Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.
YoY shift: Neutral
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is -0.07pp more bearish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
-0.11pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
-0.03pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
lose+1
bridge+1
unprofitable+1
Positive rising
advances+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
5,242 words
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a number of very significant risks. You should carefully consider the following risks and uncertainties in addition to other information in this report in evaluating our company and its business before purchasing shares of our common stock. Our business, operating results and financial condition could be due to any of the following risks. You could all or part of your investment due to any of these risks.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
bridge+6
loss+3
impairment+2
cancelled+1
Positive rising
achieve+1
MD&A (Item 7)
3,948 words
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “intends”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential”, or “continue” or the of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
We are an early-stage company which makes the evaluation of our future business prospects difficult.
We changed our business focus to our current business of developing agricultural and natural resources as a result of a reorganization with our wholly owned subsidiary PureBase AG in December 2014 and only commenced selling our agricultural products during 2017. We have not yet achievedprofitable operations.
Our success is dependent upon the successful development of suitable mineral projects, establishing our production capability and establishing a customer base for our agricultural products. Any future success will depend upon many factors, including factors beyond our control which cannot be predicted at this time. These factors may include changes in or increased levels of competition; the availability and cost of bringing mineral projects into production; the amount of agricultural and/or natural resources available and the market price of and the uses for such minerals. These factors may have a material adverse effect upon our business operating results and financial condition.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our audited consolidated financial statements as of November 30, 2025, have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a report that included an explanatory paragraph referring to our recurring losses from operations and generating negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future and our significant working capital deficiency, accumulated deficit and net loss for the year ended November 30, 2025, expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as a going concern without additional capital becoming available. As of November 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $66,488,227 and a working capital deficit of $1,104,359. For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2025, we had a net loss from operations of $1,479,577 and negative cash flows from operations of $1,111,833. We anticipate that we will continue to incur operating losses and generate negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future as we execute our development plans for 2026, as well as other potential strategic and business development initiatives. We have previously funded and plan to continue funding these losses primarily through the sale of equity and debt. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiencies, reduce expenditures, and, ultimately, to generate sufficient revenue to fund our operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising capital and have adequate capital resources to fund our operations or that any additional funds will be available to us on favorable terms or in amounts required by us. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital resources to fund operations, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our plan of operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and ability to operate as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
We will need to raise additional capital for the foreseeable future in order to continue operations and realize our business plans, the failure of which could adversely impact our operations.
Although we have started to generate revenue, such revenue is not sufficient to cover our operating expenses and financing costs. As of November 30, 2025, we had liabilities of $1,153,690 and a working capital deficiency of $1,104,359. To stay in business, we will need to raise additional capital through public or private sales of our securities, debt financing or short-term bank loans, or a combination of the foregoing. In the past, we have financed our operations by issuing secured and unsecured convertible debt and equity securities in private placements, in some cases with equity incentives for the investor in the form of warrants to purchase our common stock and have borrowed from related parties. During the year ended November 30, 2025, the Company received $101,551 of a $1,000,000 line of credit with USMC, received $515,449 of advances from USMC, received $473,124 (net of debt discounts) in bridge loans from two other sources, received $175,000 from the sale of fixed assets and received $11,000 from its Chief Executive Officer. We secured a $1,000,000 convertible line of credit on February 27, 2026 from CoreTer LLC, a company owned and operated by A. Scott Dockter, our chief executive officer and a director. We have received $532,756 in funds on the line of credit as of the date of this filing. There are no other commitments to provide us with financing. If we are unable to obtain additional financing from other sources, we may have to suspend operations, sell assets and will not be able to execute our plan of operations. Failure to become and remain profitable may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue operations. Our inability to secure capital to fund exploration and, if warranted, development costs for our mineral resources would create a competitive cost disadvantage in the marketplace which would have a material adverse effect on our operations and potential profitability.
We have been completely dependent on a related party for operating capital and will no longer receive funding from that related party.
Our sales are small and do not provide us with the funds necessary for continuing operations. We have been dependent on USMC to provide funding to us through promissory notes and a line of credit. USMC no longer provides funds to us and if we are unable to raise funds through debt through a third party or through equity financing, then we will not be able to continue operations.
