insiderdeltaSEC filings, surfaced and scored

CoverageForm 410-K10-Q8-K13D13G13F

Landstar System Inc

LSTRCIK 0000853816 · Every Form 4 filed by insiders at this issuer. See financials →

Annual report (10-K)

Latest 10-K filed Feb 24, 2026. Sentiment + YoY language diff vs prior year. Read sections →

Signal:Mild negative shift

Risk Factors:tone -0.0295Δ-0.002275% similar+30/-15 ¶

MD&A:tone -0.0143Δ-0.004388% similar+47/-40 ¶

Sentiment via Loughran-McDonald lexicon · YoY diff via Jaccard similarity + paragraph set difference.

Recent 8-K announcements

Per-item disclosure feed. Item 2.02 is the earnings release.

May 6, 2026no items parsed Apr 28, 2026no items parsed Apr 2, 2026no items parsed Jan 28, 2026no items parsed Jan 21, 2026no items parsed

Top insiders

Most active reporters at Landstar System Inc

Name	Roles	Filings
Bannister David G/	Director	6
Gattoni James B	OfficerDirector	6
Liang James L	Director	6
White Teresa L	Director	6
Cooper Aimee M	Officer	5

Showing 6-10 of 22

Per pagePrevPage 2 of 5Next

All filings

102 Form 4 / 4-A filings, newest first

Filed	Insider	Top transaction	Shares	Price	Value
May 8, 2026	Akbari Dr. Homaira Director	AGrant	825	$0.00	$0

Filed		Top transaction	Shares	Price	Value

YoY shift: Lean -

Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is -0.33pp more bearish than last year's.

Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.

Tone shift by section

The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.

Risk Factors

-0.22pp

Flat

Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.

MD&A

-0.43pp

Lean -

Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.

Per-snippet highlights

Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.

Language change vs prior 10-K

Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase

Negative rising

claims+16
fraud+12
hazardous+7
adverse+5
loss+5

Positive rising

able+3
efficiently+3
successfully+2
favorable+2
efficiency+1

Risk Factors (Item 1A)

8,031 words

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Operational Risks

Increased severity or frequency of accidents and other claims or a material unfavorable development of existing claims. As noted above in Item 1, “ Business — Factors Significant to the Company ’ s Operations — Self-Insured Claims ,” potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable. Landstar retains liability through a self-insured retention for commercial trucking claims up to $5 million per occurrence. Historically, these third party insurance arrangements were based on policy year periods beginning on May 1 and ending on the subsequent April 30. Beginning with the policy year period commencing May 1, 2025, the Company and its third party insurance providers adjusted the applicable policy year period, beginning in 2026, to commence on June 1 and end on the subsequent May 31. All applicable third party insurance arrangements with a policy period ending April 30, 2026 have been amended to provide for a policy period ending May 31, 2026, as reflected below.

Effective May 1, 2023, the Company entered into a three year commercial auto liability insurance arrangement for losses incurred between $5 million and $10 million (the “2023 Initial Excess Policy”) with a third party insurance company. For commercial trucking claims incurred on or after May 1, 2023 through May 31, 2026, the 2023 Initial Excess Policy provides for an aggregate deductible of $18 million over the thirty-seven-month term ending May 31, 2026. After payment of the deductible, the 2023 Initial Excess Policy provides for a limit for a single loss of $5 million, with an aggregate limit of $15 million for the thirty-seven-month term ending May 31, 2026.

The Company also maintains third party insurance arrangements providing excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10 million. These third party arrangements provide coverage on a per occurrence or aggregated basis. Over the past fifteen years, there has been a significant increase in the occurrence of trials in courts throughout the United States involving catastrophic injury and fatality claims against commercial motor carriers that have resulted in verdicts in excess of $10 million. Within the transportation logistics industry, these verdicts are often referred to as “Nuclear Verdicts.” The increase in Nuclear Verdicts has had a significant impact on the cost of commercial auto liability claims throughout the United States. Due to the increasing cost of commercial auto liability claims, the availability of excess coverage has significantly decreased, and the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, has significantly increased. Since the annual policy year ended April 30, 2020, as compared to the annual policy year ending May 31, 2026, the Company experienced an increase of approximately $22 million, or approximately 400%, in the premiums charged by third party insurance companies to the Company for excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10 million.

In addition to the significant increase in the cost to motor carriers relating to commercial auto liability claims throughout the United States, there has also been a very significant increase throughout the United States in the number of, and potential loss exposure associated with, claims asserted against freight brokers in connection with accidents involving motor carriers the freight broker has engaged and contracted with to haul a shipment. The claims asserted against freight brokers often involve claims of

Table of Contents

negligent selection of the motor carrier who was involved in the relevant accident. Within the transportation logistics industry, these matters are often referred to as “Broker Liability Claims.” For example, see the discussion of the Cabral Matter (as defined below) in Item 7, “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Legal Proceedings. ” There is currently significant legal uncertainty regarding Broker Liability Claims as state and federal courts across the United States are divided as to whether such claims are preempted by federal law under the FAAAA, or are subject to the “safety exception” under the FAAAA. The matter of Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, in which the Company is not a party, is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court and may result in a ruling relating to federal preemption of Broker Liability Claims under the FAAAA. No assurances can be provided as to any such ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, the timing thereof, or the impact any such ruling may have on pending or future Broker Liability Claims asserted against the Company, including the Cabral Matter.

Moreover, the Company from year to year manages the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims in excess of $10 million, including through the use of additional self-insurance, deductibles, aggregate loss limits, quota shares and other structured arrangements with third party insurance companies, based on the availability of coverage within certain excess insurance coverage layers and estimated cost differentials between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company at various levels of excess insurance coverage. For example, with respect to a single hypothetical claim in the amount of $65 million incurred during the annual policy year ending May 31, 2026, the Company would have an aggregate financial exposure of approximately $36 million.

Within the Company’s third party insurance arrangements providing excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities, structured arrangements with third party reinsurers within a specific loss layer may include provisions that require additional payments of premium in the event of unfavorable loss experience or a refund of premium in the event of favorable loss experience. During the 2025 fiscal year, with respect to one such three-year commercial auto liability reinsurance arrangement relating to certain excess claims incurred between May 1, 2020 through April 30, 2023, the Company received $12,000,000 of cash payments from third party reinsurance providers in the form of a “no claims bonus” due to favorable loss experience with respect to claims incurred during the applicable policy period. As further described in Note 11 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in connection with the Judgment (as defined below) in the Cabral Matter, the Company has recorded the “no bonus” within current insurance in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 27, 2025. The Company intends to vigorously appeal the Cabral Matter, including the Judgment; however, no assurances can be provided regarding whether the Company will ultimately be to recognize a with respect to the “no bonus.” For more information about the Cabral Matter, see Item 7, “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Legal Proceedings .”

Furthermore, the Company’s third party insurance arrangements provide excess coverage up to an uppermost coverage layer, in excess of which the Company retains additional financial exposure. No assurances can be given that the availability of excess coverage for commercial trucking claims will not continue to deteriorate, that the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, will not continue to increase, nor that insurance coverage from third party insurers for excess coverage of commercial trucking claims will even be available on commercially reasonable terms at certain levels. Moreover, the occurrence of a Nuclear Verdict, or the settlement of a catastrophic injury and/or fatality claim that could have otherwise resulted in a Nuclear Verdict, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

As noted below in Item 1, “ Legal, Tax, Regulatory and Compliance Risks — Regulatory and legislative changes ,” several of the Operating Subsidiaries maintain a federal hazardous materials safety permit in connection with the Company’s transportation of hazardous substances. In the event the Company is involved in a spill or other accident involving hazardous substances, there is a release of hazardous materials while such hazardous materials are being transported by the Company, or Landstar is found to be in violation of or fail to comply with applicable environmental laws or regulations in connection with the transportation of hazardous materials, the Company could be subject to clean-up costs and liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

The Company retains liability of up to $2,000,000 for each general liability claim, $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and $250,000 for each cargo claim. In addition, under reinsurance arrangements by Signature of certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors, the Company retains liability of up to $500,000, $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 with respect to certain occupational accident claims and up to $750,000 with respect to certain workers’ compensation claims. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various legal defenses and other factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage.

Table of Contents

In recent years, the amount and sophistication of fraud and cargo theft throughout the freight transportation and logistics supply chain has significantly increased. In particular, “strategic” cargo theft refers to instances when bad actors incorporate deceptive tactics to commit cargo theft. Such tactics may involve the use of fraud to deceive shippers, brokers, and/or carriers using a combination of methods including identity theft and impersonation, fictitious track-and-trace information, fictitious proof of delivery information and fraudulent carrier schemes. The Company has experienced, and may continue to experience, increases in the amount of cargo theft, including strategic cargo theft, resulting in increased exposure to liability from cargo claims. The Company has also experienced, and may continue to experience, incidences of other types of supply chain fraud, for example the fraud referenced in Note 19 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims, or workers’ compensation claims, claims in connection with the transportation of hazardous materials, or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s business, cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

Dependence on third party insurance companies. The Company is dependent on a limited number of third party insurance companies to provide insurance coverage in excess of its self-insured retention amounts. Historically, the Company has maintained insurance coverage for commercial trucking claims in excess of its self-insured retention, up to various maximum amounts, with a limited number of third party insurance companies. In an attempt to manage the cost of insurance and claims, the Company has historically increased or decreased the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims by increasing or decreasing its level of self-insured retention based on the estimated cost differential between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company at various levels of self-insured retention. Similarly, in its excess insurance layers, the Company may increase or decrease the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims, including through the use of additional self-insurance as well as deductibles, aggregate loss limits, quota shares and other arrangements with third party insurance companies, based on the estimated cost differential between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected experienced by the Company at various levels of excess insurance coverage. To the extent that the third party insurance companies propose increases to their premiums for coverage of commercial trucking , the Company may decide to pay such increased premiums or increase its financial exposure on an aggregate, per occurrence or other basis, including by increasing the amount of its self-insured retention. In fact, in recent years, several of the largest third party insurers providing excess coverage for commercial trucking in the United States announced that in light of increased trends related to the increase in attributable to , they would no longer provide such coverage. Decisions by these third party insurers to exit this line of business have had a significant impact on the availability and pricing of excess coverage for commercial trucking in the United States. No assurances can be given that other third party insurers will not also decide to exit the market as a provider of excess coverage for commercial trucking in the United States, which could have a further effect on the availability and pricing of such coverage. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that insurance coverage from third party insurers for in excess of the Company’s current self-insured retentions will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms.

Dependence on independent commission sales agents. As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Agent Network,” the Company markets its services primarily through independent commission sales agents. During fiscal year 2025, 457 agents generated revenue for Landstar of at least $1 million each, or in the aggregate approximately 95% of Landstar’s consolidated revenue. Included among these Million Dollar Agents, 77 agents generated at least $10,000,000 of Landstar revenue during the 2025 fiscal year, or in the aggregate approximately 68% of Landstar’s consolidated revenue. Of these larger agencies, two such Landstar independent commission sales agencies each generated over 10% of Landstar’s consolidated revenue, or in the aggregate approximately $994,000,000, or 21%, of Landstar’s consolidated revenue and approximately 16% of Landstar’s consolidated variable contribution in fiscal year 2025.

A number of these larger agencies, including the second largest of Landstar’s independent commission sales agents by revenue, maintain administrative operations in countries outside of North America where the risks may be different than in the United States or Canada due to geopolitical, legal or other risks associated with maintaining administrative operations in such foreign jurisdictions. There can be no assurance regarding the potential disruption and impact adverse geopolitical developments in these foreign jurisdictions could have on the ability of certain large independent commission sales agents to generate and maintain administrative operations in support of significant amounts of Landstar revenue. As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 28, 2022, the second largest Landstar independent commission sales agency by 2025 revenue referenced above, while based in the United States, has significant administrative operations located in Ukraine. The administrative operations of this agency were significantly disrupted during the onset of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and continue to be affected by the ongoing conflict. The Company also has another of its largest independent commission sales agencies, as measured by revenue, that is based in the United States but conducts a portion of its administrative operations in

Table of Contents

western Ukraine. Russian efforts to destroy infrastructure throughout Ukraine has impacted the availability of electricity and other basic utilities at various times throughout the country. The priority for Landstar and both of these agencies is the safety and well-being of these agencies’ Ukrainian workforces and their families. No assurances can be provided regarding the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the extent of potential future operational disruption the conflict may have on either of these Landstar agencies and the related impact of these disruptions on the Company.

Landstar competes with motor carriers and other third parties for the services of independent commission sales agents. Landstar has historically experienced very limited agent turnover in the number of its Million Dollar Agents. There can be no assurances, however, that Landstar will continue to experience very limited turnover of its Million Dollar Agents in the future. Landstar’s contracts with its agents, including its Million Dollar Agents, are typically terminable without cause upon 10 to 30 days’ notice by either party and generally contain significant but not unqualified restrictive covenants limiting the ability of a former agent to compete with Landstar for a specified period of time post-termination, and other restrictive covenants. The loss of some of the Company’s Million Dollar Agents and/or a significant decrease in revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and revenue.

Dependence on third party capacity providers. As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Third Party Capacity,” Landstar does not own trucks or other transportation equipment other than trailing equipment and relies on third party capacity providers, including BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers, to transport freight for its customers. The Company competes with motor carriers and other third parties for the services of BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers. The market for qualified truck owner-operators and other third party truck capacity providers is very competitive among motor carriers, third party logistics companies and others and no assurances can be given that the Company will be able to maintain or expand the number of BCO Independent Contractors or other third party truck capacity providers. Additionally, the Company’s third party capacity providers other than BCO Independent Contractors can be expected, under certain circumstances, to charge higher prices to cover increased operating expenses, such as any increases in the cost of fuel, labor, equipment or insurance, and the Company’s operating income may decline without a corresponding increase in price to the customer. A significant decrease in available capacity provided by either the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors or other third party capacity providers, or increased rates charged by other third party capacity providers that cannot be passed through to customers, could have a material effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and revenue.

Disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems; cyber and other information security incidents. As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Technology,” the Company’s information technology systems used in connection with its operations are located in Jacksonville, Florida and to a lesser extent in Rockford, Illinois. In addition, the Company utilizes several third party data centers throughout the United States. Landstar relies, in the regular course of its business, on the proper operation of its information technology systems to link its extensive network of customers, employees, agents and third party capacity providers, including its BCO Independent Contractors. Moreover, a majority of the Company’s employees work remotely or on a hybrid basis. Although the Company has redundant systems for its critical operations, any significant disruption or failure of its technology systems or those of third party data centers on which it relies could significantly disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company. Moreover, it is critical that the data processed by or stored in the Company’s information technology systems or otherwise in the Company’s possession remain confidential, as it often includes confidential, proprietary and/or competitively sensitive information regarding our customers, employees, agents and third party capacity providers, key financial and operational results and statistics, and our strategic plans, including technology , developments and . Cyber that impact the security, availability, reliability, speed, accuracy or other proper functioning of these systems and data, including , computer viruses, -ins and similar , could have a significant impact on our operations. Accordingly, information security and the continued development and of the controls and processes designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, or access, including from AI attacks, remain a priority for us. Our information systems and those of our third party service providers have been, and will likely continue to be, targeted by or subject to viruses, malware or other codes, access, cyber-attacks, cyber , ransomware or other occurrences which the confidentiality, or availability of our information or information systems. Cybersecurity are rapidly evolving and those and the means for obtaining access to our systems are becoming increasingly sophisticated. Cybersecurity can originate from a wide variety of sources including terrorists, nation states, financially motivated actors, hacktivists, internal actors, or third parties, such as external service providers or other third parties who may use an external service provider as a conduit to access our systems, and the techniques used change frequently and often are not recognized until after they have been launched. The rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence technologies may intensify our cybersecurity risks including the deployment of artificial intelligence technologies by actors. Although we

Table of Contents

believe that we have robust security procedures and other safeguards in place, as threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any security vulnerabilities. At any given time, we face known and unknown cybersecurity risks and threats that are not fully mitigated, and we may discover vulnerabilities as we continuously work to enhance our cybersecurity risk management program. A significant incident, including system failure, security breach, disruption by malware or ransomware, or other damage, could interrupt or delay our operations, damage our reputation with customers, agents, third party capacity providers, employees, vendors, investors or other stakeholders, cause a of customers, agents and/or third party capacity providers, us to a risk of or , and/or cause us to incur significant time and expense to remedy such an event, any of which could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Although the Company maintains cybersecurity and business interruption insurance, the Company’s insurance may not be adequate to cover all losses that may be incurred in the event of a significant disruption or failure of its information technology systems. In addition, cybersecurity and business interruption insurance could in the future become more expensive and difficult to maintain and may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Dependence on key vendors. As described above under “ Dependence on third party insurance companies ” and “ Disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems; cyber and other information security incidents, ” the Company is dependent on certain vendors, including third party insurance companies, third party data center providers, third party information technology application providers and third party payment disbursement providers. Any inability to negotiate satisfactory terms with one of these key vendors or any other significant disruption to or termination of a relationship with one of these key vendors could disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company.

Adoption of artificial intelligence (“AI”). The Company uses, and will continue to expand its use of, machine learning and AI technologies to deliver services and operate its business. If the Company fails to successfully integrate AI into its digital ecosystem and business processes, or if it fails to keep pace with rapidly evolving AI technological developments, including attracting and retaining talented AI developers and programmers and cybersecurity personnel, the Company may face a competitive disadvantage. At the same time, the use or offering of AI technologies may result in new or expanded risks and liabilities, including enhanced government or regulatory scrutiny, litigation, privacy and compliance issues, ethical or confidentiality concerns, reputational harm, and security risks. It is not possible to predict all of the risks related to the use of AI, and changes in laws, rules, directives, and regulations governing the use of AI may adversely affect the Company’s ability to develop and use AI or subject it to legal liability. The cost of complying with laws and regulations governing AI could be significant and could increase our operating expenses, which could affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, market demand and acceptance of AI technologies, including by our independent commission sales agents and BCO Independent Contractors, are uncertain, and we may be in efforts to further incorporate AI into our ecosystem of digital tools that are designed to: (i) assist Landstar independent commission sales agents in sourcing capacity, pricing transportation services and managing and analyzing the performance of their independent businesses, (ii) assist customers in meeting their transportation needs, (iii) assist third party capacity providers in identifying freight and operating their independent businesses, and (iv) operational and administrative throughout the Company.

Acquisitions, Divestitures and Investments. The Company periodically considers acquisitions and equity investments that it believes are strategically important based on the potential that any such acquisition or investment candidate would further strengthen the Company’s strategic goals and service offerings. The Company makes no assurance that it will be able to successfully achieve its strategic goals as it relates to any such acquisition or investment. Further, the Company may have difficulties integrating acquired companies or efficiently managing divestitures. For potential acquisitions, success may depend upon efficiently integrating the acquired business into our existing systems and operations. If we complete a large acquisition or multiple acquisitions within a short period of time, we may experience heightened difficulties integrating the acquired companies. The Company would also be required to integrate these acquired businesses into our internal control environment, which may present that are different than those presented by organic growth and that may be to manage. If we are to integrate and grow any acquired businesses and to realize contemplated revenue synergies and cost savings from such acquisitions, our business, prospects, results of operations, financial position, and cash flows could be materially and affected.

During 2017, the Company established Landstar Metro, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (“Landstar Metro”), which acquired substantially all of the assets of the asset-light transportation logistics business of Fletes Avella, S.A. de C.V. Landstar Metro provides freight and logistics services within Mexico and in conjunction with Landstar’s U.S.-Mexico cross-border services. The Company’s initial investment in Landstar Metro was approximately $8.5 million. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in Landstar

Table of Contents

Metro, as of December 27, 2025, was approximately $6.5 million, reflecting additional investment and the results of operations of Landstar Metro since inception, less non-cash impairment charges. Landstar Metro is subject to certain risks arising from doing business in Mexico, including: changes in Mexico’s economic strength; changes in trade agreements, US-Mexico trade relations, or the imposition of tariffs on imports from Mexico and related retaliatory tariffs that may be imposed by the Mexican government; disruptions related to port of entry restrictions; difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations; foreign currency fluctuations; theft or vandalism of equipment; and social, political, and economic instability. As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2025, in connection with an annual strategic review of the Company’s operations, the Company determined that Landstar Metro has not been able to meet the Company’s strategic or operational goals and expectations, and, in connection therewith, the Company entered into an arrangement with a financial advisor to actively market Landstar Metro and consider strategic alternatives for this business, which may involve a sale or other disposition in whole or in part of Landstar Metro. No assurances can be provided regarding any potential sale or other disposition of Landstar Metro and whether any additional non-cash charges or other additional charges and expenses will be incurred by the Company in connection with this sale process or upon any ultimate disposition of Landstar Metro.

Economic, Competitive and Industry Risks

Decreased demand for transportation services; U.S. trade relationships and potential or imposed tariffs. The transportation industry historically has experienced cyclical financial results as a result of slowdowns in economic activity, the business cycles of customers, and other economic factors beyond Landstar’s control. If a slowdown in economic activity or a downturn in the Company’s customers’ business cycles causes a reduction in the volume of freight shipped by those customers, the Company’s operating results could be materially adversely affected.

Moreover, Landstar hauls a significant number of shipments that have either been imported into the United States or are destined for export from the United States. There is significant uncertainty in the marketplace as to the potential actions of the U.S. government with respect to international trade policy, and the impact of tariffs may significantly adversely impact our customers, our industry, and our business. The U.S. government has made significant changes in U.S. trade policy, including the imposition on April 2, 2025, of a baseline tariff of 10% on product imports from almost all countries and individualized higher tariffs on certain other countries. While the announcement of the tariffs has been followed by announcements of limited exceptions and temporary pauses, certain foreign governments either have taken or are threatening to take retaliatory actions in response. The changes in U.S. trade policy and tariffs have caused uncertainty and volatility in financial markets. Further, there is potential for significant disruption with respect to trade between the United States and, respectively, Mexico and Canada, in connection with the anticipated review in 2026 of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement and related potential impacts on trade, tariffs and border duties and taxes throughout North America. Moreover, on February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. government cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) to impose tariffs, certain recent tariffs announced throughout 2025, including those on global imports from China, Canada and Mexico. This decision creates uncertainty about the immediate path forward for many supply chains, as billions of dollars in duties are now in and the process for potential refunds remains unclear. Further, not all tariffs announced throughout 2025 will be impacted by this U.S. Supreme Court decision since many tariffs were imposed under other legal authorities that remain in effect and new tariffs may continue to be implemented through these other legal authorities. Tariffs or other trade restrictions may lead to continuing uncertainty and in U.S. and global financial and economic conditions, consumer confidence, inflation or an economic . These tariffs or other trade restrictions, including corresponding actions taken by other countries in response to U.S. governmental actions or continuing uncertainty around the timing, scope, level, magnitude, duration and product range of tariffs, could have an economic impact in the markets in which the Company operates, could cause reduced demand for the Company’s services and a reduction in the volume of shipments transported by the Company’s network, and could have a material effect on Landstar’s results of operations.

Substantial industry competition. As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Competition,” Landstar competes primarily in the transportation and logistics services industry. This industry is extremely competitive and fragmented. Landstar competes primarily with truckload carriers, intermodal transportation service providers, railroads, less-than-truckload carriers, third party logistics companies, freight brokers and other asset-light transportation and logistics service providers. Management believes that competition for the freight transported by the Company is based on service, efficiency, safety and freight rates, which are influenced significantly by the economic environment, particularly the amount of available transportation capacity and freight demand. In recent years, the use of technology and the implementation of technology-based innovations, which may increasingly incorporate AI, have become increasingly important to compete within the transportation and logistics industry. In particular, management believes leadership in the development, operation and support of an ecosystem of digital technologies and applications is an ongoing part of providing high quality service. The failure of the Company to maintain or enhance its technology ecosystem in response to changing demands from customers, agents, and capacity providers could have a significant adverse impact on Landstar’s ability to compete for customers, agents and capacity providers in the transportation and logistics industry.

Table of Contents

In addition, competition in our industry, historically, has created downward pressure on freight rates. Many large shippers use 3PLs other than the Company to outsource the management and coordination of their transportation needs rather than directly arrange for transportation services with carriers. As noted above, there were eight transportation service providers, including 3PLs, included in the Company’s top 25 customers for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2025. Usage by large shippers of 3PLs often provides carriers, such as the Company, with a less direct relationship with the shipper and, as a result, may increase pressure on freight rates while making it more difficult for the Company to compete primarily based on service and efficiency. A prolonged decrease in freight rates could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its revenue and operating income.

Legal, Tax, Regulatory and Compliance Risks

Status of independent contractors. For many years, the topic of the classification of individuals as employees or independent contractors has garnered significant attention among federal and state regulators as well as the plaintiffs’ bar. Various legislative or regulatory proposals have been introduced at the federal and state levels that may affect the classification status of individuals as independent contractors or employees for either employment tax purposes (e.g., withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees (most notably, workers’ compensation benefits). Certain states (most prominently, California) have experienced significant activity by tax and other regulators and numerous class action lawsuits filed against transportation companies that engage independent contractors.

There are many different tests and standards that may apply to the determination of whether a relationship is that of an independent contractor or one of employment. For example, different standards may be applied by the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Labor, the National Labor Relations Board, state unemployment agencies, state departments of labor, state taxing authorities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, state discrimination or disability benefit administrators and state workers compensation boards, among others. For federal tax purposes, most individuals are classified as employees or independent contractors based on a multi-factor “common-law” analysis rather than any definition found in the Internal Revenue Code or Internal Revenue Service regulations. In addition, under Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978, a taxpayer that meets certain criteria may treat an individual as an independent contractor for employment tax purposes if the taxpayer has been audited without being told to treat similarly situated workers as employees, if the taxpayer has received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or a court decision affirming the taxpayer’s treatment of the individual as an independent contractor, or if the taxpayer is following a long-standing recognized practice.

The Company classifies its BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents as independent contractors for all purposes, including employment tax and employee benefits. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial, administrative or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change the employee/independent contractor classification of BCO Independent Contractors or independent commission sales agents doing business with the Company. Certain states, most notably California, have enacted laws codifying the strict “ABC” test for purposes of determining a worker’s status as an independent contractor or employee under that state’s law. Versions of the ABC test have existed in a number of other states over the years and have been challenged in various courts as violating the federal government’s exclusive right to regulate trucking in certain areas of law and interstate commerce. The Company monitors these laws and what steps may be necessary or advisable to adapt to a changing legal and regulatory environment. Nevertheless, there remains significant uncertainty regarding how these types of laws will be interpreted and enforced by state and local governments as well as by courts.

Potential changes, if any, that could impact the legal classification of the independent contractor relationship between the Company and BCO Independent Contractors or independent commission sales agents could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s operating model. Further, the costs associated with any such potential changes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition if Landstar were unable to pass through to its customers an increase in price corresponding to such increased costs. Moreover, class action litigation in this area against other transportation companies has resulted in significant damage awards and/or monetary settlements for workers who have been allegedly misclassified as independent contractors and the legal and other related expenses associated with litigating these cases can be substantial.

Regulatory and legislative changes. As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Regulation,” certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are motor carriers and/or property brokers authorized to arrange for transportation services by motor carriers which are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”), an agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and by various state agencies. Several of the Operating Subsidiaries maintain a federal hazardous materials safety permit and, as a result, have an increased risk of compliance review by the FMCSA. Certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are licensed as Ocean Transportation Intermediaries by the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission as non-vessel-operating common carriers and/or as ocean freight forwarders. The Company’s air transportation activities in the United States are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation as an indirect air carrier. One of the Company’s

Table of Contents

subsidiaries is licensed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the Bureau of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) as a customs broker. The Company is also subject to regulations and requirements relating to safety and security promulgated by, among others, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through U.S. Customs and the Transportation Security Administration, the Canada Border Services Agency and various state and local agencies and port authorities.

The transportation industry is subject to other potential regulatory and legislative changes (such as the possibility of more stringent environmental, climate change and/or safety/security regulations, limits on vehicle weight and size and regulations relating to the health and wellness of commercial truck operators) that may affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices, by changing the demand for motor carrier services or the cost of providing truckload or other transportation or logistics services, or by adversely impacting the number of available commercial truck operators.

In particular, the FMCSA may propose regulatory changes that affect the operation of commercial motor carriers across the United States. For example, effective May 20, 2025, the FMCSA established a new enforcement policy with respect to English language proficiency (“ELP”) requirements applicable to commercial motor vehicle drivers and the ability of such drivers to communicate effectively with law enforcement and understand highway traffic signs throughout the United States. In 2025, the FMCSA also proposed amendments to federal regulations applicable to the issuance by State Driver’s Licensing Agencies (“SDLAs”) of CDLs to foreign-domiciled individuals in order to significantly limit the authority of SDLAs to issue and renew CDLs with respect to individuals domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction and/or who do not maintain a lawful immigration status in the United States. It is difficult to predict in what form FMCSA regulations may be implemented, modified or enforced and what impact any such regulations may have on motor carrier operations or the aggregate number of trucks that provide hauling capacity to the Company. No assurances can be given with respect to what impact new or revised motor carrier oversight programs implemented by the FMCSA could have on the Company, its motor carrier operations or the aggregate number of trucks that provide hauling capacity to the Company.

Regulations focused on diesel emissions and other air quality matters. Focus on diesel emissions, climate change and related air quality matters has led to efforts by federal, state and local governmental agencies to support legislation and regulations to limit the amount of carbon emissions, including emissions created by diesel engines utilized in tractors such as those operated by the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers. Moreover, federal, state and local governmental agencies may also focus on regulation in relation to trailing equipment specifications in an effort to achieve, among other things, lower carbon emissions. For example, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) has implemented regulations that restrict the ability of certain tractors and trailers from operating in California and that impose emission standards on nearly all diesel-fueled trucks with gross vehicle weight ratings in excess of 14,000 lbs. that operate in California. Moreover, these emission standards have become increasingly stringent over time. As of January 1, 2023, nearly all diesel-fueled trucks with gross vehicle weight ratings in excess of 14,000 lbs. that operate in California are required to have a 2010 or newer model year engine. No assurances can be given with respect to the extent BCO Independent Contractors will choose to become CARB-compliant by purchasing a new or used CARB-compliant tractor, replacing the engine in their existing tractor with a CARB-compliant engine or performing an exhaust retrofit of their existing tractor by installing a particulate matter filter. Accordingly, many of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors may choose not to haul loads that would require travel within California, which could affect the ability of the Company to service customer freight needs for freight originating from, delivering to or traveling through California. Furthermore, increased regulation of tractor or trailing equipment specifications, including emissions created by diesel engines, could create substantial costs for the Company’s third party capacity providers and, in turn, increase the cost of purchased transportation to the Company. An increase in the costs to purchase, lease or maintain tractor or trailing equipment or in purchased transportation cost caused by existing or new regulations without a corresponding increase in price to the customer could affect Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition.

