insiderdeltaSEC filings, surfaced and scored

CoverageForm 410-K10-Q8-K13D13G13F

Corteva, Inc.

CTVACIK 0001755672 · Every Form 4 filed by insiders at this issuer. See financials →

Annual report (10-K)

Latest 10-K filed Feb 12, 2026. Sentiment + YoY language diff vs prior year. Read sections →

Signal:Neutral

Risk Factors:tone -0.0343Δ+0.002190% similar+42/-34 ¶

MD&A:tone -0.0078Δ-0.000191% similar+112/-117 ¶

Sentiment via Loughran-McDonald lexicon · YoY diff via Jaccard similarity + paragraph set difference.

Recent 8-K announcements

Per-item disclosure feed. Item 2.02 is the earnings release.

May 5, 2026no items parsed May 1, 2026no items parsed Apr 14, 2026no items parsed Feb 3, 2026no items parsed Nov 4, 2025no items parsed

Top insiders

Most active reporters at Corteva, Inc.

Name	Roles	Filings
Anderson David J	Officer	9
Johanns Michael O.	Director	9
Lutz Marcos M	Director	9
O'Connor Judd M	Officer	9
Everitt David C	Director	5

Showing 11-15 of 28

Per pagePrevPage 3 of 6Next

Top performers

Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Corteva, Inc.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.

#	Insider	Trades	Win rate	Avg	Median	Best	Worst
1	Fuerer Cornel B	4	75%	+6.7%	+6.0%	+21.5%	-6.7%
2	Titus Brian	6	33%	-0.5%	-3.6%	+9.0%	-8.0%
3	Magro Charles V.	4	50%	-0.5%	+0.4%	+5.9%	-8.7%

All filings

259 Form 4 / 4-A filings, newest first

Filed	Insider	Top transaction	Shares	Price	Value
Apr 30, 2026	Everitt David C Director	AGrant	2,350	$0.00	$0
Apr 30, 2026	Page Gregory R Director	AGrant	3,870	$0.00	$0
Apr 30, 2026	Ward Pat Director	AGrant	2,350	$0.00	$0
Apr 30, 2026	Preete Kerry J Director	AGrant	2,350	$0.00	$0
Apr 30, 2026	Policinski Christopher J. Director	AGrant	2,350	$0.00	$0

Showing 6-10 of 259

Per pagePrevPage 2 of 52Next

Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.

Filed		Top transaction	Shares	Price	Value

YoY shift: Neutral

Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is 0.10pp more bullish than last year's.

Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.

Tone shift by section

The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.

Risk Factors

+0.21pp

Flat

Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.

MD&A

-0.01pp

Flat

Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.

Per-snippet highlights

Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.

Language change vs prior 10-K

Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase

Negative rising

adverse+3
unanticipated+2
adversely+1
disruptions+1
failure+1

Positive rising

achieve+2
able+1
satisfy+1
greater+1
satisfaction+1

Risk Factors (Item 1A)

10,007 words

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Industry

Corteva may not be able to obtain or maintain the necessary regulatory approvals for some of its products, including its seed and crop protection products, which could restrict its ability to sell those products in some markets.

Regulatory and legislative requirements affect the development, manufacture and distribution of Corteva’s products, including the testing and planting of seeds containing Corteva’s biotechnology traits and the import of crops grown from those seeds, and non-compliance can harm Corteva’s sales and profitability.

Seed products incorporating biotechnology derived traits and crop protection products must be extensively tested for safety, efficacy and environmental impact before they can be registered for production, use, sale or commercialization in a given market. In certain jurisdictions, Corteva must periodically renew its approvals for both biotechnology and crop protection products, which typically require Corteva to demonstrate compliance with then-current standards which generally are more stringent since the prior registration. The regulatory approvals process is lengthy, costly, complex and in some markets unpredictable, with requirements that can vary by product, technology, industry and country. The regulatory approvals process for products that incorporate novel modes of action or new technologies can be particularly unpredictable and uncertain due to the then-current state of regulatory guidelines and objectives, as well as governmental policy considerations and non- governmental organization and other stakeholder considerations. The uncertainty and increased length of regulatory approvals may reduce Corteva’s return on its research and development investments, and impede its ability to meet sales, profitability, or sustainability metrics.

Furthermore, the detection of biotechnology traits or chemical residues from a crop protection product not approved in the country in which Corteva sells or cultivates its product, or in a country to which Corteva imports its product, may affect Corteva’s ability to supply or export its products, or even result in crop destruction, product recalls or trade disruption, which could result in lawsuits and termination of licenses related to biotechnology traits and raw material supply agreements. Delays in obtaining regulatory approvals to import, including those related to the importation of crops grown from seeds containing certain traits or treated with specific chemicals, may influence the rate of adoption of new products in globally traded crops.

Additionally, the regulatory environment may be impacted by the activities of non-governmental organizations and special interest groups and stakeholder reaction to actual or perceived impacts of new and existing technology, products or processes on safety, health and the environment. Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals requires submitting a significant amount of information and data, which may require participation from technology providers. Regulatory standards and trial procedures are continuously changing. In addition, Corteva has seen an increase in recent years in the number of lawsuits filed by those who identify themselves as public or environmental interest groups seeking to invalidate pesticide product registrations, including those for Enlist One ® , and/or challenge the way federal or state governmental entities apply the rules and regulations governing pesticide produce use. The pace of change together with the lack of regulatory harmony could result in unintended noncompliance. Responding to these changes and meeting existing and new requirements may involve significant costs or capital expenditures or require changes in business practice that could result in reduced profitability. The failure to receive necessary permits or approvals, or the invalidation thereof, could have near- and long-term effects on Corteva’s ability to produce and sell some current and future products.

The successful development and commercialization of Corteva's pipeline products will be necessary for Corteva's growth.

Corteva uses advanced breeding technologies to produce hybrids and varieties with superior performance in farmers’ fields and uses biotechnology to introduce traits that enhance specific characteristics of its crops. Corteva also uses advanced analytics, software tools, mobile communications and new planting and monitoring equipment to provide agronomic recommendations to growers. Additionally, Corteva conducts research into biological and chemical products to protect farmers’ crops from pests and diseases and enhance plant productivity.

New product concepts may be abandoned for many reasons, including greater anticipated development costs, technical difficulties, lack of efficacy, regulatory obstacles or inability to market under regulatory frameworks, competition, inability to prove the original concept, lack of demand and the need to divert focus, from time to time, to other initiatives with perceived opportunities for better returns. The processes of active ingredient development or discovery, breeding, biotechnology trait discovery and development and trait integration are lengthy, and a very small percentage of the chemicals, genes and germplasm Corteva tests is selected for commercialization. Furthermore, the length of time and the risk associated with the

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

breeding and biotech pipelines are interlinked because both are required as a package for commercial success in markets where biotech traits are approved for growers, since seed hybrids and varieties could require modification to tolerate higher doses and/or new varieties of herbicides and pesticides as weeds and insects develop resistance. Commercial transitions to the company’s new technologies can take several years to complete, and weed and insect resistance may develop faster than Corteva can respond with new technologies or enhancements to existing technologies. In countries where biotech traits are not approved for widespread use, Corteva’s seed sales depend on the quality of its germplasm. Even when initial commercialization efforts have been promising, there are no guarantees that anticipated levels of product acceptability within Corteva's markets will be achieved or that higher quality products will not be developed by Corteva's competitors in the future.

Speed in discovering, developing, protecting and responding to new technologies, including artificial intelligence and new technology-based distribution channels that accelerate Corteva’s product development timelines and could facilitate its ability to engage with customers and end users, and bringing related products to market is a significant competitive advantage. Commercial success frequently depends on being the first company to the market, and many of Corteva’s competitors are also making considerable investments in similar new biotechnology products, improved germplasm products, biological and chemical products and agronomic recommendation products.

The degree of public understanding and acceptance or perceived public acceptance of Corteva’s biotechnology and other agricultural products and technologies can affect Corteva’s sales and results of operations by affecting planting approvals, regulatory requirements and customer purchase decisions.

Concerns and claims regarding the safe use of seeds with biotechnology traits and crop protection products in general, and their potential impact on health and the environment reflect a growing trend in societal demands for increasing levels of product safety and environmental protection. These include concerns and claims that increased use of crop protection products, drift, inversion, volatilization and the use of biotechnology traits meant to reduce the resistance of weeds or pests to control by crop protection products, could increase or accelerate such resistance and otherwise negatively impact health and the environment. These and other concerns could manifest themselves in delays or failures in obtaining or retaining regulatory approvals, delayed product launches, lack of market acceptance, product discontinuation, litigation, continued pressure for and adoption of more stringent regulatory intervention, termination of raw material supply agreements, legal claims, preferred purchases and stockholder proposals. These and other concerns could also influence public perceptions, the viability or continued sales of certain of Corteva’s products, Corteva’s reputation and the cost to comply with regulations. As a result, such concerns could have a material adverse effect on Corteva’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Corteva’s business is subject to various competition and antitrust, rules and regulations around the world, and as the size of its business grows, scrutiny of its business by legislators and regulators in these areas may intensify.

On December 6, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order titled “Addressing Security Risks from Price Fixing and Anti‑Competitive Behavior in the Food Supply Chain.” The order directs the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") to establish Food Supply Chain Security Task Forces focused on investigating anti‑competitive conduct across food supply sectors, including seeds, and, critically, assessing whether control by foreign entities is increasing US food prices or creating national or economic security risks. While the ultimate impact of the executive order will depend on the actions ultimately resulting from the U.S. regulatory authorities, actions taken by such authorities may increase the regulation and regulatory costs associated with the agriculture industry in the future and restrict the company from pursuing certain growth opportunities, including mergers and acquisitions.

Scrutiny from regulators in the U.S. and abroad may intensify as Corteva’s business presence grows or as industry concentration increases. This scrutiny and related investigations, even absent an enforcement action, may result in damage to a company’s reputation, significant defense expense, as well as become a distraction to management. Antitrust and competition enforcement actions, including the current FTC and related state attorney general lawsuits pending against Corteva, may result in regulators imposing fines, penalties, or restrictions on a company’s business practices in a manner that may significantly impact its results of operations.

Changes in agricultural and related policies of governments and international organizations may prove unfavorable.

In many markets there are various pressures to reduce government subsidies to farmers, which may inhibit the growth in these markets of products used in agriculture. In addition, government programs that provide financial support or create incentives for farmers, including those established by the U.S. Farm Bill, can be temporary in nature, or may be modified or discontinued.

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

However, it is difficult to predict accurately whether, and if so when, such changes will occur. Corteva expects that the policies of governments and international organizations will continue to affect the planting choices made by growers as well as the income available to growers to purchase products used in agriculture and, accordingly, the operating results of the agriculture industry.

The costs of complying with evolving regulatory requirements could negatively impact Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Actual or alleged violations of environmental laws or permit requirements could result in restrictions or prohibitions on plant operations, substantial civil or criminal sanctions, as well as the assessment of strict liability and/or joint and several liability.

Corteva is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations, rules and ordinances relating to pollution, protection of the environment, waste water discharges, the generation, storage, handling, transportation, treatment, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and waste materials and the use of genetically modified seeds and crop protection active ingredients by growers.

Environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and standards, including those with respect to PFAS and other substances, expose Corteva to the risk of substantial costs and liabilities, including liabilities associated with Corteva’s business and the discontinued and divested businesses and operations of EIDP. As is typical for businesses like Corteva’s, soil and groundwater contamination has occurred in the past at certain sites and may be identified at other sites in the future. Disposal of waste from Corteva’s business at off-site locations also exposes it to potential remediation costs. Consistent with past practice,

these sites continue to be monitored, investigated and remediated for soil and groundwater contamination, as applicable.

Costs and capital expenditures relating to environmental, health or safety matters are subject to evolving regulatory requirements and depend on the timing of the promulgation and enforcement of specific standards which impose the requirements. Moreover, changes in environmental regulations, including those related to climate change, could inhibit or interrupt Corteva’s operations, or require modifications to its facilities in the future. Accordingly, environmental, health or safety regulatory matters could result in significant unanticipated costs or liabilities, which may be materially higher than Corteva’s accruals.

Climate change and unpredictable seasonal and weather factors could impact Corteva’s sales and earnings.

The agriculture industry is subject to seasonal and weather factors, which can vary unpredictably from period to period. Weather factors can affect the presence of disease and pests on a regional basis and, accordingly, can positively or adversely affect the demand for crop protection products, including the mix of products used or the level of returns. The weather also can affect supply chains and the quality, volume and cost of seed produced for sale as well as demand and product mix. Seed yields can be higher or lower than planned, which could lead to higher inventory and related write-offs. Climate change may increase the frequency or intensity of extreme weather such as storms, floods, heat waves, droughts and other events that could affect the quality, volume and cost of seed produced for sale as well as demand and product mix. Climate change may also affect the availability and suitability of arable land and contribute to unpredictable shifts in the average growing season, pest pressures and types of crops produced.

Corteva participates in an industry that is highly competitive and has undergone consolidation, which could increase competitive pressures.

Corteva currently faces significant competition in the markets in which it operates. In most segments of the market, the number of products available to the grower is steadily increasing as new products are introduced. At the same time, certain products are coming off patent and are thus available to generic manufacturers for production and commercialization. Upon the loss or expiration of patent protection for one of Corteva’s products or of a product that Corteva licenses, or upon the “at- risk” launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation against the generic product) by a generic manufacturer of a generic version of one of Corteva’s patented products or of a product that Corteva licenses, Corteva can lose a major portion of revenues for that product, which can have a material adverse effect on Corteva’s business. Additionally, data analytic tools and web-based new direct purchase models offer increased transparency and comparability, which creates price pressures. Corteva cannot predict the pricing or promotional actions of its competitors. Aggressive marketing or pricing by Corteva’s competitors could adversely affect Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition. As a result, Corteva continues to face significant competitive challenges.

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

Recent funding and staff reductions, including at the EPA, the USDA, the FDA and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"), could hinder our ability to receive timely regulatory approvals.

Corteva’s genetically modified seed products are subject to regulatory oversight under the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology, which includes the regulatory authority of the USDA addressing plant safety, as well as the authority of the FDA for food and feed safety. Corteva’s pesticidal crop protection products and certain biotechnology developed seed products that express pesticidal traits are also regulated by the EPA to verify that there is no unreasonable adverse effect to the environment. For Corteva’s crop protection products, the EPA is responsible for registering and overseeing the approval and marketing of pesticides, while the USDA and the FDA monitor levels of pesticide residue permitted on or in crops. See "Part I – Item 1 – Business – Regulatory Considerations" of this report for more information on the regulation of our business.

Significant staff or funding reductions, along with any extended shutdown of the federal government, may significantly impact the timelines for reviewing our regulatory submissions and re-registrations. Longer-term structural changes at relevant federal agencies, including shifts in enforcement focus, review processes, evidentiary standards and resource allocation, may extend the time it takes to commercialize our products, thereby having a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and the value of our intellectual property.

Corteva’s sales to its customers may be adversely affected should a company successfully establish an intermediary platform for the sale of Corteva’s products or otherwise position itself between Corteva and its customers.

Corteva services customers in part through the Pioneer direct sales channel in key agricultural geographies, including the United States. In addition, Corteva supplements this approach with strong retail channels, including distributors, agricultural cooperatives and dealers, and with digital and data solutions that assist farmer decision-making with a view to optimize their product selection and maximize their yield and profitability. While Corteva expects its indirect channels will extend its reach and increase exposure of its products to other potential customers, including smaller farmers or farmers in less concentrated areas, there can be no assurance that Corteva will be successful in this regard. If a competitor were to successfully establish an intermediary platform for distribution of Corteva’s products, it may disrupt Corteva’s distribution model. In such a circumstance, Corteva’s sales may be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Operations

Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected by disruptions in the global economy caused by geopolitical and military conflicts.

Military conflict or related geopolitical tensions and disputes including increased trade barriers or restrictions on global trade, could result in, among other things, cyberattacks, further supply disruptions, and changes to foreign exchange rates and financial markets, any of which may adversely affect our business and supply chains. Such geopolitical instability and uncertainty has negatively impacted our ability to sell to, ship products to, collect payments from, and support customers in certain regions. Logistics restrictions, including closures of air space and shipping ports, the reduction of the availability of farmable land, and the destruction of facilities could further increase these adverse impacts and negatively impact demand for our products in impacted regions. The global economy was negatively impacted by the military conflict between Russia and Ukraine and we experienced shortages in materials, the inability to insure shipments, and increased costs for transportation, energy, and raw material and other inputs due in part to the negative impact of this conflict. Further escalation of the military conflict or related geopolitical tensions, including increased trade barriers or restrictions on global trade, could result in, among other things, cyberattacks, further supply disruptions, and changes to foreign exchange rates and financial markets, any of which may adversely affect our business and supply chains.

Similar or more severe disruptions, trade barriers, business risks, asset seizures, and volatility in foreign exchange and financial markets could occur if tensions or conflicts between China and Taiwan, or other countries, escalate, or if the United States would become a party to such a military conflict. Currently, a material portion of the company’s crop protection inputs are sourced directly or indirectly from China. While the company utilizes dual- or multi- source supply chains to minimize business disruptions, these strategies may not be adequate to address the scope of disruptions created by such a conflict. Further escalation or expansion of economic disruption or in the scope of global or regional conflicts could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

Volatility in Corteva’s input costs, which include raw materials and production costs, could have a significant impact on Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Corteva’s input costs are variable based on the costs associated with production or with raw materials Corteva uses. For example, Corteva’s production costs vary, especially on a seasonal basis where changes in weather influence supply and demand. In addition, Corteva’s manufacturing processes consume significant amounts of raw materials, the costs of which are subject to worldwide supply and demand as well as other factors beyond Corteva’s control. Corteva refers to these costs collectively as input costs. Significant variations in input costs affect Corteva’s operating results from period to period.

When possible, Corteva purchases raw materials through negotiated long-term contracts to minimize the impact of price fluctuations. Corteva also enters into over-the-counter and exchange traded derivative commodity instruments to hedge its exposure to price fluctuations on certain purchases. In addition, Corteva takes actions to offset the effects of higher input costs through selling price increases, productivity improvements and cost reduction programs. Success in offsetting higher input costs with price increases is largely influenced by competitive and economic conditions and could vary significantly depending on the market served. If Corteva is not able to fully offset the effects of higher input costs, it could have a significant impact on its financial results.

Corteva’s operations outside the United States are subject to risks and restrictions, which could negatively affect Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Corteva’s operations outside the United States are subject to risks and restrictions, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; inflation; exchange and price control regulations; corruption risks; competitive restrictions; changes in local political or economic conditions; import and trade restrictions; import or export licensing requirements and trade policy; and other potentially detrimental domestic and foreign governmental practices or policies affecting U.S. companies doing business abroad. In addition, Corteva’s international operations are sometimes in countries with unstable governments, economic or fiscal challenges, military or political conflicts, local epidemics or pandemics, significant levels of crime and organized crime, or developing legal systems. This may increase the risk to the company's employees, subcontractors or other parties, and to other liabilities, such as property loss or damage to the company's products, and may affect Corteva's ability to safely operate in, or import into, or receive raw materials from these countries.

Additionally, Corteva’s ability to export its products and its sales outside the United States has been, and may continue to be adversely affected by significant changes in trade, tax or other policies, including other countries retaliating by purchasing less from the United States and the imposition of their own trade restrictions and/or increased tariffs in response to substantial changes to U.S. tariff, trade and tax policies. Furthermore, significant changes in trade, tax, and other related policies or enforcement may pose business and financial risks, including raising the cost of manufacturing inputs and altering customer demands.

Although Corteva has operations throughout the world, Corteva’s sales outside the United States in 2025 were principally to customers in Brazil, Eurozone countries, and Canada. Further, Corteva’s largest currency exposures are the Brazilian real, Euro, Canadian dollar and Argentine peso. Inflation, market uncertainty or an economic downturn in these geographic areas could reduce demand for Corteva’s products and result in decreased sales volume, which could have a negative impact on Corteva’s results of operations. In addition, changes in exchange rates may affect Corteva’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in future periods. Corteva actively manages currency exposures that are associated with net monetary asset positions and committed purchases.

Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by industrial espionage and other disruptions to its supply chain, information technology or network systems.

Business and/or supply chain disruptions, plant and/or power outages and information technology system and/or network disruptions, regardless of cause including acts of sabotage, employee error or other actions, geopolitical activity, military conflict, local epidemics or pandemics, weather events and natural disasters could seriously harm Corteva’s operations as well as the operations of its customers and suppliers. For example, a pandemic in locations where Corteva has significant operations, sales, or key suppliers could have a material adverse effect on Corteva’s results of operations. In addition, terrorist attacks and natural disasters have increased stakeholder concerns about the security and safety of chemical production and distribution.

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

Business and/or supply chain disruptions may also be caused by security breaches, which could include, for example, ransomware attacks and attacks on information technology and infrastructure by hackers, viruses, breaches due to employee error or actions or other disruptions. Corteva and/or its suppliers may fail to effectively prevent, detect and recover from these or other security breaches and, as a consequence, such breaches could result in misuse of Corteva’s assets, business disruptions, loss of property including trade secrets and confidential business information, legal claims or proceedings, reporting errors, processing inefficiencies, negative media attention, loss of sales and interference with regulatory and data privacy compliance.

Like most major corporations, Corteva is the target of industrial espionage, including cyber-attacks, from time to time. Corteva has determined that these incidents have resulted, and could result in the future, in unauthorized parties gaining access to certain confidential business information. Although management does not believe that Corteva has experienced any material losses to date related to industrial espionage and security breaches, including cybersecurity incidents, there can be no assurance that Corteva will not suffer such losses in the future.

Corteva actively manages the risks within its control that could lead to business disruptions and security breaches. As these threats continue to evolve, particularly around cybersecurity and artificial intelligence, Corteva may be required to expend significant resources to enhance its control environment, processes, practices and other protective measures. Despite these efforts, such events could also have a material adverse effect on Corteva’s business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation. Additionally, any losses from such an event may be excluded from, or in excess of the coverages provided by Corteva's insurance policies.

Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by environmental, litigation and other commitments and contingencies.

As a result of Corteva’s operations, including past operations and those related to divested businesses and discontinued operations of EIDP, Corteva incurs environmental operating costs for pollution abatement activities including waste collection and disposal, installation and maintenance of air pollution controls and wastewater treatment, emissions testing and monitoring and obtaining permits. Corteva also incurs environmental operating costs related to environmental related research and development activities including environmental field and treatment studies as well as toxicity and degradation testing to evaluate the environmental impact of products and raw materials. In addition, Corteva maintains and periodically reviews and adjusts its accruals for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs.

Corteva expects to continue to incur environmental operating costs since it will operate global manufacturing, product handling and distribution facilities that are subject to a broad array of environmental laws and regulations. These rules are subject to change by the implementing governmental agency, which Corteva monitors closely. Corteva’s environmental policy requires that its operations fully meet or exceed legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, Corteva expects to continue certain voluntary programs, and could consider additional voluntary actions, to reduce air emissions, minimize the generation of hazardous waste, decrease the volume of water use and discharges, increase the efficiency of energy use and reduce the generation of persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic materials. Costs to comply with complex environmental laws and regulations, as well as internal voluntary programs and goals, are significant and Corteva expects these costs will continue to be significant for the foreseeable future. Over the long-term, such expenditures are subject to considerable uncertainty and could fluctuate significantly.

Corteva accrues for environmental matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. As remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site, it is difficult to develop precise estimates of future site remediation costs. Corteva expects to base such estimates on several factors, including the complexity of the geology, the nature and extent of contamination, the type of remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other Potentially Responsible Parties (“PRPs”) at multi-party sites and the number of, and financial viability of, other PRPs. Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to environmental remediation costs and, under adverse changes in circumstances, the potential liability may be materially higher than Corteva’s accruals.

Corteva faces risks arising from various unasserted and asserted litigation matters arising out of the normal course of its current and former business operations, including intellectual property, commercial, product liability, environmental and antitrust lawsuits. Corteva has noted a trend in public and private suits being filed on behalf of states, counties, cities and utilities alleging harm to the general public and the environment, including waterways and watersheds. Claims alleging harm to the public and the environment may be brought against Corteva, notwithstanding years of scientific evidence and regulatory determinations supporting the safety of crop protection products. The litigation involving Monsanto’s Roundup ® non-selective

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

glyphosate containing weedkiller products has resulted in negative publicity and sentiment and may lead to similar suits with respect to glyphosate-containing products and/or other established crop protection products. Claims and allegations that Corteva’s products or products that Corteva manufactures or markets on behalf of third parties are not safe could result in litigation, damage to Corteva’s reputation and have a material adverse effect on Corteva’s business. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these various proceedings and any potential impact on Corteva. An adverse outcome in any one or more of these matters may result in losses not fully covered by Corteva's insurance policies, and could be material to Corteva's financial results. Various factors or developments can lead to changes in current estimates of liabilities. Such factors and developments may include, but are not limited to, additional data, safety or risk assessments, as well as a final adverse judgment, significant settlement or changes in applicable law. A future adverse ruling or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on Corteva.

The company, pursuant to the respective Separation Agreements, is entitled to cost sharing and indemnification from The Chemours Company ("Chemours"), Dow and DuPont, as applicable, for certain litigation, environmental, workers’ compensation and other liabilities related to its historical operations. In connection with the recognition of liabilities related to these matters, Corteva records an indemnification asset when recovery is deemed probable. These estimates of recovery are subject to various factors and developments that could result in differences from future estimates or the actual recovery. As of December 31, 2025, the indemnification assets pursuant to the Chemours Separation Agreement and the Corteva Separation Agreement are in aggregate $242 million within accounts and notes receivable - net and $733 million within other assets in the company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any failure by, or inability to pay, these liabilities in line with the indemnification provisions of the Separation Agreements may have a material adverse effect on Corteva and its financial condition and results of operations.

In the ordinary course of business, Corteva may make certain commitments, including representations, warranties and indemnities relating to current and past operations, including those related to divested businesses and issue guarantees of third-party obligations. If Corteva were required to make payments as a result, they could exceed the amounts accrued, thereby adversely affecting Corteva’s financial condition and results of operations.

Corteva is dependent on its relationships or contracts with third parties with respect to certain of its raw materials or licenses and commercialization.

Corteva is dependent on third parties in the research, development and commercialization of its products and enters into transactions including, but not limited to, supply agreements, licensing agreements, and manufacturing agreements in connection with Corteva’s business. The majority of Corteva’s corn hybrids and soybean varieties sold to customers contain biotechnology traits that Corteva licenses from third parties under long-term license agreements. If Corteva loses its rights under such licenses, it could negatively impact Corteva’s ability to obtain future licenses on competitive terms, commercialize new products and generate sales from existing products. Corteva may elect to out-license its technology, including germplasm. There can be no guarantee that such out-licensing will not ultimately strengthen Corteva’s competition thereby adversely impacting Corteva’s results of operations.

While Corteva relies heavily on third parties for multiple aspects of its business and commercialization activities, Corteva does not control many aspects of such third parties’ activities. Third parties may not complete activities on schedule or in accordance with Corteva’s expectations. Failure by one or more of these third parties to meet their contractual or other obligations to Corteva or to comply with applicable laws or regulations, or any disruption in the relationship between Corteva and one or more of these third parties could delay or prevent the development, approval or commercialization of Corteva’s products and could also result in non-compliance or reputational harm, all with potential negative implications for Corteva’s business.

In addition, Corteva’s agreements with third parties may obligate it to meet certain contractual or other obligations to third parties. For example, Corteva may be obligated to meet certain thresholds or abide by certain boundary conditions. If Corteva were to fail to meet such obligations to the third parties, its relationship with such third parties may be disrupted. Such a disruption could negatively impact certain of Corteva’s licenses on which it depends, could cause reputational harm, and could negatively affect Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

Corteva’s customers may be unable to pay their debts to Corteva, which could adversely affect Corteva’s results.

Corteva offers its customers financing programs with credit terms generally less than one year from invoicing in alignment with the growing season. Due to these credit practices as well as the seasonality of Corteva’s operations, Corteva may need to issue short-term debt at certain times of the year to fund its cash flow requirements. Corteva’s customers may be exposed to a variety of conditions that could adversely affect their ability to pay their debts. For example, customers in economies experiencing an economic downturn or in a region experiencing adverse growing conditions may be unable to repay their obligations to Corteva, which could adversely affect Corteva’s results.

Failure to effectively manage acquisitions, divestitures, strategic investments, restructurings, cost savings initiatives and other portfolio actions may not have the results anticipated.

From time-to-time, Corteva evaluates acquisition candidates that may strategically fit Corteva’s business and/or growth objectives, along with making investments in strategic technologies through its Corteva Catalyst platform. If Corteva is unable to successfully integrate and develop acquired businesses, including its growth in biologicals, Corteva could fail to achieve expected increases in revenues and operating results, as well as anticipated investment returns, synergies and cost savings, which could have a material adverse effect on Corteva’s financial results. Corteva continually reviews its portfolio of assets for contributions to its objectives and alignment with its strategy. However, Corteva may not be successful in separating underperforming or non-strategic assets and gains or losses on the divestiture of, or lost operating income from, such assets, may affect Corteva’s earnings. Moreover, Corteva might incur asset impairment charges related to its investments and acquisitions, or divestitures that reduce its earnings. In addition, if the execution of these transactions, investments, or portfolio actions is not successful, it could adversely impact Corteva’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Corteva’s liquidity, business, results of operations and financial condition could be impaired if it is unable to raise capital through the capital markets or short-term debt borrowings.

Any limitation on Corteva’s ability to raise money in the capital markets or through short-term debt borrowings could have a substantial negative effect on Corteva’s liquidity. Corteva’s ability to affordably access the capital markets and/or borrow short- term debt in amounts adequate to finance its activities could be impaired as a result of a variety of factors, including factors that are not specific to Corteva, such as a severe disruption of the financial markets and, in the case of debt securities or borrowings, interest rate fluctuations. Due to the seasonality of Corteva’s business and the credit programs Corteva may offer its customers, net working capital investment and corresponding debt levels will fluctuate over the course of the year.

Corteva regularly extends credit to its customers to enable them to purchase seed or crop protection products at the beginning of the growing season. The customer receivables may be used as collateral for short-term financing programs. Any material adverse effect upon Corteva’s ability to own or sell such customer receivables, including seasonal factors that may impact the amount of customer receivables Corteva owns, may materially impact Corteva’s access to capital.

Corteva has additional agreements with financial institutions to establish programs that provide financing for select customers of Corteva’s seed and crop protection products in the United States, Latin America, Europe and Asia. The programs are renewed on an annual basis. In most cases, Corteva guarantees the extension of such credit to such customers. If Corteva is unable to renew these agreements or access the debt markets to support customer financing, Corteva’s sales may be negatively impacted, which could result in increased borrowing needs to fund working capital.

Corteva’s earnings, operations and business, among other things, will impact its credit ratings, costs and availability of financing. There can be no assurance that Corteva or EIDP will maintain its current or prospective credit ratings. A decrease in the ratings assigned to Corteva or EIDP by the ratings agencies may negatively impact Corteva’s liquidity, access to the debt capital markets and increase Corteva’s cost of borrowing and the financing of its seasonal working capital.

Increases in pension and other post-employment benefit plan funding obligations may adversely affect Corteva’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

Through Corteva's ownership of EIDP, Corteva maintains the EIDP defined benefit pension and other post-employment benefit plans. For some of these plans, including EIDP’s principal U.S. pension plan, Corteva continues as sponsor for the entire plan regardless of whether participants, including retirees, are or were associated with EIDP’s agriculture business. Corteva uses many assumptions in calculating the expected future payment obligations under these plans. Significant adverse changes in

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

credit or market conditions could result in actual rates of returns on pension investments being lower than assumed. In 2026, Corteva expects to contribute approximately $ 40 million to its pension plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan, and approximately $ 100 million for its other post-employment benefit ("OPEB") plans. While there is no anticipated required contribution for 2026, Corteva expects to evaluate making discretionary contributions to the principal U.S. pension plan and/or may be required to make contributions in the future. These contributions could be significant and adversely affect Corteva’s results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Global or regional health pandemics or epidemics could negatively impact the company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Corteva's business, financial condition, and results of operations could be negatively impacted by human or animal pandemics or epidemics. The severity, magnitude and duration of the pandemics is uncertain, rapidly changing and difficult to predict. Future pandemics or epidemics and resulting illness, travel restrictions and workforce and operational disruptions could impact Corteva's global supply chain, its operations and its routes to market or those of its suppliers, co-manufacturers, or customers/distributors. These disruptions or the company's failure to effectively respond to them could increase product or distribution costs, alter the timing of recognizing manufacturing costs, or impact the delivery of products to customers or their ability to pay.

Government-pandemic or epidemic responses can significantly impact economic activity and markets around the world. Future outbreaks or pandemics could negatively impact customer demand and the company's business, financial condition, and results of operations in numerous ways, including but not limited to increased market volatility that impacts the company's hedging, financial forecasting, and liquidity, including its access to capital markets and delays or modifications to the company's strategic plans and productivity initiatives.

Sentiment towards sustainability matters could adversely affect our stock price, results of operations, and access to capital.

Corteva has established certain strategies, commitments and initiatives as part of its sustainability programs. Execution of these strategies and the achievements of Corteva’s sustainability commitments are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including regulatory action or inaction, changes in public or investor sentiment, and resource availability, many of which are out of its control. Failure to achieve its sustainability commitments within the expected timeframes and cost effectively could damage Corteva’s reputation, customer and investor relationships, or its access to financing. Further, dissatisfaction with such a failure could cause stockholders to reduce their ownership holdings, all of which, in turn could adversely affect Corteva’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and reduce its stock price.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

Enforcing Corteva’s intellectual property rights, or defending against intellectual property claims asserted by others, could materially affect Corteva’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Intellectual property rights, including patents, plant variety protection, trade secrets, confidential information, trademarks, trade names and other forms of trade dress, are important to Corteva’s business. Corteva endeavors to protect its intellectual property rights in jurisdictions in which its products are produced or used and in jurisdictions into which its products are imported. However, Corteva may be unable to obtain protection for its intellectual property in key jurisdictions. Further, changes in government policies and regulations, including changes made in reaction to pressure from non-governmental organizations, or the public generally, could impact the extent of intellectual property protection afforded by such jurisdictions.

Competitors are increasingly challenging intellectual property positions and the outcomes to these challenges, including those with Inari, can be highly uncertain and negatively impact the value of Corteva's intellectual property and investment return on its research and development. Additionally, Corteva has been subject to claims that its products violate third party intellectual property rights. Defending such claims, even those without merit, is time-consuming and expensive. In addition, any such claim could result in Corteva’s having to enter into, or continue, license agreements, develop non-infringing products or engage in litigation that could be costly. If challenges are resolved adversely, it could negatively impact Corteva’s ability to obtain licenses on competitive terms, develop and commercialize new products, generate sales from existing products or reduce its reliance on licensed technologies.

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

Corteva has designed and implemented internal controls to restrict use of, access to and distribution of its intellectual property. Despite these precautions, Corteva’s intellectual property is vulnerable to infringement, misappropriation and other unauthorized access, including through employee or licensee error or actions, theft and cybersecurity incidents, and other security breaches. When unauthorized access and use or counterfeit products are discovered, Corteva may report such situations to governmental authorities for investigation, as appropriate, and takes measures to mitigate any potential impact. Protecting intellectual property related to biotechnology is particularly challenging because theft is difficult to detect and biotechnology can be self-replicating.

In addition, because of the rapid pace of technological change, the confidentiality of patent applications in some jurisdictions and/or the uncertainty in predicting the outcome of complex proceedings relating to ownership and the scope of patents relating to certain emerging technologies, competitors may be issued patents related to Corteva’s business unexpectedly. These patents could reduce the value of Corteva’s commercial or pipeline products or, to the extent they cover key technologies on which Corteva has relied, require Corteva to seek to obtain licenses (and Corteva cannot ensure it would be able to obtain such a license on acceptable terms) or cease using the technology, no matter how valuable to Corteva’s business.

Legislation and jurisprudence on patent protection is evolving and changes in laws could affect Corteva’s ability to obtain or maintain patent protection for, and otherwise enforce Corteva’s patents related to, its products.

Corteva’s business may be adversely affected by the availability of counterfeit products.

A counterfeit product is one that has been deliberately and fraudulently mislabeled as to its identity and source. A counterfeit Corteva product, therefore, is one manufactured by someone other than Corteva, but which appears to be the same as an authentic Corteva product. The prevalence of counterfeit products is a significant and growing industry-wide issue due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following: the widespread use of the Internet, which has greatly facilitated the ease by which counterfeit products can be advertised, purchased and delivered to individual consumers; the availability of sophisticated technology that makes it easier for counterfeiters to make counterfeit products; and the relatively modest risk of penalties faced by counterfeiters compared to the large profits that can be earned by them from the sale of counterfeit products. Further, laws against counterfeiting vary greatly from country to country, and the enforcement of existing laws varies greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, in some countries, counterfeiting is not a crime; in others, it may result in only minimal sanctions. In addition, those involved in the distribution of counterfeit products use complex transport routes to evade customs controls by disguising the true source of their products.

Corteva’s global reputation makes its products prime targets for counterfeiting organizations. Counterfeit products pose a risk to consumer health and safety because of the conditions under which they are manufactured (often in unregulated, unlicensed, uninspected and unsanitary sites) as well as the lack of regulation of their contents. Failure to mitigate the threat of counterfeit products, which is exacerbated by the complexity of the supply chain, could adversely impact Corteva’s business by, among other things, causing the loss of consumer confidence in Corteva’s name and in the integrity of its products, potentially resulting in lost sales and an increased threat of litigation.

Corteva undertakes significant efforts to counteract the threats associated with counterfeit products, including, among other things, working with regulatory authorities and multinational coalitions to combat the counterfeiting of products and supporting efforts by law enforcement authorities to prosecute counterfeiters; assessing new and existing technologies to seek to make it more difficult for counterfeiters to copy Corteva’s products and easier for consumers to distinguish authentic from counterfeit products; working diligently to raise public awareness about the dangers of counterfeit products; working collaboratively with wholesalers, customs offices and law enforcement agencies to increase inspection coverage, monitor distribution channels and improve surveillance of distributors; and working with other members of an international trade association of agrochemical companies to promote initiatives to combat counterfeiting activity. No assurance can be given, however, that Corteva’s efforts and the efforts of others will be entirely successful, and the presence of counterfeit products may continue to increase.

Restrictions under the intellectual property cross-license agreements limit Corteva’s ability to develop and commercialize certain products and services and/or prosecute, maintain and enforce certain intellectual property.

The company is dependent to a certain extent on DuPont and Dow to maintain and enforce certain of the intellectual property licensed under the Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreements. For example, DuPont and Dow are responsible for filing, prosecuting and maintaining (at their respective discretion) patents on trade secrets and know-how that they each respectively license to Corteva. They also have the first right to enforce their respective trade secrets and know-how licensed to Corteva. If

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

DuPont or Dow, as applicable, fails to fulfill its obligations or chooses to not enforce the licensed patents, trade secrets or know-how under the Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreements, the company may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using and selling competitive products and services.

In addition, Corteva’s use of the intellectual property licensed to it under the Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreements is restricted to certain fields, which could limit Corteva’s ability to develop and commercialize certain products and services. For example, the licenses granted to Corteva under the agreement will not extend to all fields of use that the company may decide to enter into in the future. These restrictions may make it more difficult, time consuming and/or expensive for Corteva to develop and commercialize certain new products and services, or may result in certain of its products or services being later to market than those of its competitors.

Risks Related to the Corteva Separation

In connection with the Corteva Separation the company has assumed, and agreed to indemnify DuPont and Dow for, certain liabilities. If the company is required to make payments pursuant to these indemnities, the company may need to divert cash to meet those obligations and its financial results could be negatively impacted. In addition, DuPont and Dow have agreed to indemnify Corteva for certain liabilities. These indemnities may not be sufficient to insure the company against the full amount of liabilities it incurs, and DuPont and/or Dow, and/or their historical separated businesses, may not be able to satisfy their indemnification obligations in the future.

Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, the Employee Matters Agreement and the Tax Matters Agreement with DuPont and Dow, the company agreed to assume, and indemnify DuPont and Dow for, certain liabilities for uncapped amounts, which may include, among other items, associated defense costs, settlement amounts and judgments, as discussed further in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and Part I - Item 3 - Legal Proceedings. Payments pursuant to these indemnities may be significant and could negatively impact the company’s business, particularly indemnities relating to certain litigation for Historical DuPont operations or its actions that could impact the tax-free nature of the Corteva Distribution. Third parties could also seek to hold the company responsible for any of the liabilities allocated to DuPont and Dow, including those related to DowDuPont’s specialty products and/or materials science businesses, respectively, and those related to discontinued and/or divested businesses and operations of Historical Dow, which have been allocated to Dow. DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, have agreed to indemnify Corteva for such liabilities, but such indemnities may not be sufficient to protect the company against the full amount of such liabilities. In addition, DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, may not fully satisfy their indemnification obligations with respect to the liabilities the company incurs. Even if the company ultimately succeeds in recovering from DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, any amounts for which the company is held liable, the company may be temporarily required to bear these losses itself.

Additionally, the company generally has assumed and is responsible for the payment of its share of (i) certain liabilities of DowDuPont relating to, arising out of or resulting from certain general corporate matters of DowDuPont, (ii) certain liabilities of Historical DuPont relating to, arising out of or resulting from general corporate matters of Historical DuPont and discontinued and/or divested businesses and operations of Historical DuPont, including its Performance Chemicals spin-off, Chemours, and (iii) certain separation expenses not otherwise allocated to DuPont or Dow (or allocated specifically to Corteva) pursuant to the Corteva Separation Agreement, and third parties could seek to hold Corteva responsible for DuPont’s or Dow’s share of any such liabilities. For more information, see Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and Part I - Item 3 - Legal Proceedings. DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, will indemnify Corteva for their share of any such liabilities; however, such indemnities may not be sufficient to protect Corteva against the full amount of such liabilities, and/or DuPont and/or Dow may not fully satisfy their respective indemnification obligations. In addition, even if the company ultimately succeeds in recovering from DuPont and/or Dow any amounts for which the company is held liable in excess of its agreed share, the company may be temporarily required to bear these losses itself and may not be able to fully insure itself to cover these risks.

Risks related to the satisfaction of these indemnification obligations and temporarily bearing losses may be increased if DuPont's electronics business spin-off, Qnity Electronics, Inc., or if other divested businesses of Historical DuPont (including Chemours) or Historical Dow do not or are unable to cover their liabilities or satisfy their indemnification obligations. Even if Corteva takes legal action to protect its rights with respect to such a transaction, these legal costs may be significant. Each of the above risks could materially affect the company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

The Corteva Separation and related transactions may expose Corteva to potential liabilities arising out of state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws

Although the company received a solvency opinion from an investment bank confirming that the company and DuPont were each adequately capitalized following the Corteva Distribution, the Separation could be challenged under various state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws. In connection with fraudulent conveyances or transfers are generally defined to include transfers made or obligations incurred with the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud current or future creditors or transfers made or obligations incurred for less than reasonably equivalent value when the debtor was insolvent, or that rendered the debtor insolvent, inadequately capitalized or unable to pay its debts as they become due. Any unpaid creditor could claim that DuPont did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value in the Separation and Corteva Distribution, and that the Separation and Corteva Distribution left DuPont insolvent or with unreasonably small capital or that DuPont intended or believed it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they matured. Additionally, under its indemnity provisions of the Separation Agreement, the company could find its liabilities increased as a result of a court concluding that Historical DuPont, Historical Dow or DowDuPont executed a fraudulent conveyance in connection with divestitures and spin-offs of any one of their historical operations, including Chemours. If a court were to agree with such a plaintiff, then such court could void the Separation and Distribution as a fraudulent transfer or impose substantial liabilities on Corteva, which could materially adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. Among other things, the court could return some of Corteva’s assets or shares of Corteva common stock to DuPont, provide DuPont with a claim for money damages against Corteva in an amount equal to the difference between the consideration received by DuPont and the fair market value of Corteva at the time of the Corteva Distribution, or require Corteva to fund liabilities of other companies involved in the Internal Reorganization for the benefit of creditors.

The Distribution is also subject to review under state corporate Distribution statutes. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), a corporation may only pay dividends to its stockholders either (i) out of its surplus (net assets minus capital) or (ii) if there is no such surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Although the Distribution was made out of DowDuPont’s surplus and the company received an opinion that DowDuPont has adequate surplus under Delaware law to declare the dividend of Corteva common stock in connection with the Corteva Distribution, there can be no assurance that a court will not later determine that some or all of the Corteva Distribution was unlawful.

The company is subject to continuing contingent tax-related liabilities of DowDuPont following the Distribution.

There are several significant areas where the liabilities of DowDuPont may become Corteva’s obligations either in whole or in part. For example, under the Code and the related rules and regulations, each corporation that was a member of DowDuPont’s consolidated tax reporting group during any taxable period or portion of any taxable period ending on or before the effective time of the Distribution is jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income tax liability of the entire consolidated tax reporting group for such taxable period. Additionally, to the extent that any subsidiary of Corteva was included in the consolidated tax reporting group of either Historical DuPont or Historical Dow for any taxable period or portion of any taxable period ending on or before the effective date of the Merger, such subsidiary is jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income tax liability of the entire consolidated tax reporting group of Historical DuPont or Historical Dow, as applicable, for such taxable period. On April 1, 2019, the company entered into the Tax Matters Agreement with DuPont and Dow that allocates the responsibility for prior period consolidated taxes among Corteva, DuPont and Dow. If DuPont or Dow were unable or unwilling to pay any prior period taxes for which it is responsible, however, the company could be required to pay the entire amount of such taxes, and such amounts could be significant. Other provisions of federal, state, local, or foreign law may establish similar liability for other matters, including laws governing tax-qualified pension plans, as well as other contingent liabilities.

Risks related to our Proposed Separation

Corteva is subject to risks related to its plans to separate its seed and crop protection businesses in a spin-off that will result in two standalone public companies, including that the proposed separation may not be completed on the contemplated timeline or at all and may not achieve the intended benefits.

On October 1, 2025, Corteva announced its intent to separate its Seed and Crop Protection businesses into two standalone, publicly traded companies, in a transaction that is intended to qualify as a tax-free spin-off for U.S. federal income tax purposes (the “Proposed Separation”). The Proposed Separation is subject to the satisfaction of a number of customary conditions,

Table Of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS, continued

including, among others, the filing and effectiveness of a Form 10 registration statement with the SEC, receipt of a tax opinion from external counsel to the effect that, among other things, the transaction will qualify as a tax-free spin-off, and final approval by Corteva’s Board of Directors. The ultimate timing of the Proposed Separation will depend on the readiness of each business to operate as an independent public company and the finalization of appropriate capital structures for each. The failure to satisfy all of the required conditions for the Proposed Separation, as well as unanticipated developments, could delay, prevent or otherwise adversely affect the Proposed Separation. These potential developments, many of which are outside of Corteva’s control, include, but are not limited to, disruptions in general or financial market conditions, material adverse changes in business or industry conditions, unanticipated costs, difficulties or delays in obtaining various regulatory and tax approvals or clearances, and stakeholder actions or challenges relating to the Proposed Separation or to other aspects of Corteva’s business or strategy.

Executing the Proposed Separation will require significant time and attention from Corteva’s senior management and employees, which could disrupt Corteva’s ongoing business, negatively impact Corteva’s relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, distributors, licensors and other stakeholders and adversely affect Corteva’s financial results and results of operations. There can be no assurances that Corteva will be able to complete the Proposed Separation on the terms or on the timeline that was announced, if at all, or that the complexities, costs and dis-synergies associated with the Proposed Separation will not be significant or exceed expectations. Moreover, although Corteva expects to maintain an investment grade credit rating, a downgrade in Corteva’s rating may lead to increased borrowing costs for Corteva. In addition, there may be increased borrowing costs associated with the re-allocation or taking on of new debt in connection with the Proposed Separation.

If the Proposed Separation is completed, Corteva may not be able to achieve the full strategic and financial benefits that are expected to result from the Proposed Separation. Following the Proposed Separation, the Seed and Crop Protection businesses will bear the full costs and responsibilities of operating a standalone public company and these dis-synergies may exceed expectations. Moreover, the Seed and Crop Protection businesses will each be smaller, less diversified enterprises, and as a result, the separated companies may be more exposed to industry-specific risks and changing market conditions than Corteva is today. The Proposed Separation also may prompt existing stockholders to divest holdings that no longer align with their investment objectives, potentially affecting the trading value of each company’s common stock following the Proposed Separation. Further, there can be no assurance that the combined value of the common stock of the two companies will be equal to or greater than the value of Corteva’s common stock had the Proposed Separation not occurred.

In addition, while it is expected that Corteva will receive a tax opinion from external counsel to the effect that, among other things, the Proposed Separation will qualify as a tax-free spin-off for U.S. federal income tax purposes, any such opinion is not binding on the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Accordingly, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service may reach conclusions with respect to the Proposed Separation that are different from the conclusion reached in such opinion. If the Proposed Separation is ultimately determined to be taxable, either Corteva or Corteva’s stockholders could incur significant income tax liabilities.

Table Of Contents

Language change vs prior 10-K

MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase

Negative rising

negative+5
litigation+3
unfavorable+2
bad+2
demolition+1

Positive rising

gains+3
effective+2
gain+2
improvements+1
improved+1

MD&A (Item 7)

18,688 words

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains certain estimates and forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and may be identified by their use of words like “plans,” “expects,” “will,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “outlook,” or other words of similar meaning. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including statements about Corteva’s financial results or outlook; strategy for growth; product development; regulatory approvals; market position; capital allocation strategy; liquidity; sustainability targets and initiatives; the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, restructuring actions, or cost savings initiatives; the anticipated benefits, impacts, and timing of the Proposed Separation; and the outcome of contingencies, such as litigation and environmental matters, are forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements and other estimates are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events which may not be accurate or realized. Forward-looking statements and other estimates also involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the company's control. While the list of factors presented below is considered representative, no such list should be considered to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. Unlisted factors may present significant additional obstacles to the realization of forward-looking statements. Consequences of material differences in results as compared with those anticipated in the forward-looking statements could include, among other things, business disruption, operational problems, financial loss, legal liability to third parties and similar risks, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the company's business, results of operations and financial condition. Some of the important factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in any such forward-looking statements include: (i) failure to obtain or maintain the necessary regulatory approvals for some of the company's products; (ii) failure to successfully develop and commercialize the company's pipeline; (iii) effect of the degree of public understanding and acceptance or perceived public acceptance of the company's biotechnology and other agricultural products; (iv) failure to comply with competition and antitrust laws; (v) effect of changes in agricultural and related policies of governments and international organizations; (vi) costs of complying with evolving regulatory requirements and the effect of actual or alleged violations of environmental laws or permit requirements; (vii) effect of climate change and unpredictable seasonal and weather factors; (viii) effect of competition in the company's industry; (ix) competitor’s establishment of an intermediary platform for distribution of the company's products; (x) risks related to recent funding and staff reductions at U.S. government agencies; (xi) risk related to geopolitical and military conflict; (xii) effect of volatility in the company's input costs; (xiii) risks related to the company's global operations; (xiv) effect of industrial espionage and other disruptions to the company's supply chain, information technology or network systems; (xv) risks related to environmental litigation and the indemnification obligations of legacy EIDP liabilities in connection with the Corteva Separation; (xvi) impact of the company's dependence on third parties with respect to certain of its raw materials or licenses and commercialization; (xvii) failure of the company's customers to pay their debts to the company, including customer financing programs; (xviii) failure to effectively manage acquisitions, divestitures, alliances, restructurings, cost savings initiatives, and other portfolio actions; (xix) failure to raise capital through the capital markets or short-term borrowings on terms acceptable to the company; (xx) increases in pension and other post-employment benefit plan funding obligations; (xxi) risks related to pandemics or epidemics; (xxii) capital markets sentiment towards sustainability matters; (xxiii) the company's intellectual property rights or defense against intellectual property claims asserted by others; (xxiv) effect of counterfeit products; (xxv) the company's dependence on intellectual property cross-license agreements; and (xxvi) risks related to Corteva's Separation from DowDuPont; and (xxvii) risks related to Corteva’s Proposed Separation, including, but not limited to, whether the objectives of the proposed separation will be achieved; the terms, structure, benefits and costs of any action or transaction resulting from the proposed separation; the timing of any such separation or related action and whether any such separation will be consummated at all; the risk that the proposed separation could divert the attention and time of the company’s management; the risk of any unexpected costs or expenses resulting from the proposed separation process or separation itself; and the risk of any litigation as a result of, or relating to, the Proposed Separation.

Additionally, there may be other risks and uncertainties that Corteva is unable to currently identify or that Corteva does not currently expect to have a material impact on its business. Where, in any forward-looking statement or other estimate, an expectation or belief as to future results or events is expressed, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of Corteva's management and expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. Corteva disclaims and does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by applicable law. A detailed discussion of

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

some of the significant risks and uncertainties which may cause results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in the section titled “Risk Factors” (Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K).

Overview

The following is a summary of results from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2025:

• The company reported net sales of $17,401 million, an increase of 3 percent versus the year ended December 31, 2024, reflecting a 1 percent increase in price and a 3 percent increase in volume, partially offset by a 1 percent unfavorable currency impact.

• Cost of goods sold ("COGS") totaled $9,172 million, down from $9,529 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily driven by ongoing cost and productivity actions, raw material deflation, lower commodity prices, and a reduction in net royalty expense, with a partial offset from higher volumes.

• Restructuring and asset related charges - net were $146 million, a decrease from $288 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The charges for the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily relate to asset related charges, severance and related benefit costs, contract termination charges, and decommissioning and demolition costs associated with the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program.

• Income from continuing operations after income taxes was $1,204 million, as compared to $863 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.

• Operating EBITDA was $3,848 million, up from $3,376 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily driven by volume growth, favorable Seed price and product mix, ongoing cost and productivity benefits and net royalty improvement, partially offset by continued investment in research and development, additional commissions and compensation expense, competitive Crop Protection pricing and unfavorable currency effects . See page 44 for further discussion of the company's Non-GAAP financial measures.

In addition to the financial highlights above, the following events occurred during the year ended December 31, 2025:

• The company returned approximately $1.5 billion to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2025 under its previously announced share repurchase programs and through common stock dividends.

• On July 29, 2025, the company's Board of Directors approved an approximately 6 percent increase in the quarterly common stock dividend from $0.17 per share to $0.18 per share.

Priorities

The company believes the following priorities will continue to create significant value for its customers and shareholders over the mid-term:

• Focus on Execution – the company will focus on a value creation framework including: (1) the delivery of top tier technology in our prioritized core markets and crops with a continued focus on differentiation and yield advantage; (2) a continued move towards market share gains in Seed trait out-licensing market; (3) operational improvements focused on driving cost and productivity benefits; and (4) completing the intended separation into two industry-leading public companies in the second half of 2026.

• Deliver Innovation to Farmers, Faster – Corteva aims to deliver greater value and productivity to growers through more differentiated and sustainably advantaged solutions, which in turn promise to strengthen global food security and help farmers address the impacts of climate change.

• Deploy capital with discipline – the company aims to prioritize investment, organic and inorganic growth, and returning cash to shareholders.

Recent Developments

On October 1, 2025, the company announced its intent to separate its Seed and Crop Protection businesses into two standalone, publicly traded companies, in a transaction that is intended to be a tax-free spin-off for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Analysis of Operations

Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program

On November 5, 2023, management of the company approved a plan to further optimize its Crop Protection network of manufacturing and external partners (the "Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program"). The plan includes the exit of the company’s production activities at its site in Pittsburg, California, as well as ceasing operations in select manufacturing lines at other locations. In October 2024, management of the company amended the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program to include updates to its previous estimates and decommissioning and demolition costs associated with the ceasing of operations, primarily at the Pittsburg, California site.

The company expects to record aggregate pre-tax restructuring and asset related charges of $650 million to $700 million, comprised of $85 million to $105 million of severance and related benefit costs, $320 million to $340 million of asset-related and impairment charges, and $245 million to $255 million of costs related to exiting the company's production activities and ceasing operations (inclusive of decommissioning and demolition costs and contract terminations). Decommissioning and demolition costs are expensed on an as-incurred basis. Reductions in workforce are subject to local regulatory requirements. Through the year ended December 31, 2025, the company recorded net pre-tax restructuring and asset related charges of $611 million inception-to-date under the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program, consisting of $102 million of severance and related benefit costs, $340 million of asset-related and impairment charges, $70 million of decommissioning and demolition costs and $99 million of costs related to contract terminations.

Cash payments related to these charges are anticipated to be $330 million to $360 million, which primarily relate to the payment of severance and related benefits, decommissioning and demolition costs and contract terminations. Through December 31, 2025, the company paid $177 million associated with these charges. The restructuring actions associated with these charges are expected to be substantially complete by the end of 2026.

The Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program is expected to contribute to the company’s ongoing cost and productivity improvement efforts through achieving an estimated $180 million of savings on a run rate basis by 2027. Future actions by the company or changes in circumstances from current assumptions, including any site disposition gains or losses, may cause actual results and future cash payments to differ. See Note 5 - Restructuring and Asset Related Charges - Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Share Buyback Plan

On November 19, 2024, Corteva, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors authorized a $3 billion share repurchase program to purchase Corteva, Inc.'s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, without an expiration date ("2024 Share Buyback Plan"). The timing, price and volume of purchases will be based on market conditions, relevant securities laws and other factors. In connection with the 2024 Share Buyback Plan, the company repurchased and retired 8,318,000 shares in the open market for a cost (excluding excise taxes) of $571 million during the year ended December 31, 2025.

On September 13, 2022, Corteva, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors authorized a $2 billion share repurchase program to purchase Corteva, Inc.'s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, without an expiration date ("2022 Share Buyback Plan"). The company completed the 2022 Share Buyback Plan during the second quarter of 2025 and repurchased and retired 7,815,000, 17,909,000 and 10,026,000 shares in the open market and through privately-negotiated transactions for a cost (excluding excise taxes) of $500 million, $1 billion and $500 million during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

On August 5, 2021, Corteva, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors authorized a $1.5 billion share repurchase program to purchase Corteva, Inc.'s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, without an expiration date ("2021 Share Buyback Plan"). The company completed the 2021 Share Buyback Plan during the first quarter of 2023 and repurchased and retired 4,098,000, 17,425,000 and 5,572,000 shares in the open market for a total cost of $250 million, $1 billion and $250 million during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Results of Operations

Net Sales

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Net sales

2025 versus 2024

Net sales were $17,401 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $16,908 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily driven by a 1 percent increase in price and a 3 percent increase in volume, partially offset by a 1 percent unfavorable currency impact. Improvements in Crop Protection volume were driven by demand for new products and biologicals, while Seed experienced volume growth primarily due to increased corn area in North America and Brazil. Pricing improvements were driven by Seed, led by North America and EMEA with continued execution on the company's price for value strategy, partially offset by a decline in Crop Protection pricing primarily due to the market dynamics in Latin America. The unfavorable currency impacts were led by the Canadian Dollar and Turkish Lira.

2024 versus 2023

Net sales were $16,908 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $17,226 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by a 1 percent decrease in price and a 3 percent unfavorable currency impact, partially offset by a 2 percent increase in volume. Lower pricing reflects the continued competitive price environment in Crop Protection, particularly in Latin America, partially offset by improvement in Seed pricing driven by strong demand for top technology offerings and operational execution globally. Crop Protection volume growth was the result of demand recovery in Latin America and growth of new products. Seed volume growth was driven by the expected recovery in Brazil Safrinha corn and North America soybeans and cotton, which more than offset corn area reduction and challenges in other geographies. The unfavorable currency impacts were led by the Brazilian Real and Turkish Lira.

For the Year Ended December 31,

($ In millions)

Net Sales

% of Net Sales

Net Sales

% of Net Sales

Net Sales

% of Net Sales

Worldwide

North America

EMEA

Latin America

Asia Pacific

Year Ended December 31, 2025 vs. 2024

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

North America

EMEA

Latin America

Asia Pacific

Total

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Year Ended December 31, 2024 vs. 2023

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

North America

EMEA

Latin America

Asia Pacific

Total

Cost of Goods Sold ("COGS")

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Cost of goods sold

2025 versus 2024

COGS was $9,172 million (53 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $9,529 million (56 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily driven by ongoing cost and productivity actions, a reduction in net royalty expense, lower commodity prices and raw material deflation, with a partial offset from higher volumes.

2024 versus 2023

COGS was $9,529 million (56 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $9,920 million (58 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by favorable currency effects, ongoing cost and productivity actions, Crop Protection raw material deflation, and a reduction in net royalty expense, partially offset by an increase in volumes and higher commodity costs.

Research and Development Expense ("R&D")

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Research and development expense

2025 versus 2024

R&D expense was $1,474 million (8 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2025 and $1,402 million (8 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in R&D expense is in support of the company's long-term growth plans and was primarily driven by higher employee compensation costs due to variable compensation increases, as well as higher contractor, consulting and field, lab and facilities costs.

2024 versus 2023

R&D expense was $1,402 million (8 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $1,337 million (8 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in R&D expense is in support of the company’s long-term growth plans and was primarily driven by an increase in salaries due to higher headcount, variable compensation and contractor costs, partially offset by favorable currency impacts.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

2025 versus 2024

SG&A expenses were $3,492 million (20 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2025 and $3,196 million (19 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in commissions, variable compensation, bad debt expense, legal support fees and personnel and information technology costs, partially offset by favorable currency impacts.

2024 versus 2023

SG&A expenses were $3,196 million (19 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $3,176 million (18 percent of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in salaries and variable compensation, commissions, bad debt expense, legal support fees and portfolio impact from the Stoller and Symborg acquisitions, partially offset by favorable currency impacts and lower consulting and professional fees and marketing costs.

Amortization of Intangibles

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Amortization of intangibles

2025 versus 2024

Intangible asset amortization was $644 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and $685 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily driven by lower amortization on certain intangible assets arising from the Merger that became fully amortized in 2024.

2024 versus 2023

Intangible asset amortization was $685 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $683 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily driven by the impact of amortization relating to the intangible assets recognized in connection with the Stoller and Symborg acquisitions, which were completed on March 1, 2023, partially offset by lower amortization on certain intangible assets arising from the Merger that became fully amortized in 2024.

See Note 12 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Restructuring and Asset Related Charges - Net

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Restructuring and asset related charges - net

Restructuring and asset related charges - net were $146 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was primarily comprised of a $150 million charge associated with the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program consisting of $11 million of severance and related benefit costs, $13 million of asset related charges, $60 million in decommissioning and demolition costs and $66 million of contract termination charges.

Restructuring and asset related charges - net were $288 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, which was primarily comprised of a $232 million charge associated with the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program and a $55 million net charge from non-cash accelerated prepaid royalty amortization expense related to the Roundup Ready 2 Yield® and Roundup Ready 2 Xtend® herbicide tolerance traits. The $232 million charge associated with the Crop Protection Operations

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Strategy Restructuring Program was primarily comprised of $91 million of severance and related benefit costs, $101 million of asset related charges, $10 million in decommissioning and demolition costs and $30 million of contract termination charges.

Restructuring and asset related charges - net were $336 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was primarily comprised of a $217 million charge related to the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program, a $72 million net charge related to non-cash accelerated prepaid royalty amortization expense related to the Roundup Ready 2 Yield® and Roundup Ready 2 Xtend® herbicide tolerance traits and $42 million related to severance and related benefit costs, asset related charges and contract termination charges (including early lease terminations) associated with the 2022 Restructuring Actions. The $217 million net charge associated with the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program was primarily comprised of $214 million of asset related charges, which includes non-cash impairment charges of $152 million consisting of $92 million and $60 million related to operating lease assets and property, plant and equipment, respectively, associated with the exit of the company’s production activities at its site in Pittsburg, California.

See Note 5 - Restructuring and Asset Related Charges - Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Other Income (Expense) - Net

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Other income (expense) - net

2025 versus 2024

Other income (expense) - net was $(570) million and $(300) million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Higher other expense was primarily driven by the resolution of litigation matters and the one-time receipt of an indemnification payment negotiated with the former Stoller owners during the first quarter of 2024. These increases were partially offset by the receipt of insurance proceeds, the absence of charges related to estimated settlement reserves, a more favorable net exchange loss, a favorable tax indemnification adjustment and lower non-operating pension and OPEB costs.

2024 versus 2023

Other income (expense) - net was $(300) million and $(448) million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Lower other expense was primarily driven by decreases in net exchange losses and charges related to estimated settlement reserves, as well as the receipt of insurance proceeds and an indemnification payment negotiated with the former Stoller owners, partially offset by a decrease in interest income.

See Note 6 - Supplementary Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Interest Expense

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Interest expense

2025 versus 2024

Interest expense was $180 million and $233 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The change was primarily driven by lower short-term borrowings and lower interest rates.

2024 versus 2023

Interest expense was $233 million and $233 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The impact of lower short-term borrowings and lower interest rates was offset by higher interest related to the senior notes issued in 2023 and higher foreign currency borrowings.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes on Continuing Operations

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations

Effective tax rate

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the company’s effective tax rate of 28.7 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $1,688 million was unfavorably impacted by a $132 million charge on the establishment of a valuation allowance recorded against the net deferred tax asset position of a legal entity in Brazil, unfavorable geographic mix of earnings, a $27 million charge associated with repatriation of cash held outside of the U.S. primarily from current year earnings, and the unfavorable tax impact of certain net exchange losses recognized on the re-measurement of the net monetary asset positions. These items were partially offset by a $(55) million deferred tax benefit associated with a change in a legal entity’s U.S. tax characterization, a $(47) million benefit related to U.S. tax credits for increasing research activities, a $(29) million benefit related to a capital loss (net of valuation allowance), as well as net tax benefits associated with changes in accruals for certain prior year tax positions.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the company’s effective tax rate of 32.3 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $1,275 million was unfavorably impacted by a $120 million charge on the establishment of a valuation allowance recorded against the net deferred tax asset position of a legal entity in Brazil, unfavorable geographic mix of earnings, a $22 million charge associated with repatriation of cash held outside of the U.S. primarily from current year earnings, and the unfavorable tax impact of certain net exchange losses recognized on the re-measurement of the net monetary asset positions. These items were partially offset by a $(59) million benefit related to U.S. tax credits for increasing research activities and $(32) million in net tax benefits associated with changes to deferred taxes and accruals for certain prior year tax positions.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the company’s effective tax rate of 13.9 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $1,093 million was favorably impacted by a $(65) million benefit related to U.S. tax credits for increasing research activities, changes to deferred taxes and a tax currency change for legal entities within Switzerland in the amount of $(62) million and $(24) million, respectively, as well as favorable geographic mix of earnings. These items were partially offset by the unfavorable tax impact of certain net exchange losses recognized on the re-measurement of the net monetary asset positions, which were not deductible in their local jurisdictions, a $46 million charge associated with intellectual property realignment, and a $32 million charge associated with repatriation of cash held outside of the U.S. primarily from current year earnings.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations After Income Taxes

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations after income taxes

Income (loss) from discontinued operations after income taxes was $(99) million for the year ended December 31, 2025. The after-tax charge was driven by charges recognized relating to the MOU with Chemours and DuPont, including a charge associated with the NJ Statewide Settlement as well as PFAS environmental remediation activities primarily at Chemours' Fayetteville Works facility, along with other environmental matters.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations after income taxes was $56 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The after-tax benefit was driven by charges pursuant to the MOU with Chemours and DuPont relating to PFAS remediation activities primarily at Chemours' Fayetteville Works facility and litigation activity, which were more than offset by a favorable adjustment of certain prior year tax positions for previously divested businesses, the derecognition of an indemnification liability associated with the Water District Settlement Fund contribution, and insurance proceeds related to legacy matters.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Income (loss) from discontinued operations after income taxes was $(194) million for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was primarily comprised of charges associated with the settlement of certain PFAS related legal matters that are subject to the MOU with Chemours and DuPont, including the Nationwide Water District Settlement and the State of Ohio for natural resources damage claims, and charges associated with PFAS environmental remediation activities primarily at Chemours' Fayetteville Works facility.

See Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for further discussion.

EIDP Analysis of Operations

As discussed in EIDP Note 1 - Basis of Presentation, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, EIDP is a subsidiary of Corteva, Inc. and continues to be a reporting company, subject to the requirements of the Exchange Act. The below relates to EIDP only and is presented to provide an Analysis of Operations, only for the differences between EIDP and Corteva, Inc.

Other Income (Expense) - Net

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Other income (expense) - net

2025 versus 2024

Other income (expense) - net was $(570) million and $(261) million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Higher other expense was primarily driven by the items noted on page 36, under the header “Other Income (Expense) – Net – 2025 versus 2024." See EIDP Note 2 - Related Party Transactions, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information.

2024 versus 2023

Other income (expense) - net was $(261) million and $(448) million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Lower other expense was primarily driven by the items noted on page 36, under the header “Other Income (Expense) – Net – 2024 versus 2023." In addition, EIDP earned interest income from Corteva, Inc. of $38 million under the Master In-House Banking Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2024. See EIDP Note 2 - Related Party Transactions, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information.

Interest Expense

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Interest expense

2025 versus 2024

EIDP’s interest expense was $180 million and $233 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 36, under the header “Interest Expense – 2025 versus 2024."

2024 versus 2023

EIDP’s interest expense was $233 million and $253 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 36, under the header “Interest Expense – 2024 versus 2023,” and lower average borrowings on the related party loan between EIDP and Corteva, Inc., as the loan was repaid in the fourth quarter of 2023. See Note 2 - Related Party Transactions, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes on Continuing Operations

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations

Effective tax rate

For the year ended December 31, 2025, EIDP had an effective tax rate of 28.7 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $1,688 million, driven by the items noted on page 37, under the header “Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes on Continuing Operations - 2025". See Note 3 - Income Taxes, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, EIDP had an effective tax rate of 32.0 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $1,314 million, driven by the items noted on page 37, under the header “Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes on Continuing Operations - 2024." See Note 3 - Income Taxes, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, EIDP had an effective tax rate of 13.7 percent on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $1,073 million, driven by the items noted on page 37, under the header “Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes on Continuing Operations - 2023" and a tax benefit related to the interest expense incurred on the related party loan between EIDP and Corteva, Inc. See Note 3 - Income Taxes, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 - Recent Accounting Guidance, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.

Segment Reviews

The company operates in two reportable segments: Seed and Crop Protection. The company’s Seed segment is a global leader in developing and supplying commercial seed combining superior germplasm with advanced traits to produce high yield potential for farmers around the world. The segment offers seed and trait technologies that improve resistance to weather, diseases, pests and herbicides used to manage weeds. Its digital solutions provide data driven insights that assist farmer decision-making with a view to optimize product selection and, ultimately, help maximize yield and profitability. The segment competes in a wide variety of agricultural markets. The Crop Protection segment serves the global agricultural input industry with products that protect against weeds, insects and other pests, and disease, and that improve overall crop health both above and below ground via nitrogen management and seed-applied technologies. The segment offers crop protection solutions and digital solutions that provide farmers the tools they need to improve productivity and profitability, and help keep fields free of weeds, insects and diseases. The segment is a leader in global herbicides, insecticides, nitrogen stabilizers, pasture and range management herbicides and biologicals.

Summarized below are comments on individual segment net sales and segment operating EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023. The company defines segment operating EBITDA as earnings (loss) (i.e., income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes) before interest, depreciation, amortization, corporate expenses, non-operating benefits (costs), foreign exchange gains (losses), and net unrealized gain or loss from mark-to-market activity for certain foreign currency derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, excluding the impact of significant items and separation costs. Non-operating benefits (costs) consists of non-operating pension and OPEB credits (costs), tax indemnification adjustments and environmental remediation and legal costs associated with legacy businesses and sites. Tax indemnification adjustments relate to changes in indemnification balances, as a result of the application of the terms of the Tax Matters Agreement, between Corteva and Dow and/or DuPont that are recorded by the company as pre-tax income or expense. See Note 22 - Segment Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for details related to significant pre-tax benefits (costs) excluded from segment operating EBITDA. All references to prices are based on local price unless otherwise specified.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

A reconciliation of segment operating EBITDA to income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 is included in Note 22 - Segment Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seed

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Net sales

Segment operating EBITDA

Seed

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

North America

EMEA

Latin America

Asia Pacific

Total

Seed

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

Corn

Soybeans

Other oilseeds

Other

Total

Seed

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

North America

EMEA

Latin America

Asia Pacific

Total

Seed

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

Corn

Soybeans

Other oilseeds

Other

Total

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Seed

Seed net sales were $9,898 million in 2025, up 4 percent from $9,545 million in 2024. The sales increase was driven by a 3 percent increase in price and a 2 percent increase in volume, partially offset by a 1 percent unfavorable currency impact.

Pricing gains in most regions, led by North America, demonstrate demand for top technology and the strength of the portfolio, coupled with increased out-licensing income. Volume growth was driven primarily by increased corn area and share gains in North America and Brazil, partially offset by lower soybean area in North America. The unfavorable currency impacts were led by the Turkish Lira and Canadian Dollar.

Seed operating EBITDA was $2,636 million in 2025, up 19 percent from $2,219 million in 2024. Commercial execution and market share gains in North America and Brazil, product mix, reduction of net royalty expense and ongoing cost and productivity actions more than offset increased compensation, research and development expense, bad debt expense, selling expenses and the unfavorable impact of currency. Segment operating EBITDA margin improved by approximately 340 basis points versus the prior-year period.

Seed net sales were $9,545 million in 2024, up 1 percent from $9,472 million in 2023. The sales increase was driven by a 3 percent increase in price and 1 percent increase in volume partially offset by a 2 percent unfavorable currency impact and a 1 percent unfavorable portfolio impact.

The increase in price was driven by improvement in many products in all regions, excluding Latin America. Global corn and soybean pricing were up 2 percent. Pricing actions more than offset currency impacts in EMEA. Volume growth was driven primarily by the expected recovery in Brazil Safrinha corn and growth in North America soybeans and cotton, partially offset by reduced planted areas in EMEA, Asia Pacific and corn in Argentina. Unfavorable currency impacts were led by the Brazilian Real and Turkish Lira.

Seed operating EBITDA was $2,219 million in 2024, up 5 percent from $2,117 million in 2023. Price execution and market share gains in North America, reduction of net royalty expense and ongoing cost and productivity actions more than offset the investment in R&D, higher commodity costs, and the unfavorable impact of currency. Segment operating EBITDA margin improved by approximately 90 basis points versus the prior-year period.

Crop Protection

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Net sales

Segment operating EBITDA

Crop Protection

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

North America

EMEA

Latin America

Asia Pacific

Total

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Crop Protection

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

Herbicides

Insecticides

Fungicides

Biologicals

Other

Total

Crop Protection

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

North America

EMEA

Latin America

Asia Pacific

Total

Crop Protection

Percent Change Due To:

Net Sales Change

Price &

Portfolio /

($ In millions)

Product Mix

Volume

Currency

Other

Herbicides

Insecticides

Fungicides

Biologicals

Other

Total

Crop Protection

Crop Protection net sales were $7,503 million in 2025, up 2 percent from $7,363 million in 2024. The sales increase was driven by a 5 percent increase in volume, partially offset by a 2 percent decrease in price and a 1 percent unfavorable impact from currency.

Volume growth was driven by demand for new products, herbicides and biologicals, while price declined primarily due to market dynamics in Latin America, partially offset by North America price increases. The unfavorable currency impacts were led by the Turkish Lira and Brazilian Real.

Segment operating EBITDA was $1,350 million in 2025, up 6 percent from $1,272 million from 2024. Raw material deflation, productivity savings and volume growth more than offset the unfavorable impact from currency, price pressure and higher compensation and bad debt expense. Segment operating EBITDA margin improved by approximately 70 basis points versus the prior-year period.

Crop Protection net sales were $7,363 million in 2024, down 5 percent from $7,754 million in 2023. The sales decrease was driven by a 5 percent decrease in price and a 3 percent unfavorable impact from currency, partially offset by a 3 percent increase in volume.

The price decline was primarily due to market dynamics in Latin America. Unfavorable currency impacts were led by the Brazilian Real and Turkish Lira. The increase in volumes was driven by growth in Latin America on demand for new products

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

and spinosyns, partially offset by unfavorable weather impacts in EMEA as well as just-in-time purchasing behavior in North America.

Segment operating EBITDA was $1,272 million in 2024, down 7 percent from $1,374 million in 2023. Pricing pressure and the unfavorable impact of currency more than offset productivity savings, raw material deflation, and volume growth. Segment operating EBITDA margin contracted by approximately 45 basis points versus the prior-year period.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The company presents certain financial measures that do not conform to U.S. GAAP and are considered non-GAAP measures. These measures include operating EBITDA and operating earnings (loss) per share. Management uses these measures internally for planning and forecasting, including allocating resources and evaluating incentive compensation. Management believes that these non-GAAP measures best reflect the ongoing performance of the company during the periods presented and provide more relevant and meaningful information to investors as they provide insight with respect to ongoing operating results of the company and a more useful comparison of year-over-year results. These non-GAAP measures supplement the company's U.S. GAAP disclosures and should not be viewed as an alternative to U.S. GAAP measures of performance. Furthermore, such non-GAAP measures may not be consistent with similar measures provided or used by other companies. Reconciliations for these non-GAAP measures to U.S. GAAP are provided below.

Operating EBITDA is defined as earnings (loss) (i.e., income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes) before interest, depreciation, amortization, non-operating benefits (costs), foreign exchange gains (losses), and net unrealized gain or loss from mark-to-market activity for certain foreign currency derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, excluding the impact of significant items and separation costs. Non-operating benefits (costs) consists of non-operating pension and OPEB credits (costs), tax indemnification adjustments and environmental remediation and legal costs associated with legacy businesses and sites. Tax indemnification adjustments relate to changes in indemnification balances, as a result of the application of the terms of the Tax Matters Agreement, between Corteva and Dow and/or DuPont that are recorded by the company as pre-tax income or expense. Operating earnings (loss) per share is defined as "earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations - diluted" excluding the after-tax impact of significant items, the after-tax impact of separation costs, the after-tax impact of non-operating benefits (costs), the after-tax impact of amortization expense associated with intangible assets existing as of the Corteva Separation from DowDuPont, and the after-tax impact of net unrealized gain or loss from mark-to-market activity for certain foreign currency derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting. Although amortization of the company's intangible assets is excluded from these non-GAAP measures, management believes it is important for investors to understand that such intangible assets contribute to revenue generation. Amortization of intangible assets that relate to past acquisitions will recur in future periods until such intangible assets have been fully amortized. Any future acquisitions may result in amortization of additional intangible assets. Net unrealized gain or loss from mark-to-market activity for certain foreign currency derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting represents the non-cash net gain (loss) from changes in fair value of certain undesignated foreign currency derivative contracts. Upon settlement, which is within the same calendar year of execution of the contract, the realized gain (loss) from the changes in fair value of the non-qualified foreign currency derivative contracts will be reported in the relevant non-GAAP financial measures, allowing quarterly results to reflect the economic effects of the foreign currency derivative contracts without the resulting unrealized mark to fair value volatility.

The company also uses Free Cash Flow as a non-GAAP measure to evaluate and discuss its liquidity position and ability to generate cash. Free Cash Flow is defined as cash provided by (used for) operating activities – continuing operations, less capital expenditures. Management believes that Free Cash Flow provides investors with meaningful information regarding the company’s ongoing ability to generate cash through core operations, and the company’s ability to service its indebtedness, pay dividends (when declared), make share repurchases, and meet its ongoing cash needs for its operations.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Reconciliation of Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations after Income Taxes to Operating EBITDA

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes (GAAP)

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes (GAAP)

Depreciation and amortization

Interest income

Interest expense

Exchange (gains) losses - net

Non-operating (benefits) costs - net

Mark-to-market (gains) losses on certain foreign currency contracts not designated as hedges

Significant items (benefit) charge

Separation costs

Operating EBITDA (Non-GAAP)

Significant Items

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Restructuring and asset related charges - net

Bayer resolution 1

Estimated settlement expense 2

Inventory write-offs 3

Spare parts write-off 4

(Gain) loss on sale of business, assets and equity investments 3,4

Seed sale associated with Russia Exit 3,5

Acquisition-related costs 6

Employee Retention Credit

AltEn facility remediation charges 7

Insurance proceeds 8

Total pre-tax significant items (benefit) charge

Total tax (benefit) provision impact of significant items 9

Tax only significant item (benefit) charge 10

Total significant items (benefit) charge, after tax

1. Consists of a charge relating to the resolution of litigation with Bayer. See Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

2. Consists of estimated Lorsban® related charges.

3. Incremental (gains) losses associated with activities related to the 2022 Restructuring Actions. Within (gain) loss on sale of business, assets and equity investments, such benefits are $(14) million, $(7) million and $(14) million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

4. Incremental (gains) losses associated with activities related to the Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program. Within (gain) loss on sale of business, assets and equity investments, a $(23) million benefit was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2025.

5. Includes a benefit of $(18) million for the year ended December 31, 2023, relating to the sale of seeds already under production in Russia when the decision to exit the country was made and that the company was contractually required to purchase. It consists of $71 million of net sales and $53 million of cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2023.

6. Relates to acquisition-related costs, including transaction and third-party integration costs associated with the completed acquisitions of Stoller and Symborg as well as the recognition of the inventory fair value step-up.

7. Relates to a charge to increase the remediation accrual at the AltEn facility relating to Corteva's estimated voluntary contribution to the solid waste and wastewater remedial action plans. See Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

8. Includes proceeds received related to prior significant items.

9. Unless specifically addressed above, the income tax effect on significant items was calculated based upon the enacted tax laws and statutory income tax rates applicable in the tax jurisdiction(s) of the underlying non-GAAP adjustment.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

10. The tax only significant item for the year ended December 31, 2025 relates to the establishment of a valuation allowance recorded against the net deferred tax asset position of a legal entity in Brazil (Crop Protection business) in the amount of $132 million, as well as a deferred tax benefit associated with a change in a legal entity's U.S. tax characterization in the amount of $(55) million. The tax only significant item charge for the year ended December 31, 2024 relates to the establishment of a valuation allowance recorded against the net deferred tax asset position of a legal entity in Brazil (Seed business) in the amount of $120 million, as well as a change in estimate related to intellectual property realignment. The tax only significant item benefit for the year ended December 31, 2023 relates to the impact of changes to deferred taxes and a tax currency change for legal entities within Switzerland of $(62) million and $(24) million, respectively, as well as adjustments due to intellectual property realignment of $46 million and a change in estimate related to a worthless stock deduction in the U.S.

Reconciliation of Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Attributable to Corteva and Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock from Continuing Operations - Diluted to Operating Earnings (Loss) and Operating Earnings (Loss) Per Share

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders (GAAP)

Less: Non-operating benefits (costs), after tax

Less: Amortization of intangibles (existing as of Corteva Separation), after tax

Less: Mark-to-market gains (losses) on certain foreign currency contracts not designated as hedges, after tax

Less: Significant items benefit (charge), after tax

Less: Separation costs, after tax

Operating Earnings (Loss) (Non-GAAP)

For the Year Ended December 31,

(Dollars per Share)

Earnings (loss) per share of common stock from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders - diluted (GAAP)

Less: Non-operating benefits (costs), after tax

Less: Amortization of intangibles (existing as of Corteva Separation), after tax

Less: Mark-to-market gains (losses) on certain foreign currency contracts not designated as hedges, after tax

Less: Significant items benefit (charge), after tax

Less: Separation costs, after tax

Operating Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Non-GAAP)

Diluted Shares Outstanding (In millions)

Reconciliation of Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities – Continuing Operations to Free Cash Flow

(In millions)

For the Year Ended December 31,

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities - continuing operations

Less: Capital expenditures

Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Liquidity & Capital Resources

The company continually reviews its sources of liquidity and debt portfolio and occasionally may make adjustments to one or both to ensure adequate liquidity.

(In millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities

Total debt

The company's credit ratings impact its access to the debt capital markets and cost of capital. The company remains committed to a strong financial position and strong investment-grade rating. The company's long-term and short-term credit ratings assigned to EIDP are as follows:

Long-term

Short-term

Outlook

Standard & Poor's 1

Watch Negative

Moody’s Investors Service

Baa1

Watch Negative

Fitch Ratings 1

Watch Negative

1. In addition, Corteva, Inc. has been assigned a long-term issuer credit rating of A- with Watch Negative outlook by Standard & Poor's and an Issuer Default Rating of A with Watch Negative outlook by Fitch Ratings.

The company believes its cash on hand, as well as its ability to generate cash from operations and access to capital markets and commercial paper markets, will be adequate to meet anticipated cash requirements to fund its operations, including seasonal working capital, capital spending, dividend payments, share repurchases, pension obligations and litigation costs, net of recoveries. Corteva's strong financial position, liquidity and credit ratings will provide access as needed to capital markets and commercial paper markets to fund seasonal working capital needs. The company's liquidity needs can be met through a variety of sources, including cash provided by operating activities, commercial paper, syndicated credit lines, bilateral credit lines, long-term debt markets, bank financing and committed receivable repurchase facilities. Corteva considers the borrowing costs and lending terms when selecting the source to fund its operations and working capital needs.

The company had access to approximately $6.2 billion and $6.3 billion at December 31, 2025 and 2024 in committed and uncommitted unused credit lines, which includes the uncommitted revolving credit lines relating to the Foreign Currency Loans. These facilities provide support to meet the company’s short-term liquidity needs and for general corporate purposes, which may include funding of discretionary and non-discretionary contributions to certain benefit plans, severance payments, repayment and refinancing of debt, working capital, capital expenditures, repurchases and redemptions of securities, funding of acquisitions and funding Corteva's costs and expenses, including the settlement of litigation. These facilities are provided to the company by highly rated and well capitalized global financial institutions.

In May 2025, the company issued $500 million of 5.125 percent Senior Notes due in May 2032 (the “May 2025 Debt Offering”). The proceeds were used to repay the $500 million senior notes that matured in July 2025.

In May 2023, the company issued $600 million of 4.50 percent Senior Notes due in 2026 and $600 million of 4.80 percent Senior Notes due in 2033 (the “May 2023 Debt Offering”).

In January 2023, the company amended and restated its May 2022 364-day revolving credit agreement (the “364-Day Revolving Credit Facility”) increasing the facility amount to $1 billion and extending the expiration date to January 2024. Borrowings under the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility have an interest rate equal to Adjusted Term SOFR, which is Term SOFR plus 0.10 percent, plus the applicable margin. The 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility includes a provision under which the company may convert any advances outstanding prior to the maturity date into term loans having a maturity date up to one year later. In February 2023, the company drew down $1 billion under the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility, which was used for general corporate purposes, including funding seasonal working capital needs, capital spending, dividend payments, share repurchases and to partially fund the Stoller and Symborg acquisitions. In May 2023, the company repaid the $1 billion loan using the proceeds from the May 2023 Debt Offering and subsequently, in July 2023 reduced the available credit from $1 billion to $500 million. In February 2024, the company amended and restated the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility, increasing the facility amount to $1 billion and extending the expiration date to February 2025. In February 2025, the company amended and restated the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility, decreasing the facility amount from $1 billion to $750 million and extending the expiration date to February 2026. In February 2026, the company amended and restated the 364-Day Revolving

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Credit Facility, increasing the facility amount from $750 million to $1.25 billion, extended the expiration date to February 2027 and amended the interest rate to Term SOFR plus the applicable margin. The 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default that are typical for companies with similar credit ratings. Additionally, the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility contains a financial covenant requiring that the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization for Corteva and its consolidated subsidiaries not exceed 0.60. At December 31, 2025, the company was in compliance with these covenants.

In May 2022, the company entered into a $3 billion, five year revolving credit facility and a $2 billion, three-year revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facilities”) expiring in May 2027 and May 2025, respectively. In June 2024, the Revolving Credit Facilities were refinanced for purposes of extending the maturity dates for the five-year and three-year revolving credit facilities to June 2029 and June 2027, respectively, and lowering the facility amount of the five-year revolving credit facility to $2.85 billion and the three-year revolving credit facility to $1.9 billion. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities will have an interest rate equal to Adjusted Term SOFR, which is Term SOFR plus 0.10 percent, plus the applicable margin. The Revolving Credit Facilities may serve as a substitute to the company's commercial paper program, and can be used, from time to time, for general corporate purposes including, but not limited to, the funding of seasonal working capital needs. The Revolving Credit Facilities contain customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default that are typical for companies with similar credit ratings. Additionally, the Revolving Credit Facilities contain a financial covenant requiring that the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization for Corteva and its consolidated subsidiaries not exceed 0.60. At December 31, 2025, the company was in compliance with these covenants.

The company enters into short-term and long-term foreign currency loans from time-to-time by accessing uncommitted revolving credit lines to fund working capital needs of foreign subsidiaries in the normal course of business (“Foreign Currency Loans”). Interest rates are variable and determined at the time of borrowing. Total unused bank credit lines on the Foreign Currency Loans at December 31, 2025 was approximately $86 million. The company’s long-term Foreign Currency Loans are maturing in March 2026.

The company's indenture covenants include customary limitations on liens, sale and leaseback transactions, and mergers and consolidations affecting manufacturing plants, mineral producing properties or research facilities located in the U.S. and the consolidated subsidiaries owning such plants, properties and facilities subject to certain limitations. The outstanding long-term debt also contains customary default provisions.

In September 2023 and in accordance with the Nationwide Water District Settlement, Chemours, DuPont and Corteva established a settlement fund (the “Water District Settlement Fund”) and collectively contributed $1.185 billion, with Chemours contributing 50 percent, and DuPont and Corteva collectively contributing the remaining 50 percent pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement. The settling companies utilized the balance in the MOU Escrow Account, along with amounts previously expected to be contributed to the MOU Escrow Account in 2023, among other sources, to make their respective contributions to the Water District Settlement Fund. In April 2024, the settlement was deemed final resulting in the release of the previously restricted cash in the Water District Settlement Fund and derecognition of the associated liability. See Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

The company has meaningful seasonal working capital needs based in part on providing financing to its customers. Working capital is funded through multiple methods including cash, commercial paper, the Revolving Credit Facilities, the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility, and factoring.

In May 2023, in line with seasonal working capital requirements, the company entered into a committed receivable repurchase facility of up to $500 million (the "2023 Repurchase Facility") which expired in December 2023. Under the 2023 Repurchase Facility, Corteva sold a portfolio of available and eligible outstanding customer notes receivables to participating institutions and simultaneously agreed to repurchase at a future date.

The company has factoring agreements with third-party financial institutions to sell its trade receivables under both recourse and non-recourse agreements in exchange for cash proceeds in an effort to reduce its receivables risk. For arrangements that include an element of recourse, the company provides a guarantee of the trade receivables in the event of customer default. See Note 9 - Accounts and Notes Receivable - Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

The company also organizes agreements with third-party financial institutions that directly provide financing for select customers of its seed and crop protection products in each region. Terms of the third-party loans are less than a year and programs are renewed on an annual basis. In some cases, the company guarantees a portion of the extension of such credit to such customers. See Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for more information on the company’s guarantees.

The company's cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are $4.5 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, of which $2.1 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, was held by subsidiaries in foreign countries, including United States territories. Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are concentrated subject to local restrictions with highly rated and well capitalized global financial institutions. The underlying credit worthiness and exposures to these counterparties are monitored on a regular basis in line with the company’s overall risk management procedures. Upon actual repatriation, such earnings could be subject to withholding taxes, foreign and/or U.S. state income taxes, and taxes resulting from the impact of foreign currency movements. The cash held by foreign subsidiaries is generally used to finance the subsidiaries' operational activities and future foreign investments. At December 31, 2025, management believed that sufficient liquidity is available in the United States with global operating cash flows, borrowing capacity from existing committed credit facilities, and access to capital markets and commercial paper markets.

Summary of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities – continuing operations

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities – continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $3,457 million compared to $2,296 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily driven by higher net income, favorable changes in customer prepayments and collections, and favorable changes in accounts payable due to lower payments to third-party growers resulting from lower commodity costs and planted area, partially offset by an unfavorable change in inventories due to a lower comparable decline in volumes and the sale of lower-cost inventory in the current year.

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities – continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $2,296 million compared to $1,809 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change was primarily driven by favorable changes in working capital. The favorable changes in inventories were driven by production reductions to match demand. Within accounts payable, lower payments to third-party growers resulted from lower commodity costs and production plans, supplemented by a change in inventory purchasing patterns. Accrued and other current liabilities benefited from a decrease in soybean royalties, while noncurrent assets and liabilities benefited from derivative settlements driven by a weaker Brazilian Real currency. These movements were partially offset by unfavorable changes in receivables driven by slower collections and higher sales on credit terms.

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities – discontinued operations

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities – discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $(51) million and $(151) million, respectively. The cash outflows were primarily related to PFAS activities that are subject to the MOU with Chemours and DuPont associated with environmental remediation activities primarily at Chemours' Fayetteville Works facility. In addition, the disbursement of cash held in the Water District Settlement Fund is reflected in the year ended December 31, 2024.

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities – discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $(151) million and $(40) million, respectively. The cash outflows were primarily related to PFAS activities that are subject to the MOU with Chemours and DuPont associated with environmental remediation activities primarily at Chemours’ Fayetteville Works facility. In addition, the disbursement of the cash held in the Water District Settlement Fund is reflected in the year ended December 31, 2024. These outflows were partially offset by the receipt of insurance proceeds related to legacy matters.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Cash provided by (used for) investing activities

Cash provided by (used for) investing activities was $(543) million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $(589) million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily due to lower purchases of investments and proceeds from sales of property, partially offset by higher payments to settle net investment hedges.

Cash provided by (used for) investing activities was $(589) million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $(1,987) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change was primarily due to the acquisitions of Stoller and Symborg in 2023, partially offset by lower current year proceeds from sales and maturities of investments and higher proceeds from sales of property, businesses, and consolidated companies in 2023.

Capital expenditures totaled $591 million, $597 million, and $595 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The company expects 2026 capital expenditures to be approximately $600 million.

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities was $(1,644) million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $(1,199) million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily due to lower borrowings in 2025, and higher dividend payments and share repurchases.

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities was $(1,199) million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $(99) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change was primarily due lower required borrowings in 2024 to fund working capital needs, capital spending, dividend payments and share repurchases. In addition, there were additional borrowings in 2023 to partially fund the Stoller and Symborg acquisitions. These lower current year borrowings were offset by higher payments on debt and higher repurchases of common stock and paid dividends in 2024.

During 2025, the company's Board of Directors authorized and paid quarterly dividends on its common stock of $0.17 in the first and second quarters and $0.18 in third and fourth quarters, respectively.

On September 13, 2022, Corteva, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors authorized a $2 billion share repurchase program to purchase Corteva, Inc.'s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, without an expiration date ("2022 Share Buyback Plan"). The company completed the 2022 Share Buyback Plan during the second quarter of 2025 and repurchased and retired 7,815,000, 17,909,000 and 10,026,000 shares in the open market and through privately-negotiated transactions for a cost (excluding excise taxes) of $500 million, $1 billion and $500 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

On August 5, 2021, the company's Board of Directors authorized a $1.5 billion share repurchase program to purchase Corteva, Inc.'s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, without an expiration date (“2021 Share Buyback Plan”). The company completed the 2021 Share Buyback Plan during the first quarter of 2023 and repurchased and retired 4,098,000, 17,425,000 and 5,572,000 shares in the open market for a total cost of $250 million, $1 billion, and $250 million during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

For the first half of 2026, the company expects repurchases of approximately $500 million under the 2024 Share Buyback Plan discussed above. The total amount, timing, price and volume of purchases will be based on market conditions, relevant securities laws and other market and company specific factors.

See Note 16 - Stockholders' Equity, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information related to the share buyback plans.

EIDP Liquidity Discussion

As discussed in EIDP Note 1 - Basis of Presentation, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements, EIDP is a subsidiary of Corteva, Inc. and continues to be a reporting company, subject to the requirements of the Exchange Act. The discussion below relates to EIDP only and is presented to provide a Liquidity discussion, only for the differences between EIDP and Corteva, Inc.

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities - continuing operations

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) operating activities - continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $3,457 million compared to $2,338 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 49, under the header "Cash provided by (used for) operating activities - continuing operations."

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) operating activities - continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $2,338 million compared to $1,768 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 49, under the header "Cash provided by (used for) operating activities - continuing operations," as well as lower net interest expense related to loan activity with Corteva.

Cash provided by (used for) operating activities - discontinued operations

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) operating activities - discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $(51) million compared to $(151) million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 49, under the header "Cash provided by (used for) operating activities - discontinued operations."

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) operating activities - discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $(151) million compared to $(40) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 49, under the header "Cash provided by (used for) operating activities - discontinued operations."

Cash provided by (used for) investing activities

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $(543) million compared to $(228) million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 50, under the header "Cash provided by (used for) investing activities."

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $(228) million compared to $(2,007) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 50, under the header "Cash provided by (used for) investing activities," in addition to loan repayments by Corteva during 2024 on the related party Master In-House Banking Agreement.

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) financing activities was $(1,644) million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $(1,602) million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change was primarily driven by the items noted on page 50, under the header "Cash provided by (used for) financing activities".

EIDP’s cash provided by (used for) financing activities was $(1,602) million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $(38) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The change was primarily due to lower debt borrowings and higher debt payments and issuance of a cash dividend by EIDP to Corteva, Inc., partially offset by lower related party debt payments.

See EIDP Note 2 - Related Party Transactions, to the EIDP Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the related party loan between EIDP and Corteva, Inc.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Critical Accounting Estimates

The company's significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the company to provide the users of the financial statements with useful and reliable information about the company's operating results and financial condition.

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts, including, but not limited to, receivable and inventory valuations, impairment of tangible and intangible assets, long-term employee benefit obligations, income taxes, environmental matters and litigation. Management's estimates are based on historical experience, facts and circumstances available at the time and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable. The company reviews these matters and reflects changes in estimates as appropriate. Management believes that the following represent the more critical judgment areas in the application of the company's accounting policies which could have a material effect on the company's financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

Pension Plans and Other Post-Employment Benefits

Accounting for employee benefit plans involves assumptions and estimates. Discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets are two critical assumptions in measuring the cost and benefit obligation of the company's pension and other post-employment benefit ("OPEB") plans. Management reviews these two key assumptions when plans are re-measured. These and other assumptions are updated periodically to reflect the actual experience and expectations on a plan specific basis as appropriate. As permitted by GAAP, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated on a plan by plan basis and to the extent that such differences exceed 10 percent of the greater of the plan's benefit obligation or the applicable plan assets, the excess is amortized over the average remaining service period of active employees or the average remaining life expectancy of plan participants if all or almost all of a plan’s participants are inactive.

Most of the company's benefit obligation for pensions and OPEB plans are attributable to the U.S. benefit plans. For U.S. benefit plans, the single equivalent discount rate is developed by matching the expected cash flow of the benefit plans to a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality fixed-income instruments provided by the plans' actuaries as of the measurement date. The company measures the service and interest cost components utilizing a full yield curve approach by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. For the non-U.S. benefit plans, the company primarily utilizes prevailing long-term high quality corporate bond indices to determine the discount rate, applicable to each country, at the measurement date. The weighted average discount rates used in developing the expected 2026 net periodic pension and OPEB costs were 5.31 percent and 5.14 percent, respectively.

For the U.S. plan, the company establishes strategic asset allocation percentage targets and appropriate benchmarks for significant asset classes with the aim of achieving a prudent balance between return and risk. Where appropriate, asset-liability studies are also taken into consideration. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based upon historical real returns (net of inflation) for the asset classes covered by the investment policy, expected performance, and projections of inflation and interest rates over the long-term period during which benefits are payable to plan participants. In determining the 2025 net periodic pension cost in the U.S., an assumption of 6.00 percent for expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was used. After re-evaluating the current strategic asset allocation and market conditions, the company maintained the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption at 6.00 percent to be used in determining the 2026 net periodic pension cost in the U.S. Consistent with prior years, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets in the U.S. reflects the asset allocation of the plan and the effect of the company's active management of the plan's assets. For the non-U.S. plans, the strategic asset allocations are selected in accordance with the laws and practices for each country.

In determining annual expense for the principal U.S. pension plan, the company uses a market-related value of assets rather than the fair value. Accordingly, there may be a lag in recognition of changes in market valuation. As a result, changes in the fair value of assets are not immediately reflected in the company's calculation of net periodic pension cost. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the market-related value of assets is calculated by averaging market returns over 36 months.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

The following table shows the market-related value and fair value of plan assets for the principal U.S. pension plan:

(In billions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Market-related value of assets

Fair value of plan assets

For plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan, pension expense is determined using the fair value of assets.

The following table highlights the potential impact on the company's pre-tax earnings due to changes in certain key assumptions with respect to the company's pension and OPEB plans, based on assets and liabilities at December 31, 2025:

Pre-tax Earnings Benefit (Charge)

(Dollars in millions)

1/4 Percentage

Point

Increase

1/4 Percentage

Point

Decrease

Discount rate

Expected rate of return on plan assets

Additional information with respect to pension and OPEB expenses, liabilities and assumptions is discussed under "Long-Term Employee Benefits" beginning on page 53 and in Note 17 - Pension Plans and Other Post-Employment Benefits, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Environmental Matters

Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. At December 31, 2025, the company had accrued obligations of $562 million for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs, including $49 million for the remediation of Superfund sites. As remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site, it is difficult to develop precise estimates of future site remediation costs. The company's estimates are based on a number of factors, including the complexity of the geology, the nature and extent of contamination, the type of remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other Potentially Responsible Parties ("PRPs") at multi-party sites and the number of and financial viability of other PRPs. Therefore, considerable uncertainty exists with respect to environmental remediation and costs, and, under adverse changes in circumstances, it is reasonably possible that the ultimate cost with respect to these particular matters could range up to approximately $553 million above the accrued obligations amount. Consequently, it is reasonably possible that environmental remediation and restoration costs in excess of amounts accrued could have a material impact on the company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. For further discussion, see the "Environmental Matters" section on page 58 and Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Legal Contingencies

The company's results of operations could be affected by significant litigation adverse to the company, including product liability claims, patent infringement and antitrust claims, and claims for third-party property damage or personal injury stemming from alleged environmental torts. The company records accruals for legal matters when the information available indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Management makes adjustments to these accruals to reflect the impact and status of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of counsel and other information and events that may pertain to a particular matter. Predicting the outcome of claims and lawsuits and estimating related costs and exposure involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual costs to vary materially from estimates. In making determinations of likely outcomes of litigation matters, management considers many factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the nature of specific claims including unasserted claims, the company's experience with similar types of claims, the jurisdiction in which the matter is filed, input from outside legal counsel, the likelihood of resolving the matter through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and the matter's current status. Considerable judgment is required in determining whether to establish a litigation accrual when an adverse judgment is rendered against the company in a court proceeding. In such situations, the company will not recognize a loss if, based upon a thorough review of all relevant facts and information, management believes that it is probable that the pending judgment will be successfully overturned on appeal. A detailed discussion of significant litigation matters is contained in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Indemnification Assets

The company has entered into various agreements where the company is indemnified for certain liabilities by DuPont, Dow and Chemours. The term of this indemnification is generally indefinite and includes defense costs and expenses, as well as monetary and non-monetary settlements and judgments. In connection with the recognition of liabilities related to these matters, the company records an indemnification asset when recovery is deemed probable. In assessing the probability of recovery, the company considers the contractual rights under the separation agreements and any potential credit risk. Future events, such as potential disputes related to recovery as well as the solvency of DuPont, Dow and/or Chemours, could cause the indemnification assets to have a lower value than anticipated and recorded. The company evaluates the recovery of the indemnification assets recorded when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values may not be fully recoverable. See Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information related to indemnifications.

Income Taxes

The breadth of the company's operations and the global complexity of tax regulations require assessments of uncertainties and judgments in estimating taxes the company will ultimately pay. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions, outcomes of tax litigation and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state and international tax audits in the normal course of business. The resolution of these uncertainties may result in adjustments to the company's tax assets and tax liabilities. It is reasonably possible that changes to the company’s global unrecognized tax benefits could be significant; however, due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of completion of audits and possible outcomes, a current estimate of the range of increases or decreases that may occur within the next twelve months cannot be made.

Deferred income taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of the company's assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the need for and magnitude of appropriate valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating future taxable income, as well as successful implementation of various tax planning strategies. For example, changes in facts and circumstances that alter the probability that the company will realize deferred tax assets could result in recording a valuation allowance, thereby reducing the deferred tax asset and generating a deferred tax expense in the relevant period. In some situations, these changes could be material.

At December 31, 2025, the company had a net deferred tax asset balance of $69 million, inclusive of a valuation allowance of $887 million. Realization of deferred tax assets is expected to occur over an extended period of time. As a result, changes in tax laws, assumptions with respect to future taxable income, and tax planning strategies could result in adjustments to deferred tax assets.

See Note 7 - Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Valuation of Assets and Impairment Considerations

The assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are measured at their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, is recorded as goodwill. The determination and allocation of fair value to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based on various assumptions and valuation methodologies requiring considerable management judgment, including estimates based on historical information, current market data and future expectations. The principal assumptions utilized in the company's valuation methodologies include revenue growth rates, EBITDA margin estimates, royalty rates, and discount rates. Although the estimates are deemed reasonable by management based on information available at the dates of acquisition, those estimates are inherently uncertain.

Assessment of the potential impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, investments in nonconsolidated affiliates, and other assets is an integral part of the company's normal ongoing review of operations. Testing for potential impairment of these assets is significantly dependent on numerous assumptions and reflects management's best estimates at a particular point in time. The dynamic economic environment in which the company's segments operate, and key economic and business assumptions with respect to projected selling prices, market growth and inflation rates, can significantly affect the outcome of impairment tests. Estimates based on these assumptions may differ significantly from actual results. Changes in factors and assumptions used in assessing potential impairments can have a significant impact on the existence and

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

magnitude of impairments, as well as the time at which such impairments are recognized. In addition, the company continually reviews its portfolio of assets to ensure they are achieving their greatest potential and are aligned with the company's growth strategy. Strategic decisions involving a particular group of assets may trigger an assessment of the recoverability of the related assets. Such an assessment could result in impairment losses.

The company tests goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually (during the fourth quarter), or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit has declined below its carrying value. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment using qualitative and/or quantitative testing procedures. The company performs goodwill impairment testing at the reporting unit level, which is defined as the operating segment or one level below the operating segment. One level below the operating segment, or component, is a business in which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by segment management. The company aggregates certain components into reporting units based on economic similarities. The company’s reporting units are Seed and Crop Protection.

For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, the company has the option to first perform qualitative testing to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors assessed at the company level include GDP growth rates, long-term commodity prices, equity and credit market activity, discount rates, and overall financial performance. Qualitative factors assessed at the reporting unit level include changes in industry and market structure, competitive environments and new product launches, cost factors such as raw material prices, and financial performance of the reporting unit. If the company chooses not to complete a qualitative assessment for a given reporting unit or if the initial assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, additional quantitative testing is required.

If additional quantitative testing is required, the reporting unit’s fair value is compared with its carrying amount, and an impairment charge, if any, is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, limited to the amount of goodwill associated with the reporting unit. The company determines fair values for each of the reporting units using a discounted cash flow model (a form of the income approach), utilizing Level 3 unobservable inputs.

Under the income approach, fair value is determined based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at an appropriate risk-adjusted rate. The company’s significant assumptions in these analyses include future cash flow projections, weighted average cost of capital, the terminal growth rate and the tax rate. The company’s estimates of future cash flows are based on current regulatory and economic climates, recent operating results, and assumed business strategy from a market participant perspective and includes an estimate of long-term future growth rates based on such strategy. Actual results may differ from those assumed in the company’s forecasts. The company derives its discount rates using a capital asset pricing model and analyzes published rates for industries relevant to its reporting units to estimate the cost of equity financing. The company uses discount rates that are commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in the respective reporting units and in its internally developed forecasts.

Estimating the fair value of reporting units requires the use of estimates and significant judgments that are based on a number of factors including actual operating results. It is reasonably possible that the judgments and estimates described above could change in future periods. The company believes the current assumptions and estimates utilized are both reasonable and appropriate. Based on the qualitative annual goodwill impairment analyses performed in the fourth quarter of 2025, it was concluded more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its respective carrying value and, therefore, a quantitative test was not performed. No goodwill impairment charge was necessary.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Certain Guarantee Contracts

Information with respect to the company's guarantees is included in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Historically, the company has not made significant payments to satisfy guarantee obligations; however, the company believes it has the financial resources to satisfy these guarantees.

MOU Escrow Contributions

On January 22, 2021, Chemours, DuPont, Corteva and EIDP entered into a binding memorandum of understanding containing a settlement to resolve legal disputes originating from the Delaware Litigation and Pending Arbitration, and to establish a cost sharing arrangement for potential future legacy per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) liabilities arising out of pre-July

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

1, 2015 conduct (the “MOU”). Under the terms of the MOU, Corteva’s estimated aggregate share of the potential $2 billion is approximately $600 million. In order to support and manage any potential future PFAS liabilities, the parties have also agreed to establish an escrow account ("MOU Escrow Account"). The MOU provides that contributions to the MOU Escrow Account will be made by Chemours, DuPont and Corteva, annually over an eight-year period through 2028. Over this period, Chemours will deposit a total of $500 million in the account and DuPont and Corteva, together, will deposit an additional $500 million pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement. Additionally, if on December 31, 2028, the balance of the MOU Escrow Account (including interest) is less than $700 million, Chemours will make 50% of the deposits and DuPont and Corteva, together, will make 50% of the deposits necessary to restore the balance of the escrow account to $700 million pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement.

The company made its annual installment deposits due to the MOU Escrow Account through December 31, 2025, when considering the 2023 waiver and 2025 suspension pursuant to supplemental agreements to the MOU executed by Chemours, DuPont and Corteva as certain conditions were met. See Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for further details on the MOU and funding of the MOU Escrow Account.

Contractual Obligations

Our principal commitments consist of long-term debt, operating and finance lease obligations and environmental remediation obligations. See Note 14 - Short-Term Borrowings, Long-Term Debt and Available Credit Facilities, Note 13 – Leases, and Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively, for further discussion.

Information related to the company's other significant contractual obligations are summarized in the following table:

Payments Due In

(In millions)

Total at

December 31, 2025

2027 and

beyond

Expected cumulative cash requirements for interest payments

through maturity

Purchase obligations 1

License agreements 2, 3

Other liabilities 2, 4

Total 5

1. Represents enforceable and legally binding agreements in excess of $1 million to purchase goods or services that specify fixed or minimum quantities; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the agreement.

2. Included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. Represents undiscounted remaining payments under Pioneer license agreements (approximately $145 million on a discounted basis).

4. Includes liabilities related to employee-related benefits other than pension and other post-employment benefits, asset retirement obligations and other noncurrent liabilities.

5. Due to uncertainty regarding the completion of tax audits and possible outcomes, the timing of certain payments of obligations related to unrecognized tax benefits cannot be made and have been excluded from the table above. See Note 7 - Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional detail.

The company expects to meet its contractual obligations through its normal sources of liquidity and believes it has the financial resources to satisfy the contractual obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business.

Long-Term Employee Benefits

The company has various obligations to its employees and retirees. The company maintains retirement-related programs in many countries that have a long-term impact on the company's earnings and cash flows. These plans are typically defined benefit pension plans, as well as medical, dental and life insurance benefits for pensioners and survivors and disability benefits for employees ("other post-employment benefits" or "OPEB"). Substantially all of the company's worldwide benefit obligation for pensions and OPEB obligations are attributable to the U.S. benefit plans.

Pension coverage for employees of the company's non-U.S. consolidated subsidiaries is provided, to the extent deemed appropriate, through separate plans. The company regularly explores alternative solutions to meet its global pension obligations in the most cost-effective manner possible as demographics, life expectancy and country-specific pension funding rules change. Where permitted by applicable law, the company reserves the right to change, modify or discontinue its plans that provide pension, medical, dental, life insurance and disability benefits.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Benefits under defined benefit pension plans are based primarily on years of service and employees' pay near retirement. In November 2016, the company announced changes to the U.S. pension and OPEB plans, and on November 30, 2018, the company froze the pay and service amounts used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in the U.S. pension plans, resulting in the participants no longer accruing additional benefits. In addition, OPEB eligible employees who were under the age of 50 as of November 30, 2018 will not receive post-employment medical, dental and life insurance benefits. The majority of employees hired in the U.S. on or after January 1, 2007 are not eligible to participate in the pension and post-employment medical, dental and life insurance plans, but are eligible to participate in the defined contribution plans.

In December 2020, the company amended its retiree medical, dental and life insurance plans resulting in the company no longer providing retiree dental and life insurance benefits effective January 1, 2022 and Corteva’s portion of the cost of non-Medicare retiree medical coverage no longer being adjusted for cost increases, which capped the Corteva cost at the level as of December 31, 2021 ("2020 OPEB Plan Amendments").

Pension benefits are paid primarily from trust funds established to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The actuarial assumptions and procedures utilized are reviewed periodically by the plans' actuaries to provide reasonable assurance that there will be adequate funds for the payment of benefits. The company did not make contributions to the principal U.S. pension plan for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 or 2023.

Funding for each pension plan other than the principal U.S. pension plan is governed by the rules of the sovereign country in which it operates. Thus, there is not necessarily a direct correlation between pension funding and pension expense. In general, however, improvements in plans' funded status tend to moderate subsequent funding needs. The company contributed $5 million, $5 million and $5 million to its funded pension plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

U.S. pension benefits that exceed federal limitations are covered by separate unfunded plans and these benefits are paid to pensioners and survivors from operating cash flows. The company's remaining pension plans with no plan assets are paid from operating cash flows. The company made benefit payments of $34 million, $45 million, and $47 million to its unfunded plans for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

The company's OPEB plans are unfunded and the cost of the approved claims is paid from operating cash flows. Pre-tax cash requirements to cover actual net claims costs and related administrative expenses were $ 96 million, $101 million, and $97 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Changes in cash requirements reflect the net impact of per capita health care cost, demographic changes, plan amendments and changes in participant premiums, co-pays and deductibles.

In 2026, the company expects to contribute approximately $ 40 million to its pension plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan and approximately $ 100 million to its OPEB plans. In planning for the Proposed Separation, including the future capital structures of the two new companies, the company expects to evaluate discretionary contributions to its principal U.S. pension plan in 2026.

The company's income can be significantly affected by pension and defined contribution benefits as well as OPEB costs. The following table summarizes the extent to which the company's income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 was affected by pre-tax charges related to long-term employee benefits:

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Net periodic benefit (credit) cost - pension and OPEB

Defined contributions

Long-term employee benefit plan (credit) charges - continuing operations

The above (credit) charges for pension and OPEB are determined as of the beginning of each period. Long-term employee benefit plan (credits) costs were $186 million and $306 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The change is mainly due to the increase in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for the U.S plan net

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

of the increase in the discount rates. See "Pension Plans and Other Post-Employment Benefits" under the Critical Accounting Estimates section beginning on page 52 of this report for additional information on determining annual expense.

For 2026, long-term employee benefit costs are expected to decrease by approximately $50 million. The change is mainly due to the decrease in the discount rates.

Environmental Matters

The company operates global manufacturing, product handling and distribution facilities that are subject to a broad array of environmental laws and regulations. Such rules are subject to change by the implementing governmental agency, and the company monitors these changes closely. Company policy requires that all operations fully meet or exceed legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, the company implements voluntary programs to reduce air emissions, minimize the generation of hazardous waste, decrease the volume of water use and discharges, increase the efficiency of energy use and reduce the generation of persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic materials. Management has noted a global upward trend in the amount and complexity of proposed chemicals regulation. The costs to comply with complex environmental laws and regulations, as well as internal voluntary programs and goals, are significant and will continue to be significant for the foreseeable future.

Pre-tax environmental expenses charged to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes are summarized below:

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In millions)

Environmental operating costs

Environmental remediation costs 1

1. Environmental remediation costs include costs that are subject to the $200 million threshold and sharing arrangements as discussed in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under the header Corteva Separation Agreement.

Environmental Operating Costs

As a result of its operations, the company incurs costs for pollution abatement activities including waste collection and disposal, installation and maintenance of air pollution controls and wastewater treatment, emissions testing and monitoring, and obtaining permits. The company also incurs costs related to environmental related research and development activities including environmental field and treatment studies as well as toxicity and degradation testing to evaluate the environmental impact of products and raw materials.

Approximately 85 percent of total pre-tax environmental operating costs charged to income (loss) from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 resulted from operations in the U.S. Based on existing facts and circumstances, management does not believe that year-over-year changes, if any, in environmental operating costs charged to current operations will have a material impact on the company's financial position, liquidity or results of operations. Annual expenditures in the near term are not expected to vary significantly from the range of such expenditures experienced in the past few years. Over the longer term, expenditures are subject to considerable uncertainty and may fluctuate significantly.

Table Of Contents

Part II

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, continued

Remediation Accrual

Changes in the remediation accrual balance are summarized below:

(In millions)

Balance at December 31, 2023

Remediation payments 1

Net increase in remediation accrual 1

Net change, indemnification 2

Balance at December 31, 2024

Remediation payments 1

Net increase in remediation accrual 1

Net change, indemnification 2

Balance at December 31, 2025 3

1. Environmental remediation activity relates to Corteva-specific sites, along with accruals and payments made that are subject to the Corteva Separation Agreement as discussed in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. Represents the net change in indemnified remediation obligations. Substantially all relates to activity pursuant to the Chemours Separation Agreement and subsequent MOU, as discussed in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in which EIDP is indemnified by Chemours and DuPont for certain environmental matters.

3. Includes accrued obligations of $137 million due in the next twelve months with the remainder being due subsequent to 2025.

Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to environmental remediation costs and, under adverse changes in circumstances, the potential liability may range up to approximately $553 million above the amount accrued as of December 31, 2025. See Note 15 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for further details on the company’s accrued obligations at December 31, 2025.

As of December 31, 2025, the company has been notified of potential liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("Superfund") or similar state laws at approximately 500 sites around the U.S., including approximately 80 sites for which the company does not believe it has liability based on current information. Active remediation is under way at approximately 60 of the 500 sites. In addition, the company has resolved its liability at about 212 sites, either by completing remedial actions with other PRPs or by participating in "de minimis buyouts" with other PRPs whose waste, like the company's, represented only a small fraction of the total waste present at a site. There were no new notices in 2025 and 2024.

Environmental Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures for environmental projects, either required by law or necessary to meet the company’s internal environmental goals, were approximately $9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. The company currently estimates expenditures for environmental-related capital projects to be approximately $14 million in 2026.

Climate Impact

Shifts in climate are an important global environmental concern that presents risks and opportunities to the company, of which the Sustainability and Innovation Committee of the company’s Board of Directors maintains oversight. Management regularly assesses and manages climate-related issues. The company integrates processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risk into its enterprise risk management program. Across its business, individuals who are responsible for climate-related initiatives may have annual performance goals tied to the delivery of projects related to these initiatives.

Extreme and volatile weather events, which may be amplified by, or become more frequent with, climate change may have an adverse impact on our customers’ ability to use the company's products and seed supply, potentially reducing sales volumes, revenues and margins. These events may also shift or exacerbate existing pest and disease pressures. These pressures, along with the desire for climate-smart and climate-resilient technologies may present opportunities for the company to meet these shifting demands. Therefore, the company invests in enabling innovation that can create a more resilient agriculture value chain, while also working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through cost effective operational improvements.

Table Of Contents

Part II

Corteva, Inc.

Annual report (10-K)

Recent 8-K announcements

Top insiders

Top performers

All filings

Tone shift by section

Language change vs prior 10-K

Risk Factors (Item 1A)

Language change vs prior 10-K

MD&A (Item 7)

External resources

Permalink