Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Dakota Gold Corp.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is 0.07pp more bullish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
-0.02pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
+0.17pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
underperform+1
Positive rising
favorable+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
8,568 words
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investors in Dakota Gold should consider carefully, in addition to the other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10-K, the following risk factors before deciding to invest in the Company.
Risks Associated with Our Financial Condition
We have a limited operating history, currently generate no revenue, and if we are not successful in continuing to advance our business to production, then we may have to scale back or even our ongoing business operations.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
We have no history of revenues from operations, no earnings and there can be no assurance that we will ever operate profitably. We have no operating history and are in the exploration stage. The success of our Company is dependent on a successful acquisition, exploration, development and production program. Our operations are subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. We may be unable to locate recoverable mineral reserves or operate on a profitable basis. We are in the exploration stage and potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by enterprises in the exploration stage. If our business plan is not successful, and we are not able to operate profitably, investors may lose some or all of their investment in our company.
We will require additional capital to develop any properties in which we establish the existence of commercially viable mineral resources in a commercially exploitable quantity into production. If we cannot raise this additional capital, we will not be able to exploit the resource, and our business could fail.
Upon the discovery of mineral resources in commercially exploitable quantities on any of our properties such as those identified in the February 2025 IA, we will be required to expend substantial sums of money to establish the extent of the resource, engage in drilling operations and develop extraction and processing facilities (or make arrangements therefor) and infrastructure. We currently do not have adequate capital to develop necessary facilities and infrastructure and will need to raise additional funds. Although we may derive substantial benefits from the discovery of commercially exploitable deposits, there can be no assurance that such a resource will be large enough to justify commercial operations, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to raise the funds required for development on a timely basis. If we cannot raise the necessary capital or complete the necessary facilities and infrastructure, our business may fail.
Our business and operations are highly dependent on the market prices of our common stock, gold and silver, and these prices can be volatile. Any prolongeddecline in the price of our common stock, gold or silver prices in general could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our operations.
A prolongeddecline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because our operations have been primarily financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our continued operations. Any reduction in our ability to raise equity capital in the future would force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may have a significant negative effect on our business plans and operations, including our ability to develop new properties and continue our current operations. If our stock price declines significantly, we may not be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations.
The value of our assets, our ability to raise capital and any future economic returns are substantially dependent on the prices of gold and silver. The prices of gold and silver fluctuate on a daily basis and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. Factors tending to influence gold and silver prices include:
gold and silver sales or leasing by governments and central banks or changes in their monetary policy, including gold and silver inventory management and reallocation of reserves,
speculative short positions taken by significant investors or traders in gold and silver,
the relative strength of the U.S. dollar,
expectations of the future rate of inflation,
interest rates,
changes to economic activity in the United States, China, India and other industrialized or developing countries,
geopolitical conflicts,
changes in industrial, jewelry or investment demand,
changes in supply from production, disinvestment and scrap, and
Table of Contents
forward sales by producers in hedging or similar transactions.
The share prices of gold and silver exploration companies may significantly underperform the movement in the price of physical gold and silver. Even if the price of physical gold and silver increases, our share price may decline due to this disconnect.
We have had negative cash flows from operations and if we are not able to obtain further financing our business operations may fail.
To date, we have had negative cash flows from operations, and we have been dependent on sales of our equity securities and debt financing to meet our cash requirements and have incurred a net loss and comprehensive loss of $29.5 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. We had $29.7 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2025. We do not expect to generate positive cash flow from operations in the near future. There is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. Any decision to further expand our operations is anticipated to involve consideration and evaluation of several significant factors that could adversely affect our ability to meet our business plans including, but not limited to:
costs to bringing the property into production, including, but not limited to exploration work, preparation of production feasibility studies, and allowance for production facilities,
availability and costs of financing,
ongoing costs of production,
environmental compliance regulations and restraints, and
political climate and/or governmental regulation and control.
We depend almost exclusively on outside capital to pay for the exploration and development of our properties. Such outside capital may include the sale of additional stock and/or commercial borrowing. Capital may not be available if necessary to meet these continuing development costs or, if the capital is available, that it will be on terms acceptable to us. The issuance of additional equity securities by us may result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments. If we are unable to obtain financing in the amounts and on terms deemed acceptable to us, we may be unable to continue our business and, as a result, we may be required to scale back, diversify or cease our business operations, the result of which would be that our stockholders would lose some or all of their investment.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or prevent fraud. Any inability to report and file our financial results accurately and timely could harm our reputation and adversely impact the trading price of our common stock and our ability to file registration statements pursuant to registration rights agreements and other commitments.
Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed. As a result of our small size, any current internal control deficiencies may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operation and access to capital.
Risks Associated with Our Business
The values of our properties are subject to volatility in the price of gold, silver and any other deposits we may seek or locate.
Our ability to obtain additional and continuing funding is affected by numerous factors, all of which are beyond our control. Some of these factors include the sale or purchase of gold and silver by central banks and financial institutions; interest rates; currency exchange rates; inflation or deflation; fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and other currencies; speculation; global and regional supply and demand, including investment, industrial and jewelry demand; and the political and economic conditions of major gold, silver or other mineral producing countries throughout the world, such as Russia and South Africa. The price of gold, silver or other minerals have fluctuated widely in recent years, and a decline in the price of gold and silver could cause a significant decrease in the value of our properties, limit our ability to raise money, and render continued exploration activities of our properties impracticable. If that happens, then we could lose our rights to our properties and be compelled to sell some or all of these rights. Additionally, the future progression of our properties beyond the exploration stage is heavily dependent upon the level of gold and silver prices remaining sufficiently high to make the continuation of our properties economically viable. You may lose your investment if the price of gold or silver decreases. The greater the decrease in the price of gold or silver, the more likely it is that you will lose money.
Table of Contents
We may not be able to obtain all required permits and licenses to place any of our properties into future potential production.
Our current and future operations, including additional exploration activities, require permits from governmental authorities and such operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing prospecting, exploration, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Companies engaged in mineral property exploration generally experience increased costs, and delays in exploration and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. We cannot predict if all permits which we may require for continued exploration and development activities, will be obtainable on reasonable terms, if at all. Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses may be prohibitive and could delay our planned exploration activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing exploration operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions.
Our business is subject to extensive evolving environmental regulations, including ones involving climate change, that may make exploring, or related activities prohibitively expensive, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
All of our operations are subject to extensive environmental regulations that can substantially delay exploration and make exploration expensive or prohibit it altogether. We may be subject to potential liabilities associated with the pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste products that may occur as the result of exploring and other related activities on our properties. We may have to pay to remedy environmental pollution, which may reduce the amount of money that we have available to use for exploration, or other activities, and adversely affect our financial position. Parties engaged in exploration operations may be required to compensate those sufferingloss or damage by reason of the exploration activities and may have civil or criminalfines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. If we are unable to fully remedy an environmental problem, we might be required to suspend exploration operations or to enter into interim compliance measures pending the completion of the required remedy. We have not purchased insurance for potential environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards associated with the disposal of waste products from our exploration activities) and such insurance may not be available to us on reasonable terms or at a reasonable price. All of our exploration will be subject to regulation under one or more local, state and federal environmental impact analyses and public review processes. It is possible that future changes in applicable laws, regulations and permits or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could have significant impact on some portion of our business, which may require our business to be economically re-evaluated from time to time. These risks include, but are not limited to, the risk that regulatory authorities may increase bonding requirements beyond our financial capability. Inasmuch as posting of bonding in accordance with regulatory determinations is a condition to the right to operate under specific federal and state exploration operating permits, increases in bonding requirements could prevent operations even if we are in full compliance with all substantive environmental laws.
Additionally, a number of governments or governmental bodies have historically introduced regulatory changes in response to the potential impact of climate change. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us, our venture partners and our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs to comply with such regulations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Given the public sentiment, political significance and uncertainty around the impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition, operating performance and ability to compete. Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation. The potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate. These may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels and changing temperatures. These impacts may adversely impact the cost, production and financial performance of our operations.
Table of Contents
Our property titles may be challenged, and we are not insured against any challenges, impairments or defects to our mineral claims or property titles.
We cannot guarantee that title to our properties will not be challenged. Title insurance is not available for our mineral properties, and our ability to ensure that we have obtained secure rights to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. Some of our properties are unpatented mining claims created and maintained in accordance with the federal General Mining Law of 1872. Unpatented claims are unique U.S. property interests and are generally considered to be subject to greater title risk than other real property interests because the validity of unpatented claims is often uncertain. This uncertainty arises, in part, out of the complex federal and state laws and regulations under the General Mining Law. We have not obtained title insurance regarding these claims. Defending any challenges to our property titles may be costly and may divert funds that could otherwise be used for exploration activities and other purposes. We cannot provide any assurances that there are no title defects affecting our properties. In addition, unpatented claims are always subject to possible challenges by third parties or contests by the federal government, which, if successful, may prevent us from exploiting our discovery of commercially extractable gold and silver. Challenges to our title may increase its costs of operation or limit our ability to explore on certain portions of our properties. We are not insured againstchallenges, impairments or defects to our property titles, nor do we intend to carry extensive title insurance in the future.
Mineral operations are subject to applicable law and government regulations. These laws and regulations could restrict or prohibit the exploitation of any mineral resources we find. If we cannot exploit such mineral resource that we might discover on our properties, our business may fail.
Both mineral exploration and extraction require permits from various federal, state, provincial and local governmental authorities and are governed by laws and regulations, including those with respect to prospecting, mine development, mineral production, transport, export, taxation, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Our ability to conduct exploration, and related activities may also be impacted by administrative actions taken by federal agencies.
Companies such as ours that plan to engage in exploration and extraction activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of exploration companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on our operations and cause increases in capital expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of exploration activities at our properties or require abandonment or delays in future activities. Issuance of permits for our activities is subject to the discretion of government authorities, and we may be unable to obtain or maintain such permits. Permits required for future exploration or development may not be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a timely basis. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain any of the permits required for the continued exploration or development of our mineral properties or for the construction and operation of a mine on our properties at economically viable costs. If we cannot accomplish these objectives, our business could face difficulty and/or fail.
In South Dakota, each new mine permit is limited to a maximum new disturbance of 320 acres for each mining permit. However, authorized disturbance from pre-existing permits can be added to the total. Richmond Hill Permit No. 445 currently authorizes disturbance of 260 acres at Richmond Hill. Accordingly, we expect that an initial permit for Richmond Hill will authorize 580 acres of disturbance. The Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (“DANR”) has also advised that a company can submit multiple permits to be contiguous and increase the overall disturbance area if needed for a potential new mining operation. Our current permitting strategy is to submit an initial permit application based on a first stage of mine plan and utilize the existing mining permit at the location. We may seek additional mine permits if necessary. We can give no assurance that these efforts will succeed. Once in operations, reclaimed acres can be transferred to new areas for disturbance with DANR approval. If we are unable to obtain these permits, our business could face difficulty and/or fail.
There also can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with all laws and regulations that apply to our activities on an ongoing basis. Current laws and regulations could be amended, and we might not be able to comply with them, as amended. Further, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain all permits necessary for our future operations, or that we will be able to obtain them on reasonable terms. To the extent such approvals are required and are not obtained, we may be delayed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of our mineral properties.
Table of Contents
Environmental hazards unknown to us, which may have been caused by previous or current owners or operators of the properties, may exist on the properties in which we hold an interest. It is possible that our properties could be located on or near the site of a Federal Superfund cleanup project. Although we have thus far avoided such sites, it is possible that environmental cleanup or other environmental restoration procedures could remain to be completed or mandated by law, causing unpredictable and unexpected liabilities to arise. We are not currently aware of any environmental issues or litigation relating to any of our current properties. Neighboring landowners and other third parties could file claims based on environmental statutes and common law for personal injury and property damageallegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other waste material into the environment on or around our properties. There can be no assurance that our defense of such claims will be successful. A successful claim against us could have an adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operation.
The exploration, possible future development and any production phases of our business will be subject to federal, state and local environmental regulation. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation and set out limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Future changes in environmental regulations, if any, may adversely affect our operations. If we fail to comply with any of the applicable environmental laws, regulations or permit requirements, we could face regulatory or judicial sanctions. Penalties imposed by either the courts or administrative bodies could delay or stop our operations or require a considerable capital expenditure.
Competition in the mining industry is intense, and we have limited financial and personnel resources with which to compete.
Competition in the mining industry for desirable properties, investment capital, equipment and personnel is intense. Numerous companies headquartered in the United States, Canada and elsewhere throughout the world compete for properties on a global basis. We are currently an insignificant participant in the mining industry due to our limited financial and personnel resources. We may be unable to attract the necessary investment capital or strategic partners to fully develop our mineral properties, acquire other desirable properties, attract and hire necessary personnel, or purchase necessary equipment.
Dependence on our ability to hire qualified contractors required to conduct exploration drill programs and the ability to hire qualified and experienced technical staff and/or consultants materially impacts our business operations. In addition, we are dependent upon our workforce being able to safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness.
Future success is dependent on our ability to identify, hire, train and retain other qualified contractors, technical staff and consultants. Competition for these entities and individuals is intense, and we may not be able to attract, assimilate, or retain qualified contractors and technical personnel. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our planned advancement of the Richmond Hill heap leach project will require personnel with specific heap leach and mine building experience. These skills are unique and may be difficult to acquire.
Our success is also dependent on the contributions of our highly skilled and experienced workforce. Our ability to achieve our operating goals depends upon our ability to recruit, hire, retain and develop qualified and diverse personnel to execute on our strategy. There continues to be competition over highly skilled personnel in our industry. If we lose key personnel, or one or more members of our senior management team, and we fail to develop adequate succession plans, or if we fail to hire, retain and develop qualified and diverse employees, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be harmed.
Our business is dependent upon our workforce being able to safely perform their jobs, including the potential for physical injuries or illness. If we experience periods where our employees are unable to perform their jobs for any reason, including as a result of illness (such as a health pandemic), our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
We will be subject to operating hazards and risks that may adversely affect our financial condition.
Exploration involves many risks, which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. Our operations will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally incidental to exploration, development and production, such as unusual or unexpected formations, cave-ins or pollution, all of which could result in work stoppages, damage to property and possible environmental damage. Payment of any liabilities as a result could have a materially adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition.
Table of Contents
Uncertainty of agreements to secure access to property from adjacent landowners may affect our ability to remain in business.
Our potential revenue and profitability based upon our exploitation and development of the Black Hills Property may be contingent upon our gaining additional access to the properties through ingress and egress routes that are owned by private landowners. We may require agreements with those landowners to facilitate ingress and egress to our properties. If we fail to enter into such agreements on favorable terms, we may have difficulty conducting exploration, development and mining operations, which may result in our inability to implement our business plans.
In some instances, we own or control mineral rights without the attendant surface rights. South Dakota law provides a process for holders of mineral rights to explore and develop their mineral rights without ownership of surface rights, but the mineral right holder must negotiate access and compensation.
Increased cybersecurity vulnerabilities and threats, and more sophisticated and targeted cyber-attacks and other security incidents, pose risks to our systems, data and business and our relationships with third parties.
In the course of conducting our business, we may hold or have access to sensitive, confidential, proprietary or personal data or information belonging to us, our employees or third parties. Increased cybersecurity vulnerabilities and threats, and more sophisticated and targeted cyber-attacks and other security incidents, pose risks to our and our third-party service providers’ systems, data, and business, and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our and our employees’ data. Given the increasing frequency, sophistication and complexity of cyber-attacks, cyber-attacks now could occur routinely, and it is possible that one could go undetected and persist for an extended period. Any investigation of a cyber-attack or other security incident is inherently unpredictable and takes time before the completion of any investigation and before there is availability of full and reliable information. During such time we do not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, all or any of which would further increase the costs and consequences of the cyber-attack or other security incident. We may be required to expend significant resources to protect against, respond to, and recover from any cyber-attacks and other security incidents. As cyber-attacks continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful. The inability to implement, maintain and upgrade adequate safeguards could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Despite our and our third-party service providers’ efforts to protect our data and information, we and our service providers may be vulnerable to security breaches, theft, misplaced or lost data, programming errors, phishing attacks, denial of service attacks, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, malware, ransomware, employee errors and/or malfeasance or similar events, including those perpetrated by criminals or nation-state actors, that could potentially lead to the compromise, unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification or destruction of data or information, improper use of our systems and operational disruptions. To date we have experienced no material losses from cyber-attacks. In addition, a cyber-attack or any other significant compromise or breach of our data security, media reports about such an incident, whether accurate or not, or, under certain circumstances, our failure to make adequate or timely disclosures to the public, law enforcement agencies or affected individuals following any such event, whether due to delayed discovery or a failure to follow existing protocols, could adversely impact our operating results and result in other negative consequences, including damage to our reputation or competitiveness, harm to our relationships with partners and other third parties, distraction to our management, remediation or increased protection costs, significant litigation or regulatory actions, fines and penalties.
Table of Contents
Possible future amendments to the General Mining Law and other regulations could make it more difficult or impossible for us to execute our business plan.
In recent years, the U.S. Congress has considered a number of proposed amendments to the General Mining Law, as well as legislation that would make comprehensive changes to the law. Although no such comprehensive legislation has been adopted to date, there can be no assurance that such legislation will not be adopted in the future. If adopted, such legislation, if it includes concepts that have been part of previous legislative proposals, could, among other things, (i) limit the number of millsites that a claimant may use, (ii) impose time limits on the effectiveness of plans of operation that may not coincide with mine life, (iii) impose more stringent environmental compliance and reclamation requirements on activities on unpatented mining claims and millsites, (iv) establish a mechanism that would allow states, localities and Native American tribes to petition for the withdrawal of identified tracts of federal land from the operation of the General Mining Law, (v) allow for administrative determinations that mining would not be allowed in situations where unduedegradation of the federal lands in question could not be prevented, (vi) impose royalties on gold and other mineral production from unpatented mining claims or impose fees on production from patented mining claims, and (vii) impose a fee on the amount of material displaced at a mine. Further, such legislation, if enacted, could have an adverse impact on earnings from our exploration operations, could reduce future estimates of any reserves we may establish and could curtail our future exploration activity on our unpatented claims.
We do not know if our properties contain any gold, silver or other minerals that can be mined at a profit.
Natural resource exploration and exploring for gold and silver, in particular, is a business that by its nature is very speculative. Although the properties on which we have the right to explore for minerals are known to have historic deposits of gold or silver, there can be no assurance such deposits can be mined at a profit. Whether a gold or silver deposit can be mined at a profit depends upon many factors. Some but not all of these factors include: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; operating costs including labor and technology costs and capital expenditures required to start mining a deposit; the availability and cost of financing; the price of gold and silver, which is highly volatile and cyclical; and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.
We have released an estimate of mineral resources for our Richmond Hill Gold Project; however, estimates of mineral resources are uncertain.
On February 6, 2025, the Company announced the February 2025 IA containing an estimated mineral resource as defined by S-K 1300 for the Richmond Hill Gold Project. Estimates of mineral resources are subject to considerable uncertainty. Such estimates are largely based on the market prices of metals, as well as interpretations of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other exploration techniques. These prices and interpretations are subject to change. If the Company determines that certain estimated mineral resources have become uneconomic, it may be forced to reduce its estimates. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that estimates of mineral resources will be upgraded to mineral reserves or may ultimately be extracted.
Our properties are in the exploration stage.
The Company has not established that any of its projects or properties contain mineral reserves as defined by S-K 1300. There is no assurance that we will establish the existence of any mineral reserves on those projects in commercially exploitable quantities. If we do not establish the existence of mineral reserves on those projects, we may lose all of the funds that we expend on exploration.
The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on a number of factors including, by way of example, the size, grade and other attributes of the mineral or metal deposit, the proximity of the resource to infrastructure, roads and a point for shipping, government regulation and market prices. Most of these factors will be beyond our control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral resource unprofitable.
Our exploration and extraction activities may not be commercially successful.
While we believe there are positive indicators that our properties may contain commercially exploitable minerals, such belief has been based solely on preliminary tests that we have conducted, and data provided by third parties. Item 2 Properties contains a description of our Quality Assurance program over our testing and use of data. There can be no assurance that the tests and data upon which we have relied is correct or accurate. Moreover, mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently non-productive. Unusual or unexpected geologic formations and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor are risks involved in the conduct of exploration programs.
Table of Contents
The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsuredlosses.
The business of exploring for and extracting minerals and metals involves a high degree of risk. Few properties are ultimately developed into producing mines. Whether a mineral deposit can be commercially viable depends upon a number of factors, including the particular attributes of the deposit, including size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, metal prices, which can be highly variable, and government regulation, including environmental and reclamation obligations. These factors are not within our control. Uncertainties as to the metallurgical amenability of any minerals discovered may not warrant the mining of these metals or minerals using available technology. Our operations are, and any future mining operations or construction we may conduct will be, subject to all the operating hazards and risks normally incident to exploring for and developing mineral or metal properties, such as, but not limited to:
fluctuation in production costs that make mining uneconomic,
social, community or labor disputes resulting in work stoppages or delays, or related loss of social acceptance of community support,
changes to legal and regulatory requirements,
encountering unusual or unexpected formations,
environmental hazards, noxious fumes and gases,
ground and water conditions,
difficult surface or underground conditions,
industrial accidents,
security incidents,
failure of unproven or evolving technologies or loss of information integrity or data,
metallurgical and other processing problems,
mechanical and equipment performance problems,
failure of pit walls, dams, declines, drifts and shafts,
personal injury,
fire, cave-ins, seismic activity, flooding, landslides or other inclement weather conditions, including those impacting operations or the ability to access and supply sites,
unanticipated variations in grades of minerals or metals and other geologic problems, and
decrease in the value of mineralized material due to lower gold, silver and metal prices.
If we determine that capitalized costs associated with any of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we will incur a write-down on our investment in such property interests. All these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent which are not recoverable. The payment of any liabilities that arise from any such occurrence would have a material, adverse impact on our Company.
Market forces or unforeseen developments may prevent us from obtaining the supplies and equipment necessary to explore for gold, silver and other minerals.
Competitive demands for contractors and unforeseenshortages of supplies and/or equipment could result in the disruption of our planned exploration activities. Current demand for exploration drilling services, equipment and supplies is robust and could result in suitable equipment and skilled manpower being unavailable at scheduled times for our exploration program. The recent inflationary environment has also resulted in a significant increase in costs. If we cannot find the equipment and supplies needed for our various exploration programs, we may have to suspend some or all of them until equipment, supplies, funds and/or skilled manpower become available. Any such disruption in our activities may adversely affect our exploration activities and financial condition.
We may be denied the government licenses and permits that we need to explore or mine on our properties.
Exploration activities usually require the granting of permits from various governmental agencies. For example, exploration drilling on unpatented mineral claims requires a permit to be obtained from the United States BLM, which may take several months or longer to grant the requested permit. Depending on the size, location and scope of the exploration program, additional permits may also be required before exploration activities can be undertaken. Prehistoric or Native American graveyards, threatened or endangered species, archeological sites or the possibility thereof, difficult access, excessive dust and important nearby water resources may all result in the need for additional permits before exploration activities can commence. As with all permitting processes, there is the risk that unexpecteddelays and excessive costs may be experienced in obtaining required permits. The needed permits may not be granted at all. Delays in or our inability to obtain necessary permits will result in unanticipated costs, which may result in seriousadverse effects upon our business.
Table of Contents
Local authorities, usually counties through the conditional use permit process, also exercise some control over mining activity. Local government decisions may be subject to challenge through administrative, legal, or political processes. The various permits address issues such as prospecting, development, production, labor standards, taxes, occupational health and safety, toxic substances, air quality, water use, water discharge, water quality, noise, dust, wildlife impacts, as well as other environmental and socioeconomic issues.
We may not be able to maintain the infrastructure necessary to conduct exploration and development activities.
Our exploration and development activities depend upon adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources and water supply are important factors which affect capital and operating costs. Climate change or unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect our exploration activities and financial condition.
Our exploration activities may be adversely affected by the local climate or seismic events, which could prevent us from gaining access to our property year-round.
Earthquakes, heavy rains, snowstorms, hailstorms, windstorms, tornadoes, wildfires and floods could result in seriousdamage to or the destruction of facilities, equipment or means of access to our property, or may otherwise prevent us from conducting exploration activities on our property. Some of these conditions are not insurable or not insurable at a reasonable cost. There also may be periods of time when the unpaved portion of the access road is impassible in the event of extreme weather conditions or unusually muddy conditions. During these periods, it may be difficult or impossible for us to access our property, make repairs, or otherwise conduct exploration activities on them.
We may acquire additional mining properties in the future and our business may be negatively impacted if mineral reserves are not located on acquired properties or if we are unable to successfully execute and/or integrate the acquisitions.
We have in the past, and may in the future, acquire additional mining properties. There can be no assurance that reserves will be identified on any properties that we acquire. We may experience negative reactions from the financial markets if we complete acquisitions of additional properties and reserves are not located on acquired properties. There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete any acquisitions successfully, or that any acquisition will achieve anticipated synergies or other positive results. Any material problems that we encounter in connection with such an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position. These factors may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our business may be disrupted, and its financial results may be materially adversely affected, by any future pandemic.
Any pandemic may pose a risk to the Company’s business. If a significant portion of the Company’s workforce becomes unable to work due to illness or state or federal government restrictions (including travel restrictions and “shelter-in-place” and similar orders restricting certain activities that may be issued or extended by authorities), the Company may be forced to reduce or suspend exploration activities, which may impact liquidity and financial results. These restrictions have significantly disrupted economic activity in both the world, national and local economies and have caused volatility in capital markets.
To the extent any pandemic materially adversely affects the Company’s business and financial results, as discussed above, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this Risk Factors section, such as those relating to operation, indebtedness, and financing. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate adverse impact of any pandemic on the business, which will depend on numerous evolving factors and future developments, including the pandemic’s ongoing effect on the demand for gold and silver, as well as the response of the overall economy and the financial markets after the pandemic and response measures come to an end, the timing of which remains highly unpredictable.
Global and regional political and economic conditions could adversely impact our business and operations.
Political and economic shifts, both domestic and international, may create uncertainty and pose risks to the Company’s business. Events such as the Russia/Ukraine war, the conflicts in the Middle East, terrorism and other geopolitical instability that broadly impact the global or domestic economy or natural resource industry could have significant and sometimes adverse impact on the natural resource industry and, subsequently, our business. Policies related to populism, protectionism, economic nationalism, and attitudes toward multinational corporations could result in regulatory changes, trade barriers, or investment restrictions. Additionally, international trade disputes—including tariffs, counter-tariffs, export controls, sanctions, and currency regulations—may increase costs and disrupt supply chain, operating model, and customer relationships.
Table of Contents
Further, market volatility, driven by shifts in U.S. and foreign trade policies, fluctuating interest rates, or currency controls may affect gold and silver prices, capital availability, and investor confidence. Even the perception of these risks could lead to reduced investment, higher production costs, and operational challenges. If such trends continue, they may have a material adverse effect on the business and financial performance.
Risks Associated with Our Common Stock
Investors’ interests in us will be diluted, and investors may suffer dilution in their earnings per share, if we issue additional shares or raise funds through the sale of equity securities.
On May 18, 2023, pursuant to the authorization and approval provided by the stockholders at the Company’s annual general meeting, the Company increased its authorized shares of common stock to 300,000,000 shares. As of March 25, 2026, we have 133,517,177 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The issuance of any additional shares to raise financing would be dilutive. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuances will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders.
Trading in our common stock is volatile.
Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American LLC (“NYSE American”). The trading price of our common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations. Trading prices of our common stock may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond our control. In addition to other risk factors identified in this Form 10-K and due to volatility associated with equity securities in general, the value of a shareholder’s investment could decline due to the impact of numerous factors upon the market price of our common stock, including:
changes in the worldwide price for the metals we intend to mine;
adverse results from our exploration, development, or production efforts;
producing at rates lower than those targeted;
political and regulatory risks and social unrest, including geopolitical conflicts;
weather conditions and extreme weather events, including unusually heavy rains;
failure to meet our operating budget;
decline in demand for our common stock;
downward revisions in securities analysts’ estimates or changes in global financial markets and global economies and general market conditions;
technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies;
investor perception of our industry or our prospects;
lawsuits;
economic impact from spread of disease;
our ability to integrate and operate the companies and the businesses that we acquire;
interest rate levels and expectations of future changes in interest rates;
actions by government or central banks; and
general economic trends.
The NYSE American has generally experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies in the development stage. There can be no assurance that trading prices previously experienced by our common stock will be matched or maintained. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
Table of Contents
Because of the early stage of exploration and the nature of our business, our securities are considered highly speculative.
Mineral resource exploration is a speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover valuable deposits, but from finding deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production. The marketability of resources acquired or discovered by us may be affected by numerous factors which are beyond our control and which cannot be accurately predicted, such as market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets and processing equipment and such other factors as government regulation, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production and environmental protection, the combination of which factors may result in our company not generating an adequate return on investment capital.
The sale of our common stock by existing stockholders may depress the price of our common stock due to the limited trading market that exists.
Any sales of a significant amount of common stock by existing stockholders may depress the price of our common stock and the price of our common stock may decline.
Our officers and directors own a significant portion of our common stock, which could limit your ability to influence the outcome of any stockholder vote.
As of March 25, 2026, our directors and officers as a group hold approximately 8% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these individuals may be able to influence the outcome of stockholder votes for the foreseeable future, including votes concerning the election of directors, amendments to our articles of incorporation or proposed mergers or other significant corporate transactions. The interests of our directors and officers in these matters may not always align with the interests of some of our stockholders.
We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to “emerging growth companies” or “smaller reporting companies,” this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”), and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an emerging growth company until December 31, 2027, which is the end of the fiscal year in which the 5 th anniversary of our initial public offering occurred, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 th 2026, which is the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following January 1 st , which is the beginning of the our fiscal year. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our consolidated financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Table of Contents
Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited consolidated financial statements. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our consolidated financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
leadership+1
progress+1
MD&A (Item 7)
3,456 words
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of Dakota Gold Corp. together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review Item 1A. Risk Factors above for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
This management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements of Dakota Gold Corp. and notes thereto as set forth herein. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us, which attempt to advise interested parties of the factors which affect our business, including without limitation, the disclosures made under Item 1A. Risk Factors .
Our audited annual consolidated financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
Table of Contents
Overview
The Company’s goal is to create stockholder value through the acquisition, responsible exploration, and future development of high caliber gold properties in the Homestake District of South Dakota. Management and the technical teams cumulatively have several hundred years of international mining and exploration experience and key personnel have more than 50 combined years in the Homestake District, mostly with the Homestake Mining Company, as well as other exploration companies that have operated in the region. We believe that this experience uniquely positions the Company and will allow us to leverage our direct experience and knowledge of past exploration and mining activities in the Homestake District. Combined with the use of modern exploration and mining techniques, and new geologic understanding from experience in other mines, new research and information extracted from our new geophysical surveys, we hope to focus our programs and build upon where the historic Homestake Mining Company left off in the 1990s.
The Homestake District has historically yielded approximately 45 million ounces of gold production as of December 31, 2025 with most of it coming from within a small geographic area. The production ledges of the Homestake Mine define a cumulative surface projection area of less than three square miles. Homestake Mining Company’s historic gold production and exploration in the Homestake District was overwhelmingly focused on the underground mine. Outside of the mine area, the Homestake District has been underexplored and heretofore has not been the subject of modern exploration efforts required to search for other deposits, especially under the cover of younger rocks that dominate the surface.
We have consistently pursued a strategy of expanding our portfolio of brownfield properties located exclusively within the Homestake District to build a strong land position with the goal of consolidating possible mineral potential.
Other than our mineral resource estimate with an effective date of February 3, 2025 contained in our IA, none of our other properties are sufficiently drilled to prepare an estimate of mineral resources under S-K 1300. The Company believes the Homestake District is in a safe jurisdiction with well-developed infrastructure and is in a favorable regulatory environment in which authorities have demonstrated a willingness to work with responsible operators to permit well-planned compliant projects.
Drill Programs and Results
We expanded our drilling operations to the Richmond Hill Project and have had up to four drill rigs operating at any point in time. Dakota Gold has completed permit applications and environmental field work and currently has fourteen active permits in place with one additional permit being processed for Richmond Hill in 2025. Permitting for other exploration targets is anticipated in 2026.
In total, Dakota Gold has completed 473 holes for over 493,472 feet (150,493 meters) since drilling started in 2022.
The Company completed 25 holes for 70,181 feet (21,391 meters) of core drilling on three projects in 2022. The areas drilled in 2022 were the Maitland Project (39,231 feet; 11,958 meters), the Richmond Hill Project (24,865 feet; 7,579 meters), and other properties (6,084 feet; 1,854 meters).
The Company then completed 89 holes for 180,727 feet (55,086 meters) of core on two projects in 2023; the areas drilled were the Maitland Project (88,626 feet; 27,013 meters) and the Richmond Hill Project (92,101 feet; 24,184 meters).
The Company completed 117 holes for 146,691 feet (44,711 meters) of core on two projects during 2024; the areas drilled were the Maitland Project (102,755 feet; 31,320 meters) and the Richmond Hill Project (43,936 feet; 13,392 meters).
In 2025, the Company completed an additional 211 core holes and an additional 31 reverse circulation rotary holes at the Richmond Hill Project for a total of 87,681 feet (26,725 meters) and 7,725 feet (2,355 meters), respectively.
Significant Developments
On April 30, 2024, the Company announced the maiden S-K 1300 initial assessment for the Richmond Hill Gold Project.
On June 26, 2024, the Company announced an additional investment by Orion of $6 million with the potential to increase to $9 million subject to future market conditions (the “2024 Orion Equity Investment”).
On February 6, 2025, the Company announced that Barrick Gold agreed to extend the option period for both the Richmond Hill option and the Homestake option agreements until December 31, 2028, in return for additional annual cash payments of $170,000 and $340,000, respectively, combined as an annual payment of $510,000 on each of March 1, 2026 (paid), March 1, 2027 and March 1, 2028.
Table of Contents
On February 6, 2025, the Company announced the February 2025 IA, which was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K.
On March 25, 2025, the Company announced the successfulclosing of the Offering, whereby we raised net proceeds of approximately $32.8 million by issuing 12,400,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $2.83 per share.
On May 19, 2025, the Company announced changes to its senior leadership team and Board of Directors. Jack Henris was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) of Dakota Gold effective June 1, 2025 upon the retirement of Gerald Aberle, the Company’s prior COO. Todd Kenner and Kevin Puil were appointed to the Board of Directors effective May 15, 2025, and Amy Koenig resigned from the Board of Directors on May 31, 2025 and assumed the role of Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary for Dakota Gold effective June 1, 2025. Mr. Aberle retired as a director of the Company, effective August 8, 2025.
On July 7, 2025, the Company announced the IACF, which was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K.
On November 13, 2025, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Equity Distribution Agreement with BMO Capital Markets Corp., Canaccord Genuity LLC, and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC.
Planned Activities
Planned activities during 2026 will focus on advancing the Richmond Hill Project through feasibility, permitting, and technical de-risking while continuing to progress high-grade exploration at the Maitland Project. At Richmond Hill, the Company is transitioning from an Initial Assessment with Cash Flow to a Pre-Feasibility Study in the second half of 2026, followed by a Feasibility Study targeted for 2027. Key workstreams include mine planning optimization, engineering trade-off studies, metallurgical test work, and baseline data collection to support state and county permitting. Concurrently, the Company plans to file a Notice of Intent and advance permitting activities with Lawrence County and the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, positioning the project for construction readiness following completion of feasibility studies.
Planned activities in 2026 for our Richmond Hill Project include an extensive drilling campaign totaling approximately 15,500 meters across infill, step-out, condemnation, and geotechnical drilling. Infill drilling within the 10-year mine plan is intended to convert inferred resources to measured and indicated classifications, while step-out drilling to the north and northeast targets potential resource expansion. Additional drilling is planned to support infrastructure siting, overburden stockpile areas, and pit slope stability analyses. These activities are designed to refine the mine plan, improve resource confidence, and directly support feasibility-level engineering and economic analysis.
Metallurgical test work represents another critical planned activity in 2026. The Company is conducting a staged metallurgical program, including ore characterization, column leach testing, comminution studies, and recovery optimization, with final results expected in the fourth quarter of 2026. This work will inform heap leach pad design, crushing and stacking configurations, agglomeration requirements, and Merrill-Crowe plant sizing. The results will be incorporated into feasibility trade-off studies evaluating mining and stacking rates, heap leach pad layout, and material handling alternatives to optimize project economics and operational flexibility.
At the Maitland property, planned activities in 2026 will concentrate on advancing the Unionville Zone toward a maiden mineral resource by year-end. The Company has outlined an infill drilling program of approximately 5,600 meters in 44 holes targeting shallow Tertiary epithermal mineralization that remains open along strike and at depth. In parallel, the Company will continue to evaluate high-grade exploration optionality at the JB Gold Zone, where Precambrian iron-formation-hosted mineralization shows strong geological similarities to the historic Homestake Mine. These efforts are intended to demonstrate the broader district-scale potential of the Maitland property while maintaining focus on near-term value creation at Richmond Hill.
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
Years Ended December 31,
Operating expenses
Exploration expenses
General and administrative expenses
Loss from operations
Other income (expenses)
Foreign exchange loss
Interest expense
Interest income
Total other income
Loss before income taxes
Income tax benefit, net
Net loss and comprehensive loss
Basic and diluted loss per share
Weighted average number of basic and diluted shares of common stock outstanding
Revenue
We had no operating revenues during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. We had net losses and comprehensive losses of approximately $29.5 million and $33.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Exploration Expenses
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, our exploration expenses totaled approximately $21.0 million and $23.7 million, respectively. The year-over-year decrease primarily related to the reduced level of activity associated with drilling prior to the Offering proceeds, which resulted in a decrease of approximately $6.4 million compared to 2024. In addition, assay costs decreased by approximately $0.6 million because of the lower level of drilling. These reductions were partially offset by increases in rental or maintenance expenditure on equipment of approximately $1.5 million to support the 2025 drilling program, an increase in studies and reports of approximately $1.8 million as the Company moved to complete its metallurgical test program, an increase in exploration payroll of approximately $0.4 million as part of the resumption of drilling, an increase in miscellaneous costs of approximately $0.3 million driven by higher reclamation costs, and an increase in non-cash exploration-related stock-based compensation expenses of approximately $0.3 million. Included in exploration costs were stock-based compensation expense of approximately $0.9 and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, were approximately $9.8 million and $10.6 million, respectively. These expenditures were primarily for legal, accounting, and professional fees, investor relations, and other general and administrative expenses necessary for our operations. The year-over-year decrease is primarily related to a decrease of approximately $0.4 million in investor relations costs, which were higher in the prior year as the Company was closing a financing, and a decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of $0.7 million in expenditures on support costs, which were higher than the prior year primarily due to marginally higher compensation costs related to the successful completion of the IACF and 2025 financing as well as legal and other fees relating to filing the registration statement Form S-3.
Table of Contents
Other Income
We earned interest income from bank accounts of approximately $1.2 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
We had losses from operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, totaling approximately $30.8 million and $34.3 million respectively, losses before income tax of approximately $29.6 million and $33.9 million, respectively, leading to net losses of $29.5 million and $33.9 million, respectively.
The effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 is less than the statutory rate as the Company is in a tax loss position and does not expect to use the tax losses in the near future.
Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities
Cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 was approximately $25.4 million compared to approximately $31.5 million in the prior year. The Company was not drilling in the first quarter of 2025, the primary driver of higher operating expenses, as the Company was focused on the Richmond Hill Initial Assessment.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 was $0.4 million compared to $0.6 million in the prior year, due to lower expenditures on purchases of property and equipment and mineral properties.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, cash flows from financing activities were approximately $46.1 million and $15.9 million respectively.
In the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company issued 3,022,019 shares of common stock under the ATM Program for net proceeds of approximately $9.7 million, 12,400,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $32.8 million pursuant to the Offering, 2,020,448 shares of common stock for the exercise of warrants for proceeds of approximately $4.2 million and 120,250 shares of common stock for the exercise of stock options for proceeds of approximately $0.2 million. In addition, the Company issued 119,588 common shares for the exercise of options settled on a cashless basis. Partially offsetting these inflows were taxes remitted on RSUs, PSUs and compensation of approximately $0.8 million.
In the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company issued 2,344,836 shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $5.7 million pursuant to the 2024 Orion Equity Investment, a total of 4,510,486 shares of common stock under the ATM Program for net proceeds of approximately $9.9 million, and another 82,500 shares of common stock for the exercise of stock options for proceeds of approximately $0.2 million. Concurrent with the consummation of the 2024 Orion Equity Investment, the Company sold to Orion a 1% net smelter return royalty interest on certain properties held by the Company for total consideration of approximately $0.2 million paid at closing.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we did not have, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined by the SEC.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company is in the exploration stage and currently does not generate revenue. As such, we finance our operations and the acquisition and exploration of our mineral properties through the issuance of common stock, and the Company could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to raise capital because of market or other factors.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had working capital of approximately $27.4 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $106.1 million. The Company had a net loss of approximately $29.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Table of Contents
On March 25, 2025, the Company announced a public offering (the “Offering”), whereby we raised net proceeds of approximately $32.8 million by issuing 12,400,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $2.83 per share.
On February 11, 2026, the Company announced a public offering for 12,336,000 shares, gross proceeds of approximately $75 million, and net proceeds of approximately $71 million. In addition, on February 20, 2026, the underwriters elected to exercise their overallotment option for an additional 225,000 shares and gross proceeds of approximately $1.4 million.
The Company anticipates cash expenditures of approximately $32.3 million through to March 25, 2027.
Based on the Company’s cash balance at December 31, 2025 of approximately $29.7 million and the additional proceeds from our offerings in 2026, we believe that we will have sufficient liquidity to fund our activities for the next twelve months. The actual timing of expected expenditures is dependent upon several factors, including the management of variable exploration expenditures.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Preparation of financial statements requires management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingencies. Management bases its estimates on various assumptions and historical experience, which are believed to be reasonable; however, due to the inherent nature of estimates, actual results may differ significantly due to changed conditions or assumptions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that the Company’s consolidated financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from the Company’s assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material. The Company’s accounting policies are described in greater detail in Note 2 to the Company’s audited annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Management believes the use of Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo valuation models for measuring the fair value of stock-based compensation has a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and relies on critical accounting estimates and judgments.
Stock-based compensation is in the form of stock options, restricted stock units (“RSU”) and performance stock units (“PSU”) granted to employees and directors. Stock-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the stock options, RSUs and PSUs.
Judgments and Uncertainties
We estimate the grant date fair value of each stock option award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
The grant date fair value of the PSUs is calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The number of PSUs that will be earned is based upon the Company’s share price performance against the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index for the relevant performance periods. Compensation expense is recognized regardless of the relative performance.
The grant date fair value of the RSUs is based on the stock price on grant date, creating no judgement or uncertainty.
Table of Contents
Compensation expense will be reversed if an employee’s employment is terminated prior to satisfying the requisite service period.
The determination of fair value using option-pricing models, as indicated above, is affected by our stock price, as well as assumptions regarding several subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the awards. We determine the expected term of each award giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules, and post-vesting forfeitures. We use the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected term of the award. The value of the portion of the award that vests is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. If factors change and different assumptions are used, stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change
Once the fair value of the awards is determined at grant date, there is no subsequent remeasurement and therefore our estimates would impact the fair value of future rewards and not impact our stock-based compensation expense for the current fiscal year. This treatment is based on the awards being classified as equity. Should outstanding awards be reclassified as a liability, the impact to stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
