Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Financial Position
We have a history of losses, and may not be able to achieve profitability, or, if achieved, sustain profitability.
With the exception of 2021 and 2025, we have historically incurred losses as a result of investing in future growth. While we have increased revenues, we have not yet consistently achieved profitability due to these investments and non-cash expenses. Our ability to achieve consistent profitability depends on our ability to generate sales through our technology platform and advertising model, while maintaining reasonable expense levels. If we do not achieve sustainable profitability, it may negatively impact our ability to continue our operations.
Table of Contents
We may need to raise additional capital to grow our business and may not be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.
We may need to raise additional capital in the future, including to expand our operations and pursue our growth strategies, to respond to competitive pressures, or to meet capital needs in response to operating losses or unanticipated working capital requirements. If we are unable to raise capital in sufficient amounts on acceptable terms when needed, our ability to continue to operate our business and further expand our operations may be limited.
Servicing debt and funding other obligations requires a significant amount of cash, and our ability to generate sufficient cash depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control.
Our ability to make payments on and refinance our indebtedness and to fund our operations and capital expenditures depends on our ability to generate cash flow and secure financing in the future. Our ability to generate future cash flow depends on, among other things, future operating performance, general economic conditions, competition, and legislative and regulatory factors affecting our operations and business.
Some of these factors are beyond our control. There is no assurance that our business will generate cash flow from operations or that future debt or equity financings will be available to us to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund other needs. As a result, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. There is no assurance that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all. Any inability to generate sufficient cash flow or refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and material business operations.
Restrictions in our Term Loan could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, ability to make distributions, and the value of our securities.
The $40,000 term loan (the “Term Loan”) that the Company obtained in 2023 to partially finance the Medicx Health transaction, contains customary affirmative covenants, including, among others, covenants pertaining to the delivery of financial statements; certain financial covenants; notices of default and certain other material events; payment of obligations; preservation of corporate existence, rights, privileges, permits, licenses, franchises and intellectual property; maintenance of property and insurance and compliance with laws, as well as customary negative covenants, including, among others, limitations on the incurrence of liens and entering into capital leases, investments and indebtedness, mergers and certain other fundamental changes, dispositions of assets, restricted payments, changes in our line of business, and transactions with affiliates and burdensome agreements. These covenants could affect our ability to operate our business, increase the amount of interest expense we ultimately pay pursuant to the Term Loan, and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise.
Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our Term Loan, may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial, and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our ability to comply with these covenants may be impaired. A failure to comply with these provisions could result in a default or an event of default. Upon an event of default, unless waived, the lenders could elect to terminate their commitments, cease making further loans, cause their loans to become due and payable in full, foreclose against any assets securing the debt under our Term Loan and force us and our subsidiaries into bankruptcy or liquidation. If the payment of our debt is accelerated, our assets may be insufficient to repay such debt in full, and the holders of our stock could experience a partial or total loss of their investment.
Risks Related to Our Business: Our Industry, Operations, and Competition
Seasonal trends in the pharmaceutical brand marketing industry could affect our operating results.
In general, the pharmaceutical brand marketing industry experiences seasonal trends that affect the vast majority of participants in the pharmaceutical digital marketing industry. Many pharmaceutical companies allocate the largest portion of their brand marketing to the fourth quarter of the calendar year. As a result, the first quarter tends to reflect lower activity levels and lower revenue, with gradual increases in the following quarters. We generally expect these seasonality trends to continue and our ability to effectively manage our resources in anticipation of these trends may affect our operating results.
Table of Contents
Additionally, changes in capital allocations and the timing of marketing spend by our customers could materially impact our operating results from quarter to quarter. Accordingly, revenues for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of revenues for any future period.
Developing and implementing new and updated applications, features and services for our solutions may be more difficult than expected, may take longer and cost more than expected and may not result in sufficient increases in revenue to justify the costs.
Attracting and retaining users of our solutions requires us to continue to improve the technology underlying those solutions and to continue to develop new and updated applications, features and services for those solutions. If we are unable to do so on a timely basis or if we are unable to implement new applications, features and services without disruption to our existing ones, we may lose potential users and clients. The costs of development of these enhancements may negatively impact our ability to achieve profitability.
We rely on a combination of internal development, strategic relationships, licensing and acquisitions to develop our solutions and related applications, features and services. Our development and/or implementation of new technologies, applications, features and services may cost more than expected, may take longer than originally expected, may require more testing than originally anticipated and may require the acquisition of additional personnel and other resources. There can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from any new or updated technologies, applications, features or services will justify the amounts spent.
Any failure to offer high-quality customer support for our solutions may adversely affect our relationships with our customers and harm our financial results.
Once our solutions are implemented, our customers use our account management and support teams to resolve technical issues relating to our solutions. Increased demand for our support services may increase our costs without corresponding increases in revenue, which could adversely affect our operating results. Further, the sale of our solutions is highly dependent on the ease of use of our solutions, on our business reputation, and on favorable recommendations from our existing customers. Any failure to maintain high-quality and responsive customer support, or a market perception that we do not maintain high-quality support, could harm our reputation, cause us to lose customers, adversely affect our ability to sell our solutions to prospective customers, and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We are dependent on a concentrated group of customers, and the loss of one or more of any of the pharmaceutical brands that purchase our solutions could cause our revenue to decline.
Because the pharmaceutical industry is dominated by large companies with multiple brands, our revenue is concentrated in a relatively small number of companies. We have over 100 pharmaceutical manufacturers as customers, and our revenues are concentrated in these customers. Our top five customers represented approximately 47% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025. In 2025 and 2024, respectively, we had three customers and two customers that represented over 10% of our revenues.
We expect that we will continue to depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a significant portion of our total revenues for the foreseeable future. The loss of any of these customers or groups of customers for any reason, a year over year reduction in sales of one or more of our larger customers, a change of relationship with any of our key customers, or a loss of one or more of any of the pharmaceutical brands that purchase our solutions, could cause a material decrease in our total revenues and could have a material impact on our operating results.
