Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Angi Inc.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is -0.26pp more bearish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
-0.62pp
Lean -
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
+0.10pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
negative+3
failure+2
errors+2
limitation+2
default+2
Positive rising
successfully+1
improve+1
desired+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
11,269 words
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This annual report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of words such as “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” and “believes,” among others, generally identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements relating to: our future business, financial condition, results of operations and financial performance, our business prospects and strategy, the timing, development, and expected impact of strategic and product initiatives, future marketing strategy, future financing arrangements, future capital allocation strategy, trends in the home services industry and other similar matters. These forward-looking statements are based on the expectations and assumptions of our management about future events as of the date of this annual report, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict.
Actual results could differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including, among others, the risk factors set forth below. Other unknown or unpredictable factors that could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations may arise from time to time. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking statements discussed in this annual report may not prove to be accurate. Accordingly, you should not place reliance on these forward-looking statements, which only reflect the views of our management as of the date of this annual report. We do not undertake to update these forward-looking statements.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
restructuring+12
forfeited+1
arrears+1
Positive rising
benefit+1
better+1
profitable+1
gains+1
MD&A (Item 7)
8,766 words
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
GENERAL
Management Overview
Angi Inc. (“Angi,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) connects quality home professionals (“Pros”) with consumers across more than 500 different categories, from repairing and remodeling homes to cleaning and landscaping. There were approximately 111,000 Average Monthly Active Pros (as defined below) during the three months ended December 31, 2025. Additionally, consumers turned to at least one of our businesses to find a Pro for approximately 16 million projects during the twelve months ended December 31, 2025.
During the first quarter of 2025, the Company updated its segment reporting structure from “Ads and Leads”, “Services”, and “International” to “Domestic” and “International” to better reflect how it manages its business and how management evaluates performance and allocates resources. During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company changed the name of its “Domestic” segment to “U.S.” segment. The change reflects an updated naming convention and did not result in any change to the composition of the segment or how the Company evaluates its performance in the current year as well as prior periods. The naming convention for prior periods has been conformed to the current period. The change had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As a result of these updates, the Company now has the following two operating segments: (i) U.S. and (ii) International (consisting of businesses in Europe and Canada). The Company continues to operate under multiple brands including Angi, Angie’s List, HomeAdvisor, and Handy.
Our success will depend, in substantial part, on the continued migration of the home services market online.
We believe that the digital penetration of the home services market remains low, with the vast majority of consumers continuing to search for, select and hire Pros offline. While many consumers have historically been (and remain) averse to finding Pros online, others have demonstrated a greater willingness to embrace the online shift. Pros must also continue to embrace the online shift, which will depend, in substantial part, on whether online products and services help them to better connect and engage with consumers relative to traditional offline efforts. The speed and ultimate outcome of the shift of the home services market online for consumers and Pros is uncertain and may not occur as quickly as we expect, or at all. The failure or delay of a meaningful number of consumers and/or Pros to migrate online and/or the return of a meaningful number of existing participants in the online home services market to offline solutions, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Marketing efforts designed to drive traffic to our brands and businesses may not be successful or cost-effective.
Attracting consumers and Pros to our brands and businesses involves considerable expenditures for online and offline marketing. We have made, and expect to continue to make, significant marketing expenditures for digital marketing (primarily paid search engine marketing, display advertising and third-party affiliate agreements) and traditional offline marketing (national television and radio campaigns). These efforts may not be successful or cost-effective. Historically, we have had to increase marketing expenditures over time to attract and retain consumers and Pros and sustain our growth.
Our ability to market our brands on any given property or channel is subject to the policies of the relevant third-party seller, publisher of advertising (including search engines, web browsers and social media platforms with extraordinarily high levels of traffic and numbers of users) or marketing affiliate. As a result, we cannot assure you that these parties will not limit or prohibit us from purchasing certain types of advertising (including the purchase by Angi of advertising with preferential placement), advertising certain of our products and services or using one or more current or prospective marketing channels in the future. If a significant marketing channel took such an action generally, for a significant period of time and/or on a recurring basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, if we fail to comply with the policies of third-party sellers, publishers and/or marketing affiliates, our advertisements could be removed without notice or our accounts could be suspended or terminated, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our failure to respond to rapid and frequent changes in the pricing and operating dynamics of search engines, as well as changing policies and guidelines applicable to keyword advertising (which may unilaterally be updated by search engines without advance notice), could adversely affect our paid search engine marketing efforts (and free search engine traffic). Such changes, including any phasing out (or blocking) of third-party cookies by web browsers, could adversely affect paid listings (both their placement and pricing), as well as the ranking of our brands and businesses within search results, any or all of which could increase our marketing expenditures (particularly if free traffic is replaced with paid traffic). Any or all of
these events could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if there are changes in the usage and functioning of search engines and/or decreases in consumer use of search engines, for example, as a result of the continued development of AI technology, this could negatively impact our ability to drive traffic to our platforms. For example, AI could be utilized to better educate homeowners on how to perform their own home improvement projects, thereby reducing the need for our business, or AI could eventually transform the way search engines currently work, thereby creating unknown challenges to our marketing channels.
Evolving consumer behavior (specifically, increased consumption of media through digital means) can also affect the availability of profitable marketing opportunities. To continue to reach and engage consumers and Pros and grow in this environment, we will need to continue to identify and devote more of our overall marketing expenditures to newer digital advertising channels (such as online video, social media, streaming, OTT and other digital platforms), as well as target consumers and Pros via these channels in a cost-effective manner. As these channels continue to evolve relative to traditional channels (such as television), it could continue to be difficult to assess returns on related marketing investments, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we also enter into various arrangements with third parties to drive visitors to Angi platforms. These arrangements are generally more cost-effective than traditional marketing efforts. If we are unable to renew existing (and enter into new) arrangements of this nature, sales and marketing costs as a percentage of revenue would increase over the long-term, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the quality and convertibility of traffic and leads generated through third-party arrangements are dependent on many factors, most of which are outside our control. If the quality or convertibility of traffic and leads do not meet the expectations of our users or Pros, they could leave our network or decrease their budgets for consumer matches or participation in pre-priced booking services, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on Internet search engines to drive traffic to our various properties. Certain operators of search services offer products and services that compete directly with our products and services. If links to websites offering our products and services are not displayed prominently in search results, traffic to our properties could decline and our business could be adversely affected.
In addition to paid marketing, we rely heavily on Internet search engines, such as Google, to drive traffic to our properties through their unpaid search results. Although search results have allowed us to attract a large audience with low organic traffic acquisition costs in the past, if they fail to continue to drive sufficient traffic to our properties, we may need to increase our marketing spend to acquire additional traffic. We cannot assure you that the value we ultimately derive from any such additional traffic would exceed the cost of acquisition, and any increase in marketing expense may in turn harm our operating results.
The amount of traffic we attract from search engines is due in large part to how and where information about our brands (and links to websites offering our products and services) are displayed on search engine results pages. The display, including rankings, of unpaid search results can be affected by a number of factors, many of which are not in our direct control, and may change frequently. Search engines have made changes in the past to their ranking algorithms, methodologies and design layouts that have reduced the prominence of links to websites offering our products and services, and negatively impacted traffic to such websites, and we expect that search engines will continue to make such changes from time to time in the future. In addition, changes in the usage and functioning of search engines and/or decreases in consumer use of search engines, for example, as a result of the continued development of AI technology, could negatively impact our ability to drive traffic to our properties.
However, we may not know how (or otherwise be in a position) to influence actions of this nature taken by search engines. With respect to search results in particular, even when search engines announce the details of their methodologies, their parameters may change from time to time, be poorly defined or be inconsistently interpreted.
In addition, in some instances, search engines may change their displays or rankings in order to promote their own competing products or services, or the products or services of one or more of our competitors. Any such action could negatively impact the search rankings of links to websites offering our products and services, or the prominence with which such links appear in search results. Our success depends on the ability of our products and services to maintain a prominent position in search results, and in the event operators of search engines promote their own competing products in the future in a manner that has the effect of reducing the prominence or ranking of our products and services, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our success depends on our ability to continue to balance our various offerings to Pros across the Angi platforms.
We provide a pre-priced offering, pursuant to which consumers can request services through our platforms and pay for such services on the applicable platform directly. These service requests are then fulfilled by independently established home
services providers engaged in a trade, occupation and/or business that customarily provide such services. Increased participation in pre-priced offerings could reduce the levels of Pros’ participation in other offerings, including those based on membership subscriptions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends, in substantial part, on our ability to establish and maintain relationships with quality and trustworthy Pros.
We must continue to attract, retain and grow the number of skilled and reliable Pros who can provide services across our platforms. Similarly, in order to continue to attract, retain and grow the number of Pros who can provide services, Pros need to feel safe in their work environment. If we do not offer innovative products and services that resonate with consumers and Pros generally, as well as provide Pros with an attractive return on their marketing and advertising investments, the number of Pros affiliated with our platforms would decrease. Any such decrease would result in smaller and less diverse networks and directories of Pros, and in turn, decreases in service requests, pre-priced offerings and directory searches, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to skill and reliability, consumers want to work with Pros whom they can trust to work in their homes and with whom they can feel safe. While we maintain screening processes (which generally include certain, limited background checks) to try and prevent unsuitable Pros from joining our platforms, these processes have limitations and, even with these safety measures, no assurances can be provided regarding the future behavior of any provider on our platforms. Inappropriate and/or unlawful behavior of Pros generally (particularly any such behavior that compromises the trustworthiness of providers and/or of the safety of consumers), or claimsalleging that we are responsible for Pro’s acts or service quality, could result in decreases in service requests, bad publicity and related damage to our reputation, brands and brand-building efforts and/or actions by governmental and regulatory authorities, criminal proceedings and/or litigation. Similarly, inappropriate and/or unlawful behavior towards Pros by consumers or subscribers (particularly behavior that compromises their safety) could result in a reduction in the number of Pros willing to provide services through our platforms, bad publicity and related damage to our reputation, brands and brand-building efforts and/or actions by governmental and regulatory authorities, criminal proceedings and/or litigation. The occurrence or any of these events could, in turn, adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to develop and monetize versions of our products and services for mobile and other digital devices.
