passengers on other airlines at prearranged rates under flight interruption manifest agreements. We have been unsuccessful in procuring such agreements with other airlines, which makes our recovery from travel disruption more challenging than for larger airlines that have these agreements in place. New identification requirements, such as the implementation of rules under the REAL ID Act of 2005, and increased travel taxes, such as those provided in the Travel Promotion Act, enacted in March 2010, could also result in decreases in passenger traffic. Any general reduction in airline passenger traffic could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We face competition from air travel substitutes and technology advancements.
In addition to airline competition from legacy network airlines, LCCs and other ULCCs, we also face competition from air travel substitutes. On our domestic routes, particularly those with shorter stage lengths, we face competition from other transportation alternatives, such as buses, trains or automobiles. In addition, technology advancements may limit the demand for air travel. For example, video teleconferencing, virtual and augmented reality and other methods of electronic communication may reduce the need for in-person communication. Any inability to stimulate demand for air travel with our low-cost fares or to adjust rapidly in the event that the basis of competition in our markets changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Future public health threats or outbreaks of disease, including pandemics similar to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as measures to reduce the spread of such disease and the related economic impact, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.
Future public health threats or outbreaks of disease, including pandemics similar to the COVID-19 pandemic, have in the past and may in the future result in a severedecline in demand for air travel, and measures to reduce the spread of such diseases could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. The duration and severity of a future public health threat or outbreak of disease, or any additional governmental or regulatory requirements that could be imposed on our business in response to such public health threat or disease, cannot be predicted and could result in additional adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Threatened or actual terrorist attacks or security concerns, particularly those involving airlines, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Past terrorist attacks or attempted attacks, particularly those against airlines, have caused substantial revenue losses and increased security costs, and any actual or threatened terrorist attack or security breach, even if not directly against an airline, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For instance, enhanced passenger screening, increased regulation governing carry-on baggage and other similar restrictions on passenger travel may further increase passenger inconvenience and reduce the demand for air travel. In addition, increased or enhanced security measures have tended to result in higher governmental fees imposed on airlines, thereby resulting in higher operating costs for airlines, which we may not be able to pass on to consumers in the form of higher prices. Terrorist attacks made directly on an airline, particularly in the United States, or the fear of such attacks or other hostilities, including elevated national threatwarnings or selective cancellation or redirection of flights due to terror threats, would have a negative impact on the airline industry and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A decline in, or temporary suspension of, the funding or operations of the U.S. federal government or its agencies may adversely affect our future operating results or negatively impact the timing and implementation of our growth prospects.
The success of our operations and our future growth is dependent on a number of federal agencies, including the FAA, the DOT and the TSA. In the event of a prolongedslowdown or shutdown of the federal government, certain functions of these and other federal agencies may be significantly diminished or completely suspended for an
indefinite period of time, the conclusion of which is outside of our control. During such periods, it may not be possible for us to obtain the operational approvals and certifications required for events that are critical to the successful execution of our operational strategy, such as the delivery of new aircraft or the implementation of new routes. Additionally, there may be an impact on critical airport operations, particularly security, air traffic control and other functions that could cause airport delays and flight cancellations. Shutdown-related uncertainty can also decrease both business and leisure travel demand and slow booking trends, causing short-term business headwinds.
The most recent U.S. federal government shutdown began on October 1, 2025 and lasted until November 12, 2025, with restrictions lifted on November 17, 2025. This shutdown resulted in the DOT and FAA announcing a temporary 10% reduction in flights at 40 major U.S. airports, due to the increased strain on both pilots and air traffic controllers. Future government shutdowns are unpredictable and could negatively impact our operations due to potential mandated flight reductions, decreased availability of air traffic controllers and security personnel, and other such unforeseen impacts. Furthermore, once a period of slowdown or government shutdown has concluded, there will likely be an operational backlog within the federal agencies that may extend the length of time that such events continue to negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition beyond the end of such period.
Risks associated with our presence in international emerging markets, including political or economic instability, and failure to adequately comply with existing legal requirements, may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Some of our target growth markets include countries with less developed economies, legal systems or financial markets, and business and political environments that are vulnerable to economic and political disruptions, such as significant fluctuations in gross domestic product, interest and currency exchange rates, civil disturbances, government instability, nationalization and expropriation of private assets, trafficking and the imposition of taxes or other charges by governments. The occurrence of any of these events in markets served by us now or in the future and the resulting instability may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We emphasize compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and have implemented and continue to implement and refresh policies, procedures and certain ongoing training of our employees, third-party specialists and partners with regard to business ethics and key legal requirements; however, we cannot assure you that our employees, third-party specialists or partners will adhere to our code of ethics, other policies or other legal requirements. If we fail to enforce our policies and procedures properly or maintain adequate recordkeeping and internal accounting practices to record our transactions accurately, we may be subject to sanctions. In the event we believe, or have reason to believe, that our employees, third-party specialists or partners have or may have violated applicable laws or regulations, we may incur investigation costs, potential penalties and other related costs which, in turn, may have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.
Increases in insurance costs or reductions in insurance coverage may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If any of our aircraft were to be involved in a significant accident or if our property or operations were to be affected by a significant natural catastrophe or other event, we could be exposed to material liability or loss. If we are unable to obtain sufficient insurance (including, but not limited to: aviation hull and liability insurance, property and business interruption coverage and cybersecurity incident coverage) to cover such liabilities or losses, whether due to insurance market conditions or otherwise, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our current third-party war risk (terrorism) insurance from commercial underwriters excludes nuclear, radiological and certain other events. If we are unable to obtain adequate war risk (terrorism) insurance, or if an event not covered by the insurance we maintain were to take place, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Business
If we fail to implement our business strategy successfully, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our growth strategy includes significantly expanding our fleet and expanding the number of markets we serve. We may be unable to achieveprofitability in new markets or maintain profitability in existing markets. When developing our route network, we focus on gaining market share on routes that have been underserved or that are served primarily by higher cost airlines, where we believe we have a competitive cost advantage. Effectively implementing our growth strategy is critical for our business to achieve economies of scale and to sustain or increase our profitability. We face numerous challenges in implementing our growth strategy, including our ability to:
• sustain our relatively low unit operating costs;
• continue to realize attractive revenue performance;
• achieve and maintain profitability;
• maintain a high level of aircraft utilization; and
• access airports located in our targeted geographic markets where we can operate routes in a manner that is consistent with our cost strategy.
In addition, in order to successfully implement our growth strategy, which includes effectively planning and managing the growth of our fleet size, we will require access to a large number of gates and other services at airports we currently serve or may seek to serve. We believe there are currently significant restraints on gates and related ground facilities at many of the most heavily utilized airports in the United States, in addition to the fact that three major domestic airports (JFK and LGA in New York and DCA in Washington, D.C.) require government-controlled take-off or landing “slots” to operate at those airports. As a result, if we are unable to obtain access to a sufficient number of slots, gates or related ground facilities at desirable airports to accommodate our growing fleet, we may be unable to compete in those markets, our aircraft utilization rate could decrease and we could suffer a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our customer growth and retention relies upon our loyalty programs and related product offerings. During 2025, we made many enhancements to our loyalty program to encourage participation in the program and reward our customers with benefits to promote flying with us. If those benefits are not deemed to be sufficient or enticing enough to our customers, we may not reach the growth and retention targets we anticipate and our financial position could be negatively impacted. Further, as part of our efforts to enhance our product offering, we plan to introduce first-class seating options beginning in 2026. The initiative requires aircraft reconfiguration and will limit our available aircraft during periods of reconfiguration. There can be no assurance that customer demand will be sufficient for this new product to offset the associated costs. If we are unable to successfully implement this product, our operations and financial position could be negatively impacted.
Our growth is also dependent upon our ability to maintain a safe and secure operation and will require additional personnel, equipment and facilities as we continue to induct new aircraft and execute our growth plan. In addition, we will require additional third-party personnel for services we do not undertake ourselves. An inability to hire and retain personnel, secure the required equipment and facilities in a cost-effective and timely manner, efficiently operate our expanded facilities or obtain the necessary regulatory approvals may adversely affect our ability to achieve our growth strategy, which could harm our business. Furthermore, expansion to new markets may have other risks due to factors specific to those markets. We may be unable to foresee all of the existing risks upon entering certain new markets or respond adequately to these risks, and our growth strategy and our business may suffer as a result. In addition, our competitors may reduce their fares and/or offer special promotions following our entry into a new market. We cannot assure you that we will be able to profitably expand our existing markets or establish new markets.
Some of our target growth markets outside of the United States include countries with less developed economies that may be vulnerable to unstable economic and political conditions, see “— Risks associated with our presence in international emerging markets, including political or economic instability, and failure to adequately
comply with existing legal requirements, may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.”
Our low-cost structure is one of our primary competitive advantages, and many factors could affect our ability to control our costs.
Our low-cost structure is one of our primary competitive advantages. However, we have limited control over some of our costs. For example, we have limited control over the price and availability of aircraft fuel, aviation insurance, the acquisition and operating cost of aircraft, airport and related infrastructure costs, taxes, the cost of meeting changing regulatory requirements and our cost to access capital or financing. In addition, the compensation and benefit costs applicable to a majority of our employees are established by the terms of collective bargaining agreements, which could result in increased labor costs. See “— Increased labor costs, union disputes, employee strikes and other labor-related disruption may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.” Further, in an inflationary environment that also exhibits worker and fuel shortages, depending on airline industry and other economic conditions, we may be unable to manage through the resulting increases in our operating costs. We cannot predict the extent to which high inflation may occur in the U.S. economy in the future, or for how long an inflationary period or worker or fuel shortages will last. As such, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to maintain our relatively low costs. If our costs increase and we are no longer able to maintain a competitive cost structure, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be able to grow or maintain our unit revenues or maintain our non-fare revenues.
A key component of our strategy is attracting customers with low fares and garnering repeat business by delivering a high-quality, family-friendly customer experience with a more upscale look and feel than traditionally experienced on other ULCCs in the United States. The rising cost of aircraft and engine maintenance may impair our ability to offer low-cost fares, which may result in reduced revenues. Differentiating our brand and product has required, and will continue to require, significant investment, and we cannot assure you that the initiatives we have implemented will continue to be successful or that the initiatives we intend to implement will be successful. If we are unable to maintain or further differentiate our brand and product from the other U.S. ULCCs, our market share could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may also not be successful in leveraging our brand and product to stimulate new demand with low-cost fares or gain market share from the legacy airlines, particularly if we experience significant excess capacity.
In addition, our business strategy includes maintaining our portfolio of desirable, value-oriented, non-fare products and services. However, we cannot assure you that passengers will continue to perceive value in the non-fare products and services we currently offer and regulatory initiatives could adversely affect non-fare revenue opportunities. Failure to maintain our non-fare revenues could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, if we are unable to maintain our non-fare revenues, we may not be able to execute our strategy to continue to lower base fares in order to stimulate demand for air travel.
We depend on a sole-source supplier for our aircraft and two suppliers for our engines.
A critical cost-saving element of our business strategy is to operate a single-family aircraft fleet; however, our dependence on the Airbus A320 family aircraft for all of our aircraft and on CFM International, an affiliate of General Electric Company, and Pratt & Whitney for our engines makes us vulnerable to any delivery delays, design defects, mechanical problems or other technical or regulatory issues associated with this aircraft type or these engines. In the event of any actual or suspected design defects or mechanical problems with the Airbus A320 family aircraft or CFM International or Pratt & Whitney engines, whether involving our aircraft or that of another airline, we may choose, or be required, to suspend or restrict the use of our aircraft. Our business could also be materially adversely affected if the public avoids flying on our aircraft due to an adverse perception of the Airbus A320 family
aircraft or CFM International or Pratt & Whitney engines, whether because of safety concerns or other problems, real or perceived, or in the event of an accident involving such aircraft or engines.
Since 2022, we have begun to introduce aircraft into our fleet that use the Pratt & Whitney PW1100 Geared Turbo Fan (“GTF”) engine, and we have selected this engine for certain of our planned future deliveries. During 2023, Pratt & Whitney announced an expansion of an inspection program related to these PW1100 GTF engines. This inspection program began in 2023 and may continue beyond 2026; however this has not materially impacted our operations through December 31, 2025. During 2024, the FAA superseded two Airworthiness Directives related to PW1100 GTF engines. The new Airworthiness Directive imposed additional inspection and maintenance requirements on PW1100 GTF engines, including accelerated replacement of certain engine components. Pratt & Whitney also rolled out a new “GTF Advantage” program during 2025, which includes a significant redesign of the engine’s core. The inspection program could potentially affect the timing of future deliveries of aircraft for which Pratt & Whitney engines have been selected.
Separately, if any of Airbus, CFM International or Pratt & Whitney becomes unable to perform its contractual obligations, including a failure to deliver aircraft or engines on schedule, and we must lease or purchase aircraft or engines from another supplier, we would incur substantial transition costs, including expenses related to acquiring new aircraft, engines, spare parts, maintenance facilities and training activities. Additionally, we would lose the cost benefits realized by our current single-fleet composition, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We have experienced delays in the deliveries of Airbus aircraft, which have not exceeded several months, and our business could be additionally impacted if delayspersist in future periods. These risks may be exacerbated by the long-term nature of our fleet and order book. See also “—We may be subject to competitive risks due to the long-term nature of our fleet and order book which commits us to Airbus aircraft and the engines available for such aircraft for a substantial period of time into the future.”
We may be subject to competitive risks due to the long-term nature of our fleet and order book which commits us to Airbus aircraft and the engines available for such aircraft for a substantial period of time into the future.
