STEP Stepstone Group Inc. - 10-K

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Investing in our securities involves uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors. You should carefully consider the risks described below with all of the other information included in this annual report on Form 10-K. Some of the factors, events, and contingencies discussed below may have occurred in the past, and the disclosures below are not representations as to whether or not the factors, events, or contingencies have occurred in the past, but are provided because future occurrences of such factors, events, or contingencies could have a material adverse effect on our business, growth, reputation, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and stock price. Further, the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also materially affect our business. If any of the following risks were to occur, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. For a summary of these risks, please read “Risk Factors Summary,” which immediately precedes Part I, Item 1 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Risks Related to Our Business

The success of our business depends on the identification and availability of suitable investment opportunities for our clients.

Our success largely depends on the identification and availability of suitable investment opportunities for our clients, and in particular the success of investments made by the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts. The availability of investment opportunities will be subject to market conditions and other factors outside of our control and the control of the fund managers with which we invest. Markets in the last few years experienced meaningful headwinds, including increasing borrowing costs. The historical investment returns of the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts have benefited from investment opportunities and general market conditions, including favorable borrowing conditions in the debt markets during such historical periods, and we cannot assure you that the StepStone Funds, advisory accounts or the underlying funds in which we invest will be able to avail themselves of comparable opportunities and conditions, particularly in light of recent higher interest rates, changes in governmental policies, and other market conditions. Further, we cannot assure you that the private markets funds we select will be able to identify sufficient attractive investment opportunities to meet their investment objectives.

If the investments we make on behalf of the StepStone Funds or recommend to clients perform poorly, we may suffer a decline in our revenues and earnings, and our ability to raise capital for future StepStone Funds may be materially and adversely affected.

Our revenue from our investment management solutions is derived from fees earned for our management of the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts, performance fees, including incentive fees and carried interest allocations with respect to certain of the StepStone Funds, and monitoring and reporting fees. In the event that the StepStone Funds or individual investments perform poorly, our revenues and earnings derived from performance fees will decline and make it more difficult for us to raise capital for new focused commingled funds or gain new SMA clients in the future. If we are unable to raise or are required to repay capital, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Continued positive performance of investments we make on behalf of clients or we recommend to our clients is not assured and may not result in positive performance of an investment in our Class A common stock.

An investment in our Class A common stock is not an investment in any of the StepStone Funds. In addition, the historical and potential future investment returns of the StepStone Funds are not linked to returns on our Class A common stock. Positive performance of the StepStone Funds or the investments that we recommend to our advisory clients will not necessarily result in positive returns on an investment in our Class A common stock. However, poor investment performance of the StepStone Funds could cause a decline in our revenue and have a negative effect on our performance or on an investment in our Class A common stock.

The historical investment performance of our funds should not be considered indicative of the future investment performance of these funds or of any future funds we may invest, in part because:

• market conditions and investment opportunities may be significantly less favorable than in the past;

• the performance of our funds is largely based on the NAV of the funds’ investments, including unrealized gains, which may never be realized;

• our newly established funds may generate lower investment returns during the period that they initially deploy their capital;

• changes in the global tax and regulatory environment may affect both the investment preferences of our clients and the financing strategies employed by businesses in which particular funds invest, which may reduce the overall capital available for investment and the availability of suitable investments, thereby reducing our investment returns in the future;

• competition for investment opportunities, resulting from the increasing amount of capital invested in private markets alternatives, may increase the cost and reduce the availability of suitable investments, thereby reducing our investment returns in the future; and

• the industries and businesses in which particular funds invest will vary.

Competition for access to investment funds and other investments we make for our clients is intense.

We seek to maintain excellent relationships with fund managers, including those in which we have previously made investments for our clients and those in which we may in the future invest, as well as sponsors of investments that might provide co-investment opportunities in portfolio companies alongside the sponsoring fund manager. However, because of the number of clients seeking to gain access to investment funds and co-investment opportunities managed or sponsored by the top performing fund managers, we cannot assure you that we will be able to secure the opportunity to invest on behalf of our clients in all or a substantial portion of the investments we select, or that the size of the investment opportunities available to us will be as large as we would desire. Access to secondary investment opportunities is also highly competitive and is often controlled by a limited number of fund managers and intermediaries.

Third-party clients in many StepStone Funds have the right to remove us as the general partner of the relevant fund and to terminate the investment period under certain circumstances, leading to a decrease in our revenues, which could be substantial. In addition, the investment management agreements related to our SMAs and advisory accounts may permit the client to terminate our management of such accounts on short notice.

The governing agreements of many of the StepStone Funds provide that, subject to certain conditions, third-party clients in those funds have the right to remove us as the general partner of the relevant fund or terminate the

Table of Contents

fund, including in certain cases without cause by a simple majority vote. Any such removal or dissolution could result in a cessation in management fees we would earn from such funds or a significant reduction in the expected amounts of performance fees from those funds. We currently manage a portion of client assets through SMAs whereby we earn management fees and performance fees, and we intend to continue to seek additional SMA mandates. Clients with SMAs generally may terminate their investment management agreement with us without cause on 30 to 90 days’ notice, and in some cases, shorter notice. From time to time, we lose clients as a result of the sale or merger of a client, a change in a client’s senior management, competition from other financial institutions and other factors. Moreover, a number of our contracts with state government-sponsored clients are secured through such government’s RFP process and are subject to periodic renewal. If multiple clients were to exercise their termination rights or fail to renew their existing contracts and we were unable to secure new clients, our SMA and advisory account fees would decline materially. In the case of any such terminations, the management fees and performance fees we earn in connection with managing such account would immediately cease, which could result in a significant adverse effect on our revenues. If we experience a change of control (as defined under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Advisers Act”) or as otherwise set forth in the partnership agreements of our funds), continuation of the investment management agreements of our funds would be subject to client consent. We cannot assure you that required consents will be obtained if a change of control occurs.

In addition, with respect to our funds that are subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), each fund’s investment management agreement must be approved annually by (a) such fund’s board of directors and by a vote of the majority of such fund’s equity holders or (b) the independent members of such fund’s board of directors, as required by law. Termination of these agreements would cause us to lose the management fees and performance fees we earn from such funds, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our ability to retain our senior leadership team and attract additional qualified professionals is critical to our success.

Our success depends on our ability to retain our senior leadership team and to recruit and retain additional qualified investment, sales and other professionals. However, we may not be successful in our efforts, as the market for investment and other professionals is extremely competitive. As such, we cannot be sure we will be able to find suitable successors promptly, or at all, or to successfully integrate any successors, or that we will be able to attract, retain, and develop a sufficient number of qualified individuals in future periods. Furthermore, the individuals that comprise our senior leadership team possess substantial experience and expertise and, in many cases, have significant relationships with certain of our clients. Accordingly, the loss of any member of our senior leadership team could adversely affect certain client relationships or limit our ability to successfully execute our investment strategies. In addition, the governing agreements of the StepStone Funds typically require the suspension of our ability to call additional investment capital if, depending on the fund, designated members of our senior leadership team cease to devote sufficient professional time to or cease to be employed by the Partnership, often called a “key person event,” or in connection with certain other events. Each of these factors could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Our failure to appropriately manage conflicts of interest could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business.

As we expand the scope of our business, we increasingly confront potential conflicts of interest relating to our advisory and investment management businesses. Actual, potential or perceived conflicts can give rise to client dissatisfaction, litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. As a registered investment adviser, the Partnership owes its clients a fiduciary duty and is required to provide disinterested advice. Appropriately managing conflicts of interest is complex and difficult and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential or actual conflicts of interest. Enforcement action or litigation asserting improper management of conflicts of interest, even if unproven, could harm our reputation and our business in a number of ways, including by affecting our ability to raise additional funds or causing existing clients to reduce or terminate their business with us.

We have obligations to clients and other third parties that may conflict with stockholders’ interests.

Our subsidiaries that serve as the general partners of, or advisers to, the StepStone Funds have fiduciary and contractual obligations to the clients in those funds and accounts, and some of our subsidiaries may have contractual duties to other third parties. As a result, we may take actions with respect to the allocation of investments among the StepStone Funds (including funds and accounts that have different fee structures), the purchase or sale of investments in the StepStone Funds, the structuring of investment transactions for those StepStone Funds, the advice we provide or other actions in order to comply with these fiduciary and contractual obligations.

In addition, because our senior management and other professionals generally hold their economic interests through pass-through entities like the Partnership or other affiliated entities, which are not subject to U.S. federal and state entity-level income taxes, and our Class A common stockholders will hold their interests through StepStone Group Inc., which is subject to entity-level taxation as a corporation in the United States, conflicts relating to the selection and structuring of investments or other matters may arise between the Class B unitholders (who are also Class B stockholders of StepStone Group Inc.), Class C unitholders and Class D unitholders of the Partnership, on the one hand, and the Class A stockholders of StepStone Group Inc., on the other hand.

Recent and continuing higher interest rates or prospective decreases in the availability of credit may adversely affect the ability of the StepStone Funds to achieve attractive rates of return, particularly because certain funds and portfolio companies depend on leverage for a return on investment.

While interest rates were at historically low levels for an extended period, interest rates and the rate of inflation have since increased significantly. Although rates have declined from peak levels, interest rates have remained relatively elevated and these economic factors may also reduce credit availability, all of which may adversely affect the ability of the StepStone Funds to achieve attractive rates of return and adversely affect the value of our carried interest. In prior periods, we have recorded significant losses on unrealized carried interest allocations, which illustrate the sensitivity of carried interest to changes in valuations, interest rates, and credit conditions.

The StepStone Funds, as well as the companies in which they invest, raise capital in the structured private debt, leveraged loan and high yield bond markets. If elevated interest rates persist or further increase or credit markets experience continued or increasing dislocations, contractions or volatility, the StepStone Funds’ results of operations, and in turn ours, will suffer. In addition, acute events in these markets could adversely affect the availability of credit to businesses generally, the cost or terms on which lenders are willing to lend, or the strength of the overall economy, all of which may adversely affect our results of operations.

Table of Contents

Reductions in available sources of debt financing, or extended or increased tightening in the credit markets, may result in increases in interest rates and risk spread demanded by sources of indebtedness, which would make it more expensive to finance investments made by our funds. Certain investments may also be financed through fund-level debt facilities and, as a result of these risks, the refinancing of such facilities at the end of their respective terms may be difficult on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Finally, the interest payments on the indebtedness used to finance our focused commingled funds’ investments are generally deductible expenses for income tax purposes, subject to limitations under applicable tax law and policy. Any change in such tax law or policy to eliminate or substantially limit these income tax deductions, as has been discussed from time to time in various jurisdictions, would reduce the after-tax rates of return on the affected investments, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Similarly, private markets fund portfolio companies regularly utilize the corporate debt markets to obtain additional financing for their operations. Leverage incurred by a portfolio company may cause the portfolio company to be vulnerable to increases in interest rates and decreases in credit availability, which may make such companies less able to cope with changes in business and economic conditions or impair the operations, value or sustainability of such companies. The adverse effects of leverage on portfolio companies in which we directly or indirectly invest can adversely affect the investment returns of the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts. If the investment returns achieved by the StepStone Funds are reduced, it could result in negative reputational effects and impair the value of carried interest allocations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, as part of broader industry dynamics, certain private credit and other products that offer investors periodic liquidity (including through redemption, repurchase or tender offer features), including in the private wealth market, may experience increased investor liquidity requests during periods of market stress or higher interest rates. Such elevated liquidity requests, whether in our products or in competing products, could adversely affect investor sentiment toward such strategies and our ability to fundraise, and could contribute to increased liquidity requests across our products that offer periodic investor liquidity. Elevated liquidity requests could also adversely affect performance and reduce AUM, which could reduce our management fees and ability to earn incentive fees and carried interest, and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, recent comments by the head of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement indicate the division is more closely monitoring the private credit markets, which could result in heightened regulatory scrutiny of our private credit activities.

Clients in the StepStone Funds with commitment-based structures may not satisfy their contractual obligation to fund capital calls when requested, which could adversely affect a fund’s operations and performance.

Clients make capital commitments to StepStone Funds with commitment-based structures, and we are entitled to call capital at any time during prescribed periods that can extend for several years into the future. We depend on clients fulfilling their commitments when we call capital from them in order for those funds to consummate investments and otherwise pay their obligations when due. Any client that does not fund a capital call may be subject to penalties, potentially including forfeiting a significant amount of its existing investment in that fund. However, if a client has invested little or no capital, for instance early in the life of a fund, then the forfeiture penalty may not be a significant deterrent to default. Failures or delays in funding capital calls may occur more frequently in the future, as a result of recent increases in interest rates, decreases in equity values and dislocations in the banking sector, or in the event of a continued economic slowdown. In addition, changes to asset allocation policies or new laws or regulations resulting from declines in public equity markets may restrict or prohibit investors from investing in new or successor StepStone Funds or funding existing commitments. If clients fail to satisfy a significant amount of capital calls for any particular fund or funds, the operation and performance of those funds could be materially and adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Our failure to comply with investment guidelines set by our clients could result in damage awards against us or a reduction in AUM, either of which would cause our earnings to decline and adversely affect our business.

When clients retain us to manage assets on their behalf, they specify certain guidelines regarding investment allocation and strategy that we are required to observe in the management of their portfolios. Our failure to comply with these guidelines and other limitations could result in clients terminating their investment management agreement with us, as these agreements generally are terminable without cause on 30 to 90 days’ notice. Clients could also sue us for breach of contract and seek to recover damages from us. In addition, such guidelines may restrict our ability to pursue allocations or strategies that we believe would generate favorable investment returns, which could result in underperformance of, or losses to, a client account. Even when we comply with all applicable investment guidelines, a client may be dissatisfied with its investment performance or our services or fees and may terminate their SMAs or advisory accounts or be unwilling to commit new capital to the StepStone Funds or advisory accounts. Any of these events could cause a reduction to AUM and consequently cause our earnings to decline and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Valuation methodologies for certain assets in the StepStone Funds are subjective, and the values of assets established pursuant to such methodologies may never be realized, which could result in significant losses for the StepStone Funds.

There are no readily ascertainable market prices for a large number of the investments in the StepStone Funds, advisory accounts or the funds in which we invest. The value of the investments of the StepStone Funds is determined periodically by us based on the fair value of such investments as reported by the underlying fund managers. Our valuation of the funds in which we invest is largely dependent upon the processes employed by the managers of those funds. The fair value of investments is determined using a number of methodologies described in the particular funds’ valuation policies. These policies are based on a number of factors, including the nature of the investment, the expected cash flows from the investment, the length of time the investment has been held, restrictions on transfer and other recognized valuation methodologies. The methodologies we use in valuing individual investments are based on a variety of estimates and assumptions specific to the particular investments, and actual results related to the investment may vary materially as a result of the inaccuracy of such assumptions or estimates. In addition, because illiquid investments held by the StepStone Funds, advisory accounts and the funds in which we invest may be in industries or sectors that are unstable, in distress, or undergoing some uncertainty, such investments may experience rapid changes in value caused by sudden company-specific or industry-wide developments.

Because there is significant uncertainty in the valuation of, or in the stability of the value of, illiquid investments, the fair values of such investments as reflected in a fund’s NAV do not necessarily reflect the prices that would actually be obtained if such investments were sold. Realizations at values significantly lower than the values at which investments have been reflected in fund NAVs could result in losses for the applicable fund and the loss of potential performance fees by the fund’s manager and us. Also, a situation in which asset values turn out to be materially different from values reflected in fund NAVs could cause clients to lose confidence in us and may, in turn, result in difficulties in our ability to raise additional capital, retain clients or attract new clients.

We may not be able to maintain our desired fee structure as a result of industry pressure from private markets clients to reduce fees, which could have a material adverse effect on our profit margins and results of operations.

We may not be able to maintain our current fee structure for our funds as a result of industry pressure from private markets clients to reduce fees. In order to maintain our desired fee structure in a competitive environment, we must be able to continue to provide clients with investment returns and service levels that incentivize our clients to pay our desired fee rates. We cannot assure you that we will succeed in providing investment returns and service levels that will allow us to maintain our desired fee structure. Fee reductions on existing or future new business could have a material adverse effect on our profit margins and results of operations.

Table of Contents

We may need to pay “clawback” or “contingent repayment” obligations if and when they are triggered under the governing agreements of our funds.

Generally, if at the termination of a fund and in certain cases at interim points in the life of a fund, the fund has not achieved investment returns that exceed the preferred return threshold or we have received net profits over the life of the fund in excess of our allocable share under the applicable partnership agreement, we will be obligated to repay an amount equal to the excess of amounts previously distributed to us over the amounts to which we are ultimately entitled. This obligation is known as a “clawback” or contingent repayment obligation. Our carried interest is generally determined at the end of the period on a hypothetical liquidation basis. As of March 31, 2026, if the funds were liquidated at their fair values, no material amounts would have been subject to contingent repayment by us. We cannot assure you that we will not incur a contingent repayment obligation in the future. Although a contingent repayment obligation is split among the various obligors, with each responsible for only its respective share, the governing agreements of the StepStone Funds generally provide that, to the extent another party who received a distribution does not fund its respective share, we are required to fund any additional amount beyond the amount of carried interest actually allocated to us, up to the entire amount of the relevant contingent repayment obligation. We may need to use or reserve cash to repay such contingent repayment obligations instead of using the cash for other purposes.

Our investment management activities may involve investments in high-risk, illiquid assets, and we may lose, or our clients may lose, some or all of the amounts invested in these activities or fail to realize any profits from these activities for a considerable period of time.

The investments made by the StepStone Funds and recommended by our advisory services include high-risk, illiquid assets. We have made, and expect to continue to make, principal investments alongside our clients, as the general partner, in existing and future StepStone Funds. The StepStone Funds invest capital in private markets funds that make investments in equity or debt securities that are not publicly traded. Even where such securities are publicly traded, many of these funds may be prohibited by contract or applicable securities laws from selling such investments for a period of time. Accordingly, the private markets funds in which we and our clients invest capital may not be able to sell investments when they desire and therefore may not be able to realize the full value of such investments. Particularly in the case of securities, such funds will generally not be able to sell these securities publicly unless their sale is registered under applicable securities laws, or unless an exemption from such registration requirements is available. Furthermore, large holdings of publicly traded equity securities can often be disposed of only over a substantial period of time, exposing the investment returns to risks of downward movement in market prices during the disposition period. Investing in private markets funds is risky, and we may lose some or the entire amount of our investment or the investment made by the StepStone Funds. Poor investment performance could lead clients to terminate their agreements with us and/or result in negative reputational effects, either of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we may invest in businesses with capital structures that have significant leverage. The leveraged capital structure of such businesses increases the exposure of the funds’ portfolio companies to adverse economic factors, such as rising interest rates, downturns in the economy or deterioration in the condition of such business or its industry. If these portfolio companies default on their indebtedness, or otherwise seek or are forced to restructure their obligations or declare bankruptcy, we could lose some or all of our investment and suffer reputational harm. See “—Recent and continuing higher interest rates or prospective decreases in the availability of credit may adversely affect the ability of the StepStone Funds to achieve attractive rates of return, particularly because certain funds and portfolio companies depend on leverage for a return on investment.”

Table of Contents

The portfolio companies in which private markets funds have invested or may invest will sometimes involve a high degree of business and financial risk. These companies may be in an early stage of development, may not have a proven operating history, may be operating at a loss or have significant variations in results of operations, may be engaged in a rapidly changing business with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, may be subject to extensive regulatory oversight, may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position, may have a high level of leverage, or may otherwise have a weak financial condition. In addition, these portfolio companies may face intense competition, including competition from companies with greater financial resources, more extensive development, manufacturing, marketing, and other capabilities, and a larger number of qualified managerial and technical personnel. Portfolio companies in non-U.S. jurisdictions may be subject to additional risks, including changes in currency exchange rates, exchange control regulations, risks associated with different types (and lower quality) of available information, expropriation or confiscatory taxation and adverse political developments.

In addition, during periods of difficult market conditions, including volatility as a result of economic or political events in or affecting the world’s major economies, or slowdowns in a particular investment category, industry or region, portfolio companies may experience decreased revenues, financial losses, difficulty in obtaining access to financing and increased costs. During these periods, these companies may also have difficulty in expanding their businesses and operations and may be unable to pay their expenses as they become due. A general market downturn or a specific market dislocation may result in lower investment returns for the private markets funds or portfolio companies in which the StepStone Funds invest, which consequently would materially and adversely affect investment returns for the StepStone Funds.

The StepStone Funds may face risks relating to undiversified investments.

We cannot give assurance as to the degree of diversification that will be achieved in any of the StepStone Funds. Difficult market conditions or slowdowns affecting a particular asset class, geographic region or other category of investment could have a significant adverse effect on a given StepStone Fund if its investments are concentrated in that category, which would result in lower investment returns. Accordingly, a lack of diversification on the part of a StepStone Fund could adversely affect its investment performance and, as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Banking system volatility may adversely affect the results and financial condition of the StepStone Funds or StepStone generally.

StepStone and the StepStone Funds and their portfolio companies and other investments maintain substantially all of their respective cash and cash equivalents in accounts with major U.S. and multi-national financial institutions, and their respective deposits or investments at certain of these institutions could exceed insured limits, where applicable. Furthermore, many of the foregoing’s respective cash and cash equivalents could be held by a single financial institution or a few institutions. In addition, StepStone and the StepStone Funds and their portfolio companies and other investments may not be able to identity all potential solvency or stress concerns with respect to a financial institution or to transfer assets from one financial institution to another in a timely manner in the event a financial institution comes under stress or fails. In the event of failure of any such financial institutions, we cannot assure you that we, the StepStone Funds or any of their investments could access uninsured funds promptly or at all. Furthermore, a StepStone Fund could be unable to call capital from the investors until it sets up a new deposit account at a different institution, which could be a time-consuming process and could be prohibited under the fund’s then-existing credit facilities.

Table of Contents

Ordinarily, assets held by a regulated financial institution are insured up to stated balance amounts—the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in the case of U.S. banks or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation in the case of U.S. broker-dealers. Customers of regulated financial institutions with amounts in excess of the relevant insurance limits are unsecured creditors with respect to cash and cash equivalents held with such institutions in excess of those relevant insurance limits, and therefore such excess amounts are subject to risk of loss, although uninsured depositors of a failed bank are given priority over general unsecured creditors of the same failed bank. Although governmental intervention has resulted in additional protections for uninsured depositors of failed banks, or facilitated acquisitions, there can be no assurance that governmental intervention will be successful or avoid the risk of loss.

If deposit accounts or credit facilities are held at the same financial institution, and such institution fails, a StepStone Fund may need to make more frequent capital calls to its investors and to StepStone, and the fund or its investments may be unable to fund obligations they have to third parties.

We also caution you that the general partner of a fund (whether such general partner is StepStone or a third party) may not have a meaningful role or any role in selecting the financial institutions used by fund investments and must rely on underlying sponsors or portfolio company management to select banking or other financial services. Likewise, if an institution used by an investor fails, such investor may be unable to satisfy capital calls made by the fund. This could lead to a fund utilizing shortfall funding solutions, if available to the fund and permitted by the fund’s governing agreements. Any inability to access, or delay in accessing, deposits or credit facilities (including the inability of an investor to fund its capital commitments) or other services could adversely affect the results and financial condition of StepStone and the StepStone funds and their portfolio companies and investments.

The StepStone Funds make investments in funds and companies that we do not control.

Investments by most of the StepStone Funds will include debt instruments and equity securities of funds and companies that we do not control. The StepStone Funds may invest through co-investment arrangements or acquire minority equity interests and may also dispose of a portion of their equity investments in portfolio companies over time in a manner that results in their retaining a minority investment. Consequently, the performance of the StepStone Funds will depend significantly on the investment and other decisions made by third parties, which could have a material adverse effect on the returns achieved by the StepStone Funds. Portfolio companies in which the investment is made may make business, financial or management decisions with which we do not agree. In addition, the majority stakeholders or our management may take risks or otherwise act in a manner that does not serve our interests. If any of the foregoing were to occur, the values the investments we have made on behalf of clients or we recommend to our clients could decrease and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could suffer as a result.

Table of Contents

Our risk management strategies and procedures may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks.

Risk management applies to our investment management operations as well as to the investments we make for the StepStone Funds. We have developed and continue to update strategies and procedures specific to our business for managing risks, which include market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and reputational risk. Management of these risks can be very complex. These strategies and procedures may fail under some circumstances, particularly if we are confronted with risks that we have underestimated or not identified. In addition, some of our methods for managing the risks related to our clients’ investments are based upon our analysis of historical private markets behavior. Statistical techniques are applied to these observations in order to arrive at quantifications of some of our risk exposures. Historical analysis of private markets returns requires reliance on valuations performed by fund managers, which may not be reliable measures of current valuations. These statistical methods may not accurately quantify our risk exposure if circumstances arise that were not observed in our historical data. In particular, as we enter new lines of business, our historical data may be insufficient. Failure of our risk management techniques could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, including our right to receive performance fees.

The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with investments may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with an investment.

Before making or recommending investments for our clients, we conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisors and accountants may be involved in the due diligence process in varying degrees depending on the type of investment and the parties involved. Nevertheless, when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an investment, we rely on the resources available to us, including information provided by the target of the investment and, in some circumstances, third-party investigations. The due diligence investigation that we will carry out with respect to any investment opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that are necessary or helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not guarantee the success of an investment.

In addition, generally our underlying investments are managed by third-party sponsors and, as a result, we depend on the due diligence investigation of such third-party sponsors. We have little or no control over their due diligence process, and any shortcomings in their due diligence could be reflected in the performance of the investment we make with them on behalf of our clients. Poor investment performance could lead clients to terminate their agreements with us or result in negative reputational effects, either of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Restrictions on our ability to collect and analyze data regarding our clients’ investments could adversely affect our business.

We rely on our proprietary data and technology platforms to provide regular reports to our clients, to research developments and trends in private markets and to support our investment processes. We depend on the continuation of our relationships with the fund managers and sponsors of the underlying funds and investments in order to maintain current data on these investments and private markets activity. The termination of such relationships by a critical mass of such fund managers and sponsors or the imposition of widespread restrictions on our ability to use the data we obtain for our reporting and monitoring services could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

We and our clients depend on the reliability of our proprietary data and technology platforms and other data processing systems. Failures or interruptions of these services may disrupt our business, damage our reputation, limit our growth and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We and our clients rely heavily on our proprietary data and technology platforms, including SPI Research and SPI Reporting, and associated tools, which form a valuable part of the services we offer to our clients. We also rely heavily on other financial, accounting, compliance, monitoring and reporting data processing systems. Our back-up procedures and capabilities in the event of a failure or interruption may not be adequate. We expect that we will need to upgrade and expand the capabilities of our data processing systems and other operating technology in the future and we will incur costs to do so. We also rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our information and technology platforms and systems. Any failure, interruption or deterioration of proprietary data and technology platforms or other systems, including the loss or compromise of data by fire, natural disaster, power or telecommunications failure, or cybersecurity breaches or ransomware, or the failure of third-party service providers to perform could materially adversely affect our ability to provide services to our clients, harm our reputation, business or results of operations or result in regulatory intervention.