As consumers increasingly access our products and services through mobile and other digital devices (including through digital voice assistants), we will need to continue to devote significant time and resources to ensure that our products and services are accessible across these platforms (and multiple platforms generally). If we do not keep pace with evolving online, market and industry trends, including the continuing evolution of AI, the introduction of new and enhanced digital devices and changes in the preferences and needs of consumers and Pros generally, offer new and/or enhanced products and services in response to such trends that resonate with consumers and Pros, monetize products and services for mobile and other digital devices as effectively as our traditional products and services and/or maintain related systems, technology and infrastructure in an efficient and cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
In addition, the success of our mobile and other digital products and services depends on their interoperability with various third-party operating systems, technology, infrastructure and standards, over which we have no control. Any changes to any of these things that compromise the quality or functionality of our mobile and other digital products and services could adversely affect their usage levels and/or our ability to attract consumers and Pros, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to access, collect and use personal data about consumers.
We depend on search engines, digital app stores and social media platforms, in particular, those operated by Google, Apple, Meta and TikTok, to market, distribute and monetize our products and services. Consumers engage with these platforms directly, and as a result, these platforms generally receive personal data about consumers that we would otherwise receive if we transacted with them directly. Certain of these platforms have restricted (and continue to restrict) our access to personal data about users of our products and services obtained through their platforms. In addition, the privacy and data collection policies of certain platforms require users to opt-in to sharing their devices’ unique identifiers with our businesses, which allow them to recognize a given device and track related activity across applications and websites, primarily for marketing purposes. If these platforms continue to limit, eliminate or otherwise interfere with our ability to access, collect and use personal data about users of our products and services, and/or if a number of users decide not to opt-in to sharing their devices’ unique identifiers with our businesses, our ability to identify, communicate with, and market to a meaningful portion of our user base may be adversely impacted. If so, our customer relationship management efforts, our ability to identify, target and reach new segments of our user base and the population generally, and the efficiency of our paid marketing efforts could be adversely affected. We cannot
assure you that search engines, digital app stores, and social media platforms upon which we rely will not continue to limit, eliminate or otherwise interfere with our ability to access, collect and use personal data about users of our products and services. To the extent that any or all of them do so, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our ability to communicate with consumers and Pros via email (or other sufficient means) is critical to our success.
Historically, one of our primary means of communicating with consumers and Pros and keeping them engaged with our products and services has been via email communication. Through email, we provide consumers and Pros with service request and offering updates, as well as present or suggest new products and services (among other things) and market our products and services in a cost-effective manner. As consumers increasingly communicate via mobile and other digital devices and messaging and social media apps, usage of email (particularly among younger consumers) has declined and we expect this trend to continue. In addition, deliverability and other restrictions could limit or prevent our ability to send emails to consumers and Pros. For example, in early 2024, email providers tightened their spam thresholds. Exceeding these more stringentspam thresholds could result in some or all of our emails being delayed or blocked, and therefore less likely to be opened. We cannot assure you that any alternative means of communication (for example, push notifications and text messaging) will be as effective as email has been historically.
Further, consumers also increasingly screen their incoming emails, telephone calls and text messages, including via screening tools and warnings, and, therefore, our Pros and consumers may not reliably receive our communications. A continued and significant erosion in our ability to communicate with consumers and Pros via email could adversely impact the overall user experience, consumer and Pro engagement levels and conversion rates, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes to certain requirements applicable to certain communications with consumers may adversely impact our ability to generate leads for our Pros.
In connection with the marketing of our products and services and efforts to generate leads for our Pros, we have historically relied on our ability (and the ability of our Pros) to communicate with consumers via phone and text, in some cases using automated technology, as have third party affiliates through which we market our products and services. In an effort to reduce robocalls and robotexts, there has been an increased effort by U.S. regulatory authorities and telecommunications carriers to ensure that consumers opt in to receiving certain marketing calls and texts from businesses . To the extent that any regulatory restrictions are implemented, such restrictions could adversely impact consumer engagement levels and consumer conversion in the case of our products and services, which would decrease leads generated on our platforms, as well as our ability to obtain leads through our third party affiliate relationships, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, phone carriers increasingly dictate rules for obtaining consumers’ consent to receive text messages. This may reduce the number of consumers who opt-in to receiving both marketing and transactional texts from us and our Pros, which could further adversely impact our ability to generate leads for our Pros and, in turn, our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There may be adverse tax, legal and other consequences if the contractor classification or employment status of the Pros who use our platform is challenged.
We are particularly sensitive to the adoption of worker classification laws, specifically, laws that could effectively require us to change our classification of certain of our Pros from independent contractors to employees, as well as changes to state and local laws or judicial decisions related to the definition and/or classification of independent contractors. If we are required to reclassify Pros from independent contractors to employees and/or their classification is challenged for any reason, we could be exposed to various liabilities and additional costs for prior and future periods, including under federal, state and local tax laws, workers’ compensation and unemployment benefits, minimum and overtime wage laws, and other labor and employment laws, as well as potential liability for penalties and interest. If the amounts related to such liabilities and additional costs are significant, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. See “ Note 1 6 — C onting encies ” to the consolidated financial statements included in “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."
General Risk Factors
Our brands and businesses operate in an especially competitive and evolving industry.
The home services industry is competitive, with a consistent and growing stream of new products, services and entrants. Some of our competitors may enjoybetter competitive positions in certain geographical areas, with certain consumer and Pro demographics and/or in other key areas that we currently serve or may serve in the future. Generally, we compete with search engines, online marketplaces and social media platforms that can market their products and services online in a more prominent and cost-effective manner than we can, as well as better tailor their products and services to individual users. Any of these
advantages could enable these competitors to offer products and services that are more appealing to consumers and Pros than our products and services, respond more quickly and/or cost effectively than we do to evolving market opportunities and trends, and/or display their own integrated or related home services products and services in search results and elsewhere in a more prominent manner than our products and services, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, since most of our home services products and services are offered to consumers for free, consumers can easily switch among home services offerings (or use multiple home services offerings simultaneously) at no cost to them. And while Pros may incur additional or duplicative near-term costs, the costs for switching to a competing platform over the long term are generally not prohibitive. Low switching costs, coupled with the propensity of consumers to try new products and services generally, will most likely result in the continued emergence of new products and services, entrants and business models in the home services industry. Our inability to continue to innovate and compete effectively against new products, services and competitors could result in decreases in the size and level of engagement of our consumer and Pro bases, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our brands and businesses are sensitive to general economic events and trends, particularly those that adversely impact consumer confidence and spending behavior, as well as general geopolitical risks.
General economic conditions and other factors, such as consumer confidence in future economic conditions, recessionaryconcerns, rising interest rates, increased inflation, the availability and cost of consumer credit, levels of unemployment, tax rates and actual or potential tariffs, could result in consumers delaying or foregoing home services projects and/or Pros being less likely to pay for consumer matches and subscriptions or spending on marketing and advertising. Ongoing volatility and/or uncertainty related to global economic conditions, including as a result of the geopolitical tensions and conflicts, affect the predictability of our business. Unfavorable economic conditions, volatility and uncertainty could result in decreases in traffic, service requests and directory searches. Any such decreases could adversely impact the number and quality of Pros and/or adversely impact the reach of, and breadth of, our services offerings, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Lastly, given the adverse financial and operational impact we experienced as a result of the coronavirus and measures designed to contain its spread, any future outbreak of a widespread health epidemic or pandemic could adversely impact our ability to conduct ordinary course business activities and employee productivity and increase operating costs. Moreover, we could also experience business disruption if the ordinary course operations of our third-party affiliates, partners and vendors are adversely affected, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.
Our success depends, in substantial part, on our ability to maintain and/or enhance our brands, which could be negatively impacted by various factors.
We own and operate three of the leading home services brands in the United States (Angi, Angie’s List and HomeAdvisor), as well as leading brands in several foreign jurisdictions.
We believe that our success depends, in substantial part, on our continued ability to build awareness and loyalty to our Angi brand, maintain and enhance our established brands, as well as build awareness of (and loyalty to) our newer brands. Events that could negatively impact our brands and brand-building efforts include (among others): product and service quality concerns; Pro quality concerns; consumer and Pro complaints and lawsuits; lack of awareness of our policies or confusion about how the policies are applied; a failure to respond to feedback from our Pros and consumers; ineffective advertising; inappropriate and/or unlawful acts perpetrated by Pros and consumers; actions or proceedings commenced by governmental or regulatory authorities; and inadequate data protection and security breaches including related bad publicity. Any factors that negatively impact the Angi and/or HomeAdvisor brand(s) could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, trust in the integrity and objective, unbiased nature of the ratings and reviews found across our various brands contributes significantly to public perception of these brands and their ability to attract consumers and Pros. If consumer reviews are perceived as not authentic in general, the reputation and strength of the relevant brand could be materially and adversely affected. While we use, and will continue to use, filters (among other processes) to detect fraudulent reviews, the accuracy of consumer reviews cannot be guaranteed. If fraudulent or inaccurate reviews (positive or negative) increase and we are unable to effectively identify and remove such reviews, the overall quality of the ratings and reviews across our various brands could decrease and the reputation of affected brands might be harmed. This could deter consumers and Pros from using our products and services, which in turn could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to protect our systems, technology and infrastructure from cyberattacks or cyberattacks experienced by third parties may adversely affect us.
We are regularly under attack by threat actors through the use of botnets, malware or other destructive or disruptive software, distributed denial of service attacks, phishing, attempts to misappropriate user information and account login
credentials, and intercept payments intended for legitimate third parties, and other similar malicious activities. The incidence of events of this nature (or any combination thereof) is on the rise worldwide. Our efforts to develop and maintain systems designed to detect and prevent events of this nature from impacting our systems, technology, infrastructure, products, services, payment processes and procedures, and users are costly and require ongoing monitoring and updating as technologies change and efforts to overcome preventative security measures become more sophisticated. There can be no assurance that the systems we have designed to prevent or limit the effects of cyberattacks or other types of attacks will be sufficient to prevent or detect material consequences arising from such incidents or attacks, or to avoid a material adverse impact on our systems after such incidents or attacks do occur. Despite these efforts, some of our systems have experienced past security incidents and we could experience significant events of this nature in the future.
Any event of this nature that we experience could damage our systems, technology and infrastructure or those of our users, prevent us from providing our products and services, compromise the integrity of our products and services, damage our reputation, erode our brands or be costly to remedy, as well as subject us to investigations by regulatory authorities, fines or litigation that could result in liability to third parties. Even if we do not experience such events directly, the impact of any such events experienced by third parties could have a similar effect. If we were to experience future events involving third-party service providers, the impacts could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations in a significant or material manner. We may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate for losses resulting from any of these events. If we (or any third-party with whom we do business or on which we otherwise rely) experience(s) an event of this nature, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
If personal, confidential or sensitive user information that we maintain and store is breached or otherwise accessed by unauthorized persons, it may be costly to mitigate and our reputation could be harmed.
We receive, process, store and transmit a significant amount of personal, confidential or sensitive user and subscriber information and, in the case of certain of our products and services, enable users and subscribers to share their personal information with each other. Our efforts to develop and maintain systems designed to protect the security, integrity and confidentiality of this information may not prevent inadvertent or unauthorized use or disclosure, and third parties may gainunauthorized access to this information. When such events occur, we may not be able to remedy them, we may be required by law to notify regulators and impacted individuals and it may be costly to mitigate the impact of such events and to develop and implement protections to prevent future events of this nature from occurring. When breaches of security (ours or that of any third party that we engage to store such information) occur, we could face governmental enforcement actions, significant fines, litigation (including consumer class actions) and the reputation of our brands and business could be harmed, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our insurance coverage for these matters may be insufficient to cover our losses, and in the future, we may be unable to obtain cybersecurity insurance on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, if any of the search engines, digital app stores or social media platforms through which we market, distribute and monetize our products and services were to experience a breach, third parties could gainunauthorized access to personal data about our users and subscribers, which could indirectly harm the reputation of our brands and business and, in turn, adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal data could give rise to liabilities and increased costs.
We receive, transmit and store a large volume of personal information in connection with the provision of our products and services. The manner in which we share, store, use, disclose and protect this information is determined by the respective privacy and data security policies of our various businesses, as well as federal, state and foreign laws and regulations and evolving industry standards and practices, which are changing, and in some cases, inconsistent and conflicting and subject to differing interpretations. In addition, new laws, regulations, standards and practices of this nature are proposed and adopted from time to time.
For example, several U.S. territories and all 50 states now have data breach laws that require timely notification to individuals, and at times regulators, the media or credit reporting agencies, if a company has experienced the unauthorized access or acquisition of personal information. Certain states have enacted consumer privacy laws that impose disclosure obligations for businesses that collect personal information about residents and afford those individuals additional rights relating to their personal information that may affect our ability to use personal information or share it with our business partners. These states may impose substantial penalties for violations, impose significant costs for investigations and compliance, allow private class-action litigation and carry significant potential liability for our business.
Outside of the U.S., data protection laws also apply to our International operations. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) in the United Kingdom and the European Union imposes, among other things, strict obligations and restrictions on the collection, processing, storage and use of U.K. and European Union personal data, including where such data is processed outside those jurisdictions, a requirement for prompt notice of data breaches in certain circumstances, a requirement for implementation of certain approved safeguards for transfers of personal data to third countries,
and possible substantial fines for any violations. Governmental authorities around the world have enacted similar types of legislative and regulatory requirements concerning data protection, and additional governments are considering similar legal frameworks.
We may be subject to claims of non-compliance with applicable privacy and data protection policies, laws and regulations and industry standards and practices that we may not be able to successfullydefend or significant fines and penalties. Moreover, any non-compliance or perceived non-compliance by us (or any third-party we engage to store or process information) or any compromise of security that results in unauthorized access to (or use or transmission of) personal information could result in a variety of claimsagainst us, including governmental enforcement actions, significant fines, litigation (including consumer class actions), claims of breach of contract and indemnity by third parties and adverse publicity. When such events occur, our reputation could be harmed and the competitive positions of our various brands and businesses could be diminished, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, to the extent multiple U.S. state (or European Union member-state) laws are introduced with inconsistent or conflicting standards and there is no federal or European Union regulation to preempt such laws, compliance could be even more difficult to achieve and our potential exposure to the risks discussed above could increase.
Lastly, ongoing compliance with existing (and compliance with future) privacy and data protection laws worldwide could be costly. The devotion of significant expenditures to compliance (versus the development of products and services) could result in delays in the development of new products and services, us ceasing to provide problematic products and services in existing jurisdictions and us being prevented from introducing products and services in new and existing jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Credit card data security breaches or fraud could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We accept payments (including recurring payments) from Pros and consumers, primarily through credit and debit card transactions. The ability to access payment information on a real-time basis without having to proactively reach out to Pros and consumers to process payments is critical to our success.
When third parties (including credit card processing companies, as well as any business that offers products and services online or offline) experience a data security breach involving credit card information, affected cardholders will often cancel their credit cards. The more sizable a given affected third-party’s customer base, the greater the number of accounts impacted and the more likely it will be that our Pros and consumers would be impacted by such a breach. If such a breach were to impact our Pros and consumers, we would need to contact affected Pros and consumers to obtain new payment information. It is likely that we would not be able to reach all affected Pros and consumers, and even if we could, new payment information for some may not be obtained and pending payments may not be processed, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Even if our Pros and consumers are not directly impacted by a given data security breach, they may lose confidence in the ability of providers of online products and services to protect their personal information generally. As a result, they may stop using their credit cards online and choose alternative payment methods that are not as convenient for us or restrict our ability to process payments without significant effort, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on the integrity, quality, efficiency and scalability of our systems, technology and infrastructure, and those of third parties.
We rely on our systems, technology and infrastructure to perform well on a consistent basis. From time to time in the past we have experienced (and in the future we may experience) occasional interruptions that make some or all of this framework and related information unavailable or that prevent us from providing products and services; any such interruption could arise for any number of reasons. We also rely on third-party data center service providers and cloud-based, hosted web service providers, as well as third-party computer systems and a variety of communications systems and service providers in connection with the provision of our products and services generally, as well as to facilitate and process certain payment and other transactions with users. We have no control over any of these third parties or their operations and the interruption of any of the services provided by these third parties could prevent us from accessing user and subscriber information and providing our products and services. If any third parties do not adequately or appropriately provide their services or perform their responsibilities to us or our users, such as if third-party service providers are unable to restore operations and data, fail to perform as expected, or experience other unanticipatedproblems, we may be subject to business disruptions, losses or costs to remediate any of the deficiencies, user dissatisfaction, reputational damage, legal or regulatory proceedings, or other adverse consequences which could harm our business. Additionally, if our third-party service providers experience a security incident or other interruption, we could experience adverse consequences. While we may be entitled to damages if our third-party service providers fail to satisfy their data privacy or security-related obligations to us, any award may be insufficient to cover our
damages, or we may be unable to recover such award. In addition, supply chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties’ infrastructure in our supply chain or our third-party partners’ supply chains have not been compromised.
The framework described above could be damaged or interrupted at any time due to fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, acts of God and other similar events or disruptions. Any event of this nature could prevent us from providing our products and services at all (or result in the provision of our products and services on a delayed or intermittent basis) or result in the loss of critical data. Businesses that we acquire may employ cybersecurity controls or information security policies less robust than ours, which may require us to expend additional resources to integrate acquired systems into our own, and which may expose us to heightened risk. The backup systems that we and the third parties upon whom we rely have in place for certain aspects of our respective frameworks may be insufficient for all recovery eventualities. In addition, we may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate us for losses from a major interruption. When such damages, interruptions or outages occur, our reputation could be harmed and the competitive positions of our various brands and businesses could be diminished, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We also continually work to expand and enhance the efficiency and scalability of our framework to improve the consumer and Pro experience, accommodate substantial increases in the number of visitors to our various platforms, ensure acceptable load times for our various products and services, and keep up with changes in technology and user preferences. If we do not do so in a timely and cost-effective manner, the user experience and demand across our brands and businesses could be adversely affected, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, as our products and service offerings evolve, we must continue to update and adapt our existing technology systems to support these changes. For instance, our current efforts to consolidate onto a single global platform require significant operational focus and care. As we integrate new functionality into our existing legacy systems, modernizing the infrastructure while ensuring the accuracy of data processing, internal controls, accounting, and regulatory compliance can be complex and resource-intensive. If we are unable to effectively manage these technology updates, or if our efforts to adapt legacy systems are delayed or more difficult than anticipated, it could increase our operational complexity and heighten the risk of errors, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend on our key personnel.
Our future success depends upon our continued ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled and talented individuals, particularly in the case of senior leadership. Competition for well-qualified employees across our various businesses has been (and is expected to continue to be) intense, particularly in the case of senior leadership, technology and product development roles, and we must continue to attract new (and retain existing) employees to compete effectively. While we have established programs to attract new (and retain existing) key and other employees, we may not be able to do so in the future. If we fail to retain key and other employees, this could result in the loss of institutional knowledge and the disruption of our day-to-day operations, which could adversely impact the effectiveness of our internal control framework and our ability (and the ability of our various businesses) to successfully execute long term strategic initiatives and other goals. If we do not ensure the effective transfer of knowledge to successors and smooth transitions (particularly in the case of senior leadership) by way of tailored succession plans, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our use of AI and machine learning technologies, combined with an uncertain legal and regulatory environment, may subject us to new and evolving risks, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have incorporated, and may continue to incorporate, AI and machine learning technologies into our platforms and other aspects of our business and operations, including the deployment of a fine-tuned large language model that serves as an interface for service requests. Certain aspects of our AI strategy rely on a combination of our proprietary domain knowledge libraries and third-party partnerships, and as a result, we are subject to risks associated with such third parties, including potential service disruptions, pricing volatility and the failure of their safeguards to prevent biased or inaccurate outputs. Because AI technology is still in a nascent stage of development, ineffective or inadequate AI development or deployment practices by us or third-party partners could result in negative outcomes. In addition, any latency, disruption or failure in our AI systems or infrastructure could result in delays or errors in our product and service offerings. Developing, testing and deploying resource-intensive AI systems may require additional investment and increase our costs. Our competitors and other third parties may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, all of which could impair our ability to compete effectively. Any of the foregoing may decrease demand for our products or harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The legal and regulatory landscape surrounding AI technologies is rapidly evolving, and we expect an increase in the regulation of the use of AI in products and services. Compliance with new or changing laws, regulations, or industry standards relating to AI may impose significant operational costs and expose us to legal liability or regulatory risk, including with respect
to third-party intellectual property, privacy, publicity, contractual or other rights. Failure to appropriately respond to this evolving landscape may result in legal liability, regulatory action or brand and reputational harm.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness.
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from our operations to meet our scheduled debt obligations. If so, we could be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or seek additional capital in a manner that complies with the terms (including certain restrictions and limitations) of our current indebtedness. If these efforts do not generate sufficient funds to meet our scheduled debt obligations, we would need to seek additional financing and/or negotiate with our bondholders to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. Our ability to do so would depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any such financing, restructuring or refinancing could be on less favorable terms than those governing our current indebtedness and would need to comply with the terms (including certain restrictions and limitations) of our existing indebtedness.
Our current and future indebtedness may limit our flexibility in obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business opportunities or operating activities.
In August 2020, ANGI Group, LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Angi (“ANGI Group”), issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.875% senior notes due August 2028 (the “ANGI Group Senior Notes”). In November 2025, ANGI Group entered into a credit agreement providing for a senior secured revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of $175.0 million, including a letter of credit sublimit of up to $25.0 million (the “Revolving Facility”). As of December 31, 2025, we had no outstanding revolving loans under the Revolving Facility.
The Revolving Facility contains various restrictive covenants, including, among other things, affirmative covenants relating to the provision of periodic financial statements, compliance certificates and other notices, payment of taxes and compliance with laws, and negative covenants, including, among others, restrictions on the incurrence of certain indebtedness, granting of liens, certain affiliate transactions, mergers dissolutions and asset sales and a total net leverage ratio financial covenant. The indentures governing the ANGI Group Senior Notes contain certain negative covenants, including a limitation on liens and a limitation on merger, sale and disposal of ANGI Group’s assets. Under the terms of these covenants, we may be restricted from engaging in business or operating activities that may otherwise improve our business or from financing future operations or capital needs. Failure to comply with certain covenants, including the financial covenant, if not cured or waived, will result in an event of default that could trigger acceleration of our indebtedness, which would require us to repay all amounts owed and could have a material adverse impact on our business. In addition, the Revolving Facility has a floating interest rate that is based on variable and unpredictable U.S. and international economic risks and uncertainties. If we were to draw on the Revolving Facility, any increase in interest rates, as has occurred in the past and may occur in the future, may negatively impact our financial results.
In addition, the Revolving Facility is secured by a first priority pledge of the equity securities owned by ANGI Group and ANGI Group’s wholly-owned material U.S. subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”), subject to customary exceptions, and first priority security interests in substantially all current and after-acquired tangible and intangible personal property of ANGI Group and each Subsidiary Guarantor, in each case, subject to customary exclusions, permitted liens and other agreed limitations.
Our ability to service our current and future debt can be impacted by events beyond our control, and we may be unable to do so. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, our lenders and/or noteholders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the applicable debt agreements to be immediately due and payable. In addition, our lenders would have the right to proceed against the assets we provided as collateral in respect of the Revolving Facility. If the debt under our credit agreement were to be accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or be able to sell sufficient assets to repay it, which would have an immediate adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Risks Relating to the Distribution
Some or all of the expected benefits of the Distribution may not be achieved.
The full strategic and financial benefits expected related to the Distribution may not be achieved, or such benefits may be delayed or may never occur at all. The following are certain benefits expected from the Distribution:
• enabling us to allocate our financial resources to meet the unique needs of our businesses and to implement our own optimal capital structure tailored to our strategy and business needs;
• greater flexibility to raise equity capital needed to fund growth, including by using our stock as equity currency to make strategic acquisitions and for employee compensation; and
• the potential to attract new investors and expanded coverage by equity research analysts, which increase, if realized, could provide us with a more efficient equity currency for acquisitions and employee compensation.
We may not achieve these or other anticipated benefits for a variety of reasons, including, among others, our increased susceptibility to market fluctuations and other adverse events as an independent company and the risk of litigation, injunctions or other legal proceedings relating to the Distribution. If we fail to achieve some or all of the benefits expected to result from the Distribution, or if such benefits are delayed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
If the Distribution were to fail to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Angi and our stockholders could suffer material adverse consequences.
IAC received an opinion of its outside counsel satisfactory to the IAC board of directors, among other things, regarding the qualification of the Distribution as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 355(a) of the Code. The opinion of counsel was based upon and rely on, among other things, various facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of IAC and the Company, including those relating to the past and future conduct of their businesses. If any of these representations, statements or undertakings is, or becomes, inaccurate or incomplete, or if any of the representations or covenants contained in any of the applicable agreements or in any document relating to the opinion of counsel are inaccurate or not complied with by IAC, the Company or any of their respective subsidiaries, the opinion of counsel may be invalid and the conclusions reached therein could be jeopardized.
Notwithstanding receipt of the opinion of counsel regarding the Distribution, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) could determine that the Distribution should be treated as a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it determines that any of the representations, assumptions or undertakings upon which the opinion of counsel was based are inaccurate or have not been complied with. Moreover, even if the foregoing representations, assumptions or undertakings are accurate and have been complied with, the opinion of counsel merely represents the judgment of such counsel and is not binding on the IRS or any court, and the IRS or a court may disagree with the conclusions in the opinion of counsel. Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt by IAC of the opinion of counsel, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the Distribution does not qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. In the event the IRS were to prevail with such a challenge, the Company and our stockholders could suffer material adverse consequences.
If the Distribution were to fail to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 355(a) of the Code, in general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, IAC would recognize a taxable gain as if it had sold its Angi Class A common stock in a taxable sale for its fair market value. In such circumstance, holders of IAC common stock who received Angi Class A common stock in the Distribution would be subject to tax as if they had received a taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of such shares. Even if the Distribution were otherwise to qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 355(a) of the Code, the Distribution may result in taxable gain to IAC, but not its stockholders, under Section 355(e) of the Code if the Distribution were deemed to be part of a plan (or series of related transactions) pursuant to which one or more persons acquire, directly or indirectly, shares representing a 50 percent or greater interest (by vote or value) in IAC or the Company. For this purpose, any acquisitions of IAC stock or Angi stock within the period beginning two years before, and ending two years after, the Distribution are presumed to be part of such a plan, although IAC or the Company may be able to rebut that presumption (including by qualifying for one or more safe harbors under applicable Treasury Regulations).
Under the existing tax sharing agreement, the Company generally is required to indemnify IAC for any taxes resulting from the failure of the Distribution to qualify for the intended tax-free treatment (and related amounts) to the extent that the failure to so qualify is attributable to: (i) an acquisition of all or a portion of the equity securities or assets of the Company, whether by merger or otherwise by any person (and regardless of whether Angi participated in or otherwise facilitated the acquisition), (ii) other actions or failures to act by the Company or (iii) any of the representations or undertakings made by the Company in any of the documents relating to the opinion of counsel being incorrect or violated. Any such indemnity obligations could be material and the satisfaction of such indemnification obligations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The desired tax treatment of the Distribution limits our ability to engage in capital-raising, share repurchases and other transactions.
Under current U.S. federal income tax law, a distribution that otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment can be rendered taxable to the distributing corporation and its stockholders as a result of certain post-distribution transactions, including certain acquisitions of shares or assets of the corporation the stock of which is distributed. To preserve the tax-free treatment of the Distribution, the tax sharing agreement restricts us and our subsidiaries, for the two-year period following the Distribution (except in specific circumstances), from: (i) entering into any transaction pursuant to which shares of our capital stock would be acquired above a certain threshold, (ii) merging, consolidating or liquidating, (iii) selling or transferring assets above certain thresholds, (iv) redeeming or repurchasing stock (with certain exceptions, including repurchase of certain limited amount of our capital stock), (v) altering the voting rights of our capital stock, (vi) actions and inactions that are inconsistent with representations or covenants in any tax opinion or private letter ruling document or (vii) ceasing to engage in any active trade or business as defined in the Code. These restrictions may limit our ability to pursue certain equity issuances, strategic transactions, share repurchases or other transactions that we may otherwise believe to be in the best interests of our stockholders or that might increase the value of our business.
Actual or potential conflicts of interest may develop between our management and directors, on the one hand, and the management and directors of IAC, on the other hand.
Certain of our directors and executive officers and management and directors of IAC own capital stock of both companies, and certain members of IAC’s former senior management team currently serve as directors of our board of directors. For example, Mr. Levin, the former Chief Executive Officer of IAC, currently serves as our Executive Chairman. This overlap could create (or appear to create) potential conflicts of interest when directors and executive officers affiliated with both companies face decisions that could have different implications for IAC and us. For example, potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute between IAC and us regarding the terms of the agreements governing the Distribution and our relationship with IAC thereafter, including any commercial agreements between the parties or their respective affiliates. Potential conflicts of interest could also arise if we enter into any commercial arrangements with IAC in the future.
In connection with the Distribution, we agreed to indemnify IAC for certain liabilities, and if we are required to pay under these indemnities to IAC, our financial results could be negatively impacted. While IAC is also obligated to indemnify us for certain liabilities, it may not be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations.
Certain of the contribution agreements require each of IAC and the Company to indemnify the other for certain liabilities. Any amounts we are required to pay pursuant to these indemnification obligations and other liabilities could require us to divert cash that would otherwise have been used in furtherance of our operations. Further, the indemnity from IAC may not be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, and IAC may not be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from IAC any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves. Each of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Following the Distribution, we rely on IAC to provide certain services, and we may be unable to replace such services on favorable terms, or at all, when the arrangement terminates.
Following the Distribution, the Company and IAC updated the schedule of services under the services agreement executed prior to the Distribution, pursuant to which IAC agreed to provide us, for a fee, specified support services related to corporate functions for various terms, such as information security, legal, finance, human resources, tax, treasury services and participation in IAC’s U.S. health and welfare, 401(k) and flexible benefits plans. As some of the foregoing services terminated, we entered into new agreements or assumed the responsibility for such functions. For certain other services, including, but not limited to, maintenance and support of shared financial systems, the Company and IAC have extended the term until March 31, 2026. As each of such remaining services terminates, we will be required to either develop internal capabilities or enter into new agreements with third-party providers to assume these functions. We cannot assure you that the economic terms of the new arrangements will be similar to those under our current arrangements with IAC. If we are unable to renew or replace such arrangements on a comparable basis, or if we experience difficulties in transitioning these functions to ourselves or other third parties, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
The Distribution may result in litigation and/or regulatory inquiries and investigations, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations and could divert management attention.
In the past, securities class action litigation and/or shareholder derivative litigation and inquiries or investigations by regulatory authorities have often followed certain significant business transactions, such as the sale of a company or announcement of any other strategic transaction, such as the Distribution. Any litigation or investigation relating to the
Distribution against us or IAC, whether or not resolved in either party’s favor, could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and the ultimate value of our Class A common stock.
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock
The market price and trading volume of our Class A Common Stock may be volatile and may face negative pressure.
The market price of shares of our Class A Common Stock could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including the risks identified in this annual report or reasons unrelated to our performance. Among the factors that could affect the stock price of our Class A Common Stock are:
• actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results;
• changes in earnings estimated by securities analysts or in our ability to meet those estimates;
• the operating and stock price performance of comparable companies;
• changes to the regulatory and legal environment under which we operate;
• changes in relationships with significant customers; and
• U.S. and worldwide economic conditions.
These factors, among others, may result in short- or long-term negative pressure on the value of our Class A Common Stock.
We do not expect to declare any regular cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our capital stock in the near term. Instead, we anticipate that our future earnings will be retained to support our operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made by our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including:
• our historical and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations;
• our capital levels and needs;
• tax considerations;
• any acquisitions or potential acquisitions that we may consider;
• statutory and regulatory prohibitions and other limitations;
• the terms of any credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements that will restrict our ability to pay cash dividends;
• general economic conditions; and
• other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
In the absence of dividends, investors may need to rely on sales of their shares of our Class A Common Stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws or Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control, or changes in management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our Class A Common Stock.
The DGCL and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws currently contain provisions, that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control, or changes in management that stockholders may deem advantageous, and provisions which:
• provide that, until our 2032 meeting of stockholders, our board of directors will be divided into classes, which could have the effect of making the replacement of incumbent directors more time-consuming and difficult;
• provide that, as long as our board of directors is classified, members of our board of directors can be removed by stockholders only for cause;
• provide that holders of our Class A Common Stock will not have the right to act by written consent;
• provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by the remaining directors;
• provide that we will be subject to the Delaware statute governing business combinations with interested stockholders;
• authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock or authorized but unissued shares of Class B Common Stock and/or Class C Common Stock that our board of directors could issue to increase the number of outstanding shares and to discourage a takeover attempt;
• provide that our board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal the bylaws;
• provide that there will not be cumulative voting on the election of directors; and
• establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of our board of directors.
Any provision of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of Class A Common Stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for such shares.
Our bylaws designate specified courts as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions or proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could discourage lawsuits against the Company and its directors, officers and other employees.
Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, a state court located in the State of Delaware (or, if no state court located within the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware) will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for:
• any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company;
• any action asserting a claim for or based on a breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director or officer or other employee of the Company to the Company or its stockholders, including a claim alleging the aiding and abetting of such a breach of fiduciary duty;
• any action asserting a claim against the Company or any current or former director or officer or other employee of the Company arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws;
• any action asserting a claim related to or involving the Company that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine; and
• any action asserting an “internal corporate claim,” as that term is defined in Section 115 of the DGCL.
The exclusive forum provisions do not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The enforceability of similar exclusive forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court could find the exclusive forum provisions in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable.
These exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that such stockholder may find favorable for disputes with the Company or its directors, officers or employees, and may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims and may increase the costs to bring such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find these exclusive forum provisions inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings described above for each company, the applicable company may incur additional costs associated with resolving such disputes in other jurisdictions, which could have an adverse impact on the applicable company’s business and financial condition.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish unfavorable research about us, the price and trading volume of our Class A Common Stock could decline.
The trading market for our Class A Common Stock is, and will continue to be, influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us and our business. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage, or fails to publish reports about the applicable company regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price and/or trading volume to decline. Moreover, if our operating results do not meet the expectations of the investor community, one or more of the analysts who cover us may change their recommendations, and the stock price could decline.
In the United States, the Company provides Pros the capability to engage with potential customers, including quoting and invoicing services, and provides consumers with tools and resources to help them find local, pre-screened and customer-rated Pros nationwide for home repair, maintenance and improvement projects. Consumers can also request household services directly through the Angi platform, and such requests are fulfilled by independently established Pros engaged in a trade, occupation and/or business that customarily provides such services. Matching service, booking of pre-priced services, and related tools and directories are provided to consumers free of charge upon registration. The Company also owns marketplaces
Table of Contents
in Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK which provide Pros the ability to engage with potential customers and consumers the ability to engage with the Pros they need.
Distribution
On March 31, 2025, IAC completed the spin-off of its ownership in the Company through a special dividend of the common stock of the Company owned by IAC to the holders of IAC common stock and IAC Class B common stock (the “Distribution”). Prior to the effective time of the Distribution, IAC voluntarily converted all of the shares of our Class B Common Stock that it owned to shares of Class A Common Stock. As a result of this conversion, there are no longer any shares of our Class B Common Stock outstanding. After completion of the Distribution, IAC has no ownership in the Company, there are no shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding, and the only class of Angi capital stock with shares outstanding is Class A Common Stock.
Total Home Roofing, LLC Sale
On November 1, 2023, Angi completed the sale of 100% of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Total Home Roofing, LLC (“THR,” which comprised its former Roofing segment), which is reflected as a discontinued operation in its financial statements. For additional details, see “ Note 18—Discontinued Operations ” to the consolidated financial statements included in “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .”
Defined Terms and Operating Metrics:
Unless otherwise indicated or as the context otherwise requires, certain terms used in this annual report, which include the principal operating metrics we use in managing our business, are defined below:
• U.S. Revenue – primarily comprised of revenue generated within the U.S. segment, including Lead revenue for consumer matches, revenue from Pros under contract for advertising, membership subscription revenue from Pros and consumers and revenue from pre-priced offerings by which the consumer requests services through a Company platform and the Company connects them with a Pro to perform the service.
• International Revenue – comprised of revenue generated within the International segment (consisting of businesses in Europe and Canada), including Lead revenue for consumer matches and membership subscription revenue from Pros.
• Proprietary Revenue – the portion of U.S. Revenue allocated to Proprietary channels, calculated based on the proportionate share of Leads originating from Proprietary channels in the period.
• Network Revenue – the portion of U.S. Revenue allocated to Network channels, calculated based on the proportionate share of Leads originating from Network channels in the period.
• Service Requests – requests for connections with Pros in the period, which include pre-priced offerings and indications of interest expressed on a Pro profile.
• Leads – connections between consumers and Pros resulting from a Service Request in the period, including the completion of a job related to a pre-priced offering; a single Service Request can result in multiple Leads.
• Proprietary – refers to sources of Service Requests in which consumers go through an Angi proprietary user experience or a retail partner experiences.
• Network – refers to sources of Service Requests in which consumers are presented with Angi Pros through a third party website experience.
• Acquired Pros – new Pros onboarded onto the Angi platform and eligible to receive Leads in the period.
• Average Monthly Active Pros – the average number of Pros per month that (i) received Leads, (ii) were presented on a Service Request where they agreed to receive a Lead if selected, (iii) requested to be connected to a consumer on a Service Request, or (iv) accepted an offer to complete a pre-priced Service Request.
• ANGI Group Senior Notes - On August 20, 2020, ANGI Group, LLC (“ANGI Group”), a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $500.0 million of its 3.875% Senior Notes due August 15, 2028, with interest
Table of Contents
payable February 15 and August 15 of each year.
Components of Results of Operations
Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit
Cost of revenue, which excludes depreciation, consists primarily of (i) credit card processing fees, (ii) hosting fees, and (iii) payments made to independent third-party Pros who perform work.
Gross profit is revenue less cost of revenue. Gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of revenue.
Operating Costs and Expenses:
• Selling and marketing expense - consists primarily of (i) advertising expenditures, which include marketing fees to promote the brand to consumers and Pros with (a) online marketing, including fees paid to search engines and other online marketing platforms, partners who direct traffic to our brands, and app platforms, and (b) offline marketing, which is primarily television and radio advertising, (ii) compensation expense (including stock-based compensation expense) and other employee-related costs for our sales and marketing personnel, (iii) service guarantee expense, (iv) software license and maintenance costs, and (v) outsourced personnel costs.