As of December 31, 2025, we had substantial existing aircraft purchase commitments through 2031, all of which are for Airbus A320neo family aircraft. We have committed to purchase 168 A320neo family aircraft by the end of 2031, all of which will have Pratt & Whitney GTF engines. We have a firm obligation to purchase 21 additional spare engines to be delivered by the end of 2031, all of which are Pratt & Whitney GTF engines. In addition, roughly half of our current fleet is equipped with the LEAP engine manufactured by CFM International. The A320neo family represents the latest step in the modernization of the A320 family aircraft, and includes next-generation engine technology as well as aerodynamic refinements, large curved sharklets, weight savings, a new aircraft cabin with larger hand luggage spaces and an improved air purification system. We were one of the first airlines to utilize the A320neo family and the LEAP engine, and it could take several years to determine whether the reliability and maintenance costs associated with new aircraft and engines will have a significant impact on our operations. If we are unable to realize the potential competitive advantages we expect to achieve through the implementation of the A320neo family aircraft and LEAP or GTF engines into our fleet or if we experience unexpected costs or delays in our operations as a result of such implementation, including due to increased inspection or maintenance obligations imposed on the Pratt & Whitney GTF engines, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Furthermore, as technological evolution occurs in our industry, we may be competitively disadvantaged because we have extensive existing fleet commitments that would prohibit us from adopting new technologies on an expedited basis.
In addition, while our operation of a single family of aircraft provides us with several operational and cost advantages, any FAA directive or other mandatory order relating to our aircraft or engines, including the grounding of any of our aircraft for any reason, could potentially apply to all or substantially all of our fleet, which could materially disrupt our operations and negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Increased labor costs, union disputes, employee strikes and other labor-related disruption may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is labor intensive, with labor costs representing approximately 26% of our total operating costs for each of the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 86% of our workforce was represented by labor unions, including a number of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements that are amendable. We are currently in negotiations with our pilots, flight attendants and aircraft technicians regarding their next labor contracts. See “Business—Human Capital Resources.” We cannot assure you that our labor costs going forward will remain competitive or that any new agreements into which we enter will not have terms with higher labor costs or that the negotiations of such labor agreements will not result in any work stoppages.
We cannot provide assurance that we will not experience operational disruption resulting from any future negotiations or disagreements with our pilots or with any of our other union-represented employee groups. In addition, we cannot provide any estimate with regard to the amount or probability of future compensation increases, ratification incentives or other costs that may come as a result of future labor negotiations. Future operational disruptions or other costs related to labor negotiations, including reputational harm that may come as a result of such disruptions, if any, may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, the terms and conditions of our future collective bargaining agreements may be affected by the results of collective bargaining negotiations at other U.S. airlines that may have a greater ability, due to larger scale, greaterefficiency, superiorprofitability or other factors, to bear higher costs than we can. One or more of our competitors may also significantly reduce their labor costs, thereby providing them with a competitive advantage over us. Our labor costs may also increase in connection with our growth and we could also become subject to additional collective bargaining agreements in the future as non-unionized workers may unionize. The occurrence of any such event may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our inability to expand or operate reliably or efficiently out of airports where we maintain a large presence could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are highly dependent on markets served from airports that are significant to our business, including Denver, Orlando, and Atlanta. Our results of operations may be affected by actions taken by governmental or other agencies or authorities having jurisdiction over our operations at these and other airports, including, but not limited to:
• increases in airport rates and charges;
• limitations on take-off and landing slots, airport gate capacity or other use of airport facilities;
• termination of our airport use agreements, some of which can be terminated by airport authorities with little notice to us;
• increases in airport capacity that could facilitate increased competition;
• international travel regulations, such as customs and immigration;
• increases in taxes;
• changes in the law that affect the services that can be offered by airlines, in general and in particular markets or at particular airports;
• restrictions on competitive practices;
• the adoption of statutes or regulations that impact or impose additional customer service standards and requirements, including security standards and requirements; and
• the adoption of more restrictive locally imposed noise regulations or curfews.
Our largest operating base is Denver International Airport, where we primarily operate out of Concourse A, including the ground load facility and accompanying gates. Additionally, we operate at Orlando International Airport and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport under operating leases which expire in 2026. In general, any changes in airport operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Any damage to our reputation or brand image could adversely affect our business or financial results.
Maintaining a good reputation globally is critical to our business. Our reputation or brand image could be adversely impacted by, among other things, any failure to adopt or maintain high ethical, social and environmental sustainability practices for our operations and activities; our impact on the environment; any inability to maintain our position as “America’s Greenest Airline” as measured by fuel efficiency (ASMs per fuel gallon consumed during the year ended December 31, 2025; compared to all other major U.S. carriers) including, for example, if another major U.S. airline experiences more average fuel savings than us based on ASMs per fuel gallon consumed or if consumers perceive us to be less “green” than other airlines based on different factors or metrics or by attributing the sustainability practices of our vendors, suppliers and other third parties to us; public pressure from investors or policy groups to change our policies; customer perceptions of our advertising campaigns, sponsorship arrangements or marketing programs; customer perceptions of our use of social media; or customer perceptions of statements made by us, our employees and executives, agents or other third parties. Increasingly, our reputation may also be impacted by our customers’ and other stakeholders’ evolving, and diverging, perception of the risks and opportunities we face related to human capital management and climate change engagement, our role in the communities in which we operate and our relationship with our crew members. In addition, we operate in a highly visible industry that has significant exposure to social media. Negative publicity, including as a result of misconduct by our customers, vendors or employees, can spread rapidly through social media. If we do not respond in a timely and appropriate manner to address negative publicity, our brand and reputation may be significantly harmed. Damage to our reputation or brand image or loss of customer confidence in our services could adversely affect our business and financial condition, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation. In addition, our reputation or brand image could be adversely impacted by any inability to deliver strong operational performance, which we believe helps strengthen our customer loyalty and attract new customers. Any sustained inability to maintain or improve our operational performance could result in decreased customer loyalty and, in turn, could significantly harm our brand and reputation and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Moreover, an outbreak and spread of an infectious disease could adversely impact consumer perceptions of the health and safety of travel, and in particular airline travel, such as occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Actual or perceived risk of infection on our flights could have a material adverse effect on the public’s perception of us and may harm our reputation and business. We have in the past been, and may in the future be, required to take extensive measures to reassure our team members and the traveling public of the safety of air travel, and we could incur significant costs implementing safety, hygiene-related or other actions to limit the actual or perceived threat of infection among our employees and passengers. However, we cannot assure that any actions we might take in response to an infectious disease outbreak will be sufficient to restore the confidence of consumers in the safety of air travel.
Our reputation and business could be adversely affected in the event of an emergency, accident or similar public incident involving our aircraft or personnel.
We are exposed to potential significant losses and adverse publicity in the event that any of our aircraft or personnel is involved in an emergency, accident, terrorist incident or other similar public incident, which could expose us to significant reputational harm and potential legal liability. In addition, we could face significant costs or lost revenues related to repairs or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its temporary or permanent loss from service. We cannot assure you that we will not be affected by such events or that the amount of our insurance coverage will be adequate in the event such circumstances arise, and any such event could cause a substantial increase in our insurance premiums. In addition, any future emergency, accident or similar incident involving our aircraft or personnel, even if fully covered by insurance or even if it does not involve our airline, may create an adverse public perception about our airline or that the equipment we fly is less safe or reliable than other transportation alternatives, or, in the case of our aircraft, could cause us to perform time-consuming and costly inspections on our aircraft or engines, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors and other stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices may impose additional costs on us, harm our reputation, adversely impact our access to capital and financial results, or expose us to new or additional risks.
Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors and other stakeholders related to their ESG practices and disclosures, including practices and disclosures related to GHGs and climate change in the airline industry in particular, and human capital management, health and safety and human rights initiatives and governance standards among companies more generally. As a result, we may face increasing and/or conflicting pressure regarding our ESG practices and disclosures. Failure, or a perception of failure, to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards (including in the timeline and manner in which we adapt or comply) could negatively impact our reputation and the trading price of our common stock. Moreover, we may be subject to diverging or inconsistent ESG regulations in different jurisdictions. New, and rapidly evolving, government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and expanded mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence and disclosure. The growing emphasis on ESG matters has resulted, and may result, in the adoption of new laws and regulations, including new reporting requirements, including with respect to climate change. For example, in 2023, the State of California enacted SB 253 and SB 261 which, beginning in 2026, and if they survive ongoing legal challenge, will require disclosure of climate-related financial risks and Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions, for certain companies. Additionally, our suppliers, customers or other business partners may require us to provide additional climate-related information if they are also subject to these or additional climate-related disclosure laws or regulations in other jurisdictions. If we fail to comply with new laws, regulations or reporting requirements, or we fail to provide complete and accurate information to our suppliers, customers or other business partners, our reputation and business could be adversely impacted.
Simultaneously, there are efforts by some stakeholders to reduce companies’ efforts on certain ESG, including human capital management-related matters, and anti-ESG or anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) sentiment is gaining momentum across the United States, with several states having enacted or proposed anti-ESG or anti-DEI policies or legislation and several state and federal governmental authorities filing suit alleging that ESG or DEI measures or initiatives violate law. If we were sued under any of these claims, our financial condition, reputation or business could be adversely impacted. Increasingly, different stakeholder groups have divergent views on ESG matters, which increases the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to ESG matters will be perceived negatively by at least some stakeholders and adversely impact our reputation and business. We could be sued for our ESG or diversity policies and/or programs. Both advocates and opponents to certain ESG matters are increasingly resorting to a range of activism forms, including media campaigns and litigation, to advance their perspectives. To the extent we are subject to such activism, it may require us to incur costs or otherwise adversely impact our business. This and other stakeholder expectations could likely lead to increased costs as well as scrutiny that could heighten all of the risks identified in this risk factor. Additionally, many of our customers, business partners, and
suppliers may be subject to similar expectations, which may augment or create additional risks, including risks that may not be known to us.
In addition, we have a number of ESG initiatives, which will require ongoing investment, and there is no assurance that our initiatives will achieve their intended outcome. Consumers’ perceptions of our efforts to achieve these initiatives often differ widely, may vary over time and present risks to our reputation and brand. Further, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment or voting decisions. If we are unable to meet the ESG standards or investment criteria set by these investors, we may lose investors, investors may allocate a portion of their capital away from us and our reputation may also be negatively affected. In addition, even if our initiatives are effective, we may experience increased costs as a result of executing upon our sustainability goals that may not be offset by any benefit to our reputation, which could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition.
Negative publicity regarding our customer service could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business strategy includes the differentiation of our brand and product from the other U.S. airlines, including other ULCCs, in order to increase customer loyalty and drive future ticket sales. We intend to accomplish this by continuing to offer passengers dependable customer service. However, in the past, we have received customer complaints related to, among other things, our customer service and reservations and ticketing systems. We and other airlines have also received complaints regarding the treatment and handling of passengers’ noncompliance with airline policies. Passenger complaints, together with reports of lost baggage, delayed and cancelled flights and other service issues, are reported to the public by the DOT. The DOT may choose to investigate such customer complaints, and we have in the past received information requests from the DOT related to our compliance with certain consumer protection requirements. DOT investigations may result in fines or other penalties; for example, we have previously been required to provide flight credits to certain customers and pay a net cash penalty pursuant to a settlement agreement with the DOT. While such penalties have not previously had a material impact, future fines or other penalties imposed by the DOT could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, our loyalty programs are constantly improving and evolving, which could impact customer understanding of our current offerings. If an offering is removed or added without a customer being aware, there could be an increased number of complaints due to lack of visibility and clarity of our offerings.
We offer a self-service customer service model where our customers are able to receive support via online, mobile and text channels, including the option to chat with a live agent. Some of our customers may prefer to only speak with a live agent and could develop a negative perception of our self-service model if that option is limited to them. If we do not meet our customers’ expectations with respect to reliability and service, our brand and product could be negatively impacted, which could result in customers deciding not to fly with us and adversely affect our business and reputation.
We rely on maintaining a high aircraft utilization rate during peak days to implement our low-cost structure, which makes us especially vulnerable to flight delays, flight cancellations, aircraft unavailability or unplanned reductions in demand.
Our average daily aircraft utilization was 9.2 hours and 10.3 hours for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Aircraft utilization is the average amount of time per day that our aircraft spend carrying passengers. Part of our business strategy is to maximize revenue per aircraft through high daily aircraft utilization, which is achieved, in part, by quick turnaround times at airports so we can fly more hours on average in a day. During 2025, we responded to softened demand due to oversaturated domestic supply amid an uncertain environment by continuing to cut capacity and reduce departures on non-peak travel days; however, our business strategy remains to maximize aircraft utilization overall, especially on peak days. Aircraft utilization is reduced by delays and cancellations caused by various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports or other air traffic control problems or outages, labor availability, adverse weather conditions,
increased security measures or breaches in security, international or domestic conflicts, terrorist activity or other changes in business conditions. A significant portion of our operations are concentrated in markets such as Denver, the Southeast, the Northeast and Northern Midwest regions of the United States, which are particularly vulnerable to weather, airport traffic constraints and other delays, particularly in the winter months and during hurricane season. In addition, pulling aircraft out of service for unscheduled and scheduled maintenance may materially reduce our average fleet utilization and require that we re-accommodate passengers or seek short-term substitute capacity at increased costs. Further, an unplanned reduction in demand reduces the utilization of our fleet and results in a related increase in unit costs, which may be material. Due to the relatively small size of our fleet and high daily aircraft utilization rate, the unexpectedunavailability of one or more aircraft and resulting reduced capacity or even a modest decrease in demand could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are highly dependent upon our cash balances and operating cash flows.
