BRT Brt Apartments Corp. - 10-K

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

Set forth below is a discussion of certain risks affecting our business. The categorization of risks set forth below is meant to help you better understand the risks facing our business and is not intended to limit your consideration of the possible effects of these risks to the listed categories. Any adverse effects arising from the realization of any of the risks discussed, including our financial condition and results of operation, may, and likely will, adversely affect many aspects of our business.

Risks Related to Real Estate Investments and Our Operations

Unfavorable market and economic conditions could adversely affect rental revenues, occupancy levels and the value of our properties.

General economic conditions in the U.S. have fluctuated significantly in recent quarters. Unfavorable market and economic conditions significantly affect our occupancy levels, our rental rates and collections, the value of our properties and our ability to acquire or dispose of multi-family properties on favorable terms. Our ability to lease units at our multi-family properties at favorable rates is adversely affected by the increase in supply in the multi-family and other rental markets and other housing alternatives, and is dependent upon the overall level in the economy, which may continue to be adversely affected by, among other things, inflationary conditions, job losses and unemployment levels, personal debt levels, a downturn in the housing market, stock market volatility, and uncertainty about the future. Some of our major expenses generally do not decline when related rents decline. We would expect that declines in our occupancy levels, rental revenues and/or the values of our multi-family properties would cause us to have less cash available to make payments on our debt and to pay dividends, which could adversely affect our financial condition or the market value of our securities.

We may be unable to compete to acquire, finance or dispose of our properties or to lease rental units.

We compete with many third parties including other REITs, specialty finance companies, public and private investors, investment and pension funds, in acquiring, obtaining financing for, and disposing of multi-family properties. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. Larger and more established competitors enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, enhanced operating efficiencies and more extensive networks providing greater and more favorable access to capital, financing and tax credit allocations and more favorable acquisition opportunities.

In attracting and retaining residents to occupy our multi-family properties, we compete with numerous other housing providers. Our multi-family properties compete directly with other rental apartments, as well as condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our properties are located. Principal factors of competition include rent or price charged, attractiveness of the location of multi-family properties, and the quality and breadth of services. The number of competitive properties relative to demand in a particular area has a material effect on our ability to lease our properties, on the rents we charge and our occupancy levels.

Increasing real estate taxes, utilities and insurance premiums may negatively impact operating results

The cost of real estate taxes, utilities and insurance is a significant component of real estate operating expense. These expenses are subject to significant increases and fluctuations, including the impact of inflation, which we may be unable to control. For example, our real estate taxes have increased and will continue to increase as our properties are reassessed by taxing authorities and as property tax rates increase. Further, our real estate taxes have fluctuated and may not be comparable year-over-year because of, among other things, (i) the timing difference as to when we accrue real estate taxes and the results of any tax appeals with respect to such accrued taxes and (ii) determinations, over which we have no control, by governmental authorities to increase tax rates, assessments or procedures. In addition, our share of the insurance premiums at joint venture properties is determined by our joint venture partner at such properties. If the costs associated with real estate taxes, utilities and insurance premiums should rise, without being offset by a corresponding increase in revenues, our results of operations could be negatively impacted, and our ability to make payments on our debt and to make distributions would be adversely affected.

Most of our multi-family properties are located in the Southeast and Texas which makes us susceptible to adverse developments in such markets.

The operating performance and value of our multi-family properties is impacted by the economic environment and other conditions of the specific markets in which our properties are concentrated. As of December 31, 2025: (i) our wholly-owned properties generated approximately 75% and 9% of our 2025 revenues from properties located in the Southeast and Texas, respectively, and (ii) the properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures at December 31, 2025, generated 59% and 41% of our 2025 JV Rental and Other Revenues at properties located in the Southeast and Texas, respectively. Accordingly, adverse developments in such markets, including economic developments, pandemics, or natural or man-made disasters, would adversely impact the cash flow and value of these properties. The concentration of our properties in the Southeast United States

Table of Contents

and Texas exposes us to risks of adverse developments which are greater than the risks of owning properties with a more geographically diverse portfolio.

The failure of property management companies to properly manage our properties could adversely impact our results of operations.

We rely on property management companies to manage our properties. These management companies are responsible for, among other things, leasing and marketing rental units, selecting tenants (including an evaluation of the creditworthiness of tenants), collecting rent, paying operating expenses and maintaining our properties. If these property management companies do not perform their duties properly, the occupancy and rental rates at such properties may decline and the expenses at such properties may increase. At December 31, 2025, one property manager manages 11 properties, a second property manager manages eight properties, and five other property managers manage three or fewer properties. Three properties are managed by a management company owned by or affiliated with a joint venture partner. The loss of our property managers, and in particular, the managers that manage multiple properties, could result in a decrease in occupancy rates, rental rates or both or an increase in expenses. Further, except for our multi-family properties covered by our master insurance program, property managers are also generally responsible for obtaining insurance coverage with respect to the properties they manage, which coverage is often obtained pursuant to blanket policies covering many properties in which we have no interest. Losses at properties managed by our property managers but in which we have no interest could reduce significantly the insurance coverage available at our properties managed by these property managers. It may be difficult to terminate a non-performing management company, particularly a management company owned or affiliated with a joint venture, because such termination may require the approval of the mortgagee, our joint venture partner or both. If we are unable to terminate an underperforming property manager on a timely basis, our occupancy and rental rates may decrease and our expenses may increase.

Risks involved in conducting real estate activity through joint ventures.

Ten of our multi-family properties are owned through joint ventures with other persons or entities. Joint venture investments involve risks not otherwise present when acquiring real estate directly, including the following:

• our joint venture partners may have economic or business interests or objectives which are or become inconsistent with our business interests or objectives, including differing objectives relating to the sale or refinancing of properties held by the joint venture or the timing of the termination or liquidation of the joint venture;

• the more successful a joint venture project, the more likely that profits or distributions generated above a negotiated threshold will be allocated disproportionately in favor of our joint venture partner at a rate greater than that implied by our partner's equity interest in the venture;

• several of our joint venture partners have other competing real estate interests in the markets in which our properties are located that could influence such partners to take actions favoring their properties to the detriment of the jointly owned properties;

• our joint venture partners obtain blanket property casualty and business interruption insurance insuring properties we own jointly and other properties in which we have no ownership interest and as a result, claims or losses with respect to properties owned by our joint venture partners but in which we have no interest could significantly reduce or eliminate the insurance available to properties in which we have an interest;

• our joint venture partner might become bankrupt, insolvent or otherwise refuse or be unable to meet their obligations to us or the venture (including their obligation to make capital contributions or property distributions when due);

• we may incur liabilities as a result of action taken by our joint venture partner;

• our joint venture partner may not perform properly its property oversight responsibilities;

• our joint venture partner may be in a position to take action or withhold consent contrary to our instructions or requests, including actions that may make it more difficult to maintain our qualification as a REIT;

• our joint venture partner might engage in unlawful or fraudulent conduct with respect to our jointly owned properties or other properties in which they have an ownership interest;

• changes in personnel managing our joint venture partners have resulted in greater difficulty in working with the new personnel;

• our joint venture partner may trigger a buy-sell arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partner's interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction;

Table of Contents

• disputes between us and our joint venture partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and divert management's attention from operating our business; and

• disagreements with our joint venture partners with respect to property management (including with respect to whether a property should be sold, refinanced, or improved) could result in an impasse resulting in the inability to operate the property effectively.

Joint venture partners have acted without our authorization ( e.g ., a partner modified a mortgage term without our consent). We also have had, and expect to continue to have, disagreements with joint venture partners over various issues including, among others, as to whether, and the extent to which, value add programs should be implemented at a property, whether a mortgage debt on a property should be refinanced and the terms and conditions of such refinancing, and, because our joint venture structure may incentivize our joint venture partner to sell the property sooner than we would otherwise desire, the timing and terms and conditions of property sales.

Our operating results are significantly influenced by demand for multi-family properties generally, and a decrease in such demand will likely have a greater adverse effect on our revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

Our current portfolio is focused on multi-family properties, and we expect that going forward we will continue to focus on the acquisition (including alternative investments such as bridge loans and preferred equity), disposition and operation of such properties. As a result, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry, and a decrease in the demand for multi-family properties would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

Our operating results and assets may be negatively affected if our insurance coverage is insufficient to compensate us for casualty events occurring at our properties.

Our multi-family properties, including the properties owned by the joint ventures in which we are members, carry all risk property insurance covering the property and improvements thereto for the cost of replacement in the event of a casualty. Though we maintain insurance coverage, such coverage may be insufficient to compensate us for losses sustained as a result of a casualty because, among other things:

• the amount of insurance coverage maintained for a property may be insufficient to pay the full replacement cost following a casualty event;

•  the rent loss coverage under a policy may not extend for the full period of time that a tenant or tenants may be entitled to a rent abatement that is a result of, or that may be required to complete restoration following, a casualty event;

• certain types of losses, such as those arising from earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and terrorist attacks, and losses arising out of claims for exemplary or punitive damages, may be uninsurable or may not be economically feasible to insure;

• changes in zoning, building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors may make it impossible or impracticable, to use insurance proceeds to replace damaged or destroyed improvements at a property;

• insurance coverage is part of blanket insurance policies in which losses on properties in which we have no ownership interest could reduce significantly or eliminate the coverage available on our properties; and

• the deductibles applicable to one or more buildings at a property may be greater than the losses sustained at such buildings.

If our insurance coverage is insufficient to cover losses sustained as a result of one or more casualty events, our operating results and the value of our portfolio will be adversely affected.

We may be adversely effected if we are unable to maintain a satisfactory working relationship with any one or more of our joint venture partners.

Two of our joint venture partners or their affiliates own an aggregate of six of the eight properties we own through unconsolidated joint ventures. This concentration of ownership of properties with a limited number of joint venture partners exposes us to risks of adverse developments, and in particular, disputes or disagreements with such joint venture partners, which are greater than the risks of owning properties with a more diverse group of joint venture partners.

Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents and we may be unable to renew leases or relet units as leases expire.

Table of Contents

Our multi-family leases are generally for a term of one year or less. Accordingly, our revenues are impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the units, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than the previous rates, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected .

Risks Related to Our Financing Activities, Indebtedness and Capital Resources

If we are unable to refinance our mortgage debt at maturity on acceptable terms, we may be forced to sell properties on disadvantageous terms.

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2025, the principal balance of the mortgage payments due at maturity on our wholly-owned and unconsolidated joint venture properties and the weighted average interest rate thereon (dollars in thousands):

Consolidated Properties

Unconsolidated Properties

Year

Principal Balances Due at Maturity

Weighed Average Interest Rate

Principal Balances Due at Maturity (1)

Weighed Average Interest Rate

2031 and thereafter

Total

(1) Includes our joint venture partner's "share" of such debt.

We have a significant amount of mortgage debt maturing over the next several years. Our operating cash flow and funds available under our credit facility will be insufficient to discharge all of this debt when due. Accordingly, we will seek to refinance this debt prior to its maturity. Because current interest rates are significantly higher than the interest rates on the maturing mortgage debt (or if our access to credit markets is reduced due, among other things, to more stringent lending requirements due to our level of leverage), we may be unable to refinance this mortgage debt on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unsuccessful in refinancing such debt, or if the terms of the refinanced debt are less favorable than the current debt, we may be forced to (i) refinance such mortgage debt on unfavorable terms or (ii) dispose of properties on unfavorable terms or convey properties secured by such mortgages to the mortgagees, which would, in each case, reduce our income and impair the value of our portfolio.

Our acquisition, development and value-add activities are limited by the funds available to us.

Our ability to acquire additional multi-family properties, develop new properties and improve the properties in our portfolio is limited by the funds available to us (including funds available pursuant to our credit facility) and our ability to obtain, on acceptable terms, mortgage debt. At February 27, 2026, we had approximately $24.8 million of cash and cash equivalents (of which a significant portion is required for day-to-day operating expenses at the property level) and up to $40 million available to us under our credit facility. Our multi-family acquisition and value-add activities are constrained by funds available to us which will limit growth in our revenues and operating results.

Our failure to comply with our obligations under our debt instruments may reduce our stockholders’ equity, and adversely affect our net income and ability to pay dividends.

Several of our debt instruments include covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios, including various coverage ratios, and comply with other requirements. Failure to meet interest and other payment obligations under our debt instruments or a breach by us of the covenants to comply with certain financial ratios would place us in non-compliance under such instruments. If the lender called a default and required us to repay the full amount outstanding under such instrument, we might be required to rapidly dispose of our properties, including properties securing such debt instruments, which could have an adverse impact on the amounts we receive on such disposition. From time to time we have failed to comply with certain debt

Table of Contents

covenants. If we are unable to satisfy the covenants of our debt obligations, the lender could exercise remedies available to it under the applicable debt instrument and as otherwise provided by law, including the possible appointment of a receiver to manage the property, application of deposits or reserves maintained under the debt instrument for payment of the debt, or foreclose and/or cause the forced sale of the property or asset securing such debt. A foreclosure or other forced disposition of our assets could result in the disposition of same at below the carrying value of such asset. The disposition of our properties or assets at below our carrying value may adversely affect our net income, reduce our stockholders’ equity and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends.

We may not have sufficient funds to make required or desired capital improvements.

Our multi-family properties face competition from newer and updated properties. At December 31, 2025 the weighted average age (based on the number of units) of our multi-family properties is approximately 22 years. To remain competitive and increase occupancy at these properties and/or make them attractive to potential tenants or purchasers, we may have to make significant capital improvements and/or incur deferred maintenance costs with respect to these properties. The cost of future improvements and deferred maintenance is uncertain and the amounts earmarked for specific properties may be insufficient to effectuate needed improvements. Our results of operations and financial conditions may be adversely affected if we are required to expend significant funds (other than funds earmarked for such purposes) to repair or improve our properties.

If we are required to make payments under any “bad boy” carve out guarantees that we have provided in connection with certain mortgages and related loans, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

In obtaining certain non-recourse loans, we have provided our lenders with standard carve out guarantees. These guarantees are only applicable if and when the borrower directly, or indirectly through an agreement with an affiliate, joint venture partner or other third party, voluntarily files a bankruptcy or similar liquidation or reorganization action or takes other actions that are fraudulent or improper (commonly referred to as “bad boy” guarantees). Although we believe that “bad boy” carve out guarantees are not guarantees of payment in the event of foreclosure or other actions of the foreclosing lender that are beyond the borrower’s control, some lenders in the real estate industry have recently sought to make claims for payment under such guarantees. In the event such a claim were made against us under a “bad boy” carve out guarantee, following foreclosure on mortgages or related loans, and such claim were successful, our business and financial results would be materially adversely affected.

We could be negatively impacted by changes in our relationship with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, changes in the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and by changes in government support for multi-family housing.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been a major source of financing for multi-family real estate in the United States and we have used loan programs sponsored by these agencies to finance most of our acquisitions of multi-family properties. There have been ongoing discussion by the government and other interested parties with regard to the long term structure and viability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which could result in adjustments to guidelines for their loan products. Should these agencies have their mandates changed or reduced, lose key personnel, be disbanded or reorganized by the government or otherwise discontinue providing liquidity for the multi-family sector, our ability to obtain financing through loan programs sponsored by the agencies could be negatively impacted. In addition, changes in our relationships with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the lenders that participate in these loan programs, with respect to our existing mortgage financing could impact our ability to obtain comparable financing for new acquisitions or refinancing for our existing multi-family real estate investments. Should access to financing provided through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan programs be reduced or impaired, it would significantly reduce our access to debt capital and/or increase borrowing costs and would significantly limit our ability to acquire properties on acceptable terms and reduce the values to be realized upon property sales.

We depend on our subsidiaries for cash flow and will be adversely impacted if these subsidiaries are prohibited from distributing cash to us.

We conduct, and intend to conduct, substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries, including our unconsolidated subsidiaries. Accordingly, our only source of cash to fund our operations and pay our obligations are distributions from our subsidiaries. We cannot assure you that our subsidiaries will be able to, or be permitted to, make distributions to us that will enable us to fund our operations. Each of our subsidiaries is or will be a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions ( e.g. , restrictions imposed pursuant to mortgage debt on a property), limit our ability to obtain cash from such entities. In addition, because we operate through our subsidiaries, your claims as stockholders will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations of our subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, our assets and those of our subsidiaries will be able to satisfy your claims as stockholders only after all our and our subsidiaries' liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.