Regulations requiring the purchase and use of zero-emission vehicles (“ZEVs”). Currently, the long-haul trucking industry in North America is diesel-fuel based and long-haul trucking operations powered by electricity, natural gas, or hydrogen-based powertrains rather than diesel are not commercially feasible at scale in North America. Significant challenges remain with respect to the economic feasibility of these trucks and the further development of this technology is necessary considering power, torque, range, efficiency and other aspects of long-haul trucking operations. Moreover, the extensive nationwide charging/fueling infrastructure and maintenance network that would be necessary to support such operations does not exist. Nevertheless, federal, state and local governmental agencies may engage in efforts to support legislation and regulations mandating the transition of diesel-fuel based commercial motor vehicles, such as Class 8 tractors operated by the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers, to ZEVs.

Table of Contents

Mandates requiring the transition to ZEVs would create substantial costs for the Company’s third party capacity providers and, in turn, increase the cost of purchased transportation to the Company. An increase in the costs to purchase, lease or maintain tractor equipment or in purchased transportation cost caused by existing or new regulations without a corresponding increase in price to the customer could adversely affect Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition.

Moreover, irrespective of the enactment of these types of regulations, no assurances can be provided that the technology advancements that will need to occur to make ZEVs commercially viable for long-haul trucking or the extensive nationwide charging/fueling infrastructure and maintenance network that would be necessary to support such operations will develop in the time frame that would be necessary to enable efforts to comply with legislative or regulatory mandates requiring the transition of diesel fuel-based vehicles to ZEVs. It is not expected that long-haul trucking operations powered by electricity, natural gas, or hydrogen-based powertrains rather than diesel will become commercially viable at scale throughout North America in the next five years. However, as various technology alternatives continue to develop and mature and investment in infrastructure continues, local or regional service in certain geographic areas utilizing Class 8 tractors powered by electricity, natural gas, or hydrogen-based powertrains may become commercially viable in such time frame. Landstar intends to continue to actively monitor developments in the trucking industry related to the design, manufacture, operation, and support of heavy-duty trucks powered by electricity, natural gas, or hydrogen-based powertrains in order to consider the implementation of initiatives involving those technologies, as those technologies and the related infrastructure needed to support them may mature in the future. An increase in costs to implement these initiatives without a corresponding increase in price to the customer could affect Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition.

Supply Chain Fraud Matter. As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 2, 2025 and the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 2025 first quarter, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2025, during the last week of the Company’s 2025 first fiscal quarter, the Company identified a supply chain fraud relating to the Company’s international freight forwarding operations (the “Supply Chain Fraud Matter”). The Supply Chain Fraud Matter did not involve the Company’s core North American truckload services. The Company’s financial results for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2025 included a $4.8 million pre-tax expense, or $0.10 per basic and diluted share, relating to this matter. This expense reflected the total anticipated aggregate adverse financial impact to Landstar relating to the fraud, net of certain actual and anticipated recoveries and before taking into account the cost of legal and other professional fees as well as additional potential recoveries in the future. No assurance can be provided with respect to the Company’s ability to collect anticipated recoveries relating to the Supply Chain Fraud Matter or the cost of legal and other professional fees that may be incurred by the Company in the future in connection with such collection efforts related to the Supply Chain Matter. The of the Company to recover additional amounts relating to the Supply Chain Matter could impose additional financial impact and costs on the Company.

Potential changes in taxes. From time to time, various legislative proposals are introduced to increase federal, state, or local taxes. The Company cannot predict whether, or in what form, any increase in corporate income tax rates, state tax rates, taxes related to the procurement of insurance, motor fuel tax rates or other tax rates applicable to the transportation services provided by the Company will be enacted and, if enacted, how such increased tax rates may impact the Company. As an example, for every 100 basis point increase in the U.S. corporate income tax rate, the Company would recognize a one-time tax charge of approximately $1,000,000 in connection with revaluing its ending net deferred tax liabilities at December 27, 2025. With respect to potential increases in fuel and similar taxes, it is unclear whether or not the Company’s Truck Brokerage Carriers would attempt to pass the increase on to the Company or if the Company will be able to reflect this potential increased cost of capacity, if any, in prices to customers. Any such increase in fuel taxes, without a corresponding increase in price to the customer, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, competition from other transportation service companies including those that provide non-trucking modes of transportation would likely increase if state or federal taxes on fuel were to increase without a corresponding increase in taxes imposed upon other modes of transportation.

On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law and established a one percent excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded U.S. corporations. This provision was effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. Accrued excise tax of $1,762,000 was included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 27, 2025. The excise tax could have an adverse effect on the Company’s cash flows in future years.

General Risk Factors

Intellectual property. The Company uses both internally developed and purchased technology in conducting its business. Whether internally developed or purchased, it is possible that the use of these technologies could be claimed to infringe upon or violate the intellectual property rights of third parties. In the event that a claim is made against the Company by a third party for the infringement of intellectual property rights, any settlement or adverse judgment against the Company either in the form of increased costs of licensing or a cease and desist order in using the technology could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and its results of operations.

Table of Contents

Language change vs prior 10-K

MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase

Negative rising

impairment+14
claims+12
unfavorable+6
verdict+5
fraud+5

Positive rising

benefit+2
effective+1
success+1
able+1

MD&A (Item 7)

11,634 words

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

The following is a “safe harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements contained in this document that are not based on historical facts are “forward-looking statements.” This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements, such as statements which relate to Landstar’s business objectives, plans, strategies and expectations. Terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intention,” “expects,” “plans,” “predicts,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “will,” the negative thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are by nature subject to uncertainties and risks, including but not limited to: decreased demand for transportation services; U.S. trade relationships and potential or imposed tariffs; an increase in the frequency or severity of accidents or other claims; unfavorable development of existing accident claims; dependence on third party insurance companies; dependence on independent commission sales agents; dependence on third party capacity providers; the impact of the Russian conflict with Ukraine on the operations of certain independent commission sales agents, including the Company’s second largest such agent by revenue in the 2025 fiscal year; substantial industry competition; disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems; cyber and other information security incidents; dependence on key vendors; potential changes in taxes; status of independent contractors; regulatory and legislative changes; regulations focused on diesel emissions and other air quality matters; regulations requiring the purchase and use of zero-emission vehicles; intellectual property; acquisitions and investments; and other operational, financial or legal risks or uncertainties detailed in this and Landstar’s other SEC filings from time to time and described in Item 1A in this Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors.” These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results or events to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. Investors should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Introduction

Landstar System, Inc. and its subsidiary, Landstar System Holdings, Inc. (collectively referred to herein with their subsidiaries and other affiliated companies as “Landstar” or the “Company”), is a technology-enabled, asset-light provider of integrated transportation management solutions delivering safe, specialized transportation services to a broad range of customers utilizing a network of agents, third party capacity providers and employees. The Company offers services to its customers across multiple transportation modes, with the ability to arrange for individual shipments of freight to comprehensive third party logistics solutions to meet all of a customer’s transportation needs. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and Mexico, and between the United States and Canada, Mexico and other countries around the world. The Company’s services emphasize safety, cargo security, information coordination and customer service and are delivered through a network of approximately 960 independent commission sales agents and over 70,000 third party capacity providers, primarily truck capacity providers, linked together by a series of digital technologies which are provided and coordinated by the Company. The nature of the Company’s business is such that a significant portion of its operating costs varies directly with revenue.

Landstar markets its integrated transportation management solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents and exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport customers’ freight. Landstar’s independent commission sales agents enter into contractual arrangements with the Company and are responsible for locating freight, making that freight available to Landstar’s capacity providers and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The Company’s third party capacity providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”), unrelated trucking companies who provide truck capacity to the Company under non-exclusive contractual arrangements (the “Truck Brokerage Carriers”), air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and railroads. Through this network of agents and capacity providers linked together by Landstar’s ecosystem of digital technologies, Landstar operates an integrated transportation management solutions business primarily throughout North America with revenue of $4.7 billion during the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company reports the results of two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment.

The transportation logistics segment provides a wide range of integrated transportation management solutions. Transportation services are provided by Landstar’s “Operating Subsidiaries”: Landstar Ranger, Inc., Landstar Inway, Inc., Landstar Ligon, Inc., Landstar Gemini, Inc., Landstar Transportation Logistics, Inc., Landstar Global Logistics, Inc., Landstar Express America, Inc., Landstar Canada, Inc., Landstar Metro, S.A.P.I. de C.V., and Landstar Blue, LLC. Transportation services offered by the Company include truckload, less-than-truckload and other truck transportation, rail intermodal, air cargo, ocean cargo, expedited ground and air

Table of Contents

delivery of time-critical freight, heavy-haul/specialized, hazardous materials (“haz-mat”), cold chain/temperature-controlled, U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico cross-border, intra-Mexico, intra-Canada, project cargo and customs brokerage. Examples of the industries serviced by the transportation logistics segment include automotive parts and assemblies, consumer durables, building products, metals, chemicals, foodstuffs, heavy machinery, retail, electronics, military equipment and general commodities. In addition, the transportation logistics segment provides transportation services to other transportation companies, including third party logistics and less-than-truckload service providers. The independent commission sales agents market services provided by the transportation logistics segment. Billings for freight transportation services are typically charged to customers on a per shipment basis for the physical transportation of freight and are referred to as transportation revenue. During fiscal year 2025, revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and railroads represented approximately 38%, 53% and 2%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue. Collectively, revenue generated by air and ocean cargo carriers represented approximately 5% of the Company’s consolidated revenue during fiscal year 2025.

The insurance segment is comprised of Signature Insurance Company (“Signature”), a wholly owned offshore insurance subsidiary, and Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. The insurance segment provides risk and claims management services to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. In addition, it reinsures certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and provides certain property and casualty insurance and reinsurance to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. Revenue at the insurance segment represents reinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk is ultimately borne by Signature. Revenue at the insurance segment represented approximately 1% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for fiscal year 2025.

Changes in Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management believes the Company’s success principally depends on its ability to generate freight through its network of independent commission sales agents and to deliver freight safely, securely and efficiently utilizing BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers. Management believes the most significant factors to the Company’s success include increasing revenue, sourcing capacity, empowering its network through technology-based tools and controlling costs, including insurance and claims.

Revenue

While customer demand, which is subject to overall economic conditions, ultimately drives increases or decreases in revenue, the Company primarily relies on its independent commission sales agents to establish customer relationships and generate revenue opportunities. Management’s emphasis with respect to revenue growth is on revenue generated by independent commission sales agents who on an annual basis generate $1 million or more of Landstar revenue. Management believes future revenue growth is primarily dependent on its ability to increase both the revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents and the number of Million Dollar Agents through a combination of recruiting new agents, increasing the revenue opportunities generated by existing independent commission sales agents and providing its independent commission sales agents with digital technologies they may use to grow revenue and increase efficiencies at their businesses. The following table shows the number of Million Dollar Agents, the average revenue generated by these agents and the percent of consolidated revenue generated by these agents during the past three fiscal years:

Fiscal Years

Number of Million Dollar Agents

Average revenue generated per Million Dollar Agent

Percent of consolidated revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents

In fiscal year 2025, the change in the number of Million Dollar Agents was primarily attributable to agents who remained with the Company yet experienced lower year-over-year revenue that resulted in such agents moving below the Million Dollar Agent category due to the soft freight demand environment. Included among the Company’s Million Dollar Agents in the 2025 fiscal year, the Company had 77 independent sales agencies that generated at least $10 million in Landstar revenue. In fiscal year 2024, the change in the number of Million Dollar Agents was primarily attributable to agents who remained with the Company yet experienced lower year-over-year revenue that resulted in such agents moving below the Million Dollar Agent category due to the soft freight demand environment. Included among the Company’s Million Dollar Agents in the 2024 fiscal year, the Company had 81 independent sales agencies that generated at least $10 million in Landstar revenue.

Table of Contents

The change in the number of Million Dollar Agents on a year-over-year basis is influenced by many factors and is not solely the result of terminations of contractual relationships between agents and the Company, whether such terminations are initiated by the agent or the Company. Such other factors include consolidations among agencies or transactions in connection with ownership changes often due to retirement planning, estate planning or similar transitional matters. The change in the number of Million Dollar Agents on a year-over-year basis may also be affected by agents that remain with the Company yet experienced lower year-over-year revenue that resulted in such agent moving below the Million Dollar Agent category. Historically, the Company has experienced very few terminations of its Million Dollar Agents, whether such terminations are initiated by the agent or the Company. Annual terminations of Million Dollar Agents have typically been less than 3% of the total number of Million Dollar Agents. Revenue from accounts formerly handled by terminated Million Dollar Agents is often retained by the Company as the customer may choose to transfer its account to an existing Landstar agent.

Table of Contents

Management monitors business activity by tracking the number of loads (volume) and revenue per load by mode of transportation. Revenue per load can be influenced by many factors other than a change in price. Those factors include the average length of haul, freight type, special handling and equipment requirements, fuel costs and delivery time requirements. For shipments involving two or more modes of transportation, revenue is generally classified by the mode of transportation having the highest cost for the load. The following table summarizes this information by trailer type for truck transportation and by mode for all others for the past three fiscal years:

Fiscal Years

Revenue generated through (in thousands):

Truck transportation

Truckload:

Van equipment

Unsided/platform equipment

Less-than-truckload

Other truck transportation (1)

Total truck transportation

Rail intermodal

Ocean and air cargo carriers

Other (2)

Revenue on loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors included in total truck transportation

Number of loads:

Truck transportation

Truckload:

Van equipment

Unsided/platform equipment

Less-than-truckload

Other truck transportation (1)

Total truck transportation

Rail intermodal

Ocean and air cargo carriers

Loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors included in total truck transportation

Revenue per load:

Truck transportation

Truckload:

Van equipment

Unsided/platform equipment

Less-than-truckload

Other truck transportation (1)

Total truck transportation

Rail intermodal

Ocean and air cargo carriers

Revenue per load on loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors

Revenue by capacity type (as a % of total revenue):

Truck capacity providers:

BCO Independent Contractors

Truck Brokerage Carriers

Rail intermodal

Ocean and air cargo carriers

Other

Includes power-only, expedited, straight truck, cargo van, and miscellaneous other truck transportation revenue generated by the transportation logistics segment. Power-only refers to shipments where the Company furnishes a power unit and an operator but not trailing equipment, which is typically provided by the shipper or consignee.

Includes primarily reinsurance premium revenue generated by the insurance segment and intra-Mexico transportation services revenue generated by Landstar Metro.

Table of Contents

Expenses

Purchased transportation

Also critical to the Company’s success is its ability to secure capacity, particularly truck capacity, at rates that allow the Company to profitably transport customers’ freight. The following table summarizes the number of available truck capacity providers as of the end of the three most recent fiscal years:

Dec. 27,

Dec. 28,

Dec. 30,

BCO Independent Contractors

Truck Brokerage Carriers:

Approved and active (1)

Other approved

Total available truck capacity providers

Trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors

Active refers to Truck Brokerage Carriers who moved at least one load in the 180 days immediately preceding the fiscal year end.

Purchased transportation represents the amount a BCO Independent Contractor or other third party capacity provider is paid to haul freight. The amount of purchased transportation paid to a BCO Independent Contractor is primarily based on a contractually agreed-upon percentage of revenue generated by loads hauled by the BCO Independent Contractor. Purchased transportation paid to a Truck Brokerage Carrier is based on either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or, to a lesser extent, a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. Purchased transportation paid to railroads and ocean cargo carriers is based on either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. Purchased transportation paid to air cargo carriers is generally based on a negotiated rate for each load hauled. Purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue for truck brokerage, rail intermodal and ocean cargo services is normally higher than that of BCO Independent Contractor and air cargo services. Purchased transportation is the largest component of costs and expenses and, on a consolidated basis, increases or decreases as a percentage of consolidated revenue in proportion to changes in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated through BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers and external revenue from the insurance segment, consisting of reinsurance premiums. Purchased transportation as a percent of revenue also increases or decreases in relation to the availability of truck brokerage capacity and with changes in the price of fuel on revenue generated from shipments hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers. The Company passes 100% of fuel surcharges billed to customers for freight hauled by BCO Independent Contractors to its BCO Independent Contractors. These fuel surcharges are excluded from revenue and the cost of purchased transportation. Purchased transportation costs are recognized over the freight transit period as the performance obligation to the customer is completed.

Commissions to agents

Commissions to agents are based on contractually agreed-upon percentages of (i) revenue, (ii) revenue less the cost of purchased transportation, or (iii) revenue less a contractually agreed upon percentage of revenue retained by Landstar and the cost of purchased transportation (the “retention contracts”). Commissions to agents as a percentage of consolidated revenue vary directly with fluctuations in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated by the various modes of transportation and reinsurance premiums and, in general, vary inversely with changes in the amount of purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue on services provided by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads, air cargo carriers and ocean cargo carriers. Commissions to agents are recognized over the freight transit period as the performance obligation to the customer is completed.

Other operating costs, net of gains on asset sales/dispositions

Maintenance costs for Company-provided trailing equipment, the provision for uncollectible advances and other receivables due from BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents and recruiting and qualification costs for BCO Independent Contractors are the largest components of other operating costs. Also included in other operating costs are trailer rental costs and gains/losses, if any, on sales of Company-owned trailing equipment.

As further described in Note 18 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, during the last week of the Company’s 2025 first fiscal quarter, the Company identified a supply chain fraud relating to the Company’s international freight forwarding operations (the “Supply Chain Fraud Matter”). Other operating costs during the fiscal year ended December 27, 2025 included a $4.8 million expense relating to this matter. In addition, legal and other professional fees included in selling, general and administrative costs were slightly elevated during the Company’s 2025 fiscal year in connection with this matter.

Table of Contents

Insurance and claims

With respect to insurance and claims cost, potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable.

Landstar retains liability through a self-insured retention for commercial trucking claims up to $5 million per occurrence. The Company also maintains third party insurance arrangements providing coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $5 million. Historically, these third party insurance arrangements were based on policy year periods beginning on May 1 and ending on the subsequent April 30. Beginning with the policy year period commencing May 1, 2025, the Company and its third party insurance providers adjusted the applicable policy year period, beginning in 2026, to commence on June 1 and end on the subsequent May 31. All applicable third party insurance arrangements with a policy period ending April 30, 2026, have been amended to provide for a policy period ending May 31, 2026, as reflected below.

Table of Contents

Further, the Company retains liability of up to $2,000,000 for each general liability claim, $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and $250,000 for each cargo claim. In addition, under reinsurance arrangements by Signature of certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors, the Company retains liability of up to $500,000, $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 with respect to certain occupational accident claims and up to $750,000 with respect to certain workers’ compensation claims. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various legal defenses and other factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims or workers’ compensation claims or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and and its results of operations.

Selling, general and administrative

During the 2025 fiscal year, employee compensation and benefits accounted for approximately 62% of the Company’s selling, general and administrative costs. Employee compensation and benefits include wages and employee benefit costs as well as incentive compensation and stock-based compensation expense. Incentive compensation and stock-based compensation expense is highly variable in nature in comparison to wages and employee benefit costs.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization primarily relate to depreciation of trailing equipment and information technology hardware and software.

Impairment of intangible and other assets

During the 2025 fiscal year, the Company recorded certain non-cash, non-recurring impairment charges of $32,170,000 in the aggregate (the “Non-Cash Impairment Charges”). The Non-Cash Impairment Charges, net of tax benefit, unfavorably impacted EPS by $0.71 per basic and diluted share. The Non-Cash Impairment Charges consisted of:

$18,208,000, or $0.40 per basic and diluted share, in impairment charges to goodwill and certain other assets related to the Company’s decision to actively market for sale Landstar Metro, S.A.P.I. de C.V., the Company’s wholly-owned Mexican operating subsidiary, principally engaged in intra-Mexico truck transportation services. For additional information, see Note 14 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

$8,963,000, or $0.20 per basic and diluted share, in impairment charges related to the decision to select one of the Company’s transportation management systems as its primary such system for truckload brokerage services and, in connection with that decision, wind-down an alternative transportation management system currently in use by Landstar Blue, LLC, one of the Company’s operating subsidiaries. For additional information, see Note 15 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

$4,999,000 or $0.11 per basic and diluted share, relating to the carrying value of a non-controlling equity investment made by the Company in 2022 in Cavnue, LLC, a privately held technology start-up company. For additional information, see Note 16 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Costs of revenue

The Company incurs costs of revenue related to the transportation of freight and, to a much lesser extent, to reinsurance premiums received by Signature. Costs of revenue include variable costs of revenue and other costs of revenue. Variable costs of revenue include purchased transportation and commissions to agents, as these costs are entirely variable on a shipment-by-shipment basis. Other costs

Table of Contents

of revenue include fixed costs of revenue and semi-variable costs of revenue, where such costs may vary over time based on certain economic factors or operational metrics such as the number of Company-controlled trailers, the number of BCO Independent Contractors, the frequency and severity of insurance claims, the number of miles traveled by BCO Independent Contractors, or the number and/or scale of information technology projects in process or in-service to support revenue generating activities, rather than on a shipment-by-shipment basis. Other costs of revenue associated with the transportation of freight include: (i) other operating costs, primarily consisting of trailer maintenance, the provision for uncollectible advances and other receivables due from BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents and BCO Independent Contractor recruiting and qualification costs, as reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) transportation-related insurance premiums paid and claim costs incurred, included as a portion of insurance and claims in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) costs incurred related to internally developed software including ASC 350-40 amortization, implementation costs, hosting costs and other support costs utilized to support the Company’s independent commission sales agents, third party capacity providers, and customers, included as a portion of depreciation and amortization and of selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income; and (iv) depreciation on Company-owned trailing equipment, included as a portion of depreciation and amortization in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Other costs of revenue associated with reinsurance premiums received by Signature are comprised of broker commissions and other fees paid related to the administration of insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors and are included in selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. In addition to costs of revenue, the Company incurs various other costs relating to its business, including most selling, general and administrative costs and portions of costs attributable to insurance and and depreciation and amortization. Management continually monitors all components of the costs incurred by the Company and establishes annual cost budgets that, in general, are used to benchmark costs incurred on a monthly basis.

Gross Profit, Variable Contribution, Gross Profit Margin and Variable Contribution Margin

The following table sets forth calculations of gross profit, defined as revenue less costs of revenue, and gross profit margin, defined as gross profit divided by revenue, for the periods indicated. The Company refers to revenue less variable costs of revenue as “variable contribution” and variable contribution divided by revenue as “variable contribution margin.” Variable contribution and variable contribution margin are each non-GAAP financial measures. The closest comparable GAAP financial measures to variable contribution and variable contribution margin are, respectively, gross profit and gross profit margin. The Company believes variable contribution and variable contribution margin are useful measures of the variable costs that we incur at a shipment-by-shipment level attributable to our transportation network of third party capacity providers and independent commission sales agents in order to provide services to our customers. The Company believes variable contribution and variable contribution margin are important performance measurements and management considers variable contribution and variable contribution margin in evaluating the Company’s financial performance and in its decision-making, such as budgeting for infrastructure, trailing equipment and selling, general and administrative costs.

Table of Contents

The reconciliations of gross profit to variable contribution and gross profit margin to variable contribution margin are each presented below:

Fiscal Year

Revenue

Costs of revenue:

Purchased transportation

Commissions to agents

Variable costs of revenue

Trailing equipment depreciation

Information technology costs

Insurance-related costs (1)

Other operating costs

Other costs of revenue

Total costs of revenue

Gross profit

Gross profit margin

Plus: other costs of revenue

Variable contribution

Variable contribution margin

Insurance-related costs in the table above include (i) other costs of revenue related to the transportation of freight that are included as a portion of insurance and claims in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and (ii) certain other costs of revenue related to reinsurance premiums received by Signature that are included as a portion of selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Insurance and claims costs included in other costs of revenue relating to the transportation of freight primarily consist of insurance premiums paid for commercial auto liability, general liability, cargo and other lines of coverage related to the transportation of freight and the related cost of claims incurred under those programs, and, to a lesser extent, the cost of claims incurred under insurance programs available to BCO Independent Contractors that are reinsured by Signature. Other insurance and claims costs included in costs of revenue that are included in selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income consist of brokerage commissions and other fees incurred by Signature relating to the administration of insurance programs available to BCO Independent Contractors that are reinsured by Signature.

In general, variable contribution margin on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors represents a fixed percentage due to the nature of the contracts that pay a fixed percentage of revenue to both the BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents. For revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers, variable contribution margin may be either a fixed or variable percentage, depending on the contract with each individual independent commission sales agent. Variable contribution margin on revenue generated from shipments hauled by railroads, air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and Truck Brokerage Carriers, other than those under retention contracts, is variable in nature, as the Company’s contracts with independent commission sales agents provide commissions to agents at a contractually agreed upon percentage of the amount represented by revenue less purchased transportation for these types of shipments. Approximately 43% of the Company’s consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2025 was generated under transactions that pay a fixed percentage of revenue to the third party capacity provider and/or agents while 57% was generated under transactions that pay a variable percentage of revenue to the third party capacity provider and/or agents.

Operating income as a percentage of gross profit and operating income as a percentage of variable contribution

The following table presents operating income as a percentage of gross profit and operating income as a percentage of variable contribution. The Company’s operating income as a percentage of variable contribution is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as operating income divided by variable contribution. The Company believes that operating income as a percentage of variable contribution is useful and meaningful to investors for the following principal reasons: (i) the variable costs of revenue for a significant portion of the business are highly influenced by short-term market-based trends in the freight transportation industry, whereas other costs, including other costs of revenue, are much less impacted by short-term freight market trends; (ii) disclosure of this measure allows investors to better understand the underlying trends in the Company’s results of operations; (iii) this measure is meaningful to

Table of Contents

investors’ evaluations of the Company’s management of costs attributable to operations other than the purely variable costs associated with purchased transportation and commissions to agents that the Company incurs to provide services to our customers; and (iv) management considers this financial information in its decision-making, such as budgeting for infrastructure, trailing equipment and selling, general and administrative costs.

Fiscal Year

Gross profit

Operating income

Operating income as % of gross profit

Variable contribution

Operating income

Operating income as % of variable contribution

The decrease in operating income as a percentage of gross profit from fiscal year 2024 to fiscal year 2025 resulted from the decrease of operating income at a more rapid percentage rate than the decrease in gross profit, primarily due to the impact of the impairment of certain intangible and other assets and the impact of the Company’s fixed cost infrastructure, principally certain components of selling, general and administrative costs, in comparison to a smaller gross profit base. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of gross profit from fiscal year 2023 to fiscal year 2024 resulted from the decrease of operating income at a more rapid percentage rate than the decrease in gross profit, primarily due to the impact of the Company’s fixed cost infrastructure, principally certain components of selling, general and administrative costs, in comparison to a smaller gross profit base.

The decrease in operating income as a percentage of variable contribution from fiscal year 2024 to fiscal year 2025 resulted from the decrease of operating income at a more rapid percentage rate than the decrease in variable contribution, primarily due to the impact of increased insurance and claims costs, the impact of the impairment of certain intangible and other assets and the impact of the Company’s fixed cost infrastructure, principally certain components of selling, general and administrative costs, in comparison to a smaller variable contribution base. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of variable contribution from fiscal year 2023 to fiscal year 2024 resulted from the decrease of operating income at a more rapid percentage rate than the decrease in variable contribution, primarily due to the impact of the Company’s fixed cost infrastructure, principally certain components of selling, general and administrative costs, in comparison to a smaller variable contribution base.

Also, as previously mentioned, the Company reports two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment. External revenue at the insurance segment, representing reinsurance premiums, has historically been relatively consistent on an annual basis at 2% or less of consolidated revenue and generally corresponds directly with the number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors. The discussion of cost line items in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations considers the Company’s costs on a consolidated basis rather than on a segment basis. Management believes this presentation format is the most appropriate to assist users of the financial statements in understanding the Company’s business for the following reasons: (1) the insurance segment has no other operating costs; (2) discussion of insurance and claims at either segment without reference to the other may create confusion amongst investors and potential investors due to intercompany arrangements and specific deductible programs that affect comparability of financial results by segment between various fiscal periods but that have no effect on the Company from a consolidated reporting perspective; (3) selling, general and administrative costs of the insurance segment comprise less than 10% of consolidated selling, general and administrative costs and have historically been relatively consistent on a year-over-year basis; and (4) the insurance segment has no depreciation and amortization.

Fiscal Year Ended December 27, 2025 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2024

Revenue for fiscal year 2025 was $4,743,760,000, a decrease of $75,485,000, or 2%, compared to fiscal year 2024. Transportation revenue decreased $70,893,000, or 1%. The decrease in transportation revenue was attributable to a decreased number of loads hauled of approximately 1%, while revenue per load was approximately the same as compared to fiscal year 2024. Reinsurance premiums were $58,645,000 and $63,237,000 for fiscal years 2025 and 2024, respectively. The decrease in revenue from reinsurance premiums was primarily attributable to a decrease in the average number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024.

Table of Contents

Truck transportation revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers (together, the “third party truck capacity providers”) for fiscal year 2025 was $4,336,014,000, representing 91% of total revenue, a decrease of $10,540,000, or less than 1%, compared to fiscal year 2024. The number of loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers decreased approximately 1% in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024, while revenue per load on loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers increased approximately 1% compared to fiscal year 2024.

The decrease in the number of loads hauled via truck compared to fiscal year 2024 was primarily due to decreased demand from fiscal year 2024 for the Company’s van and less-than-truckload transportation services. Loads hauled via van equipment decreased 4% and less-than-truckload loadings decreased 1%, while loads hauled via other truck transportation services increased 13% and loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment increased 2% as compared to fiscal year 2024.

The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled via truck was primarily due to increased revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment, which was entirely attributable to an increase in the percentage of revenue contributed by heavy/specialized equipment, which typically has a higher revenue per load than unsided/platform loadings transported using standard flatbed and other less specialized pieces of platform equipment. Revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment increased 3%, while revenue per load on less-than-truckload loadings decreased 3%, on loads hauled via van equipment decreased 1% and on other truck transportation services decreased 1% as compared to fiscal year 2024.

Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $108,709,000 and $118,295,000 in fiscal years 2025 and 2024, respectively. It should be noted that billings to many customers of the Company’s truck brokerage services include a single all-in rate and do not separately identify fuel surcharges on loads hauled via Truck Brokerage Carriers. Accordingly, the overall impact of changes in fuel prices on revenue and revenue per load on loads hauled via truck is likely to be greater than that indicated.

Transportation revenue generated by rail intermodal, air cargo and ocean cargo carriers (collectively, the “multimode capacity providers”) for fiscal year 2025 was $328,597,000, or 7% of total revenue, a decrease of $45,633,000, or 12%, compared to fiscal year 2024. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers decreased approximately 10% in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024, and the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers decreased approximately 2% over the same period. Revenue per load on loads hauled via rail intermodal and ocean decreased approximately 4% and 8%, respectively, while revenue per load on loads hauled via air increased approximately 14% during fiscal year 2025 as compared to fiscal year 2024. The decrease in revenue per load on loads hauled by rail intermodal carriers was broad-based with decreases at multiple customers during fiscal year 2025. The decrease in revenue per load on loads hauled by ocean was primarily attributable to the loss of one specific customer during fiscal year 2025 in connection with the Supply Chain Fraud Matter. The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled by air cargo carriers was primarily attributable to increases at several specific customers during fiscal year 2025. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors, including revenue mix among the various modes of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity. The decrease in the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was due to a 12% decrease in ocean loadings and a 4% decrease in air loadings, while rail loadings increased 7%. The 12% decrease in ocean loadings was broad-based with decreases at several customers. The 4% decrease in air loadings was primarily attributable to decreases at several specific customers. The 7% increase in rail loadings was primarily attributable to increased loadings at one specific agency.

Purchased transportation was 77.8% and 77.7% of revenue in fiscal years 2025 and 2024, respectively. The increase in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to an increased rate of purchased transportation on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers. Commissions to agents were 8.2% and 8.1% of revenue in fiscal years 2025 and 2024, respectively. The increase in commissions to agents as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to a decreased cost of purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers.

Investment income was $13,685,000 and $14,810,000 in fiscal years 2025 and 2024, respectively. The decrease in investment income was attributable to lower average rates of return on investments in fiscal year 2025, partially offset by a higher average investment balance held by the insurance segment during fiscal year 2025.

Table of Contents

Other operating costs increased $2,805,000 in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024. The increase in other operating costs compared to the prior year was primarily due to increased trailer equipment maintenance costs, partially offset by a decreased provision for contractor bad debt.

Insurance and claims increased $45,507,000 in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024. The highly elevated increase in insurance and claims expense compared to the prior year was primarily due to (i) an increase of $23,258,000 in net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024, as further described below; (ii) increased severity of current year trucking and cargo claims in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024, including $11.0 million related to two separate tragic vehicular accidents which occurred during the 2025 fourth fiscal quarter; and (iii) a $5.3 million increase in the Company’s actuarily determined claim reserves relating to the anticipated loss exposure for claims above $1 million. During the 2025 and 2024 fiscal years, insurance and claims costs included $32,082,000 and $8,824,000 of net unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ estimates, respectively. development of prior years’ estimates of $32,082,000 during the 2025 fiscal year was primarily comprised of (i) approximately $10.7 million of development on commercial trucking up to $1 million per occurrence for years 2024 and prior; (ii) approximately $10.6 million of development on commercial trucking in excess of $1 million per occurrence for years 2024 and prior, including approximately $5.7 million related to the Cabral Matter; (iii) approximately $8.4 million of development on cargo-related primarily attributable to and theft in the supply chain; and (iv) approximately $2.4 million of net development relating to reinsurance arrangements involving the Company’s captive insurance subsidiary, Signature Insurance Company, in connection with certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors.

Selling, general and administrative costs increased $12,840,000 in fiscal year 2025 as compared to fiscal year 2024. The increase in selling, general and administrative costs compared to prior year was primarily attributable to increased information technology project consulting fees, increased stock-based compensation expense, increased wages, increased legal fees, an increased provision for incentive compensation and increased employee benefit costs, primarily attributable to increased medical and pharmacy costs under the self-insured portion of the Company’s medical plan, partially offset by the impact of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) transition costs in fiscal year 2024. Included in selling, general and administrative costs was stock-based compensation expense of $5,998,000 and $3,435,000 for the 2025 and 2024 fiscal years, respectively, and incentive compensation expense of $3,625,000 and $1,970,000 for the 2025 and 2024 fiscal years, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $10,350,000 in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to decreased depreciation on information technology software.

Impairment of intangibles and other assets was $32,170,000 in fiscal year 2025. This was attributable to the impairment matters referenced above under “ Expenses – Impairment of intangible and other assets. ”

The year-over-prior-year change in interest and debt expense (income) was $6,415,000, with net interest and debt expense of $996,000 in fiscal year 2025 compared to net interest and debt income of $5,419,000 in fiscal year 2024. The increase in interest and debt expense (income) was primarily attributable to decreased interest income earned on cash balances held by the transportation logistics segment and increased interest expense related to finance lease obligations.

The effective income tax rate was 23.6% for fiscal year 2025 and 23.0% for fiscal year 2024. The effective income tax rate was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for fiscal year 2025 primarily attributable to state taxes. The effective income tax rate was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for fiscal year 2024 primarily attributable to state taxes, partially offset by federal research and development tax credits.

Net income was $115,007,000, or $3.31 per basic and diluted share, in fiscal year 2025. Net income was $195,946,000, or $5.51 per basic and diluted share, in fiscal year 2024. Net income during fiscal year 2025 was unfavorably impacted by $32,170,000, or $0.71 per basic and diluted share, related to the impairment of intangible and other assets charges noted above.

Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2024 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2023

Revenue for fiscal year 2024 was $4,819,245,000, a decrease of $484,077,000, or 9%, compared to fiscal year 2023. Transportation revenue decreased $474,838,000, or 9%. The decrease in transportation revenue was attributable to a decreased number of loads hauled of approximately 8% and decreased revenue per load of approximately 1% compared to fiscal year 2023. Reinsurance premiums were $63,237,000 and $72,476,000 for fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. The decrease in revenue from reinsurance premiums was primarily attributable to a decrease in the average number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023.

Table of Contents

Truck transportation revenue generated by third party truck capacity providers for fiscal year 2024 was $4,346,554,000, representing 90% of total revenue, a decrease of $482,976,000, or 10%, compared to fiscal year 2023. The number of loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers decreased approximately 8% in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023, and revenue per load on loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers decreased approximately 2% compared to fiscal year 2023.

The decrease in the number of loads hauled via truck compared to fiscal year 2023 was primarily due to a broad-based decrease in demand for the Company’s truck transportation services. Loads hauled via other truck transportation services decreased 20%, less-than-truckload loadings decreased 13%, loads hauled via van equipment decreased 7% and loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment decreased 6% as compared to fiscal year 2023.

The decrease in revenue per load on loads hauled via truck was primarily due to a softer freight demand environment experienced during fiscal year 2024 and the impact of lower diesel fuel costs on loads hauled via Truck Brokerage Carriers. Revenue per load on loads hauled via other truck transportation services decreased 10%, on loads hauled via van equipment decreased 4% and on less-than-truckload loadings decreased 3%, while revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment increased 3% as compared to fiscal year 2023. The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment of 3% was favorably impacted by an increase in the percentage of revenue contributed by heavy/specialized equipment, which typically has a higher revenue per load.

Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $118,295,000 and $147,691,000 in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. It should be noted that billings to many customers of the Company’s truck brokerage services include a single all-in rate and do not separately identify fuel surcharges on loads hauled via Truck Brokerage Carriers. Accordingly, the overall impact of changes in fuel prices on revenue and revenue per load on loads hauled via truck is likely to be greater than that indicated.

Transportation revenue generated by multimode capacity providers for fiscal year 2024 was $374,230,000, or 8% of total revenue, an increase of $9,295,000, or 3%, compared to fiscal year 2023. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers increased approximately 3% in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023, while the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was approximately the same in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023. Revenue per load on loads hauled via ocean increased 15%, while revenue per load on loads hauled via air and rail intermodal decreased 51% and 9%, respectively, during fiscal year 2024 as compared to fiscal year 2023. The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled by ocean was broad-based across many customers and reflected the impact of various geopolitical events on ocean shipping rates, generally. The decrease in revenue per load on loads hauled by air cargo carriers was primarily attributable to the impact of high value air loadings at one specific customer during fiscal year 2023. The decrease in revenue per load on loads hauled by rail intermodal was broad-based across many customers. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors, including revenue mix among the various modes of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity.

Purchased transportation was 77.7% and 76.7% of revenue in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to an increased rate of purchased transportation on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers. Commissions to agents were 8.1% and 8.7% of revenue in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. The decrease in commissions to agents as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to an increased cost of purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers during fiscal year 2024.

Investment income was $14,810,000 and $10,141,000 in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in investment income was attributable to a higher average investment balance held by the insurance segment during fiscal year 2024 and higher average rates of return on investments in fiscal year 2024.

Other operating costs increased $4,590,000 in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023. The increase in other operating costs compared to the prior year was primarily due to an increased provision for contractor bad debt and decreased gains on sales of operating property.

Table of Contents

Insurance and claims decreased $312,000 in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023. The decrease in insurance and claims expense compared to the prior year was primarily due to decreased BCO miles traveled during fiscal year 2024, partially offset by increased net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in fiscal year 2024. During the 2024 and 2023 fiscal years, insurance and claims costs included $8,824,000 and $6,058,000 of net unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ claims estimates, respectively.

Selling, general and administrative costs increased $5,909,000 in fiscal year 2024 as compared to fiscal year 2023. The increase in selling, general and administrative costs compared to prior year was primarily attributable to increased employee benefit costs, primarily attributable to increased medical and pharmacy costs under the self-insured portion of the Company’s medical plan, the impact of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) transition costs and an increased provision for incentive compensation, partially offset by decreased project consulting fees. Included in selling, general and administrative costs was incentive compensation expense of $1,970,000 and $591,000 for the 2024 and 2023 fiscal years, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $1,415,000 in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to decreased trailing equipment depreciation, partially offset by increased depreciation on new and updated digital tools deployed for use by the Company’s network of agents, capacity providers and employees.

Net interest and debt income increased $1,473,000 in fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023. The increase in interest and debt income was primarily attributable to increased interest income earned on cash balances held by the transportation logistics segment, partially offset by increased interest expense related to finance lease obligations.

The effective income tax rate was 23.0% for fiscal year 2024 and 24.0% for fiscal year 2023. The effective income tax rate was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for fiscal year 2024 primarily attributable to state taxes, partially offset by federal research and development tax credits. The effective income tax rate was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% in fiscal year 2023 primarily attributable to state income taxes and nondeductible executive compensation, partially offset by excess tax benefits realized on stock-based awards.