As of December 31, 2025, we had $874 million of total available liquidity, consisting of $654 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $220 million from the undrawn Revolving Loan Facility. We will continue to be dependent on our operating cash flows (if any) and cash balances to fund our operations, provide capital reserves and make scheduled payments on our aircraft-related fixed obligations, including substantial PDPs related to the aircraft we have on order. In addition, we have sought, and may continue to seek, financing from other available sources to fund our operations, which includes PDP payments.
Under the terms of the PDP Financing Facility and the Second PDP Financing Facility, we are subject to a fixed charge coverage ratio requirement (the “FCCR Test”). If the FCCR Test is not maintained, we are required to test the loan to collateral ratio for the underlying aircraft in the PDP Financing Facility and the Second PDP Financing Facility that are subject to financing (the “LTV Test”) and make any pre-payments or post additional collateral required in order to reduce the loan to value on each aircraft in the PDP Financing Facility and the Second PDP Financing Facility that are subject to financing below a ratio threshold. The LTV Test is largely dependent on the appraised fair value of the underlying aircraft subject to financing. LTV Tests may require prepayments or collateral postings in the future depending on aircraft appraisals and other factors.
Our class A-1 enhanced equipment trust certificates (the “2025-1 EETCs”) represent the interests in our series A-1 equipment notes in respect of which we are subject to certain covenants. The equipment notes are secured by liens on substantially all of our spare parts and tooling and we are required to obtain semi-annual appraisals, and to ensure that a specified percentage of our spare parts (by appraisal value) are pledged to secure the equipment notes and that the loan-to-value ratio does not exceed a specified percentage. If we do not meet covenant requirements, or fail to make semi-annual payments, we could face accelerated payment obligations. In addition, the terms of our equipment notes limit our ability to freely use, dispose of, or pledge these assets.
If we fail to maintain certain liquidity and other financial covenants, our credit card processors, of which one vendor represents a significant majority of transactions, have the right to hold back credit card remittances to cover our obligations to them, which would result in a reduction of unrestricted cash that could be material. In addition, while we currently have aircraft lease financing that does not require that we maintain a maintenance reserve account, we could be required in the future to fund reserves in cash in advance for scheduled maintenance to act as collateral for the benefit of lessors as a result of future aircraft lease financing arrangements. Further, if our revolving loan facility is drawn upon, we may be required to hold certain amounts of cash in restricted accounts until the drawn amount is repaid. Our restricted cash is partially collateralized by our standby letters of credit and surety bonds to be issued to various airport authorities and vendors, and could result in material future use of restricted cash. If we fail to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet our operating cash requirements or do not obtain another line of credit, other borrowing facility or equity financing, we could default on our operating leases and
fixed obligations. Our inability to meet our obligations as they become due could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our ability to obtain financing or access capital markets may be limited.
We have significant obligations to purchase aircraft and spare engines that we have on order from Airbus and Pratt & Whitney, respectively. Please refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 11. Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information. We are evaluating financing options for the aircraft operating leases that are committed as of December 31, 2025. Historically, we have financed our aircraft and spare engine deliveries through sale-leaseback financing. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, we generated $441 million, $264 million and $163 million of financing cash flows, respectively, and corresponding operating gains of $302 million, $294 million and $147 million, respectively, from sale-leaseback financing related to our aircraft and spare engine deliveries. There are a number of factors that may affect our ability to raise financing or access the capital markets in the future, which includes future sale-leaseback financing, such as our liquidity and credit status, our operating cash flows, market conditions in the airline industry, U.S. and global economic conditions, the general state of the capital markets and the financial position of the major providers of commercial aircraft financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to source external financing for our planned aircraft acquisitions or for other significant capital needs, and if we are unable to source financing on acceptable terms, or unable to source financing at all, our business could be materially adversely affected. The extent of future sale-leaseback gains/losses recognized and cash generated, which is also dependent on the number of committed future deliveries of aircraft and spare engines, could be impacted if we are not able to secure sale-leaseback arrangements in the future for our deliveries. To the extent we finance our activities with additional debt, we may become subject to financial and other covenants that may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategy or otherwise constrain our growth and operations.
Our maintenance costs will increase over the near term, we will periodically incur substantial maintenance costs due to the maintenance schedules of our aircraft fleet and obligations to the lessors and we could incur significant maintenance expenses outside of such maintenance schedules in the future.
As of December 31, 2025, the operating leases for 0, 7, 14, 13 and 12 aircraft in our fleet were scheduled to terminate during 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2025, the operating leases for 1, 0, 2, 3 and 2 engines in our fleet were scheduled to terminate during 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030, respectively. In certain circumstances, such operating leases may be extended. Prior to such aircraft and engines being returned, we will incur costs to restore the aircraft and engines to the condition required by the terms of the underlying operating leases or as negotiated with lessors due to lease terminations. The amount and timing of these so-called “return conditions” costs can prove unpredictable due to uncertainty regarding the maintenance status of each particular aircraft and engine at the time it is to be returned, and it is not unusual for disagreements to ensue between the airline and the leasing company as to the required maintenance on a given aircraft or engine.
In addition, as of December 31, 2025, we had a firm obligation to purchase 168 A320neo family aircraft and 21 engines by the end of 2031. We expect that these new aircraft and engines will require less maintenance when they are first placed in service (sometimes called a “maintenance holiday”) because the aircraft and engines will benefit from manufacturer warranties and also will be able to operate for a significant period of time, generally measured in years, before the most expensive scheduled maintenance obligations, known as heavy maintenance, are first required. Following these initial maintenance holiday periods, the new aircraft and engines we have an obligation to acquire will require more maintenance as they age and our maintenance and repair expenses for each newly purchased aircraft will be incurred at approximately the same intervals. Moreover, because a large portion of our future fleet will be acquired over a relatively short period, significant maintenance to be scheduled on each of these planes may occur concurrently with other aircraft acquired around the same time, meaning we may incur our heavy maintenance obligations across large portions of our fleet around the same time. These more significant maintenance activities result in out-of-service periods during which our aircraft are dedicated to maintenance activities and unavailable to fly revenue service.
Outside of scheduled maintenance, we incur from time to time unscheduled maintenance which is not forecast in our operating plan or financial forecasts, and which can impose material unplanned costs and the loss of flight equipment from revenue service for a significant period of time. For example, a single unplanned engine event can require a shop visit costing several million dollars and cause the engine to be out of service for a number of months.
Furthermore, the terms of any lease agreements that we enter into in the future could require us to pay maintenance reserves to the lessor in advance of the performance of major maintenance, which could result in recording significant prepaid deposits on our consolidated balance sheet. We expect scheduled and unscheduled aircraft maintenance expenses to increase over the next several years. Any significant increase in maintenance and repair expenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Leased Aircraft Return Costs” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Long-Term Maintenance Agreements.”
We have a significant amount of aircraft-related fixed obligations and obligations under other debt arrangements that could impair our liquidity and thereby harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The airline business is capital intensive and, as a result, many airline companies are highly leveraged. As of December 31, 2025, all 176 aircraft in our fleet were financed under operating leases. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we incurred aircraft rent of $748 million and $675 million, respectively, and maintenance costs of $209 million and $209 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had future operating lease obligations of approximately $4,849 million and $3,966 million, respectively, and future principal debt obligations of $620 million and $507 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we made cash payments for interest related to debt of $43 million and $33 million, respectively. In addition, we have significant obligations for aircraft and spare engines that we have on order from Airbus and Pratt & Whitney, respectively, for delivery through 2031.
Our ability to pay the fixed costs associated with our contractual obligations will depend on our operating performance, cash flows and our ability to secure adequate financing, which will in turn depend on, among other things, the success of our current business strategy, fuel price volatility, any significant weakening or improvement in the U.S. economy and the availability and cost of financing, as well as general economic and political conditions and other factors that are, to some extent, beyond our control. The amount of our aircraft-related fixed obligations and our obligations under other debt arrangements could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and could:
• require a substantial portion of cash flows from operations be used for operating lease payments, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flows to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
• limit our ability to make required PDPs, including those payable to our aircraft and engine manufacturers for our aircraft and spare engines on order;
• limit our ability to obtain additional financing to support our expansion plans and for working capital and other purposes on acceptable terms or at all;
• make it more difficult for us to pay our other obligations as they become due during adverse general economic and market industry conditions because any related decrease in revenues or increase in costs could cause us to not have sufficient cash flows from operations to make our scheduled payments;
• reduce our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the airline industry and, consequently, place us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors with lower fixed payment obligations; and
• cause us to lose access to one or more aircraft and forfeit our deposits if we are unable to make our required aircraft lease rental payments and our lessors exercise their remedies under the lease agreement including cross default provisions in certain of our leases.
A failure to pay our operating lease, debt, fixed costs and other obligations or a breach of our contractual obligations could result in various adverse consequences, including the exercise of remedies by our creditors and lessors. In such a situation, it is unlikely that we would be able to cure our breach, fulfill our obligations, make required lease payments or otherwise cover our fixed costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on third-party specialists and other commercial partners to perform functions integral to our operations.
We have historically entered into agreements with third-party specialists to furnish certain facilities and services required for our operations, including ground handling, catering, passenger handling, engineering, maintenance, refueling, reservations and airport facilities, as well as administrative and support services that involve the use of internally or externally hosted information technology assets, such as hardware and software platforms. We are likely to enter into similar service agreements in new markets we decide to enter, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the necessary services at acceptable rates. In addition, certain third-party vendors may have difficulty hiring or retaining sufficient talent to meet their obligations to us due to the worker shortage impacting certain sectors of the U.S. labor market.
As we outsource certain critical business activities to third parties and we depend on a limited number of suppliers for our aircraft and engines, we have increased our reliance on the successful implementation and execution of the business continuity planning and cybersecurity controls of such third-party service providers in the current environment. If one or more of such third parties experience operational failures as a result of significant disruption in global supply chains, staffing shortages, cybersecurity attacks or due to sanctions imposed by the United States and foreign government bodies in response to the war between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East, or claim that they cannot perform due to a force majeure event, it may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We cannot guarantee that, as a result of the ongoing, or future, supply chain disruptions or staffing shortages, we or our third-party service providers will be able to timely source all of the products and services we require in the course of our business, or that we will be successful in procuring suitable alternatives.
Although we seek to monitor the performance of third parties that furnish certain facilities or provide us with our ground handling, catering, passenger handling, engineering, maintenance, refueling, reservations and airport facilities, the efficiency, timeliness and quality of contract performance by third-party specialists are often beyond our control, and any failure by our third-party specialists to perform up to our expectations may have an adverse impact on our business, reputation with customers, brand and operations. In addition, we could experience a significant business disruption if we were to change vendors or if an existing provider ceased to be able to serve us. We expect to be dependent on such third-party arrangements for the foreseeable future.
We rely on third-party distribution channels to distribute a portion of our airline tickets.
We rely on third-party distribution channels, including those provided by or through GDSs and NDCs, conventional travel agents and OTAs to distribute a portion of our airline tickets and to collect a portion of our ancillary revenues. These distribution channels are more expensive and currently have less functionality in respect of ancillary revenues than those we operate ourselves, such as our website. Certain of these distribution channels also effectively restrict the manner in which we distribute our products. To remain competitive, we will need to successfully manage our distribution costs and rights, and improve the functionality of third-party distribution channels, while maintaining an industry-competitive cost structure. Negotiations with key GDSs, NDCs and OTAs designed to manage our costs, increase our distribution flexibility and improve functionality could be contentious, could result in diminished or less favorable distribution of our tickets and may not provide the functionality we require to maximize ancillary revenues. Any inability to manage such costs, rights and functionality at a competitive level or any material diminishment in the distribution of our tickets could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position and our results of operations. Moreover, our ability to compete in the markets we serve may be
threatened by changes in technology or other factors that may make our existing third-party sales channels impractical, uncompetitive or obsolete.
We rely heavily on technology and automated systems to operate our business, and any failure of these technologies or systems or any failure on our part to implement any new technologies or systems could materially adversely affect our business.
We are highly dependent on technology that is internally or externally managed, such as computer systems, hardware and software (e.g. cloud and SaaS solutions), networks and automated systems, including artificial intelligence (“AI”), to operate our business (collectively, “IT Systems”). These IT Systems include our computerized airline reservation system provided by Navitaire, flight operations systems, telecommunications systems, mobile app, airline website, maintenance systems and check-in kiosks. In order for our operations to work efficiently, our website and reservation system must be able to accommodate a high volume of traffic, maintain secure information and deliver flight information. The Navitaire reservations system, which is hosted and maintained under a long-term contract by a third-party specialist, is critical to our ability to issue, track and accept tickets, conduct check-in, board and manage our passengers through the airports we serve and provide us with access to GDSs, which enlarge our pool of potential passengers. There are many instances in the past where a reservations system malfunctioned, whether due to the fault of the system provider or the airline, with a highly adverse effect on the airline’s operations, and such a malfunction has in the past, and could in the future, occur on our system, or in connection with any system upgrade or migration in the future. We also rely on third-party specialists to maintain our flight operations systems, and if those systems are compromised or not functioning, we could experience service disruptions, which could result in the loss of important data, increase our expenses, decrease our operational performance and stall our operations.
IT Systems, including AI, are crucial to the efficiency of our business. We believe the use of emerging technologies, such as AI, presents both significant benefits and risks. Our competitors may implement AI more quickly and on a larger scale than us, which could impact our ability to remain competitive. Implementing AI could require a large amount of human resources and analysis, which could impact our business efficiency in the short term and require additional investment. AI tools are developed through the use of data and human training of the machine learning, thus if the outputs are deemed to be inaccurate, incomplete, biased or questionable AI may be deemed unreliable and ineffective. If we are unable to implement AI efficiently or effectively, it could impact our operations and financial position.
