Insiders ranked by realized 90-day signed return on their open-market trades at Hg Holdings, Inc.. Minimum 3 scored trades. Returns are signed - a sale followed by a rally counts against the insider.
Real-time Form 4 intelligence. Smarter insider tracking.
YoY shift: Lean +
Year-over-year tone shift - average net-tone change across Risk Factors and MD&A vs the prior 10-K. This filing is 0.33pp more bullish than last year's.
Why YoY instead of absolute: the LM lexicon has ~6.6× more negative words than positive (legal/risk-disclosure language is heavy on hedging), so every 10-K reads bearish on raw tone. Year-over-year change strips that bias and surfaces the actual shift in management's framing.
Tone shift by section
The two components the gauge averages: how Risk Factors and MD&A each shifted in net tone versus last year's 10-K. The headline above is their average, so a green needle over a soft section just means the other section carried it.
Risk Factors
+0.33pp
Lean +
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
MD&A
-
Not scored
Net-tone change vs last year's 10-K.
Per-snippet highlights
Sentence-level sentiment highlighting with category and subcategory filters is coming once the snippet-scoring pipeline lands. For now, dig into the actual section text on the Sections tab.
Language change vs prior 10-K
Risk Factors (Item 1A) - words with the biggest YoY frequency increase
Negative rising
negative+1
impairment+1
terminate+1
terminations+1
Positive rising
efficiency+4
Risk Factors (Item 1A)
7,391 words
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the specific risk factors described below in addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before making a decision to invest in our common stock. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be materially and affected. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to and a of all or part of your investment.
No section text extracted for this filing. The 10-K may use a non-standard template that the parser doesn't recognize - the original doc is still linked in the Stats tab.
We have limited operating history in the title insurance and title agency businesses.
Since the Asset Sale on March 2, 2018, we completed the acquisitions of NCTIC, through which we provide title insurance, and NCTG, TAV, ONTA, ONF and ONP, through which we provide title agency services. We have limited operating history in the title insurance and title agency lines of business. Accordingly, our future success may in part be subject to the risks, expenses, uncertainties and delays inherent in establishing a footprint in this line of business and our ultimate success in the title insurance and title agency business cannot be assured.
Additionally, we may seek to acquire other assets in the title insurance and title agency businesses. If we are not successful in identifying, acquiring and operating such assets, our results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected and our stock price may decline.
An “ ownership change ” could limit the use of our net operating loss carryforwards and our potential to derive a benefit from our net operating loss carryforwards.
If an ownership change (as described below) occurs pursuant to applicable statutory regulations, we are potentially subject to limitations on the use of our net operating loss carryforwards which in turn could adversely impact our potential to derive a benefit from our net operating loss carryforwards. In general, an ownership change would occur if the percentage of our common stock held by one or more 5% shareholders increases by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of our common stock owned by such shareholder during a three-year test period.
Resources may be expended in researching potential acquisitions that might not be consummated.
The investigation of additional businesses or assets to acquire and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements and other documents will require substantial management time and attention in addition to potentially incurring legal and other professional expenses. If a decision is made not to complete a specific acquisition, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached relating to a specific acquisition, we may fail to consummate the acquisition for any number of reasons including those beyond our control.
We may be required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “ 1940 Act ” ).
Under Section 3(a)(l) of the 1940 Act, an issuer is deemed to be an investment company if it is engaged in or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. The 1940 Act defines “investment securities” broadly to include virtually all securities except U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves regulated or exempt investment companies. Consequently, the securities of HC Realty we hold may be considered investment securities and we may fall within the scope of Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act.
Table of Contents
A company that falls within the scope of Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act can avoid being regulated as an investment company if it can rely on certain of the exclusions or exemptions under the 1940 Act. One such exclusion is set forth in Rule 3a-1 under the 1940 Act, which provides a safe harbor from investment company registration for an issuer if no more than 45% of the value of its total assets consists of, and no more than 45% of its net income after taxes is derived from, securities, other than, among other limited types of securities, those issued by companies which are controlled primarily by such issuer. We acquired an equity interest in HC Realty on March 19, 2019. On April 3, 2020, April 29, 2020, and June 29, 2020, we purchased an aggregate of 825,000 additional shares of HC Series B Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $8.25 million. As a result of these purchases, we now own approximately 28.0% of the voting interest in HC Realty. We believe that these additional purchases allow us to rely on the safe harbor from investment company registration set forth in Rule 3a-1 of the 1940 Act because we own (i) at least 25% of the voting securities of HC Realty, resulting in us being presumed to control HC Realty within the meaning of Section 2(a)(9) of the 1940 Act and (ii) a sufficient number of shares of HC Series B Stock so that we primarily control HC Realty within the meaning of Rule 3a-1 of the 1940 Act.
We have not sought or obtained an exemptive order, no-action letter or any other assurances from the SEC or its staff regarding our ability to rely on Rule 3a-1 of the 1940 Act, nor has the SEC or its staff provided any such order, no-action letter or other assurances. If we are required to register under the 1940 Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would significantly increase our operating expenses. Registered investment companies are subject to extensive, restrictive and potentially adverse regulation relating to, among other things, operating methods, management, capital structure, dividends and transactions with affiliates.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business in the event we or any other party that provides us with essential services experiences cyber incidents .
We and any other party that provides us with services essential to our operations (including, but not limited to, our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries) are vulnerable to service interruptions or damages from any number of sources, including computer viruses, malware, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gainingunauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption.
The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattacks or cyber intrusions, including by computer hackers, nation-state affiliated actors, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased, and will likely continue to increase in the future. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors, “hacktivists,” organized criminalthreat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors. Some actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyberattacks, including, without limitation, nation-state actors for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we and the third-party service providers upon which we may rely may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatorycyberattacks.
The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our stockholder relationships. As we and the parties that provide essential services to us increase our and their reliance on technology, the risks posed to the information systems of such persons have also increased. We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cyber incidents, but these measures do not guarantee that a cyber-incident will not occur or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A cyber incident could materially adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations. There also may be liability for any stolen assets or misappropriated Company funds or confidential information. Any material adverse effect experienced by us or other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations could, in turn, have an adverse impact on us.
Table of Contents
We may use artificial intelligence in our business and we are subject to risks related to such use.
We may use artificial intelligence in our business or incorporate artificial intelligence into our products and services. The artificial intelligence we may use may not operate properly or as expected, which could cause our title insurance subsidiaries to write policies they may not have otherwise written, misprice policies, assume greater risks, or overpay customer claims, among other potential negative impacts on our business and operations. Our existing competitors, new entrants, technology companies or other third parties may leverage artificial intelligence to the benefit of their business or operations or may incorporate artificial intelligence into their products and services more quickly or successfully than we do, which could make us less competitive and negatively impact our results of operations. In addition, if the content, analyses, output or recommendations produced by or with the assistance of artificial intelligence are unintentionally, or are alleged to be, deficient, inaccurate or misleading, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted.
We hold our cash and restricted cash in depository accounts that could be adversely affected if the financial institutions holding such deposits fail.
In 2023, certain specialized banking institutions with elevated concentrations of uninsured deposits experienced large deposit outflows coupled with insufficient liquidity to meet withdrawal demands, resulting in the institutions being placed into Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) receiverships. We maintain our cash and restricted cash at insured financial institutions. The account balances at each institution periodically substantially exceed the FDIC insurance coverage of $250,000, and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. If a bank in which we hold funds fails or is subject to adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets, we may be subject to a risk of loss or delay in accessing all or a portion of our funds exceeding the FDIC insurance coverage, which could adversely impact our short-term liquidity, ability to operate our business, and financial performance. To date, we have not experienced any material loss as a result of the failure of any financial institution in which we hold cash or restricted cash in depository accounts.
Catastrophic events, including, but not limited to, natural events and the outbreak of diseases, along with geopolitical concerns and changes to trade policy, could have a material adverse impact on our financial performance and results of operations.
A significant natural disaster, such as a hurricane, tropical storm, tornado, windstorm, earthquake, hail, and other catastrophic events, including the occurrence of a contagious disease or illness, such as COVID-19 or any other future epidemics or pandemics, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, climate change could result in an increase in the frequency or severity of natural disasters. Given the unpredictable nature of these events with respect to size, severity, duration and geographic location, it is not currently possible to quantify the ultimate impact that they may have on our business. Additionally, geopolitical concerns (including the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East), the imposition of tariffs and other changes to trade policy in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, and terrorist attacks could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, real estate prices and the United States and the worldwide financial markets and economy more generally, including with respect to supply chain disruptions, labor market interruptions and government interventions, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our common stock is traded on the OTCQB and there may be limited ability to trade our common stock.
Trading of our common stock is currently conducted in the over-the-counter market on the OTCQB, which is generally a less active, and therefore a less liquid, trading market than other types of markets such as national stock exchanges. As a result, an investor may find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common stock than if our shares of common stock were traded on other markets.
We have recorded goodwill as a result of prior acquisitions, and an economic or business downturn could cause these balances to become impaired, requiring write-downs that would reduce our operating income.
Goodwill aggregated approximately $6.5 million, or approximatel y 14% of ou r total assets as of December 31, 2025. Current accounting rules require that goodwill be assessed for impairment at least annually or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstance indicating the carrying value of our goodwill may not be recoverable include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, a significant decline in our stock price and market capitalization, and negative industry or economic trends. As of December 31, 2025, management has deemed there is no impairment of our recorded goodwill. However, if there is an economic downturn in the future, the carrying amount of our goodwill may no longer be recoverable, and we may be required to record an impairment charge, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Management will continue to monitor our operating results, our market capitalization, and the impact of the economy to determine if there is an impairment of goodwill in future periods.
Table of Contents
Risks Related to our Title Insurance and Title Agency Businesses
Conditions in the real estate market generally impact the demand for a substantial portion of our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries ’ products and services and NCTIC ’ s title claims experience.
Demand for a substantial portion of our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries’ products and services generally decreases as real estate activity, such as sales, mortgage financing and mortgage refinancing, decreases. We have found that real estate activity and, as a result, the demand for our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries’ products and services, generally decreases in the following situations:
When mortgage interest rates are high or rising;
When the availability of credit, including commercial and residential mortgage funding, is limited; and
When real estate affordability is declining.
National inventory levels for residential real estate have declined over the past several years and remain below historical average levels. The number of residential purchase transactions has also declined, particularly as a result of decreased demand due to increased mortgage interest rates beginning in 2022. Residential refinance activity is also strongly correlated with changes in mortgage interest rates, and rising mortgage interest rates during previous years have, expectedly, had an adverse impact on our refinance business, which is expected to continue for so long as mortgage interest rates remain high relative to the interest rates of outstanding mortgages. Higher interest rates have also negatively impacted the volume of commercial transactions since 2022.
Additionally, these market conditions and the increase in foreclosures that often results therefrom, may adversely impact NCTIC’s title claims experience. Historically, increasing foreclosure activity has led to an increase in title claims.
Unfavorable economic conditions may adversely affect our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries' businesses.
Historically, uncertainty and negative trends in general economic conditions in the United States and abroad, including significant tightening of credit markets and a general decline in the value of real property, have created a difficult operating environment for our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries’ core title and settlement businesses.
The demand for our title insurance and title agency services is dependent primarily on the volume of residential and commercial real estate transactions. The volume of these transactions historically has been influenced by such factors as mortgage interest rates, inventory, affordability, availability of financing and the overall state of the economy. Mortgage rates remained very high after emergency actions taken by the Federal Reserve to substantially increase its benchmark interest rate in an attempt to control inflation during 2022 and 2023. In the latter part of 2025, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate several times to a range of 3.50% to 3.75% as of December 31, 2025. While the latest and potential future Federal Reserve rate decreases may positively impact the title insurance market, mortgage rates continue to remain relatively high as compared to pre-2022 levels and will likely continue to contribute to decreased real estate activity in the upcoming year. Ongoing political and market uncertainties (including tariff policies) are contributing to the suppressed volume of real estate activity. In addition, expectations of further Federal Reserve rate decreases may not materialize and the Federal Reserve may increase rates in the future to combat inflation, which would likely have a negative impact on the title insurance market.
Our revenues and results of operations have been and may in the future be adversely affected by a decline in real estate prices, real estate activity and the availability of financing alternatives. Deterioration in the macroeconomic environment generally causes weakness or adverse changes in the level of real estate activity, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Also, we may not be able to accurately predict the effects of periods or expectations of high or rapidly rising inflation rates, and governmental responses thereto, and may not respond in a timely or adequate manner to mitigate the negative effects of such inflation, such as decreases in the demand for our products and services and higher labor and other expenses. Depending upon the ultimate severity and duration of any economic downturn, the resulting effects on our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries’ businesses could be materially adverse, including a significant reduction in revenues, earnings and cash flows, deterioration in the value of or return on their investments and increased credit risk from customers and others with obligations to our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries.
Table of Contents
Changes in our relationships with large mortgage lenders or government – sponsored enterprises could adversely affect our business.
Large mortgage lenders and government-sponsored enterprises, because of their significant role in the mortgage process, have significant influence over our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries and other service providers. Changes in our relationship with any of these lenders or government-sponsored enterprises, the loss of all or a portion of the business we derive from these parties, any refusal of these parties to accept our products and services, the modification of the government-sponsored enterprises’ requirement for title insurance in connection with mortgages they purchase or the use of alternatives to our products and services, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
A downgrade by ratings agencies, reductions in statutory capital and surplus maintained by NCTIC, our title insurance underwriter, or a deterioration in other measures of financial strength could adversely affect our business.
The financial strength of NCTIC may be measured by ratings provided by ratings agencies. Demotech, Inc. currently rates NCTIC’s operations. NCTIC’s financial strength ratings are “Exceptional” or “A” by Demotech, Inc. This rating provides the ratings agency’s perspective on NCTIC’s financial strength, operating performance and cash generating ability. The ratings agency will continually review these ratings and the ratings are subject to change. If NCTIC’s ratings are downgraded from current levels by Demotech, Inc. or any other ratings agencies, NCTIC’s ability to retain existing customers and develop new customer relationships may be negatively impacted, which could result in a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Statutory capital and surplus, or the amount by which statutory assets exceed statutory liabilities, is also a measure of financial strength of an insurance company. Accordingly, if the statutory capital and surplus of NCTIC is reduced from the current level, or if there is a deterioration in other measures of financial strength, NCTIC’s results of operations, competitive position and liquidity could be adversely affected.
The issuance of title insurance policies and related activities by title agents, some of which operate with substantial independence from us, could adversely affect our business.
Our title insurance subsidiaries issue a significant portion of their policies through title agents, some that may operate largely independent of us. There is no guarantee that these title agents will fulfill their contractual obligations to our title insurance subsidiaries, which contracts include limitations that are designed to limit our title insurance subsidiaries’ risk with respect to the title agents’ activities. In addition, regulators are increasingly seeking to hold companies such as our title insurance subsidiaries responsible for the actions of these title agents and, under certain circumstances, our title insurance subsidiaries may be held liable directly to third parties for actions (including defalcations) or omissions of these title agents. As a result, the use of title agents by our title insurance subsidiaries could result in increased claims on the policies issued through title agents and an increase in other costs and expenses.
Competition in the title insurance industry may affect our revenues.
Competition in the title insurance industry is intense, particularly with respect to price, service and expertise. Larger commercial customers and mortgage originators also look to the size and financial strength of a title insurer. The four largest title insurance companies typically maintain greater than 80% of the market for title insurance in the United States. In our principal market, competitors include other major title underwriters such as Fidelity National Financial, Inc., First American Financial Corporation, Old Republic International Corporation, Stewart Information Services Corporation, Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, and WFG National Title Insurance Company, as well as other regional title insurance companies, underwritten title companies and independent agency operations. Although we are not aware of any current initiatives to reduce regulatory barriers to entering our industry, any such reduction could result in new competitors, including financial services firms or institutions, entering the title insurance business. From time-to-time, new entrants enter the marketplace with alternative products to traditional title insurance, although many of these alternative products have been disallowed by title insurance regulators. Further, advances in technologies, including artificial intelligence, could, over time, significantly disrupt the traditional business model of financial services and real estate-related companies, including title insurance companies. These alternative products or disruptive technologies, if permitted by regulators, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.
Table of Contents
We depend on our ability to attract and retain key personnel and agents, and our inability to do so could adversely affect our business.
Competition for skilled and experienced personnel in our industry is high, and our success is substantially dependent on our ability to attract and retain such personnel. We may have difficulty hiring and retaining the necessary marketing and management personnel to support future growth plans. Also, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in attracting and retaining new agents.
Errors and fraud involving the transfer of funds may adversely affect our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries.
Our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries rely on their systems, employees and domestic banks to transfer funds on behalf of our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries as well as title agents that are not affiliates of ours. These transfers are susceptible to user input error, fraud, system interruptions, incorrect processing and similar errors that from time-to-time result in lost funds or delayed transactions. Our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries’ email and computer systems and systems used by their agents, customers and other parties involved in a transaction may be subject to, and may continue to be the target of, fraudulent attacks, including attempts to cause our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries or their agents to improperly transfer funds. Funds transferred to a fraudulent recipient are often not recoverable. In certain instances, our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries may be liable for those unrecovered funds. The controls and procedures used by our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries to prevent transfer errors and fraud may prove inadequate, resulting in financial losses, reputational harm, loss of customers or other adverse consequences which could be material.
Regulatory oversight and changes in government regulation could prohibit or limit our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries ’ operations, make it more costly or burdensome to conduct such operations or result in decreased demand for their products and services.
Our title insurance business is regulated by various federal, state, and local governmental agencies and operates within statutory guidelines. The industry in which our title insurance business operates and the markets into which it sells its products are also regulated and subject to statutory guidelines. In general, our title insurance business may be subject to increasing regulatory oversight and increasingly complex statutory guidelines. This may be due, among other factors, to the passing of, and significant changes in, laws and regulations pertaining to privacy and data protection.
For instance, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) is charged with protecting consumers by enforcing federal consumer protection laws and regulations. The CFPB is an independent agency and funded by the United States Federal Reserve System. Its jurisdiction includes banks, credit unions, securities firms, payday lenders, mortgage servicing operations, foreclosure relief services, debt collectors and other financial companies. The nature and extent of these regulations include, but are not limited to: conducting rule-making, supervision, and enforcement of federal consumer protection laws; restricting unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices; marshalling consumer complaints; promoting financial education; researching consumer behavior; monitoring financial markets for new risks to consumers; and enforcing laws that outlaw discrimination and other unfair treatment in consumer finance.
Governmental authorities regulate our insurance subsidiaries in the states in which we do business. These regulations generally are intended for the protection of policyholders rather than stockholders. The nature and extent of these regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but typically involve:
approving or setting of insurance premium rates;
standards of solvency and minimum amounts of statutory capital and surplus that must be maintained;
limitations on types and amounts of investments;
establishing reserves, including statutory premium reserves, for losses and loss adjustment expenses;
regulating underwriting and marketing practices;
regulating dividend payments and other transactions among affiliates;
prior approval for the acquisition and control of an insurance company or of any company controlling an insurance company;
licensing of insurers, agencies and, in certain states, escrow officers;
regulation of reinsurance;
restrictions on the size of risks that may be insured by a single company;
deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders;
approval of policy forms;
Table of Contents
methods of accounting; and
filing of annual and other reports with respect to financial condition and other matters.
These regulations may impede or impose burdensome conditions on rate increases or other actions that we might want to take to enhance our operating results. In addition, state regulators perform periodic examinations of insurance companies, which could result in increased compliance or legal expenses.
Regulatory oversight could require us to raise capital, and/or make it more difficult to deploy capital. For example, our regulatory capital requirements have historically applied only at the subsidiary level, specifically our insurance underwriter subsidiaries. However, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (the "NAIC") has adopted an approach to assess group risks and capital adequacy and assist in the regulation of insurer solvency using the Group Capital Calculation (the “GCC”), which uses an aggregation methodology for all entities within an insurance holding company system. The adoption of the GCC by jurisdictions in which we are regulated could increase our prescribed capital requirements, the level at which regulatory scrutiny intensifies, as well as significantly increase our cost of regulatory compliance. In addition, changes in the applicable regulatory environment, statutory guidelines or interpretations of existing regulations or statutes, enhanced governmental oversight or efforts by governmental agencies to cause customers to refrain from using our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries’ products or services could prohibit or limit their future operations or make it more costly or burdensome to conduct such operations or result in decreased demand for their products and services or a change in their competitive position. The impact of these changes would be more significant if they involve the Florida jurisdiction, as a majority of our title premiums are currently generated in the state of Florida, and a proposed bill aligning Florida law with the GCC approach adopted by the NAIC is currently working its way through the Florida legislature. These changes may restrict our ability to acquire assets or businesses, may limit the manner in which we conduct our business or otherwise may have a negative impact on our ability to generate revenues, earnings and cash flows. Additionally, in jurisdictions where rates are not promulgated by the state insurance regulator, these changes may compel us to reduce our prices and may restrict our ability to implement price increases.
Regulation of title insurance rates could adversely affect our business.
Title insurance rates are subject to extensive regulation, which varies from state to state. Our title insurance subsidiaries currently operate primarily in the state of Florida. In Florida, rates are promulgated by the state insurance regulator. Our insurance subsidiaries’ ability to promptly adapt to changing market dynamics through price adjustments may be limited due to the rates promulgated by the state’s insurance regulator, particularly in a declining market.
Our title insurance business may be adversely affected by business or regulatory conditions that disproportionately affect Florida.
Our title insurance subsidiaries currently operate primarily in the state of Florida. As a result of the significant income derived from customers in this state, our title insurance business is exposed to adverse business or regulatory conditions that significantly or disproportionally affect Florida. For example, a declining business climate or real estate market that is localized in Florida could have an adverse effect on the title insurance segment’s results of operations. Adverse regulatory developments, including reductions in rates or increased regulatory or capital requirements in Florida could similarly adversely affect the title insurance segment’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in certain laws and regulations, and in the regulatory environment in which we operate, could adversely affect our business.
Federal and state officials are discussing various potential changes to laws and regulations that could impact our businesses, including the reform of government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and additional data privacy regulations, among others. Changes in these areas, and more generally in the regulatory environment in which our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries and their customers operate, could adversely impact the volume of mortgage originations in the United States and our title insurance and title agency subsidiaries competitive position and results of operations.
The overturning of the Chevron doctrine could have an unfavorable impact on us.
In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo case that overturned the long-standing federal Chevron doctrine. The Chevron doctrine set forth a test that outlined when courts should defer to an agency’s interpretation of federal law. Under the doctrine, if Congress had not spoken directly to the precise issue in question, the courts were to defer to the agency’s interpretation so long as the interpretation was reasonable. Under the Loper Bright decision, courts are now required to exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority and may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous.
Table of Contents
The overturning of the Chevron doctrine is likely to result in challenges to numerous agency interpretations in various areas of law including energy, environment, taxation, and labor, among others. If these challenges are upheld, they could have both favorable and unfavorable impacts on us, depending on whether the interpretations that are overturned were more favorable toward our business and operations than subsequent revised agency interpretations. The likely increase of challenges to agency actions may also increase legal costs and create less certainty around agency actions, at least in the near term.
Actual claims experience could materially vary from the expected claims experience reflected in NCTIC ’ s reserve for incurred but not reported claims.
NCTIC maintains a reserve for IBNR claims pertaining to its title insurance products. The majority of this reserve pertains to title insurance policies, which are long-duration contracts with the majority of the claims reported within the first few years following the issuance of the policy. Generally , 70% to 80% of claim amounts become known in the first six years of the policy life, and the majority of IBNR reserves relate to the six most recent policy years. Changes in expected ultimate losses and corresponding loss rates for recent policy years are considered likely and could result in a material adjustment to the IBNR reserves. Loss rates for recent policy years, positive or negative, may vary significantly given the long duration nature of a title insurance policy. In uncertain economic times, such as those experienced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, rising inflation and rising interest rates, larger changes may be more likely. Material changes in expected ultimate losses and corresponding loss rates for older policy years are also possible, particularly for policy years with loss ratios exceeding historical norms. The estimates made in determining the appropriate level of IBNR reserves could ultimately prove to be materially different from actual claims experience.
Changes in laws or regulations impacting real estate, particularly when applied retroactively, may cause a material change in expected ultimate losses and corresponding loss rates for recent and/or older policy years.
Risks Related to our Investment in HC Realty
Our investment in HC Realty may lose value.
We owned approximately 28.0% of the voting interest in HC Realty as of December 31, 2025. There is no guarantee that HC Realty will be successful implementing its business strategy for the acquisition, financing, ownership and management of Government Properties and, as a result, our investment in HC Common Stock and HC Series B Stock may lose value. Additionally, HC Realty has paused distributions on HC Common Stock and HC Series B Stock, which has resulted in our loss of revenue historically derived from such distributions, and we have recognized an impairment of our investment in HC Series B Stock.
HC Realty depends on leases by the U.S. government and its agencies for substantially all of its revenues and any failure by the U.S. government and its agencies to perform their obligations under their leases or renew their leases upon expiration could have a material adverse effect on our investment in HC Realty.
As of December 31, 2025, leases by the U.S. government and its agencies accounted for substantially all of HC Realty’s revenues. We expect that leases to agencies of the U.S. government will continue to be HC Realty’s primary source of revenues for the foreseeable future. Due to such concentration, any failure by the U.S. government to perform its obligations under its leases or a failure to renew its leases upon expiration, could cause interruptions in the receipt of lease revenue or result in vacancies, or both, which would reduce HC Realty’s revenue until the affected properties are leased, and could decrease the ultimate value of the affected property upon sale and have a material adverse effect on our investment in HC Realty. In addition, as part of ongoing efforts to reduce waste, the U.S. government and the GSA are reaching out to all tenant agencies to see if there are opportunities to reduce space usage.
By executive order on January 20, 2025, President Trump established the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) to maximize government efficiency and productivity. Among the actions taken by DOGE toward this goal were the terminations of leases by government agency or department tenants at numerous real estate properties around the country. While DOGE was disbanded in November 2025, any further effort by the U.S. government to terminate leases by government agency or department tenants for purposes of maximizing government efficiency and productivity, or otherwise, could materially and adversely affect HC Realty’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and our investment in HC Realty.
Table of Contents
Some of HC Realty’s leases with the U.S. government permit the U.S. government to terminate the lease and discontinue paying rent prior to the lease expiration date.
From time to time, HC Realty enters into leases that provide the U.S. government the right to terminate the lease during a specified period prior to the expiration of the total term stated in the lease, with such period often referred to as the “soft term.” In the event that a portion of HC Realty’s U.S. government tenant agencies exercise their termination rights during a soft term period prior to the expiration of the total term stated in the lease, for government efficiency and productivity reasons, fiscal policy reasons, security concerns or other reasons, and HC Realty is not able to lease the vacant space to another tenant in a timely manner or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on HC Realty’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and our investment in HC Realty.
The U.S. government may consolidate its existing GSA leases, which may have an adverse effect on HC Realty’s business and results of operations and our investment in HC Realty.
The U.S. government has been acting to reduce its expenses by consolidating various lease agreements for single office buildings in which several agencies and/or branches are located. HC Realty faces the risk that such consolidation will take place in one or more of its Government Properties, leading lessees to migrate to a property that is not beneficially owned by HC Realty. There can be no assurance that the U.S. government will not consolidate GSA leases. Because many of the Government Properties were built or renovated for specific GSA lessees, it may be difficult to find other tenants interested in facilities with these specifications. HC Realty may consequently have to invest significant amounts of capital to renovate Government Properties with GSA specifications for other tenants. The vacancies or costs attendant to renovations for new tenants resulting from U.S. government lease consolidation could significantly impair HC Realty’s revenues and business strategy and our investment in HC Realty.
The value of our investment in HC Realty would be adversely affected if HC Realty failed to qualify as a REIT.
HC Realty has elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. HC Realty’s continued qualification as a REIT depends on its satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution and stockholder ownership requirements on a continuing basis. HC Realty’s ability to satisfy some of the asset tests depends upon the fair market values of its assets, some of which are not able to be precisely determined and for which HC Realty has indicated it will not obtain independent appraisals. If HC Realty fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and certain statutory relief provisions are not available, HC Realty would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and distributions to stockholders would not be deductible by it in computing its taxable income. Any such corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution. Unless entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, HC Realty also would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which HC Realty ceased to qualify as a REIT. In addition, if HC Realty fails to qualify as a REIT, HC Realty will no longer be required to make distributions. As a result of all these factors, HC Realty’s failure to qualify as a REIT could impair its ability to expand business and raise capital and could adversely affect the value of our investment in HC Common Stock and HC Series B Stock.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who is also a director, may have potential or actual conflicts of interest because of his positions with HPCM and HC Realty.
Steven A. Hale II, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is the sole manager of HPCM which serves as the investment adviser for the Hale Partnership Fund, L.P. and related entities (collectively, the “Hale Funds”) and certain holders of HC Series B Stock other than us. The Hale Funds own approximatel y 74.0% of our outstanding common stock. We also own HC Series B Stock and HC Common Stock. Mr. Hale also serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President and a director of HC Realty.
Mr. Hale owes fiduciary duties to (i) us, (ii) HC Realty as a result of his position with HC Realty and (iii) the Hale Funds and certain holders of HC Series B Stock other than us as a result of his position with HPCM, the investment adviser to these parties. As a result, Mr. Hale may have potential or actual conflicts of interest when faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and HC Realty. In addition, Mr. Hale may have potential or actual conflicts of interest when faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and the Hale Funds or the other holders of HC Series B Stock advised by HPCM. For example, these potential conflicts could arise over matters such as funding and capital matters.
Table of Contents
Our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders have significant voting power and may vote their shares in a manner that is not in the best interest of other stockholders.
Our current executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders control approximately 89.7% of the voting power represented by our outstanding common stock. If these stockholders act together, whether by written consent or at a duly called and held meeting of stockholders, they may be able to exert significant control over our management and affairs requiring stockholder approval, such as the election of directors or our dissolution. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock. This concentration of ownership may not be in the best interests of all our stockholders.
Our Chief Executive Officer, who will be employed on a part-time basis for the foreseeable future, currently has outside business interests that will require his time and attention and may interfere with his ability to devote all of his time to our business, which may adversely affect our business and operations.
Mr. Hale, our Chief Executive Officer, will be employed for the foreseeable future on a part-time basis and has outside business interests that could require substantial time and attention. Mr. Hale is also associated with HPCM and HC Realty and devotes significant time to their affairs. We cannot accurately predict the amount of time and attention that will be required of Mr. Hale to perform his ongoing duties related to outside business interests. The inability of Mr. Hale to devote sufficient time to managing our business could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