Net income was $195,946,000, or $5.51 per basic and diluted share, in fiscal year 2024. Net income was $264,394,000, or $7.36 per basic and diluted share, in fiscal year 2023.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Working capital and the ratio of current assets to current liabilities were $520,486,000 and 1.7 to 1, respectively, at December 27, 2025, compared with $646,713,000 and 2.0 to 1, respectively, at December 28, 2024, and $677,517,000 and 2.0 to 1, respectively, at December 30, 2023. Landstar has historically operated with current ratios within the range of 1.5 to 1 to 2.0 to 1. Cash provided by operating activities was $224,882,000, $286,561,000, and $393,648,000 in fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The decrease in cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2025 was primarily attributable to the impact of decreased net income (excluding the non-cash impact on net income relating to the impairment of intangible and other assets) and the timing of collections of receivables, partially offset by the timing of payments of insurance claims. The decrease in cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2024 was primarily attributable to decreased net income and decreased favorable net working capital impacts in connection with decreased net receivables, defined as accounts receivable less accounts payable.

The Company declared and paid $1.56 per share, or $54,126,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2025, and during such period, also paid $70,632,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2024 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2024. In addition, on December 4, 2025, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share, or $68,117,000 in the aggregate, payable on January 21, 2026 to stockholders of record of its Common Stock as of January 6, 2026. Dividends payable of $68,117,000 related to this special dividend were included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 27, 2025. The Company declared and paid $1.38 per share, or $49,043,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2024, and during such period, also paid $71,433,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2023 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 30, 2023. In addition, on December 9, 2024, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share, or $70,632,000 in the aggregate, payable on January 21, 2025 to stockholders of record of its Common Stock as of January 7, 2025. Dividends payable of $70,632,000 related to this special dividend were included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2024. The Company declared and paid $1.26 per share, or $45,276,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2023, and during such period, also paid $71,854,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2022 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2022. Since paying its first cash dividend in August 2005, the Company has paid approximately $1,087,000,000 in cash dividends in the aggregate to its stockholders, inclusive of the $2.00 per share special dividend paid on January 21, 2026.

Table of Contents

During fiscal year 2025, the Company purchased 1,281,863 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $180,901,000, including $179,139,000 in cash purchases and accrued excise tax of $1,762,000 which is included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 27, 2025. During fiscal year 2024, the Company purchased 452,019 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $82,117,000, including $81,400,000 in cash purchases and accrued excise tax of $717,000 which was included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2024 and paid during fiscal year 2025. During fiscal year 2023, the Company purchased 319,332 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $54,267,000, including $53,919,000 in cash purchases and excise tax of $348,000 which was included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 30, 2023 and paid during fiscal year 2024. The Company has used cash provided by operating activities to fund the purchases. Since January 1997, the Company has purchased approximately $2,515,000,000 of its Common Stock under programs authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company in open market and private block transactions. As of December 27, 2025, the Company may purchase in the aggregate up to 1,266,118 shares of its Common Stock under its authorized stock purchase programs. Long-term debt, including current maturities, was $76,822,000 at December 27, 2025, compared to $102,307,000 at December 28, 2024 and $71,140,000 at December 30, 2023.

Shareholders’ equity was $795,665,000, or 91% of total capitalization (defined as long-term debt including current maturities plus equity), at December 27, 2025, compared to $972,439,000, or 90% of total capitalization at December 28, 2024 and $983,923,000, or 93% of total capitalization at December 30, 2023. The decrease in shareholders’ equity was primarily the result of purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock and dividends declared by the Company in fiscal year 2025, partially offset by net income. The decrease in shareholders’ equity in fiscal year 2024 was primarily the result of dividends declared by the Company and purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, partially offset by net income.

On July 1, 2022, Landstar entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement with a bank syndicate led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (as further amended as of June 21, 2024, the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement, which matures July 1, 2027, provides for borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving credit facility of $300,000,000, $45,000,000 of which may be utilized in the form of letters of credit. The Credit Agreement also includes an “accordion” feature providing for a possible increase of up to an aggregate amount of borrowing capacity of $600,000,000.

The Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness. The Company is required to, among other things, maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as described in the Credit Agreement, and maintain a Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, below a specified maximum. The Credit Agreement provides for a restriction on cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders on the Company’s capital stock to the extent there is a default under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement under certain circumstances limits the amount of such cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders to the extent that, after giving effect to any payment made to effect such cash dividend or other distribution, the Leverage Ratio would exceed 2.5 to 1 on a pro forma basis as of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreement provides for an event of default in the event that, among other things, a person or group acquires 35% or more of the outstanding capital stock of the Company or obtains power to elect a majority of the Company’s directors or the directors cease to consist of a majority of Continuing Directors, as defined in the Credit Agreement. None of these covenants are presently considered by the Company to be materially restrictive to the Company’s operations, capital resources or liquidity. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the debt covenants under the Credit Agreement.

At December 27, 2025, the Company had no borrowings outstanding and $34,916,000 of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. At December 27, 2025, there was $265,084,000 available for future borrowings under the Credit Agreement and access to an additional $300,000,000 under the Credit Agreement’s “accordion” feature. In addition, the Company has $75,331,000 in letters of credit outstanding as collateral for insurance claims that are secured by investments totaling $83,701,000 at December 27, 2025. Investments, all of which are carried at fair value, include primarily investment-grade bonds, asset-backed securities, commercial paper and U.S. Treasury obligations having maturities of up to five years. Fair value of investments is based primarily on quoted market prices. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included herein for further discussion on measurement of fair value of investments.

Historically, the Company has generated sufficient operating cash flow to meet its debt service requirements, fund continued growth, both organic and through acquisitions, complete or execute share purchases of its Common Stock under authorized share purchase programs, pay dividends and meet working capital needs. As an asset-light provider of integrated transportation management solutions, the Company’s annual capital requirements for operating property are generally for trailing equipment and information

Table of Contents

technology hardware and software. In addition, a significant portion of the trailing equipment used by the Company is provided by third party capacity providers, thereby reducing the Company’s capital requirements. During fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company acquired $7,732,000, $62,194,000 and $4,093,000, respectively, of trailing equipment by entering into finance leases. During fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company also purchased $9,880,000, $30,998,000 and $25,688,000, respectively, of operating property. Landstar anticipates acquiring either by purchase or lease financing approximately $104,000,000 in new trailing equipment, primarily to replace older trailing equipment in fiscal year 2026. Landstar anticipates spending approximately $12,000,000 on information technology hardware and software in fiscal year 2026, $6,000,000 of which relates to either building or buying software applications that enhance or add to the Company’s technology ecosystem. In addition, Landstar anticipates spending approximately $3,000,000 on buildings and improvements in fiscal year 2026.

Management believes that cash flow from operations combined with the Company’s borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement will be adequate to meet Landstar’s debt service requirements, fund continued growth, both internal and through acquisitions, pay dividends, complete the authorized share purchase programs and meet working capital needs.

Legal Proceedings

As previously disclosed by the Company in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 2025 second quarter filed with the SEC on July 29, 2025, the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 13, 2025, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 2025 third quarter filed with the SEC on October 28, 2025 and the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 21, 2026, a trial verdict (the “Verdict”) was rendered on August 6, 2025 in state court in El Paso County, Texas, in the matter of Eduardo Cabral, et. al. v. Landstar Ranger, Inc., et. al. (the “Cabral Matter”). As previously disclosed, the Verdict included a determination by the jury that Landstar Ranger, Inc. (“Landstar Ranger”) acted as a broker and not as a motor carrier with respect to the transportation of the shipment involved in a tragic accident. The Verdict also determined total monetary damages of $22.8 million and that 15% of such damages, or $3.42 million, was attributable to Landstar Ranger with the remainder of the total monetary attributable to the hauling motor carrier and the hauling motor carrier’s employee truck driver. On January 13, 2026, the trial court entered a judgment (the “Judgment”) with respect to the that found Landstar Ranger financially responsible for 100%, rather than 15%, of the $22.8 million of monetary awarded to the , plus pre-judgment interest. As a result of the Judgment, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of approximately $5.7 million during the 2025 fiscal fourth quarter to insurance and claim costs which is included in insurance in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 27, 2025. The Company intends to vigorously appeal the Cabral Matter, including the Judgment; however, no assurances can be provided as to the probability of with respect to any potential appeals relating to the Cabral Matter, generally, or the Judgment, specifically, or the ultimate outcome of any such appeals. The total cost associated with this matter, which may include post-judgment interest, bonding-related costs and legal and other professional fees, will depend on many factors and the ultimate financial impact, as well as the timing of the ultimate resolution of this matter, are to predict.

The Company is involved in certain claims and pending litigation arising from the normal conduct of business. Many of these claims are covered in whole or in part by insurance. Based on knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, opinions of outside counsel, management believes that adequate provisions have been made for probable and reasonably estimable losses with respect to the resolution of all such claims and pending litigation and that the ultimate outcome, after provisions therefor, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company, but could have a material effect on the results of operations in a given quarter or year.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Landstar provides for the estimated costs of self-insured claims primarily on an actuarial basis. The amount recorded for the estimated liability for claims incurred is based upon the facts and circumstances known on the applicable balance sheet date. The ultimate resolution of these claims may be for an amount greater or less than the amount estimated by the Company. The Company continually revises its existing claim estimates as new or revised information becomes available on the status of each claim. Historically, the Company has experienced both favorable and unfavorable development of prior years’ claims estimates within its various programs. During fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023, insurance and claims costs included $32,082,000, $8,824,000 and $6,058,000 of net unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ claims estimates, respectively. The unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the 2025 fiscal year was primarily due to several specific commercial trucking , including $5.7 million related to the Judgment in the Cabral Matter, and elevated cargo experience as a result of and theft in the supply chain. The development of prior years’ in the 2024 and 2023 fiscal years was attributable in each year to several specific . It is reasonably likely that the ultimate outcome of settling all outstanding will be more or less than the estimated liability at December 27, 2025, primarily due to the inherent in estimating the of commercial trucking and the potential judgment or settlement amount that may be incurred in connection with the resolution of such .

Table of Contents

Significant variances from the Company’s estimates for the ultimate resolution of self-insured claims could be expected to positively or negatively affect Landstar’s earnings in a given quarter or year. However, management believes that the ultimate resolution of these items, given a range of reasonably likely outcomes, will not significantly affect the long-term financial condition of Landstar or its ability to fund its continuing operations.

Landstar System Inc

Annual report (10-K)

Recent 8-K announcements

Top insiders

All filings

Tone shift by section

Language change vs prior 10-K

Risk Factors (Item 1A)

Language change vs prior 10-K

MD&A (Item 7)

External resources

Permalink