External factors, including the complex permitting process may result in delays or not receiving permits at all.
If we, or our third-party suppliers, cannot obtain or maintain the necessary permits, or if there is a delay in receiving such permits, our timetable and business plan for development and mining of these properties or those of third-party suppliers could be adversely affected.
We cannot predict whether we will be able to obtain new permits or whether material changes in permit conditions will be imposed. Obtaining new mining permits or the imposition of additional conditions could have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop the mining properties in which we have an interest or ownership or could increase the costs charged by third party suppliers or decrease the amount of minerals available from third party suppliers.
Federal regulation of mining activity may change resulting in additional unforeseen expenses and potential losses.
Legislation to make significant revisions to the U.S. General Mining Law of 1872 would affect our potential development of unpatented mining claims on federal lands, including any royalty on mineral production. It cannot be predicted whether any of these proposals will become law. Any levy of the type proposed would only apply to unpatented federal lands and accordingly could adversely affect the profitability of any future mineral production from projects being explored by the Company on federal property.
We cannot be certain that future changes in laws and regulations would not result in significant additional expenses, capital expenditures, restrictions or delays associated with the exploration and development of our current or future projects.
We will need to grow the size and capabilities of our company, and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth.
If and when the execution of our plan of operations, including marketing plans and business strategies further develop, we may need to recruit additional managerial, operational, sales and marketing, financial, IT and other personnel. If we are not able to effectively expand our company by hiring new employees and expanding our consultants and contractors, we may not be able to successfully implement the tasks necessary to achieve our marketing, research, development, and expansion goals.
We depend solely on a single third party for mining services and our operations could be adversely affected if we cannot negotiate further service agreements.
We have in the past relied, and for the foreseeable future may continue to rely, solely on USMC, a company controlled by John Bremer, a director, for our mining services.. There can be no assurance that mining services provided by USMC will continue to be available to us or available to us on favorable terms. If we are unable to continue mining services with USMC or find another mining service provider our business operations may be interrupted.
If we lose key employees and consultants or are unable to attract or retain qualified personnel, our business could suffer.
Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified technical, marketing, engineering, and management personnel. Any inability in hiring and retaining qualified personnel could result in delays in development or fulfillment of any current strategic and operational plans.
Our officers and directors are able to control our company and may have different interest than our stockholders.
Our officers and directors and their affiliates own approximately 77% of the common stock of our company, not including shares that they may have the rights to acquire pursuant to options or other derivative securities. As a result, they have significant influence over our management and affairs and control over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or our assets. Their interests may differ from the interests of other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are disadvantageous to other stockholders. This concentration of ownership and influence in management and board decision-making could also harm the price of our capital stock by, among other things, discouraging a potential acquirer from seeking to acquire shares of our capital stock (whether by making a tender offer or otherwise) or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company.
Raising funds through debt or equity financings in the future, would dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders and possibly subordinate certain of their rights to the rights of new investors or creditors.
We currently hope to raise additional funds in debt or equity financings if available to us on terms we believe reasonable to provide for working capital, mining development and production programs, expansion of our marketing efforts or to make acquisitions. Any sales of additional equity or convertible debt securities would result in dilution of the equity interests of our existing stockholders, which could be substantial. Additionally, if we issue shares of preferred stock or convertible debt to raise funds, the holders of those securities might be entitled to various preferential rights over the holders of our common stock and such debt instruments may contain negative covenants restricting corporate actions which could have an adverse effect on the rights and the value of our common stock and our operations.
We currently face larger, better financed and established competition and could face additional competitors in the future which could result in pricing pressures and inability to expand market share.
At the present time we are aware of other companies providing similar agricultural and natural resources as ours. In addition, other entities not currently offering the minerals or product uses similar to ours may enter the agricultural markets. Our natural resources and products will also have to compete with established companies providing minerals which are already in agricultural use. Any such competitors would likely have greater financial, mining production, production facilities, marketing and sales resources than us. Increased competition may result in pricing pressures and the inability to increase market share, which may have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
At present, our sales are concentrated within a few customers and the loss of any one customer could result in decreased revenue, increased losses and significant cash flow problems.
