Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Exelixis, Inc.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.
Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.
YoY shift: Neutral
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is 0.02pp more bullish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
-0.11pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
+0.16pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
adverse+4
against+4
barriers+4
instability+4
penalties+3
Positive rising
leadership+2
strength+1
positive+1
progress+1
innovation+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
16,789 words
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the risks discussed elsewhere in this report, the following are important factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky, and that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks or such other risks actually occur, our business and the value of your investment in our company could be harmed.
Risks Related to the Commercialization of Our Marketed Products
Our ability to grow our company is dependent upon the commercial success of CABOMETYX in its approved indications and, to a lesser degree, the continued clinical development, regulatory approval, clinical acceptance and commercial success of the cabozantinib franchise.
We anticipate that for the foreseeable future, our ability to maintain or meaningfully increase cash flow to fund our business operations and growth will depend upon the continued commercial success of CABOMETYX, both alone and in
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
termination+1
discontinue+1
tightening+1
suffer+1
fail+1
Positive rising
positive+4
progress+2
opportunities+1
encouraging+1
favoring+1
MD&A (Item 7)
11,736 words
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Some of the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about our business and our industry and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our company’s or our industry’s results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied in, or contemplated by, the forward-looking statements. Our actual results and the timing of events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include those discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These and many other factors could affect our future financial and operating results. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this report.
Table of Contents
Overview
We are an oncology company innovating next-generation medicines and regimens at the forefront of cancer care. We have produced four marketed pharmaceutical products, two of which are formulations of our flagship molecule, cabozantinib, and we are steadily and evolving our product pipeline portfolio, including our lead clinical asset, zanzalintinib, currently under review by the FDA for the treatment of certain forms of CRC, as well as the focus of an extensive -stage clinical development program in other indications. With a rational and disciplined approach to investment, we are leveraging our internal experience and expertise and the of strategic partnerships, to identify and pursue across the landscape of scientific modalities, including small molecules and biotherapeutics, such as ADCs.
combination with other therapies, as a treatment for the highly competitive indications for which it is approved, and possibly for other indications for which cabozantinib is currently being or will be evaluated in clinical trials. We cannot be certain that these clinical trials will demonstrate adequate safety and efficacy to receive regulatory approval, and even if the required regulatory approvals to market CABOMETYX for additional indications are achieved, we and our collaboration partners may not be able to commercialize CABOMETYX effectively and successfully in such indications. If revenue from CABOMETYX decreases or remains flat, or if we or our collaboration partners fail to achieve anticipated product royalties and collaboration milestones, we may need to reduce our operating expenses, access other sources of cash or otherwise modify our business plans, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to grow revenues from sales of CABOMETYX depends upon the degree of market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payers, and the medical community.
Our ability to increase or maintain revenues from sales of CABOMETYX for its approved indications is highly dependent upon the extent of market acceptance of CABOMETYX among physicians, patients, foreign and U.S. government healthcare payers such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial healthcare plans and the medical community. Market acceptance for CABOMETYX could be impacted by numerous factors, including the effectiveness and safety profile, or the perceived effectiveness and safety profile, of CABOMETYX compared to competing products, the strength of CABOMETYX sales and marketing efforts and changes in pricing and reimbursement for CABOMETYX. If CABOMETYX does not continue to be prescribed broadly for the treatment of patients in its approved indications, our product revenues could flatten or decrease, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our competitors may develop products and technologies that impair the relative value of our marketed products and any current and future product candidates.
The biopharmaceutical industry is competitive and characterized by constant technological change and diverse offerings of products, particularly in the area of oncology therapies. Some of our competitors have greater capital resources, larger research and development staff and facilities, deeper organizational regulatory experience and more extensive product manufacturing and commercial capabilities than we do, which may afford them a competitive advantage. Further, our competitors may in-license and develop new commercial products that could render our products, and those of our collaboration partners, obsolete or noncompetitive. We face, and will continue to face, intense competition from biopharmaceutical companies, as well as academic research institutions, clinical reference laboratories and government agencies that are pursuing scientific and clinical research activities similar to ours.
The specific indications for which CABOMETYX is currently or may be approved in the future are highly competitive. Several novel therapies and combinations of therapies have been approved, are in advanced stages of clinical development or are under expedited regulatory review in these indications, and these other therapies are currently competing or are expected to compete with CABOMETYX, or the FDA may update their labeling to add accepted indications that compete with CABOMETYX. Even if our current and future clinical trials produce positive results sufficient to obtain marketing approval by the FDA and other global regulatory authorities, it is uncertain whether physicians will choose to prescribe regimens containing our products instead of competing products and product combinations in approved indications.
If we are unable to maintain or increase our sales, marketing, market access and product distribution capabilities for our products, we may be unable to maximize product revenues, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Maintaining our sales, marketing, market access and product distribution capabilities requires significant resources, and there are numerous risks involved with maintaining and continuously improving our commercial organization, including our potential inability to successfully recruit, train, retain and incentivize adequate numbers of qualified and effective sales and marketing personnel. We are competing for talent with numerous commercial- and precommercial-stage, oncology-focused biopharmaceutical companies seeking to build out and maintain their commercial organizations, as well as larger biopharmaceutical organizations that have extensive, well-funded and more experienced sales and marketing operations, and we may be unable to maintain or adequately scale our commercial organization because of such competition. Also, to the extent that the commercial opportunities for CABOMETYX grow over time, we may not properly scale the size and experience of our commercialization teams to market and sell CABOMETYX successfully in an expanded number of indications. If we are unable to maintain or scale our commercial function appropriately, we may
Table of Contents
not be able to maximize product revenues, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to obtain or maintain coverage and reimbursement for our products from government and other third-party payers, our business will suffer.
Our ability to commercialize our products successfully is highly dependent on the extent to which health insurance coverage and reimbursement is, and will be, available from third-party payers, including foreign and U.S. governmental payers, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and private health insurers. Third-party payers continue to scrutinize and manage access to pharmaceutical products and services and may limit reimbursement for newly approved products and indications. Patients are generally not capable of paying for CABOMETYX or COMETRIQ themselves and rely on third-party payers to pay for, or subsidize, the costs of their medications, among other medical costs. Accordingly, market acceptance of CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ is dependent on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement is available from third-party payers. These payer entities could refuse, limit or condition coverage for our products, such as by using tiered reimbursement or pressing for new forms of contracting, or alternatively for patients who rely on our co-pay assistance program, implementing co-pay accumulators or maximizers that exempt such co-pay assistance from patient deductibles (or otherwise modify benefit designs in a manner that takes into account the availability of co-pay assistance), which actions have increased and could further increase the costs of our co-pay assistance program or cause patients to abandon CABOMETYX or COMETRIQ therapy due to higher out-of-pocket costs. In April 2024, the CMS finalized regulations that will mitigate maximizer programs by requiring individual and small group market health plans to consider as essential health benefits (EHB) all prescription drugs that are covered in excess of a state’s EHB benchmark plan. The Departments of Labor, Treasury, and HHS stated their intent to address the application of this policy to large group market and self-insured plans in future rulemaking. CMS also plans to address in future rulemaking the application of manufacturer assistance to the annual cost-sharing limit; this follows a 2023 federal district court decision vacating a rule that provided health plans with discretion whether to include manufacturer assistance toward the annual cost-sharing limit. If third-party payers do not provide or increase limitations on coverage or reimbursement for CABOMETYX or COMETRIQ, our revenues and results of operations may suffer. In addition, even if third-party payers provide some coverage or reimbursement for CABOMETYX or COMETRIQ, the availability of such coverage or reimbursement for prescription drugs under private health insurance and managed care plans, which often varies based on the type of contract or plan purchased, may not be sufficient for patients to afford CABOMETYX or COMETRIQ.
Current healthcare laws, policies, and regulations in the U.S. and future legislative or regulatory reforms to the U.S. healthcare system, including those related to drug pricing, may affect our ability to commercialize our marketed products profitably. Pricing for pharmaceutical products in the U.S. has come under increasing attention and scrutiny by federal and state governments, legislative bodies and enforcement agencies. Initiatives arising from this scrutiny may result in changes that have the effect of reducing our revenue or harming our business or reputation.
Concern over access to and affordability of pharmaceutical products continues to spur debate and action by U.S. federal and state government authorities in an effort to contain healthcare costs. Such proposals and actions include:
• use of mandated discounts, rebates, restrictive formularies, or other reference-based price controls, such as most favored nation (MFN) or international reference pricing, direct-to-consumer sales of prescription drugs, as well as price transparency reporting obligations;
• restrictions on Medicaid funding;
• efforts to reevaluate, reduce or limit the price patients pay for pharmaceutical products;
• implementation of additional data collection and transparency reporting regarding drug pricing, rebates, fees and other remuneration provided by drug manufacturers;
• tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals, or their components;
• revisions to rules associated with the calculation of average manufacturer price and average sales price; best price and rebate liability (including broadening the circumstances under which products are subject to rebates and recent changes CMS made to the calculation of average sales price for the Medicare Part B program regarding the treatment of fees as “bona fide service fees” and for bundled sales, which CMS could seek to implement in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, and which in turn could impact our rebate liability) for the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, along with CMS’ stated objective to consider potential future rulemaking that if implemented, could significantly increase manufacturer rebate liability; and
• reevaluation of safe harbors under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS).
Table of Contents
The IRA, which, among other things: enables CMS to assert control over the prices of certain single-source drugs and biotherapeutics reimbursed under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program; subjects drug manufacturers to potential civil monetary penalties and a significant excise tax for offering a price that is not equal to or less than the government-imposed MFP under the law; imposes Medicare rebates for certain Part B and Part D drugs where relevant pricing metrics associated with the products increase faster than inflation; and redesigns the funding and benefit structure of the Medicare Part D program, potentially increasing manufacturer liability while capping annual out-of-pocket drug expenses for Medicare beneficiaries. These provisions started taking effect incrementally in late 2022 and currently are subject to various legal challenges. As of the date of this report, for example, CMS has begun to implement aspects of the IRA and finalized regulations addressing the Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D inflation rebate provisions of the IRA. These provisions generally require manufacturers of Medicare Part B and Part D rebatable drugs to pay inflation rebates to the Medicare program if pricing metrics associated with their products increase faster than the rate of inflation. In addition, in September 2025, CMS issued final guidance for the third round of drug pricing evaluations (for which the next 15 selected products were announced January 27, 2026, with negotiations to follow over the course of the year, resulting in MFPs that will become effective beginning in 2028), as well as requirements for manufacturers effectuating MFPs in 2026, 2027, and 2028. The IRA also contains the limited small biotech exception, which applies on a drug-specific basis. Qualifying drugs may be exempt from possible pricing negotiation through 2028 and eligible for a lower limit (i.e., a price floor) on the potential MFP in 2029 and 2030, if the manufacturers of those drugs continue to qualify each year. We have qualified for the small biotech exception with respect to our cabozantinib franchise products through Initial Price Applicability Year (IPAY) 2027, and we reapplied for the small biotech exception for IPAY 2028. Additionally, in July 2025, Congress enacted legislation that expands the orphan drug exclusion under the IRA. Starting with price evaluations for 2028, CMS cannot select a drug if all of its approved indications are for rare diseases or conditions. Moreover, if a drug no longer qualifies for the orphan drug exclusion because it is approved for a non-rare disease or condition, the 7-year or 9-year timeline before it may be selected will begin upon approval of the drug for such non-rare disease or condition. Separately, in December 2024, CMS released final guidance on the Part D Discount Program, which requires manufacturers to take on more of the beneficiary cost previously subsidized by the federal government through the application of increased drug discounts. As we received notice from CMS that we qualify for the "specified small manufacturer” designation, we are eligible for a phase-in of the increased manufacturer discounts under the Part D Discount Program from 2025 to 2031. In November 2025, CMS issued a proposed rule on the Part D Discount Program that largely codifies the final guidance. In April 2025, CMS finalized regulations implementing the Medicare Prescription Payment Plan, under which Medicare Part D beneficiaries may opt to make their cost-sharing payments in capped monthly installments; CMS expects that this program will most likely benefit those beneficiaries with high cost-sharing early in their respective plan years.
Over time, the IRA could reduce the revenues we are able to collect from sales of our products or present challenges for payer negotiations and formulary access for our products, as well as increase our government discount and rebate liabilities; however, the degree of impact that the IRA will ultimately have upon our business remains unclear. In addition, we cannot know the final form or timing of any other legislative, regulatory and/or administrative measures, and some of these pending and enacted policy changes, if implemented as currently proposed, would likely have significant and far-reaching impacts on the biopharmaceutical industry and therefore likely also have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, there is ongoing litigationchallenging the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, and we cannot predict the outcome of these cases.
If additional prescription drug price controls are implemented, the resulting changes to the pricing and reimbursement of CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ could affect our ability to continue to commercialize the products. Consolidation and integration of private payers and pharmacy benefit managers in the U.S. has also significantly impacted the market for pharmaceuticals by increasing payer leverage in negotiating manufacturer price or rebate concessions and pharmacy reimbursement rates. Such restrictive or unfavorable pricing, coverage or reimbursement determinations for CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ or our other product candidates, whether made by governments (including regulatory agencies and courts) or by private payers, may adversely impact our business.
In addition, there have been, and may in the future be, initiatives at both the federal and state level or legal challenges that could significantly modify the terms and scope of government-provided health insurance coverage, ranging from changes to or litigationopposing some or all of the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended, to establishing a single-payer, national health insurance system, to more limited “buy-in” options to existing public health insurance programs, any of which could have a significant impact on the healthcare industry. Although such attempts to reform the U.S. healthcare system have not significantly impacted our business to date, it is possible that additional legislative, executive and judicial activities in the future could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Table of Contents
In addition, the current U.S. administration has indicated that it plans to pursue additional policies aimed at lowering prescription drug costs. For example, on May 12, 2025, the current administration published an executive order that expressed support for equalizing the prices paid for drugs in the United States and other developed countries by employing an MFN approach to drug pricing. The May 12 executive order directs the Secretary of the HHS to communicate MFN price targets to pharmaceutical manufacturers, which the Secretary announced on May 20, 2025. If significant progress towards MFN pricing targets is not delivered, the executive order directs the Secretary to propose a rulemaking plan to impose MFN pricing. On September 25, 2025 and October 2, 2025, CMS submitted proposed rules for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) models, called the Global Benchmark for Efficient Drug Pricing (GLOBE) Model and Guarding U.S. Medicare Against Rising Drug Costs (GUARD) Model, to the White House for review. These models, if implemented, may allow CMS to pursue formalized approaches to MFN pricing for prescription drugs. In addition, on November 6, 2025, CMS published a request for applications for another CMMI model, the GENEROUS (GENErating cost Reductions fOr U.S. Medicaid) Model. This is a voluntary model that tests the effect of supplemental rebate agreements between manufacturers and CMS, which align Medicaid prices with a defined MFN price. The scope of these models and the impact that they could have on Exelixis’ products is unclear at this time.
It is also unclear which authorities the current administration could use to effectuate an MFN approach beyond the CMMI models, although the May 12 executive order makes reference to using waivers on import restrictions under section 804(j)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and also to various authorities, including the antitrust laws. And, previously, on April 15, 2025, the current administration published a separate executive order that, among other things, directs specified agency heads to pursue a range of drug policy reforms, including, among other things, innovative payment models to obtain better value for high-cost prescription drugs and biologics, increasing access to drugs imported from Canada, and accelerating the approval of generics. Because the specifics of these proposals are unclear, there is uncertainty about how these and other potential legal or regulatory changes may affect our business.