Additionally, mergers or consolidations among our customers in the healthcare industry could reduce the number of our customers and could adversely affect our revenues and sales. In particular, if our customers are acquired by entities that are not also our customers, that do not use our solutions or that have more favorable contract terms with competitors and choose to discontinue, reduce or change the terms of their use of our solutions, our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
Table of Contents
If we are unable to maintain our contracts with electronic prescribing platforms and electronic health record systems, our business will suffer.
We are reliant upon our contracts with leading eRx platforms and EHR systems to generate a portion of the revenues received from our customers. Such arrangements subject us to a number of risks, including the following:
• Our eRx and EHR channel partners may experience financial, regulatory or operational difficulties, which may impair their ability to focus on and fulfill their contract obligations to us;
• Legal disputes or disagreements, including regarding the ownership of intellectual property, may occur with one or more of our eRx and EHR channel partners and may lead to lengthy and expensive litigation or arbitration;
• Significant changes in an eRx and/or EHR channel partner’s business strategy may adversely affect such partner’s willingness or ability to satisfy obligations under any such arrangement;
• An eRx and EHR channel partner could terminate their partnership arrangements with us, which could negatively impact our ability to sell our solutions and achieve revenues; and
• The failure of an eRx or EHR channel partner to provide accurate and complete financial information to us or to maintain adequate and effective internal control over its financial reporting may negatively affect our ability to meet our financial reporting obligations as required by the SEC. See Part II, Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures.”
We generated 62% and 57% of our revenue through our two largest channel partners in 2025 and 2024, respectively. As such, the inability to maintain one or more of these relationships could materially adversely impact our business.
Our agreements with eRx and EHR channel partners could be subject to audit.
Our agreements with our eRx and EHR channel partners provide for revenue-sharing payments to them based on the revenue we generate through their platforms and systems. These payments could be subject to an audit by our channel partners, at their cost, and if there is a dispute as to the calculation, we may be liable for additional payments. Some agreements would require us to also pay for the cost of the audit if an underpayment is determined to be in excess of a certain amount.
If we fail to attract new customers or retain and expand existing customers, our business and future prospects may be materially and adversely impacted.
We currently work with many leading pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, life sciences marketing agencies, and other companies. Consolidation of companies within the life sciences industry we serve, and more specifically within our customer base, may reduce the volume of solutions purchased by the consolidated customers following an acquisition or merger. Moreover, our relationships with customers or potential customers who are in competition with each other may adversely impact the degree to which other customers or potential customers buy or use our solutions. While we have experienced customer growth, this growth may not continue at the same pace in the future or at all. Achieving growth in our customer base may require us to engage in increasingly sophisticated and costly sales and marketing efforts that may not result in additional customers. We may also need to modify our solution set and/or pricing model to attract and retain such customers. If we fail to attract new customers or fail to maintain or expand existing relationships in a cost-effective manner, our business and future prospects may be materially and adversely impacted.
We expect to face increasing competition in the markets for our solutions.
The markets in which we operate are competitive, continually evolving and, in some cases, subject to rapid change, resulting in our solutions facing competition from numerous other companies. We compete for revenue from healthcare advertisers and sponsors (pharmaceutical manufacturers) with healthcare data suppliers, health-focused demand-side platforms, and health-focused walled garden websites and web platforms, and advertising networks that aggregate traffic from multiple web sites or point-of-care platforms such as telehealth, EHR, eRx, physician practice management, HIE, and site-based platforms within large health systems.
Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than we do. These organizations may be better known than we are and have more customers than we do. We cannot provide assurance
Table of Contents
that we will be able to compete successfully against these organizations or any alliances they have formed or may form. Since there are no substantial barriers to entry into the markets in which we participate, we expect that competitors will continue to enter these markets and that competition in the industry will continue to increase. If we fail to differentiate ourselves from our competitors or to gain market share, our operating results and financial position may be negatively impacted.
Developments in the healthcare industry could adversely affect our business.
Most of our revenue is derived from pharmaceutical manufacturers and could be affected by changes affecting the broader healthcare industry, including decreased spending in the industry overall.
General reductions in expenditures by healthcare industry participants could result from, among other things:
• Government regulation or private initiatives that affect the manner in which healthcare industry participants interact with consumers and the general public;
• Government regulation prohibiting the use of coupons by patients covered by federally funded health insurance programs;
• Consolidation of healthcare industry participants;
• Reductions in governmental funding for healthcare; and
• Adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting healthcare industry participants.
Even if general expenditures by industry participants remain the same or increase, developments in the healthcare industry may result in reduced spending in some or all the specific market segments that we serve now or may serve in the future. For example, the use of our solutions and services could be affected by:
• A decrease in the number of new drugs or medical devices coming to market; and
• A decrease in marketing expenditures by pharmaceutical or medical device companies.
The healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent years, and we expect that significant changes will continue to occur. However, the timing and impact of developments in the healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot assure you that the demand for our solutions and services will continue to exist at current levels or that we will have adequate technical, financial and marketing resources to react to changes in the healthcare industry.
Risks Related to Regulatory Matters
Actual or perceived failures to comply with applicable laws and regulations that affect the healthcare industry, including data protection, privacy and security, fraud and abuse laws, regulations, standards and other requirements could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving, and we are or may become subject to numerous state, federal and foreign laws, requirements and regulations governing the collection, use, disclosure, retention, and security of personal information. In addition, our customers and service providers may be or become subject to these same rules. This evolution may create uncertainty in our business, affect our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions or to collect, store, transfer, use and share personal information, necessitate the acceptance of more onerous obligations in our contracts, result in liability or impose additional costs on us. The cost of compliance with these laws, regulations and standards is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with federal, state or foreign laws or regulation, our internal policies and procedures or our contracts governing our processing of personal information could result in negative publicity, government investigations and enforcement actions, claims by third parties, and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial performance and business.
We also may be bound by contractual obligations and other obligations relating to privacy, data protection, and information security that are more stringent than applicable laws and regulations. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, laws, regulations, standards, and other obligations relating to privacy, data protection, and information security
Table of Contents
are significant. Although we work to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and standards, our contractual obligations and other legal obligations, these requirements are evolving and may be modified, interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another, and may conflict with another or other legal obligations with which we must comply. Accordingly, our failure, or perceived inability, to comply with these laws, regulations, standards, and other obligations may limit the use and adoption of our solution, reduce overall demand for our solution, lead to regulatory investigations, breach of contract claims, litigation, and significant fines, penalties, or liabilities for actual or alleged noncompliance or slow the pace at which we close sales transactions, any of which could harm our business.
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (the “HITECH”), and the rules promulgated thereunder require certain entities, referred to as Covered Entities, to comply with established standards, including standards regarding the privacy and security of protected health information (“PHI”). HIPAA further requires that Covered Entities enter into agreements meeting certain regulatory requirements with their business associates, as such term is defined by HIPAA, which, among other things, obligate the business associates to safeguard the covered entity’s PHI against improper use and disclosure. While we are not a Covered Entity, or a business associate, we process data that has been de-identified according to the expert determination method under HIPAA’s Privacy Rule. This requires us to take measures to prevent the re-identification of that data and to comply with HIPAA if that data is re-identified.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personally identifiable information (including of our employees, customers, suppliers and business partners). Any data breach may subject us to civil fines and penalties, or regulatory orders, fines or sanctions under relevant state and federal privacy laws in the United States, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020 and was amended and expanded by the California Privacy Rights Act (the “CPRA”), which took effect on January 1, 2023, and other laws and regulations. Our failure, or the failure of our third-party vendors, to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to data security and our involvement or the involvement of any of our third-party vendors in any data security incidents could result in legal claims and liability, obligations to report incidents to governmental agencies, regulatory investigations and penalties, and reputational damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Certain other laws and regulations such as federal and state anti-kickback and false claims laws may apply to us indirectly through our relationships with our customers and partners. Violations can result in considerable penalties and sanctions. If we are found to have violated, or to have facilitated the violation of such laws, we could be subject to significant penalties.
Our operations may be impacted by changes to current regulations and future legislation.
The current Executive Branch administration and regulatory agencies have proposed, and may propose additional, policy changes that create uncertainty for our business, our customers' businesses and the industries in which we operate, including for example, implementing restrictions on pharmaceutical DTC marketing.
The current U.S. administration, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) have recently announced an initiative intended to ensure transparency and accuracy in direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertisements through a series of reforms that have included and are expected to continue to include FDA rulemaking, additional enforcement action, and expanded regulatory oversight of digital and social media promotional activities. Failure to comply with applicable FDA requirements for advertising and promotional activities (including those that currently apply or may apply in the future to DTC advertising) may subject a company to adverse enforcement action by the FDA, the Department of Justice, or the Office of the Inspector General of HHS, as well as state authorities. This could subject a company to a range of penalties or other consequences that could have a significant commercial impact, including warning letters, civil and criminal fines, and agreements that materially restrict the manner in which a company promotes or distributes a drug. Any such failures could also cause significant reputational harm. The applicable regulations in countries outside the U.S. grant similar powers to the competent authorities and impose similar obligations on companies. This increased regulatory scrutiny could cause our customers to limit their use of DTC advertising, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, in its June 2024 decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (the “Loper decision”), the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the longstanding Chevron doctrine, under which courts were required to give deference to regulatory agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal statutes. The Loper decision could result in additional legal challenges to regulations and guidance issued by federal agencies applicable to our customers’ operations, including those issued by the FDA, HHS, and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Additionally, the Loper decision may result in increased regulatory uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretations and other impacts to the agency rule-making process.
Table of Contents
We cannot predict which additional measures may be adopted or the impact of current and additional measures on our business, or our customers’ businesses, which could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If our customers’ drug prices are reduced as a result of MFN pricing initiatives or other similar regulations, our business could be adversely affected.
The current Executive Branch administration is pursuing policies to reduce regulations and expenditures across government including at HHS, which include the FDA and Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), and related agencies. In May 2025, the Executive Branch administration issued an Executive Order that, among other things, required HHS, within 30 days, to establish and communicate to drug manufacturers Most Favored Nation (“MFN”) price targets designed to bring drug prices for American patients in line with those in comparably developed nations. If significant progress towards MFN pricing is not achieved, the Executive Order requires HHS to propose a rulemaking to implement MFN pricing. In December 2025, CMS issued proposed regulations to establish, under the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, two mandatory MFN demonstration models under Medicare Parts B and D, respectively. If these rules or other MFN pricing rules are finalized, they are likely to reduce prices of at least some drugs in the United States, if they are also sold in comparator countries.
At the state level, legislatures are increasingly enacting legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures.
We expect that additional federal and state healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future. If our customers’ drug prices are reduced as a result of MFN pricing initiatives or other similar regulations, our business could be adversely affected by our customers reducing their marketing and advertising spend.
If our customers, partners, and third-party providers fail to comply with the extensive and changing landscape of legal and regulatory requirements affecting the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries, they could face increased costs and/or penalties, which could lead to us losing business.
The FDA, U.S. state licensure bodies, other healthcare regulators and other comparable agencies in other jurisdictions directly regulate many of the most critical business activities of our customers, partners, and third-party providers, including research and development for biotechnology and pharmaceutical development, and pharmaceutical advertising. States increasingly have been placing greater restrictions on the marketing and advertising practices of healthcare companies, particularly pharmaceutical companies. In addition, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have been the target of lawsuits and investigations alleging violations of government regulations, including claims asserting submission of incorrect pricing information, improper promotion of pharmaceutical products, payments intended to influence the referral of federal or state healthcare business, submission of false claims for government reimbursement, antitrust violations, violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, and similar anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws. Any failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations may result in civil and/or criminal legal proceedings and lead to fines, damages, mandatory compliance programs and other sanctions and remedies that may materially affect the business, operations and reputations of our customers, partners and third-party providers which could adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
We are dependent, in part, on our intellectual property. If we are not able to protect our proprietary rights or if those rights are invalidated or circumvented, our business may be adversely affected.
