Ares Core Infrastructure Fund - 10-K

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our Shares involves a number of significant risks. The following information is a discussion of material risk factors associated with an investment in our Shares specifically, as well as those factors generally associated with an investment in a company with an investment objective, investment policies, or capital structure similar to ours. In addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, you should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our Shares. The risks below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or not presently deemed material by us may also impair our operations and performance. If any of the following events occur our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such cases, the NAV of our Shares could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risk Factor Summary

The following is a summary of the principal risks that you should carefully consider before investing in our securities.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure

• We are a relatively new company and have a limited operating history.

• The capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. Such market conditions may materially and adversely affect debt and equity capital markets, which may have a negative impact on our business and operations.

• A failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC may significantly reduce our operating flexibility.

• We are dependent upon certain key systems and personnel of Ares for our future success and upon their access to other Ares investment professionals.

• We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.

• We are subject to a 150% asset coverage ratio.

• Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.

• There are significant potential conflicts of interest that could impact our investment returns.

• The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

• Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if a significant investment fails to perform as expected.

• We are treated as an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and are subject to U.S. federal and applicable state and local income tax on our net income at the rates applicable to corporations.

Risks Relating to Our Investments

• Investments in portfolio companies that operate Infrastructure Assets are generally larger, lack liquidity and may be subject to significant regulatory limitations.

• The operation and maintenance of Infrastructure Assets involve significant capital expenditures and various risks, which may not be under our control.

• Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may result in substantial costs to our portfolio companies.

• We may face heightened risks unique to the nature of our investments in portfolio companies that own or operate Infrastructure Assets, including risks of lower-than-projected revenues and availability of raw materials, greater-than projected costs and the impact of substantial regulation of Infrastructure Assets. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Investments—We may face heightened risks unique to the nature of our portfolio companies.”

• The acquisition of portfolio companies that operate Infrastructure Assets exposes us to a higher level of regulatory control than typically imposed on other businesses.

• Most of our portfolio investments are not publicly traded and, as a result, the fair value of these investments may not be readily determinable.

• Our equity and debt investments in Infrastructure Assets may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investments.

Table of Contents

• Our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged.

• Our portfolio companies may not exhibit mitigating characteristics typical of assets, businesses or projects in the infrastructure space. As a result, there can be no assurance that any perceived benefits of our portfolio companies will be realized.

• We may acquire portfolio companies in the renewable energy industry, which is subject to risks of a rapidly evolving market.

• Geographical concentration of our Infrastructure Assets may make the assets more susceptible to changing conditions of particular geographic regions.

Risks Related to our Shares

• The amount of any distributions we may make is uncertain. Our distributions may exceed our earnings, particularly during the period before we have substantially invested the net proceeds from our Private Offering. Therefore, portions of the distributions that we make may represent a return of capital to you that will lower your tax basis in your Shares and thereby increase the amount of capital gain (or decrease the amount of capital loss) realized upon a subsequent sale or redemption of such Shares, and reduce the amount of funds we have for investment in targeted assets.

• We are a privately placed, perpetual-life BDC and our Shareholders may not be able to transfer or otherwise dispose of our Shares at desired times or prices, or at all.

• Certain investors will be subject to 1934 Act filing requirements relating to their beneficial ownership of Shares.

General Risks

• Difficult market and political conditions may adversely affect our businesses in many ways, including by reducing the value or hampering the performance of our investments or reducing our ability to raise or deploy capital, each of which could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

• Security incidents or cyber-attacks, affecting us or our third-party service providers, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential, personal or other sensitive information and/or damage to our business relationships or reputation, any of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

• Developments in artificial intelligence could disrupt markets in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, legal and regulatory risks and compliance costs.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure

We have a limited operating history.

We are a closed-end management investment company organized as a Delaware statutory trust that elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. We have a limited operating history. As a result, prospective investors have a limited track record or history on which to base their investment decision. We are subject to the business risks and uncertainties associated with newly formed businesses, including the risk that we will not achieve our investment objective and the value of a Shareholder’s investment could decline substantially or become worthless. Further, we are the first privately offered BDC our Adviser has managed. While we believe that the past professional experiences of our Adviser’s investment team, including investment and financial experience of our Adviser’s senior management, will increase the likelihood that our Adviser will be able to manage us successfully, there can be no assurance that this will be the case.

Our Board may change our operating policies and strategies without prior notice or Shareholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse to our results of operations and financial condition.

Our Board has the general authority to modify or waive our current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies without prior notice, which authority may be exercised without prior notice and without Shareholder approval unless otherwise required by applicable law. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies, investment criteria and strategies would have on our business, NAV, operating results and value of our Shares. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay you distributions and cause you to lose all or part of your investment. Moreover, we have significant flexibility in investing the net proceeds from our Private Offering and may use the

Table of Contents

net proceeds from our Private Offering in ways with which investors may not agree or for purposes other than those contemplated in this Annual Report.

Our Board may amend our Declaration of Trust without prior Shareholder approval.

So long as an amendment to our Declaration of Trust does not materially alter or change the powers, preferences, or special rights of our Shares so as to affect them adversely, our Board may, without Shareholder vote, subject to applicable federal and state law and certain exceptions, amend or otherwise supplement our Declaration of Trust by making an amendment, a Declaration of Trust supplemental thereto or an amended and restated Declaration of Trust, including without limitation to classify the Board, to impose advance notice bylaw provisions for trustee nominations or for Shareholder proposals, to require super-majority approval of transactions with significant Shareholders or other provisions that may be characterized as anti-takeover in nature.

The capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. Such market conditions may materially and adversely affect the debt and equity capital markets, which may have a negative impact on our business and operations.

From time to time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. Such disruptions may result in, amongst other things, write-offs, the re-pricing of credit risk, the failure of financial institutions or worsening general economic conditions, any of which could materially and adversely impact the broader financial and credit markets and reduce the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular.

Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods and there can be no assurance these market conditions will not occur or worsen in the future, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world's major economies, such as the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and continued conflicts and political unrest in the Middle East and South America. Sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other countries, including in connection with hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East and tensions between China and Taiwan have caused additional financial market volatility and affected the global economy. Concerns over future inflation volatility, economic recession, as well as interest rate volatility and fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels, as well as geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility. In addition, social unrest, changes regarding immigration and work permit policies and other political and security concerns may not abate, which may cause the debt and equity capital markets and our business to be adversely affected both within and outside of regions experiencing ongoing conflicts. Market uncertainty and volatility have also been magnified as a result of the current U.S. presidential administration and ongoing uncertainties regarding actual and potential shifts in U.S. and foreign, trade, economic and other policies, including with respect to treaties and tariffs. In addition to impacting the capital markets, global economic, political and market conditions could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Risk Factors—General Risk Factors—Difficult market and political conditions may adversely affect our businesses in many ways, including by reducing the value or hampering the performance of our investments or reducing our ability to raise or deploy capital, each of which could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.”

Equity capital may be difficult to raise during periods of adverse or volatile market conditions because, subject to some limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are generally not able to issue additional shares of our Shares at a price less than NAV without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our Shareholders and our Independent Trustees.

Volatility and dislocation in the capital markets can create a challenging environment in which to raise or access equity or debt capital. Such conditions could make it difficult to extend the maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that will be available to us in the future, if at all, may continue to be at a higher cost, including as a result of the current interest rate environment, and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we have historically experienced. If we are unable to raise or refinance debt, then our equity investors may not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or to fund existing commitments to our portfolio companies. Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity).

Significant disruption or volatility in the capital markets may also affect the pace of our investment activity and the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. Thus, the illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments to access capital if required, and as a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we

Table of Contents

have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. An inability to raise or access capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

A failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC may significantly reduce our operating flexibility.

We elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. If we fail to maintain our status as a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company that is required to register under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to additional regulatory restrictions and significantly decrease our operating flexibility. In addition, any such failure could cause an event of default under our outstanding indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are dependent upon certain key personnel of our Adviser for our future success and upon their access to other Ares investment professionals.

We depend on the diligence, skill, judgment, network of business contacts and personal reputations of certain key personnel of our Adviser, including Ares’ infrastructure opportunities team, and our future success depends on their continued service. We also depend, to a significant extent, on access to the investment professionals of other groups within Ares, the information and deal flow generated by Ares’ investment professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio management activities, as well as the support of senior business operations professionals of Ares.

The departure or misconduct of any of these individuals, or of a significant number of the investment professionals or partners of Ares, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that Ares Capital Management II will remain our Adviser or that we will continue to have access to Ares’ investment professionals or its information and deal flow. Further, there can be no assurance that we will replicate historical success of Ares or Ares’ other funds, including that of Ares Capital Corporation and Ares Strategic Income Fund, and we caution you that our investment returns could be substantially lower than the returns achieved by other Ares funds.

Our financial condition and results of operations depend on our ability to manage future growth effectively.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our ability to acquire suitable investments and monitor and administer those investments, which depends, in turn, on our Adviser’s ability to identify, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria.

Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of the structuring of our investment process and the ability of our Adviser to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us. Our executive officers and the members of the investment committee have substantial responsibilities in connection with their roles at Ares and with other Ares funds as well as responsibilities under the Investment Advisory Agreement. They may also be called upon to provide significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. These demands on their time, which will increase as the number of investments grow, may distract them or slow the rate of investment. In order for us to grow, Ares will need to hire, train, supervise, manage and retain new employees. However, we cannot assure you that Ares will be able to do so effectively. Any failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to grow depends on our ability to raise capital.

We will need to periodically access the capital markets to raise cash to fund new investments in excess of our repayments, and we may also need to access the capital markets to refinance any existing or future debt obligations to the extent such maturing obligations are not repaid with availability under our revolving credit facilities, which include a Revolving Credit Agreement (the “ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement”) and a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “BNP Funding Facility”, and together with the ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement, the “Revolving Credit Facilities”), or cash flows from operations. In addition, our wholly-owned subsidiaries have entered credit agreements to fund certain portfolio company investments, including the Denali Credit Agreement (as defined below), the Aspen Credit Agreement (as defined below), and the Tango Credit Agreement (as defined below). We refer to the Denali Credit Agreement, the Aspen Credit Agreement, and the Tango Credit Agreement collectively as the "Investment Credit Facilities." We intend to continue to borrow from financial institutions and issue additional securities to fund our growth. Unfavorable economic or capital market conditions may increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or could result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. An inability to successfully access the capital markets may limit our ability to refinance our existing debt obligations as they come due and/or to fully execute our business strategy and could limit our ability to grow or cause us to have to shrink the size of our business, which could decrease our earnings, if any. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure—The capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. Such market

Table of Contents

conditions may materially and adversely affect the debt and equity capital markets, which may have a negative impact on our business and operations.”

In addition, we are currently allowed to borrow amounts or issue debt securities or preferred stock, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” such that our asset coverage, as calculated pursuant to the 1940 Act, equals at least 150% (or 200% if certain requirements under the 1940 Act are not met) immediately after such borrowing (i.e., we are able to borrow up to two dollars for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities issued by us). Such requirement, in certain circumstances, may restrict our ability to borrow or issue debt securities or preferred shares. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our Adviser’s and our Board’s assessments of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing or issuance of senior securities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase the amount available to us under the Revolving Credit Facilities or the Investment Credit Facilities, obtain other lines of credit or issue senior securities at all or on terms acceptable to us.

Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to, and the way in which we, raise additional capital.

We may issue senior securities or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. As a BDC, we are currently permitted to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as calculated pursuant to the 1940 Act, equals at least 150% (or 200% if certain requirements under the 1940 Act are not met) after each such incurrence or issuance (i.e., we are able to borrow up to two dollars for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities issued by us). If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test, which may prohibit us from making distributions or repurchasing our Shares. In addition, our inability to satisfy this test could cause an event of default under our existing, and any future, indebtedness. If we cannot satisfy this test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness. Accordingly, any failure to satisfy this test could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Also, to generate cash for funding new investments, we may in the future seek to issue additional debt or to securitize certain of our loans. The 1940 Act may impose restrictions on the structure of any such securitization.

We are not generally able to issue and sell our Shares at a price below net asset value per Share. We may, however, sell our Shares, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our Shares, at a price below the current net asset value per share of our Shares if our Board determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our Shareholders and our Shareholders approve such sale. Any such sale would be dilutive to the net asset value per share of our Shares. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the determination of our Board, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any commission or discount).

We are subject to limited restrictions with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be invested in a single issuer.

We operate as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that we are not limited by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of our assets that we may invest in a single issuer. We intend to target investments in Infrastructure Assets; therefore, our investments may be focused on relatively few industries. To the extent that we continue to hold large positions in a small number of issuers, or within a particular industry, our NAV may be subject to greater fluctuation. We may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence or a downturn in particular industry.

The requirement that we invest a sufficient portion of our assets in Qualifying Assets could preclude us from investing in accordance with our current business strategy; conversely, the failure to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in Qualifying Assets could result in our failure to maintain our status as a BDC.

As a BDC, in accordance with the 1940 Act, we may not acquire any asset other than Qualifying Assets unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are Qualifying Assets. Therefore, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not Qualifying Assets. Conversely, if we fail to invest a sufficient portion of our assets in Qualifying Assets, we could lose our status as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making additional investments in existing portfolio companies in the future, which could result in the dilution of our position, or could require us to dispose of investments at an inopportune time to comply with the 1940 Act. If we were forced to sell non-qualifying investments in the portfolio for compliance purposes, the proceeds from such sale could be significantly less than the current value of such investments.

Table of Contents

We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.

Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. We currently borrow under the Revolving Credit Facilities and Investment Credit Facilities and have issued or assumed other senior securities (including the Investment Credit Facilities), and in the future may borrow from, or issue additional senior securities to banks, insurance companies, funds, institutional investors and other lenders and investors. Lenders and holders of such senior securities have fixed dollar claims on our consolidated assets that will be superior to the claims of our Shareholders or any preferred shareholders. If the value of our consolidated assets increases, then leveraging would cause the NAV per Share of our Shares to increase more sharply than it would have had we not incurred leverage.

Conversely, if the value of our consolidated assets decreases, leveraging would cause NAV to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not incurred leverage. Similarly, any increase in our consolidated income in excess of consolidated interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would had we not incurred leverage, while any decrease in our consolidated income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not incurred leverage. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make distributions or repurchase our Shares. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful.

As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $220.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facilities and approximately $843.2 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Investment Credit Facilities.

In order for us to cover our annual interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 2025, we must achieve annual returns on our December 31, 2025 total assets of at least 1.85%. The weighted average stated interest rate charged on our principal amount of outstanding indebtedness as of December 31, 2025 was 6.01%. We intend to continue borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facilities in the future and we may increase the size of the Revolving Credit Facilities or the Investment Credit Facilities or issue debt securities or other evidences of indebtedness (although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so). For more information on our indebtedness, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Our ability to service our debt depends largely on our financial performance and is subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. The amount of leverage that we employ at any particular time will depend on our Adviser’s and our Board’s assessments of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing and is subject to our compliance with our asset coverage requirement following any such borrowing.

The Revolving Credit Facilities and the Investment Credit Facilities impose financial and operating covenants that restrict our or our subsidiaries’ business activities, including limitations that could hinder our or our subsidiaries’ ability to finance additional loans and investments. A failure to renew the Revolving Credit Facilities or the Investment Credit Facilities or to add new or replacement debt facilities or to issue additional debt securities or other evidences of indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The following table illustrates the effect on return to a holder of our Shares of the leverage created by our use of borrowing at the weighted average stated interest rate of 6.01% as of December 31, 2025, together with (a) our total value of net assets as of December 31, 2025; (b) approximately $1,063.2 million in aggregate principal amount of indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and (c) hypothetical annual returns on our portfolio of minus 10% to plus 10%:

Assumed return on portfolio (net of expenses) (1)

Corresponding return to Shareholders (2)

(1) The assumed portfolio return is required by SEC regulations and is not a prediction of, and does not represent, our projected or actual performance. Actual returns may be greater or less than those appearing in the table. Pursuant to SEC regulations, this table is calculated as of December 31, 2025. As a result, it has not been updated to take into account any changes in assets or leverage since December 31, 2025.

(2) In order to compute the “Corresponding return to Shareholders,” the “Assumed return on portfolio” is multiplied by the total value of our assets as of December 31, 2025 to obtain an assumed return to us. From this amount, the interest expense (calculated by multiplying the weighted average stated interest rate of 6.01% by the approximately $1,063.2 million of principal outstanding debt as of December 31, 2025) is subtracted to determine the return available to Shareholders. The return available to Shareholders is then divided by the total value of our net assets as of December 31, 2025 to determine the “Corresponding return to Shareholders.”

Table of Contents

We are subject to a 150% asset coverage ratio.

In accordance with the 1940 Act, a BDC is allowed to borrow amounts such that its asset coverage, calculated pursuant to the 1940 Act, is at least 150% after such borrowing if certain requirements, including obtaining certain approvals, are met. The reduced asset coverage requirement permits a BDC to borrow up to two dollars for every dollar it has in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities issued by it. Because our initial Shareholders approved a proposal that allows us to reduce our asset coverage ratio to 150%, effective December 2, 2024, we are subject to a 150% asset coverage ratio.

Leverage magnifies the potential for loss on investments in our indebtedness and on invested equity capital. As we may use leverage to partially finance our investments, you will experience increased risks of investing in our securities. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the NAV attributable to our Shares to increase more sharply than it would had we not leveraged our business. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net investment income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net investment income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make distributions or pay distributions on our Shares, make scheduled debt payments or other payments related to our securities. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure—We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.”

In addition to regulatory requirements that restrict our ability to raise capital, the Revolving Credit Facilities and the Investment Credit Facilities contain various covenants that, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under such credit facilities, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

The agreements governing the Revolving Credit Facilities and the Investment Credit Facilities may require us to comply with certain financial and operational covenants. These covenants may include, among other things:

• restrictions on the level of indebtedness that we are permitted to incur in relation to the value of our assets;

• restrictions on our ability to incur liens; and

• maintenance of a minimum level of Shareholders’ equity.

As of the date of this Annual Report, we are in compliance in all material respects with the covenants of the Revolving Credit Facilities and the Investment Credit Facilities. However, our continued compliance with these covenants depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. For example, depending on the condition of the public debt and equity markets and pricing levels, unrealized depreciation in our portfolio may increase in the future. Any such increase could result in our inability to comply with an obligation to restrict the level of indebtedness that we are able to incur in relation to the value of our assets or to maintain a minimum level of Shareholders’ equity.

Accordingly, although we believe we will continue to be in compliance, there are no assurances that we will continue to comply with the covenants in the Revolving Credit Facilities and the Investment Credit Facilities. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default under such facilities, that, if we were unable to obtain a waiver from the lenders or holders of such indebtedness, as applicable, such lenders or holders could accelerate repayment under such indebtedness and thereby have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates, including the current interest rate environment.

General interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial negative impact on our future investments and our future investment returns and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our investment objective and our net investment income.

The U.S. Federal Reserve (“Federal Reserve”) decreased the federal funds rate multiple times in 2025. Because we borrow money and may issue debt securities or preferred shares to make investments, our net investment income may be dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds or pay interest or distributions on such debt securities or preferred shares and the rate at which we invest these funds. If interest rates rise again, our interest income will increase if the majority of our portfolio bears interest at variable rates while our cost of funds will also increase, which could result in an increase to our net investment income. Conversely, if interest rates continue to decrease, we may earn less interest income from investments and our cost of funds will also decrease, to a lesser extent, resulting in lower net investment income. We have entered into certain hedging transactions, such as interest rate swaps, to mitigate our exposure to changes in interest rates, and we may do so again in the future. However, we cannot assure you that such transactions will be successful in mitigating our

Table of Contents

exposure to interest rate risk. There can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. See “Risks Relating to Our Investments—We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.”

Our portfolio includes equity securities as well as fixed and floating rate investments. Market prices for debt that pays a fixed rate of return tend to decline as interest rates rise. Market prices for floating rate investments may also fluctuate in rising rate environments with prices tending to decline when credit spreads widen. A decline in the prices of the debt we own could adversely affect the NAV of our Shares.

High interest rates may also increase the cost of debt for the underlying portfolio companies that we may invest in, which could adversely impact their financial performance and ability to meet ongoing obligations to us. Also, high interest rates available to investors could make an investment in our Shares less attractive if we are not able to pay distributions at a level that provides a similar return, which could reduce the value of our Shares.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.

A number of entities will compete with us to make the types of investments that we plan to make in Infrastructure Assets. We compete against a number of parties, including other BDCs, public and private funds, banks, private equity, hedge or infrastructure investment funds, insurance companies, institutional investors, investment banking firms, utilities, independent power producers, project developers, pension funds, private credit platforms and other entities. Some of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than we do. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a BDC. In addition, new competitors frequently enter the financing markets in which we operate. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to pursue attractive investment opportunities from time to time.

We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. The loss of such investment opportunities may limit our ability to grow or cause us to have to shrink the size of our portfolio, which could decrease our earnings. If we match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss. As a result of operating in such a competitive environment, we may make investments that are on less favorable terms than what we may have originally anticipated, which may impact our return on these investments.

Our ability to enter into transactions with our affiliates is restricted.

As a BDC, we are prohibited under the 1940 Act from participating in certain transactions with certain of our affiliates without the prior approval of a majority of our Independent Trustees and, in some cases, of the SEC. Among other things, any person that, directly or indirectly, owns, controls or holds with the power to vote 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities is an affiliate of ours for the purposes of the 1940 Act. We are generally prohibited from buying or selling any securities (other than our securities) from or to an affiliate. However, we may under certain circumstances purchase any such affiliate’s loans or securities in the secondary market, which could create a conflict for our Adviser between our interests and the interests of such affiliate, in that the ability of our Adviser to recommend actions in our best interest may be limited. The 1940 Act also prohibits us from participating in certain “joint” transactions with certain of our affiliates which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times), without the prior approval of our Independent Trustees and, in cases where the affiliate is presumed to control us (i.e., they own more than 25% of our voting securities), prior approval of the SEC. Similar restrictions limit our ability to transact business with our officers or trustees or their affiliates. As a result of these restrictions, we may be prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than our securities) from or to any portfolio company of a fund managed by any affiliate of our Adviser, or entering into joint arrangements, such as certain co-investments with these companies or funds, without the prior approval of the SEC, which may limit the scope of investment opportunities that may otherwise be available to us.

We rely on the Co-Investment Exemptive Order granted to us, our Adviser and certain of our affiliates by the SEC that allows us to engage in co-investment transactions with other affiliated entities managed by our Adviser, subject to certain conditions and requirements. As a result of investments permitted by the Co-Investment Exemptive Order, there could be significant overlap in our investment portfolio and the investment portfolios of affiliated entities that have an investment objective similar to ours and can rely on the Co-Investment Exemptive Order. We may also otherwise co-invest with funds managed by Ares or any of its downstream affiliates, subject to compliance with existing regulatory guidance, applicable regulations and our Adviser’s allocation policy.

Table of Contents

There are significant potential conflicts of interest that could impact our investment returns.

Conflicts may arise in allocating and structuring investments, time, services, expenses or resources among the investment activities of Ares funds, Ares, other Ares-affiliated entities and the employees of Ares. Certain of our executive officers and trustees, and members of the investment committee, serve or may serve as officers, trustees or principals of other entities, including other Ares funds. These officers and trustees will devote such portion of their time to our affairs as is required for the performance of their duties, but they are not required to devote all of their time to us. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in our or our Shareholders’ best interests or may require them to devote time to services for other entities, which could interfere with the time available to provide services to us. Members of the investment committee may have significant responsibilities for other Ares funds. Similarly, although the professional staff of our Adviser will devote as much time to the management of us as appropriate to enable our Adviser to perform its duties in accordance with the Investment Advisory Agreement, the investment professionals of our Adviser may have conflicts in allocating their time and services among us and investment vehicles managed by our Adviser or one or more of its affiliates. These activities could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest insofar as the time and effort of the professional staff of our Adviser and its officers and employees will not be devoted exclusively to our business but will instead be allocated between our business and the management of these other investment vehicles.

In addition, certain Ares funds may have investment objectives that compete or overlap with, and may from time to time invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. Consequently, we and these other entities may from time to time pursue the same or similar capital and investment opportunities. Pursuant to its investment allocation policy, Ares and its controlled affiliates, including our Adviser, endeavors to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, and in any event consistent with any fiduciary duties owed to us. Nevertheless, it is possible that we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by other Ares funds and, if given such opportunity, may not be allowed to participate in such investments without the prior approval of our Independent Trustees and, in some cases, the prior approval of the SEC. In addition, there may be conflicts in the allocation of investments among us and the other Ares funds or one or more of our controlled affiliates or among the funds they manage, including investments made pursuant to the Co-Investment Exemptive Order. Further, such other Ares funds may hold positions in portfolio companies in which we have also invested. Such investments may raise potential conflicts of interest between us and such other Ares funds, particularly if we and such other Ares funds invest in different classes or types of securities or investments of the same underlying portfolio company. In that regard, actions may be taken by another Ares fund that are adverse to our interests, including, but not limited to, during a restructuring, bankruptcy or other insolvency proceeding or similar matter occurring at the underlying portfolio company.

We may from time to time, and subject to requirements under the 1940 Act, offer to sell assets to vehicles managed by one or more of our affiliates or we may purchase assets from vehicles managed by one or more of our affiliates. In addition, vehicles managed by one or more of our affiliates may offer assets to or may purchase assets from one another. While assets may be sold or purchased at prices that are consistent with those that could be obtained from third parties in the marketplace, and although these types of transactions generally require approval of one or more independent parties, there may be an inherent conflict of interest in such transactions between us and funds managed by one of our affiliates (including our Adviser). In addition, subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act, we may invest in loans, the proceeds of which may refinance or otherwise repay debt or securities of companies whose debt is owned by other Ares funds.

We will pay a management fee and an incentive fee to our Adviser, and may reimburse our Adviser for certain expenses it incurs. In addition, our Adviser waived its right to receive the management fee for the period prior to our first monthly closing as a BDC. Ares, from time to time, incurs fees, costs, and expenses on behalf of more than one fund. To the extent such fees, costs, and expenses are incurred for the account or benefit of more than one fund, each such fund will typically bear an allocable portion of any such fees, costs, and expenses in proportion to the size of its investment in the activity or entity to which such expense relates (subject to the terms of each fund’s governing documents) or in such other manner as Ares considers fair and equitable under the circumstances such as the relative fund size or capital available to be invested by such funds. Where a fund’s governing documents do not permit the payment of a particular expense, Ares will generally pay such fund’s allocable portion of such expense.

Our Adviser’s management fee is based on a percentage of our net assets and, consequently, our Adviser may have conflicts of interest in connection with decisions that could affect our net assets, such as decisions as to whether to incur indebtedness, or to make future investments. As a BDC, we may borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as calculated pursuant to the 1940 Act, equals at least 150% (or 200% if certain requirements under the 1940 Act are not met) after such borrowing (i.e., we are able to borrow up to two dollars for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities issued by us).

Table of Contents

Accordingly, our Adviser may have conflicts of interest in connection with decisions to use increased leverage permitted under our asset coverage requirement applicable to senior securities, as the incurrence of such additional indebtedness would result in an increase in the management fee payable to our Adviser and may also result in an increase in the incentive fee payable to our Adviser.

The incentive fee payable by us to our Adviser that relates to our pre-incentive fee net investment income will be computed and paid on income that may include interest that is accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of such fee will become uncollectible. Our Adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued income that we never actually receive.

Our Investment Advisory Agreement renews for successive annual periods if approved by our Board or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our Independent Trustees. However, both we and our Adviser have the right to terminate the agreement without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party. In addition, if we elect to continue operations following termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement by our Adviser, our Adviser will pay all expenses incurred as a result of its withdrawal. Moreover, conflicts of interest may arise if our Adviser seeks to change the terms of our Investment Advisory Agreement, including, for example, the terms for compensation to our Adviser. While, as a BDC, any material change to the Investment Advisory Agreement must be submitted to Shareholders for approval under the 1940 Act, we may from time to time decide it is appropriate to seek Shareholder approval to change the terms of the agreement.

We entered into the Administration Agreement with our Administrator, pursuant to which our Administrator will furnish us with administrative services. Payments under the Administration Agreement will be equal to an amount based upon our allocable portion of our Administrator’s overhead and other expenses (including travel expenses) incurred by our Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including our allocable portion of the compensation, rent and other expenses of certain of our officers and their respective staffs, but not investment professionals.

Our Administrator will have the right to resign under the Administration Agreement upon 60 days’ written notice, whether a replacement has been found or not. If our Administrator resigns, it may be difficult to find a new administrator or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms, or at all. If a replacement is not found quickly, our business, results of operations and financial condition are likely to be adversely affected and the value of our Shares may decline. Even if a comparable service provider or individuals to perform such services are retained, whether internal or external, their integration into our business and lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have entered into the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement. Our repayment of amounts reimbursed or waived by our Adviser or its affiliates, pursuant to the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement, will immediately reduce our NAV at the time we make such reimbursement payment and may reduce future distributions to which Shareholders may otherwise be entitled. Our Adviser has agreed to advance a portion of our organizational and initial offering expenses. The indirect impact of any expenses advanced by our Adviser may prevent or reduce a decline in NAV, by mitigating the effects of certain expenses.

We are unable to predict when we, and ultimately our Shareholders, will repay expenses advanced by our Adviser because repayment under the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement is conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events, and our Adviser can waive reimbursement of expenses in any applicable month.

As a result of the arrangements described above, there may be times when the management team of Ares (including those members of management focused primarily on managing us) has interests that differ from those of our Shareholders, giving rise to a conflict. Additionally, the members of management focused on managing us will also manage other Ares funds, and, consequently, will need to devote significant attention and time to managing other Ares funds, in addition to us.

Our Shareholders may have conflicting investment, tax and other objectives with respect to their investments in us. The conflicting interests of individual Shareholders may relate to or arise from, among other things, the nature of our investments, the structure or the acquisition of our investments, and the timing of dispositions of our investments. As a consequence, conflicts of interest may arise in connection with decisions made by our Adviser, including with respect to the nature or structuring of our investments, that may be more beneficial for one Shareholder than for another Shareholder, especially with respect to Shareholders’ individual tax situations. In selecting and structuring investments appropriate for us,

Table of Contents

our Adviser will consider our investment and tax objectives and our Shareholders, as a whole, not the investment, tax or other objectives of any Shareholder individually.

Any sub-administrator that our Administrator engages to assist our Administrator in fulfilling its responsibilities, including the sub-administrator under the Sub-Administration Agreement, could resign from its role as sub-administrator, and a suitable replacement may not be found, resulting in disruptions that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our Administrator has, and will continue to have, the right under the Administration Agreement to enter into one or more sub-administration agreements with other administrators (each a “Sub-Administrator”) pursuant to which our Administrator may obtain the services of the Sub-Administrator(s) to assist our Administrator in fulfilling its responsibilities under the Administration Agreement. If any such Sub-Administrator resigns, including the sub-administrator under the Sub-Administration Agreement, it may be difficult to find a new Sub-Administrator or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms, or at all. If a replacement is not found quickly, our business, results of operations and financial condition are likely to be adversely affected and the value of our Shares may decline. Even if a comparable service provider or individuals to perform such services are retained, whether internal or external, their integration into our business and lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, which may make it difficult for us to pay distributions or result in our paying our Adviser an incentive fee on income where we do not ultimately receive the cash.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be required to include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as OID, which may arise, for example, if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan, or PIK interest representing contractual interest added to the loan principal balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such OID or PIK interest is included in income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash, including, for example, amounts attributable to hedging and foreign currency transactions.

Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or without receiving cash in respect of such income, we may have difficulty paying distributions without selling some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raising additional debt or equity capital or reducing new investment originations.

In addition, our Adviser's incentive fee is computed and paid based on income that has been accrued but not yet received in cash, including as a result of investments with a deferred interest feature such as debt investments with PIK interest, preferred stock with PIK dividends and zero coupon securities. Accordingly, our pre-incentive fee net investment income used for purposes of determining the incentive fee may be calculated on higher amounts of income than we may ultimately realize and that may ultimately be available to be distributed to our Shareholders. For example, if a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. Our Adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the fees it received that were based on such accrued income that is never actually received.

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

As we generally make investments in private companies, substantially all of these investments are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, even if we are able to do so, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments or could be unable to dispose of our investments in a timely manner. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we or an affiliated manager of Ares has material non-public information regarding such portfolio company. Furthermore, the lack of liquidity of our investments can also make it difficult to determine the fair value of our investments for the purposes of calculating our NAV.

Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if a significant investment fails to perform as expected.

Our investment portfolio includes investments that may be significant individually or in the aggregate. If a significant investment in one or more companies fails to perform as expected, such a failure could have a material adverse effect on our

Table of Contents

business, financial condition and operating results, and the magnitude of such effect could be more significant than if we had further diversified our portfolio.

Increasing scrutiny from stakeholders and regulators with respect to sustainability - or ESG - matters may impose additional costs and expose us to additional risks.

Our business (including that of our portfolio companies) faces increasing public scrutiny related to ESG activities. We risk damage to our brand and reputation if we do not or are perceived to not act responsibly in a number of areas, including, but not limited to human rights, climate change and environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency, or consideration of ESG factors in our investment processes. Adverse incidents with respect to ESG activities could impact the value of our brand, our relationship with existing and future portfolio companies, the cost of our operations and relationships with investors, all of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Moreover, in recent years, “anti-ESG” sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with several states, the executive branch and federal agencies, and Congress having proposed, enacted or indicated an intent to pursue “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or initiatives, or issued related legal opinions and pursued related investigations and litigation. If investors subject to anti-ESG legislation view our Adviser’s responsible investing or ESG practices as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such investors may not invest in us and it could negatively impact the price of our Shares. If we do not successfully manage expectations across varied stakeholder interests, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation and constrain our investment opportunities. Such scrutiny of ESG related practices could expose our Adviser to the risk of litigation, investigations or challenges by federal or state authorities or result in reputational harm.

New and evolving and sometimes conflicting sustainability/ESG regulations and disclosure expectations could increase our compliance costs and expose us to enforcement, litigation, or fundraising constraints.

Certain regulations related to ESG that are applicable to us and our portfolio companies could adversely affect our business. For example, the European Commission’s “action plan on financing sustainable growth” (“Action Plan”) is designed to, among other things, define and reorient investment toward more sustainable economic activities. The Action Plan contemplates, among other things: establishing European Union (the “EU”) labels for green financial products; clarifying asset managers’ and institutional investors’ duties regarding ESG in their investment decision-making processes; increasing disclosure requirements in the financial services sector around ESG and increasing the transparency of companies on their ESG policies and related processes and management systems; and introducing a ‘green supporting factor’ in the EU prudential rules for banks and insurance companies to incorporate climate risks into banks’ and insurance companies’ risk management policies. Moreover, on January 5, 2023, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”) came into effect. CSRD amends and strengthens the rules introduced on sustainability reporting for companies, banks and insurance companies under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (2014/95/EU). CSRD requires companies to produce detailed and prescriptive reports on sustainability-related matters within their financial statements. CSRD is a novel regime and applicable scoping thresholds, the date of application and the substance of reporting requirements have been subject to a regulatory amendment process and are expected to be subject to further processes to refine the relevant requirements, including subsequent rule making and regulatory clarifications. There can be no assurance that developments with respect to CSRD will not adversely affect our assets or the returns from those assets. One or more of our portfolio companies may fall within scope of CSRD and this may lead to increased management burdens and costs. There is a risk that a significant reorientation in the market following the implementation of these regulations could be adverse to our portfolio companies if they are perceived to be less valuable as a consequence of, e.g., their carbon footprint or allegations or evidence of “greenwashing” (i.e., the holding out of a product as having green or sustainable characteristics where this is not, in fact, the case). We and our portfolio companies are subject to the risk that similar measures might be introduced in other jurisdictions in the future.

Compliance with any new laws or regulations increases our regulatory burden and could result in increased legal, accounting and compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, affect the manner in which we or our portfolio companies conduct our businesses and adversely affect our profitability.

We and/or our portfolio companies may be materially and adversely impacted by global climate change.

Climate change is widely considered to be a significant threat to the global economy. Our business operations and our portfolio companies may face risks associated with climate change. Infrastructure Assets in particular may face risks associated with climate change, including “transition risks”, such as risks related to the impact of climate-related legislation and regulation (both domestically and internationally), risks related to climate- related business trends (such as the process of transitioning to a lower-carbon economy), and risks stemming from the potential physical impacts of climate change, such as the increasing frequency or severity of extreme weather events (including wildfires, droughts, hurricanes and floods) and rising sea levels and temperatures. These events and the disruptions they may cause, alone or in combination, could also lead to increased costs of insurance. Further, the needs of customers of energy companies vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and

Table of Contents

humidity. To the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, energy use could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes. Increases in the cost of energy could adversely affect the cost of operations of our portfolio companies if the use of energy products or services is material to their business. A decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect some of our portfolio companies’ financial condition through, for example, decreased revenues. Extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stresses, including service interruptions.

Additionally, various regulatory and voluntary initiatives launched by international, federal, state, and regional policymakers and regulatory authorities as well as private actors seeking to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions may expose Infrastructure Assets to so-called “transition risks” in addition to physical risks, such as: (i) political and policy risks (e.g., changing regulatory incentives and legal requirements, including with respect to GHG emissions, that could result in increased costs or changes in business operations), (ii) regulatory and litigation risks (e.g., changing legal requirements that could result in increased permitting, tax and compliance costs, changes in business operations, increased disclosure obligations, or the discontinuance of certain operations, and litigation seeking monetary or injunctive relief related to impacts related to climate change), (iii) technology and market risks (e.g., declining market for Infrastructure Assets, products and services seen as GHG intensive or less effective than alternatives in reducing GHG emissions) and (iv) reputational risks (e.g., risks tied to changing investor, customer or community perceptions of an Infrastructure Asset’s relative contribution to GHG emissions). We cannot rule out the possibility that climate risks, including changes in weather and climate patterns, could result in unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of investment activities or the effective management of Infrastructure Assets once undertaken, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our portfolio companies.

We, our executive officers, trustees, and our Adviser, its affiliates and/or any of their respective principals and employees could be the target of litigation or regulatory investigations.

We, as well as our Adviser and its affiliates, participate in a highly regulated industry and are each subject to regulatory examinations in the ordinary course of business. There can be no assurance that we, our executive officers, trustees, and our Adviser, its affiliates and/or any of their respective principals and employees will avoid regulatory investigation and possible enforcement actions stemming therefrom. Our Adviser is a registered investment adviser and, as such, is subject to the provisions of the Advisers Act. We and our Adviser are each, from time to time, subject to formal and informal examinations, investigations, inquiries, audits and reviews from numerous regulatory authorities both in response to issues and questions raised in such examinations or investigations and in connection with the changing priorities of the applicable regulatory authorities across the market in general. In addition, any leadership changes or reforms at U.S. federal regulatory agencies with oversight over our industry may impose additional costs or result in other limitations on us.

We, our executive officers, trustees, and our Adviser, its affiliates and/or any of their respective principals and employees could also be named as defendants in, or otherwise become involved in, litigation. Litigation and regulatory actions can be time-consuming and expensive and can lead to unexpected losses, which expenses and losses are often subject to indemnification by us. Legal proceedings could continue without resolution for long periods of time and their outcomes, which could materially and adversely affect our value or the ability of our Adviser to manage us, are often impossible to anticipate. Our Adviser would likely be required to expend significant resources responding to any litigation or regulatory action related to it, and these actions could be a distraction to the activities of our Adviser.

Our investment activities are subject to the normal risks of becoming involved in litigation by third parties. These risks would be somewhat greater if we were to exercise control or significant influence over a portfolio company’s direction. The expense of defending against claims by third parties and paying any amounts pursuant to settlements or judgments would, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence (with respect to the performance of duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement), negligence (with respect to the performance of duties or obligations under the administration agreement), or reckless disregard of duties and obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or the Administration Agreement, in each case, as applicable, by our Adviser or Administrator, any of their respective members and any of their respective officers, managers, partners, agents, controlling persons, members and any other affiliated persons, or any of our officers or trustees, be borne by us and would reduce our net assets. Our Adviser and others are indemnified by us in connection with such litigation, subject to certain conditions.

In recent periods, there has been increased activity by certain activist and other organized groups in opposition to certain investments made by and activities of private funds. Such groups may contact or otherwise seek to engage with government and regulatory bodies and fund investors, including public pension funds, to criticize or challenge certain investments, which could lead to negative publicity that could harm our or our investment adviser's reputation. In addition, partially as a result of certain high profile defaults and bankruptcies, there has also been increased negative publicity with respect to the private credit industry. Although neither we nor our investment adviser have been involved in those particular

Table of Contents

defaults and bankruptcies, the negative publicity, press speculation about us and concerns surrounding the private credit industry generally, whether or not valid, could in the future harm our or our Adviser's reputation, heighten scrutiny on our and our Adviser's business, encourage litigation and regulatory inquiries and adversely affect our borrower or investor relationships and fundraising efforts, including by prompting increased repurchase requests from certain fund investors.

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations or the operations of our portfolio companies, changes in the interpretation thereof or enacted laws or regulations could require changes to certain business practices of us or such portfolio companies, negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of us or such portfolio companies, impose additional costs on us or such portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect our business or the business of such portfolio companies.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws and regulations at the local, state, federal and, in some cases, foreign levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time, and new laws and regulations may be enacted. Accordingly, any change in these laws or regulations, changes in their interpretation, or enacted laws or regulations could require changes to certain business practices of us or our portfolio companies, negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of us or such portfolio companies, impose additional costs on us or our portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect our business or the business of such portfolio companies. Over the past several years, there also has been increasing regulatory attention to the extension of credit outside of the traditional banking sector, raising the possibility that some portion of the non-bank financial sector may be subject to new regulation. While it cannot be known at this time whether any regulation will be implemented or what form it will take, increased regulation of non-bank lending could be materially adverse to our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

Regulators are also increasing scrutiny and considering regulation of the use of artificial intelligence technologies, including with respect to uses of artificial intelligence by investment advisors. While comprehensive U.S. regulation has not been enacted to date, various U.S. governmental agencies and departments, including the SEC and Department of the Treasury, have recently released reports or otherwise indicated interest in assessing risks relating to uses of artificial intelligence by businesses such as ours. Some specific laws governing artificial intelligence have already been passed in certain U.S. states and in the EU. We cannot predict what, if any, effects this may have on our business or the nature of future regulations.

Additionally, legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us. The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by legislators and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department. We cannot predict how future tax proposals and changes in U.S. tax laws, rates, regulations or other guidance issued under existing tax laws, might affect us, our business, our Shareholders, or our portfolio companies in the long-term. New legislation and any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting such legislation could significantly and negatively affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies or could have other adverse consequences. Shareholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor regarding tax legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities.

Changes to United States tariff and import/export regulations may have a negative effect on our portfolio companies and, in turn, harm us.

In recent periods the U.S. has imposed new tariffs or increased existing tariffs between the U.S. and many other countries, and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding additional potentially significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs. There continues to exist significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and other countries with respect to such trade policies, treaties and tariffs. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global trade and, in particular, trade between the impacted nations and the U.S. Any of these factors could depress economic activity and restrict our portfolio companies' access to suppliers or customers and have a material adverse effect on their business, financial condition and results of operations, which in turn would negatively impact us.

Our Adviser’s liability is limited under the Investment Advisory Agreement, and we are required to indemnify our Adviser against certain liabilities, which may lead our Adviser to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

Our Adviser has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render the services described in the Investment Advisory Agreement, and it will not be responsible for any action of our Board in declining to follow our Adviser’s advice or recommendations. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Adviser and its members and their respective officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons and members and any other persons affiliated with it will not be

Table of Contents

liable to us for their acts under the Investment Advisory Agreement, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the performance of their duties. We have agreed to indemnify, defend and protect our Adviser and its members and their respective officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons and members and any other persons or entities affiliated with it with respect to all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of our Adviser’s duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser for us, and not arising out of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the performance of their duties under the Investment Advisory Agreement. These protections may lead our Adviser to act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Investments—Our Adviser’s fee structure may create an incentive for it to make certain investments on our behalf, including speculative investments.”

We may be obligated to pay our Adviser certain fees even if we incur a loss.

Our Adviser is entitled to an incentive fee for each fiscal quarter in an amount equal to a percentage of the excess of our pre-incentive fee net investment income for that quarter (before deducting any incentive fee and certain other items) above a threshold return for that quarter. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income for incentive fee purposes excludes realized and unrealized capital losses or depreciation and income taxes related to realized gains that we may incur in the fiscal quarter, even if such capital losses or depreciation and income taxes related to realized gains result in a net loss on our statement of operations for that quarter. Thus, we may be required to pay our Adviser the incentive fee for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or the NAV of our Shares, including a decline in the NAV of our Shares resulting from our payment of fees and expenses, including any reimbursement of expenses advanced by our Adviser, or we incur a net loss for that quarter.

If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide interest, it is possible that accrued and unpaid interest previously used in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. Our Adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued income that we never receive.

In addition, while we deduct operating expenses when calculating our pre-incentive fee net investment income for incentive fee purposes, such operating expenses do not include all categories of expenses that may ultimately impact our income. For instance, if we are subject to corporate-level income taxes that are not included when calculating our operating expenses, our Adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the fees it receives that were based on income prior to accounting for such taxes.

As a public company, we are subject to regulations not applicable to private companies, such as provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Efforts to comply with such regulations will involve significant expenditures, and non-compliance with such regulations may adversely affect us.

As a public company, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Our management will be required to report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act after we have been subject to the reporting requirements of the 1934 Act for a specified period of time. We will be required to review on an annual basis our internal control over financial reporting, and on a quarterly and annual basis to evaluate and disclose changes in our internal control over financial reporting. As a relatively new company, developing and maintaining an effective system of internal controls may require significant expenditures, which may negatively impact our financial performance and our ability to make distributions. This process also will result in a diversion of our management’s time and attention. We cannot be certain of how long our evaluation, testing and remediation actions will take to complete or the impact of the same on our operations. In addition, we may be unable to ensure that the process is effective or that our internal controls over financial reporting will be effective in a timely manner. In the event that we are unable to develop or maintain an effective system of internal controls and maintain or achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules, we may be adversely affected.

Our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until there is a public market for our Shares, which is not expected to occur.

We are an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Shares less attractive to investors.

We are and we will remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act for up to five years, or until the earlier of (a) the last day of the fiscal year (i) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (ii) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Shares that is held by non-affiliates

Table of Contents

exceeds $700 million as of the date of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and (b) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. For so long as we remain an “emerging growth company,” we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot predict if investors will find our Shares less attractive because we will rely on some or all of these exemptions.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the 1933 Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We will take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, which may make it more difficult for investors and securities analysts to evaluate us since our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates and may result in less investor confidence.

Compliance with the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest may negatively impact our ability to raise capital in the Private Offering, which would harm our ability to achieve our investment objective.

Brokers must comply with Regulation Best Interest, which, among other requirements, enhances the existing standard of conduct for brokers and natural persons who are associated persons of a broker when recommending to a retail customer any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. The impact of Regulation Best Interest on brokers participating in our Private Offering cannot be determined at this time, but it may negatively impact whether brokers and their associated persons recommend the Private Offering to retail customers. Such brokers and their associated persons may determine that Regulation Best Interest requires such brokers and their associated persons to not recommend us to their customers because doing so may not be in the customers’ best interest, which would negatively impact our ability to raise capital in the Private Offering. If Regulation Best Interest reduces our ability to raise capital in the Private Offering, it would harm our ability to create a diversified portfolio of investments and achieve our investment objective and would result in our fixed operating costs representing a larger percentage of our gross income.

No Shareholder approval is required for certain mergers.

Our Board may undertake to approve mergers between us and certain other funds or vehicles. Subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, such mergers will not require Shareholder approval so investors will not be given an opportunity to vote on these matters unless such mergers are reasonably anticipated to result in a material dilution of our NAV per Share. These mergers may involve funds managed by affiliates of our Adviser. The Board may also convert the form and/or jurisdiction of organization, including to take advantage of laws that are more favorable to maintaining board control in the face of dissident Shareholders.

Our Declaration of Trust provides that state and federal courts in the State of Delaware are the sole and exclusive forum for certain Shareholder litigation matters, which could limit our Shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable or convenient judicial forum for disputes with us or our trustees and officers.

Our Declaration of Trust provides that, each trustee, each officer, each Shareholder and each person beneficially owning an interest in any of our shares (whether through a broker, dealer, bank, trust company or clearing corporation or an agent of any of the foregoing or otherwise), to the fullest extent permitted by law, including Section 3804(e) of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (the “Statutory Trust Act”), (i) irrevocably agrees that any claims, suits, actions or proceedings arising out of or relating in any way to us or our business and affairs, the Statutory Trust Act, this Declaration of Trust or the Bylaws or asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs (or similar) doctrine (including, without limitation, any claims, suits, actions or proceedings to interpret, apply or enforce (A) the provisions of this Declaration of Trust or the Bylaws, or (B) our duties (including fiduciary duties), obligations or liabilities to the Shareholders or the trustees, or of officers or the trustees to us, to the Shareholders or each other, or (C) the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, us, the officers, the trustees or the Shareholders, or (D) any provision of the Statutory Trust Act or other laws of the State of Delaware pertaining to trusts made applicable to us pursuant to Section 3809 of the Statutory Trust Act, or (E) any other instrument, document, agreement or certificate contemplated by any provision of the Statutory Trust Act, this Declaration of Trust or the Bylaws relating in any way to us or (F) the federal securities laws of the United States, including, without limitation, the 1940 Act, or the securities or antifraud laws of any international, national, state, provincial, territorial, local or other governmental or regulatory authority, including, in each case, the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (regardless, in every case, of whether such claims, suits, actions or proceedings (x) sound in contract, tort, fraud or otherwise, (y) are based on common law, statutory, equitable, legal or other grounds, or (z) are derivative or direct claims)), shall be exclusively brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of

Table of Contents

Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, any other court in the State of Delaware with subject matter jurisdiction, (ii) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in connection with any such claim, suit, action or proceeding, (iii) irrevocably agrees not to, and waives any right to, assert in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding that (A) it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of such courts or any other court to which proceedings in such courts may be appealed, (B) such claim, suit, action or proceeding is brought in an inconvenient forum, or (C) the venue of such claim, suit, action or proceeding is improper, (iv) consents to process being served in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding by mailing, certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy thereof to such party at the address in effect for notices hereunder, and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof; provided, nothing in clause (iv) hereof shall affect or limit any right to serve process in any other manner permitted by law, and (v) irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any such claim, suit, action or proceeding. As a result, our Shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable or convenient forum for disputes with us or our trustees and officers may be limited. In the event that any claim, suit, action or proceeding is commenced outside of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in contravention of the Declaration of Trust, all reasonable and documented out of pocket fees, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs, incurred by the prevailing party in such claim, suit, action or proceeding shall be reimbursed by the non-prevailing party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exclusive forum provision in our Declaration of Trust does not apply to any claims brought under U.S. federal securities law, or the rules and regulations thereunder.

We are highly dependent on the information systems of Ares and operational risks including systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, result in losses or limit our growth, which may, in turn, negatively affect the NAV of our Shares and our ability to pay distributions.

Our business is highly dependent on communications and information systems of Ares, the parent of our Adviser and our Administrator. In this Annual Report we sometimes refer to hardware, software, information, communications and artificial intelligence systems or programs maintained by Ares and used by us, our Adviser, and our Administrator as “our” systems. We also face operational risk from transactions and key data not being properly recorded, evaluated or accounted for with respect to our portfolio companies. In addition, we face operational risk from errors made in the execution, confirmation or settlement of transactions. In particular, our Adviser is highly dependent on its ability to process and evaluate, on a daily basis, transactions across markets and geographies in a time-sensitive, efficient and accurate manner. Consequently, we and our Adviser and our Administrator rely heavily on Ares’ financial, accounting and other data processing systems.

In addition, we operate in a business that is highly dependent on information systems and technology. Ares’ and our information systems and technology may not continue to be able to accommodate our growth, and the cost of maintaining the information systems and technology, which may be partially allocated to or borne by us, may increase from its current level, including due to existing and anticipated regulations. Such a failure to accommodate growth, or an increase in costs related to the information systems and technology, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Furthermore, a disaster or a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our businesses, including a disruption involving electronic communications, human resources systems or other services used by us, our Adviser, our Administrator or third parties with whom we conduct business could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue to operate our businesses without interruption. Although we and Ares have disaster recovery programs in place, these may not be sufficient to mitigate the harm that may result from such a disaster or disruption. In addition, insurance and other safeguards might only partially reimburse us for any losses as a result of such a disaster or disruption, if at all.

We and Ares also rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our respective businesses, including for certain information systems, technology and administration of our portfolio company investments and compliance matters. Operational risks could increase as vendors increasingly offer mobile and cloud-based software services rather than software services that can be operated within Ares’ own data centers, as certain aspects of the security of such technologies may be complex, unpredictable or beyond our or Ares’ control, and any failure by mobile technology or cloud service providers to adequately safeguard their systems and prevent cyber-attacks could disrupt our operations and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of confidential, proprietary or personal information. In addition, our counterparties’ information systems, technology or accounts may be the target of cyber-attacks. Any interruption or deterioration in the performance of these third parties or the service providers of our counterparties or failures or vulnerabilities of their respective information systems or technology could impair the quality of our funds’ operations and could impact our reputation, adversely affect our businesses and limit our ability to grow.

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Our Investments

Investments in portfolio companies that operate Infrastructure Assets are generally larger, lack liquidity and may be subject to significant regulatory limitations.

Investments in Infrastructure Assets tend to be large due to the general nature and size of such assets. We may invest in infrastructure projects including power generation (such as renewable energy and thermal power plants), renewable natural gas, liquified natural gas, transportation, telecommunications, digital infrastructure (such as data centers, fiber optic cables and cell phone towers), midstream and energy infrastructure, regulated utilities, social infrastructure (such as water treatment and management, waste management and recycling) and environmental services sectors (such as carbon capture and storage, soil and air remediation and climate change mitigation). Infrastructure assets may have unique geographic and market characteristics and may be subject to political, regulatory, and public opinion considerations, which could make them highly illiquid. We may acquire portfolios of assets that are not easily separated into individual asset acquisitions or dispositions. Accordingly, our investments may be quite sizeable. There are limited pools of capital available in the sector that can make sizeable investments and limited numbers of market participants. As a result, the potential exits from these investments may be limited and there can be no assurance that we will be able to realize our investments on favorable terms, in a timely manner or at all. Moreover, the realizable value of a highly illiquid investment may be less than its intrinsic value.

We may acquire portfolio companies in the renewable energy industry, which is subject to risks of a rapidly evolving market.

We may acquire renewable energy businesses and businesses which use renewable energy assets. The market for renewable energy businesses and businesses which use renewable energy assets continues to evolve rapidly. Diverse factors, including the cost-effectiveness, performance and reliability of renewable energy technology, changes in weather and climate and availability of government subsidies and incentives, as well as the potential for unforeseeable disruptive technology and innovations, present potential challenges to portfolio companies with renewable assets. Renewable resources (e.g., wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, etc.) are inherently variable. Variability may arise from site specific factors, daily and seasonal trends, long-term impact of climatic factors, or other changes to the surrounding environment. Variations in renewable resource levels impact the amount of electricity generated, and therefore cash flow generated, by renewable energy portfolio companies. Renewable power generation sources currently benefit from various incentives in the form of feed-in-tariffs, rebates, tax credits, Renewable Portfolio Standard regulations and other incentives. The reduction, elimination or expiration of government subsidies and economic incentives could adversely affect the cash flows and value of a particular portfolio company, the flow of potential portfolio company opportunities and the value of any platform in the sector. In addition, the development and operation of renewable assets may at times be subject to public opposition. For example, with respect to the development and operation of wind projects, public concerns and objections often center around the noise generated by wind turbines and the impact such turbines have on wildlife. While public opposition is usually of greatest concern during the development stage of renewable assets, continued opposition could have an impact on ongoing operations.

We have significant liquidity requirements, and adverse market and economic conditions may adversely affect our sources of liquidity, which could materially and adversely affect our business operations.

We expect that our primary liquidity needs will consist of cash required to meet various obligations, including, without limitation, to:

• repurchase our Shares in connection with any repurchases or redemptions of Shares or other securities issued by us;

• grow our businesses, including acquiring portfolio companies and otherwise supporting our portfolio companies;

• service any debt obligations including the payment of obligations at maturity, on interest payment dates or upon redemption, as well as any contingent liabilities, including from litigation, that may give rise to future cash payments;

• fund cash operating expenses and contingencies, including for litigation matters; and

• pay any cash distributions in accordance with our distribution policy for our Shares, if any.

These liquidity requirements may be significant. Our commitments to our portfolio companies may require significant cash outlays over time, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flows from sales of Shares to investors.

Moreover, in light of the nature of our continuous monthly Private Offering in relation to our acquisition strategy and the need to be able to deploy potentially large amounts of capital quickly to capitalize on potential acquisition opportunities, if we have difficulty identifying and purchasing suitable portfolio companies on attractive terms, there could be a delay between

Table of Contents

the time we receive net proceeds from the sale of Shares and the time we use the net proceeds to acquire portfolio companies. We may also from time to time hold cash pending deployment into acquisition opportunities or have less than our targeted leverage, which cash or shortfall in target leverage may at times be significant, particularly at times when we are receiving high amounts of offering proceeds and/or times when there are few attractive acquisition opportunities. Such cash may be held in an account for the benefit of our Shareholders that may be invested in money market funds or other similar temporary investments, each of which is subject to management fees.

If we are unable to find suitable acquisition opportunities, such cash may be maintained for longer periods, which would be dilutive to overall portfolio returns. This could cause a substantial delay in the time it takes for your investment to realize its full potential return and could adversely affect our ability to pay any potential distributions of cash flow from operations to you. It is not anticipated that the temporary investment of such cash into money market funds or other similar temporary investments pending deployment into portfolio companies will generate significant interest, and investors should understand that such low interest payments on the temporarily invested cash may adversely affect overall returns. In the event we fail to timely utilize the net proceeds of sales of our Shares or do not deploy sufficient capital to meet our targeted leverage, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

In the event that our liquidity requirements were to exceed available liquid assets for the reasons specified above or for any other reasons, we may increase our indebtedness or be forced to sell assets.

The operation and maintenance of Infrastructure Assets involve significant capital expenditures and various risks, which may not be under our control.

As a general matter, the operation and maintenance of Infrastructure Assets involve significant capital expenditures and various risks, many of which may not be under the control of the owner/operator, including labor issues, political or local opposition, failure of technology to perform as anticipated, technical obsolescence, increasing fuel prices, structural failures and accidents, environment related issues, counterparty non-performance and the need to comply with the directives of government authorities. Optional or mandatory improvements, upgrades or rehabilitation of infrastructure assets may cause delays or result in closures or other disruptions subjecting a portfolio company to various risks including lower revenues.

Furthermore, we might own portfolio companies that could operate both existing, or “Brownfield,” Infrastructure Assets or businesses and in new, or “Greenfield” Infrastructure Assets or businesses that require significant capital expenditure to complete their development, bring them to fully commissioned and/or cash-flowing status or to otherwise optimize their operational capabilities.

Construction risks typical for “Greenfield” Infrastructure Assets and businesses which our portfolio companies may own and control, include, without limitation, risks of: (i) labor disputes, shortages of material and skilled labor, or work stoppages; (ii) difficulty in obtaining regulatory, environmental or other approvals or permits; (iii) slower than projected construction progress and the unavailability or late delivery of necessary equipment; (iv) less than optimal coordination with public utilities in the relocation of their facilities; (v) adverse weather conditions and unexpected construction conditions; (vi) accidents or the breakdown or failure of construction equipment or processes; (vii) other events discussed below under “ Force majeure events may adversely affect our assets ” that are beyond the control of our Adviser and us; and (viii) risks associated with holding direct or indirect interests in undeveloped land or underdeveloped real property. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses (which could exceed expected or forecasted budgets) and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of construction activities once undertaken, any of which could have an adverse effect on us and on the amount of funds available for distribution to Shareholders. Similar risks apply to the ongoing operations of any properties and other assets or businesses. Infrastructure Assets owned by our portfolio companies might remain in construction phases for a prolonged period and, accordingly, might not be cash generative for a prolonged period. While our intention in respect of any Infrastructure Asset acquired might be for construction works to be contracted to a construction contractor on a fixed-price basis with liquidated damages payable to us where delay is caused that is attributable to the contractor, the related contractual arrangements made by us might not be as effective as intended and/or contractual liabilities on our part could result in unexpected costs or a reduction in our expected revenues. In addition, recourse against the contractor could be subject to liability caps or could be subject to default or insolvency on the part of the contractor.

Other properties and other assets and businesses that our portfolio companies may own might require large capital expenditures, including, but not limited to, in connection with completing, maintaining, developing and/or expanding their existing plant, machinery and facilities, necessary software and other intellectual property assets or securing necessary licenses, approvals and concessions and complying with related requirements of a municipal, state or national government, quasi-government, industry, self-regulatory or other relevant regulatory authority, body or agency (each a “Regulatory Agency”). Such capital expenditures could exceed cash flow from operations and/or the amount of capital that we have earmarked for the

Table of Contents

relevant portfolio company and the relevant portfolio company might need to secure additional capital through other means and sources, including selling assets or refinancing or restructuring its debt capital, which, if available, could be at higher interest rates and/or otherwise on more onerous terms than any existing debt financing. Sourcing of such capital through additional equity investment from third parties will dilute our interest in the relevant portfolio company and its returns and such dilution might be on the basis of valuations of hard-to-value illiquid assets, which could ultimately result in an over-dilution of our ownership, all of which will have an adverse impact on our financial returns generated by such portfolio company. Any delay or failure by the relevant portfolio company to secure such capital from other sources and to implement the necessary capital expenditures in whole or in part will also have an adverse impact on returns to the extent there is a delay or failure in its ability to achieve fully commissioned and/or cash- flowing status or to otherwise optimize its operational capabilities.

Inflation may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.

Certain of our portfolio companies are in industries that have been or may be impacted by inflation. Although U.S. inflation rates have fluctuated in recent periods, they remain well above the historic levels over the past several decades. Inflationary pressures have increased the costs of labor, energy and raw materials and have adversely affected consumer spending, economic growth and may adversely affect our portfolio companies’ operations. If these portfolio companies are unable to pass any increases in their costs of operations along to their customers, it could adversely affect their operating results and impact the return on our investments, particularly if interest rates rise in response to inflation. In addition, any projected future decreases in our portfolio companies’ operating results due to inflation could adversely impact the fair value of those investments. Any decreases in the fair value of our investments could result in future realized or unrealized losses and therefore reduce our net assets resulting from operations. See “—We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates, including the current interest rate environment.”

Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if a significant investment fails to perform as expected.

Our investment portfolio includes investments that may be significant individually or in the aggregate. If a significant investment in one or more companies fails to perform as expected, such a failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results, and the magnitude of such effect could be more significant than if we had further diversified our portfolio.

As of December 31, 2025, 82.7% of our total investment portfolio was represented by seven equity investments, the largest of which, Pioneer JV Holdings LLC, a common equity investment, represented 24.7% of our total investment portfolio at fair value. For more information see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Portfolio and Investment Activity” and “Note 4. Investments” to our consolidated financial statements.

Portfolio companies may experience supply chain disruptions that could adversely impact our business and financial condition.

Equipment and spare parts may become unavailable or difficult to procure on terms consistent with those that a portfolio company has budgeted for. For example, some jurisdictions in which our portfolio companies may operate have experienced supply chain challenges resulting from bottlenecks caused by, among other things, increases in demand and challenges involved with ramping up to meet this demand.

Supply chains could be further disrupted in the future by factors outside of our Adviser’s or our control. This could include (1) a reduction in the supply or availability of the commodities required to produce the parts and components that a portfolio company needs to maintain existing projects and develop new projects from its development pipeline, (2) the potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, precipitation, floods and other climatic events and their impact on transportation networks and manufacturing centers, and (3) economic sanctions or embargoes, including those relating to human rights concerns in jurisdictions that produce key materials, components or parts.

Any material delays in procuring equipment or significant cost increases of our portfolio companies could adversely impact our business and financial condition.

Changes or innovations in technology could affect the profitability of a portfolio company that relies on existing technology.

We could be exposed to the risk that a change could occur in the way a service or product is delivered to us or a portfolio company or other asset rendering the existing technology obsolete. While the risk could be considered low in the infrastructure sector given the massive fixed costs involved in constructing assets and the fact that many infrastructure

Table of Contents

technologies are well established, any technology change that occurs over the medium term, including the use of artificial intelligence and data science, could threaten the profitability of portfolio company or our other assets. If such a change were to occur, these assets would have very few alternative uses should they become obsolete.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by volatility in commodity prices.

We may be subject to commodity price risk, especially on the uncontracted portion of revenues. The operation and cash flows of a portfolio company could depend, in some cases to a significant extent, upon prevailing market prices of commodities, including, for example, commodities such as gas, electricity, steel or concrete. Commodity prices fluctuate depending on a variety of factors beyond the control of our Adviser or us, including, without limitation, weather conditions, foreign and domestic supply and demand, force majeure events, pandemics, changes in laws, governmental regulations, price and availability of alternative commodities, international political conditions and overall economic conditions. In addition, commodity prices are generally expected to rise in inflationary environments, and foreign exchange rates are often affected by countries monetary and fiscal responses to inflationary trends. The continued conflicts and political unrest in the Middle East and the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine have also caused volatility in the commodities markets.

Events in the energy markets over the last few years have caused significant dislocations and illiquidity in the equity and debt markets for energy companies and related commodities. To the extent that such events continue (or even worsen), this could have an adverse impact on some of our portfolio companies and could lead to an overall weakening of global economies. Such marketplace events could also restrict our ability to sell or liquidate portfolio companies at favorable times or for favorable prices. In the event of a further market deterioration, the value of our portfolio companies in this sector might not appreciate as projected (if applicable) or could suffer a loss. There can be no assurance as to the duration of any perceived current market dislocation.

Our portfolio companies may rely on third-party managers or operators which may fail to perform their duties adequately.

The management of the business or operations of a portfolio company might be contracted to a third-party manager or operator unaffiliated with our Adviser. The selection of a manager or operator is inherently based on subjective criteria, making the true performance and abilities of a particular manager or operator difficult to assess. Further, there are a limited number of management companies and operators with the expertise necessary to maintain and operate infrastructure and infrastructure-related projects successfully. Although it would be possible to replace any such operator, the failure of such an operator to perform its duties adequately or to act in ways that are in the portfolio company’s best interest, or the breach by an operator of applicable agreements or laws, rules and regulations, could have an adverse effect on the portfolio company’s financial condition or results of operations. A third-party manager could suffer a business failure, become bankrupt, or engage in activities that compete with a portfolio company. These and other risks, including the deterioration of the business relationship between us and the third-party manager, could have an adverse effect on a portfolio company. Should a third-party manager fail to perform its functions satisfactorily, it might be necessary to find a replacement operator, which could require the approval of a government or Regulatory Agency that has granted a concession with respect to the relevant portfolio company. It might not be possible to replace an operator in such circumstances, or do so on a timely basis, or on terms that are favorable to us.

Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may result in substantial costs to our portfolio companies.

Ordinary operation or the occurrence of an accident with respect to a portfolio company could cause major environmental damage, which could result in significant financial distress to such portfolio company, if not covered by insurance, which could occur as a result of such portfolio company not carrying adequate insurance coverage or, in some cases, as a result of the relevant environmental damage not being fully insurable. In addition, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous materials could also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of these materials at the disposal or treatment facility, whether or not that facility is or ever was owned or operated by those persons.

Certain environmental laws and regulations may require that an owner or operator of an Infrastructure Asset address prior environmental contamination, which could involve substantial cost. Such laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of environmental contamination. We could therefore be exposed to substantial risk of loss from environmental claims arising in respect of our portfolio companies. Furthermore, changes in environmental laws or regulations or the environmental condition of a portfolio company could create liabilities that did not exist at the time of its acquisition and that could not have been foreseen. Community and environmental groups could protest about the development or operation of Infrastructure Assets, which might induce government action to our detriment. New and more stringent environmental or health and safety laws, regulations and permit requirements, or stricter interpretations of current laws, regulations or requirements, could impose substantial additional costs on our portfolio companies, or could otherwise place a portfolio company at a competitive disadvantage compared to

Table of Contents

operators of alternative forms of infrastructure, and failure to comply with any such requirements could have an adverse effect on a portfolio company. Some of the most onerous environmental requirements regulate air emissions of pollutants and GHGs; these requirements particularly affect companies in the power and energy industries.

Even in cases where we are indemnified by the seller with respect to an Infrastructure Asset against liabilities arising out of violations of environmental laws and regulations, there can be no assurance as to the financial viability of the seller to satisfy such indemnities or our ability to achieve enforcement of such indemnities.

We may face heightened risks unique to the nature of our portfolio companies.

Owning portfolio companies that operate Infrastructure Assets involves many relatively unique and acute risks. Projected revenues can be affected by a number of factors including economic and market conditions, political events, competition, regulation and the financial position and business strategy of customers. Unanticipated changes in the availability or price of inputs necessary for the operation of Infrastructure Assets may adversely affect the overall profitability of a portfolio company or related project. Events outside the control of the owner of an Infrastructure Asset, such as political action, governmental regulation, demographic changes, economic conditions, pandemics, increasing fuel prices, government macroeconomic policies, political events, toll rates, social stability, competition from untolled or other forms of transportation, natural disasters (such as fire, floods, earthquakes and typhoons), changes in weather, changes in demand for products or services, bankruptcy or financial difficulty of a major customer and acts of war or terrorism and other unforeseen circumstances and incidents could significantly reduce the revenues generated or significantly increase the expense of constructing, operating, maintaining or restoring Infrastructure Assets. In turn, this may impair a portfolio company’s ability to repay its debt, make distributions to us or even result in termination of an applicable concession or other agreement. As a general matter, the operation and maintenance of Infrastructure Assets involve various risks and are subject to substantial regulation (as described below), many of which may not be under the control of the owner, including labor issues, failure of technology to perform as anticipated, structural failures and accidents and the need to comply with the directives of government authorities.

Although our portfolio companies may maintain insurance to protect against certain risks, where available on reasonable commercial terms (such as business interruption insurance that is intended to offset loss of revenues during an operational interruption), such insurance is subject to customary deductibles and coverage limits and may not be sufficient to recoup all of a portfolio company’s losses. There can be no assurance that a portfolio company’s insurance would cover liabilities resulting from claims relating to the design, construction, maintenance, or operation of the Infrastructure Assets and businesses acquired by us, lost revenues or increased expenses resulting from such damage. If a major, uninsured loss occurs, we could lose both invested capital in and anticipated profits from the affected portfolio company. Furthermore, a portfolio company may face competition from other Infrastructure Assets in the vicinity of the assets they operate, the presence of which depends in part on governmental plans and policies.

Finally, a pandemic, epidemic or other public health crisis, such as those caused by H5N1 (avian flu), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19), may occur from time to time, which could adversely impact us or our portfolio companies. It is impossible to predict with certainty the possible future business and economic ramifications arising from a public health crisis, pandemic or epidemic, including but not limited to potential adverse impacts on: (i) the NAV of our Shares, (ii) the valuations of our portfolio companies and our financial results, (iii) our and our portfolio companies’ operations, and our and their counterparties, such as suppliers and customers, (iv) our ability to raise capital and complete acquisitions, (v) our ability to successfully exit portfolio companies, (vi) the ability of us or our portfolio companies to meet our respective financial obligations, such as principal or interest payment obligations or satisfaction of financial covenants, (vii) workplace, consumer, insurance, contract and other forms of litigation that exposes us, our portfolio companies, suppliers, customers, debtors and other counterparties to risks and claims of a magnitude and nature that we cannot now anticipate, (viii) operational risks, including heightened cybersecurity risk exacerbated by remote work, and (ix) our employees’ well- being, morale and productivity and our ability to retain existing employees and hire new employees needed for our current business or the future growth of our business.

Our portfolio companies may not exhibit mitigating characteristics typical of assets, businesses or projects in the infrastructure space. As a result, there can be no assurance that any perceived benefits of our portfolio companies will be realized.

We will seek to own portfolio companies that are assets, businesses or projects that typically have some or all of the following characteristics: (i) possess a higher degree of cash flow predictability; (ii) produce returns that are derived primarily from income, with limited upside through capital gains and assets that are commonly held for longer terms (more than five years); and (iii) produce revenues and cash flows that are generally predictable as a result of being governed by either rate regulation by governmental agencies or by long-term contractual arrangements with creditworthy counterparties, such as

Table of Contents

governments, municipalities and major companies, which can shield these assets from near-term economic and market trends. Whether and to what extent such characteristics exist with respect to a portfolio company is a matter of opinion and judgment, which may prove incorrect. Such characteristics are expected to help mitigate the risks associated with our portfolio companies, but there can be no assurance that perceived or expected mitigating characteristics associated with our portfolio companies (e.g., low volatility, low correlation, high cash yield, strong downside protection, mitigation against rising interest rates, revenues keyed to inflation and an ability to control the timing, and manner of exits) will be achieved or realized. It is possible that we will own portfolio companies which operate other types of Infrastructure Assets (including infrastructure-related “opportunistic” acquisitions), which may differ in form and structure (and may not have the characteristics described above) on a case-by-case basis, as our Adviser may determine are appropriate for us in a given context based on prevailing economic and market conditions and other factors deemed relevant by us. There can be no assurance that any perceived benefits of our portfolio companies will be realized and such portfolio companies may not exhibit the forgoing characteristics.

Force majeure events may adversely affect our assets.

Our portfolio companies and their Infrastructure Assets could be affected by force majeure events (i.e., events beyond the control of the party claiming that the event has occurred, including, without limitation, acts of God, fire, flood, earthquakes, outbreaks of an infectious disease, pandemic or any other serious public health concern, war, terrorism, labor strikes, major plant breakdowns, pipeline or electricity line ruptures, failure of technology, defective design and construction, accidents, demographic changes, government macroeconomic policies, toll rates, social instability and competition from other forms of infrastructure). Some force majeure events could adversely affect the ability of a party (including an Infrastructure Asset, a portfolio company or a counterparty to us or a portfolio company) to perform its obligations until it is able to remedy the force majeure event. In addition, forced events, such as the cessation of machinery (e.g., turbines) for repair or upgrade, could similarly lead to the unavailability of essential machinery and technologies. These risks could, among other effects, adversely impact the cash flows available from a portfolio company or other issuer, cause personal injury or loss of life, damage property, or instigate disruption of service. In addition, the cost to us or one of our portfolio companies of repairing or replacing damaged assets resulting from such force majeure event could be considerable. Force majeure events that are incapable of or are too costly to cure might have a permanent adverse effect on a portfolio company. Certain force majeure events (such as war or an outbreak of an infectious disease) could have a broader negative impact on the world economy and international business activity generally, or in any of the countries where we hold portfolio companies. Additionally, a major governmental intervention into industry, including the nationalization of an industry or the assertion of control over one or more portfolio companies or their assets, could result in a loss to us, including if our ownership stake in such portfolio company is canceled, unwound or acquired (which could be without what we consider to be adequate compensation). Any of the foregoing could therefore adversely affect our performance.

The acquisition of portfolio companies that operate Infrastructure Assets exposes us to a higher level of regulatory control than typically imposed on other businesses.

In many instances, operating Infrastructure Assets involves substantive continuing involvement by, or an ongoing commitment to, Regulatory Agencies. There can be no assurance that (i) existing regulations applicable to acquisitions generally or the Infrastructure Assets will not be revised or reinterpreted; (ii) new laws and regulations will not be adopted or become applicable to Infrastructure Assets; (iii) the technology, equipment, processes and procedures selected by our portfolio companies to comply with current and future regulatory requirements will meet such requirements; (iv) such portfolio companies’ business and financial conditions will not be materially and adversely affected by such future changes in, or reinterpretation of, laws and regulations (including the possible loss of exemptions from laws and regulations) or any failure to comply with such current and future laws and regulations; or (v) regulatory agencies or other third parties will not bring enforcement actions in which they disagree with regulatory decisions made by other regulatory agencies. In addition, in many instances, the operation or acquisition of Infrastructure Assets may involve an ongoing commitment to or from a government agency. The nature of these obligations exposes the owners of Infrastructure Assets to a higher level of regulatory control than is typically imposed on other businesses.

Regulatory Agencies might impose conditions on the construction, operations and activities of an Infrastructure Asset as a condition to granting their approval or to satisfy regulatory requirements, including requirements that such assets remain managed by our Adviser or its affiliates, which could limit our ability to dispose of Infrastructure Assets at opportune times or make the continued operation of such Infrastructure Asset unfeasible or economically disadvantageous, and any expenditures made to date with respect to such Infrastructure Asset may be wholly or partially written off. Sometimes commitments to Regulatory Agencies involve the posting of financial security for performance of obligations. If obligations are breached these financial securities may be called upon by the relevant Regulatory Agency.

Table of Contents

There is also the risk that our portfolio companies do not have, might not obtain, or may lose permits necessary for their operations. Permits or special rulings may be required on taxation, financial and regulatory related issues. Many of these licenses and permits have to be renewed or maintained over the life of the business. The conditions and costs of these permits, licenses and consents may be changed on any renewal, or, in some cases, may not be renewed due to unforeseen circumstances or a subsequent change in regulations.

Regulatory Agencies often have considerable discretion to change or increase regulation of the operations of a portfolio company or to otherwise implement laws, regulations, or policies affecting its operations (including, in each case, with retroactive effect), separate from any contractual rights that the Regulatory Agencies’ counterparties have. Accordingly, additional or unanticipated regulatory approvals, including, without limitation, renewals, extensions, transfers, assignments, reissuances, or similar actions, could be required to acquire portfolio companies that operate Infrastructure Assets, and additional approvals could become applicable in the future due to, among other reasons, a change in applicable laws and regulations, or a change in the relevant portfolio company’s customer base. There can be no assurance that a portfolio company will be able to (i) obtain all required regulatory approvals that it does not yet have or that it could require in the future; (ii) obtain any necessary modifications to existing regulatory approvals; or (iii) maintain required regulatory approvals. Delay in obtaining or failure to obtain and maintain in full force and effect any regulatory approvals, or amendments thereto, or delay or failure to satisfy any regulatory conditions or other applicable requirements could prevent operation of a facility owned by a portfolio company, the completion of a previously announced acquisition or sale to third parties, or could otherwise result in additional costs and material adverse consequences to us and our portfolio companies.

Since we expect that many of our portfolio companies will provide basic, everyday services and face limited competition, Regulatory Agencies could be influenced by political considerations and could make decisions that adversely affect a portfolio company’s business. Certain types of Infrastructure Assets are in the “public eye” and politically sensitive, and as a result our activities could attract an undesirable level of publicity. Additionally, pressure groups and lobbyists could induce Regulatory Agency action to our detriment as the owner of the relevant portfolio company. There can be no assurance that the relevant government will not legislate, impose regulations, or change applicable laws, or act contrary to the law in a way that would materially and adversely affect the business of a portfolio company. The profitability of certain portfolio companies might be materially dependent on government subsidies being maintained (for example, government programs encouraging the development of certain technologies such as solar and wind power generation). Reductions or eliminations of such subsidies would likely have a material adverse impact on relevant portfolio companies and us.

An Infrastructure Asset’s operations might rely on government licenses, concessions, leases or contracts that are generally very complex and could result in a dispute over interpretation or enforceability. Even though most permits and licenses are obtained prior to the commencement of full project operations, many of these licenses and permits have to be maintained over the project’s life. If we or an Infrastructure Asset fails to comply with these regulations or contractual obligations, it could be subject to monetary penalties or lose its right to operate the affected asset, or both.

Where we or a portfolio company hold a concession or lease from a Regulatory Agency, such arrangements are subject to special risks as a result of the nature of the counterparty. The concession or lease might restrict the operation of the relevant asset or business in a way that maximizes cash flows and profitability. The lease or concession could also contain clauses more favorable to the Regulatory Agency counterparty than a typical commercial contract. In addition, there is the risk that the relevant Regulatory Agency will exercise sovereign rights and take actions contrary to the rights of us or a portfolio company under the relevant agreement. Poor performance and other events could lead to termination of the relevant concession or lease agreement, which might or might not provide for compensation to the relevant portfolio company. If it does, as the portfolio company would generally be deemed to have been “at fault,” then often the amount of any related senior debt might not be paid out in full and compensation for lost equity returns might not be provided.

Certain assets may require the use of public ways or may operate under easements. Regulatory Agencies typically retain the right to restrict the use of such public ways or easements or require a portfolio company to remove, modify, replace or relocate facilities relating to infrastructure assets at its own expense. If a Regulatory Agency exercises these rights, a portfolio company could incur significant costs and its ability to provide service to its customers could be disrupted, which could adversely impact the performance of such portfolio company.

Geographical concentration of our portfolio companies may make them more susceptible to changing conditions of particular geographic regions.

Our geographic diversification may be limited due to limited availability of suitable business opportunities. During periods of difficult market conditions or economic slowdown in certain regions and in Infrastructure Assets, the adverse effect on us could be exacerbated by the geographic concentration of our portfolio companies. We may seek to own and control

Table of Contents

several portfolio companies in certain regions or sectors within a short period of time. To the extent that our portfolio companies are concentrated in a particular company, geographic region, such portfolio companies will become more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse economic or business conditions with respect thereto. For us to achieve attractive returns, one or a few of our portfolio companies will need to perform very well. There are no assurances that this will be the case. In addition, to the extent that the capital raised is less than the targeted amount and/or repurchase requests are significant, we may own and control fewer portfolio companies and thus be less diversified.

Although we intend to target portfolio companies that operate Infrastructure Assets that are broadly diversified across a number of different infrastructure sectors, geographies and asset types, to the extent our portfolio companies are concentrated in a particular market, our portfolio may become more susceptible to fluctuations in value resulting from adverse economic or business conditions affecting that particular market. In these circumstances and in other transactions where our Adviser intends to refinance all or a portion of the capital invested, there will be a risk that such refinancing may not be completed, which could lead to an increased risk as a result of us having an unintended reduced diversification.

Declines in market prices and liquidity in the markets can result in significant reduction in the fair value of our portfolio, which in turn would reduce our NAV.

As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser, as our Valuation Designee (as defined in Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act), subject to the oversight of our Board. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a readily available market value existed for such investments, and the differences could be material. We may take into account the following types of factors, if relevant, in determining the fair value of our investments: the enterprise value of a portfolio company (the entire value of the portfolio company to a market participant, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time), the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, a comparison of the portfolio company’s securities to similar publicly traded securities, changes in the interest rate environment and the markets that may affect the price at which similar investments would trade and other relevant factors. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we use the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate our valuation. While most of our investments will not be publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its useful life). As a result, volatility in markets can also adversely affect our investment valuations. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments are recorded as unrealized depreciation. The effect of these factors on our portfolio can reduce our NAV (and, as a result our asset coverage calculation). Depending on market conditions, we could incur substantial realized and/or unrealized losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

The current macroeconomic environment is characterized by labor shortages, strikes, work stoppages, labor disputes, supply chain disruptions and accidents, changing interest rates, persistent inflation, foreign currency exchange volatility, volatility in global capital markets and concerns over actual and potential tariffs and sanctions, inflation and persistent recession risk. The risks associated with our and our portfolio companies' businesses are more severe during periods of economic slowdown or recession.

Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic downturns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans during these periods. Therefore, during these periods our non-performing assets may increase and the value of our portfolio may decrease if we are required to write down the values of our investments. Adverse economic conditions may also decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, acceleration of the time when the loans are due and foreclosure on its assets representing collateral for its obligations, which could trigger cross defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt investments that we may hold and the value of any equity securities we may own. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company.

Table of Contents

Investments in privately held companies involve significant risks.

We invest in privately held companies. Investments in privately held companies involve a number of significant risks, including the following:

• these companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing our investment;

• they may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares, which may render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;

• they may depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse effect on such portfolio company and, in turn, on us;

• there is generally little public information about these companies. These companies and their financial information are generally not subject to the 1934 Act and other regulations that govern public companies, and we may be unable to uncover all material information about these companies, which may prevent us from making a fully informed investment decision and cause us to lose money on our investments;

• they generally have less predictable operating results and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position;

• we, our executive officers, trustees and our Adviser, its affiliates and/or any of their respective principals and employees may, in the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in our portfolio companies and may, as a result, incur significant costs and expenses in connection with such litigation;

• changes in laws and regulations (including the tax laws), as well as their interpretations, may adversely affect their business, financial structure or prospects; and

• they may have difficulty accessing the capital markets to meet future capital needs.

Most of our portfolio investments are not publicly traded and, as a result, the fair value of these investments may not be readily determinable.

A large percentage of our portfolio investments are not publicly traded. The fair value of investments that are not publicly traded may not be readily determinable. We plan to value these investments monthly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Adviser, as our Valuation Designee, subject to the oversight of our Board, based on, among other things, the input of an independent third-party valuation firm that has been engaged to support the valuation of such portfolio investments by providing positive assurance monthly and an independent valuation at least semiannually (with certain de minimis exceptions) and under a valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process. However, we may use these independent valuation firms to review the value of our investments more frequently, including in connection with the occurrence of significant events or changes in value affecting a particular investment. We plan to conduct the valuation process at the end of each calendar month by our Adviser, and a portion of our investment portfolio at fair value will be subject to review by an independent third-party valuation firm each month. However, we may use these independent valuation firms to review the value of our investments more frequently, including in connection with the occurrence of significant events or changes in value affecting a particular investment.

The types of factors that may be considered in valuing our investments include the enterprise value of the portfolio company (the entire value of the portfolio company to a market participant, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time), the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, a comparison of the portfolio company’s securities to similar publicly traded securities, changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets generally that may affect the price at which similar investments would trade in their principal markets and other relevant factors. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we consider the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate our valuation. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. Our NAV per Share could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of these investments are higher than the values that we realize upon disposition of such investments.

Table of Contents

Our equity and debt investments in Infrastructure Assets may be risky, and we could lose all or part of our investments.

Equity Securities . We will invest in equity investments, including investments in common or preferred stock. There is no limitation on the type, size or operating experience of the companies in which we may invest. Because equity securities rank lower in the capital structure of an issuer, such investments may subject investors to additional risks not applicable to debt securities. Special-situation equities are event- driven and may be subject to greater volatility than other equity securities. All of our investments in stocks will be subject to normal market risks. While diversification among issuers may mitigate these risks, we are not required to diversify our investments in equity securities; and Shareholders must expect fluctuations in value of equity securities held by us based on market conditions. Because equity securities rank lower in the capital structure of an issuer, such investments may subject investors to additional risks not applicable to debt securities. In addition, holders of equity securities may be wiped out or substantially reduced in value in a bankruptcy proceeding or corporate restructuring.

Equity Kickers . Our Adviser anticipates that, in connection with certain of our originated or acquired loan investments, we may be issued or otherwise receive a range of equity incentives, which would usually be in the form of a warrant to acquire a portion of a borrower’s fully diluted equity, but could also be in the form of outright shares, an exit fee or some direct participation in proceeds of a sale or listing (and may also be received in connection any workouts or restructurings of those investments) (collectively, “Equity Kickers”). These Equity Kickers would be intended to enable us to participate in a borrower’s long-term value which may be created by growth facilitated by a loan, and accordingly will have little or no value at issuance and will typically generate income (if at all) only upon a sale, listing or recapitalization of the borrower. Such Equity Kickers will generally involve a high degree of risk and will be subordinate to (and thus are inherently riskier than) the debt securities and other liabilities of the issuers of such Equity Kickers. Prices of Equity Kickers generally fluctuate more than prices of debt securities and are likely to be affected more rapidly, and to a greater extent, by company-specific developments and poor economic or market conditions. In addition, these Equity Kickers may be illiquid or trade at significant discounts to otherwise comparable investments. Equity Kickers may not produce any income for us and may ultimately have no recognizable value. We may experience a substantial or complete loss on such Equity Kickers to the extent of any value given in connection with the acquisition thereof.

Senior Debt. Our investments may include first lien and second lien senior secured debt. Such debt may (i) include term loans and revolving loans, (ii) pay interest at a fixed or floating rate and (iii) be acquired by way of purchase or assignment in the primary and secondary markets. The purchaser of an assignment typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations of the assigning institution and becomes a contracting party under the legal documentation with respect to the debt obligation; however, its rights can be more restricted than those of the assigning institution.

The factors affecting an issuer’s first and second lien loans, and its overall capital structure, are complex. Some first lien loans may not necessarily have priority over all other unsecured debt of an issuer. For example, some first lien loans may permit other secured obligations (such as overdrafts, swaps or other derivatives made available by members of the syndicate to the company) or involve first liens only on specified assets of an issuer. Issuers of first lien loans may have two tranches of first lien debt outstanding, each with first liens on separate collateral. Second lien loans are subordinate in right of payment to one or more senior secured loans of the related borrower and therefore are subject to additional risk that the cash flow of the related borrower and the property securing the loan may be insufficient to repay the scheduled payments to us after giving effect to any senior secured obligations of the related borrower. Second lien senior loans are also expected to be a more illiquid investment than first lien senior secured loans for such reason. There also is less likelihood that we will be able to sell participations in second lien loans that we originate or acquire, which would expose us to increased risk.

Senior secured credit facilities may be syndicated to a number of different financial market participants. The documentation governing such facilities typically requires either a majority consent or, in certain cases, unanimous approval for certain actions in respect of the loan, such as waivers, amendments, or the exercise of remedies. In addition, voting to accept or reject the terms of a restructuring of a credit pursuant to a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization is usually done on a class basis. As a result of these voting regimes, we may not have the ability to control any decision in respect of any amendment, waiver, exercise of remedies, restructuring or reorganization of an investment.

Senior secured loans are also subject to other risks and can cause unsecured creditors to seek remedies to limit our potential recovery of such investments, including (a) the possible invalidation of a debt or lien as a “fraudulent conveyance”; (b) the recovery as a “preference” of liens perfected or payments made on account of a debt in the 90 days before a bankruptcy filing; (c) equitable subordination claims by other creditors; (d) lender liability claims by the issuer of the obligations; (e) environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations; (f) recharacterization claims in which certain creditors may seek to have our debt positions recharacterized as equity and therefore subordinate our claims to such

Table of Contents

creditors’ claims; and (g) designating the vote (i.e., ignoring the customary class vote system) under a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in which lenders are entitled to vote as a class.

Distressed Securities . We may invest in securities, private claims and obligations of domestic and foreign entities which are experiencing or may experience significant financial or business difficulties. We may lose a substantial portion or all of our investment in a distressed environment or may be required to accept cash or securities with a value less than the investment. Such investments also may be adversely affected by state and federal laws relating to, among other things, fraudulent conveyances, voidable preferences, lender liability and the bankruptcy court’s discretionary power to disallow, subordinate or disenfranchise particular claims. The market prices of such instruments are also subject to abrupt and erratic market movements and above average price volatility, and the spread between the bid and asked prices of such instruments may be greater than normally expected due to a variety of factors that are inherently difficult to predict, such as domestic or international economic and political developments, all of which may significantly affect the results of our activities. Investments in distressed securities, particularly rescue financings in connection with reorganizations, often involve litigation generally related to issues related to control and preference among classes, claimants and other related matters. Such litigation can be time-consuming and expensive, and can frequently lead to unpredicted delays or losses that by their nature involve business, financial, market and/or legal risks.

Convertible Securities. Our investments may include investments in convertible securities. Convertible securities are bonds, debentures, notes, preferred shares or other securities that may be converted into, or exchanged for, a specified amount of common stock of the same or different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. A convertible security entitles its holder to receive interest that is generally paid or accrued on debt or a distribution that is paid or accrued on preferred shares until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Convertible securities have unique investment characteristics in that they generally (i) have higher yields than common stocks, but lower yields than comparable non-convertible securities, (ii) are less subject to fluctuation in value than the underlying common stock due to their fixed-income characteristics and (iii) provide the potential for capital appreciation if the market price of the underlying common stock increases.

The value of a convertible security is a function of its “investment value” (determined by its yield in comparison with the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege) and its “conversion value” (the security’s market value, if converted into the underlying common stock). The investment value of a convertible security is influenced by changes in interest rates, with investment value declining as interest rates increase and increasing as interest rates decline. The credit standing of the issuer and other factors may also have an effect on the convertible security’s investment value. The conversion value of a convertible security is determined by the market price of the underlying common stock. If the conversion value is low relative to the investment value, the price of the convertible security is governed principally by its investment value. To the extent the market price of the underlying common stock approaches or exceeds the conversion price, the price of the convertible security will be increasingly influenced by its conversion value. A convertible security generally will sell at a premium over its conversion value by the extent to which investors place value on the right to acquire the underlying common stock while holding a fixed-income security. Generally, the amount of the premium decreases as the convertible security approaches maturity.

A convertible security may be subject to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the convertible security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by us is called for redemption, we will be required to permit the issuer to redeem the security, convert it into the underlying common stock or sell it to a third party. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

Investments in equity securities, many of which are illiquid with no readily available market, involve a substantial degree of risk.

We may purchase common stock and other equity securities. Although common stock has historically generated higher average total returns than fixed income securities over the long-term, common stock also has experienced significantly more volatility in those returns. The equity securities we acquire may fail to appreciate and may decline in value or become worthless and our ability to recover our investment will depend on the underlying portfolio company’s success. Investments in equity securities involve a number of significant risks, including:

• any equity investment we make in a portfolio company could be subject to further dilution as a result of the issuance of additional equity interests and to serious risks as a junior security that will be subordinate to all indebtedness (including trade creditors) or senior securities in the event that the issuer is unable to meet its obligations or becomes subject to a bankruptcy process;

Table of Contents

• to the extent that the portfolio company requires additional capital and is unable to obtain it, we may not recover our investment; and

• in some cases, equity securities in which we invest will not pay current distributions, and our ability to realize a return on our investment, as well as to recover our investment, will be dependent on the success of the portfolio company. Even if the portfolio company is successful, our ability to realize the value of our investment may be dependent on the occurrence of a liquidity event, such as a public offering or the sale of the portfolio company. It is likely to take a significant amount of time before a liquidity event occurs or we can otherwise sell our investment. In addition, the equity securities we receive or invest in may be subject to restrictions on resale during periods in which it could be advantageous to sell them.

There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities, including:

• preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, at its discretion, to defer distributions for a stated period without any adverse consequences to the issuer. If we own a preferred security that is deferring its distributions, we may be required to report income for tax purposes before we receive such distributions;

• preferred securities are subordinated to debt in terms of priority to income and liquidation payments, and therefore will be subject to greater credit risk than debt;

• preferred securities may be substantially less liquid than many other securities, such as common stock or U.S. government securities; and

• generally, preferred security holders have no voting rights with respect to the issuing company, subject to limited exceptions.

Additionally, if we invest in first lien senior secured loans (including “unitranche” loans, which are loans that combine both senior and subordinated debt, generally in a first lien position), second lien senior secured loans or subordinated debt, we may acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. Our goal is ultimately to dispose of such equity interests and realize gains upon our disposition of such interests.

However, the equity interests we may receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

We may invest, to the extent permitted by law, in the equity securities of investment funds that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions to the 1940 Act and in advisers to similar investment funds and, to the extent we so invest, will bear our ratable share of any such company’s expenses, including management and performance fees. We will also remain obligated to pay the management fee and incentive fee to our Adviser with respect to the assets invested in the securities and instruments of such companies. With respect to each of these investments, each of our Shareholders will bear a share of the management fee and incentive fee due to our Adviser as well as indirectly bearing the management and performance fees and other expenses of any such investment funds or advisers.

We may be subject to risks associated with broadly syndicated loans.

Our investments may include broadly syndicated loans that were not originated by us. Under the documentation for such loans, a financial institution or other entity typically is designated as the administrative agent and/or collateral agent. This agent is granted a lien on any collateral on behalf of the other lenders and distributes payments on the indebtedness as they are received. The agent is the party responsible for administering and enforcing the loan and generally may take actions only in accordance with the instructions of a majority or two-thirds in commitments and/or principal amount of the associated indebtedness. Accordingly, we may be precluded from directing such actions unless we or our Adviser is the designated administrative agent or collateral agent or we act together with other holders of the indebtedness. If we are unable to direct such actions, we cannot assure you that the actions taken will be in our best interests.

There is a risk that a loan agent may become bankrupt or insolvent. Such an event would delay, and possibly impair, any enforcement actions undertaken by holders of the associated indebtedness, including attempts to realize upon the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and/or direct the agent to take actions against the related obligor or the collateral securing the associated indebtedness and actions to realize on proceeds of payments made by obligors that are in the possession or control of any other financial institution. In addition, we may be unable to remove the agent in circumstances in which removal would be in our best interests. Moreover, agented loans typically allow for the agent to resign with certain advance notice.

Table of Contents

There may be circumstances in which our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.

If one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt holding as an equity investment and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. In addition, lenders can be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by them where they become too involved in the borrower’s business or exercise control over the borrower. For example, we could become subject to a lender’s liability claim, if, among other things, we actually render significant managerial assistance.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments. By their terms, such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of distributions, interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of our investments. These debt instruments would usually prohibit our portfolio companies from paying interest on or repaying our investments in the event and during the continuance of a default under such debt. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company typically are entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying such holders, the portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with our investments, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other security holders in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.

The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing any junior priority loans we make to our portfolio companies may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements (including agreements governing “first out” and “last out” structures) that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that senior obligations are outstanding, we may forfeit certain rights with respect to the collateral to the holders of the senior obligations. These rights may include the right to commence enforcement proceedings against the collateral, the right to control the conduct of such enforcement proceedings, the right to approve amendments to collateral documents, the right to release liens on the collateral and the right to waive past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if as a result our rights as junior lenders are adversely affected.

When we are a debt or minority equity investor in a portfolio company, we may not be in a position to exert influence on the entity, and other equity holders and management of the company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our investment in such portfolio company.

If we make debt or minority equity investments, we will be subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree and the other equity holders and management of such company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our investment.

We may not be in a position to exercise control over our portfolio companies or to prevent decisions by management of our portfolio companies that could decrease the value of our investments.

We generally do not hold controlling equity positions in our portfolio companies. While we are obligated as a BDC to offer to make managerial assistance available to our portfolio companies, there can be no assurance that management personnel of our portfolio companies will accept or rely on such assistance. To the extent that we do not hold a controlling equity interest in a portfolio company, we are subject to the risk that such portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the shareholders and management of such portfolio company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that are adverse to our interests. Due to the lack of liquidity for the debt and equity investments that we will typically hold in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company and may therefore suffer a decrease in the value of our investments.

In addition, we may not be in a position to control any portfolio company by investing in its debt securities. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such company, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as debt investors.

Table of Contents

Our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged.

Our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged, which may have adverse consequences to these companies and to us as an investor. These companies may be subject to restrictive financial and operating covenants and the leverage may impair these companies’ ability to finance their future operations and capital needs. As a result, these companies’ flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and to take advantage of business opportunities may be limited. Further, a leveraged company’s income and net assets will tend to increase or decrease at a greater rate than if borrowed money were not used.

Any investments that we may make in distressed securities could be considered speculative in nature and highly risky.

We may invest in distressed securities, private claims and obligations of domestic and foreign entities, or those issuers experiencing or who begin to experience some level of financial or business distress and who may be undergoing or have recently undergone bankruptcy or other restructuring, reorganization and liquidation proceedings. The characteristics of these distressed securities can cause investments in them to be particularly risky and may be considered speculative. Additionally, the ability of issuers experiencing financial or business distress to pay their debts on schedule (or at all) could be affected by adverse interest rate movements, changes in the general economic climate, economic factors affecting a particular industry or region or specific developments within the distressed business. Investments in the securities of distressed businesses frequently do not produce income while they are outstanding and may require us to bear increased expenses, including by increased investment, in order to protect and recover our investments.

Our Adviser’s fee structure may create an incentive for it to make certain investments on our behalf, including speculative investments.

The fees payable by us to our Adviser may create an incentive for our Adviser to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee payable to our Adviser is determined, which is calculated as a percentage of the return on NAV, may encourage our Adviser to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor the holders of our Shares and the holders of securities convertible into our Shares. In addition, our Adviser will receive the capital gains incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our investments. Unlike the incentive fee, there is no hurdle rate applicable to the capital gains incentive fee. As a result, our Adviser may have a tendency to invest more in investments that are likely to result in capital gains as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.

The incentive fee is computed and paid on income that has been accrued but not yet received in cash, including as a result of investments with a deferred interest feature such as debt investments with PIK interest, preferred stock with PIK dividends and zero coupon securities. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. Our Adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the fees it received that were based on such accrued interest that we never actually received. In addition, while we deduct operating expenses when calculating our pre-incentive fee net investment income for incentive fee purposes, such operating expenses do not include all categories of expenses that may ultimately impact our income. For instance, if we are subject to corporate-level income taxes that are not included when calculating our operating expense, our Adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the fees it receives that were based on income prior to accounting for such taxes.

Because of the structure of the incentive fee, it is possible that we may have to pay the incentive fee in a quarter during which we incur a loss. For example, if we receive pre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate for a quarter, we will pay the applicable incentive fee even if we have incurred a loss in that quarter due to realized and/or unrealized capital losses. In addition, if market interest rates rise, our Adviser may be able to invest our funds in debt investments that provide for a higher return, which would increase our pre-incentive fee net investment income and make it easier for our Adviser to surpass the fixed hurdle rate and receive the incentive fee.

Our investments in foreign companies or investments denominated in foreign currencies may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. and U.S. dollar denominated investments.

Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange

Table of Contents

control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes (potentially at confiscatory levels), less liquid markets, less available information than is generally the case in the U.S., higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.

Although we expect most of our investments will be U.S. dollar denominated, our investments that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we cannot assure you that such strategies will be effective or without risk to us.

We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.

We have and may in the future enter into hedging transactions, which may expose us to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Use of these hedging instruments may include counter-party credit risk. The fair value (rather than the notational value) of any derivatives or swaps we enter into will be included in our calculation of gross assets for purposes of calculating the management fee. Additionally, derivatives and swaps will be accounted for as realized or unrealized gains (losses) for accounting purposes and could impact the portion of the incentive fee based on realized capital gains. As a result, any derivatives we enter into that result in realized gains may increase the amount of the fees you will be required to pay us.

Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

The success of our hedging transactions will depend on our ability to correctly predict movements in currencies and interest rates. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to (or be able to) establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations. See also “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure—We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates, including the current interest rate environment.”

As a BDC, we are permitted to enter into unfunded commitment agreements, and, if we fail to meet certain requirements, we will be required to treat such unfunded commitments as derivative transactions, subject to leverage limitations, which may limit our ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts.

Under Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, BDCs that make significant use of derivatives are required to operate subject to a value-at-risk leverage limit, adopt a derivatives risk management program and appoint a derivatives risk manager, and comply with various testing and board reporting requirements. These requirements apply unless the BDC qualifies as a “limited derivatives user,” as defined under the rule. We qualify and operate as a “limited derivatives user,” which may limit our ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts.

In addition, under Rule 18f-4, a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has, among other things, a reasonable belief, at the time it enters into such an agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as they become due. Unfunded commitment agreements entered into by a BDC in compliance with this condition will not be considered for purposes of computing asset

Table of Contents

coverage for purposes of compliance with the 1940 Act with respect to our use of leverage as well as derivatives and/or other financial contracts.

Risks Relating to an Investment in our Shares

The amount of any distributions we may make is uncertain. Our distributions may exceed our earnings, particularly during the period before we have substantially invested the net proceeds from our Private Offering. Therefore, portions of the distributions that we make may represent a return of capital to you that will lower your tax basis in your Shares and thereby increase the amount of capital gain (or decrease the amount of capital loss) realized upon a subsequent sale or redemption of such Shares, and reduce the amount of funds we have for investment in targeted assets.

We may fund our cash distributions to Shareholders from any sources of funds available to us, including offering proceeds, borrowings, net investment income from operations, capital gains proceeds from the sale of assets, non-capital gains proceeds from the sale of assets, dividends or other distributions paid to us on account of preferred and common equity investments in portfolio companies and fee and expense reimbursement waivers from our Adviser or our Administrator, if any. Our ability to pay distributions might be adversely affected by, among other things, the impact of one or more of the risk factors described in this Annual Report. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test that is applicable to us as a BDC may limit our ability to pay distributions. All distributions are and will be paid at the sole discretion of our Board and will depend on our earnings, our financial condition, compliance with applicable BDC regulations and such other factors as our Board may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure you that we will pay distributions to our Shareholders in the future. In the event that we encounter delays in locating suitable investment opportunities, we may pay all or a substantial portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our Private Offering or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow, which may constitute a return of your capital. A return of capital is a return of your investment, rather than a return of earnings or gains derived from our investment activities.

Any distributions to Shareholders may be funded from expense reimbursements or waivers of investment advisory fees that are subject to repayment pursuant to our Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement.

Although payments under the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement will not be directly used to fund distributions, substantial portions of our distributions may be funded indirectly through the reimbursement of certain expenses by our Adviser and its affiliates, including through any potential waiver of certain investment advisory fees by our Adviser. Any expenses assumed by our Adviser after the commencement of our operations will be subject to recoupment under the terms of the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement. Any such distributions funded through expense reimbursements or waivers of advisory fees will not be based on our investment performance, and can only be sustained if we achieve positive investment performance in future periods and/or our Adviser and its affiliates continue to make such reimbursements or waivers of such fees. Repayment of amounts reimbursed or waived by the Adviser or its affiliates, pursuant to the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement, will immediately reduce our NAV at the time we make such reimbursement payment and may reduce future distributions to which you would otherwise be entitled. Further, there can be no assurance that we will achieve the performance necessary to be able to pay distributions at a specific rate or at all. Our Adviser and its affiliates have no obligation to waive advisory fees or otherwise reimburse expenses we may incur; however, if our Adviser chooses to advance any expenses, this may prevent or reduce a decline in NAV until we repay such expenses by mitigating the effects of such advanced expenses would have on us.

We have not established any limit on the amount of funds we may use from available sources, such as borrowings, if any, or proceeds from the Private Offering to fund distributions (which may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in assets).

Shareholders should understand that any distributions made from sources other than cash flow from operations or relying on fee or expense reimbursement waivers, if any, from our Adviser or our Administrator are not based on our investment performance, and can only be sustained if we achieve positive investment performance in future periods and/or our Adviser or our Administrator continues to make such expense reimbursements, if any. The extent to which we pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations will depend on various factors, including the level of participation in our distribution reinvestment plan, how quickly we invest the proceeds from this and any past or future offering and the performance of our investments. Shareholders should also understand that our future repayment to our Adviser will reduce our NAV at the time we make such reimbursement payment and may reduce future distributions to which you would otherwise be entitled. There can be no assurance that we will achieve such performance in order to sustain these distributions, or be able to pay distributions at all. Our Adviser and our Administrator have no obligation to waive fees or receipt of expense reimbursements, if any.

Table of Contents

Although we have adopted a Share Repurchase Program, we have discretion to not repurchase Shares, and our Board has the ability to amend, suspend or terminate the Share Repurchase Program.

Our Board may amend, suspend or terminate the Share Repurchase Program at any time in its discretion. You may not be able to sell your Shares at all in the event our Board amends, suspends or terminates the Share Repurchase Program absent a liquidity event, and we currently do not intend to undertake a liquidity event, and we are not obligated by our Declaration of Trust or otherwise to effect a liquidity event at any time. We will notify you of such developments in our quarterly reports or other filings. If less than the full amount of Shares requested in any given repurchase offer are repurchased, funds will be allocated pro rata based on the total number of Shares being repurchased without regard to class. The Share Repurchase Program has many limitations and should not be relied upon as a method to sell Shares promptly or at a desired price.

The timing of our repurchase offers pursuant to our Share Repurchase Program may be at a time that is disadvantageous to our Shareholders.

In the event a Shareholder chooses to participate in our Share Repurchase Program, the Shareholder will be required to provide us with notice of intent to participate prior to knowing what the NAV per Share will be on the repurchase date. Although a Shareholder will have the ability to withdraw a repurchase request prior to the repurchase date, to the extent a Shareholder seeks to sell Shares to us as part of our periodic Share Repurchase Program, the Shareholder will be required to do so without knowledge of what the repurchase price of our Shares will be on the repurchase date.

Our ability to raise capital may impact the number and type of investments we may make, our expenses may be higher relative to our total assets, and the value of your investment in us may be reduced in the event our assets under-perform.

Amounts that we raise may impact our ability to purchase a broad portfolio of investments. To the extent that we are unable to raise all the capital we seek, the opportunity for us to purchase a broad portfolio of investments may be decreased and the returns achieved on those investments may be reduced as a result of allocating all of our expenses among a smaller capital base. To the extent that we are unable to raise all the capital we seek, we may not achieve certain economies of scale and our expenses may represent a larger proportion of our total assets.

We may in the future determine to issue preferred shares, which could adversely affect the holders of our Shares.

Any issuance of preferred shares with distribution or conversion rights, liquidation preferences or other economic terms favorable to the holders of preferred shares could make an investment in our Shares less attractive. In addition, the distributions on any preferred shares we issue must be cumulative. Payment of distributions and repayment of the liquidation preference of preferred shares must take preference over any distributions or other payments to our Shareholders, and holders of preferred shares are not subject to any of our expenses or losses and are not entitled to participate in any income or appreciation in excess of their stated preference (other than convertible preferred shares that converts into Shares). In addition, under the 1940 Act, preferred shares constitute a “senior security” for purposes of the asset coverage test.

Terms relating to redemption may materially adversely affect returns on any debt securities that we may issue.

If we issue any debt securities that are redeemable at our option, we may choose to redeem such debt securities at times when prevailing interest rates are lower than the interest rate paid on such debt securities. In addition, if we issue any debt securities subject to mandatory redemption, we may be required to redeem such debt securities also at times when prevailing interest rates are lower than the interest rate paid on such debt securities. In this circumstance, holders of such debt securities may not be able to reinvest the redemption proceeds in a comparable security at an effective interest rate as high as their debt securities being redeemed.

We may have difficulty sourcing investment opportunities.

We cannot assure investors that we will be able to locate a sufficient number of suitable investment opportunities to allow us to deploy all available capital successfully. In addition, privately negotiated investments in loans and illiquid securities of private portfolio companies require substantial due diligence and structuring, and we cannot assure investors that we will achieve our anticipated investment pace. As a result, investors will be unable to evaluate portfolio company investments prior to purchasing our Shares. Additionally, our Adviser selects our investments, and our Shareholders have no input with respect to such investment decisions. These factors increase the uncertainty, and thus the risk, of investing in our Shares. To the extent we are unable to deploy all capital, our investment income and, in turn, our results of operations, will likely be materially adversely affected.

Table of Contents

In addition, we anticipate, based on the amount of proceeds that may be raised at the beginning stages of our investment operations, that it could take some time to invest substantially all of the capital we expect to raise due to market conditions generally and the time necessary to identify, evaluate, structure, negotiate and close suitable investments in companies. Distributions paid during this period may be substantially lower than the distributions we expect to pay when our portfolio is fully invested. We will pay the management fee to our Adviser throughout this interim period irrespective of our performance. If the management fee and our other expenses exceed the return on the temporary investments, our equity capital will be reduced. If we do not produce positive investment returns, expenses and fees will reduce the amount of the original invested capital recovered by the Shareholders to an amount less than the amount invested in us by such Shareholders.

Our Shares have limited liquidity.

The Shares are not and will not be registered under the 1933 Act or any other securities laws, nor will they be readily transferable, if at all. Our Shares constitute illiquid investments for which there is not, and will likely not be, a secondary market at any time prior to a public offering and listing of our Shares on a national securities exchange. We do not currently intend to list our Shares on a national securities exchange. An investment in us is suitable only for sophisticated investors and requires the financial ability and willingness to accept the high risks and lack of liquidity inherent in an investment in us. Except in limited circumstances for legal or regulatory purposes, our Shareholders are not entitled to redeem their Shares. Shareholders must be prepared to bear the economic risk of an investment in our Shares for an extended period of time. While we may consider a liquidity event at any time in the future, we currently do not intend to undertake a liquidity event, and we are not obligated by our Declaration of Trust or otherwise to effect a liquidity event at any time.

We are a privately placed, perpetual-life BDC and our Shareholders may not be able to transfer or otherwise dispose of our Shares at desired times or prices, or at all.

We are a privately placed non-exchange traded, perpetual life-BDC. Our Shares may generally only be transferred with our consent, which may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of our Adviser. Additionally, our Shares may not be listed for trading on a stock exchange or other securities market. We currently do not plan to undertake a liquidity event, so there is no guarantee that a public market for our Shares will ever develop. As a result, our Shareholders must be prepared to bear the economic risk of an investment in us for an indefinite period of time.

Certain investors will be subject to 1934 Act filing requirements relating to their beneficial ownership of Shares.

Because our Shares are expected to be registered under the 1934 Act, ownership information for any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of our Shares will have to be disclosed in a Schedule 13G or other filings with the SEC. Beneficial ownership for these purposes is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes having voting or investment power over the securities. In some circumstances, our Shareholders who choose to reinvest their distributions may see their percentage stake in us increased to more than 5%, thus triggering this filing requirement. Each Shareholder is responsible for determining their filing obligations and preparing the filings. In addition, our Shareholders who hold more than 10% of our Shares may be subject to Section 16(b) of the 1934 Act, which recaptures for our benefit profits from the purchase and sale of registered stock (and securities convertible or exchangeable into such registered stock) within a six-month period.

If we are actively marketed to investors resident or domiciled in, or having their registered office in the EU or the UK, we may be subject to additional reporting, regulatory and compliance obligations pursuant to the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (the “AIFMD”).

The AIFMD regulates the activities of certain private fund managers undertaking fund management activities or marketing fund interests to investors within the European Economic Area (“EEA”) and the UK respectively.

To the extent we are actively marketed to investors resident or domiciled in, or having their registered office in, the EEA or the UK: (i) we and our Adviser will be subject to certain reporting, disclosure and other compliance obligations under the AIFMD, which will result in us incurring additional costs and expenses; (ii) we and our Adviser may become subject to additional regulatory or compliance obligations arising under national law in certain EEA jurisdictions or the UK, which would result in us incurring additional costs and expenses or may otherwise affect our management and operation; (iii) our Adviser will be required to make detailed information relating to us and our investments available to regulators and third parties; and (iv) the AIFMD will also restrict certain of our activities in relation to EEA or UK portfolio companies, including, in some circumstances, our ability to recapitalize, refinance or potentially restructure a portfolio company within the first two years of ownership, which may in turn affect our operations generally. In addition, it is possible that some jurisdictions will elect to restrict or prohibit the marketing of non-EEA funds to investors based in EEA jurisdictions, which may make it more difficult for us to raise our targeted amount of capital. The European Union is implementing a Directive to amend AIFMD (“AIFMD

Table of Contents

II”). AIFMD II will impose obligations including: (i) minimum substance considerations that EU regulators will need to take into account during the alternative investment fund manager (“AIFM”) authorization process; (ii) enhanced requirements around delegation, including additional reporting requirements in relation to delegation arrangements; (iii) new requirements applying to AIFMs managing funds that originate loans; (iv) increased investor pre-contractual disclosure requirements, notably around fees and charges; and (v) a prohibition on non-EU AIFMs and alternative investment funds established in jurisdictions identified as “high risk” countries under the European Anti-Money Laundering Directive (as amended) or the revised EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions. The final text of AIFMD II was published in the Official Journal of the European Union in March 2024, with AIFMD II due to be implemented by EU Member States from 2026. It is possible that AIFMD II may require additional costs, expenses and/or resources, as well as restricting or prohibiting certain activities, including in relation to loan-originating funds and managers or funds established in jurisdictions outside the EU identified as having anti-money laundering and/or tax failings.

Our Adviser is a non-EEA AIFM. Non-EEA AIFMs are expected to be subject to reporting and disclosure requirements under AIFMD II as well as the prohibition in respect of “high risk” jurisdictions for anti-money laundering and tax purposes. The application of other AIFMD II requirements may depend on how far individual Member States elect to apply AIFMD II to non-EEA AIFMs. This may affect our implementation of our strategy, and/or lead to increased legal and compliance costs, in one or more EEA Member States.

We may make credit investments, which could restrict our activities and oblige us to comply with certain regulatory requirements.

Funds that make credit investments have been the subject of increasing regulatory focus at international and regional level. To the extent that we are engaged in lending activity, we may be subject to restrictions on our activities and be obliged to comply with regulatory reporting and disclosure requirements in accordance with AIFMD II and/or other future regulatory initiatives. This may impact upon our activities and/or returns, lead to additional costs and expenses, and/or require the commitment of additional resources.

The International Organization of Securities Commissions and the Financial Stability Board have called on regulators to consider issues arising from the rapid growth in private finance, including in relation to systemic risk, transparency, leverage, liquidity, and conflicts of interest. It is likely that regulators will continue to focus on the credit funds sector and may introduce further regulatory requirements in the future.

From 2026, AIFMD II will introduce rules in respect of funds that originate loans, including in relation to (a) leverage limits, (b) liquidity requirements for open-ended loan-originating funds, (c) a limit on exposure to a single financial institution, (d) a prohibition on lending to certain entities and/or individuals that may give rise to conflicts of interest, (e) a ban on ‘originate-to-distribute’ strategies, (f) a risk retention requirement, (g) mandatory disclosures and reporting, and (h) policies and procedures for loan origination.

It is not yet confirmed whether or not the AIFMD II requirements in respect of funds originating loans will apply to non-EEA AIFMs. We may or may not, therefore, be required to comply with the AIFMD II restrictions on funds originating loans. If we are required to comply with the AIFMD II restrictions, this could affect our investment portfolio, require the implementation of policies and procedures for loan origination, and lead to an increase in the resources and costs necessary for compliance.

Special considerations for certain benefit plan investors.

We intend to conduct our affairs so that our assets should not be deemed to constitute “plan assets” under the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and the Plan Asset Regulations. In this regard, until such time as all classes of our Shares are considered “publicly offered securities” within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations, we intend either to limit investment in our Shares by “benefit plan investors” to less than 25% of the total value of our Shares (within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations) or to operate so as to qualify as an “operating company” (within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations).

If, notwithstanding our intent, our assets were deemed to be “plan assets” of any Shareholder that is a “benefit plan investor” under the Plan Asset Regulations, this would result, among other things, in (i) the application of the prudence, diversification, delegation of control and other fiduciary responsibility standards of ERISA to investments made by us, and (ii) the possibility that certain transactions in which we have engaged in or might seek to engage could constitute “prohibited transactions” under ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. In such an event, absent an exemption, we could be restricted from acquiring an otherwise desirable investment or from entering into an otherwise favorable transaction. In addition, if our assets

Table of Contents

were to be treated as including plan assets of a “benefit plan investor,” the payment of certain of the fees and/or the allocation of certain of our returns to our Adviser or its affiliates might constitute prohibited transactions under ERISA and the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). If a prohibited transaction occurs for which no exemption is available, our Adviser and/or any other fiduciary that has engaged in the prohibited transaction may be subject to penalties and liabilities under ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. In addition, the party in interest or disqualified person that has participated in the nonexempt prohibited transaction may be subject to excise taxes and other penalties and liabilities under ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. These excise taxes, penalties and liabilities could be substantial.

Our Adviser can take any action it determines in good faith so that our assets should not constitute “plan assets” for purposes of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code. Our Adviser’s authority to take such action includes the right to: (1) make structural, operating or other changes with respect to the Fund; (2) make structural or other changes in any portfolio investment; (3) dissolve the Fund; (4) cancel all or part of any Shareholder’s uncommitted Capital Commitment (if any); (5) require the Transfer or withdrawal, in whole or in part, of a Shareholder’s Shares; or (6) cause the us to exercise our Limited Exclusion Right (as defined in the Subscription Agreement) to exclude a Shareholder from purchasing Shares from us if, in our sole discretion, there is a substantial likelihood that such Shareholder’s purchase of Shares would, among other things, cause the participation of Benefit Plan Investors to be “significant” or our assets to be considered “plan assets” for the purposes of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code.

Prospective investors should consult with their own advisors as to the consequences of making an investment in us.

We may be liable for unfunded pension liabilities of our portfolio companies.

In at least one federal circuit court of appeals, a court found that, in certain circumstances, an investment company could be treated as a “trade or business” for purposes of determining pension liability under ERISA. Therefore, where an investment company owns 80% or more (or, possibly, under certain circumstances, less than 80%) of a portfolio company, such company (and any other 80%-owned portfolio companies of such investment company) might be found liable for certain pension liabilities of such a portfolio company to the extent the portfolio company is unable to satisfy such liabilities. We may, from time to time, own an 80% or greater interest in a portfolio company that has unfunded pension fund liabilities. If we (or our 80%-owned portfolio companies) were deemed to be liable for such pension liabilities, this could have a material adverse effect on our operations and the companies in which we invest. This discussion is based on current court decisions, statutes and regulations regarding control group liability under ERISA as in effect as of the date of this Annual Report, which may change in the future as the case law and guidance develops.

The fiduciary of any investor governed by the fiduciary rules under ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code or other applicable Similar Laws must determine that an investment in us is appropriate for such investor.

Until such time as our Shares are considered “publicly offered securities” within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-101, as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA (the “Plan Asset Regulations”), we intend to conduct our affairs so that our assets will not be deemed to be “plan assets” under the Plan Asset Regulations by limiting investment in our Shares by “benefit plan investors” to less than 25% of the total value of our Shares or by operating us as an “operating company” within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations. The fiduciary of each prospective investor subject to ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code or other Similar Laws must independently determine whether our Shares are an appropriate investment for such investor, taking into account any fiduciary obligations under ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code or other applicable Similar Laws and the facts and circumstances of each such investor.

There is a risk that investors in our Shares may not receive distributions or that our distributions may not grow over time and that investors in any debt securities we may issue in the future may not receive all of the interest income to which they are entitled.

We intend to make distributions on a monthly basis to our Shareholders out of assets legally available for distribution and in accordance with applicable state law. Any distributions we make will be paid at the sole discretion of our Board. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. If we declare a distribution and if more Shareholders opt to receive cash distributions rather than participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, we may be forced to sell some of our investments in order to make cash distributions.

In addition, due to the asset coverage test that is applicable to us as a BDC, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions. Credit facilities that we may enter into in the future could limit our ability to declare distributions if we default under certain provisions. Further, if we invest a greater amount of assets in non-income producing securities, it could reduce the

Table of Contents

amount available for distribution and may also inhibit our ability to make required interest payments to holders of any debt we may issue, which may cause a default under the terms of debt agreements that we may be party to. Such a default could materially increase our cost of raising capital, as well as cause us to incur penalties under the terms of our debt agreements.

Investing in our Shares may involve an above average degree of risk.

The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be highly speculative and aggressive and, therefore, an investment in our securities may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.

The NAV of our Shares, and liquidity, if any, of the market for our Shares may fluctuate significantly.

The capital and credit markets have experienced periods of extreme volatility and disruption over the past several years. The NAV of our Shares may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:

• price and volume fluctuations in the capital and credit markets from time to time;

• changes in law, regulatory policies or tax guidelines, or interpretations thereof, particularly with respect to BDCs;

• changes in accounting guidelines governing valuation of our investments;

• loss of our BDC status;

• loss of a major funding source;

• our ability to manage our capital resources effectively;

• changes in our earnings or variations in our operating results;

• changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;

• any shortfall in investment income or net investment income or any increase in losses from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;

• departure of Ares’ key personnel;

• uncertainty surrounding the strength of the U.S. economy;

• uncertainty regarding U.S. immigration and work permit policies;

• global unrest; and

• general economic trends and other external factors.

Our Shareholders will experience dilution in their ownership percentage if they do not participate in our distribution reinvestment plan.

All distributions declared in cash payable to Shareholders that are participants in our distribution reinvestment plan are automatically reinvested in our Shares. As a result, our Shareholders that do not opt into our distribution reinvestment plan will experience dilution in their ownership percentage of our Shares over time. See “Item 1. Business—Distribution Reinvestment Plan.”

Our future credit ratings may not reflect all risks of an investment in our debt securities.

Any credit ratings we receive will be an assessment by third parties of our ability to pay our obligations. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in such credit ratings will generally affect the market value of any debt securities we issue. Such credit ratings, however, may not reflect the potential impact of risks related to market conditions generally or other factors on the market value of or any trading market for any debt securities we issue.

Table of Contents

Certain provisions of our Organizational Documents and actions of the Board could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the value of our Shares.

Our Declaration of Trust provides that we are not required to hold annual meetings for the election of trustees and our Subscription Agreement provides that Shares are not transferable without the consent of our Adviser. These and other provisions of the Organizational Documents may have the effect of preventing or discouraging a third party from being able to take control of us and thus preventing the holders of our Shares of the opportunity to realize a premium over the value of our Shares that a change of control might bring.

Risk Factors Related to Federal Income Taxation

We are taxed as a Corporation under Subchapter C of the Code and not as a regulated investment company.

In order to make certain investments that would be eligible for U.S. federal income tax credits and other tax incentives, we have elected to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We do not qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Code. Accordingly, we are subject to U.S. federal and applicable state and local income tax on our net income (regardless of whether such income is U.S. source) at the rates applicable to corporations without deduction for any distributions to the investors. Currently, the maximum rate of tax applicable to corporations is 21%. Therefore, since we are treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, certain investors, including U.S. taxable investors and state pension plans (which might otherwise prefer not to participate in investments through entities taxed as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes) will be required to invest through an entity taxed as a corporation in order to invest in us.

We cannot predict how tax reform legislation will affect us, our investments, or our Shareholders, and any such legislation could adversely affect our business.

Legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us. The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department. Recent legislation has made many changes to the Code, including significant changes to the taxation of business entities, the deductibility of interest expense, the availability, amount and monetization of certain tax credits and the tax treatment of capital investment. We cannot predict with certainty how any changes in the tax laws might affect us, our Shareholders, or our portfolio investments. New legislation and any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting such legislation could significantly and negatively affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to us and our Shareholders. Shareholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor regarding tax legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities.

Our eligibility for certain tax benefits may be significantly impaired.

We are expected to make investments that would be eligible for U.S. federal income tax credits and other tax incentives. Certain tax credits and accelerated depreciation are subject to reduction to the extent of ownership of the property that generates such tax credits and accelerated depreciation by tax-exempt persons. For purposes of determining the amount of reduction of such tax credits and accelerated depreciation, if tax-exempt persons own fifty percent of more by value of the stock of a corporation, then such corporation shall be treated as a tax-exempt entity (such a corporation, a “Tax-Exempt Controlled Entity”). A Tax-Exempt Controlled Entity may elect to not be treated as such, provided that any gain recognized by tax-exempt investors in the Tax-Exempt Controlled Entity on a disposition of an interest therein, and any dividend, distribution or interest received or accrued by a tax-exempt investor from such electing tax-exempt controlled entity, be treated as UBTI to the tax-exempt investor. Accordingly, our eligibility for certain tax credits and accelerated depreciation with respect to its investments may be restricted if more than 50% of our investors are tax-exempt persons. We intend to closely monitor the tax- classifications of its investors and to pursue structuring alternatives to avoid classification as a Tax-Exempt Controlled Entity.

General Risk Factors

Difficult market and political conditions may adversely affect our businesses in many ways, including by reducing the value or hampering the performance of our investments or reducing our ability to raise or deploy capital, each of which could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets and economic and political conditions throughout the world that are outside our control. These conditions may affect the level and volatility of securities prices and

Table of Contents

the liquidity and value of our investments, and we may not be able to or may choose not to manage our exposure to these conditions. This could in turn have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Global financial markets have experienced heightened volatility in recent periods, including as a result of economic and political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, such as the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East. Sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other countries, including on Iran and in connection with hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East and the tensions between China and Taiwan, have caused additional financial market volatility and affected the global economy. Concerns over future increases in inflation, economic recession, as well as interest rate volatility and fluctuations in oil and gas prices resulting from global production and demand levels, as well as geopolitical tension, have exacerbated market volatility. Market volatility has been further exacerbated by social unrest, changes regarding immigration and work permit policies and other political and security concerns both in the U.S. and across various international regions. Because of interrelationships within the global financial markets, if these issues do not abate, worsen or spread, our and our portfolio companies’ businesses may be adversely affected both within and outside of the directly affected regions.

Changes in trade policies, including the imposition of new tariffs or increases in existing tariffs between the U.S., Mexico, Canada, China or other countries, or reactionary measures in response thereto, including retaliatory tariffs, legal challenges, or currency manipulation, could adversely affect the market conditions in which we and our portfolio companies operate. These factors may affect the level and volatility of credit and securities prices and the liquidity and value of our investments, and we and our portfolio companies may not be able to successfully manage our exposure to these conditions.

In addition, numerous structural dynamics and persistent market trends have exacerbated volatility and market uncertainty. Concerns over significant volatility in the commodities markets, sluggish economic expansion in foreign economies, including continued concerns over growth prospects in China and emerging markets, growing debt loads for certain countries, uncertainty about the consequences of the U.S. and other governments withdrawing monetary stimulus measures, government agency closures, prolonged government shutdowns and speculation about a possible recession all highlight the fact that economic conditions remain unpredictable and volatile. U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns have increased the possibility of additional credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns or a recession in the U.S. In recent periods, geopolitical tensions, including between the U.S. and China, have escalated. Further escalation of such tensions and the related imposition of sanctions or other trade barriers may negatively impact the rate of global growth, particularly in China, where growth has slowed. Moreover, there is a risk of both sector-specific and broad-based volatility, corrections and/or downturns in the equity and credit markets. While weak economic environments have often provided attractive investment opportunities and strong relative investment performance, we tend to realize value from our investments in times of economic expansion, when opportunities to sell investments may be greater. Thus, we depend on the cyclicality of the market to sustain our businesses and generate attractive risk-adjusted returns over extended periods. Any of the foregoing could have a significant impact on the markets in which we and our portfolio companies operate and have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A number of factors have had and may continue to have an adverse impact on credit markets in particular. The weakness and the uncertainty regarding the stability of the oil and gas markets resulted in a tightening of credit across multiple sectors. In addition, the Federal Reserve decreased the federal funds rate multiple times in 2025. Changes in and uncertainty surrounding interest rates may have a material effect on our business, particularly with respect to the cost and availability of financing for significant acquisition and disposition transactions. Moreover, many economies outside of the U.S. continue to experience weakness, tighter credit conditions and a decreased availability of foreign capital. From time to time, liquidity in the credit markets is reduced, sometimes significantly, resulting in an increase in credit spreads and a decline in ratings, performance and market values for leveraged loans. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse impact on our business prospects and financial condition.

These and other conditions in the global financial markets and the global economy may result in adverse consequences for us and our portfolio companies, each of which could adversely affect the businesses of us or such portfolio companies, restrict our investment activities, impede our ability to effectively achieve our investment objectives and result in lower returns than we anticipated at the time certain of our investments were made. More specifically, these economic conditions could adversely affect our operating results by causing:

• decreases in the market value of securities, debt instruments or investments held by us;

• illiquidity in the market, which could adversely affect transaction volumes and the pace of realization of our investments or otherwise restrict our ability to realize value from our investments, thereby adversely affecting our ability to generate performance or other income; and

• increases in costs or reduced availability of financial instruments that finance our funds.

Table of Contents

During periods of difficult market conditions or slowdowns (which may be across one or more industries, sectors or geographies), companies in which we invest may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, credit rating downgrades, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased funding costs. During such periods, these companies may also have difficulty in expanding their businesses and operations and be unable to meet their debt service obligations or other expenses as they become due, including expenses payable to us. Difficult market conditions or volatility or slowdowns affecting a particular asset class, geographic region, industry or other category of investment could have a significant adverse impact on a fund if its investments are concentrated in that area, which would result in lower investment returns. This lack of diversification may expose us to losses disproportionate to market declines in general if there are disproportionately greater adverse price movements in the particular investments. Negative financial results in our portfolio companies may reduce the value of our portfolio companies, our net asset value and our investment returns, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flow. In addition, such conditions would increase the risk of default with respect to our debt investments. We may be adversely affected by reduced opportunities to exit and realize value from our investments, by lower than expected returns on investments made prior to the deterioration of the credit markets and by our inability to find suitable investments to effectively deploy capital. This could in turn materially reduce our net asset value and dividends and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.

We may experience fluctuations in our operating results.

We could experience fluctuations in our operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest rates payable on the debt investments we make, the default rates on such investments, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

Security incidents or cyber-attacks, affecting us or our third-party service providers, could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential, personal or other sensitive information and/or damage to our business relationships or reputation, any of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

The efficient operation of our business is dependent on information systems and technology, including computer hardware and software systems, as well as data processing systems and the secure processing, storage and transmission of information, all of which are potentially vulnerable to security incidents and cyber-attacks, which may include intentional attacks or accidental losses, either of which may result in unauthorized access to, or corruption of, our or our third party service providers’ hardware, software, or data processing systems, or to our confidential, personal, or other sensitive information. In addition, we, our Adviser, our Administrator, or their employees may be the target of fraudulent emails or other targeted attempts to gain unauthorized access to confidential, personal, or other sensitive information, which are becoming more sophisticated and difficult to detect, particularly as threat actors use artificial intelligence technologies to deploy these attacks. Artificial intelligence tools may also be susceptible to new forms of cyber-attacks, such as prompt injection attacks, which may increase our cybersecurity risks where we implement artificial intelligence technologies in our business. Cybersecurity risks are also exacerbated by the rapidly increasing volume of highly sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, personal information of our Adviser’s employees, our Administrator’s employees, their affiliates’ employees, our investors and others, and other sensitive information that Ares collects, processes and stores in its data centers and on its networks or those of its third-party service providers. Many jurisdictions have also enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of personal information, with which we and Ares must comply in the event of a security incident or cyber-attack. The result of any security incident or cyber-attack may include disrupted operations, including in our, our Adviser’s, our Shareholders’, our counterparties or third parties’ operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, fraudulent transfers or requests for transfers of money, liability for stolen or improperly accessed assets or information (including personal information), fines or penalties, investigations, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation, or damage to our business relationships and reputation, in each case, causing our business and results of operations to suffer or otherwise causing interruptions or malfunctions in our, our Adviser’s employees’, our Administrator’s employees’, their affiliates’ employees’, our investors’, our counterparties’ or third parties’ operations.

Although we are not currently aware of any security incidents or cyber-attacks that, individually or in the aggregate, have materially affected, or would reasonably be expected to materially affect, our operations or financial condition, there has been an increase in the frequency and sophistication of the cyber and security threats that we face, with attacks ranging from those common to businesses generally to more advanced and persistent attacks. Security incidents or cyber-attacks and other security threats could originate from a wide variety of sources, including cyber criminals, nation state hackers, hacktivists and other outside or inside parties, as well as through employee malfeasance. We, or our third-party providers, may face a heightened risk of a security breach or disruption with respect to confidential, personal or other sensitive information resulting from an attack by foreign governments or cyber terrorists. We may be a target for attacks because, as a specialty finance company, we hold confidential, personal and other sensitive information, including price information about existing and

Table of Contents

potential investments. Further, we are dependent on third-party service providers for hosting hardware, software and data processing systems that we do not control. We also rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our businesses, including for certain information systems, technology and administration of our funds and compliance matters. While we rely on the cybersecurity strategy and policies implemented by Ares, which includes the performance of risk assessments on our third-party providers, our reliance on them and their potential reliance on other third-party service providers removes certain cybersecurity functions from outside of our immediate control, and cyber-attacks on Ares, on us or on our third-party service providers could adversely affect us, our business and our reputation. We cannot guarantee that third parties and infrastructure in Ares’ networks and Ares’ and our partners’ networks have not been compromised or that they do not contain exploitable defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to Ares’ information technology systems or the third-party information technology systems that support our services. Ares’ and our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and they may not have adequate information security measures in place. The costs related to cyber-attacks or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by others, including by our third-party providers.

Security incidents and cyber-attacks may originate from a wide variety of sources, and while Ares has implemented processes, procedures and internal controls designed to mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber-attacks, these measures do not guarantee that a security incident or cyber-attack will not occur or that our financial results or operations will not be negatively impacted by such an incident, especially because the techniques of threat actors change frequently and are often not recognized until launched, and may be enhanced by artificial intelligence technologies. Ares relies on industry accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain confidential and proprietary information maintained on their information systems, as well as on policies and procedures to protect against the unauthorized or unlawful disclosure of confidential, personal or other sensitive information. Although Ares takes protective measures and endeavors to strengthen its computer systems, software, technology assets and networks to prevent and address potential security incidents and cyber-attacks, there can be no assurance that any of these measures prove effective. Ares expects to be required to devote increasing levels of funding and resources, which may in part be allocated to us, to comply with evolving cybersecurity and privacy laws and regulations and to continually monitor and enhance its cybersecurity procedures and controls.

Our portfolio companies also rely on similar systems and face similar risks. A disruption or compromise of these systems could have a material adverse effect on the value of these businesses. We may invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets, the nature of which could expose them to a greater risk of being subject to a terrorist attack or cyber-attack than other assets or businesses. Such an event may have material adverse consequences on our investments or may require applicable portfolio companies to increase preventative security measures or expand insurance coverage.

In addition, cybersecurity is a priority for regulators in the U.S. and around the world. The SEC has adopted cybersecurity disclosure rules for public companies and has adopted amendments to Regulation S-P that require, among other things, written incident response programs, customer notification in certain circumstances and enhanced oversight of service providers. In June 2025, the SEC formally withdrew certain pending proposed rules relating to cybersecurity risk management for investment advisers and certain funds; however, regulators continue to focus on cybersecurity through examinations, enforcement activity and guidance, and future rulemaking could re-emerge. With regulators particularly focused on cybersecurity, we expect increased scrutiny of our policies and systems designed to manage our cybersecurity risks and our related disclosures. We also expect to face increased costs to comply with SEC rules. In addition, the SEC has indicated in recent periods that one of its examination priorities for the Division of Examinations is to continue to examine cybersecurity procedures and controls, including testing the implementation of these procedures and controls. See “Item 1C. Cybersecurity” for additional information regarding our cybersecurity risk management program.

Technological developments in artificial intelligence could disrupt the markets in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, legal and regulatory risks and compliance costs.

Artificial intelligence, including machine learning technology and generative artificial intelligence, is rapidly evolving. While the full extent of current or future risks related thereto is not possible to predict, artificial intelligence could significantly disrupt the business models and markets in which we operate and subject us to increased competition, legal and regulatory risks and compliance costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business or our portfolio companies’ financial condition and results of operations.

We, our Adviser and our Administrator use and plan to expand our use of artificial intelligence tools and technologies in the operation of our business. These uses come with potential risks, including, but not limited to, generation of inaccurate results, misuse or disclosures of confidential information, infringement of third party intellectual property rights, potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities, reputational risk and regulatory burdens. In addition, artificial intelligence models may create outputs that are flawed, inaccurate, biased, or that infringe or misappropriate intellectual property of third parties. The models

Table of Contents

may also be subject to new or different modes of cyber-attacks, including prompt injection attacks, and such attacks may be able to circumvent cybersecurity tools and processes that we or the providers of such tools have in place. To the extent we, our Adviser, our Administrator, or any of our portfolio companies rely on such technologies, these risks could negatively impact us or our portfolio companies. There is also a risk that artificial intelligence tools or applications may be misused by employees and/or third parties engaged by us, our Adviser or Administrator, or by our portfolio companies. For example, an employee of our Adviser may input confidential information, including material non-public information, trade secrets, or personal information, into artificial intelligence technologies in a manner that results in such information becoming part of a dataset that is accessible by third-party artificial intelligence applications and users, including our competitors. Further, we, our Adviser or Administrator or our portfolio companies may not be able to control how any third-party artificial intelligence technologies that we or they choose to use are developed or maintained, or how data we input is used or disclosed, even where we have contractual protections with respect to these matters. The misuse or misappropriation of our data could have an adverse impact on our reputation and could subject us to legal and regulatory investigations and/or actions. The misuse or misappropriation of data of any of our portfolio companies could have an adverse impact on such businesses reputation and could subject such portfolio company to legal and regulatory investigations and/or actions.

We or our portfolio companies may also be exposed to competitive risks related to the adoption of artificial intelligence or other new technologies by others within our respective industries. If our or our portfolio companies’ competitors are more successful than us or our portfolio companies in the use of artificial intelligence or development of services or products based on artificial intelligence, or we or our portfolio companies adopt artificial intelligence at a slower pace than others, we or our portfolio companies may be at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, our or our portfolio companies’ investments in technology systems and artificial intelligence may not deliver the benefits we or they expect, which could be costly for our or their respective businesses.

Finally, governments and regulators in the U.S. and abroad have proposed, adopted or are considering laws, regulations and guidance governing the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence systems, including requirements relating to transparency, accountability, data governance, risk management, human oversight, cybersecurity, intellectual property and recordkeeping. For example, the European Union has adopted the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, which applies on a phased basis that began in 2025 and a number of U.S. states have enacted general artificial intelligence laws. These and other developments could increase our compliance costs, restrict our use of artificial intelligence in our business and investment processes, require changes to our policies, procedures, controls and vendor arrangements, and expose us to investigations, enforcement actions, litigation, fines, penalties or reputational harm.

We are subject to numerous privacy laws, and violation of such laws may subject us to significant fines or penalties, litigation, or reputational damage, and new privacy laws could impact our business and financial performance.

Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations relating to data protection, privacy, cybersecurity and information security to which we may be subject, including, the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”), the New York SHIELD Act, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and the U.K. GDPR (collectively, “Privacy Laws”). These Privacy Laws and related regulations continue to evolve and may conflict with one another, resulting in compliance challenges. Moreover, to the extent that these laws and regulations or the enforcement of the same become more stringent, or if new laws or regulations are enacted, our financial performance or plans for growth may be adversely impacted. In addition, compliance with applicable Privacy Laws may require adhering to stringent legal and operational requirements, which could increase compliance costs for us and our Adviser and require the dedication of additional time and resources to compliance by us, our Adviser or Ares. A failure to comply with applicable Privacy Laws could result in fines, sanctions, enforcement actions or other penalties or reputational damage.

Further, significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of investor, employee or other personal information, proprietary business data or other sensitive information, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance or otherwise, non-compliance with our, our Adviser’s or Ares’ contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of Ares’ privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant investigation, remediation and other costs, fines, penalties, litigation or regulatory actions against us and significant reputational harm, any of which could harm our business and results of operations. In May 2024, the SEC adopted cybersecurity regulations as an amendment to Regulation S-P designed to establish a federal “minimum standard” for covered institutions to adopt an incident response program to govern their response to any unauthorized access of customer information. The adopted rule requires compliance as of December 2025 and applies to us as it includes broker-dealers, investment companies and registered investment advisers. The amendments require implementation of written policies and procedures to safeguard customer records and information by imposing notification requirements to affected individuals whose sensitive customer information was or is reasonably likely to have been accessed or used without authorization and other requirements,

Table of Contents

such as review of incident response programs and having policies and procedures regarding compliance by third-party service providers.

There may be substantial financial penalties or fines for breach of Privacy Laws (which may include insufficient security for personal or other sensitive information). For example, the maximum penalty for breach of the GDPR is the greater of 20 million Euros and 4% of group annual worldwide turnover, and fines for each violation of the CCPA are $2,500 per violation, or $7,500 per violation for intentional violations. Non-compliance with any applicable privacy or data security laws represents a serious risk to our business, and compliance may be complicated by conflicting or inconsistent laws and regulations.

Ineffective internal controls could impact our business and operating results.

Our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results could be harmed and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. In addition, some of the statements in this Annual Report (including in the following discussion) constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or the future performance or financial condition of Ares Core Infrastructure Fund (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, where applicable, the “Fund,” “we,” “us,” or “our”). The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including statements concerning:

• our, or our portfolio companies’, future business, operations, operating results or prospects;

• the return or impact of current and future investments;

• the impact of a protracted decline in the liquidity of credit markets on our business;

• changes in the general economy, including those caused by tariffs and trade disputes with other countries, changes in inflation and risk of recession;

• fluctuations in global interest rates;

• the impact of changes in laws or regulations (including the interpretation thereof), including tax laws, governing our operations or the operations of our portfolio companies or the operations of our competitors;

• the valuation of our investments in portfolio companies, particularly those having no liquid trading market;

• our ability to recover unrealized losses;

• our ability to deploy any capital raised in our continuous private offering of securities (the “Private Offering”);

• market conditions and our ability to access different debt markets and additional debt and equity capital and our ability to manage our capital resources effectively;

• our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

• political and regulatory conditions that contribute to uncertainty and market volatility including the impact of any prolonged U.S. government shutdown as well as the legislative, regulatory, trade, immigration and other policies associated with the current U.S. presidential administration;

• the impact of supply chain constraints on our portfolio companies and the global economy;

• uncertainty surrounding global financial stability;

• ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and the Russia-Ukraine war, including the potential for volatility in energy prices and other commodities and their impact on the industries in which we invest;

• the financial condition of our current and prospective portfolio companies and their ability to achieve their objectives;

• the impact of information technology system failures, data security breaches, data privacy compliance, network disruptions, and cybersecurity attacks;

• the impact of global health crises on our or our portfolio companies’ business and the U.S. and global economy;

• our ability to anticipate and identify evolving market expectations with respect to environmental, social and governance matters, including the environmental impacts of our portfolio companies’ supply chain and operations;

• our ability to successfully complete and integrate any acquisitions;

• the outcome and impact of any litigation or regulatory proceedings;

• the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;

• the timing, form and amount of any distributions;

• the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies; and

Table of Contents

• the ability of our Adviser (as defined below) to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments.

We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “project,” “estimates,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “may” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. Our actual results and condition could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”).

We have based the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on information available to us on the filing date of this Annual Report, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we have filed or in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

Overview

We are an externally managed, closed-end management investment company, formed as a Delaware statutory trust formed on May 7, 2024; we have elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Prior to the BDC Election, we conducted our investment activities and operations pursuant to the exclusions from the definition of an “investment company” in Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act. We commenced operations on August 28, 2024 in connection with the initial closing of our Private Offering.

We elected to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, we are subject to U.S. federal income tax on its net income (regardless of whether such income is U.S. source) at the rates applicable to corporations without deduction for any distributions to the investors.

In addition, we commenced holding monthly closings for our Private Offering, in connection with which we issue Shares to our investors for immediate cash investment in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. We reserve the right to conduct additional offerings of securities in the future in addition to the Private Offering. In addition, although we intend to issue Shares on a monthly basis, we also retain the right, if determined by us in our sole discretion, to accept subscriptions and issue Shares, in amounts to be determined by us, more or less frequently to one or more investors for regulatory, tax or other reasons.

Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, we are externally managed by our Adviser, pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. Our Adviser is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting due diligence on prospective investments, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring investments and monitoring our portfolio on an ongoing basis. Our Adviser is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC. Our Administrator provides certain administrative and other services necessary for us to operate.

As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities and indebtedness of private U.S. companies and certain public U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. We also may invest up to 30% of our portfolio in non-qualifying assets, as permitted by the 1940 Act. Specifically, as part of this 30% basket, we may invest in entities that are not considered “eligible portfolio companies” (as defined in the 1940 Act), including companies located outside of the United States, entities that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions under the 1940 Act, and publicly traded entities whose public equity market capitalization exceeds the levels provided for under the 1940 Act. In addition, our Adviser and certain of our affiliates have received the Co-Investment Exemptive Order from the SEC permits us and other BDCs and registered closed-end management investment companies managed by Ares Management and its affiliates to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with affiliated investment entities (the “Co-Investment Exemptive Order”). As required by the Co-Investment Exemptive Order, we have adopted, and our Board has approved, policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with the terms of the Co-Investment Exemptive Order, and our Adviser and our Chief Compliance Officer will provide reporting to our Board. Co-investments made under the Co-Investment Exemptive Order are subject to compliance with certain conditions and other requirements, which could limit our ability to participate in a co-investment transaction. As a result of investments permitted by the Co-Investment Exemptive Order, there could be significant overlap in our investment portfolio and the investment portfolio of affiliated Ares Management entities that can rely on the Co-Investment Exemptive Order and have an investment objective similar to ours. We may also otherwise co-

Table of Contents

invest with funds managed by Ares Management or any of its downstream affiliates, subject to compliance with existing regulatory guidance, applicable regulations and our Adviser’s allocation policy.

See “Item 1. Business—Overview” for more information on our investment objectives.

Trends Affecting Our Business

Infrastructure investment opportunities in the Core Infrastructure Sector continue to be supported by demand catalysts. Growing AI adoption and digitalization is driving accelerated demand for digital infrastructure such as data centers and the corresponding power infrastructure needed to power them. Re-industrialization and electrification are further fueling power demand growth, and the resurgence in power demand growth has supported elevated contract prices for power generation resources and continued deployment of power generation assets. This dynamic has also benefited existing generation assets, which have generally increased in value. The deployment of new power generation assets is increasingly focused on reliable, baseload generation such as thermal generation and nuclear as part of an “all-of-the-above” power solution. Renewable energy assets continue to represent the majority of new generation supply additions and renewable energy transaction volumes have remained strong.

Portfolio and Investment Activity

Our investment activity is presented below ($ in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 2025

For the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024

New investment commitments:

Common equity

Other equity

First lien senior secured loans

Treasuries

Senior subordinated loans

Total new investment commitments

Amount of investments funded: (1)

Common equity

Other equity

First lien senior secured loans

Treasuries

Senior subordinated loans

Total amount of investments funded

Principal amount of investments sold or repaid:

Common equity

Other equity

First lien senior secured loans

Treasuries

Senior subordinated loans

Total principal amount of investment sold or repaid

(1) The amount of investments funded in the table excludes purchases of investments during the respective period that had not settled as of the end of the period.

Table of Contents

Our investments consisted of the following ($ in thousands):

As of December 31,

Total Underlying Projects (7)

Cost

Fair Value

Cost

Fair Value

Denali Equity Holdings, LLC (1)

Aspen Equity Holdings, LLC (2)

Tango Equity Holdings, LLC (3)

Meade Pipeline Co LLC (4)

Redwood Meade Midstream MPC, LLC (4)

Pioneer JV Holdings LLC (5)

Sierra Equity Holdings LLC (6)

Senior subordinated loans

First lien senior secured loans

Total

(1) The underlying 2.6 gigawatt portfolio consists of 15 projects in operation across Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, PJM and Southwest Power Pool, of which 53% is solar, 25% wind and 22% co-located battery storage capacity.

(2) The underlying 0.9 gigawatt portfolio consists of 4 projects in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas and the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, of which 83% is solar and 17% is co-located battery storage capacity.

(3) The underlying 0.5 gigawatt portfolio consists of 5 projects across the Pennsylvania–New Jersey–Maryland Interconnection and the Southwest Power Pool regions, of which 100% is solar capacity.

(4) Represents common equity investment in an entity holding a ~40% interest in the Central Penn Line, a fully contracted natural gas pipeline transporting gas from Northeast to Southeastern Pennsylvania via the Transco system. The pipeline spans 178 miles and has a total capacity of 3,380 MMcf/d, with ~1,332 MMcf/d net to Meade, under long-term triple net leases through 2042. Redwood Meade Midstream MPC, LLC is a holding company that structurally owns a minority interest in Meade Pipeline Co LLC.

(5) The underlying 1.0 gigawatt portfolio consists of 6 projects in operation across the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Electric Reliability Council of Texas, and Western Electricity Coordinating Council, of which 79% is solar and 21% wind capacity.

(6) The project is a 270 MW wind project in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.

(7) Represents the number of infrastructure projects undertaken by each entity in which we have an equity investment.

Table of Contents

Components of our Results of Operations

Revenues

We generate revenue in the form of interest income, from bank interest or interest from loans, and distribution income, by investing primarily in Core Infrastructure Assets, including investments in the power generation (such as renewable energy and thermal power plants), renewable natural gas, liquified natural gas, transportation, telecommunications, digital infrastructure (such as data centers, fiber optic cables and cell phone towers), midstream and energy infrastructure, regulated utilities, social infrastructure (such as water treatment and management, waste management and recycling) and environmental services (such as carbon capture and storage, soil and air remediation and climate change mitigation) sectors.

Expenses

The services of all investment professionals of our Adviser and its staff, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services to us and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, are provided and paid for by our Adviser. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions. See “Note 3. Agreements and Organizational Documents” to our consolidated financial statements for more information on fees and expenses.

From time to time, our Adviser, our Administrator or their affiliates may pay third-party providers of goods or services. We will reimburse our Adviser, our Administrator or such affiliates thereof for any such amounts paid on our behalf. From time to time, our Adviser or our Administrator may defer or waive fees and/or rights to be reimbursed for expenses.

Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement

We have entered into an amended and restated expense support and conditional reimbursement agreement (the “Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement”), with our Adviser, pursuant to which our Adviser may elect to pay certain of the Fund’s expenses on the Fund’s behalf. The Adviser has agreed to advance a portion of the Fund’s organization, initial offering and operational expense, which includes the Fund’s organization and initial offering expenses incurred in connection with the Private Offering through the date of the BDC Election. See “Note 3. Agreements and Organizational Documents” and “Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for more information on the Expense Support and Conditional Reimbursement Agreement.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Operating results for the year ended December 31, 2025 and for the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024 were as follows ($ in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 2025

For the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024

Total income

Net expenses

Net investment income before income taxes

Income tax benefit / (expense)

Net investment income

Net realized and unrealized gains on investments and derivatives

Net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations

Net income can vary substantially from period to period due to various factors, including but not limited to the level of new investment commitments, the recognition of realized gains and losses and unrealized appreciation and depreciation.

Income

For the year ended December 31, 2025

For the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024

Income:

Distribution income

Interest income

Other income

Total income

For the year ended December 31, 2025, distribution income was $55.1 million, an increase of $43.0 million from $12.1 million for the comparable period in 2024 due to the increase in the portfolio of cash yielding investments. For the year ended December 31, 2025, interest income was $20.2 million, an increase of $19.9 million from $0.3 million in the comparable period in 2024 due to the increase in the average bank balances and building a liquid credit portfolio in 2025.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we received $66.1 million of distributions from investments, of which $11.0 million was classified as a return of capital.

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2025

For the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024

Expenses:

Interest expense

Management fees

Income based fee

Capital gains incentive fee

Administration fees

Offering expense

Organizational expenses

Other operating expenses

Total expenses

Less: Expense support

Less: Management fee waiver

Less: Incentive fee waiver

Net expenses

Net investment income before income taxes

Income tax benefit / (expense)

Net investment income

For the year ended December 31, 2025, interest expense was $30.4 million, an increase of $25.5 million from $4.9 million for the comparable period in 2024 due to the addition of the Aspen Credit Agreement, ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement, Tango Credit Agreement, BNP Funding Facility and Pioneer Credit Agreement during 2025.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, management fees were $13.5 million, an increase of $12.8 million from $0.7 million for the comparable period in 2024 due to the increase in equity, mainly driven by Shareholder capital contributed during the current period.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the capital gains incentive fee accrued in accordance with GAAP was $11.2 million, an increase of $11.1 million from $0.1 million for the comparable period in 2024 primarily due to the net unrealized gains on investments in the current period. The capital gains incentive fee accrued under GAAP includes an accrual related to unrealized capital appreciation, whereas the capital gains incentive fee actually payable under our Investment Advisory Agreement does not. There can be no assurance that such unrealized capital appreciation will be realized in the future. The accrual for any capital gains incentive fee under GAAP in a given period may result in an additional expense if such cumulative amount is greater than in the prior period or a reduction of previously recorded expense if such cumulative amount is less than in the prior period. If such cumulative amount is negative, then there is no accrual. As of December 31, 2025, there was $11.3 million of capital gains incentive fee accrued in accordance with GAAP. As of December 31, 2025, there was no capital gains incentive fee actually payable under our Investment Advisory Agreement. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, for more information on the base management fee, income-based fee and capital gains incentive fee.

Table of Contents

Realized and Unrealized Gains / (Losses) on Investments and Derivatives

For the year ended December 31, 2025

For the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024

Realized and unrealized gains / (losses) on investment and derivatives:

Net realized gains / (losses):

Investments

Derivatives

Net realized gains

Net unrealized gains / (losses):

Investments

Derivatives

Income tax expense

Net unrealized gains

Net realized and unrealized gains on investments and derivatives

For the year ended December 31, 2025, unrealized gains on investments were $140.1 million, an increase of $148.5 million from a loss of $8.4 million for the comparable period in 2024 due to the net increase in fair value of the portfolio’s investments. For the year ended December 31, 2025, unrealized losses on derivatives were $6.5 million, a decrease of $16.1 million from a gain of $9.6 million for the comparable period in 2024 due to the fluctuations in market interest rates which impacted the value of the interest rate swaps. For the year ended December 31, 2025, income tax expense was $39.9 million, an increase from $0 for the comparable period in 2024 primarily due to the net unrealized gains on investments in the current period.

Table of Contents

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our current liquidity and capital resources are generated primarily from the proceeds received from the sale of our Shares pursuant to our Private Offering at a price per Share equal to the then-current NAV per Share and cash flows from our operations. Further, we expect to generate additional liquidity and capital resources from the net proceeds of the Private Offering and, any future offerings of our debt or equity securities, and any financing arrangements we may enter into in the future. We believe we have sufficient liquidity to operate our business, with $296.5 million of immediate liquidity as of December 31, 2025, comprised of cash and cash equivalents. In addition to our immediate liquidity, as of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $496.2 million available for borrowing through our credit arrangements which are subject to various draw covenants.

Our primary uses of cash and cash equivalents are for (i) investments in portfolio companies and other investments, (ii) the cost of operations (including paying our Adviser and our Administrator), (iii) cost of any borrowings or other financing arrangements, if any and (iv) cash distributions to the holders of our Shares.

In accordance with the 1940 Act, we may borrow amounts such that our asset coverage calculated pursuant to the 1940 Act, is at least 150% (or 200% if certain requirements under the 1940 Act are not met) immediately after such borrowing (i.e., we are able to borrow up to two dollars for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities issued by us). As of December 31, 2025, we had $1,063.2 million in total aggregate principal debt outstanding, $3,455.0 million of Total Assets, $297,235 million of liabilities (other than indebtedness) and our asset coverage ratio was 297%.

We have commenced a Share repurchase program, pursuant to which we intend to offer to repurchase, at the discretion of our Board, up to 5% of our Shares outstanding in each quarter. We may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase our Shares through cash purchases, as well as retire, cancel or purchase any of our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The amounts involved may be material. In addition, we may from time to time enter into new debt facilities, increase the size of existing facilities or issue debt securities, including secured debt, unsecured debt and/or debt securities convertible into common stock. Any such purchases or exchanges of our Shares or outstanding debt, or incurrence or issuance of additional debt would be subject to prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual and regulatory restrictions and other factors.

Equity Capital Activities

We hold monthly closings for our Private Offering, in connection with which we will issue Shares to investors for immediate cash investment. Each of our closings in connection with the Private Offering will be conducted in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act, including the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the 1933 Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, and other exemptions from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. We reserve the right to conduct additional offerings of securities in the future in addition to the Private Offering. In addition, although we intend to issue Shares on a monthly basis, we also retain the right, if determined in our sole discretion, to accept subscriptions and issue Shares, in amounts to be determined by us, more or less frequently to one or more investors for regulatory, tax or other reasons.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes transactions in Shares during the year ended December 31, 2025:

Year ended December 31, 2025

Shares (1)

Amount

Class I

Shares sold

Distributions reinvested

Repurchases

Net increase

Class S

Shares sold

Distributions reinvested

Repurchases

Net increase

Class D

Shares sold

Distributions reinvested

Repurchases

Net increase

(1) As of December 31, 2025, there have been no Class N Shares sold.

NAV Per Share and Offering Price

We determine NAV for our Shares as of the last day of each calendar month. Share issuances related to monthly subscriptions are effective the first business day of each month. The following table summarizes each month-end NAV per Share for the year ended December 31, 2025:

NAV Per Share

Class I

Class S

Class D

January 31, 2025

February 28, 2025

March 31, 2025

April 30, 2025

May 31, 2025

June 30, 2025

July 31, 2025

August 31, 2025

September 30, 2025

October 31, 2025

November 30, 2025

December 31, 2025

Distributions

We have declared distributions each month beginning December 2024 and, to the extent that we have excess cash flows, we intend to continue making monthly distributions to our Shareholders. Distributions to our Shareholders are recorded on the record date. All distributions will be paid at the sole discretion of the Board and will depend on our earnings, financial condition, tax considerations, compliance with applicable BDC regulations and such other factors as the Board may deem relevant from time to time.

Table of Contents

The following tables present our distributions that were declared and payable for the year ended December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands, except per Share amount):

Class I

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Net Distribution per Share

Distribution Amount

January 16, 2025

January 31, 2025

February 21, 2025

January 16, 2025

February 28, 2025

March 25, 2025

January 16, 2025

March 31, 2025

April 23, 2025

March 13, 2025

April 30, 2025

May 22, 2025

March 13, 2025

May 30, 2025

June 25, 2025

March 13, 2025

June 30, 2025

July 23, 2025

May 14, 2025

July 31, 2025

August 22, 2025

May 14, 2025

August 29, 2025

September 24, 2025

May 14, 2025

September 30, 2025

October 23, 2025

August 08, 2025

October 31, 2025

November 21, 2025

August 08, 2025

November 28, 2025

December 24, 2025

August 08, 2025

December 31, 2025

January 23, 2026

Class S

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Net Distribution per Share

Distribution Amount

August 08, 2025

October 31, 2025

November 21, 2025

August 08, 2025

November 28, 2025

December 24, 2025

August 08, 2025

December 31, 2025

January 23, 2026

Class D

Declaration Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Net Distribution per Share

Distribution Amount

August 08, 2025

October 31, 2025

November 21, 2025

August 08, 2025

November 28, 2025

December 24, 2025

August 08, 2025

December 31, 2025

January 23, 2026

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

We have adopted a distribution reinvestment plan, pursuant to which we reinvest cash distributions declared by us on behalf of our Shareholders unless such Shareholders elect for their distributions not to be automatically reinvested. As a result, if the Board authorizes, and we declare, a cash distribution, then our Shareholders who have not opted out of our distribution reinvestment plan will have their cash distributions automatically reinvested in additional Shares, rather than receiving the cash distribution. Distributions on fractional Shares will be credited to each participating Shareholder’s account. The purchase price for Shares issued under our distribution reinvestment plan will be equal to the most recent available NAV per Share for such Shares at the time the distribution is payable.

Share Repurchase Program

We have commenced a Share Repurchase Program pursuant to which we intend to offer to repurchase, at the discretion of our Board, up to 5% of our Shares outstanding (either by number of Shares or aggregate NAV) as of the close of the previous calendar quarter. We may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase our Shares through cash purchases, as well as retire, cancel or purchase any of our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The amounts involved may be material.

In accordance with the Share Repurchase Program, Shares repurchased in our tender offer completed during the year ended December 31, 2025 were repurchased using a purchase price equal to the NAV per Share as of the last calendar day of the applicable month designated by the Board, except that we deducted 2.00% from such NAV for Shares that were not outstanding for at least one year.

Table of Contents

We adopted a plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3 under the Investment Company Act so that we may issue multiple classes of Shares (the “Multiple Class Plan”), which provides that the Early Repurchase Deduction holding period ends on the one-year anniversary of the subscription closing date and the Early Repurchase Deduction will not apply to Shares acquired through our distribution reinvestment plan. The Early Repurchase Deduction may be waived in the case of repurchase requests: (i) arising from the death or qualified disability of the holder; (ii) due to trade or operational errors; (iii) submitted by discretionary model portfolio management programs (and similar arrangements); (iv) from feeder funds (or similar vehicles) primarily created to hold our Shares, which are offered to non-U.S. persons, where such funds seek to avoid imposing such a deduction because of administrative or systems limitations; and (v) in the event that a Shareholder’s Shares are repurchased because the Shareholder has failed to maintain a minimum account balance. The Early Repurchase Deduction is retained by us for the benefit of remaining Shareholders.

The following table presents the Share repurchases completed during the year ended December 31, 2025 (dollar amounts in thousands except per Share amounts):

Repurchase Pricing Date

Total Number of Shares Repurchased

Percentage of Outstanding Shares Repurchased (1)

Repurchase Request Deadline

Purchase Price Per Share

Amount Repurchased (All Classes) (2)

Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the repurchase program (3)

August 31, 2025

September 19, 2025

November 30, 2025

December 19, 2025

(1) Percentage is based on total Shares outstanding as of the close of business on the last calendar day of the month preceding the applicable repurchase pricing date.

(2) Amount shown net of the Early Repurchase Deduction.

(3) All repurchase requests were satisfied in full.

Credit Agreements

The following table summarizes the average outstanding amount and rate for each of our credit agreements for the year ended December 31, 2025 and for the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024:

For the year ended December 31, 2025

For the period from May 7, 2024 (inception) to December 31, 2024

Maturity Date

Average Outstanding Amount

Average Rate

Average Outstanding Amount

Average Rate

Denali Credit Agreement

September 2029

Aspen Credit Agreement

March 2030

ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement

April 2027

Tango Credit Agreement

July 2030

BNP Funding Facility

March 2028

Pioneer Credit Agreement

October 2030

Total

Denali Credit Agreement

Our indirect and direct wholly-owned subsidiaries ACI Denali Member, LLC and ACI Denali Holdings, LLC (together, “ACI Denali”), and Ares Denali Member, LLC (together with ACI Denali, the “Denali Co-Borrowers”), an affiliated entity managed by an affiliate of the Adviser, are party to a Credit Agreement (the “Denali Credit Agreement”), dated as of September 11, 2024, with MUFG Bank, LTD, as Administrative Agent (“MUFG”), and BNP Paribas, as Collateral Agent, the lenders from time to time party to the Denali Credit Agreement and certain other signatories thereto. The Denali Credit Agreement is related to ACI Denali’s investment in a portfolio company and ACI Denali’s portion includes a $208.0 million term loan (the “Denali Term Loan”), of which $208.0 million was drawn as of December 31, 2025, and a $10.2 million debt service letters of credit facility (“Denali DSR LC Facility”). The remaining portion of the Denali Credit Agreement and Denali DSR LC Facility are with Ares Denali Member, LLC. Outstanding borrowings under the Denali Term Loan bear interest annually at the Daily Compounded Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus 2.00%, with a 0.125% step-up after three years. ACI Denali will make interest payments quarterly, which payments began in February 2025. The Denali DSR LC Facility is to provide letters of credit (“Denali LC”) or loans for draws under such Denali LC to support contractual obligations related to the minimum debt service reserve amount under the Denali Credit Agreement. Denali LC fees are payable quarterly in arrears, at an amount equal to 0.5% multiplied by the stated amount of the Denali LC.

Table of Contents

The Denali Credit Agreement is secured by a first-priority pledge on (a) all of the equity interests of the Denali Co-Borrowers, and (b) all tangible and intangible assets of the Denali Co-Borrowers. Under the Denali Credit Agreement, the Denali Co-Borrowers have made representations and warranties regarding their businesses, among other things, and are required to comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar facilities. The Denali Credit Agreement includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature. Other than with respect to the pledge of the equity interests of the Denali Co-Borrowers, the Denali Credit Agreement is non-recourse to any upstream affiliate of the Denali Co-Borrowers, including to us.

Aspen Credit Agreement

On March 14, 2025, Ares Aspen Member LLC as borrower (the “Aspen Borrower”) and Ares Aspen Holdings LLC as pledgor (the “Aspen Pledgor”), each our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Aspen Credit Agreement”) with MUFG, as Administrative Agent, and BNP Paribas, as Collateral Agent, the lenders from time to time party to the Aspen Credit Agreement and certain other signatories thereto. The Aspen Credit Agreement is related to the Aspen Borrower’s investment in one of our portfolio companies and includes a $224.5 million term loan (the “Aspen Term Loan”), of which $224.5 million was drawn as of December 31, 2025, and a $15.6 million debt service letters of credit facility (“Aspen DSR LC Facility”). Outstanding borrowings under the Aspen Term Loan bear interest annually at the SOFR plus 1.75%, with a 0.125% step-up after three years, and outstanding undrawn commitments under the Aspen Term Loan have a commitment fee of 0.60% annually. The Aspen Borrower will make interest payments quarterly, which payments began in August 2025. The Aspen DSR LC Facility provides letters of credit (“Aspen LC”) or loans for draws under such Aspen LC to support contractual obligations related to the minimum debt service reserve amount under the Aspen Credit Agreement. Aspen LC fees are payable quarterly in arrears, at an amount equal to 1.75% multiplied by the stated amount of the Aspen LC, with a 0.125% step-up after three years.

The Aspen Credit Agreement is secured by a first-priority pledge on (a) all of the equity interests of the Aspen Borrower, and (b) all tangible and intangible assets of the Aspen Borrower. Under the Aspen Credit Agreement, the Aspen Borrower and the Aspen Pledgor, as applicable, have made representations and warranties regarding their businesses, among other things, and are required to comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar facilities. The Aspen Credit Agreement includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature. Other than with respect to the pledge of the equity interests of the Aspen Borrower, the Aspen Credit Agreement is non-recourse to any upstream affiliate of the Aspen Borrower, including to us.

ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement

On April 14, 2025, our wholly owned subsidiary ACI Portfolio Aggregator SPV LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “ACI Portfolio Aggregator”), entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement (the “ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement”) by and among ACI Portfolio Aggregator, as the borrower, NatWest Markets Plc (“NatWest”), as administrative agent, and the lenders from time to time party thereto. The ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement provides a revolving line of credit in an aggregate principal amount of $50.0 million. There were $20.0 million in borrowings drawn on the ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2025.

Borrowings under the ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement may take the form of base rate loans or SOFR loans, at the option of the ACI Portfolio Aggregator. Base rate loans will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to (a) the Base Rate (as defined in the ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement), which is subject to a floor of 0.00% per annum, plus (b) an applicable margin of 1.60% per annum. SOFR loans will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to (a) Term SOFR (as defined in the ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement) for a period of one, three or six months (as selected by ACI Portfolio Aggregator), subject to a floor of 0.00% per annum, plus (b) an applicable margin of 2.60% per annum. The $20.0 million amount outstanding was drawn as a SOFR loan.

The ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement contains various representations and warranties, affirmative covenants, and negative covenants, which are typical for this type of revolving facility.

All obligations under the ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement and the other loan documents are secured by a first priority perfected lien on, and security interest in, (i) all membership interests of ACI Portfolio Aggregator owned by us, including all proceeds thereof, and (ii) a certain collateral account of ACI Portfolio Aggregator, and all sums or other property now or at any time hereafter on deposit therein, subject to certain exceptions. Other than with respect to the pledge of the equity

Table of Contents

interests of the ACI Portfolio Aggregator, the ACI Portfolio Aggregator Credit Agreement is otherwise non-recourse to any upstream affiliate of ACI Portfolio Aggregator, including to us.

Tango Credit Agreement

On July 28, 2025, ACI Tango Member, LLC, as borrower (“ACI Tango”), and ACI Tango Holdings, LLC, as pledgor (“ACI Tango Holdings”), each our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Tango Credit Agreement”) with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent (“CIBC”), U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent, the lenders from time to time party to the Tango Credit Agreement and certain other signatories thereto. The Tango Credit Agreement is related to ACI Tango’s investment in one of our portfolio companies and includes a $334.8 million delayed draw term loan (the “Tango Term Loan Facility”), of which $184.8 million was drawn as of December 31, 2025, and a $18.8 million debt service letters of credit facility (“Tango DSR LC Facility”). Borrowings under the Tango Credit Agreement may take the form of Base Rate Loans (as defined in the Tango Credit Agreement) or SOFR loans, at the option of ACI Tango. Outstanding borrowings under the Tango Term Loan Facility bear interest annually at (i) for SOFR loans, the SOFR plus 1.50%, and (ii) for the Base Rate Loans, a fluctuating rate determined by reference to the Adjusted Base Rate (as defined in the Tango Credit Agreement) plus 0.50%, each with a 0.125% step-up after three years. The $184.8 million amount outstanding was drawn as a SOFR loan. Outstanding undrawn commitments under the Tango Term Loan Facility have a commitment fee of 0.50% annually. ACI Tango will make interest payments quarterly, which began in November 2025. The Tango DSR LC Facility provides letters of credit (“LC”) or loans for draws under such LC to support contractual obligations related to the minimum debt service reserve amount under the Tango Credit Agreement. LC fees are payable quarterly in arrears, at an amount equal to 1.50% multiplied by the stated amount of the LC, with a 0.125% step-up after three years.

The Tango Credit Agreement is secured by a first-priority pledge on (a) all of the equity interests of ACI Tango, (b) all of the equity interests of Tango Holdings, LLC owned by ACI Tango and (c) all tangible and intangible assets of ACI Tango and the equity interests of ACI Tango owned by the ACI Tango Holdings. Under the Tango Credit Agreement, ACI Tango and ACI Tango Holdings, as applicable, have made representations and warranties regarding their businesses, among other things, and are required to comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar facilities. The Tango Credit Agreement includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature. Other than with respect to the pledge of the equity interests of ACI Tango, the Tango Credit Agreement is non-recourse to any upstream affiliate of ACI Tango, including to us.

BNP Funding Facility and Contribution Agreement

On September 23, 2025, we entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “BNP Funding Facility”) with ACI Liquid Aggregator SPV, LLC, our wholly owned subsidiary, as borrower (the “BNP Borrower”), us, as equityholder and servicer, the lenders from time to time party thereto, BNP Paribas, as administrative agent, and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as collateral agent, that (i) provides a facility amount of $200 million and (ii) has a reinvestment period ending on September 23, 2027. In addition, on September 23, 2025, the Fund, as transferor, and the BNP Borrower, as transferee, entered into a Contribution Agreement, pursuant to which we will transfer to the BNP Borrower certain originated or acquired loans and related assets (collectively, the “BNP Loans”) from time to time.

The obligations of the BNP Borrower under the BNP Funding Facility are secured by substantially all assets held by the BNP Borrower, including the BNP Loans. The interest rate charged on the BNP Funding Facility is based on SOFR plus an applicable margin of 1.25%. In addition, the BNP Borrower is required to pay, among other fees, a commitment fee of up to 0.50% per annum on any excess unused portion of the BNP Funding Facility and, subject to certain exceptions, a one-time facility reduction fee if the BNP Funding Facility is terminated or there are certain reductions in commitments under the BNP Funding Facility, which facility reduction fee would be equal to the cumulative amount of the commitment fee that would have otherwise been payable from the date of any such termination or reduction through the end of the reinvestment period. Under the BNP Funding Facility, we and the BNP Borrower, as applicable, have made representations and warranties regarding our and their businesses, among other things, and are required to comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar facilities. The BNP Funding Facility includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature. There were $200.0 million in borrowings drawn on the BNP Funding Facility as of December 31, 2025.

Proceeds from the BNP Funding Facility must be used to acquire collateral loans during the reinvestment period, fund revolving collateral loans, pay certain fees and expenses and make permitted distributions. Other than with respect to the pledge of the equity interests of the BNP Borrower, the BNP Funding Facility is non-recourse to any upstream affiliates of the BNP Borrower, including to us.

Table of Contents

Pioneer Credit Agreement

On October 3, 2025, ACI Pioneer Member, LLC as borrower (the “Pioneer Borrower”) and ACI Pioneer Holdings, LLC as pledgor (the “Pioneer Pledgor”), each our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a credit agreement (the “Pioneer Credit Agreement”) with Natixis, New York Branch as administrative agent and collateral agent (“Natixis”) and Société Générale as coordinating lead arranger and bookrunner (together with Natixis in the same roles). The Pioneer Credit Agreement is related to Pioneer Borrower’s investment in one of our portfolio investments and includes a $542.2 million delayed draw term loan facility (the “Pioneer Term Loan”), of which $226.0 million was drawn as of December 31, 2025, and a $23.5 million debt service reserve letter of credit facility (the “Pioneer DSR LC Facility”).

Borrowings under the Pioneer Term Loan bear interest annually at a rate equal to daily compounded SOFR plus 1.50% per annum, with a step up of 0.125% after three years and outstanding undrawn commitments under the Pioneer Term Loan facility have a commitment fee of 0.50% annually on the average daily unused amount. The Pioneer Borrower will make interest payments quarterly beginning in January 2026, and ending on the maturity date in accordance with an amortization schedule attached to the Pioneer Credit Agreement.

The Pioneer DSR LC Facility provides letters of credit or loans for draws under such LC to support contractual obligations related to the minimum debt service reserve amount under the Pioneer Credit Agreement. An LC commitment fee is due in respect of unused LC commitments in an amount of 0.50% multiplied by the average unused daily LC commitments. LC fees follow the applicable margin of the Pioneer Term Loan, payable quarterly in arrears, at an amount equal to 1.50% annually multiplied by the stated amount of the LC, with a 0.125% step up after three years.

The Pioneer Credit Agreement is secured by a first-priority pledge on (a) all of the equity interests of the Pioneer Borrower, (b) all of the equity interests of Pioneer JV Holdings, LLC, one of our portfolio investments, owned by the Pioneer Borrower and (c) all tangible and intangible assets of the Pioneer Borrower and the equity interests of the Pioneer Borrower owned by the Pioneer Pledgor. Under the Pioneer Credit Agreement, the Pioneer Borrower and the Pioneer Pledgor, as applicable, have made representations and warranties regarding their businesses, among other things, and are required to comply with various covenants, servicing procedures, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar facilities. The Pioneer Credit Agreement includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature. Other than with respect to the pledge of the equity interests of the Pioneer Borrower, the Pioneer Credit Agreement is non-recourse to any upstream affiliate of the Pioneer Borrower, including to us.

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining such estimates could cause actual results to differ. The critical accounting estimates should be read in conjunction with the risk factors elsewhere in this Annual Report. See “Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements for more information on our critical accounting policies.

Investments

We value our investments in accordance with Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act and Rule 2a-5 thereunder, which sets forth requirements for determining fair value in good faith. Pursuant to Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act, the Board has designated the Adviser as its “Valuation Designee” to perform fair value determinations for investments held by us without readily available market quotations, subject to the oversight by our Board. Investments for which market quotations are readily available will typically be valued at such market quotations. In order to validate market quotations, the Valuation Designee, will review a number of factors to determine if the quotations are representative of fair value, including the source and nature of the quotations. Debt and equity investments that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Adviser, as our Valuation Designee, subject to the Board’s oversight, based on, among other things, the input of the Fund’s independent third-party valuation firm that has been engaged to support the valuation of such portfolio investments by providing positive assurance monthly and an independent valuation at least semiannually (with certain de minimis exceptions) and under a valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process. However, we may use these independent valuation firms to review the value of our investments more frequently, including in connection with the occurrence of significant events or changes in value affecting a particular investment.

Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment using the specific identification method without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized. Unrealized gains or losses primarily reflect the change in investment values, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses when gains or losses are realized.

Pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act, the Board designated the Adviser as our Valuation Designee to perform fair value determinations for investments held by us without readily available market quotations, subject to the oversight of the Board. All investments are recorded at fair value.

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are typically valued at such market quotations. In order to validate market quotations, the Valuation Designee looks at a number of factors to determine if the quotations are representative of fair value, including the source and nature of the quotations. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Designee, subject to the oversight of our Board, based on, among other things, the input of our independent third‑party valuation providers (“IVPs”) that have been engaged to support the valuation of such portfolio investments. However, the Valuation Designee may use these independent valuation firms to review the value of our investments more frequently, including in connection with the occurrence of significant events or changes in value affecting a particular investment.

Investments in our portfolio that do not have readily available market quotations (i.e., substantially all of our investments) are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our Valuation Designee, as described herein. As part of the valuation process for investments that do not have readily available market prices, the Valuation Designee may take into account the following types of factors, if relevant, in determining the fair value of our investments: the enterprise value of a portfolio company (the entire value of the portfolio company to a market participant, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time), the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, a comparison of the portfolio company’s securities to any similar publicly traded securities, changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets, which may affect the price at which similar investments would trade in their principal markets and other relevant factors. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent sale occurs, the Valuation Designee considers the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate its valuation.

Table of Contents

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market quotations, the fair value of our investments may fluctuate from period to period. Additionally, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded securities. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded it. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the unrealized gains or losses reflected in the valuations currently assigned.

The Valuation Designee, subject to the oversight of the Board, undertakes a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

• Our quarterly valuation process begins with a preliminary valuation being prepared by the investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investment in conjunction with our portfolio management team and valuation team.

• Preliminary valuations are reviewed and discussed by the valuation committee of the Valuation Designee.

• The Valuation Designee will provide all relevant information related to the portfolio investments for the IVP to independently provide positive assurance on the valuation approach and inputs (monthly), provide positive assurance on the valuation of all positions (quarterly), and estimate a range of fair values (at least semiannually) for each investment:

◦ Monthly, the IVP reviews and analyzes the data provided by the Valuation Designee, including the reasonableness of the valuation approach, as well as the mathematical accuracy and the appropriateness and supportability of inputs and assumptions, and provides positive assurance on the valuation approach and inputs;

◦ Quarterly, the IVP reviews and analyzes the information provided by the Valuation Designee, along with relevant market and economic data, and provides positive assurance on the valuation of all positions;

◦ At least semiannually, the IVP independently determines a range of fair values for each of the portfolio investments; and

◦ the IVP provides a report for all investments reviewed to the Valuation Designee containing the IVP’s conclusions from the positive assurance procedures or the independent range of value analysis, whichever is applicable for the period.

• The valuation committee of the Valuation Designee determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio without a readily available market quotation in good faith based on, among other things, the input of the IVPs, where applicable.

When the Valuation Designee determines the fair value of each investment as of the last day of a month that is not also the last day of a calendar quarter, the Valuation Designee intends to update the value of securities with reliable market quotations to the most recent market quotation. For securities without reliable market quotations, the Valuation Designee will generally update the value of such assets using the same set of information that was used in performing the most recent quarterly valuation. Should the Valuation Designee determine that a significant observable change has occurred since the most recent quarter end with respect to the investment (which determination may be as a result of a material event at a portfolio company, material change in public equity valuations, secondary market transaction in the securities of an investment, comparable transactions, or otherwise), the Valuation Designee will determine whether to determine the fair value for each relevant investment using data that has been updated for the impact of the significant observable change.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We follow ASC 825-10, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASC 825-10”), which provides funds the option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. ASC 825-10 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between funds that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities and to more easily understand the effect of our choice to use fair value on its

Table of Contents

earnings. ASC 825-10 also requires entities to display the fair value of the selected assets and liabilities on the face of the balance sheet. We have not elected the ASC 825-10 option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

Investments held by us are valued in accordance with Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act and Rule 2a-5 thereunder and the provisions of ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”), which among other matters, requires enhanced disclosures about investments that are measured and reported at fair value. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 determines fair value to be the price that would be received for an investment in a current sale, which assumes an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 requires us to assume that the portfolio investment is sold in its principal market to market participants or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market, which may be a hypothetical market. Market participants are defined as buyers and sellers in the principal or most advantageous market that are independent, knowledgeable, and willing and able to transact. In accordance with ASC 820-10, we have considered its principal market as the market in which we exit our portfolio investments with the greatest volume and level of activity. ASC 820-10 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. In accordance with ASC 820-10, these inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

• Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.

• Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

• Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, the Valuation Designee continues to employ the net asset valuation policy and procedures that have been reviewed by the Board and are consistent with the provisions of Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act and ASC 820-10. Consistent with its valuation policies and procedures, the Valuation Designee will evaluate the source of inputs, including any markets in which our investments are trading (or any markets in which securities with similar attributes are trading), in determining fair value. Where there may not be a readily available market value for some of the investments in our portfolio, the fair value of a portion of our investments may be determined using unobservable inputs.

Our portfolio investments classified as Level 3 are typically valued using an analysis of the enterprise value (“EV”) of the portfolio company. EV means the entire value of the portfolio company to a market participant, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. The primary technique for determining EV uses a discounted cash flow analysis whereby future expected cash flows of the portfolio company are discounted to determine a present value using estimated discount rates (typically a weighted average cost of capital based on costs of debt and equity consistent with current market conditions).

See “Note 8. Fair Value of Financial Instruments” to our consolidated financial statements for more information on our valuation process.

Recent Developments

January and February Capital Raise

In our monthly closing for January 2026, we issued and sold 11,395,800 Shares (consisting of 9,860,864 Class I Shares and 1,534,936 Class S Shares at an offering price of $25.0447 per Share for each class), and received approximately $285.4 million as payment for such Shares.

In our monthly closing for February 2026, we issued and sold 16,131,764 Shares (consisting of 14,804,765 Class I Shares and 1,326,999 Class S Shares at an offering price of $25.0263 per Share for each class) and received approximately $403.7 million as payment for such Shares.

March Capital Raise

In our monthly closing for March 2026, we agreed to sell Shares, including Class I Shares and Class S Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $354.2 million. The purchase price per Share will equal our NAV per Share of such class as of the

Table of Contents

last calendar day of February 2026, which is generally expected to be available within 20 business days after March 1, 2026. No underwriting discounts or commissions have been or will be paid in connection with the sale of such Shares. Although we do not charge investors an Upfront Sales Load with respect to its Shares, if Class D Shares, Class N Shares or Class S Shares are purchased through certain selling agents, Shareholders may be charged an Upfront Sales Load or transaction or other fees, including brokerage commissions, in such amount as such selling agents may determine, provided that such charges are subject to a 2.0% cap on NAV for Class D Shares, a 2.0% cap on NAV for Class N Shares and a 3.5% cap on NAV for Class S Shares. No Upfront Sales Loads may be charged on Class I Shares. To the extent any such Upfront Sales Load or other fees are received by the Placement Agent, such amounts will be reallowed to the applicable selling agent. The issuance of the Shares is exempt from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof, by Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder and/or Regulation S promulgated thereunder.

Distributions

On November 7, 2025, we announced the declaration of regular monthly gross distributions for January, February and March 2026 and on March 5, 2026, we announced the declaration of regular monthly distributions for April, May, and June 2026, in each case for its Class I Shares, Class S Shares, Class D Shares and Class N Shares in the amounts per Share set forth below:

Gross Distribution Per Common Share

Record Date

Payment Date (1)

Class I

Class S

Class D

Class N

January 30, 2026

February 23, 2026

February 27, 2026

March 25, 2026

March 31, 2026

April 23, 2026

April 30, 2026

May 21, 2026

May 29, 2026

June 24, 2026

June 30, 2026

July 23, 2026

(1) The distributions on our Shares will be paid on or about the payment dates set above.

These distributions will be paid in cash or reinvested in the Shares for Shareholders participating in our distribution reinvestment plan. The net distributions to be received by Shareholders of the Class D Shares, Class N Shares and Class S Shares will be equal to the gross distribution in the table above, less specific shareholder servicing and/or distribution fees applicable to such class as of their respective record dates. Class I Shares have no shareholder servicing and/or distribution fees. As of March 2, 2026, there are no Class N Shares outstanding.