Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve significant risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements.
All dollar and share amounts in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are in thousands of dollars and shares, unless otherwise indicated.
General
Koil Energy is an energy services company that provides equipment and support services to the world’s energy and offshore industries. The Company provides innovative solutions to complex customer challenges presented between the production facility and the energy source. Koil Energy’s core services and technological solutions include distribution system installation support and engineering services, umbilical terminations, loose-tube steel flying leads, and related services. Additionally, Koil Energy’s experienced professionals can support subsea engineering, manufacturing, installation, commissioning, and maintenance projects located anywhere in the world. The Company’s broad line of solutions are engineered and manufactured primarily for major integrated, large independent, and foreign national energy companies in offshore areas throughout the world. These products are often developed in direct response to customer requests for solutions to critical needs in the field. The Company primarily serves the offshore oil and gas market; however, the Company’s product offerings and service capabilities are based on core competencies that are energy source agnostic and can be applied to additional markets, including offshore wind, offshore wave energy, hydrogen, and liquefied natural gas.
Industry and Executive Outlook
The energy services industry relies heavily on the capital and operating expenditure programs of energy companies. Operators’ decisions to scale back or accelerate their exploration, drilling, and production activities are significantly influenced by the overall state of the energy sector. Notably, the oil and gas industry has historically experienced fluctuations in commodity prices, driven by various global market forces.
Global energy demand continues to rise. Meeting this demand requires incremental oil and natural gas production alongside growth in renewable energy sources. Years of underinvestment in offshore exploration and development are now fueling a resurgence in subsea activity. According to IHS Markit Ltd,, deepwater fields naturally decline at an average rate of 7% per year, underscoring the urgency for new development just to maintain current output. From our perspective, we are seeing global operators allocate more capital toward deepwater and ultra-deepwater developments, particularly in Brazil, the U.S., and West Africa.
There are three primary methods to maintain or expand subsea production:
Long-cycle greenfield development projects;
Subsea tie-back projects that connect new wells to existing infrastructure; and
Maintenance and life-extension activities, including upgrades and decommissioning of aging equipment and systems
Subsea tie-back development continues to gain momentum as a preferred approach among offshore operators. These projects allow operators to access nearby reservoirs, utilize available topside capacity, and leverage existing subsea infrastructure. In mature basins, tie-back strategies have been employed for decades. In emerging regions, operators are increasingly adopting this approach to accelerate first hydrocarbon production and enhance project returns.
A key advantage of subsea tie-back developments is the potential for shorter payback periods than traditional greenfield projects. Leveraging existing assets, these projects frequently have the potential to achieve first oil within two years of final investment decision. However, success hinges on meticulous planning and swift execution. Integrating new equipment into an aging infrastructure presents both technical challenges and opportunities, making adaptability and foresight essential. Proven, practical design, backed by a deep team experienced in subsea installation and commissioning, plays a critical role in ensuring reliability and staying on schedule.
Bidding activity and order intake for subsea tie-back and maintenance projects continued to increase throughout the year. During this period, we have continued to invest in new talent and additional assets to support our long-term growth strategy. We remain disciplined in balancing profitability with investment and are confident that our expanded capabilities position us well to execute on our backlog.
We remain focused on our strategic objective of becoming the leading provider of integrated subsea distribution systems and services globally. One indication of subsea activity is the number of subsea trees awarded and later installed. For both green fields and brown fields, industry analysts, such as Westwood Global Energy Group on March 6, 2026, reported an expected increase from 247 subsea tree awards in 2025 to 296 awards in 2026, a 20% increase. Our product sales tend to correlate with subsea tree awards, as we supply the controls infrastructure linking subsea trees to the topside production facility. The analyst also expects subsea tree installation activity, closely correlated with our service activity, to increase by approximately 8%, even when compared against last year’s elevated installation levels.
Results of Operations
Revenues
Year Ended December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
Revenues
Compared to 2024, our revenue increased 6% in 2025. While product revenue saw a slight decrease as several large, product-heavy contracts did not ramp until late in the year, service revenue had an exceptional year, increasing 45% compared to 2024. This increase in service revenue included installation support and pre-commissioning of umbilicals and distribution systems for both oil & gas and offshore wind projects.
Cost of sales and Gross profit
Year Ended December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Gross profit %
The decrease in gross profit was primarily driven by underutilization of personnel during the first half of the year. The Cost of sales increase was primarily driven by a $1,350 increase in personnel cost associated with higher direct head count and additional rent expense of $280 associated with the new Brazil office lease.
The Company records depreciation expense related to revenue-generating property, plant and equipment as cost of sales, which totaled $504 and $459 for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Year Ended December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
Selling, general & administrative
Selling, general & administrative as a % of revenue
The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) was driven by increased head count and employee benefits of $609, the reserve made against our receivable for $569, and legal expense increases of approximately $350 associated with patents and contractual agreements.
The Company records depreciation and amortization expense related to administrative property, plant and equipment, capitalized software and intellectual property as SG&A, which totaled $86 and $112 for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Interest expense (income), net
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $6 compared to net interest income of $47 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease of $41 is mainly due to increased invoice factoring expense to meet short-term liquidity requirements, which partially offset interest income.
Other income, net
The Company recorded other income, net of $386 and $33 for the years ended December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively, which increase primarily consisted of a $333 gain recognized in 2025 related to the settlement of the WW Champion lawsuit.
Gain/loss on sale of assets
The Company recorded gain of $12 and a loss of $1 related to equipment sold by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
Modified EBITDA
Management evaluates Company performance based on a measure that is not in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), which consists of earnings (net income or loss) available to common stockholders before net interest income, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash share-based compensation expense, non-cash impairments, non-cash gains or losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”), other non-cash items and one-time charges (“Modified EBITDA”). This measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. The measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating income or loss, net income or loss, cash flows provided by operating, investing, or financing activities, or other cash flow data prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The amounts included in the Modified EBITDA calculation, however, are derived from amounts included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
We believe Modified EBITDA is a useful measure of a company’s operating performance, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting methods and book value of assets, financing methods, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired. It helps investors more meaningfully evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest), asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization), and actions that do not affect liquidity (share-based compensation expense) from our operating results. Additionally, it helps investors identify items that are within our operational control. Depreciation and amortization charges, while a component of operating income, are fixed at the time of the asset purchase or acquisition in accordance with the depreciable lives of the related asset and as such are not a directly controllable period operating charge.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Modified EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024:
Years Ended December 31,
Net (loss) income
Deduct: Interest income , net
Add: Income tax expense
Add: Depreciation and amortization
Add: Share-based compensation
Add: Loss (Gain) on Litigation Settlement
Add: Restructuring
Add: Severance
Deduct: Gain (loss) on sale of asset
Modified EBITDA
The $2,567 decrease in Modified EBITDA primarily resulted from increased SG&A expenses from growth initiatives which include patent legal expenses, sales and bidding costs, expenses associated with establishing the Brazil office, and expenses for outside consultants to strengthen and restructure administrative functions during the year ended December 31, 2025. Severance expense was associated with organizational changes to strengthen the accounting function. The decrease also included a $569 receivable that a reserve was made for in 2025.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As an offshore energy services provider, our revenues, profitability, cash flows, and future rate of growth are generally dependent on the condition of the global oil and gas industry and our customers’ ability to invest capital for offshore exploration, drilling and production, and maintenance of offshore drilling and production facilities. Oil and gas prices and the level of offshore drilling and production activity have historically been characterized by significant volatility. At times, we enter into large, fixed-price contracts which may require significant lead time and investment. A decline in offshore drilling and production activity could result in lower contract volume or delays in significant contracts, which could negatively impact our earnings and cash flows. Our earnings and cash flows could also be negatively affected by delays in payments by significant customers or delays in the completion of our contracts for any reason.
The Company believes it will have adequate liquidity to meet its future operating requirements. We are generally dependent on our cash flows from operations to fund our working capital requirements, and the uncertainties noted above create risks that we may not achieve our planned earnings or cash flow from operations. On May 24, 2023, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement/Security Agreement with Zions Bancorporation, N.A., d/b/a Amegy Bank Business Credit (“Amegy”), which provides for Koil Energy from time to time to sell its accounts receivable and other rights to payment to Amegy, subject to Amegy’s right to approve or reject future accounts receivable and other rights proposed for sale, in its sole discretion. At December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively, the Company had $541 and no outstanding sales of accounts receivable to Amegy, respectively.
The principal liquidity needs of the Company are to fund ongoing operations, working capital, and capital expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company reported a $1,887 decrease in cash. The Company consumed $901 of net cash in operating activities, primarily driven by increased working capital to support customer contracts and vendor obligations of $2,436 partially offset by non-cash items including $375 of share-based compensation, $590 for depreciation and amortization, and $569 of credit loss expense. Net cash used in investing activities was $1,533, including $1,282 for new equipment and the overhaul of existing fixed assets and $263 for capitalized software development costs. Net cash provided by financing activities was $562, primarily related to short-term borrowings under the Amegy factoring facility.
The Company maintains a positive outlook on customer inquiries and views this as an opportunity to capitalize on its product, service, and rental offerings to address the subsea distribution and cable management needs of its customers. The reasons for this expected increase are set forth in the “Industry and Executive Outlook” section above. As such, the Company believes it will have adequate liquidity to meet its future operating requirements through a combination of cash on hand, cash expected to be generated from operations, and potential sales of Property, Plant and Equipment (“PP&E”). Given the inherent volatility in oil prices and global economic activity, the Company cannot predict this with certainty. To mitigate this uncertainty and preserve liquidity, the Company will concentrate capital investments on key growth needs and pursue opportunistic cost containment initiatives, which can include workforce alignment, restricting overhead spending and limiting research and development efforts to only critical items.
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that may affect assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and related allowances, contract assets and liabilities, impairments of long-lived assets, including intangibles, income taxes including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, contingencies and litigation, and share-based payments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Property, Plant and Equipment
PP&E is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, amortization, and related impairments. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Replacements and betterments are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. It is our policy to include amortization expense on assets acquired under finance leases with depreciation expense on owned assets. Additionally, we record depreciation and amortization expense related to revenue-generating assets as a component of cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
If circumstances associated with our PP&E have changed or a significant event has occurred that may affect the recoverability of the carrying amount of our PP&E, an impairment indicator exists, and we test the PP&E for impairment. Before testing for impairment, we group PP&E with other finite-lived long-lived assets (“long-lived assets”) at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows from other assets or groups of assets. Testing long-lived assets for impairment is a two-step process:
Step 1 - We test the long-lived asset group for recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset group with the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows from use and the eventual disposal of the asset group. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group is determined to be greater than the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows from use and disposal, we would need to perform step 2.
Step 2 - If the long-lived group of assets fails the recoverability test in step 1, we would record an impairment expense for the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the long-lived asset group.
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company conducted assessments of whether impairment indicators were present that indicate the carrying amount of its long-lived asset group might not be recoverable and determined that no such events or changes in circumstances were present.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. To determine the proper revenue recognition method for our customer contracts, we evaluate whether two or more contracts should be combined and accounted for as one single contract and whether the combined or single contract should be accounted for as more than one performance obligation. This evaluation requires significant judgment and the decision to combine a group of contracts or separate the combined or single contract into multiple performance obligations could change the amount of revenue and profit recorded in a given period.
For most of our fixed price contracts, the customer contracts with us to provide a significant service of integrating a complex set of tasks and components into a single project or capability even if that single project results in the delivery of multiple units. Hence, the entire contract is accounted for as one performance obligation. We account for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.
Fixed Price Contracts
For fixed price contracts, we generally recognize revenue over time as we perform because of continuous transfer of control to the customer. This continuous transfer of control to the customer is supported by clauses in the contract that allow the customer to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience, pay us for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit and take control of any work in process. In our fixed price contracts, the customer either controls the work in process or we deliver products with no alternative use to the Company and have rights to payment for work performed to date plus a reasonable profit as evidenced by contractual termination clauses.
Because of control transferring over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The selection of the method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and is based on the nature of the products or services to be provided. We generally use the cost-to-cost measure of progress for our contracts because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as we incur costs on our contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion of the performance obligation. Revenues, including estimated fees or profits, are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred.
Contracts are often modified to account for changes in contract specifications and requirements. We consider a contract modification to exist when the modification either creates new, or changes the existing, enforceable rights and obligations. Most of our contract modifications are for goods or services that are not distinct from the existing contract due to the significant integration service provided in the context of the contract and are accounted for as if they were part of that existing contract. The effect of a contract modification on the transaction price, and our measure of progress for the performance obligation to which it relates, is recognized as an adjustment to revenue (either as an increase in or a reduction of revenue) on a cumulative catch-up basis.
We have a company-wide standard and disciplined quarterly estimate at completion process in which management reviews the progress and execution of our performance obligations. As part of this process, management reviews information including, but not limited to, any outstanding key contract matters, progress towards completion and the related program schedule, identified risks and opportunities and the related changes in estimates of revenues and costs. Changes in estimates of net sales, cost of sales and the related impact to operating income are recognized quarterly on a cumulative catch-up basis, which recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a performance obligation’s percentage of completion. A significant change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of one or more of our performance obligations. When estimates of total costs to be incurred exceed total estimates of revenue to be earned on a performance obligation related to fixed price contracts, a provision for the entire loss on the performance obligation is recognized in the period the loss is estimated.
Service Contracts
We recognize revenue for service contracts over time when labor, equipment rental, and other associated costs are incurred, which we believe best depicts the transfer of services to the customer. Control transfers as services are performed on a daily basis. Services are typically billed monthly. Payment terms are generally 30 days from invoice receipt but may extend to 45, 60, or 90 days depending on the customer.
Contract Balances
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts arise when revenues are recorded based on the extent of progress towards completion but cannot be invoiced under the terms of the contract. Such amounts are invoiced upon completion of contractual milestones. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts arise when milestone billings are permissible under the contract, but the related costs have not yet been incurred. All contract costs are recognized currently on jobs formally approved by the customer and contracts are not shown as complete until virtually all anticipated costs have been incurred and the risk of loss has passed to the customer.
Assets related to costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, as well as liabilities related to billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, have been classified as current. The contract cycle for certain long-term contracts may extend beyond one year, thus complete collection of amounts related to these contracts may extend beyond one year, though such long-term contracts include contractual milestone billings as discussed above. For the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, there were no contracts with terms that extended beyond one year.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The estimation of anticipated credit losses that may be incurred as we work through the invoice collection process with our customers requires us to make judgments and estimates regarding our customers’ ability to pay amounts due. We monitor our customers’ payment history and current creditworthiness, if needed, to determine that collectability is reasonably assured. We provide an allowance for credit losses based upon a review of each accounts receivable balance with respect to a customer’s ability to make payments. We also evaluate historical loss rates as well as consider forward-looking factors specific to the customers, the overall economic environment, and management expectations to determine expected losses. When certain accounts are determined to require an allowance, they are expensed by a provision for credit losses in that period. On December 31, 2025, and 2024, we estimated the allowance for credit losses requirement to be $569 and $0 respectively. Credit loss expense totaled $569 and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively. We believe that our allowance for credit losses is adequate to cover the anticipated credit losses under current conditions; however, uncertainties regarding changes in the financial condition of our customers, either adverse or positive, could impact the amount and timing of any additional credit losses that may be required.
Income Taxes
We follow the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. This method considers the differences between financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain transactions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will expire before realization of the benefit or that future deductibility is not probable. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends upon our ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in the future. This requires management to use estimates and make assumptions regarding significant future events such as the taxability of entities operating in the various taxing jurisdictions. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all reasonably available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results, the existence of cumulative losses in the most recent years and our forecast of future taxable income. In estimating future taxable income, we develop assumptions, including the amount of future state, and federal pre-tax operating income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment. When the likelihood of the realization of existing deferred tax assets changes, adjustments to the valuation allowance are charged in the period in which the determination is made, either to income or goodwill, depending upon when that portion of the valuation allowance was originally created.
We record an estimated tax liability or tax benefit for income and other taxes based on what we determine will likely be paid in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate. We use our best judgment in the determination of these amounts. However, the liabilities ultimately realized and paid are dependent upon various matters, including resolution of tax audits, and may differ from amounts recorded. An adjustment to the estimated liability would be recorded as a provision or benefit to income tax expense in the period in which it becomes probable that the amount of the actual liability or benefit differs from the recorded amount.
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. If and when our deferred tax assets are no longer fully reserved, we will begin to provide for taxes at the full statutory rate. In addition, we are subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements are included in Note 1, “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates”, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