Our business is dependent, in part, on our ability to innovate, and, as a result, we are reliant on our intellectual property. We generally protect our intellectual property through patents, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements and other measures, to the extent our budget permits. There can be no assurance that patents will be issued from pending applications that we have filed or that our patents will be sufficient to protect our key technology from misappropriation or falling into the public domain, nor can assurances be made that any of our patents, patent applications, trademarks or our other intellectual property or proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. In the event a competitor or other party successfully challenges our solutions, processes, patents or licenses or claims that we have infringed upon their intellectual property, we could incur substantial litigation costs defending against such claims, be required to pay royalties, license fees or other damages or be barred from using the intellectual property at issue, any of
Table of Contents
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. We cannot assure that steps taken by us to protect our intellectual property and other contractual agreements for our business will be adequate, that our competitors will not independently develop or patent substantially equivalent or superior technologies or be able to design around patents that we may receive, or that our intellectual property will not be misappropriated.
If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights, we may be at a disadvantage to others who do not incur the substantial time and expense we incur. Preventing unauthorized use or infringement of our intellectual property rights is inherently difficult. Moreover, it may be difficult or practically impossible to detect theft or unauthorized use of our intellectual property. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Cybersecurity incidents could disrupt business operations, result in the loss of critical and confidential information, and adversely impact our reputation and results of operations.
Global cybersecurity threats can range from uncoordinated individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology (“IT”) systems to sophisticated and targeted measures known as advanced persistent threats. While we employ extensive measures to prevent, detect, address and mitigate these threats (including access controls, insurance, vulnerability assessments, continuous monitoring of our IT networks and systems, maintenance of backup and protective systems and user training and education), cybersecurity incidents, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially result in the misappropriation, destruction, corruption or unavailability of critical data and confidential or proprietary information (our own or that of third parties) and the disruption of business operations. The potential consequences of a material cybersecurity incident include reputational damage, loss of customers, loss of income, litigation with customers and other parties, loss of trade secrets and other proprietary business data and increased cybersecurity protection and remediation costs, which in turn could adversely affect our competitiveness and results of operations. In addition, while we maintain insurance coverage, our insurance coverage for cyberattacks may not be sufficient to cover all the losses, liabilities and costs we may experience as a result of a cybersecurity incident, including any disruptions resulting from such an incident, or that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all.
A cybersecurity incident could be caused by disasters, insiders (through inadvertence or with malicious intent) or malicious third parties using sophisticated, targeted methods, including hacking, fraud, phishing or other forms of deception. The techniques used by threat actors change frequently, are becoming increasingly diverse and sophisticated, and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time. Although we maintain information technology measures designed to protect the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of our information systems, and protect us against intellectual property theft, data breaches, and other cybersecurity incidents, such measures will require updates and improvements, and we cannot guarantee that such measures will be adequate to detect, prevent or mitigate cybersecurity threats or incidents. The implementation, maintenance, segregation and improvement of these information systems requires significant management time, support and cost. Moreover, there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving, expanding and updating current systems, including the disruption of our data management, procurement, finance, and sales and service processes. These risks may affect our ability to manage our data and adequately protect our intellectual property or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, applicable laws, regulations and contracts. Moreover, our proprietary information, confidential information, intellectual property, or personal information that we hold could be compromised or misappropriated and our reputation may be adversely affected. If these systems do not operate as we expect them to, we may be required to expend significant resources to make corrections or find alternative sources for performing these functions.
We also work with partners and third-party service providers or vendors that collect, store and process such data on our behalf and in connection with our services. There can be no assurance that any security measures that we or our third-party service providers or vendors have implemented will be fully executed, adhered to, or effective in protecting our systems and information, including against current or future cybersecurity threats. While we have designed and developed systems and processes to protect the availability, integrity, and confidentiality of our data and information, as well as those of our customers, website visitors, employees, and others, the security measures of our third-party service providers or vendors could fail and result in security incidents, including unauthorized access to, or disclosure, acquisition, encryption, modification, misuse, loss, destruction or other compromise of such data. If a compromise of such data were to occur, we may have liability under our contracts with other parties and under applicable law for damages and incur penalties and other costs to respond to, investigate and remedy such an incident. Laws require us to provide notice to customers, regulators, credit reporting agencies or others when certain sensitive information has been compromised as a result of a security breach. There are significant differences between the laws of the U.S. and other jurisdictions, and as a result compliance in the event of a widespread data breach could be complicated and costly. Such an event could harm our
Table of Contents
reputation and result in litigation against us. Any of these results could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
We may be unable to support our technology to further scale our operations successfully.
Our plan is to grow through further integration of our technology in electronic platforms. Our growth will place significant demands on our management and technology development, as well as our financial, administrative and other resources. We cannot guarantee that any of the systems, procedures and controls we put in place will be adequate to support the commercialization of our operations. Our operating results will depend substantially on the ability of our officers and key employees to manage changing business conditions and to implement and improve our financial, administrative and other resources. If we are unable to respond to and manage changing business conditions, or the scale of our solutions, services and operations, then the quality of our services, our ability to retain key personnel and our business could be harmed.
Our business will suffer if our network systems fail or become unavailable.
A reduction in the performance, reliability and availability of our network infrastructure would harm our ability to distribute our solutions to our users, as well as our reputation and ability to attract and retain customers. Our systems and operations could be damaged or interrupted by fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, internet breakdown, earthquake and similar events. Our systems could also be subject to viruses, break-ins, sabotage, acts of terrorism, acts of vandalism, hacking, cyber-terrorism and similar misconduct. We might not carry adequate business interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur from a system outage. Any system error or failure that causes interruption in availability of our solutions or an increase in response time could result in a loss of potential customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we suffer sustained or repeated interruptions, then our solutions and services could be less attractive to our users and our business would be materially harmed.
The use of AI technology in our operations and IT infrastructure could improve internal processes, but could pose security risks and privacy risks; the use of AI technology also faces regulatory uncertainty and scrutiny given that AI technology is rapidly growing and evolving.
We have increased efficiency through adoption and use of AI, machine learning, and similar tools and technologies that collect, aggregate, analyze or generate data or other materials or content, and we expect to continue to adopt such tools as appropriate. In addition, we expect our third-party vendors and service providers to increasingly develop and incorporate AI into their product offerings.
While we anticipate that we will continue to research and implement other potential AI-based technology solutions to both mitigate risk and increase automation in our environment, it is possible that bad actors and/or competitors will leverage AI solutions more effectively to either exploit vulnerabilities or take market share. Either outcome could negatively impact our business.
We are aware that generative AI tools may respond with inaccurate or fabricated information, introduce bias, or fail to provide traceability of source information.
The intellectual property risks associated with AI include uncertainties around the ownership of AI-generated works, potential infringement of existing patents and copyrights, unauthorized use of third-party data, and exposure of proprietary algorithms or trade secrets. If we fail to secure or maintain protection for the intellectual property rights in technologies developed using AI, or later have our intellectual property rights invalidated or otherwise diminished, our competitors may be able to take advantage of our research and development efforts to develop competing products or services, which could adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, or results of operations.
Dependence on AI systems or AI vendors means that any downtime or outages can disrupt business operations. Usage of our confidential data to train the AI models by us or our vendors could result in legal risk, especially if it involves customer data or our proprietary information.
There are significant and evolving risks involved in utilizing AI, and no assurance can be provided that our, our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ use of AI will enhance our, our third-party vendors’ or service providers’ products or services, or produce the intended results. The adoption and incorporation of such AI tools can lead to concerns around safety and soundness, fair treatment of consumers, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Moreover, the use
Table of Contents
or adoption of AI and machine learning in our technology may expose us to breach of a data or software license, website terms of service claims, claimed violations of privacy rights, or other tort claims. AI solutions may also be adversely impacted by unforeseen defects, technical challenges, cyberattacks, cybersecurity breaches, service outages, or other similar incidents, or material performance issues.
In addition, new laws and regulations, or the interpretation of existing laws and regulations, in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate may affect our use of AI technology and expose us to government enforcement or civil lawsuits. For example, certain states such as California, Colorado, and Utah have recently passed laws regulating the use of AI technology, which impose additional operational burdens and may require us to modify our product offerings that utilize AI technology in order to comply with these laws. Federal regulators have also issued guidance affecting the use of AI technology in regulated sectors. The current Executive Branch administration has endorsed a federal moratorium on the enforcement of certain state AI laws, including through a December 11, 2025 executive order on “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence.” To date, these efforts have not resulted in federal preemption of state action on AI regulation, contributing to a complicated legislative patchwork, which may be litigated in state and federal courts.
In addition, the European Union (“EU”)’s Artificial Intelligence Act (“AI Act”), the world’s first comprehensive AI law, entered into force on August 1, 2024, and most provisions of the legislation are scheduled to become effective on August 2, 2026. The AI Act, which may be amended or further clarified as part of the EU’s Digital Omnibus or related legislative initiatives, imposes significant obligations on providers and deployers of certain high-risk AI systems and encourages providers and deployers of AI systems to account for EU ethical principles in their development and use of these systems.
We expect these legislative trends to continue, and we may be required to devote significant attention and resources to address the frequently changing regulatory requirements, including by ensuring higher standards of data quality, transparency, and human oversight, as well as adhering to specific and potentially burdensome and costly ethical, accountability, and administrative requirements. As the legal and regulatory framework relating to the use of AI technology continues to change, there may be an increase in our operational and development expenses that could impact our ability to utilize certain AI technology.
As the use of AI technology becomes more prevalent, we anticipate that it will continue to present new legal, reputational, technical, operational, ethical, competitive, and regulatory issues. We expect that our incorporation of AI technology in our business will require additional resources, including the incurrence of additional costs, to develop and maintain our products, services, and features to minimize potentially harmful, unintended or other adverse consequences, to comply with existing and new laws and regulations, to maintain or extend our competitive position, and to address any legal, reputational, technical, operational, ethical, competitive, and regulatory issues that may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. Our vendors may also incorporate AI technology tools into their offerings, and the providers of these AI technology tools may not meet existing or rapidly evolving regulatory or industry standards, including with respect to privacy and data security. Bad actors around the world are also using increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of AI technology, to engage in illegal activities involving the theft and misuse of personal information, confidential information, and intellectual property. Additionally, our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI technology into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively. As a result, the challenges presented with our use of AI technology may result in the loss of valuable property and information, cause us to breach applicable laws and regulations, and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Furthermore, because AI technology itself is highly complex and rapidly developing, it is not possible to predict all the legal, operational or technological risks that may arise relating to the use of AI. We expect that our use of AI will require additional resources, including incurring additional costs to develop and maintain our products and solutions, to minimize potentially harmful or unintended consequences, to comply with applicable and emerging laws and regulations, to maintain or extend our competitive position, and to address any ethical, reputational, technical, operational, legal, competitive or regulatory issues which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing.
In contrast to the generative AI productivity tools described above, we develop and sell our proprietary DAAP that utilizes machine learning. There is risk that the market, our customers, and regulators may confuse our machine learning technology with unrelated generative AI products and agentic AI products that are more controversial or that are differently regulated, which could cause reputational harm.
Related to Managing Our Growth
Table of Contents
If we are unable to manage growth, our operations could be adversely affected.
Our ability to manage growth effectively will depend on our ability to improve and expand operations, including our financial and management information systems, and to recruit, train and manage personnel. There can be no assurance that management will be able to manage growth effectively. To manage growth effectively, we will be required to continue to implement and improve our operating and financial systems and controls to expand, train and manage our employee base. Our ability to manage our operations and growth effectively will require us to continue to expend funds to enhance our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures, and to attract and retain sufficient talented personnel.
If we do not properly manage the growth of our business, we may experience significant strains on our management and operations and disruptions in our business. Various risks arise when companies grow too quickly. If our business grows too quickly, our ability to meet customer demand in a timely and efficient manner could be challenged. We may also experience development delays as we seek to meet increased demand for our solutions. Our failure to properly manage the growth that we or our industry might experience could negatively impact our ability to execute on our operating plan and, accordingly, could have an adverse impact on our business, our cash flow and results of operations, and our reputation with our current or potential customers.
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions or integrate acquisitions successfully.
We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions, or integrate acquisitions successfully. We may seek additional acquisition opportunities, both to further diversify our business and to penetrate or expand important product offerings or markets. There are no assurances, however, that we will be able to successfully identify suitable candidates, negotiate appropriate terms, obtain financing on acceptable terms, complete proposed acquisitions, successfully integrate acquired businesses, or expand into new markets. Once acquired, operations may not achieve anticipated levels of revenues or profitability. Acquisitions involve risks, including difficulties in the integration of the operations, technologies, services and products of the acquired companies and the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular transaction, there are no assurances that we will properly ascertain all such risks. Difficulties encountered with acquisitions could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Our acquisition activities may disrupt our ongoing business and may involve increased expenses, and we may not realize the financial and strategic goals contemplated at the time of a transaction.
We have acquired, and may in the future acquire, companies, businesses, products, services and technologies. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including:
• our ongoing business may be disrupted, an acquisition may involve increased expenses, and our management's attention may be diverted by acquisition, transition, or integration activities;
• we may not further our business strategy as we expected;
• we may not realize anticipated synergies or other anticipated benefits of an acquisition or such synergies or benefits may take longer than anticipated to be realized;
• we may overpay for our investments, or otherwise not realize the financial returns contemplated at the time of the acquisition;
• integration with acquired operations or technology may be more costly or difficult than expected and such integration may not be successful;
• we may be unable to retain the key employees, customers and other channel partners of the acquired operation;
• we may not realize the anticipated increases in our revenues from an acquisition; and
• our use of cash to pay for acquisitions may limit other potential uses of our cash.
Table of Contents
Risks Related to Inflation, Interest Rates, and Other Adverse Economic Conditions
Interest rate increases may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Borrowings under our Term Loan are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness will increase even though the amount borrowed remains the same. As a result, our cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, will correspondingly decrease. A one-percentage-point increase in the interest rates on outstanding borrowings under our Term Loan would have increased our interest expense by approximately $292 for the year ended December 31, 2025.
We could be subject to economic, political, regulatory and other risks arising from our international operations.
Operating in international markets requires significant resources and management attention and will subject us to regulatory, economic and political risks that may be different from, and incremental to, those in the United States. In addition to the risks that we face in the United States, our international operations in Croatia, may involve risks that could adversely affect our business, including:
• difficulties and costs associated with staffing and managing foreign operations;
• natural or man-made disasters, political, social and economic instability, including wars, terrorism and political unrest, outbreak of disease, boycotts, curtailment of trade, and other business restrictions;
• compliance with United States laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, export controls and economic sanctions, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to government officials;
• unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
• less favorable foreign intellectual property laws;
• adverse tax consequences such as those related to repatriation of cash from foreign jurisdictions into the United States, non-income related taxes such as value-added tax or other indirect taxes, changes in tax laws or their interpretations, or the application of judgment in determining our global provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities given inter-company transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain;
• fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could impact expenses of our international operations and expose us to foreign currency exchange rate risk;
• profit repatriation and other restrictions on the transfer of funds;
• differing payment processing systems as well as use and acceptance of electronic payment methods, such as payment cards;
• new and different sources of competition; and
• different and more stringent user protection, data protection, privacy and other laws.
Our failure to manage any of these risks successfully could harm our international operations and our overall business, as well as results of our operations.
Inflation, the current interest rate environment, and other adverse economic conditions may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
General global economic downturns and macroeconomic trends, including heightened inflation, capital market volatility, interest rate fluctuations, tariffs, and economic slowdown or recession, may result in unfavorable conditions that could negatively affect demand for our products and solutions and exacerbate some of the other risks that affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Domestic markets experienced significant inflationary pressures in 2024, and although inflationary pressures decreased to an extent in 2025, no assurance can be provided that such pressures will not increase again in the near or long term. Threats of multinational tariffs and retaliatory tariffs provide uncertainty as to
Table of Contents
heightened inflation in the domestic markets in the next twelve months. In an inflationary environment, we may experience increases in the prices of labor and other costs of doing business. Additionally, cost increases may outpace our expectations, causing us to use our cash and other liquid assets faster than forecasted. If we are unable to successfully manage the effects of inflation, our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition may be adversely affected. The occurrence or perception of an economic slowdown or recession, or of a further increase in inflation, may have a negative impact on the global economy and may reduce customer demand for our products and services.
In addition, macroeconomic effects such as changes in interest rates, potential tariffs, and other measures taken by central banks and other policy makers could have a negative effect on overall economic activity that could reduce our customers’ demand for our products and services. Changing interest rates may have unpredictable effects on markets, may result in heightened market volatility and may detract from our performance to the extent we are exposed to such interest rates and/or volatility. An adjustment in rates would impact our variable rate debt. If interest rates increase or remain elevated, we could face higher debt service requirements, which would adversely affect our cash flow and could adversely impact our results of operations. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs, we could need to restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt. Any refinancing of indebtedness could be at higher interest rates, thereby resulting in an overall increase in interest expense.
Adverse changes in demand could impact our business, collection of accounts receivable and our expected cash flow generation, which may adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Impairment charges for goodwill or other long-lived assets may need to be recognized, lose a major customer or experience changes to the regulatory environment affecting pharmaceutical advertising restricting the use of our technology.
Annually, we evaluate goodwill and long-lived assets to determine if impairment has occurred. Additionally, interim reviews are performed whenever events or changes to the business could indicate possible impairment. The future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment could include matters such as (i) a decrease in expected net earnings, (ii) adverse equity market conditions, (iii) a decline in current market multiples, (iv) a decline in our common stock price, (v) a significant adverse change in legal factors or the general business climate, and (vi) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. Any future impairment of our goodwill or long-lived assets could require us to record an impairment charge, which would negatively impact our results of operations. An impairment could be recorded as a result of changes in assumptions, estimates or circumstances, some of which are beyond our control. Since a number of factors may influence determinations of fair value, we are unable to predict whether impairments of goodwill and other long-lived assets will occur in the future, and we can provide no assurance that continued conditions will not result in future impairments of these assets. For example, i n 2023, the Company licensed certain technology to a customer under a two year agreement. Upon receiving notice that the contract would not be renewed in 2025, and as the Company no longer utilizes the underlying technology, the patents and tradenames associated with this technology were determined to be fully impaired. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $368 was recorded and included in impairment charges within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025. See Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operation of the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 - Operating Expenses.”
Market conditions could adversely change and our earnings could decline resulting in charges to impair intangible assets, such as goodwill.
As a result of our various acquisitions, the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2025 contains goodwill of approximately $70,869 and intangible assets, net of approximately $40,796 . We evaluate on an ongoing basis whether facts and circumstances indicate any impairment to the carrying value of indefinite-lived intangible assets such as goodwill. As circumstances after an acquisition can change, we may not realize the value of these intangible assets. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recorded impairment charges, related to goodwill, of approximately $0 and $7,489, respectively . The Company recorded impairment charges of $368 and $0 against the value of our intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Any future impairment charges related to our goodwill
Table of Contents
or long-lived assets could require us to record additional impairment charges, which would negatively impact our results of operations.
Geopolitical events may affect our business and our customer base and have a material adverse impact on our sales and operating results.
Our results of operations may be affected by the conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally, both in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world. The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine have caused uncertainty in the credit markets and could cause our customers and potential customers to postpone or reduce spending on technology products or services or put downward pressure on prices, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
General Risk Factors
Our business and growth may suffer if we are unable to attract and retain members of our senior management team and other key employees.
Our success has been largely dependent on the skills, experience and efforts of our senior management team and key employees and the loss of the services of any of our senior management team or other key employees, without a properly executed transition plan, could have an adverse effect on us. The loss of any member of our senior management team or any of our other key employees could damage critical customer relationships, result in the loss of vital knowledge, experience and expertise, lead to an increase in recruitment and training costs, and make it more difficult to successfully operate our business and execute our business strategy. We may not be able to find qualified potential replacements for these individuals and the integration of potential replacements may be disruptive to our business. Furthermore, our business also depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified management, sales and technical personnel. However, competition for these types of employees is intense due to the limited number of qualified professionals with expertise in our industry. Our ability to meet our business development objectives will depend in part on our ability to recruit, train, incentivize, and retain top quality people with advanced skills who understand our industry, technology, and business. Our compensation arrangements, including our equity award programs, are essential to retaining our senior management team and other key employees, but may not always be successful in attracting new employees or retaining and motivating our existing key employees for reasons that may include movement in our stock price or our ability to maintain or increase our equity pool. If we are unable to engage, incentivize, and retain the necessary personnel, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
The impact and effects of public health crises, pandemics and epidemics could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
The actual or perceived effects of an epidemic, pandemic, or similar widespread public health concern could negatively affect our business, financial condition, and result of operations. The extent to which a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease impacts our operations will depend on future occurrences, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of any outbreak and the actions to contain or treat its impact, among others. We are prepared to take steps to modify our business practices and mitigate the impact of the emergence and spread of new variants and resurgences, or another pandemic or epidemic; however, there can be no assurance that such steps will be successful, or that our business operations, or the operations of our customers or partners will not be materially and adversely affected by the consequences of such pandemic or epidemic, which could materially impact our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
If a market for our common stock is not maintained, shareholders may be unable to sell their shares.
Our common stock is traded under the symbol “OPRX” on the Nasdaq Capital Market. We do not currently have a consistent active trading market. There can be no assurance that a consistent active and liquid trading market will develop or, if developed, that it will be sustained.
Historically, our securities have been thinly traded. Accordingly, it may be difficult to sell shares of our common stock without significantly depressing the value of the stock. Unless we are successful in developing continued investor interest in our stock, sales of our stock could continue to result in major fluctuations in the price of the stock.
Table of Contents
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Our stock price is subject to a number of factors, many of which are out of our control, including:
• Factors generally affecting the broader life-sciences, pharmaceutical, and digital marketing industries;
• Technological innovations or new solutions and services by us or our competitors;
• Government regulation of our solutions and services;
• The establishment of partnerships with other healthcare companies;
• Intellectual property disputes;
• Additions or departures of key personnel;
• Consolidation within the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries leading to fewer potential clients for our products and services;
• Sales of our common stock;
• Trading volume of our common stock;
• Our ability to execute our business plan;
• Operating results below or exceeding expectations;
• Our operating and financial performance and prospects;
• Loss or addition of any strategic relationship;
• General financial, domestic, international, economic, industry and other market trends or conditions; and
• Period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.
Our stock price fluctuated widely in 2025, and may continue to fluctuate widely, as a result of any of the above. In addition, the securities markets have from time-to-time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price or liquidity of our common stock.
We do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future and any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and future earnings, if any, to fund our future growth and do not expect to declare or pay any dividend on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, the success of an investment in our common stock may depend entirely upon any future appreciation in its value. There is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which it is purchased.
Certain provision of our articles of incorporation, bylaws and Nevada law may discourage takeover attempts and business combinations that shareholders might consider in their best interests.
The Company is a Nevada corporation. Anti-takeover provisions in Nevada law, our articles of incorporation, and Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “bylaws”) could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire control of us. These provisions could adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could reduce the amount that shareholders might receive if the Company is sold. For example, our articles of incorporation provide that the Board may issue, without shareholder approval, preferred stock in one or more series, with such voting power, full or limited, or without voting
Table of Contents
powers and with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issue thereof adopted by the Board. Such a series of preferred stock could be designated in connection with the adoption by the Board of a shareholder rights plan. Pursuant to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) §78.195(5), Nevada corporations are generally permitted to adopt shareholder rights plans without shareholder approval. In addition, our bylaws require shareholders to provide proper and timely advance notice of their intent to bring director nominations or other business before an annual meeting of shareholders, provide that the Company’s secretary is only required to call shareholder requested special meetings upon the written request of shareholders who together own of record not less than 50.1% of the capital stock of the Company issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at such meeting, shareholders cannot act by written consent and that directors may be removed by shareholders only with the approval of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the voting power of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote at an annual or special meeting of the shareholders.
Nevada has a business combination law (NRS §78.411 through §78.444, inclusive) which prohibits certain business combinations between certain Nevada corporations and any person deemed to be an “interested stockholders” for two years after the “interested stockholder” first becomes an “interested stockholder,” unless the Board approves the combination in advance or thereafter by both the Board and 60% of the disinterested stockholders. For purposes of Nevada law, an “interested stockholder” is any person who is (i) the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation, or (ii) an affiliate or associate of the corporation and at any time within the two previous years was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of the corporation. The definition of the term “business combination” is sufficiently broad to cover virtually any kind of transaction that would allow a potential acquirer to use the corporation’s assets to finance the acquisition or otherwise to benefit its own interests rather than the interests of the corporation and its other stockholders. This law generally applies to Nevada corporations with 200 or more stockholders of record. The effect of Nevada’s business combination law is to potentially discourage parties interested in taking control of us from doing so if it cannot obtain the approval of the Board. Pursuant to NRS 78.434, a Nevada corporation may elect in its articles of incorporation not to be governed by these particular laws, but if such election is not made in the corporation’s original articles of incorporation, the amendment (1) must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of stock representing a majority of the outstanding voting power of the corporation not beneficially owned by interested stockholders or their affiliates and associates, and (2) is not effective until 18 months after the vote approving the amendment and does not apply to any combination with a person who first became an interested stockholder on or before the effective date of the amendment. We have not made such an election in our original articles of incorporation, and we have not amended our articles of incorporation to so elect. The NRS also contains provisions governing the acquisition of a controlling interest in certain Nevada corporations. Nevada’s “acquisition of controlling interest” statutes (NRS §78.378 through §78.3793, inclusive) govern the acquisition of a controlling interest in certain Nevada corporations. These “control share” laws provide generally that any person that acquires a “controlling interest” in certain Nevada corporations may be denied voting rights, unless a majority of the disinterested stockholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights. These laws will apply to us as of a particular date if we were to have 200 or more stockholders of record (at least 100 of whom have addresses in Nevada appearing on our stock ledger at all times during the 90 days immediately preceding that date) and do business in the State of Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation, unless our articles of incorporation or bylaws in effect on the tenth day after the acquisition of a controlling interest provide otherwise. These laws provide that a person acquires a “controlling interest” whenever a person acquires shares of a subject corporation that, but for the application of these provisions of the NRS, would enable that person to exercise (1) one-fifth or more, but less than one-third, (2) one-third or more, but less than a majority or (3) a majority or more, of all of the voting power of the corporation in the election of directors. Once an acquirer crosses one of these thresholds, shares which it acquired in the transaction taking it over the threshold and within the 90 days immediately preceding the date when the acquiring person acquired or offered to acquire a controlling interest become “control shares” to which the voting restrictions described above apply. These laws may have a chilling effect on certain transactions if our articles of incorporation or bylaws are not amended to provide that these provisions do not apply to us or to an acquisition of a controlling interest, or if our disinterested stockholders do not confer voting rights in the control shares.
In addition, Nevada law also provides that directors may resist a change or potential change in control of the corporation if the board of directors determines that the change or potential change is opposed to or not in the best interest of the corporation upon consideration of any relevant facts, circumstances, contingencies or constituencies.
Actions of activist stockholders could be disruptive and costly and could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and/or share price.
Table of Contents
While we strive to maintain constructive communications with our stockholders, we may, from time to time, be subject to demands from activist stockholders. Any activist campaign against the Company that contests, conflicts with, or seeks to change, the Board composition, leadership, strategic direction, or business mix could have an adverse effect on us because: (i) responding to actions by activist stockholders could disrupt our operations, be costly or time-consuming, or divert the attention of the Board and senior management from their regular duties, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition; (ii) perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, including as a result of possible changes to the composition of the Board, may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of the business or lack of continuity, any of which may be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our customers, employees, and/or business partners and result in the loss of potential business opportunities, or make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, and may adversely affect our relationships with vendors, customers, business partners, and other third parties; (iii) these types of actions could cause significant fluctuations in our share price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business; and (iv) if individuals are elected to the Board with a specific agenda, it may adversely affect our ability to effectively implement our business strategy and create additional value for our stockholders.
Risks Related to Being a Public Company
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Failure to remediate the material weakness or any other material weaknesses that we identify in the future could result in material misstatements in our future financial statements.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, our management is required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The rules governing the standards that must be met for management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation. Annually, we perform activities that include reviewing, documenting and testing our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, we will not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could result in significant expenses to remediate any internal control deficiencies and lead to a decline in our stock price.
The Company has identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. To address such material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, the Company performed additional analyses and other procedures to prepare the audited consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ( “ GAAP ” ). Accordingly, management believes that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. For further discussion of the material weaknesses, see Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures.”
We cannot provide assurance that we have identified all, or that we will not in the future have additional, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we may be required to implement further remedial measures and to design enhanced processes and controls to address deficiencies. If we do not effectively remediate the material weakness identified by management and maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting in the future, we may not be able to prepare reliable financial reports and comply with our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act on a timely basis. Any such delays in the preparation of financial reports and the filing of our periodic reports may result in a loss of public confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which, in turn, could materially adversely affect our business, the market value of our common stock and our access to capital markets.
Conflicting views on environmental, social and governance matters may have a negative impact on our business, impose additional costs on us, and expose us to additional risks.
Certain stakeholders have pressured companies on initiatives relating to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters, including environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and corporate governance. Organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters, which in turn, are used by some investors to inform their investment and
Table of Contents
voting decisions. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to achieve our goals, further our initiatives, adhere to our public statements, comply with federal, state or international ESG laws and regulations, or meet evolving and varied stakeholder expectations and standards could result in reputational harm, loss of investor confidence, legal and regulatory proceedings against us and materially affect our business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.
In recent years, “anti-ESG” sentiment has gained momentum across the United States, with several states and the federal government having proposed or enacted anti-ESG policies, legislation or initiatives, or issued related legal opinions. Additionally, the current Executive Branch administration’s initiatives and executive actions surrounding ESG and diversity, equity, and inclusion matters (“DEI”) may conflict with our stakeholder initiatives on such matters, which may cause us to experience conflicts between governmental regulations and stakeholder expectations which could impose additional costs on our business and negatively impact investor sentiment. The current Executive Branch administration also recently issued an executive order opposing DEI initiatives in the private sector. Such anti-ESG and anti-DEI-related policies, legislation, initiatives, litigation, legal opinions and scrutiny could result in us facing additional compliance obligations, becoming the subject of investigations, enforcement actions or litigation, sustaining reputational harm, and/or requiring certain investors to divest, or discouraging certain investors from investing in the Company.
