HFFG Hf Foods Group Inc. - 10-K
0001680873-26-000015Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is 0.15pp more bullish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase- errors+2
- failure+1
- conflicts+1
- unauthorized+1
- impaired+1
- improve+1
- great+1
- enabled+1
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
7,760 words
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following are significant factors known to us that could materially adversely affect our business, reputation, operating results, industry, financial position and/or future financial performance. This information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this report. The following discussion of risks is not all inclusive, but is designed to highlight what we believe are the most significant factors to consider when evaluating our business. The risks set forth in this Section 1A are presented as of December 31, 2025 and the period then ended.
Risk Factors Relating to Our Business and Industry
Our industry is characterized by low margins, and periods of significant or prolonged inflation or deflation affect our product and operational costs, which may negatively impact our profitability.
The foodservice distribution industry is characterized by relatively high inventory turnover with relatively low profit margins. Volatile food costs have a direct impact on our industry. Periods of significant product cost inflation or deflation may adversely affect our results of operations if we are unable to pass on all or a portion of such product cost increases to our customers in a timely manner. In addition, periods of rapidly increasing inflation may adversely affect our business due to the impact of such inflation on discretionary spending by consumers and our limited ability to increase prices in the current, highly competitive environment.
Changes to U.S. trade policy, tariff and import/export regulations may adversely affect our operating results.
Changes in U.S. or international social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, development and investment in the territories or countries where we currently conduct our business, as well as any negative sentiment toward the U.S. as a result of such changes, could adversely affect our business. The U.S. has instituted or proposed changes in trade policies that include the negotiation or termination of trade agreements, the imposition of higher tariffs on imports into the U.S., economic sanctions on individuals, corporations or countries, and other government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries where we conduct our business. As a result of policy changes and government proposals, there may be greater restrictions and economic disincentives on international trade. The new tariffs and other changes in U.S. trade policy could trigger retaliatory actions by affected countries, and foreign governments have instituted or are considering imposing trade sanctions on U.S. goods. Such changes have the potential to adversely impact the U.S. economy or sectors thereof, our industry and the global demand for our products, and as a result, could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If the U.S. continues to impose such tariffs, this may cause supply chain disruptions and could further escalate our costs. We may determine to increase our sales prices in order to pass these increased costs to our customers. In the event we determine to take such action, our customers may reduce their orders from us, which could negatively affect our business, profitability and operating results. We are closely monitoring these developments and evaluating strategies to mitigate potential impacts.
On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered a decision invalidating tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). This decision introduces uncertainty regarding potential refund processes and future trade policy actions that could affect the Company’s cost structure and supply chain planning. The ultimate impact of tariffs and other trade policies on the Company’s business will depend on several factors, including future measures implemented by the U.S. government and the governments of other countries, the overall magnitude and duration of these measures and the Company’s ability to mitigate these effects.
A shortage of qualified labor or an inability to attract, train or retain employees could negatively affect our business and materially reduce earnings.
The foodservice distribution industry is labor intensive. The future success of our operations, including the achievement of our strategic objectives, depends on our ability, and the ability of third parties on which we rely to supply and to deliver our products, to identify, recruit, develop and retain qualified and talented individuals. As a result, any shortage of qualified labor could significantly and adversely affect our business. Employee recruitment, development and retention efforts that we or such third parties undertake may not be successful, which could result in a shortage of qualified individuals in future periods. Any such shortage could decrease our ability to effectively serve our customers and achieve our strategic objectives. Such a shortage would also likely lead to higher wages for employees (or higher costs to purchase the services of such third parties) and a corresponding reduction in our results of operations.
Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, train and retain a sufficient number of employees who understand and appreciate our culture and are able to represent our brand effectively and establish credibility with our business partners and customers. Our ability to meet our labor needs, while controlling wage and labor-related costs, is subject to numerous external factors, including the availability of a sufficient number of qualified persons in the work force of the regions in which we are located, unemployment levels within those regions, prevailing wage rates, changing demographics, health and other insurance costs and changes in employment legislation.
In the event of increasing wage rates, if we fail to increase our wages competitively, the quality of our workforce could decline, causing our customer service to suffer, while increasing our wages could cause our profits to decrease. If we are unable to hire and retain employees capable of meeting our business needs and expectations, our business and brand image may be impaired. Any failure to meet our staffing needs or any material increase in turnover rates of our employees may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Unfavorable macroeconomic conditions in the U.S. may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operating results are substantially affected by the operating and economic conditions in the regions in which we operate. Economic conditions can affect us in the following ways:
• A reduction in discretionary spending by consumers could adversely impact sales of Asian restaurants, and their purchases from us. Future economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, changes in housing market conditions, the availability of consumer credit, inflation, interest rates, tax rates and fuel and energy costs, could reduce overall consumer spending.
• Food cost and fuel cost inflation experienced by consumers can lead to reductions in the frequency of and the amount spent by consumers for food away from home purchases, which could negatively impact our business by reducing demand for our products.
• Heightened uncertainty in the financial markets negatively affects consumer confidence and discretionary spending, which can cause disruptions with our customers and suppliers.
• Liquidity issues and the inability of our customers to consistently access credit markets to obtain cash to support their operations can cause temporary interruptions in our ability to conduct day-to-day transactions involving the collection of funds from such customers.
• Liquidity issues and the inability of suppliers to consistently access credit markets to obtain cash to support their operations can cause temporary interruptions in our ability to obtain the foodservice products and supplies needed by us in the quantities and at the prices requested.
In addition, our existing distribution operations are solely in the U.S. The geographic concentration of our operations creates an exposure to economic conditions in the U.S. and any financial downturn in the U.S. could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Competition may increase in the future, which may adversely impact our margins and ability to retain customers, and make it difficult to maintain our market share, growth rate and profitability.
The foodservice distribution industry, as a whole, in the U.S. is fragmented and highly competitive, with local, regional, multi-regional and national distributors, and specialty competitors. In addition, we believe that the market participants serving Asian restaurants are also highly fragmented. Currently, we face competition from smaller and/or dispersed competitors focusing on the niche market serving Asian restaurants, especially takeout restaurants. However, with the growing demand for Asian cuisines, others are operating, or may begin operating in this niche market in the future. Those potential competitors include: (i) national and regional foodservice distributors, (ii) local wholesalers and brokers, (iii) food retailers, and (iv) farmers’ markets. The national and regional distributors are experienced in operating multiple distribution locations and expanding management, and they have greater marketing and financial resources than we do. Even though they currently offer only a limited selection of Asian specialty foods, they may be able to devote greater resources to sourcing, promoting and selling their products if they choose to do so. Conversely, the local wholesalers and brokers are small in size with a deep understanding of local preferences, but their lack of scale results in high risk and limited growth potential.
If more competitors enter this market segment aiming to serve Asian restaurants in the future, our operating results may be negatively impacted through a loss of sales, reduction in margins from competitive price changes, and/or greater operating costs, such as marketing costs, due to the increase of competition.
We may not be able to fully compensate for increases in fuel costs when fuel prices experience high volatility, and our operating results would be adversely affected.
Volatile fuel prices have a direct impact on the industry served by us. We require significant quantities of fuel for delivery vehicles and are exposed to the risk associated with fluctuations in the market price for fuel. The price and supply of fuel can fluctuate significantly based on international, political and economic circumstances, as well as other factors outside our control, such as actions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and other oil and gas producers, regional production patterns, weather conditions, environmental concerns, and geopolitical conflicts. The cost of fuel affects the price paid by us for products, as well as the costs we incur to deliver products to the customers. There is no guarantee that we will be able to pass along a portion of increased fuel costs to our customers in the future. If fuel costs remain elevated or increase further in the future, we may experience difficulties in passing all or a portion of these costs along to our customers, which may have a negative impact on our results of operations.
We rely on third-party suppliers, and our business may be affected by interruption of supplies or increases in product costs.
We purchase our food items and related products primarily from third-party suppliers. Our profitability and operating margins are dependent upon, among other things, our ability to anticipate and react to any interruptions in our distribution network and changes to food costs and availability. We generally do not enter into long-term contracts with our suppliers, whereby they would be committed to provide products to us for any appreciable duration of time. Although our purchasing volume can provide leverage when dealing with suppliers, particularly smaller suppliers for whom we may be their largest customer, suppliers may not provide or may be unable to provide the specialty food products, produce or center-of-the-plate products we need in the quantities and at the times and prices we request. The cancellation of our supply arrangements with any of our suppliers or the disruption, delay and/or inability to supply the requested products by our suppliers could adversely affect our sales. Failure to identify an alternate source of supply for these items or comparable products on commercially reasonable terms that meet our customers’ expectations may result in significant cost increases. Moreover, we do not currently use financial instruments to hedge our risk exposure to market fluctuations in the price of food products.
Similarly, our suppliers may also be affected by higher costs to source or produce and transport food products, as well as by other related expenses that they pass through to their customers, which could result in higher costs for the products they supply to us. The United States government and foreign governments may also take actions that may impact the purchase and production of goods, including imposing tariffs or other regulations on certain goods shipped, that may increase costs for goods transported globally. Our inability to anticipate and react to changing food costs through our sourcing and purchasing practices in the future could therefore negatively impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Because we do not control the actual production of most of the products we sell, we are also subject to material supply chain interruptions, delays caused by interruption in production, and increases in product costs, including those resulting from product recalls or a need to find alternate materials or suppliers, based on conditions outside our control. These conditions include labor shortages, work slowdowns, work interruptions, strikes or other adverse employment actions by employees of ours or our suppliers, government shutdowns, weather conditions or more prolonged climate change, crop conditions, product recalls, product or raw material scarcity, water shortages, transportation interruptions within our distribution channels, unavailability of fuel or increases in fuel costs, competitive demands, contamination with mold, bacteria or other contaminants, pandemics, natural disasters or other catastrophic events, including the outbreak of e. coli or similar food borne illnesses or bioterrorism in the United States, international hostilities, civil insurrection, and social unrest. In such countries, political and social unrest may cause the prices for these products to rise to levels beyond those that our customers are willing to pay, if the product is available at all. If we are unable to obtain these products, our customers may seek a different supplier for these or other products which could negatively impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Accordingly, if we are unable to obtain the specialty food products, produce, meat, poultry or seafood that comprise a significant percentage of our product portfolio in a timely manner and in the quantities and at the prices we request as a result of any of the foregoing factors or otherwise, we may be unable to fulfill our obligations to customers who may, as a result of any such failure, resort to other distributors for their food product needs or change the types of products they buy from us to products that are less profitable for us.
Our relationships with customers may be materially diminished or terminated. The loss of customers could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We have maintained long-standing relationships with a number of our customers. However, those customers could unilaterally terminate their relationship with us or materially reduce the amount of business they conduct with us at any time. Our customers may shift their purchase orders from us to other competitors due to market competition, change of customer requirements and preferences, or because of the customer’s financial condition. There is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain relationships with any of our customers on acceptable terms, or at all. The loss of a number of customers could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We rely on technology in our business and any cybersecurity incident (including artificial intelligence (“AI”) -enabled threads), AI-related operational errors, other technology disruption or delay in implementing new technology could negatively affect our business and our relationships with customers.
We use technology in our business operations, and our ability to serve customers most effectively depends on the reliability of our technology systems. We use software and other technology systems, among other things, to generate and select orders, to make purchases, to manage warehouses and to monitor and manage our business on a day-to-day basis. Further, our business involves the storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and/or confidential information and intellectual property, including customers’ and suppliers’ personal information, private information about employees, and financial and strategic information about us and our business partners.
These technology systems are vulnerable to disruption from circumstances beyond our control, including fire, natural disasters, power outages, systems failures, security breaches, espionage, cyber-attacks, viruses, theft and inadvertent releases of information. The risk of cybersecurity attacks may increase as AI capabilities improve and are increasingly used to identify
vulnerabilities and construct increasingly sophisticated cybersecurity attacks. Any such disruption to these software and other technology systems, or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, the failure of these systems to otherwise perform as anticipated, or the theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation, or release of sensitive and/or confidential information or intellectual property, could result in business disruption, negative publicity, brand damage, violation of privacy laws, loss of customers, potential liability and competitive disadvantage, any or all of which could potentially adversely affect our customer service, decrease the volume of our business and/or result in increased costs and lower profits.
A significant cybersecurity incident involving our cybersecurity infrastructure may result from actions by our employees, suppliers, third-party administrators, or unknown third parties or through cyber-attacks. The risk of such an incident can exist whether software services are in our technology systems or are in cloud-based software services. Intrusions and other incidents have occurred, and may occur again, in our systems and in the systems of our suppliers and third-party administrators. In addition, generative AI tools may inadvertently expose, misuse, or incorporate our confidential, personal, or third-party data, which could result in data leakage, intellectual property risks, privacy violations, or contractual breaches. Any such incident could result in operational impairments, significant harm to our reputation and financial losses.
A significant cybersecurity incident could affect our data framework or cause a failure to protect the personal information of our customers, suppliers or employees, or sensitive and confidential information regarding our business and could give rise to legal liability and regulatory action under data protection and privacy laws. Any such cybersecurity incident involving our or our suppliers’ cybersecurity infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Further, as we pursue our strategy to grow through acquisitions and to pursue new initiatives that improve our operations and cost structure, we are also expanding and improving our information technology, resulting in a larger technological presence and corresponding exposure to cybersecurity risk. If we fail to assess and identify cybersecurity risks associated with acquisitions and new initiatives, we may become increasingly vulnerable to such risks. Information technology systems continue to evolve and, in order to remain competitive, we need to implement new technologies in a timely and efficient manner. Investments will continue to be made in attracting, retaining, and training our human capital to remain current on the ever-changing industry best practices related to information security. If our competitors implement new technologies more quickly or successfully than we do, such competitors may be able to provide lower cost or enhanced services of superior quality compared to those we provide, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Additionally, we currently utilize certain AI tools, and as we increase our use of AI tools, the risk of unauthorized access to our data and of making errors or erroneous decisions based on our reliance on the AI tool will increase. Evolving and uncertain AI laws, standards, and governance expectations could impose new compliance obligations, restrictions, audit requirements, or liabilities, and our failure to comply could result in fines, remediation costs, or reputational harm.
Changes in consumer eating habits could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We provide foodservice distribution to Asian restaurants, primarily takeout restaurants, which focus on serving Asian food to American families. Changes in consumer eating habits (such as a decline in consuming food away from home, a decline in portion sizes, or a shift in preferences toward western foods) could reduce demand for our products. Consumer eating habits could be affected by a number of factors, including attitudes regarding diet and health or new information regarding the health effects of consuming certain foods. If consumer eating habits change significantly, we may be required to modify or discontinue sales of certain items in our product portfolio, and we may experience higher costs and/or supply shortages associated with our efforts to accommodate those changes as our suppliers adapt to new eating preferences.
Additionally, changes in consumer eating habits may result in the enactment or amendment of laws and regulations that impact the ingredients and nutritional content of our food products, or laws and regulations requiring us to disclose the nutritional content of our food products. Compliance with these laws and regulations, as well as others regarding the ingredients and nutritional content of food products, may be costly and time-consuming. We cannot make any assurances regarding our ability to effectively respond to changes in consumer culture preference, health perceptions or resulting new laws or regulations or to adapt our product offerings to trends in eating habits.
We engage in transactions with related parties and such transactions present possible conflicts of interest that could have an adverse effect on us.
We regularly purchase goods and services from related parties. These related-party transactions create the possibility of conflicts of interest with regard to our management, including that:
• we may enter into contracts between us, on the one hand, and related parties, on the other, that are not as a result of arm’s-length transactions;
• our executive officers and directors that hold positions of responsibility with related parties may be aware of certain business opportunities that are appropriate for presentation to us as well as to such other related parties and may present such business opportunities to such other parties;
• our executive officers and directors that hold positions of responsibility with related parties may have significant duties with, and spend significant time serving, other entities and may have conflicts of interest in allocating time; and
• such conflicts could cause an individual in our management to seek to advance his or her economic interests or the economic interests of certain related parties above ours.
The appearance of conflicts of interest created by related-party transactions could impair the confidence of our investors. Our Board of Directors regularly reviews these transactions. The Company’s Compliance Department also distributes conflict of interest surveys to relevant individuals on its purchasing and management team and has a robust supplier and vendor due diligence program. Notwithstanding this, it is possible that a conflict of interest could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information on our related party transactions, see Note 13 - Related Party Transactions in our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We may be unable to protect or maintain our intellectual property, which could result in customer confusion, a negative perception of our brand and adversely affect our business.
We believe that our intellectual property has substantial value and has contributed significantly to the success of our business. In particular, our “HF” logo trademarks (HF FOODS™, HF FOODS Stylized (B&W)™, HF FOODS Stylized (Color)™, HF Design (B&W)®, HF Design (Color)®) and our trade names including “the Han Feng trade name,” “ the Rong Cheng trade name” and “Great Wall Design®, and Great Wall Seafood™,” are valuable assets that reinforce our customers’ favorable perception of our products. Our trademark rights and related registrations may be challenged in the future and could be canceled or narrowed. Failure to protect our trademark rights could cause customer confusion or negatively affect customers’ perception of our brand and products, and eventually adversely affect our sales and profitability. Moreover, intellectual property disputes and proceedings and infringement claims may result in a significant distraction for management and significant expense, which may not be recoverable regardless of whether we are successful. Such proceedings may be protracted with no certainty of success, and an adverse outcome could subject us to liability, force us to cease use of certain trademarks or other intellectual property or force us to enter into licenses with others. Any one of these occurrences may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If we are unable to renew or replace our current leases on favorable terms, or any of our current leases are terminated prior to expiration of their stated terms, and we cannot find suitable alternate locations, our operations and profitability could be negatively impacted.
As of December 31, 2025 we owned approximately 0.9 million square feet of our distribution centers (or 67% of the total square feet), and the remainder (or 33% of the total square feet) was occupied under leasing arrangements. Our ability to re-negotiate favorable terms on an expiring lease or to negotiate favorable terms for a suitable alternate location, and our ability to negotiate favorable lease terms for additional locations, could depend on conditions in the real estate market, competition for desirable properties, our relationships with current and prospective landlords, and/or other factors that are not within our control. Any or all of these factors and conditions could negatively impact our growth and profitability.
Turnover among our senior management, directors and other key personnel may create uncertainty and adversely affect our operations.
Our success is substantially dependent on our senior management, directors and other key personnel. Our senior management, directors and other key personnel have been primarily responsible for determining the strategic direction of our business and for executing our growth strategy, and are integral to our brand, culture and reputation with suppliers and consumers. The loss of the services of any senior management, directors or other key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. When appropriate we will appoint new members to our board of directors as part of our continuous efforts to enhance our corporate governance and our future strategies and plans. Newly appointed directors may have different professional experiences and industry knowledge from those individuals who previously served, and may have different views on the issues that will determine our future strategies and plans. Such changes to strategic or operating goals may ultimately be unsuccessful. In addition, transition periods relating to such changes are often difficult as new personnel gain more detailed knowledge of our operations and management. If we do not integrate any new personnel successfully, including our new directors, we may be unable to manage and grow our business, and our financial condition and profitability may suffer as a result. Any departure of senior management, directors and other key personnel could be viewed in a negative light by investors and analysts, which may cause our stock price to decline.
Changes in and enforcement of immigration laws could increase our costs and adversely affect our ability to attract and retain qualified employees.
Federal and state governments from time to time implement immigration laws, regulations or programs that regulate our ability to attract or retain qualified foreign employees. Some of these changes may increase our obligations for compliance and oversight, which could subject us to additional costs and make our hiring process more cumbersome or reduce the availability of potential employees. Although we have implemented, and are in the process of enhancing, procedures to ensure our compliance with the employment eligibility verification requirements, there can be no assurance that these procedures are adequate and some of our employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. The employment of unauthorized workers may subject us to fines or civil or criminal penalties, and if any of our workers are found to be unauthorized, we could experience adverse publicity
that negatively impacts our brand and makes it more difficult to hire and keep qualified employees. We may be required to terminate the employment of certain of our employees who are determined to be unauthorized workers. The termination of a significant number of employees may disrupt our operations, cause temporary increases in our labor costs as we train new employees and result in adverse publicity. Our financial performance could be materially harmed as a result of any of these factors.
Potential labor disputes with employees and increases in labor costs could adversely affect our business.
A considerable amount of our operating costs are attributable to labor costs and, therefore, our financial performance is greatly influenced by increases in wage and benefit costs. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with a competitive labor market. Rising health care costs and the nature and structure of work rules will always be important issues. Any work stoppages or labor disturbances as a result of employee dissatisfaction with their current employment terms could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We also expect that in the event of a work stoppage or labor disturbance, we could incur additional costs and face increased competition.
If we fail to comply with requirements imposed by applicable law and other governmental regulations, we could become subject to lawsuits, investigations and other liabilities and restrictions on our operations that could significantly and adversely affect our business.
We are subject to regulation by various federal, state, and local governments, applicable to food safety and sanitation, ethical business practices, securities, transportation, minimum wage, overtime, other wage payment requirements, employment discrimination, immigration, and human health and safety. While we attempt to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, we cannot represent that we are in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations or interpretations of these laws and regulations at all times or that we will be able to comply with any future laws, regulations or interpretations of these laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to investigations, criminal sanctions or civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, and prohibitions on exporting. The cost of compliance or the consequences of non-compliance, including debarments, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, governmental units may make changes in the regulatory frameworks within which we operate that may require us to incur substantial increases in costs in order to comply with such laws and regulations.
If the products distributed by us are alleged to have caused injury or illness, or to have failed to comply with governmental regulations, we may need to recall our products and may experience product liability claims.
We, like any other foodservice distributor, may be subject to product recalls, including voluntary recalls or withdrawals, if the products we distribute are alleged to have caused injury or illness, to have been mislabeled, misbranded, or adulterated or to otherwise have violated applicable governmental regulations. We may also choose to voluntarily recall or withdraw products that we determine do not satisfy our quality standards, whether for taste, appearance, or otherwise, in order to protect our brand and reputation. Any future product recall or withdrawal that results in substantial and unexpected expenditures, destruction of product inventory, damage to our reputation, and/or lost sales due to the unavailability of the product for a period of time, could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We also face the risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of products sold by us are alleged to have caused injury or illness. We cannot be sure that consumption of our products will not cause a health-related illness in the future or that we will not be subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Further, even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image.
Litigation may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, we may be party to various claims and legal proceedings, as well as governmental and regulatory investigations and proceedings. We evaluate these claims and proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if probable and estimable, the amount of potential losses. Based on these assessments and estimates, we may establish reserves, as appropriate. These assessments and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of management judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from our assessments and estimates. For more information related to our litigation and regulatory proceedings, see Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Even when not merited, the defense of these lawsuits or legal proceedings, including potential securities litigation and/or other legal actions, is expensive and may divert management’s attention, and we may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits or legal proceedings. The results of litigation and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain, and adverse judgments or settlements in some of these legal disputes may result in adverse monetary damages, penalties or injunctive relief against us. While we maintain insurance, insurance coverage may not be adequate, and the cost to defend against future litigation may be significant. There may also be adverse publicity associated with litigation that may decrease consumer confidence in our business, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately found liable. As a result, litigation may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
An increase in interest rates could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition.
Changes to central bank policy interest rates remain uncertain and changes to these rates can impact our business. Rising interest rates could have a dampening effect on overall economic activity and/or the financial condition of our customers, either or both of which could negatively affect customer demand for our products and industry demand generally. Rising interest rates may cause credit market dislocations which can impact funding costs.
Additionally, our borrowings bear interest at variable rates and expose us to interest rate risk. Although we monitor and manage this exposure, changes in interest rates cannot always be predicted, hedged, or offset with price increases to eliminate earnings volatility.
Impairment charges for goodwill, amortizable intangible assets or other long-lived assets could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.
We review our amortizable intangible assets and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. Relevant factors, events and circumstances that affect the fair value of goodwill may include external factors such as macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, as well as cost factors, overall financial performance, other relevant entity-specific events, specific events affecting the reporting unit, or sustained decrease in share price. We may be required to record a significant charge in our consolidated financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill, amortizable intangible assets, or other long-lived assets is determined, which would negatively affect our results of operations.
Impairment analysis requires significant judgment by management and the fair value of goodwill, amortizable intangible assets or other long-lived assets are sensitive to changes in key assumptions used in the projected cash flows, which include forecasted revenues and perpetual growth rates, among others, as well as current market conditions in both the United States and globally. To the extent that business conditions may deteriorate, or if changes in key assumptions and estimates differ significantly from management’s expectations, it may be necessary to record impairment charges, which could be material. The Company completed its most recent annual impairment assessment for goodwill as of the last day of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025. The results of the assessment indicated carrying value in excess of fair value of the reporting unit, and as such, a goodwill impairment charge of $38.8 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2025. Following the impairment test conducted as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s goodwill was fully impaired.
Assumptions used in impairment testing are made at a point in time and require significant judgment; therefore, they are subject to change based on the facts and circumstances present at each impairment test date. Additionally, these assumptions are generally interdependent and do not change in isolation.
Risk Factors Relating to our Acquisition Strategy
Our continued growth depends on future acquisitions of other distributors or wholesalers and enlarging our customer base. The failure to achieve these goals could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Historically, a portion of our growth has come through acquisitions, and our growth strategy depends, in large part, on acquiring other distributors or wholesalers to access untapped market regions and enlarge our customer base. Successful implementation of this strategy is dependent on sufficient capital support from financing, finding suitable targets to acquire, identifying suitable locations and negotiating acceptable acquisition prices and terms. There can be no assurance that we will continue to grow through acquisitions. We may not be able to obtain sufficient capital support for our expansion plan, or successfully implement the plan to acquire other competitors timely or within budget or operate those businesses successfully.
If we are unable to integrate acquired businesses successfully or realize anticipated economic, operational and other benefits and synergies in a timely manner, our earnings may be materially adversely affected. A significant expansion of our business and operations, in terms of geography or magnitude, could strain our administrative and operational resources. Significant acquisitions may also require the issuance of material additional amounts of debt or equity, which could materially alter our debt-to-equity ratio, increase our interest expense and decrease net income, and make it difficult for us to obtain favorable financing for other acquisitions or capital investments.
Our operating results will be adversely affected if we fail to implement our growth strategy or if we invest resources in a growth strategy that ultimately proves unsuccessful.
There is a scarcity of and competition for acquisition opportunities.
There are a limited number of operating companies available for acquisition that we deem to be desirable targets. In addition, there is a very high level of competition among companies seeking to acquire these operating companies. Many established and well-financed entities are active in acquiring interests in companies that we may find to be desirable acquisition candidates. Many
of these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we do. Consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in negotiating and executing possible acquisitions of such businesses. Even if we are able to successfully compete with these larger entities, this competition may affect the terms of the transactions we are able to negotiate and, as a result, we may pay more or receive less favorable terms than we expected for potential acquisitions. We may not be able to identify operating companies that complement our strategy, and even if we identify a company that does so, we may be unable to complete a successful acquisition of such a company.
Risks related to acquisition financing.
We have a limited amount of financial resources and our ability to make additional acquisitions without securing additional financing from outside sources is limited. In order to continue to pursue our acquisition strategy, we may be required to obtain additional financing. We may obtain such financing through a combination of traditional debt financing and/or the placement of debt and equity securities. We may finance some portion of our future acquisitions by either issuing equity or by using shares of our common stock for all or a portion of the purchase price for such businesses. In the event that our common stock does not attain or maintain a sufficient market value, or potential acquisition candidates are otherwise unwilling to accept our common stock as part of the purchase price for the sale of their businesses, we may be required to use more of our cash resources, if available, in order to maintain our acquisition program. If we do not have sufficient cash resources, we will not be able to complete acquisitions and our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain additional capital through debt or equity financings. The terms of our credit facility require that we obtain the consent of our lenders prior to securing additional debt financing. There could be circumstances in which our ability to obtain additional debt financing could be constrained if we are unable to secure such consent.
We may experience difficulties in integrating the operations, personnel and assets of acquired businesses that may disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results.
A core component of our business plan is to acquire businesses and assets in the food distribution industry. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage businesses or successfully integrate our acquired businesses without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial problems. Such acquisitions also involve numerous operational risks, including:
• difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, services and personnel;
• the diversion of financial and management resources from existing operations;
• the risk of entering new markets;
• the potential loss of existing or acquired strategic operating partners following an acquisition;
• the potential loss of key employees following an acquisition and the associated risk of competitive efforts from such departed personnel;
• possible legal disputes with the acquired company following an acquisition; and
• the inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition or investment costs.
As a result, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute any acquisitions or investments, our business and prospects may be adversely affected.
Risk Factors Relating to our Common Stock
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which could affect our ability to ensure timely and reliable financial reports, affect the ability of our auditors to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls, and weaken investor confidence in our financial reporting.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires, among other things, that we design, implement and maintain adequate internal controls and procedures over financial reporting. Our management has concluded that (1) our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2025, (2) there existed material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, and (3) our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2025. Refer to the discussion of these conclusions below, under Item 9A. Controls and Procedures of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have taken and will continue to take appropriate actions to remediate such material weakness and inadequate disclosure controls and procedures; however, such continuous measures are still works-in-progress and may not be sufficient to address the material weaknesses identified or ensure that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. We may also discover other material weaknesses in the future. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties we encounter in the implementation of such controls, could cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements and affect the ability of our auditors to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financing reporting. In addition, substantial costs and resources may be required to rectify any internal control deficiencies. If we cannot produce reliable financial reports, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly, and our business and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Zhou Min Ni has significant influence over the Company and may have interests that conflict with those of our other shareholders.
The Company’s former Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Zhou Min Ni, directly and indirectly through the trustee of the trusts established for the benefit of his family, beneficially owns approximately 22% of our common stock. As a result, Mr. Ni has sufficient voting power to significantly influence matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. However, in June 2024, Mr. Ni entered into a settlement with the SEC, pursuant to which Mr. Ni is enjoined from directly or indirectly participating in the management of, or otherwise exercising any control or influence over the Company; provided, however, that such injunction does not prevent Mr. Ni from voting, purchasing or selling shares of the Company on his own behalf.
Despite the settlement with the SEC, the possibility that Mr. Ni may sell all or a large portion of his common stock in a short period of time could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Additionally, the interests of Mr. Ni may not align with the interests of other holders of our common stock, and he may vote against the Company’s interests. Mr. Ni’s significant beneficial ownership may also adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
Anti-takeover provisions contained in our amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions which could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying, or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors.
These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management, and amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to change or modify certain of these provisions requires approval of a super-majority of our stockholders, which we may not be able to obtain.
As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation law, which prevents certain stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding common stock not held by such 15% or greater stockholder.
Any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase- termination+2
- impaired+1
- declines+1
- cautionary+1
- disruptions+1
- benefit+7
- improvement+4
- favorable+2
- improved+1
- gain+1
MD&A (Item 7)
4,607 words
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis provides information about our business, the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources of HF Foods Group Inc. This information is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors . and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above for further explanation.
Recent Developments
CFO Transition
On October 15, 2025 (the “Separation Date”), Cindy Yao, departed from the Company as its Chief Financial Officer. In connection with Ms. Yao’s departure, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with Ms. Yao effective November 6, 2025.
Effective October 15, 2025, Paul McGarry, who previously served as the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Controller was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer. Effective January 27, 2026, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. McGarry to serve as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.
Opening of a State-of-the-Art Distribution Warehouse in Powder Springs, GA
On December 18, 2025, the Company officially opened its newest 182,000 square foot distribution center located outside Atlanta, in Powder Springs, Georgia. This brand-new facility includes warehouse, freezer, cooler, and office space and provides significant opportunities for expanding our existing operations in Atlanta and the surrounding cities and states. The Company plans to incorporate automated material handling and warehouse management technologies at the facility to support operating efficiency. The new distribution center will continue to service over 1,000 customers from HF Food’s previous Atlanta location and is now open to deliver more business throughout Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. The distribution center is located at 4795 Innovative Highway, Powder Springs, GA 30127, and currently employs over 50 individuals with plans to expand operations throughout 2026.
Business Overview
HF Foods is a leading marketer and distributor of fresh produce, frozen and dry food, and non-food products to Asian restaurants and other foodservice customers throughout the United States.
We operate a national distribution platform comprised of sixteen distribution centers and four cross-docks, supported by a fleet of over 400 vehicles, which collectively spans 46 states and covers approximately 95% of the contiguous United States. We serve approximately 15,000 customer locations through a high-frequency, service-oriented distribution model designed to meet the operational needs of independent restaurants, including timely delivery and consistent product availability.
We believe we are differentiated by our deep cultural and language understanding of the Asian restaurant community, long-standing relationships with growers and suppliers, and specialized sourcing capabilities across North America, South America, and Asia. These strengths are reinforced by nearly 1,000 employees and a centralized outsourced call center in China, which supports order taking and customer service in customers’ primary language and enables coordinated marketing and promotional campaigns.
Our product portfolio is supported by long-term partnerships with both domestic and international suppliers, which we believe enhances our ability to provide a broad and differentiated assortment at competitive prices. Our supplier relationships and market knowledge strengthen our purchasing and negotiating position and support continuity of supply, including improving our ability to manage potential supply chain disruptions, reduce stockouts, obtain pricing concessions, and maintain reliable delivery schedules. While Asian restaurants remain our core customer base, we intend to selectively broaden our customer reach into other ethnic and specialty foodservice segments over time as we execute our long-term growth strategy.
How to Assess HF Foods’ Performance
In assessing our performance, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures, including principal growth in net revenue, gross profit, distribution, selling and administrative expenses, as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. The key measures that we use to evaluate the performance of our business are set forth below:
Net Revenue
Net revenue is equal to gross sales minus sales returns, sales incentives that we offer to our customers, such as rebates and discounts that are offsets to gross sales; and certain other adjustments. Our net revenue is driven by changes in number of customers and average customer order amount, product inflation that is reflected in the pricing of our products and mix of products sold.
Gross Profit
Gross profit is equal to net revenue minus cost of revenue. Cost of revenue primarily includes inventory costs (net of supplier consideration), inbound freight, tariffs, customs clearance fees and other miscellaneous expenses. Cost of revenue generally changes as we incur higher or lower costs from suppliers and as the customer and product mix changes.
Distribution, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, stock-based compensation and benefits for employees and contract laborers, trucking and fuel expenses, utilities, maintenance and repair expenses, insurance expenses, depreciation and amortization expenses, selling and marketing expenses, professional fees and other operating expenses.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Discussion of our results includes certain non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, that we believe provides an additional tool for investors to use in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing our financial performance with other companies in the same industry, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors. We present EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in order to provide supplemental information that we consider relevant for the readers of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, and such information is not meant to replace or supersede GAAP measures.
Management uses EBITDA to measure operating performance, defined as net income before interest expense, interest income, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. In addition, management uses Adjusted EBITDA, defined as net income before interest expense, interest income, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude certain unusual, non-cash, or non-recurring expenses. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is less susceptible to variances in actual performance resulting from non-recurring expenses, and other non-cash charges and is more reflective of other factors that affect our operating performance.
The definition of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be the same as similarly titled measures used by other companies in the industry. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not defined under GAAP and are subject to important limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of HF Foods’ results as reported under GAAP. For example, Adjusted EBITDA:
• excludes certain tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available;
• does not reflect any cash capital expenditure requirements for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future;
• does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; and
• does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements, necessary to service our debt.
For additional information on EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, see the section entitled “EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA” below.
Financial Review
Highlights for 2025 included:
• Net revenue: Net revenue was $1,228.3 million in 2025, compared to $1,201.7 million in 2024, an increase of $26.6 million, or 2.2%. The increase was primarily attributable to volume growth and improved pricing in Seafood and Meat & Poultry and volume growth in Commodity, partially offset by volume decreases within other categories.
• Gross profit : Gross profit was $207.6 million in 2025 compared to $205.2 million in 2024, an increase of $2.4 million, or 1.2%. The increase was primarily attributable to volume growth and improved pricing in Seafood and Meat and Poultry and volume growth in Commodity, partially offset by volume decreases in other categories. Gross profit margin of 16.9% for 2025 decreased from 17.1% in the prior year due to a shift in sales mix from Asian Specialty with higher margin to Meat and Poultry and Commodity with lower margins.
• Distribution, selling and administrative expenses : Distribution, selling and administrative expenses increased by $3.7 million, or 1.9%, in 2025 compared to 2024, mainly due to increases in depreciation expense of $2.3 million, occupancy expenses of $1.4 million, auto & truck expense of $1.4 million and insurance costs of $1.2 million partially offset by a reduction in professional fees of $2.8 million. Distribution, selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue remained relatively consistent at 16.4% in 2025 compared to 16.5% in 2024.
• Net loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc .: Net loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc. was $38.8 million in 2025 compared to net loss of $48.5 million in 2024. The improvement of $9.7 million was primarily driven by an increase in income tax benefit of $7.9 million, due to the result of current year goodwill impairment charges, as well as an improvement in loss from operations of $6.1 million compared to 2024 which was offset by one time gain from the termination of a lease guarantee liability of $5.5 million within other income in the prior year and an increase in fair value of interest rate swap expense year over year of $3.6 million.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2025 to Year Ended December 31, 2024
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)
Change
Net revenue
Cost of revenue
Gross profit
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses
Goodwill impairment charges
Loss from operations
Interest expense
Other expense (income), net
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts
Lease guarantee income
Loss before income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net loss and comprehensive loss
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc.
The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated results of operations expressed as a percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31,
Net revenue
Cost of revenue
Gross profit
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses
Goodwill impairment charges
Loss from operations
Interest expense
Other expense (income), net
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts
Lease guarantee income
Loss before income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net loss and comprehensive loss
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc.
Net Revenue
Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $26.6 million, or 2.2%, compared to the same period in 2024. T he increase was primarily attributable to volume growth and improved pricing in Seafood and Meat & Poultry and volume growth in Commodity, partially offset by volume decreases within other categories.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $207.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $205.2 million in the same period in 2024 , an increase of $2.4 million, or 1.2% . The gross profit increase was attributable to increased net revenue partially offset by increased costs. Gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased slightly to 16.9% compared to 17.1% in the same period in 2024.
Distribution, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Distribution, selling and administrative expenses of $201.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $3.7 million, or 1.9%, in 2025 compared to $198.0 million in 2024, mainly due to increases in depreciation expense of $2.3 million, occupancy expenses of $1.4 million, auto & truck expense of $1.4 million and insurance costs of $1.2 million partially offset by a reduction in professional fees of $2.8 million. Distribution, selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue remained relatively consistent at 16.4% in 2025 compared to 16.5% in 2024.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased slightly to $11.47 million, compared to $11.43 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, an increase of $0.04 million or 0.4%. The increase was driven by an increase in our average daily line of credit balance of $1.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in our average daily JPMorgan Chase mortgage-secured term loan balance of $5.1 million combined with a slightly lower interest-rate environment. Average floating interest rates on our floating-rate debt for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by approximately 0.9% on the line of credit and 0.9% on the JPMorgan Chase mortgage-secured term loan, compared to 2024. Our average daily line of credit balance was $56.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, up from $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, while our average daily JPMorgan Chase mortgage-secured term loan balance decreased to $98.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $103.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Income tax benefit was $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to an income tax expense of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The $7.9 million increase in income tax benefit was primarily driven by lower nondeductible goodwill impairment charges in 2025, as well as the impact of the SEC settlement recognized in 2024.
Net Loss Attributable to HF Foods Group, Inc.
Net loss attributable to HF Foods Group Inc. was $38.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to a net loss of $48.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The $9.7 million improvement in net loss was primarily attributable to a $7.9 million favorable change in income taxes, a $6.1 million improvement in loss from operations due to a lower goodwill impairment charge in 2025 compared to 2024. These favorable variances were partially offset by the absence of the $5.5 million non-recurring gain recognized in the prior year from the termination of a lease guarantee liability, which was recorded in other income, and by a $3.6 million unfavorable year-over-year change in the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap. Following the 2025 impairment, the Company has no remaining goodwill.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
The following table reconciles EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)
Change
Net loss
Interest expense, net
Income tax expense (benefit)
Depreciation and amortization
EBITDA
Lease guarantee income
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts
Stock-based compensation expense
SEC settlement
Goodwill impairment charges
Business transformation costs (1)
Other non-routine expense (2)
Executive transition and organizational redesign (3)
Adjusted EBITDA
(1) Represents costs associated with the launch and continued implementation of strategic projects including supply chain management improvements and technology infrastructure initiatives.
(2) Includes legal and consulting costs related to various corporate projects and other strategic initiatives.
(3) Includes severance and related expenses for the Company’s transition of executive officers and organizational redesign.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2025, we had cash of approximately $8.6 million, checks issued not presented for payment of $1.7 million and access to approximately $61.2 million in additional funds through our $125.0 million line of credit, subject to a borrowing base calculation. We have funded working capital and other capital requirements primarily by cash flow from operations and bank loans. Cash is required to pay purchase costs for inventory, salaries, fuel and trucking expenses, selling expenses, rental expenses, income taxes, other operating expenses and to service debts.
We believe that our cash flow generated from operations is sufficient to meet our normal working capital needs for at least the next twelve months. However, our ability to repay our current obligations will depend on the future realization of our current assets. Management has considered the historical experience, the economy, the trends in the foodservice distribution industry to determine the expected collectability of accounts receivable and the realization of inventories as of December 31, 2025.
We are party to an amortizing interest rate swap contract with JPMorgan Chase for an initial notional amount of $120.0 million, expiring in March 2028, as a means to partially hedge our existing floating rate loans exposure. Pursuant to the agreement, we will pay the swap counterparty a fixed rate of 4.11% in exchange for floating payments based on CME Term SOFR.
Management believes we have sufficient access to funds to meet our working capital requirements and debt obligations in the next twelve months. However, there are a number of factors that could potentially arise which might result in shortfalls in anticipated cash flow, such as the demand for our products, economic conditions, competitive pricing in the foodservice distribution industry, and our bank and suppliers being able to provide continued support. If the future cash flow from operations and other capital resources is insufficient to fund our liquidity needs, we may have to resort to reducing or delaying our expected capital investment plans, liquidating assets, obtaining additional debt or equity capital, or refinancing all or a portion of our debt.
As of December 31, 2025, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements that currently have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, changes in financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
The following table summarizes cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
Change
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities consists primarily of net loss adjusted for non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization, goodwill impairment charges, changes in deferred income taxes and others, and includes the effect of working capital changes. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $2.8 million primarily due to an increase in non-cash expense add-backs and increases in accounts payable balances, offset by the timing of working capital outlays mainly for inventory purchases and increases in our accounts receivable balances.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $7.8 million primarily due to increased capital project spend in the year ended December 31, 2025.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities remained relatively consistent at $10.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily due to the higher overall net proceeds from line of credit activity, offset by overall lower interest rates as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. These principles require management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, cash flow and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates include, but are not limited to, inventory reserves, impairment of long-lived assets, impairment of goodwill, and the purchase price allocation and fair value of assets and liabilities acquired with respect to business combinations. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and the actual results, future financial statements will be affected.
We believe that among our significant accounting policies, which are described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity. Accordingly, we believe these are the most critical to fully understand and evaluate our financial condition and results of operations.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, as of December 31, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. We have concluded we are one reporting unit for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment.
We review the carrying value of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable and annually for goodwill as required by ASC Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other . Factors that may
be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill may not be recoverable, include a sustained decline in stock price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates and slower growth rates in our industry. This guidance provides the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If, based on a review of qualitative factors, it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a quantitative analysis. If the quantitative analysis indicates the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we measure any goodwill impairment losses as the amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
As of September 30, 2024, the Company concluded that a triggering event occurred due to a sustained decline in the Company’s stock price since December 31, 2023, which required interim testing for goodwill impairment in accordance with ASC 350. Accordingly, the Company performed a quantitative assessment as of September 30, 2024. The fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value by approximately 1%, and therefore we concluded no impairment existed as of that date.
As a result of continued declines in the level of stock price, the Company performed a quantitative impairment assessment as of December 31, 2024. The results of the testing as of December 31, 2024, concluded that the estimated fair value of the reporting unit fell short of carrying value, and therefore impairment existed as of that date. A goodwill impairment charge of $46.3 million was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2024.
As a result of declines in the stock price during the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company performed a quantitative impairment assessment as of December 31, 2025. The results of the testing at December 31, 2025, resulted in the conclusion that the estimated fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit was less than its carrying value, and its goodwill was impaired. A goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2025 of $38.8 million.
For the impairment tests conducted in 2025 and 2024, we used a combination of an income approach or a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model and market approaches, such as public company comparable analysis and comparable acquisitions analysis to determine fair value of the reporting unit. The income approach and market approaches were weighted equally to estimate fair value. The income approach requires detailed forecasts of cash flows, including significant assumptions such as revenue growth rates, gross profit margins, distribution, selling and administrative expenses, among other assumptions, and an estimate of weighted-average cost of capital which we believe approximate the assumptions from a market participant’s perspective. The market approaches are primarily impacted by an enterprise value multiple of EBITDA. These estimates incorporate many uncertain factors which could be impacted by changes in market conditions, interest rates, growth rate, tax rates, costs, customer behavior, regulatory environment and other macroeconomic changes. In addition, we considered the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit by assessing the implied enterprise value control premium based on our market capitalization and also considered the lack of liquidity in the Company’s common stock. The Company’s common stock is fairly thinly traded, with a higher level of internal stockholders than its peers, and no major analyst coverage. As a result, the implied value from the traded stock price is based on limited investment public interest. Our market capitalization is calculated using the number of common shares outstanding and common stock publicly traded price. We determined that the implied control premiums used in each analysis were reasonable which corroborates our fair value estimates. We categorize the fair value determination as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs.
See Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Assumptions used in impairment testing are made at a point in time and require significant judgment; therefore, they are subject to change based on the facts and circumstances present at each impairment test date. Additionally, these assumptions are generally interdependent and do not change in isolation.
Following the impairment test conducted as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s goodwill was fully impaired.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
We assess our long-lived assets such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Factors which may indicate potential impairment include a significant underperformance related to the historical or projected future operating results or a significant negative industry or economic trend. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying amounts to future undiscounted cash flows which the assets or asset groups are expected to generate. If property and equipment and intangible assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value. The testing for impairment of long-lived assets occurs prior to any testing related to goodwill. The Company assessed whether the carrying amounts of the Company’s long-lived assets were impaired and determined no events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
No impairment of long-lived assets was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2025 or 2024 .
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
- Exhibit 211ex211hffgsubsidiaries123125.htm · 32.0 KB
- Exhibit 231ex231bdoconsent2025.htm · 2.3 KB
- Exhibit 311a20254q-ex311.htm · 9.5 KB
- Exhibit 312a20254q-ex312.htm · 9.2 KB
- Exhibit 321a20254q-ex321.htm · 4.1 KB
- Exhibit 322a20254q-ex322.htm · 3.7 KB
- 0001680873-26-000015-index-headers.html0001680873-26-000015-index-headers.html
- Ticker
- HFFG
- CIK
0001680873- Form Type
- 10-K
- Accession Number
0001680873-26-000015- Filed
- Mar 16, 2026
- Period
- Dec 31, 2025 (Q4 25)
- Industry
- Wholesale-Groceries & Related Products
External resources
Permalink
https://insiderdelta.com/issuers/HFFG/10-k/0001680873-26-000015