• General and administrative expense - consists primarily of (i) compensation expense (including stock-based compensation expense) and other employee-related costs for personnel engaged in executive management, finance, legal, tax, human resources and customer service functions, (ii) provision for credit losses, (iii) software license and maintenance costs, (iv) outsourced personnel costs for personnel engaged in assisting in customer service functions, (v) fees for professional services, and (vi) rent expense and facilities costs (including impairments of right-of-use assets). Our customer service function includes personnel who provide support to our Pros and consumers.
• Product development expense - consists primarily of (i) compensation expense (including stock-based compensation expense) and other employee-related costs that are not capitalized for personnel engaged in the design, development, testing and enhancement of product offerings and related technology, (ii) software license and maintenance costs, and (iii) outsourced personnel costs for personnel engaged in product development.
• Restructuring - consists primarily of charges associated with a formal restructuring plan that are related to workforce reductions.
Non-GAAP financial measure
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “ Principles of Financial Reporting ” for the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and required non-GAAP reconciliations.
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . For a discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, please refer to “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the annual audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2025.
Revenue
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Lead revenue
Advertising revenue
Services revenue
Membership subscription revenue
Other revenue
Total U.S. revenue
International revenue
Total revenue
Percentage of Total Revenue:
International
Total revenue
Year Ended December 31,
Change
% Change
(In thousands, rounding differences may occur)
Operating metrics:
Service Requests
Proprietary
Network
Total
Leads
Proprietary
Network
Total
Proprietary Revenue
Network Revenue
Year Ended December 31,
Change
% Change
(In thousands)
Acquired Pros
Average Monthly Active Pros
Table of Contents
U.S. revenue decreased 14%, due primarily to a 72% decrease in Network revenue as a result of the implementation of homeowner choice in January 2025, partially offset by a 17% increase in Proprietary revenue from strong execution in paid marketing in Proprietary channels.
International revenue decreased $2.5 million, or 2%, due primarily to a management decision to change the business model of the Canadian business when migrating it onto the European platform. This decision was made to bring the business model in line with the European businesses and transition the Canadian business into a more profitable self-serve platform that needs fewer manual sales.
Cost of revenue
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)
As a percentage of revenue
U.S. cost of revenue decreased $10.2 million, or 19%, and remained constant as a percentage of revenue, due primarily to lower payments to third-party professional service providers of $5.7 million, lower credit card processing fees of $3.8 million, and lower sales tax expense of $2.9 million, partially offset by higher hosting fees of $2.6 million.
Gross profit
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)
Gross profit
Gross margin
Gross profit decreased $144.4 million, or 13%, due primarily to the decrease in revenue described in the revenue discussion above.
Selling and marketing expense
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Selling and marketing expense
As a percentage of revenue
U.S. selling and marketing expense decreased $87.8 million, or 16%, due primarily to decreases of $73.9 million in compensation expense, $4.3 million in service guarantee expense, $2.7 million in software maintenance costs, and $1.8 million in professional service costs. The decrease in compensation expense was due primarily to a reduction in headcount, and the decrease in service guarantee expense was due primarily to lower revenue.
International selling and marketing expense decreased $6.3 million, or 16%, driven by a decrease in compensation expense of $7.1 million due primarily to a reduction in headcount, partially offset by an increase in advertising expense of $1.4 million. The reduction in headcount was driven by the management decision to change the business model of the Canadian business when migrating it onto the European platform described in the revenue discussion above. The increase in advertising expense was due primarily to higher costs related to online advertising.
Table of Contents
General and administrative expense
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
General and administrative expense
As a percentage of revenue
U.S. general and administrative expense decreased $56.3 million, or 20%, due primarily to decreases of $25.7 million in compensation expense, $9.9 million in the provision for credit losses, $8.0 million in lease expense, $3.1 million in software license and maintenance costs, and $2.5 million in third-party wages. The decrease in compensation expense was primarily due to the reversal of previously recognized stock-based compensation expense of $10.2 million related to IAC restricted stock forfeited by Joseph Levin, former CEO of IAC and current Executive Chairman of Angi, in the first quarter of 2025, and a reduction in headcount. The decrease in the provision for credit losses was primarily due to lower revenue and improved collection rates. The decrease in lease expense was primarily due to impairment charges of right-of-use assets previously recognized in the first half of 2024 and the Company’s reduction of its real estate footprint. The decrease in software license and maintenance costs was due primarily to reduced costs related to data warehousing and customer support services. The decrease in third-party wages is primarily due to reduced costs related to customer support services.
Product development expense
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Product development expense
As a percentage of revenue
Product development expense decreased $8.0 million, or 8%, and remained constant as a percentage of revenue compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.
Depreciation
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation
As a percentage of revenue
Depreciation decreased $40.7 million, or 47%, due primarily to the reduction in capitalized software spend over prior periods and the write-off of certain leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures in connection with the Company’s reduction of its real estate footprint in 2024.
Restructuring
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Restructuring
As a percentage of revenue
NM = Not meaningful
Restructuring increased $12.8 million, due to a reduction of the Company’s global workforce by approximately 350 employees in order to reduce operating expenses and optimize the organizational structure in support of long-term growth. Refer to “ Note 4 — Restructuring ” for a summary of the activities related to restructuring for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Table of Contents
Amortization of intangibles
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortization of intangibles
As a percentage of revenue
NM = Not meaningful
Amortization of intangibles decreased $0.8 million, or 31%, due to a decrease in impairment charges related to U.S. indefinite-live trade names during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Operating income
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
International
Total
As a percentage of revenue
Operating income increased in 2025 compared to 2024 due primarily to the factors described above in the cost of revenue, selling and marketing, general and administrative, and depreciation expense discussions.
At December 31, 2025, there was $31.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all equity-based awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.2 years.
Adjusted EBITDA
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
International
Total
As a percentage of revenue
See “ Principles of Financial Reporting ” for the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and required non-GAAP reconciliations.
U.S. Adjusted EBITDA decreased $16.6 million, or 13%, to $112.8 million, and remained constant as a percentage of revenue. The decrease was primarily driven by lower gross profit due to the decrease in revenue, partially offset by lower selling and marketing expense due primarily to a decrease in compensation expense, lower general and administrative expense due primarily to decreases in compensation expense, lease expense, and the provision for credit losses, and lower cost of revenue due primarily to lower payments to third-party professional service providers and lower credit card processing fees.
International Adjusted EBITDA increased $11.3 million, 71%, to $27.3 million, and increased as a percentage of revenue. The increase was primarily driven by lower selling and marketing expense due to a decrease in compensation expense.
Table of Contents
Interest expense
Interest expense relates to interest on the ANGI Group Senior Notes.
For a detailed description of long-term debt, net, see “ Note 7—Long-term Debt ” to the consolidated financial statements included in “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .”
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(In thousands)
Interest expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 remained constant compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.
Other income, net
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(In thousands)
Other income, net
Other income, net included interest income of $15.7 million and gains on foreign currency exchange of $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Table of Contents
Income tax benefit (provision)
Year Ended December 31,
$ Change
% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Income tax benefit (provision)
Effective income tax rate
NM = Not meaningful
For further details of income tax matters, see “ Note 13—Income Taxes ” to the consolidated financial statements included in “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .”
In 2025, the effective income tax rate is higher than the statutory rate of 21% due primarily to the effect of cross-border tax laws, change in unrecognized tax benefits and state taxes, partially offset by research credits and a valuation allowance release.
In 2024, the Company recorded a benefit, despite pre-tax income, due primarily to the valuation allowance release described in the three month discussion and research credits, partially offset by tax shortfalls generated by the vesting of stock-based awards.
Table of Contents
PRINCIPLES OF FINANCIAL REPORTING
We report Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). This measure is considered our primary segment measure of profitability and one of the metrics by which we evaluate the performance of our businesses, and on which our internal budgets are based and may also impact management compensation. We believe that investors should have access to, and we are obligated to provide, the same set of tools that we use in analyzing our results. This non-GAAP measure should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. We endeavor to compensate for the limitations of the non-GAAP measure presented by providing the comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measure. We encourage investors to examine the reconciling adjustments between the GAAP and non-GAAP measure, which we discuss below.
Definition of Non-GAAP Measure
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) is defined as operating income excluding: (1) stock-based compensation expense; (2) depreciation; (3) acquisition-related items consisting of amortization of intangible assets and impairments of goodwill and intangible assets, if applicable; and (4) restructuring. The Company believes this measure is useful for analysts and investors as this measure allows a more meaningful comparison between its performance and that of its competitors. Adjusted EBITDA has certain limitations because it excludes the impact of these expenses.
Non-Cash Expenses That Are Excluded from Our Non-GAAP Measure
Stock-based compensation expense consists of expense associated with grants, including stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock options, performance-based RSUs (“PSUs”) and market-based awards. These expenses are not paid in cash and we view the economic costs of stock-based awards to be the dilution to our share base; we also include the related shares in our fully diluted shares outstanding for GAAP earnings per share using the treasury stock method. PSUs and market-based awards are included only to the extent the applicable performance or market condition(s) have been met (assuming the end of the reporting period is the end of the contingency period). The Company is currently settling all stock-based awards on a net basis and remits the required tax-withholding amounts from its current funds.
Depreciation is a non-cash expense relating to our capitalized software, leasehold improvements and equipment and is computed using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated useful lives, or, in the case of leasehold improvements, the lease term, if shorter.
Amortization of intangible assets and impairments of goodwill and intangible assets are non-cash expenses related primarily to acquisitions. At the time of an acquisition, the identifiable definite-lived intangible assets of the acquired company, such as professional relationships, technology, and trade names, are valued and amortized over their estimated lives. Value is also assigned to acquired indefinite-lived intangible assets, which comprise trade names and trademarks, and goodwill that are not subject to amortization. An impairment is recorded when the carrying value of an intangible asset or goodwill exceeds its fair value. We believe that intangible assets represent costs incurred by the acquired company to build value prior to acquisition and the related amortization and impairments of intangible assets or goodwill, if applicable, are not ongoing costs of doing business.
Restructuring are costs associated with a formal restructuring plan that are primarily related to workforce reductions. The Company excludes these expenses because they are not reflective of ordinary course ongoing business and operating results.
Table of Contents
The following tables reconcile net earnings attributable to Angi shareholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the Company's reportable segments and net earnings (loss) attributable to Angi shareholders:
Year Ended December 31, 2025
Operating Income
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
Depreciation
Amortization
of Intangibles
Restructuring
Adjusted
EBITDA
(In thousands)
International
Total
Interest expense
Other income, net
Earnings before income taxes
Income tax provision
Net earnings
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net earnings attributable to Angi Inc. shareholders
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Operating Income (Loss)
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
Depreciation
Amortization
of Intangibles
Restructuring
Adjusted
EBITDA
(In thousands)
International
Total
Interest expense
Other income, net
Earnings before income taxes
Income tax benefit
Net earnings
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net earnings attributable to Angi Inc. shareholders
Table of Contents
FINANCIAL POSITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial Position
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
(In thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents:
United States
All other countries
Total cash and cash equivalents
Long-term debt:
ANGI Group Senior Notes
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs
Total long-term debt, net
The Company entered into a credit agreement in November 2025, establishing a senior secured revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of $175.0 million , including a letter of credit sublimit of up to $25.0 million . There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of December 31, 2025.
At December 31, 2025, all of the Company’s international cash can be repatriated without significant consequences.
For a detailed description of long-term debt, see “ Note 7—Long-term Debt ” to the consolidated financial statements included in “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .”
Cash Flow Information
In summary, the Company’s cash flows are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Net cash provided by operating activities consists of earnings adjusted for non-cash items and the effect of changes in working capital. Non-cash adjustments include depreciation, provision for credit losses, stock-based compensation expense, non-cash lease expense (including impairment of right-of-use assets), deferred income taxes, and amortization of intangibles.
Adjustments to net earnings attributable to continuing operations consist primarily of $45.3 million of depreciation, $14.8 million of stock-based compensation expense, $13.2 million of deferred income taxes and $7.4 million of non-cash lease expense. The decrease from changes in working capital is due primarily to a decrease of $20.0 million in deferred revenue and a decrease of $13.1 million in operating lease liabilities, partially offset by a decrease of $13.4 million in other ass ets. The increase in accounts receivable, coupled with the non-cash impact from the provision for credit losses, resulted in a $4.7 million decrease in accounts receivable, net, excluding foreign currency impact of $1.1 million. The reduction in accounts receivable, net is due to lower revenue. The decrease in deferred revenue is due primarily to the mix shift in customer packages towards monthly subscriptions, lowering the prevalence of memberships and annual and quarterly prepaid packages. The decrease in operating lease liabilities is due to cash payments on leases net of interest accretion. The decrease in other assets is due to lower capitalized sales commissions, which were impacted by a reduction in the size of the sales force, a larger portion of sales commissions being expensed rather than capitalized in the period, and a shift to annual bonuses for roles that previously received commissions.
Table of Contents
Net cash used in investing activities attributable to continuing operations includes capital expenditures of $59.6 million primarily related to investments in capitalized software to support the Company’s products and services.
Net cash used in financing activities attributable to continuing operations includes $148.7 million for the repurchase of 10.5 million shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, on a settlement date basis, at an average price of $14.15 per share, $8.0 million for the payment of withholding taxes on behalf of employees for stock-based awards that were net settled, and $1.7 million of debt issuance costs in connection with the $175.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility.
Adjustments to net earnings attributable to continuing operations consist primarily of $86.1 million of depreciation, $57.3 million of provision for credit losses, $34.8 million of stock-based compensation expense, and $16.0 million of non-cash lease expense (including impairment of right-of-use assets), partially offset by $24.0 million of deferred income taxes. The decrease from changes in working capital consists primarily of an increase of $45.4 million in accounts receivable and decreases of $19.4 million in operating lease liabilities and $7.7 million in deferred revenue, partially offset by a decrease of $28.9 million in other assets. The increase in accounts receivable is due to timing of cash receipts. The decrease in operating lease liabilities is due to cash payments on leases net of interest accretion. The decrease in deferred revenue is due primarily to lower annual memberships, primarily at in the U.S. The decrease in other assets is due primarily to lower capitalized sales commissions which were impacted by a reduction in the size of the salesforce, a larger portion of sales commissions being expensed rather than capitalized in the period, and a shift to annual bonuses for roles that previously received commissions as well as a payment received related to insurance coverage for previously incurred legal fees and a decrease in prepaid hosting services.
Net cash used in investing activities attributable to continuing operations includes capital expenditures of $50.5 million primarily related to investments in capitalized software to support the Company’s products and services.
Net cash used in financing activities attributable to continuing operations includes $28.6 million for the repurchase of 1.3 million shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, on a settlement date basis, at an average price of $22.74 per share, $16.0 million for the purchase of the remaining noncontrolling interests of a foreign subsidiary, and $7.6 million for the payment of withholding taxes on behalf of employees for stock-based awards that were net settled.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Debt
As of December 31, 2025, we had $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.875% senior notes due August 15, 2028 (the “ANGI Group Senior Notes”). Interest on the ANGI Group Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year. In December 2025, ANGI Group amended the indenture governing the ANGI Group Senior Notes to add certain U.S. subsidiaries of ANGI Group that are guarantors under the Credit Agreement (defined below) as additional guarantors under such indenture.
In November 2025, ANGI Group entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), with the lenders and issuing lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, providing for a senior secured revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of $175.0 million, including a letter of credit sublimit of up to $25.0 million (the “Revolving Facility”). The Revolving Facility matures on November 6, 2030, provided that the maturity date shall at all times be no later than the 91st day prior to the maturity date of the ANGI Group Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2025, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility. For additional details, see “ Note 7—Long-term Debt ” to the consolidated financial statements included in “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .”
Share Repurchase Authorizations and Activity
Du ring the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company repurchased 10.5 million shares of its Class A Common Stock, on a trade date basis, at an average price of $14.15 per share, or $148.7 million in aggregate. On August 2, 2024, the board of directors of the Company approved a stock repurchase authorization of 2.5 million shares (the “2024 Share Authorization”), all of which were exhausted during the second quarter of 2025. On May 5, 2025 and September 17, 2025, the board of directors of the Company approved a new stock repurchase authorization of 5.0 million shares of its Class A Common Stock (“May 2025 Share Authorization”) and approximately 3.2 million shares of its Class A Common Stock (“September 2025 Share Authorization,” and collectively with the 2024 Share Authorization and May 2025 Share Authorization, the “Share Repurchase Programs”), respectively. Both the May 2025 Share Authorization and September 2025 Share Authorization were exhausted during the fourth quarter of 2025. As of December 31, 2025, there were no shares remaining in any of the Share Repurchase Programs.
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The Company enters into various contractual arrangements as a part of its continued operations. Material contractual obligations described in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements within “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ” includes operating leases as described in “ Note 5—Leases ,” and principal and interest payments on long-term as debt described in “ Note 7—Long-term Debt .”
The Company has material purchase obligations which represent legally binding agreements to purchase goods and services that specify all significant terms. Future payments under these agreements at December 31, 2025 are as follows:
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
Less Than
1 Year
Years
Years
More Than
5 Years
Total
(In thousands)
Purchase obligations
Purchase obligations include $17.3 million related to cloud computing spend to be made in 2026.
Capital Expenditures
The Company’s 2026 capital expenditures are expected to be lower than 2025 capital expenditures of $59.6 million by approximately 5% to 10% due to reduction in capitalized software.
Liquidity Assessment
The Company’s liquidity could be negatively affected by a decrease in demand for its products and services due to economic or other factors.
The Company believes its existing cash, cash equivalents, expected positive cash flows generated from operations, and if necessary, our borrowing capacity under the Revolving Facility, will be sufficient to fund its normal operating requirements, including capital expenditures, debt service, the payment of withholding taxes paid on behalf of employees for net-settled stock-based awards, and investing and other commitments, for the next twelve months. The Company may consider additional forms of liquidity. These forms of liquidity could subject us to operating and financial covenants that may restrict our business activities, including the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments and certain payments. From time to time, we may also elect to raise additional capital through the sale of additional equity or debt financing to fund business activities such as strategic acquisitions, share repurchases, or other purposes.
Additional financing may not be available on terms favorable to the Company or at all, and may also be impacted by any disruptions in the financial markets. In addition, the Company’s existing indebtedness could limit its ability to obtain additional financing.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The following disclosure is provided to supplement the descriptions of the Company’s accounting policies contained in “ Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” to the consolidated financial statements included “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ” in regard to significant areas of judgment. Management of the Company is required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions during the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These estimates, judgments and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the related disclosure of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Because of the size of the financial statement elements to which they relate, some of our accounting policies and estimates have a more significant impact on our financial statements than others. What follows is a discussion of some of our more significant accounting policies and estimates.
Table of Contents
Credit Losses
The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provides an allowance when it has determined that all or a portion of the receivable will not be collected. The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for the estimated amount of accounts receivable that will not be collected. The allowance for credit losses is based upon a number of factors, including the length of time accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the specific customer’s ability to pay its obligation to the Company and any other forward-looking data regarding customers’ ability to pay that is available. The duration of time between the Company’s issuance of an invoice and payment due date is not significant. The carrying value of the credit loss allowance is $15.9 million and $20.5 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The provision for credit losses was $48.5 million and $57.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Recoverability of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
The carrying value of goodwill i s $890.1 million and $883.4 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist of the Company’s acquired trade names and trademarks, have a carrying value of $167.1 million and $167.7 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed annually for impairment as of October 1, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset has declined below its carrying value. In performing its annual goodwill impairment assessment, the Company has the option under GAAP to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value; if the conclusion of the qualitative assessment is that there are no indicators of impairment, the Company does not perform a quantitative test, which would require a valuation of the reporting unit, as of October 1. GAAP provides a not all-inclusive set of examples of macroeconomic, industry, market and company specific factors for entities to consider in performing the qualitative assessment described above; management considers the factors it deems relevant in making its more likely than not assessments. While the Company also has the option under GAAP to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of its indefinite-lived intangible assets are less than their carrying values, the Company’s policy is to determine the fair value of each of its indefinite-lived intangible assets annually as of October 1, in part, because the level of effort required to perform the quantitative and qualitative assessments is essentially equivalent.
If the conclusion of our qualitative assessment is that there are indicators of impairment and a quantitative test is required, the annual or interim quantitative test of the recovery of goodwill involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting unit that is being tested to its carrying value. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, a goodwill impairment equal to the excess is recorded.
The Company’s annual assessment of the recovery of goodwill begins with management’s reassessment of its operating segments and reporting units. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment, which is referred to as a component. This reassessment of reporting units is also made each time the Company changes its operating segments to the extent that this also results in a change in reporting units. If the goodwill of a reporting unit is allocated to newly formed reporting units, the allocation is usually made to each reporting unit based upon their relative fair values.
For the Company’s annual goodwill test at October 1, 2025, the Company quantitatively tested the U.S. and International reporting units. The Company’s quantitative tests resulted in no impairments. Given the decline in the Company’s stock price after October 1, 2025, the Company subsequently quantitatively tested all reporting units with goodwill as of December 31, 2025, and no impairments were noted.
The October 1, 2024 annual assessment of goodwill did not identify any impairments.
The fair value of the Company's reporting units is determined using both an income approach based on discounted cash flows (“DCF”) and a market approach when it tests goodwill for impairment, either on an interim basis or annual basis as of October 1 each year. Determining fair value using a DCF analysis requires the exercise of significant judgment with respect to several items, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows and appropriate discount rates. The expected cash flows used in the DCF analyses are based on the Company’s most recent forecast and budget and, for years beyond the budget, the Company’s estimates, which are based, in part, on forecasted growth rates. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the expected future cash flows of the respective reporting units. Assumptions used in the DCF analyses, including the discount rate, are assessed based on the reporting units' current results and forecasted future
Table of Contents
performance, as well as macroeconomic and industry specific factors. The discount rates used in the quantitative tests as of December 31, 2025 for determining the fair value of the Company’s U.S. and International reporting units we re 12.0% and 14.0%, respectively. The discount rates used in the quantitative tests as of October 1, 2025 for determining the fair value of the Company’s U.S. and International reporting units were 12.0% and 14.5%, respectively. Determin ing fair value using a market approach considers multiples of financial metrics based on both acquisitions and trading multiples of a selected peer group of companies. From the comparable companies, a representative market multiple is determined which is applied to financial metrics to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit. To determine a peer group of companies for our respective reporting units, we considered companies relevant in terms of consumer use, monetization model, margin and growth characteristics, and brand strength operating in their respective sectors.
As a result of the valuation process, we determined that the fair value of the U.S. and International reporting units exceeded the carrying value and thus there was no impairment of goodwill in 2025. The fair value based on the valuation exceeded the carrying value of the U.S. and International reporting units by $109.7 million and $242.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2025.
The Company determines the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets using an avoided royalty DCF valuation analysis. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis include the selection of appropriate royalty and discount rates and estimating the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the expected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets. The royalty rates used in the DCF analyses are based upon an estimate of the royalty rates that a market participant would pay to license the Company’s trade names and trademarks. The future cash flows are based on the Company's most recent forecast and budget and, for years beyond the budget, the Company’s estimates, which are based, in part, on forecasted growth rates. Assumptions used in the avoided royalty DCF analyses, including the discount rate and royalty rate, are assessed annually based on the actual and projected cash flows related to the asset, as well as mac roeconomic and industry specific factors. The discount rates used in the Company’s annual indefinite-lived impairment assessment ranged from 12.0% to 14.5% in 2025 and 12.5% to 14.5% in 2024 and the royalty rates used ranged from 2.0% to 4.5% in 2025 and 2.5% to 4.5% in 2024.
In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company identified an impairment charge of $1.8 million related to a certain indefinite-lived trade name at the U.S. reporting unit. The discount rate used to value this trade name was 12.0% , and the royalty rate was 2.5%. The impairment of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is included in “Amortization of intangibles” in the statement of operations.
In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company identified an impairment charge of $2.6 million related to a certain indefinite-lived trade name at the U.S. reporting unit. The discount rate used to value this trade name was 14.0% , and the royalty rate was 2.5%. The impairment of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is included in “Amortization of intangibles” in the statement of operations.
Software Development Costs
We capitalize internally developed software costs (including employee payroll costs, stock-based compensation and benefit costs as well as third party production costs) subsequent to identifying technological feasibility of the software project. Significant management judgment is required in assessing when technological feasibility is established.
Depreciation of internally developed software commences when the software is available for release for its intended use and is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the software, which is typically 2-3 years. The net carrying value of capitalized software is $94.6 million and $73.1 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Income Taxes
Through March 31, 2025, the Company was included within IAC’s tax group for purposes of federal and consolidated state income tax return filings. In all periods presented, the income tax benefit and/or provision has been computed for the Company on an as if standalone, separate return basis and payments to and refunds from IAC for the Company’s share of IAC’s consolidated federal and state tax return liabilities/receivables calculated on this basis have been reflected within cash flows from operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The tax sharing agreement between the Company and IAC governs the parties’ respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to tax matters, including responsibility for taxes attributable to the Company, entitlement to refunds, allocation of tax attributes and other matters and, therefore, ultimately governs the amount payable to or receivable from IAC with respect to income taxes. Any differences between taxes currently payable to or receivable from IAC under the tax sharing agreement and the current tax provision or benefit computed on an as if
Table of Contents
standalone, separate return basis for GAAP are reflected as adjustments to additional paid-in capital in the statement of shareholders’ equity and financing activities within the statement of cash flows.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying values of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the balance of the Company’s net deferred tax asset is $124.7 million and $167.6 million, respectively.
The Company evaluates and accounts for uncertain tax positions using a two-step approach. Recognition (step one) occurs when the Company concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustainable upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. De-recognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when the Company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. This measurement step is inherently difficult and requires subjective estimations of such amounts to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company has unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, of $14.1 million and $9.7 million, respectively. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and unrecognized tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustment and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. Although management currently believes changes to unrecognized tax benefits from period to period and differences between amounts paid, if any, upon resolution of issues raised in audits and amounts previously provided will not have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of the Company, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future.
The ultimate amount of deferred income tax assets realized and the amounts paid for deferred income tax liabilities and unrecognized tax benefits may vary from our estimates due to future changes in income tax law, state income tax apportionment or the outcome of any review of our tax returns by the various tax authorities, as well as actual operating results of the Company that vary significantly from anticipated results.
The Company regularly assesses the realizability of deferred tax assets considering all available evidence including, to the extent applicable, the nature, frequency and severity of prior cumulative losses, forecasts of future taxable income, tax filing status, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, available tax planning and historical experience. During 2025, the Company’s valuation allowance decreased by $11.3 million primarily due to a change in judgment on the realizability of Travaux France NOLs and the removal of the Capital Loss asset and valuation allowance as part of the IAC tax sharing agreement. At December 31, 2025, the Company has a valuation allowance of $31.2 million related to the portion of NOLs and other items for which it is more likely than not that the tax benefit will not be realized.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation at the Company is inherently complex. Our desire is to attract, retain, incentivize and reward our management team and employees at the Company by allowing them to benefit directly from the value they help to create. We accomplish these objectives, in part, by issuing equity awards denominated in the equity of Angi or in the equity of one of our subsidiaries. We further refine this approach by tailoring certain equity awards to the applicable circumstances. For example, we issue certain equity awards for which vesting is linked to the achievement of a performance target such as revenue or profits; these awards are referred to as PSUs. In other cases, we link the vesting of equity awards to the achievement of a value target for a subsidiary or Angi’s stock price, as applicable; these awards are referred to as market-based awards (“MSUs”). The nature and variety of these types of equity-based awards creates complexity in our determination of stock-based compensation expense.
Business combinations may result in the modification of equity awards, which may create additional complexity and additional stock-based compensation expense. Also, our internal reorganizations can also lead to modifications of equity awards and may result in additional complexity and stock-based compensation expense.
Stock-based compensation expense reflected in our statements of operations includes expense related to the Company’s RSU awards, including MSUs and PSUs, stock options, stock appreciation rights, equity instruments denominated in shares of one of our subsidiaries, and an allocation of expense related to IAC denominated restricted stock.
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $14.8 million and $34.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Table of Contents
The Company issues RSUs, PSUs and MSUs. For RSUs, the value of the instrument is measured at the grant date as the fair value of the underlying Angi’s common stock and expensed as stock-based compensation expense over the vesting term. For PSUs, the value of the instrument is measured at the grant date as the fair value of the underlying Angi’s common stock and expensed as stock-based compensation over the vesting term when the performance targets are considered probable of being achieved. For MSUs, a lattice model is used to estimate the value of the awards which is expensed as stock-based compensation expense over the vesting term as the service is rendered. The Company also issues stock options and stock appreciation rights. The Company estimates the fair value of newly granted or modified stock appreciation rights and stock options, including equity instruments denominated in shares of one of our subsidiaries, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions, the most significant of which include expected term, expected volatility of the underlying shares, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield. In addition, the recognition of stock-based compensation expense is impacted by our estimated forfeiture rates, which are based, in part, on historical forfeiture rates. For stock appreciation rights and stock options, including equity instruments denominated in shares of one of our subsidiaries, the grant date fair value of the award is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period of the award.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see “ Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ” to the consolidated financial statements included in “ Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .”