Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Orion S.A.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is -0.36pp more bearish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
-0.03pp
Flat
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
-0.70pp
Lean -
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
conflicts+4
barriers+1
concern+1
Positive rising
No words rose this year.
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
12,650 words
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risks may have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are not presently aware or that we currently deem immaterial could also materially affect our business operations and financial condition.
Language change vs prior 10-K
MD&A (Item 7) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative or uncertain worldwide economic conditions may result in business volatility and may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations and performance are materially connected to worldwide economic conditions. Because carbon black is used in a diverse array of end products, demand for carbon black has historically been related to real gross domestic product (“GDP”) and general global economic conditions. In particular, a large part of our sales has direct exposure to the cyclical automotive industry and, to a lesser extent, the construction industry. As a result, certain parts of our business experience a level of cyclicality. The nature of our business and our large fixed asset base make it difficult to rapidly adjust our fixed costs downward when demand for our products declines, which could materially affect our profitability. Global and regional economic downturns have in the past, and may in the future, reduce demand or pricing for our products, which have decreased and would decrease our revenue, and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In periods with significant market turmoil or tightened credit availability, we could experience difficulties in accounts receivable collections, pricing pressures and reduced global or local business activity.
Our customers may terminate or attempt to amend their agreements for the purchase of our products due to decline in their demand and production, bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, lack of funding, operational failures, force majeure, hardship or other reasons. The current energy, financial, economic and capital markets environment, and future developments in these and other areas, present material uncertainty and risk with respect to our performance, financial condition, volume of business, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations in the EU are material to our business and important to our customers. If the competitiveness of manufacturing in the EU continues to decrease in light of factors such as increased environmental compliance costs, inconsistent economic policies and rigid labor practices, our customers may have difficulty maintaining the competitiveness of their operations in this region or lose meaningful market share to lower cost imports from other regions, particularly Asia. For example, a shift in tire production from a higher cost region (such as the EU) to a lower cost region (such as Asia) could increase the export of tires made in Asia for sales into Europe and could result in a reduction in tire production in the EU and reduce our profitability.
In addition, changes in, or tensions relating to, U.S. or other countries’ trade relations with countries where we do business or from which we source necessary supplies may adversely impact our business. The imposition of additional restrictive policies by individual countries could lead to unexpected operating difficulties in countries we operate in or do business with. Further changes and uncertainty in the geopolitical environment or government policy, including actual or threatened measures such as tariffs, counter-tariffs and other trade barriers, have and may continue to have impacts on global markets and foreign exchange rates. Any of these could increase our costs and negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our business is subject to operational risks, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations are subject to hazards inherent in chemicals manufacturing and the related use, storage, transportation and disposal of feedstocks, products and wastes, including, but not limited to, fires and explosions, accidents, accidental oil or product releases, severe weather and natural disasters (including hurricanes, tornadoes, ice storms, droughts, floods and earthquakes, some of which are significantly increasing in likelihood because of climate change), pandemics (e.g., COVID-19) or epidemics, mechanical failures, unscheduleddowntime at our production facilities or at facilities that supply raw materials to us, transportation interruptions, disruption to harbor-, road-, pipeline- or storage tank-access, pipeline, tank and silos leaks and ruptures, quality problems, technical difficulties, energy grid shutdowns, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, other environmental risks, sabotage, acts of terrorism or other acts of violence as well as potential boycotts, strikes, sanctions or blockades.
Such events have in the past disrupted, and could in the future disrupt, our supply of raw materials or otherwise affect sales, production, transportation and delivery of our products or affect demand for our products. We could incur significant expenditures in connection with such operational risks. These may be caused both by external and internal factors noted above, as well as war, military operations, strikes, official orders, technical interruptions, material defects, accidents or mistakes. In all of these cases, our property, third-party property or the environment may sustain damage, or there may be human exposure to hazardous substances, personal injuries or fatalities. Such events could result in material financial liabilities, civil or criminal law consequences, the temporary or permanent closure or loss of control over the relevant production or administrative sites or power plants and a negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are dependent on major customers for a significant portion of our sales, and a significant adverse change in a customer relationship could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Customer concentration is driven by the consolidated nature of the industries we serve. In 2025, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 48% of our volume measured in thousand metric tons (“kmt”). Our success in continuing to strengthen relationships and grow our business with our largest customers and in retaining their business over extended time periods could affect our future results. The loss of any of our major customers (including due to industry consolidation) or a reduction in volume sold to them, could adversely affect our results of operations. Any deterioration in the financial condition of any of our customers or the industries they operate in or serve that impairs our customers’ ability to place orders or make payments to us could decrease our sales or increase our uncollectible receivables and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may not be able to compete successfully in the industries and markets in which we operate.
The industries in which we operate are highly competitive based on price, product innovation, product quality, distribution capability, and industry and customer knowledge. We face competition from global and regional suppliers, both in developed and in emerging regions. While we aim to operate at low cost and are focused on reducing our fixed and variable cost bases across our production chain, there may be improvements in the cost competitiveness of other manufacturers relative to us or in the performance properties of substitutable products and raw materials, which could result in advantages for our competitors that adversely affect our business. Furthermore, some of our competitors may have greater financial and other resources, enhanced access to governmental funding or a larger capitalization than we have. Additionally, our business is sensitive to industry capacity utilization, and pricing tends to fluctuate when capacity utilization changes occur, which could affect our financial performance. If we are unable to respond successfully to changing competitive conditions, the
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
demand for our products could be adversely affected which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may not successfully develop new products and technologies that address our customers’ changing requirements or competitive challenges, and our customers may substitute our products by using other products we do not offer.
The industries into which we sell our products are subject to periodic technological changes, ongoing product improvements, product substitution and changes in customer requirements. Increased competition from existing or newly developed products offered by our competitors or companies whose products offer a similar or better functionality to our products may negatively affect demand for our products. We work to identify, develop and market innovative products on a timely basis to meet our customers’ changing requirements and competitive challenges. Should we not be able to substantially maintain or further develop our product portfolio, customers may elect to source comparable or other products from competitors, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Although carbon black continues to offer opportunities for product and process innovation, we cannot be certain that the investments we make in our innovations will result in proportional increases in revenue or profits. In addition, the timely commercialization of products that we are developing may be disrupted or delayed by manufacturing or other technical difficulties, industry acceptance or insufficient industry size to support a new product, competitors’ new products, or difficulties in moving from the experimental stage to the production stage. These disruptions or delays could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As a reinforcing agent in certain rubber applications, carbon black competes primarily with precipitated silica in combination with silane, neither of which are part of our product portfolio. Historically, silica has offered some performance benefits over carbon black in the area of rolling resistance. To date, silica-based tire applications have gained position in passenger car tire treads. Although substitution has not been significant due to carbon black’s cost advantage, technological advances and changing customer requirements may lead to increased demand for silica-based tires, especially in developed regions. Increased substitution and competition from precipitated silica producers could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Alternative materials, procedures or technologies may be developed, or existing ones may be improved and may replace those currently offered in the carbon black industry. If such newly developed or improved products are being offered at lower prices, have preferable features or other advantages, in particular from a regulatory perspective, and we are not able to offer similar new or improved products, we may lose substantial sales volume or customers, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may be unable to implement our business strategies in an effective manner.
Our future financial performance and success largely depend on our ability to maintain and improve our current competitive position and to implement our business strategies for growth successfully. We cannot guarantee that we will successfully implement our business strategies or that implementing these strategies will sustain or improve and not harm our results of operations. We may not be able to increase or sustain our manufacturing efficiency or asset utilization, enhance our current portfolio of products or achieve other fixed or variable cost savings. In addition, the costs involved in implementing our strategies may be significantly higher than we currently anticipate. Our ability to complete capacity expansions may be delayed or interrupted by the need to obtain environmental and other regulatory approvals, the availability of labor and materials, unforeseenhazards, such as weather conditions, adverse political or market developments, and other risks associated with construction or expansion projects. Moreover, the cost of expanding capacity could have a negative impact on our financial results until capacity utilization is sufficient to absorb the incremental costs associated with the expansion. Further, labor or governmental restrictions could impede or delay our ability to reduce headcount in the event headcount reduction is deemed to be sensible in our opinion.