Our sales are presently concentrated within a few customers. If any of these customers choose to no longer be a customer, in particular, the customers that provide the most significant percentage of revenue, for any reason, and these customers are not replaced, we will sustain additional losses as our fixed cost base will be left uncovered and consume working capital leading to significant cash flow problems.
We may lose the ability to sell our products to other countries due to the current tariff situation.
If the imposition of tariffs by the United States on other countries continues, then other countries may impose tariffs on United States products that might make it unprofitable for us to sell current or potentially new products to those countries.
We may lose rights to properties if we fail to meet payment requirements or development and/or production schedules.
The Company does not own or operate any mining properties. The rights to our mineral resources derive from leaseholds or purchase mining rights which require the payment of royalties, rent, minimum development expenditures or other installment fees or specified expenditures. If we fail to make these payments/expenditures when they are due, our mineral rights to the property may be terminated. This would be true for any other mineral rights which require payments to be made in order to maintain such rights. Some contracts with respect to mineral rights we may acquire may require development or production schedules. If we are unable to meet any or all of the development or production schedules, we could lose all or a portion of our interests in such properties. Moreover, we may be required in certain instances to pay for government permitting or posting reclamation bonds in order to maintain or utilize our mineral rights in such properties. Because our ability to make some of these payments is likely to depend on our ability to generate internal cash flow or obtain external financing, we may not have the funds necessary to meet these development/production schedules by the required dates which would result in our inability to use the properties.
Management may be unable to implement its business strategy resulting in diminished returns and sustained losses.
Our business strategy is to develop and extract or obtain certain minerals which we believe can have significant commercial applications and value. Our business strategy also includes developing new uses and products derived from these mineral resources, such as the use of Humate for agricultural uses. There is no assurance that we will be able to identify and/or develop commercially viable uses for the mineral resources we will be mining or obtaining. In addition, even if we identify and/or develop commercial uses and markets for our minerals, the time and cost of mining or otherwise obtaining, refining, blending and distributing such minerals may exceed our expectations or, when developed, the amount of minerals available may fall significantly short of our expectations thus providing a lower return on investment or a loss.
We have not yet established sustained and increasing sales from our customer base or distribution system.
Despite expanding our established customer base and distribution system for our agricultural products in fiscal 2022, sales decreased in fiscal 2023, fiscal 2024 and again in fiscal 2025. We have initiated closer relationships with our Arizona and California distributors in the agricultural sector in an effort to increase sales. We have a presence in digital space through LinkedIn and Facebook. Our inability to attract additional customers for our agricultural products, to deliver products in a time and cost-effective manner would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and the growth of our business.
Mineral exploration and mining are highly regulated industries requiring significant compliance requirements.
Mining is subject to extensive regulation by state and federal regulatory authorities. State and federal statutes regulate environmental quality, safety, exploration procedures, reclamation, employees’ health and safety, use of explosives, air quality standards, pollution of stream and fresh water sources, noxious odors, noise, dust, and other environmental protection controls as well as the rights of adjoining property owners. We strive to verify that mining projects in which we own rights, are currently operating or can be operated in substantial compliance with all known safety and environmental standards and regulations applicable to such mining properties and activities. There can be no assurance that our compliance efforts regarding our own properties would not be challenged or that future changes in federal or state laws, regulations or interpretations thereof will not have a material adverse effect on our ability to establish and sustain mining operations of our own properties or adversely affect the mining properties of our suppliers or service providers.
Certain of our current and proposed products will require certifications before being suitable for intended purposes.
Some of our agricultural products will require certain certifications before being suitable for labeling and usage. For example, our agricultural products must be certified under USDA and CDFA specifications and properly labeled. While the Company has certified one of its agricultural products under USDA and CDFA specifications and has received Organic Materials Review Institute certification on its newest product and is currently working with various laboratories and agencies to acquire future certifications, there is no assurance that future certifications will be obtained.
We incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.