A significant disruption or compromise to the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our IT Systems, could materially adversely affect our business. In November 2025, there was an urgent software update required for all A320 aircraft. Our aircraft were updated immediately, however if future software development issues are identified and take time to resolve, our flight operations could be impacted. Likewise, if our reservation system fails or experiences interruptions, and we are unable to book seats for a period of time, we could lose a significant amount of revenue as customers book seats on other airlines, and our reputation could be harmed. In addition, replacement technologies and systems for any service we currently utilize that experiences failures or interruptions may not be readily available on a timely basis, at competitive rates or at all. Furthermore, our current technologies and systems are heavily integrated with our day-to-day operations and any transition to a new technology or system could be complex and time-consuming. In the event that one or more of our primary technology or systems vendors fails to perform, and a replacement system is not available or if we fail to implement a replacement system in a timely and efficient manner, our business could be materially adversely affected.
Unauthorized use, unauthorized incursions or user exploitation of our IT Systems could compromise the personally identifiable information of our passengers, prospective passengers or personnel, and other sensitive information and expose us to liability, damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In the processing of our customer transactions and as part of our ordinary business operations, we and certain of our third-party specialists collect, process, transmit and store a large volume of proprietary business information (e.g. trade secrets, flights operations data) as well as personally identifiable information of our passengers,
prospective passengers or personnel, including email addresses, home addresses, financial data such as credit and debit card information and other sensitive information (collectively, the “Confidential Data”). The confidentiality, integrity and availability of the IT Systems where we and our third-party specialists store and process this Confidential Data is a critical element of our business. These IT Systems are vulnerable to cyberattacks and other security issues, including threats posed by criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored actors, corporate espionage actors, malicious insiders (e.g. employees, contractors) and human or technological error (e.g. known or unknown software and hardware vulnerabilities). The emergence of AI has created new cybersecurity threats such as Confidential Information disclosed to a third-party generative AI platform that could be leaked or disclosed to others, unbeknownst to us. Threats to cybersecurity have increased with the sophistication of malicious actors, who increasingly use techniques and tools, such as artificial intelligence, to circumvent security controls, evade detection and even remove forensic evidence, which renders effectiveincident detection, investigation and remediation both challenging and expensive. In addition, we have acquired and are likely to acquire in the future, companies with cybersecurity vulnerabilities and/or deficient security measures, which expose us to significant risk. Moreover, as noted above, a significant attack or incident experienced by a critical third-party specialist could materially impact our business.
We have experienced cybersecurity attacks and incidents in the past, however to date, no attack or incident has materially impacted our business or financial condition but we expect attacks and incidents to continue and cannot guarantee that material incidents will not occur in the future. Several high-profile companies have experienced significant data breaches and ransom attacks, which have caused those companies to suffer substantial financial and reputational harm.
A significant cybersecurity incident could result in a range of material negative consequences for us, including due to the following: lost revenue; unauthorized access to, disclosure, modification, misuse, loss or destruction of IT Systems or Confidential Data; such as personal identifying information or our intellectual property; the loss of functionality of critical IT Systems through ransomware, denial of service or other attacks; and business delays, service or system disruptions, damage to equipment and injury to persons or property. The costs and operational consequences of defendingagainst, preparing for, responding to and remediating an incident may be substantial. As cybersecurity threats become more frequent, intense and sophisticated, costs of proactive defense measures are increasing. Further, we could be exposed to litigation, regulatory enforcement or other legal action as a result of an incident, carrying the potential for damages, fines, sanctions or other penalties, as well as injunctive relief requiring costly compliance measures. A cybersecurity incident could also impact our brand, harm our reputation and adversely impact our relationship with our customers, employees and stockholders. Additionally, any material failure by us or our third-party specialists to maintain compliance with legal requirements, including the Payment Card Industry security requirements or to rectify a data security issue may result in material fines and restrictions such as our ability to accept credit and debit cards as a form of payment. While we have taken precautions to protect our IT Systems and Confidential Data, we cannot assure you that our precautions are either adequate or implemented properly to prevent and detect a data breach or other cybersecurity incident and its adverse financial and reputational consequences to our business. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information. See Part I, Item 1C, “Cybersecurity” for additional discussion.
We are also subject to increasing legislative, regulatory and customer focus on privacy issues and data security in the United States and abroad. As a result, we must comply with a proliferating and fast-evolving set of legal requirements in this area, including substantive data privacy and cybersecurity standards as well as requirements for notifying regulators and affected individuals in the event of a data security incident. In addition, we are subject to an increasing number of reporting obligations in respect of certain cybersecurity incidents. These reporting requirements have been proposed or implemented by a number of regulators in different jurisdictions, may vary in their scope and application, and could contain conflicting requirements. Certain of these rules and regulations may require us to report a cybersecurity incident before we have been able to fully assess its impact or remediate the underlying issue. Efforts to comply with such reporting requirements could divert management’s attention from our incident response and could potentially reveal system vulnerabilities to threat actors. Failure to timely report incidents under these rules could also result in monetary fines, sanctions, or subject us to other forms of liability. Moreover, the compromise of our technology systems resulting in the loss, disclosure, misappropriation of or access
to the personally identifiable information of our passengers, prospective passengers or personnel could result in governmental investigation, civil liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, any or all of which could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, a number of our commercial partners, including credit card companies, have imposed data security standards on us, and these standards continue to evolve. We will continue our efforts to meet our privacy and data security obligations; however, it is possible that certain new obligations may be difficult to meet and could increase our costs.
Our business remains dependent on select large markets and increases in competition or congestion or a reduction in demand for air travel in these markets would harm our business.
We are highly dependent on select markets where we maintain a large presence, with 21%, 17% and 16% of our flights during the year ended December 31, 2025 having Denver International Airport, Orlando International Airport, and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport as either their origin or destination, respectively. Atlanta has grown to be a significant market due to our continued expansion into the top-20 U.S. metros. Our largest operating base is Denver International Airport, where we primarily operate out of Concourse A, including the ground load facility and accompanying gates. Additionally, we operate at Orlando International Airport and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport under operating leases which expire in 2026. We have experienced an increase in operational challenges at these airports due to airport congestion, which have adversely affected our operating performance and results of operations. We have also experienced increased competition at Denver International Airport, Orlando International Airport, and Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport from carriers adding flights to and from the respective cities. Additionally, flight operations in Denver, Orlando, and Atlanta can face extreme weather challenges which, at times, has resulted in severedisruptions in our operation and the occurrence of material costs as a consequence of such disruptions.
Our business could be further harmed by an increase in the amount of direct competition we face in the select markets we operate in or by continued or increased congestion, delays or cancellations. Our business would also be harmed by any circumstances causing a reduction in demand for air transportation in the select markets we operate in, such as adverse changes in government regulations, local economic conditions, health concerns, adverse weather conditions, negative public perception of those markets, terrorist attacks or significant price or tax increases linked to increases in airport access costs and fees imposed on passengers. Additionally, if consumer preference shifts towards international routes compared to domestic routes, our business would be harmed by the change in demand for a majority of our routes.
Changes in legislation, regulation and government policy have affected, and may in the future have a material adverse effect on, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Changes in, and uncertainty with respect to, legislation, regulation and government policy at the local, state or federal level have affected, and may in the future significantly impact, our business and the airline industry. Specific legislative and regulatory proposals that could have a material impact on us in the future include, but are not limited to: infrastructure renewal programs; changes to operating and maintenance requirements and immigration and security policy and requirements; modifications to international trade policy, including withdrawing from trade agreements and imposing tariffs; changes to consumer protection laws; public company reporting requirements; environmental regulation and antitrust enforcement. To the extent that any such changes have a negative impact on us or the airline industry in general, including as a result of related uncertainty, these changes may materially impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Please see “Business—Government Regulation.”
U.S. tax legislation may adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (the “IRA”) was signed into law in the United States. Among other changes, the IRA introduced a corporate minimum tax on certain corporations with average adjusted financial statement income over a three-tax year period in excess of $1 billion and an excise tax on certain stock repurchases by certain covered corporations for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022. The corporate minimum tax
and any excise tax imposed on any repurchases of our common stock made after December 31, 2022 may adversely affect our financial condition in the future.
On July 4, 2025, the OBBBA was signed into law in the United States. Among other changes, the OBBBA modifies key business tax provisions, including, but not limited to, 100% bonus depreciation, reverting to the higher, EBITDA-based, business interest expense limitation and modifying certain international tax provisions. These provisions may adversely affect our financial condition in the future. The U.S. government may enact additional significant changes to the taxation of business entities including, among others, an increase in the corporate income tax rate, significant changes to the taxation of income derived from international operations and an addition of further limitations on the deductibility of business interest. We are unable to predict whether such additional changes will occur. If such changes are enacted or implemented, we are unable to predict the ultimate impact on our business and there can be no assurance that our business will not be adversely affected.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a corporation is generally allowed a deduction for net operating losses (“NOLs”) carried over from prior taxable years. As of December 31, 2025, we had deferred tax assets of approximately $93 million, $16 million and $15 million related to NOLs available to reduce future federal, state and foreign taxable income, respectively. Under current tax law, our federal NOL carryforwards do not expire, but the deductibility of such NOL carryforwards is limited to 80% of our taxable income. Our state NOLs may expire, if not utilized, from one year to having no expiration depending on the state the NOL is attributed to, and our foreign NOLs expire in 19 years. As a result of our assessment over the future realizability of these NOLs, as of December 31, 2025, we have a $15 million valuation allowance related to our foreign deferred tax assets and a $50 million valuation allowance related to certain federal and state deferred tax assets, with a portion considered realizable due to the future reversals of existing taxable temporary liabilities.
Realization of these NOL carryforwards depends on our future taxable income, and there is a risk that, due to economic factors, a portion of our existing NOL carryforwards could expire before we can generate sufficient taxable income to use them.
In addition, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by significant stockholders or groups of stockholders over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change taxable income or income tax liabilities may be limited. We may experience ownership changes in the future because of, among other things, shifts in our stock ownership, many of which are outside of our control. If we were to experience an ownership change for purposes of Section 382 of the Code, our ability to use our NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes to offset future U.S. federal taxable income or income tax liabilities may become subject to limitations. Similar rules and limitations may apply under state and foreign tax laws. If our NOL carryforwards expire unused (to the extent subject to expiration) or are otherwise subject to limitation and unavailable to offset future taxable income, this could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Any tariffs imposed on commercial aircraft and related parts imported from outside the United States may have a material adverse effect on our fleet, business, results of operations and financial condition.
Certain of the products and services that we purchase, including our aircraft and related parts, are sourced from suppliers located in foreign countries, and the imposition of new tariffs, or any increase in existing tariffs, by the U.S. government on the importation of such products or services could materially increase the amounts we pay for them. In early October 2019, the World Trade Organization ruled that the United States could impose $7.5 billion in retaliatory tariffs in response to illegal European Union subsidies to Airbus. On October 18, 2019, the United States imposed these tariffs on certain imports from the European Union, including a 10% tariff on new commercial aircraft. In February 2020, the United States announced an increase to this tariff from 10% to 15%. These tariffs apply to aircraft that we are already contractually obligated to purchase. In June 2021, the United States and the
European Union announced an agreement to suspend the imposition of the foregoing tariffs on commercial aircraft and related parts for five years.
Effective September 2025, the United States and European Union reached a new trade agreement. The agreement, among other changes, included an exemption on tariffs for aircrafts and aircraft parts. The agreement supersedes the prior potential imposition of retaliatory tariffs and significantly reduces the likelihood of tariff related impacts to our business, subject to the United States’ continued compliance with the agreement. We continue to monitor the situation and any potential future tariffs could negatively impact our business, operations and financial condition.
Our business could be materially adversely affected if we lose the services of our key personnel.
Our success depends, to a significant extent, upon the efforts and abilities of our senior management team and key financial and operating personnel, particularly James G. Dempsey, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Mark C. Mitchell, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Competition for highly qualified personnel is intense, and the loss of any executive officer or other key employee without an adequate replacement, or the inability to attract new qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on our management team. Additionally, value of stock-based compensation is dependent upon our stock price and assessments against our peers. If we do not reach or maintain reasonable performance in our stock price, it could affect our ability to retain or attract our key employees.
We rely on our private equity sponsor.
Indigo Partners, LLC (“Indigo Partners”) is a private equity fund with significant expertise in the ULCC business, and this expertise has been available to us through the persons affiliated with Indigo Partners on our board of directors and through a Professional Services Agreement that was put in place in connection with the 2013 acquisition from Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. and pursuant to which we are charged a fee by Indigo Partners of approximately $375,000 per quarter, plus expenses. We also pay each director affiliated with Indigo Partners an annual director’s fee as compensation. Our engagement of Indigo Partners pursuant to the Professional Services Agreement will continue until the date that Indigo Partners and its affiliates own less than approximately 19.8 million shares of our common stock. Although Indigo Partners and its affiliates, including William Franke, the Chair of our Board, continue to own a substantial percentage of our outstanding common stock, Indigo Partners and its affiliates may nonetheless elect to reduce their ownership in our company or reduce their involvement on our board of directors, which could reduce or eliminate the benefits we have historically achieved through our relationship with Indigo Partners, such as management expertise, industry knowledge and volume purchasing.
Our quarterly results of operations fluctuate due to a number of factors, including seasonality and other factors.
We expect our quarterly results of operations to continue to fluctuate due to a number of factors, including actions by our competitors, price changes in aircraft fuel and the timing and amount of maintenance expenses. As a result of these and other factors, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations and month-to-month comparisons of our key operating statistics may not be reliable indicators of our future performance. In addition, seasonality may cause our quarterly and monthly results to fluctuate since passengers tend to fly more during the summer months and less in the winter months, apart from the holiday season. We cannot assure you that we will find profitable markets in which to operate during the winter season. Such periods of low demand for air travel during the winter months could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our lack of membership in a marketing alliance or codeshare arrangements (other than with Volaris) could harm our business and competitive position.