Table of Contents

Regulatory and Tax Risks

Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation, or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in the U.S. federal income tax laws, regulations or administrative interpretations.

Liabilities relating to environmental matters may impact the value of our properties.

We may be subject to environmental liabilities arising from the ownership of properties. Under various federal, state and local laws, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the costs of removal of certain hazardous substances released on its property. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances.

The presence of hazardous substances on our properties may adversely affect our ability to finance or sell the property and we may incur substantial remediation costs. The discovery of material environmental liabilities attached to such properties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Compliance or failure to comply with the ADA or other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.

The ADA generally requires that the public areas at our properties be made accessible to disabled persons. Non-compliance could result in the imposition of fines by governmental authorities or the award of damages to private litigants. From time-to-time, claims have been, and may continue to be, asserted against us with respect to some of our properties under the ADA. If, under the ADA, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Provisions for credit losses are difficult to estimate

Our provision for credit losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis in accordance with current accounting guidance which uses the Current Expected Credit Loss model, or CECL. Under CECL, we are required to present certain financial assets such as loans held for investment, at the net amount expected to be collected. The determination of our provision for credit losses requires us to make highly subjective estimates and judgments. Our estimates and judgments are based on a number of factors, including projected cash flow from the collateral, if any, securing our investments, the structure of our investment, including the availability of reserves and recourse guarantees, likelihood of repayment in full at the maturity of a loan, potential for refinancing and expected market discount rates for varying property types, and other macro economic data, all of which are uncertain and highly subjective. If our estimates and judgments are incorrect, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.

The adoption of CECL affects how we determine our allowance for loan losses and requires us to recognize provisions for credit losses earlier in the lending cycle, including at the time we enter into the transaction. Moreover, CECL may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for credit losses. If we are required to materially increase our level of allowance for credit losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Risks Associated with the Real Estate Industry and REITs.

We face numerous risks associated with the real estate industry that could adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs.

As a real estate company, we are subject to various changes in real estate conditions, and any negative trends in such real estate conditions may adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs. These conditions include:

• changes in national, regional and local economic conditions, which may be negatively impacted by concerns about inflation, deflation, government deficits, unemployment rates and decreased consumer confidence particularly in markets in which we have a high concentration of properties;

• increases in interest rates, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain financing or to buy or sell properties on favorable terms or at all;

• the inability of tenants to pay rent;

• the existence and quality of the competition, such as the attractiveness of our properties as compared to our competitors' properties based on considerations such as convenience of location, rental rates, amenities and safety record;

• increased operating costs, including increased real property taxes, maintenance, insurance and utility costs (including increased prices for fossil fuels);

• weather conditions that may increase or decrease energy costs and other weather-related expenses;

• oversupply of competitive housing opportunities, including apartments or single-family housing, or a reduction in demand for real estate in the markets in which our properties are located;

• a favorable interest rate environment that may result in a significant number of residents or potential residents of our multi-family properties deciding to purchase homes instead of renting;

• changes in, or increased costs of compliance with, laws and/or governmental regulations, including those governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes; and

• rent control or stabilization laws, or other laws regulating rental housing, which could prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs.

Moreover, other factors may adversely affect our results of operations, including potential liability under environmental and other laws and other unforeseen events, many of which are discussed elsewhere in the following risk factors. Any or all of these factors could materially adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs.

Compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to maximize profits.

We must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, our sources of income, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our common stock, to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. We may also be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Accordingly, compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

To qualify as a REIT, we must also ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of such issuer. In addition, no more than 5% of the value of our assets can consist of the securities of any one issuer, other than a qualified REIT security. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we must dispose of the portion of our assets in excess of such amounts within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter in order to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. This requirement could cause us to dispose of assets for consideration of less than their true value and could lead to a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Table of Contents

Because real estate investments are illiquid, we may not be able to reconfigure our portfolio on a timely basis.

Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. We may not be able to reconfigure our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions. Further, even if we are able to sell properties, we may be unable to reinvest the proceeds of such sales in opportunities that are as favorable as the properties sold. Our inability to reconfigure our portfolio to profitably reinvest the proceeds of property sales promptly could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may incur impairment charges in 2026.

We evaluate on a quarterly basis our real estate portfolio for indicators of impairment. Impairment charges reflect management's judgment of the probability and severity of the decline in the value of real estate assets we own. These charges and provisions may be required in the future as a result of factors beyond our control, including, among other things, changes in the economic environment and market conditions affecting the value of real property assets or natural or man-made disasters.

If we do not continue to pay cash dividends, the price of our common stock may decline .

REITs are generally required to distribute annually at least 90% of their ordinary taxable income to maintain our REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, which we refer to as the Code. Because we continue to generate operating losses primarily due to the impact of depreciation, we are not currently required, and may not be required in the future, to pay dividends to maintain our REIT status. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will pay dividends in the future. If we do not continue to pay cash dividends, the price of our common stock may decline.

Our business and operations are subject to physical and transition risks related to climate change.

Several of our multi-family properties are located along or near coastal areas that have historically been subject to the risk of extreme weather events. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns, areas where many of our properties are located could experience more frequent and intense extreme weather events and rising sea levels, which may cause significant damage to our properties, disrupt our operations and adversely impact our residents. Over time, such conditions could result in reduced demand for housing in areas where our properties are located and increased costs related to further developing our properties to mitigate the effects of climate change or repairing damage related to the effects of climate change that may or may not be fully covered by insurance. Likewise, such conditions also may negatively impact the types and pricing of insurance we are able to procure.

Changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations on climate change could result in increased operating costs and/or capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties without a corresponding increase in rental revenues. The imposition of such requirements could increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties (for example by requiring retrofits of existing multi-family properties to improve their energy efficiency and/or resistance to inclement weather) without creating corresponding increases in rental revenues, which would have an adverse impact on our operating results.

Risks Related to BRT's Organization, Structure and Ownership of its Stock

Our transactions with affiliated entities involve conflicts of interest

Entities affiliated with us and with certain of our executive officers provide services to us and on our behalf. Among other things, we retain certain executive officers and others to provide the Services. The aggregate fees to be paid for the Services in 2026, and paid in 2025 and 2024, are $1.8 million, $1.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively. We obtain certain executive, administrative, legal, accounting and clerical personnel and the use of certain facilities pursuant to the shared services agreement. During 2025 and 2024, we reimbursed Gould Investors $750,000 and $698,000, respectively, for the personnel and facilities provided pursuant to the shared services agreement. We also obtain certain insurance in conjunction with Gould Investors and reimbursed Gould Investors $30,000 and $28,000, in 2025 and 2024, respectively, for our share of the insurance cost. These transactions may not be on terms as favorable as those that we would receive if the transactions were entered into with unaffiliated entities and persons.

Gould Investors from time-to time buys multi-family properties, including properties located in the Southeast United States. Although the properties purchased by Gould Investors are generally smaller than the properties in which we are interested, a conflict of interest will arise should Gould Investors decide to pursue the acquisition of large properties in such region. See "Item 1 - Business - Our Acquisition Approach"

Table of Contents

Senior management and other key personnel are critical to our business and our future success may depend on our ability to retain them.

We depend on the services of Jeffrey A. Gould, our president and chief executive officer, and other members of senior management to carry out our business and investment strategies. Although Jeffrey A. Gould devotes substantially all of his business time to our affairs, he devotes a portion of his business time to entities affiliated with us. In addition to Jeffrey A. Gould, only two other executive officers, Matthew Gibbons, our chief accounting officer, and Ryan Gould, a vice president, devote all or substantially all of their business time to us. Many of our executives, including Isaac Kalish, our chief financial officer (i) also provide the Services (see " Item 1. Business-Human Capital Resources ") and (ii) provide their services on a part-time basis pursuant to the shared services agreement. We rely on part-time executive officers to provide certain services to us, including legal and certain financial reporting services, since we do not employ full-time executive officers to handle all of these services. If the shared services agreement is terminated, the executives performing Services are unwilling to continue to do so, or if we are dissatisfied with the services provided pursuant to these arrangements, we will have to obtain such services from other sources or hire personnel to perform them. We may not be able to replace these services or hire such employees in a timely manner or on terms that are equivalent to or better than those we receive pursuant to the Services and the shared services agreement.

In addition, in the future we may need to attract and retain qualified senior management and other key personnel, both on a full-time and part-time basis. The loss of the services of any of our senior management or other key personnel or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could impair our ability to carry out our business and our investment strategies.

We do not carry key man life insurance on members of our senior management.

Certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws and Maryland law may inhibit a change in control that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our common stock

Certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation (the "Charter"), our Bylaws and Maryland law may impede, or prevent, a third party from acquiring control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions:

• provide for a staggered board of directors consisting of three classes, with one class of directors being elected each year and each class being elected for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualify;

• impose restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock (such provisions being intended to, among other purposes, facilitate our compliance with certain requirements under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), relating to our qualification as a REIT under the Code);

• prevent our stockholders from amending the Bylaws;

• limit who may call special meetings of stockholders;

• establish advance notice and informational requirements and time limitations on any director nomination or proposal that a stockholder wishes to make at a meeting of stockholders;

• provide that directors may be removed only for cause and only by the vote of at least two-thirds of all votes generally entitled to be cast in the election of directors;

• do not permit cumulative voting in the election of our board of directors, which would otherwise permit holders of less than a majority of outstanding shares to elect one or more directors; and

• authorize our board of directors, without stockholder approval, to amend the Charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of our stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue and classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock and set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares.

Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) may impede a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or inhibit a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could be in the best interest of holders of shares of our common stock, including:

• “business combination” provisions that, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns

Table of Contents

10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of BRT who, at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting stock) or an affiliate thereof for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter impose two super-majority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations;

• “control share” provisions that provide that, subject to certain exceptions, holders of “control shares” of BRT (defined as voting shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the holder to exercise voting power in the election of directors within one of three increasing ranges) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of issued and outstanding “control shares,” subject to certain exceptions) have no voting rights with respect to the control shares except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares; and

• additionally, Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL permits our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in the Charter or the Bylaws, to implement certain corporate governance provisions.

We have (1) exempted all business combinations between us and any other person, provided that each such business combination is first approved by our board of directors (including a majority of directors who are not affiliates or associates of such other person), from the Maryland Business Combination Act and (2) opted out of the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act.

Ownership of less than 6.0% of our outstanding shares or less than 6.0% of the aggregate outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock could violate the restrictions on ownership and transfer in our Charter, which would result in the transfer of the shares owned or acquired in violation of such restrictions to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and loss of the right to receive dividends and other distributions on, and the economic benefit of any appreciation of, such shares, and you may not have sufficient information to determine at any particular time whether an acquisition of our shares will result in the loss of the economic benefit of such shares.

In order for us to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Code, no more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock may be owned, directly or indirectly or through application of certain attribution rules, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Code) at any time during the last half of a taxable year. To facilitate our qualification as a REIT under the Code, among other purposes, the Charter generally prohibits any person from actually or constructively owning more than 6.0%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding shares of common stock, or more than 6.0% in value of the aggregate outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock, which we refer to as the “ownership limits,” unless our board of directors exempts the person from such ownership limit. In addition, the Charter prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning shares of our stock that would result in more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock to be beneficially owned by five or fewer individuals, regardless of whether such ownership is during the last half of any taxable year, which we refer to as the “Five or Fewer Limit.” Shares owned or acquired in violation of either of these restrictions will be transferred automatically to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary selected by us. The person that owned or acquired our stock in violation of the restrictions in the Charter will not be entitled to any dividends or distributions paid after the date of the transfer to the trust and, upon a sale of such shares by the trust, will generally be entitled to receive only the lesser of the market value on the date of the event that resulted in the transfer to the trust or the net proceeds of the sale by the trust to a person who could own the shares without violating the ownership limits.

Our board of directors has exempted Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould from the ownership limits and has not established a limitation on ownership for such persons. Based on information supplied to us, as of December 31, 2025, Gould Investors owns approximately 21.6% of the outstanding shares of common stock and, by virtue of the applicable attribution rules under the Code, these individuals beneficially own approximately 26.4% of outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the acquisition by each of four other individuals of 6% of our outstanding common stock, when combined with the ownership of our common stock of Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould, generally would not result in a violation of the Five or Fewer Limit. However, there is no limitation on Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould or Jeffrey A. Gould acquiring additional shares of our common stock or otherwise increasing their percentage of ownership of our common stock, meaning that the amount of our stock that other persons or entities may acquire without violating the Five or Fewer Limit could be reduced in the future and without notice. To the extent that Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould, or their affiliates, acquire additional shares or

Table of Contents

our stock, or any other event occurs (including a repurchase of shares of our stock), that results in an individual beneficially or constructively owning 24.0% or more of the outstanding shares of our stock within the meaning of the Charter, the acquisition by four other individuals of 6.0% or less of our outstanding stock would violate the Five or Fewer Limit and, therefore, could cause the stock acquired by one or more of these other individuals to be transferred to the charitable trust, despite their compliance with the 6.0% ownership limits. If any of the foregoing occurs, compliance with the 6.0% ownership limit will not ensure that your ownership of our stock does not cause a violation of the Five or Fewer Limit or that your shares of our stock are not transferred to the charitable trust.

Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould will be required by the Exchange Act and regulations promulgated thereunder to report, with certain exceptions, their acquisition of additional shares of our stock within two days of such acquisitions, and all holders of our stock will be required to file reports of their acquisition of beneficial ownership (as defined in the Exchange Act) of more than 5% of our outstanding stock. However, beneficial ownership for purposes of the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act is calculated differently than beneficial ownership for purposes of determining compliance with the Five or Fewer Limit. Further, to the extent that any one or more of Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould or Jeffrey A. Gould acquires 30% or more of our outstanding stock, ownership of five percent or less of our outstanding stock could still result in a violation of the Five or Fewer Limit and, therefore, cause newly-acquired stock in our company to be transferred to the charitable trust. As a result, you may not have enough information currently available to you at any time to determine the percentage of ownership of our stock that you can acquire without violating the Five or Fewer Limit and losing the economic benefit of the ownership of such newly-acquired shares.

The stock market is volatile, and fluctuations in our operating results, removal from various indices and other factors could cause our stock price to decline.

The stock market has experienced, and may continue to experience, fluctuations that significantly impact the market prices of securities issued by many companies. Market fluctuations could adversely affect our stock price. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, systemic, political and market conditions, such as pandemics, recessions, loss of investor confidence, interest rate changes, government shutdowns, or trade wars, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Moreover, our operating results may fluctuate and vary from period to period due to the risk factors set forth herein.

Although our common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, the volume of trades on any given day has been limited historically, as a result of which stockholders might not have been able to sell or purchase our common stock at the volume, price or time desired. Our common stock is a component of the Russell 3000® Index. If our common stock is removed from the Russell 3000® Index because it does not meet the criteria for continued inclusion in such index, index funds, institutional investors, or other holders attempting to track the composition of that index may be required to sell our common stock, which would adversely impact the price and frequency at which it trades.

General Business Risks

Breaches of information technology systems could materially harm our business and reputation.

We, our joint venture partners and the property managers managing our properties, collect and retain, through information technology systems, financial, personal and other sensitive information provided by third parties, including tenants, vendors and employees. Such persons also rely on information technology systems for the collection and distribution of funds. Our information technology systems have been breached though, to our knowledge, none of our properties nor tenants have suffered any material damages therefrom. There can be no assurance that we, our joint venture partners or property managers will be able to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information or the unauthorized distribution of funds. Any loss of this information or unauthorized distribution of funds as a result of a breach of information technology systems may result in loss of funds to which we are entitled, legal liability and costs (including damages and penalties), as well as damage to our reputation, that could materially and adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Artificial intelligence and other machine learning techniques could increase competitive, operational, legal and regulatory risks to our business in ways that we cannot predict.

The use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) by us and others, and the overall adoption of AI throughout society, may exacerbate or create new and unpredictable competitive, operational, legal and regulatory risks to our business. There is substantial uncertainty about the extent to which AI will result in dramatic changes throughout the world, and we may not be able to anticipate, prevent, mitigate or remediate all of the potential risks, challenges or impacts of such changes. These changes could

Table of Contents

potentially disrupt, among other things, our business and operational processes. Our competitors may be more successful than us in the development and implementation of services and platforms based on AI to improve their operations. If we are unable to adequately use AI, or do so at a slower pace than others in our industry, we will be at a competitive disadvantage.