A compromise or corruption of our systems or that of our vendors containing confidential information could damage our business relationships and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We collect, process and store rapidly increasing volumes of highly sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and intellectual property, information relating to third party managers and their investment opportunities which we consider, and personally identifiable information of our employees, our clients and others, in our data centers and on our networks, including in our client portal, and with our vendors, service providers and government agencies. SPI Reporting includes funds, direct investments and co-investments that we monitor and report on for the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts, and our client portal contains confidential client information. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information are critical to our operations. A significant actual or potential theft, loss, corruption, exposure, fraudulent use or misuse of client, employee or other personally identifiable or proprietary business data, whether by third parties or as a result of employee malfeasance or otherwise, non-compliance with our contractual or other legal obligations regarding such data or intellectual property or a violation of our privacy and security policies with respect to such data could result in significant remediation and other costs, fines, litigation or regulatory actions against us and significant reputational harm. Such events could damage our business relationships and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity incidents could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The frequency and sophistication of the cybersecurity threats and incidents we face continue to increase, including as a result of the advancement of AI, which malicious actors can use to create new, more sophisticated and more frequent attacks and to facilitate impersonation of personnel and third parties. As a result, we face a heightened risk of a cybersecurity incident or disruption with respect to sensitive information resulting from an attack by computer hackers, foreign governments or cyber terrorists. Our reputation and our ability to operate and expand our business depend on computer hardware and software systems, including our proprietary data and technology platforms, our client portal, and other data processing systems, which can be vulnerable to security breaches or other cyber incidents. Our funds’ portfolio companies rely on similar systems and face similar risks, and such funds may invest in strategic assets having a national or regional profile or in infrastructure assets that face a greater risk of attack. Cybersecurity incidents may be an intentional attack, such as a phishing, vishing or social engineering attack, hacker attack, ransomware or cyber extortion, virus or worm, or an unintentional event and could involve bad actors gaining unauthorized access to our information systems or those of our service providers for purposes of misappropriating assets, disclosing or modifying sensitive or confidential information, corrupting

Table of Contents

data or causing operational disruption. Cyber-criminals can attempt to redirect payments required to be paid at the closings of our investments to unauthorized accounts, which we or the services providers we retain, such as paying agents and escrow agents, may not be able to detect or protect against. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in ransomware and other hacking attempts by cyber-criminals, including of our service providers. The rapid evolution and increased availability of artificial intelligence may intensify cybersecurity risks by making such attacks and other cybersecurity incidents more difficult to detect, contain, and mitigate, including through the use of AI-facilitated impersonation and AI-related cyber events that are more automated, targeted and coordinated. The costs related to cyber or other security threats or disruptions may not be fully insured or indemnified by others, including by our service providers.

We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls designed to mitigate cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity incidents. However, these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cybersecurity incident, do not guarantee that a cyber-incident will not occur or that our financial results or operations will not be adversely affected by such an incident. Cyber-incident techniques change frequently, may not immediately be recognized and can originate from a wide variety of sources. We devote significant levels of funding and resources to comply with evolving cybersecurity regulations, including the SEC rules applicable to public companies, the SEC’s amendments to Regulation S-P with which we were required to comply by December 2025 (which impose operationally challenging notification requirements, deadlines and additional written policy and oversight expectations), as well as those rules proposed by the SEC with respect to investment advisers, and to monitor and enhance our information security procedures and controls. We maintain insurance intended to cover certain cybersecurity events, but such insurance may not cover all risks and losses that we experience.

We also face cybersecurity risks associated with sensitive information provided to third parties. We rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our business, including for certain information systems and technology, as well as administration of, and legal services for, the StepStone Funds. Additionally, each of the jurisdictions in which we operate may require us to provide sensitive information to government agencies, including biographical, financial and tax information relating to our personnel or investments. The information systems of government agencies have previously been compromised and we believe they continue to be targets for cyber-criminals. Third-party service providers and their vendors are also susceptible to, and have experienced, cyber and security threats and incidents. Any interruption or deterioration in the performance of these government agencies or third-party service providers, intentional or unintentional information security incidents caused by their personnel, failures of their information systems and technology or cyber and security breaches could, and have, put our sensitive information at risk or result in the shutdown of a service provider, and indemnification by, or insurance coverage of, such service providers may not be sufficient to cover any damage or loss, which could impair the quality of the funds’ operations and harm our reputation, thereby adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also need to expend additional resources to adapt our cybersecurity program to the evolving security landscape and to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other identified risks.

We are subject to numerous laws, regulations, and contractual obligations designed to protect our regulated data, and that of our customers. These include complex and evolving laws, rules, regulations, and standards relating to cybersecurity and data privacy in a number of jurisdictions. Such laws, rules, regulations, and standards pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and potential costs. Any loss of sensitive information and failure to comply with these requirements or other applicable laws and regulations in this area, could result in significant regulatory non-compliance exposure or other penalties and legal liabilities.

The result of these adverse incidents can include the inability to provide services to our clients, damage to our client or third party manager relationships, other disruptions of our business, corruption or modifications to our data, fraudulent transfers or requests for transfers of money, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs and litigation, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Risk related to emerging and changing technology and corresponding regulations, including AI, could impact our results of operations or financial condition.

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate and respond effectively to the risk of, and the opportunity presented by, digital disruption and other technology change. These may include new applications based on artificial intelligence, machine learning, or new approaches to data mining.

Risks related to AI, including our use of third-party products incorporating artificial intelligence, include the generation of factually incorrect or biased results, also known as hallucinations, data security vulnerabilities, potential IP infringement, mishandling of confidential, proprietary, or private information, and potentially problematic third-party license terms. The legal and regulatory landscape governing the use of AI is rapidly evolving in multiple jurisdictions, including the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom. In the United States, the SEC has established a task force and is evaluating the need for rules and regulations. Future rules or guidance, as well as evolving examination and enforcement priorities, could increase the compliance risks and costs associated with using this technology. In the European Union, the EU Artificial Intelligence Act introduces a risk-based regulatory framework for AI systems that may affect our operations or those of our service providers. Non-compliance with these evolving AI regulations could subject us to regulatory enforcement actions, fines, reputational harm and increased compliance costs.

We may also be exposed to competitive risks related to the adoption and application of new technologies by established market participants or new entrants. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments on a timely and cost-effective basis. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business may be costly. Investments in technology systems and data analytics capabilities may not deliver the benefits or perform as expected or may be replaced or become obsolete more quickly than expected, which could result in operational difficulties or additional costs. If we cannot offer new artificial intelligence-facilitated technologies or data analytics solutions as quickly as our competitors, or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies, data analytics solutions or other product offerings, we could experience a material adverse effect on our operating results, customer relationships and growth opportunities.

Poor implementation of new technologies, including artificial intelligence, by us or our third-party service providers, could subject us to additional risks we do not understand or cannot adequately mitigate, which could have an impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Employee misconduct could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain clients and subjecting us to significant legal liability and reputational harm.

There is a risk that our employees could engage in misconduct that adversely affects our business. We are subject to a number of obligations and standards arising from our advisory and investment management services and our discretionary authority over the assets we manage. The violation of these obligations and standards by any of our employees would adversely affect our clients and us. Our business often requires that we deal with confidential matters of great significance to companies and funds in which we may invest for our clients. If our employees were to improperly use or disclose confidential information, we could be subject to legal or regulatory action and suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position and current and future business relationships. It is not always possible to detect or deter employee misconduct, and the extensive precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. If one of our employees were to engage in misconduct or were to be accused of such misconduct, our business and our reputation could be materially and adversely affected. See “—Evolving laws and government regulations could adversely affect us.”

Table of Contents

We may face damage to our professional reputation if our services are not regarded as satisfactory or for other reasons and may face legal liability to our clients and third parties under securities or other laws and regulations.

As a private markets investment firm focused on providing customized investment solution services, we depend to a large extent on our relationships with our clients and our reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain clients. As a result, if a client is not satisfied with our services, such dissatisfaction may be more damaging to our business than to other types of businesses. The importance of our reputation may increase as we seek to expand our client base and into new private markets.

Our asset management and advisory activities subject us to the risk of significant legal liabilities to our clients and third parties, including our clients’ stockholders or beneficiaries. In our investment management business, we make investment decisions on behalf of our clients that could result in substantial losses. Any such losses may subject us to the risk of legal and regulatory liabilities or actions alleging negligent misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract. We could also be liable to our clients and third parties, including our clients’ stockholders or beneficiaries, under securities or other laws and regulations for materially false or misleading statements made in connection with securities and other transactions. These risks often are difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of time. We may incur significant legal expenses in defending litigation. In addition, litigation or regulatory action against us may tarnish our reputation and harm our ability to attract and retain clients.

Our non-U.S. operations are subject to certain risks, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our non-U.S. operations carry special financial and business risks, which include: fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that could adversely affect our results; unexpected changes in trading policies, regulatory and licensing requirements, trade policies and other barriers; local labor conditions, protections and regulations; adverse consequences or restrictions on the repatriation of earnings; potentially adverse tax consequences, such as trapped foreign losses or excise taxes (or other similar taxes); less stable political and economic environments; terrorism, political hostilities, war, outbreak of disease and other civil disturbances or other catastrophic events that reduce business activity; cultural and language barriers and the need to adopt different business practices in different geographic areas; and difficulty collecting fees and, if necessary, enforcing judgments.

As part of our day-to-day operations outside the United States, we are required to create compensation programs, employment policies, privacy policies, compliance policies and procedures and other administrative programs that comply with the laws of multiple countries. We also must communicate and monitor standards and directives across our global operations. Our failure to successfully manage and grow our geographically diverse operations could impair our ability to react quickly to changing business and market conditions and to enforce compliance with non-U.S. standards and procedures.

Any payment of distributions, loans or advances to and from our subsidiaries could be subject to restrictions on or taxation of dividends or repatriation of earnings under applicable local law, monetary transfer restrictions, foreign currency exchange regulations in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate or other restrictions imposed by current or future agreements, including debt instruments, to which our non-U.S. subsidiaries may be a party. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected, possibly materially, if we are unable to successfully manage these and other risks of global operations in a volatile environment. If our non-U.S. business increases relative to our total business, these factors could have a more pronounced effect on our results of operations or growth prospects.

Table of Contents

Investments of the StepStone Funds in certain jurisdictions may be subject to heightened risks, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A portion of the investments of the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts include private markets funds that are located in, or invest in portfolio companies located in, countries that are subject to heightened risks. Such investments may involve risks related to (i) currency exchange matters, including exchange rate fluctuations with respect to the foreign currency in which the investments are denominated, and costs associated with conversion of investment proceeds and income from one currency to another; (ii) regulations pertaining to investments and investment managers in such countries; (iii) differences in the capital markets of such countries, including, in some cases, the absence of uniform accounting, auditing, financial reporting and legal standards, practices and disclosure requirements and less government supervision and regulation; (iv) certain economic, social and political risks, including exchange control regulations and restrictions on foreign investments and repatriation of capital, and the risks of political, economic or social instability, or armed conflicts; and (v) the possible imposition of taxes with respect to such investments or confiscatory taxation. These risks could adversely affect the investment performance of the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Revenues from our real estate asset class are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of real estate and the construction and development of real estate.

Our real estate funds are subject to risks arising from the ownership and operation of real estate and real estate-related businesses and assets. These risks include the following: general and local economic conditions; changes in supply of and demand for competing properties in an area (as a result, for example, of overbuilding); changes in building, environmental and other laws; diminished financial resources of tenants; changes in demand for commercial office properties (including as a result of an increased prevalence of remote work); fluctuations in the average occupancy and room rates for hotel properties; energy and supply shortages; uninsured or uninsurable risks; liability for “slip-and-fall” and other accidents on properties held by our funds; natural disasters; changes in government regulations (such as rent control and tax laws); changes in real property tax and transfer tax rates; changes in interest rates; the reduced availability of mortgage funds which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable; negative developments in the economy that depress travel activity; environmental liabilities, including under environmental laws that impose, regardless of fault, joint and several liability for the cost of remediating contamination and compensation for damages; contingent liabilities on disposition of assets; unexpected cost overruns in connection with development projects; terrorist attacks, war and other factors that are beyond our control; and dependence on local operating partners. Even in cases where we are indemnified against liabilities arising out of our real estate business, we cannot assure you as to the financial viability of the indemnifying party to satisfy such indemnities or our ability to achieve enforcement of such indemnities.

If our clients or real estate funds acquire direct or indirect interests in undeveloped land or underdeveloped real property, which may often be non-income producing, they will be subject to the risks normally associated with such assets and development activities, including risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory or environmental approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks beyond the control of our fund, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages) and the availability of both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. Additionally, such investments may be managed by a third party, which makes them dependent upon such third parties. Any of these factors may cause the value of real estate investments to decline, which may have a material adverse effect on our clients or our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Our real estate asset class is exposed to commercial real estate values and commercial real estate loans, both of which are expected to be adversely affected by decreased occupancy rates, higher prevailing interest rates and decreased credit availability.

Our real estate asset class has traditionally been exposed to commercial real estate and may be adversely affected by conditions in the commercial real estate market. Commercial real estate depends on cash flows from the property to service the debt, successful completion of construction projects and, in some cases, sales of the underlying properties. Because of decreasing occupancy rates for commercial real estate, along with higher prevailing interest rates and decreased ability to refinance commercial real estate borrowings, we expect it may be more difficult for commercial real estate to generate sufficient cash flows to service debt, maintain required financial and operating covenants of such debt, pay or refinance debt as it comes due or generate a profit. As a result of these economic conditions, the value of commercial real estate investments and loans supporting such investments are expected to be adversely affected in the near term.

The investments we make on behalf of clients or we recommend to our clients in infrastructure assets may expose us to increased risks and liabilities.

Investments in infrastructure assets may expose us and our clients to increased risks and liabilities that are inherent in the ownership of infrastructure assets. For example:

• Ownership of infrastructure assets may also present additional risk of liability for personal and property injury or impose significant operating challenges and costs with respect to, for example, compliance with zoning, environmental, worker, public health and safety or other applicable laws or government actions, which may have a material adverse effect on the operations, financial condition and liquidity of particular assets and ultimately affect investment returns.

• Infrastructure asset investments may face construction and development risks including, without limitation: (i) labor disputes, shortages of material and skilled labor, or work stoppages; (ii) slower than projected construction progress and the unavailability or late delivery of necessary equipment; (iii) less than optimal coordination with public utilities in the relocation of their facilities; (iv) climate change, adverse weather conditions and unexpected construction conditions; (v) accidents or the breakdown or failure of construction equipment or processes; (vi) political or local opposition; (vii) failure to obtain regulatory approvals or permits; and (viii) catastrophic events, such as explosions, fires, war, terrorist activities, natural disasters and other similar events. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses (which may exceed expected or forecasted budgets) and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of construction activities once undertaken. Insurance against such risks may be limited. Certain infrastructure asset investments may remain in construction phases for a prolonged period of time and, accordingly, may not generate cash during such prolonged period. Recourse against the contractor may be subject to liability caps or may be subject to default or insolvency on the part of the contractor.

• The operation of infrastructure assets is exposed to potential unplanned interruptions caused by significant catastrophic or force majeure events. These risks could, among other effects, adversely affect the cash flows available from investments in infrastructure assets, cause personal injury or loss of life, damage property, or instigate disruptions of service. In addition, the cost of repairing or replacing damaged assets could be considerable. Repeated or prolonged service interruptions may result in permanent loss of customers, litigation, or penalties for regulatory or contractual noncompliance. Force majeure events that are incapable of, or too costly to, cure may also have a permanent adverse effect on an investment.

Table of Contents

• The management of the business or operations of an infrastructure asset may be contracted to a third-party management company unaffiliated with us. Although it would be possible to replace any such operator, the failure of such an operator to adequately perform its duties or to act in ways that are in our best interest, or the breach by an operator of applicable agreements or laws, rules and regulations, could have an adverse effect on the investment’s financial condition or results of operations. Infrastructure investments may involve the subcontracting of design and construction activities in respect of projects, and as a result the investments we make on behalf of clients or we recommend to our clients are subject to the risks that contractual provisions passing liabilities to a subcontractor could be ineffective, the subcontractor fails to perform services which it has agreed to perform and the subcontractor becomes insolvent.

Infrastructure investments often involve an ongoing commitment to municipal, state, federal or foreign government or regulatory agencies. The nature of these obligations exposes the investments we make on behalf of clients or we recommend to our clients to a higher level of regulatory control than typically imposed on other businesses and may require complex government licenses, concessions, leases or contracts, which may be difficult to obtain or maintain and which may restrict operations of assets in a way that maximizes cash flows and profitability, and are subject to special risks such as sovereign risks, take actions and expropriation. Infrastructure investments may require operators to manage such investments and such operators’ failure to comply with laws, including prohibitions against bribing of government officials, may adversely affect the value of such investments and cause serious reputational and legal harm. Revenues for such investments may rely on contractual agreements for the provision of services with a limited number of counterparties and are consequently subject to counterparty default risk. The operations and cash flow of infrastructure investments are also more sensitive to inflation and, in certain cases, commodity price risk. Furthermore, services provided by infrastructure investments may be subject to rate regulations by government entities that determine or limit prices that may be charged. Similarly, users of applicable services or government entities in response to such users may react negatively to any adjustments in rates and thus reduce the profitability of such infrastructure investments.

The substantial growth of our business in recent years may be difficult to sustain, as it may place significant demands on our resources and employees and may increase our expenses.

The substantial growth of our business has placed, and if it continues, will continue to place, significant demands on our infrastructure, our investment team and other employees, and will increase our expenses. We will need to continue to invest in our human resources and our infrastructure as a result of the increasingly complex investment management industry, increasing sophistication of clients and our expansion into new jurisdictions. In addition, our private wealth platform has and will require ongoing development of new infrastructure. Legal and regulatory developments, including increasing levels of regulation outside of the United States, also contribute to the increasing level of our expenses. The future growth of our business will depend, among other things, on our ability to maintain the appropriate infrastructure and staffing levels to sufficiently address our growth and may require us to incur significant additional expenses and commit additional senior management and operational resources. We may face significant challenges in maintaining adequate financial and operational controls as well as implementing new or updated information and financial systems and procedures. Training, managing and appropriately sizing our work force and other components of our business on a timely and cost-effective basis also poses challenges. In addition, our efforts to retain or attract qualified investment or operational professionals may result in significant additional expenses.

Table of Contents

We may enter into new lines of business, which may result in additional risks and uncertainties in our business.

We currently generate substantially all of our revenue from asset management and advisory services. However, we may grow our business by offering additional products and services and by entering into new lines of business. To the extent we enter into new lines of business, we will face numerous risks and uncertainties, including risks associated with the possibility that we have insufficient expertise to engage in such activities profitably or without incurring inappropriate amounts of risk, the required investment of capital and other resources and the loss of clients due to the perception that we are no longer focusing on our core businesses. In addition, we may from time to time explore opportunities to grow our business via acquisitions, partnerships, investments or other strategic transactions. We cannot assure you that we will successfully identify, negotiate, complete or integrate such transactions, or that any completed transactions will produce favorable financial results.

Entry into certain lines of business may subject us to new laws and regulations with which we are not familiar, or from which we are currently exempt, and may lead to increased litigation and regulatory risk. In addition, certain aspects of our cost structure, such as costs for compensation, occupancy and equipment rentals, communication and information technology services, and depreciation and amortization will be largely fixed, and we may not be able to timely adjust these costs to match fluctuations in revenue related to growing our business or entering into new lines of business. In addition, changes in rules and regulations that reduce risks in certain lines of business may increase competition in those markets, reducing our ability to earn sufficient fees. If a new business generates insufficient revenue or if we are unable to efficiently manage our expanded operations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We have entered into long-term agreements that provide for us to acquire all the equity interests of our asset class entities that we do not currently own.

On February 7, 2024, we entered into transactions agreements with each of SRA, SRE, and SPD (the “Asset Class Entities”). The transaction agreements provide a path to us owning all of the outstanding equity interests of SRA, SRE and SPD. The transaction agreements provide for, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions therein, the exchange of the sellers’ equity interests in each Asset Class Entity for a combination of (i) newly-created Class D equity interests in StepStone Group LP, with terms substantially similar to the existing Class C units, in the case of SRE and SRA, or shares of our Class A common stock, in the case of SPD and (ii) cash, in up to ten annual exchanges beginning in 2024 (increased to up to fifteen annual exchanges in certain circumstances in case of the sellers of SRA equity interests).

The portion of each Asset Class Entity’s equity interests to be acquired in each annual exchange is set forth in an exchange schedule attached to the applicable transaction agreement and is approximately 5% of each Asset Class Entity on each contemplated annual exchange date. The amount of consideration to be delivered will be calculated using exchange ratios determined each year based on a formula establishing an assumed value of each Asset Class Entity based on its estimated adjusted net income, relative to an adjusted trading multiple for the Class A common stock relative to our estimated adjusted net income.

Because the amount of consideration to be paid will be determined based on future adjusted net income and trading values, we do not know whether any particular exchange will be accretive to our existing shareholders and can make no assurances that the exchanges will result in enhanced cash flows or results of operations. In addition, because each exchange will be subject to closing conditions and regulatory approvals, we cannot assure you that any particular annual exchange will occur on the contemplated timeline or at all.

Table of Contents

Under our option agreement with respect to SPW, we may purchase certain profits interests of SPW and the purchase price for such purchases may be substantial.

In November 2022, we entered into arrangements under which certain members of the SPW management team received a profits interest in SPW and concurrently entered into an option agreement which provides that (i) we have the right to acquire the profits interest at the end of any fiscal quarter after June 30, 2027 in exchange for payment of a call price and (ii) the SPW management team, through an entity named CH Equity Partners, LLC, has the right to put the profits interest to us on June 30, 2026 or at the end of any fiscal quarter thereafter, in exchange for payment of a put price. The applicable call or put price is, in certain circumstances, subject to an earn-out or earn-down. The call or put price will be payable in cash unless we elect to pay up to 75% of the consideration in units of the Partnership, each to be exchangeable into shares of our Class A common stock, and, in either case, rights under one or more tax receivable agreements. If the put is exercised, or if we exercise our call, the consideration under the option agreement may be substantial. We may need to seek equity or debt financing to fund the applicable exercise price.

As of March 31, 2026, based on the fair value of the liability classified awards, the estimated minimum and maximum amount of cash that would be potentially payable to settle the liability in the event of a call or put was $564.4 million and $2,257.6 million, respectively. Certain assumptions used in determining the fair value are inherently subjective; therefore, the ultimate settlement amount for the liability classified awards may differ materially from the current estimate.

We may acquire additional businesses or assets or form joint ventures.

As part of our business strategy, we may pursue additional acquisitions of complementary businesses or assets or seek to enter into joint ventures. These acquisitions or joint ventures would be intended to leverage our existing operations and industry experience or increase our product offerings. The success of any acquisitions, joint ventures or other investments will depend on our ability to identify, negotiate, complete and, in the case of acquisitions, integrate those transactions and, if necessary, obtain satisfactory financing to fund those transactions. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, joint venture or investment. We may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business, maintain the key business relationships of businesses we acquire, or retain key personnel of an acquired business, and we could assume unknown or contingent liabilities or incur unanticipated expenses. Integration of acquired companies or businesses also may require management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our existing business, or integration may not succeed, leading to a failure to realize anticipated benefits. Any acquisitions or investments made by us also could harm our results of operations, including as a result of significant write-offs or the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities. In addition, if we choose to issue equity to fund an acquisition, our stockholders may experience dilution.

Table of Contents

Current or future indebtedness may expose us to substantial risks.

We are party to a Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and certain other lenders party thereto. In fiscal 2025, we issued $175 million in Series A senior notes which mature in October 2029. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Revolving Credit Facility” and note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for more information. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement and the Senior Notes, or any future debt we undertake, will expose us to the typical risks associated with the use of leverage. Significant future borrowings could make it more difficult for us to withstand adverse economic conditions or business plan variances, to take advantage of new business opportunities, or to make necessary capital expenditures. Any portion of our cash flow required for debt service will not be available for our operations, distributions, dividends or other purposes. Any substantial decrease in net operating cash flows or any substantial increase in expenses could make it difficult for us to meet our debt service requirements or force us to modify our operations. Restrictive covenants in agreements and instruments governing our current and future debt may adversely affect our ability to operate our business or limit our ability to engage in certain transactions or activities, including paying dividends or making other distributions on our Class A common stock. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain leverage levels in compliance with such covenants. Any failure to comply with these financial and other covenants, if not waived, could cause a default or event of default under such indebtedness.

We are subject to risks in using custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents.

Many of our funds depend on the services of custodians, counterparties, administrators and other agents to carry out certain securities and derivatives transactions and other administrative services. We are subject to risks of errors and mistakes made by these third parties, which may be attributed to us and subject us or our clients to reputational damage, penalties or losses. The terms of the contracts with these third-party service providers are often customized and complex, and many of these arrangements occur in markets or relate to products that are not subject to regulatory oversight. We may be unsuccessful in seeking reimbursement or indemnification from these third-party service providers.

Our funds are subject to the risk that the counterparty to one or more of these contracts defaults, either voluntarily or involuntarily, on its performance under the contract. Any such default may occur suddenly and without notice to us. Moreover, if a counterparty defaults, we may be unable to take action to cover our exposure, either because we lack contractual recourse or because market conditions make it difficult to take effective action. This inability could occur in times of market stress, which is when defaults are most likely to occur. In addition, our risk-management models may not accurately anticipate the effects of market stress or counterparty financial condition, and as a result, we may not have taken sufficient action to reduce our risks effectively. Default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect, foresee or evaluate. In addition, concerns about, or a default by, one large participant could lead to significant liquidity problems for other participants or the broader market, which may in turn expose us to significant losses.

In the event of a counterparty default, particularly a default by a major investment bank or a default by a counterparty to a significant number of our contracts, one or more of our funds may have outstanding trades that they cannot settle or are delayed in settling. As a result, these funds could incur material losses and the resulting market impact of a major counterparty default could harm our business, financial condition and results of operation.

In the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of a custodian, counterparty or any other party that is holding assets of our funds as collateral, our funds might not be able to recover equivalent assets in full as they will rank among the custodian’s or counterparty’s unsecured creditors in relation to the assets held as collateral. In addition, our funds’ cash held with a custodian or counterparty generally will not be segregated from the custodian’s or counterparty’s own cash, and our funds may therefore rank as unsecured creditors in relation thereto.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Industry

The investment management and investment advisory business is intensely competitive.

The investment management and investment advisory business is intensely competitive, with competition based on a variety of factors, including investment performance, the quality of service provided to clients, brand recognition and business reputation. We compete with a variety of traditional and private markets managers, commercial banks, investment banks and other financial institutions. Many factors affect our ability to compete successfully, including:

• some of our competitors have more relevant experience, greater financial and other resources and more personnel than we do;

• if, as we expect, allocation of assets to private markets investment strategies increases, there may be increased competition for private markets investments and access to fund managers;

• certain clients may prefer to invest with private partnerships rather than a public company; and

• other industry participants from time to time recruit our investment professionals and other employees away from us.

This competitive pressure could adversely affect our ability to make successful investments and restrict our ability to raise future funds, either of which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Difficult or volatile market and political conditions can adversely affect our business by reducing the market value of the assets we manage, causing our clients to reduce their investments in private markets, reducing the number of high-quality investment managers with whom we may invest, and reducing the ability of our funds to raise or deploy capital.

The global financial markets and business climate have recently deteriorated and may continue to deteriorate, including due to continued rising interest rates, ongoing high inflation, reduced availability of credit, regional and international bank failures, changes in laws and regulation, trade policies, such as tariffs or other protectionist measures and retaliatory measures, terrorism or political uncertainty, war (including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine and Middle East conflicts), and potential recession. For example, while inflation in the U.S. has stabilized, it remains higher than pandemic levels and could increase. In addition, heightened competition for workers, supply chain issues, tariffs and rising energy and commodity prices have contributed to increasing wages and other inputs, which may put pressure on the profit margins of portfolio companies within our private market funds. Additionally, volatility and disruption in the equity and credit markets, including the concentration of public-market valuations in a limited number of sectors such as AI-related companies or those companies whose strategies are more directly and negatively affected by AI, can adversely affect the portfolio companies in which private markets funds invest and adversely affect the investment performance of the StepStone Funds and advisory accounts.

Table of Contents

The extent and impact of any sanctions imposed in connection with geopolitical conflicts may also cause additional financial market volatility and impact the global economy. For example, sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or potential measures targeting other regions can disrupt global trade and supply chains. Additionally, recently the U.S. has instituted new economic and trade sanctions against China, in response to which China issued countermeasures against U.S. companies. The restrictions on investment in and trade with China may have a negative effect on some of our portfolio companies along with creating weakness in the global economy. The recent escalations of conflicts in the Middle East have the potential to negatively affect supply chains beyond oil and gas, also affecting many derivative and byproducts such as fertilizer, helium, sulfur, etc., negatively impacting portfolio companies in various industries. In addition, heightened geopolitical tensions in the Taiwan Strait and other regions could result in significant disruption to global supply chains, particularly with respect to semiconductors and other business-critical products, which could adversely affect portfolio company operations and valuations.

Our ability to manage our exposure to market conditions is limited. Market deterioration could cause us, the StepStone Funds we manage or the funds in which they invest to experience reduced liquidity, earnings and cash flow, recognize impairment charges, or face challenges in raising additional capital, obtaining investment financing and making investments on attractive terms. Adverse market conditions can also affect our ability and the ability of funds in which we and our clients invest to liquidate positions in a timely and efficient manner. More costly and restrictive financing also may adversely affect the investment returns of our co-investments in leveraged buyout transactions and, therefore, adversely affect the results of operations and financial condition of our co-investment funds.

Our business may generate lower revenue as a result of recent and prospective economic contractions, decreases in equity markets and tightening of global credit markets. These events may result in reduced opportunities to find suitable investments and make it more difficult for us, or for the funds in which we and our clients invest, to exit and realize value from existing investments, potentially resulting in a decline in the value of the investments held in our clients’ portfolios. Such a decline could cause our revenue and net income to decline by causing some of our clients to reduce their investments in private markets in favor of investments they perceive as offering greater opportunity or lower risk, which would result in lower fees being paid to us.

These events may also reduce the commitments our clients are able to devote to private markets investments generally and make it more difficult for the funds in which we invest to obtain funding for additional investments at attractive rates, which would further reduce our profitability.

Our profitability may also be adversely affected by our fixed costs and the possibility that we would be unable to reduce other costs within a time frame sufficient to match any decreases in revenue relating to changes in market and economic conditions. If our revenue declines without a commensurate reduction in our expenses, our net income will be lower.

In addition, regulatory oversight and enforcement may become more rigorous for public companies in general, and for the financial services industry in particular, as a result of the recent volatility in the financial markets. See “—Evolving laws and government regulations could adversely affect us.”

Table of Contents

A major public health crisis could severely disrupt the global financial markets and business climate and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A major public health crisis can have unpredictable and adverse impacts on global, national and local economies. Disruptions to commercial activity (such as the imposition of quarantines or travel restrictions) or, more generally, a failure to contain or effectively manage a public health crisis, has, and may in the future, adversely impact our business activity and that of the StepStone Funds. For example, such disruptions have adversely affected, and in the future could again adversely affect, our ability to effectively identify, monitor, make or dispose of investments. Additionally, any future public health crisis could contribute to extreme volatility in financial markets. Such volatility could adversely affect the business of StepStone and the StepStone Funds and the portfolio companies in which they invest, all of which could have material and adverse effect on our performance.

We operate in an industry subject to numerous regulations and any failure to comply with government regulations to which we are subject could adversely affect us.

We are subject to numerous regulations that may impact our business model. In the United States, our advisory and investment management businesses are subject to regulation by the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and other regulatory agencies, pursuant to, among other laws, the Investment Advisers Act, the Investment Company Act, the Securities Act, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Exchange Act.

The Partnership, along with certain of our consolidated subsidiaries, is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC and is subject to the requirements and regulations of the Investment Advisers Act. Such requirements include, among other things, maintaining an effective compliance program, restrictions on performance fees, solicitation arrangements and marketing materials, allocation of investments, recordkeeping, reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on agency cross and principal transactions between an adviser and their advisory clients, as well as fiduciary duties and general anti-fraud prohibitions. A failure to comply with the obligations imposed by the Investment Advisers Act could result in investigations, sanctions and reputational damage, and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and business reputation.

The SEC has continued its close scrutiny of the asset management and private equity industries, focusing on private equity fees, expen se allocations, investment allocations, client disclosures, broken-deal expenses, conflicts of interest, valuation practices and other fiduciary obligations. The lack of readily ascertainable market prices for many of the investments made by the StepStone Funds or the funds in which we invest could subject our valuation policies and processes to increased scrutiny by the SEC. The SEC has also focused on the “retailization” of private equity. Although it supports expanding retail investor access to private equity and other private markets products, it has emphasized that such access should occur through regulated structures and with enhanced safeguards for less sophisticated investors. As we continue to grow our distribution of funds targeted at private wealth investors we may face increased regulatory and compliance risk.

Table of Contents

In May 2024, the SEC adopted amendments to Regulation S-P (the privacy regulations applicable to financial institutions, including investment advisers) that expanded the scope of the regulation and mandate notification to clients and customers in the event of privacy breaches. These amendments, with which we were required to comply by December 2025, impose operationally challenging notification requirements and deadlines, and require additional written policies and oversight procedures. The SEC has also adopted disclosure rules related to cybersecurity applicable to public companies. In addition, the SEC and FinCEN jointly adopted a new rule requiring investment advisers to adopt formal anti-money laundering and customer identification programs. In June 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice adopted a rule restricting certain bulk sensitive personal data transfers and access involving countries of concern, which may further increase our compliance obligations. Bringing our firm into compliance with these new rules (and any others adopted by the SEC or other governmental authorities), could result in a significant increase in the compliance risks and regulatory burden of operating our business.

Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of our registration as an investment adviser. Even if a sanction imposed against us or our personnel is small in monetary amount, the adverse publicity arising from the imposition of sanctions against us by regulators could harm our reputation and cause us to lose existing clients or fail to gain new clients. Additionally, legislation, including proposed legislation regarding executive compensation and taxation of carried interest, may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel. See “Business—Regulatory Environment.”

To the extent that the Partnership is a “fiduciary” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), with respect to benefit plan clients, it is subject to ERISA, and to regulations promulgated thereunder. ERISA and applicable provisions of the Code impose certain duties on persons who are fiduciaries under ERISA, prohibit certain transactions involving ERISA plan clients and provide monetary penalties for violations of these prohibitions. Our failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, a court could find that one of our co-investment funds has formed a partnership-in-fact conducting a trade or business and would therefore be jointly and severally liable for the portfolio company’s unfunded pension liabilities.

As noted in “Business—Regulatory Environment—Foreign Regulation,” we provide investment advisory and other services and raise funds in a number of countries and jurisdictions outside the United States. We continue to assess the impact of evolving regulatory developments outside of the United States on our business including, but not limited to, the revised EU regime for alternative investment fund managers, the new EU anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing regime, EU rules relating to digital operational resilience for the financial sector (including the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act (“DORA”)), the U.K. Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, and the new EU framework for the collation and publication of sustainability information in annual reporting. These and other evolving privacy, cybersecurity and AI regimes may increase our compliance burden and affect our distribution and operations.

In addition, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) impose stringent data protection requirements, and we are also subject to additional national and state privacy laws. There are substantial financial penalties for breach of the GDPR, including up to the higher of 20 million Euros or 4% of group annual worldwide turnover. Non-compliance with GDPR, CCPA or similar regulation enacted elsewhere therefore represents a serious risk to our business.

Our private wealth investment platform is subject to additional regulatory requirements that could adversely impact its profitability. We have been expanding our offerings to individual investors, including through our private wealth platform, and intend to continue doing so. Expanding our product offerings to individual investors may subject us to increased litigation, regulatory enforcement and compliance risks, given that individual investors are generally afforded greater regulatory protections than institutional investors, may have less sophistication or experience with private markets investments, and may be more likely to bring claims or complaints. The operational

Table of Contents

complexity, administration and accounting requirements associated with servicing individual investors, including in non-U.S. jurisdictions, may also be greater than those for institutional investors. Certain U.S. funds we offer to private wealth investors are registered investment companies or business development companies under the Investment Company Act (the “Registered Funds”) and we expect that additional funds we offer will also be Registered Funds under the Investment Company Act or applicable laws in other jurisdictions. The Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder contain detailed parameters for the organization and operation of our Registered Funds. Among other things, the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder limit or prohibit transactions with affiliates, impose limitations on the issuance of debt and equity securities, generally prohibit the issuance of options and impose stringent governance and board independence requirements. In addition, we depend on third parties to assist us in complying with regulatory obligations with respect to our Registered Funds. With respect to non-traded products offered to individual investors, we may be subject to risk arising from increased participation in share repurchase programs or tender offers, which could adversely affect fund liquidity and our ability to manage such products effectively.

Requirements imposed by the Investment Company Act, including limitations on capital structure, the ability to transact business with affiliates and the ability to compensate senior employees, or the failure of our third-party vendors to assist us with required compliance could materially and adversely affect our businesses, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, if we fail to comply with any of the regulations that we are subject to, we could be subject to enforcement actions, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Evolving laws and government regulations could adversely affect us.

Governmental regulation of the global financial markets and financial institutions is intense and is continually evolving. This includes regulation of investment funds, as well as their managers and activities, through the implementation of compliance, risk management and anti-money laundering procedures; restrictions on specific types of investments and the provision and use of leverage; capital requirements; limitations on compensation to fund managers; and books and records, reporting and disclosure requirements. The effects on us, the StepStone Funds, or on private markets funds generally, of future regulation, or of changes in the interpretation and enforcement of existing regulation, could have an adverse effect on the StepStone Funds’ investment strategies or our business model. Policy changes and regulatory reform by the U.S. federal government may create regulatory uncertainty for our funds’ portfolio companies and our investment strategies and adversely affect the profitability of the StepStone Funds’ portfolio companies.

Ongoing political developments could adversely impact our investment management and investment advisory businesses. The financial services industry is currently experiencing an uncertain political and regulatory environment, under the current U.S. presidential administration. The administration has signaled its intent to revisit and potentially roll back certain regulatory initiatives enacted under the previous administration while simultaneously increasing scrutiny on areas such as foreign investment, national security, and the use of emerging technologies. The current administration and the current leadership of the SEC have indicated that they intend to modify or repeal certain regulations perceived as burdensome to private fund advisers, particularly those related to sustainability investing and cybersecurity. However, the administration has also proposed new rules aimed at increasing transparency and accountability, such as expanded disclosure requirements for private fund advisers and enhanced oversight of investment practices involving artificial intelligence and digital assets. The SEC and other regulatory bodies are expected to propose additional changes in the future. Any such changes, including with modifications, whether enacted under current or future leadership, could have a significant effect on private funds and private fund advisers and their operations, including increasing compliance burdens and regulatory costs, restrictions on the ability to receive expense, indemnification and other cost reimbursements, and heightened risk of regulatory enforcement action such as public sanctions, restrictions on activities, fines and reputational damage.

Table of Contents

Additionally, there is a growing focus on digital asset regulation, with new rules expected to impact the use of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies in private fund operations. Any of the foregoing could lead to further regulatory uncertainty, result in changes to our operations and could materially impact our funds and/or their investments (including the funds in which the StepStone Funds and our clients invests) and/or us, including by causing us to incur additional expenses.

Governmental policy changes and regulatory or tax reform could also have a material effect on our funds. For example, regulatory or tax reform in jurisdictions where we may be conducting business (including jurisdictions in which we have established StepStone Funds, such as the Cayman Islands) and jurisdictions in which our clients or investors in StepStone Funds are located may increase administrative costs, increase taxes borne by StepStone Funds or our clients or investors, or otherwise adversely affect our funds or our ability to successfully fundraise on behalf of our funds. A prolonged environment of regulatory uncertainty may make the identification of attractive investment opportunities and the deployment of capital more challenging. In addition, our ability to identify business and other risks associated with new investments depends in part on our ability to anticipate and accurately assess regulatory and other changes that may have a material effect on the businesses in which we choose to invest. The failure to accurately predict the possible outcome of policy changes and regulatory reform could have a material adverse effect on the returns generated from our funds’ investments and our revenues.

The United States has imposed tariffs on various products imported into the United States. These tariffs have resulted in, and may continue to trigger, retaliatory actions by affected countries, including the imposition of tariffs on the United States by other countries. Trade policy has been a central focus, with renewed scrutiny on trade relationships with China and efforts to renegotiate or withdraw from key agreements such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This shift has included the potential for additional tariffs, including on Mexican, Canadian and Chinese goods, targeted sanctions, and restrictions on investments linked to industries deemed critical to U.S. national security. Certain foreign governments, such as China, Canada and Mexico, have instituted or are considering imposing trade sanctions on certain U.S. goods and denying U.S. companies access to critical raw materials. Governmental actions related to the imposition of tariffs, sanctions or other trade barriers or changes to international trade agreements or policies, such as USMCA, could increase costs, decrease margins, reduce the competitiveness of products and services offered by current and future portfolio companies and adversely affect the revenues and profitability of companies whose businesses rely on goods imported from outside of the United States. Additionally, there may be potential future U.S. measures targeting supply chain dependencies on China, including additional restrictions on technology exports and proposed incentives to relocate manufacturing to the United States or allied nations. If we do not adequately monitor and adapt sufficiently to changes in policy and the regulations to which we are or may become subject, we could be subject to enforcement actions, which may materially and adversely affect our businesses, financial condition and results of operations.

On March 30, 2026, the DOL proposed a rule establishing a process based “safe harbor” for plan fiduciaries selecting designated investment alternatives for participant directed defined contribution plans. If adopted, the rule could facilitate an ability for individuals to allocate a portion of their 401(k) investments in alternative assets, such as private equity and private credit, as well as real estate. However, we may encounter significant competition from products tailored for 401(k) plan distribution, and if we, or our service providers, cannot meet plan fiduciaries’ process expectations, or if products designed for this channel underperform or do not meet plan participants’ investment needs, plan fiduciaries may exclude or remove such offerings from investment options, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Future changes to tax laws or our effective tax rate could materially adversely affect our company and reduce net returns to our stockholders.

Our tax treatment is subject to the enactment of, or changes in, tax laws, regulations and treaties, or the interpretation thereof, tax policy initiatives and reforms under consideration and the practices of tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we operate, including those related to the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) Project

Table of Contents

of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (“OECD”), the European Commission’s state aid investigations and other initiatives. Such changes may include (but are not limited to) the taxation of operating income, investment income, dividends received or (in the specific context of withholding tax) dividends paid, or the taxation of partnerships and other passthrough entities. In addition, the Group of Twenty, the OECD, the U.S. Congress and Treasury Department and other government agencies in jurisdictions where we and our affiliates do business have focused on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations, including, but not limited to, transfer pricing, country-by-country reporting and base erosion. The OECD has finalized guidelines under the Pillar Two framework that recommend certain multinational enterprises be subject to a minimum 15% tax rate, effective from 2024, and many jurisdictions have enacted, or are in the process of enacting, rules intended to implement these standards. In January 2026, the OECD Inclusive Framework released a “Side-by-Side Package,” which is intended to facilitate coordination of the Pillar Two global minimum tax with existing U.S. and other domestic tax regimes and includes, among other items, a permanent simplified effective tax rate safe harbor, an extension of the transitional country-by-country reporting safe harbor and a substance-based tax incentive safe harbor. In addition, all member states of the European Union have enacted Pillar Two rules. The United States has not adopted domestic Pillar Two rules, and the current U.S. administration has signaled opposition to aspects of Pillar Two, including the “undertaxed profits rule” (“UTPR”), which some foreign jurisdictions may apply in a manner that could increase the tax burden and compliance requirements of U.S.-parented groups. Foreign jurisdictions’ implementation of the UTPR could raise compliance complications for us and our operating entities and investments. This minimum tax and several of the proposed measures are potentially relevant to some of our operating entities and investments and could have an adverse tax impact on our funds, investors and/or our funds’ portfolio companies. As a result, the tax laws in the United States and other countries in which we and our affiliates do business could change on a prospective or retroactive basis, and any such changes could have an adverse effect on our worldwide tax liabilities, business, financial condition and results of operations. Some member countries have been moving forward on the BEPS agenda but, because timing of implementation and the specific measures adopted will vary among participating states, significant uncertainty remains regarding the impact of BEPS proposals. If implemented, these proposals could result in a loss of tax treaty benefits and increased taxes on income from our operations and/or investments. We are unable to predict what tax reform may be proposed or enacted in the future or what effect such changes would have on our business, but such changes, to the extent they are brought into tax legislation, regulations, policies or practices, could affect our financial position and overall or effective tax rates in the future in countries where we have operations, reduce post-tax returns to our stockholders, and increase the complexity, burden and cost of tax compliance.

Our businesses are subject to income taxation in the United States, as well as in many tax jurisdictions throughout the world. Tax rates in these jurisdictions may be subject to significant change. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 imposes, among other things, a new excise tax on stock repurchases which could adversely impact the amount and/or timing of tax we may be required to pay. If our effective tax rate increases, our results of operations and cash flow could be adversely affected. Our effective income tax rate can vary significantly between periods due to a number of complex factors including, but not limited to, projected levels of taxable income in each jurisdiction, tax audits conducted and settled by various tax authorities, and adjustments to income taxes upon finalization of income tax returns.

Table of Contents

We may be required to pay additional taxes under the Centralized Partnership Audit Regime.

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, the Partnership is subject to partnership audit rules enacted as part of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the “Centralized Partnership Audit Regime”). Under the Centralized Partnership Audit Regime, any IRS audit of the Partnership would be conducted at the Partnership level, and if the IRS determines an adjustment, the default rule is that the Partnership would pay an “imputed underpayment” including interest and penalties, if applicable. The Partnership may instead elect to make a “push-out” election, in which case the partners for the year that is under audit would be required to take into account the adjustments on their own personal income tax returns. We will decide whether or not to cause the Partnership to make this election; however, there are circumstances in which the election may not be available and, in the case of an entity in which the Partnership directly or indirectly invests, such decision may be outside of our control. If the Partnership or an entity in which the Partnership directly or indirectly invests does not make this election, the then-current partners of the Partnership (including SSG) could economically bear the burden of the understatement.

Audit adjustments for state or local tax purposes could similarly result in the Partnership (or any of its applicable subsidiaries or other entities in which the Partnership directly or indirectly invests) being required to pay or indirectly bear the economic burden of state or local taxes and associated interest, and penalties.

Federal, state and foreign anti-corruption and sanctions laws create the potential for significant liabilities and penalties and reputational harm.

We are subject to laws and regulations governing payments and contributions to political persons or other third parties, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) as well as trade sanctions and export control laws administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Department of State. The FCPA is intended to prohibit bribery of foreign governments and their officials and political parties and requires public companies in the United States to keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect those companies’ transactions. OFAC, the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Department of State administer and enforce various export control laws and regulations, including economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations and individuals. These laws and regulations affect a number of aspects of our business, including servicing existing clients, finding new clients, and sourcing new investments, as well as activities by the portfolio companies in our investment portfolio or other controlled investments.

Similar laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions, such as EU sanctions or the United Kingdom (“UK”) Bribery Act, as well as other applicable anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, or sanction or other export control laws in the United States and abroad, may also impose stricter or more onerous requirements than the FCPA, OFAC, the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Department of State, and implementing them may disrupt our business or cause us to incur significantly more costs to comply with those laws. In addition, the U.S. and other countries have begun imposing sanctions on Russia in connection with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, which may impact us, StepStone Funds and our portfolio companies to a degree which remains uncertain. Different laws contain conflicting provisions and continue to evolve, making compliance with all laws more difficult. Because different interpretations for current sanctions law may exist, we could become involved in disputes with respect to actions taken in compliance with our understanding of such laws. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could face claims for damages, civil or criminal financial penalties, reputational harm, incarceration of our employees, restrictions on our operations and other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may be subject to successor liability for FCPA violations or other acts of bribery, or violations of applicable sanctions or other export control laws committed by companies in which we or our funds invest or which we or our funds acquire. While we have developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to promote strict compliance by us and our personnel with the FCPA and other anti-corruption, sanctions and export control laws in jurisdictions in which we operate, such policies and procedures may not be effective in all instances to prevent violations. Any determination that we have violated the

Table of Contents

FCPA or other applicable anti-corruption, sanctions or export control laws could subject us to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties, material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation and a general loss of client confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we are subject to the UK Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (“ECCTA”), which makes fundamental changes to the UK’s approach to tackling financial crime. Most significantly, ECCTA introduces new law governing the attribution of criminal liability to corporate entities, which came into force on December 26, 2023, and a new corporate offense of failure to prevent fraud, which came into force on September 1, 2025. Guidance relating to the offense of failure to prevent fraud was published on November 6, 2024. Our compliance policies and procedures will need to be reviewed and updated in order to ensure we have appropriate systems and controls in place to cover these changes to the law. If appropriate systems and controls are not properly implemented, or if we fail to comply with any of the regulations that we are subject to, we could be subject to enforcement actions, which may materially and adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulation of investment advisers outside the United States could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

We provide investment advisory and other services and raise funds in a number of countries and jurisdictions outside the United States. In a number of these countries and jurisdictions, which include the UK, the EU, the EEA, Switzerland, Japan, Korea, Canada, Colombia, Chile, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore, our operations, and in some cases our personnel, are subject to regulatory oversight and affirmative requirements. These requirements variously relate to registration, licenses for our personnel, periodic inspections, the provision and filing of periodic reports, and obtaining certifications and other approvals. In the EU, we are subject to the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) and the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (“UCITS”) under which we are subject to regulatory requirements regarding, among other things, registration for marketing activities, the structure of remuneration for certain of our personnel and reporting obligations. Switzerland and the individual member states of the EU have imposed additional requirements that may include internal arrangements with respect to risk management, liquidity risks, asset valuations, and the establishment and security of depository and custodial requirements. In certain other jurisdictions, we are subject to various securities and other laws relating to fundraising and other matters. As we expand into additional countries and jurisdictions, we may become subject to additional regulatory oversight and related compliance obligations. Failure to maintain compliance with applicable laws and regulations could result in regulatory intervention, adversely affect our business or ability to provide services to our clients and harm our reputation. In certain jurisdictions, including emerging markets jurisdictions, StepStone believes it operates appropriately under exceptions to applicable financial regulations. If, however, a regulator disagrees with our approach or interpretations, we could be subject to sanctions or fines and related reputational harm, or be limited in our ability to access such markets.

The European Union Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) requires, among other things, all MiFID II investment firms to comply with more prescriptive disclosure, transparency, reporting and recordkeeping obligations and enhanced obligations in relation to the receipt of investment research, best execution, product governance and marketing communications. As we operate investment firms that are subject to MiFID II (including as applicable in the UK), we were required to implement revised policies and procedures to comply with MiFID II where relevant, including where certain rules have an extraterritorial impact on us. Compliance with MiFID II has, therefore, resulted in greater overall complexity, higher compliance, administration and operational costs, and less overall flexibility.

Table of Contents

These laws and regulations may affect our costs and manner of conducting business in one or more markets, the risks of doing business, the assets that we manage or advise, and our ability to raise capital from clients. Any failure by us to comply with either existing or new laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to divergent views of investors and differing approaches by governmental authorities in respect of the incorporation of sustainability-related factors in our investment and portfolio management process as well as human capital management, which may affect certain investors’ decision to commit or recommit capital to, or constrain investment opportunities for, our funds or subject us to increased regulatory scrutiny and compliance costs.

In recent years, certain investors have placed increasing importance on sustainability implications of private markets investments to which they commit capital. Certain investors have also demonstrated increased advocacy with respect to existing investments, including by urging asset managers to take certain actions that could adversely affect the value of an investment, or refrain from taking certain actions that could improve the value of an investment. At times, clients have conditioned future capital commitments on the taking or refraining from taking of such actions. Such clients’ focus and advocacy related to sustainability and similar matters may constrain investment opportunities we evaluate for them. In addition, institutional clients may decide to not commit capital to future fundraises as a result of their assessment of our approach to and consideration of the sustainability-related cost of investments made by us. Conversely, certain investors have raised concerns as to whether the incorporation of sustainability-related factors in the investment and portfolio management process may be inconsistent with the fiduciary duty to maximize returns for investors. Anti-“ESG” sentiment has gained momentum across the United States, with several states having enacted or proposed “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or issued related legal opinions. For example, (i) boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or “discriminate against” companies in certain industries and prohibit state entities from doing business with such institutions and/or investing the state’s assets (including pension plan assets) through such institutions; and (ii) ESG investment prohibitions require that state entities or managers/administrators of state investments make investments based solely on pecuniary factors without consideration of ESG factors. If fund investors subject to such legislation viewed our funds or sustainability practices as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, even though such view or perception may not be accurate, we may not be able to maintain or increase the size of our funds or raise sufficient capital for new funds, which may adversely affect our revenues. In addition, a failure to successfully manage sustainability-related expectations may adversely affect our reputation or erode stakeholder trust.

There has also been increasing focus by governmental authorities, investors, customers, activists, the media, governmental and non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders on a variety of human capital management matters. In January 2025, the current U.S. Presidential administration signed a number of executive orders focused on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) programs, which include a broad mandate to eliminate federal DEI programs and a caution to the private sector to end what may be viewed as illegal discrimination and preferences. Some U.S. states have followed suit, similarly cautioning against practices which may be viewed as illegal discrimination and preferences. The Executive Orders also indicate upcoming compliance investigations of private entities, including publicly traded corporations, foundations with assets of $500 million or more and institutions of higher education with endowments exceeding $1 billion, and changes to federal contracting regulations. In May 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) issued a memorandum announcing the Civil Rights Initiative, which aims to use the False Claims Act (the “FCA”) to investigate and “pursue claims against any recipient of federal funds that knowingly violates federal civil rights laws” via “racist preferences, mandates, ... and activities,” including DEI programs. The initiative covers all federal-funding recipients or contractors that certify compliance with civil rights laws, and will involve collaboration among federal and state law enforcement agencies. The memorandum directs divisions within the DOJ to establish partnerships with state attorneys general and local law enforcement to share information and coordinate enforcement activities and further highlights that Congress

Table of Contents

authorized private parties to litigate FCA claims and to share in any monetary recovery. A number of our contracts with state pensions require us to comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations. As a result of such developments, we may be increasingly subject to competing demands or expectations from different governmental authorities, regulators, clients, investors, and other stakeholders or third parties with divergent views and, if we fail to meet, or are perceived to fail to meet such competing demands or expectations, clients may reduce their investment with us and we may be subject to investigation, significant fines and penalties, and risk of litigation.

Sustainability and corporate responsibility matters have also been the subject of increased focus by regulators, including in the EU, the UK and the U.S. For example, the European Commission has adopted regulations as part of a package of legislative measures arising from its Action Plan on Sustainable Finance, which include, without limitation: (a) The Disclosure Regulation EU 2019/2088 regarding the introduction of transparency and disclosure obligations for investors, funds and asset managers in relation to sustainability, which took effect beginning on March 10, 2021 and (b) The Taxonomy Regulation EU 2020/852 regarding the introduction of EU-wide taxonomy of environmentally sustainable activities, which entered into force on July 12, 2020. These and other proposals have resulted in the Non-Financial Disclosure Regulation, EU Taxonomy Regulation and the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation. These legislative developments require additional disclosures to clients with respect to sustainability and corporate responsibility factors, which may increase our compliance obligations and expenses, and could lead clients to not commit or recommit capital in our funds. Our EU-based business, as well as any global product sales into the EU, is subject to these requirements. In November 2023, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) published final rules on its Sustainable Disclosure Requirements (“SDR”), introducing new rules and guidance for asset managers to make mandatory disclosures at both the manager and product levels, which aim to address potential greenwashing risks through the introduction of sustainable investment labels, disclosure requirements and restrictions on the use of sustainability-related terms in product naming and marketing, as well as through the introduction of disclosures consistent with the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”). The FCA has stated that it intends to further expand the SDR and labelling rules in the future. Further, the UK is expected to create UK Sustainability Disclosure Standards (“UK SDS”) based on the sustainable disclosure standards developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board (“ISSB”). In the likely event that divergent sustainable investing disclosure obligations arise between the U.S., UK and the EU, this may also present an increased compliance risk if we are required to comply with different regulatory standards. In the U.S., the SEC adopted climate-related disclosure rules for public companies; however, such rules have been subject to litigation, and the SEC has elected to end its defense of such rules and stayed their implementation. Furthermore, the SEC recently indicated that it has initiated steps to rescind the rules. Additionally, California enacted SB 253 and SB 261, which impose climate reporting requirements, including requirements related to greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risk. Certain provisions of these California statutes have been the subject of judicial challenge, including an injunction issued with respect to SB 261, and the ultimate scope and enforceability of these requirements remain uncertain. Other states have proposed similar legislation, although the current U.S. presidential administration has identified deregulation of greenhouse gas emissions as a priority, including at the state level.

Additionally, a lack of harmonization globally in relation to sustainability and corporate responsibility-related legal and regulatory reform, combined with ongoing revisions in many of the regulations noted above, leads to a risk of fragmentation in group level priorities across global jurisdictions. This may create conflicts across our global business which could risk inhibiting our future implementation of, and compliance with, rapidly developing standards and requirements. In addition, our brand and reputation are associated with our public commitments to various corporate ESG initiatives, including our goals for sustainability. Any failure or perceived failure to achieve our disclosed commitments could harm our reputation and adversely affect our client relationships or our recruitment and retention efforts. Moreover, positions we take or do not take on social issues may be unpopular with some of our employees or with our clients or potential clients, which may in the future impact our ability to attract or retain employees or clients. While we strive to implement sustainability practices, there can be no assurance that

Table of Contents

we will be able to identify all sustainability and corporate responsibility issues or will be able to successfully implement our sustainability and corporate responsibility policies. In addition, the use of sustainability and corporate responsibility metrics in the investment process could be subjective and they are not subject to uniform standards, and, as such, there is no guarantee that we will be able to accurately assess and measure the sustainability and corporate responsibility risks and compliance of its investments and potential investments. Sustainability-based exclusionary criteria could result in a StepStone Fund foregoing opportunities to make certain investments when it might otherwise be advantageous to do so, and/or selling certain investments due to their sustainability and corporate responsibility characteristics when it might be disadvantageous to do so. Devoting additional resources to sustainability and corporate responsibility matters could increase the amount of expenses we or our investments are required to bear. For example, collecting, measuring, and reporting sustainability and corporate responsibility information and metrics can be costly, difficult and time consuming, is subject to evolving reporting standards, and can present numerous operational, reputational, financial, legal and other risks. If we do not successfully manage expectations across these varied stakeholder interests, it could erode stakeholder trust, impact our reputation, and constrain our investment opportunities. Given increased U.S. and European legal and regulatory focus on sustainability and corporate responsibility matters, failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory changes may attract increased regulatory scrutiny of our business, and could result in fines and/or other sanctions being levied against us.

Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure

We were previously a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq Global Select Market listing standards and, as a result, we qualified for, and relied on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. As of September 18, 2025, we are no longer a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules and are required to comply with Nasdaq’s applicable corporate governance requirements no later than September 18, 2026. Unless and until we are fully compliant with such requirements, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

Prior to September 18, 2025, we qualified as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq Global Select Market, and, consequently, we previously qualified for, and relied on, certain exemptions from corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that (i) a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors, (ii) director nominees be selected or recommended to the board entirely by independent directors and (iii) the compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors. However, as of September 18, 2025, we are no longer a controlled company and thus these exemptions are no longer available to us, and we are required to come into compliance with Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements no later than September 18, 2026.

We do not currently satisfy all of Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements applicable to non-controlled companies, and, accordingly, we must take actions to achieve compliance by September 18, 2026. We currently do not have a majority of independent directors, our compensation committee does not consist entirely of independent directors, and our directors will not be nominated or selected entirely by independent directors. Accordingly, unless and until we have fully implemented changes necessary to comply with Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to, and compliant with, all of the corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Global Select Market.

Table of Contents

SSG depends on distributions from the Partnership to pay any dividends, if declared, taxes and other expenses, including payments under the Tax Receivable Agreements.

SSG is a holding company and its only business is to act as the managing member of the General Partner, and its only material assets are Class A units and 100% of the interests in the General Partner. SSG does not have any independent means of generating revenue. We anticipate that the Partnership will continue to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, generally will not be subject to any entity-level U.S. federal income tax. Instead, taxable income will be allocated to the partners of the Partnership. Accordingly, SSG will be required to pay income taxes on its allocable share of any net taxable income of the Partnership. We intend to cause the Partnership to make distributions to each of its partners, including SSG, in an amount intended to enable each partner to pay all applicable taxes on taxable income allocable to such partner and to allow SSG to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreements. In addition, the Partnership will reimburse SSG for corporate and other overhead expenses. If the amount of tax distributions to be made exceeds the amount of funds available for distribution, SSG will receive the full amount of its tax distribution before the other partners receive any distribution and the balance, if any, of funds available for distribution will be distributed to the other partners pro rata in accordance with their assumed tax liabilities. To the extent that SSG needs funds, and the Partnership is restricted from making such distributions under applicable laws or regulations, or is otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially and adversely affect SSG’s ability to pay dividends and taxes and other expenses, including payments under the Tax Receivable Agreements, and affect our liquidity and financial condition.

The IRS might challenge the tax basis step-ups and other tax benefits we receive in connection with our IPO and the related transactions and in connection with additional acquisitions of Partnership units.

Partnership units held directly by the partners of the Partnership other than SSG, including members of our senior leadership team, may in the future be exchanged for shares of our Class A common stock or, at our election, cash. Similar to our initial purchase of Partnership units, those exchanges may also result in increases in the tax basis of the assets of the Partnership that otherwise would not have been available. These increases in tax basis are expected to increase (for tax purposes) SSG’s depreciation and amortization and, together with other tax benefits, reduce the amount of tax that SSG would otherwise be required to pay, although it is possible that the IRS might challenge all or part of that tax basis increases or other tax benefits, and a court might sustain such a challenge. SSG’s ability to achieve benefits from any tax basis increases or other tax benefits will depend upon a number of factors, as discussed below, including the timing and amount of our future income.

We will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the Tax Receivable Agreements if the basis increases or other tax benefits described above are successfully challenged by the IRS or another taxing authority. As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under the Tax Receivable Agreements in excess of our ultimate cash tax savings.

In certain circumstances, payments under each Tax Receivable Agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual tax benefits, if any, that SSG actually realizes.

Each Tax Receivable Agreement provides that if (i) SSG exercises its right to early termination of such Tax Receivable Agreement in whole (that is, with respect to all benefits due to all beneficiaries under such Tax Receivable Agreement) or in part (that is, with respect to some benefits due to all beneficiaries under such Tax Receivable Agreement), (ii) SSG experiences certain changes in control, (iii) such Tax Receivable Agreement is rejected in certain bankruptcy proceedings, (iv) SSG fails (subject to certain exceptions) to make a payment under such Tax Receivable Agreement within 180 days after the due date or (v) SSG materially breaches its obligations under such Tax Receivable Agreement, SSG will be obligated to make an early termination payment to holders of rights under such Tax Receivable Agreement equal to the present value of all payments that would be required to be paid by SSG under such Tax Receivable Agreement. The amount of such payments will be determined on the basis of certain assumptions in each Tax Receivable Agreement, including (i) the assumption that SSG would have

Table of Contents

enough taxable income in the future to fully utilize the tax benefit resulting from the tax assets that are the subject of such Tax Receivable Agreement, (ii) the assumption that any item of loss deduction or credit generated by a basis adjustment or imputed interest arising in a taxable year preceding the taxable year that includes an early termination will be used by SSG ratably from such taxable year through the earlier of (x) the scheduled expiration of such tax item or (y) 15 years; (iii) in the case of the Reorganization Tax Receivable Agreement, the assumption that any net operating loss (and similar items) inherited from certain pre-IPO institutional investors (the “Blocker Companies”), will be used by SSG ratably from the taxable year that includes an early termination through the earlier of (x) the scheduled expiration of such net operating loss (or similar item) or (y) 15 years (or longer, to the extent that SSG is prevented from fully utilizing such net operating loss (or similar item) under certain U.S. federal income tax rules); (iv) the assumption that any non-amortizable assets are deemed to be disposed of in a fully taxable transaction on the fifteenth anniversary of the earlier of the basis adjustment and the early termination date; (v) the assumption that U.S. federal, state and local tax rates will be the same as in effect on the early termination date, unless scheduled to change and, solely with respect to the Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement; and (vi) the assumption that any units (other than those held by SSG) outstanding on the termination date are deemed to be exchanged for an amount equal to the market value of the corresponding number of shares of Class A common stock on the termination date. Any early termination payment may be made significantly in advance of the actual realization, if any, of the future tax benefits to which the termination payment relates. The amount of the early termination payment is determined by discounting the present value of all payments that would be required to be paid by SSG under such Tax Receivable Agreement at a rate equal to the lesser of (a) 6.5% and (b) the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, as reported by the Wall Street Journal (“SOFR”) plus 400 basis points.

Moreover, as a result of an elective early termination, a change in control or SSG’s material breach of its obligations under either Tax Receivable Agreement, SSG could be required to make payments under such Tax Receivable Agreement that exceed its actual cash savings under such Tax Receivable Agreement. Thus, SSG’s obligations under each Tax Receivable Agreement could have a substantial negative effect on its financial condition and liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business combinations or changes of control. We cannot assure you that we will be able to finance any such early termination payment. It is also possible that the actual benefits ultimately realized by us may be significantly less than were projected in the computation of the early termination payment. We will not be reimbursed if the actual benefits ultimately realized by us are less than were projected in the computation of the early termination payment.

Payments under each Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that we will determine and the IRS or another tax authority may challenge all or part of the tax basis increases or the inheritance of tax attributes from the Blocker Companies, as well as other related tax positions we take, and a court could sustain such challenge. If any tax benefits that have given rise to payments under either Tax Receivable Agreement are subsequently disallowed, SSG would be entitled to reduce future amounts otherwise payable to a holder of rights under such Tax Receivable Agreement to the extent such holder has received excess payments. However, the required final and binding determination that a holder of rights under a Tax Receivable Agreement has received excess payments may not be made for a number of years following commencement of any challenge, and SSG will not be permitted to reduce its payments under a Tax Receivable Agreement until there has been a final and binding determination, by which time sufficient subsequent payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may not be available to offset prior payments for disallowed benefits. SSG will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under either Tax Receivable Agreement if the basis increases described above are successfully challenged by the IRS or another taxing authority. As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under either Tax Receivable Agreement that are significantly in excess of the benefit that SSG actually realizes in respect of the increases in tax basis (and utilization of certain other tax benefits) and SSG may not be able to recoup those payments, which could adversely affect SSG’s financial condition and liquidity.

Table of Contents

In certain circumstances, the Partnership will be required to make distributions to us and the existing partners of the Partnership, and the distributions that the Partnership will be required to make may be substantial.

The Partnership is expected to continue to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, is not subject to U.S. federal income tax. Instead, taxable income will be allocated to partners, including SSG. Pursuant to the StepStone Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership will make tax distributions to its partners, including SSG, which generally will be pro rata based on the ownership of Partnership units, calculated using an assumed tax rate, to help each of the partners to pay taxes on that partner’s allocable share of the Partnership’s net taxable income. Under applicable tax rules, the Partnership is required to allocate net taxable income disproportionately to its partners in certain circumstances. Because tax distributions will be determined based on the partner who is allocated the largest amount of taxable income on a per unit basis and on an assumed tax rate that is the highest possible rate applicable to any partner, but will be made pro rata based on ownership of Partnership units, the Partnership will be required to make tax distributions that, in the aggregate, will likely exceed the amount of taxes that it would have paid if it were taxed on its net income at the assumed rate. In addition, changes to the deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m), including rules that may expand the scope of covered employees and aggregation across affiliated groups, could reduce deductible compensation and increase taxable income allocable to the Partnership and SSG, which could increase the amount of required tax distributions.

Funds used by the Partnership to satisfy its tax distribution obligations will not be available for reinvestment in our business. Moreover, the tax distributions the Partnership will be required to make may be substantial and may significantly exceed (as a percentage of the Partnership’s income) the overall effective tax rate applicable to a similarly situated corporate taxpayer. In addition, because these payments will be calculated with reference to an assumed tax rate, and because of the disproportionate allocation of net taxable income, these payments likely will significantly exceed the actual tax liability for many of the existing partners of the Partnership.

As a result of potential differences in the amount of net taxable income allocable to us and to the existing partners of the Partnership, as well as the use of an assumed tax rate in calculating the Partnership’s distribution obligations, we may receive distributions significantly in excess of our tax liabilities and obligations to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreements. We may choose to manage these excess distributions through a number of different approaches, including through the payment of dividends to our Class A common stockholders or by applying them to other corporate purposes.

We may be required to fund withholding tax upon certain exchanges of Class B or Class D units into shares of Class A common stock by non-U.S. holders.

In the event of a transfer by a non-U.S. transferor of an interest in a partnership that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, the transferee generally must withhold tax in an amount equal to 10% of the amount realized (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) by the transferor on such transfer absent an exception. Holders of Class B or Class D units include non-U.S. holders. The partners holding Class B or Class D units in the Partnership generally will be entitled to exchange such Class B or Class D units for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis or, at our election, for cash. To the extent withholding is required and we elect to deliver shares of Class A common stock (rather than cash), we may not have sufficient cash to satisfy such withholding obligation, and we may be required to incur additional indebtedness or sell shares of our Class A common stock in the open market to raise additional cash in order to satisfy our withholding tax obligations.

Table of Contents

We may have tax and other liabilities attributable to our pre-IPO investors as a result of certain reorganization transactions.

Certain of our pre-IPO institutional investors held their interests in the Partnership through entities that were taxable as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Before the IPO, SSG formed a new, first-tier merger subsidiary with respect to each Blocker Company. Contemporaneously with the IPO, each merger subsidiary merged with and into the respective Blocker Company, with the Blocker Company surviving. Immediately thereafter, each Blocker Company merged with and into SSG, with SSG surviving. In the Blocker Mergers, the 100% owners of the Blocker Companies acquired an aggregate of 9,112,500 shares of newly issued Class A common stock and the Company acquired a corresponding amount of Partnership units. As the successor to these merged entities, SSG generally succeeded to and became responsible for any outstanding or historical tax or other liabilities of the merged entities, including any liabilities incurred as a result of the mergers described in the previous sentence. Any such liabilities for which SSG is responsible could have an adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.

Pursuant to the regulations issued under Section 162(m) of the Code, SSG may not be permitted to deduct its distributive share of compensation expense to the extent that the compensation was paid by the Partnership to certain of SSG’s covered employees, potentially resulting in additional U.S. federal income tax liability for SSG and reducing cash available for distribution to SSG’s stockholders and/or for the payment of other expenses and obligations of SSG.

Section 162(m) of the Code disallows the deduction by any publicly held corporation of applicable employee compensation paid with respect to any covered employee to the extent that such compensation for the taxable year exceeds $1,000,000. A “covered employee” means any employee of the taxpayer if the employee (a) is the principal executive officer (“PEO”) or principal financial officer (“PFO”) of the taxpayer at any time during the taxable year, or was an individual acting in such a capacity, (b) was among the three highest compensated officers for the taxable year (other than the PEO and PFO) required to be disclosed in the proxy statement, (c) was among the five next highest compensated employees for the taxable year beginning with taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026, or (d) was a covered employee of the taxpayer (or any predecessor) for any preceding taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016 (other than as a result of clause (c) above). Pursuant to the regulations with respect to Section 162(m) of the Code issued by the IRS, SSG will not be permitted to deduct its distributive share of compensation expense allocated to it, to the extent that such distributive share plus the amount of any compensation paid directly by SSG exceeds $1,000,000 with respect to a covered employee, even if the Partnership, rather than SSG, pays the compensation to SSG’s covered employees. In addition, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025, changes to affiliated group aggregation rules may increase the number of individuals whose compensation is subject to the $1,000,000 limitation, which could increase the amount of compensation expense that is non-deductible to SSG. Accordingly, to the extent that SSG is disallowed a deduction for its distributive share of compensation expense under Section 162(m) of the Code, it may result in additional U.S. federal income tax liability for SSG and/or reduce cash available for distribution to SSG’s stockholders or for the payment of other expenses and obligations of SSG.

If StepStone Group Inc. were deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a result of its ownership of the Partnership or the General Partner, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

An issuer will generally be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if:

• it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or

Table of Contents

• absent an applicable exemption, it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.

We believe that we are primarily engaged in the investment advisory service business, specifically that of providing customized investment solutions and advisory, and data services to our clients and not in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We also believe that the primary source of income from each of our businesses is properly characterized as income earned in exchange for the provision of services. We hold ourselves out as an asset management firm and do not propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that StepStone Group Inc., the General Partner or the Partnership is an “orthodox” investment company as defined in section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act and described in the first bullet point above. Further, a majority of the Partnership’s assets consist of direct and indirect ownership interests as the general partner or managing member of the StepStone Funds we sponsor. We believe these interests in the StepStone Funds are not investment securities. The Partnership also will hold minority interests in certain operating subsidiaries that are consolidated on the Partnership’s financial statements as “variable interest entities.” See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Organizational Structure—Ownership of Our Businesses” for additional information regarding our variable interest entities. The Partnership’s interests in these subsidiaries may be considered investment securities under section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act. However, the value of these subsidiaries is not large enough to cause the Partnership’s holdings in investment securities to exceed the 40% threshold under section 3(a)(1)(C). StepStone Group Inc.’s unconsolidated assets consist primarily of Class A units of the Partnership and 100% of the interests in the General Partner. StepStone Group Inc. is the sole managing member of the General Partner and, in such capacity, indirectly operates and controls all of the Partnership’s business and affairs. We do not believe StepStone Group Inc.’s managing member interest in the General Partner is an investment security. Therefore, we believe that less than 40% of StepStone Group Inc.’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis comprise assets that could be considered investment securities. Accordingly, we do not believe StepStone Group Inc. is an inadvertent investment company by virtue of the 40% test in section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act as described in the second bullet point above. In addition, we believe StepStone Group Inc. is not an investment company under section 3(b)(1) of the Investment Company Act because it is primarily engaged in a non-investment company business.

The Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder contain detailed parameters for the organization and operations of investment companies. Among other things, the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder limit or prohibit transactions with affiliates, impose limitations on the issuance of debt and equity securities, prohibit the issuance of stock options, and impose certain governance requirements. We intend to conduct our operations so that StepStone Group Inc. will not be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act. However, if anything were to happen that would cause StepStone Group Inc. to be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, requirements imposed by the Investment Company Act, including limitations on our capital structure, ability to transact business with affiliates (including us) and ability to compensate key employees, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently conducted, impair the agreements and arrangements between and among the Partnership, the General Partner, us or our senior leadership team, or any combination thereof and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

A change of control of our company could result in an assignment of our investment advisory agreements.

Under the Investment Advisers Act, each of the investment advisory agreements for the funds and other accounts we manage must provide that it may not be assigned without the consent of the particular fund or other client. An assignment may occur under the Investment Advisers Act if, among other things, the Partnership undergoes a change of control. As of September 18, 2025, the Class B common stock no longer has the right to control the appointment of directors or to direct the vote on all matters that are submitted to our stockholders for a vote. If a third party acquired a sufficient number of shares to be able, alone or with others, to control the appointment of directors and other matters submitted to our stockholders for a vote, there could be deemed a change of control of the Partnership, and thus an assignment. If such an assignment occurs, we cannot be certain that the Partnership will be able to obtain the necessary consents from our funds and other clients, which could cause us to lose the management fees and performance fees we earn from such funds and other clients.

Because members of our senior leadership team hold their economic interest through other entities, conflicts of interest may arise between them and the holders of our Class A common stock or with us.

Certain members of our senior leadership team hold significant economic interest in the Partnership directly, and as a result, they may have interests that do not align with, or conflict with, those of the holders of Class A common stock or with us. For example, members of our senior leadership team will have different tax positions from Class A common stockholders, which could influence their decisions regarding whether and when to dispose of assets, whether and when to incur new or refinance existing indebtedness, and whether and when to terminate either Tax Receivable Agreement and accelerate the obligations thereunder. In addition, the structuring of future transactions and investments may take into consideration the partners’ tax considerations even where no similar benefit would accrue to us.

We rely on our equity ownership, governance rights and other contractual arrangements to control certain of our consolidated subsidiaries that are not wholly-owned, which may provide us less effective operational control than wholly owning such subsidiaries.

Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries are not wholly-owned by us. To the extent these subsidiaries are not wholly-owned by us, substantially all of the other owners are current StepStone professionals working for the related businesses. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Organizational Structure—Ownership of Our Businesses.” We have relied, and expect to continue to rely, on a combination of our equity ownership, governance rights and other contractual arrangements to control operations of these businesses. As described above, SSG and the Partnership have entered into agreements with each of SRE, SRA and SPD, providing a path to full ownership of these subsidiaries. However, these arrangements may not be as effective in providing us with control over these operations as would wholly owning these subsidiaries. For example, the other owners of these subsidiaries typically have contractual rights to be significantly represented on the board of directors or other governing body of the relevant subsidiary as well as the right to participate in certain decisions affecting the subsidiary, and may assert interests that are in conflict with the interests of StepStone with regard to significant decisions affecting these subsidiaries. As a result, the arrangements we use to control the subsidiaries that are not wholly-owned may not fully protect our interests. If control over these subsidiaries and their operations is exerted less effectively by StepStone, our ability to conduct our business and our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Distributions made by the Partnership to us may be substantial, and our ability to use the cash we receive in such distributions may be limited.

Under the terms of the StepStone Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership is obligated to make pro rata tax distributions to us and other partners of the Partnership. We may receive distributions significantly in excess of our tax liabilities and our obligations to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreements. Our board of directors will determine the appropriate uses for any excess cash so accumulated, which may include the payment of a cash dividend on the Class A common stock, payment of obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreements or the purchase of additional units in the Partnership. To the extent we do not take such actions and instead, for example, hold such cash balances, substantial cash may accumulate at SSG and not be invested in our business. In addition, Class B, Class C and Class D limited partners in the Partnership would benefit from any value attributable to such accumulated cash balances as a result of their ownership of Class A common stock following an exchange of their units for Class A common stock.

The dual class structure of our common stock may adversely affect the trading market for our Class A common stock.

We have a dual class structure, with shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock outstanding. Although our Class B common stock currently has one vote per share, and therefore does not provide its holders with a disproportionate voting multiple relative to our Class A common stock, certain stockholder advisory firms, institutional investors and other market participants may nonetheless disfavor, or have policies that discourage investment in, companies with multiple classes of common stock. As a result, the dual class structure of our common stock may cause stockholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure and may result in large institutional investors not purchasing shares of our Class A common stock. Any actions or publications by stockholder advisory firms or institutional investors critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could also adversely affect the value of our Class A common stock.

We currently pay dividends to our stockholders, but our ability to do so is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and may be limited by our holding company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law. In addition, any repurchases of our Class A common stock are discretionary and may be limited by applicable legal requirements and other considerations.

We have paid quarterly cash dividends consistently since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021and have occasionally declared supplemental dividends. However, we are not required to declare dividends. Any determination to pay future dividends on our Class A common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, projections, liquidity, earnings, business strategy, legal requirements, covenant compliance, restrictions in our existing and any future debt agreements and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. Therefore, while we may in the future continue to pay dividends to our stockholders, our board of directors may, in its discretion, decrease the level of dividends or discontinue the payment of dividends entirely. In addition, as a holding company, we will be dependent upon the ability of the Partnership to generate earnings and cash flows and distribute them to us so that we may pay our obligations and expenses (including our taxes and payments under the Tax Receivable Agreements) and pay dividends to our stockholders. Through our ownership of a 100% membership interest in the General Partner, we expect to cause the Partnership to make distributions to its partners, including us. However, the ability of the Partnership to make such distributions will be subject to its results of operations, cash requirements and financial condition. Our ability to declare and pay dividends to our stockholders is also subject to Delaware law (which may limit the amount of funds available for dividends). If, as a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we are unable to generate sufficient distributions from our business, we may not be able to make, or may be required to reduce or eliminate, the payment of dividends on our Class A common stock.

Table of Contents

In addition, we may, from time to time, repurchase shares of our Class A common stock pursuant to repurchase authorizations, including our stock repurchase program adopted in March 2026 authorizing the repurchase of up to $100 million of our Class A common stock. The timing and amount of any repurchases are determined at the discretion of our management based on business, economic and market conditions, including the availability of capital, other capital allocation alternatives and prevailing stock prices, as well as applicable legal requirements and other considerations. The stock repurchase program may be modified, suspended or discontinued at any time, and does not obligate us to acquire any amount of stock. Any stock repurchases could reduce the cash available for dividends and other corporate purposes.

General Risk Factors

The market price of our Class A common stock has been, and may continue to be volatile, which could cause the value of stockholders’ investments to decline.

The price of our Class A common stock has been volatile, and we have a relatively limited trading history. During fiscal 2026, the closing price of our Class A common stock ranged from a low of $42.46, and to a high closing price of $76.27. The closing price of our Class A common stock ranged from a low of $45.91, and to a high of $56.31, from April 1, 2026 through May 20, 2026. The price of our Class A common stock may continue to be volatile in the future. The factors described in this “Risk Factors” section may have a significant impact on the market price of our Class A common stock.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

Provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that:

• provide that vacancies on our board of directors shall be filled only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director;

• provide that our directors can be removed with or without cause, but only upon the affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2⁄3% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors;

• provide that any action required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing in lieu of a meeting of such stockholders;

• specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our board of directors or the chairman of our board of directors;

• establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors;

• authorize our board of directors to issue, without further action by the stockholders, shares of undesignated preferred stock; and

• reflect two classes of common stock, as discussed above.

Table of Contents

These and other provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. In addition, we are a Delaware corporation and governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). In general, Section 203 of the DGCL, an anti-takeover law, prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination, such as a merger, with a person or group owning 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock, which person or group is considered an interested stockholder under the DGCL, for a period of three years following the date the person became an interested stockholder, unless (with certain exceptions) the business combination or the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder is approved in a prescribed manner. We have elected in our restated certificate of incorporation not to be subject to Section 203. However, our restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that have the same effect as Section 203, except that they provide that the Principal Holders (as defined below), their affiliates and their respective successors (other than the Company or any of our subsidiaries), as well as their direct and indirect transferees, will not be deemed to be “interested stockholders,” regardless of the percentage of our voting stock owned by them, and accordingly will not be subject to such restrictions. The “Principal Holders” are Monte Brem, Scott Hart, Jason Ment, Jose Fernandez, Michael McCabe, Mark Maruszewski, Thomas Keck, Thomas Bradley, David Jeffrey and Darren Friedman (including their respective family trusts and any other permitted transferees).

Our restated certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, and the federal district courts as the exclusive forum for Securities Act claims, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain what such stockholders believe to be a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees.

Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we select or consent to the selection of an alternative forum, all complaints asserting any internal corporate claims, which include claims in

the right of our company (i) that are based upon a violation of a duty by a current or former director, officer, employee or stockholder in such capacity or (ii) as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery, shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be exclusively brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, another state court or a federal court located within the State of Delaware. Furthermore, unless we select or consent to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Our choice-of-forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act, and investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring an interest in any shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation. These choice-of-forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that he, she or it believes to be favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K. In this annual report references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “StepStone” and similar terms refer to SSG and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the Partnership. Unless otherwise indicated, references in this annual report to fiscal 2026, fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024 are to our fiscal years ended March 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Business Overview

We are a global private markets investment firm focused on providing customized investment solutions and advisory and data services to our clients. Our clients include some of the world’s largest public and private defined benefit and defined contribution pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and insurance companies, as well as prominent endowments, foundations, family offices and private wealth clients, which include high-net-worth and mass affluent individuals. We partner with our clients to develop and build private markets portfolios designed to meet their specific objectives across the private equity, infrastructure, private debt and real estate asset classes. These portfolios utilize several types of synergistic investment strategies with third-party fund managers, including commitments to funds (“primaries”), acquiring stakes in existing funds on the secondary market (“secondaries”) and investing directly into companies (“co-investments”). As of March 31, 2026, we were responsible for approximately $885 billion of total capital, including $233 billion of AUM and $652 billion of AUA.

We are a global firm and believe that our multi-asset class expertise, local knowledge, business relationships, proprietary data and technology, and presence are all critical to securing a competitive edge in the private markets. We deploy a local staffing model, operating from 31 cities across 19 countries on five continents. Our offices are staffed by investment professionals who bring valuable regional insights and language proficiency to enhance existing client relationships and build new client relationships. Since our inception in 2007, we have invested and continue to invest heavily in our platforms to drive growth and expand our investment solutions capabilities and service offerings, including through opportunistic transactions that have helped accelerate the growth of our team and capabilities. As of March 31, 2026, we had over 1,310 total employees, including approximately 420 investment professionals and approximately 890 employees across our operating team and implementation teams dedicated to sourcing, executing, analyzing and monitoring private markets opportunities.

We have a flexible business model whereby many of our clients engage us for solutions across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. Our solutions are typically offered in the following commercial structures:

• Separately managed accounts (“SMAs”). Owned by one client and managed according to their specific preferences, SMAs integrate a combination of primaries, secondaries and co-investments across one or more asset classes. SMAs are meant to address clients’ specific portfolio objectives with respect to return, risk tolerance, diversification and liquidity. SMAs, including directly managed assets, comprised $136 billion of our AUM as of March 31, 2026.

• Focused commingled funds. Owned by multiple clients, our focused commingled funds deploy capital in specific asset classes with defined investment strategies. Focused commingled funds comprised $81 billion of our AUM as of March 31, 2026.

Table of Contents

• Advisory and data services. These services include one or more of the following for our clients: (i) recurring support of portfolio construction and design; (ii) discrete or project-based due diligence, advice and investment recommendations; (iii) detailed review of existing private markets investments, including portfolio-level repositioning recommendations where appropriate; (iv) consulting on investment pacing, policies, strategic plans, and asset allocation to investment boards and committees; and (v) licensed access to our proprietary data and technology platforms, including SPI Research and our other proprietary tools. Advisory relationships comprised $652 billion of our AUA and $16 billion of our AUM as of March 31, 2026.

• Portfolio analytics and reporting. We provide clients with tailored reporting packages, including customized performance benchmarks as well as associated compliance, administrative and tax capabilities. Mandates for portfolio analytics and reporting services typically include licensed access to our proprietary performance monitoring software, SPI Reporting. We provided portfolio analytics and reporting on over $900 billion of client commitments through SPI Reporting as of March 31, 2026.

We generate revenues from management and advisory fees and performance fees earned pursuant to contractual arrangements with the StepStone Funds and our clients. We also invest our own capital in the StepStone Funds we manage to align our interests with those of our clients. Through these investments, we earn a pro-rata share of the results of such funds and may also be entitled to an allocation of performance-based fees from the limited partners in the StepStone Funds, commonly referred to as carried interest.

Trends Affecting Our Business

Our business is affected by a variety of factors, including conditions in the financial markets, regulatory environment, and economic and political conditions. Changes in global economic conditions and regulatory or other governmental policies or actions can materially affect the values of the StepStone Funds’ holdings, our ability to source attractive investments and completely utilize the capital that we have raised, and result in increased compliance costs and administrative burdens. However, we believe our disciplined investment philosophy across our diversified investment strategies has historically contributed to the stability of our performance throughout market cycles. Furthermore, we operate at scale across all four private markets asset classes and service clients across a broad range of geography, type, and size, which contributes to our operating resilience and mitigates against concentration risk.

In addition to these macroeconomic trends and market factors, we believe our future performance will be influenced by the following factors:

• The extent to which clients favor private markets investments. Our ability to attract new capital is partially dependent on clients’ views of private markets relative to traditional asset classes. We believe our fundraising efforts will continue to be subject to certain fundamental asset management trends, including (1) the increasing importance and market share of private markets investment strategies to clients of all types as clients focus on lower-correlated and absolute levels of return, (2) the increasing demand for private markets investments from private wealth clients, (3) shifting asset allocation policies of institutional clients and (4) increasing barriers to entry and growth for potential competitors.

• Our ability to generate strong, stable returns. Our ability to raise and retain capital is partially dependent on the investment returns we are able to generate for our clients and drives growth in our fee-earning AUM (“FEAUM”) and management fees. Although our FEAUM and management fees have grown significantly since our inception, adverse market conditions or an outflow of capital in the private markets management industry in general could affect our future growth rate. In addition, market dislocations, contractions or volatility could put pressure on our returns in the future which could in turn affect our fundraising abilities.

Table of Contents

• Our ability to maintain our data advantage relative to competitors. Our proprietary data and technology platforms, analytical tools and deep industry knowledge allow us to provide our clients with customized investment solutions, including asset management services and tailored reporting packages, such as customized performance benchmarks as well as compliance, administration and tax capabilities. Our ability to maintain our data advantage is dependent on a number of factors, including our continued access to a broad set of private market information and our ability to grow our relationships with fund managers and clients of all types.

• Our ability to source investments with attractive risk-adjusted returns. The continued growth in our revenues is dependent on our ability to identify attractive investments and deploy the capital that we have raised. However, the capital deployed in any one quarter may vary significantly from period to period due to the availability of attractive opportunities and the long-term nature of our investment strategies. Our ability to identify attractive investments is dependent on a number of factors, including the general macroeconomic environment, valuation, transaction size, and the liquidity of an investment opportunity. A significant decrease in the quality or quantity of potential opportunities could significantly and adversely affect our ability to source investments with attractive risk-adjusted returns.

• Increased competition and clients’ desire to work with fewer managers. There has been an increasing desire on the part of larger institutional investors to build deeper relationships with fewer private markets managers. At times, this has led to certain funds being oversubscribed due to the increasing flow of capital. Our ability to invest and maintain our relationships with high-performing fund managers across private markets asset classes is critical to our clients’ success and our ability to maintain our competitive position and grow our revenue.

Current Events

In 2025 and in early 2026, financial markets experienced significant volatility in response to the uncertainty of the economic impact from U.S. trade policy developments including the announcement and implementation of increases on tariffs charged by the U.S. on certain imports, the weakening of the U.S. dollar against several major foreign currencies and economic uncertainty driven by developments in the Middle East. Despite elevated levels of inflation, slowing global growth and elevated long-term rates, unemployment remained low, and the U.S. economy continued to grow throughout 2025 and into 2026.

On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was enacted in the U.S., which includes extensive amendments to existing tax laws applicable to businesses. The relevant provisions were included in our income tax provision for fiscal 2026 and did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. We will continue to evaluate the effect of the new legislation but do not expect the legislation to have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements.

We are continuing to closely monitor developments related to inflation, decreasing but still elevated interest rates, trade, regulatory and other governmental policy , fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, banking system volatility, geopolitical tension, unrest or conflicts, including in or with China, Russia, Ukraine, Europe and the Middle East , and assess the impact on financial markets and on our business. Our results and the overall industry results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by slowdowns in fundraising activity and the pace of capital deployment, which have resulted in, and may continue to result in, delayed or decreased management fees. Further, fund managers have been unable or less able to exit existing investments profitably. Such conditions have resulted in, and may continue to result in, delayed or decreased performance fee revenues. It is currently not possible to predict the ultimate effects of these events on the financial markets, the overall economy and our consolidated financial statements. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Industry—Difficult or volatile market and political conditions can adversely affect our business by reducing the market value of the assets we manage, causing our clients to reduce their investments in private markets, reducing the number of high-quality investment

Table of Contents

managers with whom we may invest, and reducing the ability of our funds to raise or deploy capital” and “Risk Factors—Banking system volatility may adversely affect the results and financial condition of the StepStone Funds or StepStone generally.”

Corporate Transactions

Purchase of Asset Class Non-Controlling Interests

On February 7, 2024, we entered into agreements (the “Transaction Agreements”) with each of SRA, SRE and SPD (the “Asset Class Entities”), their respective asset class heads as seller representatives, the seller parties signatory thereto, and certain other parties. The Transaction Agreements provide a path to the Partnership owning all of the outstanding equity interests of the Asset Class Entities over a defined period of time.

The Transaction Agreements provide for, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions therein, the exchange of the sellers’ equity interests in the Asset Class Entities, as applicable, for a combination of (i) Class D units of the Partnership, in the case of SRA and SRE, or shares of Class A common stock of SSG, in the case of SPD, and (ii) cash (at our discretion for all exchanges except the initial exchange), in up to ten annual exchanges (or up to fifteen annual exchanges in certain circumstances in the case of the sellers of SRA equity interests). Each Transaction Agreement also provides that beginning after the fifth annual exchange, future exchanges may be accelerated into one final exchange in certain circumstances.

The portion of the equity interests expected to be acquired in each annual exchange is set forth in an exchange schedule attached to each Transaction Agreement and is approximately 5% of each Asset Class Entity on each contemplated annual exchange date. The amount of consideration to be delivered is calculated using exchange ratios annually derived from a formula that establishes an assumed value of each Asset Class Entity based on its estimated adjusted net income, relative to an adjusted trading multiple for our Class A common stock with respect to our estimated adjusted net income. The Transaction Agreement specifies a minimum adjusted trading multiple for the exchange to take place. If this threshold is not met for a particular year, the exchange for that year will be skipped and combined with a future exchange in a subsequent year, provided the minimum adjusted trading multiple is met at that time.

On May 31, 2024, we completed the first annual exchange (the “2024 Exchange”) to acquire approximately 5% of the equity interests of each of SRA, SRE and SPD pursuant to the Transaction Agreements dated as of February 7, 2024. As a result of the 2024 Exchange, the Partnership owned approximately 54% of the outstanding equity interests of SRA, 56% of the outstanding equity interests of SRE and 54% of the outstanding equity interests of SPD. The aggregate consideration paid by us in the 2024 Exchange was approximately (i) $13 million in cash, (ii) 513,394 shares of Class A common stock and (iii) 2,239,185 Class D units of the Partnership.

In connection with the transactions contemplated by the SRA Transaction Agreement and SRE Transaction Agreement, we entered into a Class D Exchange Agreement (the “Class D Exchange Agreement”) at the closing of the 2024 Exchange on May 31, 2024. The Class D Exchange Agreement provides, among other things, sellers under the SRA Transaction Agreement and SRE Transaction Agreement with the ability, in certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions, to exchange the Class D units issued to them in connection with the SRA Transaction Agreement and SRE Transaction Agreement on a one-for-one basis with shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001. In addition, the Class D Exchange Agreement restricts the exchange of the Class D units issued to such sellers, which restriction applies for a maximum of one year (or two years if a Transaction Agreement Exchange (as defined in the Class D Exchange Agreement) constitutes an Acceleration Exchange (as defined in the Class D Exchange Agreement)), subject to certain exceptions.

Table of Contents

On May 30, 2025, we completed the second annual exchange (the “2025 Exchange”) to acquire approximately 5% of the equity interests of each of SRA, SRE and SPD pursuant to the Transaction Agreements dated as of February 7, 2024. As a result of the 2025 Exchange, the Partnership now owns approximately 60% of the outstanding equity interests of SRA, 60% of the outstanding equity interests of SRE and 59% of the outstanding equity interests of SPD. The aggregate consideration paid by us in the 2025 Exchange was approximately (i) $10 million in cash, (ii) 756,105 shares of Class A common stock and (iii) 2,438,403 Class D units of the Partnership.

We expect the third annual exchange under the Transaction Agreements to occur on or about May 29, 2026. In connection with such exchange, we expect to acquire approximately 5% of the equity interests of each of SRA, SRE and SPD, in exchange for cash and either Class A common stock or Class D units of the Partnership.

Private Wealth Transaction

In November 2022, we entered into arrangements with the SPW management team (the “Private Wealth Transaction”) under which certain members of the SPW team received a profits interest in SPW and concurrently entered into an option agreement which provides that (i) we have the right to acquire the profits interest at the end of any fiscal quarter after June 30, 2027 in exchange for payment of a call price and (ii) the SPW management team, through an entity named CH Equity Partners, LLC, has the right to put the profits interest to us on June 30, 2026 or at the end of any fiscal quarter thereafter, in exchange for payment of a put price. The applicable call or put price is, in certain circumstances, subject to an earn-out or earn-down. The call or put price will be payable in cash unless we elect to pay a portion of the consideration in units of the Partnership, each to be exchangeable into shares of our Class A common stock, and, in either case, rights under one or more tax receivable agreements.

Equity Transactions

In June 2025, we issued 152,768 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 152,768 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to an agreement with the Class B limited partners (the “Class B Exchange Agreement”) to allow for exchange of Class B units of the Partnership to shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain restrictions. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 18,000 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 18,000 Class C units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to an agreement with the Class C limited partners (the “Class C Exchange Agreement”) to allow for exchange of Class C units of the Partnership to shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain restrictions. A corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 864,640 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 864,640 Class D units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class D Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

Table of Contents

In September 2025, we issued 370,470 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 370,470 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 16,658 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 16,658 Class C units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class C Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 135,697 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 135,697 Class D units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class D Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

In December 2025, we issued 116,000 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 116,000 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 892,169 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 892,169 Class D units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class D Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

In March 2026, we issued 379,955 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 379,955 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

Organizational Structure

SSG is a holding company and its only business is to act as the managing member of the General Partner, and its only material assets are Class A units in the Partnership and 100% of the interests in the General Partner. In its capacity as the sole managing member of the General Partner, SSG indirectly operates and controls all of the Partnership’s business and affairs. Therefore, we consolidate the financial results of the Partnership and report non-controlling interests (“NCI”) related to the Class B units, Class C units and Class D units held by partners of the Partnership in our consolidated financial statements.

Pursuant to the StepStone Limited Partnership Agreement, the Class B Exchange Agreement, the Class C Exchange Agreement and the Class D Exchange Agreement that SSG and the Partnership entered into with partners holding Class B units, Class C units and Class D units of the Partnership, respectively, each Class B unit, Class C unit or Class D unit is exchangeable for one share of SSG’s Class A common stock or, at SSG’s election, for cash, subject to certain restrictions specified in the relevant exchange agreement. When a Class B unit, Class C unit or Class D unit is surrendered for exchange, it will not be available for reissuance. When a Class B unit is exchanged for a share of SSG’s Class A common stock, a corresponding share of SSG’s Class B common stock will automatically be redeemed by SSG at par value and canceled. There are no corresponding shares of common stock for the Class C and Class D units.

Table of Contents

The diagram below illustrates our organizational structure as of March 31, 2026.

Amounts may not sum to 100% due to rounding.

(1) The partners of the Partnership other than StepStone Group Inc. are:

• the General Partner, which holds a 100% general partner interest and no economic interests;

• certain members of management, employee and former employee owners and outside investors, all of whom own Class B units and an equivalent number of shares of Class B common stock;

• certain employee and former employee owners who own Class C units; and

• certain employee owners who own Class D units.

(2) Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote and vote together with the Class B common stock as a single class, except as set forth in SSG’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or as required by law.

(3) Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one vote and votes together with the Class A common stock as a single class, except as set forth in SSG’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or as required by law. The economic rights of our Class B common stock are limited to the right to be redeemed at par value.

Prior to September 18, 2025, holders of our Class B common stock controlled a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock because (i) each share of our Class B common stock entitled its holder to five votes on all matters to be voted on by stockholders generally, until the earliest to occur of certain ownership changes or September 18, 2025 as set forth in our then current Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Sunset”) and (ii) under our Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2021 (the “Stockholders Agreement”), certain Class A stockholders, Class B stockholders and Class C unitholders in the Partnership agreed to vote all of their shares of voting stock together with and as directed by the Class B Committee (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement). As a result, prior to September 18, 2025, we qualified as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance rules of The Nasdaq Global Select Market LLC (“Nasdaq”). Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power with respect to the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements. Consistent with this, until the occurrence of the Sunset, we elected not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that (i) a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors, (ii) director nominees be selected or recommended to the board entirely by independent directors and (iii) the compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors.

Table of Contents

However, since the occurrence of the Sunset and expiration of the Stockholders Agreement on September 18, 2025, each share of Class A common stock and Class B common stock is entitled to one vote, and we no longer qualify as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq rules. As a result, we are required to come into compliance with Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements applicable to non-controlled companies as described above no later than September 18, 2026. Under the Nasdaq rules, the Company may continue to rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements during a one year “phase-in” period. While we are able to rely on such exemptions during this one year “phase-in” period, we do not currently satisfy all of Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements applicable to non-controlled companies, and, accordingly, we must take actions to achieve compliance by September 18, 2026. In particular, on or before such date, we plan for our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees of our board of directors to be composed entirely of independent directors, and for a majority of our board of directors to consist of independent directors. Until the Company fully complies with these requirements, stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements under the Nasdaq rules. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure—We were previously a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq Global Select Market listing standards and, as a result, we qualified for, and relied on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. As of September 18, 2025, we are no longer a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules and are required to comply with Nasdaq’s applicable corporate governance requirements no later than September 18, 2026. Unless and until we are fully compliant with such requirements, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.”

Ownership of Our Businesses

Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries are not wholly-owned by us. To the extent these subsidiaries are not wholly-owned, substantially all of the other owners are current StepStone professionals working for the related businesses. We believe this ownership structure has benefited us by aligning our interests with the interests of our employees. We use, and expect to continue to use, a combination of our equity ownership, governance rights and other contractual arrangements to control operations of these businesses. As described above, SSG and the Partnership have entered into agreements with each of SRA, SRE and SPD, providing a path to full ownership of these subsidiaries. SSG consolidates all entities that it controls due to a majority voting interest or because it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for information on variable interest entities. The diagram below summarizes the ownership structure of the Partnership’s consolidated operations on a fully diluted basis.

Table of Contents

Segments

We operate as one business, a fully-integrated private markets solutions provider. Our chief operating decision maker, who is our chief executive officer, utilizes a consolidated approach to assess performance and allocate resources. As such, we operate in one business segment.

Key Financial Measures

Our key financial measures are discussed below. Additional information regarding our significant accounting policies can be found in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report.

Revenues

We generate revenues primarily from management and advisory fees, incentive fees and allocations of carried interest.

Management and Advisory Fees, Net

Management and advisory fees, net, consist of fees received from managing SMAs and focused commingled funds, advisory and data services, and portfolio analytics and reporting. Management fees include income-based incentive fees, which are predictable and recurring in nature and paid quarterly based on net investment income of certain funds .

• Management fees from SMAs are generally based on a contractual rate applied to committed capital or net invested capital. These fees will vary over the life of the contract due to changes in the fee basis or contractual rate changes or thresholds, built-in declines in applicable contractual rates, and/or changes in net invested capital balances. The weighted-average management fee rate from SMAs was approximately 0.39% and 0.38% of average FEAUM in fiscal 2025 and 2026, respectively.

Table of Contents

• Management fees from focused commingled funds are generally based on a specified fee rate applied against client capital commitments during a defined investment or commitment period. Thereafter, management fees are typically calculated based on a contractual rate applied against net invested capital, or a stepped-down fee rate applied against the initial commitment. The weighted-average management fee rate from focused commingled funds was approximately 1.06% and 1.01% of average FEAUM in fiscal 2025 and 2026, respectively, and primarily reflected the timing of new funds and growth in our private wealth funds which earn higher fee rates.

• The weighted-average management fee rate across SMAs and focused commingled funds was approximately 0.65% and 0.64% of average FEAUM in fiscal 2025 and 2026, respectively, and primarily reflected the timing of new funds, shifts in mix between SMAs and focused commingled funds and growth in our private wealth funds which earn higher fee rates.

• Fee revenues from advisory, StepStone Portfolio Analytics & Reporting (“SPAR”) and SPI Research are generally annual fixed fees, which vary based on the scope of services we provide. We also provide certain project-based or event-driven advisory services. The fees for these services are negotiated and typically paid upon successful delivery of services or on the execution of the event-driven service. Because advisory fees are negotiated and typically paid upon successful delivery of services or on the execution of the event-driven service, advisory fees do not necessarily correlate with the total size of our AUA.

• Management fees are reflected net of (i) certain professional and administrative services that we arrange to be performed by third parties on behalf of investment funds and (ii) certain distribution and servicing fees paid to third-party financial institutions. In both situations, we are acting as an agent because we do not control the services provided by the third parties before they are transferred to the customer.

Performance Fees

We earn two types of performance fee revenues: incentive fees and carried interest allocations, as described below. As of March 31, 2026, we had over $115 billion of performance fee-eligible capital (excluding certain legacy Greenspring funds) across over 250 programs.

Incentive fees comprise fees earned from certain client investment mandates for which we do not have a general partnership interest in a StepStone Fund. Incentive fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the profits (up to 15%) earned in respect of certain accounts, including certain permanent capital vehicles, for which we are the investment adviser, subject to the achievement of minimum return levels or performance benchmarks. Incentive fees are a form of variable consideration and represent contractual fee arrangements in our contracts with our customers. Incentive fees are typically subject to reversal until the end of a defined performance period, as these fees are affected by changes in the fair value of the assets under management or advisement over such performance period. Moreover, incentive fees that are received prior to the end of the defined performance period are typically subject to clawback, net of tax.

We recognize incentive fee revenue only when these amounts are realized and no longer subject to significant risk of reversal, which is typically at the end of a defined performance period and/or upon expiration of the associated clawback period (i.e., crystallization). However, clawback terms for incentive fees received prior to crystallization only require the return of amounts on a net of tax basis. Accordingly, the tax-related portion of incentive fees received in advance of crystallization is not subject to clawback and is therefore recognized as revenue immediately upon receipt. Incentive fees received in advance of crystallization that remain subject to clawback are recorded as deferred incentive fee revenue and included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

Carried interest allocations include the allocation of performance-based fees, commonly referred to as carried interest, to us from limited partners in the StepStone Funds in which we hold an equity interest. We are entitled to a carried interest allocation (typically 5% to 20%) based on cumulative fund or account performance to date, irrespective of whether such amounts have been realized. These carried interest allocations are subject to the achievement of minimum return levels (typically 5% to 10%), in accordance with the terms set forth in the respective fund’s governing documents. We account for our investment balances in the StepStone Funds, including carried interest allocations, under the equity method of accounting because we are presumed to have significant influence as the general partner or managing member. Accordingly, carried interest allocations are not deemed to be within the scope of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers .

Legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations include the allocation of carried interest to legacy Greenspring general partner entities from limited partners in certain legacy Greenspring funds in which the legacy Greenspring general partner entities hold an equity interest. The legacy Greenspring general partner entities are entitled to a carried interest allocation (typically 5% to 20%) based on cumulative fund or account performance to date, irrespective of whether such amounts have been realized. We account for the investment balances in the legacy Greenspring funds, including carried interest allocations, under the equity method of accounting because we are presumed to have significant influence as the general partner or managing member. Accordingly, legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations are not deemed to be within the scope of ASC 606. We do not have any direct economic interests in the legacy Greenspring general partner entities and thus are not entitled to any carried interest allocation from the legacy Greenspring funds. All of the carried interest allocations in respect of such legacy Greenspring funds are payable to employees who are considered affiliates to us and are therefore reflected as legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation in the consolidated statements of income (loss) .

We recognize revenue attributable to carried interest allocations from a StepStone Fund based on the amount that would be due to us pursuant to the fund’s governing documents, assuming the fund was liquidated based on the current fair value of its underlying investments as of that date. Accordingly, the amount recognized as carried interest allocation revenue reflects our share of the gains and losses of the associated fund’s underlying investments measured at their then-fair values, relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. We record the amount of carried interest allocated to us as of each period end as accrued carried interest allocations, which is included as a component of investments in the consolidated balance sheets. Our determination of fair value for investments in the underlying funds includes various valuation techniques. These techniques may include a market approach, recent transaction price, net asset value approach, or discounted cash flows, and may use one or more significant unobservable inputs such as EBITDA, revenue multiples, discount rates, weighted-average cost of capital, exit multiples, or terminal growth rates.

Carried interest is realized when an underlying investment is profitably disposed of and the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the specific hurdle rates, as defined in the applicable governing documents. Carried interest is subject to reversal to the extent that the amount received to date exceeds the amount due to us based on cumulative results. As such, a liability is accrued for the potential clawback obligations if amounts previously distributed to us would require repayment to a fund if such fund were to be liquidated based on the current fair value of their underlying investments as of the reporting date. Actual repayment obligations generally do not become realized until the end of a fund’s life. As of March 31, 2026 and 2025, no material amounts for potential clawback obligations had been accrued.

Expenses

Cash-based compensation primarily includes salaries, bonuses, employee benefits, cash-based incentive awards and employer-related payroll taxes.

Table of Contents

Equity-based compensation represents grants of equity related awards or arrangements to certain employees and directors and expense associated with the employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”).

Performance fee-related compensation represents the portion of carried interest allocation revenue and incentive fees that have been awarded to employees as a form of long-term incentive compensation. Performance fee-related compensation is generally tied to the investment performance of the StepStone Funds. Approximately 50% of carried interest allocation revenue is awarded to employees as part of our long-term incentive compensation plan, fostering alignment of interest with our clients and investors, and retaining key investment professionals. Carried interest-related compensation is accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the related carried interest allocation revenue and, until paid, is recorded as a component of accrued carried interest-related compensation in the consolidated balance sheets. Amounts presented as realized indicate the amounts paid or payable to employees based on the receipt of carried interest allocation revenue from realized investment activity. Carried interest-related compensation expense may be subject to reversal to the extent that the related carried interest allocation revenue is reversed. Carried interest-related compensation paid to employees may be subject to clawback on an after-tax basis under certain scenarios. To date, no material amounts of realized carried interest-related compensation have been reversed. Incentive fee-related compensation is accrued as compensation expense when it is probable and estimable that payment will be made. On April 1, 2024, certain of our non-wholly owned subsidiaries underwent transactions to effect unitization of the outstanding limited partnership interests, including the class of interests relating to awards of carried interest allocations granted to employees, to combine into a single class of limited partnership interests and redesignated into units. The class of interests relating to awards of carried interest allocations granted to employees were previously presented as carried interest-related compensation expense.

Legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation represents the legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations which are entirely payable to certain employees. Legacy Greenspring carried interest-related compensation is accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the related legacy Greenspring carried interest allocation revenue and, until paid, is recorded as a component of legacy Greenspring accrued carried interest-related compensation in the consolidated balance sheets. Legacy Greenspring carried interest-related compensation expense may be subject to reversal to the extent that the related legacy Greenspring carried interest allocation revenue is reversed. However, none of the legacy Greenspring carried interest allocation revenue is attributable to the Company.

General, administrative and other includes occupancy, travel and related costs, insurance, legal and other professional fees, depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, system-related costs, and other general costs associated with operating our business. General, administrative and other includes costs associated with the Consolidated Funds. Expenses of the Consolidated Funds have no impact on net income or loss attributable to us to the extent such expenses are borne by third-party investors.

Other Income (Expense)

Investment income (loss) primarily represents our share of earnings (losses) from the investments we make in our SMAs and focused commingled funds. We, either directly or through our subsidiaries, generally have a general partner interest in the StepStone Funds, which invest in primary funds, secondary funds and co-investment funds, or a combination thereof. Investment income will increase or decrease based on the earnings of the StepStone Funds, which are primarily driven by net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on the underlying investments held by the funds. Our co-investment funds invest in underlying portfolio companies and therefore their valuation changes from period to period are more influenced by individual companies than our primary and secondary funds, which have exposures across multiple portfolio companies in underlying private markets funds. Our SMAs and focused commingled funds invest across various industries, strategies and geographies.

Table of Contents

Consequently, our general partner investments do not include any significant concentrations in a specific sector or geography outside the United States. Investment income and legacy Greenspring investment income exclude carried interest allocations, which are presented as revenues as described above.

Legacy Greenspring investment income (loss) represents our share of earnings (losses) from the investments we make in certain legacy Greenspring funds through the legacy Greenspring general partner entities. We have no direct economic interests in the legacy Greenspring general partner entities. As a result, all such income is reflected as non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities. Legacy Greenspring investment income will increase or decrease based on the earnings of such legacy Greenspring funds, which are primarily driven by net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on the underlying investments held by the funds.

Investment income (loss) of Consolidated Funds represents gains (losses) from the investments held by the Consolidated Funds.

Interest income consists of income earned on cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and amounts associated with the Consolidated Funds.

Interest expense primarily consists of the interest expense on the Revolver and the Notes, the related amortization of deferred financing costs, and amounts associated with the Consolidated Funds.

Other income (loss) includes foreign currency transaction gains and losses, non-operating activities, and amounts associated with the Consolidated Funds.

Income Tax Expense

We are a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and therefore are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes on our share of taxable income generated by the Partnership. The Partnership is treated as a pass-through entity for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes. As such, income generated by the Partnership flows through to its limited partners, including us, and is generally not subject to U.S. federal or state income tax at the Partnership level. Our non-U.S. subsidiaries generally operate as corporate entities in non-U.S. jurisdictions, with certain of these entities subject to local or non-U.S. income taxes. Additionally, certain of our subsidiaries are subject to local jurisdiction income taxes at the entity level, which are reflected within income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. As a result, the Partnership does not record U.S. federal and state income taxes on income generated by the Partnership or its subsidiaries, except for certain local and foreign income taxes discussed above.

Non-Controlling Interests

NCI reflects the portion of income or loss and the corresponding equity attributable to third-party equity holders and employees in certain consolidated subsidiaries that are not 100% owned by us. Non-controlling interests are presented as separate components in our consolidated statements of income (loss) to clearly distinguish between our interests and the economic interests of third parties and employees in those entities. Net income (loss) attributable to SSG, as reported in the consolidated statements of income (loss), is presented net of the portion of net income (loss) attributable to holders of non-controlling interests.

Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries represent the economic interests in the consolidated subsidiaries of the Partnership held by third parties and employees, and the economic interests in certain Consolidated Funds that are not held by us but are held by the third-party investors in the funds. Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are allocated a share of income or loss in the respective consolidated subsidiary in proportion to their relative ownership interests, after consideration of contractual arrangements that govern allocations of income or loss.

Table of Contents

Non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities represent the economic interests in the legacy Greenspring general partner entities. We did not acquire any direct economic interests in the legacy Greenspring general partner entities. As a result, all of the net income (loss) attributable to the legacy Greenspring general partner entities is allocated to non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities.

Non-controlling interests in the Partnership represent the economic interests in the Partnership held by the Class B, Class C and Class D unitholders of the Partnership. Non-controlling interests in the Partnership are allocated a share of income or loss in the Partnership in proportion to their relative ownership interests, after consideration of contractual arrangements that govern allocations of income or loss.

Redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds represent the economic interests in the redeemable Consolidated Funds which are not held by us, but are held by the third-party investors in the funds. Redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds are allocated a share of income or loss in the respective fund in proportion to their relative ownership interests, after consideration of contractual arrangements that govern allocations of income or loss.

Redeemable non-controlling interests in subsidiaries represent the redeemable economic interests in the consolidated subsidiaries of the Partnership held by third parties and employees in those entities that were established in connection with the Transaction Agreements. Redeemable non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are allocated a share of income or loss in the respective consolidated subsidiary in proportion to their relative ownership interests, after consideration of contractual arrangements that govern allocations of income or loss.

Key Operating Metrics

We monitor certain operating metrics that are either common to the asset management industry or that we believe provide important data regarding our business.

Assets Under Management

AUM primarily reflects the assets associated with our SMAs and focused commingled funds. We classify assets as AUM if we have full discretion over the investment decisions in an account or have responsibility or custody of assets. Although management fees are based on a variety of factors and are not linearly correlated with AUM, we believe AUM is a useful metric for assessing the relative size and scope of our asset management business.

Our AUM is calculated as the sum of (i) the NAV of client portfolio assets, including the StepStone Funds and (ii) the unfunded commitments of clients to the underlying investments and the StepStone Funds. Our AUM reflects the investment valuations in respect of the underlying investments of our funds and accounts on a three-month lag, adjusted for new client account activity through the period end. Our AUM does not include post-period investment valuation or cash activity. AUM as of March 31, 2026 reflects final data for the prior period (December 31, 2025), adjusted for net new client account activity through March 31, 2026. NAV data for underlying investments is as of December 31, 2025, as reported by underlying managers up to the business day occurring on or after 115 days following December 31, 2025. When NAV data is not available by the business day occurring on or after 115 days following December 31, 2025, such NAVs are adjusted for cash activity following the last available reported NAV.

Table of Contents

Assets Under Advisement

AUA consists of client assets for which we do not have full discretion to make investment decisions but play a role in advising the client or monitoring their investments. We generally earn revenue for advisory-related services on a contractual fixed fee basis. Advisory-related services include asset allocation, strategic planning, development of investment policies and guidelines, screening and recommending investments, legal negotiations, monitoring and reporting on investments, and investment manager review and due diligence. Advisory fees vary by client based on the scope of services, investment activity and other factors. Most of our advisory fees are fixed, and therefore, increases or decreases in AUA do not necessarily lead to proportionate changes in revenue. We believe AUA is a useful metric for assessing the relative size of our advisory business.

Our AUA is calculated as the sum of (i) the NAV of client portfolio assets for which we do not have full discretion and (ii) the unfunded commitments of clients to the underlying investments. Our AUA reflects the investment valuations in respect of the underlying investments of our client accounts on a three-month lag, adjusted for new client account activity through the period end. Our AUA does not include post-period investment valuation or cash activity. AUA as of March 31, 2026 reflects final data for the prior period (December 31, 2025), adjusted for net new client account activity through March 31, 2026. NAV data for underlying investments is as of December 31, 2025, as reported by underlying managers up to the business day occurring on or after 115 days following December 31, 2025. When NAV data is not available by the business day occurring on or after 115 days following December 31, 2025, such NAVs are adjusted for cash activity following the last available reported NAV.

Fee-Earning AUM

FEAUM reflects the assets from which we earn management fee revenue (i.e., fee basis) and includes assets in our SMAs, focused commingled funds and assets held directly by our clients for which we have fiduciary oversight and are paid fees as the manager of the assets. Our SMAs and focused commingled funds typically pay management fees based on capital commitments, net invested capital and, in certain cases, NAV, depending on the fee terms. Management fees are only marginally affected by market appreciation or depreciation because substantially all of the StepStone Funds pay management fees based on capital commitments or net invested capital. As a result, management fees and FEAUM are not materially affected by changes in market value. We believe FEAUM is a useful metric in order to assess assets forming the basis of our management fee revenue.

Our calculation of FEAUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers and, as a result, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers.

Undeployed Fee-Earning Capital

Undeployed fee-earning capital represents the amount of capital commitments to StepStone Funds that has not yet been invested or considered active but will generate management fee revenue once this capital is invested or activated. We believe undeployed fee-earning capital is a useful metric for measuring the amount of capital that we can put to work in the future and thus earn management fee revenue thereon.

Table of Contents

Consolidation of StepStone Funds

The activity of the Consolidated Funds is reflected within the consolidated financial statement line items as indicated by reference thereto. The impact of the Consolidated Funds decrease revenues reported under GAAP to the extent these amounts are eliminated upon consolidation. The assets and liabilities of our Consolidated Funds are held within separate legal entities and, as a result, the liabilities of our Consolidated Funds are typically non-recourse to us. The net economic ownership interests of our Consolidated Funds held by third parties are reflected in our consolidated financial statements as either non-controlling interests in subsidiaries or redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds when the equity of the fund is redeemable. We generally deconsolidate funds when we are no longer deemed to have a controlling financial interest in the entity. The performance of our Consolidated Funds is not necessarily consistent with, or representative of, the combined performance trends of all of our funds.

Consolidated Results of Operations

We consolidate funds and entities where we are deemed to hold a controlling financial interest. The Consolidated Funds are not necessarily the same entities in each year presented due to changes in ownership, changes in limited partners’ or investor rights, and the creation and termination of funds and entities. The following is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the periods presented. The information is derived from our accompanying consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.

In fiscal 2026, we deconsolidated an investment fund that was previously consolidated in our results as it was determined that we no longer held a controlling financial interest. Also, we consolidated four additional StepStone Funds as it was determined that we hold a controlling financial interest in these funds.

Table of Contents

Year Ended March 31,

(in thousands)

Revenues

Management and advisory fees, net

Performance fees:

Incentive fees

Carried interest allocations:

Realized

Unrealized

Total carried interest allocations

Legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations (1)

Total performance fees

Total revenues

Expenses

Compensation and benefits:

Cash-based compensation

Equity-based compensation

Performance fee-related compensation:

Realized

Unrealized

Total performance fee-related compensation

Legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation (1)

Total compensation and benefits

General, administrative and other

Total expenses

Other income (expense)

Investment income

Legacy Greenspring investment income (loss) (1)

Investment income of Consolidated Funds

Interest income

Interest expense

Other income (loss)

Total other income

Income (loss) before income tax

Income tax expense (benefit)

Net income (loss)

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities (1)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in the Partnership

Less: Net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds

Less: Net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in subsidiaries

Net income (loss) attributable to StepStone Group Inc.

(1) Reflects amounts attributable to consolidated VIEs for which we did not acquire any direct economic interests. See notes 2, 3 and 5 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Table of Contents

Revenues

Year Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2025

Total revenues increased $818.8 million, or 70%, to $1,993.6 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The overall increase was driven by higher carried interest allocations, higher incentive fees, higher management and advisory fees, net, and higher legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations, in each case, as described below.

Management and advisory fees, net increased $159.5 million, or 21%, to $926.5 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The increase was driven by new client activity, 23% growth in average FEAUM across the platform and higher income-based incentive fees. Fiscal 2026 included retroactive fees of $5.1 million from the closings of StepStone’s Real Estate Partners V, infrastructure secondaries and multi-strategy venture capital funds. The prior year period included retroactive fees of $42.8 million from the closings of StepStone’s Secondary Opportunities V, Real Estate Partners V, Infrastructure Co-Investment Partners 2022, Tactical Growth Fund IV and VC Global Partners XI funds.

Incentive fees increased $187.9 million, or 582%, to $220.1 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, reflecting higher incentive fees generated by StepStone’s Private Venture and Growth Fund (“SPRING”) due to strong returns in the 2025 calendar year and a higher asset base.

Realized carried interest allocation revenues increased $8.9 million, or 6%, to $168.6 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, reflecting higher realization activity within our private equity funds. Unrealized carried interest allocation revenues include the reversal of realized carried interest allocation revenues. Excluding the reversal of $168.6 million, unrealized carried interest allocation revenues increased $407.1 million, or 135%, to $708.3 million for fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025. The increase in unrealized carried interest allocations for fiscal 2026 primarily reflected a higher net increase in the cumulative allocation of gains associated with the underlying portfolios within our private equity, infrastructure and real estate funds.

Legacy Greenspring carried interest allocation revenues increased $64.4 million, or 87%, to $138.7 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025 as a result of higher net unrealized appreciation in the fair value of certain underlying fund investments in the current year period as compared to the prior year period. Fiscal 2026 reflects gross realized carried interest allocations of $19.7 million and unrealized carried interest allocations, net of the reversal of realized carried interest allocations, of $119.0 million. Fiscal 2025 reflects gross realized carried interest allocations of $63.1 million and unrealized carried interest allocations, net of the reversal of realized carried interest allocations, of $11.2 million.

Year Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2024

Total revenues increased $463.2 million, or 65%, to $1,174.8 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The overall increase was driven by higher management and advisory fees, net, positive legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations in the current period as compared to a reversal in the prior year period, higher carried interest allocations and higher incentive fees, in each case, as described below.

Management and advisory fees, net increased $181.9 million, or 31%, to $767.0 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The increase was driven by new client activity and 23% growth in average FEAUM across the platform, as well as retroactive fees of $42.8 million from the closings of StepStone’s Secondary Opportunities V, Real Estate Partners V, Infrastructure Co-Investment Partners 2022, Tactical Growth Fund IV and VC Global Partners XI funds. The prior year period included $11.6 million of retroactive fees from the closings of StepStone’s Secondary Opportunities V, VC Global Partners XI and Infrastructure Co-Investment Partners 2022 funds.

Table of Contents

Incentive fees increased $6.9 million, or 27%, to $32.3 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, largely due to higher incentive fees generated by SPRING.

Realized carried interest allocation revenues increased $110.3 million, or 223%, to $159.7 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, reflecting higher realization activity within our private equity and infrastructure funds. Unrealized carried interest allocation revenues include the reversal of realized carried interest allocation revenues. Excluding the reversal of $159.7 million, unrealized carried interest allocation revenues increased $124.9 million, or 71%, to $301.2 million for fiscal 2025 compared to fiscal 2024. The increase in unrealized carried interest allocations for fiscal 2025 primarily reflected a higher net increase in the cumulative allocation of gains associated with the underlying portfolios within our private equity funds as compared to the prior year.

Legacy Greenspring carried interest allocation revenues increased $149.5 million to $74.3 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024 as a result of net unrealized appreciation in the fair value of certain underlying fund investments in the current year period as compared to net unrealized depreciation in the prior year period. Fiscal 2025 reflects gross realized carried interest allocations of $63.1 million and unrealized carried interest allocations, net of the reversal of carried interest allocations, of $11.2 million. Fiscal 2024 reflects gross realized carried interest allocations of $59.7 million and unrealized carried interest allocations, net of the reversal of realized carried interest allocations, of $(134.9) million.

Expenses

Year Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2025

Total expenses increased $1,575.3 million, or 109%, to $3,017.0 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The overall increase resulted from increases in equity-based compensation, performance fee-related compensation, cash-based compensation, legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation, and general, administrative and other expenses, in each case, as described below.

Cash-based compensation increased $82.3 million, or 25%, to $414.1 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, due to 16% higher average headcount, increased compensation levels from merit increases and higher income-based incentive fee compensation in the current year period as compared to the prior year period.

Equity-based compensation increased $1,072.9 million, or 160%, to $1,742.1 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The increase was primarily attributable to a $1,069.1 million increase in expenses for liability classified awards related to the profits interest issued in SPW in the current year period as compared to the prior year period, a $7.1 million increase for restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based RSUs (“PRSUs”) granted in the current year period with no comparable expense for these grants in the prior year period, and an increase of $1.7 million for the acceleration of RSU expense in the current year period with no comparable expense in the prior year period. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $5.0 million in expense due to the final vesting of RSUs issued in connection with our IPO. We expect that there may be additional significant increases in equity-based compensation in future periods due to further increases in the fair value of liability classified awards, which is driven by the performance of SPW. SPW generated profitability in fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2026, and we expect that there will be an increase in the profitability generated by SPW in the future which would increase the fair value of the associated liability for the profits interest issued in SPW. As of March 31, 2026 and 2025, we had recognized $2,265.8 million and $663.9 million, respectively, for liability classified awards within accrued compensation and benefits in the consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

Total performance fee-related compensation expense increased $345.8 million, or 183%, to $534.8 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, primarily reflecting the increase in carried interest allocation and incentive fee revenues. Realized performance fee-related compensation increased $97.8 million, or 103%, to $192.6 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, primarily reflecting higher realization activity and higher incentive fees from SPRING.

Legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation expense increased $64.4 million, or 87%, to $138.7 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. Fiscal 2026 reflects gross realized performance fee-related compensation expense of $19.7 million and unrealized performance fee-related compensation expense, net of the reversal of realized performance fee-related compensation expense, of $119.0 million. Fiscal 2025 reflects gross realized performance fee-related compensation expense of $63.1 million and unrealized performance fee-related compensation expense, net of the reversal of realized performance fee-related compensation expense, of $11.2 million.

General, administrative and other expenses increased $9.9 million, or 6%, to $187.3 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The overall increase primarily reflected $7.7 million in platform fees, $6.1 million in professional fees, $4.9 million in travel and associated costs for investment evaluation and client service, $3.1 million in information and technology expense, $1.7 million in occupancy costs, $1.2 million in human resources and recruiting expenses and other general operating expenses, partially offset by a $15.9 million lower expense for change in fair value for contingent consideration obligation as compared to the prior year period.

Year Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2024

Total expenses increased $901.8 million, or 167%, to $1,441.6 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The overall increase resulted from increases in equity-based compensation, legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation, performance fee-related compensation, cash-based compensation and general, administrative and other expenses, in each case, as described below.

Cash-based compensation increased $38.8 million, or 13%, to $331.8 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, due to increased staffing and compensation levels. Our average headcount increased 8% in the current year period as compared to the prior year period.

Equity-based compensation increased $626.8 million to $669.1 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to a $629.0 million increase in expenses for liability classified awards related to the profits interest issued in SPW in the current year period as compared to the prior year period, as well as $3.5 million related to the full year impact of RSUs awarded to certain employees and directors in the prior year period and additional grants of RSUs granted in the current year period and no comparable expense for these grants in the prior year period. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $5.5 million in expense due to the final vesting of RSUs issued in connection with our IPO.

Total performance fee-related compensation expense increased $76.6 million, or 68%, to $189.0 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily reflecting the increase in carried interest allocation revenue. Realized performance fee-related compensation increased $57.1 million, or 151%, to $94.7 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily reflecting higher realization activity and higher incentive fees from SPRING.

Table of Contents

Legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation expense increased $149.5 million to $74.3 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. Fiscal 2025 reflects gross realized performance fee-related compensation expense of $63.1 million and unrealized performance fee-related compensation expense, net of the reversal of realized performance fee-related compensation expense, of $11.2 million. Fiscal 2024 reflects gross realized performance fee-related compensation expense of $59.7 million and unrealized performance fee-related compensation expense, net of the reversal of realized performance fee-related compensation expense, of $(134.9) million.

General, administrative and other expenses increased $10.0 million, or 6%, to $177.4 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The overall increase primarily reflected $3.9 million in travel and associated costs for investment evaluation and client service, $3.5 million in marketing and conference expenses, $2.5 million in professional fees, $2.1 million in information and technology expenses, $1.6 million in general and administrative expenses for the Consolidated Funds, $1.4 million in human resources and recruiting expenses, $1.3 million in occupancy costs and other general operating expenses, partially offset by decreases of $3.9 million in transaction costs, $1.9 million in accelerated depreciation for leasehold improvements due to a reduction in lease terms in the prior year, $1.4 million in intangibles amortization and $1.1 million for lower loss on change in fair value for contingent consideration obligation.

Other Income (Expense)

Year Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2025

Investment income increased $25.7 million, or 170%, to $40.8 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, primarily reflecting overall changes in the valuations of the underlying investments in StepStone Funds.

Legacy Greenspring investment loss decreased $6.1 million to income of $4.9 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. Fiscal 2026 reflects gross realized investment income of $3.0 million and unrealized investment income, net of the reversal of realized investment income, of $2.0 million. Fiscal 2025 reflects gross realized investment income of $7.9 million and unrealized investment loss, net of the reversal of realized investment income, of $9.1 million.

Investment income of Consolidated Funds increased $27.0 million, or 41%, to $92.4 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, primarily reflecting overall changes in the valuations of the underlying investments of the Consolidated Funds.

Interest income increased $1.0 million, or 9%, to $11.8 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025 primarily due to higher average cash and cash equivalent balances during the current year period as compared with the prior year period, partially offset by the impact of deconsolidation of one of the Consolidated Funds during the current year period. Interest income attributable to Consolidated Funds was $4.3 million in the current year period as compared to $4.8 million in the prior year period.

Interest expense increased $5.8 million, or 46%, to $18.5 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The increase was due to higher average outstanding debt balances during the current year period as compared with the prior year period, partially offset by the lower interest rate on the Revolver for the current year period.

Other income (loss) increased $33.3 million to income of $0.7 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to a loss of $32.7 million for fiscal 2025, primarily due to a loss of $32.5 million in the prior year period associated with payment made in connection with a secondary transaction executed by one of our private wealth funds that did not reoccur in the current year period and net foreign currency transaction gains in the current year period as compared with net foreign currency transaction losses in the prior year period, partially offset by a loss of $4.2 million related to adjustments for the Tax Receivable Agreements during the current year period.

Table of Contents

Year Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2024

Investment income increased $7.6 million, or 103%, to $15.1 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily reflecting overall changes in the valuations of the underlying investments in StepStone Funds.

Legacy Greenspring investment loss decreased $7.9 million, or 87%, to $1.2 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. Fiscal 2025 reflects gross realized investment income of $7.9 million and unrealized investment loss, net of the reversal of realized investment income, of $9.1 million. Fiscal 2024 reflects gross realized investment income of $5.3 million and unrealized investment loss, net of the reversal of realized investment income, of $14.4 million.

Investment income of Consolidated Funds increased $36.9 million, or 130%, to $65.4 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily reflecting overall changes in the valuations of the underlying investments of the Consolidated Funds on higher investment balances during the current year period as compared with the prior year period.

Interest income increased $7.2 million, or 196%, to $10.9 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily due to higher average cash and cash equivalent balances during the current year period as compared with the prior year period. Interest income attributable to Consolidated Funds was $4.8 million in the current year period as compared to $1.6 million in the prior year period.

Interest expense increased $3.4 million, or 36%, to $12.7 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The increase was due to higher average outstanding balances during the current year period as compared with the prior year period, partially offset by the lower interest rate on the Notes for a portion of the current year period.

Other income decreased $35.1 million to a loss of $32.7 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily reflecting a loss associated with payment made in connection with a secondary transaction executed by one of our private wealth funds of $32.5 million in the current year period and a gain of $5.3 million in the prior year period for amounts received as part of negotiations with a third party related to certain corporate matters, partially offset by a loss of $0.8 million associated with the sale of a subsidiary in the prior year period and lower net foreign currency transaction losses in the current year period as compared with the prior year period.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense primarily reflects U.S. federal and state income taxes on our share of taxable income generated by the Partnership, as well as local and foreign income taxes of certain of the Partnership’s subsidiaries.

Our effective income tax rate was 16.6%, 22.2%, and 14.1% for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Our overall effective tax rate in fiscal 2026 is less than the statutory rate primarily due to a portion of net loss allocated to non-controlling interests and the related tax benefit being borne by the holders of non-controlling interests. Our overall effective tax rate in fiscal 2025 differs from the statutory rate primarily because of the impact of nondeductible items. Our overall effective tax rate in fiscal 2024 is less than the statutory rate primarily because a portion of income was allocated to non-controlling interests and the tax liability on such income is borne by the holders of such non-controlling interests.

Table of Contents

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) implemented Pillar Two, which establishes a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% on large multinational enterprises across their worldwide operations. While legislation pertaining to these rules is already in effect or advancing in several of the jurisdictions where we operate, the U.S. has not adopted Pillar Two legislation. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, Pillar Two did not have a material impact on our tax provision. In January 2026, the OECD Inclusive Framework released a "Side-by-Side" package intended to coordinate Pillar Two with existing U.S. and other domestic tax regimes, which provides exemptions for qualifying U.S.-headquartered multinationals from certain Pillar Two collection mechanisms and introduces new safe harbors, including a permanent simplified effective tax rate safe harbor and an extension of the transitional country-by-country reporting safe harbor, though adoption by individual jurisdictions remains ongoing. We will continue to evaluate both U.S. and global legislative developments concerning Pillar Two for future reporting periods.

Year Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2025

Income tax benefit increased $98.7 million, or 201%, to $147.9 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The increase in income tax benefit was primarily driven by the increase in pre-tax net loss for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025.

Year Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2024

Income tax expense decreased $76.8 million to a benefit of $49.2 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to expense for fiscal 2024. The decrease in tax expense was primarily driven by pre-tax net loss for fiscal 2025 compared to pre-tax net income for fiscal 2024.

Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Subsidiaries

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries increased $24.5 million, or 31%, to $103.8 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in income generated by our consolidated subsidiaries not wholly-owned by us, partially offset by an increase in our economic interests in the Asset Class Entities as a result of the Transaction Agreements resulting in a lower rate of allocation of net income to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries.

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries increased $42.0 million, or 113%, to $79.3 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in income generated by our consolidated subsidiaries not wholly-owned by us and an increase in our economic interests in the Asset Class Entities as a result of the Transaction Agreements.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in Legacy Greenspring Entities

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities represents the net income or loss attributable to the interests held by the legacy Greenspring general partner entities. We did not acquire any direct economic interests in the legacy Greenspring general partner entities. As a result, all of the net income or loss related to the legacy Greenspring general partner entities is allocated to non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities. Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities was $4.9 million, $(1.2) million, and $(9.1) million for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Table of Contents

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests in the Partnership

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in the Partnership represents the portion of net income or loss attributable to the interests held by the Class B, Class C and Class D unitholders of the Partnership. Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in the Partnership was $(384.6) million, $(125.9) million and $60.0 million for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Funds

Net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds represents income of the Consolidated Funds attributable to third-party investors. Net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds was $66.0 million, $53.7 million and $15.8 million for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Net Income Attributable to Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests in Subsidiaries

Net income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interests in subsidiaries was $2.5 million, $0.8 million and $5.8 million for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Operating Metrics

Assets Under Management

AUM was $157 billion as of March 31, 2024, $189 billion as of March 31, 2025 and $233 billion as of March 31, 2026.

Assets Under Advisement

Assets related to our advisory accounts were $521 billion as of March 31, 2024, $520 billion as of March 31, 2025 and $652 billion as of March 31, 2026.

Fee-Earning AUM

Year Ended March 31, 2026

FEAUM increased $22.7 billion, or 19%, to $144.0 billion as of March 31, 2026 as compared to $121.4 billion as of March 31, 2025. Of the increase, $8.6 billion was from SMAs and $14.0 billion was from focused commingled funds.

Year Ended March 31, 2025

FEAUM increased $27.5 billion, or 29%, to $121.4 billion as of March 31, 2025 as compared to $93.9 billion as of March 31, 2024. Of the increase, $14.3 billion was from SMAs and $13.3 billion was from focused commingled funds.

Table of Contents

Year Ended March 31, 2026

(in millions)

SMAs

Focused Commingled Funds

Total

Beginning balance

Contributions (1)

Distributions (2)

Market value, FX and other (3)

Ending balance

Year Ended March 31, 2025

(in millions)

SMAs

Focused Commingled Funds

Total

Beginning balance

Contributions (1)

Distributions (2)

Market value, FX and other (3)

Ending balance

(1) Contributions consist of new capital commitments that earn fees on committed capital and capital contributions to funds and accounts that earn fees on net invested capital or NAV.

(2) Distributions consist of returns of capital from funds and accounts that pay fees on net invested capital or NAV and reductions in fee-earning AUM from funds that moved from a committed capital to net invested capital fee basis or from funds and accounts that no longer pay fees.

(3) Market value, FX and other primarily consist of changes in market value appreciation (depreciation) for funds that pay on NAV and the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on non-U.S. dollar denominated commitments.

The following tables set forth FEAUM by asset class and selected weighted-average management fee rate data:

As of March 31,

(in millions)

FEAUM

Private equity

Infrastructure

Private debt

Real estate

Total

As of March 31,

Weighted-average fee rate (1)

Private equity (2)

Real estate, infrastructure and private debt asset classes (3)

Total

Table of Contents

(1) Weighted-average fee rates reflect the applicable management fees for the last 12 months ending on each period presented, and is inclusive of any retroactive fees for such period.

(2) The change in weighted-average fee rates primarily reflected the timing of new funds, shifts in mix between SMAs and focused commingled funds and growth in our private wealth funds which earn higher fee rates.

(3) The change in weighted-average fee rates primarily reflected the timing of new funds, shifts in asset class mix, shifts in mix between SMAs and focused commingled funds and growth in our private wealth funds which earn higher fee rates.

Undeployed Fee-Earning Capital

As of March 31, 2026, we had $40.1 billion of undeployed fee-earning capital, which will generate management fee revenue once invested or activated.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Below is a description of our non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are presented on a basis other than GAAP and should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted Net Income

Adjusted net income (“ANI”) is a non-GAAP performance measure that we present before the consolidation of StepStone Funds on a pre-tax and after-tax basis used to evaluate profitability. ANI represents the after-tax net realized income attributable to us. ANI does not reflect legacy Greenspring carried interest allocation revenues, legacy Greenspring carried interest-related compensation and legacy Greenspring investment income (loss) as none of the economics are attributable to us. The components of revenues used in the determination of ANI (“adjusted revenues”) comprise fee revenues, adjusted incentive fees and realized carried interest allocations. In addition, ANI excludes: (a) unrealized carried interest allocation revenues and related compensation, (b) unrealized investment income (loss), (c) equity-based compensation for awards granted prior to and in connection with our IPO, profits interests issued by our non-wholly owned subsidiaries, and unrealized mark-to-market changes in the fair value of the profits interests issued in the private wealth subsidiary, (d) amortization of intangibles, (e) net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in our subsidiaries and realized gains attributable to the profits interests issued in the private wealth subsidiary, (f) charges associated with acquisitions and corporate transactions, and (g) certain other items that we believe are not indicative of our core operating performance (as listed in the below table). ANI is fully taxed at our blended statutory rate. We believe ANI and adjusted revenues are useful to investors because they enable investors to evaluate the performance of our business across reporting periods.

Table of Contents

Adjusted Revenues

Adjusted revenues represents the components of revenues used in the determination of ANI and comprise fee revenues, adjusted incentive fees and realized carried interest allocations. We believe adjusted revenues is useful to investors because it presents a measure of realized revenues.

Fee-Related Earnings

Fee-related earnings (“FRE”) is a non-GAAP performance measure used to monitor our baseline earnings from recurring management and advisory fees. FRE is a component of ANI and comprises fee revenues less adjusted expenses which are operating expenses other than (a) performance fee-related compensation, (b) equity-based compensation for awards granted prior to and in connection with our IPO, profits interests issued by our non-wholly owned subsidiaries, and unrealized mark-to-market changes in the fair value of the profits interests issued in the private wealth subsidiary, (c) amortization of intangibles, (d) charges associated with acquisitions and corporate transactions, and (e) certain other items that we believe are not indicative of our core operating performance (as listed in the below table). FRE is presented before income taxes. We believe FRE is useful to investors because it provides additional insight into the operating profitability of our business and our ability to cover direct base compensation and operating expenses from total fee revenues.

Fee Revenues

Fee revenues represents management and advisory fees, net, including amounts earned from the Consolidated Funds which are eliminated in consolidation. We believe fee revenues is useful to investors because it presents the net amount of management and advisory fee revenues attributable to us.

Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares and Adjusted Net Income Per Share

ANI per share measures our per-share earnings assuming all Class B units, Class C units and Class D units in the Partnership were exchanged for Class A common stock in SSG, including the dilutive impact of outstanding equity-based awards. ANI per share is calculated as ANI divided by adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding. We believe adjusted weighted-average shares and ANI per share are useful to investors because they enable investors to better evaluate per-share operating performance across reporting periods.

Fee-Related Earnings

Year Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2025

FRE increased $42.2 million, or 14%, to $354.4 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, primarily reflecting higher fee revenues, partially offset by higher adjusted cash-based compensation, adjusted general, administrative and other expenses and adjusted equity-based compensation.

Year Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2024

FRE increased $122.4 million, or 64%, to $312.2 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily reflecting higher fee revenues, partially offset by higher adjusted cash-based compensation, adjusted general, administrative and other expenses and adjusted equity-based compensation.

Table of Contents

Adjusted Revenues and Adjusted Net Income

Year Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2025

Adjusted revenues increased $350.4 million, or 36%, to $1,320.2 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, primarily reflecting increases in adjusted incentive fees, fee revenues and realized carried interest allocations.

ANI increased $20.5 million, or 8%, to $264.6 million for fiscal 2026 as compared to fiscal 2025, primarily due to the increase in FRE as discussed above, higher performance fee-related earnings, higher adjusted realized investment income and higher interest income. The overall increase was partially offset by a higher allocation of income to non-controlling interests and higher interest expense.

Year Ended March 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended March 31, 2024

Adjusted revenues increased $304.7 million, or 46%, to $969.7 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily reflecting increases in fee revenues, realized carried interest allocation revenues and adjusted incentive fees.

ANI increased $104.7 million, or 75%, to $244.1 million for fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024, primarily due to an increase in FRE as discussed above, higher performance fee-related earnings (adjusted incentive fees, plus realized carried interest allocation revenues, less realized performance fee-related compensation), higher interest income and higher adjusted realized investment income. The overall increase was partially offset by a higher allocation of income to non-controlling interests and higher interest expense.

Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares and Adjusted Net Income Per Share

The following table shows a reconciliation of diluted weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding to adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding used in the computation of ANI per share for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024.

Year Ended March 31,

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

ANI

Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding – Basic

Assumed vesting of RSUs

Assumed vesting and exchange of Class B2 units (1)

Assumed purchase under ESPP

Exchange of Class B units in the Partnership (2)

Exchange of Class C units in the Partnership (2)

Exchange of Class D units in the Partnership (2)

Adjusted weighted-average shares

ANI per share

(1) The Class B2 units fully vested in June 2024.

Table of Contents

(2) Assumes the full exchange of Class B units, Class C units or Class D units in the Partnership for Class A common stock of SSG pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement, Class C Exchange Agreement or Class D Exchange Agreement, respectively.

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The table below shows a reconciliation of revenues to adjusted revenues.

Year Ended March 31,

(in thousands)

Total revenues

Unrealized carried interest allocations

Deferred incentive fees

Legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations

Management and advisory fee revenues for the Consolidated Funds (1)

Incentive fees for the Consolidated Funds (2)

Adjusted revenues

(1) Reflects the add back of management and advisory fee revenues for the Consolidated Funds, which have been eliminated in consolidation.

(2) Reflects the add back of incentive fee revenues for the Consolidated Funds, which have been eliminated in consolidation.

Table of Contents

The table below shows a reconciliation of GAAP measures to additional non-GAAP measures. We use the non-GAAP measures presented below as components when calculating FRE and ANI. We believe these additional non-GAAP measures are useful to investors in evaluating both the baseline earnings from recurring management and advisory fees, which provide additional insight into the operating profitability of our business, and the after-tax net realized income attributable to us, allowing investors to evaluate the performance of our business. These additional non-GAAP measures remove the impact of Consolidated Funds that we are required to consolidate under GAAP, and certain other items that we believe are not indicative of our core operating performance.

Year Ended March 31,

(in thousands)

GAAP management and advisory fees, net

Adjustments (1)

Fee revenues

GAAP incentive fees

Adjustments (2)

Adjusted incentive fees

GAAP realized investment income

Adjustments (3)

Adjusted realized investment income

GAAP interest income

Adjustments (4)

Adjusted interest income

GAAP other income (loss)

Adjustments (5)

Adjusted other income (loss)

(1) Reflects the add-back of management and advisory fee revenues for the Consolidated Funds, which have been eliminated in consolidation.

(2) Reflects the add back of incentive fee revenues for the Consolidated Funds, which have been eliminated in consolidation, and deferred incentive fees that are not included in GAAP revenues.

(3) Reflects the realization of a seed capital investment in the StepStone Funds which is eliminated in consolidation.

(4) Reflects the removal of interest income earned by the Consolidated Funds.

(5) Reflects the removal of amounts for Tax Receivable Agreements adjustments recognized as other income (loss), gain associated with amounts received as part of negotiations with a third party related to certain corporate matters, loss on sale of subsidiary, loss associated with payment made in connection with a secondary transaction executed by one of our private wealth funds and the impact of consolidation of the Consolidated Funds.

Table of Contents

The table below shows a reconciliation of income (loss) before income tax to ANI and FRE.

Year Ended March 31,

(in thousands)

Income (loss) before income tax

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries (1)

Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities

Unrealized carried interest allocations

Unrealized performance fee-related compensation

Unrealized investment income

Impact of Consolidated Funds

Deferred incentive fees

Equity-based compensation (2)

Amortization of intangibles

Tax Receivable Agreements adjustments through earnings

Non-core items (3)

Pre-tax ANI

Income taxes (4)

ANI

Income taxes (4)

Realized carried interest allocations

Realized performance fee-related compensation

Adjusted realized investment income (5)

Adjusted incentive fees (6)

Adjusted interest income (7)

Interest expense

Adjusted other (income) loss (8)

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries (1)

FRE

(1) Reflects the portion of pre-tax ANI attributable to non-controlling interests in our subsidiaries and realized gains attributable to the profits interests issued in the private wealth subsidiary. Amounts attributable to the profits interests issued in the private wealth subsidiary were $136.2 million in fiscal 2026, $23.2 million in fiscal 2025 and $3.1 million in fiscal 2024. Amounts specifically attributable to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries not attributable to the private wealth subsidiary were $81.4 million in fiscal 2026, $79.7 million in fiscal 2025 and $46.1 million in fiscal 2024.

(2) Reflects equity-based compensation for awards granted prior to and in connection with the IPO, profits interests issued by our non-wholly owned subsidiaries, and unrealized mark-to-market changes in the fair value of the profits interests issued in the private wealth subsidiary.

(3) Includes (income) expense related to transaction costs ($0.7 million in fiscal 2026, $1.0 million in fiscal 2025, and $4.9 million in fiscal 2024), unrealized amounts associated with cash-based incentive awards tracked to investment funds ($0.1 million in fiscal 2026), gain realized upon vesting of cash-based incentive awards tracked to investment funds ($0.1 million in fiscal 2026), lease remeasurement adjustments ($(0.1) million in fiscal 2024), accelerated depreciation of leasehold improvements for changes in lease terms ($1.9 million in fiscal 2024), loss on change in fair value for contingent consideration obligation ($0.2 million in fiscal 2026, $16.1 million in fiscal 2025, and $17.2 million in fiscal 2024), compensation paid to certain employees as part of an acquisition earn-out ($0.4 million in fiscal 2025 and $2.2 million in fiscal 2024), loss associated with payment made in connection with a secondary

Table of Contents

transaction executed by one of our private wealth funds ($32.5 million in fiscal 2025), gain associated with amounts received as part of negotiations with a third party related to certain corporate matters ($5.3 million in fiscal 2024), unrealized amounts associated with deferred compensation liability adjustments ($13 thousand in fiscal 2026), loss on sale of subsidiary ($0.8 million in fiscal 2024) and other non-core operating income and expenses.

(4) Represents corporate income taxes at a blended statutory rate of 22.6% applied to pre-tax ANI for fiscal 2026 and a blended statutory rate of 22.3% applied to pre-tax ANI for fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024. The 22.6% rate is based on a federal statutory rate of 21.0% and a combined state, local and foreign rate net of federal benefits of 1.6%. The 22.3% rate is based on a federal statutory rate of 21.0% and a combined state, local and foreign rate net of federal benefits of 1.3%. The increase in the blended statutory rate for fiscal 2026 compared to fiscal 2025 was due to updates in our state apportionment.

(5) Reflects the realization of a seed capital investment in the StepStone Funds which is eliminated in consolidation.

(6) Reflects the add-back of incentive fee revenues for the Consolidated Funds, which have been eliminated in consolidation, and deferred incentive fees that are not included in GAAP revenues.

(7) Reflects the removal of interest income earned by the Consolidated Funds.

(8) Reflects the removal of the impact of consolidation of the Consolidated Funds and amounts for Tax Receivable Agreements adjustments recognized as other income (loss) ($(4.2) million in fiscal 2026, $0.3 million in fiscal 2025, and $(0.3) million in fiscal 2024), loss associated with payment made in connection with a secondary transaction executed by one of our private wealth funds ($32.5 million in fiscal 2025), gain associated with amounts received as part of negotiations with a third party related to certain corporate matters ($5.3 million in fiscal 2024), and loss on sale of subsidiary ($0.8 million in fiscal 2024).

Investment Performance

The following table presents information relating to the performance of all the investments that StepStone has recommended and subsequently tracked across asset classes and investment strategies, except as set forth in greater detail below. The data for these investments are generally presented from the inception date of each strategy and asset class through December 31, 2025 and have not been adjusted to reflect acquisitions or disposals of investments subsequent to that date.

The historical results of our investments are not indicative of future results to be expected of existing or new investment funds, and are not a proxy for the performance of our Class A common stock, including because:

• market conditions and investment opportunities may differ from those in the past;

• the performance of our funds is largely based on the NAV (as defined below) of the funds’ investments, including unrealized gains, which may never be realized;

• newly-established funds may generate lower investment returns during the period that they initially deploy their capital;

• changes in the global tax and regulatory environment may impact both the investment preferences of our clients and the financing strategies employed by businesses in which particular funds invest, which may reduce the overall capital available for investment and the availability of suitable investments, thereby reducing investment returns in the future;

• competition for investment opportunities, resulting from the increasing amount of capital invested in private markets alternatives, may increase the cost and reduce the availability of suitable investments, thereby reducing investment returns in the future; and

• the industries and businesses in which particular funds invest will vary.

Historical and future returns of investments included in our track record are not directly correlated to potential returns on our Class A common stock.

Table of Contents

For the purposes of the following table:

• “Invested capital” refers to the total amount of all investments made by a fund, including commitment-reducing and non-commitment-reducing capital calls;

• “NAV” refers to the estimated fair value of unrealized investments plus any net assets or liabilities associated with the investment as of December 31, 2025;

• “IRR” refers to the annualized internal rate of return for all investments within the relevant investment strategy on an inception-to-date basis as of December 31, 2025 (except as noted otherwise below), based on contributions, distributions and unrealized value;

• “Net IRR” refers to IRR net of fees and expenses charged by both the underlying fund managers and StepStone; and

• “Net TVM” refers to the total value to paid-in capital or invested capital expressed as a multiple, and is calculated as distributions plus unrealized valuations divided by invested capital (including all capitalized costs).

StepStone Performance Summary by Asset Class

PRIVATE EQUITY BUYOUT*

VENTURE CAPITAL & GROWTH EQUITY

REAL ESTATE

INFRASTRUCTURE

PRIVATE DEBT

INVESTMENT STRATEGY (1,3,4)

NET IRR (2)

INVESTMENT STRATEGY (1,3,5)

NET IRR (2)

INVESTMENT STRATEGY (1,3,6)

NET IRR (2)

INVESTMENT STRATEGY (1,3,7)

NET IRR (2)

INVESTMENT STRATEGY (1,3,9)

NET IRR (2)

Primaries

Primaries

Core/core+ fund investments

Core/debt - all strategies

Primaries

Secondaries

Secondaries

Value-add/opportunistic fund investments

Core+/value-add - primary fund investments

Direct lending

Co-investments

Directs/co-investments

Real estate debt fund investments

Core+/value-add - secondary fund investments

Opportunistic

Value-add/opportunistic secondaries & co-investments

Core+/value-add - co-investments (8)

Co-investments/secondaries

Direct lending

Opportunistic

Customized managed accounts

(1) Investment returns reflect NAV data for underlying investments as of December 31, 2025, as reported by underlying managers up to the business day occurring on or after 115 days following December 31, 2025. For investment returns where NAV data is not available by the business day occurring on or after 115 days following December 31, 2025, such NAVs are adjusted for cash activity following the last available reported NAV. Investment returns are calculated on a constant currency adjusted reporting basis converting non-USD investment cash flows and NAVs to USD using the foreign currency exchange rate corresponding to each client’s first cash flow date.

(2) Net IRR and Net TVM are presented solely for illustrative purposes and do not represent actual returns received by any investor in any of the StepStone Funds. Returns represented above are net of fees and expenses charged by both the underlying investment and hypothetical StepStone fees. The aggregate returns are not indicative of the returns an individual investor would receive from these investments. No individual investor received the aggregate returns described herein as the investments were made across multiple mandates over multiple years. StepStone fees and expenses are based on the following assumptions (management fees and expenses represent an annual rate, charged quarterly):

Table of Contents

i. Primaries management fee: 25 basis points of net invested capital for private equity, real estate and infrastructure; 25 basis points of net asset value for private debt; 75 basis points of committed capital for the StepStone VC Platform.

ii. Secondaries management fee: 125 basis points, 125 basis points and 95 basis points of capital commitments for private equity, real estate and infrastructure, respectively, in years 1 through 4 for management fees, charged quarterly; in year 5, management fees step down to 90% of the previous year’s fee; 65 basis points of net asset value for private debt; 75 basis points of committed capital for the StepStone VC Platform.

iii. Co-investments management fee: 100 basis points of capital commitments for private equity in year 1 through 4 for management fees, charged quarterly; in year 5, management fees step down to 90 basis points of the net invested capital, charged quarterly; 100 basis points of net committed capital for real estate; 90 and 50 basis points of net committed capital for infrastructure co-investments and direct asset management investments, respectively; 65 basis points of net asset value for private debt; 200 basis points of net invested capital for the StepStone VC Platform.

iv. All investments assess 5 basis points of capital commitments for fund expenses, charged quarterly, and 1 basis point of capital commitments drawn down in the first cash flow quarter for organizational costs.

v. Private equity secondaries and co-investments include 12.5% and 10.0% of paid and unrealized carry, respectively, with an 8.0% preferred return hurdle; infrastructure secondaries and co-investments include 10.0% of paid and unrealized carry, respectively, with an 8.0% preferred return hurdle; real estate secondaries and co-investments include 15.0% of paid and unrealized carry, with an 8.0% preferred return hurdle; private debt secondaries and co-investments include 10.0% of paid and unrealized carry, with a 5.0% preferred return hurdle; and the StepStone VC Platform primaries, secondaries and co-investments/directs include 5.0%, 5.0% and 20.0%, respectively, of paid and unrealized carry with no preferred return hurdle.

Net IRR and Net TVM for investments reflect the underlying fund manager’s use of subscription backed credit facilities, if reported to StepStone as such by the underlying managers. Aggregate net performance returns for private equity buyout secondaries and co-investments are presented on a levered basis, assuming the use of a subscription line of credit drawn for 180 days, at a cost based on the historical interest rate of SOFR +200bps. Without the subscription lines, Net IRR/Net TVM for secondaries and co-investments would be 15.3%/1.3x and 14.7%/1.6x, respectively. Reinvested/recycled amounts increase contributed capital.

(3) Investment returns of client portfolios are included in the performance summary past the client’s termination date until such time as StepStone stops receiving current investment data (quarterly valuations and cash flows) for such investment. At that point, StepStone will then ‘liquidate’ the fund by entering a distribution amount equal to the last reported NAV, thus ending the investment’s contribution to the track record as of that date. Historical performance contribution will be maintained up until the ‘liquidation’ date.

(4) Private equity buyout performance includes buyout-focused strategies comprising 1,116 investments totaling $165.6 billion of capital commitments, and excludes (i) venture capital and growth equity direct investments, reported separately; (ii) 178 client-directed buyout investments, totaling $32.3 billion of capital commitments; (iii) 91 investments with fund-of-funds, energy, opportunistic and other non-buyout-focused strategies totaling $9.3 billion of capital commitments; (iv) two advisory co-investments totaling $100 million; and (v) any investments that do not have client data monitored in SPI Reporting.

* Private equity buyout investment returns have replaced private equity investment returns. Private equity buyout investment returns represent StepStone’s buyout focused investment strategies and therefore do not include venture capital and growth equity direct investments, fund-of-funds investments, energy, opportunistic and other non-buyout-focused investment strategies previously reported as part of private equity investment returns. In addition, secondary and co-investment performance was previously presented on an unlevered basis. Private equity Net IRR/Net TVM investment returns for primaries, secondaries and co-investments, as previously presented would have been, for primary investments, secondaries and co-investments 13.5%/1.5x, 14.3%/1.3x, and 15.2%/1.6x, respectively.

(5) Venture capital and growth equity includes 2,213 investments totaling $63.9 billion of capital commitments and excludes (i) 70 client-directed investments, totaling $2.4 billion of capital commitments, and (ii) investments that do not have client data monitored in SPI Reporting. StepStone's venture capital and growth equity strategy is composed of a) investments in the StepStone venture capital platform, comprising venture capital focused commingled funds and separately managed accounts (the “StepStone VC Platform”) and b) underlying venture capital investments within StepStone’s broader private equity accounts (“StepStone PE Accounts”).

Table of Contents

(6) Real estate includes 523 investments totaling $94.0 billion of capital commitments and excludes (i) 100 client-directed real estate investments, totaling $17.2 billion of capital commitments, (ii) 20 secondary/co-investment core/core+ or credit investments, totaling $1.2 billion of capital commitments, (iii) four advisory fund investments totaling $463.6 million of capital commitments, and (iv) investments that do not have client data monitored in SPI Reporting.

(7) Infrastructure includes 360 investments totaling $74.0 billion of capital commitments and excludes (i) eight infrastructure investments made by the Partnership prior to the formation of the infrastructure subsidiary in 2013 or made prior to StepStone’s acquisition of Courtland Partners, Ltd. on April 1, 2018 (the “Courtland acquisition”), totaling $501.9 million of capital commitments, (ii) 50 client-directed infrastructure investments, totaling $12.3 billion of capital commitments, and (iii) investments that do not have client data monitored in SPI Reporting.

(8) Infrastructure co-investment performance includes asset management direct investments.

(9) Private debt includes 1,874 investments totaling $70.3 billion of capital commitments and excludes (i) 48 client-directed debt investments, totaling $4.3 billion of capital commitments, (ii) 50 real estate credit investments that were recommended by Courtland Partners, Ltd. prior to the Courtland acquisition, totaling $5.1 billion of capital commitments, and (iii) investments that do not have client data monitored in SPI Reporting. *Net IRRs are not aggregated and shown for customized managed accounts (which include capacity-negotiated GP co-investment accounts and GP primary managed accounts) totaling $35.4 billion of committed capital, as the investment objective of those investments are customized to the respective client’s investment target on multiple-on-committed-capital (“MOCC”) and can differ significantly.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Liquidity

We generate cash primarily from management and advisory fees and performance fees. We have historically managed our liquidity and capital resource needs through (a) cash generated from our operating activities, (b) realizations from investment activities, (c) borrowings, interest payments and repayments under credit agreements, senior note issuances and other borrowing arrangements, (d) funding capital commitments to our funds, and (e) funding our growth initiatives, including capital expenditures for property, equipment, and acquisitions to expand into new businesses.

As of March 31, 2026, we had $213.6 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash ($1,119.0 million including Consolidated Funds) and $2,286.3 million of investments in StepStone Funds ($3,001.7 million including Consolidated Funds), including $2,036.9 million of accrued carried interest allocations, against $270.6 million in debt obligations, net of debt issuance costs ($1,201.8 million including Consolidated Funds), and $1,100.6 million in accrued carried interest-related compensation payable.

Ongoing sources of cash include (a) management and advisory fees, which are collected monthly or quarterly, (b) performance fees, which are volatile and largely unpredictable as to amount and timing; and (c) distributions from our investments in the StepStone Funds. We use cash flow from operations and distributions from our investments in the StepStone Funds to pay compensation and related expenses, general and administrative expenses, income taxes, debt service, capital expenditures, dividends to our stockholders and distributions to holders of Partnership units, make repurchases under our stock repurchase program and to make investments in the StepStone Funds. We believe we will have sufficient ability to meet our liquidity and capital resources requirements for the next 12 months through cash flows from operating activities, existing cash and cash equivalents, and our ability to obtain future financing.

Table of Contents

Cash Flows

The accompanying consolidated cash flows include the Consolidated Funds, which activities primarily consist of raising capital from third-party investors, purchasing investments, making payment for the operating costs of the fund, generating cash flows from realized income allocations of investments and sales of investments, and making distributions to investors. The Consolidated Funds are accounted for as investment companies and therefore the cash flows from investing activities are included in cash flows from operations.

The following table summarizes our cash flows attributable to operating, investing and financing activities:

Year Ended March 31,

(in thousands)

Net cash provided by operating activities

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

Operating Activities

Operating activities provided $66.5 million, $64.9 million and $161.5 million of cash for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively, these amounts primarily consisted of the following:

• net income, after adjustments for non-cash items (including unrealized mark-to-market changes in the fair value of the profits interests issued in the private wealth subsidiary, unrealized carried interest allocations, unrealized performance fee-related compensation, unrealized investment (income) loss and fair value adjustment for acquisition-related contingent consideration), of $478.6 million, $419.3 million and $243.9 million;

• net change in operating assets and liabilities of $(16.0) million, $(19.8) million and $18.8 million;

• payments made for acquisition-related contingent consideration of $0 million, $51.5 million and $0 million;

• adjustments for unrealized investment income from Consolidated Funds of $84.9 million, $62.2 million and $26.1 million;

• net purchases of investments of Consolidated Funds of $326.6 million, $221.0 million and $75.1 million; and

• net change in operating assets and liabilities of Consolidated Funds of $15.3 million, $32 thousand and $0.1 million.

Investing Activities

Investing activities provided (used) $732.9 million, $(43.5) million and $(47.3) million of cash for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and primarily consisted of the following amounts:

• net contributions to investments of $41.4 million, $42.8 million and $19.0 million;

Table of Contents

• net (contributions to) distributions from investments in legacy Greenspring entities of $1.9 million, $4.4 million and $(8.8) million;

• net cash recognized upon initial consolidation of funds of $812.1 million, $0 million and $0 million;

• net cash derecognized from deconsolidation of fund of $37.0 million, $0 million and $0 million; and

• purchases of fixed assets of $2.6 million, $5.1 million and $19.6 million.

Financing Activities

Financing activities provided (used) $37.4 million, $87.5 million and $(58.0) million of cash for fiscal 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and primarily consisted of the following:

• net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facility of $0 million, $(50.0) million and $50.0 million;

• proceeds from issuance of notes payable of $0 million, $175.0 million and $0 million;

• deferred financing costs of $0 million; $5.4 million and $0 million;

• purchase of non-controlling interests of $10.3 million, $5.4 million and $0 million;

• sale of non-controlling interests of $0 million, $0 million and $3.0 million;

• redemption of redeemable non-controlling interests of $0 million, $13.0 million and $0 million;

• proceeds from capital contributions from non-controlling interests $3.3 million, $8.8 million and $43 thousand;

• distributions to non-controlling interests of $164.6 million, $129.3 million and $97.3 million;

• proceeds from capital contributions to legacy Greenspring entities of $1.4 million, $19.6 million and $12.5 million;

• distributions to non-controlling interests in legacy Greenspring entities of $6.2 million, $32.0 million and $9.0 million;

• payments made for acquisition-related contingent consideration of $0 million, $17.8 million and $0 million;

• dividends paid to common stockholders of $117.8 million, $75.8 million and $68.5 million;

• payments for taxes related to the net settlement of equity-based awards of $0.4 million, $1.5 million and $0.7 million;

• proceeds from issuance of Class A common stock under ESPP of $3.7 million, $2.5 million and $0 million;

• payments for repurchases of Class A common stock of $8.7 million, $0 million and $0 million;

Table of Contents

• payments to related parties under the Tax Receivable Agreements of $12.6 million, $9.8 million and $10.3 million;

• net repayments on fund credit facility of $0 million, $40 thousand and $0 million;

• contributions from redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds of $403.3 million, $240.3 million and $62.3 million; and

• redemptions of redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds of $53.7 million, $18.7 million and $0 million.

Debt Obligations

Debt Obligations of the Company

Revolving Credit Facility

We are party to a credit agreement, as amended and restated in May 2024 (the “Credit Agreement”), which, among other things, increased the aggregate principal amount of the commitments thereunder to $300.0 million from $225.0 million and extended the maturity date of the revolving facility to May 2029. The Credit Agreement was arranged by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent, and certain other lenders party thereto and provides for a $300.0 million multicurrency Revolver.

Borrowings under the Revolver bear interest at a variable rate per annum. We may designate each borrowing as (i) in the case of any borrowing in U.S. dollars, a base rate loan or a Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) rate loan, (ii) in the case of any borrowing denominated in Euros, a EURIBOR rate loan, (iii) in the case of any borrowing denominated in British Pounds Sterling, a Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) loan, (iv) in the case of any borrowing denominated in Swiss Francs, a Swiss Average Rate Overnight (“SARON”) loan, and (v) in the case of any borrowing denominated in Australian dollars, an AUD rate loan. Borrowings bear interest equal to (i) in the case of base rate loans, 1.00% plus the greatest of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the New York Federal Reserve Bank Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the 1 month Term SOFR, plus 1.10%, (ii) in the case of a Term SOFR rate loan, the Term SOFR rate plus 2.10%, (iii) in the case of a EURIBOR rate loan, the EURIBOR rate multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 2.00%, (iv) in the case of a SONIA loan, the Sterling Overnight Index Average plus 2.03%, (v) in the case of a SARON loan, the Swiss Average Rate Overnight plus 2.00%, and (vi) in the case of an AUD rate loan, the AUD Screen Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate plus 2.20%, in certain cases subject to applicable interest rate floors. The weighted-average interest rate in effect for the Revolver as of March 31, 2026 was 5.79%.

Borrowings under the Revolver may be repaid at any time during the term of the Credit Agreement and, subject to certain terms and conditions, may be reborrowed prior to the maturity date. Any outstanding principal amounts, together with any accrued interest thereon, shall be due and payable on the maturity date. The maturity date for the Revolver is May 16, 2029.

The Revolver bears a fee on undrawn commitments equal to 0.25% per annum if total utilization of revolving commitments is equal to or greater than 50% and 0.35% per annum if total utilization of revolving commitments is less than 50%.

We can use available funding capacity under the Revolver to satisfy letters of credit in amounts up to $10.0 million. Amounts used to satisfy the letters of credit reduce the available capacity under the Revolver. As of March 31, 2026, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $10.1 million.

Table of Contents

Senior Notes

On October 22, 2024, we issued $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.52% Series A senior notes due October 22, 2029, pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2024, in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act.

Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 22 and October 22 of each year. Interest on the Notes accrues from and including October 22, 2024. The Notes will mature on October 22, 2029. We may, at our option, prepay at any time all, or from time to time any part of, the Notes, in an amount not less than 5% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus any applicable “make-whole amount” and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. So long as no default or event of default shall have occurred and be continuing under the Note Purchase Agreement, no make-whole amount will be due if the Notes are paid on or after April 22, 2029.

Debt Obligations of Consolidated Funds

Debt obligations of the Consolidated Funds primarily comprise amounts due to holders of debt securities issued by a consolidated collateralized financing entity (“CFE”). We are not liable for any of the notes payable issued by the CFE which are collateralized by the assets held by the CFE. As of March 31, 2026, the collateral of the CFE consisted of cash and cash equivalents and investments in funds which are generally organized as partnership and LLC interests. The notes payable may only be repaid from collateral proceeds, which will occur as distributions are received from underlying assets. Notes payable of the Consolidated Funds are collateralized by the assets held by the Consolidated Funds and the assets of one fund may not be used to satisfy the liabilities of another fund.

As of March 31, 2026, the consolidated CFE has the ability to issue up to $1,396.8 million of additional notes payable.

Certain Consolidated Funds may maintain revolving credit facilities that are secured by fund assets to fund investments on a short-term basis. The debt obligations of the Consolidated Funds are non-recourse to us.

In December 2024, one of our consolidated investment funds entered into a credit agreement with Northern Trust Global Service SE (the “Fund Credit Facility”). The Fund Credit Facility provides for a multi-currency revolving credit facility of up to $125.0 million. Amounts drawn under the facility must be repaid within 180 days. As of March 31, 2026, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Fund Credit Facility.

Borrowings under the Fund Credit Facility bear interest at a variable rate per annum. Borrowings in USD will bear interest at the applicable federal funds target rate (upper range) plus a margin of 250 basis points. Borrowings in GBP will bear interest at the Bank of England base rate plus a margin of 250 basis points. Borrowings in EUR will bear interest at the European Central Bank main refinancing rate plus a margin of 250 basis points.

In March 2026, our consolidated CFE entered into a credit agreement arranged by Alter Domus LLC, as the administrative agent, and certain other lenders party thereto that provides for a revolving credit facility (the “Liquidity Loan Facility”) of up to $408.4 million. As of March 31, 2026, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Liquidity Loan Facility.

Borrowings under the Liquidity Loan Facility bear interest at a variable rate per annum at the Term SOFR plus a margin of 270 basis points. The facility also bears an unused commitment fee of 1.00% per annum.

Table of Contents

Borrowings under the Liquidity Loan Facility may be repaid at any time during the term of the Agreement and, subject to certain terms and conditions, may be reborrowed prior to the maturity date. Any outstanding principal amounts, together with any accrued interest thereon, shall be due and payable on the maturity date. The maturity date for the Liquidity Loan Facility is March 23, 2031.

Debt Covenants

Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, certain of our assets serve as pledged collateral. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains covenants that, among other things: limit our ability to incur indebtedness; create, incur or allow liens; transfer or dispose of assets; merge with other companies; make certain investments; pay dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances; engage in new or different lines of business; and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants requiring us to maintain a total net leverage ratio and a minimum total of fee-earning assets under management.

The Note Purchase Agreement contains certain covenants, including those requiring us to (a) maintain a total net leverage ratio, (b) maintain a minimum total of fee-earning assets under management, (c) cause at least 80% of all management fees payable by material subsidiaries to us to be collected each period without deferral, waiver or reduction, (d) limit the amount of secured indebtedness to be incurred by us, and (e) other customary covenants. The Note Purchase Agreement also provides for customary events of default, which, if any occur and is continuing, could permit or require the entire unpaid principal amount of any or all Notes, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and any applicable “make-whole amount” to become or to be declared due and payable immediately.

Under the terms of the Fund Credit Facility, certain of the assets of the Consolidated Funds serve as pledged collateral. In addition, the Fund Credit Facility contains covenants that, among other things: limit the ability of the fund to incur indebtedness; create, incur or allow liens; and other customary covenants. The Fund Credit Facility also provides for customary events of default, which, if any occur and are continuing, could permit or require the entire unpaid principal amount of any or all loans under the Fund Credit Facility, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon to become or to be declared due and payable immediately.

Liquidity Loan Facility

Under the terms of the Liquidity Loan Facility, certain assets of the Consolidated Funds serve as pledged collateral. In addition, the Liquidity Loan Facility contains covenants that, among other things: limit the ability of the fund to incur indebtedness; create, incur or allow liens; and other customary covenants. The Liquidity Loan Facility also provides for customary events of default, which, if any occur and are continuing, could permit or require the entire unpaid principal amount of any or all loans under the Liquidity Loan Facility, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon to become or to be declared due and payable immediately.

As of March 31, 2026, we were in compliance with the covenants under our various debt agreements.

Table of Contents

Equity Transactions

In June 2025, we issued 152,768 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 152,768 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 18,000 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 18,000 Class C units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class C Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 864,640 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 864,640 Class D units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class D Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

In September 2025, we issued 370,470 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 370,470 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 16,658 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 16,658 Class C units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class C Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 135,697 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 135,697 Class D units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class D Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

In December 2025, we issued 116,000 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 116,000 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us. We also issued 892,169 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 892,169 Class D units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class D Exchange Agreement, and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

In March 2026, we issued 379,955 shares of Class A common stock to certain limited partners of the Partnership in exchange for 379,955 Class B units of the Partnership in accordance with the elective exchange notices submitted pursuant to the Class B Exchange Agreement. A corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock were automatically redeemed at par value and canceled in connection with such exchange and a corresponding number of Class A units of the Partnership were issued to us.

Table of Contents

Stock Repurchase Program

On March 9, 2026, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $100.0 million of our Class A common stock, excluding fees and expenses. Under the stock repurchase program, repurchases may be made from time to time through open market purchases, in privately negotiated transactions, or by other means, including through the use of trading plans intended to qualify under Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. The stock repurchase program may be modified, suspended or discontinued by the board of directors at any time without prior notice and does not have a specified expiration date. Each share of Class A common stock repurchased is funded with the proceeds, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, from the repurchase of Class A units by the Partnership from us in order to maintain the one-to-one ratio between outstanding shares of Class A common stock and Class A units.

Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity

In the future, we may issue additional equity or debt with the objective of increasing our available capital. We believe that we will be able to continue to meet our current and long-term liquidity and capital requirements through our cash flows from operating activities, existing cash and cash equivalents, and our ability to obtain future financing.

Dividends

On May 20, 2026, we announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per share of Class A common stock and a supplemental cash dividend of $0.55 per share of Class A common stock, both payable on June 30, 2026 to holders of record as of the close of business on June 15, 2026. The quarterly cash dividend and supplemental cash dividend relate to earnings in respect of our fourth fiscal quarter and full fiscal year 2026, respectively. The declaration of this supplemental dividend does not guarantee that we will declare supplemental dividends in the future and our board of directors may, in its discretion, decrease the level of dividends or discontinue the payment of dividends entirely. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure— We currently pay dividends to our stockholders, but our ability to do so is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and may be limited by our holding company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law. In addition, any repurchases of our Class A common stock are discretionary and may be limited by applicable legal requirements and other considerations.”

Table of Contents

The following table presents information regarding quarterly cash dividends on Class A common shares for the periods indicated:

Quarterly Fiscal Period 1

Dividend Payment Date

Dividend Per Share of Class A Common Stock

First quarter

June 30, 2023

Supplemental 2

June 30, 2023

Second quarter

September 15, 2023

Third quarter

December 15, 2023

Fourth quarter

March 15, 2024

Total dividends paid in FY2024

First quarter

June 28, 2024

Supplemental 2

June 28, 2024

Second quarter

September 13, 2024

Third quarter

December 13, 2024

Fourth quarter

March 14, 2025

Total dividends paid in FY2025

First quarter

June 30, 2025

Supplemental 2

June 30, 2025

Second quarter

September 15, 2025

Third quarter

December 15, 2025

Fourth quarter

March 13, 2026

Total dividends paid in FY2026

(1) Dividends paid, as reported in this table, relate to the preceding quarterly period in which they were earned.

(2) The supplemental cash dividend relates to earnings in respect of our full fiscal years 2023 , 2024 and 2025, respectively.

We may pay additional dividends to holders of our Class A common stock in the future. The declaration and payment by us of any future dividends to Class A stockholders is at the sole discretion of our board of directors. Subject to funds being legally available, we will cause the Partnership to make pro rata distributions to its limited partners, including us, in amounts sufficient to make payment of applicable income and other taxes, to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreements, and to make payment for corporate and other general expenses. Because our board of directors may determine to pay or not pay dividends to our Class A stockholders, our Class A stockholders may not necessarily receive dividend distributions relating to our excess distributions, even if the Partnership makes excess distributions to us.

Table of Contents

Tax Receivable Agreements

We have entered into an Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement with the Class B limited partners, Class C limited partners, and Class D limited partners and a Reorganization Tax Receivable Agreement with certain pre-IPO institutional investors (collectively, the “Tax Receivable Agreements”). The Tax Receivable Agreements provide for payment by SSG to these partners and pre-IPO institutional investors of the Partnership of 85% of the amount of the net cash tax savings, if any, that SSG realizes (or, under certain circumstances, is deemed to realize) as a result of increases in tax basis (and utilization of certain other tax benefits) resulting from (i) SSG’s acquisition of such partner’s and institutional investor’s Partnership units and (ii) in the case of the Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement, any payments SSG makes under the Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement (including tax benefits related to imputed interest). SSG will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these net cash tax savings under the Tax Receivable Agreements.

Capital Requirements of Regulated Entities

We are required to maintain minimum net capital balances for regulatory purposes in the United States and certain non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we do business. These net capital requirements are met by retaining cash and cash equivalents in those jurisdictions. As a result, we may be restricted in our ability to transfer cash between different operating entities and jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2026, we were required to maintain approximately $27.1 million in net capital at these subsidiaries and were in compliance with all regulatory minimum net capital requirements.

Option Agreement Payment

In November 2022, we entered into arrangements with the SPW management team (the “Private Wealth Transaction”) under which certain members of the SPW team received a profits interest in SPW and concurrently entered into an option agreement which provides that (i) we have the right to acquire the profits interest at the end of any fiscal quarter after June 30, 2027 in exchange for payment of a call price and (ii) the SPW management team, through an entity named CH Equity Partners, LLC, has the right to put the profits interest to us on June 30, 2026 or at the end of any fiscal quarter thereafter, in exchange for payment of a put price. The applicable call or put price is, in certain circumstances, subject to an earn-out or earn-down. The call or put price will be payable in cash unless we elect to pay up to 75% of the consideration in units of the Partnership, each to be exchangeable into shares of our Class A common stock, and, in either case, rights under one or more tax receivable agreements. As of March 31, 2026, based on the fair value of the liability classified awards, the estimated minimum and maximum amount of cash that would be potentially payable to settle the liability under the Private Wealth Transaction was $564.4 million and $2,257.6 million, respectively. We believe that we will be able to meet the cash requirements for settlement of the liability through our ability to obtain future financing. See note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for more information. Certain assumptions used in determining the fair value are inherently subjective; therefore, the ultimate settlement amount for the liability classified awards may differ materially from the current estimate.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements that require future cash payments.

The following table sets forth information regarding our anticipated future cash payments under our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2026:

Total

Less than 1 year

Years 1-3

Years 3-5

Thereafter

Operating lease obligations (1)

Debt obligations (2)

Interest on debt obligations (3)

Debt obligations of Consolidated Funds (4)

Capital commitments (5)

Capital commitments of Consolidated Funds (6)

Capital commitments in legacy Greenspring funds (7)

Total

(1) We lease office space and certain office equipment under agreements that expire periodically through 2039. The table only includes guaranteed minimum lease payments under these agreements, including leases signed but not yet commenced at the period end, and does not project other lease-related payments.

(2) Debt obligations presented in the table relate to the Revolver and Notes, which have maturity dates of May 16, 2029 and October 22, 2029, respectively. The balance outstanding under the Revolver as of March 31, 2026 has been presented as an obligation payable in the years 3-5 column as there are no scheduled or required principal payments on the Revolver until the maturity date on May 16, 2029. The balance outstanding under the Notes as of March 31, 2026 has been presented as an obligation payable in the years 3-5 column as there are no scheduled or required principal payments on the Notes until the maturity date on October 22, 2029.

(3) Interest on debt obligations consists of projected future interest payments for amounts drawn on the Revolver using interest rates in effect as of March 31, 2026 and semi-annual interest payments for the aggregate principal amount of the Notes using the coupon rate of 5.52%, which has been calculated assuming no additional principal payments will be made and the outstanding balance will be held until its final maturity date. These projected interest payments may differ in the future based on the balances outstanding on the Revolver and Notes, respectively, as well as changes in market interest rates for the Revolver.

(4) Debt obligations of Consolidated Funds presented in the table represent amounts due to holders of debt securities issued by the Consolidated CFE vehicle. These obligations include interest to be paid on debt securities issued by the CFE vehicle and assume that no prepayments of principal are made and outstanding notes payable are held until maturity. For debt securities that bear only the rights to the residual value of the Consolidated CFE vehicle and have no stated interest rate, no interest payments were included in this calculation. The maturity date of the notes payable issued by the Consolidated CFE vehicle is April 2041.

(5) Capital commitments represent our obligations to provide general partner capital funding to the StepStone Funds. These amounts are generally due on demand, and accordingly, have been presented as obligations payable in the less than 1 year column. Capital commitments are expected to be called over a period of several years. As of March 31, 2026, we had unfunded commitments totaling $187.5 million before the consolidation of funds, and $110.0 million after the consolidation of funds.

(6) Capital commitments of Consolidated Funds represent our obligations to provide capital funding to the StepStone Funds held through the Consolidated Funds. These amounts are generally due on demand, and accordingly, have been presented as obligations payable in the less than 1 year column. Capital commitments are expected to be called over a period of several years.

(7) In connection with the Greenspring acquisition, we, indirectly through our subsidiaries, became the sole and/or managing member of certain entities, each of which is the general partner of an investment fund (“legacy Greenspring general partner entities”). We did not acquire any direct economic interests attributable to the legacy Greenspring

Table of Contents

general partner entities, including legacy Greenspring investments in funds and carried interest allocations. We determined that the legacy Greenspring general partner entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of each such entity because we have a controlling financial interest in each entity. As a result, we consolidate these entities. Capital commitments in legacy Greenspring funds represent our obligations to provide general partner capital funding in legacy Greenspring funds for which we do not hold any direct economic interests. These amounts are generally due on demand, and accordingly, have been presented as obligations payable in the less than 1 year column. Capital commitments are expected to be called over a period of several years.

The payments that we are required to make under the Tax Receivable Agreements are expected to be substantial and are not reflected in the contractual obligations table set forth above as they are dependent upon future taxable income.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that would expose us to any liability or require us to fund losses or guarantee target returns to clients in our funds that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. See notes 4 and 16, respectively, to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report for information on variable interest entities and commitments and contingencies.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In applying many of these accounting principles, we need to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions, estimates and judgments, however, are both subjective and subject to change, and actual amounts may differ from our assumptions and estimates. If actual amounts are ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known. We believe the following critical accounting policies could potentially produce materially different results if we were to change underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments. See note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report for a summary of our significant accounting policies.

Consolidation

We consolidate all entities that we control through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). We use, and expect to continue to use, a combination of our equity ownership, governance rights and other contractual arrangements to control operations of these entities. However, these arrangements may not be as effective in providing us with control over these operations as would wholly owning these entities. See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report for information on variable interest entities.

Under the VIE model, we are required to perform an analysis as to whether we have a variable interest in an entity and whether the entity is a VIE. In evaluating whether we hold a variable interest, we review all of our financial relationships to determine whether we are exposed to the risks and rewards created and distributed by an entity. We hold variable interests in certain operating subsidiaries not wholly-owned by us and in the StepStone Funds in which we serve as the general partner or managing member. We also assess whether the fees received from the StepStone Funds as a decision maker or in exchange for services (including management fees, incentive fees and carried interest allocations) are customary and commensurate with the level of effort required to provide the services. We consider all economic interests, including indirect interests, to determine if a fee is considered a variable interest. We determined our fee arrangements with the StepStone Funds are not considered to be variable interests.

Table of Contents

If we have a variable interest in an entity, we further assess whether the entity is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. Entities that do not qualify as VIEs are assessed for consolidation under the voting interest model. Under the voting interest model, we consolidate those entities we control through a majority voting interest. The assessment of whether an entity is a VIE requires an evaluation of qualitative factors and, where applicable, quantitative factors. These judgments include: (a) determining whether the entity has sufficient equity at risk, (b) evaluating whether the equity holders, as a group, lack the ability to make decisions that significantly affect the economic performance of the entity and (c) determining whether the entity is structured with disproportionate voting rights in relation to their equity interests.

For entities that are determined to be VIEs, we are required to consolidate those entities where we have concluded that we are the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is defined as the variable interest holder with (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In evaluating whether we are the primary beneficiary, we evaluate our economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by us. At each reporting date, we determine whether any reconsideration events have occurred that require us to revisit the primary beneficiary analysis, and we will consolidate or deconsolidate accordingly.

We provide investment advisory services to the StepStone Funds, which have third-party investors. StepStone Funds are generally VIEs because they have not granted the third-party investors substantive rights to terminate or remove the general partner or participating rights. We do not consolidate most of the StepStone Funds that are VIEs because we are not the primary beneficiary of those funds, primarily because our fee arrangements are considered customary and commensurate and thus not deemed to be variable interests, and we do not hold any other interests in those funds that are considered more than insignificant. We consolidate certain of our operating subsidiaries that are VIEs because we are the primary beneficiary.

The Consolidated Funds comprise certain entities that constitute client investment funds that we manage or control and have been consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Including the results of the Consolidated Funds increases the reported amounts of the assets, liabilities, expenses and cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and amounts related to economic interests held by third-party investors are reflected as redeemable non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds. The revenues earned by us as investment manager of the Consolidated Funds are eliminated in consolidation and generally have no direct effect on the net income attributable to SSG or to stockholders' equity.

Revenues

We recognize revenue in accordance with ASC 606. Revenue is recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and for an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The application of ASC 606 requires us to identify our contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations in a contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In determining the transaction price, variable consideration is included only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized would not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. We have elected to apply the variable consideration allocation exception for our fee arrangements with our customers.

Table of Contents

Management and Advisory Fees, Net

We recognize management and advisory fee revenues when control of the promised services is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those services. For asset management services and the arrangement of administrative services, we satisfy these performance obligations over time because the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of the services as they are performed. Advisory fees from contracts where we do not have discretion over investment decisions are generally based on fixed amounts and typically billed quarterly. Management fees are reflected net of certain professional and administrative services and distribution and servicing fees paid to third parties for which we are acting as an agent. Management fees include income-based incentive fees, which are based on net investment income of certain funds.

Performance Fees

We earn two types of performance fee revenues: incentive fees and carried interest allocations, as described below.

Incentive fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the profits (up to 15%) earned in respect of certain accounts, including certain permanent capital vehicles, for which we are the investment adviser, subject to the achievement of minimum return levels or performance benchmarks. Incentive fees are a form of variable consideration and represent contractual fee arrangements in our contracts with our customers. Incentive fees are typically subject to reversal until the end of a defined performance period, as these fees are affected by changes in the fair value of the assets under management or advisement over such performance period. Moreover, incentive fees that are received prior to the end of the defined performance period are typically subject to clawback, net of tax.

We recognize incentive fee revenue only when these amounts are realized and no longer subject to significant risk of reversal, which is typically at the end of a defined performance period and/or upon expiration of the associated clawback period (i.e., crystallization). However, clawback terms for incentive fees received prior to crystallization only require the return of amounts on a net of tax basis. Accordingly, the tax-related portion of incentive fees received in advance of crystallization is not subject to clawback and is therefore recognized as revenue immediately upon receipt. Incentive fees received in advance of crystallization that remain subject to clawback are recorded as deferred incentive fee revenue and included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Carried interest allocations include the allocation of performance-based fees, commonly referred to as carried interest, to us from unaffiliated limited partners in the StepStone Funds in which we hold an equity interest. We are entitled to a carried interest allocation (typically 5% to 20%) based on cumulative fund or account performance to date, irrespective of whether such amounts have been realized. These carried interest allocations are subject to the achievement of minimum return levels (typically 5% to 10%), in accordance with the terms set forth in each respective fund’s governing documents. We account for our investment balances in the StepStone Funds, including carried interest allocations, under the equity method of accounting because it is presumed to have significant influence as the general partner or managing member. Accordingly, carried interest allocations are not deemed to be within the scope of ASC 606.

Table of Contents

Legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations include the allocation of carried interest to legacy Greenspring general partner entities from limited partners in certain legacy Greenspring funds in which the legacy Greenspring general partner entities hold an equity interest. The legacy Greenspring general partner entities are entitled to a carried interest allocation (typically 5% to 20%) based on cumulative fund or account performance to date, irrespective of whether such amounts have been realized. We account for the investment balances in the legacy Greenspring funds, including carried interest allocations, under the equity method of accounting because it is presumed to have significant influence as the general partner or managing member. Accordingly, legacy Greenspring carried interest allocations are not deemed to be within the scope of ASC 606. We do not hold any direct economic interests in the legacy Greenspring general partner entities and thus are not entitled to any carried interest allocation from the legacy funds. All of the carried interest allocations in respect of the legacy Greenspring funds are payable to employees who are considered affiliates to us and are therefore reflected as legacy Greenspring performance fee-related compensation in the consolidated statements of income (loss).

We recognize revenue attributable to carried interest allocations from a fund based on the amount that would be due to us pursuant to the fund’s governing documents, assuming the fund was liquidated based on the current fair value of its underlying investments as of that date. Accordingly, the amount recognized as carried interest allocation revenue reflects our share of the gains and losses of the associated fund’s underlying investments measured at their then-fair values, relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. We record the amount of carried interest allocated to us as of each period end as accrued carried interest allocations receivable, which is included as a component of investments in the consolidated balance sheets. Our determination of fair value for investments in the underlying funds includes various valuation techniques. These techniques may include a market approach, recent transaction price, net asset value approach, or discounted cash flows, and may use one or more significant unobservable inputs such as EBITDA, revenue multiples, discount rates, weighted-average cost of capital, exit multiples, or terminal growth rates.

Carried interest is generally realized when an underlying investment is profitably disposed of and the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the specific hurdle rates, as defined in the applicable governing documents. Carried interest is generally subject to reversal to the extent that the amount received to date exceeds the amount due to us based on cumulative results. As such, a liability is accrued for potential clawback obligations if amounts previously distributed to us would require repayment to a fund if such fund were to be liquidated based on the current fair value of their underlying investments as of the reporting date. Actual repayment obligations generally do not become realized until the end of a fund’s life.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework, which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, the characteristics specific to the financial instrument and the state of the marketplace – including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices in active markets generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and therefore a lesser degree of judgment is used in measuring their fair value.

Financial instruments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed based on the observability of inputs used in the determination of their fair values, as follows:

• Level I – Pricing inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date.

Table of Contents

• Level II – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. The types of financial instruments classified in this category include less liquid securities traded in active markets and securities traded in other than active markets.

• Level III – Pricing inputs are unobservable for the financial instruments and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and consideration of factors specific to the financial instrument.

The availability of observable inputs can vary depending on the financial asset or liability and is affected by a wide variety of factors including, for example, the type of instrument, whether the instrument has recently been issued, whether the instrument is traded on an active exchange or in the secondary market, and current market conditions. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for financial instruments categorized in Level III. The variability and availability of the observable inputs affected by the factors described above may result in transfers between Levels I, II, and III.

We consider our cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, fees and accounts receivable, accounts payable, investments, notes payable, and revolving credit facility to be financial instruments. The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, fees and accounts receivable and accounts payable equal or approximate their fair values due to their nature and/or the relatively short period over which they are held. See note 9 for additional details regarding the fair value of our notes payable and revolving credit facility balances.

Equity-Based Compensation

We account for grants of equity-based awards, including service-based RSUs and PRSUs, to certain employees and directors at fair value as of the grant date. We recognize non-cash compensation expense attributable to these grants on a straight-line basis over the requisite service and performance period, which is generally the vesting period. Expense related to grants of PRSUs is recognized if it is probable that the performance condition will be satisfied. Expense related to grants of equity-based awards is recognized as equity-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of income (loss). The fair value of RSUs and PRSUs is determined by the closing stock price on the grant date. Forfeitures of equity-based awards are recognized as they occur. Awards classified as liabilities are remeasured at the end of each reporting period until settlement. Equity-based compensation cost for the employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) is measured as the discount the employee receives upon purchase of shares and the option value of a share when the offering contains a look-back option feature. See note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our accounting for equity-based awards.

Table of Contents

Performance Fee-Related Compensation

A portion of the carried interest allocation revenue and incentive fees we earn is awarded to employees and other carry participants in the form of award letters (“carry awards”) as a form of long-term incentive compensation. Performance fee-related compensation is generally tied to the investment performance of the StepStone Funds. Approximately 50% of carried interest allocation revenue is awarded to employees and other participants as part of our long-term incentive compensation plan, fostering alignment of interest with our clients and investors, and retaining key investment professionals. Carry awards to employees and other participants are accounted for as a component of compensation and benefits expense in conjunction with our recognition of the related realized and unrealized carried interest allocation revenue and, until paid, is recorded as accrued carried interest-related compensation in the consolidated balance sheets. Upon a reversal of carried interest allocation revenue, the related compensation expense, if any, is also reversed. Liabilities recognized for carried interest-related compensation amounts due to affiliates are not paid until the related carried interest allocation revenue is realized. Incentive fee-related compensation is accrued as performance fee-related compensation expense when it is probable and estimable that payment will be made. The incentive fee-related compensation accrual is based on a number of factors, including the cumulative activity for the period and the distribution of the net proceeds in accordance with the applicable governing agreement. On April 1, 2024, certain of our non-wholly owned subsidiaries underwent transactions to effect unitization of the outstanding limited partnership interests, including the class of interests relating to awards of carried interest allocations granted to employees, to combine into a single class of limited partnership interests and redesignated into units. The class of interests relating to awards of carried interest allocations granted to employees were previously presented as carried interest-related compensation expense.

Income Taxes

SSG is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and therefore is subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes on its share of taxable income generated by the Partnership. The Partnership is treated as a pass-through entity for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes. As such, income generated by the Partnership flows through to its limited partners, including SSG, and is generally not subject to U.S. federal or state income tax at the Partnership level. The Partnership’s non-U.S. subsidiaries generally operate as corporate entities in non-U.S. jurisdictions, with certain of these entities subject to non-U.S. income taxes. Additionally, certain subsidiaries are subject to local jurisdiction taxes at the entity level, which are reflected within income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income (loss). As a result, the Partnership does not record U.S. federal and state income taxes on income in the Partnership or its subsidiaries, except for certain local and foreign income taxes discussed above.

Taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, using tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period when the change is enacted. Deferred tax liabilities are included within accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The principal items giving rise to temporary differences are certain basis differences resulting from exchanges of Partnership units. See Tax Receivable Agreements below.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the amount, timing and character of our future taxable income. When evaluating the realizability of deferred tax assets, all evidence – both positive and negative – is considered. This evidence includes, but is not limited to, expectations regarding future earnings, future reversals of existing temporary tax differences and tax planning strategies.

Table of Contents

We are subject to the provisions of ASC Subtopic 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes . This standard establishes consistent thresholds as it relates to accounting for income taxes. It defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as more-likely-than-not to be sustained by the relevant taxing authority and requires measurement of a tax position meeting the more-likely-than-not criterion, based on the largest benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized. If upon performance of an assessment pursuant to this subtopic, management determines that uncertainties in tax positions exist that do not meet the minimum threshold for recognition of the related tax benefit, a liability is recorded in the consolidated financial statements. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense and general, administrative and other expenses, respectively, in the consolidated statements of income (loss). See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for more information.

The Company has elected to account for global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by foreign subsidiaries in the period the tax is incurred.

Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining tax expense and in evaluating tax positions, including evaluating uncertainties under GAAP. We review our tax positions quarterly and adjust our tax balances as new information becomes available.

Tax Receivable Agreements

The Tax Receivable Agreements provide for payment by SSG to the Class B limited partners, Class C limited partners, Class D limited partners and pre-IPO institutional investors of the Partnership of 85% of the amount of the net cash tax savings, if any, that SSG realizes (or, under certain circumstances, is deemed to realize) as a result of increases in tax basis (and utilization of certain other tax benefits) resulting from (i) SSG’s acquisition of such partners’ and institutional investors’ Partnership units and (ii) in the case of the Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement, any payments SSG makes under the Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement (including tax benefits related to imputed interest). SSG will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these net cash tax savings under the Tax Receivable Agreements. In connection with the Greenspring acquisition, the sellers receiving Class C units of the Partnership became parties to the Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement and in connection with the closings under the Transaction Agreements for SRA and SRE, the sellers receiving Class D units of the Partnership became parties to the Exchanges Tax Receivable Agreement. See note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for more information.

Recent Accounting Developments

Information regarding recent accounting developments and their effects to us can be found in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report.