Many airlines, including the domestic legacy network airlines (American Airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines), have marketing alliances with other airlines, under which they market and advertise their status as marketing alliance partners. These alliances, such as Oneworld, SkyTeam and Star Alliance, generally provide for
codesharing, frequent flyer program reciprocity, coordinated scheduling of flights to permit convenient connections and other joint marketing activities. In addition, certain of these alliances involve highly integrated antitrust immunized joint ventures. Such arrangements permit an airline to market flights operated by other alliance members as its own. This increases the destinations, connections and frequencies offered by the airline and provides an opportunity to increase traffic on that airline’s segment of flights connecting with alliance partners. We currently do not have any marketing alliances or codeshare arrangements with U.S. or foreign airlines, other than the codeshare arrangement we entered into with Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. (an airline based in Mexico doing business as “Volaris”) in 2018. Our lack of membership in any other marketing alliances and codeshare arrangements puts us at a competitive disadvantage compared to traditional network carriers who are able to attract passengers through more widespread alliances, particularly on international routes, and that disadvantage may result in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of an investment in our stock to decline.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to:
• announcements concerning our competitors, suppliers, the airline industry or the economy in general;
• strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
• media reports and publications about the safety of our aircraft or engines or the type of aircraft we operate;
• new regulatory pronouncements and changes in regulatory guidelines;
• the impact of pandemics and other public health threats on air travel and any related government restrictions impacting air travel;
• changes in the price or availability of aircraft fuel;
• announcements concerning the availability of the type of aircraft or engines we operate;
• general and industry-specific economic conditions;
• general market, political and other economic conditions, including economic slowdowns, recessions, inflationary pressures, rising interest rates, financial market fluctuations and reduced credit availability;
• regional and global conflicts;
• changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts or failure to meet analysts’ performance expectations;
• sales of our common stock or other actions by investors with significant shareholdings; and
• trading strategies related to changes in fuel or oil prices.
The stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. Broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
In the past, stockholders have sometimes instituted securities class action litigationagainst companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. Any similar litigationagainst us could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or publish negative reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities and industry analysts may publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover our company or fails to publish reports on us
regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which may cause the trading price of our common stock and the trading volume of our common stock to decline.
The issuance or sale of shares of our common stock, or rights to acquire shares of our common stock, or the exercise of warrants issued as part of the funding provided under the CARES Act, could depress the trading price of our common stock.
We may conduct future offerings of our common stock, preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into, or exercisable for, our common stock to finance our operations or fund acquisitions, or for other purposes. In connection with our participation in the Payroll Support Program (the “PSP”), the second Payroll Support Program (“PSP2”) and the Payroll Support Program 3 (“PSP3”), we issued warrants which are exercisable for up to an aggregate of 759,850 shares of our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2025, 494,608 of those shares were exercised and 27,968 expired, as such there are 237,274 outstanding PSP warrants as of December 31, 2025. The remainder of the warrants will expire between March 2026 and June 2026.
In connection with the $150 million borrowing from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury” and the “Treasury Loan”, respectively), which was repaid in full on February 2, 2022, we issued warrants which are exercisable for up to 2,358,090 shares of our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2025, 750,000 of those shares were exercised and 1,608,090 expired. As of December 31, 2025, there are no outstanding treasury warrants. Further, we reserve shares of our common stock for future issuance under our equity incentive plans, which shares are eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various agreements and, to the extent held by affiliates, the volume and manner of sale restrictions of Rule 144. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, into the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline substantially. If we issue additional shares of our common stock or rights to acquire shares of our common stock, if any of our existing stockholders sell a substantial amount of our common stock or if the market perceives that such issuances or sales may occur, then the trading price of our common stock could significantly decline. In addition, the issuance of additional shares of common stock would dilute the ownership interests of our existing common stockholders.
The value of our common stock may be materially adversely affected by additional issuances of common stock or preferred stock by us or sales by our top stockholders.
Any future issuances or sales of our common stock by us will be dilutive to our existing stockholders. An investment fund managed by Indigo Partners, which held approximately 178.8 million shares of our common stock as of March 31, 2024, was entitled to rights with respect to registration of all such shares under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration rights agreement. Following the distribution in April 2024 of the shares of our common stock by the investment fund to its members on a pro rata basis, in-kind and without consideration, certain of the recipients of such shares are entitled to the registration of their shares pursuant to the registration rights agreement. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public or private market, a perception in the market that such sales could occur or the issuance of securities exercisable or convertible into our common stock could adversely affect the prevailing trading price of our common stock.
Our anti-takeover provisions may delay or prevent a change of control, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may make it difficult to remove our board of directors and management and may discourage or delay “change of control” transactions, which could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. These provisions include, among others:
• our board of directors is divided into three classes, with each class serving for a staggered three-year term, which prevents stockholders from electing an entirely new board of directors at an annual meeting;
• no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which prevents the minority stockholders from electing director candidates;
• the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;
• actions to be taken by our stockholders may only be affected at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders and not by written consent;
• special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by the Chair of our board of directors or by our corporate secretary at the direction of our board of directors;
• advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors and propose matters to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company;
• a majority stockholder vote is required for removal of a director only for cause (and a director may only be removed for cause), and a 66 2⁄3% stockholder vote is required for the amendment, repeal or modification of certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws; and
• our board of directors may, without stockholder approval, issue series of preferred stock, or rights to acquire preferred stock, that could dilute the interest of, or impair the voting power of, holders of our common stock or could also be used as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change of control.
Certain anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law also apply to us. While we have elected not to be subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, such certificate of incorporation provides that in the event Indigo Partners and its affiliates cease to beneficially own at least 15% of the then-outstanding shares of our voting common stock, we will automatically become subject to Section 203 of the DGCL to the extent applicable. Under Section 203, a corporation may not, in general, engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its voting stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide for an exclusive forum in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware for certain disputes between us and our stockholders, and that the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that: (i) unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, the federal district court of the State of Delaware) will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for: (A) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (B) any action asserting a claim for or based on a breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our current or former directors, officers, other employees, agents or stockholders to us or our stockholders, including without limitation a claim alleging the aiding and abetting of such a breach of fiduciary duty, (C) any action asserting a claim against us or any of our current or former directors, officers, employees, agents or stockholders arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, or (D) any action asserting a claim related to or involving us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine; (ii) unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause or causes of action arising under the Securities Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, including all causes of action asserted against any defendant to such complaint; (iii) any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in our shares of capital stock will be deemed to have notice of and consented to these provisions; and (iv) failure to enforce the foregoing provisions would cause us irreparableharm, and we will be entitled to equitable relief, including injunctive relief and specific performance, to enforce the foregoing provisions. This provision is intended to benefit and may be enforced by us, our officers and directors, the underwriters to any offering giving rise to such complaint and any other professional entity whose profession gives authority to a statement made by that person or entity and who has prepared or certified any part of the documents underlying the offering. This exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits
brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Nothing in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws precludes stockholders that assert claims under the Exchange Act from bringing such claims in federal court to the extent that the Exchange Act confers exclusive federal jurisdiction over such claims, subject to applicable law.
We believe these provisions may benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law and federal securities laws by chancellors and judges, as applicable, particularly experienced in resolving corporate disputes, efficient administration of cases on a more expedited schedule relative to other forums and protection against the burdens of multi-forum litigation. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision that is contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a forum selection provision as written in connection with claims arising under the Securities Act.
The choice of forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our current or former directors, officers, other employees, agents, or stockholders, which may result in increased costs or discourage a stockholder from bringing such claims.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains a provision renouncing our interest and expectancy in certain corporate opportunities.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for the allocation of certain corporate opportunities between us and Indigo Denver Management Company, LLC (“Indigo”) and its affiliates, including Indigo Partners. Under these provisions, neither Indigo Partners, its portfolio companies, funds or other affiliates, nor any of their agents, stockholders, members, partners, officers, directors and employees will have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities, similar business activities or lines of business in which we operate. For instance, a director of our company who also serves as a stockholder, member, partner, officer, director or employee of Indigo Partners or any of its portfolio companies, funds or other affiliates may pursue certain acquisitions or other opportunities that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, such acquisitions or other opportunities may not be available to us. These potential conflicts of interest could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition, if attractive corporate opportunities are allocated by Indigo Partners to itself or its portfolio companies, funds or other affiliates instead of to us. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we shall indemnify each of the aforementioned parties in the event of any claims for breach of fiduciary or other duties brought in connection with such other opportunities. The terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation are more fully described in the Description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which is filed as Exhibit 4.1 hereto.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include provisions limiting ownership, control and voting by non-U.S. citizens.
To comply with restrictions imposed by federal law on foreign ownership and control of U.S. airlines, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws restrict ownership, voting and control of shares of our common stock by non-U.S. citizens. The restrictions imposed by federal law and DOT policy require that we must be owned and controlled by U.S. citizens, that no more than 25% of our voting stock be owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by persons or entities who are not U.S. citizens, as defined in 49 U.S.C. § 40102(a)(15), that our president and at least two-thirds of the members of our board of directors and other managing officers be U.S. citizens, and that we be under the actual control of U.S. citizens. In addition, up to 49% of our outstanding stock may be owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by persons or entities who are not U.S. citizens but only if those non-U.S. citizens are from countries that have entered into “open skies” air transport agreements
with the United States which allow unrestricted access between the United States and the applicable foreign country and to points beyond the foreign country on flights serving the foreign country. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that the failure of non-U.S. citizens to register their shares on a separate stock record, which we refer to as the “foreign stock record,” would result in a loss of their voting rights in the event and to the extent that the aggregate foreign ownership of the outstanding common stock exceeds the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law. Our amended and restated bylaws further provide that no shares of our common stock will be registered on the foreign stock record if the amount so registered would exceed the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law. If it is determined that the amount registered in the foreign stock record exceeds the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law, shares will be removed from the foreign stock record, resulting in the loss of voting rights, in reverse chronological order based on the date of registration therein, until the number of shares registered therein does not exceed the foreign ownership restrictions imposed by federal law. See “Business—Foreign Ownership” and the Description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which is filed as Exhibit 4.1 hereto.
We are a holding company and rely on dividends, distributions, and other payments, advances, and transfers of funds from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations.
We are a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of our own. As a result, we are largely dependent upon cash dividends and distributions and other transfers, including for payments in respect of indebtedness, at the holding company level from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. Future agreements governing the indebtedness of our subsidiaries could impose restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividend distributions or other transfers to us. Each of our subsidiaries is a distinct legal entity, and under certain circumstances legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from them. The deterioration of the earnings from, or other available assets of, our subsidiaries for any reason could also limit or impair their ability to pay dividends or other distributions to us.
General Risk Factors
We may become involved in litigation that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have in the past been, are currently, and may in the future become, involved in private actions, class actions, investigations and various other legal proceedings, including from employees, commercial partners, customers, competitors and government agencies, among others. Such claims could involve discrimination (for example, based on gender, age, race or religious affiliation), sexual harassment, privacy, patent, commercial, product liability, whistleblower and other litigation and claims, and governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings.
Further, from time to time, our employees may bring lawsuits against us regarding discrimination, sexual harassment, labor, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), disability claims and employment and other claims. In recent years, companies have experienced a general increase in the number of discrimination and harassmentclaims. Coupled with the expansion of social media platforms that allow individuals with access to a broad audience, these claims have had a significant negative impact on some businesses.
Also, in recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States and abroad involving patents and other intellectual property rights. We have in the past faced, and may face in the future, claims by third parties that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights.
Any claims asserted against us or our management, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, could be harmful to our reputation and brand and have an adverse impact on our relationships with our customers, commercial partners and other third parties and could lead to additional related claims. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources, cause us to incur significant expenses or liability and/or require us to change our business practices. Because of the potential risks, expenses and uncertainties of litigation, we may, from
time to time, settle disputes, even where we believe that we have meritoriousclaims or defenses. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, we cannot assure you that the results of any of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2025 increased to $3,873 million, resulting in a cost per available seat mile (“CASM”) of 9.74¢, an increase of 5% compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Fuel expense was $112 million lower, as compared to the corresponding prior year period. This 11% decrease in fuel expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily driven by a 10% decrease in fuel cost per gallon, as well as the 2% decrease in fuel gallons consumed.
Our non-fuel expenses increased by 10% during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the corresponding prior year period, driven primarily by increased aircraft rent due to a larger fleet, increased station costs due to station mix and rate inflation, increased employee costs, and the benefit from a legal settlement in the prior period, partially offset by lower lease return costs during the same period. CASM (excluding fuel), a non-GAAP measure, increased 10% to 7.41¢, while capacity remained consistent, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the corresponding prior year period, due to the aforementioned drivers of increased non-fuel expenses.
Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), a non-GAAP measure, increased from 6.81¢ for the year ended December 31, 2024 to 7.41¢ for the year ended December 31, 2025. There were no adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2025. For the year ended December 31, 2024, Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel) excludes the impact of $38 million related to a legal settlement.
Net Income (Loss)
We generated a net loss of $137 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to a net income of $85 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. There were no non-GAAP adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2025. Considering the aforementioned non-GAAP adjustments and the $5 million valuation allowance and the write-off of $1 million in unamortized deferred financing costs for the year ended December 31, 2024, our adjusted net income, a non-GAAP measure, was $53 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
For the reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measures of the aforementioned non-GAAP adjusted measures, see “Results of Operations—Reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest” and “Results of Operations — Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted Net Income (Loss), Pre-Tax Income (Loss) to Adjusted Pre-Tax Income (Loss), and Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA, EBITDAR, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDAR.”
Liquidity
As of December 31, 2025, our total available liquidity was $874 million, consisting of $654 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and availability of $220 million under our revolving line of credit (the “Revolving Loan Facility”).
Trends and Uncertainties Affecting Our Business
We believe our operating and business performance is driven by various factors that typically affect airlines and their markets, including trends which affect the broader travel industry, as well as trends which affect the specific markets and customer base that we target. The following key factors may affect our future performance:
Competition . The airline industry is highly competitive. The principal competitive factors in the airline industry are the fare and total price, flight schedules, number of routes served from a city, frequent flyer programs, product and passenger amenities, customer service, fleet type and reputation. The airline industry is particularly susceptible to price discounting as once a flight is scheduled, airlines incur only nominal incremental costs to provide service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats. Price competition occurs on a route-by-route basis through price discounts, changes in pricing structures, fare matching, target promotions and frequent flyer initiatives. Airlines typically use discount fares and other promotions to stimulate traffic during normally slower travel periods to generate cash flow and to maximize RASM. The prevalence of discount fares can be particularly acute when a competitor has excess capacity that it is under financial pressure to sell. A key element of our competitive strategy is to maintain very low unit costs in order to permit us to compete successfully in price-sensitive markets. In addition, some of the legacy network carriers match LCC and ULCC pricing on portions of their network, including through the selective deployment of so-called “basic economy” fares. We believe that fare discounts, along with more customer optionality over product offerings and enhancements to our frequent flyer program, have and will continue to stimulate demand for Frontier.
Our strategy is underpinned by our low-cost structure, and has significantly reduced our cost base by optimizing aircraft utilization to align capacity with expected travel demand patterns, transitioning to larger and more fuel-efficient aircraft, maximizing seat density, renegotiating the majority of our distribution agreements, realigning and simplifying our network, enhancing our website and mobile app, boosting employee productivity and contracting with leading specialists to provide us with select operating and other services.
We believe that we are well positioned to maintain our low unit operating costs relative to our competitors through on-going strategic initiatives, including continuing our cost optimization efforts, planned increases in aircraft utilization and further realizing economies of scale. To the extent that we are unable to maintain our low-cost structure, our ability to compete effectively may be impaired. In addition, if our competitors engage in fare wars or similar behavior, our financial performance could be adversely impacted.
Aircraft Fuel . Fuel expense represents one of the single largest operating expense for most airlines, including ours. Aircraft fuel prices and availability are subject to market fluctuations, refining capacity, periods of market surplus and shortage and demand for heating oil, gasoline and other petroleum products, as well as meteorological, economic and political factors and events occurring throughout the world, which we can neither control nor accurately predict. The future cost and availability of aircraft fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty.
Volatility . The air transportation business is volatile and highly affected by economic cycles and trends. Global pandemics and related health scares, consumer confidence and discretionary spending, fear of terrorism or war, weakening economic conditions, fare initiatives, fluctuations in fuel prices, labor actions, changes in governmental regulations on taxes and fees, weather and other factors have resulted in significant fluctuations in revenue and results of operations in the past.
Seasonality. Our results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of those for the entire year because the air transportation business and our route network are subject to seasonal fluctuations. We generally expect demand to be greater in the summer months and less in the winter months, apart from the holiday season. As we increase our routes in other markets, we have reduced our concentration in Denver to decrease the impact of seasonality in our business. During the year ended December 31, 2025, 21% of our flights had Denver International Airport as either their origin or destination, as compared to 23% of our flights during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Labor. The airline industry is heavily unionized. The wages, benefits and work rules of unionized airline industry employees are determined by collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”). Relations between air carriers and labor unions in the United States are governed by the United States Railway Labor Act (“RLA”). Under the RLA, CBAs generally contain “amendable dates” rather than expiration dates and the RLA requires that a carrier maintain the existing terms and conditions of employment following the amendable date through a multi-stage and usually lengthy series of bargaining processes overseen by the National Mediation Board (“NMB”). This process continues until either the parties have reached an agreement on a new CBA or the parties have been released to “self-help” by the NMB. In most circumstances, the RLA prohibits strikes. However, after release by the NMB, carriers and unions are free to engage in self-help measures such as lockouts and strikes.
We have seven union-represented employee groups comprising approximately 86% of our employees as of December 31, 2025. Our pilots are represented by the Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”); our flight attendants are represented by the Association of Flight Attendants (“AFA-CWA”); our aircraft technicians, aircraft appearance agents, material specialists and maintenance controllers are all represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”); and our dispatchers are represented by the Transport Workers Union (“TWU”). We are currently in negotiations with the ALPA, AFA-CWA, and aircraft technicians represented by IBT regarding the next labor contract. Please refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 11. Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information.
Maintenance, Materials and Repairs and Maintenance Reserve Obligations . The amount of total maintenance costs and related depreciation of heavy maintenance expense is subject to variables such as estimated usage, government regulations, the size, age and makeup of the fleet in future periods, and the level of unscheduled maintenance events and their actual costs. Accordingly, we cannot reliably quantify future maintenance-related expenses for any significant period of time.
As of December 31, 2025, the average age of our aircraft was approximately five years and all of the aircraft in our fleet were financed with operating leases, the last of which is scheduled to expire in 2037. Please refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 8. Operating Leases” for further discussion. We expect that these new aircraft will require less maintenance when they are first placed into service (sometimes called a “maintenance holiday”) because the aircraft will benefit from manufacturer warranties and also will be able to operate for a significant period of time, generally measured in years, before the most expensive scheduled maintenance obligations, known as heavy maintenance, are required. Once these maintenance holidays expire, these aircraft will require more maintenance as they age and our maintenance and repair expenses for each of our aircraft will be incurred at approximately the same intervals. When these more significant maintenance activities occur, this will
result in out-of-service periods during which our aircraft are dedicated to maintenance activities and unavailable to generate revenue.
We account for heavy maintenance under the deferral method. Accordingly, heavy maintenance is depreciated over the shorter of either the remaining lease term or the period until the next estimated heavy maintenance event. As a result, maintenance events occurring closer to the end of the lease term will generally have shorter depreciation periods than those occurring earlier in the lease term. This will create higher depreciation expense specific to any aircraft related to heavy maintenance during the final years of the lease as compared to earlier periods.
Recent Developments
Macroeconomic Conditions. The U.S. government is in the process of expanding the scope of tariffs, which have significantly increased the rates on goods imported into the United States. In response, foreign governments have imposed, and are expected to impose, retaliatory measures against the United States. These or additional changes in U.S. or international trade policies, along with continued uncertainty surrounding such policies, could lead to further weakened business conditions for the transportation industry, which may adversely impact our operations through increased supply chain challenges, commodity price volatility and a decline in discretionary spending and consumer confidence, among other impacts.
During 2025, the United States and European Union reached a trade agreement. The agreement, among other changes, included an exemption on tariffs for aircrafts and aircraft parts. We continue to monitor the situation and the related impacts to our business.
Financing . During 2025, we entered into multiple transactions to provide additional cash available for general purposes. We issued approximately $105 million of class A-1 enhanced equipment trust certificates (“2025-1 EETCs”), which are secured by liens on substantially all of our spare parts and tooling. In addition, we amended our Revolving Loan Facility, which now provides for $220 million of total commitments. We continue to utilize sale-leaseback transactions related to our aircraft and engines which generated $441 million of cash proceeds in 2025.
Labor . During 2025, we entered into new contracts with our aircraft appearance agents, material specialists, and maintenance controllers, effective for five years, respectively. We are currently in negotiations with the unions which represent our pilots, flight attendants, and aircraft technicians regarding their next labor contracts. Please refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 11. Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information.
Legal/Regulatory. During 2025, we obtained a revised preliminary assessment in the amount of $133 million related to the applicability of federal excise tax to certain optional ancillary products and services. We established reserves for certain fees subject to the assessment where we believe a loss for this matter is probable and estimable. We are contesting the assessment.
Product. During 2025, we implemented various enhanced benefits related to our frequent flyer program including: free seat upgrades for Elite Gold members and above (including First Class Seating (“ First Seats ”), available in 2026), priority boarding for our loyalty members, options to redeem FRONTIER Miles for bundles, For Less price guarantee, and no change or cancel fees on bundles.
Pratt & Whitney. Since 2022, we have introduced aircraft into our fleet that use the Pratt & Whitney PW1100 Geared Turbo Fan (“GTF”) engine, and we have selected this engine for our planned future deliveries. During 2023, Pratt & Whitney announced the requirement, mandated by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, that certain engines be removed for inspection due to a possible condition in the powdered metal used to manufacture certain engine parts. This will require accelerated inspection of the PW1100 GTF engine, which we use for certain of our A320neo family aircraft, and could result in lengthy turnaround times to perform these inspections, including any resulting repairs or other modifications that may be identified. Although our operations have not been impacted as of December 31, 2025, this inspection program may have an adverse impact on our operations, particularly when we are required to temporarily take aircraft out of service. We do not anticipate this impacting our future capacity.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024
Operating Revenues
Year Ended December 31,
Change
Operating revenues ($ in millions):
Passenger
Other
Total operating revenues
Operating statistics:
ASMs (millions)
Revenue passenger miles (RPMs) (millions)
Average stage length (miles)
Load factor
pts
RASM (¢)
Total ancillary revenue per passenger ($)
Total revenue per passenger ($)
Passengers (thousands)
Total operating revenues decreased $51 million, or 1%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Revenue was unfavorably impacted by the 1% decrease in RASM, driven by 3% higher average stage length, supported by 5% fewer departures, and a 1% decrease in total revenue per passenger, partially offset by the 1.6-point increase in load factor compared to the corresponding prior year period. Capacity, as measured by ASMs, for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, remained consistent due to an 11% increase in average aircraft in service, offset by an 11% decrease in average daily aircraft utilization.
Operating Expenses
Year Ended December 31,
Change
Cost per ASM
Change
Operating expenses ($ in millions): (a)
Aircraft fuel
Salaries, wages and benefits
Aircraft rent
Station operations
Maintenance, materials and repairs
Sales and marketing
Depreciation and amortization
Other operating expenses
Total operating expenses
Operating statistics:
ASMs (millions)
Average stage length (miles)
Passengers (thousands)
Departures
CASM (excluding fuel) (¢) (b)
Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel) (¢) (b)
Fuel cost per gallon ($)
Fuel gallons consumed (thousands)
N/M = Not meaningful
(a) Cost per ASM figures may not recalculate due to rounding.
(b) These metrics are not calculated in accordance with GAAP. For the reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measures of the aforementioned non-GAAP adjusted measures, see “Reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest.”
Aircraft Fuel . Aircraft fuel expense decreased by $112 million, or 11%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to a 10% decrease in fuel cost per gallon, as well as a 2% decrease in gallons consumed.
Salaries, Wages and Benefits . Salaries, wages and benefits expense increased by $62 million, or 6%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to higher crew, employee benefits and incentives, and salary costs, as compared to the corresponding prior year period.
Aircraft Rent . Aircraft rent expense increased by $73 million, or 11%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to a larger fleet, partially offset by lower aircraft lease return costs.
Station Operations . Station operations expense increased by $80 million, or 13%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to increase in station mix and rate inflation, partially offset by 5% fewer departures.
Maintenance, Materials and Repairs . Maintenance, materials and repair expense remained consistent during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This was primarily due to the
11% increase in average aircraft in service, which resulted in higher aircraft repair and materials costs, partially offset by lower engine repair costs from recognition of vendor credits.
Sales and Marketing . Sales and marketing expense decreased by $19 million, or 11%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to decreases in third-party distribution channel fees, call center operation fees and credit card fees. The following table presents our distribution channel mix:
Year Ended December 31,
Change
Distribution Channel
Our website, mobile app and other direct channels
Third-party channels
Depreciation and Amortization . Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $19 million, or 26%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase in capitalized maintenance depreciation driven by our growing fleet.
Other Operating . Other operating resulted in an expense of $4 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to a net gain of $49 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. This movement was primarily driven by a legal settlement gain of $40 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, as well as increases to travel, taxes, insurance, and IT costs, partially offset by the increase in sale-leaseback gains compared to the corresponding prior year period.
Other Income (Expense). Other income decreased by $13 million, or 46%, during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to increased interest expense, driven by higher principal balances on our debt and decreased interest income from lower interest-bearing cash accounts, partially offset by greater capitalized interest.
Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2025 was an expense of 2.2%, compared to an expense of 1.2% for the year ended December 31, 2024, on pre-tax loss and income, respectively. The primary difference between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate for the year ended December 31, 2025 was related to an increase in our valuation allowance relating to federal and state net operating losses (“NOLs”).
Reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest
Year Ended December 31,
($ in millions)
Per ASM (¢)
($ in millions)
Per ASM (¢)
Non-GAAP financial data: (a)
CASM
Aircraft fuel
CASM (excluding fuel) (b)
Legal settlement (c)
Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel) (b)
Aircraft fuel
Adjusted CASM (d)
Net interest expense (income)
Write-off of deferred financing costs (e)
Adjusted CASM + net interest (f)
CASM
Net interest expense (income)
CASM + net interest (f)
(a) Cost per ASM figures may not recalculate due to rounding.
(b) CASM (excluding fuel) and Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel) are included as supplemental disclosures because we believe that excluding aircraft fuel is useful to investors as it provides an additional measure of management’s performance excluding the effects of a significant cost item over which management has limited influence. The price of fuel, over which we have limited control, impacts the comparability of period-to-period financial performance, and excluding the price of fuel allows management an additional tool to understand and analyze our non-fuel costs and core operating performance, and increases comparability with other airlines that also provide a similar metric. CASM (excluding fuel) and Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel) are not determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.