We are a public “reporting company” with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As a public reporting company, we incur significant legal, accounting, reporting and other expenses not generally applicable to a private company. We also incur costs associated with corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) as well as other rules implemented by the SEC. These rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.
Rule 15g-9 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:
that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and
the broker or dealer receives from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased
In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.
Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501(a) of the Securities Act. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities.
Our securities are quoted on the OTCID Basic Market, which does not provide us as much liquidity for our investors as an exchange, such as the NASDAQ Stock Market or other national or regional exchanges.
Our securities are quoted on the OTCID Basic Market, which provides significantly less liquidity than the NASDAQ Stock Market or other national or regional exchanges. Securities quoted on the OTCID Basic Market are usually thinly traded, highly volatile, have fewer market makers and are not followed by analysts. The SEC’s order handling rules, which apply to NASDAQ-listed securities, do not apply to securities quoted on the OTCID Basic Market. Quotes for stocks included on the OTCID Basic Market are not widely publicized. Therefore, prices for securities traded solely on the OTCID Basic Market may be more difficult to obtain and holders of our securities may be unable to resell their securities in a timely manner or at stable prices, or at any price. We cannot assure you a liquid public trading market in our common stock will develop.
The market price of our common stock may be adversely affected by several factors.
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly in response to various factors and events, including:
our ability to execute our business plan;
operating results below expectations;
announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors;
loss of any strategic relationship;
industry developments;
economic and other external factors; and
period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.
In addition, the securities markets have, at times, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Because we are a smaller reporting company, we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.
Sarbanes-Oxley, as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange, the Amex Equities Exchanges and NASDAQ, as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets and apply to securities which are listed on those exchanges or the NASDAQ. Because we will not be seeking to be listed on any of the exchanges in the near term, we are not presently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations.
We have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.
We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our capital stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting us at such time as the board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on any investment in our common stock will only occur if our common stock price appreciates.
A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market under Rule 144 or upon the exercise of outstanding convertible debt or equity, it could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang” and in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.
We may, in the future, issue additional shares of common stock, which would reduce the percent of ownership held by current stockholders.
Our Articles of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of 520,000,000 shares of common stock of which as of March 18, 2026, 277,968,151 shares are issued and outstanding. The future issuance of common stock may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing stockholders. We may value any common stock issued in the future on an arbitrary basis. The issuance of common stock for future services, conversion of debt, equity financing or acquisitions or other corporate actions may have the effect of diluting the value of the shares held by our investors and may have an adverse effect on any trading market of our common stock.
Compliance with changing regulations concerning corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.
The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, expands federal regulation of corporate governance matters and imposes requirements on publicly-held companies, including us, to, among other things, provide stockholders with a periodic advisory vote on executive compensation and also adds compensation committee reforms and enhanced pay-for-performance disclosures. Sarbanes-Oxley specifically requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure of controls and procedures. Compliance may result in higher costs necessitated by required disclosure and governance practices. Our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards are likely to continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and professional services expenses, and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.
Compliance with new rules may make it more difficult to attract and retain directors.
Compliance with new and existing laws, rules, regulations and standards may make it more difficult and expensive for us to maintain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. Members of our board of directors and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified directors and executive officers, which could harm our business. We continually evaluate and monitor regulatory developments and cannot estimate the timing or magnitude of additional costs we may incur as a result.
We have reported material weaknesses in internal controls in the past.
We have reported material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting as of November 30, 2025, and we cannot provide any assurances that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future or that we can effectively remediate our reported weaknesses. If our internal controls over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, there may be errors in our financial statements that could require a restatement, or our filings may not be timely, and investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information.
Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley requires us to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting every quarter and as of the end of each year, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting in each Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Over time, controls may become inadequate because changes in the conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may occur. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
As a result, we cannot assure you that additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future or that we can effectively remediate our reported weaknesses. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties we may encounter in their implementation, could result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, cause us to fail to timely meet our periodic reporting obligations, or result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations regarding disclosure controls and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting required under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley and the rules promulgated thereunder. The existence of material weaknesses could result in errors in our consolidated financial statements and subsequent restatements of our consolidated financial statements, cause us to fail to timely meet our reporting obligations and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information.
negative
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity or performance. You should not place undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. These cautionary statements should be considered with any written or oral forward-looking statements that we may issue in the future. You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made, except as required by applicable law.
Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company is based upon, and should be read in conjunction with, the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Business Overview
We are a natural resource company providing solutions to the agriculture markets in the United States through our two subsidiaries, Purebase AG and Purebase AM.
Until June 2025, we utilized the services of US Mine Corporation (“USMC”), a Nevada corporation and a significant shareholder of the Company, for the development and contract mining of industrial minerals. John Bremer, a director, is also an officer, director, and significant owner of USMC. In addition, until June 2025, a substantial portion of the minerals used by us were obtained from properties owned or controlled by US Mine, LLC, a California limited liability company. Mr. Bremer is also a significant owner of US Mine, LLC.
Agricultural Sector
The Company develops specialized sun protectants. The Company has developed and will seek to develop additional products derived from mineralized materials of kaolin clay.
Construction Sector
The Company had been developing and testing a kaolin-based product that it believed would help create a lower CO2-emitting concrete through the use of high-quality supplementary cementitious materials (“SCMs”). The Company was developing an SCM that it believed could potentially replace up to 40% of cement, the most polluting part of concrete. As government agencies continue to enact stricter requirements for less-polluting forms of concrete, the Company believed there were significant opportunities for high-quality SCM products in the construction materials sector.
The Company has decided that it will no longer develop and pursue the SCM market. The Company has decided to instead further develop and expand its presence in the agricultural sector, as it believes that it can achieve higher margins in that sector and that construction of an SCM plant would take approximately two years.
On June 18, 2025, the Company entered into the Master Agreement with the US Mine Entities, pursuant to which mining rights US Mine LLC granted to us to purchase up to 100,000,000 tons of metakaolin supplementary cementitious materials from properties owned by US Mine LLC and US Mine LLC’s stock option to purchase up to 116,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.38 per share which were granted pursuant to our Materials Extraction Agreement with US Mine LLC, dated May 27, 2021, as amended on October 6, 2021, and further amended on November 1, 2023, were cancelled.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Year Ended November 30, 2025 to the Year Ended November 30, 2024
November 30,
November 30,
Variance
Revenue, net
Cost of goods sold
Operating income
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative
Stock based compensation
Loss from operations
Loss on disposal of assets
Impairment of assets
Interest expense
Interest expense, related party
Loss before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net Loss
Revenues
Revenues decreased by $25,076, or 8%, for the year ended November 30, 2025, as compared to the year ended November 30, 2024. The decrease is primarily attributable to one customer from 2024 purchasing less product in 2025, partially offset by one customer from 2024 purchasing more product in 2025.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold decreased by $7,770 or 10% for the year ended November 30, 2025, as compared to the year ended November 30, 2024. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $27,319, or 1%, for the year ended November 30, 2025, as compared to the year ended November 30, 2024 due to an increase in general and administrative wages of $128,151 and selling and marketing expenses of $16,296, offset by decreases in other general and administrative expenses of $19,010, and in professional services of $98,118.
Stock Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation increased by $59,665, or 287%, for the year ended November 30, 2025, as compared to the year ended November 30, 2024 primarily due to the February 6, 2025 repricing of options under the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan of $33,461 and the granting of new options.
Other Income (Expenses)
Loss on disposal of assets increased to $198,542 for the year ended November 30, 2025, as compared to $0 for the year ended November 30, 2024, due to the loss on the sale of some unused equipment.
Impairment of assets increased to $194,922 for the year ended November 30, 2025, due to the write off of the SCM pilot plant as the Company decided to no longer pursue the SCM market.
Interest expense increased to $316,074 for the year ended November 30, 2025, as compared to $422 for the year ended November 30, 2024 due to debt discount amortization of the two bridge loans with J.J. Astor and the bridge loan with Vanquish Funding Group. See Note 6 to the financial statements.
