Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Dine Brands Global, Inc.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.
Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.
YoY shift: Lean -
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is -0.16pp more bearish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
-0.01pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
-0.30pp
Lean -
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
disclosed+1
challenged+1
Positive rising
successfully+1
innovative+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
11,642 words
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The occurrence of any of the events discussed in the following risk factors may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, which may materially affect the value of our common stock. It is not possible to identify or predict all risk factors. There may be risks and uncertainties that are not currently known or that are currently deemed by us to be immaterial. These other risks and uncertainties may also impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before deciding to invest in our common stock.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
impaired+2
delays+1
Positive rising
outperformed+1
strong+1
MD&A (Item 7)
6,534 words
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
General
The following provides a discussion of our results of operations for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024 and should be read together with the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For discussion of our results of operations for fiscal 2024 and 2023 results, please refer to “ Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ” contained in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2024. This Item 7 is organized as follows:
Risks Relating to Our Business and Financial Condition
Our business is affected by general economic conditions that are largely out of our control. Our business is dependent to a significant extent on national, regional and local economic conditions, and, to a lesser extent, on global economic conditions, particularly those conditions affecting the demographics of the guests that frequently patronize restaurants. If our customers' disposable income available for discretionary spending is reduced (because of circumstances such as job losses, credit constraints, higher housing costs, inflation, changes to tax regulations, energy costs, interest rates or other costs) or if the perceived wealth of customers decreases (because of circumstances such as inflation, lower residential real estate values, increased foreclosure rates, changes to tax regulations, the imposition of tariffs or other trade barriers, or other economic disruptions), our business could experience a decline in sales and/or customer traffic as potential customers choose lower-cost alternatives (such as quick-service restaurants) or other alternatives to dining out. The inflationary period experienced over recent years, and potential future inflationary periods, could negatively impact consumers’ discretionary income and reduce the amount of income previously used for dining outside the home. Additionally, negative trends in the availability of credit and in expenses such as interest rates and the cost of construction materials could affect our and our franchisees' ability to maintain and remodel existing restaurants. Any decreases in customer traffic or average customer check due to these or other reasons could reduce gross sales at our and our franchised restaurants, resulting in lower revenues, royalty payments and other payments from franchisees. This could negatively impact the financial performance of our company-owned restaurants and reduce the profitability of franchised restaurants, potentially impacting the ability of franchisees to make royalty payments owed to us when due and negatively impacting franchisees’ ability to develop new restaurants as may be required in their respective development agreements.
Our and our franchisees' failure to address cost pressures, including rising costs for commodities, labor, health care and utilities could adversely affect our franchisees and our revenues and results of operations. The success of our franchisees (and our success with company-owned restaurants) depend significantly on the ability to anticipate and react to changes in the price and availability of food (such as the cost and supply of eggs, which may be impacted by avian flu), ingredients, labor, health care, utilities, fuel and other related costs. Our franchisees have experienced and continue to experience inflationary conditions with respect to most or all of these costs during fiscal 2025.
Increases in minimum wage, health care and other benefit costs may have a material adverse effect on our and our franchisees' labor costs. We and our franchisees operate in many states and localities where the minimum wage is significantly higher than the federal minimum wage. The market for labor in the United States is competitive and has resulted in pressure on wages and may continue to do so in the future. Increases in minimum wage and market pressure may also result in increases in the wage rates paid for non-minimum wage positions. Many states and localities are also passing laws regulating employment practices and working conditions which could have a material adverse effect on our and our franchisees’ labor costs in those areas.
Our restaurants' and our franchisees’ restaurants' operating margins are also affected by fluctuations in the price of utilities such as electricity and natural gas, whether as a result of inflation or otherwise, on which the restaurants depend for their energy supply. In addition, interruptions to the availability of gas, electric, water or other utilities, whether due to aging infrastructure, weather conditions, fire, animal damage, trees, digging accidents, geopolitical impacts or other reasons largely out of our control, may adversely affect our operations. Our and our franchisees' inability to anticipate and respond effectively to an adverse change in any of these factors could have a significant adverse effect on our sales and results of operations.
Our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt. As of December 28, 2025, certain of our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries had approximately $1.2 billion of long-term debt. In addition, we had approximately $0.4 billion in operating lease, finance lease and other financing obligations as of December 28, 2025. We may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could increase. Our level of indebtedness and the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness could have important consequences to our financial health. For example, it could:
• make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our debt or refinance any of our debt on attractive terms, commercially reasonable terms, or at all;
• increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions or a downturn in our business;
• require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to debt service, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to pay dividends to our stockholders, repurchase shares of our common stock, fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
• limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
• place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged;
• limit our ability to borrow additional funds;
• prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business and make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy; and
• result in an event of default if we fail to satisfy our obligations under our debt or fail to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in our debt documents, such event of default could result in all of our debt becoming immediately due and payable and could permit certain of our lenders to foreclose on our assets securing such debt.
The terms of the securitized debt issued by certain of our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries have restrictive terms and the failure to comply with such restrictive terms could put us in default, which would have an adverse effect on our business and prospects. Unless and until we repay all outstanding borrowings under our securitized debt, we will remain subject to the restrictive terms of the securitized debt issued by certain of our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries. For example, the indenture entered into by such subsidiaries in connection with the securitized debt contains covenants that limit the ability of certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries to, among other things: sell assets; alter the business conducted by such subsidiaries; engage in mergers or acquisitions; declare dividends or redeem or purchase certain equity interests; incur, assume or permit to exist additional indebtedness or guarantees; make loans and investments; incur liens; and enter into transactions with affiliates other than on an arms-length basis. These covenants are applicable only to the securitization subsidiaries and do not apply to any of Dine Brands Global, Inc., International House of Pancakes, LLC, Applebee’s International, Inc., Dine Brands International, Inc. or FTO Holding Company, LLC as these entities are not parties to the indenture. A breach of a covenant could result in a rapid amortization event or default under the securitized debt.
Further, the securitized debt also includes limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness and contains a number of financial performance measures that must be met to avoid a possible rapid amortization event or event of default. The most significant of these measures include a minimum DSCR and minimum domestic franchise system sales. The ability to meet these financial performance measures can be affected by events beyond our control and there can be no assurance that we will satisfy these financial measures.
If amounts owed under the securitized debt are accelerated because of a default and we are unable to pay such amounts, the investors may have the right to assume control of substantially all of the securitized assets, which consist of substantially all of our domestic revenue-generating assets and domestic intellectual property.
Under the terms of the Series 2023-1 Class A-2 Notes and the Series 2025-1 Class A-2 Notes, if we maintain a leverage ratio of less than or equal to 5.25x total debt to adjusted EBITDA, we may elect to not make the scheduled principal payments. From time to time, our leverage ratio has exceeded the 5.25x total debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio and we have made the required scheduled principal payments. If we are unable to refinance or repay amounts under the securitized debt prior to the expiration of the applicable five- or six-year term, our cash flow would be directed to the repayment of the securitized debt and, other than a weekly management fee sufficient to cover minimal selling, general and administrative expenses, would not be available for operating our business.
In the event that a rapid amortization event occurs under the indenture (including, without limitation, upon an event of default under the indenture or the failure to repay the securitized debt at the end of the applicable five- or six-year term), the funds available to us would be reduced or eliminated, which would in turn reduce our ability to operate or grow our business.
Our ability to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing depends on many factors beyond our control. No assurance can be given that any refinancing or additional financing will be possible when needed or that we will be able to negotiate favorable terms. In addition, our access to capital is affected by prevailing conditions in the financial and capital markets and other factors beyond our control. There can be no assurance that market conditions will be favorable at the times that we require new or additional financing. Further, changes by any rating agency to our credit rating may negatively impact the value and liquidity of both our debt and equity securities, as well as the potential costs associated with refinancing our debt. Downgrades in our credit ratings could also affect the terms of any such financing and restrict our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.
We are heavily dependent on information technology and any material failure of that technology could impair our ability to effectively and efficiently operate our business. We rely heavily on information technology systems across our operations, including point-of-sale processing in our and our franchisees’ restaurants, online ordering and delivery,
management of our supply chain, collection of cash and other receivables, payment of obligations and various other processes and procedures. Our ability to effectively and efficiently manage our business depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems. The failure of these systems to operate effectively, problems with maintenance, upgrades or the transition to replacement systems, inaccurate or fraudulentmanipulation of sales reporting from our restaurants resulting in loss of sales and royalty payments, or a breach in security of these systems could be harmful and cause delays in customer service, reduce efficiency in our operations and negatively impact our business. Significant capital investment might be required to remediate any problems.
In addition, we outsource certain essential technology-based business processes to third-party vendors and we may share sensitive financial and other information with third party vendors which subjects us to risks, including disruptions in business, increased costs and exposure to data breaches or privacy law compliance issues of our third-party vendors.
The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our employee and business relationships, all of which could subject us to loss and harm our brands. Any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information resources is considered to be a cyber incident. More specifically, a cyber incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can include gainingunauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data, or steal confidential information about our customers, franchisees, vendors and employees. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those that we have outsourced. In addition, the rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence technologies may intensify our cybersecurity risks. Primary adverse events that could directly result from the occurrence of a cyber incident include: (i) exposure of confidential data about our customers, franchisees, vendors and employees; (ii) damage to the reputation of our brands; (iii) damage to our relationship with our franchisees; (iv) interruption of our business; and (v) an event of default under our securitized debt agreements if a cybersecurity breach impacts our ability to comply with the terms of securitized debt agreements. We, our franchisees, third-party vendors and others with whom we may do business or interact with may have inadequate cyber liability insurance or coverage terms may be restrictive or insufficient to cover potential losses and remediation costs associated with a cyber incident.
As a merchant and service provider of point of sale related services, we and our franchisees are subject to PCI DSS, issued by the Payment Card Industry Council. PCI DSS contains compliance guidelines and standards with regard to our security surrounding the physical and electronic storage, processing and transmission of individual cardholder data. Despite our cybersecurity measures and our efforts to comply with PCI DSS guidelines, we cannot be certain that all of our information technology systems are able to prevent, contain or detect any cyber-attacks or security breaches from known malware or malware that may be developed in the future.
Our use of personal information, as well as our use of innovative technologies, is regulated by international, federal and state laws, as well as by certain third-party agreements. If our security and information systems are compromised or if our employees or franchisees fail to comply with these laws and regulations, and this information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used or disclosedinappropriately, or we leverage technologies in ways that are challenged by new or evolving legal standards, it could adversely affect our reputation and could disrupt our operations and result in costlylitigation, judgments, or penalties resulting from violation of international, federal and state laws and payment card industry regulations. As privacy and information security laws and regulations change, we may incur additional costs to ensure that we remain in compliance with those laws and regulations. For example, we are subject to the CCPA and other state privacy laws which require various disclosures, processes and protections to be implemented, and provide for a variety of consumer data privacy rights that require compliance investment and may limit our ability to use certain data or technologies. For further information regarding cybersecurity, see Item 1C - Cybersecurity .
In connection with the implementation of our corporate strategies, we may face risks associated with the acquisition of businesses and franchised restaurants, the integration of acquired businesses, and the growth and development of these businesses. In pursuing our corporate strategy, from time to time we may acquire other businesses or brands, as we did in December 2022 when we acquired Fuzzy’s. We may also acquire restaurants from our franchisees. There can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated synergies or cost savings related to acquisitions or that they will be achieved in our estimated timeframe. In addition, continued integration efforts may result in material challenges. We may not be able to successfully integrate and streamline overlapping functions from past or future acquisitions, and integration may be more costly to accomplish than we expect. Furthermore, growth and development plans with respect to acquired businesses may not be achievable or may not be achieved in our estimated time frame. We could also encounter difficulties in managing our combined company due to its increased size and scope. Additionally, our efforts to reduce cost depend, in part, upon our ability to successfully refranchise acquired restaurants, which in turn, depend on our ability to select qualified and capable franchisees.
We face a variety of risks associated with doing business in international markets . Our expansion into and continued operations in international markets could create risks to our brands and reputation. There is no assurance that our international operations will be profitable or that international growth will continue. Our international operations are subject to the same risks
associated with our domestic operations, as well as a number of additional risks. These include, among other things, international economic and political conditions, issues with collections, international currency fluctuations, difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights, terrorism, civil unrest, global travel risks and differing cultures and consumer preferences.
We also are subject to governmental regulations throughout the world that impact the way we do business with our international franchisees and vendors. These include antitrust and tax requirements, import/export/customs regulations, anti-boycott regulations, other international trade regulations, the USA Patriot Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Failure to comply with any such legal requirements could subject us to monetary liabilities and other sanctions, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may be subject to litigation and other legal proceedings that could be time consuming, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources. We are involved in lawsuits, claims and proceedings incident to the ordinary course of our business. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. Any claimsagainst us, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costlylitigation, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources. There have been a growing number of lawsuits in recent years. There also has been a rise in employment-related lawsuits. From time to time, we have been subject to these types of lawsuits. The cost of defendingclaimsagainst us or the ultimate resolution of such claims may harm our business and operating results. In addition, the increasingly regulated business environment may result in a greater number of enforcement actions and private litigation. This could subject us to increased exposure to stockholder lawsuits.
We and our franchisees are subject to complaints or litigation from guests alleging illness, injury or other food quality, food safety, health or operational concerns as well as claims related to social issues (e.g., allegations of discrimination), the Americans with Disabilities Act and other premises liability. We, through the operation of our company-owned restaurants, and our franchisees, through the operation of franchised restaurants, are also subject to "dram shop" laws in some states pursuant to which we and our franchisees may be subject to liability in connection with personal injuries or property damages incurred in connection with wrongfully serving alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person.
Although our franchise agreements require our franchisees to defend and indemnify us, we may be named as a defendant and sustain liability in legal proceedings against franchisees under the doctrines of vicarious liability, agency, negligence or otherwise. Claimsagainst our franchisees may reduce the ability of our franchisees to make payments to us. We may also initiate legal proceedings against franchisees for breach of the terms of their franchise agreements, including underreporting of sales, failure to operate restaurants according to standard operating procedures and payment defaults. These claims also may reduce the ability of franchisees to enter into new franchise agreements with us.
Third-party claims with respect to intellectual property assets, if decided against us, may result in competing uses or require adoption of new, non-infringing intellectual property, which may in turn adversely affect sales and revenues. We regard our service marks and trademarks related to our restaurant businesses as having significant value and being important to our marketing efforts. To protect our brands from infringement, we rely on contracts, copyrights, patents, trademarks, service marks and other common law rights, such as trade secret and unfair competition laws. We have registered certain trademarks and service marks in the United States and international jurisdictions; however, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we have or intend to open or franchise a restaurant. Although we believe we have taken appropriate measures to protect our intellectual property, there can be no assurance that these protections will be adequate. Our failure to obtain or adequately protect our intellectual property rights (including in response to developments in artificial intelligence technologies), may diminish our competitiveness and could materially harm our business and financial condition.
In addition, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement or misappropriationclaimsagainst us, or assert claims that our rights in our trademarks, service marks and other intellectual property assets are invalid or unenforceable. Any such claims could have a material adverse effect on us or our franchisees if such claims were to be decided against us. If our rights in any intellectual property were invalidated or deemed unenforceable, it could permit competing uses of intellectual property which, in turn, could lead to a decline in restaurant revenues and sales of other branded products and services (if any). If the intellectual property became subject to third-party infringement, misappropriation or other claims, and such claims were decided against us, we may be forced to pay damages, be required to develop or adopt non-infringing intellectual property or be obligated to acquire a license to the intellectual property that is the subject of the asserted claim. There could be significant expenses associated with the defense of any infringement, misappropriation, or other third-party claims.
We cannot predict the risks associated with the implementation and use of artificial intelligence and related technologies. We may, now and in the future, use artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence, or related technologies (collectively, “Artificial Intelligence”). However, the implementation and use of Artificial Intelligence technologies could present various risks and uncertainties to our business and there is no assurance that using such technologies will produce the desired results. The risks and uncertainties related to the use of Artificial Intelligence include, but are not limited to, concerns
around privacy, security, intellectual property, and ethics, and if the Artificial Intelligence technologies that we use (or create) turn out to be controversial or otherwise flawed, we could face competitive, brand, or reputational harm, legal liability, regulatory action, or other adverse impacts on our business. As the regulatory framework surrounding Artificial Intelligence evolves, it is possible that new laws or regulations will be adopted both within the United States and in non-U.S. jurisdictions, or that existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in ways that could affect the ways in which we use Artificial Intelligence. Since these technologies are rapidly and constantly evolving and extremely complex, we cannot predict all of the business and legal risks that may arise from our use of such technologies, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our delivery initiatives and use of third-party delivery vendors subjects us and our franchisees to a variety of risks related to the delivery of our products by third parties and may not generate expected returns . There can be no assurance that delivery vendors will not take actions that could have a material adverse effect on our brands and/or subject us to increased litigation and costs. Our delivery initiatives also introduce new operating procedures to our and our franchisees’ restaurants, which could adversely affect the business, brands, and the experience of our guests.
Our business depends on the proper allocation of our human capital and our ability to attract and retain talented management and other key employees. We have dedicated brand resources for key functions such as marketing, consumer insights and operations and a shared service model for certain other functions such as legal, technology and human resources. There can be no assurance that our allocation of our human capital will effectively meet the needs of our business and brands. Further, our business is based on successfully attracting and retaining talented employees. The market for highly skilled employees and leaders in our industry is extremely competitive. If we are less successful in our recruiting efforts, or if we are unable to retain management and other key employees, our ability to develop and deliver successful products and services may be adversely affected. Effective succession planning is also important to our long-term success. The departure of a key executive or employee and/or the failure to ensure an effective transfer of knowledge and a smooth transition upon such departure may be disruptive to the business and could hinder our strategic planning and execution.
Our failure or the failure of our franchisees to comply with federal, state and local governmental regulations may subject us to losses and harm our brands. We and our franchisees are subject to a variety of laws enacted, or rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local governmental authorities that govern our operations. We are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (which governs such matters as minimum wage, overtime, collective bargaining and other working conditions), along with the Americans with Disabilities Act (which provides civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations, and other areas), the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, various family leave mandates and various other laws, rules, and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local governmental authorities that govern these and other employment matters, including tip credits, working conditions, safety standards, collective bargaining and immigration status. There have been several complaintsalleging franchisors to be joint employers with franchisees. Although we do not consider ourselves to be joint employers with our franchisees, there can be no assurance that other franchisors will not receive similar complaints in the future which may result in legal proceedings based on the actions of franchisees. Increases in payroll expenses as a result of any federal, state, and local mandated increases in the minimum wage or changes to the tip credit may negatively impact our and our franchisees’ profitability. Enactment and enforcement of various federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations on immigration, collective bargaining and labor organizations as well as rules and regulations relating to employment practices may adversely impact the availability and costs of labor in a particular area or across the United States. Other labor shortages, unionization or increased team member turnover could also impact labor costs. In addition, our vendors may be affected by higher minimum wage standards or availability of labor, which may increase the price of goods and services they supply to us. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has impacted our franchisees’ employee costs in some respects. There are no assurances that a combination of cost management and price increases can accommodate all of the costs associated with compliance.
We and our franchisees are subject to extensive federal, state and local governmental regulations, including those relating to food safety and inspection and the preparation and sale of food and alcoholic beverages. Disruptions within any government agencies could impact the U.S. food industry, which may have an adverse effect on our business. We and our franchisees are also subject to laws and regulations relating to building and zoning requirements. Our and our franchisees' restaurants are also subject to licensing and regulation by alcoholic beverage control, health, sanitation, safety and fire agencies in the state, county and/or municipality where the restaurant is located. We cannot assure you that we or our franchisees will not encounter material difficulties or failures, including with respect to obtaining and maintaining required licenses and approvals, which could impact the continuing operations of an existing restaurant, or delay or prevent the opening of a new restaurant.
In addition, we are subject to laws and regulations, which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, relating to nutritional content and menu labeling. Compliance with these laws and regulations may lead to increased costs and operational complexity and may increase our exposure to governmental investigations or litigation. In connection with the continued operation or remodeling of certain restaurants, we and our franchisees may be required to expend funds to meet federal, state, local and
international regulations. The inability to obtain or maintain such licenses or publicity resulting from actual or allegedviolations of such laws could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are subject to federal regulation and certain foreign and state laws, including state laws that govern the offer and sale of franchises. Many state franchise laws contain provisions that supersede the terms of franchise agreements, including provisions concerning the termination or non-renewal of a franchise. Some state franchise laws require that certain materials be registered before franchises can be offered or sold in that state. The failure to obtain or retain licenses or approvals to sell franchises could adversely affect us and the franchisees. Changes in, and the cost of compliance with, government regulations could have a material effect on operations.
Finally, regulatory changes or actions under current or future U.S. political administrations may impact the laws or regulations described above. We cannot predict whether or when any of these potential changes in law might become effective in any jurisdiction nor the impact, if any, of these changes to our business.
Changes in U.S. government regulations and trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and other trade barriers, could materially impact our business. Changes to U.S. government regulations could impact our business operations, financial condition, and results of operations. Regulatory changes, including without limitation to labor laws, environmental standards, healthcare, and consumer protections, could increase our compliance costs, operational complexities, and potential liabilities. Changes in trade policies, including the imposition of new tariffs or modifications to existing trade agreements, could disrupt our supply chain and increase the cost of imported goods. Changes to immigration laws could result in unknown impacts to the labor market, particularly in industries that rely on immigrant workers, which could lead to increased labor costs and operational disruptions.
We are subject to risks associated with self-insurance for medical, dental and vision benefits. We self-insure all of our employee medical, dental and vision benefits. We maintain a per claim stop loss coverage but do not maintain coverage at an aggregate level. Our reserves are based on historical loss trends that may not correlate to actual loss experience in the future. If we experience an unexpectedly large number of claims that result in costs or liabilities in excess of our projections, our reserves may prove to be insufficient and we may be exposed to significant and unexpectedlosses. For these and other reasons, including our inability to renew stop loss coverage at competitive rates, we are subject to risks associated with self-insurance that may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
In addition, access to personal medical information is regulated by federal, state and/or local laws as well as by certain third-party agreements. If our security and information systems or the systems of our third-party vendors are compromised, we could be subject to costlylitigation or penalties and our reputation and operations could be adversely affected.
Any inability or failure to execute on a comprehensive business continuity plan following a major natural disaster such as an earthquake, wildfire, tornado, flood or a man-made disaster, including terrorism, civil unrest or a cyber incident, at or affecting our corporate facilities could materially adversely impact our business. Our corporate systems and processes and corporate support for our restaurant operations are handled primarily at our restaurant support centers. We have disaster recovery procedures and business continuity plans in place to address most events of a crisis nature, including earthquakes, wildfires, tornadoes, floods and other natural or man-made disasters, and back up and off-site locations for recovery of electronic and other forms of data and information. However, if we are unable to fully implement our disaster recovery plans, we may experience delays in recovery of data, inability to perform vital corporate functions, tardiness in required reporting and compliance, failures to adequately support field operations and other breakdowns in normal communication and operating procedures that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operation and exposure to administrative and other legal claims.
The increase in volatile and adverse weather conditions as a result of climate change could adversely affect our restaurant sales or results of operations. There is growing concern that climate change and global warming have caused and may continue to cause more severe, volatile weather or extended droughts, which could increase the frequency and duration of weather impacts on our operations. Adverse weather conditions have in the past and may again impact guest traffic at our restaurants and, in more severe cases such as hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires or other natural disasters, cause temporary restaurant closures, all of which negatively impact our restaurant sales. In addition, our supply chain is subject to increased costs caused by the effects of climate change, diminishing energy and water resources. We may be forced to source ingredients from new geographic regions, which could impact quality and taste, and increase our costs. These factors are beyond our control and, in many instances, unpredictable. Climate change and government regulation relating to climate change also could result in construction delays for new restaurants and interruptions to the availability or increases in the cost of utilities.
Development initiatives outside our core business could negatively impact our brands. Our business expansion into dual-branded restaurants, non-traditional restaurant formats, including restaurants with a smaller footprint, and restaurants located in non-traditional locations could create new risks to our brands and reputation.
Failure of our internal controls over financial reporting and future changes in accounting standards may cause adverseunexpected operating results, affect our reported results of operations or otherwise harm our business and financial results. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting. Internal controls over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that we would prevent or detect a misstatement of our financial statements or fraud. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A significant financial reporting failure or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could cause a loss of investor confidence and decline in the market price of our common stock.
A change in accounting standards can have a significant effect on our reported results and may affect our reporting of transactions before the change is effective. New pronouncements and varying interpretations of pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing accounting rules or the questioning of current accounting practices may adversely affect our reported financial results. Additionally, our assumptions, estimates and judgments related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results. Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by us. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by us could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance.
Changes in tax laws and unanticipated tax liabilities could adversely affect our financial results. We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and foreign jurisdictions. Any significant changes in U.S. or foreign laws and related authoritative interpretations could affect our tax expense and profitability. We are also impacted by the outcome of tax audits, which could have a material effect on our results of operations and cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made. In addition, our effective income tax rate and our results may be impacted by our ability to realize deferred tax benefits and any increases or decreases of our valuation allowance applied to our deferred tax assets.
Declines in our financial performance have resulted in and could result in future impairment charges. United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) require annual (or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances warrant) impairment tests of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets. Generally speaking, if the carrying value of the asset is in excess of the estimated fair value of the asset, the carrying value will be adjusted to fair value through an impairment charge. Fair values of goodwill and intangible assets are primarily estimated using discounted cash flows based on ten-year forecasts of financial results that incorporate assumptions including, among other things, restaurant sales trends, future development plans, restaurant closures, cost of revenues, operating expenses, and an appropriate discount rate. Fair values of long-lived tangible assets are primarily estimated using discounted cash flows over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Significant underachievement of forecasted results or changes in the discount rate assumption could reduce the estimated fair value of these assets below the carrying value, requiring non-cash impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of the asset. In 2025 and 2024, we recognized several significant impairment charges and could incur similar charges in the future. As of December 28, 2025, our total stockholders' deficit was $273.9 million. Any significant impairment write-down of goodwill, intangible assets or long-lived assets in the future could increase the stockholders' deficit. Repurchases of our common stock will also increase the stockholders' deficit. While such a deficit balance does not create an event of default in any of our contractual agreements, the negative perception of such a deficit could have an adverse effect on our stock price and could impair our ability to obtain new financing, or refinance existing indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Failure to meet investor and stakeholder expectations regarding certain business responsibility matters may damage our reputation. There is a focus from certain investors, customers, consumers, employees and other stakeholders, both for and against certain environmental, sustainability, social and corporate governance matters. If our business responsibility practices fail to meet investor, customer, consumer, employee or other stakeholders’ evolving expectations and standards for responsible corporate citizenship in areas including environmental stewardship (such as greenhouse gas emissions), animal health and welfare, Board of Directors and employee diversity, human capital management, corporate governance and transparency, our reputation, brand, appeal to investors and employee retention may be negatively impacted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
Many factors, including those over which we have no control, affect the trading volatility and price of our stock. Many factors, in addition to our operating results, may have an impact on the trading volatility and price of our common stock. These factors include general economic and market conditions, publicity regarding us, our competitors, or the restaurant industry generally, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, changes in financial or tax reporting and accounting principles or practices, trading activity in our common stock, overall liquidity and the impact of our capital allocation initiatives, including any future stock repurchase programs or dividend declarations. Many of these factors are outside of our control, and any failure to meet market expectations whether for sales growth, earnings per share or other metrics could cause our share price to decline.
Our actual operating and financial results in any given period may differ from guidance we provide to the public,
including our most recent public guidance. From time to time, in press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls and other contexts, we have provided guidance to the public regarding current business conditions and our expectations for our future financial results. We expect that we will provide guidance periodically in the future. Our guidance is based upon a number of assumptions, expectations and estimates that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In providing our guidance, we also make various assumptions with respect to our future business decisions, some of which will change. Our actual financial results, therefore, may vary from our guidance due to our inability to meet the assumptions upon which our guidance is based and the impact on our business of the various risks and uncertainties described in these risk factors and in our public filings with the SEC. Variances between our actual results and our guidance may be material. To the extent that our actual financial results do not meet or exceed our guidance, the trading prices of our securities may be materially adversely affected.
Epidemics, disease outbreaks or public health emergencies may disrupt our business, which could materially affect our operations, and business and financial results. As experienced through the recent COVID-19 pandemic, epidemics, disease outbreaks or public health emergencies may impact sales and traffic at our and our franchisees’ restaurants, may make it more difficult to staff restaurants and, in more severe cases, may damage our reputation, cause an inability to obtain supplies, increase commodity costs or continue to cause partial or total closures of impacted restaurants. The extent to which future potential epidemics, disease outbreaks or public health emergencies will impact our business, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations, will depend on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict or assess, including the duration and scope of the pandemic; the negative impact on the economy; the short and longer-term impacts on the demand for restaurant services and levels of consumer confidence; the ability of us and our franchisees to successfully navigate the impacts; government action, including restrictions on restaurant operations; increased unemployment; and reductions in consumer discretionary spending. Even if a virus or other disease does not spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or health risk may damage our reputation and adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. A future potential epidemic, disease outbreak or public health emergency may also heighten many of the other risks described in this Item 1A - Risk Factors .
