DRH Diamondrock Hospitality Co - 10-K

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our investors and should be carefully considered. These risks are not all of the risks we face and other factors not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also affect our business if they occur. This section contains forward-looking statements. You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements beginning on page 4.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

Our business model, especially our concentration in premium full-service hotels, can be highly volatile.

We own hotels, which may be a more volatile asset class than those owned by other REITs. A typical healthcare REIT, for example, has long-term leases with third-party tenants, which provide a relatively stable long-term stream of revenue. Our TRS lessees, on the other hand, engage a hotel manager pursuant to a management agreement and pay the manager a fee for managing the hotel. The TRS lessee receives all of the operating profit or losses at the hotel rather than predictable rent. Most hotel guests stay at the hotel for only a few nights, so the rate and occupancy at each of our hotels changes every day. As a result, our earnings may be highly volatile.

In addition to fluctuations related to our business model, our hotels are, and will continue to be, subject to various long-term operating risks common to the hotel industry, many of which are beyond our control, including:

• dependence on business travelers and tourism, both of which vary with consumer and business confidence in the strength of the economy;

• decreases in the frequency of business travel that may result from alternatives to in-person meetings and a sustained increase in hybrid or remote work arrangements;

• decreases in tourism due to geopolitical pressures;

• competition from other hotels and alternative lodging channels located in the markets in which we own properties;

• competition from third-party internet travel intermediaries;

• an over-supply or over-building of hotels in the markets in which we own properties, which could adversely affect occupancy rates, revenues and profits at our hotels;

• increases in energy and transportation costs and other expenses affecting travel, which may affect travel patterns and reduce the number of business travelers and tourists;

• increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors that may not be offset by increased room rates; and

• changes in laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance.

In addition, our hotels are mostly in the premium full-service segment of the hotel business, which, historically, tends to have the strongest operating results in a growing economy and the weakest results in a contracting or slow growth economy when many travelers might curtail travel or choose lower cost hotels. In periods of weak demand, profitability is negatively affected by the relatively high fixed costs of operating premium full-service hotels as compared to other classes of hotels.

The occurrence of any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Economic conditions and other factors beyond our control may adversely affect the lodging industry.

Our entire business is related to the lodging industry. The performance of the lodging industry is highly cyclical and has historically been linked to key macroeconomic indicators, such as U.S. GDP growth, employment, personal discretionary spending levels, corporate earnings and investment, foreign exchange rates and travel demand. Given that our hotels are concentrated in major urban markets and destination resort locations in the U.S., our business may be particularly sensitive to changes in foreign exchange rates, elevated interest rates or a negative international perception of the U.S. arising from its political or other positions. Other macroeconomic factors, such as consumer confidence and conditions which negatively shape public perception of travel, including travel-related disruptions or incidents and their impact on travel, may have a negative effect on the lodging industry and may adversely impact our revenues and profitability.

Our hotels are subject to significant competition.

Table of Contents

The lodging industry is highly competitive. Our principal competitors are other owners and investors in upper upscale, full-service hotels, including other lodging REITs, as well as major hospitality chains with well-established and recognized brands. Our hotels face competition for individual guests, group reservations and conference business. We also compete against smaller hotel chains and independent and local hotel owners and operators. Additionally, we face competition from peer-to-peer inventory sources that allow travelers to stay at homes and apartments booked directly from owners. New hotels may be constructed, and these additions create new competitors, in some cases without corresponding increases in demand for hotel rooms. A material increase in the supply of new hotel rooms to a market can quickly destabilize that market and existing hotels can experience rapidly decreasing RevPAR and profitability. If such over-building occurs in one or more of the markets where our hotels are located, our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be materially adversely affected.

Our hotels are subject to seasonal volatility, which is expected to contribute to fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations.

The periods during which our hotels experience higher revenues vary from property to property, depending principally upon location and the customer base served. This seasonality can be expected to cause periodic fluctuations in a hotel’s room revenues, occupancy levels, room rates and operating expenses. We can provide no assurances that our cash flows will be sufficient to offset any shortfalls that occur as a result of these fluctuations. Volatility in our financial performance resulting from the seasonality of our hotels could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The increase in the use of third-party internet travel intermediaries and the increase in alternative lodging channels, such as Airbnb, could adversely affect our profitability.

Many of our managers and franchisors contract with third-party internet travel intermediaries, including, but not limited to, Expedia.com and Priceline.com, to sell rooms to leisure travelers, as well as for corporate and group travel. These internet intermediaries are generally paid commissions and transaction fees before such sales. If bookings through these intermediaries increase, these internet intermediaries may be able to negotiate higher commissions, reduced room rates or other contract concessions. Further, internet intermediaries emphasize pricing and quality indicators, such as a star rating system, at the expense of brand identification. In response to these intermediaries, the brand operators and franchisors have launched initiatives to offer discounted rates for booking on their sites, which could put downward pressure on rates and revenue. In addition, an increasing number of companies have entered various aspects of the online travel market. An increase in hotel reservations made through these companies, including those that deploy artificial intelligence or automated recommendation tools, such as Google, Apple, Amazon or Meta, may reduce the value of our franchise brands, which may negatively affect our average rates and revenues. Search engines (including generative AI search) and peer-to-peer inventory sources also provide online travel services that compete with our hotels. If bookings shift to higher cost distribution channels, including these internet travel intermediaries, it could materially impact our profitability.

In addition to competing with traditional hotels and lodging facilities, we compete with alternative lodging, including third-party providers of short-term rental properties and serviced apartments, such as Airbnb, as well as alternative meeting and event space platforms, such as Convene. We compete based on a number of factors, including room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels, convenience of location, reputation, reservation systems, brand recognition and supply and availability of alternative lodging and event space. Increasing use of these alternative facilities and Internet travel intermediaries could materially and adversely affect the occupancy at our hotels and could put downward pressure on average rates and revenues.

The increased use of business-related technology may materially and adversely affect the need for business-related travel, and, therefore, demand for rooms in some of our hotels.

The increased use of video conferencing technology by businesses has resulted in decreased business travel as companies have leveraged the use of technologies that allow multiple parties from different locations to participate in virtual meetings without traveling to a centralized meeting location, such as our hotels. To the extent that such technologies, or new technologies, continue to play a role in day-to-day business interactions and the necessity for business-related travel decreases, demand for hotel rooms may decrease, which may have a material adverse effect on our hotels, our results of operations and our financial condition.

Investments in hotels are illiquid and we may not be able to respond in a timely fashion to adverse changes in the performance of our properties.

Table of Contents

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more hotel properties or investments in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions may be limited. Moreover, the Code imposes restrictions on a REIT’s ability to dispose of properties that are not applicable to other types of real estate companies. In particular, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our hotels for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of hotels that would otherwise be in our best interests.

It may be in the best interest of our stockholders to sell one or more of our hotels in the future. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any hotel property or investment at an acceptable price or otherwise on reasonable terms and conditions. We also cannot predict the length of time that will be necessary to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a hotel property or loan.

These factors and any others that would impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our hotel properties could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Due to restrictions in our hotel management agreements, franchise agreements, mortgage agreements, if any, and ground leases, we may not be able to sell our hotels at the highest possible price, or at all.

Certain of our current hotel management and franchise agreements are long-term.

The majority of our hotel management agreements are terminable at our option. Only two of our hotels have long-term management agreements with remaining terms in excess of five years, with the longest remaining term of 33 years, and certain of our properties have franchise agreements with terms up to 25 years, and these term lengths may deter some potential purchasers and could adversely impact the price realized from any such sale, or our ability to sell such hotels at all. To the extent that we receive lower sale proceeds, or are unable to sell the hotels, our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to stockholders could be materially adversely affected.

Our ground leases contain certain provisions that may limit our ability to sell our hotels.

Our ground lease agreements with respect to the Embassy Suites by Hilton Bethesda, the Salt Lake City Marriott Downtown at City Creek, the Westin Boston Seaport District, the Hotel Palomar Phoenix, the Courtyard New York Manhattan/Fifth Avenue and Cavallo Point, as well as the ground lease underlying our annex sublease at the L'Auberge de Sedona, require the consent of the lessor for assignment or transfer. These provisions of our ground leases may limit our ability to sell our hotels which, in turn, could adversely impact the price realized from any such sale. In addition, at any given time, investors may be disinterested in buying properties subject to a ground lease and may pay a lower price for such properties than for a comparable property owned in fee simple or they may not purchase such properties at any price. Accordingly, we may find it difficult to sell a property subject to a ground lease or may receive lower proceeds from any such sale. To the extent that we receive lower sale proceeds or are unable to sell the hotel at an opportune time or at all, our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to stockholders could be materially adversely affected.

We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to recently sold or acquired hotels, as well as hotels that we may sell or acquire in the future.

Our recently sold or acquired hotels, as well as hotels we may sell or acquire in the future, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may be liable to the buyers or for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under our transaction agreements related to the sale or purchase of a hotel may survive for a defined period of time after the completion of the transaction.

Furthermore, indemnification under such agreements may be limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible, or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guaranty that we will not be obligated to reimburse buyers for their losses or that we will be able to recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by sellers of their representations and warranties.

In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to the unknown or contingent liabilities may exceed our expectations, and we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

Table of Contents

We are subject to risks associated with our ongoing need for renovations and capital improvements as well as financing for such expenditures.

In order to remain competitive, our hotels have an ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements, including replacements of furniture, fixtures and equipment. These capital improvements may give rise to the following risks:

• construction cost overruns and delays, including those caused by supply chain disruptions or inflationary price increases;

• a possible shortage of available cash to fund capital improvements and the related possibility that financing for these capital improvements may not be available to us on affordable terms;

• the renovation investment failing to produce the returns on investment that we expect;

• disruptions in operations or in demand for the hotel while capital improvements are underway; and

• disputes with franchisors/hotel managers regarding compliance with relevant franchise/management agreements.

The costs of these capital improvements or profit displacements during the completion of these capital improvements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

In addition, we may not be able to fund capital improvements or acquisitions solely from cash provided from our operating activities because we generally must distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year to maintain our REIT tax status. As a result, our ability to fund capital expenditures or investments through retained earnings is very limited and we rely upon the availability of debt or equity capital to fund our investments and capital improvements, which may not be available on reasonable terms or conditions.

Any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of any highly infectious disease could cause widespread disruptions in the U.S., regional and global economies, travel and the hospitality industry and could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a material adverse effect on our hotels and our business, including our results of operations and financial condition. Any future pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of any highly infectious disease, could cause widespread disruptions to the U.S. and global economy and volatility and negative pressure in financial markets and may materially and adversely affect, our business, financial condition and results of operations, and our ability to pay dividends, and may also have the effect of heightening many of the risks described below and within this “Risk Factors” section, including:

• a complete or partial closure or re-closure of, or other operational issues at, one or more of our hotels resulting from government, third-party hotel manager or franchisor action, which could materially adversely affect our operations;

• the postponement or cancellation of conferences, conventions, festivals, sporting events, public events and other group business that would have otherwise brought individuals to the cities in which our hotels are located, which could cause a decrease in occupancy rates;

• a general decline in in-person business meetings and an increase in the use of teleconferencing and video-conference technology, which could cause a sustained shift away from business-related travel and have a material adverse effect on the overall demand for hotel rooms; and

• a decrease in individuals’ willingness to travel as a result of the public health risks and social impacts of such outbreak or a decrease in consumer spending, which could affect the ability of our hotels to generate sufficient revenues.

Our hotels are subject to risks from natural disasters, climate change, terrorism, pandemics, and other catastrophic events, which may not be fully covered by insurance and could materially adversely affect our business.

Our hotels are exposed to risks from natural disasters, including earthquakes, storms, hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and rising sea levels particularly as a result of climate change. Some properties are located in areas prone to such events, including seismically active and coastal regions. In addition, several of our hotels are in major metropolitan markets that have been, or may be, targets of terrorist attacks or active shooter incidents. These hotels constitute 71% of our total revenues in 2025.

Table of Contents

Outbreaks of contagious diseases, significant military actions, or other catastrophic events could also disrupt operations and reduce travel demand, negatively impacting our financial results.

Coverage under our comprehensive insurance policies may not always be available on reasonable terms or may include significant deductibles. Certain catastrophic losses, such as from terrorism or extreme weather, may not be insurable or may exceed policy limits. Various types of catastrophic losses, like earthquakes, floods, wildfires, losses from foreign terrorist activities, or losses from domestic terrorist activities may not be insurable or are generally not insured because of economic infeasibility, legal restrictions or the policies of insurers, which may also affect our ability to obtain financing if a lender requires such insurance. Future lenders may require such insurance, and our failure to obtain such insurance could constitute a default under the loan agreements. Depending on our access to capital, liquidity and the value of the properties securing the affected loan in relation to the balance of the loan, a default could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and ability to obtain future financing. Past and future claims could also impact the availability and cost of insurance, which may adversely impact the availability or pricing of insurance available to us. In the event of an uninsured or underinsured loss, we could lose invested capital and future revenue from affected properties, and may remain liable for any related debt. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.

We and our hotel managers rely on information technology in our operations and any material failures, inadequacies, interruptions, security failures, or cybersecurity incidents could harm our business.

We and our hotel managers rely on information technologies and systems, including the Internet, to access, store, transmit, deliver and manage information and processes. Some of these information technologies and systems are provided by third-party vendors. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmission and storage of certain confidential customer information, such as individually identifiable information, including information relating to financial accounts and guest credit card information. The risk of a cybersecurity incident continues to increase as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world has increased.

For these reasons, we and our hotel managers are subject to risks associated with cybersecurity incidents, whether through cyber-attacks such as ransomware or online fraud schemes, spoofed e-mails and social engineering efforts by bad actors aimed at obtaining confidential information. Any compromise of the function, security and availability of our network and systems or the network and systems of our hotel managers or our third-party vendors could result in disruptions to operations, misappropriated or compromised confidential hotel or guest information, systems disruptions, the shutdown of our hotels, exploited security vulnerability of our respective networks, delayed sales or bookings, lost guest reservations and damage to our reputation or the reputations of our hotel managers and third-party vendors, or significant litigation or other legal expense. Although we and our hotel managers have taken steps to protect the security of these systems, there can be no assurance that such security measures will prevent failures, inadequacies or interruptions in system services, or that system security will not be breached through physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, or other cybersecurity incidents. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cybersecurity incidents could be significant and may increase as the number, intensity and sophistication of such incidents increases. Disruptions in service, system shutdowns and cybersecurity incidents affecting either the information technologies and systems of our hotel managers, our third-party vendors or our own information technologies and systems, including unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and results, our financial and compliance reporting and our reputation.

Many of our hotel managers maintain cyber insurance policies to mitigate a portion of the potential costs associated with cybersecurity incidents, and we maintain separate cyber insurance policies to provide supplemental coverage above the coverage carried by our third-party managers. However, these insurance policies may not be adequate to cover all losses relating to cybersecurity incidents. Despite various precautionary steps to protect our hotels from losses resulting from cybersecurity incidents, any occurrence of a cybersecurity incident could still result in losses at our properties, which could affect our results of operations.

Our results of operations are highly dependent on the management of our hotel properties by third-party hotel management companies.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we cannot operate our hotel properties or control the daily operations of our hotel properties and therefore our TRS lessees must enter into third-party hotel management agreements with one or more eligible independent contractors. Thus, third-party hotel management companies that enter into management contracts with our TRS lessees control the daily operations of our hotel properties.

Table of Contents

Under the terms of the hotel management agreements that we have entered into, or that we will enter into in the future, our ability to participate in operating decisions regarding our hotel properties is limited to certain matters, including approval of the annual operating budget. We currently rely, and will continue to rely, on these hotel management companies to adequately operate our hotel properties under the terms of the hotel management agreements. While we and our TRS lessees closely monitor the performance of our hotel managers, we do not have the authority to require any hotel property to be operated in a particular manner or to govern any particular aspect of its operations (for instance, setting room rates and cost structures). Thus, even if we believe that our hotel properties are being operated inefficiently or in a manner that does not result in satisfactory occupancy rates, ADRs and operating profits, we may not have sufficient rights under our hotel management agreements to enable us to force the hotel management company to change its method of operation. We can only seek remedies available under the applicable hotel management agreement if a hotel management company violates the terms of such hotel management agreement with the TRS lessee. Four of our current management agreements are non-terminable, subject to certain exceptions for cause or failure to achieve certain performance targets. In the event that we need to replace any of our hotel management companies pursuant to termination for cause or performance, we may experience significant disruptions at the affected properties and the new management companies may not meet our performance expectations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We may be unable to maintain good relationships with third-party hotel managers and franchisors.

The success of our respective hotel investments and the value of our franchised properties largely depend on our ability to establish and maintain good relationships with the third-party hotel managers and franchisors of our respective hotel management and franchise agreements. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with third-party hotel managers or franchisors, we may be unable to renew existing management or franchise agreements or expand relationships with them. Additionally, opportunities for developing new relationships with additional third-party hotel managers or franchisors may be adversely affected. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to execute our repositioning strategy through a change in brand or change in third-party hotel manager.

Several of our hotels are operated under franchise agreements and we are subject to the risks associated with the franchise brand and the costs associated with maintaining the franchise license.

As of the date of this report, 18 of our 35 hotels operate under Marriott, Hilton, or IHG franchise agreements. The maintenance of the franchise licenses for branded hotel properties is subject to the franchisors’ operating standards and other terms and conditions set forth in the applicable franchise agreement. Franchisors periodically inspect hotel properties to ensure that companies follow their brand standards.

If we fail to maintain these required standards, then the brand may terminate its agreement with us and assert a claim for damages for any liability we may have caused, which could include liquidated damages. Moreover, from time to time, we may receive notices from franchisors or the hotel brands regarding alleged non-compliance with the franchise agreements or brand standards, and we may disagree with these claims that we are not in compliance. Any disputes arising under these agreements could also lead to a termination of a franchise or management agreement and a payment of liquidated damages. If we were to lose a franchise or hotel brand for a particular hotel, it could harm the operation, financing, or value of that hotel due to the loss of the franchise or hotel brand name, marketing support and centralized reservation system, all or any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.

Contractual and other disagreements with third-party hotel managers and franchisors could make us liable to them or result in litigation costs or other expenses.

At any given time, we may be in disputes with one or more third-party hotel managers or franchisors with respect to the parties’ compliance with operational and performance conditions.

Any such dispute could be very expensive for us, even if the outcome is ultimately in our favor. We cannot predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation, the effect of any negative judgment against us or the amount of any settlement that we may enter into with any franchisor or other third-party hotel manager. In the event we terminate a management or franchise agreement early and the hotel manager or franchisor considers such termination to have been wrongful, they may seek damages. Additionally, we may be required to indemnify our third-party hotel managers and franchisors against disputes with third parties pursuant to our management and franchise agreements. An adverse result in any of these proceedings could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

Table of Contents

Our business may be adversely affected by consolidation in the lodging industry.

Consolidation among companies in the lodging industry may reduce our bargaining power in negotiating management agreements and franchise agreements due to decreased competition among major brand companies. We believe this could provide the major brand companies with leverage when negotiating for property improvement plans where the hotel brand requires renovations to bring the physical condition of a hotel into compliance with the specifications and standards required by the brand.

Industry consolidation could also result in the lack of differentiation among the brands, which could impact the ability to drive higher rates in those brands. In addition, to the extent that consolidation among hotel brand companies adversely affects the loyalty reward program offered by one or more of our hotels, customer loyalty to those hotels may suffer and demand for guestrooms may decrease. Furthermore, because each hotel brand company relies on its own network of reservation systems, hotel management systems and customer databases, the integration of two or more networks may result in a disruption to operations of these systems, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, following the completion of a merger of companies, the costs to integrate the companies may be absorbed by our impacted hotel or hotels and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our ownership of properties through ground leases exposes us to the risks that we may have difficulty financing such properties, be forced to sell such properties for a lower price, are unable to extend the ground leases at maturity or lose such properties upon breach or termination of the ground leases.

We hold a leasehold or subleasehold interest in all or a portion of the land underlying eight of our hotels owned as of December 31, 2025 and we may acquire additional hotels in the future subject to ground leases. In the past, from time to time, secured lenders have been unwilling to lend, or otherwise charged higher interest rates, for loans secured by a leasehold mortgage compared to loans secured by a fee simple mortgage. For this reason, we may have a difficult time selling a property subject to a ground lease or may receive lower proceeds from a sale. Finally, as the lessee under our ground leases, we are exposed to the possibility of losing the hotel, or a portion of the hotel, upon maturity or termination, or an earlier breach by us, of the ground lease, which would mean we would no longer receive operating income from the hotel and could therefore result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Furthermore, unless we purchase a fee simple interest in the land and improvements subject to our ground leases, we will not have any economic interest in the land or improvements at the expiration of our ground leases and therefore we generally will not share in any increase in value of the land or improvements beyond the term of a ground lease, notwithstanding our capital outlay to purchase our interest in the hotel or fund improvements thereon, and will lose our right to use the hotel.

We face competition for hotel acquisitions and investments, and we may not be successful in identifying or completing hotel acquisitions and investments that meet our criteria, which may impede our growth.

One component of our long-term business strategy is expansion through hotel acquisitions and investments. However, we may not be successful in identifying or completing acquisitions or investments that are consistent with our strategy. We compete with other investors who are engaged in hotel acquisitions and investments and this competition for hotel investments may increase the price we pay for hotels and these competitors may succeed in acquiring those hotels that we seek to purchase. In addition, the number of entities competing for suitable hotels may increase in the future, which would increase demand for these hotels and the prices we must pay to acquire them. If we pay higher prices for hotels, our returns on investment and profitability may be reduced. Also, future acquisitions of hotels, hotel companies or hotel investments may not yield the returns we expect, especially if we cannot obtain financing without paying higher borrowing costs, and may result in stockholder dilution.

Even if we successfully complete hotel acquisitions, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate the hotels we acquire into our existing operations or otherwise realize the expected benefits of these acquisitions.

Even if we successfully complete hotel acquisitions, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate the hotels we acquire into our existing operations or otherwise realize the expected benefits of these acquisitions. In addition, the acquisition and subsequent integration of the additional hotels into our existing portfolio may require significant time and focus from our management team and may divert attention from the day-to-day operations of our business, which could delay the achievement of our strategic objectives. Acquired properties may be located in markets where we may face

Table of Contents

risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, lack of business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures. Further, the acquired properties may present other unique risks due to the nature of the assets acquired. Any delay or failure on our part to operate acquired properties to meet our financial expectations could impede our growth and have an adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

Many of our costs, such as operating expenses, interest expense and acquisition and renovation costs, remain elevated and could be adversely impacted by periods of heightened inflation.

During 2025, inflation began to moderate, but our expenses remained significantly elevated relative to the years preceding 2021. Inflationary increases in certain of our operating expenses, including, but not limited to, labor costs, employee-related benefits, food, beverage and utility costs, repairs and maintenance expenses, property taxes and insurance premiums, have and may continue to negatively impact our business and results of operations. While, in general, operators of hotels possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the effects of inflation or higher costs, competitive pressures, customer resistance to higher booking costs or other factors may limit the ability of our management companies to raise room rates. Additionally, inflation may have a negative effect on our ability to renovate or make capital improvements, including replacements, from time to time, of furniture, fixtures and equipment. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Operations—We are subject to risks associated with our ongoing need for renovations and capital improvements as well as financing for such expenditures.”

We are subject to risks related to hotel labor, including unionized labor, labor disputes, labor shortages and other labor activity, which could adversely affect our business.

Our third-party managers are responsible for hiring and managing the workforce at our hotels, many of which employ unionized labor. Hotels with collective bargaining agreements are particularly susceptible to labor actions such as strikes, lockouts, and public demonstrations, which can disrupt operations, increase costs, and generate negative publicity. We remain subject to many of the costs and risks associated with the hotel labor force, including the potential for increased administrative, legal, and labor expenses, especially as labor unions have become more active in organizing hotel workers in certain regions. The resolution of labor disputes or the negotiation of new or renewed labor contracts may result in higher wages, increased benefits, or work rule changes that raise operating costs. Additionally, collective bargaining agreements may limit our hotel managers’ ability to reduce workforce size during economic downturns, and we do not control the outcome of these negotiations.

We also face risks related to labor shortages, as our third-party managers may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified employees, particularly in tight labor markets. Increased competition for employees may require higher wages and benefits, and evolving workforce expectations, such as demands for flexible schedules or remote work, could further increase labor costs. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Actions by federal, state or local jurisdictions could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Several local jurisdictions in the U.S. have enacted, or considered, legislation increasing the minimum wage for workers in the jurisdiction. Some of this legislation applies to hotels only. If a jurisdiction in which the Company owns a hotel adopts such legislation, then the cost to operate the hotel may increase significantly and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Additionally, although we do not directly employ or manage employees at our hotels, and our third-party managers are responsible for hiring, supervising and managing the labor force at our hotels, recent legislative proposals introduced in certain states and local jurisdictions have included provisions requiring that hotel owners be deemed an employer of workers at our hotels. Changes in laws or regulations relating to the employer relationship that result in a determination that we are a “joint employer” with our hotel operators could subject us to liability for employment-related and other liabilities of our hotel operators and could cause us to incur other costs that have a material adverse effect on our business (including our qualification for taxation as a REIT), financial condition and results of operations.

Our use of or failure to adopt advancements in information technology, such as artificial intelligence, may hinder or prevent us from achieving strategic objectives or otherwise harm our business.

Table of Contents

Our use of or inability to safely and effectively adopt and deliver new technological capabilities and enhancements in line with strategic objectives (or the use or failure to adopt by our hotel managers), including artificial intelligence ("AI"), may put us at a competitive disadvantage, including by failing to achieve efficiencies achieved by our competitors, or by misusing such technologies in ways that result in operational disruptions, reputation damage or legal liability exposure. Our use of AI tools will subject us to risks, including inaccurate or otherwise flawed results that are not easily detectable, misappropriation of intellectual property which may expose us to legal liability, and confidentiality, data privacy, and cybersecurity risks. Although we implement measures designed to help mitigate these risks, such measures may not always be successful.

Our vendors may use AI tools in their products or services without our knowledge, and the providers of these tools may not meet the evolving regulatory or industry standards for privacy and data protection. Consequently, this may inhibit our vendors' ability to uphold an appropriate level of service, security, or data privacy. If we, our vendors, or other third parties with which we conduct business experience an actual or perceived cybersecurity incident due to the use of AI, we may be adversely impacted, lose valuable intellectual property or confidential information, and incur harm to our reputation and the public perception of the effectiveness of our cybersecurity measures.

Although we have adopted policies with respect to these risks, including related to the development, deployment and monitoring of artificial intelligence tools, we cannot be certain that such policies will be effective.

Risks Related to Our Debt and Financing

Our credit facility and term loans contain financial covenants that may constrain our ability to sell assets and make distributions to our stockholders.

Our corporate credit facility and term loans contain several financial covenants, the most constraining of which limits the amount of debt that we may incur compared to the value of our hotels (our leverage covenant) and the amount of debt service we pay compared to our cash flow (our debt service coverage covenant). In addition, our credit facility requires that we maintain a minimum number of our hotels as unencumbered. If we were to default under either of these covenants or were unable to obtain a waiver of such default, the lenders may require us to repay all amounts then outstanding under our credit facility and term loans and may terminate our credit facility and term loans. These and our other financial covenants constrain us from incurring material amounts of additional debt or from selling properties that generate a material amount of income.

There is refinancing risk associated with our debt.

Our typical debt contains limited principal amortization; therefore, the vast majority of the principal must be repaid at the maturity of the loan in a so-called “balloon payment.” In the event that we do not have sufficient funds to repay the debt at the maturity of these loans, we will need to refinance this debt. If the credit environment is constrained at the time of our debt maturities, we would have a very difficult time refinancing debt. When we refinance our debt, prevailing interest rates and other factors may result in paying a greater amount of debt service, which will adversely affect our cash flow, and, consequently, our cash available for distribution to our stockholders. If we are unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms, we may be forced to choose from a number of unfavorable options. These options include agreeing to otherwise unfavorable financing terms on one or more of our unencumbered assets, selling one or more hotels on disadvantageous terms, including unattractive prices or defaulting on the mortgage and permitting the lender to foreclose. Any one of these options could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Future debt service obligations may adversely affect our operating results, require us to liquidate our properties, jeopardize our ability to make cash distributions necessary to maintain our tax status as a REIT and limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

In the future, we and our subsidiaries may incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, and borrowing costs on new and refinanced debt may continue to be more expensive. Our existing debt, and any additional debt borrowed in the future could subject us to many risks, including the risks that:

• our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest or to make cash distributions necessary to maintain our tax status as a REIT;

• we may be vulnerable to adverse economic and industry conditions;

Table of Contents

• we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the repayment of our debt, thereby reducing the cash available for distribution to our stockholders, operations and capital expenditures, future investment opportunities or other purposes;

• the terms of any refinancing might not be as favorable as the terms of the debt being refinanced; and

• the use of leverage could adversely affect our stock price and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Due to increased borrowing costs or less favorable terms, refinanced debt could reduce the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders, as well as reduce funds available for our operations, future investment opportunities or other purposes.

Increases in interest rates may increase our interest expense.

Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies. Higher interest rates could increase debt service requirements on any of our floating rate debt, including our unsecured term loans and any outstanding balance on our senior unsecured credit facility, and could reduce the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders, as well as reduce funds available for our operations, future business opportunities or other purposes. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 70% of our outstanding debt has unhedged variable interest rates.

In addition, historically, during periods of increasing interest rates, real estate valuations have generally decreased as a result of rising capitalization rates, which tend to be positively correlated with interest rates. Consequently, prolonged periods of higher interest rates may negatively impact the valuation of our portfolio and result in the decline of the quoted trading price of our securities and market capitalization, as well as lower sales proceeds from future dispositions.

Hedging against interest rate exposure may adversely affect us.

We manage certain exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging, such as swap agreements, to hedge against the possible negative effects of interest rate fluctuations, and we may continue to do so in the future. However, hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of volatile interest rates, available interest rate hedges may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought, the duration of the interest rate hedge may not match the duration of the related liability, and we cannot assure you that any hedging will adequately mitigate the adverse effects of interest rate increases or that counterparties under these agreements will honor their obligations. In addition, if interest rates decline, our hedging arrangements may limit our ability to benefit from lower market rates and could result in higher interest expense than we would otherwise incur. As a result, our hedging transactions could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.

Risks Related to Regulation and the Environment

Noncompliance with governmental regulations could adversely affect our operating results.

Environmental matters.

Our hotels are, and the hotels that we acquire in the future will be, subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations relating to environmental protection. Under these laws, courts and government agencies may have the authority to require us, as owner of a contaminated property, to clean up the property, even if we did not know of, or were not responsible for, the contamination. These laws apply to persons who owned a property at the time it became contaminated so we may incur cleanup costs or other environmental liabilities even after we sell a property. In addition to the costs of cleanup, environmental contamination can affect the value of a property and, therefore, an owner’s ability to borrow funds using the property as collateral or to sell the property. Additionally, under certain environmental laws, courts and government agencies also have the authority to require that (i) a person who sent waste to a waste disposal facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, pay for the clean-up of that facility if it becomes contaminated and threatens human health or the environment and (ii) a person who arranges for the disposal or treatment, or transports for disposal or treatment, a hazardous substance at a property owned by another person pay for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances released into the environment at that property.

Our hotels are also subject to various federal, state, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that address a wide variety of issues, including, but not limited to, storage tanks, air emissions from emergency generators, storm

Table of Contents

water and wastewater discharges, asbestos, lead-based paint, mold and mildew and waste management. Some of our hotels routinely handle and use hazardous or regulated substances and wastes as part of their operations, which substances and wastes are subject to regulation (e.g., swimming pool chemicals). Our hotels incur costs to comply with these laws and regulations, and could be subject to fines and penalties for noncompliance. Additionally, various court decisions have established that third parties may recover damages for injury caused by property contamination. For instance, a person exposed to asbestos while staying or working in a hotel may seek to recover damages if he or she suffers injury from the asbestos.

Although we have taken and will take commercially reasonable steps to assess the condition of our properties, there may be unknown environmental problems associated with our properties. If environmental contamination exists on our properties, we could become subject to strict, joint and several liability for the contamination by virtue of our ownership interest. In addition, we are obligated to indemnify our lenders for any liability they may incur in connection with a contaminated property.

We could be responsible for the costs associated with a contaminated property, including the costs to clean up a contaminated property or to defend against a claim, and such costs could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. Additionally, we regularly incur costs to comply with environmental laws and we cannot assure you that future laws or regulations will not impose material environmental liabilities or that the current environmental condition of our hotels will not be affected by the condition of the properties in the vicinity of our hotels (such as the presence of leaking underground storage tanks) or by third parties unrelated to us. In addition, treaties or laws related to carbon emissions or climate change could affect the operation of our properties or result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on us or our hotel managers or adversely affect our ability to sell properties or to use properties as collateral.

Climate change

In recent years, numerous regulations have been enacted to regulate or limit carbon emissions, including increased regulation for building efficiency and equipment specifications and investor requirements for environmental and social disclosures. The drive to limit carbon emissions and other climate change related regulations and any increase in investor requirements for climate related disclosures may require us to make significant investments in our hotels and could result in increased energy costs at our properties which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Americans with Disabilities Act and other changes in governmental rules and regulations.

Our properties must comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”), to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations” as defined by the ADA. Under the ADA, all public accommodations must meet various federal non-discrimination requirements related to access and use by individuals with disabilities. Compliance with the ADA’s requirements could require removal of architectural barriers to access and non-compliance could result in the payment of civil penalties, damages, and attorneys' fees and costs. We believe that our properties are in substantial compliance with the ADA; however, the obligation to comply with the ADA is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess our properties and to make alterations as appropriate in this regard. If we are required to make substantial modifications to our hotels, whether to comply with the ADA or other changes in governmental rules and regulations, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be adversely affected.

Our hotel properties may contain or develop harmful mold, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediating the problem.

When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing, as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic reactions. As a result, the presence of mold to which our hotel guests or employees could be exposed at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property, which would reduce our cash available for distribution. In addition, exposure to mold by our guests or employees, management company employees or others could expose us to liability if property damage or adverse health concerns arise.

Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT

We cannot assure you that we will remain qualified as a REIT.

Table of Contents

We believe that we are qualified to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our taxable year ended December 31, 2025, and we expect to continue to qualify as a REIT for future taxable years, but we cannot assure you that we have qualified, or will remain qualified, as a REIT. The REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex and official interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Certain aspects of our REIT qualification are beyond our control. Additionally, although we generally do not directly employ or manage employees at our hotels, and our third-party managers are responsible for hiring, supervising and managing the labor force at our hotels, recent legislative proposals introduced in certain states and local jurisdictions have included provisions requiring that hotel owners be deemed an employer of workers at our hotels. Changes in laws or regulations relating to the employer relationship that result in a determination that we are a “joint employer” with our hotel operators could subject us to liability for employment-related and other liabilities of our hotel operators and could cause us to incur other costs that have a material adverse effect on our business (including our qualification for taxation as a REIT), financial condition and results of operations.

Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in operating so that we can remain qualified as a REIT. At any time, new laws, interpretations or court decisions may change the U.S. federal tax laws (or application thereof) or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of our qualification as a REIT. Moreover, our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, or otherwise cease to be a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate tax rate. We might need to borrow money or sell assets in order to pay any such tax. Also, we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to our stockholders in computing our taxable income and we would no longer be compelled to make distributions under the Code. Unless we were entitled to relief under certain U.S. federal income tax laws, we could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT but are eligible for certain relief provisions, then we may retain our status as a REIT, but we may be required to pay a penalty tax, which could be substantial.

Maintaining our REIT qualification contains certain restrictions and drawbacks.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities.

To remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forgo attractive business or investment opportunities. For example, we may not lease to our TRS any hotel that contains gaming. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely to maximize profits.

To qualify as a REIT, we must meet annual distribution requirements.

In order to remain qualified as a REIT, we generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gains, each year to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% non-deductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal tax laws. As a result of differences between cash flow and the accrual of income and expenses for tax purposes, or non-deductible expenditures, for example, our REIT taxable income in any given year could exceed our cash available for distribution. Accordingly, we may be required to borrow money or sell assets at disadvantageous prices, distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions or capital expenditures or used for the repayment of debt, pay dividends in the form of “taxable stock dividends” or find another alternative source of funds to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in a particular year.

Our ownership of our TRSs and TRS lessees increases our overall tax liability.

Overall, no more than 20% (25% for taxable years commencing after December 31, 2025) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRS. Our domestic TRS are subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on their taxable income. The taxable income of our TRS lessees currently consists and generally will continue to consist of revenues from the hotels leased by our TRS lessees plus, in certain cases, key money payments (amounts paid to us by a hotel

Table of Contents

management company in exchange for the right to manage a hotel we acquire) and yield support payments, net of the operating expenses for such properties and rent payments to us. Such taxes could be substantial.

We will be subject to a 100% excise tax to the extent that transactions with our TRSs are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. For example, to the extent that the rent paid by one of our TRS lessees exceeds an arm’s-length rental amount, such excess is potentially subject to this excise tax. While we believe that we structure all of our leases on an arm’s-length basis, upon an audit, the IRS might disagree with our conclusion.

If the leases of our hotels to our TRS lessees are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will fail to qualify as a REIT.

To qualify as a REIT, we must annually satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be derived from certain sources, such as “rents from real property.” Rents paid to us by our TRS lessees pursuant to the leases of our hotels will constitute substantially all of our gross income. In order for such rent to qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of the gross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, financing arrangements, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. If our leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will fail to qualify as a REIT.

If any third-party hotel managers do not qualify as “eligible independent contractors” or if our hotels are not “qualified lodging facilities,” we will fail to qualify as a REIT.

Rent paid by a lessee that is a “related party tenant” of ours will not be qualifying income for purposes of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs. An exception is provided, however, for leases of “qualified lodging facilities” to a TRS so long as the hotels are operated by an “eligible independent contractor” and certain other requirements are satisfied. Substantially all of our hotels are leased to our TRS lessees which have engaged third-party hotel managers that we believe qualify as “eligible independent contractors.” Among other requirements, an operator will qualify as an eligible independent contractor if it meets certain ownership tests with respect to us, and if, at the time the operator enters into a property management contract with a TRS or its TRS lessee with respect to one of our properties, the operator is actively engaged in the trade or business of operating “qualified lodging facilities” (as defined below) for one or more persons not related to the REIT or its TRSs. No assurances can be provided that any of our current and future hotel managers will in fact comply with this requirement. Failure to comply with this requirement would require us to find other hotel managers for future contracts, and, if we hired a management company without knowledge of the failure, it could jeopardize our status as a REIT.

Finally, each property with respect to which our TRS lessees pay rent must be a “qualified lodging facility.” A “qualified lodging facility” is a hotel, motel, or other establishment in which more than one-half of the dwelling units are used on a transient basis, including customary amenities and facilities, provided that no wagering activities are conducted at or in connection with such facility by any person who is engaged in the business of accepting wagers and who is legally authorized to engage in such business at or in connection with such facility. We believe that the properties that are leased to our TRS lessees are qualified lodging facilities. Although we intend to monitor future acquisitions and improvements of properties, REIT provisions of the Code provide no or only limited guidance for making determinations under the requirements for qualified lodging facilities, and there can be no assurance that these requirements will be satisfied.

You may be restricted from transferring our common stock.

In order to maintain our REIT qualification, among other requirements, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the U.S. federal income tax laws to include certain entities) during the last half of any taxable year. In addition, the REIT rules generally prohibit a manager of one of our hotels from owning, directly or indirectly, more than 35% of our stock and a person who holds 35% or more of our stock from also holding, directly or indirectly, more than 35% of any such hotel management company. To qualify for and preserve REIT status, our charter contains certain share ownership limits. Generally, any shares of our stock owned by affiliated owners will be added together for purposes of the aggregate share ownership limit, and any shares of a specific class of stock, owned by affiliated owners will be added together for purposes of the share ownership limit for such class of stock.

If anyone transfers or owns shares in a way that would violate a share ownership limit (unless such ownership limit has been waived by our board of directors), or would prevent us from continuing to qualify as a REIT under the U.S. federal income tax laws, those shares instead will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and will be either redeemed by us or sold to a person whose ownership of the shares will not violate the applicable share ownership limit. If this transfer to a trust would not be effective to prevent a violation of the ownership restrictions in our charter, then the initial intended transfer or ownership will be null and void from the outset. The intended transferee or owner of those shares will be

Table of Contents

deemed never to have owned the shares. Anyone who acquires or owns shares in violation of the a share ownership limit (unless such ownership limit has been waived by our board of directors) or the other restrictions on transfer or ownership in our charter bears the risk of a financial loss when the shares are redeemed or sold if the market price of our stock falls between the date of purchase and the date of redemption or sale.

Even if we maintain our status as a REIT, in certain circumstances, we may be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to U.S. federal income taxes or state taxes in various circumstances. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. In addition, we may not be able to distribute all of our income in any given year, which would result in corporate level taxes, and we may not make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes. We may also decide to retain certain gains from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such gains. In that event, our stockholders would be required to include such gains in income and would receive a corresponding credit for their share of taxes paid by us. We may also be subject to U.S. state and local and non-U.S. taxes on our income or properties, either directly or at the level of our operating partnership or the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. In addition, we may be subject to U.S. federal, state, local or non-U.S. taxes in other various circumstances. Any U.S. federal or state taxes that we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Our property taxes could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which could impact our cash flow.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to pay state and local property taxes on our properties. The property taxes on our properties may increase as property tax rates change or as our properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Therefore, the amount of property taxes we pay in the future may increase substantially from what we have paid in the past and such increases may not be offset by increased room rates at our hotels. If the property taxes we pay increase, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common stock and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our stockholders may be negatively impacted.

Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.

A maximum 20% tax rate applies to “qualified dividend income” payable to individual U.S. stockholders. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates on qualified dividend income and are taxed at normal ordinary income tax rates (provided that non-corporate taxpayers generally may deduct 20% of their ordinary REIT dividends that are not “capital gain dividends” or “qualified dividend income”). However, to the extent that our dividends are attributable to certain dividends that we receive from a TRS, such dividends generally will be eligible for the reduced rates that apply to qualified dividend income (but will be ineligible for the 20% deduction). The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay qualified dividend income, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock. In addition, some non-REIT corporations may choose to pay dividends or increase dividends as a result of the lower effective corporate income tax rate. As a result, the trading price of our common stock may be negatively impacted.

Failure of our operating partnership to be taxable as a partnership could cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT and we could suffer other adverse tax consequences.

We believe that our operating partnership will continue to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a partnership and not as an association or as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. As a partnership, the operating partnership generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its income. Instead, each of its partners, including us, will be allocated that partner’s share of the operating partnership’s income. No assurance can be provided, however, that the IRS will not challenge the operating partnership’s status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were to determine that our operating partnership was properly treated as an association or as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation, our operating partnership would be required to pay U.S. federal income tax at corporate rates on its net income, its partners would be treated as stockholders of our operating partnership and distributions to partners would constitute distributions that would not be deductible in computing the operating partnership’s taxable income. In addition, we could fail to qualify as a REIT, with the resulting consequences described above.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect our stockholders.

Table of Contents

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to investments in REITs and similar entities. Additional changes to applicable tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure our stockholders that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our common stock. All stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisors with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our common stock.

Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure

Provisions of our charter may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of our company.

Our charter provides that no person may beneficially own more than 9.8% of the aggregate outstanding shares of our common stock, more than 9.8% of the value of the aggregate outstanding shares of our capital stock, except certain “look-through entities,” such as mutual funds, which may beneficially own up to 15% of the aggregate outstanding shares of our common stock, or up to 15% of the value of the aggregate outstanding shares of our capital stock. Our board of directors has waived this ownership limitation for certain investors. Our bylaws waive this ownership limitation for certain other classes of investors. These ownership limitations may prevent an acquisition of control of our company by a third party without our board of directors’ approval, even if our stockholders believe the change of control is in their best interests and even if such change in control would not reasonably jeopardize the Company's REIT status.

Our charter also authorizes our board of directors to issue up to 400,000,000 shares of common stock and up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock and to set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. Furthermore, our board of directors may, without any action by the stockholders, amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue. Issuances of additional shares of stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control of our company that might involve a premium to the market price of our common stock or otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interests.

Certain advance notice provisions of our bylaws may limit the ability of a third party to acquire control of our company.

Our bylaws provide that (a) with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations of individuals for election to our board of directors and the proposal of other business to be considered by stockholders may be made only (i) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (ii) by the board of directors or (iii) by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and has complied with the advance notice procedures set forth in the bylaws and (b) with respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our notice of meeting may be brought before the meeting of stockholders and nominations of individuals for election to the board of directors may be made only (A) by the board of directors or (B) provided that the board of directors has determined that directors shall be elected at such meeting by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and has complied with the advance notice provisions set forth in the bylaws. These advance notice provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control of our company that might involve a premium to the market price of our common stock or otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interests.

Stockholders have limited control over any changes that we make to our policies.

Our board of directors determines our major policies, including policies related to our investment objectives, leverage, financing, growth and distributions to our stockholders. Our board of directors may amend or revise these policies without a vote of our stockholders, including our historical dividend policy. This means that our stockholders will have limited control over changes in our policies and those changes could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Our success depends on senior executive officers whose continued service is not guaranteed, and changes in our senior executive officers may adversely affect the operation of our business.

We depend on the efforts and expertise of our senior executive officers to manage our day-to-day operations and strategic business direction. Finding suitable replacements for senior executive officers can be difficult. The loss of any of their services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Table of Contents

We have entered into an agreement with each of our senior executive officers that provides each of them benefits in the event that his or her employment is terminated by us without cause, by him or her for good reason or under certain circumstances following a change of control of our company.

We have entered into an agreement with each of our senior executive officers that provides each of them with severance benefits if his or her employment is terminated under certain circumstances following a change of control of our company. Certain of these benefits and the related tax indemnity in the case of certain executive officers could prevent or deter a change of control of our company that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders or decrease the value that stockholders receive in such a change of control.

We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations to make distributions to our stockholders at expected levels, and we cannot assure you of our ability to make distributions in the future.

We are required to pay dividends that represent at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. Our ability to make these distributions may be adversely affected by the factors, risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports that we file from time to time with the SEC. Our board of directors has the sole discretion to determine the timing, form and amount of any distribution to our stockholders and will make determinations regarding distributions based upon many facts, including our financial performance, our debt service obligations, our debt covenants, our capital expenditure requirements, the requirements for qualification as a REIT and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. As a result, no assurance can be given that we will be able to make distributions to our stockholders at expected levels, or at all, or that distributions will increase or even be maintained over time, any of which could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Changes in market conditions could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

As with other publicly traded equity securities, the value of our common stock depends on various market conditions that may change from time to time. Among the market conditions that may affect the value of our common stock are the following:

• the extent of investor interest in our securities;

• the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of our equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate-based companies;

• the underlying asset value of our hotels;

• investor confidence in the stock and bond markets, generally;

• national and local economic conditions;

• changes in tax laws;

• our financial performance; and

• general stock and bond market conditions.

The market price of our common stock has been highly volatile in the past, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in their stock price. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources. The market value of our common stock is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions. Consequently, our common stock may trade at prices that are greater or less than our net asset value per share. If our future earnings or cash distributions are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our common stock will diminish.

In addition, interest rates have increased significantly in recent years and may remain elevated in the near term. The market for common shares and preferred shares of publicly traded REITs may be influenced by the distribution yield on their shares (i.e., the amount of annual distributions as a percentage of the market price of their shares) relative to market interest rates. As market interest rates increase, prospective purchasers of REIT common shares and preferred shares may seek to achieve a higher distribution yield, which we may not be able to, or may choose not to, provide. Thus, higher market interest

Table of Contents

rates could cause the returns on investment in our common stock to be relatively less attractive to our investors and the market price of our common stock to decline. Additionally, higher market interest rates may adversely impact the market values of our hotels, which may be reflected in the market price of our common stock.

We may be subject to litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and trading price of our common stock.

We may be subject to litigation.  In addition, we generally indemnify third-party hotel managers for legal costs resulting from management of our hotels. Some of these claims may result in defense costs, settlements, fines or judgments against us, some of which are not covered by insurance. The outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted. Payment of any such costs, settlements, fines or judgments that are not insured could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.  In addition, certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance coverage, which could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured and/or adversely impact our ability to attract officers and directors.

Future issuances of our common stock or our operating partnership’s common OP units, may depress the market price of our common stock and have a dilutive effect on our existing stockholders.

We cannot predict whether future issuances of our common stock or the availability of shares for resale in the open market may depress the market price of our common stock. Future issuances or sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the issuance of our common stock in connection with future property, portfolio or business acquisitions, or the perception that such issuances or sales might occur, may cause the market price of our shares to decline. In addition, future issuances or sales of our common stock may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

Our December 2018 acquisition of Cavallo Point, The Lodge at the Golden Gate was partially funded by the issuance by our operating partnership of common OP units, which became redeemable by the sellers after the one-year anniversary of such issuance for cash or, at our election, on a one-for-one basis for shares of our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the contribution agreement governing our acquisition of Cavallo Point, if any of the common OP units are outstanding seven years after their issuance, we have the option to redeem them for cash or shares of our common stock, at our election. In the future, our operating partnership may issue additional common OP units to acquire additional properties or portfolios. Such common OP unit issuances would reduce our ownership interest in the operating partnership and may in the future result in dilution of our shareholders’ equity interests.

Future offerings of debt securities or preferred stock, which would be senior to our common stock upon liquidation and for the purpose of distributions, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

In the future, we may increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities, which may include senior or subordinated notes, classes of preferred stock and/or common stock. We will be able to issue additional shares of common stock or preferred stock without stockholder approval, unless stockholder approval is required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our securities may be listed or traded. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings could significantly dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Preferred stock and debt, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on dividend or interest payments that could limit our ability to make distributions to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their interest.

We cannot guarantee that we will repurchase our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program or that our share repurchase program will enhance long-term stockholder value. Share repurchases could also increase the volatility of the price of our common stock and could diminish our cash reserves.

The timing, manner, price and actual number of shares repurchased under our share repurchase program will depend on a variety of factors including stock price, corporate and regulatory requirements, market conditions, and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities. Our share repurchase program may be limited, suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. In addition, repurchases of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program could affect our stock price and increase its volatility. The existence or use of our share repurchase program may cause our stock price to be higher than it

Table of Contents

would otherwise be, and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. Additionally, our share repurchase program could diminish our cash reserves, which may impact our ability to finance future growth and to pursue any possible future strategic opportunities or acquisitions. There can be no assurance that any share repurchases will enhance stockholder value because the market price of our common stock may decline below the levels at which we repurchased shares of stock. Although our share repurchase program is intended to enhance long-term stockholder value, there is no assurance that it will do so, and short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program’s effectiveness.

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our operating partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.

Limited partners in our operating partnership have the right to vote on certain amendments to the agreement that governs our operating partnership, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with our stockholders’ interests. As general partner of our operating partnership, we are obligated to act in a manner that is in the best interests of all partners of our operating partnership. Circumstances may arise in the future when the interests of limited partners in our operating partnership may conflict with the interests of our stockholders. These conflicts may be resolved in a manner that some stockholders believe is not in their best interests.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in "Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements" and "Risk Factors" contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other reports that we file from time to time with the SEC.

Overview

DiamondRock Hospitality Company (the “Company”, “we”, or "our") is a self-managed and self-administered lodging-focused real estate investment trust ("REIT") that owns a portfolio of premium hotels and resorts. As of December 31, 2025, we owned 35 hotels with 9,595 rooms located in 26 markets in the United States. The markets that we target for ownership are those that we believe align with our strategic objectives, which include those in destination markets with constrained supply trends, those that provide geographic diversity relative to our existing portfolio, and those we consider to have high demand growth potential. We are an owner, as opposed to an operator, of the hotels in our portfolio. As an owner, we receive all operating profits or losses generated by our hotels after we pay fees to the hotel managers, which are based on the revenues and profitability of the hotels, and the hotel brands, in certain cases, which are based on the revenues of the hotels. Each hotel is positioned to maximize its cash flow and value; accordingly, we choose to operate nearly 40% of our portfolio as an independent hotel and the remainder are operated under a brand owned by one of the leading global lodging brand companies (Marriott International, Hilton Worldwide, or IHG Hotels & Resorts).

We are a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We conduct our business through a traditional umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT, in which our hotel properties are owned by our operating partnership, DiamondRock Hospitality Limited Partnership, or subsidiaries of our operating partnership. The Company is the sole general partner of our operating partnership and owns 99.5% of the limited partnership units (“common OP units”) of our operating partnership as of December 31, 2025. The remaining 0.5% of the common OP units are held by third parties and current and former executive officers of the Company. See Note 9 for additional disclosures related to common OP units.

Key Indicators of Financial Condition and Operating Performance

We use a variety of operating and other information to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of our business. These key indicators include financial information that is prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted

Table of Contents

Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”), as well as other financial information that is not prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, we use other information that may not be financial in nature, including statistical information and comparative data. We use this information to measure the performance of individual hotels, groups of hotels and/or our business as a whole. We periodically compare historical information to our internal budgets as well as industry-wide information. These key indicators include:

• Occupancy percentage;

• Average Daily Rate (“ADR”);

• Rooms Revenue per Available Room (“RevPAR”);

• Total Revenue per Available Room (“Total RevPAR”);

• Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”), Earnings Before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for real estate (“EBITDA re ” ) , Adjusted EBITDA, and Hotel Adjusted EBITDA; and

• Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted FFO.

Occupancy, ADR, RevPAR, and Total RevPAR are commonly used measures within the hotel industry to evaluate operating performance. RevPAR, which is calculated as the product of ADR and occupancy percentage, and Total RevPAR, which is calculated as total revenues divided by room nights available, are important statistics for monitoring operating performance at the individual hotel level and across our portfolio. We evaluate individual hotel RevPAR and Total RevPAR performance on an absolute basis with comparisons to budget and prior periods, as well as on a company-wide and regional basis. Room revenue comprised approximately 65% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 and is dictated by demand, as measured by occupancy percentage, pricing, as measured by ADR, and our available supply of hotel rooms.

Our ADR, occupancy percentage, RevPAR, and Total RevPAR performance may be impacted by macroeconomic factors such as U.S. economic conditions generally, inflation, interest rates, tariffs, regional and local employment growth, personal income and corporate earnings, office vacancy rates and business relocation decisions, airport and other business and leisure travel, increased use of lodging alternatives, new hotel construction and the pricing strategies of our competitors. In addition, our ADR, occupancy percentage, RevPAR, and Total RevPAR performance is dependent on the continued success of our hotels' global brands and our hotel operators.

We also use EBITDA, EBITDA re , Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO as measures of the financial performance of our business. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further discussion on these financial measures.

Our Hotels

The following table sets forth certain operating information for the year ended December 31, 2025 for each of the hotels we owned during 2025.

Table of Contents

Property

Location

Number of

Rooms

Occupancy (%)

ADR ($)

RevPAR($)

Total RevPAR ($)

% Change

from 2024 Total RevPAR

Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile

Chicago, Illinois

Westin Boston Seaport District

Boston, Massachusetts

Salt Lake City Marriott Downtown at City Creek

Salt Lake City, Utah

Worthington Renaissance Fort Worth Hotel

Fort Worth, Texas

Westin San Diego Bayview

San Diego, California

Westin Fort Lauderdale Beach Resort

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Westin Washington D.C. City Center (1)

Washington, D.C.

The Dagny Boston

Boston, Massachusetts

The Hythe Vail

Vail, Colorado

Courtyard New York Manhattan/Midtown East

New York, New York

Atlanta Marriott Alpharetta

Atlanta, Georgia

The Gwen

Chicago, Illinois

Hilton Garden Inn New York/Times Square Central

New York, New York

Embassy Suites by Hilton Bethesda

Bethesda, Maryland

Hotel Champlain Burlington

Burlington, Vermont

Henderson Beach Resort

Destin, Florida

AC Hotel Minneapolis Downtown (2)

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Kimpton Hotel Palomar Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona

Bourbon Orleans Hotel

New Orleans, Louisiana

Hotel Clio

Denver, Colorado

Courtyard New York Manhattan/Fifth Avenue

New York, New York

L'Auberge de Sedona (3)

Sedona, Arizona

Margaritaville Beach House Key West

Key West, Florida

The Lodge at Sonoma Resort

Sonoma, California

Courtyard Denver Downtown

Denver, Colorado

The Lindy Renaissance Charleston Hotel

Charleston, South Carolina

Kimpton Shorebreak Huntington Beach Resort

Huntington Beach, California

Cavallo Point, The Lodge at the Golden Gate

Sausalito, California

Chico Hot Springs Resort & Day Spa

Pray, Montana

Havana Cabana Key West

Key West, Florida

Tranquility Bay Beachfront Resort

Marathon, Florida

Hotel Emblem San Francisco

San Francisco, California

Kimpton Shorebreak Fort Lauderdale Beach Resort

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

The Landing Lake Tahoe Resort & Spa

South Lake Tahoe, California

Lake Austin Spa Resort

Austin, Texas

Henderson Park Inn

Destin, Florida

TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE

(1) The percentage change from 2024 RevPAR reflects the comparable period in 2024 to our 2025 ownership period from January 1, 2025 until the hotel was sold on February 19, 2025.

(2) The hotel was acquired on November 12, 2024. The percentage change from 2024 RevPAR reflects the comparable period in 2024 to our 2025 ownership period.

(3) During the fourth quarter 2025, Orchards Inn Sedona and L'Auberge de Sedona were combined and operate as one hotel. Amounts presented have been adjusted to reflect the combination.

Outlook for 2026

The U.S. economy is projected to deliver moderate growth in 2026, broadly comparable to that of 2025. Growth is supported by easing financial conditions, fiscal stimulus and incremental investment in technology, while constrained by a softening labor market, affordability pressures, and the impacts of an uncertain trade policy. Inflation has moderated from the peak levels observed in recent years but is forecasted to remain above the Federal Reserve's long-term target of 2% in 2026. While interest rate reductions are anticipated this year, the Federal Reserve has continued to signal a cautious, data-dependent approach to monetary policy as it assesses progress towards price stability and conditions in the labor market. Consumer spending, which has been a key source of economic resilience, is expected to remain positive in 2026 but with growth decelerating from 2025 levels. Spending patterns are likely to remain uneven, with higher‑income households continuing to

Table of Contents

account for a disproportionate share of demand, while lower‑income consumers face persistent affordability challenges that may constrain their discretionary spending.

Travel demand remains sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, and uncertainty surrounding economic growth continues to influence the hospitality industry. Travel demand is expected to remain relatively steady in 2026 with RevPAR growth driven primarily by higher rates; however, elevated operating costs, particularly related to labor, utilities, and property taxes are expected to continue to pressure hotel profitability and operating margins. Changes in labor market conditions and broader economic uncertainty may also influence consumer confidence and discretionary spending.

Our portfolio, which consists primarily of luxury and upper upscale hotels and resorts in major urban centers and desirable leisure destinations, is well positioned for continued resilient performance. Our portfolio is relatively insulated from competitive new supply and the majority of our hotels are marketed to higher-income consumers. While certain markets may experience moderating demand trends, as consumers adjust discretionary spending in response to evolving economic conditions, we do expect pricing power to be maintained and ancillary revenues to continue to increase in the portfolio.

In 2026, we expect to benefit from: (1) the ownership of a high-quality portfolio, (2) return on investments from recently completed renovations, rebrandings, and repositionings, and limited earnings disruption from ongoing renovations, (3) incremental travel demand from a favorable holiday calendar and one-time events, such as the FIFA World Cup, (4) asset management initiatives, and (5) a conservative debt capital structure.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2025 to the Year Ended December 31, 2024

All properties owned during these periods have been included in our results of operations during the respective periods since their date of acquisition. Based on when a property was acquired, operating results for certain properties are not comparable for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The AC Hotel Minneapolis Downtown was acquired on November 12, 2024 and will hereinafter be referred to as our “2024 Acquisition.” The Westin Washington D.C. City Center was sold on February 19, 2025, and will hereinafter be referred to as our “2025 Disposition.”

Revenue . Revenue consists of the following (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

Change

Rooms

Food and beverage

Other

Total revenues

The following are key hotel operating statistics for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The 2024 operating statistics reflect the period in 2024 comparable to our ownership period in 2025 for the 2024 Acquisition and 2025 Disposition.

Year Ended December 31,

% Change

Occupancy %

ADR

RevPAR

Total RevPAR

Rooms revenues decreased by $14.0 million from the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2025. A decrease of $22.6 million was attributable to our 2025 Disposition, which was partially offset by an increase of $8.4 million due to our 2024 Acquisition. The remaining increase in rooms revenues of $0.2 million was due to a modest decline in lodging demand offset by ADR growth in group and business transient segments.

Table of Contents

Food and beverage revenues increased $0.1 million from the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2025. The increase was attributable to growth in banquets, catering, and service charge revenues, offset by a decrease of $5.7 million due to our 2025 Disposition.

Other revenues, which primarily represent spa, parking, resort fees and attrition and cancellation fees, increased $4.5 million from the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to an increase in spa revenue, parking revenue, and resort fees, including the implementation of a resort fee at the Bourbon Orleans Hotel and The Lindy Renaissance Charleston Hotel.

Hotel operating expenses. The operating expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

Change

Rooms

Food and beverage

Other departmental and support expenses

Management fees

Franchise fees

Other property-level expenses

Total hotel operating expenses

Our hotel operating expenses decreased $8.9 million from $818.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $809.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, with $20.6 million of such decrease attributable to our 2025 Disposition, partially offset by an increase of $7.3 million due to our 2024 Acquisition. The remaining increase of $13.3 million was due to higher property tax assessments, primarily related to our Chicago hotels, as well as increases in utilities and repairs and maintenance costs.

Depreciation and amortization. Our depreciation and amortization expense decreased $0.5 million from $113.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $113.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to our 2025 Disposition.

Impairment losses. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded an impairment loss of $1.1 million related to the write-off of construction in progress that was determined not to be recoverable. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded impairment losses of $32.6 million related to the Westin Washington D.C. City Center and $1.6 million related to the write-off of construction in progress that was determined not to be recoverable. The impairment of the Westin Washington D.C. City Center was a result of our evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying amount of the hotel due to our determination in the fourth quarter of 2024 that it was more likely than not that the hotel would be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The impairment adjusted the hotel's carrying amount to its estimated fair value less costs to sell.

Corporate expenses. Corporate expenses principally consist of employee-related costs, including payroll, bonus, share-based compensation and benefits. Corporate expenses also include corporate operating costs, professional fees and directors' fees. Our corporate expenses decreased $18.5 million, from $52.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $34.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily due to severance expense recognized during the year ended December 31, 2024, in connection with executive leadership changes made in April 2024.

Interest expense. Our interest expense was comprised of the following (in thousands):

Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31,

Change

Unsecured term loan interest

Mortgage debt interest

Credit facility interest and unused fees

Amortization of debt issuance costs

Finance lease expense (1)

(1) In October 2024, we extended the term on one of our ground leases, and, as a result, the lease classification changed from an operating lease to a finance lease.

The decrease in interest expense is primarily due to our mortgage debt repayments in 2025.

Income taxes. During t he year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized an income tax benefit of $1.2 million, which was primarily related to the release of $2.4 million of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. The release was driven by improved evidence of realizability at our TRSs, including cumulative taxable income over the most recent three-year period, the expected reversal of certain taxable temporary differences, and forecasted future taxable income. This benefit was slightly offset by state and local income tax expense. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized income tax expense of $1.5 million, which was primarily related to state and local income tax expense. The income tax expense was slightly offset by a release of $0.2 million of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2024 to the Year Ended December 31, 2023

Discussion of the comparison of the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 to the year ended December 31, 2023 was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 on page 47 under Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2025.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay our scheduled debt service, operating

expenses, ground lease payments, capital expenditures directly associated with our hotels, any share repurchases, and distributions to our common stockholders.

Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for the costs of acquiring additional hotels, renovations and other capital expenditures that need to be made periodically to our hotels, scheduled debt payments, debt maturities, certain redemptions of common OP units, ground lease payments, share repurchases, and making distributions to our common stockholders. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of capital, including cash provided by operations, borrowings, issuances of additional equity, including common OP units, and/or debt securities and proceeds from property dispositions. Our ability to incur additional debt is dependent upon a number of factors, including the state of the credit markets, our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing restrictions imposed by existing lenders. Our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional equity and/or debt securities is also dependent on a number of factors including the current state of the capital markets, investor sentiment and our intended use of proceeds. We may need to raise additional capital if we identify acquisition opportunities that meet our investment objectives and require liquidity in excess of existing cash balances. Our ability to raise funds through the issuance of equity securities depends on, among other things, general market conditions for hotel companies and REITs and market perceptions about us.

Our Financing Strategy

Since our formation in 2004, we have been committed to a conservative capital structure with prudent leverage. Our outstanding debt consists of unsecured term loans and periodic borrowings on our senior unsecured credit facility. We have a preference to maintain a significant portion of our portfolio as unencumbered in order to provide balance sheet flexibility. As of December 31, 2025, our portfolio is fully unencumbered by secured debt. We expect that our strategy will enable us to maintain a balance sheet with an appropriate amount of debt throughout all phases of the lodging cycle. We believe that it is prudent to reduce the inherent risk of highly cyclical lodging fundamentals through a low leverage capital structure.

Table of Contents

We prefer a relatively simple yet efficient capital structure. We generally structure our hotel acquisitions to be straightforward and to fit within our capital structure; however, we will consider a more complex transaction, such as the issuance of common OP units in connection with the acquisition of Cavallo Point, The Lodge at the Golden Gate, if we believe that the projected returns to our stockholders will significantly exceed the returns that would otherwise be available.

We believe that we maintain a reasonable amount of debt. As of December 31, 2025, we had $1.1 billion of debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 4.98%, which includes the effect of interest rate swaps, and a weighted average maturity date of approximately 3.6 years, assuming all extension options available in our debt agreements are exercised. We remain committed to our core strategy of prudent leverage.

The following table outlines the timing and extent of our debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments for our mortgage debt and unsecured term loans as of December 31, 2025, assuming all extension options available in our debt agreements are exercised (in thousands):

Principal

Interest (1)

Total Principal and Interest

(1) The interest expense for our variable rate unsecured term loans is calculated based on the weighted average rate as of December 31, 2025 of 4.98%, which includes the effect of interest rate swaps.

Information about our financing activities is available in Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ATM Program

In August 2024, our board of directors approved an “at-the-market” equity offering program (the “ATM Program”), pursuant to which we may issue and sell shares of our common stock from time to time, having an aggregate offering price of up to $200.0 million. We did not sell any shares under the ATM Program during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Share Repurchase Program

On May 1, 2024, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of our common stock under a share repurchase program. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including price and general business and market conditions. The share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of shares, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion. The share repurchase program will expire on May 1, 2026. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we repurchased 4,798,642 shares of common stock at an average price of $7.72 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $37.1 million. As of February 27, 2026, we have $137.0 million of authorized capacity remaining under the share repurchase program.

Preferred Shares

We are authorized by our charter to issue up to 10 million shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. Our board of directors is required to set for each class or series of preferred stock the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption.

As of December 31, 2024, there were 4,760,000 shares of 8.250% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) issued and outstanding with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. On August 31, 2025, the Series A Preferred Stock became redeemable at the Company's option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date. On December 31, 2025, the Company redeemed all 4,760,000 outstanding shares at $25.00 per share for a total redemption amount of $119.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid dividends.

Table of Contents

Short-Term Borrowings

Other than borrowings under our senior unsecured credit facility, discussed below, we do not utilize short-term borrowings to meet liquidity requirements.

Senior Unsecured Credit Facility and Unsecured Term Loans

Prior to July 22, 2025, we were party to a Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that provided us with a $400.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and two term loan facilities in the aggregate amount of $800.0 million. The revolving credit facility was scheduled to mature on September 27, 2026, subject to customary extension options. The term loan facilities consisted of a $500.0 million term loan maturing on January 3, 2028 and a $300.0 million term loan maturing on January 3, 2026. We had the right to increase the aggregate amount of the facilities to $1.4 billion upon the satisfaction of certain standard conditions. On July 2, 2025, we drew $60.0 million on our senior unsecured revolving credit facility, which was subsequently repaid.

On July 22, 2025, we entered into the Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Facility”), which provides us with a $400.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and three term loan facilities in the aggregate amount of $1.1 billion. The senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) matures on January 22, 2030. The term loan facilities consist of a $500.0 million term loan that matures on January 3, 2028 (the “Term 1 Loan”), a $300.0 million term loan that matures on January 22, 2030 (the “Term 2 Loan”) and a $300.0 million term loan that matures on January 22, 2029 (the “Term 3 Loan”). The maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility, Term 1 Loan and Term 3 Loan may be extended for two additional six-month periods upon the payment of applicable fees and satisfaction of certain standard conditions. As of December 31, 2025, we had $400.0 million of borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility.

Additional information about the Amended Credit Facility, including a summary of significant covenants, can be found in Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Sources and Uses of Cash

As of December 31, 2025, we had $68.1 million of unrestricted corporate cash and $35.1 million of restricted cash, and no outstanding borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility.

Our net cash provided by operations was $243.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025. Our cash from operations generally consists of the net cash flow from hotel operations, offset by cash paid for corporate expenses, interest payments, and other working capital changes.

Our net cash provided by investing activities was $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which consisted of $89.0 million of proceeds from the sale of Westin Washington D.C. City Center offset by $81.6 million of capital expenditures.

Our net cash used in financing activities was $276.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, which consisted of $295.8 million of mortgage debt principal payments, $119.0 million paid for the redemption of our preferred stock, $98.3 million of distributions paid to holders of common stock and common units, $37.1 million of common shares repurchased under our share repurchase program, $11.6 million of financing costs, $9.8 million of distributions paid to holders of preferred stock, $5.1 million paid to repurchase shares upon the vesting of restricted stock for the payment of tax withholdings obligations, partially offset by $300.0 million of term loan proceeds.

We currently anticipate our significant sources of cash for the year ending December 31, 2026 will be net cash flow from hotel operations and potential dispositions. We expect our estimated uses of cash for the year ending December 31, 2026 will be debt service payments, potential acquisitions of hotel properties, capital expenditures, distributions to common stockholders, share repurchases, and corporate expenses.

Dividend Policy

We intend to distribute to our stockholders dividends at least equal to our REIT taxable income to avoid paying corporate income tax and excise tax on our earnings (other than the earnings of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are all subject to tax at regular corporate rates) and to qualify for the tax benefits afforded to REITs under the Code. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our stockholders each year at least:

Table of Contents

• 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP); plus

• 90% of the excess of our net income from foreclosure property over the tax imposed on such income by the Code; less

• any excess non-cash income (as determined under the Code).

The timing and frequency of distributions will be authorized by our board of directors and declared by us based upon a variety of factors, including our financial performance, restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements, our debt service requirements, our capital expenditure requirements, the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. Information about our distributions declared and paid can be found in Note 9 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Capital Expenditures

The management and franchise agreements for each of our hotels provide for the establishment of separate property improvement reserves to cover, among other things, the cost of replacing and repairing furniture, fixtures and equipment at our hotels and other routine capital expenditures. Contributions to the property improvement fund are calculated as a percentage of hotel revenues. In addition, we may be required to pay for the cost of certain additional improvements that are not permitted to be funded from the property improvement reserves under the applicable management or franchise agreement. As of December 31, 2025, we have set aside $35.1 million for capital projects in property improvement funds, which are included in restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets.

We invested approximately $81.6 million in capital improvements at our hotels during the year ended December 31, 2025. Completed projects in 2025 included the following:

• Hilton Garden Inn New York/Times Square Central: We completed a renovation of the hotel's guestrooms during the first quarter of 2025.

• Sedona Repositioning: We completed the repositioning of Orchards Inn as the Cliffs at L'Auberge during the third quarter of 2025, which integrated the hotel with the adjacent L'Auberge de Sedona and included construction of a new hillside pool and path connecting the two properties, renovation of the guestrooms and creation of a new arrival experience and new outdoor event space. The renovation of the guestrooms, arrival experience and event space was completed in May 2025 and the pool and path connection were completed in September 2025.

• Kimpton Hotel Palomar Phoenix: We completed a renovation of the hotel's guestrooms during the third quarter of 2025.

We expect to spend approximately $80 to $90 million i n capital improvements at our hotels in 2026. Significant projects in 2026 include the following:

• Courtyard New York Manhattan/Midtown East: We commenced a renovation of the hotel's guestrooms, which is expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2026.

• Henderson Park Inn: We commenced a renovation of the hotel's guestrooms and bathrooms, which is expected to be completed during the first quarter of 2026.

• Westin San Diego Bayview: We expect to commence a renovation of the entrance and public spaces throughout the lobby, including the lobby bar in mid-2026.

• Atlanta Marriott Alpharetta: We expect to commence a renovation of the hotel's guestrooms during the fourth quarter of 2026.

• Kimpton Shorebreak Huntington Beach Resort: We expect to commence a renovation of the hotel's guestrooms during the fourth quarter of 2026.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use the following non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors as key measures of our operating performance: EBITDA, EBITDA re , Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with U.S. GAAP. EBITDA, EBITDA re , Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to other companies that do not define such terms exactly as the Company.

Table of Contents

Use and Limitations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Our management and Board of Directors use EBITDA, EBITDA re , Adjusted EBITDA, Hotel Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO to evaluate the performance of our hotels and to facilitate comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital intensive companies. The use of these non-GAAP financial measures has certain limitations. These non-GAAP financial measures as presented by us, may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures as calculated by other real estate companies. These measures do not reflect certain expenses or expenditures that we incurred and will incur, such as depreciation, interest and capital expenditures. We compensate for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our reconciliations to the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures, and our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and consolidated statements of cash flows, include interest expense, capital expenditures, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures.

These non-GAAP financial measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. They should not be considered as alternatives to operating profit, cash flow from operations, or any other operating performance measure prescribed by U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect additional ways of viewing our operations that we believe, when viewed with our U.S. GAAP results and the reconciliations to the corresponding U.S. GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. We strongly encourage investors to review our financial information in its entirety and not to rely on a single financial measure.

EBITDA and EBITDA re

EBITDA represents net income (calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP) excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) provision for income taxes, including income taxes applicable to sale of assets; and (3) depreciation and amortization. The Company computes EBITDA re in accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”) guidelines, as defined in its September 2017 white paper “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for Real Estate.” EBITDA re represents net income (calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP) adjusted for: (1) interest expense; (2) provision for income taxes, including income taxes applicable to sale of assets; (3) depreciation and amortization; (4) gains or losses on the disposition of depreciated property including gains or losses on change of control; (5) impairment write-downs of depreciated property and of investments in unconsolidated affiliates caused by a decrease in value of depreciated property in the affiliate; and (6) adjustments to reflect the entity's share of EBITDA re of unconsolidated affiliates.

We believe EBITDA and EBITDA re are useful to an investor in evaluating our operating performance because they help investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization, and in the case of EBITDA re , impairment and gains or losses on dispositions of depreciated property) from our operating results. In addition, covenants included in our debt agreements use EBITDA as a measure of financial compliance. We also use EBITDA and EBITDA re as measures in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.

FFO

We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by Nareit, which defines FFO as net income (calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP) excluding gains or losses from sales of properties and impairment losses, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization. We believe that the presentation of FFO provides useful information to investors regarding its operating performance because it is a measure of our operations without regard to specified non-cash items, such as real estate related depreciation and amortization and gains or losses on the sale of assets. We also use FFO as one measure in assessing our operating results.

Adjustments to EBITDAre and FFO

We adjust EBITDA re and FFO when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance and that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO when combined with U.S. GAAP net income, EBITDA re and FFO, is beneficial to an investor's complete understanding of our consolidated and property-level operating performance. We adjust EBITDA re and FFO for the following items:

Table of Contents

• Non-Cash Lease Expense and Other Amortization : We exclude the non-cash expense incurred from the straight line recognition of expense from our ground leases and other contractual obligations and the non-cash amortization of our favorable and unfavorable contracts, originally recorded in conjunction with certain hotel acquisitions. We exclude these non-cash items because they do not reflect the actual cash amounts due to the respective lessors in the current period and they are of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for that period.

• Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle : The Financial Accounting Standards Board promulgates new accounting standards that require or permit the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. We exclude the effect of these adjustments, which include the accounting impact from prior periods, because they do not reflect the Company’s actual underlying performance for the current period.

• Gains or Losses from Debt Extinguishment : We exclude the effect of gains or losses recorded on the debt extinguishment because these gains or losses result from transaction activity related to the Company’s capital structure that we believe are not indicative of the ongoing operating performance of the Company or our hotels.

• Hotel Acquisition Costs : We exclude hotel acquisition costs expensed during the period because we believe these transaction costs are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels.

• Severance Costs : We exclude corporate severance costs, or reversals thereof, incurred with the termination of corporate-level employees and severance costs incurred at our hotels related to lease terminations or structured severance programs because we believe these costs do not reflect the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels.

• Hotel Manager Transition and Hotel Pre-Opening Costs : We exclude the transition costs associated with a change in hotel manager and the pre-opening costs associated with the redevelopment or rebranding of a hotel because we believe these items do not reflect the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels.

• Share-Based Compensation Expense: We exclude share-based compensation expense as it is a non-cash item. This adjustment aligns with the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA for our financial covenant ratios under our credit facility, supporting consistency in our financial reporting and covenant compliance, as well as comparability with our peers.

• Other Items : From time to time we incur costs or realize gains that we consider outside the ordinary course of business and that we do not believe reflect the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels. Such items may include, but are not limited to, the following: non-cash realized gains or losses on our deferred compensation plan assets; management or franchise contract termination fees; terminated transaction costs; gains or losses from legal settlements; costs incurred related to natural disasters; and gains on property insurance claim settlements, other than income related to business interruption insurance.

In addition, to derive Adjusted FFO, we exclude any unrealized fair value adjustments to interest rate swaps and the portion of our non-cash ground lease expense recognized as interest expense. We exclude these non-cash amounts because they do not reflect the underlying performance of the Company.

Hotel Adjusted EBITDA

We believe that Hotel Adjusted EBITDA provides our investors with a useful financial measure to evaluate our hotel operating performance, excluding the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest), our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization), and our corporate-level expenses. With respect to Hotel Adjusted EBITDA, we believe that excluding the effect of corporate-level expenses provides a more complete understanding of the operating results over which individual hotels and third-party management companies have direct control. We believe property-level results provide investors with supplemental information on the ongoing operational performance of our hotels and effectiveness of the third-party management companies operating our business on a property-level basis. Hotel Adjusted EBITDA margins are calculated as Hotel Adjusted EBITDA divided by total hotel revenues.

The following table is a reconciliation of our U.S. GAAP net income to EBITDA, EBITDA re, Adjusted EBITDA and Hotel Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):

Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31,

(As Adjusted) (1)

(As Adjusted) (1)

Net income

Interest expense

Income tax (benefit) expense

Real estate related depreciation and amortization

EBITDA

Impairment losses

EBITDA re

Non-cash lease expense and other amortization

Share-based compensation expense (2)

Hotel pre-opening costs

Terminated transaction costs

Loss on debt extinguishment

Severance costs (3)

Adjusted EBITDA

Corporate expenses

Interest (income) and other (income) expense, net

Hotel Adjusted EBITDA

Effective January 1, 2025, we exclude share-based compensation from our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA. Amounts reported for 2024 and 2023 have been adjusted to reflect the current year presentation.

Amounts include less than $0.1 million, $0.6 million, and $0.7 million of non-cash items related to our deferred compensation plan for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred severance costs related to the executive team changes that occurred in April 2024.

The following table is a reconciliation of our U.S. GAAP net income to FFO and Adjusted FFO (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,

(As Adjusted) (1)

(As Adjusted) (1)

Net income

Real estate related depreciation and amortization

Impairment losses

FFO

Distributions to preferred stockholders

FFO available to common stock and unit holders

Non-cash lease expense and other amortization

Share-based compensation expense

Terminated transaction costs

Loss on debt extinguishment

Severance costs (3)

Hotel pre-opening costs

Fair value adjustments to interest rate swaps

Adjusted FFO available to common stock and unit holders

Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2025, we exclude share-based compensation from our calculation of Adjusted FFO. Amounts reported for 2024 and 2023 have been adjusted to reflect the current year presentation.

Amounts include less than $0.1 million, $0.6 million, and $0.7 million of non-cash items related to our deferred compensation plan for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred severance costs related to the executive team changes that occurred in April 2024.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DiamondRock Hospitality Company and all consolidated subsidiaries. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ materially from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to the impairment of long-lived assets, on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies are disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The following represent certain critical accounting policies that require us to exercise our business judgment or make significant estimates:

Investment in Hotels

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Costs of improvements that extend the economic life or improve service potential, which generally includes significant improvements, renovations and replacements, are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Acquisitions of hotel properties are generally accounted for as acquisitions of a group of assets and recorded at relative fair value based upon total accumulated cost of the acquisition. The acquisition cost is allocated to land, buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, as well as identifiable intangible and lease assets and liabilities. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price we evaluate several factors, including but not limited to comparable sales, expected future cash flows discounted at risk adjusted rates as well as industry and Company data. Direct acquisition-related costs are capitalized as a component of the acquired assets.

Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the assets' estimated useful lives, which are generally as follows: 15 to 40 years for buildings and improvements; 1 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment; and 3 to 5 years for computer equipment and acquired software.

We evaluate the carrying value of our property and equipment for indicators of impairment. Indicators of impairment that may cause a review include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in the demand for lodging at the properties, current or projected losses from operations, and an expectation that the property is more likely than not to be sold significantly before the end of its useful life. When such indicators exist, we perform an analysis to determine the recoverability of the asset group by comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, including the proceeds from the ultimate disposition of a hotel, less costs to sell, to the net carrying value of the asset group. If the carrying value of the asset group is not recoverable and it exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset group, we recognize an impairment loss in our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value. We allocate the impairment loss related to the asset group among the various assets within the asset group pro rata based on the relative carrying values of the respective assets.

We will classify a hotel as held for sale in the period that we have made the decision to dispose of the hotel, a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash and no significant financing or other contingencies exist which could cause the transaction to not be completed in a timely manner. If these criteria are met, we will record an impairment loss if the fair value less costs to sell is lower than the carrying amount of the hotel and related assets and will cease recording depreciation expense. We will classify the assets and related liabilities as held for sale on the balance sheet.

Upon the sale or retirement of a fixed asset, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the Company’s accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statements of operations and comprehensive income.

Inflation

Table of Contents

Operators of hotels generally possess the ability to adjust room rates on a daily basis to reflect the effects of inflation. Our management companies may adjust room rates daily, excluding previously contractually committed reservations. However, competitive pressures, demand elasticity, or other market factors may limit the ability of our management companies to increase room rates. Inflation may also affect our operating expenses and the cost of capital improvements, including, without limitation, increases in costs of labor, employee-related benefits, food, commodities and other materials, taxes, property and casualty insurance and utilities. Refer to “Outlook for 2026” above for more information regarding inflation.

Seasonality

The periods during which our hotels experience higher revenues vary from property to property, depending principally upon location and the customer base served. Accordingly, we expect some seasonality in our business. Volatility in our financial performance from the seasonality of the lodging industry could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

See Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information relating to recently issued accounting pronouncements.