(c) We reached a legal settlement with a former lessor for breach of contract for a total of $40 million (please refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 11. Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information). $38 million of the settlement represents a one-time reimbursement of damages incurred and $2 million relates to the reimbursement of previously recorded legal expenses.
(d) Adjusted CASM is included as supplemental disclosure because we believe it is a useful metric to properly compare our cost management and performance to other peers, as derivations of Adjusted CASM are well-recognized performance measurements in the airline industry that are frequently used by our management, as well as by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties in comparing the operating performance of companies in the airline industry. Additionally, we believe this metric is useful because it removes certain items that may not be indicative of base operating performance or future results. Adjusted CASM is not determined in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable across all carriers and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.
(e) In September 2024, we reduced the capacity of the pre-delivery deposit payments (“PDPs”) Financing Facility from $365 million to $135 million. The downsize of the facility resulted in a one-time write-off of $1 million in unamortized deferred financing costs. This amount is a component of interest expense within our consolidated statements of operations.
(f) Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest are included as supplemental disclosures because we believe they are useful metrics to properly compare our cost management and performance to other peers that may have different capital structures and financing strategies, particularly as it relates to financing primary operating assets such as aircraft and engines. Additionally, we believe these metrics are useful because they remove certain items that may not be indicative of base operating performance or future results. Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest are not determined in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable across all carriers and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted Net Income (Loss), Pre-Tax Income (Loss) to Adjusted Pre-Tax Income (Loss) and Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA, EBITDAR, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDAR
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)
Non-GAAP financial data (unaudited):
Adjusted pre-tax income (loss) (a)
Adjusted net income (loss) (a)
EBITDA (a)
EBITDAR (b)
Adjusted EBITDA (a)
Adjusted EBITDAR (b)
(a) Adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are included as supplemental disclosures because we believe they are useful indicators of our operating performance. Derivations of pre-tax income (loss), net income (loss) and EBITDA are well-recognized performance measurements in the airline industry that are frequently used by our management, as well as by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties in comparing the operating performance of companies in our industry.
Adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools. Some of the limitations applicable to these measures include: adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our indebtedness; although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and other companies in our industry may calculate adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. Because of these limitations, adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because derivations of adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not determined in accordance with GAAP, such measures are susceptible to varying calculations and not all companies calculate the measures in the same manner. As a result, derivations of pre-tax income (loss), net income (loss) and EBITDA, including adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss) and adjusted EBITDA, as presented may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies.
For the foregoing reasons, each of adjusted pre-tax income (loss), adjusted net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA has significant limitations which affect its use as an indicator of our profitability. Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information.
(b) EBITDAR and adjusted EBITDAR are included as a supplemental disclosure because we believe them to be useful solely as valuation metrics for airlines as their calculations isolate the effects of financing in general, the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions (primarily aircraft, which may be acquired directly, directly subject to acquisition debt, by capital lease or by operating lease, each of which is presented differently for accounting purposes), and income taxes, which may vary significantly between periods and for different airlines for reasons unrelated to the underlying value of a particular airline. However, EBITDAR and adjusted EBITDAR are not determined in accordance with GAAP, are susceptible to varying calculations and not all companies calculate the measure in the same manner. As a result, EBITDAR and adjusted EBITDAR, as presented, may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. In addition, EBITDAR and adjusted EBITDAR should not be viewed as a measure of overall performance since they exclude aircraft rent, which is a normal, recurring cash operating expense that is necessary to operate our business. Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information.
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)
Adjusted net income (loss) reconciliation (unaudited):
Net income (loss)
Non-GAAP Adjustments (a) :
Legal settlement
Write-off of deferred financing costs
Pre-tax impact
Tax benefit (expense) related to non-GAAP adjustments
Valuation allowance (b)
Net income (loss) impact
Adjusted net income (loss)
Adjusted pre-tax income (loss) reconciliation (unaudited):
Income (loss) before income taxes
Pre-tax impact
Adjusted pre-tax income (loss)
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)
EBITDA, EBITDAR, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR reconciliation (unaudited):
Net income (loss)
Plus (minus):
Interest expense
Capitalized interest
Interest income and other
Income tax expense (benefit)
Depreciation and amortization
EBITDA
Plus: Aircraft rent
EBITDAR
EBITDA
Plus (minus) (a) :
Legal settlement
Adjusted EBITDA
Plus: Aircraft rent
Adjusted EBITDAR
(a) See “Reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest” above for discussion on adjusting items.
(b) During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded a $5 million non-cash valuation allowance against our U.S. federal and state NOL deferred tax assets, which largely do not expire, mainly as a result of being in a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss position, which has no impact on cash taxes and is not reflective of our effective tax rate for deductible NOLs generated or actual cash tax obligations created. Please refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 13. Income Taxes” for additional information.
Comparative Operating Statistics
The following table sets forth our operating statistics for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. These operating statistics are provided because they are commonly used in the airline industry and, as such, allow readers to compare our performance against our results for the corresponding prior year period, as well as against the performance of our peers.
Year Ended December 31,
Change
Operating statistics (unaudited) (a)
Available Seat Miles (“ASMs”) (millions)
Departures
Average stage length (miles)
Block hours
Average aircraft in service
Aircraft – end of period
Average daily aircraft utilization (hours)
Passengers (thousands)
Average seats per departure
RPMs (millions)
Load factor
pts
Fare revenue per passenger ($)
Non-fare passenger revenue per passenger ($)
Other revenue per passenger ($)
Total ancillary revenue passenger ($)
Total revenue per passenger ($)
Total revenue per available seat mile (“RASM”) (¢)
RASM, stage-length adjusted to 1,000 miles (¢) (c)
Cost per available seat mile (“CASM”) (¢)
CASM (excluding fuel) (¢) (b)
CASM + net interest (¢) (b)
Adjusted CASM (¢) (b)
Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel) (¢) (b)
Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), stage-length adjusted to 1,000 (¢) (b)(c)
Adjusted CASM + net interest (¢) (b)
Adjusted CASM + net interest, stage-length adjusted to 1,000 (¢) (b)(c)
Fuel cost per gallon ($)
Fuel gallons consumed (thousands)
Full-time equivalent employees
(a) Figures may not recalculate due to rounding. See “Glossary of Airline Terms” for definitions of terms used in this table.
(b) These metrics are not calculated in accordance with GAAP. For the reconciliation to corresponding GAAP measures, see “Results of Operations—Reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest.”
As of December 31, 2025, we had $874 million of total available liquidity, consisting of $654 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $220 million from the undrawn Revolving Loan Facility. We had $614 million of total debt, net, of which $301 million was short-term and consisted primarily of amounts outstanding under our Pre-delivery Credit Facilities. Our total debt, net was comprised of $348 million outstanding under our PDP Financing Facility, $105 million of 2025-1 EETCs, $101 million outstanding under our pre-purchased miles facility with Barclays Bank Delaware (“Barclays”), and $66 million in 10-year loans (collectively, the “PSP Promissory Notes”) from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”), partially offset by $6 million in deferred debt acquisition costs.
In connection with the term loan facility entered into with the Treasury in September 2020, which was repaid in full in February 2022, and the PSP Promissory Notes, we issued warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase 3,117,940 shares of FGHI common stock at a weighted-average price of $6.95 per share. In June 2024, the Treasury sold all such Warrants to a financial institution. During the year ended December 31, 2025, 1,244,608 Warrants were exercised. We settled the exercises through a net share settlement of 248,893 shares of FGHI common stock and cash of less than $1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2025 1,636,058 Warrants expired. As of December 31, 2025, Warrants to purchase 237,274 shares of FGHI common stock were outstanding and set to expire during 2026.
We continue to monitor our covenant compliance with various parties, including, but not limited to, our lenders and credit card processors. As of the date of this report, we are in compliance with all of our covenants.
The following table presents the major indicators of our financial condition and liquidity as of:
December 31,
($ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents
Total current assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents
Total current liabilities, excluding current maturities of long-term debt, net and operating leases
Current maturities of long-term debt, net
Long-term debt, net
Stockholders’ equity
Debt to capital ratio
Debt to capital ratio, including operating lease obligations
Use of Cash and Future Obligations
We expect to meet our cash requirements for the next twelve months through use of our available cash and cash equivalents, our Pre-delivery Credit Facilities, and cash flows from operating activities. We expect to meet our long-term cash requirements with cash flows from operating and financing activities, including, but not limited to, potential future borrowings under the Pre-delivery Credit Facilities, our undrawn Revolving Loan Facility and/or potential issuances of debt or equity. The Revolving Loan Facility also permits us to enter into additional indebtedness secured by our loyalty program and brand-related assets, to the extent such indebtedness is pari passu with the Revolving Loan Facility. Our primary uses of cash are for working capital, aircraft PDPs, debt repayments and capital expenditures.
Our single largest capital commitment relates to the acquisition of aircraft. As of December 31, 2025, we operated all of our 176 aircraft under operating leases. PDPs relating to future deliveries under our agreement with
Airbus are required at various times prior to each aircraft’s delivery date. As of December 31, 2025, our Pre-delivery Credit Facilities, which allow us to draw up to an aggregate of $391 million, had $348 million outstanding. As of December 31, 2025, we had $428 million of PDPs held by Airbus, which have been partially financed by our Pre-delivery Credit Facilities.
As of December 31, 2025, we had a firm obligation to purchase 168 A320neo family aircraft and 21 additional spare engines to be delivered by 2031. Of our aircraft commitments, 20 had committed operating leases for deliveries occurring between 2026 and 2027. We intend to evaluate financing options for the remaining aircraft.
The following table summarizes current and long-term material cash requirements as of December 31, 2025, which we expect to fund primarily with operating and financing cash flows (in millions):
Material Cash Requirements
Thereafter
Total
Debt obligations (a)
Interest commitments (b)
Operating lease obligations (c)
Flight equipment purchase obligations (d)
Total
(a) Includes principal commitments only associated with our Pre-delivery Credit Facilities with borrowings as of December 31, 2025, our affinity card unsecured debt due through 2029,the PSP Promissory Notes through 2031, and our class A-1 enhanced equipment certificate through 2032. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 7. Debt.”
(b) Represents interest and commitment fees on debt obligations and our undrawn Revolving Loan Facility.
(c) Represents gross cash payments related to our operating fixed lease obligations that are not subject to discount as compared to the obligations measured on our consolidated balance sheets. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 8. Operating Leases.”
(d) Represents purchase commitments for aircraft and engines. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 11. Commitments and Contingencies.”
Cash Flows
The following table presents information regarding our cash flows in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)
Net cash used in operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
Operating Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash used in operating activities totaled $525 million, which was driven by $202 million of outflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities, non-cash adjustments of $186 million and $137 million of net loss.
The $202 million of outflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities included:
• $257 million in increases in other long-term assets primarily driven by increases in capitalized maintenance and prepaid maintenance;
• $12 million in increases in accounts receivable;
• $1 million in decreases in accounts payable; and
• $1 million in decreases in other liabilities; partially offset by
• $58 million in increases in our air traffic liability driven by an increase in customer flight credits for non-refundable future travel, increased sales in our membership programs as well as increased bookings; and
• $11 million in decreases in supplies and other current assets.
Our net loss of $137 million was also adjusted by the following non-cash items to arrive at net cash used in operating activities:
• $302 million in gains recognized on sale-leaseback transactions; partially offset by
• $91 million in depreciation and amortization;
• $21 million in stock-based compensation expense;
• $3 million in deferred tax expense; and
• $1 million in amortization of cash flow hedges, net of tax.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in operating activities totaled $82 million, which was driven by non-cash adjustments totaling $204 million, partially offset by $85 million of net income and $37 million of inflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities.
The $37 million of inflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities included:
• $82 million in decreases in aircraft maintenance deposits;
• $77 million in other liabilities driven primarily by leased aircraft return accruals, passenger taxes payable and other operational related accruals;
• $41 million in increases in our air traffic liability driven by increased booking and related fares;
• $22 million in decreases in accounts receivable; and
• $20 million in decreases in supplies and other current assets; partially offset by
• $190 million in increases in other long-term assets primarily driven by increases in capitalized maintenance, prepaid maintenance and deferred purchase incentives; and
• $15 million in decreases in accounts payable.
Our net income of $85 million was also adjusted by the following non-cash items to arrive at net cash used in operating activities:
• $294 million in gains recognized on sale-leaseback transactions; partially offset by
• $72 million in depreciation and amortization;
• $16 million in stock-based compensation expense;
• $1 million loss on extinguishment of debt; and
• $1 million in amortization of cash flow hedges, net of tax.
Investing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash used in investing activities totaled $99 million, driven by:
• $75 million in cash outflows for capital expenditures; and
• $24 million in net expenditures for PDP activity.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in investing activities totaled $75 million, driven by:
• $76 million in cash outflows for capital expenditures; and
• $2 million in cash outflows relating to other investing activity; partially offset by
• $3 million in net proceeds for PDP activity.
Financing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities was $555 million, primarily driven by:
• $492 million in cash proceeds from debt issuances, net of issuance costs, consisting of $205 million drawn on our Revolving Loan Facility, $181 million of net borrowings on our Pre-delivery Credit Facilities, $105 million of borrowings related to Class A-1 Equipment Certificates and $1 million drawn on our Barclays facility;
• $441 million in net proceeds received from sale-leaseback transactions; and
• $6 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options; partially offset by
• $380 million in cash outflows from principal repayments on debt, which include $205 million in Revolving Loan Facility payments, $163 million in Pre-delivery Credit Facilities payments and $12 million in payments pursuant to our previous building notes; and
• $4 million cash outflows for payments related to tax withholdings of share-based awards.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $288 million, primarily driven by:
• $476 million in cash proceeds from debt issuances, consisting of $444 million of net borrowings on our Pre-delivery Credit Facilities, $20 million in draws on our Barclays facility and $12 million in new borrowings on our building notes;
• $264 million in net proceeds received from sale-leaseback transactions; and
• $1 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options; partially offset by
• $447 million in cash outflows from principal repayments on debt, which include $431 million in Pre-delivery Credit Facilities payments and $16 million in payments pursuant to our previous building note; and
• $6 million cash outflows for payments related to tax withholdings of share-based awards.
As of December 31, 2025, we did not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2025, our contractual purchase commitments include future aircraft and spare engine acquisitions. The table below does not include commitments that are contingent on events or other factors that are uncertain or unknown at this time.
A320neo
A321neo
Total
Aircraft (a)
Engines
Year Ending
Thereafter
Total
(a) While the schedule presented above reflects the contractual delivery dates as of December 31, 2025, we continue to experience delays in the deliveries of Airbus aircraft which may persist in future periods.
As of December 31, 2025, all 176 aircraft in our fleet were subject to operating leases. These leases expire between 2027 and 2037. Leases for 73 of our aircraft could generally be renewed for one to four years.
Separately, we have various leases with respect to real property as well as various agreements among airlines relating to fuel consortia or fuel farms at airports. Under some of these contracts, we are party to joint and several liability regarding damages. Under others, where we are a member of an LLC or other entity that contracts directly with the airport operator, liabilities are borne through the fuel consortia structure. Our aircraft, services, equipment lease and sale and financing agreements typically contain provisions requiring us, as the lessee, obligor or recipient of services, to indemnify the other parties to those agreements, including certain of those parties’ related persons, against virtually any liabilities that might arise from the use or operation of the aircraft or such other equipment. We believe that our insurance would cover most of our exposure to liabilities and related indemnities associated with the commercial real estate leases and aircraft, services, equipment lease and sale and financing agreements described above.
Certain of our aircraft and other financing transactions include provisions that require us to make payments to preserve an expected economic return to the lenders if that economic return is diminished due to certain changes in law or regulations. In certain of these financing transactions and other agreements, we also bear the risk of certain changes in tax laws that would subject payments to non-U.S. entities to withholding taxes.
Certain of these indemnities survive the length of the related financing or lease. We cannot reasonably estimate our potential future payments under the indemnities and related provisions described above because we cannot predict when and under what circumstances these provisions may be triggered and the amount that would be payable if the provisions were triggered because the amounts would be based on facts and circumstances existing at such time.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In doing so, we make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, as well as related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial condition and results of operations could be affected. We base our estimates on past experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and we evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as critical accounting estimates, which we discuss below. For a detailed discussion of our significant accounting policies, please refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
Frequent Flyer Program
Our FRONTIER Miles program provides frequent flyer travel awards to program members based on accumulated miles. Miles are accumulated as a result of travel, purchases using the co-branded credit card, For Less price guarantee, and purchases from other participating partners. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, our total frequent flyer liability was $60 million and $49 million, respectively.
The contract to sell miles under the co-branded credit card partnership has multiple performance obligations. The agreement provides for joint marketing, and we account for this agreement consistently with the accounting method that allocates the consideration received to the individual products and services delivered based on relative stand-alone selling prices. We determined the best estimate of the selling prices by considering discounted cash flow analysis using multiple inputs and assumptions, including: (1) the expected number of miles awarded and number of miles redeemed, (2) equivalent ticket value (“ETV”) for the award travel obligation, (3) licensing of brand and access to member lists, (4) advertising and marketing efforts and (5) airline benefits. Any changes in the assumptions outlined above related to our co-branded credit card partnership at agreement inception or material modification would impact the allocation of consideration received and the resulting timing of when revenues from the each of the specific performance obligation would be recognized.
We estimate breakage (miles that are expected to expire unutilized) based on statistical models derived from historical redemption patterns. Breakage assumptions, including the period over which miles are expected to be redeemed, the actual redemption activity for miles, or the estimated fair value of miles expected to be redeemed, could have an impact on revenues in the year in which the change occurs and in future years. Additionally, we estimate ETV, which is used to determine the value per mile, based on the historical prices of the flights redeemed using miles and changes to these assumptions could impact the initial allocation of consideration in our co-branded credit card partnership or the amount of revenue recognized or deferred for miles accumulated as a result of travel.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, holding other factors constant, a 10% change in our estimated frequent flyer breakage rate would have resulted in a change to passenger revenues of approximately $4 million, or less than 1%.
Revenues from Customer’s Rights to Book Future Travel
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, our air traffic liability balance was $361 million and $303 million, respectively, of which $43 million and $19 million were related to customer rights to book future travel in the form of a flight credit, which mainly expire 12 months after issuance if not redeemed by the passenger. The amounts not expected to be redeemed are recognized as revenue over the historical pattern of rights exercised by customers. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, we recognized $79 million, $37 million and $44 million, respectively, in passenger revenue within our consolidated statements of operations, related to expected and actual expiration of customer rights to book future travel.
We estimate amounts not expected to be redeemed (breakage) based on historical redemption patterns of such customer rights, which also considers any historical redemption activity that may not be indicative of future trends such as program modifications that may impact future expectations of breakage. Changes in breakage rate
assumptions as a result of actual results differing from historical patterns or other factors, including the period over which these rights are expected to be redeemed, could have a material impact on revenues recognized in the year in which the change occurs and in future years.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, holding other factors constant, a 10% change in our estimated breakage related to customer’s rights to book future travel, which assumes no change in historical pattern of usage of such rights, would have resulted in a change to passenger revenues of approximately $14 million, or less than 1%.
Leased Aircraft Return Costs
Our aircraft operating lease agreements generally require us to return aircraft airframes and engines to the lessor in a certain condition or pay an amount to the lessor based on the airframe and engine’s actual return condition. These return provisions are evaluated at inception of the lease and throughout the lease terms and are accounted for as either fixed or variable lease payments (depending on the nature of the lease return condition). When such costs become both probable and estimable, they are accrued as a component of supplemental rent through the remaining lease term. Changes to the assumptions utilized in the estimation of these lease return costs are accounted for on a cumulative catch-up basis. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, our total leased aircraft return cost liability was $19 million and $49 million, respectively.
In 2025 and 2024, we extended the term for certain aircraft operating leases that were slated to expire between 2026 and 2027, and between 2025 and 2027, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded a benefit of $27 million and $14 million, respectively, to aircraft rent in our consolidated statement of operations related to previously accrued lease return costs that were variable in nature and associated with the anticipated utilization and condition of the airframes at the original return date. Given the extension of these aircraft operating leases, such variable return costs are no longer probable of occurring.
In assessing the future potential lease return costs, we consider the future anticipated costs and scope of maintenance events (largely driven by projected number of flight hours and cycles estimated to be utilized on the aircraft and engines prior to return), estimated timing of such events including the timing since the last expected major maintenance event, the date the aircraft is due to be returned to the lessor, contractual terms of the lease and maintenance provider agreements, current condition of each aircraft, number of heavy maintenance events on engines, age of the aircraft at lease expiration, type of engine, projected number of hours and cycles run on the engines at the time of return and the number of projected cycles run on the airframe at the time of return, among other estimates.
If actual estimates vary materially from those utilized in the estimation of lease return costs we could incur more or less supplemental rent expense depending on the direction of the adjustments necessary. There can be no assurance that the projections utilized will not materially change in the future given the inherent difficulty in forecasting future utilization of aircraft over their lease terms, as well as the shop visit timing particularly considering new engine technology we deploy in our fleet; however, the estimates utilized are the best available at the time the financial statements were issued.
Income Tax Valuation Allowance
As of December 31, 2025, our total deferred tax assets, net of a $65 million valuation allowance, were $1,225 million, which included $124 million of deferred tax assets related to NOL carry forwards. These deferred tax assets are comprised of $93 million, $16 million and $15 million related to NOLs available to reduce future federal, state and foreign taxable income, respectively. We assess whether it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable income will be generated to realize deferred tax assets, and a valuation allowance is established if it is not likely that deferred income tax assets will be realized. We consider sources of taxable income from prior period carryback
periods, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies and future taxable income when assessing the future utilization of deferred tax assets.
As part of our assessment of whether a valuation allowance is warranted, we consider all available positive and negative evidence in conjunction with evaluating the source and availability of taxable income to utilize such deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2023, a significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated was the cumulative loss incurred over the three-year period ended December 31, 2023. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence, such as our projections for future growth. As a result of our assessment, we concluded that as of December 31, 2023, it is more likely than not that the benefit from a portion of our federal and state deferred tax assets will not be realized and we recorded a valuation allowance of $37 million against our federal and state deferred tax assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, as a result of the change in the overall net deferred tax position and pre-tax income generated, we reduced the valuation allowance by $18 million and maintained a valuation allowance of $19 million against our federal and state NOL-related deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of future income to be generated. Furthermore, we maintained a valuation allowance related to our $11 million of foreign deferred tax assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, as a result of the change in the overall net deferred tax position and pre-tax loss generated, we increased the valuation allowance by $31 million and maintained a valuation allowance of $50 million against our federal and state NOL-related deferred tax assets due to our continued inability to utilize subjective evidence such as our projections for future income. Furthermore, we have a valuation allowance related to $15 million of our foreign deferred tax assets. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced or increased or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight is given to subjective evidence such as our projections for taxable income.
Long-Term Maintenance Agreements
We have entered into maintenance agreements with both of our engine providers, CFM International and Pratt & Whitney, to cover the primary maintenance services of the engines for a majority of our fleet. The arrangements stipulate that we pay a baseline per-flight-hour rate based on monthly engine utilization over the life of the arrangement. Given that the accounting for the arrangement will follow our heavy maintenance accounting and is dependent on many projected factors such as flight hours, shop visit timing and scope, and the stand-alone value of certain maintenance services, there are significant estimates that impact the accounting of our per-flight-hour maintenance agreements including amounts capitalized as recoverable pre-paid maintenance, expensed and treated as capitalized maintenance as well as the timing of each.
As of December 31, 2025, we had capitalized $275 million of rate per hour payments considered pre-paid maintenance, included within other assets on our consolidated balance sheets, which are probable to be recovered via future shop visits.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
GLOSSARY OF AIRLINE TERMS
Set forth below is a glossary of industry terms:
“A320 family” means, collectively, the Airbus series of single-aisle aircraft, including the A320ceo, A320neo, A321ceo and A321neo aircraft.
“A320neo family” means, collectively, the Airbus series of single-aisle aircraft that feature the new engine option, including the A320neo and A321neo aircraft.
“Adjusted CASM” is a non-GAAP measure and means operating expenses, excluding special items, divided by ASMs. For a discussion of such special items and a reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations.”
“Adjusted CASM including net interest” or “Adjusted CASM + net interest” is a non-GAAP measure and means the sum of Adjusted CASM and net interest expense (income) excluding special items divided by ASMs. For a discussion of such special items and a reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations.”
“Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel)” is a non-GAAP measure and means operating expenses less aircraft fuel expense, excluding special items, divided by ASMs. For a discussion of such special items and a reconciliation of CASM to CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM (excluding fuel), Adjusted CASM, Adjusted CASM including net interest and CASM including net interest, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations.”
“Air traffic liability” means the value of tickets, unearned membership fees, customer rights to book future travel, and other related fees sold in advance of travel.
“Ancillary revenue” means the sum of non-fare passenger revenue and other revenue.
“Available seat miles” or “ASMs” means seats (empty or full) multiplied by miles the seats are flown.
“Average aircraft in service” means the average number of aircraft used in flight operations, as calculated on a daily basis.
“Average daily aircraft utilization” means block hours divided by number of days in the period divided by average aircraft in service.
“Average stage length” means the average number of miles flown per flight segment.
“Block hours” means the number of hours during which the aircraft is in revenue service, measured from the time of gate departure before take-off until the time of gate arrival at the destination.
“CASM” or “unit costs” means operating expenses divided by ASMs.
“CASM (excluding fuel)” is a non-GAAP measure and means operating expenses less aircraft fuel expense, divided by ASMs.
“CASM including net interest” or “CASM + net interest” is a non-GAAP measure and means the sum of CASM and net interest expense (income) divided by ASMs.
“DOT” means the United States Department of Transportation.
“EPA” means the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
“Fare revenue” consists of base fares for air travel, including miles redeemed under our frequent flyer program, unused and expired passenger credits and revenue derived from charter flights.
“Fare revenue per passenger” means fare revenue divided by passengers.
“Load factor” means the percentage of aircraft seat miles actually occupied on a flight (RPMs divided by ASMs).
“Net interest expenses (income)” means interest expense, capitalized interest, interest income and other.
“Non-fare passenger revenue” consists of fees related to certain ancillary items such as baggage, service fees, seat selection, and other passenger-related revenue that is not included as part of base fares for travel.
“Non-fare passenger revenue per passenger” means non-fare passenger revenue divided by passengers.
“Other revenue” consists primarily of services not directly related to providing transportation, such as the advertising, marketing and brand elements of the FRONTIER Miles affinity credit card program and commissions revenue from the sale of items such as rental cars and hotels.
“Other revenue per passenger” means other revenue divided by passengers.
“Passengers” means the total number of passengers flown on all flight segments.
“Passenger revenue” consists of fare revenue and non-fare passenger revenue.
“PDP” means pre-delivery deposit payments, which are payments required by aircraft manufacturers in advance of delivery of the aircraft.
“RASM” or “unit revenue” means total revenue divided by ASMs.
“Revenue passenger miles” or “RPMs” means the number of miles flown by passengers.
“Total ancillary revenue per passenger” means ancillary revenue divided by passengers.
“Total revenue per passenger” means the sum of fare revenue, non-fare passenger revenue, and other revenue (collectively, “Total Revenue”) divided by passengers.
