Item 1A. Risk Factors.
An investment in our common stock is subject to risks and uncertainties. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect us are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all the other information included or incorporated by reference herein. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair our business operations. This Annual Report on Form 10-K is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.
If any of the events described in the risk factors should occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of our securities could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
CREDIT RISKS
Deterioration in credit quality may adversely affect our earnings.
Our primary source of revenue is interest income derived from loans to individuals, small businesses, and commercial entities. As such, we are exposed to credit risk, which is the risk that borrowers may fail to meet their repayment obligations. Credit losses are inherent in the business of making loans and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, risks of non-payment, risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral, and risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions and increases in inflation and interest rates. The credit quality of our loan portfolio can be influenced by several factors, including changes in economic conditions, the financial health of borrowers, industry-specific risks, and local market conditions. A downturn in the local or national economy could lead to higher unemployment rates, reduced consumer spending, and lower demand for credit, which in turn could increase the risk of loan defaults and charge-offs. Changes in the economy can also cause the assumptions that we made at origination to change and can cause borrowers to be unable to make payments on their loans, and significant changes in collateral values can cause us to be unable to collect the full value of loans we make. In addition, increases in interest rates and inflation increase costs and decrease profits, reducing the ability of borrowers to make payments on loans. Even in stable economic environments, we may experience higher-than-expected loan or , which could lead to increased provisions for credit and impact our and capital.
To manage the credit risk arising from lending activities, we maintain sound underwriting policies and procedures. We continuously monitor asset quality to determine the appropriateness of valuation allowances. However, there is no assurance that our credit risk monitoring and loan approval procedures are or will be adequate or will reduce the inherent risks associated with lending.
Credit losses could increase, and the allowance may not be adequate to cover actual credit losses.
We maintain an ACL to reserve for estimated expected credit losses within our loan portfolio. The level of the ACL reflects our evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; loan portfolio quality; and economic, political, and regulatory conditions. The determination of the appropriate level of the ACL inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires management to make significant estimates related to current and expected future credit risks and trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Deterioration in general economic conditions and unforeseen risks affecting clients may have an adverse effect on borrowers’ capacity to repay timely their obligations before risk grades could reflect those changing conditions. In times of improving credit quality, with growth in our loan portfolio, the ACL may decrease as a percent of total loans. Changes in economic and market conditions may increase the risk that the allowance would become inadequate if
Table of Contents
borrowers experience economic and other conditions adverse to their businesses. Although management believes the ACL is appropriate to absorb probable losses within the loan portfolio, this allowance may not be adequate. Maintaining the adequacy of our ACL may require that we make significant and unanticipated increases the allowance, which would result in an expense for the period, thereby reducing the amount of reported net income, which may also adversely affect capital.
In addition, federal banking regulators, as an integral part of their respective supervisory functions, periodically review our ACL. The bank regulatory agencies may require us to change classifications or grades on loans, increase the ACL with large provisions for credit losses, and recognize further loan charge-offs based upon their judgments, which may be different from ours. Any increase in the ACL required by these regulatory agencies could have a negative effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Concentrations within the loan portfolio may increase exposure to credit losses.
A financial institution’s exposure to risk increases if a disproportionate amount of the loan portfolio is extended to a single borrower, specific industry sector, or geographic area. A downturn in the economy, natural disaster, or industry-specific stressor may have a larger impact on the financial health of those borrowers, and in turn, the financial institution.
The Bank’s loan portfolio consists of consumer, commercial, and agricultural loans. While our risk management framework includes robust underwriting standards, diversified lending practices, and monitoring of concentration risk within the portfolio, unforeseen economic shocks or industry-specific downturns could still lead to higher-than-expected loan losses, charge-offs, and impairments to collateral.
INTEREST RATE AND LIQUIDITY RISKS
Changes in interest rates may reduce our net interest income.
As a financial institution, our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our ability to generate net interest income, which is the difference between interest income we earn as a result of interest paid to us on loans and investments and interest we pay to third parties such as our depositors and those from whom we borrow funds. As interest rates change, net interest income is affected. Interest rate risk results from the timing differences in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial institution’s interest earning assets, such as loans and securities, and its interest bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed funds.
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, changes in monetary policy, demand for loans, securities and deposits, policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, and a change over time in the mix of our loans and investment securities as well as our deposits and other liabilities. Sustained low levels of market interest rates, as experienced prior to 2022, would place downward pressure on our net interest margins and, therefore, on our earnings. Conversely, increases in interest rates, though they could increase our interest margins absent a commensurate rise in our cost of funds, also have the potential to affect borrowers’ ability to repay, particularly for the small and medium sized businesses to which we lend, subjecting us to potential loan losses. This effect could be exacerbated by an inflationary environment. We monitor the potential effects of changes in interest rates through simulations and gap analyses. To help mitigate the effects of changes in interest rates, we make significant efforts to stagger projected cash flows and maturities of interest sensitive assets and liabilities.
The value of our investment securities portfolio may be negatively impacted by fluctuations in the market, including credit deterioration of the issuers of individual securities.
Factors beyond our control can significantly influence and cause adverse changes to occur in the fair values of securities in our investment securities portfolio. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions in respect of the investment securities in our portfolio, defaults by the issuers of such securities, concerns with respect to the enforceability of the payment or other key terms of such securities, changes in market interest rates, continued instability in the capital markets, and lack of liquidity or marketability. Any of these factors, as well as others, could cause other-than-temporary impairments and realized or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in other comprehensive income, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.
A volatile interest rate environment, illiquid market, or decline in credit quality could require us to recognize a credit-related impairment to the investment securities held in our portfolio. We consider many factors in determining whether a credit-related impairment exists including the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than cost, the investment credit rating, and the probability that the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due. While we do not intend to sell a security in an unrealized loss position or before recovery of its cost basis, the presence of these risk factors could lead to impairment charges.
Table of Contents
We are subject to liquidity risk in our operations, which could adversely impact our ability to fund various obligations.
Liquidity risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from our inability to meet obligations, such as deposit withdrawals, loan disbursements, and other operating costs, when they come due without incurring unacceptable and significant costs. Liquidity risk includes the inability to manage unplanned changes in funding sources, or failure to address changes in market conditions that affect the ability to liquidate assets quickly and with minimal loss in value. Retail deposits, cash, and unencumbered AFS securities are our primary sources of liquidity, supplemented by alternative and wholesale funding sources. In addition, from time to time, we borrow from the FHLB. Potential alternative sources of liquidity include the sale of loans, the acquisition of national market non-core deposits, the issuance of additional collateralized borrowings such as the FHLB, advances, access to the FRB discount window, and the issuance of additional equity securities and/or debt. Our ability to manage liquidity will be hindered if we are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable costs. In addition, if we rely too heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, our operating margins and would be affected. Furthermore, if the Corporation is to raise adequate funds through external sources, the Corporation may need to sell assets with unrealized in order to generate additional liquidity, which could decrease the capital of the Corporation and have an effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Minimum capital requirements may adversely affect our ability to pay cash dividends, reduce our profitability, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
As a banking organization, our capital and liquidity are subject to regulation and supervision by banking regulators. We are required to maintain minimum levels of capital. The need to maintain capital and liquidity could result in our being required to increase our regulatory capital, restrict our lending capacity, and may dilute shareholder value or limit our ability to pay dividends or otherwise return capital to our investors through stock repurchases.
Our access to funds from subsidiaries may be restricted.
The Corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Bank and its non-banking subsidiaries. The Corporation depends on dividends, distributions, and other payments from its banking and non-banking subsidiaries to fund dividend payments on its common stock, debt service of subordinated borrowings, fund stock repurchase program, and to fund strategic initiatives or other obligations. The Bank is not obligated to pay dividends to us. Furthermore, the Corporation’s subsidiaries are subject to laws that authorize regulatory bodies to block or reduce the flow of funds from those subsidiaries to the Corporation based on assertion that certain payments from subsidiaries are considered an unsafe or unsound practice, which could impede our access to funds that we may need to make payments on our obligations or dividend payments, if and when declared from time to time by our Board in its sole discretion out of funds legally available for that purpose.
Earnings may not grow if we are unable to successfully attract core deposits and lending opportunities and execute opportunities to generate fee-based income.
Historically, our loan and deposit growth has been the principal factor in our increase in net-interest income. If we are unable to execute our business strategy of continued growth in loans and deposits, our earnings could be adversely impacted. The Corporation’s ability to continue to grow depends, in part, upon our ability to expand our market share, to successfully attract core deposits and identify loan and investment opportunities, as well as opportunities to generate fee-based income. Our ability to manage growth successfully will also depend on whether we can continue to efficiently fund asset growth and maintain asset quality and cost controls, as well as on factors beyond our control, such as economic conditions and interest-rate trends.
Wholesale funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits, support operations, and future growth.
We must maintain sufficient funds to respond to the needs of customers. To manage liquidity, we use several wholesale funding sources in addition to core deposit growth, loan repayments, and maturities of loans and securities. These sources include FHLB and FRB advances, proceeds from the sale of securities, and loans and liquidity resources at the holding company. At times, the cost of these funds can exceed the cost of core deposits in our market area as well as digital deposits, which could have a material adverse effect on our net interest income margins. Wholesale funding is subject to certain practical limits such as the FHLB’s maximum borrowing capacity and our liquidity targets. Our maximum borrowing capacity from the FHLB is based on the amount and fair market value and face amount, respectively, of commercial loans and securities we can pledge. If we are unable to pledge sufficient collateral to secure funding from the FHLB, we may lose access to this source of liquidity that we have historically relied upon. Additionally, we are required to establish limits on certain types of deposits including brokered deposits and listing service deposits, as well as total wholesale funding sources. If we reach these limits, future asset growth may be reduced or halted. If we are to access any of these types of funding sources or if our costs related to them increase, our liquidity and ability to support demand for loans could be materially affected. If we were not to
Table of Contents
replace such wholesale funding, we may have to liquidate loans, which may be at losses that would have a material adverse effect on our capital, our business, and your investment in the Corporation.
Loss of deposits or a change in deposit mix could increase our cost of funding.
Our future growth will largely depend on our ability to maintain and grow our deposit base and our ability to retain our trust clients, who provide deposits. In the current environment of elevated interest rates, our deposits may not be as stable or as interest rate insensitive as similar deposits may have been in the past, and some existing or prospective deposit customers of banks generally, including the Bank, may be inclined to pursue other investment alternatives, which may negatively impact our net interest margin. Additionally, negative news about the Corporation or the Bank, or the banking industry in general, could negatively impact market and/or customer perceptions of the Corporation and the Bank, which could lead to a loss of depositor confidence and an increase in deposit withdrawals. The account and deposit balances can decrease when clients perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market or real estate, as providing a better risk/return tradeoff. In general, deposits are a low cost and stable source of funding. We compete with banks and other financial institutions for deposits. Funding costs may increase if deposits are and we are to replace them with more expensive sources of funding, if customers shift their deposits into higher cost products or if we need to raise interest rates to avoid deposits. Furthermore, the portion of our deposit portfolio that is comprised of large deposits may be more likely to be withdrawn rapidly under economic conditions. If our clients move money out of bank deposits into investments or to other financial institutions, we could a relatively low-cost source of funds, increasing our funding costs and reducing our net interest income, net interest margin, and net income.
Prepayments of loans may negatively impact our business as customers may prepay the principal amount of their outstanding loans at any time.
The speeds at which such prepayments occur, as well as the size of such prepayments, are within the customers’ discretion. Fluctuations in interest rates, in certain circumstances, may also lead to high levels of loan prepayments, which may also have an adverse impact on net interest income. If customers prepay the principal amount of their loans, and we are unable to lend those funds to other borrowers or invest the funds at the same or higher interest rates, interest income will be reduced. A significant reduction in interest income could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Secondary mortgage market conditions may adversely affect our financial condition and earnings.
The secondary mortgage markets are impacted by interest rates and investor demand for residential mortgage loans and increased investor yield requirements for these loans. These conditions may fluctuate in the future. As a result, a prolonged period of secondary market illiquidity may reduce our loan production volumes, change loan portfolio composition, and reduce operating results. Secondary markets are affected by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginny Mae for loan purchases that meet their conforming loan requirements. These agencies could limit purchases of conforming loans due to capital constraints, changes in conforming loan criteria, or other factors. Proposals to reform mortgage finance could affect the role of these agencies and the market for conforming loans.
OPERATIONAL AND REPUTATIONAL RISKS
Operational risks could lead to financial loss, litigation, and reputation risk.
Like most financial institutions, we are exposed to many types of operational risk. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from failed or inadequate internal processes, people, and systems or from external events. Errors or lapses in internal controls could result in financial loss, regulatory violations, or reputational damage. Our dependence upon automated systems may further increase the risk that system errors will result in losses that are difficult to detect. Operational risks may also arise from employee misconduct, including fraud or theft. It is not always possible to prevent employee error or misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not always be . These factors may lead to reputation risk and transaction risk.
Reputation risk is managed by developing and retaining marketplace confidence in handling customers’ financial transactions in an appropriate manner and protecting our safety and soundness. Transaction risk includes losses from fraud, error, the inability to deliver products or services, and loss or theft of information. Transaction risk also encompasses product development and delivery, transaction processing, information technology systems, and the Corporation’s internal control environment.
To minimize potential losses due to operational risks, we have established a robust system of internal controls that are regularly tested by our internal audit department in conjunction with external audit firms. While we strive to maintain robust internal controls and oversight, there is no guarantee that operational failures will be entirely avoided.
Table of Contents
Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information, whether through cyber attacks, breach of computer systems or other means could severely harm the Corporation’s business.
See Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
Regulations relating to privacy, information security, and data protection could increase our costs, affect or limit how we collect and use personal information, and adversely affect our business opportunities.
We are subject to various privacy, information security, and data protection laws, including requirements concerning security breach notification, and we could be negatively impacted by these laws. Various state and federal banking regulators and states have also enacted data security breach notification requirements with varying levels of individual, consumer, regulatory, or law enforcement notification in certain circumstances in the event of a security breach. Moreover, legislators and regulators in the U.S. are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, information security, and data protection laws that potentially could have a significant impact on our current and planned privacy, data protection, and information security-related practices, our collection, use, sharing, retention, and safeguarding of consumer or employee information, and some of our current or planned business activities. This could also increase our costs of compliance and business operations and could reduce income from certain business initiatives. This includes increased privacy-related enforcement activity at the federal level by the Federal Trade Commission, as well as at the state level. Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection, and information security laws (including those regarding security breach notification) affecting customer or employee data to which we are subject could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services, which could have a material effect on our business, financial conditions, or results of operations. Our to comply with privacy, data protection, and information security laws could result in potentially significant regulatory or governmental or actions, , , sanctions, and to our reputation, which could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our operations rely on external vendors.
We rely upon certain external vendors for our daily operations, some of which provide critical functions. If one of these vendors fails to perform in accordance with their established performance standards or encounters financial, regulatory, or strategic issues, it could disrupt our operations and/or expose us to liability. While we have a formal vendor management program to assist in vendor selection and ongoing performance monitoring, the failure of a vendor to perform in accordance with contractual agreements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The Bank may experience losses related to fraud or theft.
Reported fraud continues to increase on local, state, and national levels. The increased use of the internet and mobile devices to conduct financial and other everyday transactions, coupled with the increased sophistication and activities of criminals, increases the Bank’s security risks. Criminals are using social engineering and phishing attacks for identity theft and account takeover. ATM/debit card, check, real-time payment, and wire fraud are just a few examples of the channels used by criminals to steal money. While the Bank continues to invest in fraud prevention tactics and tools, along with educating the public about common scams, the losses from fraud and theft cannot be eliminated entirely.
The Bank’s framework for managing risk may not be effective in mitigating its risk and loss.
The Bank’s risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and loss by ensuring a culture of risk management is integrated throughout the Bank’s operational processes, strategic planning, and business lines. The Bank has established policies and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, and manage risk. This includes oversight of compliance, credit, legal, liquidity, market, operational, strategic, reputational, and wealth risk. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, we could incur losses, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage that may affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Impairment of goodwill could result in a negative impact on our results of operations.
Under current accounting standards, goodwill is not amortized but, instead, is subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. A decline in our stock price or the occurrence of a triggering event following any of our quarterly earnings releases and prior to the filing of the periodic report for that period could, under certain circumstances, require performance of a goodwill impairment test and result in an impairment charge being recorded for that period which was not reflected in such earnings release. Our most recent impairment test indicated that the estimated fair value of our sole reporting unit “Isabella Bank” exceeded the carrying value. In a future assessment, we could conclude that all or a portion of our goodwill is impaired, which would result in a non-cash charge to earnings.
Table of Contents
STRATEGY AND EXTERNAL RISKS
Deterioration in national, state, and local economic conditions may adversely affect our financial performance.
The results of operations for financial institutions, including our Bank, may be adversely affected by changes in local, state, and national economic conditions. We provide banking and financial services to individuals and businesses located primarily in the Bay, Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties in Michigan. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for our products and services, as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans, and the stability of our deposit funding sources. A significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, international or domestic occurrences, a health crisis, unemployment, changes in securities markets, or other factors could impact these local economic conditions and, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
An economic downturn in the state, national, or global markets could also negatively impact our financial condition and results of our operations. Broader economic and geopolitical developments, including global trade tensions, political instability, and natural disasters, can create volatility in financial markets and affect the economic outlook. A significant decline in U.S. GDP, rising inflation, or prolonged high unemployment rates could reduce demand for loans, increase credit risk, and reduce consumer confidence. Geopolitical events, such as trade wars or foreign conflicts, can disrupt markets and introduce volatility, which may indirectly affect our operations by influencing local economic conditions, interest rates, and the availability of capital.
We continually monitor key economic indicators to anticipate the possible effects of downturns in the local, regional, and national economies.
Monetary policy and economic environment could impact our financial performance.
Our earnings are significantly affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of governmental authorities, including the FRB. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the FRB to implement these objectives are open-market operations in U.S. Government securities and federal funds, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These instruments of monetary policy are used in varying combinations to influence the overall level of bank loans, investments, and deposits, and the interest rates charged on loans and paid for deposits.
The FRB frequently uses these instruments of monetary policy, especially its open-market operations and the discount rate, to influence the level of interest rates, thereby affecting the strength of the economy, the level of inflation, or the price of the dollar in foreign exchange markets. The monetary policies of the FRB have had a significant effect on the operating results of banking institutions in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. It is not possible to predict the nature of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies, or the effect which they may have on our business and earnings.
Wealth management business line could create risks associated with the industry.
Our wealth management operations present special risks not borne by institutions that focus exclusively on other traditional retail and commercial banking products. For example, the investment advisory industry is subject to fluctuations in the stock market and interest rate volatility that may have a significant adverse effect on transaction fees, client activity, and client investment portfolio gains and losses. Also, additional or modified regulations may adversely affect our wealth management operations. In addition, our wealth management operations are dependent on our financial advisors, whose departure could result in the loss of a significant number of client accounts. A significant decline in fees and commissions or trading losses suffered in the investment portfolio could adversely affect our income and potentially require the contribution of additional capital to support our operations.
Strong competition within our markets may significantly impact profitability.
We compete with an ever-increasing array of financial service providers. See the section entitled “General” in Item 1. Business for additional competitor information. Competition from nationwide banks, as well as local institutions, continues to mount in our markets. To compete, we focus on quality customer service, making decisions at the local level, maintaining long-term customer relationships, building customer loyalty, and providing products and services designed to address the specific needs of customers. Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken our competitive position, which could adversely affect growth and profitability.
Table of Contents
Market changes may adversely affect demand for our services and impact revenue, costs, and earnings.
Channels for servicing our customers are evolving rapidly, with less reliance on traditional branch facilities, increased use of e-commerce channels, and demand for relationship managers who can service multiple product lines. We have an ongoing process for evaluating the profitability of our branch system and other office and operational facilities. The identification of unprofitable operations and facilities can lead to restructuring charges and introduce the risk of disruptions to revenues and customer relationships. We compete with larger financial institutions who are rapidly evolving their service channels and escalating the costs of the service process.
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated because of trading, clearing, counterparties and other relationships. Further, when volatility, market events or similar issues affect a subset of financial institutions, or when there are news reports or high-profile incidents relating to trends, concerns, and other issues in the banking industry, the ramifications can affect the sector, regardless of the effect, or lack thereof, on any specific institution. We have exposure to different industries and counterparties through transactions with counterparties in the bank and non-bank financial services industries, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, and other institutional clients. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more bank or non-bank financial services companies, or the bank or non-bank financial services industries generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or by us or by other institutions. Future events of this nature could have an effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Expansion, growth, and acquisitions could negatively impact earnings if not successful.
We may grow organically both by geographic expansion and through business line expansion, as well as through acquisitions of banks and non-bank financial services companies within or outside our principal market areas. We regularly identify and explore specific acquisition opportunities as part of our ongoing business practices. However, we have no current arrangements, understandings, or agreements to make any material acquisitions. We face significant competition from numerous other financial services institutions, many of which will have greater financial resources or more liquid securities than we do, when considering acquisition opportunities. Accordingly, attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying or completing any future acquisitions.
Success of these activities depends on our ability to continue to maintain and develop an infrastructure appropriate to support and integrate such growth. Success may also depend on acceptance of the Bank by customers in these new markets and, in the case of expansion through acquisitions, these factors include the long-term recruitment and retention of key personnel and acquired customer relationships. Profitability depends on whether the marginal revenue generated in the new markets will offset the increased expenses of operating a larger entity, with more staff, more locations, and more product offerings. Failure to achieve any of these success factors may have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be adversely affected by continuous technological change.
The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological change which includes the frequent introduction of new technology-driven products and services, including those based on artificial intelligence. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional operational efficiencies.
The introduction of new products and services can entail significant time and resources. Our failure to manage risks and uncertainties associated with new products and services exposes us to enhanced risk of operational lapses which may result in the recognition of financial statement liabilities. Regulatory and internal control requirements, capital requirements, competitive alternatives, vendor relationships, and shifting market preferences may also determine if such initiatives can be brought to market in a manner that is timely and attractive to our customers. Products and services relying on internet and mobile technologies may expose us to fraud and cybersecurity risks. Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, may further increase the risk of a cyber-attack. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption, cyber attack, or other security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such occurrences will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be addressed. to manage these risks in the development and implementation of new products or services could have a material effect on our business and reputation.
Table of Contents
LEGAL, REGULATORY, AND COMPLIANCE RISKS
We are subject to extensive government regulation and supervision, and any regulatory changes may adversely affect us.
As a federally insured financial institution, we are subject to regulation and oversight by various regulatory bodies including the FDIC, DIFS, FRB, SEC, and the CFPB. Federal and state laws and regulations are designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance fund, consumers, and the stability of the U.S. financial system, and not necessarily our shareholders. If we do not appropriately comply with regulations, the Bank may be subject to fines, penalties or judgments, or material regulatory restrictions in its business.
The nature, extent, and timing of the adoption of significant new laws, changes in existing laws, or repeal of existing laws may have a material impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, the effect of which is impossible to predict in advance.
The Bank has a formal Compliance Risk Management Program in place to mitigate the risk of noncompliance with laws, regulations, or rulings. However, changes or stricter enforcement of these laws could lead to higher compliance costs or require adjustments to our business practices, which may affect profitability. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities. This includes the imposition of restrictions on the operations of an institution, the classification of assets by the institution, and the appropriateness of an institution’s allowance for credit losses. Future regulatory changes or accounting pronouncements may also increase our regulatory capital requirements or adversely affect our regulatory capital levels.
The obligations associated with being a public company require significant resources and management attention.
We expect to incur incremental costs related to operating as a public company. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which require that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition and proxy and other information statements, and the rules and regulations implemented by the SEC, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the PCAOB, and Nasdaq, each of which imposes additional reporting and other obligations. We expect these rules and regulations and changes in laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure to increase legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time consuming and costly. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our investment in compliance with existing and evolving regulatory requirements will result in increased administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Many of our new activities and expansion plans require regulatory approvals, and failure to obtain them may restrict our growth.
Generally, we must receive federal regulatory approval before we can acquire an FDIC-insured depository institution or related business. Such regulatory approvals may not be granted on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. We may also be required to sell banking locations as a condition to receiving regulatory approval, which condition may not be acceptable to us or, if acceptable to us, may reduce the benefit of any acquisition. In addition, as opportunities arise, we may continue de novo branching as a part of our expansion strategy. De novo branching and acquisitions carry with them numerous risks, including the inability to obtain all required regulatory approvals. The failure to obtain these regulatory approvals for potential future strategic acquisitions and de novo banking locations could impact our business plans and restrict our growth.
The FRB may require the Corporation to commit capital resources to support the Bank.
The Dodd-Frank Act and the FRB require a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to a subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Accordingly, a capital injection may be required to provide financial assistance to the Bank if it experiences financial distress. Such capital injection may be required at times when the Corporation may not have the resources to provide and therefore may be required to borrow the funds or raise capital to make the required capital injection. Any borrowing by the Corporation in order to make the required capital injection may be more difficult and expensive and may adversely impact the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations and/or future prospects.
Table of Contents
Legal and regulatory proceedings could adversely affect us or the financial services industry in general.
We may be subject to various legal and regulatory proceedings in the future. Actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against us could require significant time and resources to respond to those actions and may lead to penalties. Whether the claims and legal action related to our performance are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, they may result in significant liability, adversely affect reputation, and reduce demand for our products and services. Any financial liability or reputational damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Societal responses to climate change could adversely affect the Bank’s business and performance, including indirectly through impacts on the Bank’s customers.
Concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led and may continue to lead to governmental efforts around the world to mitigate those impacts. Consumers and businesses also may change their behavior on their own because of these concerns. The Bank and its customers will need to respond to new laws and regulations, as well as consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. The Bank and its customers may face cost increases, asset value reductions, operating process changes, among other impacts. The impact on our customers will likely vary depending on their specific attributes, including reliance on our role in carbon intensive activities that may be negatively affected by economic transition towards a lower-carbon economy. The Bank could experience a drop in demand for its products and services, particularly in certain sectors. In addition, the Bank could face reductions in creditworthiness on the part of some customers or in the value of assets securing loans. The Bank’s efforts to take these risks into account in making lending and other decisions, including by increasing business relationships with climate-resilient companies, may not be effective in protecting use from the negative impact of new laws and regulations or changes in consumer or business behavior.
Pandemics, severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, and other external events could significantly impact our business and the business of our customers.
Pandemics, severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct business. Such events could affect the stability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue, and/or cause us to incur additional expenses. Such events may have a particularly negative impact upon the business of customers who are engaged in the hospitality industry in our markets, which could have a direct negative impact on our business and results of operations. Further, work-from-home and other modified business practices may introduce additional operational risks, including cybersecurity and execution risks, which may result in inefficiencies or delays, and may affect our ability to, or the way we conduct our business activities. We have developed and tested recovery plans for all significant aspects of our operations to minimize .
GENERAL RISK FACTORS
Changes in accounting policies or in accounting standards could materially affect our results of operations, and financial condition.
Accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations, and financial condition. Some of the accounting policies are critical because they require us to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. We may experience material losses if such estimates or assumptions underlying in our financial statements are incorrect.
From time to time, the FASB and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards or the interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of our external financial statements. These changes could materially impact how we report our results of operations and financial condition. New or revised standards could also require retroactive application, which could result in the restatement of our prior period financial statements in material amounts.
Internal controls may become ineffective in preventing or detecting material errors.
We regularly review and update our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the controls are met. Any failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Table of Contents
We may be unable to attract and retain key personnel .
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain key personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the financial services industry can be intense, and we may not be able to hire or retain the key personnel. The unexpected loss of key personnel could have an adverse impact on our business because of their skills, knowledge of the markets in which we operate, years of industry experience, and the difficulty of promptly finding a qualified replacement.
An active public trading market may not be sustained.
We completed the uplisting of the Corporation’s common stock from the OTCQX market to the Nasdaq Capital Market on May 12, 2025. An active trading market for shares of our common stock may not be sustained. If an active trading market is not sustained, you may have difficulty selling your shares of our common stock at an attractive price, or at all. Consequently, you may not be able to sell your shares of our common stock at or above an attractive price at the time that you would like to sell.
The market price of our common stock could be volatile and may fluctuate significantly, which could cause the value of an investment in our common stock to decline, result in losses to our shareholders and litigation against us.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in price in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, if the market for stocks in our industry, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition, or results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to lawsuits. Despite unsuccessful, as in the past, securities class action lawsuits have been instituted against some companies following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We could in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our normal business, which could affect our results of operation and financial condition.
Future equity issuances, including through our current or any future equity compensation plans, could result in dilution, which could cause the price of our shares of common stock to decline.
We may issue additional shares of our common stock in the future pursuant to current or future equity compensation plans, upon conversions of preferred stock or debt, upon exercise of warrants or in connection with future acquisitions or financings. We may seek to raise additional funds, finance acquisitions, or develop strategic relationships by issuing additional shares of our common stock. If we choose to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, or securities convertible into shares of our common stock, for any reason, the issuance could have a dilutive effect on the holders of our common stock and could have a material negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit and is subject to risk of loss.
An investment in our common stock is not a bank deposit and is not insured against loss or guaranteed by the FDIC, any deposit insurance fund, or by any other public or private entity. As a result, you could lose some or all of your investment.