If the data we, or third parties whose services we rely on and over whom we have limited oversight, use in connection with the possible development or deployment of AI is incomplete, inadequate or biased in some way, the performance of our business could suffer. Data in technology that uses AI may contain a degree of inaccuracy and error, which could result in in flawed decision-making on our part or the part of our property managers and other service providers. This could reduce the effectiveness of AI technologies and adversely impact us and our operations to the extent that we rely on the AI's work product. There is also a risk that we or our service providers may improperly disclose confidential information, including material non-public information or personally identifiable information, into AI applications, resulting in such information becoming a part of a dataset that is accessible by third parties.

Our and our service providers use of AI may require compliance with legal or regulatory frameworks that are not fully developed or tested, and we may face litigation and regulatory actions related to our or our service providers use of AI.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Controls and Procedures

Other Information

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

PART III

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Executive Compensation

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Form 10-K Summary

Signatures

Table of Contents

Explanatory Note

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires:

• all references “us”, “we”, “BRT” or the “Company” refer to BRT Apartments Corp. and its consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries;

• "acquisitions" include investments in unconsolidated joint ventures;

• our "significant subsidiaries" (as such term is by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X), includes TRB Holdings LLC, and TRB Civic Center LLC, which owns Civic Center I and II, properties located in Southaven, MS;

• the term "promote" refers to our joint venture partner's share of the income and/or cash flow from a multi-family property greater than that implied by their percentage of equity interest in such project;

• we refer to certain entities as “affiliated entities”, because such entities share with us certain executive personnel and ownership. Our “affiliated entities” include Gould Investors L.P. (“Gould Investors”), a master limited partnership involved primarily in the ownership and operation of a diversified portfolio of real estate assets; Georgetown Partners LLC (“Georgetown”), which is the managing general partner of Gould Investors and which is controlled by Jeffrey A. Gould, our President, Chief Executive Officer and a director, and Matthew J. Gould, our Senior Vice President and a director; One Liberty Properties, Inc. (“OLP”), a NYSE listed industrial focused REIT; and Majestic Property Management LLC. (“Majestic Property”), a property management company which compensates certain of our executive officers, and which is indirectly owned by, among others, Jeffrey A. Gould and Matthew J. Gould. The use of the term "affiliated entities" or similar terms does not constitute an acknowledgement that such person(s) or entities are affiliates (as such term is used in the Securities Act (as defined below) or Exchange Act (as defined below)) of ours or one another;

• "same store properties" refer to properties that we owned and operated for the entirety of periods being compared, except for properties that are in lease-up. We move properties previously excluded from our same store portfolio (because they were in lease up) into the same store designation once they have stabilized (as described below) and such status has been reflected fully in all applicable periods of comparison. Newly constructed, lease-up, development and redevelopment properties are deemed stabilized upon the earlier to occur of the first full calendar quarter beginning (a) 12 months after the property is fully completed and put in service and (b) attainment of at least 90% physical occupancy;

• "standard carve-outs" refers to recourse items to an otherwise non-recourse mortgage and are customary to mortgage financing. While carve-outs vary from lender to lender and transaction to transaction, the carve-outs may include, among other things, a voluntary bankruptcy filing, environmental liabilities, the sale, financing or encumbrance of the property in violation of loan documents, damage to property as a result of intentional misconduct or gross negligence, failure to pay valid taxes and other claims which could or in certain cases, would create a lien on a property and the conversion of security deposits, insurance proceeds or condemnation awards;

• references to unconsolidated joint ventures exclude ventures in which we have a preferred equity investment; and

• rental rates do not reflect the impact of rent concessions.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

We consider this and other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, with respect to our expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements do not discuss historical fact, but instead include statements related to expectations, projections, intentions or other items related to the future. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding expected operating performance and results, property acquisition and disposition activity, joint venture activity, development and value add activity and other capital expenditures, and capital raising and financing activity, as well as revenue and expense growth, occupancy, interest rate and other economic expectations. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “projects,” “assumes,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “budget,” “target,” “outlook,” “opportunity,” “guidance” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors as described below, which are in some cases beyond our control, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results of operations, financial conditions or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such forward-looking statements included in this report may not prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such information.

The following factors, among others, could, and in certain cases would, cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements:

Table of Contents

• inability to generate sufficient cash flows due to unfavorable economic and market conditions ( e.g. , inflation, volatile interest rates and the possibility of a recession), changes in supply and/or demand, competition, uninsured losses, changes in tax and housing laws or other factors;

• adverse changes in real estate markets, including, but not limited to, the extent of future demand for multi-family units in our significant markets, barriers of entry into new markets which we may seek to enter in the future, limitations on our ability to maintain or increase rental or occupancy rates, competition, our ability to identify and consummate attractive acquisitions and dispositions on favorable terms, and our ability to reinvest sale proceeds in a manner that generates favorable returns;

• general and local real estate conditions, including any changes in the value of our real estate;

• decreasing rental rates or increasing vacancy rates;

• challenges in acquiring properties (including challenges in buying properties directly without the participation of joint venture partners and the limited number of multi-family property acquisition opportunities available to us), which acquisitions may not be completed or may not produce the cash flows or income expected;

• the competitive environment in which we operate, including competition that adversely affects our ability to acquire properties and/or limits our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental rates;

• exposure to risks inherent in investments in a single industry and sector;

• the concentration of our multi-family properties in the Southeastern United States and Texas, which makes us more susceptible to adverse developments in those markets;

• increases in expenses over which we have limited control, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, insurance, and utilities, due to inflation and other factors;

• impairment in the value of real estate we own;

• failure of property managers to manage properties effectively and efficiently;

• accessibility of debt and equity capital markets;

• disagreements with, or misconduct by, joint venture partners;

• inability to obtain financing at favorable rates, if at all, or refinance existing debt as it matures due to the level and volatility of interest or capitalization rates or capital market conditions;

• extreme weather and natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes and floods;

• lack of or insufficient insurance to cover, among other things, losses from catastrophes;

• risks associated with acquiring value-add multi-family properties, which involves greater risks than more conservative approaches;

• events giving rise to increases in our current expected credit loss reserve;

• the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, which could adversely impact us;

• changes in Federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations, including laws and regulations relating to taxes and real estate and related investments;

• our failure to comply with laws, including those requiring access to our properties by disabled persons, which could result in substantial costs;

• board determinations as to timing and payment of dividends, if any, and our ability or willingness to pay future dividends;

• our ability to satisfy the complex rules required to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes;

Table of Contents

• possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently or previously owned, by us or a subsidiary owned by us or by the unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have interests;

• our dependence on information systems, risks associated with breaches of such systems, and the impact on us by the use of artificial intelligence by our competitors and suppliers;

• disease outbreaks and other public health events, and measures that are taken by federal, state, and local governmental authorities in response to such outbreaks and events;

• impact of climate change on our properties or operations;

• risks associated with the stock ownership restrictions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") for REITs and the stock ownership limit imposed by our charter; and

• the other factors described in this Annual Report, including those set forth under the captions "Item 1. Business," "Item 1A. Risk Factors," and "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" .

We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. Except to the extent otherwise required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the filing of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events thereafter.

Table of Contents

PART I

Item l.    Business.

General

We are an internally managed real estate investment trust, also known as a REIT, that owns, operates, and to a lesser extent, holds interests in joint ventures that own and operate multi-family properties. At December 31, 2025, we (i) wholly-own 21 multi-family properties with an aggregate of 5,420 units and a carrying value of $595.2 million; (ii) have ownership interests, through unconsolidated entities, in ten multi-family properties with an aggregate of 2,891 units for which the carrying value of our net equity investment therein is $46.1 million; (iii) have preferred equity investments in two multi-family properties with a carrying value of $17.7 million; and (iv) own other assets, through consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries, with a carrying value of $1.6 million. The 31 multi-family properties are located in 11 s tates; primarily in the Southeast United States and Texas.

Our website can be accessed at www.brtapartments.com , where copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, can be obtained free of charge.

2025 and Recent Developments.

During 2025:

• we acquired, through two unconsolidated joint ventures in two separate and unrelated transactions, an 80% interest in two multi-family properties (referred to collectively as the "2025 Acquisitions") with an aggregate of 364 units for an aggregate purchase price of $59.5 million, including $40.1 million of mortgage debt. The mortgage debt bears a weighted average interest rate of 4.34% and a weighted average remaining term to maturity of 6.6 years.

• we refinanced four mortgages maturing in 2025 and 2026 in aggregate principal amount of $58.0 million (the “Prior Mortgages”) and bearing a weighted average fixed interest rate of 4.38% with four replacement mortgages in aggregate principal amount $87.7 million (the "2025 Financings"). The replacement mortgages (the “Replacement Mortgages”) have a weighted average remaining term to maturity of 8.5 years, a weighted average fixed interest rate of 4.97%, and unlike the Prior Mortgages, are interest only until maturity (other than with respect to a mortgage in principal amount of $15.8 million, which is interest only until 2030, one year prior to its maturity). As a result of the 2025 Financings, our aggregate annual principal payments are expected to decrease by $1.2 million (until 2030), and our annual interest expense is expected to increase by $1.8 million, from the corresponding amounts under the Prior Mortgages.

• we sold a cooperative apartment unit in New York, NY for a sales price of approximately $1.0 million and recognized a gain of $755,000.

• we repurchased 321,060 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.0 million ( i.e., an average purchase price of $15.53 per share).

Subsequent to December 31, 2025, we purchased 75,155 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.1 million ( i.e., an average price of $14.82 per share). In March 2026, our board of directors increased the value of the shares that we can repurchase up to $10 million and extended the repurchase program through December 31, 2028.

Table of Contents

Our Multi-Family Properties

Generally, our multi-family properties are garden apartments and, to a lesser extent, mid-rise or town home style properties that provide residents with amenities, such as a clubhouse, swimming pool, laundry facilities and internet access. Residential leases are typically for a one-year term and may require security deposits equal to one month's rent. Substantially all of the units at these properties are leased at market rates. Set forth below is selected information regarding the multi-family properties in which we have an interest (other than the Preferred Equity Investments (described under "Preferred Equity Investments")), as of December 31, 2025; the properties in which we have a less than 100% ownership interest are owned by unconsolidated joint ventures:

Our Percentage Ownership (%) (1)

Average Monthly Rental Rate Per

Occupied Unit ($)

Average Physical Occupancy (%)

Property Name and Location

Number

of Units

Age

Acquisition

Date

Silvana Oaks Apartments—N. Charleston, SC

Avondale Station—Decatur, GA

Brixworth at Bridge Street—Huntsville, AL

Newbridge Commons—Columbus, OH

Crossings of Bellevue—Nashville, TN

Avalon Apartments—Pensacola, FL

Parkway Grande—San Marcos, TX

Woodland Trails—LaGrange, GA

Grove at River Place — Macon, GA

Civic Center I—Southaven, MS

Civic Center II — Southaven, MS

Verandas at Alamo Ranch—San Antonio, TX

Kilburn Crossing — Fredericksburg, VA

Bells Bluff — West Nashville, TN

Vanguard Heights — Creve Coeur, MO

Jackson Square — Tallahassee, FL

Magnolia Pointe at Madison — Madison, AL

The Woodland Apartments — Boerne, TX (2)

Somerset at Trussville — Trussville, AL

Crestmont at Thornblade — Greenville, SC

Abbotts Run — Wilmington, NC

The Pointe at Lenox Park— Atlanta, GA

Canalside Lofts — Columbia, SC

Canalside Sola — Columbia, SC

Mercer Crossing — Farmers Branch, TX

Gateway Oaks — Forney, TX

Landings of Carrier Parkway — Grand Prairie, TX

Village at Lakeside — Auburn, AL

Stono Oaks-Johns Island, SC (3)

1322 North —Auburn, AL

Oaks at Victory —Savannah, GA

Total

(1)    Distributions to, and profit sharing between, joint venture partners, are determined pursuant to the applicable agreement governing the relationship between the parties and are generally not pro rata to the equity ownership percentage each

joint venture partner has in the applicable joint venture.

(2)    Occupancy in 2021 was effected by damage from the February ice storm in Texas (the "Texas Storm").

(3) This property was in lease up until September 2025.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth certain information, presented by state, related to our consolidated properties as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

State

Number of Properties

Number of Units

2025 Rental and

Other Revenue

% of 2025 Rental and Other Revenue

Tennessee

Mississippi

Alabama

Georgia

Florida

Texas

South Carolina

Virginia

North Carolina

Ohio

Missouri

Other (1)

Total

(1) Includes non-multi-family revenues primarily from a commercial property located in Yonkers, NY.

The following table sets forth certain information, presented by state, related to properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures at of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

State

Number of

Properties

Number of

Units

2025 JV Rental and Other Revenues (1)

Percent of 2025

JV Rental

and Other Revenues (1)

Texas

South Carolina

Georgia

Alabama

Total

(1) The term "JV Rental and other Revenues" refers to the revenues generated at multi-family properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures.

Our Acquisition Process and Underwriting Criteria

We identify multi-family property acquisition opportunities primarily through relationships developed with, among others, current or former joint venture partners, real estate investors and brokers. We will acquire multi-family properties either with joint venture partners (and especially with partner’s experienced in the target market), which allows us to benefit from such partner’s experience, or directly ( i.e. , without a joint venture partner), which allows for the possibility for greater returns on our investment.

We emphasize acquiring the following types of multi-family properties:

• Class B or better properties with strong and stable cash flows in markets where we believe there exists opportunity for rental growth and further value creation;

• Class B or better properties that offer significant potential for capital appreciation through repositioning or rehabilitating the asset to drive rental growth; and

• properties available at opportunistic prices providing an opportunity for a significant appreciation in value.

We seek properties that provide stable risk adjusted total returns ( i.e., operating income plus capital appreciation), including value-add opportunities ( i.e. , properties that can be repositioned or improved allowing us to generate higher rents or improved occupancy) and emphasize acquiring properties in the Southeast United States and Texas. We have been opportunistic in pursuing multi-family property acquisitions and have not mandated any specific acquisition criteria, although

Table of Contents

we take the following, among other things, into account in evaluating an acquisition opportunity: location, demographics, size of the target market, property quality, availability and terms and conditions of long-term fixed-rate mortgage debt, potential for capital appreciation or recurring income, extent and nature of contemplated capital improvements and property age.

A key consideration in our acquisition process is the availability of mortgage debt to finance the acquisition (or the ability to assume the mortgage debt on the property) and the terms and conditions ( e.g ., interest rate, amortization and maturity) of such debt. Generally, approximately 35% to 50% of the purchase price has been paid in cash (all or a portion of our share of which may be funded by borrowing from our credit facility) and the balance is financed with mortgage debt. We believe that the use of leverage allows us the ability to earn a greater return on our investment than we would otherwise earn. Generally, the mortgage debt obtained in connection with an acquisition matures in five to ten years, is interest only for one to five years, and provides for a fixed interest rate and for the amortization of the principal of such debt over 30 years.

Potential acquisitions are reviewed and approved by our investment committee. Approval requires the assent of not less than five of the nine members of this committee, most of whom are our executive officers. Board of director approval is required for any single multi-family property acquisition in which our equity investment exceeds $40 million.

From time-to-time we have pursued development opportunities with joint venture partners when we believe the potential higher returns justify the additional risks. The factors considered in pursuing these opportunities generally include the factors considered in evaluating a standard acquisition opportunity, and we place additional emphasis on our joint venture partner's ability to execute a development project. We do not anticipate development properties will constitute a significant part of our portfolio.

It is our policy, and the policy of our affiliated entities, that any investment opportunity presented to us or to an affiliated entity that involves the acquisition of a multi-family property with more than 100 units, will first be offered to us and may not be acquired by our affiliated entities unless we decline the opportunity. Gould Investors has purchased and will continue to purchase multi-family properties in the Southeast United States. We have not been interested in acquiring any of the properties purchased by Gould Investors.

Property and Joint Venture Dispositions

We monitor our portfolio to identify properties that should be sold. Factors considered in deciding whether to sell a property generally include our evaluation of the current market price of such property compared to its projected economics (including the age of the property and anticipated maintenance costs), changes in the factors considered by us in acquiring such property, the ability to reinvest net proceeds from a sale into a more favorable acquisition opportunity or other productive purpose, our ability to refinance the debt maturing on such property on acceptable terms, our liquidity requirements and, with respect to properties that are owned by unconsolidated joint ventures, our partners' desires with respect thereto. If our partners deem it in their own economic interest to dispose of a property at an earlier date than we would otherwise dispose of a property, we may accommodate such request and agree to sell the property to a third party or attempt to purchase our partner's interest.

Table of Contents

Joint Venture Arrangements

The arrangements with our multi-family property joint venture partners are deal-specific and vary from transaction-to- transaction. Generally, these arrangements provide for us and our joint venture partner to receive net cash flow available for distribution and/or profits in the following order of priority: (i) a preferred return o f 8% to 10% on each party's unreturned capital contributions, until such preferred return has been paid in full; and (ii) the return in full of each party's capital contribution (and together with the preferred return, the "Mandatory Return"). Thereafter, distributions to, and profit sharing between, joint venture partners, is determined pursuant to the applicable agreement governing the relationship between the parties. The allocation and distribution of cash and profits to BRT after the Mandatory Return is generally less than that implied by BRT's percentage equity interest in the venture/property as a result of allocation/distribution provisions of our joint venture operating agreements.

Although as noted above each joint venture operating agreement contains different terms, such agreements may limit our right to vote and receive distributions. Such agreements generally provide for a buy-sell procedure under specified circumstances, including, (i) if the partners are unable to agree on major decisions or (ii) upon a change in control of our subsidiary owning the interest in the joint venture. These arrangements may also allow us, and in some cases, our joint venture partner, to force the sale of the property after it has been owned by the joint venture for a specified period ( e.g ., four-to-five years after the acquisition).

Preferred Equity Investments

During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, we invested (the "Preferred Equity Investments"), in two separate and unrelated transactions, an aggregate of $18.3 million in joint ventures that purchased a 204-unit multi-family property in Wilmington, NC (the “Wilmington Investment”) and a 184-unit multi-family property in Kennesaw, GA (the “Kennesaw Investment”). These investments are unsecured and are subordinate (including the payment of the returns thereon), to an aggregate of $51.0 million of mortgage debt bearing a weighted average interest rate of 4.81% and a weighted average remaining term to maturity of 4.8 years. Generally, these investments provide for an annual return to us of 13% (i) of which 6.0% to 6.5% ($1.2 million is payable monthly to the extent of available cash-flow (the “Current Return”) and (ii) with the balance of 6.5% to 7% of the amount invested in the applicable joint venture (the “Hurdle Return”), also to be paid from remaining cash flow after the payments to the sponsor of specified fees and investment returns. We do not anticipate receiving the Hurdle Return with respect to the Kennesaw Investment until June 2029 and the Wilmington Investment until November 2031, if at all. Our maximum exposure to loss with respect to these investments is limited to our invested capital.

For financial statement reporting purposes, these investments are treated as loans and are included in "Loan receivables, net of deferred loan fees and allowance for credit loss" on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2025. See notes 1, 5 and 6 to our consolidated financial statements for further information about these investments.

In evaluating whether to pursue preferred equity investments, we generally consider the same factors used in evaluating the purchase of a multi-family property through a joint venture partner.

Property Management

The day-to-day management of our multi-family properties is overseen by property management companies operating in the market in which the property is located. (Four of our seven joint venture properties are managed by management companies that are owned by a joint venture partner or its affiliates). The property management companies that manage our properties are paid fees ranging from 2% to 4% of revenues generated by the applicable property. Generally, we can terminate these management companies upon specified notice or for cause, subject to the approval of the mortgage lender and, in some cases, our joint venture partner. We believe satisfactory replacements for property managers are available, if required.

Mortgage Debt and Other Real Estate Financings

In acquiring properties, we use fixed rate mortgage debt to pay from 50% to 65% of the purchase price. Although fixed rate mortgage debt is typically more expensive and less flexible than variable rate mortgage debt ( e.g. , the interest rate is higher at origination and there are typically high prepayment penalties, yield maintenance payments and/or defeasance penalties when refinancing the debt prior to maturity), we prefer using such debt as it caps our exposure to fluctuating interest rates. We also from time-to-time obtain supplemental mortgage debt on an acquired property which, among other things, allows us to generate additional cash resulting from the appreciation of the value of the property. As of December 31, 2025, 19 of our 21 wholly-owned properties are subject to fixed-rate mortgage debt; our interests in the two remaining wholly-owned properties have been pledged to our credit facility lender. At December 31, 2025, the weighted average annual interest rate on these mortgages was 4.22% and the weighted average remaining term to maturity was 6.3 years.

Table of Contents

Our unconsolidated multi-family properties are subject to fixed-rate mortgage debt, other than Stono Oaks-Johns Island, SC, which is subject to a variable-rate construction loan. As of December 31, 2025, the weighted average annual interest rate on all of the unconsolidated debt is 4.21% and the weighted average remaining term to maturity is 3.3 years.

The following table sets forth scheduled principal (including amortization) mortgage payments due for all of our multi-family properties as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

YEAR

Principal Payments Due for Consolidated Properties (1)

Principal Payments Due for Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (2)

Total Principal Payments Due

Thereafter

Total

(1) Does not give effect to deferred loan fees and mortgage fair value adjustments of $304 (see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements).

(2) Includes all of the mortgage debt on properties owned by such joint venture and excludes the effect of $2,048 mortgage discounts relating to our 2025 acquisition of Oaks at Victory.

The mortgage debt associated with our multi-family properties, including the mortgage debt at our significant subsidiaries, generally contain covenants, including covenants that require, (i) the guarantor of the mortgage debt to maintain a certain level of net worth and liquid assets or (ii) in connection with the sale or other transfer of the property, the mortgage debt to be paid off (or assumed by the buyer with the consent of the mortgage lender). The mortgage debt is generally non-recourse to us and the entity that owns the property, subject to standard carve-outs. We, at the parent entity level ( i.e ., BRT Apartments Corp.), are the standard carve-out guarantor with respect to the mortgage debt of almost all of our wholly-owned properties. At December 31, 2025, the principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding with respect to the properties at which we are the carve-out guarantor is approximately $468 million.

Corporate Level Financing Arrangements

See " Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Corporate Level Financing Arrangements " for information about our corporate level financing arrangements.

Insurance

Each of the multi-family properties is covered by all risk property insurance generally covering 100% of the replacement cost for each building, and business interruption and rental loss insurance (covering up to twelve months of loss). On a case-by-case basis, based on an assessment of the likelihood of the risk, availability of insurance, cost of insurance and in accordance with standard market practice, we obtain earthquake, windstorm, flood, terrorism and boiler and machinery insurance. We carry commercial general liability insurance and umbrella policies for each of our properties which generally provide no less than $7 million to $25 million of coverage per incident. We request certain extension of coverage, valuation clauses, and deductibles in accordance with standard market practice and availability.

Although we may carry insurance for potential losses associated with our multi-family properties, we may still incur losses due to uninsured risks, deductibles, co-payments or losses in excess of applicable insurance coverage and those losses may be material. In addition, insurance coverage at our unconsolidated properties is provided through blanket policies obtained by our joint venture partners or the property managers for such property. A consequence of obtaining insurance coverage in this manner is that losses on properties in which we have no ownership interest could reduce significantly or eliminate the coverage available on one or more properties in which we have an interest.

Our Other Real Estate Assets and Activities

In addition to our multi-family properties and Preferred Equity Investments, we own assets, and in particular, real estate assets, with an aggregate carrying value of $1.6 million at December 31, 2025. These assets include cooperative apartment units located in Lawrence and Washington Heights, NY, a leasehold position with two commercial tenants at a property in Yonkers, NY, and a nominal profit participation in an entity that owns several multi-family properties in Newark, NJ. None of these

Table of Contents

assets generate significant net income or revenue other than (i) the leasehold interest in Yonkers, NY which generated $1.5 million of rental income and $1.3 million of cash flow from operations in 2025 before giving effect to the non-controlling interest, and (ii) from the sale, from time-to-time, of some of these legacy assets (in particular, the cooperative apartment units in Washington Heights, NY). See notes 2 and 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

Competition

We compete to acquire multi-family properties with publicly traded and non-publicly traded real estate investment trusts, pension and investment funds, real estate developers, private real estate investors and other owners and operators of such properties. Competition to acquire such properties, among other things, is based on price, the ability to secure financing on a timely basis, an extensive network able to introduce us to appropriate acquisition opportunities and the ability to absorb certain risks that we may be unwilling to absorb (and that larger competitors may be willing to absorb).

We compete for tenants at our multi-family properties—such competition depends upon various factors, including alternative housing options available in the applicable sub-market, rent, amenities provided and proximity to employment and quality of life venues.

Many of our competitors possess greater financial and other resources than we possess. To the extent that a potential joint venture partner introduces us to a multi-family acquisition opportunity, we compete with other sources of equity capital to participate in such joint venture based on the financial returns we are willing to offer such potential partner and the other terms and conditions of such arrangement.

Government Regulation

Multi-family properties are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to common areas, such as swimming pools, activity centers, and recreational facilities. We believe that each of our properties has the necessary permits and approvals to operate its business.

Americans with Disabilities Act

Our properties must comply with applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which we refer to as the "ADA". Among other things, the ADA may require removal of structural barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. We believe that our properties are in substantial compliance with the ADA and that we will not be required to make substantial capital expenditures to address the requirements of the ADA. However, noncompliance with the ADA could result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. Our obligations under the ADA are ongoing and we will continue to assess our properties and make alterations as appropriate.

Fair Housing Act

The Fair Housing Act, which we refer to as the "FHA", its state law counterparts and the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and various state agencies, prohibit discrimination in housing on the basis of race or color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status or handicap (disability) and, in some jurisdictions, financial capability or other bases. Our failure to comply with these laws could result in litigation, fines, penalties or other adverse claims, or could result in limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could materially and adversely affect us. We believe that we operate our properties in substantial compliance with the FHA.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to regulation at the federal, state and municipal levels and are exposed to potential liability should our properties or actions result in damage to the environment or to other persons or properties. These conditions include the presence or growth of mold, potential leakage of underground storage tanks, breakage or leaks from sewer lines and risks pertaining to waste handling. The potential costs of compliance, property damage restoration and other costs for which we could be liable or which could occur without regard to our fault or knowledge, are unknown and could potentially be material. There are no material claims made or pending against us with regard to environmental damage, nor are we aware of any potential environmental hazards related to any of our properties which could reasonably be expected to result in a material loss.

Human Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2025, we had 12 salaried employees, including one individual who devotes approximately 50% of his time to our activities, one individual who works on a part-time basis, and two individuals with respect to whom a portion of their salary is allocated to affiliated entities pursuant to the shared services agreement described below. In addition, part-time personnel (including part-time executive officers), perform certain executive, administrative, legal, accounting and clerical

Table of Contents

functions for us. The services of the part-time personnel as well as the provision to us of certain facilities and other resources are supplied pursuant to a shared services agreement between us and several affiliated entities, including Gould Investors. The expenses for the shared personnel, facilities and resources is allocated to us and the other affiliated entities in accordance with the shared services agreement. The allocation is based on the estimated time devoted by such part-time personnel to the affairs of the parties to this agreement.

We also retain several related parties, among other things, to analyze and approve multi-family property acquisitions and dispositions, develop and maintain banking and financing relationships and provide investment advice and long-term planning (the “Services”). The aggregate fees to be paid in 2026, and paid in 2025 and 2024, for the Services, are $1.8 million, $1.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively. See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the shared services agreement and the Services.

We believe that we provide a competitive benefits program, either directly or through the shared services agreement, to help meet the needs of our employees. In addition to salaries, the program includes annual cash bonuses, stock awards, pension plan contributions, healthcare and insurance benefits, flexible spending accounts, paid-time off and family leave. Employees are provided regular opportunities to participate in professional development programs, and we work with our employees to help them meet their personal and family needs. Most of our employees have a long tenure with us, which we believe is indicative of their satisfaction with our work environment.

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of Registrant

Set forth below is a list of our executive officers whose terms, except as otherwise indicated, will expire at our 2026 annual Board of Directors' meeting (the business history of officers who are also directors will be provided in our proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30, 2026):

Name

Age

Office

Israel Rosenzweig (1)

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Jeffrey A. Gould (2)

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

George E. Zweier

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Matthew J. Gould (2)

Senior Vice President and Director

David W. Kalish (3)

Senior Vice President - Finance

Mark H. Lundy

Senior Vice President and Counsel

Steven Rosenzweig (1)

Senior Vice President - Legal

Isaac Kalish (3)

Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer

Matthew Gibbons

Chief Accounting Officer

Ryan Gould (4)

Vice President

(1) Steven Rosenzweig is the son of Israel Rosenzweig.

(2) Jeffrey A. Gould and Matthew J. Gould are sons of Fredric H. Gould, a director.

(3) Isaac Kalish is the son of David W. Kalish.

(4) Ryan Gould is the son of Jeffrey A. Gould

George E. Zweier, a certified public accountant, has served as our Chief Financial Officer and a Vice President since 1998. He resigned from the Company effective February 27, 2026.

David W. Kalish, a certified public accountant, served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1990 to 1998, and as our Senior Vice President, Finance since 1998. From 1990 to 2023, he served as Chief Financial Officer of One Liberty Properties, Inc. and since 1990 he has served as Chief Financial Officer of Georgetown.

Mark H. Lundy has been our Counsel and/or General Counsel since 2007, Senior Vice President since 2005 and Vice President from 1993 to 2005. He served as a Vice President of One Liberty Properties from 2000 to 2006 and has been its Assistant Secretary/Secretary and Senior Vice President since June 1993 and 2006, respectively. Since 2013, Mr. Lundy has served as President and Chief Operating Officer, and from 1990 through 2013 served as a Vice President/Senior Vice President, of Georgetown. He is licensed to practice law in New York and Washington, D.C.

Steven Rosenzweig has been associated with us since 2013, served as a Vice President from 2015 through 2019 and as Senior Vice President - Legal since 2019. He has served as Vice President of Georgetown since January 2016. Mr. Rosenzweig is licensed to practice law in New York.

Isaac Kalish, a certified public accountant, has been associated with us since 2004, served as Assistant Treasurer from 2007 through 2014, as Vice President and Treasurer since 2013 and 2014, respectively, as Senior Vice President since 2022, and as our Chief Financial Officer upon George Zweier's resignation. He served as Vice President of One Liberty Properties from 2013 through 2022, as its Senior Vice President since 2022 and as its Chief Financial Officer since 2023. Mr. Kalish served as Assistant Treasurer of Georgetown from 2012 through 2013, and as its Treasurer since 2013.

Matthew Gibbons, a certified public accountant, has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since September 2025. He served as a Director of Audit and Assurance at BDO US LLP from 2015 to 2023 (including the period at which BDO served as our independent auditor) and at Baker Tilly US LLP from January 2023 until the commencement of his employment with us in July 2024 as Chief Accounting Officer.

Ryan Gould commenced employment with the Company in 2022 after receiving an M.S. in Real Estate Finance and Investment from the NYU Schack Institute of Real Estate. He has served as a Vice President since 2025.

Table of Contents

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Our information technology, communication networks, enterprise applications, accounting and financial reporting platforms and related systems are integral to our operations. We use these systems, among others, for internal communications, for accounting and record-keeping functions, and for many other key aspects of our business. Our operations rely on securing, collecting, storing, transmitting, and processing of proprietary and confidential data.

We have deployed various safeguards designed to protect our information technology (“IT”) systems from cybersecurity threats, including firewalls, intrusion prevention and detection systems, anti-malware functionality and access controls. At the management level, these cybersecurity defense systems are overseen by our network administrator who performs services for us on a part-time basis pursuant to the shared services agreement. Our network administrator has more than 20 years of experience with IT systems and holds various IT certifications. Our network administrator reports to, and is in regular contact with, our Senior Vice President-Finance and Senior Vice President . These officers do not have IT or cybersecurity training. In the event of a cybersecurity incident, among other things, the network administrator and these officers would consult with one another and, as needed or appropriate, other members of management to determine the appropriate course of action (including whether such incident should be reported to other members of management and/or the audit committee and whether public disclosure should, or is, required to be made).

Our internal auditor performs certain procedures to test the integrity and functionality of our IT systems (which includes a high-level review of our cybersecurity defenses). In addition, we have retained a third-party cybersecurity consulting firm that (i) advises us as to cybersecurity matters (including prevailing cybersecurity threats), (ii) performs, on a periodic basis, assessments of our cybersecurity defenses and (iii) on a continuous basis, monitors our IT systems for cybersecurity threats and intrusions.

We are not aware of any risks from cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report for additional discussion about cybersecurity-related risks.

To operate our business, we use certain third-party service providers to perform a variety of functions . We seek to engage reliable, reputable service providers that maintain cybersecurity programs and we rely on such providers to maintain appropriate internal and external cybersecurity practices.

At the Board level, our cybersecurity practices are overseen by the audit committee as part of its oversight of our risk management activities. The committee meets periodically with, among others, our internal auditor and network administrator to review and discuss cybersecurity matters.

Item 2.    Properties.

Our principal executive office is located at 60 Cutter Mill Road, Suite 303, Great Neck, NY. We believe that this facility is satisfactory for our current and projected needs.

See "Item 1—Business" for additional information regarding our properties.

Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

Set forth below is a discussion of certain risks affecting our business. The categorization of risks set forth below is meant to help you better understand the risks facing our business and is not intended to limit your consideration of the possible effects of these risks to the listed categories. Any adverse effects arising from the realization of any of the risks discussed, including our financial condition and results of operation, may, and likely will, adversely affect many aspects of our business.

Risks Related to Real Estate Investments and Our Operations

Unfavorable market and economic conditions could adversely affect rental revenues, occupancy levels and the value of our properties.

General economic conditions in the U.S. have fluctuated significantly in recent quarters. Unfavorable market and economic conditions significantly affect our occupancy levels, our rental rates and collections, the value of our properties and our ability to acquire or dispose of multi-family properties on favorable terms. Our ability to lease units at our multi-family properties at favorable rates is adversely affected by the increase in supply in the multi-family and other rental markets and other housing alternatives, and is dependent upon the overall level in the economy, which may continue to be adversely affected by, among other things, inflationary conditions, job losses and unemployment levels, personal debt levels, a downturn in the housing market, stock market volatility, and uncertainty about the future. Some of our major expenses generally do not decline when related rents decline. We would expect that declines in our occupancy levels, rental revenues and/or the values of our multi-family properties would cause us to have less cash available to make payments on our debt and to pay dividends, which could adversely affect our financial condition or the market value of our securities.

We may be unable to compete to acquire, finance or dispose of our properties or to lease rental units.

We compete with many third parties including other REITs, specialty finance companies, public and private investors, investment and pension funds, in acquiring, obtaining financing for, and disposing of multi-family properties. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. Larger and more established competitors enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, enhanced operating efficiencies and more extensive networks providing greater and more favorable access to capital, financing and tax credit allocations and more favorable acquisition opportunities.

In attracting and retaining residents to occupy our multi-family properties, we compete with numerous other housing providers. Our multi-family properties compete directly with other rental apartments, as well as condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our properties are located. Principal factors of competition include rent or price charged, attractiveness of the location of multi-family properties, and the quality and breadth of services. The number of competitive properties relative to demand in a particular area has a material effect on our ability to lease our properties, on the rents we charge and our occupancy levels.

Increasing real estate taxes, utilities and insurance premiums may negatively impact operating results

The cost of real estate taxes, utilities and insurance is a significant component of real estate operating expense. These expenses are subject to significant increases and fluctuations, including the impact of inflation, which we may be unable to control. For example, our real estate taxes have increased and will continue to increase as our properties are reassessed by taxing authorities and as property tax rates increase. Further, our real estate taxes have fluctuated and may not be comparable year-over-year because of, among other things, (i) the timing difference as to when we accrue real estate taxes and the results of any tax appeals with respect to such accrued taxes and (ii) determinations, over which we have no control, by governmental authorities to increase tax rates, assessments or procedures. In addition, our share of the insurance premiums at joint venture properties is determined by our joint venture partner at such properties. If the costs associated with real estate taxes, utilities and insurance premiums should rise, without being offset by a corresponding increase in revenues, our results of operations could be negatively impacted, and our ability to make payments on our debt and to make distributions would be adversely affected.

Most of our multi-family properties are located in the Southeast and Texas which makes us susceptible to adverse developments in such markets.

The operating performance and value of our multi-family properties is impacted by the economic environment and other conditions of the specific markets in which our properties are concentrated. As of December 31, 2025: (i) our wholly-owned properties generated approximately 75% and 9% of our 2025 revenues from properties located in the Southeast and Texas, respectively, and (ii) the properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures at December 31, 2025, generated 59% and 41% of our 2025 JV Rental and Other Revenues at properties located in the Southeast and Texas, respectively. Accordingly, adverse developments in such markets, including economic developments, pandemics, or natural or man-made disasters, would adversely impact the cash flow and value of these properties. The concentration of our properties in the Southeast United States

Table of Contents

and Texas exposes us to risks of adverse developments which are greater than the risks of owning properties with a more geographically diverse portfolio.

The failure of property management companies to properly manage our properties could adversely impact our results of operations.

We rely on property management companies to manage our properties. These management companies are responsible for, among other things, leasing and marketing rental units, selecting tenants (including an evaluation of the creditworthiness of tenants), collecting rent, paying operating expenses and maintaining our properties. If these property management companies do not perform their duties properly, the occupancy and rental rates at such properties may decline and the expenses at such properties may increase. At December 31, 2025, one property manager manages 11 properties, a second property manager manages eight properties, and five other property managers manage three or fewer properties. Three properties are managed by a management company owned by or affiliated with a joint venture partner. The loss of our property managers, and in particular, the managers that manage multiple properties, could result in a decrease in occupancy rates, rental rates or both or an increase in expenses. Further, except for our multi-family properties covered by our master insurance program, property managers are also generally responsible for obtaining insurance coverage with respect to the properties they manage, which coverage is often obtained pursuant to blanket policies covering many properties in which we have no interest. Losses at properties managed by our property managers but in which we have no interest could reduce significantly the insurance coverage available at our properties managed by these property managers. It may be difficult to terminate a non-performing management company, particularly a management company owned or affiliated with a joint venture, because such termination may require the approval of the mortgagee, our joint venture partner or both. If we are unable to terminate an underperforming property manager on a timely basis, our occupancy and rental rates may decrease and our expenses may increase.

Risks involved in conducting real estate activity through joint ventures.

Ten of our multi-family properties are owned through joint ventures with other persons or entities. Joint venture investments involve risks not otherwise present when acquiring real estate directly, including the following:

• our joint venture partners may have economic or business interests or objectives which are or become inconsistent with our business interests or objectives, including differing objectives relating to the sale or refinancing of properties held by the joint venture or the timing of the termination or liquidation of the joint venture;

• the more successful a joint venture project, the more likely that profits or distributions generated above a negotiated threshold will be allocated disproportionately in favor of our joint venture partner at a rate greater than that implied by our partner's equity interest in the venture;

• several of our joint venture partners have other competing real estate interests in the markets in which our properties are located that could influence such partners to take actions favoring their properties to the detriment of the jointly owned properties;

• our joint venture partners obtain blanket property casualty and business interruption insurance insuring properties we own jointly and other properties in which we have no ownership interest and as a result, claims or losses with respect to properties owned by our joint venture partners but in which we have no interest could significantly reduce or eliminate the insurance available to properties in which we have an interest;

• our joint venture partner might become bankrupt, insolvent or otherwise refuse or be unable to meet their obligations to us or the venture (including their obligation to make capital contributions or property distributions when due);

• we may incur liabilities as a result of action taken by our joint venture partner;

• our joint venture partner may not perform properly its property oversight responsibilities;

• our joint venture partner may be in a position to take action or withhold consent contrary to our instructions or requests, including actions that may make it more difficult to maintain our qualification as a REIT;

• our joint venture partner might engage in unlawful or fraudulent conduct with respect to our jointly owned properties or other properties in which they have an ownership interest;

• changes in personnel managing our joint venture partners have resulted in greater difficulty in working with the new personnel;

• our joint venture partner may trigger a buy-sell arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partner's interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction;

Table of Contents

• disputes between us and our joint venture partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and divert management's attention from operating our business; and

• disagreements with our joint venture partners with respect to property management (including with respect to whether a property should be sold, refinanced, or improved) could result in an impasse resulting in the inability to operate the property effectively.

Joint venture partners have acted without our authorization ( e.g ., a partner modified a mortgage term without our consent). We also have had, and expect to continue to have, disagreements with joint venture partners over various issues including, among others, as to whether, and the extent to which, value add programs should be implemented at a property, whether a mortgage debt on a property should be refinanced and the terms and conditions of such refinancing, and, because our joint venture structure may incentivize our joint venture partner to sell the property sooner than we would otherwise desire, the timing and terms and conditions of property sales.

Our operating results are significantly influenced by demand for multi-family properties generally, and a decrease in such demand will likely have a greater adverse effect on our revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

Our current portfolio is focused on multi-family properties, and we expect that going forward we will continue to focus on the acquisition (including alternative investments such as bridge loans and preferred equity), disposition and operation of such properties. As a result, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry, and a decrease in the demand for multi-family properties would likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

Our operating results and assets may be negatively affected if our insurance coverage is insufficient to compensate us for casualty events occurring at our properties.

Our multi-family properties, including the properties owned by the joint ventures in which we are members, carry all risk property insurance covering the property and improvements thereto for the cost of replacement in the event of a casualty. Though we maintain insurance coverage, such coverage may be insufficient to compensate us for losses sustained as a result of a casualty because, among other things:

• the amount of insurance coverage maintained for a property may be insufficient to pay the full replacement cost following a casualty event;

•  the rent loss coverage under a policy may not extend for the full period of time that a tenant or tenants may be entitled to a rent abatement that is a result of, or that may be required to complete restoration following, a casualty event;

• certain types of losses, such as those arising from earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and terrorist attacks, and losses arising out of claims for exemplary or punitive damages, may be uninsurable or may not be economically feasible to insure;

• changes in zoning, building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors may make it impossible or impracticable, to use insurance proceeds to replace damaged or destroyed improvements at a property;

• insurance coverage is part of blanket insurance policies in which losses on properties in which we have no ownership interest could reduce significantly or eliminate the coverage available on our properties; and

• the deductibles applicable to one or more buildings at a property may be greater than the losses sustained at such buildings.

If our insurance coverage is insufficient to cover losses sustained as a result of one or more casualty events, our operating results and the value of our portfolio will be adversely affected.

We may be adversely effected if we are unable to maintain a satisfactory working relationship with any one or more of our joint venture partners.

Two of our joint venture partners or their affiliates own an aggregate of six of the eight properties we own through unconsolidated joint ventures. This concentration of ownership of properties with a limited number of joint venture partners exposes us to risks of adverse developments, and in particular, disputes or disagreements with such joint venture partners, which are greater than the risks of owning properties with a more diverse group of joint venture partners.

Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents and we may be unable to renew leases or relet units as leases expire.

Table of Contents

Our multi-family leases are generally for a term of one year or less. Accordingly, our revenues are impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the units, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than the previous rates, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected .

Risks Related to Our Financing Activities, Indebtedness and Capital Resources

If we are unable to refinance our mortgage debt at maturity on acceptable terms, we may be forced to sell properties on disadvantageous terms.

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2025, the principal balance of the mortgage payments due at maturity on our wholly-owned and unconsolidated joint venture properties and the weighted average interest rate thereon (dollars in thousands):

Consolidated Properties

Unconsolidated Properties

Year

Principal Balances Due at Maturity

Weighed Average Interest Rate

Principal Balances Due at Maturity (1)

Weighed Average Interest Rate

2031 and thereafter

Total

(1) Includes our joint venture partner's "share" of such debt.

We have a significant amount of mortgage debt maturing over the next several years. Our operating cash flow and funds available under our credit facility will be insufficient to discharge all of this debt when due. Accordingly, we will seek to refinance this debt prior to its maturity. Because current interest rates are significantly higher than the interest rates on the maturing mortgage debt (or if our access to credit markets is reduced due, among other things, to more stringent lending requirements due to our level of leverage), we may be unable to refinance this mortgage debt on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unsuccessful in refinancing such debt, or if the terms of the refinanced debt are less favorable than the current debt, we may be forced to (i) refinance such mortgage debt on unfavorable terms or (ii) dispose of properties on unfavorable terms or convey properties secured by such mortgages to the mortgagees, which would, in each case, reduce our income and impair the value of our portfolio.

Our acquisition, development and value-add activities are limited by the funds available to us.

Our ability to acquire additional multi-family properties, develop new properties and improve the properties in our portfolio is limited by the funds available to us (including funds available pursuant to our credit facility) and our ability to obtain, on acceptable terms, mortgage debt. At February 27, 2026, we had approximately $24.8 million of cash and cash equivalents (of which a significant portion is required for day-to-day operating expenses at the property level) and up to $40 million available to us under our credit facility. Our multi-family acquisition and value-add activities are constrained by funds available to us which will limit growth in our revenues and operating results.

Our failure to comply with our obligations under our debt instruments may reduce our stockholders’ equity, and adversely affect our net income and ability to pay dividends.

Several of our debt instruments include covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios, including various coverage ratios, and comply with other requirements. Failure to meet interest and other payment obligations under our debt instruments or a breach by us of the covenants to comply with certain financial ratios would place us in non-compliance under such instruments. If the lender called a default and required us to repay the full amount outstanding under such instrument, we might be required to rapidly dispose of our properties, including properties securing such debt instruments, which could have an adverse impact on the amounts we receive on such disposition. From time to time we have failed to comply with certain debt

Table of Contents

covenants. If we are unable to satisfy the covenants of our debt obligations, the lender could exercise remedies available to it under the applicable debt instrument and as otherwise provided by law, including the possible appointment of a receiver to manage the property, application of deposits or reserves maintained under the debt instrument for payment of the debt, or foreclose and/or cause the forced sale of the property or asset securing such debt. A foreclosure or other forced disposition of our assets could result in the disposition of same at below the carrying value of such asset. The disposition of our properties or assets at below our carrying value may adversely affect our net income, reduce our stockholders’ equity and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends.

We may not have sufficient funds to make required or desired capital improvements.

Our multi-family properties face competition from newer and updated properties. At December 31, 2025 the weighted average age (based on the number of units) of our multi-family properties is approximately 22 years. To remain competitive and increase occupancy at these properties and/or make them attractive to potential tenants or purchasers, we may have to make significant capital improvements and/or incur deferred maintenance costs with respect to these properties. The cost of future improvements and deferred maintenance is uncertain and the amounts earmarked for specific properties may be insufficient to effectuate needed improvements. Our results of operations and financial conditions may be adversely affected if we are required to expend significant funds (other than funds earmarked for such purposes) to repair or improve our properties.

If we are required to make payments under any “bad boy” carve out guarantees that we have provided in connection with certain mortgages and related loans, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.

In obtaining certain non-recourse loans, we have provided our lenders with standard carve out guarantees. These guarantees are only applicable if and when the borrower directly, or indirectly through an agreement with an affiliate, joint venture partner or other third party, voluntarily files a bankruptcy or similar liquidation or reorganization action or takes other actions that are fraudulent or improper (commonly referred to as “bad boy” guarantees). Although we believe that “bad boy” carve out guarantees are not guarantees of payment in the event of foreclosure or other actions of the foreclosing lender that are beyond the borrower’s control, some lenders in the real estate industry have recently sought to make claims for payment under such guarantees. In the event such a claim were made against us under a “bad boy” carve out guarantee, following foreclosure on mortgages or related loans, and such claim were successful, our business and financial results would be materially adversely affected.

We could be negatively impacted by changes in our relationship with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, changes in the condition of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and by changes in government support for multi-family housing.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been a major source of financing for multi-family real estate in the United States and we have used loan programs sponsored by these agencies to finance most of our acquisitions of multi-family properties. There have been ongoing discussion by the government and other interested parties with regard to the long term structure and viability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which could result in adjustments to guidelines for their loan products. Should these agencies have their mandates changed or reduced, lose key personnel, be disbanded or reorganized by the government or otherwise discontinue providing liquidity for the multi-family sector, our ability to obtain financing through loan programs sponsored by the agencies could be negatively impacted. In addition, changes in our relationships with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the lenders that participate in these loan programs, with respect to our existing mortgage financing could impact our ability to obtain comparable financing for new acquisitions or refinancing for our existing multi-family real estate investments. Should access to financing provided through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan programs be reduced or impaired, it would significantly reduce our access to debt capital and/or increase borrowing costs and would significantly limit our ability to acquire properties on acceptable terms and reduce the values to be realized upon property sales.

We depend on our subsidiaries for cash flow and will be adversely impacted if these subsidiaries are prohibited from distributing cash to us.

We conduct, and intend to conduct, substantially all of our business operations through our subsidiaries, including our unconsolidated subsidiaries. Accordingly, our only source of cash to fund our operations and pay our obligations are distributions from our subsidiaries. We cannot assure you that our subsidiaries will be able to, or be permitted to, make distributions to us that will enable us to fund our operations. Each of our subsidiaries is or will be a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions ( e.g. , restrictions imposed pursuant to mortgage debt on a property), limit our ability to obtain cash from such entities. In addition, because we operate through our subsidiaries, your claims as stockholders will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations of our subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, our assets and those of our subsidiaries will be able to satisfy your claims as stockholders only after all our and our subsidiaries' liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.

Table of Contents

Regulatory and Tax Risks

Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation, or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in the U.S. federal income tax laws, regulations or administrative interpretations.

Liabilities relating to environmental matters may impact the value of our properties.

We may be subject to environmental liabilities arising from the ownership of properties. Under various federal, state and local laws, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the costs of removal of certain hazardous substances released on its property. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances.

The presence of hazardous substances on our properties may adversely affect our ability to finance or sell the property and we may incur substantial remediation costs. The discovery of material environmental liabilities attached to such properties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Compliance or failure to comply with the ADA or other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs.

The ADA generally requires that the public areas at our properties be made accessible to disabled persons. Non-compliance could result in the imposition of fines by governmental authorities or the award of damages to private litigants. From time-to-time, claims have been, and may continue to be, asserted against us with respect to some of our properties under the ADA. If, under the ADA, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Provisions for credit losses are difficult to estimate

Our provision for credit losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis in accordance with current accounting guidance which uses the Current Expected Credit Loss model, or CECL. Under CECL, we are required to present certain financial assets such as loans held for investment, at the net amount expected to be collected. The determination of our provision for credit losses requires us to make highly subjective estimates and judgments. Our estimates and judgments are based on a number of factors, including projected cash flow from the collateral, if any, securing our investments, the structure of our investment, including the availability of reserves and recourse guarantees, likelihood of repayment in full at the maturity of a loan, potential for refinancing and expected market discount rates for varying property types, and other macro economic data, all of which are uncertain and highly subjective. If our estimates and judgments are incorrect, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.

The adoption of CECL affects how we determine our allowance for loan losses and requires us to recognize provisions for credit losses earlier in the lending cycle, including at the time we enter into the transaction. Moreover, CECL may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for credit losses. If we are required to materially increase our level of allowance for credit losses for any reason, such increase could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Risks Associated with the Real Estate Industry and REITs.

We face numerous risks associated with the real estate industry that could adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs.

As a real estate company, we are subject to various changes in real estate conditions, and any negative trends in such real estate conditions may adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs. These conditions include:

• changes in national, regional and local economic conditions, which may be negatively impacted by concerns about inflation, deflation, government deficits, unemployment rates and decreased consumer confidence particularly in markets in which we have a high concentration of properties;

• increases in interest rates, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain financing or to buy or sell properties on favorable terms or at all;

• the inability of tenants to pay rent;

• the existence and quality of the competition, such as the attractiveness of our properties as compared to our competitors' properties based on considerations such as convenience of location, rental rates, amenities and safety record;

• increased operating costs, including increased real property taxes, maintenance, insurance and utility costs (including increased prices for fossil fuels);

• weather conditions that may increase or decrease energy costs and other weather-related expenses;

• oversupply of competitive housing opportunities, including apartments or single-family housing, or a reduction in demand for real estate in the markets in which our properties are located;

• a favorable interest rate environment that may result in a significant number of residents or potential residents of our multi-family properties deciding to purchase homes instead of renting;

• changes in, or increased costs of compliance with, laws and/or governmental regulations, including those governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes; and

• rent control or stabilization laws, or other laws regulating rental housing, which could prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs.

Moreover, other factors may adversely affect our results of operations, including potential liability under environmental and other laws and other unforeseen events, many of which are discussed elsewhere in the following risk factors. Any or all of these factors could materially adversely affect our results of operations through decreased revenues or increased costs.

Compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to maximize profits.

We must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, our sources of income, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our common stock, to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. We may also be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Accordingly, compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

To qualify as a REIT, we must also ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of such issuer. In addition, no more than 5% of the value of our assets can consist of the securities of any one issuer, other than a qualified REIT security. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we must dispose of the portion of our assets in excess of such amounts within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter in order to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. This requirement could cause us to dispose of assets for consideration of less than their true value and could lead to a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Table of Contents

Because real estate investments are illiquid, we may not be able to reconfigure our portfolio on a timely basis.

Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. We may not be able to reconfigure our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions. Further, even if we are able to sell properties, we may be unable to reinvest the proceeds of such sales in opportunities that are as favorable as the properties sold. Our inability to reconfigure our portfolio to profitably reinvest the proceeds of property sales promptly could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may incur impairment charges in 2026.

We evaluate on a quarterly basis our real estate portfolio for indicators of impairment. Impairment charges reflect management's judgment of the probability and severity of the decline in the value of real estate assets we own. These charges and provisions may be required in the future as a result of factors beyond our control, including, among other things, changes in the economic environment and market conditions affecting the value of real property assets or natural or man-made disasters.

If we do not continue to pay cash dividends, the price of our common stock may decline .

REITs are generally required to distribute annually at least 90% of their ordinary taxable income to maintain our REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, which we refer to as the Code. Because we continue to generate operating losses primarily due to the impact of depreciation, we are not currently required, and may not be required in the future, to pay dividends to maintain our REIT status. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will pay dividends in the future. If we do not continue to pay cash dividends, the price of our common stock may decline.

Our business and operations are subject to physical and transition risks related to climate change.

Several of our multi-family properties are located along or near coastal areas that have historically been subject to the risk of extreme weather events. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns, areas where many of our properties are located could experience more frequent and intense extreme weather events and rising sea levels, which may cause significant damage to our properties, disrupt our operations and adversely impact our residents. Over time, such conditions could result in reduced demand for housing in areas where our properties are located and increased costs related to further developing our properties to mitigate the effects of climate change or repairing damage related to the effects of climate change that may or may not be fully covered by insurance. Likewise, such conditions also may negatively impact the types and pricing of insurance we are able to procure.

Changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations on climate change could result in increased operating costs and/or capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties without a corresponding increase in rental revenues. The imposition of such requirements could increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties (for example by requiring retrofits of existing multi-family properties to improve their energy efficiency and/or resistance to inclement weather) without creating corresponding increases in rental revenues, which would have an adverse impact on our operating results.

Risks Related to BRT's Organization, Structure and Ownership of its Stock

Our transactions with affiliated entities involve conflicts of interest

Entities affiliated with us and with certain of our executive officers provide services to us and on our behalf. Among other things, we retain certain executive officers and others to provide the Services. The aggregate fees to be paid for the Services in 2026, and paid in 2025 and 2024, are $1.8 million, $1.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively. We obtain certain executive, administrative, legal, accounting and clerical personnel and the use of certain facilities pursuant to the shared services agreement. During 2025 and 2024, we reimbursed Gould Investors $750,000 and $698,000, respectively, for the personnel and facilities provided pursuant to the shared services agreement. We also obtain certain insurance in conjunction with Gould Investors and reimbursed Gould Investors $30,000 and $28,000, in 2025 and 2024, respectively, for our share of the insurance cost. These transactions may not be on terms as favorable as those that we would receive if the transactions were entered into with unaffiliated entities and persons.

Gould Investors from time-to time buys multi-family properties, including properties located in the Southeast United States. Although the properties purchased by Gould Investors are generally smaller than the properties in which we are interested, a conflict of interest will arise should Gould Investors decide to pursue the acquisition of large properties in such region. See "Item 1 - Business - Our Acquisition Approach"

Table of Contents

Senior management and other key personnel are critical to our business and our future success may depend on our ability to retain them.

We depend on the services of Jeffrey A. Gould, our president and chief executive officer, and other members of senior management to carry out our business and investment strategies. Although Jeffrey A. Gould devotes substantially all of his business time to our affairs, he devotes a portion of his business time to entities affiliated with us. In addition to Jeffrey A. Gould, only two other executive officers, Matthew Gibbons, our chief accounting officer, and Ryan Gould, a vice president, devote all or substantially all of their business time to us. Many of our executives, including Isaac Kalish, our chief financial officer (i) also provide the Services (see " Item 1. Business-Human Capital Resources ") and (ii) provide their services on a part-time basis pursuant to the shared services agreement. We rely on part-time executive officers to provide certain services to us, including legal and certain financial reporting services, since we do not employ full-time executive officers to handle all of these services. If the shared services agreement is terminated, the executives performing Services are unwilling to continue to do so, or if we are dissatisfied with the services provided pursuant to these arrangements, we will have to obtain such services from other sources or hire personnel to perform them. We may not be able to replace these services or hire such employees in a timely manner or on terms that are equivalent to or better than those we receive pursuant to the Services and the shared services agreement.

In addition, in the future we may need to attract and retain qualified senior management and other key personnel, both on a full-time and part-time basis. The loss of the services of any of our senior management or other key personnel or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could impair our ability to carry out our business and our investment strategies.

We do not carry key man life insurance on members of our senior management.

Certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws and Maryland law may inhibit a change in control that stockholders consider favorable and could also limit the market price of our common stock

Certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation (the "Charter"), our Bylaws and Maryland law may impede, or prevent, a third party from acquiring control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions:

• provide for a staggered board of directors consisting of three classes, with one class of directors being elected each year and each class being elected for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualify;

• impose restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock (such provisions being intended to, among other purposes, facilitate our compliance with certain requirements under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), relating to our qualification as a REIT under the Code);

• prevent our stockholders from amending the Bylaws;

• limit who may call special meetings of stockholders;

• establish advance notice and informational requirements and time limitations on any director nomination or proposal that a stockholder wishes to make at a meeting of stockholders;

• provide that directors may be removed only for cause and only by the vote of at least two-thirds of all votes generally entitled to be cast in the election of directors;

• do not permit cumulative voting in the election of our board of directors, which would otherwise permit holders of less than a majority of outstanding shares to elect one or more directors; and

• authorize our board of directors, without stockholder approval, to amend the Charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of our stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue and classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock and set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares.

Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) may impede a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or inhibit a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could be in the best interest of holders of shares of our common stock, including:

• “business combination” provisions that, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns

Table of Contents

10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of BRT who, at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting stock) or an affiliate thereof for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter impose two super-majority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations;

• “control share” provisions that provide that, subject to certain exceptions, holders of “control shares” of BRT (defined as voting shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the holder to exercise voting power in the election of directors within one of three increasing ranges) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of issued and outstanding “control shares,” subject to certain exceptions) have no voting rights with respect to the control shares except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares; and

• additionally, Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL permits our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in the Charter or the Bylaws, to implement certain corporate governance provisions.

We have (1) exempted all business combinations between us and any other person, provided that each such business combination is first approved by our board of directors (including a majority of directors who are not affiliates or associates of such other person), from the Maryland Business Combination Act and (2) opted out of the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act.

Ownership of less than 6.0% of our outstanding shares or less than 6.0% of the aggregate outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock could violate the restrictions on ownership and transfer in our Charter, which would result in the transfer of the shares owned or acquired in violation of such restrictions to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and loss of the right to receive dividends and other distributions on, and the economic benefit of any appreciation of, such shares, and you may not have sufficient information to determine at any particular time whether an acquisition of our shares will result in the loss of the economic benefit of such shares.

In order for us to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Code, no more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock may be owned, directly or indirectly or through application of certain attribution rules, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Code) at any time during the last half of a taxable year. To facilitate our qualification as a REIT under the Code, among other purposes, the Charter generally prohibits any person from actually or constructively owning more than 6.0%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding shares of common stock, or more than 6.0% in value of the aggregate outstanding shares of all classes and series of our stock, which we refer to as the “ownership limits,” unless our board of directors exempts the person from such ownership limit. In addition, the Charter prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning shares of our stock that would result in more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of our stock to be beneficially owned by five or fewer individuals, regardless of whether such ownership is during the last half of any taxable year, which we refer to as the “Five or Fewer Limit.” Shares owned or acquired in violation of either of these restrictions will be transferred automatically to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary selected by us. The person that owned or acquired our stock in violation of the restrictions in the Charter will not be entitled to any dividends or distributions paid after the date of the transfer to the trust and, upon a sale of such shares by the trust, will generally be entitled to receive only the lesser of the market value on the date of the event that resulted in the transfer to the trust or the net proceeds of the sale by the trust to a person who could own the shares without violating the ownership limits.

Our board of directors has exempted Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould from the ownership limits and has not established a limitation on ownership for such persons. Based on information supplied to us, as of December 31, 2025, Gould Investors owns approximately 21.6% of the outstanding shares of common stock and, by virtue of the applicable attribution rules under the Code, these individuals beneficially own approximately 26.4% of outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, the acquisition by each of four other individuals of 6% of our outstanding common stock, when combined with the ownership of our common stock of Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould, generally would not result in a violation of the Five or Fewer Limit. However, there is no limitation on Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould or Jeffrey A. Gould acquiring additional shares of our common stock or otherwise increasing their percentage of ownership of our common stock, meaning that the amount of our stock that other persons or entities may acquire without violating the Five or Fewer Limit could be reduced in the future and without notice. To the extent that Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould, or their affiliates, acquire additional shares or

Table of Contents

our stock, or any other event occurs (including a repurchase of shares of our stock), that results in an individual beneficially or constructively owning 24.0% or more of the outstanding shares of our stock within the meaning of the Charter, the acquisition by four other individuals of 6.0% or less of our outstanding stock would violate the Five or Fewer Limit and, therefore, could cause the stock acquired by one or more of these other individuals to be transferred to the charitable trust, despite their compliance with the 6.0% ownership limits. If any of the foregoing occurs, compliance with the 6.0% ownership limit will not ensure that your ownership of our stock does not cause a violation of the Five or Fewer Limit or that your shares of our stock are not transferred to the charitable trust.

Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould and Jeffrey A. Gould will be required by the Exchange Act and regulations promulgated thereunder to report, with certain exceptions, their acquisition of additional shares of our stock within two days of such acquisitions, and all holders of our stock will be required to file reports of their acquisition of beneficial ownership (as defined in the Exchange Act) of more than 5% of our outstanding stock. However, beneficial ownership for purposes of the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act is calculated differently than beneficial ownership for purposes of determining compliance with the Five or Fewer Limit. Further, to the extent that any one or more of Gould Investors, Fredric H. Gould, Matthew J. Gould or Jeffrey A. Gould acquires 30% or more of our outstanding stock, ownership of five percent or less of our outstanding stock could still result in a violation of the Five or Fewer Limit and, therefore, cause newly-acquired stock in our company to be transferred to the charitable trust. As a result, you may not have enough information currently available to you at any time to determine the percentage of ownership of our stock that you can acquire without violating the Five or Fewer Limit and losing the economic benefit of the ownership of such newly-acquired shares.

The stock market is volatile, and fluctuations in our operating results, removal from various indices and other factors could cause our stock price to decline.

The stock market has experienced, and may continue to experience, fluctuations that significantly impact the market prices of securities issued by many companies. Market fluctuations could adversely affect our stock price. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, systemic, political and market conditions, such as pandemics, recessions, loss of investor confidence, interest rate changes, government shutdowns, or trade wars, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Moreover, our operating results may fluctuate and vary from period to period due to the risk factors set forth herein.

Although our common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, the volume of trades on any given day has been limited historically, as a result of which stockholders might not have been able to sell or purchase our common stock at the volume, price or time desired. Our common stock is a component of the Russell 3000® Index. If our common stock is removed from the Russell 3000® Index because it does not meet the criteria for continued inclusion in such index, index funds, institutional investors, or other holders attempting to track the composition of that index may be required to sell our common stock, which would adversely impact the price and frequency at which it trades.

General Business Risks

Breaches of information technology systems could materially harm our business and reputation.

We, our joint venture partners and the property managers managing our properties, collect and retain, through information technology systems, financial, personal and other sensitive information provided by third parties, including tenants, vendors and employees. Such persons also rely on information technology systems for the collection and distribution of funds. Our information technology systems have been breached though, to our knowledge, none of our properties nor tenants have suffered any material damages therefrom. There can be no assurance that we, our joint venture partners or property managers will be able to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information or the unauthorized distribution of funds. Any loss of this information or unauthorized distribution of funds as a result of a breach of information technology systems may result in loss of funds to which we are entitled, legal liability and costs (including damages and penalties), as well as damage to our reputation, that could materially and adversely affect our business and financial performance.

Artificial intelligence and other machine learning techniques could increase competitive, operational, legal and regulatory risks to our business in ways that we cannot predict.

The use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) by us and others, and the overall adoption of AI throughout society, may exacerbate or create new and unpredictable competitive, operational, legal and regulatory risks to our business. There is substantial uncertainty about the extent to which AI will result in dramatic changes throughout the world, and we may not be able to anticipate, prevent, mitigate or remediate all of the potential risks, challenges or impacts of such changes. These changes could

Table of Contents

potentially disrupt, among other things, our business and operational processes. Our competitors may be more successful than us in the development and implementation of services and platforms based on AI to improve their operations. If we are unable to adequately use AI, or do so at a slower pace than others in our industry, we will be at a competitive disadvantage.

If the data we, or third parties whose services we rely on and over whom we have limited oversight, use in connection with the possible development or deployment of AI is incomplete, inadequate or biased in some way, the performance of our business could suffer. Data in technology that uses AI may contain a degree of inaccuracy and error, which could result in in flawed decision-making on our part or the part of our property managers and other service providers. This could reduce the effectiveness of AI technologies and adversely impact us and our operations to the extent that we rely on the AI's work product. There is also a risk that we or our service providers may improperly disclose confidential information, including material non-public information or personally identifiable information, into AI applications, resulting in such information becoming a part of a dataset that is accessible by third parties.

Our and our service providers use of AI may require compliance with legal or regulatory frameworks that are not fully developed or tested, and we may face litigation and regulatory actions related to our or our service providers use of AI.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, and in particular, personal injury claims involving the operations of our properties. Although we believe that the primary and umbrella insurance coverage maintained with respect to our properties is sufficient to cover claims for compensatory damages, many of these personal injury claims also assert exemplary ( i.e., punitive) damages. Generally, insurance does not cover claims for exemplary damages and we may be adversely affected if claims for exemplary damages are asserted successfully. See note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information; Holders

Our shares of common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol "BRT." As of February 27, 2026, there were approximately 679 holders of record of our common stock.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

The following tables summarize the purchases of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2025 by us and by Gould Investors (Gould Investors may be deemed to be an "affiliated purchaser" (as such term is used in Rule 10b-19a)(3) promulgated under the Exchange Act) of our company as Jeffrey A. Gould and Matthew J. Gould, our executive officers, are directly or indirectly, the managers of the managing general partner of Gould Investors):.

Purchases by Issuer

Period

Total Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid per Share

Total Amount of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

October 1 - October 31, 2025

November 1 - November 30, 2025

December 1 - December 31, 2025

Total

Subsequent to December 31, 2025 we purchased, pursuant to our publicly announced repurchase program, 75,155 shares at an average price of $14.82 per share. As of March 11, 2026, after giving effect to an increase in, and extension of, our share repurchase authorization, we are authorized to repurchase up to $10.0 million of shares through December 31, 2028.

Purchases by Affiliated Purchaser

Period

Total Number of Purchased Shares

Average Price Paid per Share

Total Cost

October 1 - October 31, 2025

November 1 - November 30, 2025

December 1 - December 31, 2025

Total (1)

(1) Excludes 46,600 and 50,337 shares of common stock purchased at an average price of $15.62 and $14.70, respectively, pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan with respect to dividends declared in September and December 2025, respectively.

Item 6. [Reserved]

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

We are an internally managed real estate investment trust, also known as a REIT, that owns, operates and to a lesser extent holds interest in joint ventures that own and operate multi-family properties. At December 31, 2025, we: (i) wholly-own 21 multi-family properties with an aggregate of 5,420 units and a carrying value of $595.2 million, (ii) have ownership interests, through unconsolidated entities, in ten multi-family properties with an aggregate of 2,891 units with a carrying value of $46.1 million; (iii) have preferred equity investments in two multi-family properties with a carrying value of $17.7 million; and (iv) own other assets, through consolidated and unconsolidated entities, with a carrying value of $1.6 million. The 31 multi-family properties are located in 11 states; primarily in the Southeast United States and Texas.

2025 and Recent Developments.

During 2025:

• we acquired, through two unconsolidated joint ventures in two separate and unrelated transactions, an 80% interest in two multi-family properties (referred to collectively as the "2025 Acquisitions") with an aggregate of 364 units for an aggregate purchase price of $59.5 million, including $40.1 million of mortgage debt. The mortgage debt bears a weighted average interest rate of 4.34% and a weighted average remaining term to maturity of 6.6 years.

• we refinanced four mortgages maturing in 2025 and 2026 in aggregate principal amount of $58.0 million (the “Prior Mortgages”) and bearing a weighted average fixed interest rate of 4.38% with four replacement mortgages in aggregate principal amount $87.7 million (the "2025 Financings"). The replacement mortgages (the “Replacement Mortgages”) have a weighted average remaining term to maturity of 8.5 years, a weighted average fixed interest rate of 4.97%, and unlike the Prior Mortgages, are interest only until maturity (other than with respect to a mortgage in principal amount of $15.8 million, which is interest only until 2030, one year prior to its maturity). As a result of the 2025 Financing, our aggregate annual principal payments are expected to decrease by $1.2 million (until 2030), and our annual interest expense is expected to increase by $1.8 million from the corresponding amounts under the Prior Mortgages.

• we sold a cooperative apartment unit in New York, NY for a sales price of approximately $1.0 million and recognized a gain of $755,000.

• we repurchased 321,060 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $4.99 million ( i.e., an average purchase price of $15.53 per share).

Subsequent to December 31, 2025, we purchased 75,155 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.1 million ( i.e., an average price of $14.82 per share). In March 2026, our board of directors increased up to $10 million the value of the shares that we can repurchase and extended the repurchase program through December 31, 2028.

Challenges and Uncertainties as a Result of the Uncertain Economic Environment

We face challenges due to the uncertain national economic environment ( e.g. , inflation, recession and/or stagflation, the potential impact of tariffs and trade wars, and/or interest rates), and the oversupply of multi-family properties in several markets in which we compete (including Atlanta, GA, Huntsville, AL, Dallas, TX, San Antonio, TX, Nashville TN, Pensacola, FL, LaGrange, GA and San Marcos, TX). In addition, we use concessions (and in particular, in markets that are especially competitive) as a means to improve occupancy. The use of concessions reduces our rental income and adds to the variability of our operating results. These challenges and uncertainties have, and we anticipate will continue to adversely impact (i) the rental and occupancy rates at our properties, and (ii) our ability to grow rental income and/or control our real estate operating expenses, some of which, such as real estate taxes, we have a very limited ability to control and frequently increase, with limited notice of the increase.

We anticipate that our mortgage interest expense will increase as we refinance the aggregate $154.6 million of principal balances of mortgage debt maturing through 2027 (including $84.0 million of such principal balances at unconsolidated subsidiaries) because current comparable mortgage interest rates are generally higher than the weighted average interest rate on such maturing mortgages. For comparison purposes, the weighted average interest rate on the mortgages on our consolidated and unconsolidated properties maturing through December 31, 2027 is 4.43% and the weighted average interest rate on the 2025 Financings that were completed in December 2025 was 4.97%.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024

The term "same store properties" refers to 21 multi-family properties with an aggregate of 5,420 units that were owned for all of 2025 and 2024.

Revenues

The following table compares our revenues for the years indicated:

(Dollars in thousands):

Change

% Change

Rental and other revenue from real estate properties

Loan interest and other income

Total revenues

Rental and other revenue from real estate properties

The components of the increase include:

• $510,000 due to a 0.74% net increase in average rental rates year-over-year,

• $261,000 due to an increase in average occupancy year-over-year from 93.8% to 93.9%,

• $149,000 in other rental income (tenant reimbursements such as trash and utilities); and

• $114,000 increase at our commercial property in Yonkers, NY (the "Yonkers' Property") due to an increase in the rental rate obtained in connection with a lease extension.

The increase was offset primarily by a $532,000 decrease in revenue recognized from straight line adjustments of rent concessions, net of amortization, with approximately 50% related to Bells Bluff.

Loan interest and other income

The $1 million increase is due primarily to the inclusion, for all of 2025, of the income earned from the Preferred Equity Investments originated in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Expenses

The following table compares our expenses for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)

Change

% Change

Real estate operating expenses

Interest expense

General and administrative

Provision for credit loss

Depreciation and amortization

Total expenses

Real estate operating expenses.

The components of the increase include:

• increases of $564,000 and $476,000 in payroll and utilities (primarily water/sewer charges), respectively, at several properties;

• $354,000 increase in other expenses, including $100,000 related to advertising and $90,000 related to a loan modification; and

• a net $255,000 increase in real estate taxes at several properties.

Table of Contents

Offsetting the change was a $927,000 decrease in insurance expense due to reduced premiums in 2025 (and we estimate that 2026 insurance premiums will be approximately $500,000 less in 2026 than in 2025) and a $221,000 reduction in repairs and maintenance expenses.

Interest expense

Approximately $1 million of the increase is due to the $27.4 million mortgage obtained in August 2024 on Woodland Trails-La Grange, GA (the "Woodlands Financing"), $318,000 due to the 2025 Financings, and $237,000 due to increased draws on the credit facility. The increase was offset by a $375,000 decrease on our floating rate junior subordinated notes due to the decrease in SOFR and a $275,000 decrease of mortgage interest due to the impact of amortization of mortgage principal amounts.

General and administrative.

The components of the decrease include $521,000 due to the reduction in the number of employees and the inclusion, in 2024, of $141,000 of expense related to the vesting of restricted stock units that vest based on the satisfaction of metrics related to adjusted funds from operations (the "AFFO Awards"); no expense was recorded with respect to the AFFO Awards outstanding in 2025 as such awards are not expected to vest. The decrease was offset due to a (i) $272,000 increase in internal and external audit costs, including approximately $100,000 in out of scope audit costs expensed in 2025 for the 2024 audit, and (ii) $294,000 increase due to higher levels of employee compensation.

Provision for credit loss

In 2025, we recorded a non-cash provision of $5,000 related to the Loan Receivables ( i.e. the Preferred Equity Investments) in comparison to $270,000 recorded in 2024.

Depreciation and amortization

The increase is related to property improvements in 2025 and 2024.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures

Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $1.8 million, from $1.6 million in 2024, to a loss of $174,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025. The components of the decrease include:

• $1.5 million from the 2025 Acquisitions, primarily due to the amortization of the lease intangibles acquired in such transactions. We estimate that through the quarter ending September 30, 2026, approximately $1 million of expense will be recognized in connection with the amortization of these intangibles.

• $408,000 at same store properties, due to a decrease in operating margins ( i.e.,a decrease in rental revenues, a decrease in straight-line rent adjustments of rent concessions, net of amortization, and an increase in operating expense primarily due to increased payroll and repairs and maintenance expense).

Insurance recovery of casualty loss

During 2025, we received an aggregate of $313,000 from insurance recoveries primarily related to the Silvana Oaks and Avalon properties. There were no comparable recoveries in 2024.

Gain on sale of real estate

In 2025, we sold a cooperative apartment in New York for a sales price of $995,000 and a gain of $755,000. In 2024, we sold a cooperative apartment in NY for a sales price of approximately $1.1 million and a gain of $806,000.

Table of Contents

Provision (benefit) for taxes

Income tax provision for 2025 was $174,000, a $400,000 increase from the $226,000 benefit recorded in 2024. The benefit recorded in 2024 is the result of a $534,000 refund of franchise tax received as a result of a change in Tennessee law, offset by the 2024 estimated state tax expense of $318,000.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023

As we are a smaller reporting company, this comparison is omitted in accordance with Instruction 1 to Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K.

Table of Contents

Funds from Operations; Adjusted Funds from Operations; Net Operating Income.

In view of our multi-family property activities, we disclose funds from operations ("FFO"), adjusted funds from operations ("AFFO") and net operating income ("NOI") because we believe that such metrics are a widely recognized and appropriate measure of the performance of a multi-family REIT.

We compute FFO in accordance with the "White Paper on Funds From Operations" issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") and NAREITs related guidance. FFO is defined in the White Paper as net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding depreciation and amortization related to real estate, gains and losses from the sale of certain real estate assets, gains and losses from change in control, impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities where the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. In computing FFO, we do not add back to net income the amortization of costs in connection with our financing activities or depreciation of non-real estate assets.

We compute AFFO by adjusting FFO for loss on extinguishment of debt, our straight-line rent accruals, restricted stock and RSU compensation expense, fair value adjustment of mortgage debt, gain on insurance recovery, insurance recovery from casualty loss and deferred mortgage and debt costs (including, in each case as applicable, from our share from our unconsolidated joint ventures). Since the NAREIT White Paper does not provide guidelines for computing AFFO, the computation of AFFO may vary from one REIT to another.

We believe that FFO and AFFO are useful and standard supplemental measures of the operating performance for equity REITs and are used frequently by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in evaluating equity REITs, many of which present FFO and AFFO when reporting their operating results. FFO and AFFO are intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assures that the value of real estate assets diminish predictability over time. In fact, real estate values have historically risen and fallen with market conditions. As a result, we believe that FFO and AFFO provide a performance measure that, when compared year-over-year, should reflect the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and other matters without the inclusion of depreciation and amortization, providing a perspective that may not be necessarily apparent from net income. We also consider FFO and AFFO to be useful to us in evaluating potential property acquisitions.

FFO and AFFO do not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP. FFO and AFFO should not be considered to be an alternative to net income as a reliable measure of our operating performance; nor should FFO and AFFO be considered an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities (as defined by GAAP) as measures of liquidity.

FFO and AFFO do not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of our cash needs, including principal amortization and capital improvements. FFO and AFFO do not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP.

Management recognizes that there are limitations in the use of FFO and AFFO. In evaluating our performance, management is careful to examine GAAP measures such as net income (loss) and cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. Management also reviews the reconciliation of net income (loss) to FFO and AFFO.

Table of Contents

The table below provides a reconciliation of net income determined in accordance with GAAP to FFO and AFFO for each of the indicated years (amounts in thousands):

GAAP Net loss attributable to common stockholders

Add: depreciation of properties

Add: our share of depreciation in unconsolidated joint venture properties

Add: provision for credit loss

Deduct: gain on sales of real estate

Deduct: our share of earnings in earnings from sale of unconsolidated joint

venture properties

Adjustment for non-controlling interests

Funds from operations

Adjust for: straight line rent concession, net of amortization

Adjust for: our share of straight-line rent concession, net of amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures

Add: amortization of restricted stock and RSU expense

Add: amortization of deferred mortgage and debt costs

Add: our share of deferred mortgage costs from unconsolidated joint venture properties

Add: amortization of fair value adjustment for mortgage debt

Adjustment for non-controlling interests

Adjusted funds from operations

Table of Contents

The table below provides a reconciliation of net income per common share (on a diluted basis) determined in accordance with GAAP to FFO and AFFO.

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

Add: depreciation of properties

Add: our share of depreciation in unconsolidated joint venture properties

Add: provision for credit loss

Deduct: gain on sales of real estate

Deduct: our share of earnings from sale of unconsolidated joint venture properties

Adjustment for non-controlling interests

Funds from operations

Adjust for: straight line rent concessions, net of amortization

Adjust for: our share of straight-line rent concession, net of amortization from unconsolidated joint ventures

Add: amortization of restricted stock and RSU expense

Add: amortization of deferred mortgage and debt costs

Add: our share of amortization of deferred mortgage and debt costs from

unconsolidated ventures

Add: amortization of fair value adjustment for mortgage debt

Adjustment for non-controlling interests

Adjusted funds from operations

Diluted shares outstanding for FFO and AFFO

FFO for 2025 increased $337,000, or 1.6%, to $21.3 million from $20.9 million in 2024. Contributing to the increase was a:

• $1.6 million increase in operating margins ( i.e., rental and other revenues from real estate properties less real estate operating expenses) across our portfolio ( i.e. consolidated and unconsolidated multi-family properties);

• $906,000 increase in loan interest and other income;

• $314,000 increase in insurance recoveries; and

• $184,000 decrease in equity-based compensation.

The increase was offset by a:

• $1.5 million increase in interest expense;

• $607,000 decrease in straight line rent concessions, net of amortization;

• $400,000 increase in income tax expense; and

• $119,000 increase in general and administrative expense (excluding the impact of equity based compensation).

AFFO increased $778,000 or 2.9%, to $27.4 million in 2025 from $26.7 million in 2024. The increase is primarily due to the factors impacting the changes in FFO, other than the changes to net straight-line deferred rent concessions and equity-based compensation.

See “Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024” for further information regarding these changes.

Table of Contents

NOI is a non-GAAP measure of performance. NOI is used by our management and many investors to evaluate and compare the performance of our properties to other comparable properties, to determine trends at our properties and to determine the estimated fair value of our properties. The usefulness of NOI may be limited in that it does not take into account, among other things, general and administrative expense, interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt, casualty losses, insurance recoveries and gains or losses as determined by GAAP. NOI is a property specific performance metric and does not measure our performance as a whole. Same store NOI reflects the operations of all of our wholly-owned multi-family properties.

NOI is defined as "Rental and other revenue from real estate properties" less "Real estate operating expenses" in each case as presented on our statements of operations. Real estate operating expenses include real estate taxes, insurance, property management expense, utilities, repairs and maintenance, administrative and marketing. Other REIT’s may use different methodologies for calculating NOI, and accordingly, our NOI may not be comparable to other REIT’s. We believe NOI provides an operating perspective not immediately apparent from GAAP operating income or net income (loss). NOI is one of the measures we use to evaluate our performance because it (i) measures the core operations of property performance by excluding corporate level expenses and other items unrelated to property operating performance and (ii) captures trends in rental housing and property operating expenses. However, NOI should only be used as an alternative measure of our financial performance.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders as computed in accordance with GAAP to NOI for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

For the year ended December 31,

GAAP Net loss attributable to common stockholders

Less: Loan interest and other income

Add: Interest expense

General and administrative

Depreciation

Provision for credit loss

Provision (benefit) for taxes

Less: Gain on sale of real estate

Adjust for: Equity in loss (earnings) of unconsolidated joint venture properties

Less: Insurance recovery of casualty loss

Add: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

Net Operating Income

Less: Non same store and non multi-family

Revenues

Operating Expenses

Non-same store NOI

Same Store Net Operating Income

In 2025, NOI decreased by $35,000 from 2024 due primarily to a $527,000 increase in real estate operating expenses, offset by a $389,000 increase in rental revenue at wholly-owned multi-family properties and a $114,000 increase in rental revenue at the Yonkers' Property. Same store NOI decreased $138,000 in 2025 from 2024 primarily due to the factors impacting NOI, other than the Yonkers' Property. See " Results of Operations -Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024 " for a discussion of these changes.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We require funds to pay operating expenses and debt service obligations, acquire properties, make capital and other improvements, fund capital contributions, pay dividends and repurchase shares of our common stock. Generally, in 2025, our primary sources of capital and liquidity were the operations of our multi-family properties (including distributions of $4.2 million from the operations of our unconsolidated joint ventures), $29.7 million from the 2025 Financing, $1.2 million from interests in our Preferred Equity Investments and our available cash. Excluding funds held at our unconsolidated subsidiaries, at December 31, 2025 and February 27, 2026, our available liquidity was approximately $65.1 million and $64.8 million, respectively, including $25.1 million and $24.8 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents, and subject to compliance with borrowing base and other requirements, up to $40 million available under our credit facility. A significant amount of our cash and cash equivalents is maintained at our properties for general working capital purposes.

We anticipate that for the four years beginning January 1, 2026, our operating expenses, $120 million of mortgage amortization and interest expense (including $38.8 million from unconsolidated joint ventures) and $314.6 million of balloon payments due with respect to mortgages maturing through 2029 (including $151.7 million from unconsolidated joint ventures), anticipated capital expenditures (for 2026 only) of an aggregate of $12.1 million for consolidated and unconsolidated properties, estimated cash dividend payments of at least $75.6 million (assuming (i) the current quarterly dividend rate of $0.25 per share and (ii) 18.9 million shares outstanding), will be funded from cash generated from operations (including distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures), mortgage financings and re-financings, sales of properties, the issuance of additional equity and, if available, our $40 million credit facility. Our operating cash flow and available cash is insufficient to fully fund the $314.6 million of balloon payments, and if we are unable to refinance such debt on acceptable terms, we may need to issue additional equity or dispose of properties, in each case on potentially unfavorable terms.

Our ability to acquire multi-family properties (including making alternative investments such as preferred equity investments), and implement value-add projects is limited by our available cash and our ability to (i) draw on our credit facility, (ii) obtain, on acceptable terms, mortgage debt and (iii) raise capital from the sale of our common stock.

Disclosure of Known Material Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2025 our known material contractual obligations:

Payment Due by Period

(Dollars in thousands)

Less than

1 Year

Years

Years

More than

5 Years

Total

Long-Term Debt Obligations (1)

Interest and Principal Amortization

Balloon Principal Payments (2)

Operating Lease Obligations

Purchase Obligations (3) (4)

Total

(1) Reflects payments of principal (including amortization payments) and interest and excludes deferred costs. Includes all of the debt of unconsolidated joint ventures. See the following table for information regarding same. Assumes that the interest rate on the junior subordinated notes will be 6.10% per annum, which was the rate in effect at December 31, 2025.

(2) During the year ending December 31, 2026, $37.2 million and $51.5 million is due in March and September, respectively. We anticipate that the amount due in March under the Stono Oaks floating rate construction loan will be extended until March 2027.

(3) Assumes that $1 million and $1.8 million will be paid annually through December 31, 2030 pursuant to the shared services agreement and for the Services, respectively.

(4) Assumes that approximately $2.5 million of property management fees will be paid annually to the property managers of our multi-family properties, including $760,000 related to unconsolidated joint ventures. Such sum reflects the amount we anticipate paying in 2026 on the multi-family properties we own at December 31, 2025. These fees are typically charges based on a percentage of rental revenues from a property. No amount has been reflected as payable pursuant thereto after five years as such amount is not determinable.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2025 information regarding the components of our long-term debt obligations:

Payment due by Period

(Dollars in thousands)

Less than

1 Year

Years

Years

More than

5 Years

Total

Mortgages on consolidated properties (1)

Mortgages on unconsolidated properties (1)

Junior subordinated notes and credit facility (2)

Total

(1) Includes payments of principal (including amortization payments), and interest, and excludes deferred financing costs.

(2) Assumes that the interest rate on the junior subordinated notes will be 6.10% per annum and that no amounts are outstanding under the credit facility.

Corporate Level Financing Arrangements

Junior Subordinated Notes

As of December 31, 2025, $37.4 million (excluding deferred costs of $217,000) in principal amount of our junior subordinated notes is outstanding. These notes mature in April 2036, contain limited covenants (including covenants prohibiting us from paying dividends or repurchasing capital stock if there is an event of default (as defined therein) on these notes), are redeemable at our option and bear an interest rate, which resets and is payable quarterly, of three-month term SOFR plus 226 basis points. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the interest rate on these notes was 6.1% and 6.85%, respectively.

Credit Facility

Our credit facility with VNB New York, LLC, an affiliate of Valley National Bank (collectively, "VNB"), allows us to borrow, subject to compliance with borrowing base requirements and other conditions, up to $40 million, (i) for the acquisition of, and investment in, multi-family properties, (ii) to repay mortgage debt secured by multi-family properties and (iii) for Operating Expenses ( i.e. , working capital (including dividend payments) and operating expenses); provided, that not more than $25 million may be used for Operating Expenses. The credit facility is secured by cash accounts maintained by us at VNB (we are required to maintain substantially all of our bank accounts at VNB), and the pledge of our interests in the entities that own three unencumbered multi-family properties used in calculating the borrowing base. The credit facility bears an annual interest rate, which resets monthly, equal to one-month term SOFR plus 250 basis points, with a floor of 6.00%. The interest rate at December 31, 2025 and February 27, 2026, was 6.37% and 6.18% respectively. There is an annual fee of 0.25% on the total amount committed by VNB and unused by us. The credit facility matures in September 2027. As of February 27, 2026, there was no balance outstanding and up to $40 million was available to be borrowed thereunder.

The terms of the credit facility include certain restrictions and covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of liens, require that we maintain and include in the collateral securing the facility at least two unencumbered properties with an aggregate value(as calculated pursuant to the facility) of at least $50 million, and require compliance with financial ratios relating to, among other things maintaining a minimum tangible net worth of $140 million, the minimum amount of debt service coverage with respect to the properties (and amounts drawn on the credit facility) used in calculating the borrowing base. Net proceeds received from the sale, financing or refinancing of wholly-owned properties are generally required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under the credit facility.

As of December 31, 2025, we were in compliance in all material respects with the requirements of the facility.

Other Financing Sources and Arrangements

At December 31, 2025, we are joint venture partners in unconsolidated joint ventures which own ten multi-family properties which distributed $3.9 million to us in 2025. We may be required to make capital contributions with respect to these properties. At December 31, 2025, our investment in these joint venture properties have a net equity carrying value of $46.1 million and are subject to mortgage debt, which is not reflected on our consolidated balance sheet, of $286.5 million. Although BRT Apartments Corp. is not the obligor with respect to such mortgage debt, the loss of any of these properties due to mortgage foreclosure or similar proceedings would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. See note 6 to our consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2025, we had preferred equity investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that own multi-family properties. These joint ventures paid us $1.2 million in 2025 and we anticipate that, subject to the underlying property generating sufficient cash flow, that such joint ventures will pay us $1.3 million in 2026. At December 31, 2025, the carrying value of these investments was $17.7 million and these investments are subordinate to mortgage debt of $51.0 million, which debt is not reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.

See " Item 1. Business-Mortgage Debt " for information regarding our mortgage debt at consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries.

Inflation

Substantially all of our multi-family property leases are for periods of one-year or less. The short-term nature of these leases generally serves to reduce, but does not eliminate, the affect of inflation on our net income. During 2025, we continued to experience inflationary pressures that drove higher operating expenses, primarily in personnel, repairs and maintenance, and real estate taxes; such increases may continue in 2026 and thereafter, which would adversely affect our operating results.

Inflation affects the overall cost of our debt. We mitigate the risks presented by inflation through the use of fixed interest rate mortgage debt and by paying down, when we deem appropriate, our credit facility debt. However, increasing interest rates, which generally correlates to increasing inflation, increases the interest expense on our junior subordinated notes and makes it less attractive to obtain mortgage debt (including the refinancing of an aggregate of $88.7 million of mortgage debt (including $60.9 million of mortgage debt at unconsolidated joint ventures, that matures in 2026)) or use our credit facility in connection with acquisition and value add activities.

Cash Distribution Policy

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, we must, among other things, meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute currently at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income to our stockholders. It is our current intention to comply with these requirements and maintain our REIT status. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate federal, state or local income taxes on taxable income we distribute currently (in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations) to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate rates and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years. Even if we qualify for federal taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and to federal income taxes on our undistributed taxable income ( i.e. , taxable income not distributed in the amounts and in the time frames prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations thereunder) and are subject to Federal excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.

It is our intention to pay to our stockholders within the time periods prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code no less than 90%, and, if possible, 100% of our annual taxable income, including taxable gains from the sale of real estate. It will continue to be our policy to make sufficient distributions to stockholders in order for us to maintain our REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code.

We anticipate that if we do not sell any multi-family properties this year, that a significant amount of the dividends we will pay in 2026, if any, will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a return of capital.

Our board of directors will continue to evaluate, on a quarterly basis, the amount of dividend payments based on its assessment of, among other things, our short and long-term cash and liquidity requirements, prospects, debt maturities, net income, funds from operations, and adjusted funds from operations.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we reconsider and evaluate our estimates and assumptions.

We base our estimates on historical experience, current trends and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could materially differ from any of our estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of our

Table of Contents

consolidated financial statements in this report. We believe the accounting estimates listed below are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Equity method investments

We report our investments in unconsolidated entities, over whose operating and financial policies we do not control, under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our pro rata share of the applicable entity's earnings or losses is included in our consolidated statements of operations. We initially record our investments based on either the carrying value for properties contributed or the cash invested.

We evaluate our equity-method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investments may exceed the fair value. If it is determined that a decline in the fair value of our investments is not temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below its carrying value, an impairment is recorded. Determining fair value involves significant judgment. Our estimates consider available evidence including the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at market rates, general economic conditions and other relevant factors.

Carrying Value of Real Estate Portfolio

We conduct a quarterly review of each real estate asset owned by us and through our joint ventures. This review is conducted in order to determine if indicators of impairment are present on the real estate.

In reviewing the value of the real estate assets owned, if there is an indicator of impairment and the carrying value of the real estate asset is determined to be unrecoverable, we seek to arrive at the fair value of each real estate asset by using one or more valuation techniques, such as comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis or replacement cost analysis. A real estate asset is considered to be unrecoverable when an analysis suggests that the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the property will be insufficient to recover our investment. Any impairment taken with respect to our real estate assets reduces our net income, assets and stockholders' equity to the extent of the amount of the allowance, but it will not affect our cash flow until such time as the property is sold.

Allowance for credit losses

We estimate the allowance for credit losses in accordance with the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) model under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 326. This model requires us to estimate expected lifetime credit losses for our loan portfolio ( i.e., our preferred equity investments) by considering historical loss experience, current economic conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic trends. The estimate is highly subjective and involves significant judgment in the following areas:

• Historical Loss Data: We segment our loan portfolio based on risk characteristics such as borrower type, loan term, and collateral. We will use historical loss experience when available, as a basis for expected credit losses.

• Macroeconomic Forecasts: We incorporate forward-looking macroeconomic indicators, such as GDP growth, unemployment rates, and interest rate trends, to adjust historical loss trends.

• Qualitative Adjustments: We apply management judgments to adjust the allowance for factors that may not be fully captured in the quantitative model, including changes in emerging risks such as regulatory, geopolitical, or credit risks.

• The estimate of expected credit losses is inherently uncertain and sensitive to changes in economic conditions. For example, a 100-basis-point increase in unemployment rates or a prolonged downturn in the real estate market could result in a higher allowance for credit losses, negatively impacting our financial results. Conversely, improvements in economic conditions could result in a lower allowance.

• We continually evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses and adjust it as necessary. However, actual losses may differ from our estimates due to unforeseen changes in economic conditions or borrower behavior.

Purchase Price Allocations

We allocate the purchase price of properties, including acquisition costs and assumed debt, when appropriate, to the tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their relative fair values. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we use a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property, our own analysis of recently acquired and existing comparable properties in our portfolio and other market data. We also consider information obtained about each

Table of Contents

property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

Equity-Based Compensation

We grant shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units ("RSUs") to eligible plan participants, subject to the recipient's continued service over a specified period and, with respect to the RSUs, the satisfaction of specified conditions over a specified period. A portion of the RSUs vest based upon satisfaction of specified metrics with respect to (i) total stockholder return(“TSR Awards”) and (ii) adjusted funds from operations(“AFFO Awards”), in each case as calculated pursuant to the applicable award agreement. We account for the restricted stock awards and RSUs in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, which requires that such compensation be recognized in the financial statements based on its estimated grant-date fair value. The value of such awards is recognized as compensation expense in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations over the applicable service periods. Grant date fair value is determined with respect to the (i) the restricted stock awards, by the closing stock price on the date of grant, (ii) TSR Awards, by using a Monte Carlo simulation relying upon various assumptions and (iii) AFFO Awards, by using the closing stock price on the grant date, subject to quarterly adjustment based upon management’s subjective projections as to the achievability of the specified metrics related to the AFFO Awards (the “AFFO” Metrics).There is substantial subjectivity in (i) the inputs selected for the Monte Carlo simulation used in determining the grant date fair value of the TSR Awards and the use of different inputs would change the expense we recognize with respect to such awards and (ii) management’s projections as to the achievability of the AFFO Metrics and changes in such projections will cause fluctuations in our results of operations. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements.