ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to factors discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report and in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," the following are some of the important factors that could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Company’s Business and Industry
The Company’s profits will decline if the price of raw materials or energy rises and it cannot increase the price of its products, and the Company’s financial results could be adversely affected if the Company was not able to obtain sufficient quantities of raw materials.
The Company uses various raw materials, such as aluminum, steel, tin, and materials derived from crude oil and natural gas, such as polyethylene and polypropylene resin, and also water, natural gas, electricity, and other processed energy, in its manufacturing activities. Sufficient quantities of these raw materials may not be available in the future or may be available only at increased prices. In 2025, consumption of aluminum and steel represented 47% and 8% of the Company’s consolidated cost of products sold, excluding depreciation and amortization. The Company’s raw material supply contracts vary as to terms and duration, with aluminum contracts typically multi-year in duration with fluctuating prices based on aluminum ingot costs and steel contracts typically one year in duration with fixed prices. The availability of various raw materials and their prices depend on global and local supply and demand forces, governmental regulations and trade policies (including tariffs and duties), level of production, resource availability, transportation, and other factors, including disruptions caused by accident or
Crown Holdings, Inc.
natural disasters such as floods and earthquakes, and pandemics. The U.S. has signaled its intention to change U.S. trade policy, including potentially renegotiating or terminating existing trade agreements and leveraging tariffs. In February 2025, the U.S. imposed additional tariffs on aluminum and steel as well as on imports from China and announced and subsequently paused implementation of tariffs from Canada and Mexico. In April 2025, the U.S. imposed additional tariffs on imports from a broad range of companies and materials. These additional tariffs, as well as potential retaliation by another government against such tariffs or policies could significantly affect the price of steel, aluminum, and other raw materials used by the Company, which may adversely affect the Company’s profits and financial results. The scope, timing, and duration of tariffs on imports and exports and any retaliatory measures on U.S. goods remain uncertain and could impact the Company’s business. On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that many tariffs imposed by the current administration were unlawful. The scope, timing and practical effect of this decision including whether and how such tariffs may be modified, refunded, replaced or otherwise addressed through new measures and its impact on tariffs, duties and broader trade relations remain uncertain, and could be material to our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In recent years the consolidation of steel suppliers, shortage of raw materials affecting the production of steel and the increased global demand for steel, have contributed to an overall tighter supply for steel, resulting in increased steel prices and, in some cases, special surcharges and allocated cut backs of products by steel suppliers. Moreover, future steel supply contracts may provide for prices that fluctuate or adjust rather than provide a fixed price during a one-year period. As a result of continuing global supply and demand pressures, other commodity-related costs affecting the Company’s business may increase as well, including natural gas, electricity and freight-related costs.
The prices of certain raw materials used by the Company, such as aluminum, steel, and energy, have historically been subject to
volatility. The Company continues to manage the challenges of supply chain disruptions and fluctuating costs for raw materials and energy. While certain, but not all, of the Company’s contracts pass through raw material costs to customers, the Company may be unable to increase its prices to offset increases in raw material costs without suffering reductions in unit volume, revenue and operating income. The Company also uses commodity forward contracts to manage its exposure to these raw material costs. The ability to mitigate inflationary risks through these measures varies by region and the impact on the results of the Company’s segments for the year-ended December 31, 2025 is discussed, as applicable in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations."
In addition, any price increases may take effect after related cost increases, reducing operating income in the near term. Significant increases in raw material costs may increase the Company’s working capital requirements, which may increase the Company’s average outstanding indebtedness and interest expense and may exceed the amounts available under the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and other sources of liquidity. In addition, the Company hedges raw material costs on behalf of certain customers and may suffer losses if such customers are unable to satisfy their purchase obligations.
If the Company is unable to purchase aluminum, steel, resins or other raw materials for a significant period of time, the Company’s operations would be disrupted and any such disruption may adversely affect the Company’s financial results. If customers believe that the Company’s competitors have greater access to raw materials, perceived certainty of supply at the Company’s competitors may put the Company at a competitive disadvantage with respect to pricing and product volumes. The financial stability of the Company’s suppliers can also impact the continuity of the Company’s supply chain. The Company’s suppliers may face higher prices due to inflation or increased tariffs. If one or more of the Company’s suppliers encounter financial hardships, delivery setbacks, or other performance-related difficulties, the Company may be unable to fulfill its obligations to customers. Furthermore, if any of the raw materials to the Company’s manufacturing become to the Company’s suppliers, or are only accessible at significantly higher costs, including due to increased tariffs or trade restrictions, or are affected by quality or , the Company’s ability to deliver certain products on schedule or within budget could be compromised.
The Company’s principal markets may be subject to overcapacity and intense competition, which could reduce the Company’s net sales and net income.
Beverage and food cans are standardized products, allowing for relatively little differentiation among competitors. This could lead to overcapacity and price competition among beverage and food can producers if capacity growth outpaced the growth in demand for beverage and food cans and overall manufacturing capacity exceeded demand. These market conditions could reduce product prices and contribute to declining revenue and net income. Competitive pricing pressures, overcapacity, the failure to develop new product designs and technologies for products, as well as other factors, such as consolidation among the Company’s competitors, could cause the Company to lose existing business or opportunities to generate new business and could result in decreased cash flow and net income.
Crown Holdings, Inc.
The Company is subject to competition from substitute products and decreases in demand for its products, which could result in lower profits and reduced cash flows.
The Company is subject to substantial competition from producers of alternative packaging made from glass, paper, flexible materials and plastic. The Company’s sales depend heavily on the volumes of sales by the Company’s customers in the beverage and food markets. Changes in preferences for products and packaging by consumers of beverage cans and prepackaged food cans significantly influence the Company’s sales. Changes in packaging by the Company’s customers may require the Company to re-tool manufacturing operations, which could require material expenditures. In addition, a decrease in the costs of, or a further increase in consumer demand for, alternative packaging could result in lower profits and reduced cash flows for the Company. For example, increases in the price of aluminum and steel and decreases in the price of plastic resin, which is a petrochemical product and may fluctuate with prices in the oil and gas market, may increase substitution of plastic food and beverage containers for metal containers, or increases in the price of steel may increase substitution of aluminum packaging for aerosol products. Moreover, due to its high percentage of fixed costs, the Company may be unable to maintain its gross margin at past levels if it is not able to achieve high capacity utilization rates for its production equipment. In periods of low worldwide demand for its products or in situations where industry expansion creates excess capacity, the Company experiences relatively low capacity utilization rates in its operations, which can lead to reduced margins and can have an effect on the Company’s business.
The Company’s business results depend on its ability to understand its customers’ specific preferences and requirements, and to develop, manufacture and market products that meet customer demand.
The Company’s ability to develop new product offerings for a diverse group of global customers with differing preferences, while maintaining functionality and spurring innovation, is critical to its success. This requires a thorough understanding of the Company’s existing and potential customers on a global basis, particularly in developing markets and areas, such as the Middle East, South America, Eastern Europe, and Asia. Failure to deliver quality products that meet customer needs ahead of competitors could have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s business.
Loss of third-party transportation providers upon whom the Company depends or increases in fuel prices could increase the Company’s costs or cause a disruption in the Company’s operations.
The Company depends generally upon third-party transportation providers for delivery of products to customers. Strikes, slowdowns, transportation disruptions, or other conditions in the transportation industry, including, but not limited to, shortages of truck drivers, disruptions in rail service, decreases in the availability of vessels or increases in fuel prices, could increase the Company’s costs and disrupt the Company’s operations and its ability to service customers on a timely basis or cost-effective basis.
The Company’s business is seasonal and weather conditions could reduce the Company’s net sales.
The Company manufactures metal and glass packaging primarily for the beverage and food can market. Its sales can be affected by weather conditions. Due principally to the seasonal nature of the soft drink, brewing, iced tea, and other beverage industries, in which demand is stronger during the summer months, sales of the Company’s products are expected to vary by quarter and by region. Unseasonably cool weather can reduce consumer demand for certain beverages packaged in the Company’s containers. In addition, poor weather conditions that reduce crop yields of packaged foods can decrease customer demand for its food containers.
The Company has a significant amount of goodwill that, if impaired in the future, would result in lower reported net income and a reduction of its net worth.
Impairment of the Company’s goodwill would require a write down of goodwill, which would reduce the Company’s net income in the period of any such write down. At December 31, 2025, the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill was $3.2 billion. The Company is required to evaluate goodwill reflected on its balance sheet at least annually or when circumstances indicate a potential impairment. If it determines that the goodwill is impaired, the Company would be required to write off a portion or all of the goodwill.
A significant portion of the Company’s workforce is unionized and labor disruptions could increase the Company’s costs and prevent the Company from supplying its customers.
A significant portion of the Company’s workforce is unionized, and a prolonged work stoppage or strike at any facility with unionized employees could increase costs and prevent the Company from supplying its customers. In addition, upon the
Crown Holdings, Inc.
expiration of existing collective bargaining agreements, the Company may not reach new agreements without union or works council action in certain jurisdictions, and any such new agreements may not be on terms satisfactory to the Company. If the Company is unable to negotiate acceptable collective bargaining agreements, it may become subject to union-initiated work stoppages, including strikes. Moreover, additional groups of currently non-unionized employees may seek union or works council representation in the future.
Failure by the Company’s joint venture partners to observe their obligations could adversely affect the business and operations of the joint ventures and, in turn, the business and operations of the Company.
A portion of the Company’s operations, including certain beverage can operations in Asia, the Middle East, and South America, is conducted through joint ventures. The Company participates in these ventures with third parties. In the event that the Company’s joint venture partners do not observe their obligations or are unable to commit additional capital to the joint ventures, it is possible that the affected joint venture would not be able to operate in accordance with its business plans or that the Company would have to increase its level of commitment to the joint venture.
The loss of the Company’s intellectual property rights may negatively impact its ability to compete.
If the Company is unable to maintain the proprietary nature of its technologies, its competitors may use its technologies to compete with it. The Company has a number of patents covering various aspects of its products, including its SuperEnd® beverage can end, whose primary patent expired in 2016 and Ideal™ product line. The Company’s patents may not withstand challenge in litigation, and patents do not ensure that competitors will not develop competing products or infringe upon the Company’s patents. Moreover, the costs of litigation to defend the Company’s patents could be substantial and may outweigh the benefits of enforcing its rights under its patents. The Company markets its products internationally, and the patent laws of foreign countries may offer less protection than the patent laws of the U.S. Not all of the Company’s domestic patents have been registered in other countries. The Company also relies on trade secrets, know-how and other unpatented proprietary technology, and others may independently develop the same or similar technology or otherwise obtain access to the Company’s unpatented technology. In addition, the Company has from time to time received letters from third parties suggesting that it may be on their intellectual property rights, and third parties may bring suits the Company, which could result in the Company needing to seek licenses from these third parties or refraining altogether from use of the claimed technology.
Business interruptions at the Company’s facilities could adversely impact the Company’s operations and financial results.
Our operations depend heavily on the uninterrupted performance of our manufacturing facilities. Any significant disruption, whether due to natural disasters (such as earthquakes, fires, floods, or hurricanes), equipment failures, power outages, labor disputes, cyberattacks, supply chain breakdowns, or public health crises could materially impair our ability to produce and deliver products on schedule. Such events could lead to increased costs from repairs, lost production, or contractual penalties, as well as damage to customer relationships if we fail to meet demand. We carry insurance for certain interruptions, but coverage may not extend to all scenarios, may involve significant deductibles, or may be insufficient to offset .
Risks Relating to the Company’s International Operations
The Company’s international operations, which generated appr oximately 61% of its consolidated net sales in 2025, are subject to various risks that may lead to decreases in its financial results, particularly in the case of the Company’s operations in emerging markets.
The Company is an international company, and the risks associated with operating in non-U.S. jurisdictions, and with operating and seeking to expand business in a number of different regions and countries generally, expose the Company to potentially conflicting cultural practices, business practices and legal and regulatory requirements and may have a negative impact on the Company’s liquidity and net income. The Company’s international operations generated approximately 61% of its consolidated net sales in the year ended 2025 and 63% of its consolidated net sales in the years ended 2024 and 2023. In addition, the Company’s business strategy includes continued expansion of international activities, including within developing markets and areas, such as the Middle East, South America, Eastern Europe, and Asia, that may pose political and economic volatility and instability, greater vulnerability to infrastructure and labor disruptions and differing local customer product preferences and requirements than the Company’s other markets. The Company’s expansion efforts may also use capital and other resources of the Company that could be invested in other areas. Further, if a in economic conditions ultimately leads to a significant devaluation of a foreign currency such as the euro, the value of any financial assets that are denominated in that currency may be reduced when translated to U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Any of these conditions could ultimately the Company’s overall business, prospects, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows.
Crown Holdings, Inc.
Emerging markets are a focus of the Company’s international growth strategy, and the Company’s success in developing market share and operating profitably in these markets is critical to the Company’s growth. The developing nature of these markets and the nature of the Company’s international operations generally are subject to various risks, including:
• foreign governments’ restrictive trade policies;
• conflicting regulation (including with respect to product labelling, privacy, data protection and advanced technologies) and policy changes by foreign agencies or governments;
• duties, taxes, or government royalties, including the imposition or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by non-U.S. subsidiaries;
• customs, import/export control and other trade compliance regulations;
• foreign exchange rate risks and exchange controls;
• difficulty in collecting international accounts receivable and potentially longer payment cycles;
• increased costs in maintaining international manufacturing and marketing efforts;
• non-tariff barriers and higher duty rates;
• difficulties associated with expatriating or repatriating cash generated or held abroad in a tax-efficient manner;
• changes in tax laws and regulations;
• difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations and intellectual property rights and difficulties in protecting intellectual property or sensitive commercial and operations data or information technology systems generally;
• national and regional labor strikes and work stoppages;
• geographic, language, and cultural differences between personnel in different areas of the world;
• high social benefit costs for labor, including costs associated with restructurings;
• civil unrest or political, social, legal, and economic instability;
• product boycotts, including with respect to the products of the Company’s multi-national customers;
• customer, supplier, and investor concerns regarding operations in areas such as the Middle East;
• taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation;
• imposition of limitations on conversions of foreign currencies into dollars or payment of dividends and other payments by non-U.S. subsidiaries;
• hyperinflation and currency devaluation in any country where such currency devaluation could affect the amount of cash generated by operations in that country and thereby affect the Company’s ability to satisfy its obligations;
• geographical concentration of the Company’s factories and operations and regional shifts in its customer base;
• war (such as the ongoing military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the Israel - Hamas conflict, other hostilities in the Middle-East, the Thailand - Cambodia border conflict, and potential conflicts in Venezuela), civil disturbance (such as cartel-related violence in Mexico), global or regional catastrophic events, natural disasters, and acts of terrorism;
• epidemics, pandemics, and other disease outbreaks and health crises;
• the complexity of managing global operations; and
• compliance with applicable anti-corruption, anti-bribery laws and anti-money laundering laws and sanctions; and continuing legal, political, and economic uncertainty.
As emerging geographic markets become more important to the Company, its competitors are also seeking to expand their production capacities and sales in these same markets, which may lead to industry overcapacity that could adversely affect pricing, volumes and financial results in such markets. Although the Company is taking measures to adapt to these changing circumstances, the Company’s reputation and/or business results could be negatively affected should these efforts prove unsuccessful. Furthermore, the continuing and accelerating globalization of businesses in emerging markets and elsewhere could significantly change the dynamics of the Company’s competition, customer base and product offerings, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial position.
The Company is subject to the effects of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, which may reduce its net sales and cash flow.
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies as a significant portion of its consolidated net sales, costs, assets and liabilities, are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The Company’s international operations generated
Crown Holdings, Inc.
approximately 61% of its consolidated net sales in the year ended 2025 and 63% of its consolidated net sales in the years ended 2024 and 2023. In certain countries, government capital and currency controls restrict the Company’s ability to access U.S. dollars and remit earnings from the Company’s operations in those countries, leaving the Company exposed to long-term currency fluctuations. Worldwide foreign currency exposures impact the Company’s cash flows and financial results. Based on anticipated and committed foreign currency cash inflows and outflows, significant strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies could materially impact the Company’s expected net cash flows. Volatility in exchange rates may increase the costs of the Company’s products, impair the purchasing power of its customers in different markets, result in significant competitive benefit to certain of its competitors who incur a material part of their costs in other currencies than it does, increase its hedging costs, and limit its ability to hedge exchange rate exposure. Although the Company may use financial instruments such as foreign currency forwards from time to time to reduce its exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations in some cases, it may not elect or have the ability to implement hedges or, if it does implement them, there can be no assurance that such agreements will the effect. In its consolidated financial statements, the Company translates local currency financial results into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period. During times of a U.S. dollar, its reported international revenue and earnings will be reduced because the local curren cy will translate into fewer U.S. dollars. Conversely, a U.S. dollar will effectively increase the dollar-equivalent of the Company’s expenses and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Market Risk” and "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk" in this Annual Report.
For the year ended 2025, the Company was primarily impacted by changes in the Mexican peso, the euro, and the Thai baht. For the year-ended December 31, 2025, a 10% movement in the average foreign exchange rates used to translate income and expense items during the year would h ave decreased net income by approximately $ 20 mil lion.
Risks Relating to the Company’s Indebtedness and Liquidity
The indebtedness of the Company could prevent it from fulfilling its obligations under its debt agreements.
The Company has outstanding indebtedness. As a result of the Company’s indebtedness, a significant portion of the Company’s cash flow will be required to pay interest and principal on its outstanding indebtedness, and the Company may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or have future borrowings available under its senior secured credit facilities, to enable it to repay its indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs. As of December 31, 2025, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately $6 billion of indebtedness, excluding unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs.
The Company’s current sources of liquidity include a securitization facility with a program limit up to a maximum of $800 million that expires in July 2027 and securitization facilities with program limits of $230 million and $180 million that expire in November 2027. Additional sources of the Company’s liquidity include borrowings under its $1,650 million revolving credit facilities that mature in August 2027.
The Company’s indebtedness includes its $400 million 4.25% senior notes due in September 2026; its €500 million ($587 million at December 31, 2025) 5.00% senior notes due in May 2028; its €500 million ($587 million at December 31, 2025) 4.75% senior notes due in March 2029; its €600 million ($705 million at December 31, 2025) 4.50% senior notes due in January 2030; its $500 million 5.25% senior notes due in April 2030; its €500 million ($587 million at December 31, 2025) 3.75% senior notes due in September 2031; its $700 million 5.875% senior notes due June 2033; its $40 million 7.50% senior notes due in December 2096; and its $54 million of other indebtedness in various currencies due at various dates through 2027. In addition, the Company’s term loan facilities mature as follows: $32 million in 2026 and $1,730 million in 2027.
The indebtedness of the Company could:
• increase the Company’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including rising interest rates;
• restrict the Company from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting business opportunities, including any planned expansion in emerging markets;
• limit the Company’s ability to make capital expenditures both domestically and internationally in order to grow the Company’s business or maintain manufacturing plants in good working order and repair;
• limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants under the Company’s debt agreements, the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing, dispose of assets, or pay cash dividends;
Crown Holdings, Inc.
• require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to service its indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of its cash flow to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenditures, and other general corporate requirements;
• require the Company to sell assets used in its business;
• limit the Company’s ability to refinance its existing indebtedness, particularly during periods of adverse credit market conditions when refinancing indebtedness may not be available under interest rates and other terms acceptable to the Company or at all;
• increase the Company’s cost of borrowing;
• limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industry in which it operates; and
• place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt.
If its financial condition, operating results, and liquidity deteriorate, the Company’s creditors may restrict its ability to obtain future financing and its suppliers could require prepayment or cash on delivery rather than extend credit, which could further diminish the Company’s ability to generate cash flows from operations sufficient to service its debt obligations. In addition, the Company’s ability to make payments on and refinance its debt and to fund its operations will depend on the Company’s ability to generate cash in the future.
Some of the Company’s indebtedness is subject to floating interest rates, which would result in the Company’s interest expense increasing if interest rates rise.
As of December 31, 2025, approximately $1.8 billion of the Company’s $6 billion of total indebtedness and $1.3 billion of securitization and factoring programs were subject to floating interest rates. Changes in economic conditions could result in higher interest rates, thereby increasing the Company’s interest expense and reducing funds available for operations or other purposes. While the U.S. Federal Reserve issued three interest rate cuts in 2025, interest rates in certain key markets remained elevated. The Company’s annual interest expense was $398 million, $452 million, and $436 million for 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Based on the amount of variable rate debt outstanding and securitization and factoring at December 31, 2025, a 0.25% increase in variable interest rates would increase its annual interest expense by approximately $8 million before tax. Accordingly, the Company may experience economic losses and a negative impact on earnings as a result of interest rate fluctuation. The actual effect of a 0.25% increase in these floating interest rates could be more than $8 million as the Company’s average borrowings on its variable rate debt and securitization and factoring may be higher during the year than the amount at December 31, 2025. Although the Company may use interest rate protection agreements from time to time to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations in some cases, it may not elect or have the ability to implement hedges or, if it does implement them, there can be no assurance that such agreements will achieve the effect. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Market Risk” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this Annual Report.
Restrictive covenants in the debt agreements governing the Company’s current or future indebtedness could restrict the Company’s operating flexibility.
The indentures and agreements governing the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and outstanding notes contain affirmative and negative covenants that limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to take certain actions. These restrictions may limit the Company’s ability to operate its business and may prohibit or limit its ability to enhance its operations or take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. The Company’s senior secured credit facilities require the Company to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial conditions. The agreements or indentures governing the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and certain of its outstanding notes restrict, among other things, the ability of the Company and the ability of all or substantially all of its subsidiaries to:
• incur additional debt;
• pay dividends or make other distributions, repurchase capital stock, repurchase subordinated debt and make certain investments or loans;
• create liens and engage in sale and leaseback transactions;
• create restrictions on the payment of dividends and other amounts to the Company from subsidiaries;
• make loans, investments and capital expenditures;
• change accounting treatment and reporting practices;
Crown Holdings, Inc.
• enter into agreements restricting the ability of a subsidiary to pay dividends to, make or repay loans to, transfer property to, or guarantee indebtedness of, the Company or any of its subsidiaries;
• sell or acquire assets, enter into leaseback transactions and merge or consolidate with or into other companies; and
• engage in transactions with affiliates.
In addition, the indentures and agreements governing the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and certain of its outstanding notes limit, among other things, the ability of the Company to enter into certain transactions, such as mergers, consolidations, joint ventures, asset sales, sale and leaseback transactions, and the pledging of assets.
The breach of any of these covenants by the Company or the failure by the Company to maintain any of these ratios or meet any of these conditions could result in a default under any or all of such indebtedness. If a default occurs under any such indebtedness, all of the outstanding obligations thereunder could become immediately due and payable, which could result in a default under the Company’s other outstanding debt and could lead to an acceleration of obligations related to the Company’s senior secured credit facilities, outstanding notes and other outstanding debt. The ability of the Company to comply with these covenants and the covenants in agreements it may enter into in the future can be affected by events beyond its control and, therefore, it may be unable to satisfy its obligations under its debt agreements.
Notwithstanding the Company’s current indebtedness levels and restrictive covenants, the Company may still be able to incur substantial additional debt or make certain restricted payments, which could exacerbate the risks described above.
The Company may be able to incur additional debt in the future, including in connection with acquisitions or joint ventures. Although the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and indentures governing certain of its outstanding notes contain restrictions on the Company’s ability to incur indebtedness, those restrictions are subject to a number of exceptions, and, under certain circumstances, indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. The Company may also consider investments in joint ventures or acquisitions or increased capital expenditures, which may increase the Company’s indebtedness. Moreover, although the Company’s senior secured credit facilities and indentures governing certain of its outstanding notes contain restrictions on the Company’s ability to make restricted payments, including the declaration and payment of dividends and the repurchase of the Company’s common stock, the Company is able to make such restricted payments under certain circumstances which may increase indebtedness. Adding new debt to current debt levels or making otherwise restricted payments could intensify the related risks that the Company and its subsidiaries now face.
The Company’s senior secured credit facilities provide that certain change of control events constitute an event of default. In the event of a change of control, the Company may not be able to satisfy all of its obligations under the senior secured credit facilities or other indebtedness.
The Company may not have sufficient assets or be able to obtain sufficient third-party financing on favorable terms to satisfy all of its obligations under the Company’s senior secured credit facilities or other indebtedness in the event of a change of control. The Company’s senior secured credit facilities provide that certain change of control events constitute an event of default under the senior secured credit facilities. Such an event of default entitles the lenders thereunder to, among other things, cause all outstanding debt obligations under the senior secured credit facilities to become due and payable and to proceed against the collateral securing the senior secured credit facilities. Any event of default or acceleration of the senior secured credit facilities will likely also cause a default under the terms of other indebtedness of the Company. In addition, the indentures governing certain of the Company’s outstanding notes require that the Company offer to repurchase the notes at an offer price of 101% of principal upon certain change of control repurchase events.
The Company is subject to certain restrictions that may limit its ability to make payments on its debt out of the cash reserves shown on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The ability of the Company’s subsidiaries and joint ventures to pay dividends, make distributions, provide loans or make other payments to the Company may be restricted by applicable state and foreign laws, potentially adverse tax consequences and their agreements, including agreements governing their debt. In addition, the equity interests of the Company’s joint venture partners or other shareholders in the Company’s non-wholly owned subsidiaries in any dividend or other distribution made by these entities would need to be satisfied on a proportionate basis with the Company. As a result, the Company may not be able to access a portion of its cash flow to service the Company’s debt.
The Company has pension plan obligations worldwide and unfunded postretirement obligations, which could reduce its cash flow and negatively impact its results of operations and its financial condition.
Crown Holdings, Inc.
The Company sponsors various pension plans worldwide, with the largest funded plans in the U.S. and Canada. In 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company contributed $13 million, $122 million, and $19 million, respectively, to its pension plans. Pension expense was $27 million and is expected to be $33 million in 2026, using foreign currency exchange rates in effect at December 31, 2025. A 0.50% change in the 2026 expected rate of return assumptions would change 2026 pension expense by approximately $2 million. A 0.50% change in the discount rates assumptions as of December 31, 2025 would change 2026 pension expense by approximately $4 million. The Company may be required to accelerate the timing of its contributions under its pension plans. The actual impact of any accelerated funding will depend upon the interest rates required for determining the plan liabilities and the investment performance of plan assets. An acceleration in the timing of pension plan contributions could decrease the Company’s cash available to pay its outstanding obligations and its net income and increase the Company’s outstanding indebtedness.
Based on current assumptions, the Company expects to make pension contributions of $28 million in 2026, $19 million in 2027, $65 million in 2028, $48 million in 2029, and $40 million in 2030. Future changes in the factors used to determine pension contributions, including investment performance of plan assets, could have a significant impact on the Company’s future contributions and its cash flow available for debt reduction, capital expenditures, or other purposes.
The difference between pension plan obligations and assets, or the funded status of the plans, significantly affects the net periodic benefit costs of the Company’s pension plans and the ongoing funding requirements of those plans. Among other factors, significant volatility in the equity markets and in the value of illiquid alternative investments, changes in discount rates, investment returns and the market value of plan assets can substantially increase the Company’s future pension plan funding requirements and could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations and profitability. See Note S to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report. As long as the Company continues to maintain its various pension plans, the Company will continue to incur additional pension obligations. The Company’s pension plan assets consist primarily of common stocks and fixed income securities and also include alternative investments such as interests in private equity and hedge funds. If the performance of plan assets does not meet the Company’s assumptions or discount rates decline, the underfunding of the pension plans may increase and the Company may have to contribute additional funds to the pension plans, and the Company’s pension expense may increase. In addition, certain of the Company’s pension and postretirement plans are .
The Company’s U.S. funded pension plan is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or ERISA. Under ERISA, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or PBGC, has the authority to terminate an underfunded plan under certain circumstances. In the event its U.S. pension plan is terminated for any reason while the plan is underfunded, the Company will incur a liability to the PBGC that may be equal to the entire amount of the underfunding, which under certain circumstances may be senior to the Company’s outstanding notes. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, the unfunded accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, as calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, for retiree medical benefits was approximately $103 million, based on assumptions set forth under Note S to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report.
Risks Relating to Litigation and Regulatory Matters
The Company is subject to litigation risks which could negatively impact its operations and net income.
The Company is subject to various lawsuits and claims with respect to matters such as governmental, environmental and employee benefits laws and regulations, securities, labor, and actions arising out of the normal course of business, in addition to asbestos-related litigation described under the risk factor titled “Pending and future asbestos litigation and payments to settle asbestos-related claims could reduce the Company’s cash flow and negatively impact its financial condition.” The Company is currently unable to determine the total expense or possible loss, if any, that may ultimately be incurred in the resolution of such legal proceedings. Regardless of the ultimate outcome of such legal proceedings, they could result in significant diversion of time by the Company’s management. The results of the Company’s pending legal proceedings, including any potential settlements, are uncertain and the outcome of these disputes may decrease its cash available for operations and investment, restrict its operations or otherwise negatively impact its business, operating results, financial condition and cash flow.
In March 2015, the Bundeskartellamt, or German Federal Cartel Office (“FCO”), conducted unannounced inspections of the premises of several metal packaging manufacturers, including a German subsidiary of the Company. The local court order authorizing the inspection cited FCO suspicions of anti-competitive agreements in the German market for the supply of metal packaging products. The Company conducted an internal investigation into the matter and discovered instances of inappropriate conduct by certain employees of German subsidiaries of the Company. The Company cooperated with the FCO and submitted a leniency application with the FCO which disclosed the findings of its internal investigation to date. In April 2018, the FCO
Crown Holdings, Inc.
discontinued its national investigation and referred the matter to the European Commission (the “Commission”). Following the referral, Commission officials conducted unannounced inspections of the premises of several metal packaging manufacturers, including Company subsidiaries in Germany, France and the U.K. The Company cooperated with the Commission and submitted a leniency application with the Commission with respect to the findings of its internal investigation in Germany. In July 2022, the Company reached a settlement with the Commission relating to the Commission’s investigation, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay a fine in the amount of $8. Fining decisions based on settlements can be appealed under EU law and the Company sought annulment of the Commission’s fining decision on the basis that the referral of the case from the FCO to the Commission was unjustified. In October 2024, the General Court of the EU issued a judgment dismissing the Company’s appeal. In December 2024, the Company appealed the General Court’s judgment to the European Court of Justice. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of such appeal.
On October 7, 2021, the French Autorité de la concurrence (the French Competition Authority or “FCA”) issued a statement of objections to 14 trade associations, one public entity and 101 legal entities from 28 corporate groups, including the Company, certain of its subsidiaries, other leading metal can manufacturers, certain can fillers and certain retailers in France. The FCA alleged violations of Articles 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU and L.420-1 of the French Commercial Code. The statement of objections alleges, among other things, anti-competitive behavior in connection with the removal of bisphenol-A from metal packaging in France. The removal of bisphenol-A was mandated by French legislation that went into effect in 2015. On December 29, 2023, the FCA issued a decision imposing a fine of €4 million on the Company. The Company has appealed the decision of the FCA, however there can be no assurance regarding the outcome of such appeal.
Pending and future asbestos litigation and payments to settle asbestos-related claims could reduce the Company’s cash flow and negatively impact its financial condition.
Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (Crown Cork), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is one of many defendants in a substantial number of lawsuits filed throughout the U.S. by persons alleging bodily injury as a result of exposure to asbestos. In 1963, Crown Cork acquired a subsidiary that had two operating businesses, one of which is alleged to have manufactured asbestos-containing insulation products. Crown Cork believes that the business ceased manufacturing such products in 1963.
As of December 31, 2025, Crown Cork’s accrual for pending and future asbestos-related claims and related legal costs was $177 million, including $125 million for unasserted claims. The Company determines its accrual without limitation to a specific time period. Assumptions underlying the accrual include that claims for exposure to asbestos that occurred after the sale of the subsidiary’s insulation business in 1964 would not be entitled to settlement payouts and that state statutes described under Note P to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, including Texas and Pennsylvania statutes, are expected to have a highly favorable impact on Crown Cork’s ability to settle or defend against asbestos-related claims in those states and other states where Pennsylvania law may apply.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, Crown Cork received approximately 1,300 new claims, settled or dismissed approximately 700 claims, and had approximately 59,900 claims outstanding at the end of the period. Of the Company’s outstanding claims, approximately 18,000 claims relate to claimants alleging first exposure to asbestos after 1964 and approximately 41,900 relate to claimants alleging first exposure to asbestos before or during 1964, of which approximately 13,000 were filed in Texas, 1,300 were filed in Pennsylvania, 6,000 were filed in other states that have enacted asbestos legislation, and 21,600 were filed in other states. Due to the passage of time, the Company considers it unlikely that the plaintiffs in these cases will pursue further action. The exclusion of these inactive claims had no effect on the calculation of the Company’s accrual as the claims were filed in states where the Company’s liability is limited by statute. The Company devotes significant time and expense to these various , and proceedings, and there can be no assurance that the expenses or from operating the Company’s business arising from these defenses will not increase materially.
Crown Cork made cash payments of $19 million, $15 million, and $17 million in 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively, to settle asbestos claims and pay related legal and defense costs. These payments and any such future payments will reduce the cash flow available to Crown Cork for its business operations and debt payments.
Asbestos-related payments including defense costs may be significantly higher than those estimated by Crown Cork because the outcome of this type of litigation (and, therefore, Crown Cork’s reserve) is subject to a number of assumptions and uncertainties, such as the number or size of asbestos-related claims or settlements, the number of financially viable responsible parties, the extent to which state statutes relating to asbestos liability are upheld and/or applied by the courts, Crown Cork’s ability to obtain resolution without payment of asbestos-related claims by persons alleging first exposure to asbestos after 1964, and the potential impact of any pending or future asbestos-related legislation. Accordingly, Crown Cork may be required to make payments for claims substantially in excess of its accrual, which could reduce the Company’s cash flow and impair its
Crown Holdings, Inc.
ability to satisfy its obligations. Further information regarding Crown’s Cork’s asbestos-related liabilities is presented within “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the headings, “Provision for Asbestos” and “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and under Note P to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
The Company is subject to costs and liabilities related to stringent environmental and health and safety standards.
Laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and health and safety may increase the Company’s costs of operating and reduce its profitability. The Company’s operations are subject to numerous U.S. federal and state and non-U.S. laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, including those relating to operating permits, treatment, storage and disposal of waste, the use of chemicals in the Company’s products and manufacturing process, discharges into water, emissions into the atmosphere, remediation of soil and groundwater contamination and protection of employee health and safety. Future regulations may impose stricter environmental or employee safety requirements affecting the Company’s operations or may impose additional requirements regarding consumer health and safety, such as potential restrictions on the use of bisphenol-A, a starting material used to produce internal and external coatings for some food, beverage, and aerosol containers and metal closures. The EU and Canada have banned the use of bisphenol-A in baby bottles, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has considered adding bisphenol-A, which it has described as a potential reproductive, developmental, and systemic toxicant, to the chemical concern list and using its Design for the Environment program to encourage reductions in bisphenol-A manufacturing and use. Certain other nations, including Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Canada, and France, have implemented or considered implementing legislation restricting the use of bisphenol-A, including imposing product labeling requirements or restrictions on the importation and placement in the market of packaging and utensils containing bisphenol-A, and the European Food Safety Authority has recommended that the tolerable daily intake of bisphenol-A be lowered. Domestic and international, federal, state, municipal or other regulatory authorities could further restrict or prohibit the use of bisphenol-A in the future. In addition, public reports, , and other regarding the potential health of bisphenol-A could contribute to a perceived safety risk about the Company’s products and impact sales or otherwise the Company’s business. While the Company is exploring various alternatives to the use of bisphenol-A and conversion to alternatives is underway in some applications, there can be no assurance the Company will be completely in its efforts or that the alternatives will not be more to the Company.
Also, for example, future restrictions in some jurisdictions on air emissions of volatile organic compounds and the use of certain paint and lacquering ingredients may require the Company to employ additional control equipment or process modifications. The Company’s operations and properties, both in the U.S. and abroad, must comply with these laws and regulations. In addition, a number of governmental authorities in the U.S. and abroad have introduced or are contemplating enacting legal requirements, including emissions limitations, cap and trade systems or mandated changes in energy consumption, in response to the potential impacts of climate change. Given the wide range of potential future climate change regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, the potential impact of both climate change and climate change regulation is uncertain.
Climate change and evolving laws, regulations and market trends in response to climate change could adversely affect the business and operations of the Company.
The Company may incur significant costs and experience operational disruptions as a result of increases in the frequency, severity or duration of severe weather events caused by climate change (including thunderstorms, hurricanes, blizzards, wildfires, flooding, typhoons, and tornados), and may incur additional costs to prepare for, respond to and mitigate the effects of climate change. Furthermore, in the event that severe weather events, temperature shifts, or coastline changes resulting from climate change adversely impact crop yields for fruits and vegetables, our customers’ demand for our products may be reduced due to customers’ inability to make products that require packaging in the first instance. The Company is not able to accurately predict the materiality of any potential losses or costs associated with the effects of climate change. The impact of climate change may also vary by geographic location and other circumstances, including weather patterns and any impact to natural resources such as water.
A number of governmental authorities both in the U.S. and abroad also have enacted, or are considering, legal requirements relating to environmental conservation and sustainability, energy efficiency deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change and product stewardship, including mandating recycling, the use of recycled materials and/or limitations on certain kinds of packaging materials such as plastics. In addition, some companies with packaging needs have responded to such developments, and/or to perceived environmental concerns of consumers, by using containers made in whole or in part of recycled materials. Such developments may reduce the demand for some of the Company’s products, and/or increase its costs.
Crown Holdings, Inc.
The Company may experience significant negative effects to its business as a result of new federal, state or local taxes, increases to current taxes or other governmental regulations specifically targeted to decrease the consumption of certain types of beverages.
Public health and government officials have become increasingly concerned about the health consequences associated with over-consumption of certain types of beverages, such as sugar-sweetened beverages and including those sold by certain of the Company’s significant customers. Possible new federal, state, or local taxes, increases to current taxes or other governmental regulations specifically targeted to decrease the consumption of these beverages may significantly reduce demand for the beverages of the Company’s customers, which could in turn affect demand of the Company’s customers for the Company’s products. For example, taxes on certain sugar-sweetened beverages and/or energy drinks have been enacted in France, the U.K., Poland, Portugal, Hungary, India, and Saudi Arabia. Some state and local governments are also considering similar taxes, and several U.S. cities, including in California, Pennsylvania, and Colorado, have enacted taxes on certain sugar-sweetened beverages. The imposition of such taxes may decrease the demand for certain soft drinks and beverages that the Company’s customers produce, which may cause the Company’s customers to respond by decreasing their purchases from the Company. Consumer tax legislation and future attempts to tax sugar-sweetened or energy drinks by other jurisdictions could reduce the demand for the Company’s products and materially adversely affect the Company’s business and financial results.
On July 4, 2025, the President of the United States signed and enacted tax legislation into law through a reconciliation bill titled 'An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14,' commonly referred to as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (the "OBBBA"). The OBBBA makes permanent key elements of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, including 100% bonus depreciation, domestic research cost expensing, and the business interest expense limitation. The legislation has multiple effective dates, with certain provisions effective in 2025 and others implemented through 2027. The Company continues to review the OBBBA tax provisions to assess impacts to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, effective tax rate, and cash tax obligations. The ultimate impact of this legislation on the Company’s financial results remains uncertain and could be material.
Demand for the Company’s products could be affected by changes in laws and regulations applicable to food and beverages and changes in consumer preferences.
The Company manufactures and sells metal and glass packaging primarily for the beverage and food can market. As a result, many of the Company’s products come into direct contact with beverages and food. Accordingly, the Company’s products must comply with various laws and regulations for beverages and food applicable to its customers. Changes in such laws and regulations, such as the sugary-drink taxes discussed above, could negatively impact customers’ demand for the Company’s products as they comply with such changes and/or require the Company to make changes to its products. Such changes to the Company’s products could include modifications to the coatings and compounds that the Company uses, possibly resulting in the incurrence of additional costs. Additionally, because many of the Company’s products are used to package consumer goods, the Company is subject to a variety of risks that could influence consumer behavior and negatively impact demand for the Company’s products, including changes in consumer preferences driven by various health-related concerns and perceptions.
Changes in accounting standards, taxation requirements and other law could negatively affect the Company’s financial results.
New accounting standards or pronouncements that may become applicable to the Company from time to time, or changes in the interpretation of existing standards and pronouncements, could have a significant effect on the Company’s reported results for the affected periods. The Company is also subject to income tax in the numerous jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Increases in income tax rates or other changes to tax laws could reduce the Company’s after-tax income from affected jurisdictions or otherwise affect the Company’s tax liability.
In addition, the Company’s products are subject to import and excise duties and/or sales or value-added taxes in many jurisdictions in which it operates. Increases in indirect taxes could affect the Company’s products’ affordability and therefore reduce demand for its products.
General Risk Factors
The loss of a major customer and/or customer consolidation could reduce the Company’s net sales and profitability.
Many of the Company’s largest customers have acquired companies with similar or complementary product lines. This consolidation has increased the concentration of the Company’s business with its largest customers. In many cases, such consolidation has been accompanied by pressure from customers for lower prices, reflecting the increase in the total volume of
Crown Holdings, Inc.
product purchased or the elimination of a price differential between the acquiring customer and the company acquired. Increased pricing pressures from the Company’s customers may reduce the Company’s net sales and net income. In addition, customer concentration could expose the Company to increased credit risk if large customers were unable to fulfill their payment obligations to the Company.
The majority of the Company’s sales are to companies that have leading market positions in the sale of beverages, packaged food and household products to consumers. The loss of any major customers, a reduction in the purchasing levels of these customers or an adverse change in the terms of supply agreements with these customers could reduce the Company’s net sales and net income. A continued consolidation of the Company’s customers could exacerbate any such loss. In addition, the Company’s relationship with several of its customers, particularly in Transit Packaging, is noncontractual, and as a result its customers may unilaterally reduce their purchases of its products.
The Company may not be able to manage its anticipated growth, and it may experience constraints or inefficiencies caused by unanticipated acceleration and deceleration of customer demand.
Unanticipated acceleration and deceleration of customer demand for the Company’s products may result in constraints or inefficiencies related to the Company’s manufacturing, sales force, implementation resources and administrative infrastructure, particularly in emerging markets where the Company is seeking to expand production. Such constraints or inefficiencies may adversely affect the Company as a result of delays, lost potential product sales or loss of current or potential customers due to their dissatisfaction. Similarly, over-expansion, including as a result of overcapacity due to expansion by the Company’s competitors, or investments in anticipation of growth that does not materialize, or develops more slowly than the Company expects, could harm the Company’s financial results and result in overcapacity.
To manage the Company’s anticipated future growth effectively, the Company must continue to enhance its manufacturing capabilities and operations, information technology infrastructure, and financial and accounting systems and controls. Organizational growth and scale-up of operations could strain its existing managerial, operational, financial, and other resources. The Company’s growth requires significant capital expenditures and may divert financial resources from other projects, such as the development of new products or enhancements of existing products or reduction of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness. If the Company’s management is unable to effectively manage the Company’s growth, its expenses may increase more than expected, its revenue could grow more slowly than expected and it may not be able to achieve its research and development and production goals, any of which could have a material effect on its business, operating results or financial condition.
Acquisitions, dispositions or investments that the Company is considering, has pursued or may pursue could be unsuccessful, consume significant resources and require the incurrence of additional indebtedness.
The Company has completed and may consider acquisitions and investments that complement its existing business or dispositions of portions of its existing business. The actual or potential acquisitions, dispositions and investments, such as the Company’s divestiture of its European Tinplate business in August 2021, involve or may involve significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence (including the incurrence of additional indebtedness under the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facilities or other secured or unsecured debt), operating losses and expenses and the diversion of management’s attention that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
In particular, if the Company incurs additional debt in order to finance an acquisition, the Company’s liquidity and financial stability could be impaired as a result of using a significant portion of available cash or borrowing capacity. Moreover, the Company may face an increase in interest expense or financial leverage if additional debt is incurred to finance an acquisition, which may, among other things, adversely affect the Company’s various financial ratios and the Company’s compliance with the conditions of its existing indebtedness. In addition, such additional indebtedness may be incurred under the Company’s senior secured credit facilities or otherwise secured by liens on the Company’s assets.
Acquisitions and dispositions involve numerous other risks, including:
• diversion of management time and attention;
• failures to identify material problems and liabilities of acquisition targets or to obtain sufficient indemnification rights to fully offset possible liabilities related to the acquired businesses;
• difficulties integrating the operations, technologies and personnel of the acquired businesses;
• inefficiencies and complexities that may arise due to unfamiliarity with new assets, businesses or markets;
• disruptions to the Company’s ongoing business;
Crown Holdings, Inc.
• inaccurate estimates of fair value made in the accounting for acquisitions and amortization of acquired intangible assets which would reduce future reported earnings;
• the inability to obtain required financing for the new acquisition or investment opportunities and the Company’s existing business;
• the need or obligation to divest portions of an acquired business;
• challenges associated with successfully bifurcating operations that involve both remaining and departing personnel in divestiture transactions;
• challenges associated with operating in new geographic regions or discontinued operations in legacy regions;
• difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects;
• potential loss of key employees, contractual relationships, suppliers or customers of the acquired businesses or of the Company; and
• inability to obtain required anti-trust and other regulatory approvals.
To the extent the Company pursues an acquisition or disposition that causes it to incur unexpected costs or that fails to generate expected returns, the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected, and the Company’s ability to service its indebtedness may be negatively impacted.
If the Company fails to retain key management and personnel, the Company may be unable to implement its business plan.
Members of the Company’s senior management have extensive industry experience, and it might be difficult to find new personnel with comparable experience. Because the Company’s business is highly specialized, the Company believes that it would also be difficult to replace its key technical personnel. The Company believes that its future success depends, in large part, on its experienced senior management team. Losing the services of key members of its management team could limit the Company’s ability to implement its business plan. In addition, under the Company’s unfunded Senior Executive Retirement Plan certain members of senior management are entitled to lump sum payments upon retirement or other termination of employment and a lump sum death benefit of five times the annual retirement benefit, which could result in unexpected increased costs to the Company for a particular period.
The Company relies on its information technology, and potential cyber-attack, data breach or other failure or disruption of its information technology could disrupt its operations and adversely affect its results of operations.
The Company’s business increasingly relies on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of its information technology systems to process, transmit, and store electronic information. A significant portion of the communication between the Company’s personnel around the world, customers, and suppliers depends on information technology. As with all large systems, the Company’s information technology systems may be susceptible to damage, disruptions, or shutdowns due to failures during the process of upgrading or replacing software, databases or components thereof, power outages, hardware failures, telecommunication failures, user errors, or catastrophic events. In addition, cybersecurity related risks including security breaches and cyber-attacks such as computer viruses, denial-of-service attacks, malicious code (including ransomware), social-engineering attacks (including phishing attacks), or other information security could result in disclosure or of the Company’s confidential information. These also may be further in frequency or effectiveness through actors’ use of new technologies like artificial intelligence, machine learning, and quantum computing.
Given the increasing complexity and sophistication of techniques used by bad actors to obtain unauthorized access to or disable information technology systems, and the fact that cyber-attacks are being made by groups and individuals with a wide range of expertise and motives, it is increasingly difficult to anticipate and defend against cyber-attacks.
The concentration of processes in shared services centers means that any disruption could impact a large portion of the Company’s business within the operating zones served by the affected service center. If the Company does not allocate, and effectively manage, the resources necessary to build, sustain and protect the proper technology infrastructure, the Company could be subject to transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, loss of customers, business disruptions, the loss of or damage to intellectual or physical property through security breach, and reputational harm, as well as potential litigation, civil liability and fines under various laws and regulatory regimes of jurisdictions in which the Company does business. While the Company has security measures in place designed to protect the integrity of customer information and prevent data loss, , and other security , the Company’s information technology systems could nevertheless be penetrated by outside parties intent on extracting information, information or business processes (including for purposes of ransom demands or other forms of blackmail), particularly if the Company’s information security training and compliance programs prove to be . In addition, if the Company’s information technology systems , , or
Crown Holdings, Inc.
shutdown and the Company’s business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, the Company may lose customers and suppliers and revenue and profits as a result of its inability to timely manufacture, distribute, invoice and collect payments from its customers, and could experience delays in reporting its financial results, including with respect to the Company’s operations in emerging markets. Furthermore, if the Company is unable to prevent security breaches, it may suffer financial and reputational damage because of lost or misappropriated confidential information belonging to the Company or to its customers or suppliers, and it may suffer indirect economic loss if its existing insurance policies and coverage related to information security risks prove to be . or of the Company’s information technology systems, or the back-up systems, for any reason could the Company’s operations and impact the Company’s cash flows or financial condition.
The Company’s reliance on third-party cloud infrastructure and its use of artificial intelligence technologies create operational, security, and compliance risks.
The Company’s reliance on cloud-based systems owned by third parties creates particular risks. Because the Company does not control the underlying infrastructure, the Company depends on the security and reliability of third-party providers, and any outage, misconfiguration, or loss of data could compromise the integrity of the Company’s and the Company’s customers’ operations. New technologies, such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing, may present new technological risks or vulnerabilities that could compromise the Company’s systems and data.
Artificial intelligence technologies have rapidly developed, and the Company’s business may be adversely affected if the Company cannot successfully integrate the technology into its internal business processes, products, and services in a timely, cost-effective, compliant, and responsible manner. If the data used to train artificial intelligence solutions or the content, analyses, or recommendations that machine learning applications assist in producing is deemed to be inaccurate, incomplete, biased, or questionable, the Company’s brand and reputation may be harmed, and the Company may be subject to legal liability claims. Such risks could result in significant costs, operational disruptions, regulatory penalties, litigation, reputational damage, and material adverse effects on the Company’s business and financial condition.
Sentiment towards climate change, sustainability and other ESG matters could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
The Company has announced sustainability goals for its next phase of Sustainability as part of its Twenty by 30 program. Execution of this program and the achievements of the Company’s sustainability goals is subject to risk and uncertainties, many of which are out of the Company’s control. Failure to achieve these sustainability goals within the currently projected costs and expected timeframes could damage the Company’s reputation, customer and investor relationships, or ability to access capital on favorable terms, particularly given investors’ increased focus on ESG matters in recent years, and in turn could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
If the Company fails to maintain an effective system of internal control, the Company may not be able to accurately report financial results or prevent fraud.
Effective internal controls are necessary to provide reliable financial reports and to assist in the effective prevention of fraud. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud could harm the Company’s business. The Company must annually evaluate its internal procedures to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires management and auditors to assess the effectiveness of internal controls. If the Company fails to remedy or maintain the adequacy of its internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, the Company could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties, or shareholder litigation.