Interest expense related party decreased to $88,189 for the year ended November 30, 2025, as compared to $99,436 for the year ended November 30, 2024 primarily as a result of the conversion to shares of common stock of the Company of notes payable and lines of credit with USMC.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of November 30, 2025, we had cash on hand of $5,304 and a working capital deficiency of $1,104,359, as compared to cash on hand of $28,100 and a working capital deficiency of $1,093,058 as of November 30, 2024. The increase in working capital deficiency of $11,301 is a result of the conversion to common stock of $1,000,000 of the line of credit with USMC, the conversion to common stock of $416,449 of advances from USMC, an increase in prepaid expenses of $17,330, a decrease in interest payable related party of $25,292, and the conversion to common stock of $17,000 in convertible notes payable related parties, offset by an increase in advances from USMC of $515,449, an increase in notes payable to J.J.Astor of $514,353, an increase in notes payable to Vanquish Funding Group of $107,563, an increase in the line of credit with USMC of $101,551, an increase of accounts payable and accrued expenses of $206,493, an increase in convertible notes payable related parties of $19,000, a decrease in net right of use asset/liability of $167, and a decrease in cash of $22,796.
The Company’s operating activities consume the majority of its cash resources. The Company anticipates that it will continue to incur operating losses as it executes its development plans for 2026, as well as other potential strategic and business development initiatives. In addition, the Company has had and expects to have negative cash flows from operations, at least into the near future. The Company previously funded these losses with cash advances from USMC and the sale of equity and convertible notes. The Company will no longer be funded by infusions of cash from advances from USMC. The Company secured a $1,000,000 convertible line of credit on February 27, 2026 from CoreTer LLC, a related party. We have received $532,756 in funds on the line of credit as of the date of this filing.
Although no assurances can be given as to the Company’s ability to deliver on its revenue plans or that unforeseen expenses may arise, management currently believes that the revenue to be generated from operations together with bridge loans and equity and debt financing, will provide the necessary funding for the Company to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months.
Currently there are no other arrangements or agreements for financing, and management cannot guarantee any other potential debt or equity financing will be available, or if available, on favorable terms. As such, these matters raise substantial doubt by our independent registered public accounting firm about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the twelve months from the issue date of this report. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, or at all, the Company will need to curtail operations or cease operations completely.
Going Concern
The consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has accumulated losses from inception through November 30, 2025 of $66,488,227, as well as negative cash flows from operating activities and a working capital deficiency. During the year ended November 30, 2025, the Company received net cash proceeds of $617,000 from USMC from a note payable issued and the line of credit, $373,124 from J.J. Astor, $100,000 from Vanquish Funding Group, $175,000 from the sale of fixed assets and $11,000 from A. Scott Dockter, our CEO. The Company does not have sufficient cash to meet its obligations in the twelve months following the date of this Annual Report if it does not generate additional revenue and obtain financing from either a debt or equity raise. The Company will no longer receive financing from USMC. The Company secured a $1,000,000 convertible line of credit on February 27, 2026 from CoreTer LLC, a related party. We have received $532,756 in funds on the line of credit as of the date of this filing. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is in the process of evaluating various financing alternatives in order to finance the capital requirements of the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful with its fund-raising initiatives.
Working Capital Deficiency
November 30,
November 30,
Current assets
Current liabilities
Working capital deficiency
The increase in current assets is primarily the result of an increase in prepaid expenses and the right of use asset, offset by a decrease in cash. The increase in current liabilities is primarily a result of the increase in notes payable to J.J. Astor and Vanquish Funding Group, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, an increase in advances related party, an increase in lease liability, and an increase in convertible notes payable related party, offset by the decrease in the lines of credit related party and interest payable related party due to the conversion to common stock.
Cash Flows
Year Ended
November 30,
Net cash used in operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Increase (decrease) in cash
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $1,111,833 for the year ended November 30, 2025 and was due to the net loss of ($2,279,704), offset by the net changes in operating assets and liabilities of $825,611, and the net changes in non-cash expenses of $342,260.
Net cash used in operating activities was $2,167,932 for the year ended November 30, 2024 and was due to the net loss of ($1,477,545) and net changes in operating assets and liabilities of ($796,297), which were offset by non-cash expenses of $105,910.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $175,000 for the year ended November 30, 2025 due to the sale of property and equipment.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1,538 for the year ended November 30, 2024 due to the purchase of property and equipment.
Financing Activities
For the year ended November 30, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities was $914,037, of which $515,449 was advances from USMC, $101,551 was a line of credit with USMC, $373,124 was bridge loans from J.J. Astor, $100,000 was a bridge loan from Vanquish Funding Group, and $11,000 from A. Scott Dockter, our CEO, which were offset by $176,087 in payments to J.J. Astor on the bridge loans and $11,000 in payments to A. Scott Dockter in connection with outstanding notes payable.
For the year ended November 30, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $2,191,998, of which $618,000 was advances from USMC through a note payable, $1,551,714 was lines of credit with USMC, and $31,000 was a loan from a related party, which were offset by $8,716 in payments to A. Scott Dockter in connection with an outstanding note payable.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Effects of Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs to purchase products, to acquire mineral rights and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, a continued high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues if the selling prices of our services do not increase with these increased costs.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2025. We believe that the accounting policies below are critical to fully understand and evaluate our financial condition and results of operations.
Fair Value Measurement
As defined in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement). This fair value measurement framework applies at both initial and subsequent measurement.
Level 1:
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.
Level 2:
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.
Level 3:
Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows of the operation to which the assets relate to the carrying amount. If the operation is determined to be unable to recover the carrying amount of its assets, then these assets are written down first, followed by other long-lived assets of the operation to fair value. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carry forwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company utilizes ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method to compute the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the related financial amounts, using currently enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
For uncertain tax positions that meet a “more likely than not” threshold, the Company recognizes the benefit of uncertain tax positions in the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue Recognition
The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers . The Company derives revenues from the sale of its agricultural products. The Company’s contracted transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company’s contracts have a single performance obligation which are not separately identifiable from other promises in the contracts and is, therefore, not distinct. The Company’s performance obligation is satisfied upon the transfer of risk of loss to the customer.
Exploration Stage
In accordance with GAAP, expenditures relating to the acquisition of mineral rights are initially capitalized as incurred while exploration and pre-extraction expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time as the Company exits the exploration stage by establishing proven or probable reserves. Expenditures relating to exploration activities such as drill programs to establish mineralized materials are expensed as incurred. Expenditures relating to pre-extraction activities are expensed as incurred until such time proven or probable reserves are established for that project, after which expenditures relating to mine development activities for that particular project are capitalized as incurred.
Mineral Rights
Acquisition costs of mineral rights are capitalized as incurred while exploration and pre-extraction expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time as the Company exits the exploration stage by establishing proven or probable reserves, as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study. Expenditures relating to exploration activities are expensed as incurred and expenditures relating to pre-extraction activities are expensed as incurred until such time proven or probable reserves are established for that project, after which subsequent expenditures relating to development activities for that particular project are capitalized as incurred.
Where proven and probable reserves have been established, the project’s capitalized expenditures are depleted over proven and probable reserves upon commencement of production using the units-of-production method. Where proven and probable reserves have not been established, such capitalized expenditures are depleted over the estimated production life upon commencement of extraction using the straight-line method.
The carrying values of the mineral rights are assessed for impairment by management on a quarterly basis or when indicators of impairment exist. Should management determine that these carrying values cannot be recovered, the unrecoverable amounts are written off against earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company applies the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees, including employee stock options, in its statements of operations.
For stock options issued to employees and members of the Company’s board of directors for their services, the Company estimates the grant date fair value of each option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the Common Stock consistent with the expected life of the option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividend yields of the Common Stock. For awards subject to service-based vesting conditions, including those with a graded vesting schedule, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense equal to the grant date fair value of stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting term. Forfeitures are recorded as they are incurred as opposed to being estimated at the time of grant and revised.
Pursuant to ASU 2018-07 Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting , the Company accounts for stock options issued to non-employees for their services in accordance ASC 718. The Company uses valuation methods and assumptions to value the stock options that are in line with the process for valuing employee stock options noted above.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Any new and recently adopted accounting pronouncements are more fully described in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for the year ended November 30, 2025.