Furthermore, because we participate in the 340B Program to sell a portion of our marketed products, changes in the administration of the program could have a material adverse impact on our revenues. Effective July 2022, and as subsequently updated, we implemented a 340B Program Integrity Initiative, pursuant to which Exelixis offers its 340B covered outpatient drugs (i.e., CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ) directly to all covered entities (i.e., entities that participate in the 340B Program) at their Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) registered locations (including both the HRSA registered parent and child site locations), and requires that covered entities provide claims-level data for all dispenses of Exelixis’ 340B covered outpatient drugs including dispenses of such products at covered entity in-house pharmacies. A covered entity that does not have an in-house pharmacy capable of dispensing 340B drugs to its patients may designate one (1) contract pharmacy within our authorized specialty pharmacy network for delivery of 340B priced drugs, but may no longer select an affiliated contract pharmacy to fulfill this purpose. We believe this initiative will provide much-needed transparency and promote compliance with program requirements, and at the same time, should not restrict patient access to our medicines.
Some manufacturers that have implemented similar contract pharmacy integrity programs received enforcement letters from the HHS asserting that those programs violate the 340B Program statute, have been referred to the HHS Office of Inspector General for assessment of civil monetary penalties, and have been subject to administrative dispute resolution (ADR) proceedings brought on behalf of covered entities. Several manufacturers are challenging the HHS’ position in litigation. Relatedly, in November 2023, we received from several covered entities a 340B Program ADR petition seeking to invoke an administrative adjudication process overseen by the HRSA. The petitioners contend that our 340B Program Integrity Initiative caused them to be overcharged for CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ. We have since received confirmation that the HRSA will assign an ADR panel to the claim and responded to the complaint in October 2024. At this time, it remains unclear what, if any, liabilities we might incur as a party to this ADR proceeding.
In addition, a growing number of states have enacted laws requiring manufacturers to provide the 340B Program pricing through contract pharmacy arrangements, and additional states may adopt similar laws. We believe these laws, which are being challenged in ongoing litigation, are invalid or are otherwise inapplicable to our 340B Program Integrity Initiative, but we have carved out covered entities in certain states while litigationchallenging these laws proceeds. We also believe that our 340B Program Integrity Initiative complies with the 340B Program statute, as supported by the federal appellate court decisions in Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC v. United States Department of Health and Human Services (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit) and Novartis v. Johnson (U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia).
On March 17, 2025, April 24, 2025, and May 27, 2025, we received notice letters (collectively, Notices) from the West Virginia Board of Pharmacy (WV Board) of complaints filed against us for purportedviolations of laws related to distribution of drugs to 340B facilities (West Virginia Code § 60A-8-6a (WV Statute)). The WV Statute provides for civil
Table of Contents
monetary penalties, in addition to investigative demands, remedies, and other penalties for violations. We acknowledged receipt of the Notices, and there have been no further communications. Other pharmaceutical manufacturers are challenging the WV Statute in court.
Depending on the outcome of the ongoing litigation or any specific proceedings involving us, however, we may be required to modify or suspend our 340B Program Integrity Initiative. Ultimately, any negative ruling in a federal court, HHS administrative proceeding, or state-level proceeding in which we are a party, or in which the compliance of our 340B Program Integrity Initiative is at issue, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Other aspects of the 340B Program are subject to ongoing litigation, the resolution of which could impact the scope of the 340B Program. In addition, potential policy changes by the current U.S. administration may introduce additional uncertainty for our business. These could include changes to the level of scrutiny applied by the HRSA to enforce non-compliance with the 340B Drug Pricing Program, new price restrictions on products we sell to Medicaid, Medicare, or other government purchasers, or other regulatory changes impacting reimbursement or competitive dynamics in multisource markets. Any such policy shifts could significantly impact our business and operations. Due to general uncertainty with respect to these issues, we are unable to predict the impact of any future legislative, regulatory, third-party payer, or policy actions at this time. If proposed changes are ultimately enacted, we and any third parties we might engage may be unable to adapt to any changes implemented because of such measures, and we could face difficulties in maintaining or increasing profitability or otherwise experience a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Increasingly, states are enacting legislation requiring manufacturers to report drug pricing information. However, states have not always clearly defined their reporting requirements, which may result in manufacturers inadvertentlyfailing to properly disclose the required pricing information. Complying with federal and state programs and future changes to these programs can be complex and cost-and resource-intensive and could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition.
In addition to such drug pricing and transparency matters, other state legislative and regulatory initiatives include proposals designed to control pharmaceutical and biotherapeutic product pricing, including restrictions on pricing or reimbursement at the state government level, limitations on discounts to patients, advance notices of price increases, marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, policies to encourage importation from other countries (subject to federal approval) and bulk purchasing.
Lengthy regulatory pricing and reimbursement procedures and cost control initiatives imposed by governments outside the U.S. could delay the marketing of and/or result in downward pressure on the price of our approved products, resulting in a decrease in revenue.
Outside the U.S., including major markets in the EU and Japan, the pricing and reimbursement of prescription pharmaceuticals is generally subject to significant governmental control. In these countries, pricing and reimbursement negotiations with governmental authorities or payers can take six to 12 months or longer after the initial marketing authorization is granted for a product, or after the marketing authorization for a new indication is granted. This can substantially delay broad availability of the product. To obtain reimbursement and/or pricing approval in some countries, our collaboration partners Ipsen and Takeda may also be required to conduct a study or otherwise provide data that seeks to establish the cost effectiveness of CABOMETYX compared with other available established therapies. The conduct of such a study could also result in delays in the commercialization of CABOMETYX.
Additionally, cost-control initiatives, increasingly based on affordability and accessibility, as well as post-marketing assessments of the added value of CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ as compared to existing treatments, could influence the prices paid for and net revenues we realize from CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ, or the indications for which we are able to obtain reimbursement, which would result in lower license revenues to us. Recent legislative changes and ongoing policy changes in the EU are aimed at increasing cooperation between the Member States of the EEA. Such initiatives, particularly the Regulation on Health Technology Assessment adopted in December 2021 and entered into application in January 2025, may further impact the price and reimbursement status of CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ.
Table of Contents
The timing of the entrance of generic competitors to CABOMETYX and legislative and regulatory action designed to reduce barriers to the development, approval and adoption of generic drugs in the U.S. could limit the revenue we derive from our products, most notably CABOMETYX, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Under the FDCA, the FDA can approve an ANDA for a generic version of a branded drug without the applicant undertaking the human clinical testing necessary to obtain approval to market a new drug. The FDA can also approve a 505(b)(2) NDA that relies in part on the FDA’s findings of safety and/or effectiveness for a previously approved drug, where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference or use. Both the ANDA and 505(b)(2) NDA processes are discussed in more detail in “Item 1. Business—Government Regulation—FDA Review and Approval—Abbreviated FDA Approval Pathways and Generic Products” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In either case, if an ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA applicant submits an application referencing one of our marketed products prior to the expiry of one or more of our Orange Book-listed patents for the applicable product and includes a paragraph IV certification asserting that the patents are invalid or not infringed, we may litigate with the potential generic competitor to protect our patent rights, which would result in substantial costs, divert the attention of management, and could have an adverse impact on our stock price. For example, other companies, including MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (individually and collectively with certain of its affiliates, including MSN Laboratories Private Limited, referred to as MSN) have applied for or received tentative approval for an ANDA for generic versions of CABOMETYX tablets. Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Azurity) has received tentative approval for a 505(b)(2) NDA for cabozantinib tablets and Handa Oncology, LLC (Handa) has submitted a 505(b)(2) NDA requesting approval to market cabozantinib capsules (in the form of cabozantinib lauryl sulfate). Both of these 505(b)(2) products are for different strengths of cabozantinib than CABOMETYX. Because of this, we believe that the FDA would not consider them to be therapeutically equivalent and they cannot be automatically substituted for CABOMETYX. With the exception of Handa (for which we continue to evaluate all legal and strategic options), we have subsequently filed patent infringement lawsuits against these companies. For a more detailed discussion of these matters, see “Legal Proceedings” in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. It is possible that MSN, Azurity, Handa, or other companies, will obtain FDA approval of an ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA, and introduce generic or otherwise competitor versions of cabozantinib before our patents expire if they do not infringe our patents or if it is determined that our patents are invalid or unenforceable. We expect that generic cabozantinib products would be offered at a significantly lower price compared to our marketed cabozantinib products. Regardless of the regulatory approach, the introduction of a generic version of cabozantinib would likely decrease our revenues derived from the U.S. sales of CABOMETYX and thereby materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. There are also equivalent procedures in the EEA permitting authorization of generic versions of medicinal products authorized in the EU once related data and market exclusivity periods have expired.
The U.S. federal government has also taken numerous legislative and regulatory actions to expedite the development and approval of generic drugs. Both Congress and the FDA are considering, and have enacted, various legislative and regulatory proposals focused on drug competition, including legislation focused on drug patenting and provision of drug to generic applicants for testing. For example, the Ensuring Innovation Act, enacted in April 2021, amended the FDA’s statutory authority for granting NCE exclusivity to reflect the FDA’s existing regulations and longstanding interpretation that award NCE exclusivity based on a drug’s active moiety, as opposed to its active ingredient, which is intended to limit the applicability of NCE exclusivity, thereby potentially facilitating generic competition. In addition, the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, which incorporated the framework from the Creating and Restoring Equal Access To Equivalent Samples (CREATES) legislation, allows ANDA, 505(b)(2) NDA or biosimilar developers to obtain access to quantities of branded drug and biological product samples necessary to conduct research and development. Further, Section 3222 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, enacted on December 29, 2022 (2023 Appropriations Act), requires the FDA to make therapeutic equivalence determinations for 505(b)(2) NDAs at the time of approval, or up to 180 days thereafter, if requested by the applicant. Additionally, Section 3224 of the 2023 Appropriations Act allows the FDA to approve an ANDA even if there are differences between the generic drug’s proposed labeling and that of the listed drug due to the FDA approving a change to the listed drug’s label (excluding warnings) within 90 days of when the ANDA is otherwise eligible for approval, provided that the ANDA applicant agrees to submit revised labeling for the generic drug within 60 days of approval. In addition, the policies introduced in the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments Commitment Letter give the FDA greater flexibility to approve ANDAs without adding additional review cycles when there are changes to the reference listed drug that may previously have delayed approval. While the full impact of these provisions is unclear at this time, they have the potential to facilitate the development and future approval and market success of generic versions of our products, introducing generic competition that could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, in September 2023, the FTC issued a policy statement, supported by the FDA, warning brand pharmaceutical companies that they could face legal action under the FTC
Table of Contents
Act if they improperly list patents in the Orange Book, and it subsequently initiated, and continues to initiate, challengesagainst patents held by brand pharmaceutical companies and listed in the Orange Book under the FDA’s patent listing dispute process. In December 2024, the Federal Circuit ruled that, to be listed in the Orange Book, a patent must claim the active ingredient of the drug product. This decision may limit the number of patents brand pharmaceutical companies may list in the Orange Book. In April 2025, the U.S. administration issued an executive order that, among other things, directs the FDA to issue a report with recommendations to accelerate the approval of generics, biosimilars, combination products, and second-in-class brand name medications, and, in October 2025, the FDA announced a pilot prioritization program that makes generic drugs for which required bioequivalence testing is conducted in the U.S. and that are made in the U.S. using domestic sources for active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) eligible for priority review. It remains to be seen what effect these may have on potential generic competition for our products, if any.
Risks Related to Growth of Our Product Portfolio and Research and Development
We may be unable to expand our discovery and development pipeline, which could limit our growth and revenue potential.
Our business is focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of new medicines for difficult-to-treat cancers. In this regard, we have invested substantial technical, financial and human resources toward drug discovery activities with the goal of identifying new potential product candidates to advance into clinical trials. Notwithstanding this investment, many drug discovery programs that initially show promise will ultimately fail to yield clinical product candidates for multiple reasons. For example, product candidates and preclinical development candidates may, on further study, be shown to have inadequate efficacy, harmful side effects, suboptimal pharmaceutical profiles or other characteristics suggesting that they are unlikely to become commercially viable products.
Apart from our drug discovery efforts, our strategy to expand our development pipeline is also dependent on our ability to successfully identify and acquire or in-license relevant investigational oncology assets and technologies. However, the in-licensing and acquisition of investigational oncology assets and technologies is a highly competitive area, and many other companies are pursuing the same or similar investigational oncology assets and technologies to those that we may consider attractive. Larger companies with more capital resources and more extensive clinical development and commercialization capabilities may have a competitive advantage over us. Furthermore, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We may also be unable to in-license or acquire additional investigational oncology assets and technologies on acceptable terms that would allow us to realize an appropriate return on our investment. Even if we succeed in our efforts to obtain rights to suitable investigational oncology assets and technologies, the competitive business environment may result in higher acquisition or licensing costs, and our investment in these potential product candidates and technologies will remain subject to the inherent risks associated with the development and commercialization of new medicines. In certain circumstances, we may also be reliant on licensors for the continued development of any product candidates and/or technologies that we have in-licensed and such licensors’ efforts to safeguard their underlying intellectual property.
With respect to acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate the target company successfully into our existing business, maintain the key business relationships of the target company, or retain key personnel of the acquired business. Furthermore, we could assume unknown or contingent liabilities or otherwise incur unanticipated expenses. Any acquisitions or investments made by us also could result in our spending significant amounts of resources, issuing dilutive securities, assuming or incurring significant debt obligations and contingent liabilities, incurring large one-time expenses, and acquiring intangible assets that could result in significant future amortization expense and significant write-offs, any of which could harm our financial condition and results of operations. If our drug discovery efforts, including research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and other business development activities, do not result in suitable product candidates, our business and prospects for growth could suffer.
Clinical testing of our product candidates is a lengthy, costly, complex and uncertain process that may ultimately fail to demonstrate sufficiently differentiated safety and efficacy data for those products to compete in our highly competitive market environment.
Clinical trials are inherently risky and may reveal that a product candidate is ineffective or has an unacceptable safety profile with respect to an intended use. This also applies to the testing of new indications for cabozantinib, or the clinical development of zanzalintinib, or any of our other product candidates. Adverse clinical trial results may significantly decrease the likelihood of regulatory approval of a new product or a new indication for an existing product. Furthermore, the results of preliminary studies do not necessarily predict clinical or commercial success, and late-stage or other
Table of Contents
potentially label-enabling clinical trials may fail to confirm the results observed in early-stage trials or preliminary studies. Finally, although we have established timelines for clinical development as well as manufacturing of zanzalintinib and our other product candidates based on existing knowledge of our compounds in development and industry metrics, we may not be able to meet those timelines.