Risks Related to Our Franchise Business Model
Restaurant development plans under development agreements may not be implemented effectively and developed restaurants may not achievedesired results. We rely on franchisees to develop IHOP, Applebee's and Fuzzy's restaurants. From time to time, our franchisees have failed to fulfill their commitments to build new restaurants in the numbers and within the timeframes required by their development agreements, and we expect that this will continue to varying degrees in the future. Restaurant development and the success of restaurants opened by our franchisees involve substantial risks, including the following:
• the demand for IHOP, Applebee’s and Fuzzy's restaurants and the selection of appropriate franchisee candidates;
• costs of construction, permit issuance and regulatory compliance;
• the availability of suitable locations and terms for potential development sites, including lease or purchase terms for new locations;
• the availability of financing, at acceptable rates and terms, to both franchisees and third-party landlords, for restaurant development and/or implementation of our business strategy through new remodel programs and other operational changes;
• delays in obtaining construction permits and in completion of construction;
• competition for suitable development sites;
• challenges in the general labor market and our franchisees' ability to maintain adequate staffing of restaurants;
• changes in governmental rules, regulations, and interpretations (including interpretations of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act); and
• general economic and business conditions.
Additionally, developed restaurants may not achievedesired revenue or cash flow levels once opened. This could result in restaurant closures, which may be significant in number, and may cause our royalty revenues and financial performance to decline. The inability to open new restaurants that achieve and sustain acceptable sales volumes and/or the closure of existing restaurants that do not achieve or sustain acceptable sales volumes may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We are significantly franchised; as a result, we are highly dependent upon our franchisees. Substantially all IHOP, Applebee's and Fuzzy’s restaurants are owned and operated by our franchisees. Our dependence on our franchisees could adversely affect us, our brands, and our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our financial results are
significantly contingent upon the performance of our franchised restaurants because we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from royalties that are based on a percentage of gross sales at franchised restaurants. Worsening economic conditions and declining trends in sales, traffic and/or average check could impact the performance of our franchised restaurants, resulting in lower royalty, advertising fund and other payments from franchisees. If declining conditions persist, franchisee profitability and financial health may worsen and franchisees may suffer from financial, personal or other difficulties, including insolvency. Franchisees may also experience financial risks unrelated to the operation of restaurants under our brands, such as a decline in performance of other brands or businesses held by franchisees. Additionally, lenders to our franchisees may be less likely to provide current or prospective franchisees necessary financing on favorable terms, or at all, due to market conditions and our or our franchisees’ operating results. These and other factors could impact franchisees’ ability to make royalty and other payments owed to us when due and franchisees could default on their financial obligations to us. A decrease in franchisee profitability as well as other reasons could also cause franchisees’ failure or inability to meet new restaurant development obligations and other obligations such as maintenance or remodel requirements and rent obligations for certain leases on which we retain contingent liability.
Additionally, our franchise agreements have expiration dates. Upon expiration, franchisees are generally offered new franchise agreements in order to extend the franchise relationship. We or the franchisee may or may not elect to enter into these successor franchise agreements based on a number of factors, including a failure to meet our criteria, lack of interest by either party and/or the inability of franchisees to enter into successor franchise agreements. It is expected that, in the ordinary course of business, some franchise agreements will expire without successor franchise agreements. As our franchise portfolio matures with initial franchise agreements that are successfully renewed being replaced with renewal or successor franchise agreements, we generally expect to see a larger number of franchise agreements coming up for renewal on an annual basis due to the fact that the duration of renewal agreements is less than the duration of initial franchise agreements. We continue to have a substantial number of franchise agreements set to expire for our brands. We cannot ensure that renewal or successor franchise agreements or extensions will be entered into once the current term expires. This may result in reduced royalties and other payments due to a decrease in the number of restaurants operating under our brands.
As independent third parties, franchisees own, operate and oversee the daily operations of their restaurants and their employees are not our employees. Accordingly, we do not control their actions. While our franchise agreements are designed to maintain brand consistency, having almost all franchisee-operated restaurants may expose us to risks not otherwise encountered if we maintained ownership and control of all of the restaurants. Franchisees may breach the terms of their franchise agreements in a manner that adversely affects our brands, such as failing to operate restaurants in accordance with our required standards, and we may be limited in our ability to enforce franchise obligations. Franchisees are required to conform to specified product quality standards and other requirements pursuant to their franchise agreements in order to protect our brands and to optimize restaurant performance. If franchisees do not successfully operate their restaurants in a manner consistent with our standards, or customers have negative experiences due to issues with food quality or operational execution, our reputation and brands could suffer, and we could be subject to claims by guests even if we are not legally liable for the franchisee's actions or failure to act. This could result in a material adverse effect on our business. The quality of franchisees’ operations may also be diminished by factors beyond our control, including a lack of investment in enhancing or maintaining acceptable standards for restaurant operations due to financial and other constraints. Franchisees also may fail or be unable to hire or retain qualified managers and other personnel and training of managers and other personnel may be inadequate. These and other such negative factors could reduce franchisees' restaurant revenues, impact payments to us under the franchise agreements and could have a material adverse effect on us.
Various other risks associated with the operation of a franchised business model that may have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition include:
• inability or unwillingness of franchisees to participate in implementing changes or to participate in business strategy changes;
• inability or unwillingness of franchisees to support our marketing programs and strategic initiatives;
• inability of franchisees to participate in business strategy changes due to financial constraints;
• failure of franchisees to report sales information accurately;
• greater proportional impact of general and administrative expenses on our business and financial condition; and
• inability to retain franchisees in the future, both in terms of number and quality, and inability to attract, retain and motivate sufficient numbers of franchisees of the same caliber, including top performing franchisees.
While we try to maintain positive working relationships with our franchisees, the nature of the franchisor-franchisee relationship inherently subjects us to potential disagreements with our franchisees on matters pertaining to the business and/or our brands. From time to time, we have experienced, and we may continue to experience, poor franchise relations caused by the efforts of one or more of our larger franchisees or an organized franchise association.
Concentration of Applebee's franchised restaurants in a limited number of franchisees subjects us to greater risk. As of December 28, 2025, Applebee's franchisees operated 1,413 Applebee's restaurants in the United States. Of those restaurants, the ten largest Applebee's franchisees owned 1,153 restaurants, representing 82% of all franchised Applebee's restaurants in the United States. The largest Applebee's franchisee owned 459 restaurants, representing 32% of all franchised Applebee's restaurants in the United States. The concentration of franchised restaurants in a limited number of franchisees subjects us to a potentially higher level of risk with respect to such franchisees because their obligations to us, including financial obligations, are greater as compared to those franchisees with fewer restaurants. The risk associated with these franchisees is also greater where franchisees are the sole or dominant franchisee for a particular region of the United States, as is the case for most domestic Applebee's franchised territories. In particular, if any of these franchisees experience financial or other difficulties, the franchisee may default on its obligations under multiple franchise agreements, notes receivable or other agreements, including payments to us and the maintenance and improvement of its restaurants. From time to time, we may work with our franchisees who are experiencing financial difficulties to assess and address their financial health and their ability to satisfy their financial obligations to us. In certain of these situations, we may agree to alternative arrangements with franchisees for the payment of amounts due to us under our franchise and other agreements. We cannot assure you that these arrangements will be successful, nor can we assure you that they will result in us receiving all or any of the amounts due to us under our franchise agreements, notes receivable and other agreements. Any franchisee that owns and operates a significant number of Applebee's restaurants and fails to comply with other obligations under the franchise agreement, such as those relating to the quality and preparation of food and maintenance of restaurants, could cause significant harm to the Applebee's brand and subject us to claims by consumers even if we are not legally liable for the franchisee's actions or failure to act. Development rights for Applebee's restaurants are also concentrated among a limited number of existing franchisees. If any of these existing franchisees experience financial difficulties, future development of Applebee's restaurants may be materially adversely affected.
An insolvency or bankruptcy proceeding involving a franchisee could prevent or delay the collection of payments or the exercise of rights under the related franchise agreement. An insolvency proceeding involving a franchisee could prevent or delay us from collecting payments or exercising any of our other rights under the related franchise agreement. If a franchisee is subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, a bankruptcy court may prevent the termination of the related franchise and development agreement. In particular, the protection of the statutory automatic stay that arises under Section 362 of the United States Bankruptcy Code upon the commencement of a bankruptcy proceeding by or against a franchisee may prohibit us from terminating a franchise agreement previously entered into with a franchisee. Furthermore, a franchisee that is subject to bankruptcy proceedings may reject the franchise agreement in which case we would be limited to a general unsecured claim against the franchisee's bankruptcy estate on account of breach-of-contract damages arising from the rejection. Payments previously made to us by a franchisee that is subject to a bankruptcy proceeding also may be recoverable from us on behalf of the franchisee as a preferential transfer under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
We are subject to credit risk from our IHOP franchisees operating under our Previous IHOP Business Model, and a default by these franchisees may negatively affect our cash flows. Prior to 2003, new IHOP restaurants were generally developed by us, and we were involved in all aspects of the construction and financing of the restaurants. We typically identified and leased or purchased the restaurant sites for new company-developed IHOP restaurants, built and equipped the restaurants and then franchised them to franchisees. In addition, we typically financed as much as 80% of the franchise fee for periods ranging from five to eight years and leased the restaurant and equipment to the franchisee over a 25-year period. Therefore, in addition to franchise fees and royalties, the revenues received from an IHOP franchisee operating under the Previous IHOP Business Model may include, among other things, lease or sublease rents for the restaurant property building, rent under an equipment lease and interest income from the financing arrangements for the unpaid portion of the franchise fee under the franchise notes. If any of these IHOP franchisees were to default on their payment obligations to us, we may be unable to collect the amounts owed under the building property lease/sublease agreement and our notes and equipment contract receivables, as well as outstanding franchise royalties. The additional amounts owed to us by each of these IHOP franchisees subject us to greater credit risk and defaults by IHOP franchisees operating under our Previous IHOP Business Model and may negatively affect our cash flows. Of the 1,672 IHOP domestic franchise and area license restaurants as of December 28, 2025, approximately 521 restaurants have property lease/sublease agreements and/or notes and equipment contract obligations outstanding.
We and our franchisees are subject to potential losses that may not be covered by insurance. We and our franchisees may have insufficient insurance coverage to cover all of the potential risks associated with the ownership and operation of restaurants. We and our franchisees may have insufficient funds to cover future unanticipated increases in insurance premiums or losses that are not covered by insurance. Certain extraordinary hazards may not be insurable and insurance may not be available (or may be available only at prohibitively expensive rates) with respect to many other risks. Moreover, there is no assurance that any loss incurred will not exceed the limits on the policies obtained, or that claim payments on such policies will be received on a timely basis. Further, there can be no assurance that any such payments, even if obtained on a timely basis, will prevent losses to franchisees or enable timely franchise payments. Accordingly, in cases in which a franchisee experiences increased insurance premiums or must pay out-of-pocket claims, the franchisee may not have the funds necessary to make
franchise and other payments to us, and franchisees may be unable to perform other obligations under their franchise agreements.
If franchisees and other licensees do not observe the required quality and trademark usage standards, our brands may suffer reputational damage, which could in turn adversely affect our business. We license our intellectual property to our franchisees, product suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, advertisers and other third parties. The franchise agreements and other license agreements require that each franchisee or other licensee use our intellectual property in accordance with established or approved quality control guidelines. However, there can be no assurance that the franchisees or other licensees will use the intellectual property assets in accordance with such guidelines. Franchisee and licensee noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the governing franchise agreement or other license agreement may reduce the overall goodwill associated with our brands. Franchisees and other licensees may refer to our intellectual property improperly in communications, resulting in the weakening of the distinctiveness of our intellectual property. There can be no assurance that the franchisees or other licensees will not take actions that could have a material adverse effect on our intellectual property.
In addition, even if the licensee product suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, or advertisers observe and maintain the quality and integrity of our intellectual property assets in accordance with the relevant license agreement, any product manufactured by such suppliers may be subject to regulatory sanctions and other actions by third parties which can, in turn, negatively impact the perceived quality of our restaurants and the overall goodwill of our brands, regardless of the nature and type of product involved. Any such sanctions or actions could reduce restaurant revenues and corresponding franchise payments to us.
Our business strategy may not achieve anticipated results. We expect to continue to apply a business strategy that includes operation of a significantly franchised restaurant system across multiple brands and brand-specific business strategies suited to each brand. There can be no assurance that the business strategy we apply to one franchise system will be suitable or will achieve results similar to the application of such business strategy to another franchise system. In addition, operational improvement, purchasing and other strategic initiatives for any of our brands may not be successful or achieve the desired results, and there can be no assurance that franchisees will respond favorably to such initiatives. Additionally, our strategic initiatives may subject us and our franchisees to new and additional risks. Our business strategy includes the addition of new brands to our restaurant portfolio through mergers and acquisitions. There can be no assurance that any such transaction will be successful or produce favorable financial or other results.
Risks Related to Operating in the Restaurant Industry
Our performance is subject to risks associated with the restaurant industry, including the highly competitive nature of the industry. We derive a substantial portion of our revenues in the form of royalties based on the gross sales of our franchised restaurants. Sales and profitability of these restaurants may be negatively impacted by a number of factors associated with operating in the restaurant industry, some of which are outside of our control. These factors include:
• changes in consumer behavior driven by macro-level shifts in retail, technology, media, e-commerce, global safety and demography which may impact where, when, whether and how often customers visit full-service restaurants;
• declines in comparable restaurant sales growth rates due to: (i) failure to meet or adequately adapt to changing customer expectations for food type, quality and taste, or to innovate and develop new menu items to retain existing customers and attract new customers; (ii) competitive intrusions in our markets, including competitive pricing initiatives and day-part expansion by competitors; (iii) opening new restaurants that cannibalize the sales of existing restaurants; (iv) failure of national or local marketing to be effective; and (v) natural or man-made disasters or adverse weather conditions;
• negative trends in operating expenses such as: (i) increases in food and other commodity costs or related distribution costs; (ii) increases in labor costs due to minimum wage and other employment laws or regulations, immigration reform, the potential impact of union organizing efforts and tight labor market conditions; and (iii) increases in other operating costs including advertising, utilities, lease-related expenses and credit card processing fees;
• the highly competitive nature of the restaurant and related industries with respect to, among other things: (i) price, service, location, personnel and the type and quality of food; (ii) the trend toward convergence in grocery, deli, retail and restaurant services, as well as the continued expansion of restaurants into the breakfast day-part; (iii) the entry of major market players in non-competing industries into the food services market; and (iv) the decline in the price of groceries which may increase the attractiveness of dining at home versus dining out;
• difficulty in increasing menu pricing to offset increased operating expenses; and
• failure to effectively manage further penetration into mature markets.
Factors outside our control may harm our brands' reputations. The success of our business is largely dependent upon brand recognition and the strength of our franchise systems. Our and our franchisees’ continued success is directly dependent
upon maintaining a favorable public view of the IHOP, Applebee's and Fuzzy's brands. Negative publicity (e.g., crime, scandal, litigation, on-site accidents and injuries or other harm to customers, social issues and food-borne illness) at a single IHOP, Applebee's or Fuzzy's location can have a substantial negative impact on all restaurants within their respective system. Multi-unit food service businesses such as ours can be materially and adversely affected by widespread negative publicity of any type, including through social media, but particularly regarding food quality, food-borne illness, food tampering or preparation, obesity, discrimination or bias, injury or other health concerns with respect to certain foods and actions of our or our franchisees’ managers or employees, regardless of whether such claims are accurate or valid.
The risk of food-borne illness or food tampering cannot be completely eliminated. Any outbreak of food-borne illness or other food-related incidents attributed to IHOP, Applebee's or Fuzzy's restaurants or within the food service industry or any widespread negative publicity regarding the IHOP, Applebee's or Fuzzy's brands or the restaurant industry in general could harm our reputation. Even where such food-related incidents occur solely at restaurants of our competitors or within the industry, our business could be adversely affected by negative publicity about the restaurant industry generally. Our company-owned restaurants and our franchisees may produce or receive through the supply chain sub-standard or non-compliant food or beverage products. In addition, our franchisees’ failure to comply with food quality and preparation requirements may subject us to potential losses, even when we are not legally liable for a franchisee's actions or failure to act. Although we maintain liability insurance, and each franchisee is required to maintain liability insurance pursuant to its franchise agreements, a liability claim could injure the reputation of all IHOP, Applebee's or Fuzzy's restaurants, whether or not it is ultimately successful.
A lack of availability of suitable locations for new restaurants or a decline in the quality of the locations of our current restaurants may adversely affect our sales and results of operations. The success of our brands depends in large part on restaurant locations. As demographic and economic patterns change, current locations may not continue to be attractive or profitable. Potential declines in neighborhoods where restaurants are located or adverse economic conditions in areas surrounding those neighborhoods could result in reduced sales in those locations. In addition, desirable locations for new restaurant openings or for the relocation of existing restaurants may not be available at an acceptable cost when we identify a particular opportunity for a new restaurant or relocation. Additionally, restaurant revitalization initiatives may not be completed as and when projected and may not produce the results we expect. We also may be unable to operate effectively in new and/or highly competitive geographic regions or local markets in which our franchisees have limited operating experience.
We may experience shortages or interruptions in the supply or delivery of food and other products from third parties or in the availability of utilities. Our and our franchised restaurants are dependent on frequent deliveries of fresh produce, food, beverages and other products. Shortages or interruptions in food and beverage supplies may result from a variety of causes, including shortages due to climate change, adverse weather, labor unrest, labor shortages, political unrest, terrorism, pandemics, epidemics, outbreaks of food-borne illness, disruption of operation of production facilities, financial difficulties (including bankruptcy) of our distributors or suppliers or other unforeseen circumstances. For example, the current outbreak of avian flu may impact the cost and availability of obtaining eggs. Such shortages could adversely affect our and our franchisees’ ability to operate our restaurants and, in turn, affect our and our franchisees’ revenue and profits. Additionally, the inability to secure adequate and reliable supplies or distribution of food and beverage products could limit our ability to make changes to our core menus or offer promotional "limited time only" menu items, which may limit our ability to implement our business strategies. Our and our franchisees’ restaurants bear risks associated with the timeliness of deliveries by suppliers and distributors as well as the solvency, reputation, labor relationships, freight rates, prices of raw materials and health and safety standards of each supplier and distributor. Other significant risks associated with our suppliers and distributors include improper handling of food and beverage products and/or the adulteration or contamination of such food and beverage products. Disruptions in our relationships with suppliers and distributors may reduce the payments we receive from our franchisees or our pancake and waffle dry mix distributors or the profits generated by our company-owned restaurants. In addition, interruptions to the availability of gas, electric, water or other utilities may adversely affect the operations of our and our franchised restaurants.
Any inability to effectively manage or forecast appropriate inventory levels may adversely affect our business. Effective management of inventory levels depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to changing consumer demand and preferences. From time to time, we may carry excessive inventory resulting from menu events that vary from forecasted demand which may result in financial loss to us and/or to our franchisees. Conversely, if we underestimate demand, we may experience inventory shortages, which may result in lost revenues.
A failure to develop and implement innovative marketing and guest relationship initiatives, ineffective or improper use of social media or other marketing initiatives and increased advertising and marketing costs could adversely affect our business results. If our competitors increase their spending on advertising and promotions, if our advertising, media or marketing expenses increase, or if our advertising and promotions become less effective than those of our competitors, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business results. A failure to sufficiently innovate, develop guest relationship initiatives, or maintain adequate and effective advertising could inhibit our ability to maintain brand relevance and drive increased sales.