Our business strategies are based on our assumptions about future demand for our existing products, the new products and applications we are developing, and on our continuing ability to produce our products profitably. Each of these factors depends on, among other things, our ability to realign our product portfolio, divest businesses on favorable terms and with minimal disruptions, discontinue product lines with minimal disruption, finance our operations and product development activities, negotiate favorable terms, maintain high-quality and efficient manufacturing operations, relocate and close certain manufacturing facilities with minimal disruption to our operations, respond to competitive and regulatory changes, access quality raw materials in a cost-effective and timely manner, and retain and attract highly skilled technical, managerial, marketing and finance personnel. Any failure to develop, revise or implement appropriate business strategies in a timely and effective manner may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to volatility in the costs, quality and availability of raw materials and energy, which could decrease our production volumes and margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our manufacturing processes consume significant amounts of raw materials and energy, the costs of which are subject to fluctuations in local and worldwide supply and demand as well as other factors beyond our control. The preponderance of raw material cost used in the production of carbon black is related to petroleum-based or coal-based feedstock known as carbon black oil, with some additional use of other raw materials, such as acetylene, hydrogen and natural gas. We obtain a considerable portion of our raw materials and energy from selected key suppliers. Although we maintain certain raw material reserves, if any of these suppliers is unable to meet its obligations under supply agreements with us on a timely basis or at all, or if we cannot source sufficient supply, we may be forced to incur higher costs to
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
obtain the necessary raw materials and energy elsewhere. Additionally, raw material sourcing and related infrastructure (e.g., harbor access, cargo or ship availability, pipeline, tank, rail, waterway or road-access), may be subject to local developments or regulations in certain jurisdictions where we operate that may reduce, delay or halt the physical supply of raw materials. Our inability to source energy or quality raw materials like carbon black oil, including due to the Russia-Ukraine war, Middle East conflicts and China’s relations with the U.S. and with the EU, or otherwise, in a timely fashion and at costs that we anticipate or that are acceptable to us, or an inability to pass-through any cost increases to our customers, could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Most of our Rubber Carbon Black supply contracts contain provisions that adjust prices to account for changes in a relevant feedstock price index. However, we are exposed to oil price and gas price fluctuations, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to shift the price risks to our customers. Success in offsetting increased raw material, energy and tax or tariff costs with related price increases is also influenced by competitive and economic conditions, as well as the speed and severity of such changes, and could vary significantly, depending on the segment served. Such increases may not be accepted by our customers, may not be fully reflected in the indices used in our pricing formulas, may not be sufficient to compensate for increased raw material and energy costs or may decrease demand for our products and our volume of sales. Oil and energy price fluctuations have had, and are likely to continue to have, significant and varying effects on our earnings and results of operations, partly because oil price changes affect our sales prices and our cost of raw materials and energy at different times and amounts, and partly due to other factors, such as differentials affecting the ultimate carbon black oil price paid by us (versus a particular reference price index), carbon black oil usage amounts and ongoing efficiency initiatives, the value of which fluctuates with oil prices. Failure to fully offset the effects of fluctuating raw material or energy costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, volatility in costs and pricing could result in commercial disputes with suppliers and customers regarding the interpretations of complex contractual pricing arrangements, which could adversely affect our business.
Significant movements in the market price for crude oil tend to create volatility in our carbon black feedstock costs, which have in the past affected and may in the future affect our Net Working Capital, cash requirements and operating results. Changes in raw material and energy prices have a direct impact on our Net Working Capital levels. Increases in the cost of raw materials lead to an increase in our Net Working Capital. Due to the quantity of carbon black oil and finished goods that we typically keep in stock together with the levels of receivables and payables maintained, increases occur gradually over a two to three-month period but can vary depending on inventory levels and working capital levels, generally. Net Working Capital swings are particularly significant in an environment of high price volatility.
We may also be subject to volatility in the cost, quality and availability of raw materials and energy due to factors beyond our control, such as geopolitical conflict. See “ Negative or uncertain worldwide economic conditions may result in business volatility and may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ” and “ Our business, financial condition and results of operations have in the past and could in the future be adversely affected by disruptions in the carbon black oil and natural gas supplies, including disruptions caused by the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, ongoing geopolitical tension in the Middle East and the growing tension between China and Taiwan ” This could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Any failure to realize benefits from investments, joint ventures, acquisitions or alliances could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We have made, and may continue to make, investments and acquisitions and enter into joint ventures and collaborations. The success of acquisitions of existing facilities, new technologies, companies and products, or arrangements with third parties is not always predictable, and we may not achieve our anticipated objectives. Failure to achieve our respective goals could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Plant capacity expansions and capital investments such as site development projects may be delayed, cost more than anticipated and/or may not achieve the expected benefits.
Our ability to complete capacity expansions and consolidations as planned, including capacity conversions from Rubber Carbon Black to Specialty Carbon Black and vice versa, and other capital investments, such as site development projects, including those associated with yield efficiencyimprovements or emission controls, have in the past been and may in the future be delayed, interrupted, or otherwise limited by the need to obtain environmental and other regulatory approvals, unexpected cost increases, changes in end-use markets, availability of labor and materials, unforeseenhazards such as weather or health conditions, and other risks associated with construction projects. In addition, lower oil prices may impact our yield efficiencyimprovements. Moreover, the costs of these activities could have a negative impact on our results of operations and capacity utilization at any particular facility. We may not be able to absorb the incremental costs associated with capacity expansion projects. In addition, our ability to expand capacity depends in part on economic and political conditions in the regions we focus on and, in some cases, on our ability to establish operations, construct additional manufacturing capacity or form strategic business alliances.
We may be subject to information technology systems failures, network disruptions, cybersecurity attacks and breaches of data security.
We rely on information technology systems to manage and operate our production facilities, to process transactions and to summarize our operating results. Our information technology systems are an important element for effectively operating our business. Information technology systems failures, particularly in connection with running SAP, including risks associated with upgrading or timely updating our systems, network disruptions, misuse, cybercrime and breaches of data security, have occurred in the past, and if they occur in the future, could disrupt our production as well as our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, our ability to protect customer or
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
company information and our financial reporting, and could lead to increased costs. It is possible that future technological developments could adversely affect the functionality of our computer systems and require further action and substantial funds to prevent or repair computer malfunctions. Our information technology systems, including our back-up systems, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cybercrime, internal or external security breaches, catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, acts of war or terrorism, and usage errors by our employees or third-party providers. These risks may be exacerbated as we continue to develop our information technology systems, including through the implementation of certain artificial intelligence tools, which may also expose us to additional risks. Although we have taken extensive steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security, back-up systems and internal control measures, there can be no assurance that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If our information technology systems are damaged or cease to function properly, we may have to make a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may sufferloss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our production and operations. Any material disruption in our information technology systems, or delays or difficulties in implementing or integrating new systems or enhancing current systems, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We have experienced non-material cybersecurity attacks in the past and may experience additional cybersecurity attacks in the future, potentially with more frequency or sophistication.
While we continually work to safeguard our systems, train our employees and mitigate potential risks, there is no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to prevent cybersecurity attacks or security breaches that manipulate or improperly use our systems or networks, compromise or lose confidential or otherwise protected information, destroy or corrupt data, or otherwise disrupt our operations and safety tools. The occurrence of such events could negatively impact our reputation and our competitive position and could result in litigation with third parties, regulatory action, loss of business, potential liability and increased remediation costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, such attacks or breaches could require significant management attention and resources, and result in the diminution of the value of the Company’s intellectual property and other assets. A breakdown in existing controls and procedures around the Company’s cybersecurity and security prevention environment may prevent us from detecting, reporting or responding to cybersecurity incidents in a timely manner and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or the market price of our securities.
In addition to supporting our operations, we use our systems to collect and store confidential and sensitive data, including information about our know-how, technology and business, as well as about our customers and our employees. As our technology continues to evolve, we anticipate that we will collect and store even more data in the future, and that our systems will increasingly use remote cloud-based solutions and communication features that are sensitive to both willful and unintentional security breaches. Much of our value is derived from our confidential business information, including customer data, proprietary technology and trade secrets. To the extent the confidentiality of such information is compromised, we may lose our competitive advantage, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may suffer. We also collect, retain and use personal information, including data we gather from customers for product development and marketing purposes, and data we obtain from employees. In the event of a breach in security that allows third parties access to this information, we are subject to a variety of laws on a global basis that require us to provide notification to the data owner, and that may expose us to lawsuits, fines and other means of regulatory enforcement. Our reputation could suffer in the event of such a data breach, which could cause customers to purchase from our competitors. Ultimately, any compromise of our data security could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are exposed to political or country risk inherent in doing business in some countries.
We operate a global network of production plants located in Europe, the U.S., South Korea, China, South Africa and Brazil. Accordingly, our business is subject to risks related to the different legal, political, social and regulatory requirements and economic conditions of many jurisdictions. Risks inherent in international operations include the following: disruption of supply chains and shipping routes, changes in the rate of economic growth; unsettled political or economic conditions; expropriation or other governmental actions; social unrest, war, terrorist activities or other armed conflict; national and regional labor strikes; confiscatory taxation or other adverse tax policies, trade and or tariff disputes between countries; deprivation of contract rights; trade regulations affecting production, pricing and marketing of products; reduced protection of intellectual property rights; restrictions on the repatriation of income or capital; exchange controls; inflation, deflation, and currency fluctuations and devaluation; the effect of global environmental, health and safety issues; pandemics or epidemics, respective lock-downs, changes to economic conditions, market opportunities and operating restrictions; changes in foreign laws and tax rates; changes in trade sanctions or embargoes that result in losing access to customers and suppliers in those countries; costs associated with compliance with anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws; nationalization of private enterprises by foreign governments; and changes in financial policy, free funds flow and availability of credit or financing sources. These factors could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, there continues to be uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and certain countries, and our reliance upon production in such countries exposes us to risks due to changes in these relationships, including with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs, among others.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations have in the past and could in the future be adversely affected by disruptions in the carbon black oil and natural gas supplies, including disruptions caused by the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, ongoing geopolitical tension in the Middle East and the growing tension between China and Taiwan.
The impacts of war and other geopolitical events, including but not limited to the war in Ukraine and ongoing geopolitical tension in the Middle East, the growing tension between China and Taiwan, are difficult to predict. For example, the conflict in Ukraine has previously
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
caused, and may continue to cause, volatility in crude oil and natural gas prices. The responses of countries and political bodies to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, the larger overarching tensions, and Ukraine’s military defenses and the potential for wider conflict may generally increase energy market volatility, have severeadverse effects on regional and global economic markets and cause volatility in energy and other product prices. The sanctions, shipping disruptions, collateral war damage, and the potential continuation or expansion of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, or the ongoing geopolitical tension in the Middle East, could further disrupt the availability of crude oil and natural gas supplies.
The extent or length of any adverse effects of the war in Ukraine or the Middle East conflicts on the supply of oil and natural gas and the quality and availability of carbon black oil is difficult to quantify.
The continuation or escalation of events like the war in Russia-Ukraine war or the Middle East conflicts could decrease our production volumes and margins and may adversely impact our business operations, financial condition and results of operations and are difficult to predict. The war in Ukraine has caused and may continue to cause curtailed or delayed spending by our customers’ customers, particularly in the automotive industry, and increases the risk of customer defaults or delays in payments. The Middle East conflicts or any escalation thereof could adversely impact our margins.
These and other conflicts may also lead to increased physical terrorist or cyberattacks, damage to global supply chains, and have other consequences that impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Our operations are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. We have been and may in the future be subject to investigations by regulatory authorities in respect of allegedviolations and may incur significant costs to maintain compliance with, and to address liabilities under, these laws and regulations and respective litigation and proceedings.
We are subject to extensive supranational, domestic, foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental protection and occupational health and safety, all of which may be subject to change in the future. The raw material procurement, as well as the production and processing of carbon black and its byproducts involve the handling, transportation, manufacture, use and disposal of substances or components that may pose environmental risks or be considered toxic, hazardous or carcinogenic under applicable laws. We are also required to obtain permits or other approvals from various regulatory authorities for our operations, which may be required for matters including air emissions as well as wastewater and storm water discharge, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous substances, remediation of soil, tanks, pipelines or buildings and the operation, maintenance and closure of landfills. If we contaminate the environment, violate or are found to have violated or otherwise fail to comply with laws, regulations or permits or other approvals, or fail to receive the timely renewal of and due application for required permits, we may have to limit production, incur fines and civil or criminal sanctions, be required to undertake significant capital expenditures to achieve compliance, or be subject to other obligations by one or more regulatory authorities. Certain environmental laws and regulations could also impose strict liability, meaning the Company could be forced to assume liability for environmental damage caused by a party other than the Company, even in circumstances where the Company’s actions were lawful.
If environmental harm to soil, groundwater, surface water or natural resources is found to have occurred as a result of our current or historical (prior to the existence of the Company) operations, we may be required to incur significant remediation costs at our current or former production facilities, or at third-party sites and for storage facilities. Many of the facilities and third-party storage facilities we utilize have a long history of operation, which might in the future incur environmental compliance and remediation costs due to past spills, contamination, chemical storage, wastewater treatment and waste disposal practices and other activities depending on present and developing laws. For instance, some of our facilities have onsite landfills that have been open for a number of years; we may incur significant costs when these landfills are closed in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Under certain laws and regulations, the obligations to investigate and remediate contamination at a facility or site may be imposed on current and former owners or operators who disposed of waste on–site. Liability under such laws and regulations may be without regard to fault or to the legality of the activities giving rise to the contamination. As a result, we may incur liabilities for contamination or wastes, including hazardous wastes, generated by our operations and disposed of onsite or at offsite locations, even if we were not responsible at the time the waste was disposed or the contamination occurred. Further, we may also incur additional closure and cleanup costs in connection with the closure of plants or separate feedstock storage sites, including costs relating to decommissioning of equipment, decontamination and clean-up, asbestos removal and relocation or closure of operating equipment such as storage tanks, pipelines, wastewater treatment systems, ponds and landfills.
Our operations inherently create significant hazards when storing carbon black oil, converting carbon black oil to carbon black and packaging and storing of carbon black and shipping the products to our customers. These hazards and risks include fires, explosions, spills, discharges and other releases or exposures, any of which could impact the environment, neighboring community and our employees, which could result in, environmental pollution, personal injury or wrongful death claims, damage to our and neighboring properties and reputational harm. In these cases, authorities could impose fines, and the Company could be required to rectify any damage which occurs in or outside of our fence lines.
Environmental and safety regulations are subject to frequent change, as are the priorities of those who enforce them, and we could incur substantial costs to comply with current or future laws and regulations, particularly if these regulations change rapidly or require us to
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
comply with multiple, diverging sets of requirements in the different jurisdictions in which we operate. The global trend in environmental regulation is to impose increasingly stringent restrictions on activities that may affect the environment, although certain governments, including the current U.S. Administration, are engaging in efforts to reduce climate-related regulations in various jurisdictions in which we operate. Such regulations have in the past included, and may in the future include, laws and rules designed to reduce emissions of GHG, SO2, NOx, particulate matter and other air pollutants. For instance, the EU has enacted GHG legislation and continues to expand the scope of such legislation. The EPA has promulgated regulations applicable to operations involving GHG above certain thresholds, and the United States and certain states within the United States have enacted, or are considering, limitations on GHG emissions. Any new or amended environmental laws and regulations may result in costly measures for matters subject to regulation, including but not limited to more stringent limits or control requirements for our air emissions; new or increased compliance obligations relating to emission of GHG, SO2, NOx, and particulate matter; any impact our operations could have on the environment or surrounding community; which, in each case, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition and cash flows. We may be unable to offset these impacts or costs with price increases, productivity improvements, or cost-reduction efforts. Any success we do have in offsetting these impacts or costs will depend on competitive and economic conditions that are inherently variable.
Compliance with future more stringent environmental laws and regulations may result in significantly increased capital expenditures related to prevention and remediation. Our business and financial conditions may be impacted if we are unable to finance these increasing compliance costs. Regardless, we may be required to incur non-capital expenditure costs to satisfy climate change and other environmental obligations imposed on us by the various regulations.
Certain national and international health organizations have classified carbon black as a possible or suspect human carcinogen. To the extent that, in the future, (i) these organizations re-classify carbon black as a known or confirmed carcinogen, (ii) other organizations or government authorities in other jurisdictions classify carbon black or any of our other finished products, raw materials or intermediates as suspected or known carcinogens or (iii) there is discovery of adverse health effects attributable to the production or use of carbon black or any of our other finished products, raw materials or intermediates, we could be required to incur significantly higher costs to comply with environmental, health and safety laws, or to comply with restrictions on sales of our products, our reputation and business could be adversely affected, and we could become the subject of liability, litigation or enforcement actions. In addition, chemicals that are currently classified as harmless may be classified as dangerous in the future, and our products may have characteristics that are not recognized today but may be found in the future to be carcinogenic or otherwise impair human health. See “ Item 1. Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters .”
Environmental, social and governance matters, including regulations requiring a reduction of or that impose additional taxes or fees on greenhouse gas emissions, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and an increased awareness as well as adverse publicity about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation.
U.S., EU and international regulators, investors and other stakeholders are increasingly focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters. For example, the changing U.S., EU and international laws, regulations and investor expectations relating to ESG matters, including environmental sustainability and climate change and human capital management, are under consideration or being adopted, which may include specific, target-driven disclosure requirements or expectations. Our response will require increased costs to comply, including the implementation of new reporting processes, entailing additional compliance risk, enhanced workforce skills, and other incremental investments, and our action or inaction in response to these expectations could harm our reputation and relationship with stakeholders.
Given the industry we operate in, regulations requiring a reduction of or that impose additional taxes or fees on greenhouse gas emissions may have a significant impact on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows as further explained below. Despite our efforts to control emissions, significant volumes of CO 2 , a GHG, are emitted in our carbon black manufacturing processes. Over the past few decades, the relationship between GHGs and concern for global climate change have resulted in increased levels of scrutiny from regulators, investors and the public alike, and have led to proposed and enacted laws and regulations on both national and supranational levels, to monitor, regulate, control and tax emissions of CO 2 and other GHGs. These laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Investors and other financial institutions are also focused on sustainability and climate change as it relates to their investment and financing decisions. Increased awareness in the investment community and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could also harm our reputation.
The international community continues to negotiate a binding treaty that would require reductions in GHG emissions by developed countries. In addition, a number of further measures addressing GHG emissions may be implemented, such as a successor international agreement, if any, to the Kyoto Protocol and the EU’s proposal to consider raising its commitment to reduce carbon emissions to at least 55% below 1990 levels by 2030. The United Nations Conference on Climate Change in December 2015 led to the creation of the Paris Agreement and encourages countries to continuously review and improve their GHG emission reduction goals. While signing the Paris Agreement does not legally bind countries to reduce GHG emissions, countries that participate may respond by enacting legislation or regulations in order to progress in lowering GHG emissions. In the United States, Congress has from time to time considered legislation to reduce emissions of GHGs, but no comprehensive legislation has been enacted to date, and significant uncertainty currently exists as to how any such GHG legislation or regulations would impact large stationary sources, such as our facilities in Belpre (Ohio), Borger (Texas), Orange (Texas) or Ivanhoe (Louisiana), and what costs or operational changes these regulations may require in the future. Some U.S. states
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
have taken legal measures to reduce emissions of GHGs, primarily through the development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional or state GHG cap-and-trade programs. South Africa, where we have an operating plant, has adopted a CO 2 tax regime. There are also ongoing discussions and regulatory initiatives in other countries, including in Brazil where we have production facilities, regarding GHG emission reduction programs, but those programs have not yet been defined. There is no assurance that, in the future, the current level of regulation will continue in the jurisdictions where we operate. In addition, several countries, spanning across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South America and the Asia-Pacific region, are currently evaluating further and more restrictive regulations to reduce GHG emissions and to implement stricter environmental regulations generally.
Compliance with current or future GHG regulations governing our operations may result in significantly increased capital and operating expenditures for measures such as the installation of more environmentally efficient technology or the purchase of allowances to emit GHGs. We may need to purchase emission rights to cover the shortfall where emissions exceed the quantity of allowances (EU and South Korean ETS), which may cause a material financial impact. Examples of such expenditures may include, but are not limited to, becoming subject to carbon and GHG emission trading requirements under which we may be required to purchase carbon credits and other offsets aimed at reducing our ecological footprint if our emission levels exceed our allocations. Costs of complying with regulations could increase, as concerns related to greenhouse gases and climate change continue to emerge. The enactment of new environmental laws and regulations and/or the more aggressive interpretation of existing requirements could require us to incur significant costs for compliance or capital improvements or limit our current or planned operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings or cash flow. We attempt to offset the effects of these compliance costs through price increases, productivity improvements and cost reduction efforts. Such price increases may not be accepted by our customers, may not be sufficient to compensate for increased regulatory costs or may decrease demand for our products and our volume of sales. While their potential effect on our manufacturing operations or financial results cannot be estimated, they could be substantial. We cannot reliably predict the form that future regulations may take or to estimate any costs that we may be required to incur with respect to these or any other future requirements. In addition to the increased expenditures outlined above, such requirements could also adversely affect our energy supply, or the costs (and types) of raw materials we use, and ultimately may directly or indirectly restrict our operations or reduce demand for our products. The realization of any or all of these consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “ Item 1. Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters.”
Developing regulation of carbon black as a nano-scale material could require us to comply with costly new requirements.
Carbon black consists of aggregates of primary nano-scale particles. The EPA and other governmental agencies have developed regulatory schemes under which they collect further data on nano-scale materials, including carbon black. In addition, the EPA and other nations’ environmental regulatory authorities, including the European Commission, are also conducting extensive environmental health and safety investigations of nano-scale materials. If carbon black is found to be harmful to humans and/or to the environment, it could be subject to more stringent regulatory control, which could require us to incur significantly higher costs to comply with new environmental, health and safety laws and could adversely affect our reputation and business. See “ Item 1. Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters .”
In the EU, in 2022 the European Commission finalized the process on the revision of the nanomaterial definition. With its updated recommendation on June 10, 2022 of the definition of nanomaterial (2022/C 220/01), the status for carbon black remains unchanged in comparison to the previous version (2011/696/EU). The majority of carbon black grades are defined as nanomaterials. Furthermore, the International Organization for Standardization (“ISO”) developed the ISO TC 229 “Nanotechnologies,” which considers carbon black a “nano-structured material.” The industry is not yet generally affected by these definitions. However, certain regulations regarding cosmetics applications or articles which are intended for food contact have already implemented nano-specific provisions. Similar nano-specific provisions are also being discussed for other regulations which may additionally affect the use of carbon black in the future. This development may significantly affect our business in a manner we cannot predict, including by increasing the costs of doing business or decreasing the marketability of our products. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our operations have the potential to cause environmental and other damage as well as personal injury.
The operation of a chemical manufacturing business as well as the sale and distribution of chemical products involve safety, health and environmental risks. For example, the production and processing of carbon black and other chemicals involves the storage, handling, transportation, manufacture or use of certain substances or components that may be considered toxic or hazardous. Our manufacturing processes and the storage and transportation of chemical products entail risks such as leaks, fires, explosions, toxic releases or mechanical failures. If operational risks materialize, they could result in injury or loss of life, damage to the environment or damage to property. In addition, the occurrence of material operating problems at our facilities due to any of these hazards may result in loss of production, which in turn, may make it difficult for us to meet customer needs. Accordingly, these hazards and their consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, both during and after the period of operational difficulties, and could harm our reputation.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
The European Union REACH legislation or similar legislation in other countries may affect our ability to manufacture and sell certain products.
The REACH legislation as described under “Chemical Regulation” above or similar legislation in other countries or jurisdictions may limit the ability to market or sell our products, in particular if the relevant authorities may change or amend the registration prerequisites for our products or may narrow their interpretation of such legislation in relation to our products.
Additionally, other organizations and countries, including South Korea and China, have adopted or may in the future adopt comparable or even more restrictive regulations than REACH, which could affect our ability to manufacture and sell certain products in the future.
In certain jurisdictions, carbon black has been added to lists of hazardous products that are subject to labeling and other requirements. Compliance with these requirements is required to sell our products in these jurisdictions, and noncompliance may result in material fines or penalties or other enforcement actions, including injunctions, recalls or seizures, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Changes in the classification of carbon black on these lists or to the applicable regulations could result in more stringent or new requirements and adversely affect our compliance costs. See “ Item 1. Business, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters .”
Market and regulatory changes may affect our ability to sell or otherwise benefit from co-generated energy, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Most of our manufacturing sites, including one jointly owned production facility, have some form of co-generation transforming waste heat from combusting exhaust gas, the main by-product of the carbon black production process, into electricity, steam or hot water. Some of this co-generated energy is self-consumed, and the excess may be sold to third parties. Our ability to benefit from co-generation, and in particular our ability to sell it to third parties, may be limited due to general market conditions or regulatory changes, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Litigation or legal proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and thus adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business. In particular, certain asbestos related claims have been filed with respect to time periods when previous owners were in control of our business. Some matters involve claims for damage payments as well as other relief. Additional claims by (former) employees or contractors based on alleged past exposure to asbestos or other substances with negative health effects may be received in the future.
We may also be subject to litigation based on environmental matters such as pollution, remediation, contamination, or exposure to hazardous substances either in the workplace or resulting from the use of our products. This litigation could result in substantial liability for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability. Certain environmental groups could also initiate litigationagainst us, which could cause reputational as well as financial harm.
The outcome of legal proceedings is extremely difficult to predict, and we offer no assurances in this regard. Adverse rulings, judgments or settlements in pending or future litigation or administrative proceedings, including employment-related disputes and litigation, contract disputes and litigation, intellectual property disputes and litigation, product liability claims, tort claims and other personal injuryclaims, claims based on alleged exposure to asbestos, chemicals or to carbon black, environmental permitting disputes or in connection with environmental remediation activities or contamination, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Because many of our products provide critical performance attributes to our customers’ applications and products, the sale of these products involves a risk of product liability claimsagainst us, including claims arising in connection with the use of, or exposure to, our products. Our products have widespread end-uses in a variety of consumer industries. A successful product liability claim, or series of claims, arising out of these various uses that results in liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage or for which we are not indemnified by a third party or have not otherwise provided for could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In particular, we could be required to increase our debt or divert resources from other investments in our business in order to discharge any such liabilities.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights successfully.
Our intellectual property rights are important to our success and competitive position. We own various patents and other intellectual property rights and have licenses to use intellectual property rights covering some of our products as well as certain processes and product uses. We often choose not to seek to patent a production method or product in order to avoid disclosure of business specific know-how. In addition to patents, a significant part of our intellectual property are our trade secrets, general know-how and experience regarding manufacturing technology, plant operation and quality management, which third parties, including our competitors, may develop independently without violating our trade secret rights. We make careful assessments with respect to production process improvements and decide whether to apply for patents or retain and protect them as trade secrets. In some of the countries in which we operate or sell products, such as China, the laws protecting patent holders are scoped or interpreted differently than in the U.S., the EU or certain other regions. When we file a patent application, it is usually filed for all countries with active competition where we have existing customers.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
Nonetheless, because the laws and enforcement mechanisms in some countries may not be as effective as in others, and because our intellectual property rights may, if asserted, ultimately be found to be invalid or unenforceable, we may not be able to protect all of our intellectual property rights successfully. Insufficient protection of intellectual property may limit our ability to make use of technological advantages or result in a reduction of future profits. This may cause competitive restrictions and may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may also be subject to claims that our products, processes or product uses infringe or misappropriate the intellectual property rights of others. These claims, even if without merit, can be expensive and time consuming to defend or litigate. If we were to suffer an adverse ruling, we could be subject to injunctions, obligated to pay damages or enter into licensing agreements requiring royalty payments and use restrictions, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, licensing agreements may not be available to us, and, if available, may not be available to us on acceptable terms.
Risks Related to Indebtedness, Currency Exposure and Other Financial Matters
Our financial leverage may make it difficult for us to service that debt and operate our businesses.
We are leveraged with recurring debt service obligations and expect to continue to have leverage for the foreseeable future. We may also incur more debt in the future. This may have negative consequences for our business and investors, including requiring that a substantial portion of the cash flows from our operations be dedicated to debt service obligations; reducing the availability of cash flows to fund internal growth through working capital, capital expenditures, to fund other general corporate purposes, to pay dividends and to finance stock buy-backs; increasing our vulnerability to economic downturns generally or in our industry; exposing us to interest rate increases on our existing indebtedness and indebtedness that we may incur in the future; placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt in relation to cash flows; limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and our industry; restricting us from pursuing strategic acquisitions or exploiting certain business opportunities; and limiting, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds or raise equity capital in the future and increasing the costs of such additional financings.
If our future cash flows from operations and other capital resources are insufficient to pay our obligations as they mature or to fund our liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay our business activities and capital expenditures, sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity financing, restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity or reduce or cease paying our dividend. In the worst-case scenario, an actual or impendinginability to pay debts as they become due and payable could result in our insolvency or an insolvency of one or more of our subsidiaries.
Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments may limit our ability to operate our business. Our failure to comply with these covenants, including as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our current debt instruments impose some operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions include limitations on our ability to, among other things, merge or consolidate with other companies; sell, lease, transfer or dispose of assets; pay dividends, redeem stock capital or redeem or reduce subordinated indebtedness; and make acquisitions or investments. Our debt instruments contain covenants that may adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations and capital needs or to pursue available business opportunities. Our ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by changes in economic or business conditions or other events beyond our control. In addition, our debt instruments contain cross-default provisions such that a default under one particular financing arrangement could automatically trigger defaults under other financing arrangements and cause such indebtedness to become due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. As a result, any default under an indebtedness to which we are party could result in a substantial loss to us and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A deterioration in our financial position or a downgrade of our ratings by a credit rating agency could adversely affect our ability to find new financing and maintain existing financing sources, ensure the continued access to receivables factoring programs, increase our borrowing costs, and our business relationships could be adversely affected.
A deterioration of our financial position or a downgrade of our credit ratings for any reason could adversely affect our ability to find new financing and maintain existing financing sources, maintain or expand our receivables programs, increase our borrowing costs and have an adverse effect on our business relationships as well as on the payments and other terms agreeable with customers, suppliers and hedging counterparties. We currently do and may in the future enter into various forms of hedging arrangements against currency exchange, interest rate, raw material and energy and oil price fluctuations. Financial strength and credit ratings are important to the availability and pricing of these hedging activities. As a result, any downgrade of our credit ratings may make it more costly for us to engage in these activities, and changes to our level of indebtedness may make it more difficult or costly for us to engage in these activities in the future.
In addition, a downgrade could adversely affect our existing financing, limit access to the capital or credit markets, or otherwise adversely affect the availability of other new financing on favorable terms, if at all, result in more restrictive covenants in agreements governing the terms of any future indebtedness that we incur, increase our borrowing costs or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates. Our results of operations have in the past been affected and may in the future be affected by both the transaction and translation effects of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We are exposed to currency fluctuation when we convert currencies that we may receive for our products into currencies required to pay our debt, or into currencies in which we purchase raw materials, meet our fixed costs or pay for services, any of which could result in a gain or loss depending on fluctuations in exchange rates. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could require us to reduce our prices to remain competitive in foreign markets. In each case, the relevant income or expense is reported in the relevant local currency and is translated into the U.S. dollar at the applicable currency exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, our financial results in any given period are materially affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, in particular the euro, the Korean won and Chinese renminbi. In addition, certain of our outstanding debt obligations are denominated, pay interest and must be repaid in euros (and certain of our future debt obligations may be denominated in euros), and therefore expose us to additional exchange rate risks. An appreciation of the euro would make our financing under euro-denominated instruments more expensive. We are also exposed to adverse changes in interest rates. We manage our foreign exchange risk through normal operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the selective use of derivative transactions, the effectiveness of which is dependent, in part, upon the counterparties to these contracts honoring their financial obligations to us. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in reducing the risks inherent in exposures to foreign currency and interest rate fluctuations, and our financial results could be adversely affected.
From time to time, it may be necessary for us to enter into hedging arrangements to reduce the impact of price and exchange rate volatility. Unavailability or ineffectiveness of hedging could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In the past, we have entered into certain hedging arrangements to reduce the impact of raw material and energy price volatility as well as interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations. It may be necessary for us to enter into hedging arrangements in the future to reduce the impact of raw material or energy price volatility or currency and exchange rate fluctuation, which may or may not be effective. The use of derivative hedging instruments is generally dependent on the availability of adequate credit lines with appropriate financial institutions. As a result, we could be unable to use derivative financial instruments in the future, to the extent necessary or on commercially reasonable terms, and any hedging strategy we employ could therefore be adversely affected. The effectiveness of our derivative hedging instruments will also depend on the relevant hedging counterparties honoring their financial obligations. Any failure by a hedging counterparty to perform its obligations could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may be required to impair or write off certain assets if our assumptions about future sales and profitability prove incorrect.
In analyzing the value of our inventory, property, plant and equipment, investments and intangible assets, we have made assumptions about future sales (prices and volume), costs and cash generation. These assumptions are based on management’s best estimates, and if the actual results differ significantly from these assumptions, we may not be able to realize the value of the assets recorded, which could lead to an impairment or write-off of certain of these assets which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be required to increase our pension fund contributions.
We have made pension commitments to our existing and some of our former employees. These commitments are partially covered by pension schemes, pension and benevolent funds and insurance policies some of which are maintained by previous employers. The amount of obligations is based on certain actuarial assumptions, including discount factors, life expectancy, pension trends and future salary development as well as expected interest rates applicable to the plan assets. Actual results deviating from these assumptions could result in a considerable increase of our pension commitments and liabilities and higher allocations to the pension reserves in future years, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all the risks we may face, and it may be difficult to obtain replacement insurance on acceptable terms or at all.
Our plants, equipment and other assets are insured for property damage and business interruption risks, and our business as a whole is insured for public and products liability risks with reputable insurance companies. We believe these insurance policies are generally in accordance with customary industry practices, including deductibles and coverage limits. However, we cannot be fully insured against all potential hazardsincident to our business, including losses resulting from war risks or terrorist acts, or all potential losses, including damage to our reputation. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially, and in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable at a reasonable cost or may be available only for certain risks. We can provide no assurances that we would be able to obtain replacement insurance on acceptable terms or at all.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
We could experience a material adverse effect on our financial condition if the tax authorities were to successfullychallenge decisions and assumptions we have made in assessing and complying with our tax obligations.
We are subject to tax in Luxembourg, Germany and in other jurisdictions, and significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes. We make, and have in the past made, numerous decisions and assumptions in assessing and complying with our tax obligations, including assumptions regarding the tax deductibility of certain interest expenses, the upholding and recognition of our German tax group, the applicability of the regulations to our business as a group headquartered as a Luxembourg company and the prices applied between our subsidiaries for intercompany transactions, known as transfer pricing. Many of the tax laws that apply to us are complex and often require judgments to be made when the law is unclear or the facts are uncertain. While we believe the decisions we have made and the assumptions and practices we have applied are reasonable and accurate, we cannot guarantee that these decisions, assumptions and practices will not be questioned or rejected by the tax authorities. In particular, we are subject to tax audits in various jurisdictions, and could be subject to additional tax audits, and in many cases, these audits have not yet begun or have not been completed and could give rise to issues of this kind. If these tax authorities successfullychallenge our decisions or assumptions, we could be required to pay additional amounts to such authorities to satisfy our tax obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, though most of the jurisdictions in which we operate have double tax treaties with other foreign jurisdictions providing a framework for mitigating the impact of double taxation, such mechanisms for resolving such conflictingclaims can be expected to be very lengthy. If such conflictingclaims are not resolved in our favor, or if the resolution thereof is more extensive than we expect, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Significant changes in our jurisdictional earnings mix or in the tax laws of those jurisdictions, as well as changes in their interpretation, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our future tax rates may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the enactment of new tax legislation, other changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws, changes in the estimated realization of our net deferred tax assets, the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed, adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns, increases in expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of acquired in process R&D and impairment of goodwill in connection with acquisitions, changes in available tax credits and additional tax or interest payments resulting from tax audits with various tax authorities. Losses for which no tax benefits can be recorded could materially impact our tax rate and its volatility from period to period. Any significant change in our jurisdictional earnings mix or in the tax laws in those jurisdictions, as well as changes in their interpretation, could increase our tax rates and adversely affect our financial results in those periods.
Other international tax measures, such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (“OECD’s”) base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project and the global minimum taxation regime (“Pillar Two”) contribute to increased uncertainty and may adversely affect our tax provision. The BEPS project contemplates changes to numerous international tax principles, as well as national tax incentives, and these changes, when adopted by individual countries, could adversely affect our provision for income taxes. The rules are new and certain aspects of Pillar Two are not yet finalized. We continuously monitor the development of these rules and if and to which extent they may affect us. Changes in these and other international tax measures, as well as our interpretation of them and their impacts on our business, could adversely impact our tax rates and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Additionally, during periods of high profitability in certain industries, there are often calls for increased taxes or surcharges on incremental revenues or profits, often called “ windfall profit ” taxes. Governments in various jurisdictions may impose or increase such taxes for certain companies operating in the energy and oil and gas sector. The imposition of, or increase to, such windfall profit taxes could adversely affect our financial results.
Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock
We cannot assure investors that we will pay dividends on our Common stock.
Our ability to pay dividends on our Common stock is generally dependent on a proposal by our Board of Directors subject to approval by our stockholders and will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, our financial condition and results of future operations, growth opportunities and restrictive covenants in our debt instruments.
The rights of our stockholders may differ from the rights they would have as stockholders of a U.S. corporation, which could adversely affect trading in our Common stock and our ability to conduct equity financings.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our Articles of Association and the laws of Luxembourg, including the Luxembourg Company Law. The rights of our stockholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the U.S. Luxembourg laws may not be as extensive as those in effect in the U.S., and Luxembourg law and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters might not be as protective of minority stockholders as state corporation laws in the U.S. As a result, our stockholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our directors and officers than they would as stockholders of a corporation incorporated in the U.S.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
We are organized under the laws of Luxembourg and it may be difficult to obtain or enforce judgments or bring original actions against us or the members of our Board of Directors in the United States.
We are organized under the laws of Luxembourg, and the majority of our assets are located outside the U.S. Furthermore, some of the members of our Board of Directors and officers reside outside the U.S., and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the U.S. Investors may not be able to effect service of process within the U.S. upon us or these persons or to enforce judgments obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts. Likewise, it may also be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the U.S., including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Awards of punitivedamages in actions brought in the U.S. or elsewhere are generally not enforceable in Luxembourg.
As there is no direct treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the U.S. and Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments rendered by U.S. courts will be subject to the procedure and the conditions set forth in the Luxembourg procedural code.
Litigation in Luxembourg is also subject to rules of procedure that differ from the U.S. rules, including with respect to the taking and admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the proceedings and the allocation of costs. For these reasons, it may be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us, the members of our Board of Directors or our officers. In addition, even if a judgment is obtained against our Company, the non-U.S. members of our Board of Directors or our officers based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws, a U.S. investor may not be able to enforce it in U.S. or Luxembourg courts.
Under our Articles of Association, we may indemnify our directors for and hold them harmless against all claims, actions, suits or proceedings brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. The right to indemnification does not exist in the case of gross negligence, fraud or wrongfulmisconduct. The rights and obligations among or between us and any of our current or former directors and officers are generally governed by the laws of Luxembourg and are subject to the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of such persons’ capacities listed above. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce this indemnification provision in an action brought in the U.S. under U.S. federal or state securities laws, this provision could make judgments obtained outside Luxembourg more difficult to enforce against our assets in Luxembourg or in jurisdictions that would apply Luxembourg law.
Luxembourg and European insolvency and bankruptcy laws are substantially different from U.S. insolvency laws and may offer our stockholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
We are subject to Luxembourg insolvency and bankruptcy laws. Should courts in another European country determine that the insolvency and bankruptcy laws of that country apply to us in accordance with and subject to such EU regulations, the courts in that country could have jurisdiction over any insolvency proceedings initiated against us. Insolvency and bankruptcy laws in Luxembourg or the relevant other European country, if any, may offer our stockholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws and make it more difficult for them to recover the amount they could expect to recover in a liquidation under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
General Risk Factors
If we are unable to successfully negotiate with the representatives of our employees, including labor unions and works councils, we may experience strikes and work stoppages.
We are party to collective bargaining agreements. We also are required to consult with our employee representatives, such as works councils, on certain matters such as restructuring, acquisitions and divestitures. Although we believe that our relations with our employees are good, there can be no assurance that current agreements will not be terminated, new agreements will be reached or consultations completed without union or works council actions or on terms satisfactory to us. Current and future negotiations and consultations with employee representatives could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, a material work stoppage or union dispute could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may not be able to recruit or retain key management and personnel.
Our success is dependent on the management and leadership skills of our key management and personnel. The loss of any member of our key leadership team and personnel, or an inability to attract, retain, develop and maintain additional personnel could prevent us from implementing our business strategy. The loss of one or more members of our key management or operating personnel, or the failure to attract, retain and develop additional key personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A.
Disruptions in credit and capital markets may make it more difficult for us and our suppliers and customers to borrow money or raise capital.
Disruptions in the credit markets may result in less credit being made available by banks and other lending institutions. As a result, we may not be able to obtain financing to pursue other business plans or make necessary investments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Furthermore, the inability of our customers to obtain credit facilities or capital market financing may adversely affect our business by reducing our sales and increasing our exposure to bad debt, while the inability of our suppliers to access adequate financing may adversely affect our business by increasing prices for raw materials, energy and transportation.
MD&A (Item 7)
4,449 words
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations and financial condition during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, and should be read in conjunction with the information included under Item 1. Business and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included elsewhere in this Annual Report. We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP” or “U.S. GAAP”) and in U.S. dollars.
This section discusses year-to-year comparisons between 2025 and 2024. For discussions on year-to-year comparison between 2024 and 2023 refer to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2024 Annual Report in Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 19, 2025 (the “ Prior Annual Report ”).
Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
We believe certain factors had, and will continue to have, a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition. As many of these factors are beyond our control, and certain of these factors have historically been volatile, past performance will not necessarily be indicative of future performance, and it is difficult to predict future performance with any degree of certainty. In addition, important factors that could cause our actual results of operations or financial conditions to differ materially from those expressed or implied below, include, but are not limited to, factors indicated under “ Item 1A. Risk Factors ” and “ Cautionary Statement for the Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ” elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Operating Result s
2025 Compared to 2024
Operating results for the periods discussed are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Year-Over-Year
Delta
(In millions, except volume)
Volume (in kmt)
Net sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Research and development costs
Loss (recovery) due to misappropriation of assets, net
Goodwill impairment
Other expense (income), net
Income from operations
Interest and other financial expense, net
Income (loss) before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes
Income tax expense
Earnings in affiliated companies, net of tax
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Net losses on derivatives
Defined benefit plans, net
Other comprehensive loss
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net sales
Volume increased marginally by 13.8 kmt, or 1.5%, year-over-year to 948.6 kmt, primarily due to higher Rubber Carbon Black segment volume, partially offset by lower Specialty Carbon Black segment volume .
Net sales decreased by $70.8 million, or 3.8%, from $1,877.5 million in 2024 to $1,806.7 million in 2025, driven primarily by the pass-through effect of lower oil prices, partially offset by higher volume in the Rubber Carbon Black segment and a favorable foreign exchange rate impact.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A
Cost of sales
Cost of sales decreased marginally by $1.8 million, or 0.1%, from $1,448.7 million in 2024 to $1,446.9 million in 2025.
Gross profit
Gross profit decreased by $69.0 million or 16.1%, from $428.8 million in 2024 to $359.8 million in 2025.
The decrease was primarily driven by unfavorable product and regional mix, contractual price and unfavorable timing from the pass-through effect of raw material costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $7.1 million, or 3.0%, from $237.8 million in 2024 to $230.7 million in 2025 driven primarily by impact of cost saving measures initiated by us and lower distribution costs. Those were partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange rate impact.
Loss (recovery) due to misappropriation of assets, net
During the third quarter of 2024, we were the target of a criminal scheme that resulted in multiple fraudulently induced outbound wire transfers to accounts controlled by unknown third parties aggregating to $55.7 million, net of recoveries. In addition, we incurred $3.6 million of professional fees in connection with our investigations.
During 2025, we recovered $9.2 million (€7.9 million) and incurred $2.3 million of professional fees, which was reported in Loss (recovery) due to misappropriation of assets, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For more information, refer to Note Q. Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill impairment
During the third quarter of 2025, we experienced a significant decrease in the trading price of our Common stock. In our Rubber reporting unit, elevated levels of low value tire imports from Asia during 2025 have indirectly impacted our demand in core Western markets and our overall profitability. In our Specialty reporting unit, persistently soft industrial economies coupled with uncertainty related to global trade, tariffs and regulatory matters have impacted our demand and portfolio mix. We performed quantitative impairment assessments for each of our two reporting units as of September 30, 2025.
Based on our quantitative assessments, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $80.8 million, which impaired all of our existing goodwill. For more information, refer to Note H. Goodwill and Intangible Assets to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was $35.8 million and $9.7 million in 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The 2025 effective income tax rate was (104.4)% compared with 18.0% in 2024. The increase in the effective tax rate was mainly driven by the negative tax effects from the goodwill impairment and valuation allowances. Those were partially offset by US tax refunds and tax-free income.
The 2025 effective tax rate was particularly impacted by:
• the $18.5 million tax effect from the non-tax deductible goodwill impairment charge, and
• valuation allowances of $10.6 million.
For further details, see Note P. Income Taxes in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Comprehensive income (loss)
2025 vs 2024 ―Comprehensive income (loss) decreased by $86.7 million, from Comprehensive income of $14.2 million to Comprehensive loss of $72.5 million, primarily due to a decrease in Net income. The activities from the remaining components of Comprehensive income are discussed below.
• $19.8 million favorable foreign currency translation adjustments due to weakening of U.S. dollar versus euro,
• $5.7 million related to net favorable fair value changes in defined pension and other post-retirement benefits and
• $2.1 million related to net favorable impacts related to financial derivative instruments primarily driven by net periodic changes in cross currency swaps.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A
General Economic Conditions, Cyclicality and Seasonality
We believe carbon black feedstock and production costs are or may be influenced by a variety of geopolitical developments and macroeconomic considerations, including but not limited to the current U.S. administration’s evolving tariff policy, the European Union’s (“EU”) climate policies, the result of the EU’s anti-dumping investigation into Chinese tire imports, market prices of carbon emission certificates (“CO 2 ”) in the EU, and the ongoing Russian-Ukraine war. To mitigate energy-related cost volatility risks, we have incorporated, where possible, raw material and regulatory cost pass-through provisions in our supply agreements, and we are continually focused on diversifying our global feedstocks sources.
Revolving credit facility —In February 2026, we entered into the Fifteenth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, which amended and restated our revolving credit facility (the “RCF”). See Note J. Debt and Other Obligations to our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We present certain financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP or the accounting standards of any other jurisdiction and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their nearest comparable GAAP measures, see section Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
These non-GAAP measures include, but are not limited to, Adjusted EBITDA, Net Working Capital and Capital Expenditures.
We define:
• EBITDA —Income from operations before depreciation and amortization.
• Adjusted EBITDA —Income from operations before depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, and non-recurring items (such as, restructuring expenses, Loss (recovery) due to misappropriation of assets, net, Goodwill impairment, etc.) plus Earnings in affiliated companies, net of tax.
• Segment Gross Profit —Segment Net sales minus segment Cost of sales.
• Net Working Capital —Inventories, net plus Accounts receivable, net minus Accounts payable.
• Capital Expenditures —Cash paid for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment.
• Free Cash Flow— Net cash provided by operating activities less Net cash used in investing activities.
Our operations are managed by senior executives who report to our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), the C hief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). Adjusted EBITDA is used by CODM to evaluate our operating performance and to make decisions regarding allocation of capital, because it excludes the effects of items that have less bearing on the performance of our underlying core business. We use this measure, together with other measures of performance under GAAP, to compare the relative performance of operations in planning, budgeting and reviewing our business. We believe these measures are useful metrics of financial performance in addition to Net income, Income from operations and other profitability measures under GAAP, because they facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period. By eliminating potential differences in results of operations between periods caused by factors such as depreciation and amortization, historic cost and age of assets, financing and capital structures and taxation positions or regimes, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides a useful additional basis for evaluating and comparing the current performance of the underlying operations. In addition, we believe these non-GAAP measures aid investors by providing additional insight into our operational performance and help clarify trends affecting our business.
However, other companies and analysts may calculate non-GAAP financial measures differently, so making comparisons among companies on this basis should be done carefully. Non-GAAP measures are not performance measures under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or construed as substitutes for Net sales, Net income, Income from operations, Gross profit and other GAAP measures as an indicator of our operations in accordance with GAAP.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following table presents a Reconciliation of Net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA :
Year Ended December 31,
Year-Over-Year
Delta
(In millions)
Net income (loss)
Add back Income tax expense
Add back Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax
Income (loss) before earnings in affiliated companies and income taxes
Add back Interest and other financial expense, net
Income from operations
Add back Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and amortization of intangible assets and right of use assets
EBITDA
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax
Loss (recovery) due to misappropriation of assets, net
Misappropriation of assets, net
Professional fees related to misappropriation of assets
Goodwill impairment
Long term incentive plan
Other adjustments
Adjusted EBITDA
Specialty Carbon Black Adjusted EBITDA
Rubber Carbon Black Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA (A Non-GAAP Financial Measure)
Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $54.2 million, or 17.9%, from $302.2 million in 2024 to $248.0 million in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to lower volume in the Specialty Carbon Black segment, unfavorable customer and regional mix in the Rubber Carbon Black segment and unfavorable timing from the pass-through effect of raw material costs.
Segment Discussion
Our business operations are managed through two operating segments—Specialty Carbon Black and Rubber Carbon Black. We use Segment Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of segment performance and profitability.
Overview
In 2025, our Rubber Carbon Black (“RCB”) reporting segment experienced softer demand in core Western markets, as key tire making customers reduced production rates because they were impacted by elevated levels of typically low value tire imports from Asia. Our Specialty Carbon Black segment results, including demand and mix, were impacted by persistently soft global industrial economies, coupled with broad uncertainty related to global trade, tariffs and regulatory matters.
In 2025, our net sales were $1,806.7 million, sales volume was 948.6 kmt, net loss was $70.1 million, and Adjusted EBITDA was $248.0 million.
• Specialty Carbon Black Segment —Adjusted EBITDA was $93.5 million. This segment accounted for 34.2% of our total revenue, 37.7% of total Adjusted EBITDA and 24.6% of our total volume in 2025.
• Rubber Carbon Black Segment —Adjusted EBITDA was $154.5 million. This segment accounted for 65.8% of our total revenue, 62.3% of total Adjusted EBITDA and 75.4% of our total volume in 2025.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A
Specialty Carbon Black
Year Ended December 31,
Year-Over-Year
Delta
(In millions, unless otherwise indicated)
Volume (kmt)
Net sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Adjusted EBITDA
Specialty Carbon Black segment volume decreased by 12.0 kmt, or 4.9%, from 245.8 kmt in 2024 to 233.8 kmt in 2025, primarily driven by lower demand across all regions.
Net sales of the Specialty Carbon Black segment decreased by $27.8 million, or 4.3%, from $646.3 million in 2024 to $618.5 million in 2025. The net sales decrease in 2025 was primarily due to the pass-through effect of lower oil prices and lower volume, partially offset by a favorable foreign exchange rate impact.
Gross profit of the Specialty Carbon Black segment decreased by $11.1 million, or 7.3%, from $151.9 million in 2024 to $140.8 million in 2025. Adjusted EBITDA of the Specialty Carbon Black segment decreased by $14.6 million, or 13.5%, from $108.1 million in 2024 to $93.5 million in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to lower demand across all regions, partially offset by favorable product mix.
Rubber Carbon Black
Year Ended December 31,
Year-Over-Year
Delta
(In millions, unless otherwise indicated)
Volume (kmt)
Net sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Adjusted EBITDA
Volume of the Rubber Carbon Black segment increased by 25.8 kmt, or 3.7%, from 689.0 kmt in 2024 to 714.8 kmt in 2025. The increase was primarily due to higher demand in the Americas and Asia Pacific regions, partially offset by lower demand in Europe, Middle East and Africa region.
Net sales of the Rubber Carbon Black segment decreased by $43.0 million, or 3.5%, from $1,231.2 million in 2024 to $1,188.2 million in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to the pass-through effect of lower oil prices, partially offset by higher volume and a favorable foreign exchange rate impact.
Gross profit of the Rubber Carbon Black segment decreased by $57.9 million, or 20.9%, from $276.9 million in 2024 to $219.0 million in 2025. The decrease was primarily driven by the pass-through effect of lower oil prices and unfavorable price and regional customer mix, partially offset by higher volume.
Adjusted EBITDA of the Rubber Carbon Black segment decreased by $39.6 million, or 20.4%, from $194.1 million in 2024 to $154.5 million in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to unfavorable customer and regional mix as well as the unfavorable impact from the pass-through effect of raw material costs. Those were partially offset by higher volume.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
Our principal sources of liquidity are the net cash generated (i) from operating activities, primarily driven by our operating results and changes in working capital requirements and (ii) from financing activities, primarily driven by borrowing amounts available under our RCF and related ancillary facilities, uncommitted local credit lines and, from time to time, term loan borrowings and Accounts receivable factoring.
We believe our anticipated future operating cash flow, the capacity under our existing credit facilities, along with access to surety bonds, will be sufficient to finance our planned capital expenditures, settle our commitments and contingencies and address our normal anticipated working capital needs for the foreseeable future.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had liquidity of $253.7 million, including cash and equivalents of $60.7 million and $193.0 million in availability remaining under our committed RCF, including ancillary lines.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents increased $9.4 million to $60.7 million as of December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024.
The table below presents cash flows and Free Cash Flow derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Free Cash Flow (1) (1-2)
(1) Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure, and other companies may use a similarly titled financial measure that is calculated differently from the way we calculate Free Cash Flow.
Operating Activities— Cash provided by operating activities primarily reflected our Net income, adjusted for non-cash items and changes in working capital. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2025 included $6.9 million partial recovery related to 2024 loss due to misappropriation of assets, net.
Investing Activities— Cash used by investing activities amounted to $161.0 million. The expenditures were primarily related to maintenance and growth investments, including $66.9 million related to construction of the facility in La Porte, Texas.
Financing Activities— Net cash used in financing activities was $41.2 million. These outflows primarily consisted of $24.8 million repurchases of our Common stock, $8.9 million of scheduled debt repayments, $4.7 million dividend distributions and $4.6 million related to cash paid for refinancing our RCF. See Note J. Debt and Other Obligations to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Company’s indebtedness.
Net Working Capital (A Non-GAAP Financial Measure)
We define Net Working Capital as the total of Inventories, net and Accounts receivable, net, less Accounts payable. Net Working Capital is a non-GAAP financial measure, and other companies may use a similarly titled financial measure that is calculated differently from the way we calculate Net Working Capital. The components of Net Working Capital at December 31, are as follows:
(In millions)
Inventories, net
Accounts receivable, net
Accounts payable
Net working capital
Our Net Working Capital position can vary significantly due to fluctuations in oil prices and receipts of carbon black oil shipments. In general, increases in the cost of raw materials lead to an increase in our Net Working Capital requirements. Due to the quantity of carbon black oil that we typically keep in stock, such increases in Net Working Capital occur gradually over a period of two to three months. Conversely, decreases in the cost of raw materials lead to a decrease in our Net Working Capital requirements over the same period of time.
Our Net Working Capital decreased to $293.9 million as of December 31, 2025 compared to $346.1 million as of December 31, 2024. The primary working capital change drivers, year over year, were as follows:
• Inventory —Decrease in inventory was primarily due to year-end destocking activity, and
• Accounts payable —Increase in accounts payable was primarily due to timing of payments.
Those were partially offset by:
• Accounts receivable, net —Change in working capital includes $456.3 million sale of certain Accounts receivables, discussed in Note C. Accounts Receivable to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the factoring agreement.
Table of Contents
Orion S.A
Capital Requirements
Capital Expenditures —We define Capital Expenditures as cash paid for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment. We plan to finance our capital expenditures with cash generated by our operating activities and or utilizing existing debt capacity. We do not plan to make any other capital expenditures outside the ordinary course of our business.
In 2025 December, we adjusted the construction timeline of the La Porte facility to better reflect end market conditions, including a protracted domestic adoption rate of electric vehicles. For further discussion refer to Note F. Property, Plant and Equipment to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Debt and Other Obligations —Our gross debt balance as of December 31, 2025 was $981.9 million, an increase of $73.2 million compared to December 31, 2024, primarily due to weakening of U.S. dollar versus the euro. In 2026, we will repay $16.1 million of long-term debt from cash in hand and cash generated by operating activities. For more information on Debt, refer to Note J. Debt and Other Obligations to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations —We believe our contractual obligations will be met with cash generated by operating activities and/or utilizing existing debt capacity. For more information on contractual obligations, refer to “ Note Q. Commitments and Contingencies ” to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Leases —We do not have material short-term lease obligations. We believe lease obligations would be met with cash generated by our operating activities and/or utilizing existing debt capacity. For operating and finance leases, refer to Note G. Leases to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The policies and estimates discussed below are considered by our management to be critical to an understanding of the Consolidated Financial Statements, because their application requires the most significant judgments from management in estimating matters for financial reporting that are inherently uncertain. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in this Annual Report in Form 10-K.
Inventories —W e account for our raw materials, work-in-progress and finished goods inventories using average cost method of accounting. The cost of raw materials, which represents a substantial portion of our operating expenses and energy costs, generally follow price trends for crude oil and/or natural gas.
We periodically review inventory for both potential obsolescence and potential declines in anticipated selling prices. Due to natural inventory composition changes, variation in pricing from period to period does not necessarily result in a linear lower of cost or market (“LCM”) impact. Fluctuation in the prices from period to period may result in the recognition of charges to adjust the value of inventory to the lower of cost or market in periods of falling prices and the reversal of those charges in subsequent interim periods as market prices recover. We write down the value of our inventories by an amount equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated net realizable value. Historically, such write-downs have not been material. However, if actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management at the time of the assessment, additional inventory write-downs may be required, which could reduce our gross profit and our earnings.
Loss Contingencies —We record liabilities for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable. We provide disclosure when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will exceed the recorded provision by a material amount or if the loss is not reasonably estimable but is expected to be material to our financial results. We are currently involved in litigation and other proceedings, as discussed in Note Q. Commitments and Contingencies to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. We have accrued our estimates of the probable losses associated with these matters and associated legal costs are generally recognized as incurred. However, our losses are typically resolved over long periods of time and are often difficult to estimate due to various factors including the possibility of multiple actions by third parties. Therefore, it is possible future earnings could be affected by changes in our estimates related to these matters.
Accruals for Taxes Based on Income —The determination of our provision for income taxes and the calculation of our tax benefits and liabilities is subject to management’s estimates and judgments due to the complexity of the tax laws and regulations in the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Uncertainties exist with respect to interpretation of these complex laws and regulations.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse.
We recognize future tax benefits to the extent that the realization of these benefits is more likely than not. Our current provision for income taxes is impacted by the recognition and release of valuation allowances related to net deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions. Further changes to these valuation allowances may impact our future provision for income taxes, which will include no tax benefit with respect to
Table of Contents
Orion S.A
losses incurred and no tax expense with respect to income generated in these countries until the respective valuation allowance is eliminated.
We recognize the financial statement benefits with respect to an uncertain income tax position that we have taken or may take on an income tax return when we believe it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained with the tax authorities.
ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING CHANGES
For a discussion of the potential impact of new accounting pronouncements on our Consolidated Financial Statements, see Note B. Recent Accounting Pronouncements to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