We may experience numerous unforeseen events, during or as a result of clinical investigations, that could delay or prevent commercialization of cabozantinib in new indications or of zanzalintinib or our other new product candidates. These events may include:
• lack of acceptable efficacy or a tolerable safety profile;
• being placed on clinical hold by the FDA due to safety or effectiveness concerns;
• negative or inconclusive clinical trial results that require us to conduct further testing or to abandon projects;
• discovery or commercialization by our competitors of other compounds or therapies that demonstrate potentially superior safety or efficacy profiles as compared to cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates;
• our inability to identify and maintain a sufficient number of clinical trial sites;
• lower-than-anticipated patient registration or enrollment in our clinical testing;
• additional complexities posed by clinical trials evaluating cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates in combination with other therapies, including extended timelines to provide for collaboration on clinical development planning, the failure by our collaboration partners to provide us with an adequate and timely supply of product that complies with the applicable quality and regulatory requirements for a combination trial;
• reduced staffing or shortages in laboratory supplies and other resources necessary to complete clinical trials;
• replacement of staff at the FDA’s OCE that changes OCE’s view of the acceptability of the design, conduct, or data produced by our clinical trials;
• failure of our third-party contract research organizations or investigators to satisfy their contractual obligations, including deviating from any trial protocols or failing to adhere to appropriate recordkeeping or data integrity requirements; and
• withholding of authorization from regulators or institutional review boards to commence or conduct clinical trials or delays, variations, suspensions or terminations of clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a determination by these regulators and institutional review boards that participating patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks.
Further, with the passage of the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (FDORA), Congress clarified the FDA’s authority to conduct inspections by expressly permitting inspection of facilities involved in the preparation, conduct or analysis of clinical and non-clinical studies submitted to the FDA, as well as of other persons holding study records or otherwise involved in the study process, which could delay or add complexity to our clinical trials.
The ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East and the political, economic and social instability in Venezuela have had modest impacts on our clinical development operations and may continue to have adverse impacts on the ability of clinical sites and enrolled patients to adhere to trial protocols for in-office clinical visits and other procedures, our ability to supply clinical sites with cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or other study drugs and to pay clinical sites and investigators for work performed, as well as our ability to collect data and conduct site monitoring visits, all of which could undermine the data quality for patients enrolled at these clinical sites. These issues could further impact our anticipated timelines for completing the trials and achieving clinical endpoints, as well as increase our clinical development expenses. If there are further delays in or termination of the clinical testing of cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates due to any of the events described above or otherwise, our expenses could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be impaired, either of which could adversely impact our financial results. Furthermore, we have relied and may in the future rely on collaboration partners to share a significant portion of the expenses associated with our clinical development programs. Should one or all of our collaboration partners decline to support future planned clinical trials, we will be entirely responsible for financing the further development of the cabozantinib franchise, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates and, as a result, the burden of clinical trial expenses we incur associated with our business plans may be materially greater than currently anticipated, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Table of Contents
We may not be able to pursue the further development of the cabozantinib franchise, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates or meet current or future requirements of the FDA or regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions in accordance with our stated timelines or at all. Our planned clinical trials may not begin on time, or at all, may not be completed on schedule, or at all, may not be sufficient for registration of our product candidates or otherwise may not result in an approvable product. The duration and the cost of clinical trials vary significantly due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the characteristics of the product candidate under investigation; the number of patients who ultimately participate in the clinical trial; the duration of patient follow-up; the number of clinical sites included in the trial; and the length of time required to enroll eligible patients. Any delay could limit our ability to generate revenues, cause us to incur additional expenses and cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly.
The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, uncertain and subject to change, and may not result in regulatory approvals for additional cabozantinib indications or for our other product candidates, such as zanzalintinib, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The activities associated with the research, development and commercialization of the cabozantinib franchise, zanzalintinib and our other product candidates are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the U.S., as well as by comparable regulatory authorities in other territories. The processes of obtaining regulatory approvals in the U.S. and other foreign jurisdictions are expensive and often takes many years, if approval is obtained at all, and they can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. For example, before an NDA or sNDA can be submitted to the FDA, or a MAA to the EMA or any application or submission to comparable regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions, the product candidate must undergo extensive clinical trials, which can take many years and require substantial expenditures.
Any clinical trial may fail to produce results satisfactory to the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities; moreover, these regulatory authorities have substantial discretion and influence over clinical trial design and conduct, as well as the drug approval process. As such, approval outcomes are difficult to predict. Even if late-state, registrational clinical trials for our new products are positive, the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities may refuse to approve any NDA or sNDA or their foreign equivalents, or require additional preclinical, clinical, safety or other non-clinical studies.
In addition, policy-based activities could delay the approval of an application for cabozantinib, zanzalintinib, or our other product candidates. For example, the FDA’s OCE has many initiatives aimed at improving oncology drug development, some of which may lead to the need for additional studies, such as dose optimization. Many of these initiatives are based on guidance issued by OCE. If the FDA chooses to withdraw those guidance documents for any reason it may affect our ability to gain regulatory approval based on studies that relied on those guidance documents. The FDA also continues to develop and finalize guidance documents that further refine the development process for oncology drug products, although the FDA’s rate of issuing guidance has slowed significantly under the current U.S. administration. And, as this market expands, it becomes increasingly difficult to demonstrate benefit over the standard of care, which can be a hurdle for approval. Moreover, the development of our product candidates may be delayed by other events beyond our control. For example, action by the current U.S. administration to further limit federal agency budgets or personnel, may result in reductions to the FDA’s budget, workforce, and operations, which may lead to slower response times and longer review periods, potentially affecting our ability to progress development of our product candidates or obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates. Pursuant to a February 2025 executive order on workforce optimization, on March 27, 2025, the HHS announced that it was initiating a restructuring of the department, including reducing the FDA’s workforce by approximately 3,500 full-time employees, which began on April 1, 2025. The termination of these employees has been preceded and accompanied by the resignation of senior and mid-level leaders within the FDA, which could result in the potential loss of certain institutional knowledge and experience. Terminations, and resignations at the FDA have continued and there has been notable turnover and instability in key leadership positions. Although the full impact of these events remains unclear, there could be an adverse effect on the FDA’s ability to efficiently carry out its functions, including conducting inspections and timely reviewing drug product applications, and a potential impact on how it interprets and enforces its authorities, which may be also exacerbated by other events, such as a U.S. federal government shutdown. Further, ongoing deregulation and transparency efforts at the FDA could create regulatory uncertainty for biopharmaceutical companies. Additionally, uncertainty remains as to how the FDA’s use of artificial intelligence (AI) and deployment of agentic AI capabilities, including for review of drug product applications, will impact the outcomes and timeliness of FDA reviews and other activities.
The FDA has also been tightening the requirements for confirmatory studies for drugs approved via accelerated approval under additional authorities the FDA received in Section 3210 of the FDORA (incorporated in Section 3222 of the
Table of Contents
2023 Appropriations Act). While the standard for accelerated approval remains unchanged, the FDA may now require that confirmatory trials for drugs approved under the pathway be underway prior to approval, which was not previously a requirement. The changes to the law are intended to prevent accelerated approval of drugs without verified clinical benefit, which had previously resulted in withdrawal of approval for certain products and indications approved on an accelerated basis. While it is not clear at this time how these legislative and regulatory initiatives will affect our plans to pursue accelerated approval for one or more of our product candidates, these developments may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The FDA may also choose to convene an advisory committee of independent experts to evaluate the adequacy of the safety and efficacy data supporting a drug candidate’s approvability. The outcome of such advisory committee meetings is inherently uncertain and may have a significant impact on the likelihood, timing, and scope of regulatory approval for our product candidates. In addition, while influential, advisory committee decisions are not binding on the FDA and there have been instances in the oncology space where the FDA chose not to take an advisory committee’s recommendation. There is also the risk that an advisory committee may recommend against approval, suggest a narrower indication, or require additional studies or safety labeling, and the FDA may or may not accept these recommendations. This uncertainty is heightened by recent leadership changes at OCE, which may result in shifts in regulatory priorities, review standards, or interpretations of clinical data, further complicating the approval process. As a result, the regulatory pathway for our drug candidates may be even more unpredictable, complex, and lengthy, and any adverse outcome in the advisory committee process or final FDA decision could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Even if the FDA or a comparable authority in another jurisdiction grants accelerated approval for cabozantinib in one or more new indications or for zanzalintinib or one of our other product candidates, such accelerated approval may be limited, imposing significant restrictions on the indicated uses, conditions for use, labeling, distribution, and/or production of the product and would impose requirements for post-marketing studies, including additional research and clinical trials, all of which may result in significant expense and limit our and our collaboration partners’ ability to commercialize cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates in any new indications. In addition, some products approved under accelerated approval have encountered challenges with CMS coverage determinations. Failure to complete post-marketing requirements could significantly increase costs or delay, limit or ultimately restrict the commercialization of cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or another product candidate in the approved indication, or result in product withdrawal. Further, current or any future laws or executive orders governing FDA or foreign regulatory approval processes that may be enacted or executed could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Risks Related to Financial Matters
Our profitability could be negatively impacted if expenses associated with our drug discovery, clinical development, business development and commercialization activities grow more quickly than the revenues we generate.
Although we reported net income of $782.6 million and $521.3 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, we may not be able to maintain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis, and we are unable to predict the extent of future profits or losses. The amount of our net profits or losses will depend, in part, on: the level of sales of CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ in the U.S.; our achievement of development, regulatory and commercial milestones, if any, under our collaboration agreements; the amount of royalties from sales of CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ outside of the U.S. under our collaboration agreements; other collaboration revenues; and the level of our expenses associated with our extensive drug discovery, clinical development, business development and commercialization activities, as well as our general business expansion plans. Our expected future expenses may also be increased by inflationary pressures, which could increase the costs of outside services, labor, raw materials and finished drug product. Significant changes in tariffs or other trade barriers, such as the enactment of tariffs on goods imported into the United States, including, but not limited to, tariffs on goods imported from China, Mexico and Canada (including raw materials and components used in our manufacturing processes) or the introduction of additional tariffs or other trade barriers, could also increase the costs of our finished drug product. We expect to continue to spend substantial amounts to fund the continued development of the cabozantinib franchise for additional indications and of zanzalintinib and our other product candidates, as well as the commercialization of our approved products. In addition, we intend to continue to expand our oncology product pipeline through our drug discovery efforts, including research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and other strategic transactions that align with our oncology drug development, regulatory and commercial expertise, which efforts could involve substantial costs. To offset these costs in the future, we will need to generate substantial revenues. If these costs exceed our current expectations, or we fail to achieve anticipated revenue targets, our profitability and financial condition may be adversely affected and the market value of our common stock may decline.
Table of Contents
Risks related to recent U.S. tariff announcements
The U.S. government has made and continues to make significant additional changes in U.S. trade policy and may continue to take future actions that could negatively impact U.S. trade. For example, the United States has announced tariffs on many goods imported from specified nations. In addition, there are currently discussions concerning potential increased tariffs for pharmaceutical products, which may impact our supply chain and create uncertainty in the broader pharmaceutical industry. While certain tariffs have been suspended, modified or temporarily reduced, we cannot predict the results of the U.S. government’s trade negotiations or the outcome of ongoing legal challenges to specific tariff policies. Changes in U.S. trade policy, including recently announced tariffs, related to countries where we or our suppliers operate could result in increased costs for raw materials, components, or finished goods for us, or challenges for our third-party contract manufacturers, distributors and suppliers to continue to meet demands for our products at current prices. These cost increases may reduce our margins, require us to raise prices, or make our products less competitive in the marketplace. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs imposed by other countries on U.S. exports could adversely impact demand for our products in international markets or increase the costs of conducting business. If we are unable to mitigate these risks through supply chain adjustments, pricing strategies, or other measures, our financial performance and growth prospects could be negatively affected.
Risks Related to Our Relationships with Third Parties
We rely on Ipsen and Takeda for the commercial success of CABOMETYX in its approved indications outside of the U.S., and we are unable to control the amount or timing of resources expended by these collaboration partners in the commercialization of CABOMETYX in its approved indications outside of the U.S.
We rely upon the regulatory, commercial, medical affairs, market access and other expertise and resources of our collaboration partners, Ipsen and Takeda, for commercialization of CABOMETYX in their respective territories outside of the U.S. We cannot control the amount and timing of resources that our collaboration partners dedicate to the commercialization of CABOMETYX, or to its marketing and distribution, and our ability to generate revenues from the commercialization of CABOMETYX by our collaboration partners depends on their ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for, achieve market acceptance of, and to otherwise effectively market, CABOMETYX in its approved indications in their respective territories. If our collaboration partners are unable or unwilling to invest the resources necessary to commercialize CABOMETYX successfully in the EU, Japan, and other international territories where it has been approved, this could reduce the amount of revenue we are due to receive under these collaboration agreements, thus resulting in harm to our business and operations.
Our clinical, regulatory and commercial collaborations with major companies make us reliant on those companies for their continued performance and investments, which subjects us to a number of risks.
We have established clinical and commercial collaborations with leading biopharmaceutical companies for the development and commercialization of our products, and our dependence on these collaboration partners subjects us to a number of risks, including, but not limited to:
• our collaboration partners’ decision to terminate our collaboration, or their failure to comply with the terms of our collaboration agreements and related ancillary agreements, either intentionally or as a result of negligence or other insufficient performance;
• our inability to control the amount and timing of resources that our collaboration partners devote to the development or commercialization of our products;
• the possibility that our collaboration partners may stop or delay clinical trials, fail to supply us on a timely basis with product required for a combination trial, or deliver product that fails to meet appropriate quality and regulatory standards;
• disputes that may arise between us and our collaboration partners that result in the delay or termination of the development or commercialization of our products or product candidates, or that diminish or delay receipt of the economic benefits we are entitled to receive under the collaboration, or that result in costlylitigation or arbitration;
• the possibility that our collaboration partners may experience financial difficulties that prevent them from fulfilling their obligations under our agreements;
• our collaboration partners’ inability to obtain regulatory approvals in a timely manner, or at all;
Table of Contents
• our collaboration partners’ failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements relevant to the authorization, marketing, distribution and supply of our marketed products in the territories outside the U.S. where they are approved; and
• our collaboration partners’ failure to properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or their use of our intellectual property rights or proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our intellectual property rights or expose us to potential litigation.
If any of these risks materialize, we may not receive collaboration revenues or otherwise realize anticipated benefits from such collaborations, and our product development efforts and prospects for growth could be delayed or disrupted, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our growth potential is dependent in part upon companies with which we have entered into research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and similar business development relationships.
To expand our early-stage product pipeline, we have augmented our drug discovery activities with multiple research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements with other companies. Our dependence on our relationships with these research and in-licensing partners subjects us to numerous risks, including, but not limited to:
• our research and in-licensing partners’ decision to terminate our relationship, or their failure to comply with the terms of our agreements, either intentionally or as a result of negligent performance;
• disputes that may arise between us and our research and in-licensing partners that result in the delay or termination of research and development activities with respect to any in-licensed assets or supporting technology platforms;
• the possibility that our research and in-licensing partners may experience financial difficulties that prevent them from fulfilling their obligations under our agreements;
• our research and in-licensing partners’ failure to retain essential staff, which is crucial for fulfilling their obligations under our agreements;
• the possibility that our research and in-licensing partners’ technology may be superseded or otherwise no longer be competitive;
• the possibility that our research and in-licensing partners may be acquired, and that any acquiring entity may not honor our partners’ research commitments or otherwise fail to continue fulfilling their obligations under our agreements;
• our research and in-licensing partners’ failure to properly maintain or defend their intellectual property rights or their use of third-party intellectual property rights or proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our license to develop these assets or utilize technology platforms;
• laws, regulations or practices imposed by countries or regions outside the U.S. that could impact or inhibit scientific research or the development of healthcare products by foreign competitors or otherwise disadvantage healthcare products made by foreign competitors, as well as general political or economic instability or downturn in those countries, including as a result of tariffs or the imposition of new tariffs, trade wars, barriers, restrictions, or threats of such actions and the related uncertainty thereof, any of which could complicate, interfere with or impede our relationships with our ex-U.S. research, development and in-licensing partners; and
• our research and in-licensing partners’ failure to comply with applicable healthcare laws, as well as established laws and regulations related to Good Practice guidelines.
If any of these risks materialize, we may not be able to expand our product pipeline or otherwise realize a return on the resources we will have invested to develop these early-stage assets, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and prospects for growth.
If third parties, upon which we rely to perform clinical trials for cabozantinib in new indications and for other new product candidates, do not perform as contractually required or expected, additional regulatory approvals may be delayed or may not be possible.
We do not have the ability to conduct clinical trials for cabozantinib or for new potential product candidates independently, so we rely on independent third parties for the performance of these trials, such as the U.S. federal government, third-party contract research organizations, medical institutions, clinical investigators and contract laboratories to conduct our clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or regulatory obligations or meet expected deadlines, or if the third parties must be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of
Table of Contents
the data they generate or provide is compromised due to their failure to adhere to our clinical trial or data security protocols or regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our preclinical development activities or clinical trials may be extended, delayed, suspended or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize cabozantinib beyond currently approved indications or obtain regulatory approval for zanzalintinib or our other product candidates. In addition, due to the complexity of our research initiatives, we may be unable to engage with third-party contract research organizations that have the necessary experience and sophistication to help advance our drug discovery efforts, which would impede our ability to identify, develop and commercialize our potential product candidates.
If third-party advisors we rely on to assist with our drug discovery and development efforts do not perform as expected, the expansion of our product pipeline may be delayed.
We work with scientific advisors at academic and other institutions, as well as third-party contractors in various locations throughout the world, who assist us in our research and development efforts, including in drug discovery and preclinical development strategy. These third parties are not our employees and may have other commitments or contractual obligations that limit their availability to us. Although these third-party scientific advisors and contractors generally agree not to do competing work, if a conflict of interest between their work for us and their work for another entity arises, we may lose their services. There has also been scrutiny surrounding the disclosures of payments made to medical researchers from companies in the pharmaceutical industry, and it is possible that the academic and other institutions that employ these medical researchers may prevent us from engaging them as scientific advisors and contractors or otherwise limit our access to these experts, or that the scientific advisors themselves may now be more reluctant to work with industry partners. Even if these scientific advisors and contractors with whom we have engaged intend to meet their contractual obligations, their ability to perform services may be impacted by increased demand for such services from other companies or by other external factors, such as reduced capacity to perform services. If we experience additional delays in the receipt of services, lose work performed by these scientific advisors and contractors or are unable to engage them in the first place, our discovery and development efforts with respect to the matters on which they were working or would work in the future may be significantly delayed or otherwise adversely affected.
We lack our own manufacturing and distribution capabilities necessary for us to produce materials required for certain preclinical activities and to produce and distribute our products for clinical development or for commercial sale, and our reliance on third parties for these services subjects us to various risks.
We do not operate our own manufacturing or distribution facilities for CMC development activities, clinical or commercial production and distribution for our current products and new product candidates. Instead, we mostly rely on various third-party contract manufacturing organizations to conduct these operations on our behalf in accordance with cGMP. As our operations continue to grow in these areas, we are expanding internal CMC development laboratories to include preclinical, and continue to augment our external network focusing on our product candidates. We expect this to enable us to maximize application of our internal expertise and scientific know-how and advance our product candidates more efficiently and with greater technical precision, speed, agility and quality, while working in close collaboration with our expanding external manufacturing and supply chain network through additional third-party contract manufacturers, distributors and suppliers. To establish and manage our manufacturing network and supply chain requires a significant financial commitment, the creation of numerous third-party contractual relationships and continued oversight of these third parties to fulfill compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s cGMP, the EC’s Guidelines on GDP, as well as other stringent regulatory requirements enforced by the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies, as applicable. These third parties are also subject to routine inspections by the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies. Although we maintain significant resources to directly and effectively oversee the activities and relationships with the third parties in our network, we do not have direct control over their operations.
Our third-party contract manufacturers may not be able to produce or deliver material on a timely basis or manufacture material with the required quality standards, or in the quantity required to meet our preclinical, clinical development and commercial needs and applicable regulatory requirements. Although we have not yet experienced significant production delays or seen significant impairment to our supply chain as a result of the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, the political, economic and social instability in Venezuela or other global events, including as a result of tariffs or the imposition of new tariffs, trade wars, barriers, restrictions, or threats of such actions and the related uncertainty thereof, our third-party contract manufacturers, distributors and suppliers could experience operational delays due to lack of capacity or resources, facility closures and other hardships as a result of these types of global events, which could impact our supply chain by potentially causing delays to or disruptions in the supply of our preclinical, clinical or commercial products. If our third-party contract manufacturers, distributors and suppliers do not continue to supply us with our products or product candidates in a timely fashion and in compliance with applicable quality
Table of Contents
and regulatory requirements, or if they otherwise fail or refuse to comply with their obligations to us under our manufacturing, distribution and supply arrangements, we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. Furthermore, their failure to supply us could impair or preclude meeting commercial or clinical product supply requirements for us or our partners, which could delay product development and future commercialization efforts and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, through our third-party contract manufacturers and data service providers, we continue to provide serialized commercial products as required to comply with the DSCSA and its foreign equivalents where applicable. If our third-party contract manufacturers or data service providers fail to support our efforts to continue to comply with DSCSA and its foreign equivalents, as well as any future electronic pedigree requirements, we may face legal penalties or be restricted from selling our products.
Risks Related to Healthcare Regulatory and Other Legal Compliance Matters
We are subject to healthcare laws, regulations and enforcement; our failure to comply with those laws could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, which laws and regulations are enforced by the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. We also conduct clinical trial activities outside the United States and are therefore subject to applicable laws in the countries where those operations take place. Should our compliance controls prove ineffective at preventing or mitigating the risk and impact of improper business conduct or inaccurate reporting, we could be subject to enforcement of the following, including, without limitation:
• the federal AKS;
• federal Civil Monetary Penalties law, including the beneficiary inducement provisions;
• the Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act;
• the FDCA and its implementing regulations;
• federal civil and criminalfalseclaims laws, including the civil FalseClaims Act, and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law;
• federal criminal laws that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters;
• the HIPAA and its implementing regulation, as amended;
• state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws;
• state laws concerning contract pharmacy arrangements and related obligations of drug manufacturers;
• state and local laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to marketing activities, payments and other remuneration and items of value provided to healthcare professionals and entities;
• state and federal pharmaceutical price and price reporting laws and regulations, including the provisions enacted through the IRA;
• European countries’ national laws mandating public disclosure of transfers of value to healthcare professionals, healthcare organizations and other entities active in the healthcare sector, as well as requirements for prior review and/or approval of agreements with healthcare professionals; and
• laws and regulations in effect in foreign jurisdictions where drug manufacturers, or third party entities operating on behalf of drug manufacturers (including clinical research organizations), are conducting clinical trial activities.
In addition, we are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a U.S. law which regulates certain financial relationships with foreign government officials (which could include, for example, medical professionals employed by national healthcare programs) and its foreign equivalents, as well as federal and state consumer protection and unfair competition laws.
These federal and state healthcare laws and regulations govern prescription drug marketing practices, including off-label promotion and direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements. These laws and regulations may also affect our current and future business arrangements with third parties, including various healthcare entities. If our operations are found, or even alleged, to be in violation of the laws described above or other governmental regulations that apply to us, we, or our officers or employees, may be subject to significant penalties, including administrative civil and criminalpenalties, damages, fines, regulatory penalties, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs, imprisonment, reputational harm, additional reporting requirements and oversight through a Corporate Integrity Agreement or other monitoring agreement, any of which would
Table of Contents
adversely affect our ability to sell our products and operate our business and also adversely affect our financial results. Furthermore, responding to any such allegation or investigation and/or defendingagainst any such enforcement actions can be time-consuming and would require significant financial and personnel resources. Therefore, if any state or the federal government initiates an enforcement action against us, our business may be impaired, and even if we are ultimately successful in our defense, litigating these actions could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management.
Enhanced governmental and private scrutiny over, or investigations or litigation involving, pharmaceutical manufacturer patient assistance programs and donations to patient assistance foundations created by charitable organizations could negatively impact our business practices, harm our reputation, divert the attention of management and increase our expenses .
To help patients afford our products, we have a patient assistance program and also make periodic donations to independent charitable foundations that help financially needy patients. These types of programs are designed to provide financial assistance to patients who might otherwise be unable to afford pharmaceuticals that they have been prescribed by their physicians and have become the subject of Congressional interest and enhanced government scrutiny. The HHS Office of Inspector General established guidelines permitting pharmaceutical manufacturers to make donations to charitable organizations that provide co-pay assistance to Medicare patients, provided that manufacturers meet certain specified compliance requirements. In the event we are found not to have complied with these guidelines (including as interpreted by the HHS Office of Inspector General) and other laws or regulations respecting these arrangements, we could be subject to significant investigations or damages, fines, penalties or other criminal, civil or administrative sanctions or enforcement actions.
We also rely on a third-party hub provider and exercise oversight to monitor patient assistance program activities. Hub providers are generally hired by manufacturers to assist patients with insurance coverage, financial assistance and treatment support after the patients receive a prescription from their healthcare professional. For manufacturers of specialty pharmaceuticals (including our marketed products), the ability to have a single point of contact for their therapies helps ensure efficient medication distribution to patients. Accordingly, our hub activities are also subject to scrutiny and may create risk for us if not conducted in accordance with the views of federal or state enforcement authorities. A variety of entities, including independent charitable foundations and pharmaceutical manufacturers, but not including our company, have received subpoenas in recent years from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and other enforcement authorities seeking information related to their patient assistance programs and reimbursement and other product support programs, and certain of these entities have entered into costly civil settlement agreements with DOJ and other enforcement authorities that include requirements to maintain complex corporate integrity agreements that impose significant reporting and other requirements. Should we or our hub providers receive a subpoena or other process, regardless of whether we are ultimately found to have complied with the prevailing industry guidance and enforcement standards governing patient assistance and other product support programs, this type of government investigation could negatively impact our business practices, harm our reputation, divert the attention of management and increase our expenses.
We are subject to laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection and the collection and processing of personal data. Failure to maintain compliance with these regulations could create additional liabilities for us.
The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve in the U.S. and other jurisdictions around the world. For example, the CCPA went into operation in 2020 and affords California residents expanded privacy rights and protections, including civil penalties for violations and statutory damages under a private right of action for data security breaches. These protections were expanded by the CPRA, which became effective in January 2023. A rapidly-growing number of privacy laws in other states may also impact our operations, including both comprehensive and sector-specific legislation, and Congress has also considered additional federal privacy legislation. In addition, most healthcare professionals and facilities are subject to privacy and security requirements under HIPAA with respect to our clinical and commercial activities. Although we are not considered to be a covered entity or business associate under HIPAA, we could be subject to penalties if we use or disclose individually identifiable health information in a manner not authorized or permitted by HIPAA. Other countries also have, or are developing, laws governing the collection, use and transmission of personal information. For example, in the EU, the GDPR regulates the processing of personal data of individuals within the EU, even if, under certain circumstances, that processing occurs outside the EU, and also places restrictions on transfers of such data to countries outside of the EU, including the U.S. Should we fail to provide adequate privacy or data security protections or maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, including the CCPA, as amended by the CPRA, as well as the GDPR, we could be subject to sanctions or other penalties, litigation, an increase in our cost of doing business and questions concerning the validity of our data processing activities, including clinical trials.
Table of Contents
Risks Related to Our Information Technology and Intellectual Property
Data breaches and other cybersecurity incidents impacting our information technology operations and infrastructure could compromise our intellectual property or other sensitive information, damage our operations and cause significant harm to our business and reputation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we and our third-party service providers, such as contract research organizations, collect, maintain and transmit sensitive data on our networks and systems, including our intellectual property and proprietary or confidential business information (such as research data and personal information) and confidential information with respect to our customers, clinical trial patients and our collaboration partners. We outsource significant elements of our information technology infrastructure to third parties and, as a result, such third parties may or could have access to our confidential information. Additionally, we are vulnerable to data exfiltration, which is the loss of confidential and proprietary data in the event that persons with authorized access to our systems transfer our confidential and proprietary data outside our systems for their own use, evading our system safeguards and violating our policy restrictions on data transfer.
AI software is increasingly being used in the biopharmaceutical industry, including, in limited instances, by us. The misuse of AI-based software could result in inadvertent disclosure and improper use of confidential information (including personal and proprietary data) of our employees, clinical trial participants, or other third parties, leading to the loss of trade-secrets or other intellectual property. As with many developing technologies, AI also presents risks related to misuse by outside threat actors who may try to gainunauthorized access to our systems and information. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our business and reputation, and while we have enhanced and are continuing to enhance our cybersecurity efforts commensurate with the growth and complexity of our business, our systems and those of third-party service providers may be vulnerable to cybersecurity incidents or threats. In addition, we are heavily dependent on the functioning of our information technology infrastructure to carry out our business processes, such as external and internal communications or access to clinical data and other key business information. Accordingly, both inadvertentdisruptions to this infrastructure and/or cyber-attacks could cause us to incur significant remediation or litigation costs, result in product development delays, disruptcritical business operations, expend key information technology resources and divert the attention of management.
Although the aggregate impact of cybersecurity incidents and threats, including cyber-attacks and data exfiltration, on our operations and financial condition has not been material to date, we and our third-party service providers have frequently been the target of threats of this nature and expect them to continue. Any future data breach and/or unauthorized access or disclosure of our information or intellectual property could compromise our intellectual property and expose our sensitive business information or sensitive business information of our collaboration partners, which may lead to significant liability for us. A data security breach could also lead to public exposure of personal information of our clinical trial patients, employees or others and result in harm to our reputation and business, compel us to comply with federal and/or state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, including the GDPR, subject us to investigations and mandatory corrective action, or otherwise subject us to liability under laws and regulations that protect the privacy and security of personal information, which could disrupt our business, result in increased costs or loss of revenue, and/or result in significant financial exposure. Furthermore, the costs of maintaining or upgrading our cybersecurity systems (including the recruitment and retention of experienced information technology professionals, who are in high demand) at the level necessary to keep up with our expanding operations and prevent against potential attacks or other cybersecurity incidents are increasing, and despite our best efforts, our network security and data recovery measures and those of our third-party service providers may still not be adequate to protect against such security breaches and disruptions, which could cause material harm to our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, third parties may be able to use our technology, which could adversely affect our ability to compete in the market.
Our success will depend in part upon our ability to obtain patents and maintain adequate protection of the intellectual property related to our technologies and products. The patent positions of biopharmaceutical companies, including our patent position, are generally uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. We will be able to protect our intellectual property rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our technologies are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. We will continue to apply for patents covering our technologies and products as, where and when we deem lawful and appropriate. However, these applications may be challenged or may fail to result in issued patents. Our issued patents have been and may in the future be challenged by third parties as invalid or unenforceable under U.S. or foreign laws, or they may be infringed by third
Table of Contents
parties, and we are from time to time involved in the defense and enforcement of our patents or other intellectual property rights in a court of law, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office inter partes review or reexamination proceeding, foreign opposition proceeding or related legal and administrative proceeding in the U.S. and elsewhere. The costs of defending our patents or enforcing our proprietary rights in post-issuance administrative proceedings and litigation can be substantial and the outcome can be uncertain. An adverse outcome may allow third parties to use our intellectual property without a license and/or allow third parties to introduce generic and other competing products, any of which would negatively impact our business. Third parties may also attempt to invalidate or design around our patents, or assert that they are invalid or otherwise unenforceable, and seek to introduce generic versions of cabozantinib. For example, we received Paragraph IV certification notice letters from MSN, Teva, Cipla, Sun, and Biocon concerning the respective ANDAs that each had filed with the FDA seeking approval to market generic versions of CABOMETYX tablets. We have also received Paragraph IV certification notice letters from Azurity and Handa concerning the 505(b)(2) NDA that each has filed with the FDA seeking approval to market cabozantinib tablets and cabozantinib (in the form of cabozantinib lauryl sulfate) capsules, respectively. Because these 505(b)(2) products are for a different strength than CABOMETYX, we believe they will not be considered generic equivalents. However, should MSN, Teva, Cipla, Sun, Biocon, Azurity, Handa, or any other third parties receive FDA approval of an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) NDA with respect to cabozantinib, it is possible that such company or companies could introduce generic versions or otherwise competitor versions of our marketed products before our patents expire if they do not infringe our patents or if it is determined that our patents are invalid or unenforceable, and the resulting generic competition could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue, third parties may have pending applications, unknown to us, which may later result in issued patents that cover the production, manufacture, commercialization or use of our product candidates. Our existing patents and any future patents we obtain may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing competing products. They may also be negatively impacted by the decisions of foreign courts, which could limit the protection contemplated by the original regulatory approval and our ability to thwart the development of competing products that might otherwise have been determined to infringe our intellectual property rights. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our patents. In addition, our patents may be challenged or invalidated or may fail to provide us with any competitive advantages, if, for example, others were the first to invent or to file patent applications for closely related inventions.
The laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S., and many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending such rights in foreign jurisdictions. Many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties and many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of the patent. Moreover, the Russian Federation has and may further limit protections on patents originating from certain countries (including the U.S.) in response to sanctions relating to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, and in general, the legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the aggressive enforcement of patent and other intellectual property protection, which makes it difficult to stop infringement. We also rely on trade secret protection for some of our confidential and proprietary information, and we are taking security measures to protect our proprietary information and trade secrets, particularly in light of recent instances of data loss and misappropriation of intellectual property in the biopharmaceutical industry. However, these measures may not provide adequate protection, and while we seek to protect our proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements with employees, partners and consultants, as well as maintain cybersecurity protocols within our information technology infrastructure, we cannot provide assurance that our proprietary information will not be disclosed, or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. In addition, our competitors may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or may otherwise gain access to our trade secrets.
Litigation or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement could require us to spend substantial time and money and adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize products.
Our commercial success depends in part upon our ability to avoid infringing patents and proprietary rights of third parties and not to breach any licenses that we have entered into with regard to our technologies and the technologies of third parties. Other parties have filed, and in the future are likely to file, patent applications covering products and technologies that we have developed or intend to develop. If patents covering technologies required by our operations are issued to others, we may have to obtain licenses from third parties, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and may require us to pay substantial royalties, grant a cross-license to some of our patents to another patent holder or redesign the formulation of a product candidate so that we do not infringe third-party patents, which may
Table of Contents
be impossible to accomplish or could require substantial time and expense. In addition, we may be subject to claims that our employees or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers, or that they used or sought to use patent inventions belonging to their former employers. Furthermore, third parties may obtain patents that relate to our technologies and claim that use of such technologies infringes on their patents or otherwise employs their proprietary technology without authorization. Regardless of their merit, such claims could require us to incur substantial costs and divert the attention of management and key technical personnel in defending ourselves against any such claims or enforcing our own patents. In the event of any third party’s successful claim of patent infringement or misappropriation of trade secrets, we may losevaluable intellectual property rights or personnel, which could impede or prevent the achievement of our product development goals, or we may be required to pay damages and obtain one or more licenses from these third parties, subjecting us to substantial royalty payment obligations. We may not be able to obtain these licenses on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any of these licenses could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize products.
Risks Related to Our Operations, Managing Our Growth and Employee Matters
If we are unable to manage our human capital needs, there could be a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our prospects may be adversely affected .
As we continue to grow our pipeline of product candidates, our clinical development organization and related functions may grow, which may place significant demands on our management and resources, and our current and planned personnel and operating practices may not be adequate to support such growth. To effectively manage our evolving human capital needs, we must continue to improve existing, and when necessary, implement new facilities, operational and financial systems, and procedures and controls, as well as train and manage our employee base, and there can be no assurance that we can do so effectively or avoid experiencing operating inefficiencies or control deficiencies. We continue to rely on our management personnel to oversee our operations, and retaining and recruiting qualified individuals is difficult. If we are unable to manage our human capital needs effectively, or if we are unsuccessful in retaining or recruiting qualified management personnel, there could be a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The loss of key personnel or the inability to retain or attract additional personnel could impair our ability to operate successfully.
We are highly dependent upon the principal members of our management, as well as clinical, commercial and scientific staff, the loss of whose services might adversely impact the achievement of our objectives. Also, we may not have sufficient personnel to execute our business plans. Retaining and, where necessary, recruiting qualified clinical, commercial, scientific and pharmaceutical operations personnel will be critical to support activities related to advancing the development programs for the cabozantinib franchise, zanzalintinib and our other product candidates, successfully executing upon our commercialization plan for the cabozantinib franchise and continuing our proprietary research and development efforts. Competition is intense for experienced clinical, commercial, scientific and pharmaceutical operations personnel, and we may be unable to retain or recruit such personnel with the expertise or experience necessary to allow us to successfully develop and commercialize our products. Furthermore, the majority of our employees are employed “at will” and, therefore, may leave our employment at any time.
Risks Related to Environmental and Product Liability
We use hazardous chemicals and biological materials in our business. Any claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of these materials could be time consuming and costly.
Our research and development processes involve the controlled use of hazardous materials, including chemicals and biological materials, and our operations can produce hazardous waste products. We cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or discharge, or any resultant injury from these materials, and we may face liability under applicable laws for any injury or contamination that results from our use or the use by our collaboration partners or other third parties of these materials. Such liability may exceed our insurance coverage and our total assets, and in addition, we may be required to indemnify our collaboration partners against all damages and other liabilities arising out of our development activities or products produced in connection with our collaborations with them. Moreover, our continued compliance with environmental laws and regulations may be expensive, and current or future environmental regulations may impair our research, development and production efforts.
Table of Contents
We face potential product liability exposure far in excess of our limited insurance coverage.
We may be held liable if any product we or our collaboration partners develop or commercialize causes injury or is found otherwise unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims could result in decreased demand for our products and product candidates, injury to our reputation, withdrawal of patients from our clinical trials, product recall, substantial monetary awards to third parties and the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop in the future. We maintain limited product liability insurance coverage for our clinical trials and commercial activities. However, our insurance may not be sufficient to reimburse us for expenses or losses we may suffer. Moreover, if insurance coverage becomes more expensive, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us againstlosses due to liability.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price has been and may in the future be highly volatile.
The trading price of our common stock has been highly volatile, and it may remain highly volatile or fluctuate substantially due to factors such as the following, many of which we cannot control:
• the announcement of FDA or other regulatory approval or non-approval, or delays in the FDA or other regulatory review process with respect to cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates, our collaboration partners’ product candidates being developed in combination with either cabozantinib, zanzalintinib or our other product candidates, or our competitors’ product candidates;
• the commercial performance of both CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ and the revenues we generate from those approved products, including royalties paid under our collaboration and license agreements;
• adverse or inconclusive results or announcements related to our or our collaboration partners’ clinical trials or delays in those clinical trials;
• the timing of achievement of our clinical, regulatory, partnering, commercial and other milestones for the cabozantinib franchise, zanzalintinib or any of our other product candidates or programs;
• our ability to make future investments in the expansion of our pipeline through drug discovery, including future research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and other strategic transactions;
• our ability to obtain the materials and services, including an adequate product supply for any approved drug product, from our third-party vendors or do so at acceptable prices;
• the timing and amount of expenses incurred for clinical development and manufacturing of cabozantinib, zanzalintinib and our other product candidates;
• actions taken by regulatory agencies, both in the U.S. and abroad, with respect to cabozantinib or our clinical trials for zanzalintinib or our other product candidates;
• unanticipated regulatory actions taken by the FDA as a result of changing FDA standards and practices concerning the review of product candidates, including approvals at earlier stages of clinical development or with lesser developed data sets and expedited reviews;
• the announcement of new products or clinical trial data by our competitors;
• the announcement of regulatory applications, such as MSN’s, Teva’s, Cipla’s, Biocon’s and Sun’s respective ANDAs, seeking approval of generic versions of our marketed products, and Azurity’s and Handa’s 505(b)(2) NDAs seeking approval of a different solid formulation or salt of cabozantinib;
• quarterly variations in our or our competitors’ results of operations;
• changes in our relationships with our collaboration partners, including the termination or modification of our agreements, or other events or conflicts that may affect our collaboration partners’ timing and willingness to develop, or if approved, commercialize our products and product candidates out-licensed to them;
• the announcement of an in-licensed product candidate or strategic acquisition;
• litigation, including intellectual property infringement and product liability lawsuits, involving us;
• changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, or financial guidance from our management team, and any failure to achieve the operating results projected by securities analysts or by our management team;
• the entry into new financing arrangements;
Table of Contents
• developments in the biopharmaceutical industry;
• sales of large blocks of our common stock or sales of our common stock by our executive officers, directors and significant stockholders;
• the announcement of a repurchase of our common stock;
• additions and departures of key personnel or board members;
• the disposition of any of our technologies or compounds; and
• general market, macroeconomic and political conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.
These and other factors could have a material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the stock markets in general, and the markets for biotechnology and pharmaceutical stocks in particular, have historically experienced and may continue to experience significant volatility that has often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. Likewise, as a result of significant changes in U.S. or global political and macroeconomic conditions, including the potential for local and/or global economic downturn or recession, inflation, fluctuating interest rates, as well as policies governing foreign trade, including tariffs or the imposition of new tariffs, trade wars, barriers, restrictions, or threats of such actions and the related uncertainty thereof, and healthcare spending and delivery, the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East, or the political, economic and social instability in Venezuela, the financial markets could continue to experience significant volatility that could also continue to negatively impact the markets for biotechnology and pharmaceutical stocks. These broad market fluctuations have adversely affected and may in the future adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Excessivevolatility may continue for an extended period of time following the date of this report.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated. A securities class action suit against us could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent or deter attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
Provisions in our corporate charter and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent an acquisition of us, a change in control, or attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove members of our current Board of Directors. Because our Board of Directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could in turn affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our management team. These provisions include:
• a prohibition on actions by our stockholders by written consent;
• the ability of our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to institute a “poison pill” that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our Board of Directors; and
• advance notice requirements for director nominations and stockholder proposals.
Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
Our disclosures related to environmental, social and governance matters subjects us to risks, including risks to our market perception and stock price.
The focus of governments, investors and other stakeholders on environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and disclosures is constantly shifting and expectations in this area continue to evolve. Various jurisdictions are adopting or considering new laws and regulations that expand or curtail disclosure, reporting and diligence requirements with respect to ESG topics, including California legislation that requires various climate-related disclosures. We manage, track and report on our ESG initiatives, including in our Corporate Values & Sustainability Report or as may be required in our annual and quarterly reports. Our efforts to accomplish and report on these topics subjects us to risks, any of which
Table of Contents
could have a material adverse impact on our business, including specifically market perception and the market price of our common stock. Such risks may be outside of our control and the criteria by which our ESG practices and disclosures are assessed may change due to the evolving regulatory requirements affecting ESG standards and disclosures, which could result in changed expectations for us with respect to ESG matters (including those in support of or in opposition to ESG principles). In addition, state attorneys general and other governmental authorities may take action against certain ESG policies or practices, and we may become subject to restrictions on ESG initiatives. Our failure or perceived failure to pursue or achieve our ESG objectives, or to maintain our ESG practices that meet evolving stakeholder expectations or expanding legal requirements (which are continually evolving and may emphasize different priorities than the ones we focus on or none at all), could have a material adverse impact on our market perception and stock price, as well as expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation.
advancing
late
strength
opportunities
Sales related to cabozantinib account for the majority of our revenues. Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, including MET, AXL, VEGF receptors and RET and has been approved by the FDA, and in 68 other countries for all or a combination of, the following indications: as CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) tablets for advanced RCC (both alone and in combination with BMS’ nivolumab (OPDIVO®)), previously treated HCC, previously treated, RAI-refractory DTC and previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, well-differentiated pNET and epNET; and as COMETRIQ® (cabozantinib) capsules for progressive MTC. For physicians treating these types of cancer, cabozantinib has become or is becoming an important medicine in their selection of effective therapies.
The other two products resulting from our discovery efforts are: COTELLIC® (cobimetinib), an inhibitor of MEK, approved as part of multiple combination regimens to treat specific forms of advanced melanoma and marketed under a collaboration with Genentech (a member of the Roche Group); and MINNEBRO® (esaxerenone), an oral, non-steroidal, selective blocker of the mineralocorticoid receptor, approved for the treatment of hypertension in Japan and licensed to Daiichi Sankyo.
We plan to continue leveraging our operating cash flows to advance a broad array of diverse biotherapeutics and small molecule programs for the treatment of cancer, as well as to support company-sponsored and externally sponsored clinical trials evaluating cabozantinib and zanzalintinib, a novel oral inhibitor of kinases including the TAM kinases (TYRO3, AXL, MER), MET and VEGF receptors. Our zanzalintinib development program includes a series of ongoing and planned pivotal trials to explore its therapeutic potential in CRC, ccRCC and nccRCC, NET and meningioma, as well as earlier-stage trials. Our pipeline programs in phase 1 development each have best-in-class potential and include: XL309, a small molecule inhibitor of USP1, which has emerged as a synthetic lethal target in the context of BRCA-mutated tumors; XB010, an ADC consisting of a MMAE payload conjugated to a mAb targeting the tumor antigen 5T4; XB628, a first-in-class bispecific antibody that simultaneously targets PD-L1 and NKG2A, identified as key regulators of adaptive and innate immune cell activity; and XB371, a next-generation TF-targeting ADC with a topoisomerase inhibitor payload. We complement our internal drug discovery and development efforts by in-licensing or acquiring, or obtaining options to in-license or acquire, investigational oncology assets from third parties if those oncology assets demonstrate evidence of, or potential for, clinical success.
Cabozantinib Franchise
The FDA first approved CABOMETYX in the U.S. as a monotherapy for previously treated patients with advanced RCC in April 2016, and then for previously untreated patients with advanced RCC in December 2017. In January 2021, the CABOMETYX label was expanded to include first-line advanced RCC in combination with nivolumab, which was the first CABOMETYX regimen approved for treatment in combination with an ICI. In addition to RCC, in January 2019, the FDA approved CABOMETYX for the treatment of patients with HCC previously treated with sorafenib, and in September 2021, the FDA approved CABOMETYX for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age and older with locally advanced or metastatic DTC that has progressed following prior VEGF receptor-targeted therapy and who are RAI-refractory or ineligible. In March 2025, the FDA approved CABOMETYX for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age and older with previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, well-differentiated pNET and epNET.
The IRA introduced numerous substantial changes to drug pricing, reimbursement and access support in the U.S., including enabling the CMS to assert control over the prices of certain single-source drugs and biotherapeutics reimbursed under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. CMS has begun to announce rounds of drugs eligible for negotiation and establish so-called MFP under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. The IRA also contains the limited small biotech exception, which applies on a drug-specific basis, and provides that qualifying drugs will be exempt from possible pricing negotiation through 2028 and eligible for a lower limit (i.e., a price floor) on the potential MFP in 2029 and 2030, if the manufacturers of those drugs continue to qualify each year. We have qualified for the small biotech exception with
Table of Contents
respect to our cabozantinib franchise products through IPAY 2027 and we reapplied for the small biotech exception for IPAY 2028. We also intend to apply to CMS to maintain our small biotech exception and price floor each subsequent year through 2030. Separately, in December 2024, CMS released final guidance on another program, the Part D Discount Program, which requires manufacturers to take on more of the beneficiary cost previously subsidized by the federal government through the application of increased drug discounts. We have since received notice from CMS that we qualify for the "specified small manufacturer” designation and are thereby eligible for a phase-in of the increased manufacturer discounts under the Part D Discount Program, from 2025 to 2031. In November 2025, CMS also issued a proposed rule on the Part D Discount Program that largely codifies the final guidance. The IRA also imposes additional rebates for certain Part B and Part D drugs where relevant pricing metrics associated with the products increase faster than inflation.
There have also been proposals from the current U.S. administration that aim to lower prescription drug costs, both through formal regulatory action and by encouraging voluntary compliance from manufacturers. These proposals include efforts to equalize the prices of drugs in the U.S. with the prices of those drugs in other developed countries (also known as MFN drug pricing policy), as well as efforts to sell prescription drugs directly to consumers. In 2025, an executive order issued by the White House directed HHS and other federal agencies to implement MFN pricing through new models and potential regulatory actions. CMS has announced a pilot program in this regard for the Medicaid Program, but the full scope, timing, and impact of these initiatives remain uncertain. Adoption of these and other controls and measures and tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit reimbursement of pharmaceuticals. As a result, the business case for any product that receives regulatory approval for commercial sale in the U.S. may suffer if the government and third-party payers fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement.
To develop and commercialize cabozantinib outside the U.S., we have entered into license agreements with Ipsen and Takeda. To Ipsen, we granted the rights to develop and commercialize cabozantinib outside of the U.S. and Japan, and to Takeda we granted such rights in Japan. Both Ipsen and Takeda also contribute financially and operationally to the further global development and commercialization of the cabozantinib franchise, and we work closely with them on these activities. Utilizing its regulatory expertise and established international oncology marketing network, Ipsen has continued to execute on its commercialization plans for CABOMETYX, having received regulatory approvals and launched in multiple territories outside of the U.S., including in the EEA, the U. K. and Canada, as a treatment for advanced RCC (both as a monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab) and for previously treated HCC and DTC indications. In July 2025, Ipsen received approval for CABOMETYX as a treatment for previously treated, well- differentiated/unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic pNET or epNET (with local labeling variations) from the EC for the EEA and health regulatory authorities in Brazil and Australia, and from health regulatory authorities in Switzerland and Singapore in October 2025 and December 2025, respectively. With respect to the Japanese market, Takeda received Manufacturing and Marketing Approvals from the Japanese PMDA for monotherapy CABOMETYX as a treatment of patients with curatively unresectable or metastatic RCC and as a treatment of patients with unresectable HCC that has progressed after cancer chemotherapy, as well as for CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab as a treatment for unresectable or metastatic RCC.
Pipeline Activities
Small Molecule Programs
Zanzalintinib
Zanzalintinib is a novel oral inhibitor of kinases including the TAM kinases (TYRO3, AXL, MER), MET and VEGF receptors, which are implicated in cancer’s growth and spread. We are evaluating zanzalintinib in a robust and growing development program that builds on our prior experience with cabozantinib and targets indications with high unmet need. We have established collaborations and will continue to explore additional opportunities for novel combinations with zanzalintinib. To date, we have initiated two large phase 1b/2 clinical trials studying zanzalintinib as a monotherapy and in combination with ICIs (STELLAR-001 and STELLAR-002). Patient enrollment into STELLAR-001 was completed in 2023 and preliminary results from a randomized expansion cohort of patients with metastatic CRC were presented at the ASCO GI 2025 . In May 2025, preliminary results from an expansion cohort of patients with previously untreated advanced ccRCC from STELLAR-002 were presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, along with data from multiple dose-escalation cohorts.
We also have three ongoing pivotal trials, two evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with ICIs and one evaluating zanzalintinib as a monotherapy. Our first such trial, STELLAR-303, was initiated in June 2022 and is evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with atezolizumab versus regorafenib in patients with metastatic, refractory non-MSI-H/dMMR CRC. In June 2025, we announced positive top-line results demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in OS versus regorafenib
Table of Contents
in the ITT population, and in October 2025, announced that the study demonstrated a 20% reduction in the risk of death versus regorafenib in the ITT population at the final analysis (stratified hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.93; P=0.0045). At a prespecified interim analysis, data pertaining to the other dual primary endpoint, OS in patients without liver metastases, showed a trend in OS favoring the combination (15.9 months versus 12.8 months; stratified HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61-1.03; P=0.0875) at a median follow-up of 16.8 months. Detailed findings from the study, including OS and PFS in the ITT population and in the subset of patients without liver metastases, were presented at ESMO 2025 and simultaneously published in The Lancet . The trial will proceed to the planned final analysis for the dual primary endpoint of OS in patients without liver metastases, expected in mid-2026, depending on event rates. In December 2025, we submitted a NDA to the FDA for zanzalintinib in combination with atezolizumab for the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. In January 2026, we announced that the FDA had accepted our NDA and assigned a standard review, with a PDUFA target action date of December 3, 2026.
The second pivotal trial, STELLAR-304, was initiated in December 2022 and is evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with nivolumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated patients with advanced nccRCC. We expect top-line results in mid-2026, depending on event rates.
In June 2025, we initiated STELLAR-311, a phase 2/3 pivotal trial evaluating zanzalintinib versus everolimus in patients with advanced NET, regardless of site of origin, who had received up to one prior line of therapy. The primary endpoint of the trial is PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review. Enrollment is currently ongoing.
Beyond STELLAR-001, STELLAR-002, STELLAR-303, STELLAR-304 and STELLAR-311, we intend to initiate additional early-stage and pivotal trials evaluating zanzalintinib across a broad array of potential future indications, including: STELLAR-201, a planned, single-arm phase 2 study that will evaluate zanzalintinib in patients with Grade I/II/III meningioma with relapse or progression following surgery and radiation, or who are not candidates for radiation/surgery, anticipated to commence in the first half of 2026, and STELLAR-316, a planned phase 3 pivotal trial, in collaboration with Natera, which we anticipate will commence in mid-2026. STELLAR-316 will evaluate zanzalintinib, with and without an ICI, in patients with resected stage II/III CRC who, following completion of definitive therapy, have tested positive for MRD+ and have no radiographic evidence of disease. Natera will provide its Signatera™ assay to identify MRD+ for trial enrollment.
To further expand our exploration of the clinical potential of zanzalintinib, we entered into a clinical development collaboration with Merck. Pursuant to this collaboration, Merck is sponsoring KEYMAKER-U03 (a phase 1/2 trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with WELIREG® (belzutifan), Merck's oral HIF-2α inhibitor, in RCC), LITESPARK-033 (a phase 3 trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with WELIREG versus cabozantinib in first-line advanced RCC) and one additional phase 3 pivotal trial in RCC. Merck will fund one of these phase 3 studies and we will co-fund the phase 1/2 study and the other phase 3 study, as well as supply zanzalintinib and cabozantinib. Under the collaboration, we continue to retain all global commercial and marketing rights to zanzalintinib.
Other Small Molecules
The knowledge and experience gained through our efforts to discover cabozantinib, cobimetinib and esaxerenone, each of which were approved by regulatory authorities and are commercially distributed, informs our current strategy for discovering and developing additional small molecules with the potential to treat cancer, including XL309, a potentially best-in-class small molecule inhibitor of USP1, a synthetic lethal target in the context of BRCA-mutated tumors. XL309 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial as monotherapy and in combination with PARP1/2 inhibition in patients with advanced solid tumors and enrollment is ongoing. XL309 has potential in patients whose tumors are no longer responsive to PARPi, including ovarian, breast and prostate cancers. XL309 also has potential in combination with PARPi agents to deepen and prolong the response seen to PARPi, as well as to broaden the activity beyond that observed in patients with tumors that harbor a BRCA1/2 mutation.
Beyond these small molecule assets, we continue to make progress on multiple lead optimization programs for molecules that address a variety of targets, and that we believe have significant potential for clinical differentiation. We anticipate that some of these other programs could reach development candidate status in 2026 and beyond.
Termination of STELLAR-305 trial and XL495 Development Program.
In October 2024, we announced the initiation of a phase 1 clinical trial evaluating XL495, an inhibitor of PKMYT1, both as a monotherapy and in combination with select cytotoxic agents, in patients with advanced solid tumors. In May 2025, based on early clinical data generated for XL495, we announced that we will discontinue further development of this
Table of Contents
program. In December 2023, we initiated STELLAR-305, a phase 2/3 pivotal trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 ICI developed by Merck & Co., versus placebo in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Based on our evaluation of emerging data from the phase 2 portion of STELLAR-305, competition in this indication, and assessment of other, potentially larger, commercial opportunities, in July 2025 we announced that the study will not proceed to phase 3.
Biotherapeutics
Part of our drug discovery activity focuses on discovering and advancing various biotherapeutics that have the potential to become anti-cancer therapies, such as bispecific antibodies, ADCs and other innovative treatments. ADCs in particular present a unique opportunity for new cancer treatments, given their capabilities to target the delivery of anti-cancer drug payloads to specific cells expressing the target; this increased precision should minimize collateral impact on healthy tissues that do not express the target. To facilitate the growth of our various biotherapeutics programs, we have established multiple research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements and entered into other strategic transactions, aimed at conserving capital and managing risks, that provide us with access to antibodies, binders, payloads and conjugation technologies, which are the components employed to generate next-generation ADCs or multispecific antibodies. We have also established laboratories for discovery of novel biologics with capabilities in antibody engineering, ADC chemistry, bioanalysis and preclinical testing.
As part of our strategy to access clinical- or near-clinical-stage assets, we executed an exclusive option and license agreement and clinical development collaboration with Sairopa to develop ADU-1805. ADU-1805 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors, as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Enrollment is ongoing. In addition to the option deal with Sairopa, some of our active collaborations for biotherapeutics programs are with:
• Adagene, which is focused on using Adagene’s SAFEbody TM technology to develop novel masked ADCs or other innovative biotherapeutics with potential for improved therapeutic index;
• Catalent, which is focused on the discovery and development of multiple ADCs using Catalent’s proprietary SMARTag® site-specific bioconjugation technology; and
• Invenra, which is focused on the discovery and development of novel binders and multispecific a ntibodies for the treatment of cancer.
We have made significant progress under our research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements and believe we will continue to do so in 2026 and in future years. For example, in April 2025, we initiated the phase 1 study of XB628, a first-in-class bispecific antibody discovered, in part, in collaboration with Invenra, and in August 2025, we initiated a phase 1 study of XB371, a next-generation tissue factor-targeting ADC with a topoisomerase inhibitor payload, which was discovered, in part, in collaboration with Catalent. As part of our rational and disciplined approach to investment, we have decided to discontinue further development of the XB064 and XB033 programs.
Beyond these biotherapeutics assets, we continue to make progress on multiple preclinical programs for molecules that address a variety of targets, and that we believe have significant potential for clinical differentiation. We anticipate that some of these other programs could reach development candidate status in 2026 and beyond.
Future Expansion of our Pipeline
Increasing the number of novel anti-cancer agents in our pipeline is essential to our overall strategy and business goals. We are working to expand our oncology product pipeline through drug discovery efforts, which encompass our diverse biotherapeutics and small molecule programs exploring multiple modalities and mechanisms of action. This approach provides a high degree of flexibility with respect to target selection and modality of treatment and allows us to prioritize those targets that we believe have the greatest chance of becoming impactful therapeutics. As part of our strategy, our drug discovery activities have and will continue to include internal research, as well as external research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and other strategic transactions that collectively leverage a wide range of technology platforms and assets and increase our probability of success. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we expect to progress up to two new development candidates into preclinical development during 2026. We will continue to engage in pipeline expansion initiatives with the goal of discovering, acquiring and/or in-licensing promising investigational oncology assets and then further characterize and develop them utilizing our established preclinical and clinical development infrastructure.
Table of Contents
2025 Business Updates and Financial Highlights
Business Updates
• In January 2025, we presented preliminary results from a randomized expansion cohort of patients with metastatic CRC from STELLAR-001, and results from a subgroup analysis of patients in the epNET cohort with advanced gastrointestinal NET in CABINET, at the ASCO GI 2025.
• In February 2025, we announced final five-year follow-up results from the CheckMate -9ER trial at the ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.
• In March 2025, we announced FDA Approval of CABOMETYX for patients with previously treated advanced NET.
• In May 2025, we presented preliminary results from an expansion cohort of patients with previously untreated advanced ccRCC from STELLAR-002, along with data from multiple dose-escalation cohorts, at ASCO 2025.
• In June 2025, we announced positive top-line results from the STELLAR-303 phase 3 pivotal trial that the study met one of its dual primary endpoints, OS in the ITT population, with the OS benefit of the zanzalintinib and atezolizumab combination consistently observed across pre-specified subgroups.
• In June and July 2025, the USPTO declined to institute Azurity’s inter partes review of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,298,349 and 12,128,039, respectively.
• In July 2025, we entered into a settlement agreement with Biocon, which resolved patent litigation we brought in response to Biocon’s ANDA.
• In July 2025, we announced that our partner Ipsen received approval from the EC for CABOMETYX for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic, well-differentiated epNET and pNET who have progressed following at least one prior systemic therapy other than somatostatin analogues, following the positive opinion received from the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use in June 2025. In July, Ipsen also received approval for CABOMETYX as a treatment for previously treated advanced NET by health regulatory authorities in both Brazil and Australia.
• In August 2025, we announced the appointment of Dana T. Aftab, Ph.D. as Executive Vice President, Research and Development.
• In October 2025, we presented results from a subgroup analysis of the CABINET phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating CABOMETYX in advanced lung and thymic neuroendocrine tumors, and detailed results from STELLAR-303, at ESMO 2025 and published the results concurrently in The Lancet .
• In October 2025, our Board of Directors authorized the October 2025 SRP for the repurchase of up to an additional $750 million of our common stock before December 31, 2026. This repurchase authorization is in addition to the two $500 million repurchase authorizations announced in August 2024 and February 2025. As of December 31, 2025, we have repurchased $1,159.7 million of our common stock, at an average price of $38.39 per share under these SRPs and have completed the SRPs authorized in August 2024 and February 2025.
• In December 2025, we submitted an NDA to the FDA for zanzalintinib in combination with atezolizumab for the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer based on positive results from the STELLAR-303 phase 3 pivotal trial. In January 2026, we announced that the FDA had accepted our NDA and assigned a standard review, with a PDUFA target action date of December 3, 2026.
• In December 2025, we hosted our virtual 2025 R&D Day: Building Next-generation Oncology Franchises event to review the progress of Exelixis’ R&D activities and outline the company’s strategy to advance future oncology franchises.
• In January 2026, we announced a collaboration with Natera, on STELLAR-316, a planned phase 3 pivotal trial, which we anticipate will commence in mid-2026. STELLAR-316 will evaluate zanzalintinib, with and without an ICI, in patients with resected stage II/III CRC who, following completion of definitive therapy, have tested positive for MRD+ and have no radiographic evidence of disease. Natera will provide its Signatera™ assay to identify MRD+ for trial enrollment.
Financial Highlights
• Net product revenues for 2025 were $2,122.8 million, as compared to $1,809.4 million for 2024.
• Total revenues for 2025 were $2,320.1 million, as compared to $2,168.7 million for 2024.
• Research and development expenses for 2025 were $825.0 million, as compared to $910.4 million for 2024.
• Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2025 were $518.7 million, as compared to $492.1 million for 2024.
Table of Contents
• Provision for income taxes for 2025 was $158.6 million, as compared to $160.4 million for 2024.
• Net income for 2025 was $782.6 million, or $2.88 per share, basic, and $2.78 per share, diluted, as compared to $521.3 million, or $1.80 per share, basic, and $1.76 per share, diluted, for 2024.
See “Results of Operations” below for a discussion of the detailed components and analysis of the amounts above.
Outlook, Challenges and Risks
We will continue to face numerous challenges and risks that may impact our ability to execute on our business objectives. In particular, for the foreseeable future, we expect our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to fund our business operations and growth will depend upon the continued commercial success of CABOMETYX, both alone and in combination with other therapies, as a treatment for the highly competitive indications for which it is approved. In addition, CABOMETYX will only continue to be commercially successful if private third-party and government payers continue to provide coverage and reimbursement. As is the case for all innovative pharmaceutical therapies, obtaining and maintaining coverage and reimbursement for CABOMETYX is becoming increasingly difficult, both within the U.S. and in foreign markets. Further, healthcare policymakers in the U.S. continue to express concern over healthcare costs, and corresponding legislative and policy initiatives and activities have been launched aimed at increasing the healthcare cost burdens borne by pharmaceutical manufacturers, as well as expanding access to, and restricting the prices and growth in prices of, pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, the current U.S. administration has suggested that it may impose tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals.
Achievement of our business objectives will also depend on our ability to maintain a competitive position in the shifting landscape of therapeutic strategies for the treatment of cancer, which we may not be able to do. On an ongoing basis, we assess the constantly evolving landscape of other approved and investigational cancer therapies that could be competitive, or complementary in combination, with our products, and then we adapt our development strategies for the cabozantinib franchise and our pipeline product candidates accordingly, such as by modifying our clinical trials to include evaluation of our therapies with ICIs and other targeted agents. Even if our current and future clinical trials produce positive results sufficient to obtain marketing approval by the FDA and other global regulatory authorities, it is uncertain whether physicians will choose to prescribe regimens containing our products instead of competing products and product combinations in approved indications.
In the longer term, we may eventually face competition from potential manufacturers of generic or follow-on versions of our marketed products, including the proposed generic versions of CABOMETYX tablets that are the subject of ANDAs submitted to the FDA by MSN, Teva, Cipla, Biocon and Sun, as well as the 505(b)(2) for cabozantinib capsules submitted by Handa, or the 505(b)(2) for cabozantinib tablets submitted to the FDA by Azurity. The approval of any of these follow-on products and their subsequent launch could significantly decrease our revenues derived from the U.S. sales of CABOMETYX and thereby materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Separately, our research and development objectives may be impeded by the challenges of scaling our organization to meet the demands of expanded drug development, unanticipateddelays in clinical testing and the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with drug discovery operations, especially on the global level. In connection with efforts to expand our product pipeline, we may be unsuccessful in discovering new potential cancer treatments or identifying appropriate candidates for in-licensing or acquisition.
Some of these challenges and risks are specific to our business, others are common to companies in the biopharmaceutical industry with development and commercial operations, and an additional category are macroeconomic, affecting all companies. For a more detailed discussion of challenges and risks we face, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
Impact of the Duration of Our Fiscal Year
We have adopted a 52- or 53-week fiscal year policy that generally ends on the Friday closest to December 31st. Fiscal year 2025, which was a 52-week fiscal year, ended on January 2, 2026; and fiscal year 2024, which was a 53-week fiscal year, ended on January 3, 2025. The 52-week fiscal year 2025, as compared to the 53-week fiscal year 2024, contributed to the year-over-year decreases in certain revenues and expenses. For convenience, references in this report as of and for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2026 and January 3, 2025, are indicated as being as of and for the years ended
Table of Contents
December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. In fiscal year 2026, the annual period will end on January 1, 2027, and will be a 52-week fiscal year.
This discussion and analysis generally addresses 2025 and 2024 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. Discussions of 2023 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 11, 2025.
Revenues
Revenues by category were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Net product revenues
License revenues
Collaboration services revenues
Total collaboration revenues
Total revenues
Net Product Revenues
Gross product revenues, discounts and allowances, and net product revenues were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Gross product revenues
Discounts and allowances
Net product revenues
Net product revenues by product were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
CABOMETYX
COMETRIQ
Net product revenues
The increase in net product revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, was primarily related to a 16% increase in the number of CABOMETYX units sold reflecting continuing demand for CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab as a first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC, and demand for previously treated advanced NET and, to a lesser extent, a 1% increase in the average net selling price of CABOMETYX. The increase in sales volume was largely driven by refills, reflecting the longer duration of therapy for the combination of CABOMETYX with nivolumab, and an increase in related market share reflecting the continued evolution of the metastatic RCC and NET treatment landscapes.
We project our net product revenues may increase in fiscal year 2026, as compared to 2025, for similar reasons noted above.
We recognize product revenues net of discounts and allowances that are described in “Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Discounts and allowances have generally increased over time as the number of patients participating in government programs has increased and as the discounts given and rebates paid to government payers
Table of Contents
have also increased. The increase in the amount of discounts and allowances for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, was primarily the result of an increase in the volume of units sold, and the increase in utilization and dollar amount of chargebacks under the 340B Drug Pricing program.
We project our discounts and allowances may increase in fiscal year 2026, as compared to 2025, for similar reasons noted above.
License Revenues
License revenues primarily include: (a) the recognition of the portion of milestone payments allocated to the transfer of intellectual property licenses for which it had become probable, in the related period, that a milestone would be achieved and a significant reversal of revenues would not occur in future periods; and (b) royalty revenues.
See “Note 4. Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Cabozantinib Commercial Collaborations— Performance Obligations and Transaction Prices for our Ipsen and Takeda Collaborations ” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion on the allocation of transaction price which impacts the proportion of milestone revenues allocated to license revenues and collaboration services revenues.
Milestone revenues, which are allocated between license revenues and collaboration services revenues, were $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to $169.3 million for 2024. Milestone revenues achieved in the respective fiscal year included the following:
• For the year ended December 31, 2025, milestone revenues included $4.7 million in license revenues recognized in connection with a $5.0 million regulatory milestone payment from Ipsen, upon approval by the EC for the treatment of patients with either advanced pNET or advanced epNET.
• For the year ended December 31, 2024, milestone revenues included: (1) $150.0 million in license revenues recognized in connection with a commercial milestone payment from Ipsen upon its achievement of $600.0 million in cumulative net sales of cabozantinib over four consecutive quarters in its related Ipsen license territory; (2) $2.2 million in license revenues recognized in connection with a commercial milestone payment from Ipsen upon its achievement of CAD$30.0 million in cumulative net sales of cabozantinib over four consecutive quarters in Canada; and (3) $11.4 million in revenues related to a $12.5 million regulatory milestone payment from Ipsen upon submission of a variation application the EMA for evaluating cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with either advanced pNET or advanced epNET who experienced progression after prior systematic therapy.
Due to uncertainties surrounding the timing and achievement of development, regulatory and commercial milestones, it is difficult to predict the timing of future milestones revenues; consequently, milestones may vary significantly from period to period.
Royalty revenues increased primarily as a result of an increase in Ipsen’s net sales of cabozantinib outside of the U.S. and Japan. Ipsen royalties were $165.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to $154.0 million for 2024. Ipsen’s net sales of cabozantinib have continued to grow since the first commercial sale of CABOMETYX in the Ipsen territories in 2016, primarily due to regulatory approvals in new territories, including regulatory approval in the EU for the combination therapy of CABOMETYX and nivolumab received in March 2021. Royalty revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 also included $13.2 million, as compared to $12.9 million for 2024, related to Takeda’s net sales of cabozantinib. As of December 31, 2025, CABOMETYX is approved and commercially available in 68 countries outside of the U.S.
Collaboration Services Revenues
Collaboration services revenues include: (a) the development cost reimbursements earned under our collaboration agreements and product supply revenues, net of product supply costs; (b) the recognition of deferred revenues for the portion of upfront and milestone payments that have been allocated to research and development services performance obligations; offset by (c) the royalties we pay to Royalty Pharma on sales by Ipsen and Takeda of products containing cabozantinib.
Development cost reimbursements were $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to $25.8 million for 2024. The decrease in development cost reimbursements during the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily due to a decrease in spending on studies evaluating cabozantinib that are subject to reimbursement.
Table of Contents
Recognition of deferred revenues for the portion of upfront and milestone payments that have been allocated to research and development services performance obligations were not material for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Collaboration services revenues were reduced by $22.8 million and $21.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, to account for the 3% royalty we are required to pay Royalty Pharma on the net sales by Ipsen and Takeda of any product containing cabozantinib. As royalty generating sales of cabozantinib by Ipsen and Takeda have increased as described above, our royalty payments due to Royalty Pharma have also increased.
We project our collaboration services revenues may decrease in fiscal year 2026, as compared to 2025, primarily as a result of a decrease in development cost reimbursements and an increase in royalty payments on the sales of cabozantinib by Ipsen and Takeda.
Cost of Goods Sold
The cost of goods sold and our gross margins were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Cost of goods sold
Gross margin %
Cost of goods sold is related to our product revenues and consists of a 3% royalty payable on U.S. net sales of any product containing cabozantinib, as well as the cost of inventory sold, indirect labor costs, write-downs related to expiring, excess and obsolete inventory, and other third-party logistics costs. The increase in cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, was primarily due to the increase in royalties as a result of increased U.S. CABOMETYX sales, partially offset by a decrease in certain period costs. We project our gross margin in 2026 will remain consistent with fiscal year 2025.
Research and Development Expenses
We do not track fully burdened research and development expenses on a project-by-project basis. We group our research and development expenses into three categories: (1) development; (2) drug discovery; and (3) other research and development. Our development group leads the development and implementation of our clinical and regulatory strategies and prioritizes disease indications in which our compounds are being or may be studied in clinical trials. Development expenses include license and other collaboration costs, primarily composed of upfront license fees, development milestones and other payments associated with our clinical-stage in-licensing collaboration programs, clinical trial costs, personnel expenses, consulting and outside services and other development costs, including manufacturing costs of our drug development candidates. Our drug discovery group utilizes a variety of technologies, including in-licensed technologies, to enable the rapid discovery, optimization and extensive characterization of lead compounds and biotherapeutics such that we are able to select development candidates with the best potential for further evaluation and advancement into clinical development. Drug discovery expenses include license and other collaboration costs primarily composed of upfront license fees, research funding commitments, option exercise fees, development milestones and other payments associated with our in-licensing collaboration programs in preclinical development stage. Other drug discovery costs include personnel expenses, consulting and outside services and laboratory supplies. Other research and development expenses include the allocation of general corporate costs to research and development services and development cost reimbursements in connection with certain of our collaboration arrangements.
Table of Contents
Research and development expenses by category were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Development:
Clinical trial costs
Personnel expenses
License and other collaboration costs
Consulting and outside services
Other development costs
Total development
Drug discovery:
License and other collaboration costs
Other drug discovery costs
Total drug discovery
Stock-based compensation
Other research and development
Total research and development expenses
In addition, we track our external clinical trial costs by product and product candidate and by scientific modalities, which are categorized as small molecule and biotherapeutics programs. Small molecule clinical development for the reported periods was primarily composed of zanzalintinib and cabozantinib. Biotherapeutics clinical development for the reported periods was primarily composed of XB010, XB371, XB628 and XB002.
Clinical trial costs by scientific modalities, by product and by product candidate were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Small molecules:
Zanzalintinib
Cabozantinib
Other small molecules
Total small molecules
Biotherapeutics
Total clinical trial costs
The decrease in research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, was primarily related to decreases in license and other collaboration costs, clinical trial costs and manufacturing costs to support our development candidates (presented as part of other development costs), partially offset by increases in consulting and outside services and stock-based compensation.
Development-related license and other collaboration costs and Drug discovery-related license and other collaboration costs decreased for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, primarily due to lower development milestone achievement in our clinical-stage and discovery-stage in-licensing collaboration programs. Clinical trial costs, which include services performed by third-party contract research organizations and other vendors who support our clinical trials, decreased for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, primarily due to lower costs associated with studies evaluating cabozantinib and XB002, partially offset by higher costs associated with zanzalintinib, XB628, XL309 and XB010 studies.
In addition to reviewing the three categories of research and development expenses described above, we principally consider qualitative factors in making decisions regarding our research and development programs. These
Table of Contents
factors include enrollment in clinical trials for our product candidates, preliminary data and final results from clinical trials, the potential market indications and overall clinical and commercial potential for our product candidates, and competitive dynamics. We also make our research and development decisions in the context of our overall business strategy.
We project that clinical trial costs may increase with higher costs associated with various studies evaluating zanzalintinib, XB628, XB371 and XB010, partially offset by decreases in costs associated with cabozantinib.
To continue growing our pipeline, we are prioritizing investment in new molecules that are clinically differentiated with the potential to improve the standard of care for our cancer patients, including current progressing and planned clinical trial programs evaluating zanzalintinib, XB628, XB371, XL309, and XB010. We are working to expand our oncology product pipeline through drug discovery efforts, which encompass our diverse biotherapeutics and small molecule programs exploring multiple modalities and mechanisms of action. This approach provides a high degree of flexibility with respect to target selection and allows us to prioritize those targets that we believe have the greatest chance of yielding impactful therapeutics. As part of our strategy, our drug discovery activities have included and continue to include internal research, as well as external research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and other strategic transactions that collectively incorporate a wide range of technology platforms and assets and increase our probability of success. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we expect to progress up to two new development candidates into preclinical development in 2026. We will continue to engage in pipeline expansion initiatives with the goal of acquiring and in-licensing promising investigational oncology assets and then further characterize and develop them utilizing our established preclinical and clinical development infrastructure.
We project our research and development expenses may increase for fiscal year 2026, as compared to 2025, primarily driven by increases in clinical trial costs, including the current and planned trials evaluating zanzalintinib, XB628, XB371 and XB010, and personnel expenses.
A discussion of the risks and uncertainties with respect to our research and development activities, and the consequences to our business, financial position, and growth prospects can be found in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1)
Stock-based compensation
Total selling, general and administrative expenses
(1) Excludes stock-based compensation allocated to selling, general and administrative expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, stock-based compensation, marketing costs and certain other administrative costs.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, was primarily due to increases in marketing activities in support of the commercial launch of CABOMETYX for the treatment of patients with previously treated advanced NET and pre-launch activities for zanzalintinib, stock-based compensation, and personnel expenses, partially offset by a decrease in corporate giving.
We project our selling, general and administrative expenses may increase in fiscal year 2026, as compared to 2025, as a result of increases in personnel expenses for the salesforce expansion in support for the commercial sale of CABOMETYX for the treatment of patients with previously treated advanced NET, marketing activities in support of the anticipated commercial launch of zanzalintinib and legal and advisory fees.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Impairment of long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2024, was related to certain leased facilities at our Alameda campus. During fiscal year 2024, we listed certain buildings for sublease. As a result, we assessed the impacted
Table of Contents
asset groups for impairment and concluded that the related right-of-use assets and leasehold improvements were not fully recoverable and recognized a $51.7 million non-cash impairment charge. See “Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Impairment of long-lived assets were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Impairment of long-lived assets
Restructuring Expenses
Restructuring expenses resulted from the execution of the 2025 corporate reorganization plan (2025 Plan) and 2024 corporate restructuring plan (2024 Plan), consisting primarily of severance and employee-related costs, asset impairment, and contract termination costs. See “Note 13. Restructuring” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Restructuring expenses were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Restructuring expenses
Non-Operating Income
Non-operating income was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Interest income
Other expenses, net
Non-operating income
The decrease in non-operating income for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, was primarily the result of a decrease in interest income due to lower average interest-bearing investment balances, and lower average interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes and the effective tax rates were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Provision for income taxes
Effective tax rate
The decrease in provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, was primarily due to the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) deduction and excess tax benefits related to certain stock grants, offset by an increase in income before income taxes. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2025 differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%, primarily due to the FDII deduction, the generation of federal tax credits, and excess tax benefits related to certain stock grants. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2024 differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21%, primarily due to state taxes, partially offset by the generation of federal tax credits. We project that our effective tax rate may be between 21% and 23% in fiscal year 2026.
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2025, we had $1.66 billion in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, as compared to $1.75 billion as of December 31, 2024. We anticipate that the aggregate of our current cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities available for operations, net product revenues and collaboration revenues will enable us to maintain our operations for at least 12 months and thereafter for the foreseeable future.
Our primary cash requirements for operating activities, which we project will increase in fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal year 2025, are for: employee related expenditures; payments related to our collaboration and development programs; income tax payments; royalty payments on our net product sales; cash payments for inventory; rent payments for our leased facilities and contract manufacturing payments.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed into law on December 22, 2017, modified the tax treatment of research and experimental (R&E) expenditures beginning in fiscal year 2022, requiring that they must be capitalized and amortized ratably over five years for domestic R&E expenditures or 15 years for foreign R&E expenditures. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was signed into law on July 4, 2025, which, among other provisions, permanently repeals the requirement to capitalize domestic R&E expenditures for federal income tax purposes for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, and allows for the accelerated deduction of any remaining unamortized domestic R&E expenditures. Foreign R&E expenditures are still required to be capitalized and amortized ratably over 15 years. The federal cash tax benefit for this provision of the OBBBA was $191 million for our fiscal year 2025, with no corresponding impact to the federal income tax provision.
Our primary sources of operating cash are: cash collections from customers related to net product revenues, which we project may increase for fiscal year 2026, as compared to 2025; cash collections related to milestones achieved and royalties earned from our commercial collaboration arrangements with Ipsen, Takeda and others; and cash collections for cost reimbursements under certain of our development programs with Ipsen and Takeda which we project may decrease in 2026, as compared to 2025. The timing of cash generated from commercial collaborations and cash payments required for in-licensing collaborations relative to upfront license fee payments, cost reimbursements, exercise of option payments and other contingent payments such as development milestone payments may vary from period to period.
We project that we may continue to spend significant amounts of cash to fund the development of product candidates in our pipeline, including zanzalintinib, XB371, XB628, XL309 and XB010, and the development and commercialization of cabozantinib. In addition, we may continue to expand our oncology product pipeline through additional research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and other strategic transactions that align with our oncology drug development, regulatory and commercial expertise.
In August 2024, our Board of Directors authorized a SRP to acquire up to $500.0 million of our outstanding common stock before December 31, 2025. In February 2025, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $500.0 million of our outstanding common stock before December 31, 2025. In October 2025, our Board of Directors authorized the October 2025 SRP for the repurchase of up to an additional $750.0 million of our common stock before December 31, 2026. As of December 31, 2025, we have repurchased 30.2 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,159.7 million under these SRPs and have completed the SRPs authorized in August 2024 and February 2025. As of December 31, 2025, approximately $590.2 million remained available under the October 2025 SRP for future stock repurchases before December 31, 2026.
Stock repurchases under these SRPs may be made from time to time through a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, in block trades, Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, accelerated share repurchase transactions, exchange transactions, or any combination of such methods. The timing and amount of a ny stock repurchases under the SRPs will be based on a variety of factors, including ongoing assessments of the capital needs of the business, alternative investment opportunities, the market price of Exelixis’ common stock and general market conditions. These SRPs do not obligate us to acquire any amount of our common stock, and the SRPs may be modified, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.
Financing these activities could materially impact our liquidity and capital resources and may require us to incur debt or raise additional funds through the issuance of equity. Furthermore, even though we believe we have sufficient funds for our current and future operating plans, we may choose to incur debt or raise additional funds through the issuance of equity based on market conditions or strategic considerations.
Table of Contents
Sources and Uses of Cash (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Working capital
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
Working capital : The decrease in working capital as of December 31, 2025, as compared to December 31, 2024, was primarily due to the payments for repurchases of our common stock, partially offset by the favorable impact to our net current assets resulting from our increase in net product revenues. In the future, our working capital may be impacted by one of these factors or other factors, the amounts and timing of which are variable.
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities : Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of deposits at major banks, money market funds, commercial paper and other securities with original maturities 90 days or less. Marketable securities primarily consist of debt securities available-for-sale and certificates of deposit. For additional information regarding our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, see “Note 5. Cash and Marketable Securities,” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The decrease in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at December 31, 2025, as compared to December 31, 2024, was primarily due to cash payments to repurchase our common stock, cash payments to support our development and discovery programs, including acquisition of in-process research and development technology, tax payments and operating cash payments for employee-related expenditures and restructuring, partially offset by cash inflows generated by our operations from sales of our products and our commercial collaboration arrangements.
Cash flow activities were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Percent Change
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Net cash used in financing activities
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities is derived by adjusting our net income for non-cash operating items such as deferred taxes, stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, non-cash lease expense, impairment of long-lived assets, acquired in-process research and development technology, and changes in operating assets and liabilities, which reflect timing differences between the receipt and payment of cash associated with transactions and when they are recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, primarily due to an increase in cash received on sales of our products, lower cash paid for certain operating expenses, partially offset by cash payments related to the 2024 and 2025 Plans.
Investing Activities
The changes in cash flows from investing activities primarily relates to the timing of marketable securities activity, acquisition of in-process research and development technology and capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures primarily consist of investments to expand our operations and acquire assets that further support our research and development activities.
Net cash was provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to net cash used in investing activities in 2024. The increase in cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to an increase in cash proceeds from maturities and sales of marketable securities and decreases in purchases of marketable securities, property and equipment and in-process research and development technology related to certain in-licensing collaboration arrangements.
Table of Contents
Financing Activities
The changes in cash flows from financing activities primarily relate to payments for repurchases of common stock, proceeds from employee stock programs and taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards.
Net cash used in financing activities increased for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024, primarily due to increases in payments for repurchases of common stock and withholding taxes remitted to the government related to net share settlements of equity awards.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2025, we anticipate the aggregate of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and cash generated from operations to be sufficient to fund our contractual obligations, as well as cash requirements to support our ongoing operations and capital expenditures. Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2025 primarily consist of:
Operating leases: We have certain lease agreements related to our corporate campus facilities and laboratory facilities located in Alameda, California, under which we are obligated to make lease payments. As of December 31, 2025, we had $28.5 million of lease payments due in one year and $230.7 million due over the remaining lease term.
Purchase obligations: Purchase obligations include firm purchase commitments related to manufacturing of inventory, software services and other facilities and equipment. As of December 31, 2025, we had $61.7 million total purchase obligations due within one year and $29.6 million due after one year.
Contingent payments: We have committed to make certain contingent payments for potential future milestones, research funding commitments and royalties to certain collaboration partners, including contingent exercise fee payments if we decide to exercise certain of our options to in-license or acquire in-process research and development technology as part of our agreements with those parties. We do not expect these contingent payments to have a significant impact on our liquidity in the near term.
See “Notes 4. Collaboration Agreements and Business Development Activities” and “Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our contractual obligations and contingencies.
As of December 31, 2025, we did not have any material off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined by applicable SEC regulations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements conforms to accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. which requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact our Consolidated Financial Statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates including, but not limited to: those related to revenue recognition, including determining the nature and timing of satisfaction of performance obligations, and determining the standalone selling price of performance obligations, and variable consideration such as rebates, chargebacks, sales returns and sales allowances as well as milestones included in collaboration arrangements; the accrual for certain liabilities including accrued clinical trial liabilities; and valuations of equity awards used to determine stock-based compensation, including certain awards with vesting subject to market or performance conditions; and the amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities including the related valuation allowance. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other market-specific and other relevant assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
We believe our critical accounting policies relating to revenue recognition, clinical trial and collaboration accruals, stock-based compensation and income taxes reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table of Contents
For a complete description of our significant accounting policies, see “Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Revenue Recognition
Net Product Revenues and Discounts and Allowances
We recognize revenues when our customers obtain control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we are entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We calculate gross product revenues based on the price that we charge to the specialty pharmacies and distributors in the U.S. We estimate our domestic net product revenues by deducting from our gross product revenues: (a) trade allowances, such as discounts for prompt payment; (b) estimated government rebates and chargebacks; (c) certain other fees paid to specialty pharmacies, distributors and commercial payors; and (d) returns. We record estimates for these deductions at the time we recognize the related gross product revenue. However, the actual rebate or chargeback on the sale of our product to a distributor is not invoiced to us until a future period, generally within three months from the date of sale. Due to this time lag, we must estimate the amount of rebates and chargebacks to accrue. We base our estimates for the expected utilization on customer and payer data received from the specialty pharmacies and distributors and historical utilization rates. We update our estimates every quarter to reflect actual claims and other current information. Actual rebates and chargebacks claimed for prior periods have varied from our estimates by less than 1% of the amount deducted from gross product revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Our current estimates may differ significantly from actual results.
Collaboration Revenues
We enter into collaboration arrangements with third parties, under which we license certain rights to our intellectual property, and account for the arrangements as either license revenue or collaboration services revenue when the counterparty is a customer. The terms of these arrangements may include payments to us for one or more of the following: non-refundable, up-front license fees; development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments; product supply services; development cost reimbursements; profit sharing arrangements; and royalties on net sales of licensed products.
As part of the accounting for these arrangements, we must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the standalone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract. We use key assumptions to determine the standalone selling price, which may include forecast revenues and costs, clinical development timelines and costs, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, discount rates and probabilities of technical and regulatory success. At the inception of each arrangement that includes development milestone payments, we evaluate whether the milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimate the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, we re-evaluate the probability of earning of such development milestones and any related constraint, and if necessary, adjust our estimate of the overall transaction price. For arrangements that may include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, we recognize revenue at the later of (i) when the related sale occurs or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). Development milestone adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect collaboration services revenues in the period of adjustment. In addition, in recording revenues for our research and development services performance obligations, we use projected development cost estimates to determine the amount of revenue to record as we satisfy this performance obligation.
Clinical Trial and Collaboration Accruals
We execute all of our clinical trials with support from contract research organizations and other vendors and we accrue costs for clinical trial activities performed by these third parties based upon the estimated amount of work completed on each trial. For clinical trial expenses, the significant factors used in estimating accruals include the number of patients enrolled, the activities performed for each patient, the number of active clinical sites and the duration for which the patients will be enrolled in the trial. Certain of our in-licensing collaboration arrangements include contingent payments in the form of development, regulatory and commercial milestones. We recognize expense for contingent payments when they are deemed probable of achievement which requires judgment as to the probability and timing of the achievement of the underlying milestones. To the extent actual results, or updated probability estimates, differ from current estimates, such amounts are recorded as an adjustment in the period estimates are revised. We monitor patient enrollment levels and assess the related research and development activities progress, including the probability of achieving milestone payments
Table of Contents
associated to the respective terms and conditions of our in-licensing and collaboration arrangements to the extent possible through internal reviews and estimates of the operational progress of our discovery and early-stage clinical development programs, correspondence with contract research organizations and review of contractual terms. We base our estimates on the best information available at the time. However, additional information may become available to us, which may allow us to make a more accurate estimate in future periods. If we do not identify costs that we have begun to incur or if we underestimate or overestimate the level of services performed or the costs of these services, our actual expenses could differ from our estimates.
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense requires us to estimate the fair value of performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs) and restricted stock units (RSUs) subject to market conditions, and estimate the number of shares subject to PSUs and RSUs with market conditions that will ultimately vest. To determine the fair value, we use models that require a number of complex and subjective assumptions including our stock price volatility, employee exercise patterns and risk-free interest rates. Monte Carlo simulation models are used to determine grant date fair value of awards with market conditions. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of market conditions awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
We recognize stock-based compensation for PSUs over the requisite service period only for awards which we estimate will ultimately vest, which requires judgment as to the probability and timing of the achievement of the underlying performance goals. Significant factors we consider in making those judgments include forecasts of our product revenues and those of our collaboration partners, estimates regarding the operational progress of late-stage clinical development programs and discovery pipeline expansion performance targets. To the extent actual results, or updated estimates, differ from current estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised and as such, can materially affect our stock-based compensation expense in the current period and in the future. Compensation expense related to RSUs with market vesting conditions is recognized regardless of the outcome of the market conditions.
Income Taxes
We compute our income tax provision or benefit under the asset and liability method. Significant estimates are required in determining our income tax provision or benefit. We base some of these estimates on interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their respective financial reporting amounts (temporary differences) at enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets, including net operating losses and tax credits, will not be realized. We periodically re-assess the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets based on various factors including our historical earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, and forecasts of future operating results and utilization of net operating losses and tax credits prior to their expiration. Significant judgment is required in making this assessment and, to the extent that we deem a reversal of any portion of our valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets to be appropriate, we recognize a tax benefitagainst our income tax provision in the period of such reversal.
We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by tax authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements for a particular tax position is based on the largest benefit that is more likely than not to be realized. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted as appropriate for changes in facts and circumstances, such as significant amendments to existing tax law, new regulations or interpretations by tax authorities, new information obtained during a tax examination or resolution of an examination. We have elected to record interest and penalties in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income as a component of income taxes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a description of the expected impact of recent accounting pronouncements, see “Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
