RJET Republic Airways Holdings Inc. - 10-K
0001628280-26-019614Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
10,336 words
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to factors discussed elsewhere in this Report, the following are important risks which could adversely affect our future results. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently do not deem material may also impair our business operations. If any of the risks we describe below occur, or if any unforeseen risk develops, our operating results may suffer, our financial condition may deteriorate, the trading price of our common stock may decline and investors could lose all or part of their investment in us.
Risks Related to Disruption of our Operations
Various negative economic or industry conditions may result in reductions to our flight schedules, which could materially and adversely affect our operations and financial condition.
Our operations and financial condition are affected by many changing economic and other conditions beyond our control, including, among others:
• actual or potential changes in international, national, regional and local economic, business and financial conditions, including recession, inflation, higher interest rates, higher taxes and/or tariffs, public health emergencies, including pandemics, international hostilities (including the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine), terrorist attacks or political instability;
• impact on workforce availability and economic uncertainty;
• future public health threats, outbreaks of diseases or other illnesses could negatively affect travel behavior and the industry;
• changes in consumer preferences, perceptions, spending patterns or demographic trends;
• changes in the competitive environment due to industry consolidation, new airlines entering the market, our major Partner Airlines operating smaller sized aircraft that may reduce the demand for regional aircraft and other factors;
• actual or potential disruptions to U.S. air traffic control systems, caused by a government funding shutdown or otherwise;
• interference on aviation equipment from the deployment of 5G wireless telecommunications systems, or other factors disrupting communications;
• price of jet fuel and oil that may negatively impact the number of flights we are scheduled to operate by our major Partner Airlines under our CPAs and may negatively impact the profitability of our agreements;
• disruptions in the credit markets, which may impact availability of price competitive financing;
• weather and natural disasters.
The effect of any, or some combination, of the foregoing economic and industry conditions on our operations or financial condition is virtually impossible to forecast; however, the occurrence of any or all of such conditions in a significant manner could materially and adversely affect our operations and financial condition and could cause our major Partner Airlines to reduce the utilization levels of our aircraft under our code-share agreements.
We may experience disruption in service due to delays from key third-party service providers.
We rely on third-party vendors for a variety of services and functions critical to our business, including airframe and engine maintenance, telecommunication systems, and information technology infrastructure, as well as services and functions provided by our Partner Airlines such as ground handling, fueling, computer reservation system hosting, telecommunication systems, and information technology infrastructure and services.
Even though we strive to formalize agreements with these vendors that define expected service levels, our use of third-party vendors increases our exposure to several risks. In the event that one or more vendors goes into bankruptcy, ceases operation, or fails to perform as promised , replacement services may not be readily available at competitive rates, or at all. If one of our vendors fails to perform adequately, we may experience increased costs, delays, maintenance issues, safety issues, or negative public perception. Vendor bankruptcies, unionization, regulatory compliance issues, or significant changes in the competitive marketplace among suppliers could adversely affect vendor services or force us to renegotiate
Table of Contents
existing agreements on less favorable terms. These events could result in disruptions in our operations or increases in our cost structure.
We currently depend on Embraer, General Electric (“GE ” ) Aviation, and other original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) to support our fleet of aircraft.
We currently rely on Embraer as the primary manufacturer of all of our regional jets and GE Aviation and its affiliates as the primary manufacturer for our supporting engines. Our risks in relying on a limited number of aircraft and engine manufacturers include:
• the failure or inability of Embraer, GE Aviation, or an OEM to provide sufficient parts or related support services on a timely basis;
• the interruption of scheduled passenger service as a result of unscheduled or unanticipated maintenance requirements for these aircraft;
• the issuance of DOT or FAA directives restricting or prohibiting the use of Embraer aircraft or GE Aviation engines or requiring time-consuming inspections and maintenance;
• the enactment of tariffs that will increase cost and/or delay parts at the border causing prolonged time of repair; and
• the adverse public perception of a manufacturer as a result of an accident or other adverse publicity.
Our operations could be materially and adversely affected by the failure or inability of Embraer, GE Aviation, or an OEM to provide sufficient parts or related maintenance and support services on a timely basis or by an interruption of fleet service as a result of unscheduled or unanticipated maintenance requirements for our aircraft or engines.
In addition, our Partner Airlines include both Embraer aircraft and aircraft manufactured by other OEMs as part of their networks. If we continue to operate a single manufactured fleet, we may not be able to compete for and win new regional flying opportunities, and our growth could be limited. Therefore, our growth plan may require us to expand our operations to flying regional jets manufactured by other OEMs. In such event, the introduction of additional aircraft types will require us to develop and implement specific operational proficiencies, including pilots, flight attendants, and maintenance technicians. Doing so may erode our operational efficiencies gained from flying a single aircraft type and could cause margin degradation.
We are at risk of losses stemming from an accident or incident involving any of our regional or general aviation aircraft or personnel.
It is possible that one or more of our commercial passenger aircraft or general aviation aircraft may be involved in an accident in the future, causing death or serious injury to individual air travelers and our employees, destroying our aircraft, and the property of third parties.
In addition, an accident involving one of our aircraft could expose us to significant tort liabilities. Such liabilities could include liability arising from the claims of those on board, including passengers or their estates seeking to recover damages for death or injury. There can be no assurance that the insurance we carry to cover such damages will be adequate. Accidents could also result in unforeseen mechanical and maintenance costs. In addition, any accident involving an aircraft type that we operate could create a public perception that our aircraft are not safe. Such an accident could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and the price of our common stock.
We are also at risk of adverse publicity stemming from any incident involving us, which could expose us or our Partner Airlines to reputational harm and potential legal liability. Our involvement in any such incident could negatively impact our relationship with our Partner Airlines or affect our Partner Airlines’ respective brands, and as a result, adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition, and the price of our common stock.
Interruptions or disruptions in service at one of our hub airports, due to weather, system malfunctions, security closures, or for any other reason, could have an adverse impact on our operations.
Table of Contents
We currently operate primarily through hubs supporting our Partner Airlines’ respective route network across the Northeast, Midwest, and South regions of the United States. A significant portion of our flights either originate from or fly into one of these hubs. These regions tend to experience higher than average adverse weather events, air traffic control disruptions, and the airports within these regions tend to experience significant congestion relative to many other U.S. airports, each of which creates significant challenges to completing flights on time. Our revenues depend primarily on our completion of flights and, secondarily, on service factors such as timeliness of departures and arrivals. Certain revenues are also impacted by non-controllable conditions such as weather. Any interruptions or disruptions could, therefore, adversely affect us. Extreme weather such as blizzards, hurricanes or tornados can cause flight disruptions, and during periods of storms or adverse weather, our flights may be cancelled or significantly delayed. An interruption or disruption in service at one of our hubs, due to adverse weather, system malfunctions, air traffic control disruptions, airport construction, security closures, or otherwise, could result in the cancellation or delay of a portion of our flights and, as a result, could have adverse impact on our operations and financial performance.
Risks Related to the Merger and Integration with Mesa Air Group, Inc.
We may be unable to integrate Mesa’s business with ours successfully and realize any anticipated benefits of the Merger, which could negatively impact our stock price and our future business and financial results.
We must devote significant management attention and resources to integrating the business practices and operations of Mesa Airlines. Potential difficulties we may encounter as part of the integration process include the following:
• integrating complex systems, operating procedures, regulatory compliance programs, technology, aircraft fleets, networks, and other assets of the two companies in a manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers, suppliers, employees, and other constituencies;
• diversion of the attention of our management and other key employees;
• integrating the workforces of the two companies while maintaining focus on providing consistent, high quality customer service and running a safe, clean, and reliable flying experience;
• disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, our ongoing business;
• liabilities that are significantly larger than we currently anticipate and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the Merger, including transition costs to integrate the two businesses that may exceed the costs that we currently anticipate;
• maintaining productive and effective employee relationships and achieving cost-competitive collective bargaining agreements that cover the combined union-represented work groups;
• the increased scale of our operations resulting from the Merger;
• retaining key employees of our company; and
• obligations that we will have to counterparties of Mesa that arise as a result of the change in control of Mesa.
If we do not successfully manage these issues and the other challenges inherent in integrating an acquired business the size of Mesa, then we may not achieve any potential benefits of the Merger of Mesa and our revenues, expenses, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We are expected to incur substantial expenses related to the Merger and the integration of Mesa Airlines’ business.
We are expected to incur substantial integration and transition expenses in connection with the Merger of Mesa Airlines related to a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies, and systems that must be integrated. While we have assumed that a certain level of expenses will be incurred, there are many factors beyond our control that could affect the total amount or the timing of the integration expenses. Moreover, many of the expenses that will be incurred are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the financial benefits we expect to achieve from the Merger, including the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings. These integration expenses likely will continue to result in us taking significant charges against earnings in future periods, and the amount and timing of such charges are uncertain at present.
Risks Related to our Capacity Purchase Agreements with our Partner Airlines
Table of Contents
Our business is dependent on our CPAs with our Partner Airlines.
Substantially all of our revenues depend on relationships created by our regional jet CPAs with American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines. For the year ended December 31, 2025, our American Airlines capacity purchase agreements (the “American Airlines CPAs”) accounted for 43% of our revenue, our Delta Air Lines capacity purchase agreements (the “Delta Air Lines CPAs”) accounted for 24% of our revenue and our United Airlines capacity purchase agreement s(the “United Airlines CPAs”) accounted for 31% of our revenue.
The American Airlines CPAs expire with respect to different tranches of aircraft between 2028 and 2033, unless otherwise extended or amended. In addition, the American Airlines CPAs are subject to early termination for cause. The Delta Air Lines CPAs expire with respect to different tranches of aircraft between 2027 and 2030, unless otherwise extended or amended. In addition, the Delta Air Lines CPAs are subject to early termination for material breach of contract and significant declines in operating performance, among other triggering events. The United Airlines CPAs expire with respect to different tranches of aircraft between 2026 and 2037 , unless otherwise extended or amended. In September 2021, we entered into a new capacity purchase agreement with United Airlines. The terms extended the contract expiration from 2029 to 2037 and provided for 38 E170 aircraft to be replaced with new E175s which began in June 2022 with the remaining three new E175s to be delivered throughout the three months ending March 31, 2026. In addition, the United Airlines CPAs are subject to early termination for breach of contract.
As substantially all of our revenues are currently generated under our CPAs, adverse material modification to, or termination of, our CPAs with any of our Partner Airlines could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the results of our operations. None of our Partner Airlines are under any obligation to renew their respective CPAs. If any one of our Partner Airlines were to terminate or fail to renew their CPA, we would have difficulty replacing these agreements, due to the concentration of major airlines in the industry. If we were unable to replace these CPAs with alternative commitments from our Partner Airlines or with new partners, our results of operations would be significantly impacted. Operating an airline independently from our Partner Airlines would be a significant departure from our business plan and would likely require significant time and resources, which may not be available to us at that point.
Reduced utilization levels of our aircraft under CPAs with our Partner Airlines would adversely impact our revenues, earnings, and liquidity.
Our CPAs with our Partner Airlines require each of them to schedule our aircraft to a minimum level of utilization. Even though the fixed fee rates may adjust, either up or down, based on scheduled utilization levels, or require a fixed amount per day to compensate for our fixed costs , if our aircraft are utilized only at the minimum requirement (taking into account block hour and departure utilization and frequency of its scheduled flights), we will likely lose both (i) fixed-fee revenues (as a result of reduced utilization) and (ii) the opportunity to earn an additional margin and incentive compensation for such flights.
Challenges with hiring, training, and retaining pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians, and dispatchers may also lead to reduced utilization levels of our aircraft and possibly the incurrence of penalties under our CPAs. Additionally, our Partner Airlines may change routes and frequencies of flights without notice to us or our consent, which can negatively impact our operating efficiencies. Changes in schedules may increase our flight costs, which could exceed the fixed rates paid by our Partner Airlines.
If the financial strength of any of our Partner Airlines decreases, our financial strength, in turn, is at risk.
We are directly affected by the financial and operating strength of our Partner Airlines. In the event of a decrease in the financial or operational strength of any of our Partner Airlines, such Partner may be unable to make the payments due to us under our CPA. In addition, a Partner may reduce utilization of our aircraft to the minimum levels specified in the relevant CPAs, and it is possible that any CPAs with a Partner that files for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code may not be assumed in bankruptcy and could be modified or terminated. Our Partner Airlines have experienced, and may experience in the future, a sudden and severe loss of passenger demand and significant financial
Table of Contents
stress as a result of unforeseen events or conditions. Any such event impacting our Partner Airlines could have an adverse effect on our operations.
Our Partner Airlines may choose to operate their own regional aircraft, thus limiting the opportunity for expansion of our relationships with them.
We depend on major airlines, such as our Partner Airlines, to contract with us instead of purchasing and operating their own aircraft; however, some major airlines own their own regional airline subsidiaries and operate their own regional aircraft instead of entering into contracts with us or other independent regional carriers. Currently, the regional airlines owned by major airlines include Endeavor Air, Inc. (“Endeavor”) (owned by Delta Air Lines), Envoy Air Inc. (“Envoy”) (subsidiary of the parent company of American Airlines), PSA Airlines, Inc. (“PSA”) (subsidiary of the parent company of American Airlines), Piedmont Airlines (“Piedmont”) ( subsidiary of the parent company of American Airlines), and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. (“Horizon”) (owned by Alaska Air Group, Inc.). The major airlines possess the financial and other resources needed to acquire and operate their own regional jets, create or grow their own captive regional airlines, or acquire other regional air carriers instead of entering into contracts with us. We have no guarantee that, in the future, our Partner Airlines or any other airline will choose to enter into contracts with us instead of purchasing their own aircraft or entering into relationships with competing regional airlines, as they are not prohibited from doing so under the CPAs. A decision by American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, or United Airlines to phase out our contract-based relationships as they expire and instead acquire and operate their own aircraft or enter into similar agreements with one or more of our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations, and the price of our common stock. Because of the concentration of major airlines in the industry, we would have difficulty replacing lost revenues if any of our Partner Airlines were to terminate or reduce their CPAs with us.
Our Partner Airlines may be restricted in increasing the level of business that they conduct with us, thereby limiting our growth.
In general, the pilots’ unions of certain major airlines have negotiated clauses in their CBAs that restrict the number and/or size of aircraft that can be operated by the regional partners of such major airlines, referred to in the industry as “scope clauses.” These CBAs limit regional airlines to flying aircraft with a maximum take-off weight of 86,000 pounds and a maximum passenger configuration of 76 seats with certain exceptions expressly provided in certain CBAs. Except as contemplated by our existing CPAs, we cannot be sure that our Partner Airlines will contract with us to fly any additional aircraft.
We may not have additional growth opportunities or may agree to modifications to our CPAs that reduce certain benefits to us in order to obtain additional aircraft or for other reasons. Given the competitive nature of the airline industry, we believe its current environment with limited growth opportunities may result in competitors accepting reduced margins and less favorable contract terms in order to secure new or additional capacity purchase operations. Even if we are offered growth opportunities by our Partner Airlines, those opportunities may involve economic terms or financing commitments that are unacceptable to us.
Additionally, our Partner Airlines may reduce the number of regional jets in their system by not renewing or extending existing flying arrangements with regional operators or transitioning those flying arrangements to their own captive regional carriers. Any one or more of these factors may reduce or eliminate our ability to expand our flight operations with our Partner Airlines.
Disagreements regarding the interpretation of the CPAs with our Partner Airlines could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
To the extent that we experience disagreements regarding the interpretation of the CPAs or other agreements, we will likely expend valuable management time and financial resources in our efforts to resolve those disagreements. Those disagreements may result in litigation, arbitration, settlement negotiations, or other proceedings. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that any or all of those proceedings, if commenced, would be resolved in our favor or that we would be able to exercise sufficient leverage in any proceeding relative to our Partner Airlines to achieve a favorable outcome. An
Table of Contents
unfavorable result in any such proceeding could have adverse financial consequences and could require us to modify our operations. Such disagreements and their consequences could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
The residual value of our owned aircraft may be less than estimated in our depreciation policies.
As of December 31, 2025 , we had $2.4 billion of aircraft, engines, property, and other equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, of which most relates to aircraft and engines. In accounting for these long-lived assets, we make estimates about the expected useful lives of the assets, the expected residual values of certain of these assets, and the potential for impairment based on the fair value of the assets and the cash flows they generate. Factors indicating potential impairment include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of the long-lived assets, a significant change in the condition of the long-lived assets, and operating cash flow losses associated with the use of the long-lived assets. In the event the estimated residual value of any of our aircraft types is determined to be lower than the residual value assumptions used in our depreciation policies, the applicable aircraft type in our fleet may be impaired and may result in a material reduction in the book value of applicable aircraft types we operate or we may need to prospectively modify our depreciation policies. Impairment on any of the aircraft types we operate or an increased level of depreciation expense resulting from a change to our depreciation policies could result in a material negative impact to our financial results. We have recorded impairment charges in the past when aircraft values decreased faster than our depreciation policies estimated and future cash flows did not support the current net book value of the aircraft.
Risks Related to our Operating Costs and Personnel
We may experience difficulty hiring, training, and retaining qualified aviation professionals.
As is common within the regional airline industry, we have, from time to time, faced considerable turnover of our employees. Our pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians, and dispatchers sometimes leave to work for major airline, low cost, and cargo carriers, which generally offer higher salaries and more extensive benefit programs than regional airlines are financially able to offer.
The airline industry has experienced a significant shortage of qualified personnel, specifically pilots, as a result of decreased interest in the profession, new and more stringent government regulations, and an aging pilot population. These factors have created a greater industry-wide demand for pilots, including at major airlines, low cost, and cargo carriers, which frequently recruit from regional airlines and offer higher salaries and more extensive benefit programs than regional carriers have historically offered. This, in turn, has increased difficulty for regional airlines to retain sufficient pilot staffing levels.
In 2013 , the congressionally mandated pilot experience qualifications contained in the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 became effective (“FAA Qualification Standards”). As a result of this legislation, the age and training requirements for our First Officer pilots generally increased to 23 years and 1,500 hours of flight time, respectively, and First Officer pilots are required to hold an Air Transport Pilot (“ATP”) Certificate. Previously, First Officers were required to have only a commercial pilot certificate, which required 250 hours of flight time and no ATP certification requirement. Military pilots are subject to somewhat lower requirements, but there is a limited number of military-trained pilots available to enter the workforce. In addition, the FAA implemented a regulation beginning in 2014 that increased the flight crew duty, flight, and rest requirements for pilots. This update changed the length of time a pilot may be on duty and how much she or he may fly in a day, month, and year. These limitations, together with the more restrictive certification and qualification requirements, have resulted in a scarcity of qualified new entrants and have contributed to a severe nationwide pilot shortage from time to time.
The industry-wide pilot shortage is also caused by the aging population of experienced pilots approaching the mandatory retirement age of 65 . As a result, the global demand for pilots is expected to increase over the next decade. The shift in demographics is concentrated at major airline, low cost, and cargo carriers, giving rise to increased attrition at regional air carriers to replace those pilots. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain sufficient
Table of Contents
qualified pilots and our operations and financial condition may be negatively impacted if we are unable to hire and train pilots in a timely manner.
In 2022 and 2023, we experienced significant levels of pilot attrition, particularly attrition of C aptains and experienced First Officers, as a result of industry-wide hiring following the COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding shortages of Captains caused a sequential reduction in our annual block hours in 2022, 2023, and the first half of 2024. Although Captain attrition levels eased in 2024, future elevated pilot attrition levels could constrain our flight schedules. Operating at reduced flying schedules results in operating inefficiencies which negatively impacts our financial results.
Additionally, there can be no assurance that labor shortages may not affect other staffing needs, including those related to flight attendants, dispatchers, and maintenance technicians. If we are unsuccessful in sufficiently staffing these positions, our operations and financial condition may be negatively impacted if hiring and training of flight attendants, dispatchers, and maintenance technicians is not done in a timely manner.
Furthermore, any labor disruption or labor strikes by our employees or those of our Partner Airlines would adversely affect our ability to conduct our business. Relations between air carriers and labor unions in the United States are governed by the RLA. Under the RLA, CBAs generally contain amendable dates rather than expiration dates, and the RLA requires that a carrier maintain the existing terms and conditions of employment following the amendable date through a multi-stage and often lengthy series of bargaining process overseen by the NMB. This process continues until either the parties have reached agreement on a new CBA, or the parties have been released to “self-help” by the NMB. In most circumstances, the RLA prohibits strikes; however, after release by the NMB, carriers and unions are free to engage in self-help measures such as lock-outs and strikes. Any strike, labor dispute, or increased unionization among our employees could disrupt our operations, reduce profitability, or interfere with the ability of our management to focus on business strategies.
Increases in our labor costs, which constitute a substantial portion of our total operating costs, will directly impact our earnings and ability to compete for new fixed-fee business.
Wages and benefits constituted 51% of our total operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2025 , and we have experienced pressure to increase wages and benefits for our employees. Under our CPAs, our reimbursement rates for certain operating costs contemplate labor costs that increase on a set schedule generally tied to an increase in the consumer price index. We are entirely responsible for our labor costs, and we are not entitled to receive increased payments for our flights from our Partner Airlines if our labor costs increase above the assumed costs included in the reimbursement rates. As a result, a significant increase in our labor costs above the levels assumed in our reimbursement rates could result in a material adverse effect to our results of operations, cash flows, and the price of our common stock.
Due to our business strategy to position the airline for future capacity growth, we have from time to time reached a pilot staffing level that exceeds the pilot base necessary to operate our current contractual obligations. These staffing levels are necessary to position our airline to accept new business, acquire additional aircraft, and expand our fleet. During periods in advance of growth, or in the event that we are unable to achieve fleet expansion and capacity growth, the cost to carry excess pilots could result in a material adverse effect to our results of operations, cash flows, and the price of our common stock.
In response to past significant increases in attrition and wage escalation in selected work groups, we have increased wages and provided signing bonuses to attract new employees in order to be competitive in the marketplace. If our annual revenue rate increases are less than our actual cost escalations, our financial results will be negatively impacted.
Our maintenance expenses will increase as our fleet ages and may be higher than we anticipate.
We bear substantial costs for routine and major maintenance events. Maintenance expenses comprise a significant portion of our operating expenses. The average age of our aircraft is approxima tely 13.0 years old. As a result, our newer aircraft require less maintenance now than they will in the future. We have incurred lower maintenance expenses because some of the parts on our aircraft are under multi-year warranties. Our maintenance costs will increase as these warranties expire and our fleet ages. For example, our recent engine expenses for our aircraft do not reflect the full mature cost of
Table of Contents
maintaining the aircraft, as they do not include all of our expenses for future engine life limited parts replacement (“LLP”) restoration as these parts are only replaced approximately every ten to twelve years. As we incur expenses to replace these LLPs, only a portion of the expense may be passed through to our Partner Airlines, thus our future results of operations and liquidity will be materially impacted. If our annual revenue rate increases are less than our actual cost escalations, our financial results will be negatively impacted.
In addition, we are periodically required to take aircraft out of service for heavy maintenance checks, which can increase costs and reduce revenue. We also may be required to comply with regulations and airworthiness directives the FAA issues, the cost of which our aircraft lessors may only partially assume depending upon the magnitude of the expense. Although we believe that our owned and leased aircraft are currently in compliance with all effective FAA airworthiness directives, our aircraft could fall out of compliance, or additional airworthiness directives may be required in the future, necessitating additional expenditures.
We have a significant amount of debt and other contractual obligations that could impair our liquidity and thereby harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, and the price of our common stock.
The airline business is capital intensive, and as a result, we are highly leveraged. As of December 31, 2025 , we had approximately $ 1.1 billion in total debt and finance leases. Substantially all of our debt was incurred in connection with the acquisition of aircraft and spare aircraft engines. This substantial indebtedness could:
• require us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available for operations and future business opportunities;
• make it difficult for us to satisfy our debt service payments and other obligations;
• limit our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, or other purposes, if needed, and increase the cost of any of these borrowings; and/or
• reduce our flexibility in planning for or responding to changing business and economic conditions.
If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations or to fund our other liquidity needs, we will need to restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt, which could cause us to default on our existing debt obligations and impair our liquidity. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on, among other things, our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates or otherwise on more onerous terms. Moreover, in the event of a default, the holders of our indebtedness, could elect to declare all the funds borrowed to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
We also have significant long-term debt obligations primarily relating to our aircraft fleet. As of December 31, 2025 , our minimum required debt service payments for the next 12 months totals $257.0 million and our finance lease payments total approximately $9.5 million. We have significant operating lease obligations with respect to our flight simulators and facility leases, which aggregated to approximately $140.4 million a s of December 31, 2025 through the remaining minimum lease terms.
If our liquidity is materially diminished, we might not be able to timely pay our lease payments and debts or comply with material provisions of our contractual obligations.
Our business could be harmed if we are unable to attract, develop, and retain the services of our key personnel.
Our business depends upon the efforts of our key management and operating personnel. If we experience a substantial turnover in our leadership and other key employees and are not able to replace these persons with individuals with comparable skills, our performance could be materially adversely impacted. In addition, competition for skilled personnel has intensified and may continue to intensify if overall industry capacity continues to increase and/or we were to incur attrition at levels higher than we have historically.
We may have difficulty replacing management or other key personnel who leave and, therefore, the loss of the services of any of these individuals could harm our business.
Table of Contents
Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation
We may become involved in litigation that may have a material and adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
From time to time, we may become involved in various legal proceedings relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including employment, commercial, product liability, class action, whistleblower, and other litigation and claims, and governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources, and cause us to incur significant expenses or liability and/or require us to change our business practices. Because of the potential risks, expenses, and uncertainties of litigation, we may, from time to time, settle disputes, even where we believe that it has meritorious claims or defenses. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, we cannot assure that the results of any of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and the price of our common stock.
Regulatory changes or tariffs could negatively impact our business and financial condition.
We rely on a limited number of aircraft types, including E170s and E175s, and we import a substantial portion of the equipment we need. The issuance of FAA or manufacturer directives restricting or prohibiting the use of the aircraft types we operate could negatively impact our business and financial results. Additionally, potential regulatory changes or action by the U.S. government or U.S. regulatory agencies, including the imposition of new tariffs, increase in existing tariffs, or changes in international trade treaties, could negatively impact the cost and availability of parts and aircraft. Our business may be subject to additional costs as a result of potential regulatory changes, which could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial results.
The United States has recently enacted and proposed to enact significant new tariffs. There continues to exist significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and other countries with respect to such trade policies, treaties and tariffs. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly impact the cost of new Embraer aircraft imported from Brazil, aircraft parts and supplies sourced internationally or impact the cost of service providers located outside of the United States, which in turn would negatively impact us.
We are subject to various environmental and noise laws and regulations, which could negatively impact our business and financial condition.
We are subject to increasingly stringent Federal, state, local, and foreign laws, regulations, and ordinances relating to noise and the protection of the environment, including those relating to emissions to the air, discharges (including storm water discharges) to surface and subsurface waters, safe drinking water, and the use, management, disposal, and release of and exposure to, hazardous substances, oils, and waste materials.
We are or may become subject to new or proposed laws and regulations that may have a direct effect (or indirect effect through our third-party specialists or airport facilities at which we operate) on our operations. In addition to other potential new regulations, U.S. airport authorities are exploring ways to limit de-icing fluid discharges to groundwater, which can result in additional costs to and restrictions on airlines required to participate in the construction of new or modified airport de-icing facilities. Additionally, air quality initiatives at the state and local level (including state implementation plans for achieving national ozone standards) could, in the future, result in curtailments in services, increased operating costs, limits on expansion, or further emission reduction requirements. Certain airports and/or state governments either have or are seeking to establish environmental fees and other requirements applicable to carbon/greenhouse gas emissions, local air quality pollutants, and/or noise. As a result, we may face increased taxes or costs related to greenhouse gas emissions, as well as other regulatory requirements.
Similarly, we are subject to environmental laws and regulations that require us to investigate and remediate soil or groundwater to meet certain remediation standards. Under certain laws, generators of waste materials and current and former owners or operators of facilities, can be subject to liability for investigation and remediation costs at locations that have been identified as requiring response actions. Liability under these laws may be strict, joint, and several, meaning that
Table of Contents
we could be liable for the costs of cleaning up environmental contamination regardless of fault or the amount of waste materials directly attributable to us.
We support our Partner Airlines’ goals and strategies to reduce carbon emissions on flights we operate under our code-share agreements and, as we work to support each of our Partner Airlines’ goals and strategies, initiatives to reduce emissions may not materialize and could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business plans, strategies, results of operations, and the price of our common stock.
Under our flying contracts, our Partner Airlines are responsible for fuel procurement and have significant control over our flight schedules. Accordingly, we anticipate our Partner Airlines will take responsibility for carbon emissions incurred on our contract flights. Each of our Partner Airlines may have different goals, strategies and timelines to reduce carbon emissions on our flights. We are largely dependent on the direction from our Partner Airlines regarding long-term fuel saving initiatives such as engine innovations reducing fuel consumption, use of sustainable alternative fuels, carbon sequestration programs, and air traffic flow routing efficiencies, among other initiatives. Each of our Partner Airlines may pursue alternative strategies and goals to reduce carbon emissions on flights we operate under our code-share agreements that may impact the rate at which we are able to reduce our carbon emissions, if at all. There is no assurance our Partner Airlines will take responsibility for carbon emissions incurred under our contract flights and no assurance future long-term fuel saving initiatives will materialize. In the event we pursue initiatives to reduce our carbon emissions, the cost could materially and adversely affect our business plans, results of operations, and the price of our common stock.
Risks Related to our Industry
Airlines are often affected by factors beyond their control, including economic conditions, air traffic congestion at airports, air traffic control inefficiencies, government shutdowns, major construction or improvements at airports, FAA grounding of aircraft, increased security measures, new travel-related taxes and fees, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters.
Demand for air travel could weaken in an economic recession or due to other factors that are outside of our control. The airline industry is highly cyclical and the level of demand for air travel is correlated to the strength of the U.S. and global economies, including unemployment levels, consumer confidence levels and the availability of consumer and business credit. Air transportation is often a discretionary purchase that leisure travelers may limit or eliminate during difficult economic times. Short-haul travelers, in particular, have the option to replace air travel with surface travel. In addition, during periods of unfavorable economic conditions, business travelers historically have reduced the volume of their travel, either due to cost-saving initiatives, the replacement of travel with alternatives such as videoconferencing, or as a result of decreased business activity requiring travel. Furthermore, an increase in price levels generally or in price levels in a particular sector (such as current inflationary pressures related to domestic and global supply chain constraints, which have led to both overall price increases and pronounced price increases in certain sectors) could result in a shift in consumer demand away from both leisure and business travel. Any of the foregoing could have a significant negative impact on our results of operations and the price of our common stock.
Our business is also affected by other factors beyond our control, including air traffic congestion at airports, air traffic control inefficiencies, government shutdowns, major construction or improvements at airports at which we operate, increased security measures, new travel-related taxes and fees, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, and public health events, including the outbreak of disease (such as the COVID-19 pandemic). During periods of fog, ice, low temperatures, storms, or other adverse weather conditions, flights may be cancelled or significantly delayed. For example, in 2025 , we cancelled approximately 3% of our scheduled flights due to extreme weather.
The Federal government controls all U.S. airspace, and airlines are completely dependent on the FAA to operate that airspace in a safe, efficient, and affordable manner. The air traffic control system, which is operated by the FAA, faces challenges in managing the growing demand for U.S. air travel. U.S. and foreign air-traffic controllers often rely on outdated technologies that routinely overwhelm the system and compel airlines to fly inefficient, indirect routes resulting in delays, and such delays may impact our operations. The Federal government also controls airport security. In addition, Congress could enact legislation that could impose a wide range of consumer protection requirements, which could
Table of Contents
increase the costs of doing business. Further, implementation of the Next Generation Air Transport System, or NextGen, by the FAA could result in changes to required aircraft equipment or aircraft routings and flight paths that could lead to increased flight time and potentially increased costs. In addition, Federal government shutdowns can affect the availability of federal resources necessary to provide air traffic control and airport security. Furthermore, a Federal government grounding of our aircraft type could result in flight cancellations and adversely affect our business.
Adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, thunderstorms, winter snowstorms, or earthquakes, can cause flight cancellations or significant delays, and in the past have led to Congressional demands for investigations. Cancellations or delays due to adverse weather conditions or natural disasters, air traffic control problems or inefficiencies, breaches in security, or other factors may affect us to a greater degree than other, larger airlines that may be able to recover more quickly from these events, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, the price of our common stock, and financial condition to a greater degree. Similarly, outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, such as COVID-19, Ebola, measles, avian flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1 (swine) flu, pertussis (whooping cough), and zika virus, or their respective variants, have resulted and could continue to result in significant decreases in passenger traffic and the imposition of government restrictions in service and could have a material adverse impact on the airline industry. Any increases in travel-related taxes could also result in decreases in passenger traffic. Any general reduction in airline passenger traffic could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, the price of our common stock, and financial condition. Moreover, U.S. Federal government shutdowns may cause delays and cancellations or reductions in discretionary travel due to longer security lines, including as a result of furloughed government employees, or reductions in staffing levels, including air traffic controllers. U.S. government shutdowns may also impact our ability to take delivery of aircraft and commence operations in new domestic stations. Any extended shutdown may have a negative impact on our operations.
Under our CPAs, our regional airline business is partially protected against cancellations due to weather or air traffic control, although these factors may affect our ability to receive variable revenues for flight completions and incentive payments for flying more than the minimum number of flights specified in our CPAs.
The airline industry is heavily regulated.
Airlines are subject to extensive regulatory and legal compliance requirements, both domestically and internationally, that impose significant costs. In the last several years, Congress has passed laws and the FAA, DOT, and TSA have issued regulations, orders, directives, rulings, and guidance relating to the operation, maintenance, safety, and security of airlines and to consumer protections that have required significant expenditures. We expect to continue to incur expenses in connection with complying with such laws and government regulations, orders, directives, rulings, and guidance. FAA requirements cover, among other things, retirement of aged aircraft, collision avoidance systems, airborne wind shear avoidance systems, noise abatement, aircraft safety measures, and increased inspection and maintenance procedures to be conducted on older aircraft.
The FAA, in its authority granted by U.S. Federal legislation, issues mandatory regulations and orders relating to, among other things, pilot and flight attendant rest rules, air traffic procedures, the grounding of aircraft, inspection of aircraft, installation of new safety-related items, and removal, replacement, or modification of aircraft parts that have failed or may fail in the future. We are dependent on the operation of the FAA even in times of government agency closures and employee furloughs affected by intermittent periods of shutdown of the U.S. government. Our inability to secure the necessary registrations, permits, and approvals from the FAA in these times could impact our ability to operate our aircraft, which could in turn, adversely impact our results of operations and the price of our common stock. Similarly, a decision by the FAA to ground, or require time consuming inspections of or maintenance on, all or any of our aircraft, for any reason, could negatively impact our results of operations and the price of our common stock.
In addition to state and Federal regulation, airports, and municipalities enact rules and regulations that affect our operations. The imposition of any limits on the use of our aircraft at any airport at which it operates could interfere with our obligations under our CPAs and severely interrupt our business operations.
Table of Contents
Additional laws, regulations, taxes, and increased airport rates and charges have been proposed from time to time that could significantly increase the cost of airline operations or reduce the demand for air travel.
We incur substantial costs in maintaining our current certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules, and regulations to which we are subject. We cannot predict whether we will be able to comply with all present and future laws, rules, regulations, and certification requirements or that the cost of continued compliance will not significantly increase our costs of doing business.
The DOT has broad authority over airlines and their consumer and competitive practices and has used this authority to issue numerous regulations and pursue enforcement actions, including rules and fines relating to the handling of lengthy tarmac delays, consumer notice requirements, consumer complaints, customer service commitments, contracts of carriage, and the transportation of passengers with disabilities. Among these are recently issued rules on refunds on airfare, baggage fees, and ancillary services, rules on disclosure of information regarding fees for ancillary services and rules regarding accommodation of passengers with disabilities. Furthermore, in 2024 , the U.S. Congress approved a five -year reauthorization for the FAA, which encompasses significant aviation tax and policy-related issues. The law includes a range of policy changes related to enhancing aviation safety, improving and modernizing air traffic control, and strengthening the aviation workforce, implementation of some items continues into the new Administration, and depending on how they are implemented, could impact our operations and costs.
The airline industry is highly competitive and has undergone a period of consolidation and transition leaving fewer potential partners, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
The airline industry is highly competitive and has undergone a period of consolidation and transition leaving fewer potential partners, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We compete with other regional airlines, some of which are owned by or operated as partners of major airlines, on various factors including, but not limited to labor resources, including pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians, and dispatchers; financial resources, including the ability to finance aircraft at competitive terms; geographical infrastructure; and overall customer service levels relating to on-time arrival and flight completion percentages. Our Partner Airlines rely on us to fly passengers from various locations into their hubs under our CPAs at competitive terms. Within the airline industry, we also face indirect competition from low-cost or ultra-low-cost carriers who compete with our Partner Airlines on many routes we operate, and major airlines on many of our routes, including carriers that fly point to point instead of to, or through, a hub. Additionally, future developments of electric-powered aircraft designed to operate on routes typically served by regional aircraft could impact our Partner Airlines’ strategy and result in reduction of demand or increase our capital expenditures and could have a negative impact on our business and financial condition.
In addition, some of our competitors are larger and have significantly greater financial and other resources than we do. Moreover, federal deregulation of the industry allows competitors to rapidly enter our markets and to quickly discount and restructure fares. The airline industry is particularly susceptible to price discounting because airlines incur only nominal costs to provide service to passengers occupying otherwise unsold seats.
In addition to traditional competition among airlines, the industry faces competition from videoconferencing and other methods of electronic communication. New advances in technology may add a new dimension of competition to the industry as business travelers seek lower-cost substitutes for air travel.
The DOT has broad authority over airlines and their consumer and competitive practices and has used this authority to issue numerous regulations and pursue enforcement actions, including rules and fines relating to the handling of lengthy tarmac delays, consumer notice requirements, consumer complaints, customer service commitments, contracts of carriage, and the transportation of passengers with disabilities. Among these is the series of Enhanced Airline Passenger Protection rules issued by the DOT. See “ The airline industry is heavily regulated .”
Furthermore, the airline industry has undergone substantial consolidation, and any additional consolidation or significant alliance activity within the airline industry could further limit the number of potential partners with whom we could enter into CPAs, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Table of Contents
Terrorist activities or warnings have dramatically impacted the airline industry and will likely continue to do so.
Past terrorist attacks and their aftermath negatively impacted the airline industry in general, including our operations. If additional terrorist attacks or other acts of violence are launched against the airline industry, there will be lasting consequences of such attacks, which may include loss of life, property damage, increased security, and insurance costs, increased concerns about future terrorist attacks, increased government regulation, and airport delays due to heightened security. We cannot provide any assurance that these events will not harm the airline industry generally or our operations or financial condition in particular.
General Risks Related to Us
We are increasingly dependent on technology, and if our technology fails, we do not adequately continue to invest in new technology or we are the subject of any cybersecurity incidents of our information technology infrastructure, our business may be adversely affected.
The performance and reliability of our technology, and the technology of our Partner Airlines, are critical to our ability to compete effectively. We have become increasingly dependent on technology to manage our flight operations, reduce costs, and compete in the current business environment, such as software programs supporting flight operations, supply chain logistics, crew scheduling, and crew communications. Technology initiatives will continue to require significant capital investments in order to deliver these expected benefits. If we are unable to make these investments, the technology fails, or the expected benefits do not materialize, our business and operations could be negatively affected.
Any internal technological error or failure or large-scale external interruption in the information systems, networks, hardware, software, and technological infrastructure we depend on, such as U.S. air traffic control systems, power, telecommunications, or the internet, may disrupt our internal network, impact our ability to conduct our business, lower the utilization of our aircraft, negatively impact our reputation, lower revenue, and/or result in increased costs. Our technological systems (including those provided by third parties) and those of our Partner Airlines, may be vulnerable to a variety of sources of interruption due to events beyond our control, including natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications or IT System failures, computer viruses, hackers, and other security issues.
In addition, as a part of our ordinary business operations, we collect and store sensitive data, including the personal information of our employees. Our information systems are subject to an increasing threat of continually evolving cybersecurity risks that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of such systems. Unauthorized parties, including diverse threat actors such as state-sponsored organizations, opportunistic hackers and hacktivists, may attempt to gain access to our technological systems or information through fraud or other means of deception, including through diverse attack vectors, such as social engineering/phishing, security breaches, malfeasance by insiders, human, or technological error, computer viruses, malicious destructive code, misconfigurations “bugs”, or other vulnerabilities in commercial software that is integrated into our technological systems. The methods used to obtain unauthorized access, disable, or degrade service, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving and threat actors are becoming increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools—including artificial intelligence—that circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate or to detect, investigate, remediate, or recover from attacks or incidents for long periods of time.
We may not be able to prevent all data security breaches or misuse of data. The compromise of our technology systems resulting in the loss, disclosure, misappropriation of, or access to, employees’ or business partners’ information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disruption to our operations, and damage to our reputation, any or all of which could adversely affect its business and financial condition.
Our ability to obtain financing or access capital markets may be limited.
There are a number of factors that may limit our ability to raise financing or access capital markets in the future, including our significant debt and future contractual obligations, our liquidity and credit status, our operating cash flows, the market conditions in the airline industry, U.S. and global economic conditions, the general state of the capital markets,
Table of Contents
and the financial position of the major providers of commercial aircraft financing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to source external financing for our planned aircraft acquisitions or for other significant capital needs, and if we are unable to source financing on acceptable terms, or if we are unable to source financing at all, our business could be materially and adversely affected. To the extent we finance our activities with additional debt, we may become subject to financial and other covenants that may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategy or otherwise constrain our growth and operations.
Our business strategy includes making investments that complement our existing business. These investments could be unsuccessful or consume significant resources, which could adversely affect our operating results.
Some of the businesses we may seek to invest in may be marginally profitable or unprofitable. For these businesses to achieve acceptable levels of profitability, we may need to improve their management and operations. Investments may involve significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence, operating losses, and expenses. It may be difficult for us to complete investments quickly or integrate investments efficiently into our current business operations. Any investments may ultimately harm our business or financial condition, as such investments may not be successful and may ultimately result in impairment charges.
Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock
The market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of an investment in our stock to decline.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including: (i) announcements concerning our Partner Airlines, competitors, the airline industry, or the economy in general; (ii) strategic actions by us, our Partner Airlines, or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings; (iii) media reports and publications about the safety of our aircraft or the types of aircraft we operate; (iv) new regulatory pronouncements and changes in regulatory guidelines; (v) announcements concerning the availability of the types of aircraft we use; (vi) significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of companies in the airline industry; (vii) changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts or failure to meet analysts’ performance expectations; (viii) sales of our common stock or other actions by insiders or investors with significant shareholdings, including sales by our principal shareholders; and (ix) general market, political and other economic conditions; and (x) in response to the risk factors described in this Report.
The stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. Broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. In the past, shareholders have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. Any similar litigation against us could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and the price of our common stock .
Provisions in our charter documents might deter acquisition bids for us, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Our second amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that, among other things:
• authorize our Board of Directors, without shareholder approval, to designate and fix the voting powers, designations, preferences, limitations, restrictions, and relative rights of one or more series of preferred stock so designated, or right to acquire such preferred stock;
• dilute the interest of, or impair the voting power of, holders of our common stock and could also have the effect of discouraging, delaying, or preventing a change of control;
• establish advance notice procedures that shareholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our Board of Directors and propose matters to be brought before an annual or special meeting of our shareholders,
Table of Contents
which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company;
• authorize a majority of our Board of Directors to appoint a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of our Board of Directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which may prevent shareholders from being able to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors;
• restrict the number of directors constituting our Board of Directors to within a set range, and give our Board of Directors exclusive authority to increase or decrease the number of directors within such range, which may prevent shareholders from being able to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors; and
• restrict the ability of shareholders to call special meetings of shareholders.
We currently do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment is if the price of our common stock appreciates.
We have not historically paid dividends on shares of our common stock and do not expect to pay dividends on such shares in the foreseeable future. Additionally, our United CPA, certain of our aircraft lease facilities, and our loan with the U.S. Treasury contain restrictions that limit our ability to or prohibit us from paying dividends to holders of our common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, restrictions contained in current or future leases and financing instruments, business prospects and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant, including restrictions under applicable law. Consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a positive return on your investment in us will be if the market price of our common stock appreciates.
MD&A (Item 7)
10,158 words
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, the accompanying notes, and the other financial information included elsewhere in this Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties,
Table of Contents
and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements below. Factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in this Report.
Overview
We are the second largest independent regional airline in the United States based on total fleet and daily departures. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had an operational fleet of 275 and 208 regional jet aircraft that regularly provides scheduled passenger service on approximately 1,300 and 1,000 daily flights, to approximately 130 and 90 cities, respectively, in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean.
On November 25, 2025, the Company and Mesa Air Group, Inc. (“Mesa Parent”), former parent company of Mesa Airlines, completed the Merger of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. and Mesa Air Group, Inc., whereby the Company merged with and into Mesa Air Group, Inc. (the “Merger”). The legal entity Mesa Air Group, Inc. continued as the surviving corporation; however, upon completion of the Merger, the legal entity was renamed Republic Airways Holdings Inc . The Company, on a pre-Merger basis, is referred to as “Legacy Republic.” The Company includes the operations of Legacy Republic and, beginning on November 25, 2025, also includes the operations, financial position, and cash flows of the former entity Mesa Air Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. S ee Note 3, Merger with Mesa Air Group, Inc. , in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Report.
Substantially all of our flights are operated under multi-year CPAs with our Partner Airlines. We exclusively operate the dual class Embraer E170/175 family of aircraft and are one of the world’s largest operators of that popular aircraft type. Under the CPAs, we provide substantially all of our flight capacity to our Partner Airlines. Our compensation is not materially or directly affected by variations in fares or passenger load factors, nor by variations in the price of fuel, the cost of which is paid directly by our Partner Airlines, effectively providing us with contractual monthly revenues, while reducing our exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices, fare competition, and passenger loads. In 2025 and 2024 , we carried passengers on more than 371,000 and 323,000 flights, generating revenue s of $1,676.5 million and $1,474.0 million and pre- tax income of $113.4 million and $86.9 million , respectively.
We operate under our Partner Airlines’ two-letter flight designation codes, paint our aircraft in the style of our Partner Airlines’ brand requirements, and use our Partner Airlines’ service marks to market ourselves as a carrier for our Partner Airlines. Our Partner Airlines control route selection, pricing, seat inventories, marketing, and scheduling, and provide us with ground support services, airport take-off and landing slots, and gate access, allowing us to focus on operational excellence, positioning ourselves as the regional airline of choice for our Partner Airlines and passengers through the delivery of safe, clean, reliable, and efficient regional service. For the year ended December 31, 2025 , American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines accounted for 43%, 28%, and 29% of our departures, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, Bryan K. Bedford, our former Chief Executive Officer, was nominated and subsequently confirmed for service as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. In connection with such nomination, Mr. Bedford retired effective July 1, 2025 . We paid a cash payment of $16.0 million related to his employment contract. Upon effectiveness of his retirement, 652,475 shares were considered earned and vested immediately, resulting in additional compensation expense of $9.8 million . We recorded total expense of approximately $20.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 related to Mr. Bedford’s separation and retirement, which includes $2.0 million related to subsequent remeasurements of Mr. Bedford’s awards. Matthew Koscal, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, was promoted to President and Chief Commercial Officer, and David Grizzle, Chairman of the Board of Directors, began serving as Chief Executive Officer upon Mr. Bedford’s retirement on July 1, 2025 . During the year ended December 31, 2025, we announced that the Board of Directors expects that Mr. Koscal will succeed Mr. Grizzle in the position of CEO during the year ending December 31, 2026, at which time David Grizzle will return to the position of non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. Any final succession decision will be determined at a future undetermined date, in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors and publicly announced, as legally required.
Table of Contents
Factors, Trends, and Uncertainties Affecting Republic’s Business
We believe our operating and business performance is driven by various factors that typically affect regional airlines and their markets, including factors and trends which affect the broader airline and travel industries. The following key factors, trends, and uncertainties have affected our historical results of operations and may materially affect our future performance:
Availability and Training of Qualified Pilots . Effective July 15, 2013 , as directed by U.S. Congress, the FAA issued more stringent pilot qualification and crew member flight training standards, which, among other things, increased the required training time for new commercial airline pilots from 250 hours to 1,500 hours of flight time. With these changes, the supply of qualified pilot candidates eligible for hiring by the airline industry has been dramatically reduced in recent years. In addition, the FAA’s mandatory retirement age of 65 is expected to cause a significant number of pilots to retire over the next decade.
To address the expected increasingly diminished supply of qualified pilot candidates, we developed and launched a proprietary flight training school called LIFT Academy in 2018 and continue to develop relationships with flight schools across the country to help fulfill our need for pilots. Since its founding in 2018 in Indianapolis, IN , LIFT Academy expanded its operations with additional flight school locations in Columbia, SC, Myrtle Beach, SC, Galveston, TX, Columbus, IN and at Moton Field in partnership with Tuskegee University in Tuskegee, AL.
We also entered into a partnership with Hyannis Air Service Inc. d/b/a Cape Air and Nantucket Airlines (“Cape Air”) in order to create a pipeline of talent from LIFT Academy to Cape Air and then to Republic to provide additional structured pathways for accumulation of the FAA 1,500 flight hour requirement. This strategic partnership will help us retain talented pilots as they transition from LIFT Academy students to pilots at Republic in less time and with more experience. We also built a state-of-the-art aviation campus that opened in early 2023 . Finally, we have undertaken substantial efforts to generate renewed interest in the industry, including developing partnerships with secondary education institutions to promote the availability of careers in aviation. Our ability to grow and continue to provide safe, clean, and reliable regional airline services to our Partner Airlines will depend on our ability to successfully attract, train, and develop pilots. Furthermore, pilot training and development is constrained by the availability of full motion flight simulation equipment in the marketplace. In order to ensure access to this equipment, we have acquired one flight simulator and have long-term lease agreements in place that guarantee a minimum level of flight simulator availability and provide for potential access to additional flight simulators.
Pilot Attrition and Staffing Base. We experience significant volatility in our attrition as a result of the demand for pilots at mainline, low-cost, and cargo carriers who obtain pilot hires, in part, from regional airlines. Pilot attrition could be a factor impacting our results and ability to acquire new market share in future periods. In addition, the lead-time in acquiring and training new pilots requires that we grow our pilot staffing base in excess of our then-current need when we accept new business and expand our fleet.
Workforce Development. Over the past few years we have expanded our investment in LIFT Academy to address workforce development needs to include a DOL approved maintenance technician apprenticeship program and CFR Part 145 repair station to expand the level of experience and learning opportunities afforded to technicians and other aspiring aviation operations personnel. In addition, we secured a partnership with Cape Air to create a flow program of talented aviators from LIFT Academy to Cape Air to supplement their workforce in exchange for flight hours and valuable experience. We also built a state-of-the-art aviation campus that houses simulators, a cabin trainer, and classrooms to train our pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians, dispatchers, and other employees. Our inability to source qualified aviation personnel, whether from LIFT Academy or externally, may adversely impact our ability to operate in a cost-effective manner, expand our fleet, and carry out reliable operations.
The Company also operates Bridge Air with a dedication to helping aviation professionals achieve their dream of becoming a commercial airline pilot as quickly, safely, and inexpensively as possible.
Table of Contents
Labor. The airline industry is heavily unionized. The wages, benefits, and work rules of unionized airline industry employees are determined by our CBAs. As of December 31, 2025 , approximately 71% of our workforce was represented under CBAs. The terms and conditions of our future CBAs may be affected by the results of collective bargaining negotiations at other airlines, regional or otherwise, that may have a greater ability, due to larger scale, greater efficiency, or other factors, to bear higher wage costs than we can. In addition, conflicts between airlines and their unions can lead to work slowdowns or stoppages. A strike or other significant labor dispute with our unionized employees may adversely affect our ability to conduct business.
Competition. The airline industry is highly competitive. We compete principally with other regional airlines. Major airlines typically award CPAs to regional airlines based on the following criteria: (i) ability to fly contracted schedules; (ii) availability of labor resources (including pilots); (iii) low operating cost; (iv) financial resources; (v) geographical infrastructure; (vi) overall customer service and reliability levels such as on-time arrival and flight completion percentages; and (vii) the overall image of the regional airline. Our ability to earn additional flying opportunities in the future will depend, in significant part, on our ability to consistently operate as a safe, clean, reliable, cost-effective, and high-quality regional airline.
Market Volatility. The airline industry is volatile and sensitive to economic cycles and trends. Declining consumer confidence and discretionary spending, fear of terrorism or war, fear of a global pandemic, weakening economic conditions, fare initiatives, fluctuations in fuel prices, labor actions and wage escalation, changes in governmental regulations on taxes, fees and tariffs, weather, and other factors have contributed to a number of reorganizations, bankruptcies, liquidations, and business combinations among major and regional air carriers. The effect of economic cycles and trends may be somewhat mitigated by our reliance on long-term CPAs. If, however, any of our Partner Airlines experience a prolonged decline in the number of passengers served or is negatively affected by low ticket prices or high fuel prices, it may seek rate reductions in future CPAs or materially reduce its scheduled flights in order to reduce its costs. Our financial performance could be negatively impacted by any adverse changes to contracted revenue rates, number of aircraft in the fleet, or utilization under our CPAs.
Maintenance Contracts, Costs, and Timing. Our associates perform routine airframe and engine maintenance along with periodic inspections of equipment at our maintenance facilities. We also use third-party vendors for certain heavy airframe, engine, and other maintenance work, along with parts procurement and component overhaul services for our aircraft fleet.
The average age of our aircraft is approximately 13.0 years. Due to the age of certain aircraft, our aircraft require less overall maintenance now than they will in the future. As our aircraft fleet ages and warranties expire, we expect that our maintenance costs will increase in absolute terms and as a percentage of revenues.
We use the direct expense method of accounting for our maintenance of regional jet engine overhauls, airframe, landing gear, and normal recurring maintenance whereby we recognize expense as maintenance work is completed or over the repair period, if materially different. While we keep a record of expected maintenance events, the actual timing and costs of major engine maintenance expense are subject to variables such as estimated usage, government regulations (including tariffs), the extent of the occurrence of unscheduled maintenance events, and their actual costs. Accordingly, we cannot reliably quantify the cost or timing of future maintenance-related expenses for any significant period of time.
In addition, we have entered into long-term maintenance “power-by-the-hour” service contracts with third-party maintenance providers under which we are charged fixed rates for each flight hour or other measure accumulated by the majority of our engines and some of the major airframe components. The effect of such contracts is to reduce the volatility of aircraft maintenance expense over the term of the maintenance agreement.
Aircraft Leasing and Finance Determinations. We have generally funded aircraft acquisitions through a combination of debt financing, finance leases, and operating leases. Our decision to finance the acquisition of aircraft through leases or secured debt may be influenced by a variety of factors, including the preferences of our Partner Airlines, the strength of our balance sheet and credit profile (and those of our Partner Airlines), the length and terms of the available financing alternatives, prevailing market interest rates, and any lease return condition requirements. Generally, under our
Table of Contents
CPAs, the monthly ownership costs of the aircraft we operate are reimbursed, in whole or in part, by our Partner Airlines. When practical, we prefer to finance aircraft through secured debt rather than with leasing products, due to the accelerated tax depreciation benefits, opportunity to acquire equity in our aircraft, absence of lease return conditions, and greater flexibility in renewing the aircraft under our CPAs with our Partner Airlines at end of term. We currently own or have finance leases on 66% of our existing aircraft and expect to own, rather than lease, a majority of any new fleet acquired. The remaining 34% of our fleet is owned directly by certain of our Partner Airlines, which we refer to as “Partner Controlled Aircraft.” Subsequent to the initial acquisition of an aircraft, we may also refinance the aircraft or convert one form of financing to another (e.g. replacing an aircraft operating lease with debt financing or vice versa) to meet our capital needs at a given time.
As of December 31, 2025 , we ha ve 11 aircraft subject to finance leases. At lease inception, we make certain estimates in order to determine the proper classification of our leased aircraft as either operating leases or finance leases, economic useful lives of subject assets, fair value of the asset under lease, as well as selection of an appropriate discount rate to be used in discounting future lease payments. These estimates also affect the value recorded for the finance lease asset and the corresponding finance lease liability, which is classified as current and long-term debt. Amortization of the finance lease asset is recorded to depreciation and amortization expense. The interest component of a finance lease payment is recorded to interest expense.
Seasonality. Our results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of those for the entire year, in part because the airline industry is subject to seasonal fluctuations and changes in general economic conditions. A significant portion of our CPAs is based on completing flights as scheduled, and we typically have more scheduled flights during the summer months and concurrently generally experience significant weather cancellations during the summer months, which negatively impacts our revenues during such months.
Key Components of Republic’s Results of Operations
Revenue
We operate under the American Eagle, Delta Connection, and United Express brands through our CPAs with American Airlines, Inc. (“American Airlines”), Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta Air Lines”), and United Airlines, Inc. (“United Airlines”), respectively. Under these arrangements, we receive fixed fees, as well as reimbursement of specified costs with additional possible incentives from our Partner Airlines for superior performance. Substantially all of our revenues are earned under our CPAs with our Partner Airlines. The number of aircraft we operate, aircraft utilization, and the rates we charge are the most significant drivers of our revenues. The number of passengers carried and the fares which revenue-generating passengers pay do not affect our revenues. We earn revenues based on aircraft utilization levels under the applicable CPAs with each of our Partner Airlines, subject to minimum utilization guarantees.
Revenues associated with regional jet services are generally derived from (i) a fixed fee per departure, flight hour, and/or block hour of time incurred and a fixed rate for available-to-schedule aircraft, payable on a monthly basis; and (ii) a premium amount, which is earned monthly or quarterly by maintaining minimum aircraft utilization levels and exemplary operating results. To the extent that minimum targets are not achieved, we could be subject to financial penalties. These fixed-fee rates are contractually subject to periodic economic adjustment. We also receive reimbursement from our Partner Airlines for direct expenses incurred such as qualifying maintenance activities, property taxes, and miscellaneous operating expenses. The Company refers to Partner reimbursements as “pass-through charges.” Certain charges such as fuel, landing fees, and certain ownership costs are generally paid directly by the Partner Airlines, although the charges were incurred by the Company in ongoing operations. The Company refers to these charges as “Partner direct charges.” Pass-through charges are primarily recorded to revenues and the corresponding operating expense on a gross basis. Pass-through charges recorded on a net basis are not material.
Amounts recognized as regional jet services revenues are measured at the contractual amount we expect we will be entitled to in exchange for the promised services. We allocate the transaction price as flights are completed with variable consideration that relates specifically to our efforts in delivering each flight recognized in the period in which the individual flight is completed and measured on a monthly basis. We record an estimate for incentive revenue based on our
Table of Contents
expected performance at the end of each period. These estimates are derived under accounting guidance related to variable consideration constraints and based on amounts expected to be collected. We have concluded that allocating the variability directly to the individual flights results in an overall allocation meeting the objectives in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 606, Revenue Recognition . This results in a pattern of revenue recognition that generally follows the variable amounts billed from us to our Partner Airlines.
Operating Expenses
A brief description of the items included in our operating expenses line items are as follows:
Wages and Benefits
This expense includes salaries and wages earned by our pilots, flight attendants, dispatchers, and other employees, as well as expenses associated with various employee benefit plans, stock-based compensation, employee incentives, and payroll taxes. These expenses fluctuate primarily based on our level of operations, changes in wage rates for contract and non-contract employees, and changes in costs of our benefit plans.
Aircraft and Engine Rent
This expense consists of the costs of aircraft and spare engines under operating leases. Leased aircraft (including wing-mounted engines) and spare engines are operated under long-term operating leases and subject to adjustment as costs associated with minimum lease return conditions become probable and able to be estimated, generally coinciding with the last heavy maintenance visit.
Maintenance and Repair
Maintenance and repair expenses include all materials and external labor required to maintain our aircraft and engines. We have entered into long-term maintenance “power-by-the-hour” service contracts with certain third-party maintenance providers under which we are charged fixed rates for each flight hour or departure accumulated by the majority of our engines and certain major airframe components. The effect of such contracts is to reduce the volatility of aircraft maintenance expense over the term of our maintenance agreements. All other maintenance charges are expensed as incurred under the direct expense method of accounting. Certain maintenance and repair activities, such as engine overhauls and heavy maintenance, qualify for reimbursement from our Partner Airlines under the pass-through provisions of our CPAs.
Depreciation and Amortization
This expense includes depreciation expense of all owned aircraft, property, and equipment which includes aircraft under debt obligations and finance leases, spare engines, flight equipment, general aviation aircraft, and ground equipment as well as amortization expense on leasehold improvements. Effective January 1, 2024, we revised the estimated useful lives of regional jet aircraft, spare engines, and flight equipment from 22.0 to 26.0 years in an effort to more closely align with market data impacting our fleet usage pattern.
Executive Separation and Merger-related Items
We classify certain operating expenses as executive separation and Merger-related items due to their nonrecurring or infrequently occurring nature.
Executive separation and Merger-related items are principally composed of transaction-related expenses incurred for the ongoing integration of Mesa Airlines into the legacy operations of the Company, post-employment benefit costs, and costs incurred for the consolidation of the airline operating certificates (“AOCs”) of Mesa Airlines, Inc. and Republic Airways, Inc., among others. The Company does not expect to incur costs of this nature following completion of Merger-related integration activities.
Table of Contents
Other Operating Expense
Costs of crew training, crew travel, facilities and administrative lease expenses, professional fees, software, and all other administrative and operational overhead expenses are recorded to other operating expense. Additionally, to the extent that these charges are incurred, we record expenses related to gains and losses on asset disposals, impairment charges, and bad debt expense to other operating expense.
Other Expense, net
Other expense, net is comprised of interest expense on secured and unsecured debt obligations, realized and unrealized gains and losses on fair value adjustments to marketable securities and non-current investments, warrants, and put options held with EVE Holdings, Inc. (“EVE”), and our minority interest in Cape Air and our proportionate share of income or losses of Cape Air. Additionally, we have a strategic partnership with EVE for the development of electric vertical takeoff and landing (“eVTOL”) aircraft.
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024
The following table sets forth information rega rding our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 :
(in millions)
$ Variance
% Variance
Revenues
Operating expenses:
Wages and benefits
Aircraft and engine rent
Maintenance and repair
Depreciation and amortization
Executive separation and Merger-related items
Other operating expense
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Total other expense
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
Net income % (1)
pts
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
Adjusted EBITDA % (2)
pts
Adjusted EBITDAR (2)
Adjusted EBITDAR % (2)
pts
(1) Net income % is net income expressed as a percentage of revenues.
(2) Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before executive separation and Merger-related items, interest expense, investment income, and other, net, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expense. Adjusted EBITDAR represents net income before executive separation and Merger-related items, interest expense, investment income, and other, net, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, and aircraft and engine rent. Adjusted EBITDA % and EBITDAR % are non-GAAP measures that represent Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR, respectively, expressed as a percentage of revenues. Republic’s management uses these metrics, and it believes these metrics are also useful to investors to understand Republic’s financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA %, Adjusted EBITDAR, and Adjusted EBITDAR % are included as supplemental disclosure because Republic’s management believes that they are well recognized valuation metrics in the airline industry that are
Table of Contents
frequently used by companies, investors, securities analysts, and other interested parties in comparing companies in Republic’s industry. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR have limitations as analytical tools. Some of the limitations applicable to these measures include:(i) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters Republic considers not to be indicative of its ongoing operations; (ii) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect Republic’s cash expenditures for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; (iii) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, Republic’s working capital needs; (iv) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect the interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on its debts; (v) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future and Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and (vi) other companies in Republic’s industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR differently than Republic does, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Adjusted EBITDAR should not be viewed as a measure of overall performance because it excludes aircraft and engine rent, which is a normal, recurring cash operating expense that is necessary to operate Republic’s business. For the foregoing reasons, each of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA %, Adjusted EBITDAR, and Adjusted EBITDAR % has significant limitations which affect its use as an indicator of Republic’s profitability. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information.
The following table presents the reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR for the periods presented below:
(in millions)
Net income
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization
Executive separation and Merger-related items
Interest expense
Investment income and other, net
Income tax expense
Adjusted EBITDA
Plus:
Aircraft and engine rent
Adjusted EBITDAR
The following table summarizes certain operating data that we believe are useful indicators of our operating performance for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 . We believe block hours, departures, and average daily utilization of each aircraft are our primary measures in evaluating aircraft production, incurrences of revenues and operating expenses, and efficiency of the Airline.
Operating Highlights
% Variance
Aircraft under operation for the Partner Airlines at period end (1)(2)
Block hours (3)
Departures
Average daily utilization of each aircraft (hours) (4)
Average length of aircraft haul (miles)
(1) Excludes five spare aircraft as of December 31, 2025.
(2) Excludes 31 aircraft that have been leased to another airline as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
(3) Reflects hours of aircraft movement from gate to gate (including taxi time before takeoff and after landing) until the aircraft comes to rest at the next point of landing.
Table of Contents
(4) Reflects average daily utilization in block hours (aircraft movement from gate to gate, including taxi time) for the greater of actual in-service aircraft or minimum contracted scheduled aircraft, if applicable.
Revenues
Revenues increased $202.5 million, or 13.7%, to $1,676.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $1,474.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily related to a $188.3 million increase in variable revenue year-over-year due in part to the increase in flying compared to the prior year. This included a 18.2% increase in block hour production and a 14.6% increase in departures due to increased daily utilization and contribution of additional flying under the new CPA with United Airlines resulting from the Merger, beginning November 25, 2025.
Operating expenses
Wages and benefits expense increased $85.4 million, or 12.6%, to $762.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $677.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to a $67.3 million increase in salaries and wages due largely to the 18.2% increase in block hour production.
Maintenance and repair expense increased $9.7 million, or 3.1%, to $320.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $311.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was due to a $28.2 million increase primarily in engine, rotable, landing gear, and auxiliary power unit repairs driven by a 18.2% increase in block hours, partially offset by a decrease in heavy check maintenance events and LLP contract expenses of $18.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $9.3 million, or 7.9%, to $126.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $117.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was due to the addition of new E175 aircraft delivered throughout 2024 and 2025, offset by the sale of six E175 aircraft during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Executive separation and Merger-related items expense increased $43.9 million to $47.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was due primarily to cash and share based compensation expenses related to the modification and acceleration of restricted stock awards upon Mr. Bedford’s retirement of $20.8 million, coupled with an increase in professional fees of $16.5 million year-over-year from the increased work scope and expenses related to the Merger, as well as an increase of $6.5 million in Merger-related compensation.
Other operating expense increased $25.8 million, or 11.5%, to $250.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $224.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to a $12.3 million increase in crew hotel and other travel expense caused by increased flying. Additionally, professional fees, software costs, and freight increased by $10.2 million, combined with a reduction of $3.6 million in gain from asset disposals, primarily related to the sale of aircraft year-over-year.
Other expense, net
Other expense, net increased $4.8 million, or 9.6%, to $54.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $50.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The table below shows the (increase) decrease related to the changes in other expense, net:
(in millions)
Unrealized gains from marketable securities
Interest expense
Other, net
Total
Table of Contents
Income tax expense
We recorded income tax expense of $37.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to income tax expense of $22.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 at an effective tax rate of 32.8% and 25.7%, respectively. Our effective tax rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 21.0% primarily due to state income taxes and valuation allowances on net operating losses. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded additional income tax expense of $8.1 million related to non-deductible items. We expect an effective tax rate of 29% in 2026.
Year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023
The following table sets forth information regarding our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023:
(in millions)
$ Variance
% Variance
Revenues
Operating expenses:
Wages and benefits
Aircraft and engine rent
Maintenance and repair
Depreciation and amortization
Executive separation and Merger-related items
Other operating expense
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Total other expense
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income
Net income % (1)
pts
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
Adjusted EBITDA % (2)
pts
Adjusted EBITDAR (2)
Adjusted EBITDAR % (2)
pts
(1) Net income % is net income expressed as a percentage of revenues.
(2) Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before executive separation and Merger-related items, interest expense, investment income, and other, net, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expense. Adjusted EBITDAR represents net income before executive separation and Merger-related items, interest expense, investment income, and other, net, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, and aircraft and engine rent. Adjusted EBITDA % and EBITDAR % are non-GAAP measures that represent Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR, respectively, expressed as a percentage of revenues. Republic’s management uses these metrics, and it believes these metrics are also useful to investors to understand Republic’s financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA %, Adjusted EBITDAR, and Adjusted EBITDAR % are included as supplemental disclosure because Republic’s management believes that they are well recognized valuation metrics in the airline industry that are frequently used by companies, investors, securities analysts, and other interested parties in comparing companies in Republic’s industry. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR have limitations as analytical tools. Some of the limitations applicable to these measures include:(i) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters Republic considers not to be indicative of its ongoing operations; (ii) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect Republic’s cash expenditures for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; (iii) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, Republic’s working capital needs; (iv) Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect the interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on its debts; (v) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future and Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and (vi) other companies in Republic’s industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR differently than Republic
Table of Contents
does, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Adjusted EBITDAR should not be viewed as a measure of overall performance because it excludes aircraft and engine rent, which is a normal, recurring cash operating expense that is necessary to operate Republic’s business. For the foregoing reasons, each of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA %, Adjusted EBITDAR, and Adjusted EBITDAR % has significant limitations which affect its use as an indicator of Republic’s profitability. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information.
The following table presents the reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAR for the periods presented below:
(in millions)
Net income
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization
Executive separation and Merger-related items
Interest expense
Investment income and other, net
Income tax expense
Adjusted EBITDA
Plus:
Aircraft and engine rent
Adjusted EBITDAR
The following table summarizes certain operating data that we believe are useful indicators of our operating performance for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 . We believe block hours, departures, and average daily utilization of each aircraft are our primary measures in evaluating aircraft production, incurrences of revenues and operating expenses, and efficiency of the Airline.
Operating Highlights
% Variance
Aircraft under operation for the Partner Airlines at period end (1)(2)
Block hours (3)
Departures
Average daily utilization of each aircraft (hours) (4)
Average length of aircraft haul (miles)
(1) Excludes one spare aircraft as of December 31, 2023.
(2) Excludes 31 and 25 aircraft that have been leased to another airline as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(3) Reflects hours of aircraft movement from gate to gate (including taxi time before takeoff and after landing) until the aircraft comes to rest at the next point of landing.
(4) Reflects average daily utilization in block hours (aircraft movement from gate to gate, including taxi time) for the greater of actual in-service aircraft or minimum contracted scheduled aircraft, if applicable.
Revenues
Revenues increased $44.9 million, or 3.1%, to $1,474.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $1,429.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily related to a $83.8 million or 9.0% increase in Carrier-Controlled Revenue year-over-year due in part to the increase in flying compared to the prior year. This included a 5.3% increase in block hours, a 5.4% increase in flight hours, and a 5.0% increase in departures. This was offset by a $40.0
Table of Contents
million, or 13.1% decrease in aircraft ownership revenue due to fleet changes that occurred throughout the year ended December 31, 2024.
Operating expenses
Wages and benefits expense increased $22.4 million, or 3.4%, to $677.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $654.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in wages and benefits expense was primarily due to the 5.3% increase in block hour production.
Maintenance and repair expense increased $25.9 million, or 9.1%, to $311.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $285.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in maintenance and repair expense was primarily due to the 5.3% increase in block hour production.
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $42.4 million, or 26.6%, to $117.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $159.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Effective January 1, 2024, we revised the estimated useful lives of regional jet aircraft, spare engines, and flight equipment from 22.0 years to 26.0 years in an effort to closely align with our expectation of utilization of the aircraft, including engine life limited parts replacement (“LLP”). The change in accounting estimate on the then-current fleet assets decreased depreciation and amortization expense by $50.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. This was offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $7.4 million due to the delivery of six and 13 new aircraft during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and further offset by additional depreciation for building assets put into service in the year ended December 31, 2024.
Executive separation and Merger-related items expense increased $2.9 million to $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to an increase in professional fees of $2.9 million year-over-year caused by increased work scope related to the Merger due diligence.
Other operating expense increased $36.9 million, or 19.6%, to $224.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $187.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized a $2.5 million gain on the sale of six E175 aircraft compared to a $11.4 million gain on the sale of six E175 aircraft during the year ended December 31, 2023. This was coupled with a $7.0 million increase in professional fees and software costs, and a $5.2 million increase in travel expenses caused by a 5.3% increase in block hour production when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023.
Other expense, net
Other expense, net increased $2.8 million, or 5.9%, to $50.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $47.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The table below shows the (increase) decrease related to the changes in other expense, net:
(in millions)
Unrealized gains from marketable securities
Interest expense
Other, net
Total
Income tax expense
We recorded income tax expense of $22.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to income tax expense of $33.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 at an effective tax rate of 25.7% and 37.7%, respectively. Our effective tax rates differ from the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to state income taxes, valuation allowances on state net operating losses, and certain non-deductible expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2024
Table of Contents
and 2023, our effective state income tax rate increased due to increased operations in higher income tax jurisdictions, resulting in $1.2 million and $12.2 million of additional income tax expense, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require cash to fund our operating expenses and working capital requirements, including outlays to fund capital expenditures, aircraft pre-delivery deposit payments, maintenance expenses, aircraft rent, and debt service obligations, including principal and interest payments. Our cash needs vary from period to period, primarily based on the timing and costs of significant maintenance events and capital expenditures. Our principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand and liquid investments, including investments in marketable securities, cash generated from operations, and funds raised from external borrowings or offerings. In the near term, we expect to fund our primary cash requirements through cash generated from operations, cash, and cash equivalents on hand (including our investments in marketable securities), and funds from new borrowings on aircraft deliveries and our aviation campus. There is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any additional liquidity from third-party creditors. We believe that cash flow from operating activities coupled with existing cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities will be adequate to fund our operating and capital needs through at least the next 12 months.
As of December 31, 2025 , we had a working capital deficit of $33.6 million . The airline industry is highly capital intensive due to the nature and financing methods for its fleet assets used to generate operating cash flows. If we fail to generate sufficient funds from operations to repay such obligations, we may need to raise capital through the issuance of equity or obtain or refinance borrowings to meet our existing obligations. There can be no assurance that such equity transactions or borrowings will be available or, if available, will be at terms, rates, or prices acceptable to us.
The following table summarizes our total cash and marketable securities as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 as well as our operating, investing, and financing cash flow activities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 :
(in millions)
$ Variance
% Variance
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Marketable securities
Total
(in millions)
$ Variance
% Variance
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
During the year ended December 31, 2025 , total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable security positions decreased $3.5 million, or 1.1%, to $319.9 million as of December 31, 2025 from $323.4 million as of December 31, 2024.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $95.9 million, or 42.4%, to $322.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 from $226.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was attributable to the increase in earnings excluding non-cash expenses, coupled with changes in working capital accounts from the timing of collection of receivables and settlement of liabilities when compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $245.4 million to $350.9 million net cash used during the year ended December 31, 2025 from $105.5 million net cash used during the year ended December 31, 2024. We purchased $176.2 million and redeemed $212.5 million in marketable securities and investments during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to purchases of $187.3 million and redemptions of $255.3 million in marketable securities and investments during the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, we acquired 12 E175 regional aircraft and sold no E175 regional
Table of Contents
aircraft resulting in proceeds during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the acquisition of six E175 regional aircraft and the sale of six E175 regional aircraft resulting in proceeds during the year ended December 31, 2024. We also received $22.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 in connection with the Merger.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities changed $156.9 million to $54.7 million net cash provided for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $102.2 million net cash used for the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we obtained secured borrowings resulting in cash inflows of $299.4 million, compared to obtaining secured borrowings resulting in cash inflows of $177.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. Additionally, there were no accelerated payments and early debt extinguishments for aircraft-related notes during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the accelerated payment and early debt extinguishment for aircraft-related notes of $37.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Our credit agreements require that we comply with customary affirmative and negative covenants. We believe we are in compliance with all of our financial covenants as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Letters of Credit
As we enter new markets, increase the amount of maintenance space we lease, or add leased aircraft, we are often required to provide airport authorities and lessors with letters of credit. We also provide letters of credit for our workers’ compensation insurance, construction activities, and student loans. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024 , we had cash collateralized letters of credit totaling $22.8 million and $21.4 million, respectively . Cash collateralized against our letters of credit is recorded in restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets.
Aircraft and Other Leases
Our lease obligations consist of aircraft, spare engines, flight training equipment, terminal space, operating facilities, and office space, which expire through 2038 . All of our leases are classified as operating leases and finance leases with contractual terms extending up to 13 years . For operating leases with terms greater than 12 months, we record an operating lease liability and the related right-of-use asset at the present value of remaining lease payments at the measurement date, taking into consideration rental escalation provisions, when applicable. Lease obligations expected to be paid within 12 months represent current maturities and are classified within the current portion of operating lease liabilities to our consolidated balance sheets. Lease obligations with expected repayment extending beyond 12 months are recorded to operating lease liabilities—less current portion to our consolidated balance sheets in our accompanying consolidated financial statements. We record our finance lease assets, current liability, and noncurrent liability to property and equipment, net, current portion of long-term debt and finance leases, and long-term debt and finance leases—less current portion, respectively. Amortization of the finance lease asset is recorded to depreciation and amortization expense. The interest component of the lease payment is recorded to interest expense. With the exception of our CPAs and some operating facilities, we do not separate lease and non-lease contractual components. Provisions for residual value guarantees are not material. See Note 7 , Leases , in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Report.
Components of operating and finance lease costs for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, are as follows:
Years Ended
(in millions)
December 31,
December 31,
December 31,
Operating lease cost
Finance lease cost (1)
Variable and short-term lease cost
Total lease cost
Table of Contents
(1) Finance lease costs include depreciation and amortization costs and interest costs.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have guaranteed certain obligations of LIFT Academy and certain third parties related to LIFT Academy. Expected losses from guaranteed obligations are derived from total commitments outstanding to third parties coupled with the probability of repayment. Total guaranteed obligations as of December 31, 2025 were $21.1 million . Losses expected to be incurred from guaranteed obligations were $7.3 million as of December 31, 2025 .
Commitments and Obligations
From time to time, we enter into purchase commitments for future aircraft and engine deliveries. We regularly make pre-delivery deposit payments (“PDP”) to support aircraft and engines on order. PDPs are retained until scheduled aircraft or engine delivery occurs or when deposit amounts are no longer expected to be returned by the manufacturer. Interest costs associated with PDPs are capitalized as a portion of the overall historical cost of the related aircraft or engine and are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, we recorded $2.1 million, $1.6 million, and $1.1 million, respectively, in capitalized interest costs to property and equipment, net, in our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table sets forth our future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2025 :
(in millions)
Total
Less than
1 year
1 – 3 years
3 – 5 years
More than
5 years
Current and long-term debt obligations
Interest on debt obligations (1)
Operating lease obligations
Finance lease obligations
Aircraft and spare engines under purchase obligations
Aviation Campus purchase commitment
Total
(1) Interest calculated for fixed rate debt and estimated for variable rate debt based on current interest rates as of December 31, 2025. 84.2% of Republic’s debt is fixed rate debt.
We have an order for 29 Embraer regional jets (E175), and expect three aircraft to be delivered during the three months ended March 31, 2026, with the remaining deliveries beginning in 2027 through 2029.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we executed an amendment to an existing financing arrangement to finance contractually scheduled aircraft deliveries during the year ending December 31, 2026, which provides funding for a portion of the total aircraft cost, is secured by the related aircraft, and is funded upon each delivery. Additionally, we entered into a new credit facility secured by spare engines. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining maximum borrowings allowable under the agreements is $115.6 million.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we completed the initial phase of three phases of a new flight aviation campus and corporate headquarters in Carmel, Indiana (the “Aviation Campus”). The Aviation Campus includes a training center that will be used to perform substantially all of our training activities for pilots, flight attendants, maintenance technicians, and dispatchers and houses eight full motion simulators along with flat panel simulators, cabin trainers, and classrooms. Additionally, the Aviation Campus includes overnight accommodations that will be used exclusively by associates in training and a parking garage. In January 2026, the second phase of the Aviation Campus was completed, including a new corporate headquarters. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024 , we recorded $2.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in capitalized interest costs to property and equipment, net, in the consolidated balance sheets associated with the construction of the Aviation Campus.
Table of Contents
We have long-term agreements relating to our maintenance costs associated with engines, auxiliary power units (“APUs”), avionics, and other aircraft equipment. The following agreements comprise our long-term maintenance agreements for various airframe and engine components as of December 31, 2025 :
Maintenance Agreement
Termination
APUs
December 2034
Avionics
December 2029
Engines
December 2037
Wheels and Brakes
September 2030
Certain fixed agreements include a guaranteed minimum payment amount based on flight hours, departures, or other measures. Aggregate payments under long-term maintenance agreements were $154.0 million, $149.4 million, and $150.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 , respectively.
Taxes
We recorded income tax expense o f $37.2 million, $22.3 million, and $33.2 million, during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively, at an effective tax rate of 32.8%, 25.7%, and 37.7%, respectively. We utilize Federal NOLs against our current period taxable income. Our Federal NOL deferred tax assets are largely generated from the accelerated tax depreciation on aircraft and other significant asset acquisitions. Based on our expected utilization and expiration of our NOL deferred tax assets as well as anticipated aircraft deliveries, we do not expect to become a cash tax-paying entity until at least 2028. See Note 11, Income Taxes , in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Report.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act , enacted on July 4, 2025, has introduced changes to the United States Federal tax laws. We do not expect that this legislation will have a material impact to our income tax expense and deferred tax balances.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Some of those estimates and judgments can be subjective and complex. Consequently, actual results could differ from those estimates. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if: (i) the accounting estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made; and (ii) we reasonably could have used different estimates in the current period , or changes in these estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period as new information becomes available, and a change in these estimates would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, the price of our common stock, or cash flows.
We continually evaluate the estimates and judgments used to prepare our consolidated financial statements. Our estimates are based on historical experience, information from third-party professionals, and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable. There are other items within our financial statements that require estimation but are not deemed critical based on the criteria above. Changes in estimates used in these and other items could have a material impact on our financial statements in any one period.
Significant estimates include but are not limited to (i) estimated useful lives and residual values of aircraft and equipment, (ii) provision for income taxes, and (iii) accounting for business combinations. Actual results could materially differ from our initial estimates.
Table of Contents
Estimated useful lives and residual values of aircraft and equipment — We record property and equipment at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation, which is charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the related asset. Effective January 1, 2024, we adjusted the estimated useful life of certain aircraft, rotable spare parts, and engines from 22.0 to 26.0 years to more closely align with market data impacting our fleet usage pattern, including LLP. Estimated useful lives and residual values for each asset class are as follows:
Asset Class
Current Useful
Life Effective
January 1, 2024
(Years)
Previous Useful Life Effective December 31, 2023 and Prior (Years)
Residual Value
Building
Regional jet aircraft
General aviation aircraft, engines, and flight equipment
Office equipment and leasehold improvements
Income taxes — We have generated significant NOLs for U.S. federal income tax purposes primarily from accelerated depreciation on owned aircraft. As of December 31, 2025, we had estimated NOLs of approximately $300 million for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which begin to expire in 2036.
The future use of NOLs is limited to the extent that the utilization of deferred tax assets and other carry forwards becomes uncertain in future years. If such conditions exist, we will be required to record a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets not expected to be utilized at the time that it becomes more likely than not that we will not generate sufficient taxable income to reali ze our NOL deferred tax assets and establish or adjust our valuation allowance if such conditions exist. In evaluating the likelihood of utilizing our net deferred income tax assets, significant judgments include limitations on utilization, our recent history of profitability, forecasts of our taxable income trends, and future impacts of taxable temporary differences.
The Company cannot conclude that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain Federal and state NOL carryforwards will be realized. In recognition of this uncertainty, the Company has provided a valuation allowance of $82.7 million and $36.4 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, on the deferred tax assets related to these NOL carryforwards. During the year ended December 31, 2025, there was an adjustment of $58.7 million to the valuation allowance as a result of IRC Sec 382 limitation due to the ownership change caused by the Merger, and the unlikelihood of fully utilizing the deferred tax assets. If or when recognized, the tax benefits related to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be recognized as a reduction of income tax expense.
Accounting for the Merger with Mesa Air Group, Inc — The Merger is accounted for as a reverse acquisition under provisions of FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations , using the acquisition method of accounting. Legacy Republic is designated the accounting acquirer and legal acquiree for financial reporting purposes on the basis that, immediately following consummation of the Merger, (i) shareholders of Legacy Republic hold a substantial majority of the voting interest in the Company, (ii) Legacy Republic designated six of seven director positions on the Company’s Board, and (iii) senior management of Legacy Republic retained all named executive officer positions within the Company following the Merger. The accounting for the Merger as a reverse acquisition resulted in the issuance and relinquishment of 11.9% of the pre-Merger voting interest in Legacy Republic as consideration in exchange for certain net assets of Mesa, which is measured at the acquisition date fair value of the consideration exchanged. To record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of the Merger with Mesa Parent, we performed a purchase price allocation utilizing the best information available to management. We recognized the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. Any excess Merger consideration exchanged over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill. Determining the fair value of these items requires management’s judgment, and more often than not the utilization of independent valuation specialists. Additionally, the determination of what is a part of and separate from the business combination requires management’s judgment in the application of FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations . The valuation of these tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities is subject to further review from management and may change between the preliminary allocation and end of the purchase price allocation period. Management will continue to evaluate these estimates and assumptions should new information become available, and
Table of Contents
adjustments may be recorded to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as soon as practicable, but no later than November 25, 2026. For more information on our acquisitions and application of the acquisition method, see Note 3, Merger with Mesa Air Group, Inc. in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
S ee Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Report.
Table of Contents
- 0001628280-26-019614-index-headers.html0001628280-26-019614-index-headers.html
- rjet-10xk_exx311xsection30.htmrjet-10xk_exx311xsection30.htm · 9.1 KB
- rjet-10xk_exx312xsection30.htmrjet-10xk_exx312xsection30.htm · 9.7 KB
- rjet-10xk_exx321xsection90.htmrjet-10xk_exx321xsection90.htm · 5.7 KB
- rjet-10xk_exx322xsection90.htmrjet-10xk_exx322xsection90.htm · 5.8 KB
- Ticker
- RJET
- CIK
0000810332- Form Type
- 10-K
- Accession Number
0001628280-26-019614- Filed
- Mar 19, 2026
- Period
- Dec 31, 2025 (Q4 25)
- Industry
- Air Transportation, Scheduled
External resources
Permalink
https://insiderdelta.com/issuers/RJET/10-k/0001628280-26-019614