As part of our marketing efforts, we rely on search engine marketing and social media platforms to attract and retain guests.
These efforts may not be successful, resulting in expenses incurred without the benefit of higher revenues or increased employee engagement. In addition, a variety of risks are associated with the use of social media, including the improper disclosure of proprietary information, posting of negative comments about our brands or experiences in our or our franchisees’ restaurants, exposure of personal information, fraud, and use of outdated information. The use, including any inappropriate or otherwise harmful use, of social media vehicles by our franchisees and their employees, guests, our employees or others in the general public could increase our costs, lead to litigation or result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation.
Changing health or dietary preferences may cause consumers to avoid IHOP, Applebee's and Fuzzy's restaurants in favor of alternative options. The food service industry as a whole rests on consumer preferences and demographic trends at the local, regional, national and international levels. Franchise development and system-wide sales depend on the sustained demand for our products, which may be affected by factors we do not control. New information regarding diet, nutrition and health and efforts by advocacy groups to influence consumer eating habits may negatively affect the demand for our food. Various additional factors such as: (i) the Food and Drug Administration’s menu labeling rules; (ii) nutritional guidelines issued by the United States Department of Agriculture and issuance of similar guidelines or statistical information by state or local municipalities; (iii) academic studies; or (iv) efforts by environmental, animal health and welfare and sustainability advocacy groups, may impact consumer choice and cause consumers to select foods other than those that are offered by IHOP, Applebee's or Fuzzy's restaurants. We may not be able to adequately adapt IHOP, Applebee's or Fuzzy's restaurants' menu offerings to keep pace with developments in consumer preferences, which may result in reduced royalty revenues from a decline in demand for our food and fewer guests visiting our restaurants.
• Consolidated Results
• Key Performance Indicators
• Segment Results
• Non-Segment Items
• Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company
• Critical Accounting Estimates
• Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Consolidated Results
Change
(In millions)
Revenues:
Franchise revenues
Company-owned restaurant revenues
Rental revenues
Total revenues
Cost of revenues:
Franchise expenses
Company-owned restaurant expenses
Rental expenses
Total cost of revenues
Gross profit
General and administrative expenses
Interest expense, net
Closure and impairment charges
Amortization of intangible assets
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Gain on disposition of assets
Income before income taxes
Total revenues increased $67.0 million in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024, largely driven by $95.3 million increase from the Company-owned restaurant segment from restaurants acquired over the last 14 months. This increase was partially offset by a $20.5 million decrease in franchise revenues due to lower system sales and a $7.8 million decrease in rental revenues. Total cost of revenues increased $83.0 million primarily due to an increase in Company-owned restaurant expenses.
Income before income taxes in fiscal year 2025 decreased compared to fiscal year 2024 largely due to increases in closure and impairment charges, decrease in gross profit, increases in general and administrative expenses, and increase in interest expense. The increase in closure and impairment charges is primarily due to a $29 million non-cash impairment charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025 related to the Fuzzy's tradename intangible assets. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to an increase in compensation-related expenses and an increase in professional service fees. The increase in interest expense is primarily the result of the refinancing of our Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes Series 2025-1 completed in June 2025. This increase is driven by an increase in the interest rate and an increase to the principal, partially offset by a decrease in the Credit Facility interest.
Key Performance Indicators
In addition to revenue, cost of revenues, and gross profit in evaluating the performance of each of our brands, management also considers the following key performance indicators in evaluating our business:
"System sales” are retail sales at IHOP, Applebee’s and Fuzzy's restaurants operated by franchisees reported to the Company and revenues generated at Company-owned restaurants. Sales at restaurants that are operated by franchisees are not revenues attributable to the Company. An increase in system sales of franchised restaurants will result in a corresponding increase in our royalty revenues, while a decrease will result in a corresponding decrease in our royalty revenues.
“Domestic same-restaurant sales change” reflects the percentage change in sales of domestic restaurants in any given fiscal period that operated during the comparable prior year period and have been open for at least 18 months. Due to new restaurant openings and restaurant closures, the restaurants open throughout both fiscal periods being compared may be different from period to period.
“Same-restaurant sales change” reflects the percentage change in sales of domestic and international restaurants in any given fiscal period that operated during the comparable prior year period and have been open for at least 18 months. Due to new restaurant openings and restaurant closures, the restaurants open throughout both fiscal periods being compared may be different from period to period.
"Domestic average weekly unit sales" represents the average sales generated per restaurant per operating week during the reporting period. This is calculated by dividing total restaurant sales by the number of operating weeks for all restaurants open during the period. For restaurants that were open for only part of the period, adjustments are made to the number of operating weeks to correspond to the period there were restaurant sales.
"Net development" refers to the overall change in the number of restaurants during a period, calculated as total openings less total closures.
IHOP
Applebee's
Fuzzy's
System Sales (in millions)
Franchise
Company
Total
System:
Domestic same-restaurant sales change
Same-restaurant sales change (a)
Franchise (b) :
Domestic same-restaurant sales change
Same-restaurant sales change (a)
Domestic average weekly unit sales (in thousands)
Company:
Domestic average weekly unit sales (in thousands)
IHOP
Applebee's
Fuzzy's
Development
Franchise (c), (d)
Beginning
Opened
Closed
Ending
Company (c), (d)
Beginning
Opened
Closed
Ending
Total
Domestic
International
Net Development
(a) Applebee's System same-restaurant sales change and Franchise same-restaurant sales change for fiscal year 2023 was 0.7% and 0.7%, respectively.
(b) The franchise sales percentage change for 2025 was impacted by the acquisition of 47 Applebee's restaurants in November 2024, 10 IHOP restaurants in March 2025, and 12 Applebee's restaurants in May 2025 now reported as company-owned.
(c) Included in the IHOP franchise restaurants closed and IHOP company-owned restaurants opened are 10 restaurants acquired by the Company in March 2025. Included in the Applebee's franchise restaurants closed and Applebee's company-owned restaurants opened are 12 restaurants acquired by the Company in May 2025 and 56 restaurants acquired by the Company in November 2024.
(d) Included in the Applebee's franchise restaurants opened and Applebee's company-owned restaurants closed are nine restaurants refranchised by the Company in 2024.
Dual-branded restaurants are defined as restaurants that operate our IHOP and Applebee's restaurant concepts under two separate franchise agreements but within one restaurant location. Because of this, each dual-branded restaurant is counted as part of both IHOP and Applebee’s restaurant count and activity.
As of December 28, 2025, we had 27 dual-branded domestic IHOP and Applebee's restaurant locations. Of these 27 locations, we had 26 existing IHOP or Applebee’s restaurants which added a second brand and one new restaurant which added both brands, totaling 28 dual-branded domestic openings.
As of December 28, 2025, we had 32 dual-branded international IHOP and Applebee's restaurant locations. Of these 32 locations, we had 10 existing IHOP or Applebee’s restaurants which added a second brand and four new restaurants which added both brands, totaling 18 dual-branded international openings in 2025. The remaining dual-branded locations were opened prior to 2025.
As of December 29, 2024, we had 18 dual-branded international IHOP and Applebee's restaurant locations. Of these 18 locations, we had four existing IHOP or Applebee’s restaurants which added a second brand and seven new restaurants which added both brands, totaling 18 dual-branded international openings in 2024. The remaining dual-branded locations were opened prior to 2024.
As our dual-branded business expands, we may reevaluate how these restaurants are counted in future disclosures.
IHOP’s system domestic same-restaurant sales increased 0.3% for the three months ended December 28, 2025 and decreased 1.5% for the year ended December 28, 2025, as compared to the same respective periods of 2024. The increase for the three months ended December 28, 2025 was primarily driven by an increase in traffic, partially offset by a decrease in average check. The decrease for the year was primarily due to a decrease in average check, resulting from the introduction of our new everyday value menu.
Based on data from Black Box Intelligence, a restaurant sales reporting firm (“Black Box”), IHOP domestic same-restaurant sales outperformed for the three months ended December 28, 2025 and underperformed for the twelve months ended December 28, 2025 in the family dining category (excluding IHOP), as compared with the same respective periods of fiscal 2024. According to Black Box, the family dining category experienced a decrease in same-restaurant sales resulting from a decrease in customer traffic, partially offset by an increase in average customer check for the twelve months ended December 28, 2025.
IHOP Off-Premise Sales Data
Fourth Fiscal Quarter
Fiscal Year
Off-premise sales (in millions) (1)
% sales mix
(1) Primarily to-go, delivery and catering sales.
IHOP's off-premise sales for the three and twelve months ended December 28, 2025 increased by $6.4 million and $6.3 million respectively, as compared to the same respective periods of fiscal 2024 primarily due to the brand's focus on delivery promotions and catering services.
Applebee’s system domestic same-restaurant sales decreased 0.4% for the three months ended December 28, 2025 and increased 1.3% for the year ended December 28, 2025, as compared to the same respective periods of 2024. The decrease for the three months ended December 28, 2025 was primarily due to a decrease in traffic, partially offset by an increase in average check. The increase for the year ended December 28, 2025 was primarily due to an increase in average check resulting from menu price increases, partially offset by additional value offerings.
Based on data from Black Box, Applebee's domestic same-restaurant sales for the three and twelve months ended December 28, 2025 underperformed the casual dining category (excluding Applebee's) as compared with the same respective periods of fiscal 2024. Black Box reported the casual dining category experienced strong same-restaurant sales increase for the twelve months ended December 28, 2025 driven by an increase in average customer check.
Applebee's Off-Premise Sales Data
Fourth Fiscal Quarter
Fiscal Year
Off-premise sales (in millions) (1)
% sales mix
(1) Primarily to-go, delivery and catering sales.
Applebee's off-premise sales for the three and twelve months ended December 28, 2025 increased $2.3 million and $7.6 million, respectively, as compared with the same respective periods of fiscal 2024, primarily due to limited time offers paired with digital promotions to encourage more off-premise occasions.
Domestic Same-Restaurant Sales - Fuzzy's
Fuzzy's system domestic same-restaurant sales decreased 0.8% for the three months ended December 28, 2025 and decreased 7.0% for the year ended December 28, 2025, as compared to the same respective periods of 2024. The decrease for the three and twelve months ended December 28, 2025 was primarily due to a decrease in traffic, partially offset by an increase in average check, resulting primarily from menu price increases.
Segment Results
Franchise Segment
Change
(In millions)
Franchise Revenues
IHOP
Applebee's
Fuzzy's
Advertising
Total franchise revenues
Franchise Expenses
IHOP
Applebee's
Fuzzy's
Advertising
Total franchise expenses
Franchise Segment Profit
Our total franchise segment profit decreased $3.8 million in 2025 compared to 2024.
Franchise revenues decreased as a result of the following:
• IHOP franchise revenue decreased $6.9 million primarily due to a decrease in royalty revenue and a decrease in proprietary product sales. The decrease in royalty revenue and proprietary product sales was primarily due to a 1.5% decrease in franchise domestic same-restaurant sales and a decrease in the number of franchise restaurants due to the acquisition of 10 IHOP company-owned restaurants in March 2025.
• Applebee’s franchise revenue decreased $2.6 million primarily due to a decrease in royalty revenue partially offset by an increase in termination fees. The decrease in royalty revenue was primarily due to a decrease in the number of franchise restaurants due in part to the acquisition of our 47 Applebee’s company-owned restaurants in November 2024 and 12 Applebee’s company-owned restaurants in May 2025. This decrease was partially offset by a 1.4% increase in franchise domestic same-restaurant sales.
• Fuzzy’s franchise revenue decreased $2.3 million primarily due to a decrease in royalty revenue and a decrease in proprietary product sales. The decrease in royalty revenue and proprietary product sales was primarily due to a 7.0% decrease in franchise domestic same-restaurant sales and a decrease in the number of franchise restaurants.
• Advertising revenue decreased $8.7 million due to the decrease in the number of franchise restaurants as noted above and a 1.5% decrease in IHOP domestic same-restaurant sales, partially offset by a 1.4% increase in Applebee’s domestic same-restaurant sales.
Franchise expenses decreased as a result of the following:
• IHOP franchise expenses decreased $2.8 million primarily due to a decrease in the cost of proprietary sales and a decrease in franchisor advertising contributions as compared to the prior year.
• Applebee’s franchise expenses increased $5.3 million primarily due to an increase in bad debt expense.
• Fuzzy’s franchise expense decreased $2.8 million primarily due to a franchisor advertising contribution in the prior year.
• Advertising expenses decreased $16.4 million primarily due to a corresponding decrease in the number of franchise restaurants and a 1.5% decrease in IHOP domestic same-restaurant sales, partially offset by a 1.4% increase in Applebee's franchise domestic same-restaurant sales.
Company-Owned Restaurant Segment
Change
(In millions)
Company-owned restaurant revenues
Company-owned restaurant expenses
Company-owned restaurant segment loss
During fiscal year 2025, the Company owned 72 restaurants compared to 48 restaurants in fiscal year 2024. The change in company-owned restaurant revenue and expenses is primarily driven by the increase in the number and timing of restaurants acquired during the fiscal years 2025 and 2024. Segment loss for the company‑owned restaurant for the twelve months ended December 28, 2025 was primarily due to costs of transitioning the restaurants, including expenditures and delays related to obtaining liquor licenses and closures from remodeling activities.
Rental Segment
Change
(In millions)
Rental revenues
Rental expenses
Rental Segment Profit
Rental operations primarily relate to IHOP franchise restaurants that were developed prior to 2003. Rental revenues are primarily derived from operating leases and interest income from real estate leases. Rental expenses are costs of leases and interest expense of leases on certain franchise restaurants.
Rental segment profit for the year ended December 28, 2025 decreased compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to lease terminations resulting from restaurant closures and the impact of company-acquired IHOP restaurants in March 2025 for which we previously collected rental revenues as the lessor from the franchisee.
Non-Segment Items
General and Administrative Expenses
Change
(In millions)
General and administrative expenses
Other income
Total
Total general and administrative expenses for 2025 increased $7.1 million, primarily due to an increase in compensation-related expenses and professional service fees, partially offset by a $3.4 million recovery of franchise fees from a settlement with a franchisee.
Interest expense, net and Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt
Change
(In millions)
Interest expense, net
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt
Total
Interest expense, net, increased $5.9 million in 2025, primarily due to the refinancing of our Series 2025-1 6.720% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2 at a higher interest rate and an increase to the principal, partially offset by a decrease in the Credit Facility interest.
As part of the refinancing, the Company repaid the entire outstanding balance of approximately $594.0 million of its 2019 Class A-2-II Notes and recognized a $0.9 million loss on extinguishment of debt from the refinancing in June 2025.
Closure and Impairment Charges
Change
(In millions)
Closure charges
Goodwill impairment
Tradename impairment
Other asset impairment charges
Total
Closure charges
For the year ended December 28, 2025, we recorded $5.0 million of closure charges primarily comprised of $3.6 million for restaurant closure costs related to IHOP restaurants closed in 2025 or earlier. This includes $2.0 million related to two leased properties we acquired in March 2025 and closed during 2025 related to the acquisition and closure of certain IHOP restaurants. We also incurred $0.7 million related to the exit of office space in the Leawood, Kansas restaurant support center.
The closure charges of $2.2 million for the year ended December 29, 2024 were $1.5 million for revisions to existing reserves, for approximately 21 IHOP restaurants closed prior to 2023, and $0.6 million related to the office space in the Leawood, Kansas restaurant support center referenced above.
Intangible assets impairment charges
In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company determined the Fuzzy's tradename intangible asset was impaired and recorded a $29.0 million noncash impairment charge. In the fourth quarter of 2024, we wrote off goodwill of $7.1 million related to our acquisition of Fuzzy's. See Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policy, Note 6 - Goodwill and Note 7 - Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Asset Impairment Charges
The $6.0 million impairment charge of other assets for the year ended December 28, 2025 primarily relates to $2.7 million of off-market leases attributable to the acquisition and closure of certain IHOP restaurants in March 2025, $2.0 million write-off of work-in-process assets associated with the transition of Applebee's to a new point-of-sale platform, and a $1.0 million write off of an investment the Company had in a robotic automation company focused on developing automation solutions for the food industry.
Other Income and Expense Items
Change
(In millions)
Amortization of intangible assets
Gain on disposition of assets
Total
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets primarily relates to Applebee's and Fuzzy's franchise rights. See Note 7 - Other Intangible Assets , in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Gain on Disposition of Assets
The gain on disposition of assets for the year ended December 28, 2025 primarily relates to the early termination of a finance lease and the release of certain financing obligations in 2025 compared to a gain on the refranchising of nine Applebee's restaurants simultaneously acquired with 47 Applebee's restaurants in 2024.
Income Tax Provision
Change
(In millions)
Income tax provision
Effective tax rate
The fiscal year 2025 effective tax rate of 32.0% was different than the statutory Federal income tax rate of 21% primarily due to state and local taxes and a lower tax deduction related to stock-based compensation.
The fiscal year 2024 effective tax rate of 27.5% was different than the statutory Federal income tax rate of 21% primarily due to state and local taxes and a lower tax deduction related to stock-based compensation.
Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company
Our total cash balances including restricted cash, net of revolving credit facility borrowings, at December 28, 2025 and December 29, 2024 were as follows:
December 28, 2025
December 29, 2024
(In millions)
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash, current
Restricted cash, non-current
Total cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents
Less: Revolving credit facility borrowing
Total cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents, net
Cash Flows
In summary, our cash flows for the years ended December 28, 2025 and December 29, 2024 were as follows:
Change
(In millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities decreased $19.2 million during the current fiscal year compared to the same period of the prior year. This decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease from operating performance of company restaurants and increase in incentives paid to franchisee, partially offset by a decrease in income tax payments during the fiscal year.
Investing Activities
Investing activities used net cash of $31.6 million for the year ended December 28, 2025 compared to using net cash of $8.5 million during the comparable prior period. The increase in cash used in investing activities is largely driven by the remodels and construction of the company-owned restaurants and decrease of principal receipts from notes and equipment contracts receivables offset by the decrease in restaurant reacquisition activity.
The following table represents the timing of principal receipts from the Company's long-term receivables for equipment, real estate leases receivable, and other notes receivable from franchisees as of December 28, 2025:
Principal Receipts Due By Period
Thereafter
Total
(In millions)
Equipment leases (1)
Real estate leases receivable (2)
Other notes (3)
Total
(1) Equipment leases receivable extend through the year 2037.
(2) Real estate leases receivable extend through the year 2046.
(3) Other notes receivable extend through the year 2032.
Financing Activities
Cash flows used in financing activities increased $52.6 million for the year ended December 28, 2025. The increase in cash used in financing activities of $52.6 million was primarily due to the increase of $48.6 million in repurchases of common stock and repayment and issuance of long-term debt of $5.6 million including payment of debt issuance costs. There were no repayment or issuance of long-term debt during the year ended December 29, 2024.
Long-Term Debt
Key provisions of our long-term debt potentially impacting liquidity are summarized below. See Note 8 - Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional detail on long-term debt, including the balances outstanding as of December 28, 2025 and December 29, 2024.
Instruments
Our long-term debt includes two series of fixed rate senior secured notes, the Series 2023-1 7.824% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2 in an initial aggregate principal amount of $500 million (the "2023 Class A-2 Notes") and the Series 2025-1 6.720% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2 in an initial aggregate principal amount of $600 million (the "2025 Class A-2 Notes" and, together with the 2023 Class A-2 Notes, the "Class A-2 Notes").
Our long-term debt also includes the Credit Facility that allows for drawings up to $325 million of variable funding notes on a revolving basis and the issuance of letters of credit. As of December 28, 2025, we had drawn $100.6 million, which includes $0.6 million of letters of credit. The weighted average interest rate on Credit Facility borrowings for the period outstanding during the year ended December 28, 2025 was 6.78%.
Maturity
The final maturity of the 2023 Class A-2 Notes is in March 2053, but it is anticipated that, unless repaid earlier, to the extent permitted under the Indenture, the 2023 Class A-2 Notes will be repaid in June 2029. The final maturity of the 2025 Class A-2 Notes is in June 2055, but it is anticipated that, unless repaid earlier, the 2025 Class A-2 Notes will be repaid in June 2030 (together with the 2023 Class A-2 Notes and 2025 Class A-2 Notes, the "Class A-2 Notes").
While the Class A-2 Notes are outstanding, payment of principal and interest is required to be made on the Class A-2 Notes on a quarterly basis. The payment of principal on the Class A-2 Notes may be suspended when the leverage ratio for the Company and its subsidiaries is less than or equal to 5.25x. As of December 28, 2025, our leverage ratio was approximately 4.8x. Exceeding the leverage ratio of 5.25x does not violate any covenant related to the Class A-2 Notes.
The renewal date of the Credit Facility is June 2030, subject to two additional one-year extensions at the option of the Company upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.
On February 16, 2023, our Company's Board of Directors authorized a debt repurchase program of up to $100 million. Repurchases of the Company's debt, if any, are expected to reduce future cash interest payments, as well as future amounts due at maturity or upon redemption. Under the authorization, the Company may make repurchases of the Company's debt from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions upon such terms and at such prices as management may determine.
Make-whole Premiums
We may voluntarily repay the Class A-2 Notes at any time; however, if repaid prior to certain dates we would be required to pay make-whole premiums. As of December 28, 2025, the make-whole premium associated with voluntary prepayment of the 2023 Class A-2 Notes was approximately $17.4 million and for the 2025 Class A-2 Notes was approximately $37.1 million. We also would be subject to a make-whole premium in the event of a mandatory prepayment required following certain rapid amortization events or certain asset dispositions.
Covenants and Restrictions
Our long-term debt is subject to a series of covenants and restrictions customary for transactions of this type, including maintenance of a debt service coverage ratio ("DSCR"). In general, the DSCR ratio is net cash flow for the four quarters preceding the calculation date divided by the total debt service payments of the preceding four quarters. Failure to maintain a DSCR greater than 1.75x can trigger events causing required immediate payments of our Class A-2 Notes and Credit Facility.
Our DSCR for the reporting period ended December 28, 2025 was approximately 3.0x.
Capital Allocation
Dividends
During the fiscal years ended December 28, 2025, December 29, 2024 and December 31, 2023, we declared and paid dividends on common stock as shown in Note 11 - Stockholders' Deficit , of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. On February 20, 2026, our Board of Directors declared a first quarter 2026 cash dividend of $0.19 per share of common stock, payable on April 10, 2026 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 18, 2026.
Share Repurchases
On February 17, 2022, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program, effective April 1, 2022, of up to $250 million (the "2022 Repurchase Program"). A summary of shares repurchased under the 2022 Repurchase Program, during the year ended December 28, 2025 and cumulatively, is as follows:
Shares
Cost of shares
(In millions)
2022 Repurchase Program
Repurchased during the year ended December 28, 2025
Cumulative (life-of-program) repurchases
Remaining dollar value of shares that may be repurchased
See Note 11 - Stockholders' Deficit, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report for shares repurchased in fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023.
From time to time, we also repurchase shares owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations on the vesting of restricted stock awards. Shares are deemed purchased at the closing price of our common stock on the vesting date. See Part II, Item 5 - Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for detail on this stock repurchase activity during the twelve months ended December 28, 2025.
Adjusted Free Cash Flow
We define “adjusted free cash flow” for a given period as cash provided by operating activities, plus receipts from notes and equipment contract receivables, less additions to property and equipment. Management uses this liquidity measure in its periodic assessments of, among other things, the amount of cash dividends per share of common stock and repurchases of common stock and we believe it is important for investors to have the same measure used by management for that purpose. Adjusted free cash flow does not represent residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes.
Adjusted free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure. This non-GAAP measure is not defined in the same manner by all companies and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, the U.S. GAAP information contained within our financial statements. Reconciliation of the cash provided by operating activities to adjusted free cash flow is as follows:
Change
(In millions)
Cash flows provided by operating activities
Net receipts from notes and equipment receivables
Additions to property and equipment
Adjusted free cash flow
The decrease in adjusted free cash flow in 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily due to the increase in additions to property and equipment and the decrease in cash provided by operating activities, which was discussed in preceding section of this Management's Discussion & Analysis.
As of December 28, 2025, we had contractual obligations to repay debt, make payments under operating leases, finance leases and financing obligations, and to purchase certain goods and services. Material cash requirements to satisfy these obligations were as follows:
Obligation
Due in Fiscal 2026
Due Thereafter
Total
Reference (1)
(in millions)
Long-term debt (principal)
Note 8 - Long-term Debt
Long-term debt (interest)
Note 8 - Long-term Debt
Operating leases
Note 9 - Leases
Finance leases
Note 9 - Leases
Financing obligations
Note 9 - Leases
Purchase commitments
Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies
Total
(1) See referenced note of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the obligation.
See Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for a description of the Company's lease guarantees.
We believe that our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash flow from operations and the borrowing capacity available under our Credit Facility will provide us with sufficient liquidity for at least the next twelve months.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are comprehensively described in Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We believe the accounting policies discussed below, which are important in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, require a higher degree of judgment or complexity in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. In exercising these judgments, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from our estimates and judgments, which could significantly affect our reported results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in the future.
Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets considered to have an indefinite life are required to be tested for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, events or circumstances such as a significant adverse change in our business, climate of the business, unanticipated competition, a loss of key personnel, adverse legal or regulatory developments or a significant decline in the market price of our common stock.
If no indicators of impairment exist, we perform our annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually in the fourth fiscal quarter. In doing so, we first perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that an impairment exists. Factors considered in this assessment include, but are not limited to, macro-economic conditions, market and industry conditions, cost considerations, the competitive environment, share price fluctuations, overall financial performance and results of past impairment tests. If we qualitatively determine that it is more likely than not that an impairment exists, we perform a quantitative impairment test. Alternatively, in any given year, we may elect to skip the qualitative assessment and only perform a quantitative assessment of impairment.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at our reporting units. Reporting units are operating segments or one level below an operating segment. In performing a quantitative test for impairment of goodwill, we compare the carrying value of a reporting unit to its fair value. We primarily use a discounted cash flow method of valuation to determine the fair value of a reporting unit. In addition, we may use a market approach that includes the guideline public company method to determine the fair value of a reporting unit or to compare to the value derived from our discounted cash flow. Significant assumptions made by management in estimating fair value under the discounted cash flow model include restaurant sales trends, future development plans, restaurant closures, cost of revenues, operating expenses, and an appropriate discount rate based on our estimated cost of equity capital and after-tax cost of debt. Significant assumptions used to determine fair value under the guideline public company method include the selection of guideline companies and the valuation multiples applied. We believe our assumptions and valuation methodologies are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant.
Our indefinite-lived intangible assets have primarily consisted of the Applebee's and Fuzzy's tradenames. In performing a quantitative impairment test of these, we primarily use the relief from royalty method under the income approach of valuation. Significant assumptions used to determine fair value under the relief from royalty method include future trends in system sales, the royalty rate applied to system sales, and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the forecasted cash flow stream.
There is an inherent degree of uncertainty in preparing any forecast of future results. Future trends in system sales are dependent to a large degree on national, regional and local economic conditions, and, to a lesser degree, on global economic conditions, particularly those conditions affecting the demographics of the guests that frequently patronize our restaurants. There are numerous potential events that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the forecast of system sales, from a decrease in customers' disposable income to an unexpected event such as a global pandemic. As a result, our restaurants could experience a decline in system sales as a result of numerous factors.
During the year ended December 28, 2025, the Company performed a qualitative test of goodwill and the Applebee’s tradename and a quantitative test of Fuzzy's tradename, using the approaches described above. Based on our qualitative assessment of goodwill and the Applebee’s tradename we determined it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units and Applebee’s tradename were greater than their respective carrying values. Our quantitative test of the Fuzzy’s tradename showed that the fair value was less than its carrying value and we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $29.0 million in the fourth quarter. In fiscal year 2024, our quantitative test of goodwill determined that the fair value of the Fuzzy’s reporting unit was less than its carrying value and we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $7.1 million during the year.
Property and Equipment and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
The Company assesses whether property and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets that are held and used are impaired whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. These assets are primarily made up of property and equipment and right-of-use ("ROU") assets of Company-owned restaurants, ROU assets leased or subleased to franchisees and Applebee’s and Fuzzy’s franchising rights. When there is an indication an asset may not be recoverable, the analysis requires the asset to be grouped with other assets used to generate cash flows that are largely independent of cash flows generated by other assets. The sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the group is compared to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the group of assets exceeds the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the fair value of the group of assets is determined. The fair value of the group of assets is primarily determined using the discounted cash flows. An impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the group’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value. For assets of Company-owned restaurants and ROU assets leased or subleased, we generally determine the individual restaurant to be the group of assets. For property and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets held for sale, the group of assets is written down to its fair value, less costs to sell.
Income Taxes
We provide for income taxes based on our estimate of US and foreign income tax liabilities. We make certain estimates and judgments in the calculation of tax expense, the resulting tax liabilities and in the recoverability of deferred tax assets that arise from temporary differences between the financial statement recognition of revenue and expense and recognition of those for tax reporting.
Deferred tax accounting requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. When we establish or reduce the valuation allowance, our income tax expense will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayers and respective governmental authorities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report, for a description of accounting standards we adopted in the current fiscal year and newly issued accounting standards that may impact us in the future.
